Splitting up emails to multiple recipients

Hello, I have some people who want to send out one-time mailings to a few hundred recipients. They don't want to go through the effort of setting up a listserv, however. One of our main recipient domains has a limit of 100 recipients max per email. So, when we send out these mass emails, they get

Mailbox Manager - Exchange 2000

Hi Guys, Here's an interesting problem I've set up a recipient policy in Exchange 2000 to delete messages in the deleted items folder that are more than 15 days old. For some reason, the policy doesn't seem to work. If I uncheck the "Age" box (the "Size" box is already unchecked), so that it

RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

Mmmm all sushi'd up. No Yahoo groups MSN me this weekend. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server Stud with no Yahoo Groups for the weekend.. Go have

RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

Stud with no Yahoo Groups for the weekend.. Go have some Sushi and stop bragging, Mr. Blackstone. We all know you are very good at this stuff. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma

RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

Stud -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server Gee who wrote that one??? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net c

RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

Gee who wrote that one??? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q155269 h

RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q155269 http://www.exchange-mail.org/books.html http://www.swinc.com/resource/books.asp http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm http://www.microsoft.com/exchange 5.5 DR white paper http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/administratio

Re: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

Use the links below. Buy a book. - Original Message - From: "Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: Building an Exchange 5.5 server > Anyone know of any good sites (besides TechNet) for getting some inf

RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server

You see the links at the bottom of every email from this list? That would be a great place to start. Tom. -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building an Exchange 5.5 server Anyone know of an

Building an Exchange 5.5 server

Anyone know of any good sites (besides TechNet) for getting some info on building an Exchange server. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearc

Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

How to Change Active Directory Display Names: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q300427 Change Display Names of Active Directory Users with ADSI Script: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q277717 - Original Message - From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

Q249680 states that even if a message is slated for Hard deletion with a 0 day retention and no waiting for backup first, it may take upwards of 24 hours for the record pointers to be purged from the system through normal maintenance. Henry Schlarb "Most people, when they stumble across truth, m

Ok here one because its Friday and my brain is fried...

says this real fast: She's a thistle sifter and she has a sieve of sifted thistles and a sieve of unsifted thistles she sifts into a sieve of sifted thistles because she is a thistle sifter AHH... _ List posting FAQ:

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

Thank you everyone. Jeff Fantin SRP - Office Software Support Phone: 602-236-3547 RightFAX: 602-681-2773 -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: If I delete an email is it really go

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

I didn't see in the conversation, and I know you said backup later, but their is the option on the server to not fully delete messages until backed up. In other words, even if you delete the message, empty deleted items, and empty deleted item retention, the message is still retained until it m

RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

Point taken. Maybe I can find an answer searching the Windows KB. I keep forgetting that Exchange is integrated into AD now. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Orig

RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

Don't blame in on Exchange, it's and AD problem. Exchange no longer owns user accounts. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:59 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking Sub

Re: If I delete an email is it really gone?

The allocated space within the EDB file is marked available for overwrite, just as when you delete a file off a hard drive. So yes, the data is still there but all pointers to it have been removed. Given the dynamic nature of Exchange's database technology it'll probably be overwritten fairly quic

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

You are not going to be able to realize your quest. First, don't turn off the dumpster, it saves butts many more times than it burns them. A) As our folks at Enron have found out, deleting a message is a long way from destroying it. Once a message has been created, just assume that it's there

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

Since it's Friday. If a tree falls in a forest... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 3:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: If I delete an email is it really gone? Exchange 5.5 SP4, 10 Exchange servers, 1 site Outl

RE: eseutil /d

That does sound like my argument First in looking at the arguments, it helps to understand what you are arguing. Somewhat as stated, your team is right defragmentation should be done on a regular basis. It reduces the number of extensions on messages, but more importantly makes it faster and

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

Of course, knowing that everything I delete is permanently gone I will: 1. Never Delete (Ok, Mailbox Manager) 2. Forward Everything to an external account to save (Ok, Block replies to the Internet) 3. Use a pst (Gotcha!) 4. Print it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

Now there is a loaded question. The answer truly is it depends. The message is (to my understanding) not really deleted and hence gone until ALL pointers to that message in the IS are deleted. If the message exists in one inbox, outbox, sent items or folder stored on the mail system then techni

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

For the most part it is gone, you might be able to recover it from a RAW dump of HD or memory. You also need to look at the log files as they house all of the data written to the store. What are you trying to accomplish. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwes

RE: If I delete an email is it really gone?

