On 26/09/12 15.10, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Francesco, using nslookup or dig, how can I simulate a name resolution
using this kind of dns name?
I´ve tried:
nslookup -type=MX university.ac.uk? MY-DNS-SERVER
and
dig university.ac.uk?
without success.
ps: Even nslookup -type=MX university.ac.uk
Hi all,
I don't think that XMail is still being developed and maintained.
But, just in case: a user of mine sent an email to
first.l...@university.ac.uk? (note the trailing question mark).
XMail tried to deliver and failed for the following reason:
ErrCode = -109
SMTP-Error = Unable to get
On 25/09/12 22.01, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Francesco, even using SmartDNSHost will this error be returned?
I use SmartDNSHost
ps: Could I try to send a message to first.last@... ?
Yes, you can use a fake email b/c the trailing ? will screw things up
anyway.
Ciao, Francesco
At 11.55 13/04/11, you wrote:
How can I debug filters operations?
You can try running XMail with command line switches --debug -Md -Qg
-Md enables verbose output on the console, including filters operations
-Qg is supposed to enable filters logging (undocumented)
Back in 2005, a helpful
At 19.43 02/04/11, you wrote:
However, the behavior of my installation of xmail imap customer does not
match the one described in your inbox.
/var/MailRoot/domains/mydomain/account/Maildir/cur
/var/MailRoot/domains/mydomain/account/Maildir/new
At 21.15 01/04/11, you wrote:
Recently, the directors of a company that uses a mail server XMail
have purchased IPhone terminals, which have set up to manage their
mailboxes through the IMAP protocol.
This configuration has led to the creation of a folder Deleted
Messages and Sent Messages
At 04.12 06/01/11, you wrote:
Alternatively, XMail should take care of escaping leading dots
when doing SMTP
delivery of files picked up by LMAIL.
You are right. Either SendMail.cpp should do it, or XMail.
Davide wait a moment ... I quickly looked at the source and sent a
couple of test
Hi all (and happy new year),
I saw lines like these in the SMAIL log:
tsd.unifi.it 1294151990810.a28.880.25d715.dex1 L1C7667
[PRIVATE] [PRIVATE] SMTP gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com.
2011-01-04 15:36:46 5.5.1 Unrecognized command. a11si22710935wer.104
tsd.unifi.it 1294151991384.a28.880.25d722.dex1
At 04.12 06/01/11, you wrote:
Alternatively, XMail should take care of escaping leading dots
when doing SMTP
delivery of files picked up by LMAIL.
You are right. Either SendMail.cpp should do it, or XMail.
Better XMail, I think, b/c LMAIL clients need not use the sendmail binary AFAIK
As
At 15.47 05/07/10, you wrote:
I´m using XMail Win32 for +- 8 years without problems.
But, since last week our server is logging several messages like this:
ErrCode = -55
ErrString = Invalid spool file
Unable to load spool file
At 11.42 12/01/10, you wrote:
Is there a way to be sure a filter won't be executed on members of a ML ?
You can try setting:
- ML users' write permissions to A (check done using the email
address used for SMTP authentication)
- filter execution flag to aex (exclude filter execution in case
Hi all,
if an address in the envelope of a spool file fails the syntax check
(I had an example of a null recipient, RCPT TO:), currently XMail
raises a -55 ERR_INVALID_SPOOL_FILE error and silently freezes the message.
I think in these cases a bounce would be appropriate, to let the
sender
At 18.04 24/12/09, you wrote:
What you have seen in the latest bug report, it is a bug.
Do you mean there's a bug in XMail? (I'm still using 1.26 on my server).
Let me explain what I think has happened: webmail created a file in
spool/local with a header like this:
MAIL
At 08.41 17/12/09, Stephan Mueller wrote:
I am starting to use xmail on an embedded system based on ARM. Due to the
limited space available, I had to make IPv6 and SSL support a compile time
option.
Essentially, I added a bunch of ifdefs around the problematic code. There are
not that many
At 11.36 17/12/09, you wrote:
Strange !?
