On Wednesday 29 August 2001 23:18, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Two general unix problems to fix before tommorows tag.
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:11 AM
>
> > wrowe 01/08/29 22:11:42
> >
> > Modified:os/unix unixd.h
> > Log:
> > No under
> > * srclib/apr/file_io/unix/dir.c: changed a suspicious #ifdef
> > statement. Is this a missconfiguration of thread vs. non-thread #ifdef
> > exclusion?!?!
>
> I am leaving the question of this patch to the more gifted. I see where
> you are coming from, but I read the original (and patch) t
Two general unix problems to fix before tommorows tag.
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:11 AM
> wrowe 01/08/29 22:11:42
>
> Modified:os/unix unixd.h
> Log:
> No under cygwin.
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.26 +4 -0 httpd-2.0/o
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 21:18, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:17:32PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 20:22, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > Should we be at 2.0.26-dev in ap_release.h? -- justin
> >
> > should we re-roll&tar 26 (which would include a
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 6:35 AM
> Attached is a first patch to support the Cygwin 1.x platform.
>
> It is made against 2.0.22-alpha, due to the fact that I am currently
> on vacation and don't have the bandwidth (GSM modem :(( to grap a
> fresh CV
Assuming no one vetoes this, this can get committed before we tag
tomorrow. No rush though. =-)
- Updates upgrading.html
- Reverts Aaron's earlier docco patch (sorry...)
- Adds -X to all mpms in the tree
I won't be around tomorrow morning to commit this before 2.0.26 is
tagged. If it doesn'
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:32:43AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> PS: what about the new MPMs?
I'll take care of them too.
> > I'll wait until tomorrow night to commit unless rbb changes to a
> > veto or someone else vetoes. I've said all I have to say on this
> > in the last thread. -- justin
No docs change needed (see the previous note to the list.)
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0.26?
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:18:00PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Ryan said -0.9 (non-veto)
> Dean and Roy said +1.
>
> With my vote which now counts, we have three +1s and a non-veto.
Make it four... Cliff +1
PS: what about the new MPMs?
> I'll wait until tomorrow night to commit unless rbb changes to a
> veto
If you thought this patch;
> --- mod_mime.c 2001/08/28 15:31:08 1.60
> +++ mod_mime.c 2001/08/30 04:11:57 1.61
> @@ -116,8 +116,6 @@
>
>apr_array_header_t *remove_mappings; /* A simple list, walked once */
>
> -char *type; /* Type forced with ForceType
Greg Ames wrote:
>
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >
> > I have just finished tagging the tree. I'll be rolling the tarball in a few
>minute.
> >
> > Please look at httpd://dev.apache.org/dist in about 30 minutes for the tarballs.
>
> just a quick update. I grabbed & installed the tarball on daedalus,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:18:00PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I'm verifying wrowe's commit right now. It looks right. =)
> See if it works right...
wrowe's commit took out SetHandler (on purpose??) which means that
the server-status conf example needs to change. Trying to figure
out w
On 29 Aug 2001, Ian Holsman wrote:
> should we re-roll&tar 26 (which would include a patch to worker and
> ldap_cache, some NW fixes and the apr-dbm change)
>
> or just re-tag the 2 files modified as 25 and re tar?
It'd be nice if it built on BeOS. ::prod, prod:: :-) I vote for 26
tomorrow mi
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:17:32PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 20:22, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > Should we be at 2.0.26-dev in ap_release.h? -- justin
>
>
> should we re-roll&tar 26 (which would include a patch to worker and
> ldap_cache, some NW fixes and the apr-dbm ch
On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 20:22, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> Should we be at 2.0.26-dev in ap_release.h? -- justin
should we re-roll&tar 26 (which would include a patch to worker and
ldap_cache, some NW fixes and the apr-dbm change)
or just re-tag the 2 files modified as 25 and re tar?
