On 29/9/05, E.R.N. Reed, discombobulated, unleashed:
klingon smile
I don't think I've ever seen a Klingon smile.
They do when there's the scent of blood in the air.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/29 Thu PM 08:21:15 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Frank Theriault replied to Mark Roberts as follows:
Naw, we turned 'em back after they got as far as North Carolina in
June
Mike Wilson wrote:
I've already acquired the water balloon launching apparatus.
You should be careful about what you start
http://www.spudtech.com/
Hey, biological weapons are a violation of international law.
If you're gonna play rough then I'll have to up the ante too. Does anyone
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/30 Fri AM 11:29:12 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Mike Wilson wrote:
I've already acquired the water balloon launching apparatus.
You should be careful about what you start
On 9/30/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see the headline in the GFM local paper next year. 15 injured in
shootout at Photo contest. Bugsy Reese on the run from the Feds Who gets
to play the Jodie Foster role?
I will.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/29/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Naw, we turned 'em back after they got as far as North Carolina in
June...
We?
LOL
I was working under cover for the forces of darkness.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
On 9/30/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was working under cover for the forces of darkness.
Your accent threw me off...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Now that's an image I didn't need this early in the morning.
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/30/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see the headline in the GFM local paper next year. 15 injured in shootout at Photo
contest. Bugsy Reese on the run from the Feds Who gets to play
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/30/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was working under cover for the forces of darkness.
Your accent threw me off...
That's how I lull people into a false sense of security. I sound like
I'm from Pittsburgh so no one ever suspects
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/30/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see the headline in the GFM local paper next year. 15 injured in shootout at Photo
contest. Bugsy Reese on the run from the Feds Who gets to play the Jodie Foster
role?
I will.
-frank
why hello,
Doug Brewer wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/30/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see the headline in the GFM local paper next year. 15
injured in shootout at Photo contest. Bugsy Reese on the run from
the Feds Who gets to play the Jodie Foster role?
I will.
-frank
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/30 Fri PM 12:13:59 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
On 9/30/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see the headline in the GFM local paper next year. 15 injured
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/30/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see the headline in the GFM local paper next year. 15 injured in
shootout at Photo contest. Bugsy Reese on the run from the Feds Who
gets to play the
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/30 Fri PM 02:12:42 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/30/05, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On 9/30/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's how I lull people into a false sense of security. I sound like
I'm from Pittsburgh so no one ever suspects anything! ;-)
LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 28/9/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
We're hoping you'll trade us Florida for Quebec eventually.
That so you can be closer to Castro?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
On 28/9/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
We're hoping you'll trade us Florida for Quebec eventually.
That so you can be closer to Castro?
It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau
On 9/29/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau and [Castro] were lovers.
Actually, I believe that was Pierre Trudeau, wasn't it?
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/09/29 Thu PM 01:33:37 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
On 9/29/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau and [Castro] were lovers
I thought it was a monogue(sp. damn I have enough trouble with English)
a trois...
frank theriault wrote:
On 9/29/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's rumoured that Maggie Trudeau and [Castro] were lovers.
Actually, I believe that was Pierre Trudeau, wasn't it?
-frank
I missed this earlier, but yes, I still shoot film... The last one I
finished (in for development now) was a roll of the new(ish) Kodak Elite
Colour 400UC...
- T
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wait a minute, I though the Canadians had already invaded Florida.
Naw, we turned 'em back after they got as far as North Carolina in
June...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 9/29/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Naw, we turned 'em back after they got as far as North Carolina in
June...
We?
LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Frank Theriault replied to Mark Roberts as follows:
Naw, we turned 'em back after they got as far as North Carolina in
June...
We?
He chooses sides depending on which way the wind is blowing. He's gonna have
to make a final decision soon. The winds of war are blowing a gale and all
On 29/9/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've already acquired the water balloon launching apparatus.
klingon smile
This will be good!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Supersoakers for support?
Cotty wrote:
On 29/9/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've already acquired the water balloon launching apparatus.
klingon smile
This will be good!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
klingon smile
I don't think I've ever seen a Klingon smile.
It's hard to tell because they usually show their teeth.
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Cotty wrote:
klingon smile
I don't think I've ever seen a Klingon smile.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
In a message dated 9/27/2005 5:44:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Weren't you the one who, just a while ago, suggested keeping politics out
of this discussion. Yet here you are, jumping in with both feet and moving
the discussion further towards politics. LOL And yes, I
Marnie wrote:
Yes, I slipped. My bad.
Actually I hate the term 'my bad'. I know it came from some movie. To me
it says Yeah, I made a mistake, so what?... and is designed to rid oneself
of any perceived guilt they may feel over their own inadequacy, inaccuracy,
or plain old screw up. At
In a message dated 9/27/2005 11:20:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a very liberal phrase to spout. :)
I'm pulling your leg on most of this rhetoric, though the phrase does bug
me, especially when I consider who says it in the work place.