On my install (win32), no ssl enables with server.tab variables and I never
had any SSL issue
Like 99% users, I think. Copying and creating the SSL stuff is not
that terrible, of course, but merging a diff is even faster ;-)
provided someone has made
At 16.39 17/12/09, you wrote:
For Davide: there are *a lot* of broken links on XMail home page.
I can send a
list if you feel like deleting them.
If you have a list, send it to me and I'll clean it up.
These do not work for sure (checked links with link checker and
checked link checker
At 17.01 28/10/09, you wrote:
Does anyone have a success story with Xmail and webmail for linux ?
I am so addicted to XMail that I don't want to install another MTA.
And since XMail is such a great piece of software, I was wondering if
someone out there has managed to make it work and/as a
At 16.29 15/10/09, you wrote:
ERR_LOADMODULE and ERR_LOADMODULESYMBOL say moading instead of
loading in their messages.
Perhaps it's a technical word that stands for m(odule l)oading :-))
BTW, since it's house cleaning time, I add that SysSameAddress in
SysDepCommon.cpp is no longer used
At 10.34 25/09/09, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Server : W2K server SP4, xmail 1.26
WorkStation : W2K workstation SP4, ctrlclnt.exe copied from xmail 1.26
server (so exactly same binary)
When running CtrlClnt from the workstation all ok, output result is ok,
ctrlclnt exit immediatly and exit code
Hi all,
zen.spamhaus.org has been catching nothing on my server for over a
week, now (it used to catch thousands of spams per day). Looks like
XMail cannot reach it, maybe because of some DNS problems of theirs
(see
http://www.dnssniffer.com/report.php?domain=spamhaus.orgSniff=Sniff).
Is it
At 14.12 27/11/08, you wrote:
Seems ok here too
Perhabs your xmail server (or SmartDnsHost if configured) try only the
'temporary unavailable' spamhaus dns server (as seens in the report)
What does your nslookup report for zen.spamhaus.org? Mine reports a
timeout error, maybe it is related.
At 14.12 27/11/08, you wrote:
Seems ok here too
It is definitely a problem with the university dns. Changed my dns
setup and spamhaus worked again.
Ciao, Francesco
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
Hi all,
I've just moved glst from pre-data to post-rcpt and noticed that
every rejection generates two entries in the smtp log: a spurious
DATA=EFILTER followed by RCPT=EFILTER. I've tried patching
SMTPSvr.cpp in 1.26 pre-01 (moving the log statement from
SMTPRunFilters to SMTPHandleCmd_DATA)
At 06.45 25/04/08, you wrote:
Greylisting is not working as well as it used to... Verizon, Hotmail and
Yahoo Mail seem to not re-send correctly when Graylisting is ON. I previously
posted about this
AFAIK it is only Yahoo Groups that does no resend and requires xnet
or white list. In any
At 12.47 21/03/08, David Lord wrote:
On 21 Mar 2008, at 1:56, max toro q wrote:
I installed Xmail on win2k, and I have delivery problems to hotmail.
Some messages get delivered, some simply get lost. The log shows no
sign of problem.
Yes but not very often. Mails are accepted but never
At 19.16 21/03/08, Phillip R. Shaw wrote:
if a MTA accepts a message for delivery, it must either deliver or bounce..
While this was a nice idea at one time, it really isn't desirable any more.
Why? SPAM. I get thousands of emails that I accept but are then
rejected by my spam filtering. You
At 11.39 19/03/08, you wrote:
Here is a sample xmail generated 'Received :' header :
Received: from some_sender_name ([aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd]:p)
(not important)
What is exactly the 'some_sender_name' actual value ?
- The value of the HELO/EHLO ?
- The reverse dns of aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd
Hi all,
since installing 1.25 I notice that when a message gets frozen
immediately because of a DNS problem there are two kinds of slog messages.
One is familiar since 1.23
ErrCode = -215
ErrString = DNS name not exist
Recipient domain yahoo.fr' does not exist (or it has a misconfigured DNS)
At 23.20 15/11/07, you wrote:
Not using from a long time pop before smtp auth method.
Looks like nobody is using it, indeed, since I've not yet received
feedback from others using that feature, so far ...
Anyway, a feature should either be dropped or work, IMHO ...
