Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-19 Thread /0
if you all rush out and get it now, theres nothing stopping them from
releasing the next one for a buck or two more.

consider that, but keep in mind that I respect you all as music listeners
and collectors, so holding off on a great piece of (available) vinyl isnt
always an option :)


- Original Message - 
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


 but will you get this record? its certainly not easy to come by
 used for nothing. im sure some people will have their stories, but
 in a smaller city like pittsburgh, theres pretty much zero chance
 of me coming up with that record.

 who cares. i'll get a dozen other records that are equally good. i'm a
music
 lover not a collector..in most cases..
 .
 demand IS that great though! like i said=, all the distros with it
 that ive seen (unique, watts, and 161) were out of it within hours
 of having it in. and that was at a price of $10 wholesale!

 well we'll see how well the stores can actually sell it. none of the
people
 i was with at recordtime looked twice at it. too much other good chit to
buy
 for 1/3 the price

 when the only other way to get it is through ebay, its worth that
 by far. and i dont think this record needed any more hype than it
 already has from being an excellent record.

 fart

 also, AFAIK theres no difference between the repress and the
 original. in 20 years, no one will know or even remember which one
 is which.

 thats a completely false assertion. thats what record collecting is all
 about. my dad's been selling rare records for 40 yearsand i've been
 selling stuff on ebay for quite awhile. music lovers dont care about
 pressings etc, but this chit isnt priced for music lovers. but it will be
 soon enough...in 20 years it will be very easy to remember which pressing
is
 which because the original will cost a fortune and the repress will be
 affordable...as it should be now.

 the peacefrog joints are a whole other story. those are tunes with
 no prior track record. i think that practice is a little weak,

 but the artist roster has plenty of draw. it's really not so different.
just
 sought after artists instead of sought after tracks..

 much more willing to pay for records that i know and want that are
 hard to get ahold of. their rarity and goodness is established,
 not created.

 a repress is not rare and does not deserve that price, the end. you dont
 press a rare record, it becomes rare over time. the rarity of the original
 record is established. the inflated cost of a repress is just trying to
 quickly take advantage of the demand for the original. it's a cheap trick.
 guarantee you the repress will be worth less than current wholesale price
in
 5 years.

 you're missing the point entirely. just because you can price something
high
 and still sell it ok doesnt mean you are justified in doing so (by
anything
 other than overzealous capitalism). clone could have priced their glass
 domain rerelease similarily, but didnt. because they are not trying to
 overcapitalize. your willingness to pay exorbitant prices does not excuse
 the jacked up pricetag...it makes you a sucker...

 it hasnt taken one tiny bit of joy out of me finally being able to
 own 4 jazz funk classics. if nothing else, im extremely excited.

 you got the collector itch in you, or a thick wallet -- i hope a thick
 wallet so you're still buying other stuff

 if pressing small numbers and charging high prices will convince
 people to repress hard to find classics, im ALL FOR IT. if carl

 cool, you're the one they're selling to then..

 repressed each of the retroactive records at that price, id buy
 each and every one of them.

 really? i sure wouldnt. they're not all great, some sound very dated now.
 but following this new pricing strategy down the line, why not just
repress
 100 copies of the retroactive stuff and sell them for $100 each. make $10k
 off 100 records, yea! can you still not see why that sucks? from a
music
 lover's pov, it sucksfor the collectors, for the stores it's great...i
 pretty much make my living selling stuff to compulsive collectors, but i
am
 not about to become one, i cant afford it...

 _
 FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
 http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/




Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-19 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




if you all rush out and get it now, theres nothing stopping them from
releasing the next one for a buck or two more.

consider that, but keep in mind that I respect you all as music listeners
and collectors, so holding off on a great piece of (available) vinyl isnt
always an option :)


There's nothing stopping them from charging $100 if they wanted to
it's their product and they can charge as much as they want
doesn't matter if we all rush out now or take a year to go and buy them all
up
maybe there is a reason for the higher price -
none of us will know until a rep from Planet E gets on this list and tell
us why the price is higher
what I do know is I'm enjoying having this record finally

MEK



Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-19 Thread Jason Brunton

We have this in stock at the moment if anyone needs a copy

cheers

Jason
On 16 Apr 2004, at 21:16, Minto George wrote:



colonel MAC wrote:


true, and there's a 69 CD on RS with different cuts
from the 69
12-inches, My Machines, Sound on Sound, etc.  I think
i lost that one
over the years too.   :P



arg






RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-19 Thread ani
i saw one of these at record time roseville, but not sure what the price
was.  i'm going there shortly, in case anyone wants to know what they're
charging.

ani

: -Original Message-
: From: Jason Brunton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
: Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 3:13 PM
: To: Minto George
: Cc: 313
: Subject: Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?
: 
: 
: We have this in stock at the moment if anyone needs a copy
: 
: cheers
: 
: Jason
: On 16 Apr 2004, at 21:16, Minto George wrote:
: 




Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-16 Thread Marsel // Nomorewords.net

about this 69 repress,  there were copies still available at Hardwax until
three years ago?
from the original press so to say.. and even then it went already sky rocket
high on ebay

strange things.

===

Nomorewords.net
IJplein 262,
1021 LR, Amsterdam
The Netherlands

http://nomorewords.net
phn +31-20-494-5535
fax +31-20-494-5510



Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-16 Thread Minto George

colonel MAC wrote:

true, and there's a 69 CD on RS with different cuts
from the 69 
12-inches, My Machines, Sound on Sound, etc.  I think
i lost that one 
over the years too.   :P

arg

Matt or anyone who wants this, I know where there is a
copy. I had a couple I bought in at a store i worked
at years ago and no one ever bought em, they are
probably still sitting on the shelf with a mound of
dust on em. let me know!

m

=
down low music 
http://downlowmusic.org
UPCOMING '04
East Island vs The Moderator dL011 OUT NOW 
Iridite Productions The Acceptable Face of Elitist Techno dL012 MAR




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html


RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




Hmmm - Hot Grooves has it for $9.28 + shipping
the cheapest shipping option I can get is $3.99

so the total for my order would be $13.27 so if I pay an extra $2.00 at my
local shop I can have it today

not much cheaper one way or the other

MEK



RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread yussel
oh my god!  get all these creepy record collectors away from me!


RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread David Powers
Well JT, all I can say is I've wanted this record for YEARS, if I see it
in Gramaphone I will probably pick it up even for $16-17.  I bet that
there are a lot of people like me, I don't think we are getting played
or jacked.  Note that I already have it on MP3, but I love vinyl and I
think this is really a seminal Detroit techno record, something worth
owning for the rest of my life.  I'm not buying it just because it is
rare.  Sure, maybe they pressed too many copies and the prices will come
down - but how can we know if that is the case?  And why not let an
artist make a little extra money off a great record, he couldn't have
made THAT MUCH on the original to begin with.  

Remember, people can find the mp3 for free.  The value of vinyl is that
people like me enjoy owning it despite the availability of mp3s.  Sure I
look for good deals buying records, but I do collect music that I really
like just because I love it, and I'm willing to pay for this.  The vinyl
market is NOT for everyone, it is elitist by its very nature.  High
pricing for limited pressings of classics does make sense, as long as
they don't press so many that the price turns out to be unsustainable
and they can't sell all the copies produced.

~David

-Original Message-
From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

so you dont like the record because its not good? i dont
understand. if you were actually a music lover, i think youd be
happy to finally get your hands on a good record that otherwise
you wouldnt pay crazy loot for.

i'm not a music lover. i was just playing. music is for the birds tweet 
tweet
who said i didnt like the record? i just dont like the price. i've got 
better things to spend my money on, like, new stuff thats priced
normally. i 
dont even buy old records for high prices, i find them cheap or i dont
have 
them. there is too much great music out there that can be found cheap.

stores arent smoking crack for the most part. they dont order
things they think they wont be able to sell.

i'd be interested in hearing back from somebody in detroit whether those

69's on the wall at recordtime sell or not. they didnt order many tho.

excellent argument.

i respond to hot air with hot air

the repress is exactly identical to the original. how will they
determine which it is? carbon dating a sample from the vinyl?

yes wiseass you have to carbon date the vinyl. or look at the 
runout/label/sleeve. something about it will be different. if its truly 
identical, than the high price is even more shady -- based on the rarity
of 
the original, which it has suddenly become itself, but widely
available..

this is my point though. it would be bad if big name artists just
started selling their records for more because they are who they
are. putting a premium price on an established anthem is
altogether different.