OK... very seriously, my
That's fine Marnie. :) I'm spouting off myself... on some kind of kick
tonight. Last week on this job and starting a new one next week.
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Date
wouldn't work at all.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Tim Sherburne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2005 00:44
To: Pentax Discussion List
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
I recently ran across these working definitions that go
beyond
It's just that words change meaning with languages and geography. Especially in
politics were the winner may try to degrade the views of the opponent.
Liberal is slightly on the right wing here, but may be understood as left wing
in the US, and I've met americans who cant understand how we can
On 9/27/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two Lawrence Livermore Labs. One is classified, the other
isn't. I believe it was done that way to confuse people...
I don't understand.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 9/27/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two Lawrence Livermore Labs. One is classified, the other
isn't. I believe it was done that way to confuse people...
I don't understand.
--
Scott Loveless
One LLL is the LL Rad Lab. I don't know what
keith_w wrote:
One LLL is the LL Rad Lab. I don't know what the other one is called.
The Rad Lab did all manner of weapons research, as I recall, and all
highly classified...
So let me get this straight. You know what they did in the top secret lab
but you have no idea what they did in the
Tom Reese wrote:
keith_w wrote:
One LLL is the LL Rad Lab. I don't know what the other one is called.
The Rad Lab did all manner of weapons research, as I recall, and all
highly classified...
So let me get this straight. You know what they did in the top secret lab
but you have no idea
Come on now, Keith, Scott was expressing confusion... English IS your
native language, isn't it?
Jokes and the Internet. If it is not idiotically childish no one gets it.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
keith_w wrote:
keith_w replied to me as follows:
Tom Reese wrote:
keith_w wrote:
One LLL is the LL Rad Lab. I don't know what the other one is called.
The Rad Lab did all manner of weapons research, as I recall, and all
highly classified...
So let me get this straight. You know what they did in
It's true, you can look it up.
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 9/27/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two Lawrence Livermore Labs. One is classified, the other
isn't. I believe it was done that way to confuse people...
I don't understand.
--
Scott Loveless
That's part of the beauty of it. If you're a spy, you know what they're
doing in the classified lab, but not the details.
You have no idea what they're doing in the unclassified lab, so you
spend all your time trying to find out...
(Ok, so that's not exactly correct, but, it's still funny).
In a message dated 9/28/2005 4:56:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One LLL is the LL Rad Lab. I don't know what the other one is called.
The Rad Lab did all manner of weapons research, as I recall, and all
highly classified...
keith whaley
Now they claim they
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:54:37 -0700
It's just that words change meaning with languages and geography.
Especially in
politics were the winner may try to degrade the views of the opponent.
Liberal is slightly on the right wing here, but may be understood as left
wing
in the US, and I've met
On 9/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip The bans on firearms, certain religious speech
(Canada and Sweden in particular)snip
Can't speak for Sweden, but WRT to Canada: Huh? There is neither a
ban on firearms nor any ban on religious speech that I know of...
cheers,
frank
graywolf wrote:
Come on now, Keith, Scott was expressing confusion... English IS your
native language, isn't it?
I know that, I _knew_ that, and yes.
WHy did you feel it was necessary to point it out to me. Did I miss
somethng here? I don't think I said anything to put him down or make fun
Tom Reese wrote:
keith_w replied to me as follows:
Tom Reese wrote:
keith_w wrote:
One LLL is the LL Rad Lab. I don't know what the other one is called.
The Rad Lab did all manner of weapons research, as I recall, and all
highly classified...
So let me get this straight. You know
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip The bans on firearms, certain religious speech
(Canada and Sweden in particular)snip
Can't speak for Sweden, but WRT to Canada: Huh? There is neither a
ban on firearms nor any ban on
On 9/28/05, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Canada had more firearms per capita than the United States. (Of course,
the population here is vastly greater, so the total number of firearms
is greater than that of Canada. We're probably safe from invasion!)
Well, that was the point I was
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Canada had more firearms per capita than the United States. (Of course,
the population here is vastly greater, so the total number of firearms
is greater than that of Canada. We're
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
The bans oncertain religious speech
(Canada in particular),
C'est What?
William Robb
William Robb warned:
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Canada had more firearms per capita than the United States. (Of course,
the population here is vastly greater, so the total number of firearms
is greater than that of Canada. We're probably safe
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
Canada had more firearms per capita than the United States. (Of course,
the population here is vastly greater, so the total number of firearms
is greater than that of Canada. We're probably safe from invasion!)
I bet that % and
Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
The bans oncertain religious speech
(Canada in particular),
C'est What?
