er initialization also. If the library path has
> changed, then the path needs to be updated with the new device name for
> the new library path.
>
>
> Jerry Michalak
> jerry_...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Howard Coles
> To:
path.
Jerry Michalak
jerry_...@yahoo.com
From: Howard Coles
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Mon, January 4, 2010 10:07:53 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] unexpected result from audit library
That would depend on your library. However, you can check those tapes
you rec
] On Behalf Of
ashish sharma
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:55 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] unexpected result from audit library
Hello Howard,
Yes , they intervened as we didnt had the licenses for all the slots we
have
in the library and we asked for aditional number o
lf Of
> km
> Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 12:07 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] unexpected result from audit library
>
> They didnt perhaps change the length of volser (i.e. if LTO generation
> should be a part of the volume serial or not)? That
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] unexpected result from audit library
They didnt perhaps change the length of volser (i.e. if LTO generation
should be a part of the volume serial or not)? That would explain not
finding any already checked in volumes.
On 02/01, ashish sharma wrote:
> Hello Howard,
>
They didnt perhaps change the length of volser (i.e. if LTO generation
should be a part of the volume serial or not)? That would explain not
finding any already checked in volumes.
On 02/01, ashish sharma wrote:
> Hello Howard,
>
> Yes i received a lot of messages " cant find tapes in slot". I jus
un an
> audit.
>
> the order I would take care of this is:
> 1. make sure no clients or processes are running (other than Admin
> Sessions).
> 2. Make sure no volumes are mounted.
> 3. Run "Audit libr" with the checklabel=barcode option (can't remember
> the
(can't remember
the exact syntax for some reason run: help audit library)
4. Check any errors or "can't find tape in slot" whatever messsages.
5. Update any volumes still showing as "Unavailable".
Or you could update them ahead of time, but you will want to check a
On Saturday 02 January 2010, ashish sharma wrote:
> Hello Richards and Howard,
>
> The paths are ok, as i can run migration and i used checkin libvolume
> command and it works fine. The only concern is the volumes which are
> containing data and are in unavailable status in library. I can update t
Hello Richards and Howard,
The paths are ok, as i can run migration and i used checkin libvolume
command and it works fine. The only concern is the volumes which are
containing data and are in unavailable status in library. I can update the
volume status to readwrite but there is no use ,as i can
there was no scratch available in library. To my surprise , the status
> of all the volumes were private though they didnt contaioned any data. After
> running audit libray command , i find in the actlog that all the volumes
> were unavailable and after audit library my "q libv"
A situation like that can be expected to be cause by a library
failure, or failure of the path to the library. Use the library Web
page or the mtlib command or similar to check out the condition of the
library, and proceed from there. Do research in your TSM Activity Log
and operating system eve
were private though they didnt contaioned any data. After
running audit libray command , i find in the actlog that all the volumes
were unavailable and after audit library my "q libv" o/p showed 0
libvolumes. But i had a lot of data backed up on tapes and i could see that
"q vol &qu
>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:02:10 -0400, Richard Rhodes
>> said:
> QUESTION: How can you effectively get a audit libr
> cmd to run in a busy library sharing environment?
Here's how I solved that problem: I wrote a script to generate a
truckload of UPDATE PATH statements.
#!/usr/local/bin/per
marist.edu] On
Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:02 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] audit library problems
This past weekend we started the process of upgrading our TSM
environment from v5.4.1 to v.5.2.2. We have 2 dedicated library
managers (3584 libs) and 7 t
Stor cc
Manager"
RES: audit library problems
06/22/2009 01:36
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
Richard
ng maintenance upgrades and
they worked flawlessly.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] audit library problems
I tried a DISA
Dist Stor Manager [ads...@vm.marist.edu] em Nome de Richard Rhodes
[rrho...@firstenergycorp.com]
Enviado: segunda-feira, 22 de junho de 2009 12:02
Para: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Assunto: audit library problems
This past weekend we started the process of upgrading our TSM environment
from v5.4.1 to v.5
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 12:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] audit library problems
I tried a DISABLE SESSIONS ALL, but it didn't work. Tape mounts (via
server-to-server, I assume) still worked. I found this puzzling.