which is the established anthem on 4 jazz funk? my machines? anthem? i

dont think thats quite the right word somehow..more like sought-after
techno 
collector stuff...hence the pricetag...and is this not just because it's

carl craig? elite techno stuff? all that old trax stuff was wa 
bigger than this...and i think farley trumps craig as far as big
names...and 
those represses were cheap..

anthems dont tend to have an inflated pricetag

throw is 1000 times the anthem of anything on 4 jazz funk, but is priced

normally. the price of the 69 is to take advantage of collectors. you
can 
argue all you want, yes it's a great record to own, but you got played.
of 
course it's no problem to you if it was worth (personally) what you paid
for 
it. but in the larger context of the record business, it sucks and is a
jack 
move..and its not normally how represses are handled. usually they are
aimed 
at giving rare music a renewed availability and accessibility. the
repress 
is cheap, the original stays valuable and rare and even more sought 
after...but the pricetage on this is jumping the gun. it's essentially 
calling a record rare even as it's hot off the presses and available 
everywhere, totally a marketing ploy. it's the record industry
collapsing on 
itself, not looking for new listeners but to instead take existing
customers 
(collectors especially) for all it can...while it can. because soon
people 
will be aware that this record is not so hard to find anymore. there
will be 
copies sitting in stores, the urgency will wear off. the collector
demand 
will evaporate. it's a a gaaame, and i do not like these games

ill bet you a ton of money on that. look at shades of jae by
moodymann. that record has been repressed, even as recently as 5

what its worth and what people will pay for it are seperate things 
sometimes. i've sold records which arent worth a pile of beans for a
decent 
little chunk on eBay. the record collecting business is very similar to 
comic book collecting. price

RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread J. T.

ah well, good points...
i just dont care anymore or something i guess. or maybe i am too broke. if 
it was normal price i'd buy it, but since it's way marked up, no way.
granted those of us selling records at normal wholesale price aren't making 
squat. but it just seems a little odd when you have even more rare chit 
getting repressed and sold at normal price, but oh this, this is special! it 
does smell of some kinda techno elitism or something to me. and is 
definitely taking advantage of collector mindset/fetishism, but if you're a 
collector or horny for this record, what do you care i guess. i still think 
you're being suckered, but if you're a willing sucker i guess you're not 
really a sucker. it's kinda sickly funny that putting a high price on 
something is actually a way to hype it up nowadays. pricing a repress as if 
it immediately shares the rarity of the original is a bit of a marketing 
trick, but if it works, hey. basic channel, clone, rephlex, environ, etc etc 
you guys missed out on the $$...doh!
of course i want to get ahold of good music (that i dont have to have my 
computer on to listen to) and this makes me wish i could afford to be a 
collector. with my reasoning and my budget, there's no way i can feel ok 
buying this thing. it kinda bugs me but whatever. i'll look for it in the 
used bins etc. they'll end up there sooner or later whether they pressed a 
lot or a few anyways. there's plenty floating around now..
anyways thanks for the pov dave, you forgot to insult my mentality or 
appreciation for music tho...



Well JT, all I can say is I've wanted this record for YEARS, if I see it
in Gramaphone I will probably pick it up even for $16-17.  I bet that
there are a lot of people like me, I don't think we are getting played
or jacked.  Note that I already have it on MP3, but I love vinyl and I
think this is really a seminal Detroit techno record, something worth
owning for the rest of my life.  I'm not buying it just because it is
rare.  Sure, maybe they pressed too many copies and the prices will come
down - but how can we know if that is the case?  And why not let an
artist make a little extra money off a great record, he couldn't have
made THAT MUCH on the original to begin with.

Remember, people can find the mp3 for free.  The value of vinyl is that
people like me enjoy owning it despite the availability of mp3s.  Sure I
look for good deals buying records, but I do collect music that I really
like just because I love it, and I'm willing to pay for this.  The vinyl
market is NOT for everyone, it is elitist by its very nature.  High
pricing for limited pressings of classics does make sense, as long as
they don't press so many that the price turns out to be unsustainable
and they can't sell all the copies produced.

~David

-Original Message-
From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

so you dont like the record because its not good? i dont
understand. if you were actually a music lover, i think youd be
happy to finally get your hands on a good record that otherwise
you wouldnt pay crazy loot for.

i'm not a music lover. i was just playing. music is for the birds tweet
tweet
who said i didnt like the record? i just dont like the price. i've got
better things to spend my money on, like, new stuff thats priced
normally. i
dont even buy old records for high prices, i find them cheap or i dont
have
them. there is too much great music out there that can be found cheap.

stores arent smoking crack for the most part. they dont order
things they think they wont be able to sell.

i'd be interested in hearing back from somebody in detroit whether those

69's on the wall at recordtime sell or not. they didnt order many tho.

excellent argument.

i respond to hot air with hot air

the repress is exactly identical to the original. how will they
determine which it is? carbon dating a sample from the vinyl?

yes wiseass you have to carbon date the vinyl. or look at the
runout/label/sleeve. something about it will be different. if its truly
identical, than the high price is even more shady -- based on the rarity
of
the original, which it has suddenly become itself, but widely
available..

this is my point though. it would be bad if big name artists just
started selling their records for more because they are who they
are. putting a premium price on an established anthem is
altogether different.

which is the established anthem on 4 jazz funk? my machines? anthem? i

dont think thats quite the right word somehow..more like sought-after
techno
collector stuff...hence the pricetag...and is this not just because it's

carl craig? elite techno stuff? all that old trax stuff was wa
bigger than this...and i think farley trumps craig as far as big
names...and
those represses were cheap..

anthems dont tend to have an inflated pricetag

throw is 1000 times

Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Stewart Caig
I can wholly understand JTs attitude to this. At the day these labels are
making a business decision to release or rerelease music and sell it at an
inflated cost because they can. They know the mentality of the record
collector, hell I used to have it myself! Especially coming from the point
of view of someone struggling to make a label successful themselves, its
kinda frustrating. I guess I have slightly less of a problem with Planet E
than I do the Peacefrog Privte Pressings, at least Carl Craig is selling
this record based on it being an established great record, but the Private
Pressings arent even that great, certainly not to the point of them ever
really becoming clasics in thier own right IMO, they certainly dont have the
judos of already being a classic to justify the price tag. They are being
sold and marketed in a way that directly plugs into the record collectors
mentality. Theres loads of better records coming out that are better and
much better value for money from a pure musical point of view that are
struggling to even sell 500 copies, so it kinda smacks of arrogance from
Peacefrog to release 500 and then use the numbers to justify the price. Ive
seen plenty of posts here from people that have bought these and theres
always the feeling that they know they are getting ripped off, but cant help
themselves, which is fine I guess, at the end of the day in 20 years time
nobodys gonna think they were ripped off all that time ago, youre just gonna
be glad you bought it when you did. My problem is where does this end? What
if Peacefrog start banging out these Private Pressings every week, or Carl
Craig does rerelease all the Retroactive stuff and charge $20 for it? How
many good  new records on struggling labels are gonna take a hit because
people just cant afford to pick everything up?



- Original Message -
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:42 AM
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


 ah well, good points...
 i just dont care anymore or something i guess. or maybe i am too broke. if
 it was normal price i'd buy it, but since it's way marked up, no way.
 granted those of us selling records at normal wholesale price aren't
making
 squat. but it just seems a little odd when you have even more rare chit
 getting repressed and sold at normal price, but oh this, this is special!
it
 does smell of some kinda techno elitism or something to me. and is
 definitely taking advantage of collector mindset/fetishism, but if you're
a
 collector or horny for this record, what do you care i guess. i still
think
 you're being suckered, but if you're a willing sucker i guess you're not
 really a sucker. it's kinda sickly funny that putting a high price on
 something is actually a way to hype it up nowadays. pricing a repress as
if
 it immediately shares the rarity of the original is a bit of a marketing
 trick, but if it works, hey. basic channel, clone, rephlex, environ, etc
etc
 you guys missed out on the $$...doh!
 of course i want to get ahold of good music (that i dont have to have my
 computer on to listen to) and this makes me wish i could afford to be a
 collector. with my reasoning and my budget, there's no way i can feel ok
 buying this thing. it kinda bugs me but whatever. i'll look for it in the
 used bins etc. they'll end up there sooner or later whether they pressed a
 lot or a few anyways. there's plenty floating around now..
 anyways thanks for the pov dave, you forgot to insult my mentality or
 appreciation for music tho...

