That's cool, I'll look at that when 1.2 get's released prime time,
when is that incidentally.
For now though : ) I need to integrate the current mimemailhtml
functionality in, is there
an easier way than creating a component for this...?
On Jun 19, 11:14 pm, Walker Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Looks to me like rewrites aren't working i can access your hello page
via pretty urls http://coaddons.sourceforge.net/cake/index.php/pages/hello
On Jun 20, 1:33 pm, "chanh.ong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is odd that I am the only person use sourceforge.net for my cake
> development.
>
> Loo
Please add the patch to http://trac.cakephp.org/
The devs will notice it there and patch it
Tarique
On 6/16/07, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> After checking the dbo files, "set" is indeed missing for the mysql
> and mysqli drivers so a simple patch is to add
>
> if (strpo
chanh, is demapp correct, or did you mean demoapp?
just checking for possible typo
On 6/19/07, chanh.ong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You will find the console in 1.2 and I learn that you can do this:
>
> cake bake -app demapp
>
> very similar to 1.1 whereas php bake.php -app demoapp
>
>
> On
You will find the console in 1.2 and I learn that you can do this:
cake bake -app demapp
very similar to 1.1 whereas php bake.php -app demoapp
On Jun 19, 5:13 pm, Felix Geisendörfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because things work very different that 1.0 did and I am confused. How
> > do I b
It is odd that I am the only person use sourceforge.net for my cake
development.
Look like I might just bark on the wrong tree here!
On Jun 19, 7:02 am, "chanh.ong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to set up cake on my sourceforge.net project but having lot of
> issues but don't know exactly
Sound really simple way!
Thanks
On Jun 19, 4:25 pm, Grant Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Put your global helper functions in app/config/bootstrap.php
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" gr
On Jun 19, 2007, at 8:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It seems to me that there are a lot of good arguments on both sides of
> the wiki style debate (wikipedia seems to work, but only through shear
> number of managers).
>
> However, the point here is more fundamental to Cake in my opinion.
It seems to me that there are a lot of good arguments on both sides of
the wiki style debate (wikipedia seems to work, but only through shear
number of managers).
However, the point here is more fundamental to Cake in my opinion.
It's already been raised that it can be difficult to identify and
d
Did you ever get a response to this question, I'm looking for the same
thing?
On May 21, 7:37 am, szeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I don't know how I can achieve this..
>
> I want to find all Persons, butorderthem by the 'Due_Date' of the
> 'Group' they are assigned to (hasAndBelongs
Hi John!
As I have stressed few threads ago, I do agree with you, we should not
fork or split our efforts on documenting CakePHP. I am just worried
about licensing issues, which would - at least in my thoughs - give a
fright on independent initiatives; and availability of resources, such
comment
because things work very different that 1.0 did and I am confused. How
do I bake with 1.2
CakePHP 1.2 is not officially released yet and there is no official
support for it. A new manual is in the works but not released.
So if you are new to the kitchen - stay with 1.1. And regardless, in
Thanks for the update John. I look forward to seeing the 1.2 manual
when it is released.
I am pretty new to CakePHP and am developing my app on the 1.2.x.x
code base. To date there has not been a single problem that I could
not overcome by browsing this group, the api, or the Bakery. I
encourage
because things work very different that 1.0 did and I am confused. How
do I bake with 1.2
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.
thank you, that worked
On Jun 19, 6:10 pm, Walker Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> shorten the string that's there
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, s
Put your global helper functions in app/config/bootstrap.php
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Found it:
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/brief-overview-of-the-new-emailcomponent
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroup
On Jun 19, 2007, at 3:45 PM, Finster wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 3:03 pm, "John David Anderson (_psychic_)"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Why would you need to distribute the docs when they're already freely
>> available?
