Re: Why are most of my messages EMPTY_MESSAGE

On Tuesday 05 September 2006 20:58, scottjf8 wrote: > Using the newest SA with Amavisd > > Most of my messages keep getting hit by "EMPTY_MESSSAGE" and > "MISSING_SUBJECT" when these are plaintext emails with subjects and > messages > > Where should I start troubleshooting? Maybe turn up t

Why are most of my messages EMPTY_MESSAGE

Using the newest SA with Amavisd Most of my messages keep getting hit by "EMPTY_MESSSAGE" and "MISSING_SUBJECT" when these are plaintext emails with subjects and messages Where should I start troubleshooting? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-are-most-of-my-mes

Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.

DAve wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Chris Thielen wrote: Matt, Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional updates foreseen i

Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.

Rick Macdougall wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: Chris Thielen wrote: Matt, Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional updates foreseen it should prob

Re: Re: add headers

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Nigel Frankcom wrote: > >John D. Hardin wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, e2rd wrote: > >> > >>> I would like to add headers X-Spam-Status, X-Spam-Level, X-Spam-Flag to > >>> every e-mail tested by SpamAssassin. > >> > >> Try "report_safe 0" > > Shouldn't that be report

Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.

Matt Kettler wrote: Chris Thielen wrote: Matt, Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional updates foreseen it should probably be removed from RDJ

Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.

Chris Thielen wrote: > Matt, > > Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue > publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to > wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional > updates foreseen it should probably be removed from RDJ altogether.

Spamd child states?

Hello, Running SA 3.1.4, I see messages such as these in the log file: Sep 6 00:05:21 tracy spamd[1710]: prefork: child states: KKI >From the code the various letters seem to indicate killed, initialised, busy etc. My question though is are these just informational type messages? Are they

Re: Lint error

Gestern (05.09.2006/22:47 Uhr) schrieb Theo Van Dinter, > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:41:19PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: >> >> spamassassin --lint >> >> [[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at >> >> /usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 588. >> >> >> >> perl

Re: increase spamassassin filter

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > John D. Hardin wrote: > > > You also might want to upgrade to 3.1.3 or 3.1.4, and make sure you're > > running sa-update at least weekly. > > Any reason not to use 3.1.5? It includes some improvements to > sa-update itself. No, I'm just a little

Re: RBL Rules Misfiring

Bowie Bailey wrote: You should also list any other mail servers that accept mail for your domain. This includes email gateways and relays under your control. This can also include your ISP's mailservers, but if you do that, make sure to specify internal_networks separately and leave the ISP's s

RE: RBL Rules Misfiring

D.J. wrote: > D.J. wrote: > > OK, after Googling around for a bit, I may have stumbled on > > something... specifically this trust path thing. I had my > > trusted_networks and internal_networks set as my SMTP's and MX's > > class C network. Because of that, is that causing SA to look at the > >

Re: increase spamassassin filter

John D. Hardin wrote: You also might want to upgrade to 3.1.3 or 3.1.4, and make sure you're running sa-update at least weekly. Any reason not to use 3.1.5? It includes some improvements to sa-update itself. Daryl

Re: Lint error

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 10:41:19PM +0200, Jim Knuth wrote: > >> spamassassin --lint > >> [[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at > >> /usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 588. > >> > >> perl -MNet::DNS -e'print "$Net::DNS::VERSION\n";' > >> 0.58 You appa

Re: Lint error

Heute (05.09.2006/19:09 Uhr) schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt, > * Jim Knuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hallo und Guten Abend spamassassin-users, >> >> I`ve installed SA 3.1.5 on Debian Woody (Perl v5.6.1) >> and see the following error: >> >> --snip >> spamassassin --lint >> [[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS ve

Re: RBL Rules Misfiring

D.J. wrote: OK, after Googling around for a bit, I may have stumbled on something... specifically this trust path thing. I had my trusted_networks and internal_networks set as my SMTP's and MX's class C network. Because of that, is that causing SA to look at the relay beyond

RE: Test: anyone else getting a deltahealthgroup bounce?

