--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> > That's why a progressive income tax is a good thing. It is an
> > disincentive to accumulating excessive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > A flat tax (some say 17% would do it) with no or few deductions,
> > starting at incomes over $30-50,00
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> History shows that not to be true at all. Most are just greedy
bastards
> who care little about their fellow humanity. People like Bill Gates
are
> a rare exception
Well 280 billion annually in american philanthropy s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
> who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
> of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
> package.
>
> At some point in the accumulation o
Original posts
> I was just reading in the Times about Richard Grasso,
> who, making $12 million a year, went through all kinds
> of contortions to obtain his $140 million retirement
> package.
>
> At some point in the accumulation of wealth, money
> ceases to be a medium of exchange and becomes s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > > When rich people talk about money, they're talking
> > > about something entirely differ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Judy never met a mass-murdering dictator she didn't like.
Bush? Nixon? Oh, you said "dictators", not "almost or hopeful
dictators". My mistake.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Few people are aware that any suggestion for the elimination of the
> estate tax comes with the elimination of the stepped-up basis for
> capital gains. Currently, all capital gains get "stepped-up" of
> their co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > &
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > &
>From adjacent post:
[to Judy]
If you wish to start a new thread on "The Massive Shortcomings of
New.Morning" I could start it with at least several 100 points. But I
am biased. I am sure you cite 1000's of points, real or imagined. And
just let Unc get started. Perhaps you and others can start th
raits -- not a critique
of the thesis itelf.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_sla
Thanks card for posting the article on B12. For decades, as a
vegetarian (mostly -- with a 2-3 year trial exception of fish and
poultry ) and vegan at times, I have been aware of the need to
supplement ones diet with B12.
I did not know the low absorbsion rate of the almost universally used
form
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
>
> > > For Bush to say Saddam wouldn't let them in is simply a lie.
> > >
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new.morning wrote:
>
>>> BTW, do you fancy yourself a Libertarian? You read that way.
> >
> >I don't fancy myself anything. I don't take some platform and adopt
> >it. I think through each issue and decide on the merit
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > From adjacent post:
> >
> > [to Judy]
> > If you wish to start a new thread on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy,
> >
> > Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy,
> >
> > Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Judy,
> >
> > Again, I am heartedned that your manfiest critique of my observation
Re: The Massive Shortcomings of New.Morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > From adjacent post:
> >
> > [to Judy]
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>new.morning wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >&g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Like many TM'ers back in the late 1970's I gave up on being a
> vegetarian. I had too many bouts with hypoglycemia, anemia and vata
> derangements. Using supplements will not often deal with the pH
> imbalance that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Of course all others are cordially welcomed to chime in. Unc, Tom,
> > Jim, Peter all have good, perhap
We were sitting in a Manhattan living room on a spring afternoon, and
Warren Buffett had a Cherry Coke in his hand as usual. But this
unremarkable scene was about to take a surprising turn.
"Brace yourself," Buffett warned with a grin. He then described a
momentous change in his thinking. Within m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think a good test would be to take an Indian who comes from a long
> line of vegetarians and pair him with a westerner who claims they
> function well as a vegetarian and see who actually performs better in a
> batte
In reading posts over the years, it appears that a variety of posters
hold the same Views on a number of points. For example, I sense the
following points are (near) consensus views. It appears among the
proponents of such -- though perhaps stated in somewhat different
terms -- are Tom T., Jim, Bar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 3, 2006, at 6:48 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> > 3) There are many paths and many mountians. Process is Product (LBS,
> > and to a degree others such as akasha/anon)
>
&
While I have great reservations, concerns, and downright complaints
about the TMO and MUM in recent years, I always have a soft spot, for
"monks and nuns" who dedicate themselves to IT. While they may be
deluded in a localized spiral of things, I applaud their
non-attachement in the larger sphere
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
>
> >>May I take a stab at integrating your insights/realizations/
> >>\knowledge -- which btw, relate beyond point 3.3 -- into the
> >>perenial DRAFT FFL Sutras, v1.1?
