Re: [WiX-users] setupbld setup.exe repair install

2010-08-05 Thread Sagar1111
hi Warne any guideline on using msistuff.exe ? Also which setup.exe should i use in command line? the one available with from Wix toolset? -- View this message in context: http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/setupbld-setup-exe-repair-install-tp3973894p5376436.html

Re: [WiX-users] SETUPBLD and BURN, multiple uninstalls

2010-07-23 Thread Blair
- Burn supports that. - Not that I know of. - Chained MSI detection is built into Burn. Your UI code you add to Burn allows you to react to command-line options and package detection performed by burn and allows you to order (if you wish) or decide to include/exclude/even remove packages as part

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld - quiet install defaults to passive install

2010-03-04 Thread Jacques Eloff
Okay, so after digging through the code, I noticed that when generating the bootstrapper using the -mi option, setup.exe does something interesting: if (pPackage-dwAttributes SETUP_INSTALL_CHAIN_IGNORE_FAILURES) { dwUiLevelPackage |= INSTALLUILEVEL_PROGRESSONLY; // don't throw any scary error

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld diagnosing?

2009-12-02 Thread Pally Sandher
Of Scotland Science Park, Glasgow G20 0SP Email Disclaimer -Original Message- From: JKLists [mailto:jkli...@ifm-services.com] Sent: 02 December 2009 07:09 To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] setupbld diagnosing? John L Krupka wrote: You should

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld diagnosing?

2009-12-01 Thread JKLists
John L Krupka wrote: You should be able to set up preconditions on those things in the msi. Setupbld is not the place for that to the best of my knowledge. This is where my lack of understanding how MSIs work raises its head. My MSI has a condition where it needs .NET 3.5 SP1, and

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld setup.exe repair install

2009-11-14 Thread Rob Mensching
Don't worry. Burn will be part of WiX v3.5. Said another way, WiX v3.5 won't release without Burn. I'm just caught up in a whirlwind of change right now that has significantly impeded the progress of Burn. Getting all that unblocked is my utmost priority. smile/ On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:35 AM,

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld setup.exe repair install

2009-11-10 Thread warne warne
Turned out this is not so trivial. Line in the setup.cpp file (the source for the SETUPBLD stub setup.exe) says hr = StrAllocConcat(pwzProperties, L REINSTALL=ALL REINSTALLMODE=\vomus\, 0); this forces a minor upgrade instead of a normal install that produces the

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld setup.exe repair install

2009-11-09 Thread warne warne
or more simply the setup.exe version just goes straight to Resuming install.. instead of Welcome to install ? From: warne...@hotmail.com To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: setupbld setup.exe repair install Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:57:31 + Hi there, I am using setupbld to

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld and -bitmap not supported? -title not supported?

2009-11-08 Thread John Robbins
K, Here's how I got SetupBld.exe from WiX to behave like you wanted: http://www.wintellect.com/CS/blogs/jrobbins/archive/2009/02/27/creating-a-bootstrap-loader-with-wix-3-0.aspx. Hope it helps! John Wintellect http://www.wintellect.com 877-968-5528 -Original Message- From:

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld and -bitmap not supported? -title not supported?

2009-11-08 Thread kerberos
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, John Robbins j...@wintellect.com wrote: K, Here's how I got SetupBld.exe from WiX to behave like you wanted: http://www.wintellect.com/CS/blogs/jrobbins/archive/2009/02/27/creating-a-bootstrap-loader-with-wix-3-0.aspx. John, thanks for your response and

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld and -bitmap not supported? -title not supported?

2009-11-08 Thread kerberos
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, John Robbins j...@wintellect.com wrote: K, Here's how I got SetupBld.exe from WiX to behave like you wanted: http://www.wintellect.com/CS/blogs/jrobbins/archive/2009/02/27/creating-a-bootstrap-loader-with-wix-3-0.aspx. Oh, I think I've got it now, or at least

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld and -bitmap not supported? -title not supported?

