On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > what would be the effective way to change the > status quo around IPMC an make it more board like?
The Board works very hard to provide thorough review of the reports it receives. While IPMC review of podling reports is better than it used to be, there is still room for improvement, particularly in the realm of cross-cutting feedback. > Perhaps we can start from making the release policy actually > make sense along the lines that Ross has outlined. I guess > I can propose a change to the current policies (or to Ross' > point just get it back from the wayback machine :-)). We worked hard to improve the situation around releasing and we succeeded. The Incubator today produces higher quality releases more efficiently and with less contention than it ever has before. To address the specific point about voting, there have been a number of times when release votes are run simultaneously on the podling dev list and general@incubator. It's fine. I tend not to recommend it simply because most podlings screw up RC release mechanics a lot and going through several trivial RCs adds noise to general@incubator. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
