Messages by Date
-
2003/04/05
Re: [EM] IRV in action
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/04/05
RE: [EM] IRV in action
James Gilmour
-
2003/04/05
Re: [EM] IRV in action
Bart Ingles
-
2003/04/05
[EM] IRV in action.....Improved IRV
Chris Benham
-
2003/04/05
Re: [EM] Strong FBC, tie-breakers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
[EM] apologies for duplicates (no msg body)
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] IRV in action
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] Strong FBC, tie-breakers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] Strong FBC, tie-breakers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] Strong FBC, tie-breakers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] Strong FBC, tie-breakers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] Strong FBC, tie-breakers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
[EM] [Fwd: Pairs Approval default]
Chris Benham
-
2003/04/04
RE: [EM] Nader everyone's 2nd choice
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] The Strong Favorite Betrayal Criterion at Last!
Forest Simmons
-
2003/04/04
Re: [EM] [Fwd: Re: Strong Favourite Betrayal Criterion at last!]
Forest Simmons
-
2003/04/04
RE: [EM] IRV in action
James Gilmour
-
2003/04/04
RE: [EM] IRV in action
James Gilmour
-
2003/04/04
RE: [EM] IRV in action
Adam Tarr
-
2003/04/04
[Fwd: Re: [EM] Re: Strong FBC at last! ....Approval Runoff]
Chris Benham
-
2003/04/03
RE: [EM] IRV in action
James Gilmour
-
2003/04/03
RE: [EM] IRV in action
James Gilmour
-
2003/04/03
Re: [EM] Re: Strong FBC at last! ....Approval Runoff
Alex Small
-
2003/04/03
[EM] Re: Strong FBC at last! ....Approval Runoff
Chris Benham
-
2003/04/03
[EM] Re: Election-methods digest, Vol 1 #63 - 3 msgs
Chris Benham
-
2003/04/03
[EM] [Fwd: Re: Strong Favourite Betrayal Criterion at last!]
Chris Benham
-
2003/04/03
Re: [EM] Re: Strong Favourite Betrayal Criterion at last!
Forest Simmons
-
2003/04/02
Re: [EM] Re: Strong Favourite Betrayal Criterion at last!
Alex Small
-
2003/04/02
[EM] Re: Strong Favourite Betrayal Criterion at last!
Forest Simmons
-
2003/04/02
[EM] Re: Strong Favourite Betrayal Criterion at last!
Chris Benham
-
2003/04/02
RE: [EM] IRV in action
Alex Small
-
2003/04/02
RE: [EM] IRV in action
Adam Tarr
-
2003/04/02
Re: [EM] IRV in action
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/04/01
[EM] The Strong Favorite Betrayal Criterion at Last!
Forest Simmons
-
2003/04/01
RE: [EM] IRV in action
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/31
[EM] The "Tennesee example" for Condorcet
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/31
Re: [EM] IRV in action
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/03/30
Re: [EM] IRV in action
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/30
[EM] IDEA report of voting turn out
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/30
[EM] IRV in action
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/30
Re: [EM] Duverger's Law
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/30
Re: [EM] Defining Majority [was: Blake's margins arguments]
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/29
[EM] Debian election results are in
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/29
Re: [EM] Defining Majority [was: Blake's margins arguments]
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/03/29
Re: [EM] Duverger's Law
Bart Ingles
-
2003/03/29
[EM] Defining Majority [was: Blake's margins arguments]
Bart Ingles
-
2003/03/28
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/28
Re: [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportionalrepresentation
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/26
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers. Australian example
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/26
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers. Australian example
Anthony Duff
-
2003/03/26
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/26
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/26
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/25
RE: [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/25
Re: [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/25
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Alex Small
-
2003/03/25
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/25
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/25
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/25
Re: RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Alex Small
-
2003/03/25
Re: RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
stephane . rouillon
-
2003/03/25
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Alex Small
-
2003/03/25
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/25
Re: [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportionalrepresenation
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/25
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/25
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/24
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/24
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/24
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/24
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/24
[EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/24
[EM] ok
Diego Tello
-
2003/03/24
RE: [EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional representation
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/23
[EM] Electoral reform in Poland: do away with proportional represenation
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/23
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/23
RE: [EM] PR and Second Chambers
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/23
[EM] PR and Second Chambers
Alex Small
-
2003/03/23
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/23
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/23
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Alex Small
-
2003/03/23
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/23
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/22
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
James Gilmour
-
2003/03/22
[EM] Retiring from voting systems
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/22
Re: [EM] Interesting article-- James Buchanan
Sampo Syreeni
-
2003/03/21
Re: [EM] Interesting article-- James Buchanan
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/21
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/21
Re: [EM] A strategy free method
Alex Small
-
2003/03/21
Re: [EM] A strategy free method
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/21
Re: [EM] A strategy free method
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/21
Re: [EM] A strategy free method
atarr
-
2003/03/21
Re: [EM] A strategy free method
Alex Small
-
2003/03/21
[EM] A strategy free method
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/20
[EM] Update on Electorama
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/20
RE: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Alex Small
-
2003/03/20
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Alex Small
-
2003/03/20
Re: [EM] MAM non-deterministic when tied losers make cycle?