Title: Test: anyone else getting a deltahealthgroup bounce? yes, and administrators should unsub someone who is doing stuff like this.   From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:05 PMTo: SaTalk (E-mail)Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject:

Re: Please sanity check these ideas for rules.

mouss wrote: It even happens to me from time to time (delete the subject to replace it, then see an error in the body, switch to correct the body, then forget that the subject was deleted). *blink* What happened to the "New Message" button (or whatever it's been (re)labelled this week)

Re: Please sanity check these ideas for rules.

mouss wrote: (counter) examples are available on this list (see a message sent on 2006/07/27) and on other lists. I've also seen many corportae mail with empty subject (forgotten, or considered irrelevant by the sender). It even happens to me from time to time (delete the subject to replace it,

Re: increase spamassassin filter

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, John D. Hardin wrote: On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, nik600 wrote: I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on unixmail. X-Spam-L

Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.

Matt, Does antidrug still get updates? If you are going to continue publishing updates to antidrug I will change the URL in RDJ to wherever eventually move it. If, however, there are no additional updates foreseen it should probably be removed from RDJ altogether. LMK. Chris Thielen Matt

Re: Tesseract OCR open sourced

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Robert LeBlanc wrote: > The only /non-technical/ issue that occurs to me is in the > licensing, which is a combination of the Apache License (2.0) and > a custom clause that may be a non-starter for some applications: > "If you wish to use it for commercial gain you must contac

Re: increase spamassassin filter

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, nik600 wrote: > I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is > recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores > > *** > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on unixmail. > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, score

Re: increase spamassassin filter

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Matthias Haegele wrote: > >> I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is > >> recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores > > You could adjust the score for HTML_MESSAGE (or adjust it for other > rules that "hit" your spam) ... > (afaik default i

Re: Lint error

* Jim Knuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hallo und Guten Abend spamassassin-users, > > I`ve installed SA 3.1.5 on Debian Woody (Perl v5.6.1) > and see the following error: > > --snip > spamassassin --lint > [[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at > /usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail

Lint error

Hallo und Guten Abend spamassassin-users, I`ve installed SA 3.1.5 on Debian Woody (Perl v5.6.1) and see the following error: --snip spamassassin --lint [[6320] warn: dns: Net::DNS version is 0.12, but need 0.34 at /usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 588. --snap but perl -M

Test: anyone else getting a deltahealthgroup bounce?

Title: Test: anyone else getting a deltahealthgroup bounce? I'm getting a very weird bounce messege from the list. Reporting-MTA: dns;dhgsrv26.DeltaHealthGroup.com Received-From-MTA: dns;DHG Arrival-Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:46:01 -0500 Final-Recipient: rfc822;users@spamassassin.apache.org

RE: Enumerating the robots?

Title: RE: Enumerating the robots? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:17 AM > To: Chris Santerre > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; SpamAssassin Users List > Subject: Re: Enumerating the robots? > > > > Chris

RE: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.

Title: RE: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates. > > So, here's your first (of 3) warning to disable RDJ for antidrug until > the move is completed. (If you have SA 3.0.0 or higher you > shouldn't be > using antidrug.cf anyway). I still get hits to the original SARE website! This is lik

Re: Enumerating the robots?

Chris Santerre writes: > > -Original Message- From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: > > Monday, September 04, 2006 8:36 PM To: Loren Wilton Cc: SpamAssassin > > Users List Subject: Re: Enumerating the robots? > > > > > > Loren Wilton wrote: > > > It was mentioned that several peopl

RE: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report

> Starting out with another clean database, further testing > shows that in fact the message was learned when I ran > 'spamassassin -r' (though bayes_toks remained at 12288 > bytes), and the same message was learned again when I ran > 'sa-learn --spam' (and the size once again grew to 24576 bytes)

Re: RBL Rules Misfiring

OK, after Googling around for a bit, I may have stumbled on something... specifically this trust path thing.  I had my trusted_networks and internal_networks set as my SMTP's and MX's class C network.  Because of that, is that causing SA to look at the relay beyond the trusted network as the agent

RE: Enumerating the robots?

