For mathematics notation, I use MathSVGPlugin by Paulo Soares.
http://www.math.ist.utl.pt/~psoares/MathSVG.html
I have used this plugin for several years on many versions of TW and
Firefox.
Cheers
Andrew Mc
On Friday, October 5, 2012 11:04:49 AM UTC+13, Marc wrote:
Apologies if this is a bit
Apologies if this is a bit off-topic, but readers of this thread are
obviously concerned about math notation in TW, so I'll put the question:
What are you using today to get math notation in your TWs? I've tried
searching generally, but haven't really found a satisfactory solution. I'm
Hi,
I use the jsMath plugin quite satisfactory (see
http://mcard.tiddlyspot.com/, http://ehcuds.tiddlyspot.com/ or
http://udsth0910.tiddlyspot.com/). It does not cover LaTex completly (I
miss the possibility of using xy-diagrams- for this I upload jpeg images of
diagrams previously compiled),
I understand the possible problems (even just corrupting data is a
possible one), but have no idea of criteria to be used.
The criteria will evolve no doubt. The point is that the core plugin
library shouldn't just become a dumping ground of every plugin plugins
from over the years, it will
Hello Jeremy,
What do you mean by coded safely and reliably? (ok, perhaps this is
not a question to discuss without an example..)
Well, a poorly written plugin might fail if it encounters unexpected
data, or might leak private information in HTTP headers, or might not
work reliably in
What do you mean by coded safely and reliably? (ok, perhaps this is
not a question to discuss without an example..)
Well, a poorly written plugin might fail if it encounters unexpected
data, or might leak private information in HTTP headers, or might not
work reliably in mobile browsers, or
Not speaking for Jeremy of course, but I would expect all the core
functionality to be enabled *not* requiring *any* server in the sense of a
process with a separate IP address. If a server process is made part of
core, then I would hope that it could be run on the same machine, so that TW
One thing that I hope to make easy in TW5 is to be able to publish your
TiddlyWiki as a folder full of static HTML files that you can then whack
onto a webserver, giving a very resilient, lightweight way of publishing
stuff.
That would be excellent. I imagine the core functionality would
Wow, the expectations on TW5 are huge, these are shiny perspectives.
At what state is the development now?
I'm thinking that the plugin library would have some very simple
criteria for inclusion:
- Useful to more than one person
- Has adequate documentation
- Has proper unit tests
- Is
On Sunday, February 5, 2012 4:46:19 AM UTC+7, Yakov wrote:
Do you mean that the server would be needed once -- to generate those
html files so that one can publish them in a DropBox, -- or rather
during the process of browsing? What's the role of the server?
Not speaking for Jeremy of
Somewhat related but more for maintaining a master hierarchy repository TWs
for meta and content rather than system (plugin and theming) tiddlers:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/z1Q-_3az7bY/discussion
I see you (Yakov) also participated in that, but thought I'd add the link
In what sense is the core too big?
hpon,
for me, like for Daniel, too big means TW as a web page will load
too slow from web.
Jeremy,
I think that core plugins idea would be good when functions like
import and update work solidly. Also, updating core plugin for each TW
will still require some
On Friday, February 3, 2012 11:51:02 PM UTC+7, Yakov wrote:
too big means TW as a web page will load too slow from web
+1
updating core plugin for each TW will still require some time and routine
actions. It seems for me that a system which allows download a plugin and
share it between
for me, like for Daniel, too big means TW as a web page will load
too slow from web.
One thing that I hope to make easy in TW5 is to be able to publish
your TiddlyWiki as a folder full of static HTML files that you can
then whack onto a webserver, giving a very resilient, lightweight way
of
On Saturday, February 4, 2012 12:32:28 AM UTC+7, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
One thing that I hope to make easy in TW5 is to be able to publish your
TiddlyWiki as a folder full of static HTML files that you can then whack
onto a webserver, giving a very resilient, lightweight way of publishing
I think that mathematical notation should be regarded as an elimentary
feature, since the purpose of TW (in my view) is to present and manage
information in an effective way. That purpose cannot be generally
fullfilled without a proper support for math notation. Plus, society
as we know it
On Jan 30, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
In terms of plugin distribution, I've come to believe that the present
scattered nature of TiddlyWiki makes things needlessly hard for users.
They have to find tiddlywiki.com, download the product, and then by
reading the groups they have to
PMario,
Thanks for your reply.
In what sense is the core too big?
I think that mathematical notation should be regarded as an elimentary
feature, since the purpose of TW (in my view) is to present and manage
information in an effective way. That purpose cannot be generally
fullfilled without a
I agree with PMario. although the current implementations are
difficult to get working (believe me I've tried), if you look at the
size of the source of empty.html, or heck, even look at the size.
about 350kb. which could be represented as a couple hundred pages of
text. this is exceptional for a
I'm trying to design TiddlyWiki5 so that it works well with MathJax
and other off-the-shelf text processing components. I'm interested in
the general idea of supporting domain specific notations. So I'd be
happy if TW5 could be used by choreographers (who have their own
notational systems), but I
On Monday, January 30, 2012 8:48:18 PM UTC+7, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
In terms of plugin distribution, I've come to believe that the present
scattered nature of TiddlyWiki makes things needlessly hard for users. They
have to find tiddlywiki.com, download the product, and then by reading
the
TW5 comes in two packages: a conventional node.js application and the
familiar single HTML file. The former is generated by the latter. Many
users will choose to just pull down the HTML file from tiddlywiki.com;
power users may want to install the node.js app (which is incredibly
easy these days)
On Jan 30, 11:13 am, hpon peter.norli...@gmail.com wrote:
In what sense is the core too big?
It simply is file size.
I think that mathematical notation should be regarded as an elimentary
feature, since the purpose of TW (in my view) is to present and manage
information in an effective way.
Hi hpon,
I personally think, that the core (empty TiddlyWiki) is allready big
enough. Some say, it is too big and stick with a version prior to
jQuery. And as you say. There are some possibilities (plugins) out
there, that handle the situation quite well. So what ever is included
into the core,
24 matches
Mail list logo
