mark mcclure wrote:
> On Nov 23, 3:30 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That is true.  In fact, I hope in the proposal to not insult or snub
>> non-free commercial software either.
> 
> But William, just two days ago on sage-support you wrote:
> "Let's put Mathworks out of business."
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b56450bab6d43bf7/a82a770db1abd6dc#msg_d72f94b7ff856c29
> 
> So I wonder, what is your true feeling on this matter?
> 
> To be clear, I am not attempting to be inflammatory.
> I have been genuinely interested in Sage for a couple
> years and have used it for real mathematics sporadically.
> I could even imagine jumping into Sage development but I
> have been *very* put off by the outright hostile stance
> frequently expressed towards the commercial systems on
> the sage discussion groups.  


Let it be clear that the opinion expressed above is William's opinion 
(maybe in a moment of frustration about the patent business?).  I have a 
lot of respect for Cleve and what he's done, and don't feel like my 
purpose for involvement is to put Mathworks out of business.  In fact 
(as William has expressed elsewhere about commercial software), I'm 
*glad* that Mathworks is dumping (millions of?) dollars into math 
software development.  That's a great thing for mathematics and 
mathematics software.  Patenting some of the (obvious?) things they've 
patented makes me sad, though.

Jason

--
Jason Grout

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to