>>
>
> Because they are, like the wiki apparently was, outdated. The manual
This file is no longer relevant and is there primarily for backwards
compatibility. See this post for sharing JS and CSS assets across
multiple applications:
http://joelmoss.info/switchboard/blog/2142:Whats_new_in_CakePHP_Asset_Sharing
All you really have to do is drop the files into vendors/js
the new 1.2 has an email component built-in...
there's a tutorial in the bakery
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To
shorten the string that's there
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMA
On Jun 19, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Dérico Filho wrote:
>
> Hi John!
>
>> Why would you need to distribute the docs when they're already freely
>> available?
>
> "Free" -> chmod 0444??? Free to read, you mean, I guess. :-)
Yes. There's a reason we don't allow everyone to post freely to an
official C
hello,
I have upgrated to 1.2 but i get this error
Notice: Please change the value of CAKE_SESSION_STRING in app/config/
core.php to a salt value specific to your application in /Library/
WebServer/Documents/cake/cake/libs/debugger.php on line 373
what should i change it to?
thanks for your he
Hi all,
I've just started out with CakePHP over the last few days and I'm stuck
trying to integrate
htmlmimemail into the framework. Do I have to create a Component and
reference it in
app/vendors or is there another way to do this? Can I just reference the
htmlmimemail.php
class directly. If s
On Jun 19, 3:03 pm, "John David Anderson (_psychic_)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why would you need to distribute the docs when they're already freely
> available?
>
Because they are, like the wiki apparently was, outdated. The manual
is great, but there is a LOT of stuff in there that is out
On Jun 19, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Jonathan Langevin wrote:
> Thanks for the info, it's greatly appreciated :-)
>
> I'd love to be able to help out, but I dunno that I have anything
> to contribute. I'm 2 weeks into Cake (I've tested it before, but
> never attempted development until now), and I'm
Hi John!
> Why would you need to distribute the docs when they're already freely
> available?
"Free" -> chmod 0444??? Free to read, you mean, I guess. :-)
Let's us take a hypotetic project (not so hypothetic, because I am
doing one with CakePHP).
I make a Project using CakePHP. MIT Licence allo
Thanks for the info, it's greatly appreciated :-)
I'd love to be able to help out, but I dunno that I have anything to
contribute. I'm 2 weeks into Cake (I've tested it before, but never
attempted development until now), and I'm about as lost as most of the other
newbies out there, if not more :-)
I like to have a little worker function that I would like to have
available in Cake wherever I need them.
Which of these options will my functions be availalbe in all places
like model, controller, and view?
Thanks
On Jun 19, 2:08 pm, "Tane Piper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If it is a set of
Bakers one and all,
I think the recent "Commented Version of CakePHP Manual" is a direct
result of me not sharing what's going on with the docs: where we've
been, and where we're headed. Hopefully I can clear this up a bit
right now.
First, the wiki was a festering pit of misinformation an
ah, okay, sometimes the emails just don't seem to have posted (@_@;)
thanks for the tip, Jonathan! Yeah, I should really be keeping this
in some type of SVN or CVS or something someday...
andy
On Jun 19, 12:44 pm, "Jonathan Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> both of your responses showed
I'm noticing that the vendors.php file refers to ..\..\vendors
\javascript\, however the folder doesn't exist or is still named
vendors\js\ in the cake templates. Is this intentional if I want to
use the vendors.php structure do I need to add a javascript folder to
vendors and then add my .js file
If it is a set of classes, you can put them in your vendors directory,
within your application. You can then call them like this:
vendor('my_class');
$myClass = new MyClass;
If it just a bunch of functions you have, you can create a component with them:
http://manual.cakephp.org/chapter/compon
I think you'll agree Chris that the CakePHP community has grown a lot
recently, maybe there would be more people willing to take it on.
There are certainly quite a few regulars on the IRC channel and here
in the group.
I for one would volunteer some time.
On 6/19/07, Chris Hartjes <[EMAIL PROTE
On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:42 PM, Jonathan Langevin wrote:
> I'm not saying the developers aren't capable of providing
> documentation. Docs for 1.1 are probably the nicest I've seen
> (although since the group convinced me to try 1.2, I've become very
> frustrated with 1.2 's lack of docs). my
On 6/19/07, rtconner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My only commnents: "I wish we had a Wiki."
