Messages by Date
-
2005/08/30
[EM] RE: reason #17
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/30
[EM] FW: Recent History Perspective on Condorcet Methods
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/30
[EM] correction
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/30
[EM] cloneproof[strat2-revote]
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] range voting, properties with strategic re-voting, and utilitarianism
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] 64 vs 65, post for purpose of annoying Jobst Heitzig
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] range voting, properties with strategic re-voting, and utilitarianism
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] simple MMP-ish idea - works with plurality voting in single-winner districts
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] wiki emergency: home page hacked (and maybe more)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] 2-party domination = favorite betrayal?
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] range voting, properties with strategic re-voting, and utilitarianism
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/30
[EM] Typo: DMC, not "DOC"
Chris Benham
-
2005/08/30
[EM] 64 vs 65, post for purpose of annoying Jobst Heitzig
Chris Benham
-
2005/08/30
[EM] simple MMP-ish idea - works with plurality voting in single-winner districts
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/30
[EM] Obvious(?) extension of DMC to range
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/30
[EM] DMC, Ties & Eppley's RVH
Eric Gorr
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] wiki emergency: home page hacked (and maybe more)
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] reply to Heitzig criticzing range voting
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/30
[EM] Re: DMC / 2-party domination
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/08/30
[EM] wiki emergency: home page hacked (and maybe more)
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/30
[EM] 2-party domination = favorite betrayal?
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/30
[EM] 64 vs 65, post for purpose of annoying Jobst Heitzig
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/30
[EM] DMC Definition
Eric Gorr
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] DMC and 2-party domination
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/30
[EM] Re: reason #17
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/08/30
RE: [EM] Re: DMC / 2-party domination
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] A?B versus A=B
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/30
[EM] range voting, properties with strategic re-voting, and utilitarianism
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] A?B versus A=B
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/30
[EM] Replies to Warren's very interesting positions
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] reply to Heitzig criticzing range voting
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/30
[EM] question/comments re DMC
Chris Benham
-
2005/08/30
Re: [EM] question/comments re DMC
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/29
[EM] A?B versus A=B
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] reply to Heitzig criticzing range voting
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] Re: question/comments re DMC
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] reply to Heitzig criticzing range voting
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/29
[EM] reason #17
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] question/comments re DMC
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] question/comments re DMC
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] DMC / 2-party domination
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] question/comments re DMC
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] reply to Heitzig criticzing range voting
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/29
Re: [EM] question/comments re DMC
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/29
[EM] DMC and 2-party domination
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/29
[EM] Re: DMC / 2-party domination
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/08/29
RE: [EM] DMC / 2-party domination
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/08/29
[EM] Re: question/comments re DMC
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/08/29
[EM] Re: 15 reasons to support DMC
Araucaria Araucana
-
2005/08/28
[EM] reply to Heitzig criticzing range voting
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/28
[EM] DMC / 2-party domination
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/28
[EM] question/comments re DMC
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/28
Re: [EM] 15 reasons to support DMC
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/28
Re: [EM] 15 reasons to support DMC
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/27
[EM] Re: [Condorcet] 15 reasons to support DMC
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/27
[EM] RE: [Condorcet] 15 reasons to support DMC
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/25
[EM] More endorsement of Range (and Approval) Voting from Mike Ossipoff
Jan Kok
-
2005/08/24
[EM] Endorsement of Range Voting from Mike Ossipoff
Jan Kok
-
2005/08/24
RE: [EM] RE: lotteries unbeaten in mean
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/08/24
[EM] RE: lotteries unbeaten in mean
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/24
[EM] RE: 15 reasons
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/23
[EM] Typo in: 15 reasons to support DMC
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/23
[EM] 15 reasons to support DMC
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/22
[EM] RE: Clarifications/commentary on solutions to Gerrymandering.
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/22
RE: [EM] solving the NP-hard problem? no. The CRV approach to gerrymandering.
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/08/22
[EM] Re: [RangeVoting] Clarifications/commentary on solutions to Gerrymandering.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/22
[EM] Re: Clarifications/commentary on solutions to Gerrymandering.
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/22
[EM] Clarifications/commentary on solutions to Gerrymandering.
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/21
Re: [EM] solving the NP-hard problem? no. The CRV approach to gerrymandering.
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/21
Re: [EM] solving the NP-hard problem? no. The CRV approach to gerrymandering.
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/21
RE: [EM] solving the NP-hard problem? no. The CRV approach to gerrymandering.
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/08/21
[EM] solving the NP-hard problem? no. The CRV approach to gerrymandering.
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/20
Re: [EM] a democratic approach to intractable optimizations
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/08/20
[EM] RE: simplifying ballots
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/20
[EM] RE: simplifying ballots
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/20
[EM] a democratic approach to intractable optimizations
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/20
Re: [EM] range ballots chew up slots; "unsupported" range voting claims
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/20
Re: [EM] Re: IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
RLSuter
-
2005/08/20
[EM] RE: A class of ballot set with "unbeaten in mean lotteries."
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/20
[EM] Re: A class of ballot set with "unbeaten in mean lotteries."
Jobst Heitzig
-
2005/08/20
Re: [EM] Re: IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
Jan Kok
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] Re: IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/19
[EM] Re: IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
RLSuter
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/19
[EM] A class of ballot set with "unbeaten in mean lotteries."
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/19
RE: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
James Gilmour
-
2005/08/19
RE: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] range ballots chew up slots; "unsupported" range voting claims
Jan Kok
-
2005/08/19
[EM] Re: IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] Range voting is just a Borda count with a bunch of throwaway candidates
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/08/19
[EM] range with L levels chew up L slots? - other ideas by Lomax & me
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/19
[EM] range and borda really alike? not.
