On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Actually We probably can provide a non facelets based solution >>> under the myfaces umbrella, tomahawk, extensions or impl I don´t care >>> but I am definitely sure we will be unable to provide it under >>> the standard f: tags... >>> >>> +1 for a non facelet based solution... >> >> As I was thinking about this bit more. I think we are now there that >> JSP is officially (almost) dead. When you want to upgrade, by >> simple replacing the JARs, this will work. Moving forward in your >> project, by using the new introduced stuff, you have to use Facelets. >> >> So, I am +1 for what Ganesh proposed (=> CORE) >> >> I am not against an tomahawk:ajax tag, for JSP, if one want's that. >> >> > I am still -1 regarding a pure facelet based one, JSF is not dead, it is not > smelling yet...
no, but JSP > Seriously most projects use facelets nowadays but I would not call JSP dead, but they EG decided to add new things (e.g. f:ajax) only to the facelets view. -M > besides that the new component api simplifies things anyway, so it is not > that hard to provide something on api level. > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
