OK, I figured it out (sort of).
~alias/.qmail-postmaster was forwarding to root..
When I changed it to adam-postmaster, mail to root started working again.
Anyone have an idea why this happened?
--Adam
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 12:27:00AM -0400, Adam D . McKenna wrote:
> Here's a dumb one. Can
Here's a dumb one. Can anyone tell me why this is happening?
adam@spotted:~$ cat ~alias/.qmail-root
adam-root
adam@spotted:~$ cat ~adam/.qmail-root
./Mail/root/
I tried changing ~alias/.qmail-root to be adam-rt instead of adam-root but
the same thing happens.
- Forwarded message from [EMAI
Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 2 July 1999 at 21:05:09 -0400
> On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Kevin King wrote:
>
> > My "experience" with this list has been overall farely pleasant - despite
> > my stupid newbie questions. People like Dave Sill have been very patient.
> > BUT, because I'm a newbie,
"Johan Van Gompel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I mean the latter. When I add e.g. 'hotmail.com' to rcpthosts, everyone
| inside the LAN is able to send messages to that host. If I don't, they get
| that darn 'not found in rcpthosts' message.
Let's try a simple test. Our goal is to verify that
> isn't that incorrect...
> I'm not prattling on endlessly about my ignorance.
> I mean, if you think trying to clarify things means that I'm ignoreant,
> so be it, but that's not what you said.
Can we please drop this?
Thanks
jason
Yeah, that works. But it gets a tad more annoying when you want to install
everything as root when you build the package and then have the RPM file apply
the user and group ownerships. Also when you want to provide a packaged
instcheck utility.
I just created a conf-qmail_pack and conf-users_pac
As Dave said, MAPI is a Windows API. Your professor is confusing the term
MAPI Server to mean a mail-server (such as qmail or Sendmail) and the
client-server behavior of a MAPI Server providing messaging services to
other applications running on the same machine...
Yes. I know they don't "have" t
On 2 Jul 1999, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> I just can't stand listening to Scott prattle on endlessly about his own
> ignorance anymore...
isn't that incorrect...
I'm not prattling on endlessly about my ignorance.
I mean, if you think trying to clarify things means that I'm ignoreant,
so be it, but th
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Solomon B. Smith wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm a long-time Windows user, but can see many advantages to Linux, but I've
> got a lot yet to learn... I've been reading this list and it has been quite
> helpful in installing qmail successfully.
>
> I've installed the memphis rpms, acc
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Kevin King wrote:
> My "experience" with this list has been overall farely pleasant - despite
> my stupid newbie questions. People like Dave Sill have been very patient.
> BUT, because I'm a newbie, sometimes even when I "RTFM" things don't
> always click. I agree with Adam Mc
cyclog. Part of Dan's daemontools package.
ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/daemontools.html
At 10:09 AM 7/2/99 , you wrote:
>There was discussion a while ago about a faster syslogd replacement
>(part of the qmail distribution or something separate?), could someone
>point me at some informaiton ab
Very Easy... depending on your level of skill.
If you follow the directions in the tarball exactly (read EVERYTHING first,
especially the FAQ) you can do it first try.
I run the same system for an ISP mail server and it works, FLAWLESSLY.
Outlook Express on Win98 are no problem.
You should def
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Racer X wrote:
> > Installing QMail is much closer to attempting to learn to fly. The
>
> Installing qmail is nowhere near as dangerous as learning to fly. Flying
> requires not only knowledge of theory but a large amount of practical
> skill, and a lack of skill has serious
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Alex Miller wrote:
> In your negative response you wrote GFY.
> That was your PUBLIC response here on this list.
> Your PRIVATE email to me regarding making the
> web site was hardly "Good For You" and you know it.
> There are two kinds of people. Honest people and dishonest
> It's understandable that as a flying newbie, you would think that
> handed a set of keys, it would be "up to you" to know how to use
> the plane.
