Sorry John, I've been away for a bit and just got back.
I'm not too good with the Jelly script but I'll see what I can come up
with and send it though the normal channels.
Yes, I do have a day job :) which means that I don't have fixed amount
of time to work this problem, particularly not being
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:41 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Michal Maczka wrote:
Have you tried to do it with the war?
Coulpe of times. With different result sas some
First, let me apologize to the list for being short yesterday, it was
entirely born out of have to explain things 4 times and still getting
negative feedback that didn't address the issue.
Ryan Sonnek wrote:
whoo now, i don't want to get involved, but i do want to let it be known that since
Send the patch in and lets talk it through.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:38:22 -0400, Brill Pappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, let me apologize to the list for being short yesterday, it was
entirely born out of have to explain things 4 times and still getting
negative feedback that didn't
Ok, let me explain this one more time.
What you are saying is indeed part of the servlet spec, and the
container may actually read and care about what's in the WAR manifest,
however code running in the application context doesn't know, and
doesn't care.
It doesn't care because for things to be
Brill,
I've been reading along, and I agree that you have a valid use case.
However, this is all academic until you send in some sort of patch. I
might even use this patch if it were sent in - but I don't have time to
develop it myself. Sorry, but you're starting to put the cart before the
horse
like any other dependency that you bundle into
your war file).
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
To clarify; I'm not asking that the classes dir go away, I'm just
: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2004 13:38
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Yes, I thought of doing that very thing :) however I then
have problems with Eclipse as it doesn't understand
multi-project builds, and you really want all the parts
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:38 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Yes, I thought of doing that very thing :)
however I then have problems with Eclipse as it doesn't understand
multi
Michal wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:38 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Yes, I thought of doing that very thing :)
however I then have problems with Eclipse as it doesn't understand
multi
-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2004 13:38
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Yes, I thought of doing that very thing :) however I then
have problems with Eclipse as it doesn't understand
multi-project builds, and you really want all the parts
on introducing some of the more basic principles of OOD.
Matt.
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2004 14:03
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Actually I don't really have much of a problem with Eclipse,
other
-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:38 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Yes, I thought of doing that very thing :)
however I then have problems with Eclipse as it doesn't understand
multi-project builds, and you really
I thought I had explained this?
Under no circumstances am I asking that classes not ever go into the
classes directory, I'm not even asking that the JAR method be the
default... I just want to be able to do it.
Our requirements do not clash not even a little bit. So far, I've only
herd reasons
heh,
Ready or not, here it comes (re: mavin).
The team I work with now is likely one of the best I've ever worked
with... but also a fairly stubbourn bunch; unfortunatly buzz-words won't
work here... we pratice Scrum, Pair Programming, agile and TDD daily so
its not like there is no exposure or
: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:01 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
I thought I had explained this?
Under no circumstances am I asking that classes not ever go into the
classes directory, I'm not even asking that the JAR method be the
default... I just want to be able to do
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 18:00, Brill Pappin wrote:
I thought I had explained this?
You did not.
[...]
If you want to know more about what I'm doing (and why I'm asking for
this), you can get a very good idea at this site:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/versioning/index.html
: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 9:03 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Actually I don't really have much of a problem with Eclipse, other than
I have to keep the parts of an app together... remember I'm one of the
group who is trying
Thanks,
thats a good and simple temporary solution and will do until a property
can be added.
- Brill
Charles Daniels wrote:
Brett,
If you want to generate a jar file for your war file and do not want to
create 2 subprojects (as is the general convention), you can create a very
simple postGoal
Michal Maczka wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 18:00, Brill Pappin wrote:
I thought I had explained this?
You did not.
[...]
Actually yes I did, working backwards in time and no including the one
quoted here:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:53:47 -0400:
The reason I specifically want to do it, is
will take the patch and apply it to the codebase! =)
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:41 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Michal Maczka wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 18:00, Brill
to JIRA.
* hope that a commiter will take the patch and apply it to the codebase! =)
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 3:41 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
Michal Maczka wrote
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:53:45 -0400, Brill Pappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure some of us would prefer to keep the WEB-INF/classes dir, so my
suggestion would be to include a switch property that would allow the
user to use one or the other.
Here's one reason: servlet specs define, that
I don't see any reason to do this. It won't make it any smaller,
unless you compress the JAR - but if you are worried about space keep
the WAR packed in the container and compressed and you won't gain
anything from packing the classes.
You can still add a manifest to a WAR. I'd recommend against
: Montag, 28. Juni 2004 15:03
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:53:45 -0400, Brill Pappin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure some of us would prefer to keep the WEB-INF/classes dir, so
my suggestion would be to include a switch property that would allow
be such possibilty in 'war' plugin - please, make it
not-default.
Regards,
Tomek
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Montag, 28. Juni 2004 15:03
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004
in 'war' plugin - please, make it
not-default.
Regards,
Tomek
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Pik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Montag, 28. Juni 2004 15:03
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:53:45 -0400, Brill Pappin
property set to true (just like any other dependency that you bundle into
your war file).
-Original Message-
From: Brill Pappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 2:21 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: RFE for the war plugin
To clarify; I'm not asking
28 matches
Mail list logo
