On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> the Traffic Server podling "PMC" has deliberated hard, and we've decided
>>> that it's best for everyone
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
[...]
> I'd like to make the suggestion that we alter this to:
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator priv
Ben Laurie wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
There is a proposed "PGP" package being discussed in Jakarta Commons. Would
there be any overlap at lower levels (not at the WS layer) between them,
providing for some collaboration?
This strikes me as orthogonal, but it might be of interest that I'm
Roy T.Fielding wrote:
Jackrabbit is following the procedures of the original Apache Group
in adding new committers. We nominate them first on the
jackrabbit-private mailing list (which includes all of the existing
Jackrabbit committers and any members who want to help incubation)
and, if there a
Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:02 PM
> > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> >
> >> I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN.
[...]
> Agreed. -1 as a requirement; +1 as a recommendation.
Ditto.
Sander
--
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:58 PM
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> >>I'm quite confident that a good portion of the inhabitants of this
> >>list doesn't care much about who is going to "win"
> >>this flamefest.
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Ther
Hi,
The results of the vote are:
+1: 11
-1: 0
For details:
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&by=thread&from=806972
The resolution below was brought before the Board yesterday,
and passed. SpamAssassin is now a TLP. Thanks everyone for
all the work to get to this point!
Sa
> [X] +1 - The SpamAssassin project has met the requirements
> for incubation and will be recommended to the
> board for TLP status
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-m
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 23:55, Leo Simons wrote:
> Sander Striker wrote:
> > I'd like to call for a vote to graduate SpamAssassin from the
> > Incubator.
>
> looking at the status file
>
> ! Verify distribution rights
>
> || date || item
> | -..-.
Hi,
I'd like to call for a vote to graduate SpamAssassin from the
Incubator.
SpamAssassin started working on incubation around August last year.
Since then a lot if not all of the Incubator requirements have been
addressed; the final one this week. Patience and persistence has been
a prominent p
On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 02:48, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I'm changing the subject to make it clear to those skimming their mail that
> this is a VOTE to incubate Beehive, based upon their proposal.
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tor.apache.org&by=thread&from=
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 10:21, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > My thought was something along the lines of:
> >
> > /home/incubator/
> >incubator/ -- cvs co incubator
> > incubator-site/ -- cvs co incubator-site
> > forrest/ -- our
Hi,
Can someone regenerate the site? Updates were committed to the
spamassassin.cwiki and it would be nice to see those published.
Thanks,
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 12:30, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> I became involved in the last few months in the Catacomb effort
> (http://www.webdav.org/catacomb). For those of you who don't know this
> project, it's all about building a mod_dav plugin/provider that, using a
> RDBMS as a backend, provid
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 01:45, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2004 01:28 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> > given the *massive* numbers of issues with this list in its current
> > home, I suggest we may be better off moving it to Apache.org sooner
> > rather than later.
> >
> > Currently, o
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 14:04, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2004, at 9:56, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> >> Copyright and distribution rights still remain to be verified,
> >> although
> >> all CLAs should now be in, assuming Matt Sergeant finally got around
&g
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 04:13, Justin Mason wrote:
> --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE--
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [resend, last one was misaddressed ;). Added some more text as well,
> BTW, so previous mail can be ignored.]
>
> Sander -- here's our status report. Please feel free to take this and
> mangle
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 01:15, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> On Thursday 22 January 2004 00:34 CET Erik Abele wrote:
> > Indeed and if someone is really interested in meeting other
> > German/Austrian/Swiss/etc. ASF fellows, he/she should have a look at
> > /docs/de-meeting in the committers CVS module. (
The SA report, unedited.
Sander
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[resend, last one was misaddressed ;). Added some more text as well,
BTW, so previous mail can be ignored.]
Sander -- here's our status report. Please feel free to take this and
mangle it i
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 19:01, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> > The Incubator project board report is due in a bit more than a week, as
> > the board meeting should take place on Wed, 21 Jan 2004, 10am Pacific [1].
> >
> > Thus all Mentors should ensure that every Incuba
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 04:10, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
>
> This is what i have been thinking about. For long.
>
> "Committership in specified duration".
>
> For example, "Log4XXX" (New Project) needs some
> committers in order to improve the quality of the
> codebases rapidly and
Hi guys,
Can we go back to friendly replies again?
The thread 'Re: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers'
is starting to sound a lot more hostile that it has to be.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 06:34, Justin Mason wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Rodent of Unusual Size writes:
> >o All projects under incubation must use a STATUS file (or a
> > status.xml file if the project prefers XML) that contains
> > information the P
Interesting enough to seek some feedback.
My initial reaction is:
- you can't maintain code which isn't covered by CLAs
- 'unconvered' code may sit in our repo for code history purposes*
- The 2.6x branch should be svn rm'd
- No release may ever be done from the 2.6x branch
Given that SpamAssass
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 02:23, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Incubator not interested in providing advice?