 Well JT, all I can say is I've wanted this record for YEARS, if I see it
 in Gramaphone I will probably pick it up even for $16-17.  I bet that
 there are a lot of people like me, I don't think we are getting played
 or jacked.  Note that I already have it on MP3, but I love vinyl and I
 think this is really a seminal Detroit techno record, something worth
 owning for the rest of my life.  I'm not buying it just because it is
 rare.  Sure, maybe they pressed too many copies and the prices will come
 down - but how can we know if that is the case?  And why not let an
 artist make a little extra money off a great record, he couldn't have
 made THAT MUCH on the original to begin with.
 
 Remember, people can find the mp3 for free.  The value of vinyl is that
 people like me enjoy owning it despite the availability of mp3s.  Sure I
 look for good deals buying records, but I do collect music that I really
 like just because I love it, and I'm willing to pay for this.  The vinyl
 market is NOT for everyone, it is elitist by its very nature.  High
 pricing for limited pressings of classics does make sense, as long as
 they don't press so many that the price turns out to be unsustainable
 and they can't sell all the copies produced.
 
 ~David
 
 -Original Message-
 From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:51 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org

Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread James_Bucknell





maybe the change in pricing of records reflects a change in the market for
these records. the market for the planet e represses, ugly edits etc. is
mainly middle class, (approaching) middle age record collectors. it's no
longer driven by student djs in europe  or american inner city kids who
hear the stuff on the dancefloor or on WBMX then run to vinylmania or
gramaphone the next day.

remember all those claims that techno is the new jazz? maybe they're true.
maybe it's a genre full of mainly obsessive balding male record collectors.
james
www.jbucknell.com



   
 Stewart Caig
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 soul.co.ukTo
   313@hyperreal.org 
 15/04/04 07:05 AM  cc
   
   Subject
   Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE   
   represses?  
   
   
   
   
   
   





 i'd be interested in hearing back from somebody in detroit whether those
 
 69's on the wall at recordtime sell or not. they didnt order many tho.
 
  excellent argument.
 
 i respond to hot air with hot air
 
  the repress is exactly identical to the original. how will they
  determine which it is? carbon dating a sample from the vinyl?
 
 yes wiseass you have to carbon date the vinyl. or look at the
 runout/label/sleeve. something about it will be different. if its truly
 identical, than the high price is even more shady -- based on the rarity
 of
 the original, which it has suddenly become itself, but widely
 available..
 
  this is my point though. it would be bad if big name artists just
  started selling their records for more because they are who they
  are. putting a premium price on an established anthem is
  altogether different.
 
 which is the established anthem on 4 jazz funk? my machines? anthem? i
 
 dont think thats quite the right word somehow..more like sought-after
 techno
 collector stuff...hence the pricetag...and is this not just because it's
 
 carl craig? elite techno stuff? all that old trax stuff was wa
 bigger than this...and i think farley trumps craig as far as big
 names...and
 those represses were cheap..
 
 anthems dont tend to have an inflated pricetag
 
 throw is 1000 times the anthem of anything on 4 jazz funk, but is priced
 
 normally. the price of the 69 is to take advantage of collectors. you
 can
 argue all you want, yes it's a great record to own, but you got played.
 of
 course it's no problem to you if it was worth (personally) what you paid
 for
 it. but in the larger context of the record business, it sucks and is a
 jack
 move..and its not normally how represses are handled. usually they are
 aimed
 at giving rare music a renewed availability and accessibility. the
 repress
 is cheap, the original stays valuable and rare and even more sought
 after...but the pricetage on this is jumping the gun. it's essentially
 calling a record rare even as it's hot off the presses and available
 everywhere, totally a marketing ploy. it's the record industry
 collapsing on
 itself, not looking for new listeners but to instead take existing
 customers
 (collectors especially) for all it can...while it can. because soon
 people
 will be aware that this record is not so hard to find anymore. there
 will be
 copies sitting in stores, the urgency will wear off. the collector
 demand
 will evaporate. it's a a gaaame, and i do not like these games
 
  ill bet you a ton of money on that. look at shades of jae by
  moodymann. that record has been repressed, even as recently as 5
 
 what its worth and what people will pay for it are seperate things
 sometimes. i've sold records which arent worth a pile of beans for a
 decent
 little chunk on eBay. the record collecting business is very similar to
 comic book collecting. price trends are extreme, and shortlived. what
 might
 be worth $50 this year, in five years could be worth $5. or you might
 just
 find it for $1 in some secondhand store somewhere. some people only look
 to
 eBay...italo is crazy on there too. dirt cheap if you actually look for
 it.
 like, give a wantlist to somebody you know in nyc or chicago

Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Jason Brunton
The parallels are pretty similar here- when I first got into buying 
vinyl  it was around 1986/87 and there was a serious amount of classic 
jazz being reissued on Blue Note and other labels- it lead me to a lot 
of musical gems I would never have had the opportunity to experience 
otherwise.  I'm hoping that a whole load of kids about 18-20 discover 4 
Jazz Funk Classics, Relics, Night+Da etc, etc and find them as exciting 
and fresh as I did when they first came out.


The danger lies when the artists concerned aren't producing much new 
work of worth and rely on their back cat to support them and their 
reputation- this certainly happened in the Jazz field in my opinion- 
hope it doesn't happen in Techno.


cheers

Jason


On 15 Apr 2004, at 07:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:






remember all those claims that techno is the new jazz? maybe they're 
true.
maybe it's a genre full of mainly obsessive balding male record 
collectors.

james
www.jbucknell.com





RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT)
Touch :0D

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2004 7:12 
To: Scott K Ellis; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


I just picked up an original pressing from Save The Children for 50p

-Original Message-
From: Scott K Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:01 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


Think I saw it at Hot Grooves for less than $10.  Sure hope Record Time
isn't jacking up the price that much.

Scott

-Original Message-
From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:51 PM
To: 'J. T.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?



well it worked out at £11.99 over here ($20-25!)

cheaper than ebay prices i guess but still a little cheeky

somebody's been looking at the Ugly Edit prices and taken note.

robin...

- -Original Message-
- From:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- org] On Behalf Of J. T.
- Sent: 14 April 2004 17:47
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
- Subject: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?
-
-
- i saw the first 69 repress at recordtime over the
- weekend...it was $16!!
- maybe it had the wrong sticker on it, i didnt have any money
- anyway so didnt
- ask. is it a euro press  distrib thing? orr..oh well.
-
-
- I've asked Carl Craig about this repress last friday (@
- nouveau casino
- -Paris) and he said the three 69 records are going to be
- repressed, but
- he did not mention a date. A good news for everybody who
- missed them and
- don't want to spend hundreds on ebay !!!
- 
- Hope that helps :)
- 
- 
- On 14-apr-04, at 16:52, Lee Herrington IV wrote:
- 
- 
-can anyone speak to the possibility that there will be more 69
- represses?
- it's nice to be able to own a copy of 4 jazz funk
- classics without
- having
- to sell major organs to fund the purchase.
- 
-
- _
- FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
- http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
-
- ---
- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
- Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004
-
-

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004



#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

#



***
Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and 
not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies. 
This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies 
and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently 
transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the 
use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by 
attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the To or Cc 
lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for 
delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended 
recipient and have received this email in error.  Any use by an 
unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager 
by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please 
then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies 
thereof.  Thank you.
***



RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Robert Taylor
Psyche!

-Original Message-
From: Blackman, Ryan (UKEKT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:12 AM
To: Robert Taylor; Scott K Ellis; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


Touch :0D

-Original Message-
From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 April 2004 7:12 
To: Scott K Ellis; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


I just picked up an original pressing from Save The Children for 50p

-Original Message-
From: Scott K Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:01 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


Think I saw it at Hot Grooves for less than $10.  Sure hope Record Time
isn't jacking up the price that much.

Scott

-Original Message-
From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:51 PM
To: 'J. T.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?



well it worked out at £11.99 over here ($20-25!)

cheaper than ebay prices i guess but still a little cheeky

somebody's been looking at the Ugly Edit prices and taken note.

robin...

