Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-15 Thread Nonreality

Mnyb;360162 Wrote: 
 Nonreality, id you ever submit a bug on this ?
 Is it still open, this is the kind of bug I want to vote on.

I did but it got put with another bug on soundcheck that had nothing to
do with it. That bug was declared fixed but not this problem.  I tried a
couple of times to re-submit but finally gave up as they didn't seem to
understand the problem or the bug got lost in other soundcheck
problems, not sure what happened. I also might have submitted it wrong 
the second and third times.  Maybe I'll try again when I get a chance. 
It should have been a real easy fix.  Only use one or the other but
don't add them together as they are the same thing just a different way
of doing replay gain.


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality

Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-14 Thread Nonreality

DeVerm;358577 Wrote: 
 Hmm.. you're hitting a big void in my knowledge what tags exactly
 are we talking about? I know track  album gain but what are
 soundcheck tags?
 
 cheers
 Nick.

Itunes version of replay gain.  They have to be different you know.  It
adds it as a proprietary comment field ( I can't remember the name right
now).  If you look at the extended tags in mp3tag it will show up as a
comment and the field will contain a bunch of numbers.  It converts to
a value very close to the replay gain value and SC will add these
together. It shouldn't. You should use one or the other. So if you have
a -8 replay gain you will actually be lowering your volume about 16 db's
in playback in SC. Only a problem if you have both and smart gain set. 
It's been a problem for me because I had to give up using soundcheck
with my ipods and they won't use replay gain.  I wanted to use replay
gain at home so I ended up getting rid of the soundcheck tags from all
my albums.  I have not checked to see if this is still true with 7.2.1
but I haven't seen anything in the notes about it being fixed.  It
could be a real problem (actually it is a real problem for ipod users)
if you have a high positive replay gain and having it doubled.


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality

Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-14 Thread Mnyb

Nonreality, id you ever submit a bug on this ?
Is it still open, this is the kind of bug I want to vote on.


-- 
Mnyb

Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-10 Thread Nonreality

andynormancx;357063 Wrote: 
 Not forgetting of course that issue with Apple Lossless files where the
 replayrain was being applied twice, thus making them sound even less
 like the WAV files they were compared to.Yes and not just apple lossless.  
 Any file that has both soundcheck tags
and replay gain will add both together and usually if it's a minus will
cause the sound to be much lower.  It's an issue with mp3 and apple
files that have both tags.  Why SC adds these together is decision that
someone made long ago and it's a wrong one and needs to be changed.


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality

Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-10 Thread DeVerm

Nonreality;358414 Wrote: 
 Yes and not just apple lossless.  Any file that has both soundcheck tags
 and replay gain will add both together and usually if it's a minus will
 cause the sound to be much lower.  It's an issue with mp3 and apple
 files that have both tags.  Why SC adds these together is decision that
 someone made long ago and it's a wrong one and needs to be changed.

Hmm.. you're hitting a big void in my knowledge what tags exactly
are we talking about? I know track  album gain but what are
soundcheck tags?

cheers
Nick.


-- 
DeVerm

DeVerm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18104
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-05 Thread jeanchris

In my personnal installation SC 7.2.1 run under a Mac Mini 2 GHz  2 Go
RAM running Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)... much more than enough isn't it ?


-- 
jeanchris

jeanchris's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20946
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-05 Thread opaqueice

vincentyan;318146 Wrote: 
 Dear GuyDebord,
 
 Please confirm your finding that WAV is better than FLAC in terms of
 sound quality.  There are folks that are getting serious on this.
 
 Vincent

Such claims have been made many times in the past.  Upon further
investigation, they always turned out to be:

1) not audible in a blind test, hence almost certainly the result of
expectation bias, or 

2) the result of replay gain.  WAV files do not have replay gain (I'm
pretty sure), FLAC files do.  So if you've enabled replaygain for your
FLACs there will be an audible difference, simply due to the volume
adjustment.  It is well established that volume differences have a very
strong affect on perceived audio quality.


