Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Depends on whether you equate bare domains with URL's, I suppose.
If MUA's equate them with URLs, spammers will use this, and
SpamAssassin will use it.
There is only so much braindea
L by the most ignorant of UA's")... something requiring
a protocol name (ftp:, http:, tftp:, etc.), a domain name, and a path
name (even if it's just slash).
Or at the very least, to score complete URL's higher than just domain
names alone.
-Philip
Matt Kettler wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please, do not paste a gigantic blob of multipart MIME messages. Put it
up somewhere, raw, and simply provide a link.
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:44 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm s
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Please, do not paste a gigantic blob of multipart MIME messages. Put it
up somewhere, raw, and simply provide a link.
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 18:44 -0800, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyway, I have no idea why I'm seeing some of these scores. URL matches
when
iki for some of these, but couldn't find descriptions.
What should I do? Just block their domain? I don't want to deal with their
misconfiguration issues.
-Philip
Received: from localhost (localhost)
by mail.redfish-solutions.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) id m1H2M5XP027602;
ment the ineffectual ones you're now using. ;-)
-Philip
Kim Hurlbutt wrote:
Wondering if you can point me in the right direction on how to make
our spam scores lower. How can I get information on how to make edits
to our pages to lower our scores? We currently use Kintera to send
our e
it was asking too much to have meaningful legislation
on "net neutrality" (or digital rights, or copyright reform, etc) come
from Washington D.C. Perhaps in 50 years they'll finally have a handle
on it.
But I dared to hope...
-Philip
as-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Chuckle
Thread-Index: AcfzukOHakkCi8HDRJ2nEhvQOY8RZgACopXw
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "John Doe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Philip Prindeville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2007 16:10:40.0
o mail to the abuse mailbox to see if it gets
delivered, and then if it bounced, mail to the OrgTech mailbox
instead... because that's too much wasted time... So you To: the abuse
mailbox on the odd chance that it exists, and you Bcc: the "noc" mailbox
(or the "hostmaster" or whatever) as a fallback address.
-Philip
cultural imperialism.
Bests,
Olivier
That's a fairly specious argument.
-Philip
me countries enforce anti-spam, anti-trespass laws. Others lack them
or don't enforce them.
When these countries put some teeth into the enforcement of their laws,
then they will stop being blacklisted.
-Philip
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Steven Kurylo wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign
ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers...
What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to
Steven Kurylo wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign
ignorance to cover up their implicit approval of spammers...
What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to
their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail
Between the truly clueless administrator, and those that feign ignorance
to cover up their implicit approval of spammers...
What do you do in the case where someone is filtering deliveries to
their "abuse" mailbox? (Like 99% of mail sent there isn't going to
score positively...)
Sigh.
Phil Barnett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
No joy.
How long ago did you report it?
Which time? It happens regularly, and it's been going on over a
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
No joy.
How long ago did you report it?
Which time? It happens regularly, and it's been going on over a month.
Ok. That changes things, but you didn't say anything in your post
about it going on for a month
Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
We're seeing a lot of unwanted attempts to relay traffic through our
site by Orange.fr, and we've reported this to their Abuse contact as
well as their upstream provider (rain.fr):
Jul 11 11:30:37 mail mimedefang.pl[316
BL site (or
as appropriate) to get them listed on until they start "playing well
with others"?
Would the FAQ's "Reporting Spam" section be a good place to mention the
various sites that you can rat out offenders?
Thanks,
-Philip
d.
I looked and found that yes schema is used in perl net ldap but I would
assume if your going to use uri::ldap to parse the uri it needs to follow
uri::ldaps requirements.
I could be wrong, but it seems that the change made from 3.1 to 3.2 has
been implemented wrong.
Is Net::LDAP::Schema what should be used for getting the schema instead?
Thanks
Philip S. Hempel
ry little. Really nothing related to spamassasin and ldap.
Thanks.
Philip S. Hempel
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> I'm looking at the headers I just got from a Canadian
> ISP's autoresponder I guess the software is called
> "KANA". Anyone know who owns this? (Yes, "someone
> not very clueful", I know... let's be more specific th
Ironically, KANA is supposed to track Spam (and other service)
tickets... but it just ends up muddying the waters by potentially
creating more incidents of Spam.
Quelle folie.
