--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think these discussions about ALE who, PSK this, who hates Pactor
etc are starting to destroy this group.
We all have our favourite ideas/opinions etc. IF people feel strongly
about regulatory or operational
*applause*
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
- Original Message -
From: David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, January 14, 2008 2:41
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Its all getting out of hand.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Hi
Hi all Pactorologists!
I now have my band scanning function running (I think!) for Pactor connects.
The controller talks to my Icom 718 to scan 10 frequencies in 5
bands, the scan delay for each frequency is 3 seconds. My tones
are Mark 1600 Space 1400 with USB mode on all frequencies.
Hi all Pactorologists!
Sorry, the first frequency should read 14.078 NOT .087
Back to yourscheduledprogramme!
73s
Jack VK4JRC
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all Pactorologists!
Sorry, the first frequency should read 14.078 NOT .087
Hi Jack,
Are these frequencies CENTER frequencies?
I will try to connect you today sometime and keep trying different
times until we
At 08:27 PM 1/14/2008, Demetre wrote:
Hi Jack,
Are these frequencies CENTER frequencies?
I will try to connect you today sometime and keep trying different
times until we can link.
Back to yourscheduledprogramme!
73s
Jack VK4JRC
73 de Demetre SV1UY
Hi Demetre,
They are DIAL
At 08:45 PM 1/14/2008, Skip wrote:
Jack,
I use my 80m base-loaded, tophat, vertical on 30m, and it works great! 80m
and 30m are harmonically related. 3.5 x 3 = 10.150. Similar to using a 40m
antenna on 15m.
73, Skip KH6TY
Skip,
Thanks for that. Unfortunately its a Cushcraft MA-5V 20m through
Sadly, my antenna cannot accommodate 30 metres..
73s
Jack VK4JRC
Jack,
I use my 80m base-loaded, tophat, vertical on 30m, and it works great! 80m
and 30m are harmonically related. 3.5 x 3 = 10.150. Similar to using a 40m
antenna on 15m.
73, Skip KH6TY
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John, do you really characterize the innovation that's been driving
the development of new digital modes as madness? Do you really
think that the explosion of soundcard digital mode users is
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John, do you really characterize the innovation that's been driving
the development of new digital modes as madness? Do you really
think that the explosion of soundcard digital mode users is
The station you singled out, VE2AFQ, is not operating illegally when
operating just below 14070 as a Pactor PMBO. A polite reminder sent to
the
station might work?
Tried that before 1-1-08 and got no reply. Will try again now that the
bandplan has been published, but it really should be
At 10:01 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote:
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Demetre,
They are DIAL frequencies, and I am running my published tones. IF
a few people want to coordinate other dial frequencies and
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Demetre,
They are DIAL frequencies, and I am running my published tones. IF
a few people want to coordinate other dial frequencies and
standardize on a different tone set, I am happy to change anything
For clarification only:
Your statement, John, about DXLab as program suite with Dave as
author is incorrect. I'd suggest you look into the facts before
communicating wrong statements like All the modes you have built
your software around I don't use when your next sentences are
informing us
On Sunday 13 January 2008 08:15:45 pm John Becker, WØJAB wrote:
The anti-automatic and anti-everything-that-is-not-PSK31
hams have a very hard time understanding what the rest are doing.
Some of us are just ant-Bully In The Neighborhood.
You simply refuse to recognize that some modes are a
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK Demetre,
I will leave it run for another hour or so, before I go to bed. I
would leave it run all night, but the transceiver band switching
relays will keep me awake! Fire it up again at 1900z
FB Jack,
I will
This seems to me to sum up much of the difficulty in working together to
solve a common problem.
It is my understanding (and someone can correct me if I am wrong about
this) that the ARRL approached the FCC a while back and asked them if
the rules could be changed here in the U.S. so that
- Original Message -
From: Jack Chomley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:57 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] VK4JRC Pactor Operations..
Hi all Pactorologists!
I now have my band scanning function running (I think!) for Pactor
I'm still trying for W0JAB (John) and you, of course. I've heard no signal
from you whatsoever to date, same think for W0JAB. I'm still trying
and I'm sure the effort will pay off before long.