- -Original Message-
- From:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- org] On Behalf Of J. T.
- Sent: 14 April 2004 17:47
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
- Subject: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?
-
-
- i saw the first 69 repress at recordtime over the
- weekend...it was $16!!
- maybe it had the wrong sticker on it, i didnt have any money
- anyway so didnt
- ask. is it a euro press  distrib thing? orr..oh well.
-
-
- I've asked Carl Craig about this repress last friday (@
- nouveau casino
- -Paris) and he said the three 69 records are going to be
- repressed, but
- he did not mention a date. A good news for everybody who
- missed them and
- don't want to spend hundreds on ebay !!!
- 
- Hope that helps :)
- 
- 
- On 14-apr-04, at 16:52, Lee Herrington IV wrote:
- 
- 
-can anyone speak to the possibility that there will be more 69
- represses?
- it's nice to be able to own a copy of 4 jazz funk
- classics without
- having
- to sell major organs to fund the purchase.
- 
-
- _
- FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
- http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
-
- ---
- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
- Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004
-
-

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004



#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

#



***
Opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and 
not Entergy-Koch Trading Limited or its affiliated companies. 
This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies 
and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently 
transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the 
use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by 
attorney-client privilege. If you are not listed on the To or Cc 
lines of the original email (or are not the person responsible for 
delivering to an intended recipient), then you are not an intended 
recipient and have received this email in error.  Any use by an 
unintended recipient is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the IT manager 
by telephone on +44 (0)20 7337 8300 or via email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], attaching this message. Please 
then delete this email and all attachments, and destroy any copies 
thereof.  Thank you.
***


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#



Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Martin Dust
 The danger lies when the artists concerned aren't producing much new
 work of worth and rely on their back cat to support them and their
 reputation- this certainly happened in the Jazz field in my opinion-
 hope it doesn't happen in Techno.


Some good points chief but even at £14, the artist won't be making that much
- I like the Peacefrog idea and if it means the artist has enough cash to
carry on for another month of making music - sweet.

Martin




Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread alex . bond

JasonBruntonI'm hoping that a whole load of kids about 18-20 discover 4
Jazz Funk Classics, Relics, Night+Da etc, etc and find them as exciting
and fresh as I did when they first came out.

It's working Jason, seen it with my own eyes.
This kid (18/19?) I know from hanging about in the record shop, really nice
kid, dead enthusiastic about music, always mithering for tips on things. I
saw him last week on Oldham St. Big grin on his face clutching a piccadilly
records bag. He comes up to me Have you heard this with a big look of
amazement.
1 copy of 4 Jazz Funk Classics in his bag.
I gave him the little wink wink, and said see you later, and I walked off
with a big grin on my face, happy that a repress can put such an
enthusiastic music lover onto some proper techno instead of all that
flipping rubbish kids can be hoodwinked into buying.

Oh, yeah, and another thing.

The one thing that has surprised me about this thread is this...

HALF OF YOU NEVER OWNED A COPY OF FOUR JAZZ FUNK CLASSICS?

YOU LOT ARE RUBBISH, GET WITH THE PROGRAM.

All the best,

Alex
_

- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
individual, non-business capacity and is not on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
give your consent to such monitoring





RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Ken Odeluga

There seem to be a lot of concerns about the price of this re-release - and
it's highlighting a lot of issues about price in general.

However, I'd like to point out something In London, prices are varying. My
copy cost me GBP9.99 from Soul Jazz (or whatever they're calling themselves
nowadays). This is only about GBP2 more or even less, than the most
expensive price of a more conventional release from most other shops
specializing in this music. Some shops are slightly above, some slightly
below.

I would suggest - correct me if I am very wrong - that the situation is
similar in the States (although of course this discussion will be moot in
ten days I think, as the stocks really *are* finite!).

Therefore, whilst a lot of issues worthy of discussion are being raised, I
don't think that this is in fact the most expensive record of it's kind
around in recent months. From my point of view, if it's a record which you
have been seeking, this is probably the best deal going for many years. In
view of that, I think the price is fine. Only mho.

k


RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Peteri, Jochem
WORD!!!

Have a great day,

Jochem


HALF OF YOU NEVER OWNED A COPY OF FOUR JAZZ FUNK CLASSICS?

YOU LOT ARE RUBBISH, GET WITH THE PROGRAM.

All the best,

Alex

The information contained in this e-mail communication is solely intended for 
the person/legal person to whom it  has been sent, and as it may contain 
information of a personal or confidential nature, it may not be made public by 
virtue of law, regulations or agreement. If someone other than the intended 
recipient should receive or come into possession of this e-mail communication, 
he/she will not be entitled to read, disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are requested to inform the sender of 
this e-mail message of this immediately, and to destroy the original e-mail 
communication. Neither Randstad Holding nv nor its subsidiaries accept any 
liability for incorrect and incomplete transmission or delayed receipt of this 
e-mail.


Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Jason Brunton

That is the same price that Rub A Dub are charging

cheers

Jason

On 15 Apr 2004, at 10:02, Ken Odeluga wrote:



There seem to be a lot of concerns about the price of this re-release 
- and

it's highlighting a lot of issues about price in general.

However, I'd like to point out something In London, prices are 
varying. My
copy cost me GBP9.99 from Soul Jazz (or whatever they're calling 
themselves

nowadays). This is only about GBP2 more or even less, than the most
expensive price of a more conventional release from most other shops
specializing in this music. Some shops are slightly above, some 
slightly

below.

I would suggest - correct me if I am very wrong - that the situation is
similar in the States (although of course this discussion will be moot 
in

ten days I think, as the stocks really *are* finite!).

Therefore, whilst a lot of issues worthy of discussion are being 
raised, I

don't think that this is in fact the most expensive record of it's kind
around in recent months. From my point of view, if it's a record which 
you
have been seeking, this is probably the best deal going for many 
years. In

view of that, I think the price is fine. Only mho.

k





Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




I would just like to state that for the record (no pun intended) - I have a
full head of hair.
But I dig that craazy beat maan!

MEK


   
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  sDigest.com  To: 
   cc:   313@hyperreal.org
  04/15/04 01:37 AMSubject:  Re: (313) Re: () 
SIX NINE represses?
   
   









maybe the change in pricing of records reflects a change in the market for
these records. the market for the planet e represses, ugly edits etc. is
mainly middle class, (approaching) middle age record collectors. it's no
longer driven by student djs in europe  or american inner city kids who
hear the stuff on the dancefloor or on WBMX then run to vinylmania or
gramaphone the next day.

remember all those claims that techno is the new jazz? maybe they're true.
maybe it's a genre full of mainly obsessive balding male record collectors.
james
www.jbucknell.com




 Stewart Caig
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 soul.co.ukTo
   313@hyperreal.org
 15/04/04 07:05 AM  cc

   Subject
   Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE
   represses?











 i'd be interested in hearing back from somebody in detroit whether those
 
 69's on the wall at recordtime sell or not. they didnt order many tho.
 
  excellent argument.
 
 i respond to hot air with hot air
 
  the repress is exactly identical to the original. how will they
  determine which it is? carbon dating a sample from the vinyl?
 
 yes wiseass you have to carbon date the vinyl. or look at the
 runout/label/sleeve. something about it will be different. if its truly
 identical, than the high price is even more shady -- based on the rarity
 of
 the original, which it has suddenly become itself, but widely
 available..
 
  this is my point though. it would be bad if big name artists just
  started selling their records for more because they are who they
  are. putting a premium price on an established anthem is
  altogether different.
 
 which is the established anthem on 4 jazz funk? my machines? anthem? i
 
 dont think thats quite the right word somehow..more like sought-after
 techno
 collector stuff...hence the pricetag...and is this not just because it's
 
 carl craig? elite techno stuff? all that old trax stuff was wa
 bigger than this...and i think farley trumps craig as far as big
 names...and
 those represses were cheap..
 
 anthems dont tend to have an inflated pricetag
 
 throw is 1000 times the anthem of anything on 4 jazz funk, but is priced
 
 normally. the price of the 69 is to take advantage of collectors. you
 can
 argue all you want, yes it's a great record to own, but you got played.
 of
 course it's no problem to you if it was worth (personally) what you paid
 for
 it. but in the larger context of the record business, it sucks and is a
 jack
 move..and its not normally how represses are handled. usually they are
 aimed
 at giving rare music a renewed availability and accessibility. the
 repress
 is cheap, the original stays valuable and rare and even more sought
 after...but the pricetage on this is jumping the gun. it's essentially
 calling a record rare even as it's hot off the presses and available
 everywhere, totally a marketing ploy. it's the record industry
 collapsing on
 itself, not looking for new listeners but to instead take existing
 customers
 (collectors especially) for all it can...while it can. because soon
 people
 will be aware that this record is not so hard to find anymore. there
 will be
 copies sitting in stores, the urgency will wear off. the collector
 demand
 will evaporate. it's a a gaaame, and i do not like these games
 
  ill bet you a ton of money on that. look at shades of jae by
  moodymann. that record has been repressed, even as recently as 5
 
 what its worth and what people will pay for it are seperate things
 sometimes. i've sold records which arent worth a pile of beans for a
 decent
 little chunk on eBay. the record collecting business is very similar to
 comic book collecting. price trends are extreme, and shortlived. what
 might
 be worth $50 this year, in five years could be worth $5. or you might
 just
 find it for $1 in some secondhand store somewhere. some people only look
 to
 eBay...italo is crazy on there too. dirt cheap if you actually look for
 it.
 like, give a wantlist to somebody you know in nyc or chicago...
 
  im

Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Greg Earle

On Apr 15, 2004, at 10:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Oh, yeah, and another thing.