--
Ian Ho
Pretty danged close :) Good job (probably would have lost the race I hadn't
just memorized every line of that code in the last two weeks ;)
We really can skip it if exinfo->forced_type is set, though. That overrides
all other mime types.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Erenkr
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:49 PM
> From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:29 PM
>
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:20:38PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > HEAD looks like it has this probl
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 10:49:31PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:29 PM
>
>
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:20:38PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > HEAD looks like it has this problem fixed (the buffer
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:29 PM
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:20:38PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > HEAD looks like it has this problem fixed (the buffered read fixes
> > perhaps?). Please check it out and see if it works for you wit
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/08/29 18:23:08 $]
Release:
2.0.25 : rolled August 29, 2001
2.0.24 : rolled August 18, 2001
2.0.23 : rolled August 9, 2001
2.0.22 : rolled July 29, 2001
2.0.21 : rolle
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2001/08/21 15:30:28 $]
Release:
1.3.21: In development
1.3.20: Tagged and rolled May 15, 2001. Announced May 21, 2001.
1.3.19: Tagged and rolled Feb 26, 2001. Announced Mar 01, 2001.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:20:38PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> HEAD looks like it has this problem fixed (the buffered read fixes
> perhaps?). Please check it out and see if it works for you with
> the latest CVS.
No, it's not fixed. My bad.
I had a stale config which had SetOutputFil
Should we be at 2.0.26-dev in ap_release.h? -- justin
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:14:39PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
> The headers returned from the server are,
>
> HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:11:19 GMT
> Server: Apache/2.0.25 (Unix)
> Vary: accept-language
> Accept-Ranges: bytes
>
From: "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:21 PM
> and then make it configurable using configure [default=SIGUSR1]. To make
> it even better, we should have a way to signal it using httpd itself
>
> httpd restart
> httpd graceful
> httpd stop
>
Netcat 1.1 usually does fine for me, but I'm usually looking at whole content,
not just headers :( It was kind of handy when the lat Mozilla offered that
panel... now I dunno where it's disappeared to.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 18:21, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
This was discussed at length before, and it was decided that we should
use the same signal on all platforms for all MPMs (assuming the platform
supports signals). Making this be a different signal on different platforms
is just plain wron
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:44:27PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
> that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
> comments are just plain wrong today, so this patch fixes them.
>
> (Hmmm, I wonder i
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:01:35PM -0700, Marc Slemko wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:14:39PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
> > > > Using the prefork mpm on FreeBSD 4.2-R with a default installatio
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:01:35PM -0700, Marc Slemko wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:14:39PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
> > > Using the prefork mpm on FreeBSD 4.2-R with a default installation
> > > (./configure --prefix=/my/full/path -with
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> it even better, we should have a way to signal it using httpd itself
>
> httpd restart
> httpd graceful
> httpd stop
>
> would check for an existing process and send it the appropriate signal.
> That way we wouldn't be spreading implementa
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:13:47PM -0700, Roy Fielding wrote:
> > RGH! The reason it wasn't committed is because the lack of -X
> > is a stupid-ass leftover from a bad decision and changing the comments
> > doesn't make any sense when we should be
This has been on my to-do list for ages. The decision to change from
SIGUSR1 to SIGWINCH just because a particular old version of Linux threads
happens to suck was a bad decision. Hard-coding the value within a
bunch of places in httpd was just bad coding.
I would really appreciate it if someon
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:58:50PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> I'd also love to see a patch that looked for -X on the command line and
> exited with an error message to the console saying that -X doesn't exist
> anymore and you should consider using -DONE_PROCESS or -DNO_DETACH...
Roy/Justin ma
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 06:13:47PM -0700, Roy Fielding wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:44:27PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> > I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
> > that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
> > comments are ju
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 05:44:27PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
> that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
> comments are just plain wrong today, so this patch fixes them.
RGH! The reason
> As a side note, some portions of the code are compiled with "-D_REENTRANT
> -D_THREAD_SAFE" even when building using the prefork mpm. Why? Doesn't that
> have the potential to do the wrong thing on some platforms?
No, it would do the wrong thing if they were not defined. They are required
for
"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote:
>
> I'll try reproducing on Win32.
>
> [Dang me for testing with IE! Mozilla from now on, promise!!! Whatever
> happened to that little 'show http headers' feature from Mozilla .91???]
I dunno, but I have a tiny little VB utility to get HTTP headers without
havin
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:14:39PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
> > Using the prefork mpm on FreeBSD 4.2-R with a default installation
> > (./configure --prefix=/my/full/path -with-port=8080) a request for a
> > non-existant page (E.g., /bogus) ret
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:58:50PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
> > that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
> > comments are just plain wrong to
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
> that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
> comments are just plain wrong today, so this patch fixes them.
