On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: > Hi Matthias, Simon (K.) and Werner,
no need to name only a few folks. Choosing the right subject will bring attention to folks that are interested ;-) > > Sorry I need to come back on this again. We had agreed on putting the > extension attributes within f:attribute tags nested in f:ajax to avoid > compatibility issues with other implementations. In the meantime I realized > that f:ajax is a facelets-only tag, so additional tag attributes aren't :-) it is funny that the core statement was every view needs to be supported. I can see that some features may only work with Facelets, but a Tag should be present for both, JSP(X) and Facelets. Or am I wrong ? > declared in a taglib, would be ignored by other implementations and cannot > be detected by the TCK. So, I changed my mind and now would prefer > > <f:ajax myfaces="pps:true, queuesize:1"/> I like that. > over > > <f:ajax> > <f:attribute name="myfaces_pps" value="true"/> > <f:attribute name="myfaces_queuesize" value="1"/> > </f:ajax> > > because the former is less verbose and better readable. +1 I am with you -M > > Can you agree with these new arguments? > > Best Regards, > Ganesh > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
