Actually We probably can provide a non facelets based solution
under the myfaces umbrella, tomahawk, extensions or impl I don´t care
but I am definitely sure we will be unable to provide it under
the standard f: tags...
+1 for a non facelet based solution...
Werner
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote:
Hi Matthias, Simon (K.) and Werner,
no need to name only a few folks.
Choosing the right subject will bring attention
to folks that are interested ;-)
Sorry I need to come back on this again. We had agreed on putting the
extension attributes within f:attribute tags nested in f:ajax to avoid
compatibility issues with other implementations. In the meantime I realized
that f:ajax is a facelets-only tag, so additional tag attributes aren't
:-) it is funny that the core statement was every view needs to be supported.
I can see that some features may only work with Facelets, but a Tag should
be present for both, JSP(X) and Facelets. Or am I wrong ?
declared in a taglib, would be ignored by other implementations and cannot
be detected by the TCK. So, I changed my mind and now would prefer
<f:ajax myfaces="pps:true, queuesize:1"/>
I like that.
over
<f:ajax>
<f:attribute name="myfaces_pps" value="true"/>
<f:attribute name="myfaces_queuesize" value="1"/>
</f:ajax>
because the former is less verbose and better readable.
+1 I am with you
-M
Can you agree with these new arguments?
Best Regards,
Ganesh