Where was it send from and to? I guess the message is as gone as if you deleted a file from your hard drive, generally less so. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer

RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

So, what you are saying is, I can only search in the order the names are displayed. Again I say, could Exchange 2000 be stupider than 5.5? In 5.5 we could search on any string of characters anywhere in the name and it would resolve Example to get Johan Sebastian Bach, I could simply type bast

If I delete an email is it really gone?

Exchange 5.5 SP4, 10 Exchange servers, 1 site Outlook 2000 clients I was tasked with the following and need some help finding the answers. I need to be assured that when an item is deleted from a mailbox, it is really gone. We currently have the dumpster feature enabled which I plan to disable

RE: eseutil /d

True, however I didn't do the service pac's because I thought it would reduce my white space, or even decrease my backup times. I (as most of us?) did/do the upgrades, service pac's, hot fixes, etc. for very specific reasons. I get the "should we be doing (insert your utility here) on a schedule

Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

You will have to change the display name by running a script. They are available on MS's site. Search for Display Names Change I think. - Original Message - From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:49 PM Subject

Re: eseutil /d

;) I seem to recall having to field this question when I was on the stage at the Boston MEC. My responses now will be the same as they were then. IOW: no real need unless you really WANT to. - Original Message - From: "William Lefkovics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[E

RE: eseutil /d

I remember that. Mr Woodrick was pushing the envelope there. With the whitespace taken away, Exchange would have to take back diskspace as the database began to grow again. The resources required for that would likely not be noticeable. :o) But of course he was correct. William -Origina

RE: eseutil /d

As am I :-)...I really am against doing offline defrags because I really hate to even touch eseutil unless I have to. The people in question are infrastructure guys (jack's of all trades...masters of none). We did a defrag awhile back on a server because it's store had grown to 50 GB when it re

RE: eseutil /d

You are such a sick-o- My friend. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Di

RE: eseutil /d

I do not totally agree with that statement though. Granddad or Jim McBee. Otherwise, I would still be on Exchange5.5 sp2 (or WinGate or Postfix on BSD) instead of Exchange2000 sp2. It's like the technical solutions / behavioral problems quote. We use it when it fits. That said, I am too lazy

RE: MDAC on Exchange

With Exchange 5.5+ the database technology is a complete departure from that technology used in Access or other .mdb files. This means that there should be no interaction of components, at least in theory. Joel -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Fri

RE: eseutil /d

I am SO going to enjoy this thread. :o) -Original Message- From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eseutil /d I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation (offline) should be done as ro

RE: eseutil /d

I have had the good fortune >{ to participate in offline defragmentation lately. Remind your colleagues that it is potentially destructive (welll it could be). Remind them that in some cases, it takes all night. Are these colleagues people who know how exchange works??? And who told them e

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

No they are very different. Word + outlook = PST, where PST=BAD! --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, March 15,

Re: Conversion to Internet format failed

Word e-mail editor is evil. Trust me on this. - Original Message - From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:39 PM Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed > Not really sure. Would that matter?

Re: eseutil /d

In that case they need to formulate an SLA on the permissable amount of white space in the databases and use offline defrag to attain that SLA, not just shotgun it. - Original Message - From: "paragon400" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, Mar

RE: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

Yes. They are displayed First Last. Thanks...Ray Quote of the day: There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them. -- Werner Karl Heisenberg -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 20

Re: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

How are the names displayed in the list? FN LN - Original Message - From: "Ray Beckwith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM Subject: Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking I have a question that has been stumpin

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Not really sure. Would that matter? Rich text using word or rich text using outlook. Both the same right? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Conversion to Internet format failed

RE: Tracking an Email Message

Do you have the request come by written or verbal? I never thought about these consequences and now am wondering if I should ask for a written request. I talked to HR and asked them to find out what I need to do. Thanks -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Tracking an Email Message

In the United States, I know of no case law which even suggests that there is an unlimited right to privacy in a corporate environment. Every case I've ever heard of has been decided that a company has the right to look at emails on its own system. If there is a corporate policy in place which e

RE: eseutil /d

While their second argument is technically valid (backups treat whitespace and used space the same), I would think that you wouldn't have much whitespace to begin with. Check the even logs to see just how much whitespace exists. On my 20+GB databases, it tends to be less than a few megs. I'd ask

RE: eseutil /d

How much "white space" do you have in the databases (look for the 1221 events in your App log)? > -- > From: paragon400 > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:41 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: eseutil /d > > Their reasoning is t

Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email SHOULD be Crashing E2K

Finally getting the hang of this. I hate MS support site. The errors never match up. Issue was SMTP service was really never started. Showed started in Services but when attempting to reinstall E2K it gave me an error, SMTP service not started. Tried to restart service, could not. Uninstalled an

