ome level without inducing corruption. I have a feeling that its
somehow being overly conservative in this stance.
On 5/30/06, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> Wednesday, May 31, 2006, 12:44:22 AM, you wrote:
>
> JL> Well, I would caution at this point against the is
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
Joe Auty
April 5, 2011 3:38 PM
Hello,
I'm debating an OS change and also thinking a
fault Completed - 293 - [- - -]
...
/Tomas
Joe Auty
April 5, 2011 3:53 PM
Hello,
A while I was expl
a
little less taxing than rsync cronjobs?
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician
helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are
easy
to maintain and to int
health of an individual SATA drive in my pool
short of what ZFS itself reports?
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician
helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are
easy
a
little less taxing than rsync cronjobs?
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician
helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful, professional,
custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy to
maintain and to int
help is greatly appreciated. I new to this so please try to dumb your
answers down a little to help me learn. Thanks
Joe
C:\>iperf.exe --client 192.168.0.47
Client connecting to 192.168.0.47, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8
All true, I just saw too many "need ubuntu and zfs" and thought to state the
obvious in case the patch set for nexenta happen to differ enough to provide a
working set. I've had nexenta succeed where opensolaris quarter releases failed
and vice versa
On Jun 27, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Erik Trimble w
Of course, nexenta os is a build of ubuntu on an opensolaris kernel.
On Jun 26, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Ben Miles wrote:
>> What supporting applications are there on Ubuntu for RAIDZ?
>
> None. Ubuntu doesn't officially support ZFS.
>
> Yo
,
if there is corruption your mirror (i.e. machine you are using with zfs
recv) will be corrupted too?
At any rate, thanks for answering this question! At some point if I go
this route I'll test send and recv functionality to give all of this a
dry run.
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
Ne
tilfeller
eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician
helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy
to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks.
w
What other strategies might exist if I
wanted to do this? What sort of pain would be in store for me if I were
to go this route?
Thanks in advance for your help, I've learned a lot from you guys!
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician
helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
pr
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Joe,
I have no clue why this drive was removed, particularly for a one time
failure. I would reconnect/reseat this disk and see if the system
recognizes it. If it resilvers, then you're back in business, but I
would use zpool status and fmdu
o you think?
-- Garrett
Joe Auty wrote:
I'm also noticing that I'm a little short on RAM. I have 6 320 gig
drives and 4 gig of RAM. If the formula is POOL_SIZE/250, this would
mean that I need at least 6.4 gig of RAM.
What role does RAM play with queuing and caching a
ool's performance.
Any idea what happened here? Some weird one time fluky thing? Something
I ought to be concerned with?
Thanks,
Cindy
On 06/08/10 11:39, Joe Auty wrote:
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Joe,
Yes, the device should resilver when its b
I'm also noticing that I'm a little short on RAM. I have 6 320 gig
drives and 4 gig of RAM. If the formula is POOL_SIZE/250, this would
mean that I need at least 6.4 gig of RAM.
What role does RAM play with queuing and caching and other things which
might impact overall disk performance? How much
Brandon High wrote:
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Joe Auty <j...@netmusician.org>
wrote:
things. I've also read this on a VMWare forum,
although I don't know if
this correct? This is in context to me questioning why I don't seem to
have these same
the VMDKs. All
user data on my VM guests that is subject to change is hosted on a ZFS
share, only the OS and basic OS applications are saved to my VMDKs.
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician
helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
professional, custom designed, career-essentia
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Joe,
The REMOVED status generally means that a device was physically removed
from the system.
If necessary, physically reconnect c0t7d0 or if connected, check
cabling, power, and so on.
If the device is physically connected, see what cfgadm
Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Joe,
Yes, the device should resilver when its back online.
You can use the fmdump -eV command to discover when this device was
removed and other hardware-related events to help determine when this
device was removed.
I would recommend exporting
e.
How would I do so? Attach? Replace? Some other command? I'm not sure
how to add a disk to an already established Raid-Z pool safely. In
fact, I didn't think it could be done...
-- richard
--
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician
helps musicians, bands and artists cre
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Emily Grettel
wrote:
>
> I'm wondering what other people are using, even though the Green series has
> let me down, I'm still a Western Digital gal.
