Ward, I think that quite a few editors would like to know,
indeed,
best,
Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:Ward Cunningham
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Cc:ste...@stellaresults.com
Sent:Sun, 13 Aug 2017 10:19:58 -0700
Subject:Re: [Wiki-research-l] What pe
good point, Sam, imo actually the best so far :-)
-- Original Message ---
From:Sam Katz
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Sun, 28 Feb 2016 15:41:12 -0600
Subject:Re: [Wiki-research-l] citing female academics
> Let me comment on the original question. The
>
thank you for listing my dissertation topic,
> Wikipedia entries on fiction and non-propositional
> knowledge representation
btw, it can be reviewed in two perspectives:
* innovative topic and/or
* innovative publishing model (pdf combinded with a wikified version that
has attracted debate on bo
hi all, hi Aaron,
"Wikipedia entries on fiction and non-propositional knowledge
representation" (wikified) = my PhD thesis Sept 2015, for a pdf version see
http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.04206
abstract in English here:
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikipedia_entries_on_fiction_and_non-
propositio
Hi Aaron, which of Juergen's statements do you mean?
my question is: do you have any evidence for the contrary?
best, Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:Aaron Halfaker
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:55:02 -0500
Subject:Re: [Wiki-res
Hi Jane, thanks, I like your argumentation,
and I do agree with your slant in general, yet
hi all, second thoughts: with so many female user contributing to 'general'
topics already, why should non-female human beings not be able and willing
to contribute more good content on, e.g., clothing an
thanks,
how about artists identifying as neither female nor male?
cheers,
Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:Magnus Manske
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:59:18 +
Subject:Re: [Wiki-research-l] Gendergap and checking our
progres
Hi Sam, while my impression has been that the feel in
debates on this list is way from friendly-space inclusive
(and I daresay that, of course, out of ignorance I have been
contributing to the lamented climate myself...),
may I express the wish that you bring more arguments to
strengthen your poi
Hi Sam and all,
> real life experiments
why not describe their rationale, their setting, the
variables, if people knew they were producing data for your
experiment etc.
> does knowing someone's gender increase bias?
I'd say the outcome depends on cultural factors, e.g., bias
is likely to be the
when what is known? gender discrimination?
-- Original Message ---
From:Sam Katz
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:28:55 -0600
Subject:Re: [Wiki-research-l] a cautious note on gender
stats Re: Fwd: [Gendergap] Wikipedia readers
> does a w
> I would prefer we not track gender at all.
why not for a wiki like Wikipedia?
and, in your opinion, what exactly makes this wiki "a ton harder" to deal
with?
thanks,
Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:Sam Katz
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Fri, 6
yes, I agree the point you raise is interesting
in attacks, however, the perceived gender is probably more
important than how the attacked user might identify (or not)
and again, this might be one of the reasons why people
identifying as female* tend to refrain from joining surveys
and simply pre
hi Pine,
I wonder: have you had any other replies yet that looked
helpful?
Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:"Kerry Raymond"
To:"'Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase
theparticipation of women within Wikimedia projects.'"
, "'Wiki Research-l'"
, "'Wikimedi
Hi Frances,
your assumption (an "unknown" user in a language where
personal nouns are gendered will always display the
masculine form) is correct for deWP, I just tested it from a
new dummy account.
you might call it a truly sytemic bias, and especially so
because community majority has not see
Hi Jonathan Cardy, hi all,
I just found something that could enhance our exchange by naming a few
more factors than usually discussed on this list:
"In practice, the opportunities for realizing novel, unusual, or less
fashionable
technological functions are often constrained by a variety of fa
Hi Kerry,
I think that such a tool, if ever, should be used only if everyone who agrees
with implementing it has had their own behaviour analysed publicly...
btw,
one reason why the "thank you" function is not used widely on Wikipedia
might be that their logs are made public, even if for the
hm,
a. > the dark side
... might be where most bright light bulbs are producing the nicest shades of
shadow ;-)
b. > how can we form research projects around this
maybe by looking at how power is being upheld by those in power instead of
looking at what those should do or have done that hav
this is interesting for me, thank you very much, Jonathan Cardy
a few thoughts:
> But it
> is interesting when personal experience is in
> accord with research.
for me it usually turns out to be much more challenging when personal
experience is NOT in accord with research ;-)
> Subject prefe
thank you, Kerry,
any other opinions on techno-(non)-determinism and on how mediawiki
software has "an influence on" Wikipedia community climate?