Turquoise Blue ? wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > >
> > > >>May I take
Good one.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mrfishey2001"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
>
>
> "May I take a stab at integrating your insights/realizations/
> kn
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's no "side effect" to CC: its just the brain
> better maintaining the global connectivity
> of Pure Consciousness along with the normal
> activation of various states whether major
> states like waking, dreaming and sleeping, or
> localized activi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hugheshugo"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
Totally fascinating article (long) in the New York Times magazine. A
few excerpts:
My Pain, My Brain
...
The area of the brain that the scanner focus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate >
Perhaps variations and imperfections of the [INTERPRETATION of the]
"experience" of IT, consciousness being alive within itself explains
some of the logical discrpency. IT certainly feels like IT is
self-sufficient
My points, interspersed are not meant as argumentative. But they seek
to put in fuller light some delicious contradictions still remaining.
Which may be "real", or artifacts of language or loopy logic.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That "CC/
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
The shift from a bound self to a
> non-localized Self is pure acausal grace that can not
> be enacted from the side of the bound mind.
And if the shift occurs, and there is something acausal, then what
does the acausal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And contradiction is bad exactly why?
In my view, there is a vast realm where logic is of great value, and
where contradictions are indicative of an error. And there are other
realms which are outside the realm of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" > Tom T;
> This thing called Enlightenment or Awakening is the ultimate paradox.
> It can be lived but anything and everything one can say about IT can
> also be both true and untrue at the same time as it can not acurately
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" >
> Tom T:
> An analogy is to think about sitting in front of a 10 million
> candlewatt strobe light with the eyes closed and wearing an eye mask.
> THe effect of all that light will leave an imprint on the physiology
> e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
"There's a Miss Boom-Boom LaVerne here for you,"
Ah, another Bob Cummings fan.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join Th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > I honestly thin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >I honestly think that what you're *h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >I honestly think that what you're *h
"understand" it
> > >using the rational mind. And you hope that despite
> > >the fact that most of the enlightened throughout
> > >history have said just the opposite, that it *can't*
> > >be understood or described by the rational mind.
ss, albeit mild, to my attention. I vow to try to refrain
from such in the future. Please feel free to bring any lapses of such
to my attention.
Thank you for your kind attention.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In Fairfie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > However eventually this was supplanted with the idea that
> > consciousness *was* the unified field--and thus the infamous
> > Hagelin article where he ga
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> > However eventually this was supplanted with the idea that
> > consciousness *was* the unified field--and thus the infamous
> > Hagelin article where he gave
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On May 21, 2006, at 4:12 AM, sparaig wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Domash, IIRC, ... but
> > > he didn't buy into MMY's ideas about Quantum Mechanics.
That so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 21, 2006, at 6:20 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
>
> > But in what I observed, he hardly "came to MIU in the first place
> > because his expert view was that consci
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But I could never tell where the line was with MMY: was this all
> > just an analogy or was it describing the reality?
> >
>
> It's not an anology for MMY or Hagelin either. Perhaps it was for
>Domash. Maybe that's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On May 21, 2006, at 6:20 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> >
> > > But in what I observed, h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
&
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ashelkent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> >
> > That's the normal way it works, anyway. If the
> > book is being self-published, the schedule could
> > be shorter depending on how much of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 5/23/06 11:20 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > On May 23, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
> >
> >> I was listening to Eckhart Tolle yesterday (Silence Speaks) and
he was
> >> saying that any
Since last night 11pm or so PST, there have been 25 posts. 15 of them
stem from Shemp deciding now was a good time to revisit his views of
what Judy posted in January.
If that one post were kept at the poster's thought level, the ensuing
low value (IMO) 14 posts would have not been posted. If
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since last night 11pm or so PST, there have been 25 posts. 15 of them
> stem from Shemp deciding now was a good time to revisit his views of
> what Judy posted in January.
>
&g
ost interesting -- those we assume are "given", true a priori.