Rick
"Petrullo,
381
Email: mpetru...@leggmason.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:02 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] audit library problems
This past weekend we started the process of
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] audit library problems
Hi Rick,
Try using the following commands which will disable all client and
server sessions to the TSM server:
DISABLE SESSIONS CLIENT
DISABLE SESSIONS SERVER
Hope this helps!
Michael Petrullo
Storage Support Administrator
Legg Mason
...@leggmason.com
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:02 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] audit library problems
This past weekend we started the process of upgrading our TSM
This past weekend we started the process of upgrading our TSM environment
from v5.4.1 to v.5.2.2. We have 2 dedicated library managers (3584 libs)
and 7
tsm library client instances and a bunch of storage agents.
The first step was to upgrade _one_ of the library managers.
After we upgrade this l
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Audit library problem.
We've seen something like this. It was a tape library microcode bug, not a TSM
problem. It's still unresolved, though it only bites us about once a year.
Still in a finger-pointing dispute with Quantum over their lib
>Have anyone experienced any problems like this one below?
>
>
>05/28/07 14:08:02 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library
>TLS-412180
> started as process 15. (SESSION: 15, PROCESS: 15)
>05/28/07 14:08:03 AN
barcode_len = 36 barcode = 000313
So it seems to me that the library is working?
Possibly. As you've reviewed the past reports in the List archives,
you know that the initial Audit Library can sometimes itself cause
the problem situation to clear; or coincidental library events may
me that the library is working?
//Erik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Sims
Sent: den 28 maj 2007 14:56
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Audit library problem.
On May 28, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Erik Björndell wrote
On May 28, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Erik Björndell wrote:
Hi All!
Have anyone experienced any problems like this one below?
05/28/07 14:08:02 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for
library TLS-412180
started as process 15. (SESSION: 15,
PROCESS: 15)
05/28/07 14
Hi All!
Have anyone experienced any problems like this one below?
05/28/07 14:08:02 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library
TLS-412180
started as process 15. (SESSION: 15, PROCESS: 15)
05/28/07 14:08:03 ANR8788W Unable to read the barcode of
.
-Original Message-
From: French, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3494 audit library time estimate
Anyone out there with an IBM 3494 library that has ever performed an "audit
library" have any idea how long
Another thing to remember is that the "audit library" command
will not run as long as any tapes are mounted in the library. The
process will sit out there and keep other tapes from being mounted, but
will wait until all current tapes are dismounted by natural means. So, a
lo
>Anyone out there with an IBM 3494 library that has ever performed an
>"audit library" have any idea how long it should take? I had about 60
>tapes that are in the library but TSM refuses to mount them stating that
>they are unavailable (updated the to read/write and tri
Anyone out there with an IBM 3494 library that has ever performed an "audit library"
have any idea how long it should take? I had about 60 tapes that are in the library
but TSM refuses to mount them stating that they are unavailable (updated the to
read/write and tried to audit
Hot Diggety! Karel Bos was rumored to have written:
>
> On both sites we had some problems with tapes stuck in drives. On both sites
> we had to do audit libraries to get TSM in synch with the libraries. While
> the tapes were stuck in the drive, the audit library failes and now one of
ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library 3584LIB
failed.
07/24/03 15:35:07 ANR0985I Process 32 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the
BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at
15:35:07.
os'ses=AIX + win2k
TSM=4.2.2.13 (AIX) + 5.1.7.0 (
st Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: audit library
On Friday, Jan 24, 2003, at 21:20 Australia/Sydney, Michelle Wiedeman
wrote:
> one of my drives in t
>one of my drives in the library continues to produce errors and is taken
>offline by tsm.
>01/24/03 11:00:45 ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/rmt1, error number=46.
>01/24/03 11:00:51 ANR8792E Unrecoverable drive failures on drive RMT1
>(/dev/rmt1); drive is now taken offline.
>errno 46 is defi
or as long
as the
audit is running, but again nowhere it states which ones or maybe all
processes.
If this is a 3494 library, I've done several audits with no hassle.