As noted by Davide seems
Hi all,
apparently I have a problem with the new SysGetHostByName which
causes POP3-SMTP auth always to fail. This chainsaw patch works for me:
--- POP3Utils.cpp 2007-11-02 01:34:32.0 +0100
+++ POP3Utils.cpp.new 2007-11-16 13:23:20.890625000 +0100
@@ -1544,8 +1544,7 @@
At 18.24 16/11/07, you wrote:
Can you try the patch below?
diff --git a/POP3Utils.cpp b/POP3Utils.cpp
index 85ee92d..5b3111b 100644
--- a/POP3Utils.cpp
+++ b/POP3Utils.cpp
@@ -1542,10 +1542,10 @@ int UPopUserIpCheck(UserInfo *pUI, SYS_INET_ADDR
const *pPeerInfo, unsigned int
At 18.24 16/11/07, you wrote:
Can you try the patch below?
diff --git a/POP3Utils.cpp b/POP3Utils.cpp
index 85ee92d..5b3111b 100644
--- a/POP3Utils.cpp
+++ b/POP3Utils.cpp
@@ -1542,10 +1542,10 @@ int UPopUserIpCheck(UserInfo *pUI, SYS_INET_ADDR
const *pPeerInfo, unsigned int
At 20.12 16/11/07, you wrote:
Duh!?
Can you try to add here ...
const *pPeerInfo, unsigned int
fclose(pIpFile);
char szIPP[128];
SysInetNToA(*pPeerInfo, szIPP, sizeof(szIPP));
SysLogMessage(LOG_LEV_MESSAGE, PreIP='%s'\tCurrIP='%s'\n,
szIPP, szIP);
At 22.01 16/11/07, you wrote:
Cat you try to show me the content and metadata of the account's .ipconn
file?
dir C:\MailRoot\domains\tsd.unifi.it\vertova\.ipconn
Volume in drive C is unlabeled Serial number is F8F7:824F
Directory of C:\MailRoot\domains\tsd.unifi.it\vertova\.ipconn
Hi all,
I've installed 1.25-pre22 from an hour. Looks like auth'd (SMTP after
POP3) users cannot bypass DNSBL in spite of code 0:
excerpt from today's pop3log:
dex1.tsd.unifi.it tsd.unifi.it 151.49.38.240 2007-11-15
09:30:54 xxx LOGIN 230 4129295
dex1.tsd.unifi.it
Hi all,
just got a directory listing of MAIL_ROOT/dnscache/mx. After 30 or 40
mins it reported a total of over 252,000 files. Since XMail checks
MailerDomain before CustMapsList (why?), I think they're mostly
domain files of blacklisted spam. Is it advisable and safe to delete
some of this
At 17.03 08/11/07, Edinilson - ATINET wrote:
Here we are using:
CustMapsList
zen.spamhaus.org.:0,dsn.rfc-ignorant.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0
BUT we are having too many
'551 Server access forbidden by your IP'
*even* with authenticated users (yes, I=B4m sure they are authenticated).
The default
At 17.26 08/11/07, you wrote:
So, in which situation '551 Server access forbidden by your IP' is returned?
I think it's a sort of default error message. Usually from
smtp.ipmap.tab, since the other IP-based blocks (CustMapsList and
spammers.tab) have their own messages.
Because, if I comment
At 18.46 08/11/07, you wrote:
Here we are using:
#SmtpMsgIPBanMaps 550 Denied due inclusion of your IP in the following
map
With that entry commented out, the peer should get a 550 Denied due
inclusion of your IP inside (map name), besides the usual
SNDRIP=EIPMAP (map name) in the SMTP log. If
At 11.35 07/11/07, you wrote:
To filter a bit the spam, I'm using this CustMapsList (but I'm not satisfied
at all with my list.)
CustMapsList
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.:0,combined.njabl.org.:0,bl.spamcop.net.:0
Anyone has a better list to give me or complete?