Exchange 2000, Outlook 2000 and Name Checking

I have a question that has been stumping me for the past week. We just brought up our new Exchange 2000 server last weekend and I can't figure out why we can no longer type in a last name or part of a last name and have Outlook 2000 resolve it from the GAL. Exchange 5.5 would do this and many o

RE: eseutil /d

Their reasoning is to save disk space (there really is not a disk space issue...9 GB store on a 40 GB drive for example)...and to speed up backups. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

Re: eseutil /d

It won't hurt Exchange performance but will needlessly break any uptime metrics. There is one, count 'em, one difference between an offline and an online defrag. The former moves the EOF, the latter does not. - Original Message - From: "Ray Zorz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discuss

RE: Tracking an Email Message

I am not filtering anything other than viruses and the normal *.exe, *.vbs, and so on. I am running Antigen for E2K. I don't think Antigen provides anything for this. Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Byrne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:05 AM Po

RE: Tracking an Email Message

But im sure you must have a DMZ what are you using to filter your email??I may be able to help -Original Message- From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message I don't have any ad

RE: Tracking an Email Message

Its one of those touchy, up to interpretation subjects. Remember, case law is just what someone else decided, and there is always that concept of expectation of privacy. They are just suggesting that someone high enough in the company to take responsibility for doing it give you permission/reques

RE: eseutil /d

I remember an excellent explanation of how this will actually hurt Exchange performance by one of the Ed's. I saved it, then lost it somehow. Maybe someone still has it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Friday, March 15,

Re: eseutil /d

One cannot prove a negative. Have them give their reasoning for this and then you can address their concerns. - Original Message - From: "paragon400" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 AM Subject: eseutil /d > I have som

RE: Tracking an Email Message

I don't have any additional software. The only thing I am running on it is Exchange 2000. Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Byrne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:42 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Tracking an Email Message Subject: R

RE: eseutil /d

Try reading Jim McBee's book - Exchange 247. It talks about this very issue. Basically, it comes down to the view, from my reading, that "if it ain't broke - leave it alone". If you aren't seeing any errors in the Event logs that clue you into a problem with the databases don't go begging for t

Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email SHOULD be Crashing E2K

- Original Message - From: "John Q Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email > Boy can I crash Exchange servers like the best. This one is a E2K, on Win >

RE: Tracking an Email Message

Yes if you have mailsweeper you can create a custome archive to copy every mail in and out to a specified mail account. -Original Message- From: Exchange Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 5:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Me

RE: eseutil /d

As granddad once said, if it ain't broke don't fix it! -Original Message- From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: eseutil /d I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation (offline) shou

RE: Tracking an Email Message

I absolutely agree with this. My original point was just that flat statements like 'It's illegal' are not true. This whole area puts email admins in a very difficult position. Usually the people asking you to do this sort of thing are the ones that sign your paycheck. Getting it in writing is

RE: Tracking an Email Message

Also, I don't think that there is any governing Federal case law yet. The first time there is a ruling in your circuit, your State law could be modified, and depending on the type of case and the statutory authority, a ruling in one circuit might be valid across the country. I am reasonably cert

RE: Tracking an Email Message

Thanks for the Advice. I will make sure that I get it in writing to do that. I didn't of it as being against the law as the Company owns the email system. But besides that, Is there a way to do it? Thanks Saul -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Post

eseutil /d

I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation (offline) should be done as routine maintenance. I don't share this opinion, but I am having a hard time finding evidence to support my belief. Does anyone know of any links that support the theory that eseutil should not be

Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email

Boy can I crash Exchange servers like the best. This one is a E2K, on Win 2K, both SP2. All lastes Hotfixes from windowsupdate.ms.com. Running Trend Scanmail for E2K.System was running fine for 1 year now, out of now where this. Did activate TS licenses on this server yesterday, but that's it. Hav

RE: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email

My guess is that the problem is probably much simpler than what has been portrayed. Are there any non-Exchange Server DL's or is there someone making heavy use of personal DL's, with multiple entries or nesting going on? Almost certainly, the system is doing exactly what the users have told it t

RE: MDAC on Exchange

I've not tested it yet. I'm mostly concerned with the JET components that they want updated. MDAC 2.5 dropped the Jet components and if you need those (this does) then you need to install the Jet40SP3_comp.exe. I'm not too pleased about replacing JET components on an application that runs with JET

RE: Tracking an Email Message

The law varies from State to State and Country to Country. Best practice is get advice from counsel. Don't do it without something in writing. Tom. -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Tracking an Email Message

Have you heard the saying; 'better to be safe than sorry'? Conferring with your legal department would make certain to what you think is true in your state. Email privacy is a shady subject in all areas of the world. Make sure you have every angle covered before you go down this route. Regards

RE: Tracking an Email Message

Were do you get the information that it is criminal? I certainly don't agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least in my state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business is who owns it. -Original Message- From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMA

RE: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email

Are you using a PIX Firewall, if so have your network administrator turn off the smtp fixup protocol. Jeff -Original Message- From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same

RE: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email

We had that recently and only tracked it down after getting all the headers from a number of the duplicated messages, then checking the routing part of header to see at which point the duplication was. Without this evidence everyone will deny responsibility, so get the users to track down some cop

RE: Evil OST files.