Since
the 3494's library controller maintains a database of all the tapes
present
in the library, a TSM "audit li
Hi Michelle
First of all, the problem doesnt sound like one where an audit library
would solve the problem. Have you checked the drive for errors, or if
there are a tape stuck in the drive?
What kind of library are you running TSM against?
The audit library with checklabel=yes will take quite
Hi all,
one of my drives in the library continues to produce errors and is taken
offline by tsm.
01/24/03 11:00:45 ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/rmt1, error number=46.
01/24/03 11:00:51 ANR8792E Unrecoverable drive failures on drive RMT1
(/dev/rmt1); drive is now taken offline.
errno 46 is d
Corporation
Matt Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/22/2002 01:53 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Audit Library question.
|
| Fax to:
Following the discussion here (and in past months), part of the
problem is the way libraries respond. I believe (Tivoli maybe coluld
chime in and give the fine points on this) that when audit library
checkl=barcode is issued that a certain SCSI command is sent to
library.
With the varied
We too have a 3584. When an AUDIT LIBRARY checklabel=barcode (run daily) occurs, the
arm moves over the entire library of tapes, reading the barcodes. I have witnessed
this. If there is something that was done at installation time, of our LTO, to effect
this, I couldn't say. Maybe so
Murray, Jim [mailto:JMurray@;LIBERTY-BANK.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
>
>
> Not so here with an ATL 7100 checklabel=barcode and it Always
> moves up and
> down the rows, can only assume it is reading
At 11:03 AM -0700 10/22/02, KEN HORACEK said:
With checklabel=barcode, all of the barcodes are read. This is then
checked with the internal memory of the library as to what the
library's inventory says is where.
That's not what I'm seeing, and that's not what I think I'm reading
from others her
-Confucius
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:Todd_Lundstedt@;VIA-CHRISTI.ORG]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 14:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
Not true on my library, Ken...
I have run several audits using checklabel=barcode before with success.
T
tsm an audit library checklabel=barcode only checks against the
library manager's data base.
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: KEN HORACEK [mailto:KHORACEK@;INCSYSTEM.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library question.
Not
|
| cc:
|
| Fax to:
|
| Subj
able to move the tape out and back into the library. But Query LIBVolume
did not show the tape in the library.
I thought Audit Library with checklabel=barcode should fix it, but after 2
hours, the process hadn't ended. So I cancelled it.
What I ended up doing was manually removed the tape (vi
Not true...
With checklabel=barcode, all of the barcodes are read. This is then checked with the
internal memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is where. The
tape is mounted, only if the barcode is mis-read.
Ken
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/2002 1
I imagine the checkl=barocde was introduced to shorten audit, without
it you would have to mount every tape in library - which would take
some considerable time with some libraries! What you are doing is
checkinbg the barcode label in library memory as opposed to checking
the
magnetic tape label h
At 11:29 AM -0400 10/22/02, David Longo said:
With checklabel=barcode, what happens is that TSM reads the internal
memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is
where.
So checklabel=barcode doesn't really mean read the barcodes? It just
means check the library's internal memo
t;>>
At 10:41 AM -0500 10/18/02, Todd Lundstedt said:
>How long should the command
>"Audit Library LibName CheckLabel=BARCODE"
>take to process. I have less than 200 tapes in the library. I have
done
>this before and it took less than 5 mins. This one has been running
fo
At 10:41 AM -0500 10/18/02, Todd Lundstedt said:
How long should the command
"Audit Library LibName CheckLabel=BARCODE"
take to process. I have less than 200 tapes in the library. I have done
this before and it took less than 5 mins. This one has been running for
over 40 minutes
channel
LTO drives. I am running TSM 5.1.1 on win2k.
--
Thanks,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Todd Lundstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri Oct 18 11:41:46 2002
Subject: Audit Library question.
How long sho
ck what tape is in location 4119. Tape is probably
bad in some way.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/02 12:37PM >>>
Hi TSMers;
I get the following when I run the command "Audit library"
10/07/02 11:52:32 ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/rmt0, error
number=46.