It depends on the reasons why you are
At 11.24 27/09/07, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
IMOO, is this case (Domain ok BUT no MX AND no A entry), xmail such
immediatly stop at first attempt and return an NDR to the sender (like a 5xx
error) as the domain older didn't give any info who to join them by mail
This issue has already been brought
At 21.19 10/06/07, Davide Libenzi wrote:
I made pre15 with some new -M* options. You can select if to use only
IPV4, only IPV6, IPV4 if present or IPV6, IPV6 if present or IPV4.
It defaults to the former at the moment.
For those wishing a clickable link:
At 22.41 16/05/07, you wrote:
The exact same yahoo issue happens to our users very often. The yahoo
groups servers do not retry - they simply stop sending after any failure.
And they even send viri, from time to time. They suck ...
Has anyone been successfull in finding all the needed xnet
At 10.35 10/04/07, you wrote:
I agree, but i have thousand of entrances of this, all for
pellicano.biz, all after and immediately after the upgrade. I only
running 1.25-pre04 for 30 minutes.
Do you mean: I would like XMail not to report this kind of error in
the Event Log?
Description:
At 13.56 15/03/07, you wrote:
Well, see, that's the weird thing. When I do a glst --cleanup, the
glst.dbm file actually *grows* (admittedly, only a small amount - maybe
10 - 20 KB or so). Which I thought was weird.
That may be normal: --cleanup marks some space allocated by the file
as unused -
At 23.43 05/03/07, you wrote:
Also, my spool is loaded with messages that xmail keeps trying to
deliver to obviously bad addresses.
This has been mostly cured with XMail = 1.23. Which version are you running?
Ciao, Francesco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
At 18.50 11/02/07, you wrote:
!aex,wlexTAB/var/MailRoot/filters/filip-supera-filters/GLST_.plTAB@@REMOTEADDRTAB@@FILETAB@@FROMTAB@@CRCPT
A doubt: should be something like
--mfileTAB@@FILETAB--raddrTAB@@REMOTEADDR, I think ...
Also, if you pass a @@FILE you don't need any other parameters (they
Suggestion for 1.25:
if UseReplyTo is set, XMail will prepend a Reply-To header to
messages for a mailing list. If the incoming message already has one,
it will end up with multiple Reply-To headers, which is - depending
on different interpretations of the RFCs - either illegal (agents
should
At 17.35 24/01/07, you wrote:
- does anyone knows an antivirus working fine with xmail (on
Windows 2003 server) and working with xmail filters.
I've been using F-PROT for DOS on both Win2K Pro and WinXP Pro and
works very well in a post-data filter. I've also tested ClamAV -
native
At 07.54 23/01/07, you wrote:
Davide Libenzi a écrit :
Hmmm, that shouldn't happen. Did anyone else have problems with wlex?
Does anyone else use wlex with success ?
I'm using !aex,wlex for glst - as pre-data
filter - on Windows and it works as expected, AFAIK.
Ciao, Francesco
-
To
At 09.58 11/11/06, you wrote:
Just so that I'm absolutely correct according to the documentation, the new
wlex will work as a flag inside of filter files used by filters.in.tab and
filters.out.tab but will NOT work if it is part of filters.pre* and
filters.post* files correct?
As I understand
At 13.20 08/11/06, Rob Arends wrote:
And found this in the readme:
MACRO SUBSTITUTION
XMail support two kinds of macro declaration inside its TAB file. The old
macro declaration done by prefixing the macro name with the '@@' sequence is
still supported for backward
At 00.25 30/10/06, you wrote:
Ok, this comes from 2005 but I'm going through stuff to include in 1.23.
The trailing dot is not legal, according to section 4.1.2 of:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html
Path = [ A-d-l : ] Mailbox
Mailbox = Local-part @ Domain
Domain = (sub-domain 1*(.
At 21.34 09/10/06, you wrote:
Is there a way to run XMail (Win32 version) with the spool dir in a
separeted folder (example: I'm running XMail on D:\mailroot BUT I want to
run *only* spool in another drive/folder, something like: Z:\spool or
Z:\mailroot\spool)?
Under Win2K/XP and NTFS you can
At 22.25 01/10/06, you wrote:
Hi list. Spam seems to be getting to rediculous levels so I'm trying to re=
duce the number of spam messages I am receiving in my xmail server.