Yes, it is. But, considering the holidays, cut everyone
some slack.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addi
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 00:27, Leo Simons wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> could someone (mentor or someone else involved) please
> start writing and filling out a status file for spamassassin?
I guess that's something for me to take care of. Maybe Dirk
is able to fill in some blanks since he has helped a lo
On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 13:42, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Apart from the general agreement on PPMCs, for this particular vote
> instance there has been a +1 from me, one from Noel, on with changes
> from Aaron and a positive comment from Leo.
>
> Thus, and also given the rule we have tacitly agre
On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 18:57, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:28, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
>
> >
> > Ballot 2:
> >
> > Since Axion is to be a sub-project of the Apache DB project and is
> > currently com
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 18:49, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > First of all, we are in the process of deciding and clearly documenting
> > that only TLPs are to be incubated. Why? Because in Apache there are
> > only TLPs. Thus, Ruper is incubated on the p
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 11:10, Leo Simons wrote:
> The only one who can change
> a charter is the board, or the collective members, right?
> Given the responses given here by some of the board
> members already, I doubt the board feels like it.
What usually happens is that a project produces an amen
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 09:00, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > You speak as if there was no possible way to get into Apache before the
> > Incubator.
>
> That is not what I said. Clearly it could not be true, since the Incubator
> was not created until October 2002.
>
> Neither one of us was present wh
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 09:29, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Berin Lautenbach said:
>
> BL>> 2) Identify the PPMC who gets to name this project - and hold them
> BL>> accountable for their decision.
> BL>
> BL>+1. I think the Incubator PMC is in a kind of unique position. We
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 22:25, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> The Geronimo folks are talking about making logos and there seems to
> be a desire to have official signoff on the name. Please vote on one
> of the following choices:
>
>
> [ ] - Let them keep "Geronimo" as the official name.
> [ ] - Punt t
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 04:30, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> We've already made announcements. If this is the way you want
> us to proceed I can recall the infrastructure request. Should
> we do that?
You already did the announcements, and I personally have less
of a problem subscribing the list of peop
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 01:32, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I there are no objections I would like to forward mail from the sf.net
> ldapd project to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. This is obviously
> a short term thing until the community has switched over completely to
> the Apache infrastructu
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 8:51 AM
>> Cannot open /home/cvs/CVSROOT/commitlogs/incubator: Permission denied
>
> The group permissions on that file are wrong -- I've asked root to
> fix it.
Fixed.
Sander
-
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 2:33 PM
>>Stephen McConnell wrote:
> I think the real reason is that I have a lot of scepticism about the
> successful functioning of the Incubator. I imaging future scenarios
> where candidates are keep wa
> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:46 PM
> Who chooses the members of the incubator PMC? I know anyone can vote
> for anything, but who gets binding votes?
The PMC members of the Incubator PMC vote on new members of said PMC.
The Board signs
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:06 PM
> There have been no objections, so I would appreciate it if we could
> get rid of the incubator unix group in favor of apcvs for everything
> except the incubator-core repository:
Done.
I'll cleanup th
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:04 AM
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:25:35 -0400
> Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > the foundation *as a whole*. presumably you care about the welfare
> > of japan, but don't know what's goi
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 3:07 PM
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 14:28:06 +0200
> Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It might look, admittedly, strange that an ASF officer is not an ASF
> > member, but for the PMC chair role, the
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 12:47 PM
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:21:07 +0200
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please, do not post stats of any kind to say something about merit.
>
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 6:16 AM
> I see. but here's one question. Does this "meritocracy"
> encourage the inactive *ASF members* into the retirement status
> or hibernation status?
This is something for the ASF membership to worry abou
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 3:49 AM
>> "Meritocracy"?
>> Here is a good stats on this ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mailing list.
>
> Excuse me, but volume of messages has nothing to do with merit. Roy T.
> Fielding posts very infrequently in my
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:07 PM
> I really hate to keep harping on this, but the whole
> idea of the PMC Chair having "power" somehow implies that
> the PMC itself is under the "whim" of the Chair. Yes, the
> chair has the ultimate respo
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 10:09 AM
[...]
> I thought the same thing. Also, to tell the truth, I think that
> in Incubator, there need at least two or three persons who
> have real power. (One Chair and two Vice Chair?)
Why would we ne
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:11 AM
> My understanding from discussion with Sam and Ken was that creation of a new
> TLP or migrating to an existing one would be an exit, not entry, issue.
That's correct. However, it wouldn't make much s
> From: Cliff Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:55 AM
[...]