>
> What do people already use on their enterprise level NAS's? Any good Seagates?
>
FWIW, I looked at the WDs, bu
Hi all,
I'm still an OpenSolaris noob, so please be gentle...
I was just wondering if it is possible to spindown/idle/sleep hard disks that
are part of a Vdev & pool SAFELY?
My objective is to sleep the drives after X time when they're not being used
and spin them back up if required. This is
On 01/ 5/10 10:01 AM, Richard Elling wrote:
How are the files named? If you know something about the filename
pattern, then you could create subdirs and mv large numbers of files
to reduce the overall size of a single directory. Something like:
mkdir .A
mv A* .A
mkdir .B
mv B*
I've had this happen to me too. I found some dtrace scripts at the
time that showed that the file system was spending too much time
finding available 128k blocks or the like as I was near full per each
disk, even though combined I still had 140GB left of my 3TB pool. The
SPA code I believe it was w
I am seeing this issue posted a lot in the forums:
A zpool add/replace command is run, for example:
zpool add archive spare c2t0d2
invalid vdev specification
use '-f' to override the following errors:
/dev/dsk/c2t1d7s0 is part of active ZFS pool archive. Please see zpool(1M).
(-f just says: the
ports to as Sun 25k using VCS to
cluster a ZFS RAIDZ that is then NFS exported.
For performance I am looking at disabling ZIL, since these files have
almost identical names.
What are Sun's thoughts on this?
Thanks for any insight.
--
Joe Cicardo
System
n.com/bonwick/entry/raid_z
>
>
Hey Tim,
I have seen and read that page several times before and after writing this.
I've see several comparisons to existing RAID solutions, but I'm not
finding whether the more disks you add, the more I/O you can get, unless
I'm missing
Toby Thain wrote:
> On 8-Nov-09, at 12:20 PM, Joe Auty wrote:
>
>> Tim Cook wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:03 AM, besson3c >> <mailto:j...@netmusician.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Why not just c
was that you need these other pieces to
make such an infrastructure useful?
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Erik Ableson
>
> On 8 nov. 2009, at 19:12, Tim Cook mailto:t...@cook.ms>>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Joe Auty > &l
Tim Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Joe Auty <mailto:j...@netmusician.org>> wrote:
>
> Tim Cook wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:03 AM, besson3c > <mailto:j...@netmusician.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm ente
uld Virtualbox stack up against VMWare Server? Last I checked it
doesn't have a remote console of any sort, which would be a deal
breaker. Can I disable allocating virtual memory to Virtualbox VMs? Can
I get my VMs to auto boot in a specific order at runlevel 3? Can I
control my VMs via the comm
ding Unbreakable Linux (Oracle's version of RHEL).
>
I remember now why Xen was a no-go from when I last tested it. I rely on
the 64 bit version of FreeBSD for most of my VM guest machines, and
FreeBSD only supports running as domU on i386 systems. This is a monkey
wrench!
Sorry, just think
I have machine that had 2x 1TB drives in it. They were in the same zpool and
that entire zpool is set to "copies=2". From what I understand this will store
all my data twice, and if the SPA is doing its job right it will store the
copies on different disks and store the checksum for any given bl
out the writes across the platter(s), you run the risk of
the common-case disk failure mode where many consecutive sectors are damaged.
It would not hurt when it's disabled, but it would cripple a system when it is
enabled.
--Joe
___
zfs-discu
e several Linux client to be able to access this share
depending on their username, as I'm connecting to the share via NFS, which
commands should I be looking into in order to set up the correct user/group
permissions? If anyone has links to documentation or advice I would really
appre
off my automatic snapshots and 3 days later my resilver is done.
Joe
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> Also, b57 is about 2 years old and misses the
> improvements in performance,
> especially in scrub performance.
Yep, I know. I'll upgrade them at some point down the road, but they've been
serving our needs nicely so far.
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
> Are you taking snapshots periodically? If so, you're
> using a build old
> enough to restart resilver/scrub whenever a snapshot
> is taken.
Actually yes, I take snapshots once an hour of various things. I'll try
disabling them for the time being and see how far along it gets.
Thanks!