I would? I know that planes are fairly complicated and dangerous pieces of
machinery and that a pilot's license is required to fly legally in most
p
> Alex assumed that the acronym stood for some sort of insult or profanity.
> Why? If you'll read the paragraph that I was replying to, you
> can tell that
> it was blatant flamebait. Alex proved this with his reaction.
Actually Adam,
I proposed making a web site
In your negative response
Ok, as a flying newbie I can understand what you are trying to say.
As someone more experienced let me just explain that in reality,
flying a plane is very different than driving a car. The physical
skills are similar but the standards of access are quite different.
It's understandable that as a
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Alex Miller wrote:
> Threats of law suits
> should I elaborate?
rcpthosts... need I say more?
... anyway, wait until you get some idiot who wants to sue you because
you are no longer an open relay.
Scott
> Care to add to the list? I'm going to make a website on things you should
> know, skills you should have, before attempting to install qmail. I'll
> devote a special section called
Why not just point people to lwq (which, no offense intended, is probably
infinitely better than a resource from
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 05:27:54AM +0200, Johan Van Gompel wrote:
> Adam D . McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How are you starting tcpserver?
--Adam
Adam D . McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How are you starting tcpserver?
> Did you remember to compile your /etc/tcp.smtp into /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb
using
> tcprules?
It did everything as described in FAQ #5.4, including compiling the rules
in /etc/tcp.smtp into /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb using tcprule
Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| If tcpserver is bound only to the internal interface of a bastion host, then
| there's no danger of being used as a relay from the outside world.
...until one day someone accidently changes something, or misunderstands
or misapplies that advice.
Given
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 05:48:48PM -0400, Scott Schwartz wrote:
> | This host has more than one interface? If that's the case, you shouldn't even
> | need any tcprules file, assuming that you want to allow anyone on your internal
> | network to relay. If you're listening to port 25 only on the int
| This host has more than one interface? If that's the case, you shouldn't even
| need any tcprules file, assuming that you want to allow anyone on your internal
| network to relay. If you're listening to port 25 only on the internal
| interface, then you can remove the rcpthosts file without fear
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 04:22:24AM +0200, Johan Van Gompel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Despite following the necessary instructions (#5.4) we are still
> experiencing an outgoing mail problem with qmail 1.03. Unless I remove
> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts nobody can send mail outside the LAN.
Do you rea
How are you starting tcpserver?
Did you remember to compile your /etc/tcp.smtp into /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb using
tcprules?
--Adam
On Sat, Jul 03, 1999 at 04:22:24AM +0200, Johan Van Gompel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Despite following the necessary instructions (#5.4) we are still
> experiencing an outgoin
Hello,
Despite following the necessary instructions (#5.4) we are still
experiencing an outgoing mail problem with qmail 1.03. Unless I remove
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts nobody can send mail outside the LAN.
This is what I put in /etc/tcp.smtp:
--
192.168.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
127.:allow,RELA
> > >Let me ask you this. If you got into an airplane, a Cessna 150,
> > and I handed
> > >you a key, could you start it? Is the key what starts it? Should
> > you turn it
> > >like a car key? Is there a difference between turning it left or
right?
>
> Technically, if you try to fly a plane, and y
If you insist on doing this, could do please do the rest of the list a
favor and not CC us on replies? We already know how to unsubscribe from
the mailing list because we read the welcome message when we subscribed in
the first place.
shag
- Original Message -
From: Alex Miller <[EMAIL
> Wouldn't the person on the help line be just a bit negligent if they
failed
> to ask. Do you have a learner's permit and are you seated next to a
licensed
> driver over 18?
No, I'm sorry, I really don't think it's GM's responsibility to make sure
that everyone using their product is legally ent
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Richard Letts wrote:
> for years bind allowed '_' in domain names. at one version they 'fixed'
> this and thousands of zone files around the world had to be fixed. Who is
> to say at some point in the future the server won't implement the
> checking.