> Sorry for any confusion; let me be more clear:
>
> In order to start the project, the first step was for BEA (the company,
> not any individual employee of the company) to sign the ASF's License
> From: Cliff Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:05 AM
> Thanks to the help of Brian Behlendorf, Ted Leung, Steven Noels, Greg Stein,
> and several other friendly folks within Apache, BEA has just checked the
> entire XMLBeans source code into cvs.apache.org [
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:06 PM
> jefft 2003/08/08 05:06:01
>
> Modified:build/site/skin breadcrumbs.js
> Log:
> Automatic publish at Fri Aug 8 14:05:59 CEST 2003 from
> http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org.
?
> Revis
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 1:39 AM
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:01:53PM +0100, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > >Paul -- please set your umask [on login] to enable group-write on the files
> > >in /www/incubator.apache.org. It is making it ver
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 12:43 AM
> By the way, I think there was a significant news about the
> Jim's resignation of Incubator PMC Chair. It's really news-worthy,
> I am sure.
Technically Jim is still the Incubator PMC Chair. The vote
> From: Richard Monson-Haefel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:18 AM
> Well, I'm pretty ignorant about Apache's ways, but it was my understanding
> that the original committers would vote in the PMC. Is that correct?
Not at this point no. This project starts in the
> From: Erik Abele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:40 AM
> I wonder if someone should collect the addresses of all the interested
> people coming in here with absolutely no clue and send them a
> standardized mail with some instructions on how to get involved
> (m
Hi,
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 3:14 PM
> jefft 2003/08/07 06:13:39
>
> Added: src/documentation/content/forms
> ASF_Contributor_License_1_form.pdf
> ASF_Contributor_License_2.
> From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:10 AM
>>You do realize that I'm neither a member of the Incubator PMC nor do I
>>support its existence. Create the mail list. The name shouldn't be up to
>>the Incubator, it should be up to the XML PMC. Its you're ba
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 4:08 PM
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:58:51 +0200
> (Subject: RE: XMLBean project creation request)
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -1 if it is outside of apache.or
> From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 3:57 PM
> By the way, I think this url
> http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/
> is not yet taking effect.
>
> How about asking the infrastructure team to
> point this url (http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/)
> to the curren
> From: Erik Abele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:18 PM
[...]
> Okay, I'm fine with this for now, but without an explicitly stated
> policy this discussion will come up every time a project arrives at the
> incubator. We definitely need a policy here, IMHO!
I agree.
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:48 PM
> Since IMHO this has been already discussed enough and different POVs
> remain, I ask for a vote on the following.
>
> What should we use as a policy in creating resources for incubating
> projects?
>
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:52 AM
>>> May I have commit access to the CVS to maintain this?
>>>
>>> Ted
>>
>> +1
>
> And another +1 here...
>
> I've updated CVSROOT/avail already. You should have commit access now to the
> 'incubator' and 'in
> From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 11:07 AM
[...]
>> You should definitely document what you think is important to
>> exit the incubation process. I suggest committing something
>> to the incubator CVS (see the other projects' STATUS files
>> for a template)
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 9:39 PM
> smoothly as anticipated. Nevertheless, the following projects
> are being incubated as we speak:
[...]
> o Tapestry:
> A complete framework offering an alternative to JSP & Velocity
> scripti
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:39 PM
>> Also, I think our charter mentions Forrest for docs specifically?
>
> Nope. If it does, it shouldn't.
No, only for the incubator docs itself.
Sander
> From: Vic Cekvenich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 10:47 PM
> See: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?PortalProposal
>
> Some time ago I posted a proposal for a successful SourceForge project
> for incubator.
> The only discussion was that at the time it
Hi,
+1: Jim Jagielski, B.W. Fitzpatrick, Sander Striker, Nicola Ken Barozzi,
Ken Coar, Paul Hammant
No negative votes.
Tapestry exit Incubator...
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 3:48 PM
+1
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 1:30 AM
> Please add rana_b and jvanzyl to the incubator unix group.
Done.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
> From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:29 AM
>> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 4:19 AM
>
>>> With all due respect Roy, thats not fair. They've asked, the
> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:28 AM
> Maybe part of my offer to chair swap with someone on the PMC, was
> perhaps to give anyone the opportunity to step down. Anyone who may lack
> the time to do anything for incubator presently
Having t
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:21 AM
> No, accepting the donation of new code has to come though incubator.
> Unfortunately, the incubator PMC currently consists of the same people
> who have over-volunteered their time for all of the other pr
> From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 4:19 AM
>> With all due respect Roy, thats not fair. They've asked, they've
>> begged, both here and the incubator.
>
> I was talking about incubator. I notice that somebody forwarded their
> request to infras
> From: Paul Hammant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:29 AM
> >The vote on AltRMI received only one vote here (Nicola Ken's), that I saw. I
> >may have missed others.
> >
> >
> There was a very low vote, yes. The project is quite active though.
>
> >This lack of a
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:14 PM
> At 10:27 PM +1100 1/30/03, Conor MacNeill wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It seems that I too was under the impression that the incubator
>> project would be providing the documentation on the "Apache Way".
>> AI
75 matches
Mail list logo