Title: RE: Enumerating the robots? > -Original Message- > From: mouss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 8:36 PM > To: Loren Wilton > Cc: SpamAssassin Users List > Subject: Re: Enumerating the robots? > > > Loren Wilton wrote: > > It was mentioned that se

RE: Running on Debian stable

Hi Miles, I'm currently using the spamassassin version from sarge-backports. I have not encountered any issues but I have also based my setup on this excellent how-to: http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/ the author provides a very thorough explanation. - Joe -Original Message- From: Mile

RE: OS X Server spam still getting through :-(

mikemacfr wrote: > OK, but isn't spamd the "settings" file for spamassassin? > How does spamassassin know how to work if spamd is not used when > amavis is doing the routing? The way it works is that Amavis uses SpamAssassin routines to score the mail and then uses its own settings to decide what

sa-learn vs spamassassin tests

# sa-learn -L --spam and spamassassin -L -r learn the same spam differently. SA version 3.13, using db or sql database, doesn't seem to matter, --sync or not --sync, doesn't matter. Also, it doesn't matter if I run sa-learn --spam or spamassassin -r first. Further, spamassassin -r and sa-learn --

Re: SFP question

Marco Michelino wrote: > Hi list, > I have a question about SPF support. > > On my server, SPF_HELO_* tests work properly while SPF_* checks are > never performed; why this? Actually, if any SPF tests are run, they are ALL run. My guess is you have a broken trust path, which is causing the normal

spamd and vpopmail user preferences

Hi ihave problem with vpopmail and spamassassin everything works fine email message delivered but user preferences not working #tail -n20 /var/log/everything/current Sep 5 13:04:25 [spamd] config: cannot write to /.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such file or directory_ Sep 5 1

Re: increase spamassassin filter

Sipos Gabor schrieb: Hi i am using spamassassin as mail-filter, it tags me about the 40-50% of the spam. I've use sa-learn on spam and ham messages, (i've learned about 3000 ^^ spam messages) I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of s

RE: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report

> -Original Message- > From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report > > Starting out with another clean database, further testing > shows that in fact the messag

Re: increase spamassassin filter

> Hi > i am using spamassassin as mail-filter, it tags me about the 40-50% of the > spam. > I've use sa-learn on spam and ham messages, (i've learned about 3000 > spam messages) > I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is > recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores

RE: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report

> -Original Message- > From: Gary V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:56 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Sa-learn --ham vs spamassassin -report > > Starting out with another clean database, further testing > shows that in fact > the me

Re: Hacked E-Trade Phishing Site

--On Friday, September 01, 2006 9:25 AM -0400 Gino Cerullo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And he's signed his work this time. Hail 'The Fat Bastard Controller' :P Whooop! I tried to post direct links to other hacked sites but didn't see it go to the list. So here's the google term I used to fin

Re: Tesseract OCR open sourced

Kenneth Porter wrote: > > > Theo just mentioned this on the -devel list: > > I posted about this last week on the Devel-Spam and Maia-Users lists, along with t

Re: Tesseract OCR open sourced

Theo just mentioned this on the -devel list:

increase spamassassin filter

Hi i am using spamassassin as mail-filter, it tags me about the 40-50% of the spam. I've use sa-learn on spam and ham messages, (i've learned about 3000 spam messages) I use 5 score to tag a spam but most of spam not detected is recognized only by HTML_MESSAGE and reports 0 scores

SFP question

Hi list, I have a question about SPF support. On my server, SPF_HELO_* tests work properly while SPF_* checks are never performed; why this? How does spamassassin decide to perform one test or the other? In 25_spf.cf I see: tflags SPF_PASS net nice userconf but I cant'understand

is obfuscated.cf still maintained?

Hi I just noticed an older ruleset which produces some warnings on --lint -D which I'm not sure anymore where it's from or if it's already incorporated or whatever... It's called obfuscated.cf and starts with: # # Catch financial report advisorys. # body__FIDEW1/project/i body

Re: add headers

On Tuesday 05 September 2006 00:18, e2rd wrote: > Hi, > > "report_safe 0" doesn't help. > > I have also: > always_add_headers 1 > spam_level_stars 1 > always_add_report 1 > > Do you have any other idea? > My local.cf has the following : report_safe 1 add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_ add_header

Re: Re: add headers

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 01:18:55 -0700 (PDT), e2rd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi, > >"report_safe 0" doesn't help. > >I have also: >always_add_headers 1 >spam_level_stars 1 >always_add_report 1 > >Do you have any other idea? > >Best regards, >e2rd > > >John D. Hardin wrote: >> >> On Mon, 4 Sep 2006

Re: add headers

Hi, "report_safe 0" doesn't help. I have also: always_add_headers 1 spam_level_stars 1 always_add_report 1 Do you have any other idea? Best regards, e2rd John D. Hardin wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, e2rd wrote: > >> I would like to add headers X-Spam-Status, X-Spam-Level, X-Spam-Flag to >