>
> I guess bind doesn't
Hello
I'm a long-time Windows user, but can see many advantages to Linux, but I've
got a lot yet to learn... I've been reading this list and it has been quite
helpful in installing qmail successfully.
I've installed the memphis rpms, according to Keith Burdis' how-to
instructions. I've download
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, Russ, I guess you've never been bitten by config.cache.
No, I can honestly say that I've never been bitten by config.cache. I've
run configure, seen a bunch of things show up as cached when I knew I
didn't have a valid cache, and deleted the ca
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 1999 3:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Howto
>
>
> "Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Let me ask you this. If you got into an airplane, a Cessna 150,
> and I handed
> >you a k
Ah, now you've pinpointed the logic behind my use of an acronym.. (they're
so fun!)
Alex assumed that the acronym stood for some sort of insult or profanity.
Why? If you'll read the paragraph that I was replying to, you can tell that
it was blatant flamebait. Alex proved this with his reaction
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, McGinnis, Tom wrote:
>
> I've tried and tried, but can't seem to figure out why "GFY" is so
> offensive. Obviously I haven't figured out the real meaning. "Good for
> you" is all I can come up with.
When I first saw it, I too thought it was "Good For You" but based on
whats
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 09:01:35PM -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> Chris, when you get that filter written would you mind sharing a copy?
> Unless I get a few minutes to do it myself, then I'll share.
>
> Scott, can you say **plonk** ?
Maybe the freds could extend ezmlm with an rfish option?
Title: qmail-unsubscribe
qmail-unsubscribe
I've tried and tried, but can't seem to figure out why "GFY" is so
offensive. Obviously I haven't figured out the real meaning. "Good for
you" is all I can come up with.
-Tom
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
> Ok, so we've beaten the dead horse with the fact that MX records can't
> be CNAMES... so why does bind allow this? Go figure.
for years bind allowed '_' in domain names. at one version they 'fixed'
this and thousands of zone files around the world ha
Eric Dahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I'm using serialmail-70 over a ppp link for outgoing mail on a linux
>box. From the ip-up scripts it runs perfectly. However, if the conection
>stays up, I call serialmail from a crontab on the hour.
Smells like an environment difference.
>I have the pat
"Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Let me ask you this. If you got into an airplane, a Cessna 150, and I handed
>you a key, could you start it? Is the key what starts it? Should you turn it
>like a car key? Is there a difference between turning it left or right?
>
>Would you be an idiot if
My "experience" with this list has been overall farely pleasant - despite
my stupid newbie questions. People like Dave Sill have been very patient.
BUT, because I'm a newbie, sometimes even when I "RTFM" things don't
always click. I agree with Adam McKenna, if you ask nicely, you'll probably
get a
Hello,
I'm using serialmail-70 over a ppp link for outgoing mail on a linux
box. From the ip-up scripts it runs perfectly. However, if the conection
stays up, I call serialmail from a crontab on the hour.
I have the path to tcpclient set as a system wide path, and call
serialmail from the cronta
The way to unsubscribe from an ezmlm list is based on it's name.
This name of this list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] (via the People's Republic of
Tonga)
So to unsubscribe send a blank email to this address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] from your subscribing email address.
For more about ezmlm check out http://w
"Durham, Kenneth J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| General Motors doesn't have a help line for people who don't know how
| to drive.
"An analogy is like a cup of instant coffee. It can wake you up, but
it's not the real thing." --- Peter da Silva
| Imagine if they did...
http://www.gm.com/v
> General Motors doesn't have a help line for people who don't know how
> to drive. Imagine if they did...
You mean a help line like their web page?
http://www.gm.com/vehicles/us/owners/partners_safety/e830.html
Wouldn't the person on the help line be just a bit negligent if they failed
to ask.
Profanity isn't that complicated.
