Re: Handling high volume lists

Thus said "Robin S. Socha" on 14 May 2001 22:30:00 +0200: > > Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see a Mail-Followup-To header in your > > message. Are people supposed to guess whether or not you are on the > > list or whether or not you want a cc header listing your address so > > that your mail fi

Re: OT - Problems with daemontools 0.70

Thus said "Michael Geier" on Mon, 14 May 2001 13:39:10 CDT: > 'preciate that no one flamed... Generally you won't get flamed for decent technical questions like this, however you might get flamed for using Microsoft Outlook to post your email. :-) Andy -- [---[system uptime]-

Re: Who is List Manager

Thus said "Niles" on Mon, 14 May 2001 11:49:46 EDT: > Jim, > > Try sending mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED] My guess, however, is that he isn't on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list... Andy -- [---[system uptime]-

Re: Unsubscribe Doesn't Work

Thus said Jim Darrough on Sun, 13 May 2001 09:27:30 PDT: > I have sent three blank emails to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in an attempt to unsubscribe three times > without any apparent effect. Anyone got a better idea? Maybe you're not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], you may have subscrib

Re: html based email

On Wed, 09 May 2001 09:40:22 PDT, "Michael Boyiazis" wrote: > It has 3 parts: > plain text > html for normals > html for aol Shouldn't that be: text/plain for normals bloat/html for lusers bloat/html for aol users :-) Andy

Re: assign file being overwritten regularly

On Tue, 08 May 2001 18:42:20 EDT, "Carl J. Danowski" wrote: > Does anyone know why the 'assign' file in /etc/qmail/users would continually be >overwritten? > Hmm, who else has ``root'' access to your box? If none, which cronjob did you write that overwrites it? If none, which web utility di

Re: Qmail and its parts.

On Mon, 07 May 2001 14:36:54 EDT, "Carl J. Danowski" wrote: > Why is someone sending this message again? I was successfully helped. Someone else finally noticed... If you check the archives, I brought this up months ago and no one seemed to notice the duplicates. mail.delanet.com has been d

Re: defaultdomain ?

Thus said Joan Picanyol i Puig on Sat, 05 May 2001 22:04:49 +0200: > However, look at the From: header of this message :( This is most likely a client problem. You need to configure your client to use the correct address. BTW, you didn't show the contents of the rest of the control files...

Re: Ban These Exchange Server Users

On 24 Apr 2001 06:57:45 PDT, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I know you all are so against it... but don't you think it's time to > > re-consider installing a scanner on Mailing Lists? > > No, I think it's time to kick everyone running one of those broken > scanners that mails the mailing list off of th

Re: It's not my list but ... (AV Bots)

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:35:10 CDT, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > It isn't my list, but if it was I would add the IP addresses of any servers > that sent a virus warning to my list into my tcp rules block list. Unfortunately that won't work. The email is sent to a list exploder and never directly del

Here we go again [was Re: Antigen found W32/Navidad-B (Sophos,Norman) virus ]

Thus said ANTIGEN_ITMAILMAN2 on Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:37:19 BST: > Antigen for Exchange found Emanuel.exe infected with W32/Navidad-B > (Sophos,Norman) virus. Please fix your lame borken anti-virus scanner!!! Andy -- [---[system uptime]] 9:22

Re: Can't establish SMTP connection (Error 4.4.1)

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:22:50 +0200, Willy De la Court wrote: > Is'nt it time to install a virus scanner on the list. Why? I see no reason why the list should have a virus scanner. Andy

Re: [OT] Re: VIRUS ALERT

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:10:10 EDT, Jason Kawaja wrote: > folks on the list who are _still_ using a windows box should go to : Maybe you should refer them to something like: http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Installation-HOWTO/index.html or http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html ;-) Andy

Re: VIRUS ALERT

On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:15:08 -0300, "Alan R." wrote: > You are sending email with virus. Please use some anti-virus program. What makes it worse are dumb anti-virus scanners that bounce messages back to the list... :-) Andy

Re: tcpserver help

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:01:57 +0200, "NDSoftware" wrote: > PLEASE USE A ANTIVIRUS !!! Please don't send lame messages like this to the list. If you have already blocked the virus with your software then what are you worried about?