The one thing that has surprised me about this thread is this...

HALF OF YOU NEVER OWNED A COPY OF FOUR JAZZ FUNK CLASSICS?

YOU LOT ARE RUBBISH, GET WITH THE PROGRAM.


Ahem.

I own Sound On Sound.  I own Lite Music.  I even own the CD
that combines the two of them (still don't understand why Carl
didn't release a CD that contains all 3 along with 4 Jazz Funk
Classics ... mutter).

I've only *seen* 4 Jazz Funk Classics *ONCE*.  Joe Babylon (of
Plug Research fame) owns it, and I saw his copy.  (I still chuckle
at the image of Joe writing QUADRANT in big letters on a piece of
paper and walking up to the DJ booth at the Planet E party a couple
of years ago while Carl was on the decks and sticking it right in
front of his face ;-) )

You can't get with the program if you can't find the damn program!

BTW, I also own the Elements 1989-1990 album on *both* vinyl and CD.
(Found the vinyl first, then the CD later ... d'oh!).

I'd gladly trade the vinyl version (which has fewer tracks, btw) ...
for an original edition copy of 4 Jazz Funk Classics  ;-)

- Greg



Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread alex . bond

I've only *seen* 4 Jazz Funk Classics *ONCE*

really?

It wasn't rare at all here, even thought the other two got licensed to RS,
there was still loads of these kicking around.

Maybe they all got exported to Europe or something?

Alex
_

- End of message text 

This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
individual, non-business capacity and is not on
behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.

PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
give your consent to such monitoring





Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Sven Venema
 Greg Earle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I've only *seen* 4 Jazz Funk Classics *ONCE*

Alex Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 really?

 It wasn't rare at all here, even thought the other two got licensed
to RS,
 there was still loads of these kicking around.

In terms of rarity, I've also only ever seen 1 copy of this record
(admittedly, I haven't looked REALLY hard , but it's on my list :). The
other 2 were also fairly scarce around here, even though other
supposedly rare records were quite easy to obtain.

Sven



Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Matt MacQueen

The one thing that has surprised me about this thread is this...
HALF OF YOU NEVER OWNED A COPY OF FOUR JAZZ FUNK CLASSICS?


or worse, like me, you bought the first time, played it for 10 years,  
then LOST your original, now i'm going to fork it over for a repress.  
:P  Life ain't fair.   But honestly i was so sure I'd never own it 
again at eBay prices,  I'm pretty happy I can mix with it again at all. 
  How about this line:  approved by 66 for interplanetary disco 
dancing


I share JT's pain about the blatant cash-in, it seems silly, I applaud 
you for taking a stand.  In my case I am willing to pay for it because 
I need/want/love to mix with this record and so much of other current 
crap pales in comparison to this gem.  It's like not having a favorite 
color available to paint with.   i'd gladly skip 2 other lesser new 
imports.   It's all a matter of justification to myself, but I'd rate 
as one of my top 20 detroit techno records.  Does that justify how 
Planet E decided to price it?  Not really, but they placated an addict 
like me.  It's like the friggin methadone program.


Now as for rare, who got the glow-in-the-dark 69 t-shirt that came out 
about the same time as the original ?   Well hey - it doesn't matter 
much cause you can't put a needle on it and hear great tunes!


Exploitably yours,
--
Matt MacQueen
http://SonicSunset.com



Re: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-15 Thread Matt MacQueen



I've only *seen* 4 Jazz Funk Classics *ONCE*


really?

It wasn't rare at all here, even thought the other two got licensed to 
RS,

there was still loads of these kicking around.


true, and there's a 69 CD on RS with different cuts from the 69 
12-inches, My Machines, Sound on Sound, etc.  I think i lost that one 
over the years too.   :P


arg

--
Matt MacQueen
http://SonicSunset.com



RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread robin

well it worked out at £11.99 over here ($20-25!)

cheaper than ebay prices i guess but still a little cheeky

somebody's been looking at the Ugly Edit prices and taken note.

robin...

- -Original Message-
- From: 
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- org] On Behalf Of J. T.
- Sent: 14 April 2004 17:47
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
- Subject: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?
- 
- 
- i saw the first 69 repress at recordtime over the 
- weekend...it was $16!! 
- maybe it had the wrong sticker on it, i didnt have any money 
- anyway so didnt 
- ask. is it a euro press  distrib thing? orr..oh well.
- 
- 
- I've asked Carl Craig about this repress last friday (@ 
- nouveau casino 
- -Paris) and he said the three 69 records are going to be 
- repressed, but 
- he did not mention a date. A good news for everybody who 
- missed them and 
- don't want to spend hundreds on ebay !!!
- 
- Hope that helps :)
- 
- 
- On 14-apr-04, at 16:52, Lee Herrington IV wrote:
- 
- 
-can anyone speak to the possibility that there will be more 69 
- represses?
- it's nice to be able to own a copy of 4 jazz funk 
- classics without 
- having
- to sell major organs to fund the purchase.
- 
- 
- _
- FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
- http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
- 
- ---
- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
- Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004
-  
- 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004
 



RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.

-- Original Message --
From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

well it worked out at £11.99 over here ($20-25!)

cheaper than ebay prices i guess but still a little cheeky

somebody's been looking at the Ugly Edit prices and taken note.

its supply and demand. even @ $10 and up from US distros, all the
distros were out within hours of getting them in. i know my demand
for the record was well over $17 (what i paid for it from
submerge) but well under what a used copy goes for on ebay. ill be
happy to get the other 69 records for the same price as well. now
carl needs to repress those retroactive records and a couple more
early planet e joints to make me happy.

tom


andythepooh.com







RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Scott K Ellis
Think I saw it at Hot Grooves for less than $10.  Sure hope Record Time
isn't jacking up the price that much.

Scott

-Original Message-
From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:51 PM
To: 'J. T.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?



well it worked out at £11.99 over here ($20-25!)

cheaper than ebay prices i guess but still a little cheeky

somebody's been looking at the Ugly Edit prices and taken note.

robin...

- -Original Message-
- From:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- org] On Behalf Of J. T.
- Sent: 14 April 2004 17:47
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
- Subject: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?
-
-
- i saw the first 69 repress at recordtime over the
- weekend...it was $16!!
- maybe it had the wrong sticker on it, i didnt have any money
- anyway so didnt
- ask. is it a euro press  distrib thing? orr..oh well.
-
-
- I've asked Carl Craig about this repress last friday (@
- nouveau casino
- -Paris) and he said the three 69 records are going to be
- repressed, but
- he did not mention a date. A good news for everybody who
- missed them and
- don't want to spend hundreds on ebay !!!
- 
- Hope that helps :)
- 
- 
- On 14-apr-04, at 16:52, Lee Herrington IV wrote:
- 
- 
-can anyone speak to the possibility that there will be more 69
- represses?
- it's nice to be able to own a copy of 4 jazz funk
- classics without
- having
- to sell major organs to fund the purchase.
- 
-
- _
- FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
- http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
-
- ---
- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
- Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004
-
-

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004




RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Robert Taylor
I just picked up an original pressing from Save The Children for 50p

-Original Message-
From: Scott K Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 5:01 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


Think I saw it at Hot Grooves for less than $10.  Sure hope Record Time
isn't jacking up the price that much.

Scott

-Original Message-
From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:51 PM
To: 'J. T.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?



well it worked out at £11.99 over here ($20-25!)

cheaper than ebay prices i guess but still a little cheeky

somebody's been looking at the Ugly Edit prices and taken note.

robin...