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-05 Thread andynormancx

opaqueice;357062 Wrote: 
 Such claims have been made many times in the past.  Upon further
 investigation, they always turned out to be:
 
 1) not audible in a blind test, hence almost certainly the result of
 expectation bias, or 
 
 2) the result of replay gain.  WAV files do not have replay gain (I'm
 pretty sure), FLAC files do.  So if you've enabled replaygain for your
 FLACs there will be an audible difference, simply due to the volume
 adjustment.  It is well established that volume differences have a very
 strong affect on perceived audio quality.
Not forgetting of course that issue with Apple Lossless files where the
replayrain was being applied twice, thus making them sound even less
like the WAV files they were compared to.


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-04 Thread jeanchris

Hi all,

I'm using a SB Duet that use my ALAC iTunes library located on a Mac
Mini (used as both server  mediacenter) running Leopard  latest
iTunes + Quicktime releases.
I use my Duet with an external DAC (embedded in my CAIRN FOG3 CD
Player) and not using the analog RCA outputs.

I just try to test the differences of ALAC - WAV and ALAC - FLAC by
recording the SPDIF output of the SB Receiver (using a Stereovox HDXV
digital cable). Here are the results (all tests with SC 7.2.1 
firmwares up to date) :

1/ Comparison on the Mac Mini : ALAC file versus WAV file (the WAV is
from an EAC RIP on a PC  is my reference. This WAV was imported in
iTunes as ALAC)
Result : no difference
2/ 1st comparison using the SB Receiver : ALAC - WAV
Result : no difference
3/ 2nd comparison using the SB Receiver : ALAC - FLAC
Result : no difference

Conclusion : Transitively, there is no difference between the original
ripped CD track  the hardware decoded FLAC on the SB Receive side !

I think it is a placebo effect to ear a difference between WAV, FLAC or
ALAC for a same track at least using the SPDIF output. Perharps the SB
(for my hardware : SB Receiver, it can not be the same for a SB3 or a
Transporter) incorporated Digital to Analog conversion permit to ear a
difference but using an all Digital signal  an external high grade DAC
there is none.


-- 
jeanchris

jeanchris's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20946
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-11-04 Thread DeVerm

I'm way far from able to test anything but couldn't it be that the
ALACFLAC conversion on SC has a problem? What kind of hardware  OS
does the SC run on? A NAS without FPU? Many variables.

p.s. GuyDebord, I'm from Rotterdam too! ;-)

cheers,
Nick.


-- 
DeVerm

DeVerm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18104
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-07-08 Thread vincentyan

Dear GuyDebord,

Please confirm your finding that WAV is better than FLAC in terms of
sound quality.  There are folks that are getting serious on this.

Vincent


-- 
vincentyan

vincentyan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17868
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-07-07 Thread ilbravo

GuyDebord;316806 Wrote: 
 I just changed the settings in squeeze center to ALAC-WAV and I couldnt
 believe the difference, .

thank you very much for this posting. I made the same exciting sound
experience you describe with my recently purchased transporter, when I
played for the first time  AIFF files ripped from a CD (Saint-Saens,
Symphony #3 -Organ) with iTunes. Surprisingly,  the  ALAC and FLAC
rips (using Max because performed on an iMac)) from the same CD
sounded poorer. This was very confusing and misleading  because it is
stated as a matter of fact, that lossless formats should not loose
sound quality.  

According to your experience, I would guess now that the transporter
perform some on the fly conversion with FLAC files in the default
settings. Unfortunately I could not figure out, where to change the
settings you described. In the advanced settings for file conversion in
the 7.0.1. version of squeezecenter, there is no way to set any format
to WAV. There is only a choice between Native and deactivated for
most of the formats (I hopeI have used  the right vocabulary because I
am using a german localization of the server). Any additional hint
would be very much appriciated..


-- 
ilbravo

ilbravo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18371
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-07-04 Thread GuyDebord

jgs;316821 Wrote: 
 What were your settings before (that weren't so good)?