[OT] Re: Sticky question about qmail-queue and qmail-smtpd interactions

Thus said Jason Haar on Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:06:02 +1200: > me to realise a rare error condition I hadn't expected. This virus scanner > didn't like scanning a 90Mb zip'ped AVI file (ahem) - whereas another vendor > scanner took 1.5minutes to scan it, this one took nearly two hours... Tell them t

Re: RFCs?

Thus said "D. J. Bernstein" on 15 Apr 2001 19:31:35 -: > See http://cr.yp.to/qmail/warfield.html. Wow, I've never seen a more clueless sysadmin.[1] It's apparent that he doesn't understand what the problem was and decided to make qmail the scapegoat. What's sad is that there are people out

Re: Some mail is getting to qmail, some others aren't

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:11:43 PDT, "Steve Quezadas" wrote: > Non-authoritative answer: > pcrush.com MX preference = 5, mail exchanger = 63.204.40.234 I could be wrong, but I believe that MX records are supposed to be names not IP addresses. This could be part of the problem. Andy p.s. nsl

Re: End of the qmail era?

Thus said Adam McKenna on Sun, 01 Apr 2001 01:48:17 -0800: > > > > Come on now. You can do better than this. I got a good laugh out of it anyway. :-) Andy -- [---[system uptime]--

Re: very large queue list (qmail-qread)

Thus said "Ross Davis - Data Anywhere" on Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:53:02 PST: > when I run qmail-qread I get 108,000 lines of emails, most of which have > sent. When I run qmail-qstat is says that there typically about 250 emails > that in queue. > > Is that normal to have that may lines returned fr

Re: 554 too many hops?

On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:32:36 PST, "Brad Dameron" wrote: > failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_554_too_many_hops,_mail_i > s_looping. > > Anyone know what can cause this error? Is there a way to stop the loop? It means there are too many received lines in a message. To stop the

Re: 2 questions

Thus said David Dyer-Bennet on 12 Mar 2001 00:21:10 CST: > Because my local users are used to using mailbox-based tools, but I'm > using vmailmgr for virtual support and it likes maildir. And some of > my local users want to also check via pop from time to time. How do you intend to keep the ma

Re: 2 questions

Thus said Alberto Dainotti on Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:31:30 +0100: > Is there a pop server allowing to use the maildir format > for users who have "Maildir" and a standard Mailbox > file for the other users ? qmail-pop3d comes with qmail, but it only supports maildir, why would you want both? > Th

Re: Error 554 from hotmail

Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 09 Mar 2001 13:55:22 +0800: > I've got 800+ error 554 form hotmail out of 1000+ email sent to valid hotmail.com >accounts. > Can anyone explain what's the problem - Hotmail or qmail or network problem? Why don't you post a copy of one of the errors? Andy --

Re: e-mail notification

On Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:19:39 PST, "info" wrote: > is there a way to notify me that i've received an e-mail for the account >[EMAIL PROTECTED] into my other account [EMAIL PROTECTED] , without forwarding a copy of the >e-mail? > Oops, forgot one thing... Don't forget to put the normal deliver

Re: e-mail notification

On Wed, 07 Mar 2001 17:19:39 PST, "info" wrote: > is there a way to notify me that i've received an e-mail for the account >[EMAIL PROTECTED] into my other account [EMAIL PROTECTED] , without forwarding a copy of the >e-mail? > Something like: | sed -n -f $HOME/headers.sed | qmail-inject -f$

Re: Qmail and time zone

On Thu, 01 Mar 2001 17:08:43 EST, wrote: > This is very annoying! I've spent lots of time training the users to > configure their clients properly, and now my qmail server sends out > garbage, which defeats the purpose. :( What did you train your users to do? They should be putting in a cor

Re: qmail vulnerability

Thus said "D. J. Bernstein" on 01 Mar 2001 02:27:37 GMT: >http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/2237 ``Currently the SecurityFocus staff are not aware of any vendor supplied patches for this issue.'' Why haven't they updated this? On a properly configured qmail system this is a non-issue

Duplicate mails on mailing list.