- -Original Message-
- From:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- org] On Behalf Of J. T.
- Sent: 14 April 2004 17:47
- To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
- Subject: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?
-
-
- i saw the first 69 repress at recordtime over the
- weekend...it was $16!!
- maybe it had the wrong sticker on it, i didnt have any money
- anyway so didnt
- ask. is it a euro press  distrib thing? orr..oh well.
-
-
- I've asked Carl Craig about this repress last friday (@
- nouveau casino
- -Paris) and he said the three 69 records are going to be
- repressed, but
- he did not mention a date. A good news for everybody who
- missed them and
- don't want to spend hundreds on ebay !!!
- 
- Hope that helps :)
- 
- 
- On 14-apr-04, at 16:52, Lee Herrington IV wrote:
- 
- 
-can anyone speak to the possibility that there will be more 69
- represses?
- it's nice to be able to own a copy of 4 jazz funk
- classics without
- having
- to sell major organs to fund the purchase.
- 
-
- _
- FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
- http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
-
- ---
- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
- Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004
-
-

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.647 / Virus Database: 414 - Release Date: 29/03/2004


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#



RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread J. T.
what?? there's no reason for a gd repress to be $17. f that. i aint buying 
it. i'll wait to pick up a dozen other classics for the same money at a 
secondhand place. there's loads of other classics out there...
i dont think there are many positive ramifications of pricing records this 
way.
it is supply and demand yes, high price to make as much profit as possible 
because demand is not that great. those who want it want it bad enough to 
pay the retarded price. it's a kinda shady way to hype your product: it 
costs a lot -- it must be good! it's worth it! well maybe, but it's not 
worth 3 times the price of other new records, especially not for a repress. 
even from a collector standpoint..all glory is to the original pressing, 
traditionally represses arent worth much, they even devalue. you cant put a 
price on good music, but there is a standard price for records so...
overall i think this trend stinks. leaves buyers with a smaller budget for 
other new records, gives these high-priced classics, new peacefrogs etc, 
somewhat undue priority with your wallet. nice marketing trick but makes the 
vinyl market even more exclusive, and harder for smaller labels to stay in 
the game. generally takes some joy out of buying new records. whatever.

props to clone for repressing glass domain with a normal pricetag.



its supply and demand. even @ $10 and up from US distros, all the
distros were out within hours of getting them in. i know my demand
for the record was well over $17 (what i paid for it from
submerge) but well under what a used copy goes for on ebay. ill be
happy to get the other 69 records for the same price as well. now
carl needs to repress those retroactive records and a couple more
early planet e joints to make me happy.

tom


andythepooh.com







_
Limited-time offer: Fast, reliable MSN 9 Dial-up Internet access FREE for 2 
months! 
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialuppgmarket=en-usST=1/go/onm00200361ave/direct/01/




RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Steward, Tim
I agree with J.T.  just think $17 for the record today
with 1-4 tracks then a CD tomorrow with 8 plus tracks
will end up priced at $34  this absolutely squeezes out
the small labels. I think the reason behind this is
If and artist is hot today, there is no guarantee he/she
will be hot tomorrow so they make as much money as they
can today. But if we keep buying they will keep selling

TS-1

-Original Message-
From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


what?? there's no reason for a gd repress to be $17. f that. i aint buying 
it. i'll wait to pick up a dozen other classics for the same money at a 
secondhand place. there's loads of other classics out there...
i dont think there are many positive ramifications of pricing records this 
way.
it is supply and demand yes, high price to make as much profit as possible 
because demand is not that great. those who want it want it bad enough to 
pay the retarded price. it's a kinda shady way to hype your product: it 
costs a lot -- it must be good! it's worth it! well maybe, but it's not 
worth 3 times the price of other new records, especially not for a repress. 
even from a collector standpoint..all glory is to the original pressing, 
traditionally represses arent worth much, they even devalue. you cant put a 
price on good music, but there is a standard price for records so...
overall i think this trend stinks. leaves buyers with a smaller budget for 
other new records, gives these high-priced classics, new peacefrogs etc, 
somewhat undue priority with your wallet. nice marketing trick but makes the

vinyl market even more exclusive, and harder for smaller labels to stay in 
the game. generally takes some joy out of buying new records. whatever.
props to clone for repressing glass domain with a normal pricetag.


its supply and demand. even @ $10 and up from US distros, all the
distros were out within hours of getting them in. i know my demand
for the record was well over $17 (what i paid for it from
submerge) but well under what a used copy goes for on ebay. ill be
happy to get the other 69 records for the same price as well. now
carl needs to repress those retroactive records and a couple more
early planet e joints to make me happy.

tom


andythepooh.com






_
Limited-time offer: Fast, reliable MSN 9 Dial-up Internet access FREE for 2 
months! 
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialuppgmarket=en-usST=1/go/onm00200361ave/
direct/01/



The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
and then destroy it. 



RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Scott K Ellis
Maybe this is some kind of ploy to cash in on the ebay resale market.  If
you don't flood the market with a bunch of represses then most people will
still be looking to ebay for the think in a couple of months or so.  Seems
like undue stress on the consumer who just wants to hear the music on vinyl
and not just worship it's rarity.

Scott

-Original Message-
From: Steward, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:01 PM
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


I agree with J.T.  just think $17 for the record today
with 1-4 tracks then a CD tomorrow with 8 plus tracks
will end up priced at $34  this absolutely squeezes out
the small labels. I think the reason behind this is
If and artist is hot today, there is no guarantee he/she
will be hot tomorrow so they make as much money as they
can today. But if we keep buying they will keep selling

TS-1

-Original Message-
From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?


what?? there's no reason for a gd repress to be $17. f that. i aint buying
it. i'll wait to pick up a dozen other classics for the same money at a
secondhand place. there's loads of other classics out there...
i dont think there are many positive ramifications of pricing records this
way.
it is supply and demand yes, high price to make as much profit as possible
because demand is not that great. those who want it want it bad enough to
pay the retarded price. it's a kinda shady way to hype your product: it
costs a lot -- it must be good! it's worth it! well maybe, but it's not
worth 3 times the price of other new records, especially not for a repress.
even from a collector standpoint..all glory is to the original pressing,
traditionally represses arent worth much, they even devalue. you cant put a
price on good music, but there is a standard price for records so...
overall i think this trend stinks. leaves buyers with a smaller budget for
other new records, gives these high-priced classics, new peacefrogs etc,
somewhat undue priority with your wallet. nice marketing trick but makes the

vinyl market even more exclusive, and harder for smaller labels to stay in
the game. generally takes some joy out of buying new records. whatever.
props to clone for repressing glass domain with a normal pricetag.


its supply and demand. even @ $10 and up from US distros, all the
distros were out within hours of getting them in. i know my demand
for the record was well over $17 (what i paid for it from
submerge) but well under what a used copy goes for on ebay. ill be
happy to get the other 69 records for the same price as well. now
carl needs to repress those retroactive records and a couple more
early planet e joints to make me happy.

tom


andythepooh.com






_
Limited-time offer: Fast, reliable MSN 9 Dial-up Internet access FREE for 2
months!
http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialuppgmarket=en-usST=1/go/onm00200361ave/
direct/01/



The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose
it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately
and then destroy it.



RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

what?? there's no reason for a gd repress to be $17. f that. i 
aint buying 
it. i'll wait to pick up a dozen other classics for the same 
money at a 
secondhand place. 

but will you get this record? its certainly not easy to come by 
used for nothing. im sure some people will have their stories, but 
in a smaller city like pittsburgh, theres pretty much zero chance 
of me coming up with that record. 

there's loads of other classics out there...
i dont think there are many positive ramifications of pricing 
records this 
way.
it is supply and demand yes, high price to make as much profit as 
possible 
because demand is not that great. 

demand IS that great though! like i said=, all the distros with it 
that ive seen (unique, watts, and 161) were out of it within hours 
of having it in. and that was at a price of $10 wholesale! 

those who want it want it bad enough to 
pay the retarded price. it's a kinda shady way to hype your 
product: it 
costs a lot -- it must be good! it's worth it! well maybe, but 
it's not 
worth 3 times the price of other new records

when the only other way to get it is through ebay, its worth that 
by far. and i dont think this record needed any more hype than it 
already has from being an excellent record. 

especially not for a repress. 
even from a collector standpoint..all glory is to the original 
pressing, 
traditionally represses arent worth much, they even devalue. 

im not worried about my records being worth anything. i just want 
good music on vinyl. and if you think about it, paying ebay prices 
for this 12 not only hits my wallet hard as hell, restricting my 
purchasing of other new records, but it also gives no more money 
to the artist. this way im getting a record i want for cheaper 
than it is avaliable, and at the same time im giving money to the 
label and artist who deserve it instead of some bozo on ebay. 
whats the problem here? 

also, AFAIK theres no difference between the repress and the 
original. in 20 years, no one will know or even remember which one 
is which. 

you cant put a 
price on good music, but there is a standard price for records 
so...
overall i think this trend stinks. leaves buyers with a smaller 
budget for 
other new records, gives these high-priced classics, new 
peacefrogs etc, 
somewhat undue priority with your wallet.

the peacefrog joints are a whole other story. those are tunes with 
no prior track record. i think that practice is a little weak, 
really. i havent paid for one of their private presses yet. but im 
much more willing to pay for records that i know and want that are 
hard to get ahold of. their rarity and goodness is established, 
not created. 

nice marketing trick but makes the 
vinyl market even more exclusive, and harder for smaller labels 
to stay in 
the game. generally takes some joy out of buying new records. 

it hasnt taken one tiny bit of joy out of me finally being able to 
own 4 jazz funk classics. if nothing else, im extremely excited. 
if pressing small numbers and charging high prices will convince 
people to repress hard to find classics, im ALL FOR IT. if carl 
repressed each of the retroactive records at that price, id buy 
each and every one of them. 

whatever.
props to clone for repressing glass domain with a normal pricetag.

its cool when people do it some other way, but ill take the 
records i want how i can get them, as long as it isnt for hundreds 
of dollars on ebay.

