serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• RFR: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8280553: resourcehogs/serviceability/sa/TestHeapDumpForLargeArray.java can fail if GC occurs Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8280543: Update the "java" and "jcmd" tool specification for CDS Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8280543: Update the "java" and "jcmd" tool specification for CDS Harold Seigel
  • Re: RFR: 8280543: Update the "java" and "jcmd" tool specification for CDS [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8280543: Update the "java" and "jcmd" tool specification for CDS Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8280543: Update the "java" and "jcmd" tool specification for CDS Calvin Cheung
  • Re: RFR: 8280543: Update the "java" and "jcmd" tool specification for CDS [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Integrated: 8280543: Update the "java" and "jcmd" tool specification for CDS Ioi Lam
• Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v6] Yi Yang
• RFR: 8280555: serviceability/sa/TestObjectMonitorIterate.java is failing due to ObjectMonitor referencing a null Object Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280555: serviceability/sa/TestObjectMonitorIterate.java is failing due to ObjectMonitor referencing a null Object Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8280555: serviceability/sa/TestObjectMonitorIterate.java is failing due to ObjectMonitor referencing a null Object Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8280555: serviceability/sa/TestObjectMonitorIterate.java is failing due to ObjectMonitor referencing a null Object Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8280555: serviceability/sa/TestObjectMonitorIterate.java is failing due to ObjectMonitor referencing a null Object Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8076089: Cleanup: Inline & remove sun.management.Util.newException Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8076089: Cleanup: Inline & remove sun.management.Util.newException Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8076089: Cleanup: Inline & remove sun.management.Util.newException Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8076089: Cleanup: Inline & remove sun.management.Util.newException Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8076089: Cleanup: Inline & remove sun.management.Util.newException Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8076089: Cleanup: Inline & remove sun.management.Util.newException Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8076089: Cleanup: Inline & remove sun.management.Util.newException Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related assert in PointerFinder.find() Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8280601: ClhsdbThreadContext.java test is triggering codecache related asserts Chris Plummer
• RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Address remaining doclint issues in JDK build Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Use cross-module syntax for cross-module links Alexey Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280492: Use cross-module syntax for cross-module links [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: JDK-8280492: Use cross-module syntax for cross-module links Joe Darcy
• RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible [v3] Thomas Stuefe
  • Integrated: JDK-8280503: Use allStatic.hpp instead of allocation.hpp where possible Thomas Stuefe
• RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v4] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v5] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v5] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute [v6] Alex Menkov
  • Integrated: 8240908: RetransformClass does not know about MethodParameters attribute Alex Menkov
• Integrated: 8280413: ProblemList jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java on all X64 platforms Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: Integrated: 8280413: ProblemList jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java on all X64 platforms Alexander Zvegintsev
  • Re: Integrated: 8280413: ProblemList jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java on all X64 platforms Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Integrated: 8280413: ProblemList jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestLargeRootSet.java on all X64 platforms Daniel D . Daugherty
• Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v5] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v5] Yi Yang
• Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v4] Yi Yang
• Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v3] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v3] Yi Yang
• RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v3] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v3] Per Liden
  • Re: RFR: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8269542: JDWP: EnableCollection support is no longer spec compliant after JDK-8255987 Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8270199: Most SA tests are skipped on macosx-aarch64 because all executables are signed Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases [v3] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases [v3] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8280166: Extend java/lang/instrument/GetObjectSizeIntrinsicsTest.java test cases Aleksey Shipilev
• Deprecate DTrace support Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: Deprecate DTrace support Laurence Cable
• Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Yi Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Xin Liu
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8275775: Add jcmd VM.classes to print details of all classes [v2] Yi Yang
• RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Peter Levart
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable [v2] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable [v2] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable [v2] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable [v2] Andrey Turbanov
  • Integrated: 8280035: Use Class.isInstance instead of Class.isAssignableFrom where applicable Andrey Turbanov
• [jdk18] Integrated: 8280034: ProblemList jdk/jfr/api/consumer/recordingstream/TestOnEvent.java on linux-x64 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • [jdk18] Integrated: 8280034: ProblemList jdk/jfr/api/consumer/recordingstream/TestOnEvent.java on linux-x64 Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: [jdk18] Integrated: 8280034: ProblemList jdk/jfr/api/consumer/recordingstream/TestOnEvent.java on linux-x64 Calvin Cheung
  • Re: [jdk18] Integrated: 8280034: ProblemList jdk/jfr/api/consumer/recordingstream/TestOnEvent.java on linux-x64 Daniel D . Daugherty
• RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Sergey Bylokhov
  • Integrated: 8280010: Remove double buffering of InputStream for Properties.load Andrey Turbanov
• RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream [v2] Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: JDK-8280002: jmap -histo may leak stream [v2] Serguei Spitsyn

• Earlier messages
• Later messages