2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Chrisanthy Carlane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mailserver buffering Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 23:17:22 -0700 From: Andy Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This is the duplicate: -

Re: mailserver buffering

Thus said "Chrisanthy Carlane" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:13:52 +0700: > What I want to ask is: HOW to create that buffering thing ? Do I have to add > every user for every domain(which will be a lot of user)? With a standard qmail install it's as simple as: Add their domain to /var/qmail/control/r

Re: nfs mounting /var/qmail/alias

Thus said "Phil Oester" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:02:15 PST: > Any issues with NFS mounting the alias directory so a common version can be > shared by all mail servers? You should probably use the ``fastforward'' package and then distribute the alias.cdb with rsync or something like that. I belie

Re: mailserver buffering

Thus said "Chrisanthy Carlane" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:44:14 +0700: > > They must produce an appropriate MX record in their DNS information > > which points to your mail server. > OK, and when their emails go to my server, where do they go(what directory, > do I have to make a directory for their

Re: mailserver buffering

Thus said "Chrisanthy Carlane" on Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:13:52 +0700: > What I want to ask is: HOW to create that buffering thing ? Do I have to add > every user for every domain(which will be a lot of user)? With a standard qmail install it's as simple as: Add their domain to /var/qmail/control/r

Re: forwarding when somebody already has an account

Thus said Chris Hellberg on Wed, 01 Jan 1997 04:57:21 +1300: > Oops, you're right, doesn't seem to work. The file should be named just > .qmail in the user's directory. I've tried it with .qmail file and works > for me so give that a shot. Just so you understand why this works and not .qmail-def

Re: Missing To:/From: Fields in Virtual Domain Setup.

On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:57:59 PST, wrote: > have I obviously missed?? I've used the LWQ and set up the qmail server > using Ch 11 of Running with qmail - Using qmail as an ISP server. Am I > supposed to resupply the To: / From: fields using variables in the > .qmail-default file?? Any help would

Re: tcpserver prints to console!?!

Thus said Paul Farber on Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:28:56 EST: > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -q -ladmin.f-tech.net -xtcp.cdb -- 0 25 > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd I think you need a 2>&1 at the end of that line (and that line should be all on one line). > Also, the multilog part of the qmail-smtpd dosen'

Re: outgoing message(with multi recipient address) was sent multi-times

Thus said "Qiao Aijun" on Sat, 17 Feb 2001 02:49:41 GMT: > I have routed outgoing message to my ISP's SMTP server. I hope our email with multi >recipient address are forwarded to my ISP's SMTP once. How can I do that? > Unless someone has written this functionality for qmail to do this then i

Re: redirecting Mail ??

Thus said TAG on Fri, 16 Feb 2001 11:36:05 +0200: > ok - Yes - how Put a single ``#'' in your dotqmail file for postmaster. > > and NO - why not ?? What if for some strange reason someone starts spamming from your mail server. I would like to be able to send an email to postmaster to inform

Re: SMTP routing based on From: address?

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:39:22 GMT, "Grant Edwards" wrote: > It's sort of an odd request, but I'd like to route outgoing mail to one of > two SMTP servers, but I don't want to do it based on the destination > address. I would like to do it based on the From: address in the header. You could proba

Re: svscan does not recurse into subdirectories

Thus said Mario Thaten on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:44:25 +0100: > From the docs of svscan I learned, that > "svscan starts a pair of supervise processes, one for sub, one for > sub/log, with a pipe between them.", but this effect does not take > place, and I really don't know, what the problem might

Re: tcp.smtp file

Thus said "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" on Wed, 07 Feb 2001 15:11:28 EST: > What is the proper format for the tcp.smtp file in regards to multiple class > c networks. For example > > 209.168.128-143.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" This seems to be consistent with http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcprules.html in the ``

Re: qmail port

On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 21:16:46 +0200, "Mike Jackson" wrote: > When was the last time anybody actually heard from DJB? The last time he posted to this list was not too long ago actually. Date: 25 Jan 2001 22:18:11 - (Thu 15:18 MST) From: "D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: How does SVSCAN work ?

On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 11:45:23 +0200, Mike Jackson wrote: > I tried to use svscan for something other than qmail and couldn't get > it to work. The process in question, slapd, wasn't producing specific > log files, and svscan refused to start. It works just fine for me with > qmail when I specify

Re: How does SVSCAN work ?

