This is not very encouraging.   I hope that the books are not being cooked to 
get action by governmental agencies.  Sometimes the authors leave out a very 
important part of the data if it does not support their political plans.  An 
example is the talk of a large portion of the ice melting on Greenland this 
year as compared to normal.  They fail to reveal the fact that the melting is 
only skin deep relative to the mass of ice.  If you ask experts, I am sure they 
will concede that it would take many, many years for the ice to melt if the 
present conditions persist.

We need unbiased science in this field.  There are far too many people 
incapable of looking at the situation without extreme emotional responses.  It 
is easy to see why both sides of the argument feel that way since time to act 
appears important.  But the lives of poor peoples are important as well and 
their quality of life should be considered before energy is made scarce.  Our 
interest in LENR appears to be the solution to most of the ills, so lets kick 
some butt and get it into production.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Jul 31, 2012 2:46 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Koch founded climate skeptic changes sides


Warming hits 'tipping point'
Siberia feels the heat It's a frozen peat bog the size of France and Germany 
combined, contains billions of tonnes of greenhouse gas and, for the first time 
since the ice age, it is melting

The Guardian,                                                                   
                                                    Thursday 11 August 2005 
07.36 EDT


A vast expanse of western Sibera is undergoing an unprecedented thaw that could 
dramatically increase the rate of global warming, climate scientists warn today.
Researchers who have recently returned from the region found that an area of 
permafrost spanning a million square kilometres - the size of France and 
Germany combined - has started to melt for the first time since it formed 
11,000 years ago at the end of the last ice age.
The area, which covers the entire sub-Arctic region of western Siberia, is the 
world's largest frozen peat bog and scientists fear that as it thaws, it will 
release billions of tonnes of methane, a greenhouse gas 20 times more potent 
than carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere.
It is a scenario climate scientists have feared since first identifying 
"tipping points" - delicate thresholds where a slight rise in the Earth's 
temperature can cause a dramatic change in the environment that itself triggers 
a far greater increase in global temperatures.
The discovery was made by Sergei Kirpotin at Tomsk State University in western 
Siberia and Judith Marquand at Oxford University and is reported in New 
Scientist today.
The researchers found that what was until recently a barren expanse of frozen 
peat is turning into a broken landscape of mud and lakes, some more than a 
kilometre across.
Dr Kirpotin told the magazine the situation was an "ecological landslide that 
is probably irreversible and is undoubtedly connected to climatic warming". He 
added that the thaw had probably begun in the past three or four years.
Climate scientists yesterday reacted with alarm to the finding, and warned that 
predictions of future global temperatures would have to be revised upwards.
"When you start messing around with these natural systems, you can end up in 
situations where it's unstoppable. There are no brakes you can apply," said 
David Viner, a senior scientist at the Climatic Research Unit at the University 
of East Anglia.
"This is a big deal because you can't put the permafrost back once it's gone. 
The causal effect is human activity and it will ramp up temperatures even more 
than our emissions are doing."
In its last major report in 2001, the intergovernmental panel on climate change 
predicted a rise in global temperatures of 1.4C-5.8C between 1990 and 2100, but 
the estimate only takes account of global warming driven by known greenhouse 
gas emissions.
"These positive feedbacks with landmasses weren't known about then. They had no 
idea how much they would add to global warming," said Dr Viner.
Western Siberia is heating up faster than anywhere else in the world, having 
experienced a rise of some 3C in the past 40 years. Scientists are particularly 
concerned about the permafrost, because as it thaws, it reveals bare ground 
which warms up more quickly than ice and snow, and so accelerates the rate at 
which the permafrost thaws.
Siberia's peat bogs have been producing methane since they formed at the end of 
the last ice age, but most of the gas had been trapped in the permafrost. 
According to Larry Smith, a hydrologist at the University of California, Los 
Angeles, the west Siberian peat bog could hold some 70bn tonnes of methane, a 
quarter of all of the methane stored in the ground around the world.
The permafrost is likely to take many decades at least to thaw, so the methane 
locked within it will not be released into the atmosphere in one burst, said 
Stephen Sitch, a climate scientist at the Met Office's Hadley Centre in Exeter.
But calculations by Dr Sitch and his colleagues show that even if methane 
seeped from the permafrost over the next 100 years, it would add around 700m 
tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere each year, roughly the same amount that is 
released annually from the world's wetlands and agriculture.
It would effectively double atmospheric levels of the gas, leading to a 10% to 
25% increase in global warming, he said.
Tony Juniper, director of Friends of the Earth, said the finding was a stark 
message to politicians to take concerted action on climate change. "We knew at 
some point we'd get these feedbacks happening that exacerbate global warming, 
but this could lead to a massive injection of greenhouse gases.
"If we don't take action very soon, we could unleash runaway global warming 
that will be beyond our control and it will lead to social, economic and 
environmental devastation worldwide," he said. "There's still time to take 
action, but not much.
"The assumption has been that we wouldn't see these kinds of changes until the 
world is a little warmer, but this suggests we're running out of time."
In May this year, another group of researchers reported signs that global 
warming was damaging the permafrost. Katey Walter of the University of Alaska, 
Fairbanks, told a meeting of the Arctic Research Consortium of the US that her 
team had found methane hotspots in eastern Siberia. At the hotspots, methane 
was bubbling to the surface of the permafrost so quickly that it was preventing 
the surface from freezing over.
Last month, some of the world's worst air polluters, including the US and 
Australia, announced a partnership to cut greenhouse gas emissions through the 
use of new technologies.
The deal came after Tony Blair struggled at the G8 summit to get the US 
president, George Bush, to commit to any concerted action on climate change and 
has been heavily criticised for setting no targets for reductions in greenhouse 
gas emissions.
 
Its aready too late...
 
 
 
Axil




On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:


I think Axil is just having fun.  I suspect he is a grad student in physics 
somewhere trying to see how many people he can rope into his hypotheticals.


Eric

Le Jul 30, 2012 à 2:14 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> a écrit :





Axil,
 
You speak of ice receding as though it is inevitable.  My major worry is that 
the present heating will trigger an ice event.  I guess we could use the old 
ice core data to determine the typical length of time between heating and the 
following ice age which would be a far worse catastrophe.
 
Dave









 

Reply via email to