2009-11-08 Thread kerberos
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:39 PM, John Robbins j...@wintellect.com wrote: Hello K, Glad my blog entry could help. However, I didn't go into the icon stuff as I figured that was common knowledge, but that was a mistake on my part, I'm sorry! You've done everything right so far. :) Not common

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld bootstrapper 64bit

2009-03-19 Thread Frédéric Viollet
Bob Arnson a écrit : Frédéric Viollet wrote: -I want to install a 64 bit product (my exes and dll are natively compiled for 64bit) on a 64bit OS -I build an x64 MSI (Platform=x64, Win64=yes in Components, etc...) -I build a 32bit bootstrapper using setupbld -This setup will be able to

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld bootstrapper 64bit

2009-03-18 Thread Bob Arnson
Frédéric Viollet wrote: -do I have to install the 64bit version of Wix? I guess not...the 32bit version should still be working... am I right? The 64-bit WiX installer exists to support MSBuild running as a 64-bit process. That's all. -will setupbld.exe build 64bit executables? If not,

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld bootstrapper 64bit

2009-03-18 Thread Frédéric Viollet
Bob Arnson a écrit : Frédéric Viollet wrote: -do I have to install the 64bit version of Wix? I guess not...the 32bit version should still be working... am I right? The 64-bit WiX installer exists to support MSBuild running as a 64-bit process. That's all. -will setupbld.exe

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld bootstrapper 64bit

2009-03-18 Thread Bob Arnson
Frédéric Viollet wrote: -I want to install a 64 bit product (my exes and dll are natively compiled for 64bit) on a 64bit OS -I build an x64 MSI (Platform=x64, Win64=yes in Components, etc...) -I build a 32bit bootstrapper using setupbld -This setup will be able to install the embedded x64

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem

2009-01-30 Thread Uwe Stump
17:23 An: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Betreff: Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem I think this is a bug introduced with the large changes to IIS CA recently to handle UAC/IIS7 better. Can you try an older build and see if the problem reproduces there? If it does

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem

2009-01-30 Thread Rob Mensching
Fix was just checked-in. If all goes well, build that comes out tomorrow will be much happier. -Original Message- From: Uwe Stump [mailto:uwe.st...@gewi.com] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 01:14 To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem

2009-01-29 Thread Uwe Stump
anyone help me to avoid the strange message? Kind regards, Uwe -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bob Arnson [mailto:b...@joyofsetup.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Januar 2009 19:15 An: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Betreff: Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem Uwe

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem

2009-01-29 Thread Uwe Stump
Dear all, after some research I found a workaround: I do wrap my msi to an exe file with setupbld now by using the command line option -msuc (c added). c means enable msi caching. So the whole msi gets cached in Windows\Installer. On uninstall the msi file will be found by MSI and the message

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem

2009-01-29 Thread Rob Mensching
). Thanks. -Original Message- From: Uwe Stump [mailto:uwe.st...@gewi.com] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 04:31 To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem Dear all, after some research I found a workaround: I do wrap my msi

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem

2009-01-29 Thread Bob Arnson
Uwe Stump wrote: I do not know if attachements are allowed. So here is the critical section of the log file: ... MSI (s) (0C!4C) [09:17:43:187]: Resolving source. The critical part is right before: That's where MSI identifies the resource it needs the source for. -- sig://boB

Re: [WiX-users] SetupBld and IIs Problem

2009-01-28 Thread Bob Arnson
Uwe Stump wrote: The MSI-file has been wrapped to IIsInstallProblem.exe. The installation with these EXE-file works fine but on uninstall via Software I got the following message: The feature you are trying to use is on a network resource that is unavailable. Click OK to try again, or enter

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl)

2008-12-08 Thread carlldev
. Can you tell what we're focused on? smile/ -Original Message- From: carlldev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 01:39 To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl) Thanks Rob

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl)

2008-11-29 Thread Rob Mensching
just been focused on killing the last few extension bugs. Can you tell what we're focused on? smile/ -Original Message- From: carlldev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 01:39 To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl)

2008-11-27 Thread carlldev
the functionality completely. All of the ClickThrough related work moved to WiX v4. -Original Message- From: carlldev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 07:22 To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl)