William Robb
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold
Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb warned:
From: Mark Roberts
Canada had more firearms per capita than the United States. (Of course,
the population here is vastly greater, so the total number of firearms
is greater than that of Canada. We're probably safe from invasion!)
I have to say that I thought Intelligent Design (the name is a joke in
itself) was an American invention. It certainly seems to have been taken
up by Americans in a much bigger way than elsewhere. And as for an
unwillingness to discuss issues, I don't think Americans can claim to be
John Forbes
As for bans on firearms: would you still want a handgun if nobody else had
one? And if so, why?
I'd want mine. I love target shooting with it.
Tom Reese
On 9/28/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bet that % and number was higher when we razed yer White House too.
Don't underestimate us.
William Robb
Just to clarify, Mr. Robb, the burning of our White House was a
symbollic victory over a mostly deserted, undefended town of less than
As every good American knows, Canada's ability to invade the US was thoroughly
analyzed in a recent episode of South Park. I don't remember exactly how it
ends. I think the Canadians decide they don't want it after all. Kenny, of
course, dies in defense of his country. But then Kenny dies in
John opined:
As for a ban on firearms...(snip)
Oh, oh, this is going over to guns. Time to stop boys and girls. Remember the
last one? It got really, really ugly, blazed on for several weeks.
On 9/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John opined:
As for a ban on firearms...(snip)
Oh, oh, this is going over to guns. Time to stop boys and girls. Remember the
last one? It got really, really ugly, blazed on for several weeks.
You're right - I wasn't intending on getting
pcn Oh, oh, this is going over to guns. Time to stop boys and girls.
pcn Remember the last one? It got really, really ugly, blazed on for several
weeks.
I second that. Please :)
Good light!
fra
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 04:55:25AM -0700, keith_w wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 9/27/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are two Lawrence Livermore Labs. One is classified, the other
isn't. I believe it was done that way to confuse people...
I don't understand.
--
Den 28. sep. 2005 kl. 19.03 skrev frank theriault:
On 9/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip The bans on firearms, certain religious speech
(Canada and Sweden in particular)snip
Can't speak for Sweden, but WRT to Canada: Huh? There is neither a
ban on firearms nor any
On 9/28/05, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Let´s go back to photography snip
I don't want to get into a discussion about religion or guns either.
I simply wanted the record to reflect that it is a mis-statement to
say that Canada bans firearms or restricts certain religious speech
Hi,
What many of us fear is the constant reduction of freedom
from the more serious socialists. The bans on firearms,
certain religious speech (Canada and Sweden in particular), a
general unwillingness to discuss issues but instead demagogue
ideas (like Intelligent Design),
Bob W wrote:
Bellowing across the swamp about it like primeval
mastodons serves no purpose.
Mark.
Actually it confirms to the primeval mastadons on one side of the swamp,
that there are indeed primeval mastadons on the other side.
Tom C.
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film
1. There was a comma after the gun statement.
It was not a designation regarding Canada.
But to that point, consider Australia.
2. Regarding certain religious speech, here's a Canada example.
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jun/05060808.html
The problem is that the apparent exemption is a
. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Bob W wrote:
Bellowing across the swamp about it like primeval mastodons
serves no
purpose.
Mark.
On 9/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. There was a comma after the gun statement.
It was not a designation regarding Canada.
But to that point, consider Australia.
2. Regarding certain religious speech, here's a Canada example.
Older handguns are beautiful machines, as worthy of collecting as any
other well made object. Additionally Government agents will always have
handguns, or worse. Right now they are on the side of the angels,
mostly. That could change. Even if I don't need a handgun, for that
reason, I
Because they are fun to shoot. Because they can be used conveniently in
indoor ranges. Because they are nifty mechanical gizmos, which is the
same reason lots of folks buy cameras, or watches for that matter.
People who buy them primarily as weapons need to be watched closely, in
my opinion.
Wait a minute, I though the Canadians had already invaded Florida.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As every good American knows, Canada's ability to invade the US was thoroughly analyzed in a recent episode of South Park. I don't remember exactly how it ends. I think the Canadians decide they don't
They invaded GFM last year. GRIN
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
P. J. Alling wrote:
Wait a minute, I though the Canadians had already invaded Florida.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As every good American knows, Canada's
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Bah. Most of your army would quit when they reached the first Milwaukee
brewery.
Amarican beer?
FEH!!
WW
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
1. There was a comma after the gun statement.
It was not a designation regarding Canada.
But to that point, consider Australia.
2. Regarding certain religious speech, here's
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Wait a minute, I though the Canadians had already invaded Florida.
We're hoping you'll trade us Florida for Quebec eventually.