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: Scott K Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Maybe this is some kind of ploy to cash in on the ebay resale 
market.  If
you don't flood the market with a bunch of represses then most 
people will
still be looking to ebay for the think in a couple of months or 
so.  Seems
like undue stress on the consumer who just wants to hear the 
music on vinyl
and not just worship it's rarity.

i think its funny that this is an absolute classic record, yet the 
price is half that of the unknown tunes on peacefrog private 
presses, and people are still complaining. it makes no sense. if 
you want this record, $17 seems like nothing compared to its 
second hand price. i mean no one is making anyone buy the record, 
but $17 later i have a record i really want for a reasonable 
price. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread J. T.

but will you get this record? its certainly not easy to come by
used for nothing. im sure some people will have their stories, but
in a smaller city like pittsburgh, theres pretty much zero chance
of me coming up with that record.


who cares. i'll get a dozen other records that are equally good. i'm a music 
lover not a collector..in most cases..

.

demand IS that great though! like i said=, all the distros with it
that ive seen (unique, watts, and 161) were out of it within hours
of having it in. and that was at a price of $10 wholesale!


well we'll see how well the stores can actually sell it. none of the people 
i was with at recordtime looked twice at it. too much other good chit to buy 
for 1/3 the price



when the only other way to get it is through ebay, its worth that
by far. and i dont think this record needed any more hype than it
already has from being an excellent record.


fart


also, AFAIK theres no difference between the repress and the
original. in 20 years, no one will know or even remember which one
is which.


thats a completely false assertion. thats what record collecting is all 
about. my dad's been selling rare records for 40 yearsand i've been 
selling stuff on ebay for quite awhile. music lovers dont care about 
pressings etc, but this chit isnt priced for music lovers. but it will be 
soon enough...in 20 years it will be very easy to remember which pressing is 
which because the original will cost a fortune and the repress will be 
affordable...as it should be now.



the peacefrog joints are a whole other story. those are tunes with
no prior track record. i think that practice is a little weak,


but the artist roster has plenty of draw. it's really not so different. just 
sought after artists instead of sought after tracks..



much more willing to pay for records that i know and want that are
hard to get ahold of. their rarity and goodness is established,
not created.


a repress is not rare and does not deserve that price, the end. you dont 
press a rare record, it becomes rare over time. the rarity of the original 
record is established. the inflated cost of a repress is just trying to 
quickly take advantage of the demand for the original. it's a cheap trick. 
guarantee you the repress will be worth less than current wholesale price in 
5 years.


you're missing the point entirely. just because you can price something high 
and still sell it ok doesnt mean you are justified in doing so (by anything 
other than overzealous capitalism). clone could have priced their glass 
domain rerelease similarily, but didnt. because they are not trying to 
overcapitalize. your willingness to pay exorbitant prices does not excuse 
the jacked up pricetag...it makes you a sucker...



it hasnt taken one tiny bit of joy out of me finally being able to
own 4 jazz funk classics. if nothing else, im extremely excited.


you got the collector itch in you, or a thick wallet -- i hope a thick 
wallet so you're still buying other stuff



if pressing small numbers and charging high prices will convince
people to repress hard to find classics, im ALL FOR IT. if carl


cool, you're the one they're selling to then..


repressed each of the retroactive records at that price, id buy
each and every one of them.


really? i sure wouldnt. they're not all great, some sound very dated now. 
but following this new pricing strategy down the line, why not just repress 
100 copies of the retroactive stuff and sell them for $100 each. make $10k 
off 100 records, yea! can you still not see why that sucks? from a music 
lover's pov, it sucksfor the collectors, for the stores it's great...i 
pretty much make my living selling stuff to compulsive collectors, but i am 
not about to become one, i cant afford it...


_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/




RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

who cares. i'll get a dozen other records that are equally good. 
i'm a music 
lover not a collector..in most cases..

so you dont like the record because its not good? i dont 
understand. if you were actually a music lover, i think youd be 
happy to finally get your hands on a good record that otherwise 
you wouldnt pay crazy loot for. 

well we'll see how well the stores can actually sell it. none of 
the people 
i was with at recordtime looked twice at it. too much other good 
chit to buy 
for 1/3 the price

stores arent smoking crack for the most part. they dont order 
things they think they wont be able to sell. 

fart

excellent argument. 

thats a completely false assertion. thats what record collecting 
is all 
about. my dad's been selling rare records for 40 yearsand 
i've been 
selling stuff on ebay for quite awhile. music lovers dont care 
about 
pressings etc, but this chit isnt priced for music lovers. but it 
will be 
soon enough...in 20 years it will be very easy to remember which 
pressing is 
which because the original will cost a fortune and the repress 
will be 
affordable...as it should be now.

the repress is exactly identical to the original. how will they 
determine which it is? carbon dating a sample from the vinyl? 

but the artist roster has plenty of draw. it's really not so 
different. just 
sought after artists instead of sought after tracks..

this is my point though. it would be bad if big name artists just 
started selling their records for more because they are who they 
are. putting a premium price on an established anthem is 
altogether different. 

a repress is not rare and does not deserve that price, the end. 
you dont 
press a rare record, it becomes rare over time. the rarity of the 
original 
record is established. the inflated cost of a repress is just 
trying to 
quickly take advantage of the demand for the original. it's a 
cheap trick. 
guarantee you the repress will be worth less than current 
wholesale price in 
5 years.

ill bet you a ton of money on that. look at shades of jae by 
moodymann. that record has been repressed, even as recently as 5 
years ago. it still goes for pretty good money on ebay, no matter 
which version youre bidding on. it might not go for as much as 
other non-repressed KDJs but its still worth way more than what 
anyopne paid for the represses. 

you're missing the point entirely. just because you can price 
something high 
and still sell it ok doesnt mean you are justified in doing so 
(by anything 
other than overzealous capitalism). clone could have priced their 
glass 
domain rerelease similarily, but didnt. because they are not 
trying to 
overcapitalize. your willingness to pay exorbitant prices does 
not excuse 
the jacked up pricetag...it makes you a sucker...

im the sucker because i have a record i want? how does that make 
sense? IMO youre a sucker if you pass up a chance to buy a great 
record because of a $10 price increase. dont go out to eat one 
night. dont buy a couple drinks next time youre at the club 
watching deejays spin. $10 isnt $100, there are so many ways that 
money can be spent that is much more worthless than getting a 
great record. ill play this 12 way more than 17 times in my life. 
even at $1 per play it would be well worth it. 

you got the collector itch in you, or a thick wallet -- i hope a 
thick 
wallet so you're still buying other stuff

i buy plenty of other stuff. i wouldnt call my wallet thick 
though, i just buy the things i want. just like i wouldnt pay 
anything for a filler record, ill pay money for a great record. 

cool, you're the one they're selling to then..

and every single other person who didnt have one and just picked 
one up for a reasonable non-ebay price. brand new, in fact. 

really? i sure wouldnt. they're not all great, some sound very 
dated now. 

good mentality. music cant stay good if it sounds dated? thats 
especially funny coming from you, considering the type of music 
you like to make. 

but following this new pricing strategy down the line, why not 
just repress 
100 copies of the retroactive stuff and sell them for $100 each. 
make $10k 
off 100 records, yea! can you still not see why that sucks? 
from a music 
lover's pov, it sucks

$100 does suck, youre right. $17 OTOH doesnt at all. 

for the collectors, for the stores it's great...i 
pretty much make my living selling stuff to compulsive 
collectors, but i am 
not about to become one, i cant afford it...

i know, that extra $10 on one record might kill you. youll be 
eating ramen for years. please. im a student who barely works, and 
i spend my record money very wisely. which is exactly why i bought 
this record, since ill never in my life see it any cheaper. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread jason kenjar
Somebody mentioned Hotgrooves has them for under $10, last one there is a 
rotten egg.