1
Try the audit again and see if it works o.k. If it still fails,
then physically check what tape is in location 4119. Tape is probably
bad in some way.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/02 12:37PM >>>
Hi TSMers;
I get the following when I run the command "Audit l
Hi TSMers;
I get the following when I run the command "Audit library"
10/07/02 11:52:32 ANR8779E Unable to open drive /dev/rmt0, error
number=46.
10/07/02 11:52:32 ANR8912E Unable to verify the label of volume from
slot-element 4119 in drive LTOLIB1DR1
No drives in use, it's been working in the past. The library has had
firmware upgrades over time
too however.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Longo [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re
s.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/02/02 10:51PM >>>
Hi *SMers,
I have a problem with a 3575L18 library that is
refusing to respond to
an "audit library" (either barcode or not). It just sits there and so does
the process.
Versions a
Hi *SMers,
I have a problem with a 3575L18 library that is
refusing to respond to
an "audit library" (either barcode or not). It just sits there and so does
the process.
Versions are as follows:
Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 4, Release 2,
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Next weekend there is a teach on our 3494-library. After that we are going
>do to an audit library.
>
>Now I was wondering, based on experience in other sites, how long an audit
>library took and how your environment was looking (like amount of tap
Sent by: "ADSM: Subject: Time audit library
Dist Stor
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU>
04/05/2002 03:09
PM
Hello,
Next weekend there is a teach on our 3494-library. After that we are going
do to an audit library.
Now I was wondering, based on experience in other sites, how long an audit
library took and how your environment was looking (like amount of tapes, and
so on).
Thanks,
Brian
Hi Robin,
I know that there can be some problems with the Audit Library if there are
still some tapes mounted. Maybe you can check that.
Regards,
Maurice van 't Loo
The Netherlands
- Original Message -
From: "Robin v/d Vliet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL P
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Audit Library doesn´t complete
Hi fellow TSM admins/lovers/friends,
We´ve scheduled an Audit Library to run every day on our TSM 4.2 for AIX
with
IBM LTO dri
Audit library will only run successfully when no drives are in use.
If you use "checklabel=barcode" option, it should take less than a minute.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/01 07:10AM >>>
Hi fellow TSM admins/lovers/friends,
We ve scheduled an Audit Lib
Hi fellow TSM admins/lovers/friends,
We´ve scheduled an Audit Library to run every day on our TSM 4.2 for AIX with
IBM LTO drives.
The Audit starts succesfully but this process won´t complete. The day after we
still see this Audit Library process as active and this disrupts our other
schedules
Cycle power on the library, then run the audit library command with no
other processes running with a checklabel=barcode swtich.
George Lesho
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 09/11/2001 08:13:26 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAI
>ANR8834E Library volume 04DB5C is still present in library 3570LIB drive DRIVE2
>(/dev/rmt1), and must be removed manually.
>
>But drive is empty, and all cartridges are in their home-slots.
Wojciech - If this is a solid problem (continues to persist)
I would use the tapeutil command'
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
I haven't worked on your STK 9740. I have worked some on a STK 9710. When you
say it did the audit after you closed the doo
gt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/01 02:38PM >>>
funny thing happened...
I opened the library and closed it. This caused a StorageTek audit. Then
I went to TSM and ran audit library tekwolf checklabel=barcode. I ran over
to the StorageTek and watched. The Robot went to the bottom DRIVE and
s
:03 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
funny thing happened...
I opened the library and closed it. This caused a StorageTek audit. Then
Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David Longo
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: audit library STILL unsuccessful!
I guess you're down to that one slot now. Have you looked in the library to
see w
funny thing happened...
I opened the library and closed it. This caused a StorageTek audit. Then
I went to TSM and ran audit library tekwolf checklabel=barcode. I ran over
to the StorageTek and watched. The Robot went to the bottom DRIVE and
scanned. It then moved up a DRIVE and searched
13 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
Hi George,
Is there a way to clear that ram and have the storage library re-audit the
library?
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/28/2001 Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
02:13 PM
David, You made a comment that barcode problems would show up in an error
log...
not so. I have first hand experience here. I have lost my barcode reade
ho
Storage/System Admin
AFC Enterprises
David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/28/2001 10:18:44 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: George Lesho/Partners/AFC)
Fax to:
Subject: Re: audit library STILL u
nded action.