Thus said "dennis" on Mon, 05 Feb 2001 13:23:55 +1100: > I must be as thick as two short planks but for the file of me I can't get my > head around how SVSCAN works. Can someone please enlighten me, PLEASE !! svscan ``scans'' the directory that you give it for other directories. For each direc

Re: mail loops back to me (MX problem?)

On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 15:56:26 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > sendmail[23266]: OAA23264: to=toto@the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine, > > ctladdr=the_sender_on_the_machine (50011/50012), delay=00:00:00, > > xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, > > relay=the_virtual_vpopdomain_on_the_machine. [xxx.xx

Re: Secure IMAP server

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:32:13 +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote: > That is not sufficient. That was my point. Not having seen a security audit, nor looked at the code myself, there is not solid claim to security. > That said, I use the imapd myself. We use it here as well on production systems.

Re: Sorry about the size of my prevous e-mail (I have beem flamed on this before).

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:48:21 +0200, "Alex Kramarov" wrote: > I do not use a broken MUA. I use an MUA that helps me construct > a more personal e-mail by adding backgrounds and other multimedia > elements. If you want to check that out, there is a link to it's site > on the bottom of my e-mail. N

Re: Secure IMAP server

On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:08:06 PST, Sam Trenholme wrote: > The only security document I could find in the source tarball for > courier-0.30.0 has this note: courier is not an IMAP package but a MTA like qmail. What you need to get is courier-imap and look there... I just looked there myself and

Re: Secure IMAP server

Thus said Rahsheen Porter on Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:27:14 EST: > I'm extremely happy with qmail and the other software available from > DJB, but I've yet to hear anything about an IMAP server that takes > security into consideration. I'm running Courier-IMAP right now, but I > haven't actually opene

Re: What variables are available inside of .qmail-*?

Thus said Peter Green on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:28:12 EST: > Also, if you ever have any doubt, create a temporary .qmail file for a user > that reads: > > env>/tmp/qmail.env Don't forget the pipe... :-) | env > /tmp/qmail.env Andy -- [---[system uptime]

Re: Specific IP

Thus said Linux on Sat, 27 Jan 2001 14:24:39 +0100: > There is a method to run qmail on a specific IP address. > For example binding on 111.222.222.222:25 instead of 0.0.0.0:25 This is the job of tcpserver... find your invocation of tcpserver and change the 0 to 111.222.222.222. Andy -- [

Re: Wildcards in badmailfrom?

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 10:40:12 CST, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Someone posted a patch to do this some time ago. You could search the > qmail list archives for it, or look at qmail.org for a pointer. I think > it was called 'badrcptpatterns' or something similar. Yes, thanks to another poster I fou

Wildcards in badmailfrom?

Hey all, I have a really annoying spammer on my hands and just wonder if it is possible to use wildcards in badmailfrom? Originally I added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to badmailfrom and that blocked it for about a month. Then he got halfway smart and changed his sender address to [E

Re: A firestorm of protest?

Thus said "Robin S. Socha" on 16 Jan 2001 20:47:55 +0100: > A module is not a patch. You can apply as many well written modules as > you like - but you cannot simply patch away at an existing code base. Unless you write code in Lisp... :-) Andy -- [---[system uptime]---

Re: Virus-ridden emails from 'funky gao'?

On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 08:02:44 EST, "Hubbard, David" wrote: > Is everyone else receiving a bunch of emails > from 'funky gao'? Can someone remove this > [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list? I've > received quite a few messages from him this > morning, all containing the file Emanuel.exe > with a vir

Re: hrm....pop3d

Thus said Andy Bradford on Sat, 13 Jan 2001 22:19:11 MST: > My guess would be that you specified pop-3 in your start script, > however, pop-3 does not exist in /etc/protocols Oops, make that /etc/services (I hate replying to my own replies) :-) Andy -- [---[system

Re: hrm....pop3d

Thus said "Kurth Bemis" on Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:11:57 EST: > Jan 12 06:54:30 noname pop3d: 979300470.784986 tcpserver: fatal: unable to figure >out port number for pop-3 > Jan 12 06:54:31 noname qmail: 979300471.799484 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20 My guess would be that you specified pop-3 in

