On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually We probably can provide a non facelets based solution > under the myfaces umbrella, tomahawk, extensions or impl I don´t care > but I am definitely sure we will be unable to provide it under > the standard f: tags...
yeah. I know. I am really wondering why the "support all views" ship sailed away. Again, I understand that some solutions may only fly in Facelets land... That said, but wasn't the promised goal of the formal/current EG that a flexible ViewLayer was the KEY ? ==> Swing-based RenderKit etc ? Or is this (JSF) just another web-framework ? > > +1 for a non facelet based solution... > > > Werner > > > > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Matthias, Simon (K.) and Werner, >> >> no need to name only a few folks. >> Choosing the right subject will bring attention >> to folks that are interested ;-) >> >>> Sorry I need to come back on this again. We had agreed on putting the >>> extension attributes within f:attribute tags nested in f:ajax to avoid >>> compatibility issues with other implementations. In the meantime I >>> realized >>> that f:ajax is a facelets-only tag, so additional tag attributes aren't >> >> :-) it is funny that the core statement was every view needs to be >> supported. >> I can see that some features may only work with Facelets, but a Tag should >> be present for both, JSP(X) and Facelets. Or am I wrong ? >> >>> declared in a taglib, would be ignored by other implementations and >>> cannot >>> be detected by the TCK. So, I changed my mind and now would prefer >>> >>> <f:ajax myfaces="pps:true, queuesize:1"/> >> >> I like that. >> >>> over >>> >>> <f:ajax> >>> <f:attribute name="myfaces_pps" value="true"/> >>> <f:attribute name="myfaces_queuesize" value="1"/> >>> </f:ajax> >>> >>> because the former is less verbose and better readable. >> >> +1 I am with you >> >> -M >> >>> Can you agree with these new arguments? >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Ganesh >>> >> >> >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