I started by uncommenting the line in server.tab:
CustMapsList
At 20.22 27/06/06, oi01 wrote:
actually it should be host:port like 192.168.0.1:8956, seperated by
a colon.
Yes, after some experimenting I can confirm that the ip is NOT
included in square brackets. I can say nothing about the port part
since I only retrieve the IP but I think you are right.
Hi all,
before starting trial and error: do you know the format of the
@@REMOTEADDR macro passed to SMTP filters? ip:port, [ip;port] ...?
Ciao, Francesco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the
At 16.49 27/06/06, you wrote:
The Manual here: http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html
OK, I RTFMed and found: @@REMOTEADDR: remote IP address and port of
the sender. But how are they bundled together in the macro? Are they
separated by comma, colon, space, nothing ... Are they enclosed in
At 12.30 22/05/06, you wrote:
First problem : Use of A domain entry (exist) even if Mx entries
exist for the destination domain
[00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=3D[554
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Relay access denied]
(preliminary: my nslookup reports non-authoritative answer for
ifrance.com
Hi all,
It seems that glst 0.23 does not distinguish between a numeric
ClientDomain - a spammer sends an IP address as HELO - and the actual
sender IP. As a result, if the ClientDomain is a XNETted IP -
typically, the mail server's IP - glst stops processing and passes
the message. Can
At 21.49 17/02/06, you wrote:
I have found a situation with XMail where XMail ignores the mailbox =
quotas.
If there are two mailboxes on the same box and one forwards into the =
other,
XMail ignores the mailbox quota of the second mailbox when receiving
forwards from the first one.
From what
At 00.57 18/02/06, you wrote:
It seems that the quota check is done on smtp processing, but should be done
at other times too.
I'd like to see a change in the way Xmail processes mail, so that whenever a
movement of mail occurs, all checks are done.
I see a problem here: checking mailbox
At 21.55 16/02/06, you wrote:
If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- with a trailing '.'
After the .com, I get a mail loop error back.
I suppose domain.com is a local domain. This is a known issue (see
the thread on local domain and trailing dot). Queued for next
release. By now the only
Hi all,
if I have domain.net in domains.tab and send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note the final dot), domain.net. is not
recognized as local, which leads to a mail loop. Can anybody confirm this?
Ciao, Francesco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body
At 05.12 31/10/05, you wrote:
What is the condition that makes the log files end with 0100?
I suspect it has to do with DST change. If this is the case - it's a
classical topic that comes up twice a year - you should have two
files for Oct 30: one ending in storing entries until 2:59:59
At 11.40 18/10/05 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Davide,
what are these .arch-ids folders that are spread thru the whole
directory tree of the 1.22 Win32 ZIP archive ? Are they vital ?
I hope they aren't, since I nuked them from the whole MAIL_ROOT dir just
after upgrading ...
Ciao, Francesco
-
To
At 10.33 04/08/05 -0600, you wrote:
I've been trying to hack an AV script of ours to have an IP whitelist, but
my Perl is pretty rudimentary, so I haven't had a lot of success. I'd love
to see this functionality in XMail itself.
The overhead of an interpreted script is mostly in initialization.
At 18.06 04/08/05 +0200, you wrote:
I think a flag for (SMTP)-filters which disables filter execution for
whilelisted Ips (listed in smtp.ipprop.tab with Whitelist=3D1) would =
be very
helpful (similar to aex).
Something like:
!ipprop(Whitelist=3D1)[TAB]command[TAB]arg-or-macro[TAB]...[NEWLINE=
At 16.50 21/07/05 -0300, you wrote:
XMail DNS resolver had a bug in handling CNAME, but this was fixed in 1.18
and later. However, all versions of XMail have problems with - which means,
are less good than nslookup and dig at - handling DNS info that is
'Non-authoritative' (see below). I used
At 18.14 20/07/05 -0300, you wrote:
any idea why XMail (1.21 Win32) delivers OK to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but fails to
deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The two have exactly
the same MX
records,
I do, I do :)
http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=datacomm.iue.it
So another
Hi all,
any idea why XMail (1.21 Win32) delivers OK to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but fails to
deliver to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The two have exactly the same MX
records, the only difference being that datacomm.iue.it has also an A
record (is an alias of dns1.iue.it). For some reason, XMail tries A instead
At 11.29 15/06/05 +0200, you wrote:
LOL - someone could assume that this is my personal PITA mailserver for
If I remember well, this is the very same guy (or machine) who reinjected
messages in the list a couple of weeks ago. From the header:
Received: from mail pickup service by
At 14.04 07/06/05 -0400, you wrote:
Yes Windows will not allow trailing spaces or periods in file or directory
names. I have just checked my DNS cache.