>
Are you volunteering to maintain it? My impression was that last time
CakePHP had a wiki that it was terrible and didn't contribute
anything. Maintaining a wiki is a critically important job.
--
C
I wonder, why Wiki was replaced by Bakery?
On Jun 19, 5:52 pm, rtconner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only commnents: "I wish we had a Wiki."
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To p
If I have a set of commonly use functions want to make it available
like Cake global functions what is the most acceptable way to tag
along my global function and still ease of doing Cake upgrade without
needing to add my global function in each time.
I don't want to hack basics.php to add my fun
Hi Tane,
I've opened the link... Heed your link is almost exactly what Bakery
and Cakeforge nowadays already do.
But I understood the point, a outside effort that would meet the
project documentation needs. I do not think it's the CakePHP case...
CakePHP has active effort on documentation... T
My only commnents: "I wish we had a Wiki."
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
See http://jquery.com/plugins/
This was a team effort from people outside the core team, that has
been brought under the official site. It sits on top of a customized
Drupal install, and provides an excellent resource for plugins, not
just downloading but commenting, examples and scores.
I'm wo
Hi John,
I don't see a matter of diluting the energy among several projects...
But people that does not feel comfortable with restrictive licences
(or restrictive behaviour of companies that hold their particular
licences, which is my case) might want help only the free initiatives.
Perhaps it
Hi Chris,
I think the point here is not the ability of Cake Core Team providing
documentation or not. You guys are excellent and have been doing a
great job.
The point is: "Why can't I deal with the documentation on the same
terms I do with the software?"
Officially the MIT License allows me t
Hi Anderson,
That's why I posted before:
> I plan to talk to CakePHP core team in order to offer the tool I made
> for commenting to be hosted on manual.cakephp.org... If they refuse
> the offer, surely I'll make it available on some sort of mirroring
> system... Thus it would be hosted either
Hi Chris!
I just wanted to be polite, not posh. :-) Well, he's the president...
I was affraid of being uncivil towards him.
:-)
Uldérico
On Jun 19, 2:52 pm, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Dérico Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
>
> > I am not s
Thanks a lot for explanation, Ad and Dan. I guess it will be
interesting to work more with them :)
Max
On Jun 19, 12:00 pm, AD7six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 6:26 am, Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
>
> > I've been trying to find more about behaviors to start with them.
I'm not suggesting multiple efforts, maybe 1 effort that is supported by
cake, with no infringement :-)
On 6/19/07, John David Anderson (_psychic_) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Langevin wrote:
>
> I agree a central location would be best, but to also avoid
On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Jonathan Langevin wrote:
> I agree a central location would be best, but to also avoid any
> legal issues, is why I suggested a 3rd party GPL effort
How many third-party efforts would you suggest? :)
I still don't see how diluting the effort in many parallel proj
both of your responses showed up for me ;-)
maybe set your .htaccess to be read only, to avoid an issue like that?
that's happened many times in the past for me, i hate it :-)
that's why now I keep all my code in SVN, and just do a checkout to the
website when it's ready, helps me avoid overwrites
I'm not saying the developers aren't capable of providing documentation.
Docs for 1.1 are probably the nicest I've seen (although since the group
convinced me to try 1.2, I've become very frustrated with 1.2's lack of
docs). my comment wasn't intended to put down anyone, my thinking is to keep
trad
On 6/19/07, Jonathan Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree a central location would be best, but to also avoid any legal
> issues, is why I suggested a 3rd party GPL effort
>
So you seem to think that the CakePHP developers themselves
(disclaimer: I am one of them) aren't capable of provi
Sorry, somehow my response to this has been lost.
Anyway, earlier this morning, I replied to you guys (or tried to,)
that I finally realized what I had messed up in the cake project.