-Philip
From: "Monster.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Reply-To: "Monster.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Philip Prindeville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Money-Investment
Mime
d ips as trusted_networks
>
Given the number of ISP's that don't have rDNS configured,
whitelist_from_rcvd should probably be extended to support
IP/CIDR addresses as well...
Let's not overload the meanings of trusted_networks and
internal_networks. These latter two are already confusing
enough for most newbies without having them take on
additional unintended meanings.
-Philip
e a bug for the enhancement?
-Philip
rd so mail.abcltd.com goes
to our spamassassin filters ip address.
Email to @abcltd.com goes to our spam filter, it checks it, if its spam
it saves it in a local mailbox, if its ham it forwards it to ABC Ltd's
server.
Kind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
Turnstone Technologies NZ Limited
Phone:
I take it your saving your email on the same server that does the spam
filtering?
Only other thing I could think of if this is not the case is email being sent
directly to your mail server via secondry mx records or something.
I run a server which filters mail for clients which is what made me th
ind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
Turnstone Technologies NZ Limited
Phone: +64 9 970 5550
Fax: +64 9 970 5559
DDI: +64 9 970 5552
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.turnstone.co.nz
-Original Message-
From: Steve Pfister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 February 2007 10:51 a.m.
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin using spamc but not using rules correctly? Is my time
being wasted changing local.cf etc?
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:42:22AM +1300, Philip Seccombe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I've taken over a mail server from a previous techn
TECTED] or
something?
Kind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
Turnstone Technologies NZ Limited
Phone: +64 9 970 5550
Fax: +64 9 970 5559
DDI: +64 9 970 5552
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.turnstone.co.nz
-Original Message-
From: Steve Monkhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 February
sa_fast) {
while ($si < $sa_score) {
$si++;
$sa_level .= $sa_symbol;
}
}
}
$stop_spamassassin_time=[gettimeofday];
$spamassassin_time = tv_interval ($start_spamassassin_time,
$stop_spamassassin_time);
&debug("spamassassin: finished scan
Can you blacklist @ returns.groups.yahoo.com and then whitelist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or something?
I'm not sure how the yahoo groups work, but is the reply address
specific to each group or does it get sent from the person to the group
address like this list?
Kind Regards,
Philip Sec
Apologies if this has been answered before or anything, but where/how
are you generating those stats?
I'm not using SA with SQL so I'm not sure if it will work for me, but
those I like!
Stats in question: http://www.blue-canoe.com/stats/index.php?D1=11
Kind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 38 not upgraded.
nibbler:/etc/init.d#
If apt-get will not install it, how do I upgrade it properly?
Kind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
Turnstone Technologies NZ Limited
Phone: +64 9 970 5550
Fax: +64 9 970 5559
DDI: +64 9 970 5552
Email
.77).
Term::ReadKey is up to date (2.30).
Term::ReadLine::Perl is up to date (1.0302).
YAML is up to date (0.62).
Text::Glob is up to date (0.07).
CPAN is up to date (1.8802).
File::Which is up to date (0.05).
nibbler:~#
And there's just nothing happening
Kind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
Turnstone
have any
parameters you want to pass to the calls, please specify them here.
Parameters for the 'perl Build.PL' command?
Typical frequently used settings:
--install_base /home/xxx # different installation
directory
Your choice: []
Oops :s
Kind Regards,
Philip Secc
bjects with matching identifiers.
nibbler:~#
Kind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
Turnstone Technologies NZ Limited
Phone: +64 9 970 5550
Fax: +64 9 970 5559
DDI: +64 9 970 5552
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.turnstone.co.nz
-Original Message-
From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
tion passed, installing update
[9013] dbg: channel: updating MIRRORED.BY contents
[9013] dbg: channel: cleaning out update directory
[9013] dbg: channel: extracting archive
Insecure dependency in open while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl/5.8/IO/File.pm line 70.
Kind Regards,
Phi
e of squirrelmail to
look like a spam filter release but its far from ideal, does anyone know
of any templates for squirrelmail or have they developed any?
Kind Regards,
Philip Seccombe
Turnstone Technologies NZ Limited
Phone: +64 9 970 5550
Fax: +64 9 970 5559
DDI: +64 9 970 5552
Ema
their email.