Theoretical question: if such file names are not allowed in Windoze, how
can XMail create and use them?
Practical answer (this is copyright
At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any
others?
The list of DNSBL is very dependent on your special needs (and geographical
location, I think). You have to experiment a bit for yourself. I'm using
spamcop, njabl, spamhaus
At 10.39 27/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Davide and list
XMail doc in sections for filters (in and out) and smtp filters (in and out)
says that first line in the spool file passed to filters is as this :
ClientDomain;ClientIP;ClientPort;ServerDomain;ServerIP;ServerPort;Time;Logo
The filter
At 10.37 20/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
Now I'm using Spamhaus, Ordb and Spamcop as RBL servers, do you advise any
others?
The list of DNSBL is very dependent on your special needs (and geographical
location, I think). You have to experiment a bit for yourself. I'm using
spamcop, njabl, spamhaus
At 10.39 27/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Davide and list
XMail doc in sections for filters (in and out) and smtp filters (in and out)
says that first line in the spool file passed to filters is as this :
ClientDomain;ClientIP;ClientPort;ServerDomain;ServerIP;ServerPort;Time;Logo
The filter
At 20.53 03/05/05 +0200, you wrote:
On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:15 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Francesco Vertova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The (unrelated) question is: a ListSender[tab] in user.tab sets an
empty MAIL FROM: in delivering to ML users without changing the mail
headers (much like
Hi all,
for those of you who are wondering why /domain$/ may not match a @@FILE's
4th line: the SMTP filters docs should say
MAIL FROM:...[ SIZE=...] [ 4th line ]
rather than
MAIL FROM:... [ 4th line ]
Apparently, the line holds the peer's MAIL FROM command as is, including
the (optional)
At 07.18 12/04/05 -0700, you wrote:
Only, no SMTP transaction was logged for
about 1 hour. Nothing in the Event Log, disk OK (no errors in chkdsk), no
server load (30 messages or so during the blackout, no idea about rejected
connections: they are only logged in smtp logs). Has anybody
At 00.55 06/04/05 -0700, you wrote:
Can _NOT_ be modified while XMail is running (And shouldn't be edited by
hand - use the CTRL Admin Protocol instead):
aliases.tab
aliasdomain.tab
domains.tab
extaliases.tab
mailusers.tab
pop3links.tab
They shouldn't be modified through the CTRL cfgfileset
At 07.55 28/03/05 +0200, you wrote:
I use 1.21
As I tought today the logs are fine. But we could think about next change...
I've been using XMail since version 1.17, first on NT4 then on Win2K
(always with the latest service pack) and I've always observed this
behaviour at daylight saving time
At 20.32 28/03/05 -0800, you wrote:
Hi all -
Does anyone know of a way, or have a filter written to, do a lookup of
the domain in the from field and/or the return field of an email and
check that it has a valid MX record as a spam deterrent using XMail?
At least on my server ( 90% of incoming
At 23.42 29/03/05 +1000, you wrote:
Sounds more like it is only a problem on the _day_ DST changes.
DST usually changes at 02:00, so I'm guessing that on the day of change,
when a new log is being rotated, the new day is having 1 hour adjusted when
the file name is being calculated at 00:00 (day
At 17.06 17/02/05 +0100, you wrote:
What's a clear response ;-)
Thanks Chris ;-)
What is the new crypto algo used here ? Didn't pass any crack here ... =
;-)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : Chris L. Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoy=E9 : jeudi 17 f=E9vrier 2005 14:30
=C0 :
Hi all,
current XMail (1.21) accepts addresses such as real name [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(tries to deliver to address], which eventually results in a DNS failure)
or 'real name' [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tries to deliver to address, which
eventually results in a user unknown from address). Is this correct?