ALAC - FLAC


-- 
GuyDebord

Verity Audio Tamino X2 wired with v/d Hul Inspiration, REL Strata5.
AMPS: Pathos Classic One MKIII's in mono config. ANALOGUE: Clearaudio
Ambient CMB, Satisfy Carbon  Lyra Helikon SL, ASR Basis Exclusive
phono preamp, link: AcousticZen Silver Reference2 XLR’s. DIGITAL:
SlimDevices Transporter, link: WireWorld SilverEclipse 5.2.  POWER:
Isotek MiniSub GII, Isotek Elite cables (MiniSub, Rel), ASR Magic Cord
(ASR), Siltech SPX30 MKII's (Pathos)  v/d Hul Mainserver
(Transporter).

GuyDebord's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14587
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-07-02 Thread GuyDebord

I just changed the settings in squeeze center to ALAC-WAV and I couldnt
believe the difference, I still cant believe it, already did blind
comparisons with my wife helping change the squeeze center settings and
It was clearer than water from Swiss springs.

The bass tightened, the highs became ridiculously airier and the mids
sweetened, how much I was missing!!!

Still vinyl rules in my system but now digital doesnt fall to much
behind as it used to, now i can really consider listening sessions with
the transporter...

I dont know what goes on in circuits or codes, all I know is that it
sounds much better...


-- 
GuyDebord

Verity Audio Tamino X2 wired with v/d Hul Inspiration, REL Strata5.
AMPS: Pathos Classic One MKIII's in mono config. ANALOGUE: Clearaudio
Ambient CMB, Satisfy Carbon  Lyra Helikon SL, ASR Basis Exclusive
phono preamp, link: AcousticZen Silver Reference2 XLR’s. DIGITAL:
SlimDevices Transporter, link: WireWorld SilverEclipse 5.2.  POWER:
Isotek MiniSub GII, Isotek Elite cables (MiniSub, Rel), ASR Magic Cord
(ASR), Siltech SPX30 MKII's (Pathos)  v/d Hul Mainserver
(Transporter).

GuyDebord's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14587
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-07-02 Thread jgs

GuyDebord;316806 Wrote: 
 I just changed the settings in squeeze center to ALAC-WAV and I couldnt
 believe the difference

What were your settings before (that weren't so good)?


-- 
jgs

jgs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7538
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-07-01 Thread jgs

vincentyan;316197 Wrote: 
 Here is what I did: convert a song of Apple Lossless in iTunes to AIFF,
 WAV, and MP3 (iTunes doesn't support FLAC so I can't test FLAC).  The
 resulting 3 files are .aif, .wav, and .mp3.  Play them with
 SqueezeCenter.  I can only FF/RW the MP3 song, not the AIFF nor the
 WAV.  Any comment?
 
 It was strange that some of the AIFF songs in my iTunes library are
 .m4a files - those imported uncompressed from Grarageband.  Well of
 course this is an iTunes issue and I guess I have to inquire Apple
 about that.

I just double-checked to make sure I'm not losing my mind.  I'm not
(well not about this anyway) -- I can FF/RW MP3 and AIFF.  I also
generated my AIFF using iTunes, by ripping to Apple Lossless using Max,
then importing the Apple Lossless into iTunes and transcoding to AIFF
using iTunes.  

When you select one of your AIFF songs and right-arrow to get the
file's info and then scroll down to see the file format, what does it
say?  Mine says AIFF, which I presume means SqueezeCenter has
recognized it as such.  The file extension is indeed .aif.

I'm running SqueezeCenter 7.0.1 though I remember this working before
too.

Another thing to check would be to look at your SqueezeCenter prefs,
and go to the Advanced Tab and then choose File Types.  See if AIFF is
configured to stream natively.  If not, change it to be.


-- 
jgs

jgs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7538
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-07-01 Thread jgs

jgs;316382 Wrote: 
 FYI, I went ahead and opened bug 8620
 (http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8620) analogous to bug
 571, to request FF/RW support for Apple Lossless.

... and it got dup'd and bug 571 updated to encompass Apple Lossless,
which is fine.  I also noticed another relevant bug, 3345 support alac
in hardware (http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3345).  

Note that you can vote for bugs if you make yourself a bugreporter
account.  Not sure how much votes actually matter, but I'm just sayin'.


-- 
jgs

jgs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7538
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread m1abrams

vincentyan;315962 Wrote: 
 How do you fast forward/rewind AIFF files in the Squeezebox 3?
 