>
> (Hmmm, I wonder if it's still like thi
Forgot all about the worker MPM (not that I haven't been working on it
or anything...).
-aaron
Index: server/mpm/worker/worker.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker/worker.c,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u
I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
comments are just plain wrong today, so this patch fixes them.
(Hmmm, I wonder if it's still like this in worker too...)
-aaron
Index: server/mpm/perc
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> I have just finished tagging the tree. I'll be rolling the tarball in a few minute.
>
> Please look at httpd://dev.apache.org/dist in about 30 minutes for the tarballs.
just a quick update. I grabbed & installed the tarball on daedalus,
port 8092. Static pages seem fine
The build is screwed on beos. I'll try to look at it in the morning.
david
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ian Holsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: time for 2.0.2
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:54:42PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 August 2001 13:42, Ian Holsman wrote:
>...
> > Solaris 8/Sparc runs.
> > but PROXY generates a core dump
> > when i expand have a SSI tag printenv in it.
>
> Proxy is not currently a part of the Apache 2.0 dist, so I do
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: 2.0.25 on FreeBSD 4.2-R -- 404 returns text/plain error page
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:14:39PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
> > Using the prefork mpm on FreeBSD 4.2-R w
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> The tarballs are up now! Let's get to beta this time,PLEASE
If it isn't beta quality, then release it as alpha.
But it should be released, no matter what.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:14:39PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
> Using the prefork mpm on FreeBSD 4.2-R with a default installation
> (./configure --prefix=/my/full/path -with-port=8080) a request for a
> non-existant page (E.g., /bogus) returns the HTML error document as
> text/plain.
Yup, tha
Using the prefork mpm on FreeBSD 4.2-R with a default installation
(./configure --prefix=/my/full/path -with-port=8080) a request for a
non-existant page (E.g., /bogus) returns the HTML error document as
text/plain.
The headers returned from the server are,
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 13:52, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Solaris 8/Sparc runs.
> > but PROXY generates a core dump
> > when i expand have a SSI tag printenv in it.
> >
> >
> > Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2
> > #0 0x4b340 in ap_escape_html (p
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 13:42, Ian Holsman wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 12:11, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 29 August 2001 11:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > >
> > > The tarballs are up now! Let's get to beta this t
Hi,
I'm working on Linux and also AS/400 (yes there is Unix hackers
using that exotic OS)
Since OS/400 release V5R1, Apache 2.0 is included :)))
Reported as Apache 2.0.18 (beta ?)
It's very pleasant to reuse httpd.conf on AS/400.
Did you know if it the same code base and if the IBM teams
(iSer
Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Solaris 8/Sparc runs.
> but PROXY generates a core dump
> when i expand have a SSI tag printenv in it.
>
>
> Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2
> #0 0x4b340 in ap_escape_html (p=0x1d9f40, s=0x0) at util.c:1642
> 1642for (i = 0, j = 0; s
On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 12:11, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 August 2001 11:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > The tarballs are up now! Let's get to beta this time,PLEASE
>
> 2.0.25 compiles and runs on Solaris 8/x
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> If httpd is configured with multiple listeners, S_L_U_A is irrelevant because you
>have to
> select() before calling accept(). And to the best of my knowledge, it is always bad
>to
> have multiple threads/processes block in select(), for all OS'.
Wel
> At 11:00 AM -0400 8/28/01, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> >The order it checks for (at the moment :) ) is sysvsem, flock, pthread
> >mutex, fcntl. The last match wins (i.e., fcntl is preferred). This
> >can be overridden on a platform basis in apr_hints.m4 by setting the
> >variable apr_lock_metho
From: "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:24 PM
> Hi there,
>
> I just updated to 2.0.25 on my Win32 system, where I have the
> following lines in the httpd.conf to use PHP 4 as CGI
>
> ScriptAlias /php/ "e:/server/php/"
> AddType applicati
[warning: annoying rambling to follow]
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'm suggesting, today, that we support the following syntax for all these
>directives;
>
> {Add|Remove}{Input|Output}Filter [+|-]foo[;[+|-]bar...] ext [ext...]