Thanks,
-Philip
Any takers? ;-)
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=1102&op=5&type=14&dockey=xml/7/a/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&bb=0&source=15
Any takers? ;-)
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=1102&op=5&type=14&dockey=xml/7/a/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&bb=0&source=15
Poor choice of words.
Not a virus. A vaccine. ;-)
-Philip
Justin Mason wrote:
>er, it's illegal, and we're not criminals like they are? ;)
>
>--j.
>
>Philip Prindeville writes:
>
>
>>Given that spammers read this list to figure out how to defeat us...
Given that spammers read this list to figure out how to defeat us...
Why don't we just secure a copy of ratware and engineer a retro-virus
for it?
-Philip
Justin Mason wrote:
>there was a very interesting project described in CEAS which did
>just this -- engaged 419ers and other
tware Ostg Source Group in
>all Rights.
>Latest a News new or Graphics and Sprites Release archive. Va
>Software Ostg Source Group in all Rights.
>Intended Audience Education."""
>
>--
>
>
I hear the New York Times isn't too picky about who they hire.
Someone could create an army of ghost writers and sit back and
collect the paychecks.
-Philip
this a lurking ratware writer? Who on this list runs Exchange?
Why is this bouncing back to me, and not the envelope sender,
which was:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Philip
--- Begin Message ---
Subject of the message: Redundant QP encoding of Subject/From fields...
Rec
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>
>>Received: (private information removed)
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>It just boggles my mind why anyone would go through that much trouble
>>to deliberately damage a header line, rather than just
Don't they? I thought the recommended retry time was 2 minutes,
doubling on each failure, and maxing out at 2 hours.
That's what sendmail does (unless it's retry time has been explicitly
set to more than 2 hours, of course).
-Philip
Richard Frovarp wrote:
>I don't thi
including the definition of CFWS in 3.2.3.]
It just boggles my mind why anyone would go through that much trouble
to deliberately damage a header line, rather than just delete it.
Well, maybe they'll get a whiff of the errs of their ways in the
Hall of Spam Shame...
-Philip
y limit how many sites they hit before they get
shut down.
Of course, graylisting a larger value (2 hours) for totally
unknown correspondents would be more effective.
-Philip
ere are no non-USASCII characters in either field.
Hence, specifying =?iso-8859-1?Q? is not necessary.
The test SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP seems to handle this (at least the Subject:
part). I'd like to crank it up to 3.5 or higher.
Any intuitive reasons why this wouldn't work? Are there any
valid mailers that are braindead?
Thanks,
-Philip
, Pound Sterling, Trademark, etc. Plus, there are
words in English that when properly written do contain accents,
such as resume, dais, cliche, cooperation, etc.
Excluding words with pounds and yen in the Subject line might be
a good thing, however...
-Philip
I'll ask again... Can someone who handles a fair mix of
email content (i.e. not just western European languages)
do a triage (individually) of the rules below for ham versus
spam?
I'd suspect that very little genuine ham contains "IBM852"
or "Unicode" or "CP12[
g Hamann
>
>
You're right! The rendering system does need to be pretty smart.
Unfortunately, few of them are.
But that's still no excuse to lobotomize character encodings.
The least offensive of all solutions would have been to create a
throw-away non-rendering character, like the non-break space,
that says, "glue these two together as a ligature". It would waste
a lot less of an already limited encoding space, too.
-Philip
You'd think, wouldn't you????
-Philip
Robert Nicholson wrote:
> This is Japanese
>
> # Japanese: Peter Evans writes: iso-2022-jp = rfc approved, rfc 1468,
> created
> # by Jun Murai in 1993 back when he didnt have white hair! rfc
> approved.
> # (rfc 2237
ss.
Just out of curiosity, what are the charsets_for_locale{'en'}
anyway? If it were up to me, I'd limit it to USASCII,
ISO-8859-1, and UTF-8. Period.
Likewise, for Japanese, how many UA's use anything other
than ISO2022JP? This is the blessed standard. Anything
John D. Hardin wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
>
>
>>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail1.microsoft.com
>>>whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] smt
SM wrote:
>At 11:49 14-11-2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>The problem with this is that the DNS returns the response (of the multiple
>>PTR records) in no particular order, so looking up the rDNS can return
>>one of three different names...
>>
>&
SM wrote:
>At 18:56 13-11-2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>I recently saw an email get bounced that was legitimately coming
>>
>>
>>from Microsoft:
>
>[snip]
>
>
>
>
>>I've put into my spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.