--
This
UPDATE: It's now back down to 0.9% complete. Does anyone have a clue as to
whats happening here or where I can look for problems?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolar
I've got a Thumper running snv_57 and a large ZFS pool. I recently noticed a
drive throwing some read errors, so I did the right thing and zfs replaced it
with a spare.
Everything went well, but the resilvering process seems to be taking an
eternity:
# zpool status
pool: bigpool
state: ONL
ce that a block is no longer used.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I don't want to run SXCE anymore. I'm trying to decide between:
EON ZFS NAS
http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
--or--
NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
--or--
OpenSolaris 2009.06 (when it's released)
My needs are:
* Easy package management
* Easy upgrades
*
s provides a memory
control, for example) which steals pages of virtual-chip memory to avoid the
hypervisor swapping.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Joe S wrote:
> Today, I noticed this:
>
> [...@coruscant$] zpool status
> pool: tank
> state: ONLINE
> status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
> attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are
Today, I noticed this:
[...@coruscant$] zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected.
action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the
have the new
contents. If the TXG containing the rename() isn't complete and on the ZIL
device at crash time, foo would have the old contents.
Posix doesn't require the OS to sync() the file contents on close for local
files like it does for NFS access? How odd.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
SURE it's
hooked up to a UPS that can support it for the 30 second cache flush timeout on
the array. And make sure you don't power it down hard. I think you want to
uncheck the "ignore FUA" setting, so that FUA requests are respected. My guess
is that this
#x27;t resilver the whole disk, just the
data blocks. So it doesn't have to read the full array to rebuild a failed
disk, so it's less likely to cause a subsequent failure during parity rebuild.
My $.02.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Kyle Kakligian wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Richard Elling
> wrote:
>> additional comment below...
>>
>> Kyle Kakligian wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Blake wrote:
>>>
that link suggests that this is a problem with a dirty ex
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:31 AM, wrote:
>
> >I'm using opensolaris and zfs at my house for my photography storage
> >as well as for an offsite backup location for my employer and several
> >side web projects.
> >
> >I have an 80g drive as my root drive. I recently took posesion of 2
> >74g 10k d
e the 80 g
drive.
>From what I gather it is only possible if I zfs export my storage
array and reinstall solaris on the new disks.
So I guess I'm hoping zfs shrink and grow commands show up sooner or later.
Just a data point.
Joe Esposito
www.j-espo.com
On 2/28/09, "C. Bergström
on an EXT2 filesystem (or
unlogged UFS for that matter) the recovery will require an fsck of that
filesystem to ensure that the filesystem structure is consistant. Perforing a
"lockfs" on the filesystem while the snapshot is taken could mitigate that, but
that's still out of the
ercome this in your bugfix, would you
care to share?
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I appreciate the feedback.
I've decided to:
* create daily ZFS snapshots and zfs send these to separate external
disks (via esata).
* create monthly full backups via rsync, tar, or amanda on separate
external disks.
I'm not going to store everything on S3, it is too expensive. However,
I will ke
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, David Magda wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2009, at 17:56, Joe S wrote:
>
>> Does that sound like a viable backup solution?
>
> It has been explicitly stated numerous times that the output of 'zfs send'
> has no guarantees and it is undoc
I have an OpenSolaris snv_105 server at home that holds my photos,
docs, music, etc, in a zfs pool. I backup my laptops with rsync to the
OpenSolaris server. All of my important data is in one place, on the
OpenSolaris server. I want to backup this data. I want to protect
against losing my data, an
Miles Nordin wrote:
> >>>>> "mj" == Moore, Joe writes:
>
> mj> For a ZFS pool, (until block pointer rewrite capability) this
> mj> would have to be a pool-create-time parameter.
>
> naw. You can just make ZFS do it all the time, li
is would have to be
a pool-create-time parameter. Perhaps a --usable-size=N[%] option which would
either cut down the size of the EFI slices or fake the disk geometry so the EFI
label ends early.
Or it would be a small matter of programming to build a perl wrapper for zpool
create that would acc
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:21 PM, JZ wrote:
> try that first, and then please ask again - "will run OpenSolaris"?
>
> You don't run things on NAS boxes, you attach things to them.