 
On Wednesday, April 14, 2004, at 02:22PM, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] wrote:

-- Original Message --
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

who cares. i'll get a dozen other records that are equally good. 
i'm a music 
lover not a collector..in most cases..

so you dont like the record because its not good? i dont 
understand. if you were actually a music lover, i think youd be 
happy to finally get your hands on a good record that otherwise 
you wouldnt pay crazy loot for. 

well we'll see how well the stores can actually sell it. none of 
the people 
i was with at recordtime looked twice at it. too much other good 
chit to buy 
for 1/3 the price

stores arent smoking crack for the most part. they dont order 
things they think they wont be able to sell. 

fart

excellent argument. 

thats a completely false assertion. thats what record collecting 
is all 
about. my dad's been selling rare records for 40 yearsand 
i've been 
selling stuff on ebay for quite awhile. music lovers dont care 
about 
pressings etc, but this chit isnt priced for music lovers. but it 
will be 
soon enough...in 20 years it will be very easy to remember which 
pressing is 
which because the original will cost a fortune and the repress 
will be 
affordable...as it should be now.

the repress is exactly identical to the original. how will they 
determine which it is? carbon dating a sample from the vinyl? 

but the artist roster has plenty of draw. it's really not so 
different. just 
sought after artists instead of sought after tracks..

this is my point though. it would be bad if big name artists just 
started selling their records for more because they are who they 
are. putting a premium price on an established anthem is 
altogether different. 

a repress is not rare and does not deserve that price, the end. 
you dont 
press a rare record, it becomes rare over time. the rarity of the 
original 
record is established. the inflated cost of a repress is just 
trying to 
quickly take advantage of the demand for the original. it's a 
cheap trick. 
guarantee you the repress will be worth less than current 
wholesale price in 
5 years.

ill bet you a ton of money on that. look at shades of jae by 
moodymann. that record has been repressed, even as recently as 5 
years ago. it still goes for pretty good money on ebay, no matter 
which version youre bidding on. it might not go for as much as 
other non-repressed KDJs but its still worth way more than what 
anyopne paid for the represses. 

you're missing the point entirely. just because you can price 
something high 
and still sell it ok doesnt mean you are justified in doing so 
(by anything 
other than overzealous capitalism). clone could have priced their 
glass 
domain rerelease similarily, but didnt. because they are not 
trying to 
overcapitalize. your willingness to pay exorbitant prices does 
not excuse 
the jacked up pricetag...it makes you a sucker...

im the sucker because i have a record i want? how does that make 
sense? IMO youre a sucker if you pass up a chance to buy a great 
record because of a $10 price increase. dont go out to eat one 
night. dont buy a couple drinks next time youre at the club 
watching deejays spin. $10 isnt $100, there are so many ways that 
money can be spent that is much more worthless than getting a 
great record. ill play this 12 way more than 17 times in my life. 
even at $1 per play it would be well worth it. 

you got the collector itch in you, or a thick wallet -- i hope a 
thick 
wallet so you're still buying other stuff

i buy plenty of other stuff. i wouldnt call my wallet thick 
though, i just buy the things i want. just like i wouldnt pay 
anything for a filler record, ill pay money for a great record. 

cool, you're the one they're selling to then..

and every single other person who didnt have one and just picked 
one up for a reasonable non-ebay price. brand new, in fact. 

really? i sure wouldnt. they're not all great, some sound very 
dated now. 

good mentality. music cant stay good if it sounds dated? thats 
especially funny coming from you, considering the type of music 
you like to make. 

but following this new pricing strategy down the line, why not 
just repress 
100 copies of the retroactive stuff and sell them for $100 each. 
make $10k 
off 100 records, yea! can you still not see why that sucks? 
from a music 
lover's pov, it sucks

$100 does suck, youre right. $17 OTOH doesnt at all. 

for the collectors, for the stores it's great...i 
pretty much make my living selling stuff to compulsive 
collectors, but i am 
not about to become one, i cant afford it...

i know, that extra $10 on one record might kill you. youll be 
eating ramen for years. please. im a student who barely works, and 
i spend my record money very wisely. which is exactly why i bought 
this record, since ill never 

RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: jason kenjar [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Somebody mentioned Hotgrooves has them for under $10, last one 
there is a rotten egg.

they must be losing money on them if theyre selling for that 
price. like i said all the distros are selling them for $9.79-$10-
79 or so. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


RE: (313) Re: () SIX NINE represses?

2004-04-14 Thread J. T.

so you dont like the record because its not good? i dont
understand. if you were actually a music lover, i think youd be
happy to finally get your hands on a good record that otherwise
you wouldnt pay crazy loot for.


i'm not a music lover. i was just playing. music is for the birds tweet 
tweet
who said i didnt like the record? i just dont like the price. i've got 
better things to spend my money on, like, new stuff thats priced normally. i 
dont even buy old records for high prices, i find them cheap or i dont have 
them. there is too much great music out there that can be found cheap.



stores arent smoking crack for the most part. they dont order
things they think they wont be able to sell.


i'd be interested in hearing back from somebody in detroit whether those 
69's on the wall at recordtime sell or not. they didnt order many tho.



excellent argument.


i respond to hot air with hot air


the repress is exactly identical to the original. how will they
determine which it is? carbon dating a sample from the vinyl?


yes wiseass you have to carbon date the vinyl. or look at the 
runout/label/sleeve. something about it will be different. if its truly 
identical, than the high price is even more shady -- based on the rarity of 
the original, which it has suddenly become itself, but widely available..



this is my point though. it would be bad if big name artists just
started selling their records for more because they are who they
are. putting a premium price on an established anthem is
altogether different.


which is the established anthem on 4 jazz funk? my machines? anthem? i 
dont think thats quite the right word somehow..more like sought-after techno 
collector stuff...hence the pricetag...and is this not just because it's 
carl craig? elite techno stuff? all that old trax stuff was wa 
bigger than this...and i think farley trumps craig as far as big names...and 
those represses were cheap..


anthems dont tend to have an inflated pricetag

throw is 1000 times the anthem of anything on 4 jazz funk, but is priced 
normally. the price of the 69 is to take advantage of collectors. you can 
argue all you want, yes it's a great record to own, but you got played. of 
course it's no problem to you if it was worth (personally) what you paid for 
it. but in the larger context of the record business, it sucks and is a jack 
move..and its not normally how represses are handled. usually they are aimed 
at giving rare music a renewed availability and accessibility. the repress 
is cheap, the original stays valuable and rare and even more sought 
after...but the pricetage on this is jumping the gun. it's essentially 
calling a record rare even as it's hot off the presses and available 
everywhere, totally a marketing ploy. it's the record industry collapsing on 
itself, not looking for new listeners but to instead take existing customers 
(collectors especially) for all it can...while it can. because soon people 
will be aware that this record is not so hard to find anymore. there will be 
copies sitting in stores, the urgency will wear off. the collector demand 
will evaporate. it's a a gaaame, and i do not like these games



ill bet you a ton of money on that. look at shades of jae by
moodymann. that record has been repressed, even as recently as 5


what its worth and what people will pay for it are seperate things 
sometimes. i've sold records which arent worth a pile of beans for a decent 
little chunk on eBay. the record collecting business is very similar to 
comic book collecting. price trends are extreme, and shortlived. what might 
be worth $50 this year, in five years could be worth $5. or you might just 
find it for $1 in some secondhand store somewhere. some people only look to 
eBay...italo is crazy on there too. dirt cheap if you actually look for it. 
like, give a wantlist to somebody you know in nyc or chicago...



im the sucker because i have a record i want? how does that make
sense? IMO youre a sucker if you pass up a chance to buy a great


it doesnt make sense, but you asked not me. you're asking yourself questions 
that dont make sense, which really doesnt make sense.


it didnt make sense to pay $17 for 4 jazz funk when we could (and did) spend 
less money on a couple fragile represses, an original copy of voice of q, 
and classic old dancemania chit. we got an entire dj set of classics for 
less than $17. we probably would have bought 4 jazz funk if it was priced 
normally. if we were eagerly after it, maybe we would have paid the $17. and 
be happy to have it. but it still doesnt justify the pricing. considering 
what we could spend our money on instead, it made a whole lot more sense to 
just hope to run into a cheaper copy some other time



record because of a $10 price increase. dont go out to eat one
night. dont buy a couple drinks next time youre at the club
watching deejays spin. $10 isnt $100, there are so many ways that
money can be spent that is much