A single paragraph, that says, "GFY" is profanity. It is an acronym and
unlike the RTFM acronym, it's actual meaning is meant as full value.
That's what I'm referring to.
Alex Miller
P.S.
I wasn't quoting anyone, or if I did that was a typo. I was SAYing "Don
Ritchie Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We just set up a RedHat 6.0 server to be used as a mail server in our
>deparment at school. Is Qmail MAPI 2.0 compliant? I am not really sure
>what his even is, but one of the professers is hesitant to let us dump
>Groupwise and switch to qmail if it isn
> May sombody point me where I should send msg to unsubscribe
>from this list. I'm taking vacation and may mailbox will be very fast
>full.
See:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#mailing-lists
-Dave
We just set up a RedHat 6.0 server to be used as a mail server in our
deparment at school. Is Qmail MAPI 2.0 compliant? I am not really sure
what his even is, but one of the professers is hesitant to let us dump
Groupwise and switch to qmail if it isn't. Also, is there an easy way
to go from gr
Hi
May sombody point me where I should send msg to unsubscribe
from this list. I'm taking vacation and may mailbox will be very fast
full.
Jozef
> But what *you* have to understand is that if you're that much of a
> newbie, you probably shouldn't be trying to install qmail.
Respectfully, you're wrong.
QMail does what I need it to do. Sendmail doesn't. The fact that I still
haven't resolved my firewall problems or can't set up my own DNS
If you want build root support, I've got a patch to the
qmail-1.03 distribution that adds that in.
Well, does not something like
DESTDIR=/okidoki
make
make man
mkdir -p $DESTDIR/var/qmail
chmod 755 $DESTDIR/var/qmail
echo $DESTDIR/var/qmail > conf-qmail
make install
make inst
Alex,
As you quoted "Don't think that the behavior on this list isn't
completely public, and potentially newsworthy." This is a very public
mailing list and from what i remember freedom of speach is still in affect.
One of the greatist things in america is that if someone does not like
something o
Actually,
Things I find objectionable:
RTFM, particularly, when the issue is misunderstanding what was read, or not
having the right prior knowledge, instead of when the user didn't actually
read the manual. In India, confessions are prohibited in the courts because
it is recognized that their u
Russell Nelson writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:
> > Also note that Dan is reinventing parts of autoconf in his build process;
> > that's what all those try programs are. He's doing precisely the same
> > thing that autoconf does, namely write out a little program, compile it,
> > and see what
Diego Puertas writes:
> Sam wrote:
>
> > Diego Puertas writes:
> >
> > > When I put wrong email adresses (i.e.: "|/sbin/mkmess [EMAIL PROTECTED]" , or
> > > "//@%^&*|" ) in the mail from command of a qmail server, the server does
> > > not protest, as sendmail does. Postfix does the same as qm
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 07:50:32AM -0700, Durham, Kenneth J wrote:
} Being a newbi as alex in qmail an other things. You guys have to understand
} that alot of the manuals are made for linux users and not newbies. The text
} as well as explination of alot of the commands do not make any sense at
Sam wrote:
> Diego Puertas writes:
>
> > When I put wrong email adresses (i.e.: "|/sbin/mkmess [EMAIL PROTECTED]" , or
> > "//@%^&*|" ) in the mail from command of a qmail server, the server does
> > not protest, as sendmail does. Postfix does the same as qmail.
> >
> > What are the reasons and
That would be after the signup process.
Dirk
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 11:10:49PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Dirk Harms-Merbitz writes:
> > How do you identify an idiot during the signup process?
>
> They respond to off-topic postings.
>
> --
> -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://cryn
Finally, I installed the Memphis RPM, I noticed immediate differences.
1) First, there is no rc file in /var/qmail.
The README in my ftp directory explains the differences between the
tarball and the rpm's setup.
2) There were additional daemons running, particularly the tcp se
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 10:55:33AM -0400, Dave Kitabjian wrote:
>
> This is probably very simple, but indulge me.