>
These NAS devices need an OS. They come preinstalled with Windows Home
Server. I would like to install OpenSolaris o
In the last few weeks, I've seen a number of new NAS devices released
from companies like HP, QNAP, VIA, Lacie, Buffalo, Iomega,
Cisco/Linksys, etc. Most of these are powered by Intel Celeron, Intel
Atom, AMD Sempron, Marvell Orion, or Via C7 chips. I've also noticed
that most allow a maximum of 1
o a new zfs
filesystem, you'd have to atomically change the devid inside all the processes
that have open files under that directory. Finding those open files is
practically impossible.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
h
I did not use the Marvell nic.
I use an Intel gigabit pci nic (e1000g0).
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:03 PM, SV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> js.lists , or anyone else who is using a XFX MDA72P7509 Motherboard ---
>
> that onboard NIC is a Marvell? - Do you choose not to use it in favor of the
> I
:57 AM, Carsten Aulbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Joe S wrote:
>>
>> How do I get SMART data from my drives?
>>
>> I'm running snv_101 on AMD64.
>>
>> I have 6x SATA disks.
>
> I guess that highly depends how these are c
How do I get SMART data from my drives?
I'm running snv_101 on AMD64.
I have 6x SATA disks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I read Ben Rockwood's blog post about Thumpers and SMART
(http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=993). Will the SUNWhd
package only work on a Thumper? Can I use this on my snv_101 system
with AMD 64 bit processor and nVidia SATA?
___
zfs-discuss ma
to take a long
time to be given a deadline (now + (vdev-device-timeout ?:
(zpool-device-timeout?: forever)))* and consider the I/O complete with whatever
data has returned after that deadline: if that's a bunch of 0's in a read,
which would have a bad checksum; or a partially-completed
atermelon, nor on any other type of epigynous berry.
If you try, you will certainly rind up with a mess, if not a core dump. And
let me tell you, that's the pits.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I had the same problem described by kometen with our Areca ARC-1680 controller
on opensolaris 2008.05. We were using the controller in JBOD mode and allowing
zpool to to use entire disks.
Setting the drives in pass-through mode on the Areca controller manager solved
the issue.
Also worthy to
h as
setting an error in a shared piece of memory (where it might be
sufficient to attempt to keep the first error, but in race conditions
perhaps get the second error).
(After the update, the variable can have any of N values
Right - this only applies to situations where any of the N values are
ac
is correct, question is: is it considered
clean and proper to rely on this?
Just wondering if putback code reviews would consider this relying on
assumptions we shouldn't, or having unnecessary locking...
(I originally posed this question on the opensolaris discuss, but never
got an answe
jsp
>
> Get it, install it, be happy :-)
>
Or if you haven't tweaked the discovery order, there's a map at
http://docs.sun.com/source/819-4359-14/figures/CH2-power-bios-9.gif
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Thanks Gary. This solved the problem. I wish I knew where to find
these reminders in advance of doing an upgrade. I hate reboots. ;-)
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:09:08PM -0700, Joe S wrote:
>> Sorry if this is
Sorry if this is the wrong list, but I would like to know if this is a
known problem, or if its just me.
I'm in the middle of a live upgrade on an x86 box.
I type this command:
# luupgrade -u -n snv_99 -s /mnt
~~~output~~~
System has findroot enabled GRUB
No entry for BE in GRUB menu
Copying fa
You may need an add-on SATA card. I haven't come across any 8 port motherboards.
As far as chipsets are concerned, take a look at something with the
Intel X38 chipset. It's the only one of the desktop chipsets that
supports ECC ram. Coincidentally, it's also the chipset used in the
Sun Ultra 24 wo
Brian Hechinger
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:47:04AM -0400, Moore, Joe wrote:
> >
> > I wonder if an AVS-replicated storage device on the
> backends would be appropriate?
> >
> > write -> ZFS-mirrored slog -> ramdisk -AVS-> physical disk
> >
a time when it was better to place workstations' swap files on the
far side of a 100Mbps ethernet link rather than using the local spinning rust.
Ah, the good old days...
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Moore, Joe wrote:
> > Given the fact that NFS, as implemented in his client
> systems, provides no end-to-end reliability, the only data
> protection that ZFS has any control over is after the write()
> is issued by the NFS server process.