Re: qmail-1.03-6.src.rpm

Thus said "Keith Smith" on Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:56:09 MST: > I received an error ""Shadow-Utils is needed by qmail-1.03-6 Sounds like you need to install the shadow-utils RPM... Andy -- [---[system uptime]] 10:41pm up 70 days, 1:02, 6 user

Re: help needed

On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 18:50:29 EST, wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > x.x.x.x does not like recipient. > Remote host said: 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address > rejected: Relay access denied > Giving up on x.x.x.x. Hmm, this is not a qmail error message. In fact, if I do the following it

Re: control/mailroutes (was: QMTP autoreply tester)

Thus said Ricardo Cerqueira on Sun, 07 Jan 2001 01:50:16 GMT: > Hmmm... OK, disregard my previous mail. > Personally, I'd rather have one file for SMTP, and another for QMTP. Does > anyone else here agree with me? This seems more logical to me as it allows finer control over the entire system.

Re: rcpthosts - IP addresses not allowed?

On Thu, 04 Jan 2001 13:38:56 EST, Bernard Karmilowicz wrote: > I am trying to send mail from host FROM_HOST (1.2.3.4) to host TO_HOST > (1.2.3.5). The mail is addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". qmail is running on > both hosts. Unfortunately, TO_HOST refuses the mail. However, TO_HOST > will accep

Re: Hy.....

On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:17:40 +0200, Seby wrote: > How can i configure qmail to allow a users to send emails only to > the localhost.. and to can not send emails romote (to another host) echo 0 > /var/qmail/control/concurrencyremote Might do the trick---but I believe that would just hold

Re: AntiVirus!

On Tue, 05 Dec 2000 02:18:33 +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote: > By the way, about the discussion about the net worth of virus scanners, > please have a look a the email I just got (no, I am not making this up): I can verify this---I too received a similar bounce from their group and sent them ba

Re: Minimum OS Requirement to run Qmail

Thus said Andrew Buenaventura on Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:56:36 +0800: > I am going to setup a dedicated linux box that will run qmail only. What is > the most minimum package that I need to install from Red Hat 7.0 to be able > to run Qmail? I do not want unnecessary services/daemons running on that

Re: Please Ignore

Thus said "montgomery f. tidwell" on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 18:59:32 PST: > sorry for all the tests. this is the only mail list that > will accept my Sender: messed up emails. That's because qmail doesn't care about the Sender header... Andy -- [---[system uptime]

Re: newbie need help

Thus said Arif Rudiana on Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:14:42 +0700: > to find in archive files... I think it's better to post my questions to > this millist Please turn of HTML in your emails. ;-) > in recipient the sender username appears like this >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wh

Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question)

Thus said Jamin Collins on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:45:04 CST: > > * 6 attribution lines > > Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If it is, > which one? > > > * No citation leader > > Once again. Don't believe this is a requirement or violation of any RFC. If > it is, whi

Re: List Courtesy (was Newbie question)

Thus said "asantos" on Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:13:18 -0100: > For someone with such a doubtfull sense of humour as he shows to have > welcoming IE users the way he does at http://socha.net/, he seems to be > inordinately proud of listing among his "computer skills" Microsoft Office. Bah! That's a l

Re: Henning Brauer's reply

Thus said Chris Olson on Tue, 28 Nov 2000 00:28:26 CST: > I believe I'm no more braindead than you are. At least I have the > common courtesy to not post a derogatory statement like this on the > list, nor would I even send a private email to anyone containing a Granted, it is pretty rude to se

Re: changing to tcpserver

On Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:06:03 EST, Dave Sill wrote: > I recommend copying and pasting the scripts, rather than typing them > in by hand. Unless you're in Florida, in which case, entering manually > is more accurate. ROTFLOL!!! This has got to be one of the best Florida jokes I have seen. :-) A

Re: auto append signature file to all outgoing messages

Thus said Romeyn Prescott on Sat, 25 Nov 2000 11:52:05 EST: > There may be others. I have no idea if this will work. It may work for a few cases, but with today's mailiers, it most likely will corrupt the message or not be seen at all. Consider the different Content-Type made available in mo

Re: Hostname Lookup

On Wed, 22 Nov 2000 08:21:10 EST, Warren Small wrote: > I'm sure a lot of you will say that the problem is obviously a DNS lookup > issue but I can lookup this server name successfully from the same server > that is having problems talking to the qmail server. This problem is also > not confined