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/20
Re: [EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/20
Re: [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/20
Re: [EM] Strategy-free Condorcet resolution methods
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/20
Re: [EM] Strategy-free Condorcet resolution methods
Alex Small
-
2003/03/20
[EM] Strategy-free Condorcet resolution methods
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/20
Re: [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/20
[EM] Timely Question on Borda Applications
Alex Small
-
2003/03/20
[EM] Another PR method based on ranked ballots
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/19
Re: [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/19
Re: [EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/19
Re: [EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?
Alex Small
-
2003/03/19
Re: [EM] Your opinion on being able to vote no preference?
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/19
[EM] Condorcet Letter in Salon.com
Alex Small
-
2003/03/18
[EM] Interesting article-- James Buchanan
Bart Ingles
-
2003/03/15
[EM] MAM non-deterministic when tied losers make cycle?
matt matt
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/14
Re: IIA performance (was Re: [EM] IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/14
Re: IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)
Norman Petry
-
2003/03/14
[EM] Approval/Ranked Pairs hybrid
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] RP vs BeatpathWinner, committee clarification
Eric Gorr
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] RP vs BeatpathWinner, committee clarification
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/14
IIA performance (was Re: [EM] IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria)
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/14
Re: [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/13
[EM] Re: Blake's margins arguments
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/13
[EM] RP vs BeatpathWinner, committee clarification
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/13
[EM] Re: Markus, RP vs BeatpathWinner
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/13
[EM] Smith//MinMax
Rob LeGrand
-
2003/03/13
Re: [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/13
Re: [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/13
Re: [EM] Comparing ranked versus unranked methods
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/13
RE: [EM] Elections Scheduling?
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/13
Re: [EM] Elections Scheduling?
Jan Kok
-
2003/03/13
RE: [EM] Elections Scheduling?
Narins, Josh
-
2003/03/13
Re: [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant
Rob LeGrand
-
2003/03/13
Re: [EM] Dyadic ballots (was "...encouraging truncation")
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/13
Re: IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/12
Re: [EM] Electoral systems experts meeting
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/12
[EM] Electoral systems experts meeting
Stephane Rouillon
-
2003/03/12
[EM] Non-monotonicity example for Zavist-Tideman Ranked Pairs
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/12
Re: IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/12
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/12
Re: [EM] Elections Scheduling?
Olli Salmi
-
2003/03/12
Re: IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/12
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
matt matt
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
matt matt
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/11
Non-monotonicity of Zavist-Tideman (was Re: [EM] re: Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/11
IMC, I2C and LIIA criteria (was Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD)
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/11
[EM] re: Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD
Eric Gorr
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/11
[EM] errata
Narins, Josh
-
2003/03/11
[EM] Elections Scheduling?
Narins, Josh
-
2003/03/11
Re: [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/11
[EM] Your appraisals requested
Tom McIntyre
-
2003/03/10
Re: [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/10
Re: [EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/10
Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/10
[EM] Minor update to voting site
ericgorr
-
2003/03/10
Comment re: Ranked Pairs (was Re: [EM] MinMax variant)
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/10
Re: [EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/10
Re: [EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/10
[EM] Approval-Condorcet hybrid encouraging truncation
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/10
Re: [EM] FBC (was MinMax)
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/10
Re: [EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/10
[EM] Electorama discussion board
Rob Lanphier
-
2003/03/09
[EM] Markus: RP & BeatpathWinner/CSSD
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/09
[EM] MinMax (pairwise opposition) and Approval
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/09
[EM] Inferring a method from an MMC axiom
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/09
Re: [EM] Markus re: Steve Eppley
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/09
Re: [EM] Re: MC -1,0,1 ---- IRV hybrid (slightly amended)
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/08
[EM] Markus re: Steve Eppley
MIKE OSSIPOFF
-
2003/03/08
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/08
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/08
[EM] Re: MC -1,0,1 ---- IRV hybrid (slightly ammended)
Chris Benham
-
2003/03/08
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/07
Wrong claim that FBC checks a method (Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/07
[EM] Burt L Monroe, "Voice of Reason" electoral method
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/07
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Markus Schulze
-
2003/03/07
Re: [EM] MinMax variant
Steve Eppley
-
2003/03/07
Re: [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant
Kevin Venzke
-
2003/03/07
[EM] MinMax variant
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/06
Re: [EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid
Dave Ketchum
-
2003/03/06
Re: [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/06
Re: [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/03/06
Re: [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/06
Re: [EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant
Forest Simmons
-
2003/03/06
Re: Positive and Negative preferences (was Re: [EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/03/06
Positive and Negative preferences (was Re: [EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/06
[EM] Re: Blake's Margins Arguments
Blake Cretney
-
2003/03/05
[EM] Re: MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid
Venzke Kevin
-
2003/03/05
Re: [EM] Vermont IRV can elect a fanatical candidate
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/05
[EM] MC -1, 0, 1 --- STV hybrid
Chris Benham
-
2003/03/05
Re: [EM] So "preference" means "representation of preference"?
Craig Carey
-
2003/03/05
[EM] Description of "Median," my Approval variant
Venzke Kevin