>
> man for qmail-smtpd says:
>
> rcpthosts may include wildcards:
>
> heaven.af.mil
> .heaven.af.mil
>
> So is the "." the wildcard? My current
This is probably very simple, but indulge me.
man for qmail-smtpd says:
rcpthosts may include wildcards:
heaven.af.mil
.heaven.af.mil
So is the "." the wildcard? My current understanding is:
heaven.af.mil - will allow all email to @heaven.af.m
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 07:50:32AM -0700, Durham, Kenneth J wrote:
> Being a newbi as alex in qmail an other things. You guys have to understand
> that alot of the manuals are made for linux users and not newbies. The text
> as well as explination of alot of the commands do not make any sense at
Being a newbi as alex in qmail an other things. You guys have to understand
that alot of the manuals are made for linux users and not newbies. The text
as well as explination of alot of the commands do not make any sense at all
to someone that is new. If the manuals were also out with text that
I believe the point was that you read your car manual to see where the power
connects are for the stereo your also reading a manual for to install. Or, in
other words, read your linux manual to learn how to use your inetd correctly
while you read the qmail manual as you install it.
"Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Any other books you can think of that are worthwhile, particularly those
| that might help with installing QMail.
The Unix Programming Environment, by Kernighan and Pike
(It's dated, but seminal.)
No magic maybe, but perhaps a different syntax in the inetd that Redhat
uses.
No, syntax for Rh inetd is the same as in the INSTALL:
16. Set up qmail-smtpd in /etc/inetd.conf (all on one line):
smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env
tcp-env
>I have installed the line
>from FAQ 5.1
>in the ined.conf
>
>tcpserver -u 501 -g 500 0 smtp /car/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd &
The FAQ never said to put the above line in inetd.conf. It says put
the above line in your sys startup files. tcpserver is used *instead
of* inetd.
The FAQ cannot really b
It's great.
That being said vigorously sincerely, there are a few improvements.
2.8.1 discusses /var/qmail/rc
The memphis RPM which, so far, was the only way I could get QMail to
function differs from conventional setups in that there is no /var/qmail/rc
file.
It would be nice if something wer
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 03:09:24PM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
You're looking for cyclog, which is part of the daemontools package. Find
it at:
ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/pub/software/daemontools-0.53.tar.gz
> There was discussion a while ago about a faster syslogd replacement
> (part of the qmai
There was discussion a while ago about a faster syslogd replacement
(part of the qmail distribution or something separate?), could someone
point me at some informaiton about it please.
--
Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://ww
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999 08:11:03 -0400 (EDT), Russell Nelson wrote:
>Sorry, Russ, but autoconf is a lose (compared to Dan's methods --
>obviously it's much better than the old "edit the Makefile; edit
>config.h; make; iterate" way). It's just wrong, all the way.
>Something can solve a problem but st
"Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Wether you like it or not, there is going to be a new set of install
>documents for QMail.
No problem, there's room for plenty more. Before you charge off,
though, please take a few minutes to skim "Life with qmail" and a drop
me a line telling me wher
"Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Later, recently, Dave Sill pointed out the reason why, which incidentally,
>ISN'T yet in the manual, not the inetd manual, nor any qmail manual. Not yet
>anyway.
Oh yes it is. "Life with qmail", which is *certainly* a qmail manual,
says:
4.For a ligh
"Scott D. Yelich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Yes. Everything I need is on the Internet, well, except for good
>documentation --
Have you read "Life with qmail"? If you have, I'd be happy to hear
what you think needs improvement.
The URL:
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html
-Dave
Ok
So, on a web page giving people a list of things they should know (including
links to man pages, other web pages etc.)
Should the following be included as Sun only?
sunrpc, portmap
And the NFS daemons, again, are statd and lockd Sun only?
Would something like this be reasonable?
Linux basi
Is there a particular reason why you don't want QMail to work beyond the
scope of your network?