Re: sending messages from sysadm to users

Thus said David Ryan on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 16:13:43 +1100: > The main difference is that I do not want them to be able to > reply-to-all. I had used a mailing list but someone did a reply-to-all > and caused all sorts of trouble. Use ezmlm to setup a mailing list and then make the list moderated s

Re: How insall qmail relay server in an DMZ

Thus said Jose AP Celestino on Wed, 22 Nov 2000 01:38:39 GMT: > Have you tried rtfm. There's plenty of stuff on this. Why don't you RTFM on your MUA so you don't send out duplicate emails to the mailing list... sheesh. Andy -- [---[system uptime]--

Re: return receipts

Thus said "David L. Nicol" on Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:12:46 CST: > What about the "notification on delivery" stuff -- is that not > an MTA feature? Is it deprecated? Rather it would be a feature > of the MDA, has anyone added it to qmail-local? You mean something like what is covered in "man qrece

Re: secrets and lies

Thus said Raul Miller on Sun, 19 Nov 2000 12:33:30 EST: > Or do you have similar problems deciding whether ATM means automated > teller machine or asychronous transfer mode? Or deciding whether > ASP means active server pages or application service provider? Or ... Not generally, however, I mu

Re: Adding CR to bare LFs

Thus said "Casey Allen Shobe" on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 03:30:55 EST: > Hi there, I run a webmail service, and am having some trouble. It appears > that not all web browsers send CRLF, but instead send LF only when I > compose (this is the fault of the widget used for entering email). It has nothin

Re: secrets and lies

Thus said "Michael T. Babcock" on Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:41:20 EST: > OSI == "Open Source Initiative" I believe ... That's funny, I always thought that OSI was the _Open Systems Interconnection_ internet model proposed by the ISO. I guess this goes to show that context really does matter. :-) A

Re: RFC822 compliant?

Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 12 Nov 2000 11:54:48 CST: > So you're basically saying that qmail can pretty much mung up an > e-mail address any way it likes because it's...qmail! No, he is not saying that at all. qmail out-of-the-box will not munge anything. What that user was asking

Re: Script for adding new qmailusers

Thus said defender of the protocol on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 21:24:59 EST: > someone correct me if im wrong, but when i add a user (to users/assign, i > have all virtualdomains), i run qmail-newu and SIGHUP qmail-send, so yeah There is no need to HUP qmail-send unless virtualdomains or locals has ch

Re: cc incoming mail

Thus said Kimberly Vher on Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:35:34: > so that i have a copy in my hotmail account. but i want to make a copy to > multiple address how can i do that? Just put in multiple addresses in the .qmail file---they should each be separated by a newline. That's all folks. Andy -- [-

Re: New Mail Notification (with VMailMgr, advanced, not qbiff etc)

On Wed, 08 Nov 2000 14:24:11 GMT, "Michael Vorburger" wrote: > I need to implement a New Mail Notification; not for login like qbiff etc, > but more like notifiying users on another external email, SMS etc in the > future. So a simple forward won't do, I need to call some external script > each

Re: Quota on outgoing mail

Thus said Jens Georg on Sat, 04 Nov 2000 19:49:57 +0100: > > echo 10485760 > /var/qmail/control/databytes > > is this really enough ? i remember to read once that qmail has to be > compiled specially to use this feature. Yes, this really is all that needs to be done---no special compiling or p

Re: (Fwd) failure notice

Thus said Brett Randall on 03 Nov 2000 13:44:59 +1100: > In-Reply-To (note caps)...I will make it case insensitive for future > cases. Apologies to Phil and anyone else who has received this > error... I believe all headers should be treated case insensitive... :-) Kind of nice that it's worki

Re: Return receipt

On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:28:09 +0100, Enrique wrote: > Qmail doesn't support "return receipt". Any solution for this?. Return receipt is not at all a function of the underlying MTA. All you really need is to include a Disposition-Notification-To header in every outgoing mail with the address th

Re: FILTERING ATTACHEMENTS

Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 15:38:38 EST: > Andy, I appreciate the advice, but I like LISTAR much better. The feature > set looks to be fuller to me than does EZMLM. All I want to do is strip out > attachements at the SMTP level. Is that possible? No, it is not possible to st

Re: people are definately starting to harvest emailadresses on this list...