A more specific response to your points later.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 5/24/06 12:29 AM, new_morning_blank_slate at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > Since last night 11pm or so PST, there have been 25 posts. 15 of
> them
> > stem from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
>
> > "Is being driven by and apparently obsessed with the past a sign of
> > something g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > &
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [It is useful to be] constantly being open to new data and new
> concepts. For
> example, maybe we often skip a poster which our theory predicts will
> waste our time. BUT, my poin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> > wrote:
> > >
> &
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> > > In a way, it's like that bar where the regulars had
> > > heard all the jokes so man
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree there's a severe limit to the progress that can be made with
> talk therapy that focuses on intellectual analysis of past hurts. But
> the fact remains that you can't transcend your way out of deep
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree there's a severe limit to the progress that can be made with
> talk therapy that focuses on intellectual analysis of past hurts. But
> the fact remains that you can't transcend your way out of deep
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I
> have several friends who Awakened recently, and they say that soon
> thereafter, the shit hit the fan. They began feeling guilt and other
> emotions that needed dealing with a thousand times more intensely than
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I
> have several friends who Awakened recently, and they say that soon
> thereafter, the shit hit the fan. They began feeling guilt and other
> emotions that needed dealing with a thousand times more intensely than
> b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> whyich brings us back to the question which these countries are.
>
> Anyonre knows?
The Good Ones, obviously. :)
Someone posted a list a while back. I think Netherlands, most of
Scandanavia, Germany, some "ne
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Self in each of us recognizes the Self in another. We are
> conscious of this to one degree or another, whether our Self has
> been fully awakened to us, or not.
>
> This is how someone somewhat Awake will r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 5/24/06 2:02 PM, new_morning_blank_slate
> > Asking the same question that you asked Vaj, why do you make
> > unprovable assumption that these people are Awakened?
>
> 'cau
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> wrote:
> > on 5/24/06 2:02 PM, new_morning_blank_slate at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Or that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > on 5/24/06 3:04 PM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With all respect, I think you have missed the point of what I have
> written.
Perhaps. I am certainly open to any corrections.
But perhaps you have missed my point. You have an "experience" /
"knowlwedge" tha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLif
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Or that the
> > > > > label "Awakening" has much of a c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> With all respect, the bedrock of my Awakening serves as the
> foundation for that which I write. Accept it or not, makes no
> difference to me.
And why would I, or anyone, accept "your truth" or your "awakening".
si
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> No, his term was Self Actualization. Most people on this forum share a
> common definition of Self Realization.
Which is?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> wrote:
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > On May 24, 2006, at 4:21 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
> >
> I ask you both, with no rancor, do you believe that
> the high
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > > > And in your worldview, what do you call the state where all
> > > illusions
> > > > have been dissolved?
> > >
> > > 'the state where all illusions have b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And in your worldview, what do you call the state where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > > > So "shit" is rejection. OK Rev. Jim.
> > > >
> > > F
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have asked because some/many would not associate illusions with
> > aw
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >As I said before, whether you
> > > accept it or not makes n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> holding any belief as valid or true would be a
> filter or impostion on what is. Any belief we could hold would then
> keep us from real integrity. And the riches that can flow freely are
> not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > If one is using E. or similar terms, but meaning a
> > state with different attributes than the MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I simply disagree with you, and see much of what you have written
> above as invalid from my point of view.
In the "above", I made five basic points.
1) I rarely accept unprovable assertions as a priori true
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > > 'the state where all illusions have been dissolved'? Actually I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
>
> > You appear to be saying: "I want to let all of you know that I am a
> > living ex
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > >
> > As I said yesterday:
> >
> > "The Self in each of us recognizes the Self in anot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
>
> > "I'm OK, You're OK" was actually a 2x2 matrix, giving rise to four
> sta
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > What kind of negative or annoying side-effects, if
> > > any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> An interesting remark by David Orme-Johnson:
>
> "Over the 40 years that I've been interested in
> self-development, *I've tried most of the meditation
> and relaxation techniques that are out there*
> (emp
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister > >
> > I seem to recall one of Krishna's criteria for a true
> > yogii/yoginii is that s/he is "jitendri-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 5/25/06 1:07 PM, new_morning_blank_slate at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to recall one of Krishna's criteria for a true
> >> yogii/yoginii is that s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> > wrote:
&g
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hugheshugo"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> > wrote:
&
101 - 200 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