>
> NFS
e organization is, but
the reality is that the thumper series is good for some things in a large
enterprise, and not good for some things.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ction that ZFS has any control over
is after the write() is issued by the NFS server process.
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
When I issue the zpool remove command on the spare I receive no response, good
or bad. Afterwards the drive is still listed as a spare in the zpool. Zpool
shows the spare is listed as FAULTED. Any ideas?
$ zpool status
pool: datapool1
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ
o the latest nightly
build? Or would just taking the iscsitgtd from that build suffice?
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I have a kernel dump from the zonehost and a snoop
capture of the wire for the Windows host (but it's big).
I'll be opening a bug too.
Thanks,
--Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Todd H. Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't agree with you more. I'm beginning to understand what the phrase
> "Sun's software is great - as long as you're running it on Sun's hardware"
> means...
>
> Whether it's deserved or not, I feel like this OS isn't
2t3d0disk connectedconfigured ok
sata0/4::dsk/c2t4d0disk connectedconfigured ok
sata0/5::dsk/c2t5d0disk connectedconfigured ok
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Joe S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While I wanted the In
Hello,
ZFS is working great for us, but we have seen it use all or most of the
memory on our systems.Is there a recommended setting to put in
/etc/system to limit the amount of RAM to cache? Or is it recommended
to just leave it alone, and let it release the memory as needed. Most
of our
While I wanted the Intel Core 2 Duo confuration, it was too much
money. Even when I substituted the processor for a low power wolfdale,
the E7200. The Intel option cost $126 more than the AMD/GeForce
option. I was up to $457.88 with shipping and tax.
Also, in some power benchmarks, the AMD 4850e d
I'm want to upgrade the hardware of my Open Solaris b95 server at
home. It's currently running on 32 bit intel hardware. I'm going 64
bit with the new hardware. I don't need server grade hardware since
this is a home server. This means I'm not buying the an Opteron or
Xeon, or any quad core process
Mark Shellenbaum wrote:
> Joe Blount wrote:
>>
>>>> Is the acl_t intentionally designed to be opaque?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, its meant to be opaque.
>>>
>>> The layout of the acl_t will likely change in the not too distant
>
upgrade (layout
change), could we write the old ACL to the new ZFS code?
thanks,
Joe
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ted" operating system, even on supported
hardware. I've had too many experiences with first-level support (and
second-level support -- not necessarily Sun's) whose first suggestion is
to install (the latest) supported OS, before even investigating the
hardware aspe
Hello Cindy,
That did the trick. Thank you for your quick assessment and solution.
Joe
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hello,
I recently installed SunOS 5.11 snv_91 onto a Ultra 60 UPA/PCI with OpenBoot
3.31 and two 300GB SCSI disks. The root file system is UFS on c0t0d0s0.
Following the steps in ZFS Admin I have attempted to convert root to ZFS
utilizing c0t1d0s0. However, upon "init 6" I am always presented w
I got overzealous with snapshot creation. Every 5 mins is a bad idea.
Way too many.
What's the easiest way to delete the empty ones?
zfs list takes FOREVER
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/list
h a
> star performer?
Features. RAS. Simplicity. Corporate Inertia (having storage admins
who don't know OpenSolaris). Executive outings with StorageTek-logo'd
golfballs. The last 2 aren't something I'd build a business case
around, but they're a reality.
--Joe
__
is
different. If you have a zpool tank mounted on /tank and /tank/homedirs
with mountpoint=/export/home, do you create the next dataset
/tank/homedirs/carson, or /export/home/carson ? And does the mountpoint
get inherited in the obvious (vs. the simple vs. not at all) way? I
don't know.
rby, but when dealing with snapshotted sequential files
being rewritten, there is no way to keep everything in order.
But if you read through the thread referenced above, you'll see that
there's no clear data about just how that impacts performance (I still
owe Mr
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Joe Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> &g
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Peeyush Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys, please excuse me in advance if I say or ask anything stupid :)
>>
>> Anyway, Solaris newbie here. I've built for myself a new file server
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Hugh Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Akhilesh Mritunjai
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it's right. You'd have to move to a 64 bit kernel. Any reasons to
>> stick to a 32 bit
>> kernel ?
>
> My reason would be lack of
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