>
> {Add|Remove}{Input|Output}FilterByType
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> recall that the current code *defaults* to NONE (basically, if no
> other method is compiled in) and will allow that option to be used
> (but will post a warning unless MULTITHREAD is defined). So we're
> even *safer* than the current such that if none
Hi there,
I just updated to 2.0.25 on my Win32 system, where I have the
following lines in the httpd.conf to use PHP 4 as CGI
ScriptAlias /php/ "e:/server/php/"
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
Action application/x-httpd-php "/php/php.exe"
Action application/x-httpd-php
recall that the current code *defaults* to NONE (basically, if no
other method is compiled in) and will allow that option to be used
(but will post a warning unless MULTITHREAD is defined). So we're
even *safer* than the current such that if none are compiled in,
we don't start.
Basically the pat
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 August 2001 11:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The tarballs are up now! Let's get to beta this time,PLEASE
2.0.25 compiles and runs on Solaris 8/x86. The 404/506 errors are now
fixed, so I'm cool with this.
+1
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > Marc Slemko wrote:
> > >
> > > So I don't see how "NONE" is viable on _ANY_ platform in the multiple
> > > listener case. It may seem to "mostly" work, but it is not reliable and
> > > can not be permitte
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Marc Slemko wrote:
> >
> > So I don't see how "NONE" is viable on _ANY_ platform in the multiple
> > listener case. It may seem to "mostly" work, but it is not reliable and
> > can not be permitted.
> >
>
> threaded
???
First off, simply being thr
Doug,
the mod_proxy group's autobuild kicks some a$$! Would it be possible to get
the test build system set up and automailing on a nightly basis, so Win32 folks
and others without the time to follow the test environment discovers these things
very soon after their patches? I plead guilty, I
Folks,
I'm working on the AddOutputFilterByType/AddInputFilterByType patch to core.c.
I'll drop it into core.c, since we only have three other ByType directives (AddIcon
and AddDesc from mod_autoindex, and ExpiresByType in mod_expires.)
I discovered something's pecular about SetOutputFilter/
From: "Gonyou, Austin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:48 AM
> The referrence here is one about all the filters used by apache 2.0. If
> there is a filter bucket in APR, it's understandable that Apache 2.0 modules
> will have 2 parts. The logic piece and the filter piece.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> how would it not work? fubar kernel?
>
The trick would be in it *working*... NONE implies no mutexing
at all, even for multiple listeners. And *that's* the exception.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|]
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 11:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The tarballs are up now! Let's get to beta this time,PLEASE
:-) :-):-)
Ryan
> +1
>
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 August 2001 09:25, Ian Holsman wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was panning to tag this afternoon. I just nee
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Gonyou, Austin wrote:
> The referrence here is one about all the filters used by apache 2.0.
> If there is a filter bucket in APR,
What do you mean by "filter bucket"?
> it's understandable that Apache 2.0 modules will have 2 parts. The
> logic piece and the filter piece.
Marc Slemko wrote:
>
> So I don't see how "NONE" is viable on _ANY_ platform in the multiple
> listener case. It may seem to "mostly" work, but it is not reliable and
> can not be permitted.
>
threaded
--
===
Jim Jagi
I have just finished tagging the tree. I'll be rolling the tarball in a few minute.
Please look at httpd://dev.apache.org/dist in about 30 minutes for the tarballs.
Ryan
__
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cov
In 1.3.x, it was so happening that Apache/mod_ssl registers the connection
id (fd) with OpenSSL, and then OpenSSL takes over the connection handling as
well as the protocol communication stuff from that point onwards..
In 2.x, with the introduction of filters, OpenSSL nolonger talks directly to
+1
Ryan Bloom wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 29 August 2001 09:25, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
>
> I was panning to tag this afternoon. I just need five minutes to do it.
>
> Ryan
>
> > apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix)
> > for a while now (>3days).
> >
> > How about we Tag&Rol
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 09:39, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
The SSL filters are what actually does the encryption/decryption. If
they don't exist, we don't have SSL. Everything else is just to control
how the filters work.
As for mod_tls, what you are missing, is that the filters have been copied
On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 10:28, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:25:13AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix)
> > for a while now (>3days).
> >
> > How about we Tag&Roll .25 put it up on apache.org and if all goes
> > well m
On 29 Aug 2001, Ian Holsman wrote:
> apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix)
> for a while now (>3days).