WW
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 September 2005 23:13
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Older handguns are beautiful machines, as worthy of
collecting as any other well made object
DagT wrote:
Let´s go back to photography and talk about attempts in the US to
stop the free speech of artist like Mapplethorpe, Sally Mann, Jock
Sturges, etc, as well as certain differences between European and US
versions of movies, music ++.-)
The Mapplethorpe controversy was about
Quite so. By the same token, we should also watch that small minority of
people who buy lenses to take pictures, rather than to fondle them as
well-made objects.
John
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:09:02 +0100, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because they are fun to shoot. Because they can be
In a message dated 9/28/2005 12:38:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's just a separate section within the main Lab campus.
It's easy enough to spot - it's the part with razor wire
surrounding it, guard turrets at the corners (staffed by
guys who look link they have *no*
Gee, I thought that was all done in that non-existant town in Tennesee,
Oak Ridge.
I lived there for a while. They really do have gun towers where other
towns have welcome signs. The gun towers weren't manned at that time,
but I do wonder about now?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
I should have thought any port in a storm.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Tom Reese Subject: Re: Liberty.
Was: anybody still shoot film?
Bah. Most of your army would quit when they reached the first Milwaukee
brewery.
Amarican beer? FEH!!
WW
--
When
Sorry, even we're not that stupid.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: P. J. Alling Subject: Re:
Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Wait a minute, I though the Canadians had already invaded Florida.
We're hoping you'll trade us Florida for Quebec eventually
. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Older handguns are beautiful machines, as worthy of
collecting as any other well made object. Additionally
Government agents will always have handguns, or worse. Right
now they are on the side of the angels, mostly. That could
change. Even if I don't need a handgun
I bought a scanner four years ago with the intention of scanning all my
slides. The job is barely started. I find scanning ONCE to be a major
headache. But I suppose it depends whether you are scanning one or two,
or thousands.
John
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 04:45:24 +0100, Rob Studdert
years ago. I get great scans by just pushing the button. I
don't think commercial operations can give me a better quality scan.
YMMV
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: anybody still shoot film?
On Sep 27, 2005, at 4:04 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
You'd be surprised at what you're missing ... but there's a difference
between a commercial service and those who provide truly high quality
scans made on top quality equipment.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kenneth Waller
I got tired of paying ever increasing prices for scans and bought
That's true, Shel. But finding someone who can actually produce great scans is
a problem for most of us. I tried a $100 drum scan from the top pro lab in this
area, and it was mediocre at best. A lot of correction was required. I'm
currently working on a project with a very good photo
On 27 Sep 2005 at 5:52, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You'd be surprised at what you're missing ... but there's a difference
between a commercial service and those who provide truly high quality
scans made on top quality equipment.
True, pro-scans here off any type of gear are generally nothing to
With current true drum scanners (the Imacon ain't one of them) costing
between $35,000 and $80,000 the number of scans you can get at $45 each
is between about 80 and 1800. At the 80 figure many folks would probably
be better off buying, at the 1800 figure it would be a toss up.
One of the
Hi Paul ...
Your comment reminds me of the time I went into a highly-regarded
restaurant in St. Louis. I saw that there were some fish dishes on the
menu and I asked the waitress if they prepared fish well. She
enthusiastically replied that they sure did! When the fish arrived it
was terribly
A little town like Berkeley! Shel, you make it sound like some dorp in
the back of beyond. It is, I believe, one of the top university towns in a
country with reputedly the best universities in the world. It would be
surprising if it didn't have lots of wonderful things going for it.
John Forbes wrote:
A little town like Berkeley! Shel, you make it sound like some dorp
in the back of beyond. It is, I believe, one of the top university
towns in a country with reputedly the best universities in the world.
It would be surprising if it didn't have lots of wonderful
On 27/9/05, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a small university town, filled to the brim and overflowing, with
aged old hippies and *far* left liberal souls...
Isn't there a linear accelerator there? IIRC it runs across / under the
freeway? Going purely from memory of 30 years ago
Cotty wrote:
On 27/9/05, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a small university town, filled to the brim and overflowing, with
aged old hippies and *far* left liberal souls...
Isn't there a linear accelerator there? IIRC it runs across / under the
freeway? Going purely from memory
Can you be an old hippie without being aged? :-)
But I'm glad you concede that liberals HAVE souls...!
The word comes from Old French, and originally meant pertaining to a free
man. Its very root means free.
So why is it that in the land of the free, many people seem to like
freedom
True ... but it ~is~ a small town, both in terms of area and in population.
However, it has some of the best restaurants in the San Francisco area, a
wonderfully diverse population, a deep cultural life, a large number of
theaters, a great university, some wonderful social aspects, art everywhere
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
Subject: OT: Liberty. Was: anybody still shoot film?
Of political opinions: Favourable to constitutional changes and legal or
administrative reforms tending in the direction of freedom or democracy.
Surely this is what all Americans want
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