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
RLSuter
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] range ballots chew up slots; "unsupported" range voting claims
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
-
2005/08/19
RE: [EM] IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
James Gilmour
-
2005/08/19
[EM] Re: Range voting is just a Borda count with a bunch of throwaway candidates
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/08/19
[EM] Re: [RangeVoting] Ballot Initiative feedback from Lomax
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/19
RE: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
James Gilmour
-
2005/08/19
[EM] IRV vs Range on totalizing machines
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] Range voting is just a Borda count with a bunch of throwaway candidates
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] range ballots chew up slots; "unsupported" range voting claims
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/08/19
[EM] Range voting is just a Borda count with a bunch of throwaway candidates
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/08/19
Re: [EM] range ballots chew up slots; "unsupported" range voting claims
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/18
Re: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/18
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/18
[EM] range ballots chew up slots; "unsupported" range voting claims
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/17
Re: [EM] RE: simplifying ballots
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/17
[EM] RE: simplifying ballots
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/17
Re: [EM] WDS reply to Dave Ketchum elementary questions re range voting
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/16
Re: [EM] Asset Voting (was: Simplifying Ballots)
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/16
RE: [EM] Simplifying ballots
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/16
[EM] Asset Voting (was: Simplifying Ballots)
Alex Small
-
2005/08/16
Re: [EM] Simplifying ballots
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/16
Re: [EM] WDS reply to Dave Ketchum elementary questions re range voting
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/16
RE: [EM] Simplifying ballots
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/08/16
[EM] Simplifying ballots
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/16
Re: [EM] RE: Approval strategy in close three-way race?
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/16
Re: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
Scott Ritchie
-
2005/08/16
Re: [EM] WDS reply to Dave Ketchum elementary questions re range voting
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/15
[EM] WDS reply to Dave Ketchum elementary questions re range voting
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/15
[EM] Range ballots vs range voting
Ken Kuhlman
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Unifying behind range is tactically necessary (including for AV & Condorcet advocates)
Brian Olson
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Unifying behind range is tactically necessary (including for AV & Condorcet advocates)
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Unifying behind range is tactically necessary (including for AV & Condorcet advocates)
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
RLSuter
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Proposal to change Wikipedia Arbitration Committee to first-past-the-post
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
[EM] RE: Approval strategy in close three-way race?
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] 2-party systems are not democracies
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] range versus condorcet & others; practical purposes
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Eric Gorr
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Abd ulRahman Lomax
-
2005/08/15
[EM] Unifying behind range is tactically necessary (including for AV & Condorcet advocates)
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/15
RE: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/08/15
RE: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections
James Gilmour
-
2005/08/15
RE: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections
James Gilmour
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections
Markus Schulze
-
2005/08/15
[EM] Approval for many candidate, non-partisan, multi-seat elections
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/15
Re: [EM] range versus condorcet & others; practical purposes
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/14
[EM] Corrected statement from the CAV/AAV Board
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/14
[EM] Proposal to change Wikipedia Arbitration Committee to first-past-the-post
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] range versus condorcet & others; practical purposes
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] Approval strategy in close three-way race?
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/14
[EM] Approval strategy in close three-way race?
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] range versus condorcet & others; practical purposes
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/14
[EM] 2 parties is not democracy
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/14
[EM] More on tactics of adoption/range V condorcet & approval/ why unify behind range
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/14
[EM] 2-party systems are not democracies
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/14
[EM] range versus condorcet & others; practical purposes
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/14
RE: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
James Gilmour
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/14
Re: [EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/13
[EM] New election-methods web-based chat room
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] Re: simplcity of range v condorcet
Andrew Myers
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
bql
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/13
[EM] Re: [RangeVoting] further reply to Parr... et al... 2-party dominance recap
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] Re: simplcity of range v condorcet
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/13
[EM] Statement from the CAV/AAV Board
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/13
[EM] Re: simplcity of range v condorcet
Rob LeGrand
-
2005/08/13
RE: [EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/13
RE: [EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/08/13
[EM] simplcity of range v condorcet
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/13
RE: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
James Gilmour
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
Rob Lanphier
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
Eric Gorr
-
2005/08/13
RE: [EM] 0-info approval voting, repeated polling, and adjusting priors
Simmons, Forest
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
RLSuter
-
2005/08/13
Re: [EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/13
[EM] The "official" and "unofficial" defns of "Condorcet", range voting, & red herrings
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/13
RE: [EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/08/13
[EM] voter strategy & 2-party domination under IRV voting
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/13
[EM] voter strat & 2-party domination under Condorcet voting
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/13
[EM] Expressing pairwise preferences
Juho Laatu
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Re the "official" definition of "condorcet"
Eric Gorr
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Re the "official" definition of "condorcet"
Dave Ketchum
-
2005/08/12
RE: [EM] Re the "official" definition of "condorcet"
Paul Kislanko
-
2005/08/12
[EM] Re the "official" definition of "condorcet"
RLSuter
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Re the "official" definition of "condorcet"
Chris Benham
-
2005/08/12
[EM] Re the "official" definition of "condorcet"
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Chris Benham
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/12
[EM] WDS repsonse to Tarr re Condorcet v Range & strategy
Warren Smith
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Adam Tarr
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] encourage dishonesty / range / WDS reply to robla
Kevin Venzke
-
2005/08/12
Re: [EM] Center for Range Voting Formed
Adam Tarr