>
> How about we Tag&Roll .25 put it up on apache.org and if all goes
> well monday will be beta2 day.
recent-ish changes have broken the sh*t out of modperl-2.0 "make
On 29 Aug 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At 11:00 AM -0400 8/28/01, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > >
> > >HAVE_NONE_xxx means that you can turn the accept mutex into a no-op,
> > >even in the multiple-listener case. If we can play around with this
> > >on o
Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix)
> for a while now (>3days).
>
> How about we Tag&Roll .25 put it up on apache.org and if all goes
> well monday will be beta2 day.
I'll be leaving for two weeks of vacation in the UK on Friday. I can
help out t
On Wednesday 29 August 2001 09:25, Ian Holsman wrote:
I was panning to tag this afternoon. I just need five minutes to do it.
Ryan
> apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix)
> for a while now (>3days).
>
> How about we Tag&Roll .25 put it up on apache.org and if all goes
>
could some one give pointers on the need for filters around the ssl
code. What would be lost if those filters don't exist. And, what was the
need to put them in, originally.
thanks,
sunitha
Gonyou, Austin wrote:
>The referrence here is one about all the filters used by apache 2.0. If
>there i
Title: javascript vs. java code and 9IAS over Apache and default parameters
Guys,
I am being asked advice on the relative efficiencies or lack of efficiencies between javascript, java and other web code. Is there a simple way to tell the difference between the different types of code by lo
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 09:25:13AM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix)
> for a while now (>3days).
>
> How about we Tag&Roll .25 put it up on apache.org and if all goes
> well monday will be beta2 day.
+1 for tagging what we have now. I'm no
Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's the 2nd, improved version of the make-accept-mutex-method-runtime
> patch. It includes changes suggested... Tested under Solaris and OS X.
> Please check out...
I've played with this a little (after changing SYSVMEM and sysvmem to
SYSVSEM and sy
Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 11:00 AM -0400 8/28/01, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> >HAVE_NONE_xxx means that you can turn the accept mutex into a no-op,
> >even in the multiple-listener case. If we can play around with this
> >on one platform (e.g., Darwin), why can't we play aroun
The referrence here is one about all the filters used by apache 2.0. If
there is a filter bucket in APR, it's understandable that Apache 2.0 modules
will have 2 parts. The logic piece and the filter piece. As far as I can
tell, the filter mechanism allows for some distinct advantages and makes for
On 29 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> martin 01/08/29 06:32:07
>
> Modified:src CHANGES
>.Makefile.tmpl config.layout configure
>conf highperformance.conf-dist httpd.conf-dist
> httpd.conf-dist-nw httpd.conf-
apache.org seems to have been running .24 (+mod_include fix)
for a while now (>3days).
How about we Tag&Roll .25 put it up on apache.org and if all goes
well monday will be beta2 day.
--
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Performance Measurement & Analysis
CNET Networks - (415) 364-86
one of our developers over here came up with a interesting question.
say we have a GET request which gets served from a CGI or proxy. and it
is streamed/chunked out (which is the desired effect)
now lets say I have a VERY SLOW connection.
does this cause the server to hold onto the backend c
Yes, I understand that this would solve the problem. My thought is if
there wasn't an AddType, shouldn't we be trying to use the default type?
If the default type is good enough to use when serving the README directly,
why not when serving it up for directory browsing?
Rob Simonson
[EMAIL PROTE
This is a wee bit to hackish. Proper configuration of the files is more
appropriate. On Apache 1.3, I believe the hack that works is
AddType /README text/plain
AddType /HEADER text/plain
Please don't ask why this should work ... is just does ;)
Give it a shot, let us know if it solves your pr
This patch is to set the content_type to the default if the subrequest
request_rec content_type is NULL.
Rob Simonson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
--- mod_autoindex.c.asfsave.c Wed Aug 29 08:29:17 2001
+++ mod_autoindex.c Wed Aug 29 08:32:15 2001
@
Hello,
I m asking very basic question ..
How can i share data across the modules ?? Assume that these modules are shared
objects.
e.g If I fetch something in authentication phase(mod_auth), and i want to use it in
handler module(mod_dav).
How can i do that ?
Thanks
Amit
Get 250 color bus
94 matches
Mail list logo