 Isn't it very easy to convert Apple Lossless to AIFF, WAVE, or FLAC
 when you need?

You can not FF/RW any transcoded format on the SB.  Only native formats
allow this.


-- 
m1abrams

m1abrams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=850
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread vincentyan

AIFF is native, but how can I fastforward on SB3?  I couldn't find the
button in Squeezecenter.  It would be quite nice if I can fastforward
and rewind.


-- 
vincentyan

vincentyan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17868
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread Phil Leigh

vincentyan;316018 Wrote: 
 AIFF is native, but how can I fastforward on SB3?  I couldn't find the
 button in Squeezecenter.  It would be quite nice if I can fastforward
 and rewind.

Apple Aiff is not native to the SB - it's transcoded using MOV123 (or
FAAD if you have installed that).
You can't FF/Rew it.


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good Vibrations S/W - MF X-DAC
V3/X-PSU/X-10 buffer (Audiocomm full mods)- Linn 5103 - Linn Aktiv 5.1
system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend
Supertweeters, Kimber  Chord cables

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread andynormancx

Phil Leigh;316026 Wrote: 
 Apple Aiff is not native to the SB - it's transcoded using MOV123 (or
 FAAD if you have installed that).
 
My File Types screen in SC says that AIFF is native.


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread m1abrams

andynormancx;316028 Wrote: 
 My File Types screen in SC says that AIFF is native.

It is not.  Only native formats that the SB and Transporter currently
support is mp3,flac, and wav.  Note that the original SB does NOT have
native flac support and the Slimp3 only supports mp3 native.


-- 
m1abrams

m1abrams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=850
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread andynormancx

m1abrams;316035 Wrote: 
 It is not.  Only native formats that the SB and Transporter currently
 support is mp3,flac, and wav.  Note that the original SB does NOT have
 native flac support and the Slimp3 only supports mp3 native.
The wiki doesn't agree with you:

http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/HardwareComparison

It says that SB2 and later decode MP3, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, WMA (except
WMA Lossless), AIFF, WAV.


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread Phil Leigh

I think we are getting confused about the file formats...
what extension are your files?

If they are .AIF then these are AIFF files that are handled natively.
If they are .m4a files (or other Apple variants) then these are NOT
handled natively and are transcoded via MOV123 etc.

(or ALAC for Apple lossless files)


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good Vibrations S/W - MF X-DAC
V3/X-PSU/X-10 buffer (Audiocomm full mods)- Linn 5103 - Linn Aktiv 5.1
system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend
Supertweeters, Kimber  Chord cables

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread Phil Leigh

m1abrams;316035 Wrote: 
 It is not.  Only native formats that the SB and Transporter currently
 support is mp3,flac, and wav.  Note that the original SB does NOT have
 native flac support and the Slimp3 only supports mp3 native.

Not quite. SB2+ supports the following natively (without transcoding):

File Format  Stream Format
AIFF AIFF
FLAC FLAC
MP3  MP3
WAV  WAV
WMA  WMA
Ogg Vorbis   Ogg Vorbis


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good Vibrations S/W - MF X-DAC
V3/X-PSU/X-10 buffer (Audiocomm full mods)- Linn 5103 - Linn Aktiv 5.1
system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend
Supertweeters, Kimber  Chord cables

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread vincentyan

Thanks for the tip.  My AIFF files do have the extension of m4a (so they
are not native AIFF files?).  I then go to WAV: file type is .WAV and
shown in iTunes as WAV type.  Still can't find how to FF/RW in SB3. 
How does it work?


-- 
vincentyan

vincentyan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17868
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread m1abrams

Phil Leigh;316048 Wrote: 
 Not quite. SB2+ supports the following natively (without transcoding):
 
 File Format  Stream Format
 AIFF AIFF
 FLAC FLAC
 MP3  MP3
 WAV  WAV
 WMA  WMA
 Ogg Vorbis   Ogg Vorbis

Wow, did they add more support after initial release?  Cause I could
have sworn it was just WAV, FLAC, and MP3.  However I stand corrected,
sorry for the mis-information.