I accidentally overwrote one of the main .htaccess files because
I didn't realize there was already one in the ma
Okay, now I know what happened--
I was copying a previously created .htaccess file into the main cake
directory. What I didn't know is that there is already a .htaccess
file in that folder (as well as the webroot folder, apparently,) and
so... I accidentally overwrote the old .htaccess.
Stupid
I agree a central location would be best, but to also avoid any legal
issues, is why I suggested a 3rd party GPL effort
On 6/19/07, John David Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Dérico Filho wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> >
> > I am not sure... But I thi
On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Dérico Filho wrote:
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>
> I am not sure... But I think the CakePHP Manual and CakePHP logo are
> intellectual property of Cake Software Foundation, which is the back-
> company of CakePHP.
> CakePHP is MIT Licensed, however that's not the case of th
On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Jonathan Langevin wrote:
> Ah, I can understand logo, surprised about the documentation itself
> though.
>
> So maybe there should be a 3rd-party documentation effort, GPL
> licensed, so that other sites can host the documentation, as many
> do with php.net's d
thanks for that catch nate
On 6/19/07, Ita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> OK - you are right.
> It just seems that no one picked up on this "feature".
> Nothing to be done then :)
>
> On Jun 19, 7:42 pm, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Providing a DOM ID in the create() *and* end() method...
Do you have access to your HTTPD error log?
On 6/19/07, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> No, I haven't touched the core Cake files since I set this project up.
>
> I haven't touched the config files for a while as well... which is why
> I don't understand this problem.
>
>
> On Jun 19, 10:59
I found out the $html helper does return the right url but if I want
to use image rather then text in the url then it does not work!
So I did a little hack and it works for just this!
$img=$html->image('edit.gif',array('title'=>'Edit'));
$url=$html->link('','/records/edit/' . $record['Record']['
No, I haven't touched the core Cake files since I set this project up.
I haven't touched the config files for a while as well... which is why
I don't understand this problem.
On Jun 19, 10:59 am, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/07, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That
Hi Dax.
Or else, could you give me an example of how such a dynamic
> bindModel() will look like?
>
Thake a look at this article
http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2006/02/22/new-feature-bindmodelunbindmodel/
--
Daniel Dias
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mes
Okay, i'll post on the ticket then, though likely my issue is likely due to
programmer error on my end.
On 6/19/07, AD7six <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 19, 5:52 pm, "Jonathan Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -
> >
> > What is puzzling me, is the fact that an
While it is nice that Cake allow to not use .htaccess and mod_rewrite
with the change in the core.php
define ('BASE_URL', env('SCRIPT_NAME'));
But I found out all code the generated by Cake are counting
on .htaccess and mod_rewrite to be there otherwise Cake will not work
correctly!
To s
On 6/19/07, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what I thought, too, and I have checked my httpd.conf and
> restarted the web server a few times to see if that would fix the
> problem. But Cake still doesn't run like it should. I checked
> another PHP/MySQL/Apache-based script program on th
Ah, I can understand logo, surprised about the documentation itself though.
So maybe there should be a 3rd-party documentation effort, GPL licensed, so
that other sites can host the documentation, as many do with php.net's docs
On 6/19/07, Dérico Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jonathan
Yeah, I know that nothing should stop working if nothing has been done
to it.
So, it might be the localhost webserver that has caused some sort of
problem.
That's what I thought, too, and I have checked my httpd.conf and
restarted the web server a few times to see if that would fix the
problem.
On 6/19/07, Dérico Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>
> I am not sure... But I think the CakePHP Manual and CakePHP logo are
> intellectual property of Cake Software Foundation, which is the back-
> company of CakePHP.
> CakePHP is MIT Licensed, however that's not the case of th
On 6/19/07, andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The project I've been working on in Cake has been working for weeks,
> even months. Yet when I opened up my laptop this morning and tried to
> open up my project, none of the normal links work (links to methods,
> etc.)! My webroot folder c
Hi Jonathan,
I am not sure... But I think the CakePHP Manual and CakePHP logo are
intellectual property of Cake Software Foundation, which is the back-
company of CakePHP.