Matt Kettler wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>I recently saw an email get bounced that was legitimately coming
>>from Microsoft:
>>
>>Nov 13 14:59:26 mail mimedefang.pl[19053]: helo: maila.microsoft.com
>>(131.107.115.212) said "helo smtp.mi
be
maila.microsoft.com instead?
And what do DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE and DNS_FROM_RFC_POST correspond to?
Where do I get the descriptions of these tests, why some sites get
tagged with them, etc?
-Philip
H_WIN1252)
describe WIN_CHARSETContent-Type is Windows-specific text
score WIN_CHARSET 0.01
-Philip
Robert Nicholson wrote:
>You may have misunderstand but that's the point.
>
>The message was _not_ being filtered out like it should be and that
>
Jim Maul wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>Hi.
>>
>>I'm running FC3 on an AMD64 platform for my mail server,
>>and I had last installed SpamAssassin 3.1.5. Well, I grabbed the
>>tarball for 3.1.7, and did a "rpmbuild -tb ..." of the t
86_64/perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.7-1.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
perl-Mail-SpamAssassin = 3.1.5-1 is needed by (installed)
spamassassin-3.1.5-1.x86_64
any ideas why this is happening and what the fix is?
-Philip
I tried to use Compress::LZW to decompress the stream, but
that only seems to work on 12 or 16 bit minimum codesize,
whereas GIF images are routinely 4, 6, or 8 bits long.
Does anyone have a handle on what Perl modules to use for
dissecting GIF objects?
Thanks,
-Philip
Matt Kettler wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>&
Matt Kettler wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>There's no way to whitelist just the empty address then? Rather than
>>everything?
>>
>>-Philip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Not given the simple file-glob format of the whitelist comm
Matt Kettler wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>There's no way to whitelist just the empty address then? Rather than
>>everything?
>>
>>-Philip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Not given the simple file-glob format of the whitelist comm
Matt Kettler wrote:
>Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well, yes, especially since the IP address of the sender is reserved for
>>a machine that does ticketing and auto-replies exclusively (I was going
>>
John D. Hardin wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hmm Maybe if I post with a more obvious subject line
>>
>>What is the notation for writing a "whitelist_from" or
>>"whitelist_from_rcvd" when the sender
Hmm Maybe if I post with a more obvious subject line
What is the notation for writing a "whitelist_from" or "whitelist_from_rcvd"
when the sender is <> ? (As in "MAIL FROM: <>")
Thanks,
-Philip
Philip Prindeville wrote:
>Well, I have
Well, I have the following issue. When I report abuse to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
they send me back an auto-generated email ticket with a broken Date: on
it (honestly, people, how hard is it to correctly format the date???).
They do this as <> for the sending address.
How does one go about writing a "
SPAM is invalid?
>
>(I had a user who had a 3rd party program that he'd do that with - I
>asked him to stop because when he'd do it, it'd bog down my email
>with "invalid recipient" type emails since the person he
>was "notifying" was an invalid address).
>
>
Thankfully there are fewer open relays each day, and hence if you
reject the message as it's being sent, then the sender is the spammer,
and he will know he is failing.
With any luck, he might even remove you from the list of addresses
that he will try to spam in the future.
-Philip
What are the steps to whitelist email sent from <> (i.e. Postmaster
when bouncing mail) or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
-Philip
Does SpamAssassin support SPF record checking?
Or is this something I have to patch into my incoming SMTP server?
I did a trivial test for alternative and gif, and it didn't pan out very
>well. Will need some additional conditions to make it more usable.
>
>Loren
>
>
>
What Perl modules are there that can process (decode, perform certain
inspections and histogram analysis, etc) of GIF files?
I'd like to throw something together...
-Philip
John D. Hardin wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>
>>John D. Hardin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The spammers send mul
John D. Hardin wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>
>
>
>>the text and the images. The spammers send multipart/alternative
>>because they want the text/plain section to confuse the Bayes
>>filters, since they know it won't be rendered.
much of the above would be absolutely necessary, but I
>suspect at least some of it is. Still, this is a fairly trivial sort of
>thing to have to accumulate. Expecially since all spam (at least currently)
>uses gifs, which a blind man can decode with a hair comb - no fancy software
>required.
>
>Loren
>
>
Yup. Exactly.