What if alot of bullying is undertaken by users who prefer to act undercover
with multiple accounts but a mediawiki registration page encourages you
thanks, Kerry,
yet, if Wikipedia community culture in the English language version is
dominated by a large majority of male users, it seems likely that only this
user group that could drive any change.
instead of asking: “do women want to be in an abrasive environment?”
we might therefore be b
Hi Jonathan Cardy and all, (see below for some software issues)
I agree with your argument, WereSpielChequers/ Jonathan Cardy, and I would
like to hear more details about
> many pieces of evidence
since these, I am told, usually form a good basis for hypotheses that might
be used in qualitative
... so what if IRL many more female* editors start articles on trans*, inter*,
non-genderidentified* and male* people than male* editors start articles on
female*, trans*, inter* and non-genderidentified* people?
best,
Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:Maximilian Klein
To:Re
(disclaimer: research-wise, in this thread, I am speaking from a margin
position in a role maybe similar to the one Shakespeare potrays his fools in,
because it is not my field and I only have a rather vague idea of how people
actually undertake such studies)
re
> I think if we can make Wikipe
Hi WereSpielChequers, Kerry, Aaron and all,
WereSpielChequers wrote:
"the community is more abrasive towards women"
this may be stats expert discourse, but let me show you how the question
itself has a gendered slant.
imagine what would happen - also in your research design - if it read:
Hi Bryce, interesting thoughts,
can you quickly explain to me what you mean by "forms of information"?
best,
Claudia
koltzenb...@w4w.net
GPG-Key-ID: DDD21523
-- Original Message ---
From:Bryce Peake
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Mon, 16 Feb 2015 09:3
Hi Sidney and everyone else,
it seems to me that this list might be turned into a research ideas
switchboard, here's some of my thoughts
my impression is that counting just two genders is outdated, and maybe
calling a phenomenon a "gender gap" might therefore no longer be suitable,
either,
a
hi dariusz,
> the current methods are far from perfect.
in your opinion, in which respect do they need to be improved?
has anyone published on that, or are there any "non-published" links
available?
best,
Claudia
koltzenb...@w4w.net
Meine GPG-Key-ID: DDD21523
- mehr dazu: https://de.wikipedi
Hi GerardM,
two questions come to mind re your mail:
is your reply (esp. in the second part) a statement about something like
"enoughness"?
what does any number of a certain kind of articles in any version have to do
with the issue at hand?
and here's two hypotheses:
1. the relevance of r
Hi Jeremy, thank you for this pointer,
hi all,
can anyone explain to me why data from 2008 are re-used in quantitative
studies of this kind? (instead of asking new questions, for example, and also
changing the framework in which the data were created)
another issue seems to be that, while Wik
ah, thanks, GerardM,
so -- if I read your reaction correctly -- the underlying hypothesis on which
it
is based says that much has changed (or may have) since those old days?
What information do you base this hypothesis on?
my main point, anyway, is to cast a doubt as to the methods used in suc
Hi GerardM,
why not have a guess ;-)
Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:Gerard Meijssen
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:42:08 +0100
Subject:Re: [Wiki-research-l] a cautious note on gender stats Re: Fwd:
[Gendergap] Wikipedia reader
my2cents re figures on percentages (... in a gender binary paradigm), well...
I'd suggest to take into account User:Pundit's thoughtful
considerations,
author of: Jemielniak, Dariusz (2014), Common knowledge? An ethnography
of Wikipedia, Stanford University Press, pp. 14-15
Dariusz Jemielniak w
Do you know of any study that deals with Wikipedia's entries on fiction?