CakePHP is MIT Licensed, however that's not the case of their
documentation and logo...
But that's OK, mr. Woodworth told m
Hi,
The project I've been working on in Cake has been working for weeks,
even months. Yet when I opened up my laptop this morning and tried to
open up my project, none of the normal links work (links to methods,
etc.)! My webroot folder cannot seem to be found either, so all of
the CSS is missi
On Jun 19, 7:20 pm, "John David Anderson (_psychic_)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:11 AM, daxhuiberts wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a HABTM association between 'movies' and 'genres'. All works
> > fine 'n stuff.
> > Now I want a list of movies by a specific genre, o
On Jun 19, 5:52 pm, "Jonathan Langevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-
>
> What is puzzling me, is the fact that an entry is made with id = 0. Any
> subsequent entries, whether a child entry or not, has no weird behavior.
> Only the first child does this.
>
> Any ideas?
Please e
On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:11 AM, daxhuiberts wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a HABTM association between 'movies' and 'genres'. All works
> fine 'n stuff.
> Now I want a list of movies by a specific genre, on which I do $this-
>> Genre->find("name = '".$name."'"). So far so good.
> But since there wil
Hello,
I have a HABTM association between 'movies' and 'genres'. All works
fine 'n stuff.
Now I want a list of movies by a specific genre, on which I do $this-
>Genre->find("name = '".$name."'"). So far so good.
But since there will be thousands, possibly a couple tenthousand
movies in the databa
OK - you are right.
It just seems that no one picked up on this "feature".
Nothing to be done then :)
On Jun 19, 7:42 pm, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Providing a DOM ID in the create() *and* end() method. um.
> why
>
> Can someone please enlighten me as to where that fits into t
Providing a DOM ID in the create() *and* end() method. um.
why
Can someone please enlighten me as to where that fits into the core
philosophy of "Don't Repeat Yourself"?
FormHelper::create() already allows you to pass an ID in the $options
array parameter.
On Jun 19, 10:05 am, Ita <
btw, the need for parent_id surprises me, as the nested set model is
supposed to function with only requiring lft,rght
On 6/19/07, Jonathan Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm attempting to use the Tree behavior (patched with AD7six's diff that
> he posted in trac 2 days ago).
>
> I've add
I'm attempting to use the Tree behavior (patched with AD7six's diff that he
posted in trac 2 days ago).
I've added parent_id, lft, rght to my table, modified the Model to enable
the Tree behavior.
Now, if I create a new item in the table (starting from scratch), it adds
with id = 1, parent_id = 0
Hey Mark,
So I'm pretty sure some of the functions I used are specific to 1.2.
But you can try. I'll give you a basic overview of what I did.
I made a componant, and inside the componant in the initialize
method.. I do this:
(all the connection data is stored in a Client Model, that I load with
dan, thanks for this post, it helped me out alot with the Tree behavior
(struggled with that code for 2 days, lol)
On 6/19/07, danfreak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hey Max,
>
> well behaviours are great in terms of code reusability.
> They stand to modules as components stand to controllers.
How was the intellectual property misused? Not arguing or doubting, just
wondering
On 6/19/07, Dérico Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, everyone!
>
> I've been contacted by Mr. Woodworth, President for Cake Software
> Foundation.
>
> I seems I misused Cake's Intellectual Property. I play
I agree, hopefully your request gets applied :-)
On 6/19/07, Ita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I think that giving an id in the create and end is not a bad idea.
> I'll file a request...
> Thanks
>
> On Jun 19, 3:59 pm, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/19/07, Ita <[EMAIL PROT
> i want to have only ONE code logic for addUser, thats why i use
innerHTML to add the html code within the addUser-div only if its
necessary.