SMTP handling will send mail out to the world
POP-3 and IMap will handle sending and recieving mail via remote machines
(i.e. not the localhost machine running QMail) I don't have Pop3 working yet
(to
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 06:31:49AM -0400, Alex Miller wrote:
> > inetd/xinetd/tcpd and anything running under them
> > sunrpc (nfsd, statd, lockd, etc.)
> > portmap
> > tcpserver
> > named
>
> ok, I think we got inetd covered.
>
> xinetd (that's not on my system, nor is it listed in LINUX in a
Russ Allbery writes:
> Also note that Dan is reinventing parts of autoconf in his build process;
> that's what all those try programs are. He's doing precisely the same
> thing that autoconf does, namely write out a little program, compile it,
> and see what happens. So he's actually using p
Vince Vielhaber wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > Janos Farkas wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1999-07-02 at 11:09:56, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
> > > > I have a small question about the databytes control file:
> > > > does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Janos Farkas wrote:
> >
> > On 1999-07-02 at 11:09:56, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
> > > I have a small question about the databytes control file:
> > > does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size is checked?
> >
> > No, qmail-smtpd c
"Any competent system administrator needs to know the syntax that the base
networking daemons on his operating system use, and if he doesn't know the
syntax, he should at least know where to look it up."
Adam
> inetd/xinetd/tcpd and anything running under them
> sunrpc (nfsd, statd, lockd, etc.)
qmail Digest 2 Jul 1999 10:00:01 - Issue 689
Topics (messages 27367 through 27464):
Howto
27367 by: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
27370 by: "Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
27375 by: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
27380 by: "Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Alex Miller wrote:
> available on Access. I don't understand why Postgres doesn't yet support the
> alter table command)
PostgreSQL has supported ALTER TABLE at least since 6.4 (the first time
I tried using it).
>
> Any other books you can think of that are worthwhile, part
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 11:17:10AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a small question about the databytes control file:
> >
> > does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size is checked?
> > Becuase if so, a client can send mails of 10 GB... they won't go through,
Janos Farkas wrote:
>
> On 1999-07-02 at 11:09:56, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
> > I have a small question about the databytes control file:
> > does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size is checked?
>
> No, qmail-smtpd checks it continously while passing the message data to
> q
On 1999-07-02 at 11:09:56, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
> I have a small question about the databytes control file:
> does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size is checked?
No, qmail-smtpd checks it continously while passing the message data to
qmail-queue. As soon as it founds i
Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a small question about the databytes control file:
>
> does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size is checked?
> Becuase if so, a client can send mails of 10 GB... they won't go through,
> but they would block the server completely.
Hi,
I have a small question about the databytes control file:
does a mail first get stored on local disk before the size is checked?
Becuase if so, a client can send mails of 10 GB... they won't go through,
but they would block the server completely...
Franky
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 06:52:54PM -0600, Jeff Lush wrote:
I can think of 2 possibilities:
1. (server side): The timestamp on the message files is in the future, and
so qmail-pop3d does not "see" them. To fix, simply touch the files.
# touch ~username/Maildir/new/*
2. (client side): The client
Answers follow below...
Dave Sill wrote:
> Doug Lumpkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snip...
> How are you running qmail-smtpd? Via tcpserver, inetd, or what? Show
> us the the commands.
>
tcpserver...
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c100 -u502 -g500 0 smtp
\
/var/qmail/bin/qm
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Adam D. McKenna wrote:
> > the RFC, it will just state something like "MX records can't point to
> > CNAMES" -- and never really state why this is so.
> You were given the answer to this two days ago and didn't bother to read
> it. Russ just answered you again, let's see i
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 12:08:20AM -0600, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
First of all I'd like to apologize to the entire list for posting this. I
had told myself I wasn't going to post any more on this thread, but it's just
too funny to keep away from.
This, however, WILL be my last post, and as for s
95 matches
Mail list logo