2008-11-26 Thread carlldev
I've logged this bug on SourceForge as Bootstrapper cannot take command line parameters with spaces - ID: 2229894 Rob has changed the Group property to v4.0. Does this mean we have to wait for Wix 4.0 before we see a change to this? -- View this message in context:

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl)

2008-11-26 Thread Rob Mensching
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl) I've logged this bug on SourceForge as Bootstrapper cannot take command line parameters with spaces - ID: 2229894 Rob has changed the Group property to v4.0. Does this mean we have to wait for Wix 4.0 before

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld, bootstrappers and command line parameters (msicl)

2008-11-06 Thread Sébastien Mouren
2008/11/6 carlldev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that the wix bootstrappers can't take command line parameters that have spaces in them? I have created a bootstrapper using setupbld, and it works fine if run as it is. But try and feed in some parameters like this: setup.exe

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld/setupexe question

2008-05-08 Thread Tanikella, Rajanikanth (SCR US)
Hi Scott I haven't tried exactly what you are describing, but I can say this: 1) Setup.exe extracts to an uniquely named folder in %TEMP%. Whatever you have built in the setup will be extracted to there. The is MSI placed in that same folder as well. 2) I tried to embed an MSP in a

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld

2007-10-08 Thread Frédéric Viollet
Bob Arnson a écrit : Frédéric Viollet wrote: Ok. I've just had a look at setupbld source code. And it seems that REINSTALLMODE is set to vomus for a minor upgrade. I guess I need it to be set to vamus to force all files to be rewritten. Is there another bootstrapper that would allow me to

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld

2007-10-08 Thread Bob Arnson
Frédéric Viollet wrote: Do you know another bootstrapper that would allow me to do this? No but I'm sure there are some that exist. -- sig://boB http://joyofsetup.com/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld

2007-10-07 Thread Bob Arnson
Frédéric Viollet wrote: Ok. I've just had a look at setupbld source code. And it seems that REINSTALLMODE is set to vomus for a minor upgrade. I guess I need it to be set to vamus to force all files to be rewritten. Is there another bootstrapper that would allow me to achieve this?

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld

2007-10-05 Thread Frédéric Viollet
Frédéric Viollet a écrit : Bob Arnson a écrit : Frédéric Viollet wrote: When I perform a minor upgrade of my product using the generated executable file, not all of the files are upgraded. Only the files that have changed are updated. I thought that even on a minor upgrade, all the

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld

2007-10-04 Thread Bob Arnson
Frédéric Viollet wrote: When I perform a minor upgrade of my product using the generated executable file, not all of the files are upgraded. Only the files that have changed are updated. I thought that even on a minor upgrade, all the files for the installed components would be upgraded

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld

2007-10-04 Thread Frédéric Viollet
Bob Arnson a écrit : Frédéric Viollet wrote: When I perform a minor upgrade of my product using the generated executable file, not all of the files are upgraded. Only the files that have changed are updated. I thought that even on a minor upgrade, all the files for the installed

Re: [WiX-users] setupbld/setupexe - using both UI and quiet modes

2007-09-19 Thread Bob Arnson
Hongping Lim wrote: Does the default setup.exe that comes with setupbld.exe support both UI and quiet installation (/q) modes in the generated .exe? No, that's not currently supported. (You can see the source in the setupexe directory.) -- sig://boB http://joyofsetup.com/

Re: [WiX-users] Setupbld produces file but doesn't do anything?

2007-08-21 Thread Josh Maletz
] Cc: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Setupbld produces file but doesn't do anything? Josh Maletz wrote: setupbld -out XsSetup.exe -mcst ExtendedServicesSetup.msi -setup setup.exe -title Extended Services Setup The -mt subswitch is looking for UI transforms but you

Re: [WiX-users] Setupbld produces file but doesn't do anything?

2007-08-20 Thread Bob Arnson
Josh Maletz wrote: setupbld -out XsSetup.exe -mcst ExtendedServicesSetup.msi -setup setup.exe -title Extended Services Setup The -mt subswitch is looking for UI transforms but you aren't supplying any. That would break it, however. How big is your package? Extracting it might take a