Do you understand what does this code?
link('Add new item', '/phases/formAdd/',
array('update' => 'add')); ?>
It renders link, which will cause that rende
Hi
I receive from a 3rd party, a CSV of data with a Unique field "code",
which is a varchar of 5 characters or so, e.g. TR34 or XE288
I need to turn this into a table that will work with Cake well, so
lets call it "codes" and then I am not sure what to do about setting a
primary key?
I am think
Hi, everyone!
I've been contacted by Mr. Woodworth, President for Cake Software
Foundation.
I seems I misused Cake's Intellectual Property. I play by the rules,
and therefore, I had to shutdown the free-to-comment version of the
manual.
I managed to talk to Mr. Woodworth and we are on talks to
thanks tane, yeah, I thought this might work when I switched to a lvie
deployment, so I tested it on the remote server and it just worked. I
think it is to do with move_uploaded_file PHP command.
thanks again,
luke
On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, "Tane Piper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm - Now I get t
I think that giving an id in the create and end is not a bad idea.
I'll file a request...
Thanks
On Jun 19, 3:59 pm, "Chris Hartjes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/19/07, Ita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -
> > Back to 2 forms with he same ID?
>
> Well, the problem is that t
I tried to set up cake on my sourceforge.net project but having lot of
issues but don't know exactly what they are until today!
I track down the problem that I am having on sf.net but need some cake
expert to tell me what to do to get around this
I created a static page hello.thtml in pages fold
On 6/19/07, wahyu setianto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some problem using cakephp while posting input file type, how get the
> filename store to database and data file store to directory? i have not
> answer yet :(
Do you have debug set to 1 or greater in config/core.php. You might
be se
On 6/19/07, Ita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -
> Back to 2 forms with he same ID?
Well, the problem is that the magic methods aren't smart enough to
know you are having two forms on the same page pointing to the same
controller.
What I have done in the past is use a separate cont
Iulian - as I wrote a few posts ago:
"My Bad.
I used $from->submit when I should have used $form->end
ok now each form send the right data but still both of them have the
same ID.
Even if this doesn't cause any problem should they have different ID's
just so things will be clearer? "
So the miss
On 6/19/07, Mark aka drecaise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to add a database config and use it after init. It's for an
> application that numerous clients will use. Each with it's own
> database. During login a master database is queried for a users
> corresponding company database an
The why is not related to the fact that 2 forms should not have the
same ID but I'll clarify.
I'm creating a web site.
On the top right corner there will be a login box. This login box
allows loin via ajax from and always sits the no matter what the
website displays.
When the user logs in it says
Are you sure appears in your HTML source? From what are you saying
it seems your first form is not closed.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-p
Hi, I am new to Cake and to PHP as well. I haev a question about
reuiresPost() method which supposedly takes list of actions which can
only be triggered by a POST request. The way Cake bakes the code it
uses same edit and add methods to do 2 things:
1.) present form to user to add or edit (if f
thanks for all your hints.
as i really like xajax i have already installed Cakex.
the reason why i create this html-code inside the controller is, that
i have a Navigation with "Add User" which is available on each page.
As soon as i click on it, i render the html code inside
- i want to have o
I have some problem using cakephp while posting input file type, how get the
filename store to database and data file store to directory? i have not
answer yet :(
example :
I have one table : name table_galleries with field id, title, description,
and picture
i want to the data file store to web
I'm trying to add a database config and use it after init. It's for an
application that numerous clients will use. Each with it's own
database. During login a master database is queried for a users
corresponding company database and the application should switch to
that database. Is this possible?
Hi,
I notice the $html->link has an optional parameter for Confirmation
(the rest of the confirm control passed via htmlAttributesArr):
$html->link( $title, $url, $htmlAttributesArr, $confirmMessageBool,
$escapeTitleBool, $returnBool);
Is there a similar way of doing this with a $html->submit
On 6/19/07, Ita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem is that when I have 2 forms in the same page they both get
> the same ID.
> And when I submit one form via get (in my example) I also get an empty
> field from another from.
>
Perhaps you can clarify this for me: why do you have two form
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