-Philip
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 2:10 PM
>>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>>Subject: On bichromatic GIF stock spam
>>
>>
>>I get a lot o
ely, which hosts a lot of the lists that I read...
-Philip
. ;-) I.e. that at a minimum the host portions of the URL and the
label for the link would have to match...
If the sender REALLY needs to have the link reside somewhere else,
they could always have the published address send a Location: response
that redirects you to the eventual resting place
document them.
-Philip
Screaming Eagle wrote:
>I getting this type of spam:
>
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on
> X-Spam-Virus: No
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_30_40,
>
I noticed the following message (well, I'll just put a fragment):
Note that the '=' got escaped as '=3D' they probably entered
the text and their HTML editor escaped it, not figuring it was
raw HTML being entered directly...
-Philip
Is there a blacklist of phone numbers?
A lot of diploma spam I get has totally different message bodies,
except they list the same phone number to call.
or port 465 (and not the
typical usage of submitting messages via a pipe into an exec'd sendmail
process
on the same machine, etc).
If I have a network 192.168.1.0/24, and I have workstations at 10-25 that
submit email, should I just have:
internal_networks 192.168.1.0/24
Thanks,
-Philip
I'm getting about 50+ per day of these spams not being caught by
SpamAssassin (SpamAssassin version 3.1.1 running on Perl version
5.8.4). There's two types:
1. Lose weight type spam, uses bad English e.g. "yrs" instead of
"years", "u" instead of "you", "ur" instead of "your", talks about not
havin
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 13:32:10 -0600:
Except that developers aren't vetted in any particular way.
vetted?
You can sign yourself up for most lists, if you have a valid address
and a web browser.
You have to try to get you
jdow wrote:
From: "Philip Prindeville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
are fired... And you might have a specific set of rules for a list
like
alsa-devel (the 'L' in ALSA is for Linux, so it might be reasonable
to assume that no one will be posting with charset='window
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 11:26:33 -0600:
No, it's to a list. At the list exploder, we want to be able to apply
certain per-list policies. For instance, for most lists (but not all),
the following would be applicable:
I don't use
rhaps especially if it's MS, since they're
big enough to have adequate personnel and resources to know better) should
be spanked.
Otherwise, it won't get fixed.
As I remember, setting the default codepage in Windows to be ISO-8859-1
system-wide isn't that hard.
-Philip
Well, I didn't get any responses on the MDF mailing list,
so I was wondering if SA was the better angle to be coming
at this with.
Thanks,
-Philip
--- Begin Message ---
I was wondering... Since MdF can be used to invoke SA, and it can
extract information from the headers such as
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote on Thu, 18 May 2006 08:47:48 -0600:
How legitimate is email sent as
windows-1252?
Very, because broken Windows clients use it.
Kai
Ah, the "Strong Arm school of standards enforcement." ;-)
-Philip
e in the Unix world (or more broadly, not in the
Windows world),
why would you want to use vendor-specific encodings for no reason other than
they're the broken defaults Microsoft chose to use?
-Philip
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:47:40PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Philip Mak wrote:
> > Why does ALL_TRUSTED have a score of -3.3? Doesn't this mean that any
> > spammer who connects directly to my mail server has a good chance of
> > getting past SpamAssassin?
>
I've been getting a lot of spam lately ever since I moved my mail
server to a new system. Here's one of the false negatives that slipped
through, for example:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50,
NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_BY_IP,YOUR_INCOME autolearn=ham
Are you running Mimedefang?
It might be a start.
We block email from subscriber addresses at networks that are known to be
large sources of spam.
See:
http://www.mimedefang.org/kwiki/index.cgi?PhilipsWorkingFilter
in particular, how %bad_tld's is used.
-Philip
Kristopher Austin wrote
m since Outlook prefers MIME content.
If anyone wants to talk to us, they can stick with ISO Latin-1. We
don't need no stinkin'
Windows-125x... (or -839 for that matter).
-Philip
>adult, what do you recommend for accomplishing that?
>
>
> Same here. I took a couple years of high school Spanish in California and
Comic books. Or "bande dessinee" as it's called in French.
The story lines are often simple, and the pictures give a lot of context
to what is
being talked about.
-Philip
Hmmm. Already a rule for that. Good...
-Philip
201 - 300 of 392 matches
Mail list logo
