On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Actually We probably can provide a non facelets based solution
>>>> under the myfaces umbrella, tomahawk, extensions or impl I donĀ“t care
>>>> but I am definitely sure we will be unable to provide it under
>>>> the standard f: tags...
>>>>
>>>> +1 for a non facelet based solution...
>>>
>>> As I was thinking about this bit more. I think we are now there that
>>> JSP is officially (almost) dead. When you want to upgrade, by
>>> simple replacing the JARs, this will work. Moving forward in your
>>> project, by using the new introduced stuff, you have to use Facelets.
>>>
>>> So, I am +1 for what Ganesh proposed (=> CORE)
>>>
>>> I am not against an tomahawk:ajax tag, for JSP, if one want's that.
>>>
>>>
>> I am still -1 regarding a pure facelet based one, JSF is not dead, it is not
>> smelling yet...
>
> no, but JSP
>
>> Seriously most projects use facelets nowadays but I would not call JSP dead,
>
> but they EG decided to add new things (e.g. f:ajax) only to the facelets view.

I guess they did that b/c they think JSP is dead.
Also, there is this time no new JSP version, next to a new Servlet version.
That is also a sign that JSP is not more that (well) alive

Anyway, Tomahawk can ship an :ajax tag. Or something like the previous discussed
myfaces:ajax as well.

But for Facelets I like Ganesh's proposal

-M

>
> -M
>
>> besides that the new component api simplifies things anyway, so it is not
>> that hard to provide something on api level.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to