03/27/01 13:56:59 ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library TEKWOLF
failed
David Longo
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: DistSubject: Re: audit library STILL
unsuccessful!
Sto
-
=Cartridge load failure). Refer to Appendix B in
the
'Messages' manual for recommended action.
03/27/01 13:56:59 ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library TEKWOLF
failed
David Longo
03/28/2001 cc:
> 11:23 AM Subject: Re: audit library STILL
> unsuccessful!(Document link: Marc D Levitan)
>
>
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, i don't know what volume is supposed to go in the slot! =)
> (I can&#
(Slot 210 is empty)
Marc D Levitan
To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/28/2001 cc:
11:23 AM Subject: Re: audit library STILL
unsuccess
12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: audit library STILL unsuccessful!
Is there a way to find out what Volume TSM thinks is in a particular Slot
(Element ID)
I need to find out what volume TSM thinks is in slot 210 so that I can
check it out of the library... (Slot 210 is empty
Levitan
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: audit library STILL unsuccessful!
Unfortunately, i don't know what volume is supposed to go in the slot! =)
(I can't checkout a volume that i don't know what it is...)
I also checked ALL of my vo
: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/28/2001 cc:
11:23 AM Subject: Re: audit library STILL
unsuccessful!(Document link: Marc D Levitan)
Unfortunately, i don't know what volume is suppo
d.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5525
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/28/01 10:48AM >>>
I have made progress though... the original issue is at the bottom.
I ran a audit library Tekwolf checklabel=barcode and this
Roger C Cook
cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: audit library STILL
unsuccessful!
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Marc Levitan
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: audit library STILL unsuccessful!
I have made progress though... the original issue is at the bottom.
I ran a audit library
put a intact cartridge there? No more ideas; good luck!
Marc Levitan schrieb:
>
> I have made progress though... the original issue is at the bottom.
>
> I ran a audit library Tekwolf checklabel=barcode and this is what I got...
>
> 03/27/01 13:56:42 ANR2017I Administ
Checkin all Private volumes using search=yes
This will work unless there is a fault with the library and/or the SCSI
card.
Regards
Alex
Marc Levitan
cc:
Sent by: Subject: audit library STILL unsuccessful
I have made progress though... the original issue is at the bottom.
I ran a audit library Tekwolf checklabel=barcode and this is what I got...
03/27/01 13:56:42 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: AUDIT
LIBRARY
tekwolf checkl=barcode
03/27/01 13:56:42
o errors! Thanks for all the input.
Roger C Cook
RCG Information Services
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David Longo
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
That rings a
, 2001 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
That rings a bell. It seems that several months ago I had a probelm with
one tape. Looking at the tapeutil inventory for that slot it showed the
"Slot State" for that element address as "Error" o
1:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
Thanks for the reply. I will give your suggestions a try as soon as I can.
In response:
1. If I just run the command, change nothing, then run the command again, I
will get the same error for the same slot. This is after verifyi
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
Thanks for the reply. I will give your suggestions a try as soon as I can.
In response:
1. If I just run the command, change nothing, then run the command again, I
will get the same error for the same slot. This is after verifying that the
proper tape is
C Cook
RCG Information Services
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David Longo
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 1:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Audit Library Unsuccessful
I have your identical config except have TSM 3.7.4.0 serve
me_name from libvolumes
order by home_element". I removed any that were not on the list and checked
out the ones that were on the list but not in the library. Now the audit
library completes successfully, yet every time I get the "Unable to read
barcode..." message. I compare what is in t
y. Now the audit
library completes successfully, yet every time I get the "Unable to read
barcode..." message. I compare what is in the slot to what the system says
should be there (same), then pull the tape and re-insert it. Then the
library does its init element to rescan. I run audit db
Here it works :
ACSLS 5.3
,# oslevel
4.3.1.0
TSM3.7.4
tsm: TSM>audit library stk9710 checklabel=barcode
ANS8003I Process number 73 started.
03/27/01 12:08:08 ANR0985I Process 73 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the
BACKGROUND completed with completion state SUCCESS
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