In particular, I am seeking information about what experts consider the prevalent theoretical slant informing entries on fiction. Has anyone come across research on this or other literary topics?
thanks,
Claudia
koltzenb
t; > needs to be substantiated by data that
> > >
> > > * show the usefulness of the project's expected outcome for research fields
> > > in which proofs do not predominantly rely on measurement but predominantly
> > > on solidity of argumentation
> >
y on measurement but predominantly
> > on solidity of argumentation
> > * outline how the bias towards facticity (Mautpreller 2011) in Wikidata
> > disadvantages non-propositional kinds of knowledge even though the purported
> > claim of Wikipedia is to represent "the su
e.g., representatives of the fields of Maths as well as of Arts & Humanities seem to be missing
best,
Claudia Koltzenburg
koltzenb...@w4w.net
My GPG-Key-ID: DDD21523
-- Original Message ---
From:Daniel Mietchen
To:"wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org"
Sent:Fri, 1
hi everybody,
can you recommend any FLOSS tool for visualizing the following
for a certain sample from namespaces 0 and 1
* language linking revisions for a sample of topically related pages
("how has interwiki linking been revised over time in this and that article in
this and that version?")
Hi @all,
do you have any idea how to unify date formats in various WPs via URL?
my aim is to compare revision date/time from different WP versions
and it would be great to have the same date format for every version of WP
that I am looking at.
Does anyone know a solution for the Wikipedias t
Hello Everton,
thank you for your call for chapter submissions
I have two questions that I guess are of global concern
* author income: how much would authors be paid per contributed page?
* author license choice: what licences could authors choose for their
contributions without having to arg
yepp, Joe, agree,
let's develop both of these answer 2 + 2a ideas further
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas/Research_Hub
see you@all there
Claudia
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:10:55 +, Joe Corneli wrote
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
>
> > Answer 2:
> >
> > articles
ome background see
a.
Wikis in scholarly publishing. Daniel Mietchen, Gregor Hagedorn, Konrad
Förstner, M Fabiana Kubke, Claudia
Koltzenburg, Mark Hahnel, and Lyubomir Penev (2011).
http://precedings.nature.com/documents/5891/version/1
b.
Collaborative platforms for streamlining workflows in Open Sc
thanks, Joe, for opening a new wiki page for
the peer review model debate
from
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas
to
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas/Review_model
Claudia
koltzenb...@w4w.net
___
Wiki-research-l mailin
hm, sadly enough I must agree that you seem to be raising important real-life
points, Dariusz. But am I
getting you correctly that you think that major flaws will only be pointed out
in a review if the reviewer can
officially stay anonymous?
in your experience, Dariusz, does this mean reviewe
Manuel asks:
> In fact, what's the gain in knowing who is reviewing a paper?
let us look at this from another angle, maybe: As reviewers in open reviewing
we get a chance of becoming
more aware of our own inclinations in the face of public visibility vis-a-vis
objectivity, well-reflected
argum
well, any attempts at pressures or bribes could easily be made known, couldn't
they?
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:56:35 +0100, Manuel Palomo Duarte wrote
> I don't thnk opening peer reviewing would be a good idea. Reviewer must
> keep unknown, or she could suffer preasures (even bribes) from authors. In
agree,
... so it is up to you as a reviewer what you do with your "blindness" :-)
doesn't this point in the direction of - plus - is + ?
I mean: why not do open peer reviewing?
Claudia
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 09:43:39 +0100, Manuel Palomo Duarte wrote
> Even more, you can easily identify the autho
+1 Jodi!
I agree it would be great to experiment on-site as you suggest
Claudia
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:39:34 +, Jodi Schneider wrote
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Ward Cunningham wrote:
>
> > I wonder if a better place to innovate might be in the conduct of
> > research, rather than th
Hi Piotr, hi all,
Piotr, I like your idea about instituting awards because awards may help
younger researchers in particular to
try something new that their bosses are not likely to have tried out by
themselves, e.g. contributing
scientific or otherwise research-related stuff to Wikipedia
in
thank you very much, Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
for a first answer see here:
http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskuse_s_wikipedistou:JAn_Dudík#how_do_a_search_for_a_certain_kind_of_inte
rlanguage_links.3F
thanks
Claudia
On Sat, 5 May 2012 09:55:43 +0300, Amir E. Aharoni wrote
Hi @all,
I am looking into cases of language switch and I wish to find edits not
undertaken by bots,
- how can I do such a search in Wikipedia? would I do this by a search that
involves a string similar to
[[xx:...]]?
- where would I find the entry point for such a search?
maybe there
50 matches
Mail list logo
