date:20061010

Re: [Wicket-user] Repositioning the WICKET AJAX DEBUG link

2006-10-10 Thread Matej Knopp

We can consider using id for the link, it could be in 1.2.3.

-Matej

Matt Brictson wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I like the functionality provided by the WICKET AJAX DEBUG link that  
> appears when I'm in development mode, but the link is in an  
> unfortunate position in my UI (it obscures some important elements).  
> I'd like to reposition the debug link, but I can't find an easy way  
> to do this.
> 
> The link is generated in wicket-ajax-debug.js like this:
> 
>
> 
> Unfortunately that doesn't give me any options to override the  
> position with CSS (there is no class or id attribute). I could write  
> my own version of wicket-ajax-debug.js, but how would wicket know to  
> load my version at runtime instead of the one bundled in wicket.jar?  
> Or do I have to modify the original and compile a custom wicket.jar?  
> That seems like overkill for such a minor change.
> 
> Any ideas? I am using wicket 1.2.2.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> Matt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 


-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] HTTPSession Creation

2006-10-10 Thread Johan Compagner

in 1.2 yes the session is createdBut how does your login page look like? A form with a Form component in wicket?That would mean in 1.2 a statefull page anyway.in 2.0 we have a stateless form that you can use.
johanOn 10/11/06, craigdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where can you down wicket 2.0?  I'm assuming this is a pre production release/ build?I agree that this is not a security issue, however a person just has toright a simple script, say with wget to create many many session within your
application possibly causing performance and memory issues.So when you talk about stateful / stateless pages am I hearing that everypage in wicket 1.2 gets put into the session regardless if it needs to keep
state?Eelco Hillenius wrote:>>> Does this mean that a HTTPSession is created upon a page request?>> Basically>> I'm a little worried that if I have an application that has a security in
>> front of it (a login page) that a HTTPSession doesn't get created when>> the>> user hits the login page but rather only when they are sucessfully>> validated>> via the login page.
>> It would never be a security concern though, only possibly an> efficiency/ scalability concern. In wicket 1.2, a session is always> created. In Wicket 2.0, a session is created when the first statefull
> page (yep, that's the opposite of a stateless page, and the default in> Wicket) is rendered.>>> It this assumption correct? and if so is there a way to override this>> functionality, say only create a session if the page being requested is
>> not>> the home page?>> Use stateless pages with Wicket 2.0.>> Eelco>> -> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share> your> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash> 
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV> ___> Wicket-user mailing list> 
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>>--View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/HTTPSession-Creation-tf2420077.html#a6747914Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.-Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of ITJoin SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cashhttp://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___Wicket-user mailing listWicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] HTTPSession Creation

2006-10-10 Thread craigdd

Where can you down wicket 2.0?  I'm assuming this is a pre production release
/ build?

I agree that this is not a security issue, however a person just has to
right a simple script, say with wget to create many many session within your
application possibly causing performance and memory issues.

So when you talk about stateful / stateless pages am I hearing that every
page in wicket 1.2 gets put into the session regardless if it needs to keep
state?

Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> 
>> Does this mean that a HTTPSession is created upon a page request? 
>> Basically
>> I'm a little worried that if I have an application that has a security in
>> front of it (a login page) that a HTTPSession doesn't get created when
>> the
>> user hits the login page but rather only when they are sucessfully
>> validated
>> via the login page.
> 
> It would never be a security concern though, only possibly an
> efficiency/ scalability concern. In wicket 1.2, a session is always
> created. In Wicket 2.0, a session is created when the first statefull
> page (yep, that's the opposite of a stateless page, and the default in
> Wicket) is rendered.
> 
>> It this assumption correct? and if so is there a way to override this
>> functionality, say only create a session if the page being requested is
>> not
>> the home page?
> 
> Use stateless pages with Wicket 2.0.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ___
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/HTTPSession-Creation-tf2420077.html#a6747914
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
___
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Re: [Wicket-user] Custom date component...

2006-10-10 Thread Alexei Sokolov

I noticed that this component uses current date as default value. Is it possible to modify it so if one of the fields is not selected the component fails validation?Thank you,Alex
On 9/8/06, Andrew Lombardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 7, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Erik Brakkee wrote: Andrew Lombardi wrote:
Erik, I had similar issues with the DatePicker for various reasons. After some help from Nick and Igor I built a 3 dropdown component for choosing date similar to what you describe below. Check out my blog entry for details on it:
http://www.mysticcoders.com/blog/2006/08/21/datechooser-component-for-wicket/
Excellent! This is exactly what I need. By the way, I think a component like this should also be part of wicket extensions. There is no need for a one-size-fits all
date component and in practice you encounter many different types of date choosers. The advantage of the dropdown version over the _javascript_ version in my opinion is that you can use the keyboard and that it doesn't give you a popup and force a user to use the mouse. An experienced user should be able to use the interface with the keyboard only I think.
yeah, having it as a secondary option in wicket-extensions might be nice. I believe I can create a wicket-contrib project with this on it. Just so its available somewhere
basically you want to create a DateModel which holds a
Date object passed in to your component and override getObject to return the appropriate value based on the field you want, MONTH, DAY_OF_MONTH, YEAR. []
I have just read your blog. I will try it out tomorrow. validation would probably be easiest just to use some client-side _javascript_.
Or use the validation support of the FormComponent. I had also looked around a bit and discovered that the problem was that Panel doesn't extend FormComponent. Because of this I was a bit reluctant about writing a component myself because I don't know the APIs for rendering HTML. But I really like your solution. You solved it by implementing the custom component, adding three nested components to it, and then you provide a custom Panel for generating the HTML markup. This is surely an interesting pattern that I would want to use as well.
good deal :) Cheers Erik
Cheers, andrew On Sep 7, 2006, at 2:29 AM, Erik Brakkee wrote:Hi,
I have tried to use the DatePicker component but somehow it doesn't
really work on Firefox 1.5 on linux. For instance, it only shows theeven years, and has strange behavior resetting fields.
Therefore, I want to write my own date component. Very simple, threedrop down choices for year, month, and day of month respectively. I am
now using a Panel component for this. The problem is here that the stateof my DateChooser is represented by three String fields for year, month,
and day of month, whereas my model is represented as a java.util.Date inthe IModel (PropertyModel).
Now, when I make sure that my DropDownChoice implementation haswantOnSelectionChangedNotification() returning true, I get notified ofevery change and in this callback I can set the model to the appropriate
date by using the three String field values as input. Problem is that ifthe user doesn't change the date, then no date will be set. Furthermore,
a server round-trip is not necessary so I would like to get rid of this.I would like to avoid server round trips, make sure the model is set on
submit of the form, and also I would like to use validation of the date(the day of month could be out of range). How would I solve this problem?
Cheers Erik
-Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
___Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

To our success!

Andrew Lombardi
:
Mystic Coders, LLC
- Coding Magic
contact |
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- 714-697-8046 | aim - nlpjunke
This message is for the named person's use only. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
-Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easierDownload IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&ki

52 matches

Mail list logo