I usually misread everything. :) -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Evil OST files. My certainty about how it works now is not 100%. But, I think that Tom is probably correct in

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

I think he's gone. I can pretend to be him if you like? Now where did i put that spoofing software... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 March 2002 16:46 To: Exchange Discuss

Re: Disabling 'Hard Deletion'

Here in the States the SEC (Securities Exchange Commission, the folks who regulate stock-related activities) required the retention of mail a couple years ago. That's when MS came out with the journaling feature; that is to say, the purpose of the journaling feature is exactly what you're looking

Re: Conversion to Internet format failed

Are the clients using Word as the e-mail editor? - Original Message - From: "Woodruff, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:58 AM Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed > Mainly .docs. They are being attac

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Sorry, out for the rest of the day. Thanks for the help. To be continued.. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Even if that was the ca

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Even if that was the case, I have my IMC to never send rich text. I wouldn't think that it would come back with that error? -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet

RE: Evil OST files.

Glad it all worked out. You're probably right about the profile having been changed. Damned first level support! ;) Tom. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Evil OST files. That

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Yes Sir. That's what I thought until I got a bounce saying the same thing with the attachments attached like they should be. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Are you definitely sure that it happens with attachments? I think this may be an issue with pasting word documents into the body of the email. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Yep, it doesn't do anything for me. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed I only have Plain Text selected in that box. Have you tried removing

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Outbound only. Right now have all rich text formatting to never be sent. We have a bunch of Lotus clients and I think that might have been affecting the conversion. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:11 AM To: Exchange Dis

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

I only have Plain Text selected in that box. Have you tried removing HTML? See if that does anything? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodru

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

This is only happening when trying to send Outbound? Or is it both inbound or outbound? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mai

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Plain text and html. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed Michael, on your IMC. What do you have selected for your outbound attachements unde

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Michael, on your IMC. What do you have selected for your outbound attachements under the Internet Mail tab? ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support & Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Wo

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

Mainly .docs. They are being attached both ways. Inserting them as attachments and copying and pasting. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Conversion to Internet format failed How

RE: Disabling 'Hard Deletion'

How about asking your HR department to speak to the some 'not many' users who insist on using this method. Perhaps saying that if they persist they can fu$k off out the door. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[

Re: Disabling 'Hard Deletion'

The only way you can completely assure that ALL emails are retained is to turn on journaling. - Original Message - From: "Taylor, Mal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:32 AM Subject: Disabling 'Hard Deletion' > Mutterings

RE: Disabling 'Hard Deletion'

Done that, but if you use 'tools recover deleted items' and then delete they are gone for good - been scouring technet & other resources for a good while. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 March 2002 15:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Disabl

RE: Disabling 'Hard Deletion'

Yes. the dumpsteralwayson registry value allows items that have been hard deleted to be recovered. Search TechNet for dumpsteralwayson Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Taylor, Mal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 March 2002 1

Disabling 'Hard Deletion'

Mutterings in the media seem to indicate that the UK or EU powers that be, may enable laws requiring companies to retain ALL emails for a specific period. In our case we have deleted item retention set to 7 days and not finally deleted until a backup is performed. + backups retained for a specific

limerick friday (In honor of St. Pats day)

On our network we have many AGs our recipient policy does as it please my mail lives in MA but when time came to take messages away It said that I lived in Belize For some reason our automatic recipient policies (which we have added our message retention policies to ) seem to be getting appl

RE: Conversion to Internet format failed

How are the attachments being attached? What sort of attachments are they? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 March 2002 14:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Conversion to In

Conversion to Internet format failed

Exch 5.5 SP4, Win2k SP2. When some of my users try to send to internet mail with attachments, they get this bounce. I have checked everything on the IMC and everywhere else. Any thoughts? They are sending in Rich Text, but that shouldn't be a problem. MSEXCH:IMS:GSW:Columbus:EXCHANGECMH 0x8007

RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server?

But it IS Friday. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Messag

RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server?

Sorry folks..me bad ID10T today I guess. didn't mean to put it in the incorrect thread. fingers quicker then brain right now..coffee should kick in soon. I can't even use the excuse that it's monday.. -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March

  1   2   >