Thus said Brett Randall on 28 Oct 2000 22:28:51 +1100: > A better alternative, IMHO, is to use a certain anti-spam e-mail > address (someone on this list uses it but I can't remember who) that > only lasts like a week, and then its gone. This gives most ppl enuf > time to reply. This won't cut do

Re: people are definately starting to harvest emailadresses on this list...

Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 29 Oct 2000 01:00:11 MST: > > and have your *real* address that you give out to people who you want to > > have a stable address be user-@domain and be careful about > > revealing that . :) > > That's a good idea Russ. It is a very good idea, however, you ha

Re: FILTERING ATTACHEMENTS

Thus said "Anthony Abby" on Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:29:41 EDT: > Can someone point me to documentation or just tell me how I can filter out > ALL attachements to my smtp server. I'm using Qmail solely in a listserver > environment and I want to make sure that zero attachements get through. I'm > ne

Re: Problem with sqwebmail + qmail-scanner

Thus said [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:26:33 GMT: > I have noticed that it is possible to send infected messages > with sqwebmail running qmail-scanner. > I guess sqwebmail put messages directly in the queue, so it > no qmail-smptd is called and no antivirus is used. I don't see how

Re: unsubscribe qmail

Thus said Adam McKenna on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:51:03 EDT: > That's why ezmlm creates a random tag for each subscription that is sent back > to the subscriber for confirmation. There is no way to subscribe someone > else to an ezmlm list unless you have access to their mail spool. Then, what is t

Re: unsubscribe qmail

Thus said Daniel Augusto Fernandes on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:07:49 -0200: > You should look at the mail header of this message and see what's your > address. > The very first (mostly) is something like this: > > > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unfortunately, the return-path may not always be av

Re: unsubscribing from qmail list a project in itself

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:56:05 EDT, "McGillicuddy, Dennis" wrote: > - sent a blank email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" . > (several times) It is possible that you aren't actually on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, but on one of the sublists. Look at the headers of the messages you are receiving to find

Re: Resending large bulks of mail!

On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:50:46 +0200, "Wilson, Frank" wrote: > This means of course, that when mail.web-trade.com is down, the mail will be > stored localy in the postmaster account on be.wise.no. You must have configured it do deliver email locally then. If you simply accept the mail and not de

Re: What to do about these barelinefeeds?

Thus said "Hubbard, David" on Thu, 26 Oct 2000 23:31:01 EDT: > verify that since I don't have a mailer to try it with > but it seems that you'd never want the 451 in this case > because obviously it will be the same mailer that will > retry each time and it will continue to be broken for each > t

Re: Maildir search tools?

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000 20:12:14 +0200, "Mark Weinem" wrote: > Are there any search tools (like grepmail) for Maildirs? Well, you could use a combination of grep and find maybe... or even iterate over the files found by find and grep on those, whatever... I can think of a number of different possi

Re: wildcards in virtualdomains

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:35:07 MDT, Andy Bradford wrote: > thenewdawn.com:thenewdawn I think I made a mistake... I believe it should be: thenewdawn.com:alias-thenewdawn Andy

Re: wildcards in virtualdomains

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:57:22 BST, "ROD" wrote: > Would > > info.@thenewdawn:ezmlm-test > > send anything with info.*@thenewdawn to the ezmlm-test? > > e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sorry about that last blank email... I accidentally hit ctrl-s instead of ctrl-d. :-) Anyway, no you cannot use wild

Re: wildcards in virtualdomains

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:57:22 BST, "ROD" wrote: > I have read qmail-send but still i'm still a bit unclear to how to doit. > Would > > info.@thenewdawn:ezmlm-test > > send anything with info.*@thenewdawn to the ezmlm-test? > > e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: any comment on this line

Thus said "Yamin Prabudy" on Tue, 24 Oct 2000 13:31:42 +0700: > My friend forwad it to me from http://www.orbs.org/otherresource.html The URL is actually: http://www.orbs.org/otherresources.html I suggest you read it and then take your pick which you want to use... When qmail is configured p

  1   2   >