Howard - when I call out a dial frequency for pactor such
as the one I hang out on 7077.5 it's going
For me, the proven offenders can be ATTENDED stations.
The past week I was linked to a Winlink station on 40 meters when
somebody started calling on top of us.
I turned on my linear, and he kept on calling. Three options to be
heard: my correspondent,
me, and me and my half gallon linear.
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] VK4JRC Pactor Operations..
Howard - when I call out a dial frequency for pactor such
as the one I hang out on
What frequency were you using? Was it a keyboard mode that started
calling on top of you, or a modem mode? Hard to believe someone
with a keyboard mode and a waterfall display would start over top of
you, although there are jerks everywhere.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose
This is not new in any way Jim.
Just a few weeks Tony, K2MO was in a QSO on 7077.5
Pactor and someone started calling CQ and then just
sent trash. I did sent a email. His reply was (as it always is)
I was thinking it was a PMBO station .
John, W0JAB
At 01:51 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote:
What
Greetings
Am new to the list and do have a problem. I downloaded multipsk and was able to
run the program but when I shut it down, it left the desktop full of folders.
Did miss
something in the installation?
Thanks
Lynn
Regarding the continuing vocal disagreement (and flame-wars) between the
live chat operators, Morse operators, and the
BBS/Winlink or ALE network operators:
Two HF bands are discussed below as examples of possible ongoing
evolution throughout the amateur radio service's spectrum
Hello Lynn,
That is not a normal install. Perhaps you inadvertently unzipped the
files into your desk top? You might also ask on the dedicated Multipsk
group - alot of very helpful people there, although I am sure Patrick
monitors this group also.
73,
Bill N9DSJ
--- In
Elaine
You really know how to make Friends with comments like
STONE AGE .
Seems to me that the ones dragging there knuckles on
the ground are those who fail to accept the fact that
there are other things but using the ham bands for
E-MAIL
When you start to act like others exist and they
Hello Jose,
You are correct, it does not seem that attended stations are always
listening stations. Have seem many clients qrming each other and
probably, to some locations, qrming the PMBO itself as they are
calling the PBMO that is already linked.
Might explain why, even though supposed busy
First, let me say that these recommendations are based solely upon
hopes and dreams. There are no facts or data with by which one can
adequately assess the recommendations. If you want to convince
someone that further segmentation of the rtty/data segments into
smaller and smaller pieces is a
At 07:26 PM 1/14/2008, you wrote:
Seems to me that the ones dragging there knuckles on
the ground are those who fail to accept the fact that
there are other things but using the ham bands for
E-MAIL
Bruce
If I may - here is one of the so called email that you referred to.
this message was
Results of the EPSK PSK63 QSO Party are in..
Continental Party Winners
Continent Call Sign EPC QSOs Mults Score WW Place
Europe RU3QR 0016 599 490 1253910 001
Asia 4L1QX 0203 421 361 674709 012
Africa CN8YZ 0364 409 311 515327 017
North America AA6YQ 2640 144 105 59220 095
Gee I did no make the list.
But you're ignoring the aggregate effects. It's like showing your
wife a hair off an elephant that is rampaging through your house and
saying, no big deal, look it's just a little hair.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 07:26 PM
Jose Amador wrote:
For me, the proven offenders can be ATTENDED stations.
Indeed, Jose, this is always possible. Who among us has not on some
erroneous occasion transmitted without listening long ENOUGH, and
instead unintentionally QRMed an innocent QSO? But VERY few of us would
ever do
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gee I did no make the list.
Well, John, you did at least as well as I did or better.
73.
Bill N9DSJ
7102.2, center frequency. Certainly, a busy frequency.
I cannot tell what mode called on top of me, because, robotic or
manned, all pactor link initiations are about the same. Only after you
receive a system ID or a human greeting you get to know. But I guess,
given the frequency, that it was
OK, Bill, I had heard it before, and refrained to comment, but this time
I suffered it myself.
I decided to change the subject to something more appropiate to what I
am referring to.
I have been thinking a bit about all thisI am tempted to try to
monitor using Multipsk with the soundcard
Thanks, Andy. That was my first -- and likely last -- contest.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 9:15 PM
To: DIGITALRADIO
Subject: [digitalradio] PSK63
38 matches
Mail list logo