At 22.59 10/01/05 +1100, you wrote:
Thanks Davide, Would you believe Google can't translate Abemus Papam
There are numerous google hits, but I have been unable to workout what you
said - only I think it is related to Finally
Could you enlighten the non Italian speaking world?
It isn't
At 23.52 01/11/04 -0500, you wrote:
If I wan to run a perl script (on Windows)should the command be:
c:\perl\bin\perl.exe[TAB]MyFilter.pl[TAB]@@FILE...
or
c:\perl\bin\perl.exe MyFilter.pl[TAB]@@FILE...
for some reason following line doesn't work:
MyFilter.pl[TAB]@@FILE...
even though .pl is
At 21.12 11/10/04 +0200, you wrote:
Thank you Francesco, It indeed worked. Can you tell me what's the different
between filters*.tabs?
I want to use the fastest attachment check. No other check (AV, content) is
used. Shouldn't I use the filters.in or global filters file?
In my own view, the best
At 13.51 11/10/04 +0200, you wrote:
Hi all,
What's the easiest way to reject mail that contains exe, pif and vbs and
received on XMAIL 1.20 (windows)?
I've been running a modified version of Michail Altair Valasek's FLAVS for
a year (the link to the original version can be found on the XMail
At 16.24 11/10/04 +0200, you wrote:
Francesco hi,
This looks like exactly what I need, but although xmail process the filter,
the bad attachment still delivers. I tried changing the error code (from 97
to 4), but it didn't work either (message was still delivered. Can you help
me getting it
At 01.08 06/08/04 +0200, you wrote:
I'm looking for a smtp log file description. I need to give
a name to each column of data. Found nothing in doc. Any
help ? Thanks.
Try here: http://xmail.eye-catcher.com/products/XMail/LogFiles/index.asp
Ciao, Francesco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
At 09.55 02/08/04 +0200, you wrote:
I received a complained where people could not reply to a message they =3D
received because the reply field seemed empty in their mail client. =3D
Appearently the people who sent these mails have special characters in =3D
their names like 'L=3DE9on'.
If I look
At 11.15 28/05/04 -1000, you wrote:
I think it would be neat to allow replacement anywhere in an argment,
so you could write something like:
/some/path/myfilter.pl rcpt=@@RCPTmsg=@@FILEfrom=@@FROM
and have the replacements done. Then, in this example, you could parse
a single argument like a
Hi all,
for those who have not looked at the headers of this msg: 1.19-pre06 has
been up and running for a day on my Windows NT box :-)
I noticed that message files are no longer named stime.pid.hostname but
stime.pid.hexdigit.hostname. What's that additional hex digit for?
(I also noticed
At 16.02 25/05/04 +0200, you wrote:
where can I find the meanings of all the fields in xmail log files?
Try here: http://xmail.eye-catcher.com/products/XMail/LogFiles/index.asp
Ciao, Francesco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
At 11.39 23/05/04 -0700, you wrote:
(I need to escape @@FROM b/c the Windows VBS interpreter sees everything
beginning with // - including a malformed MAIL FROM address - as an
argument to itself rather than to the script ...).
If you have:
myexe.exe @@FROM@@FROM@@FROM
At 12.58 22/05/04 -0700, you wrote:
I made 1.19-pre05 for Unix (source) and Win32 (source and binaries):
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.19-pre05.tar.gz
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.19-pre05.win32bin.zip
I'd like to receive reports from all the architectures XMail runs on, that
on 1.19
At 12.46 13/05/04 -0400, you wrote:
I've noticed that, when a message is rejected by filter.pre-data.tab or
filter.post-data.tab, no log entry is made in the SMTP logs. It might be a
good idea to add a log entry there, so that log review can see that (why) a
message was rejected...
I agree: a
At 12.11 12/05/04 -0500, you wrote:
Why Xmail decided to use the A record from the next DNS it was
able to talk with is beyond me.
My dns reports MX information for bioenergy.com as Non-authoritative. It
seems - I've seen this other times - that in such a case the XMail internal
resolver
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