-- 
m1abrams

m1abrams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=850
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread Phil Leigh

vincentyan;316075 Wrote: 
 Thanks for the tip.  My AIFF files do have the extension of m4a (so they
 are not native AIFF files?).  I then go to WAV: file type is .WAV and
 shown in iTunes as WAV type.  Still can't find how to FF/RW in SB3. 
 How does it work?

If they are .m4a they are not aiff files and they will need to be
transcoded. Therefore they cannot support ff/rew. I think there may be
an issue with WAV FF/Rew...but as I have never felt the need to FF or
Rew anything EVER on an SB I wouldn't know for sure. However, I am
pretty confident that if you convert your m4a files to FLAC then FF/Rew
will work fine.


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT RCS 2.2X with Good Vibrations S/W - MF X-DAC
V3/X-PSU/X-10 buffer (Audiocomm full mods)- Linn 5103 - Linn Aktiv 5.1
system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend
Supertweeters, Kimber  Chord cables

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread jgs

vincentyan;315962 Wrote: 
 How do you fast forward/rewind AIFF files in the Squeezebox 3?
 
 Isn't it very easy to convert Apple Lossless to AIFF, WAVE, or FLAC
 when you need?

Sounds like you've gotten your answer with regard to fast
forwarding/rewinding AIFFs.  (Summary, works with .aif, not with
.m4a.)

As for whether it's easy to convert Apple Lossless to AIFF, WAV, when
needed -- well, yeah, it's not too hard.  But since I never know when I
might want to fast forward/rewind a song, that implies I need to have my
entire library already converted.  Which is what I've done, in effect.

By the way, bug 571 (http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571)
looks like it may be relevant.


-- 
jgs

jgs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7538
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-30 Thread vincentyan

Here is what I did: convert a song of Apple Lossless in iTunes to AIFF,
WAV, and MP3 (iTunes doesn't support FLAC so I can't test FLAC).  The
resulting 3 files are .aif, .wav, and .mp3.  Play them with
SqueezeCenter.  I can only FF/RW the MP3 song, not the AIFF nor the
WAV.  Any comment?

It was strange that some of the AIFF songs in my iTunes library are
.m4a files - those imported uncompressed from Grarageband.  Well of
course this is an iTunes issue and I guess I have to inquire Apple
about that.


-- 
vincentyan

vincentyan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17868
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-29 Thread egd

opaqueice;192974 Wrote: 
 That's an extraordinary claimAhem, this is after all the Audiophiles 
 forum...


-- 
egd

Internet forums: conclusive proof depth of gene pool is indeed variable,
monkeys can be taught to cut code, and world peace is utterly
unrealistic...

Integrating MusicIP with SqueezeCenter...'*here's how*'
(http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/Integrating_MusicIP_with_SqueezeCenter).

egd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3425
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-29 Thread iPhone

gdg;191951 Wrote: 
 Hi All,
 For years I've been ripping my files to wave using EAC but in the  as
 my Itune library has grown I've realized that I'd be better off (in
 terms of disc space) condolodating my entire library in Itunes. Is
 there any risk that I will sacrifice any audio quality if I use Apple
 Lossless files as the source for my Squeezebox?
 Gerry

Just to chime in with my two cents, I think it is a compromise. Not in
the sense that I don't think lossless is lossless, but in the sense
that it is not open source. I don't trust Apple and there are more
layers involved in all process from ripping to playback.

In a minimalist audiophile way, Apple Lossless seems to break the rules
instead of follow them. If one were to use FLAC, then all the doors open
and one can stream in multiple ways. One has ripped a master source file
that can now we converted into just about any file one needs or desires.
Hard drives are so big and cheap these days, what is the big deal about
saving 4 or 5 MB of space per song. It is laughable. For use with Apple
iTunes or hardware, I then convert FLAC to 320 MP3. I don't let iTunes
anywhere near my FLAC masters.


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/mephone)
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono Blocks,
Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference
Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1  


Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Bedroom: SB3, NAD C370, Thiel 2.3
Home Office: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, VSM-1 Sigs
Mobile: SB3, Audioengine A5

iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-29 Thread GuyDebord

iPhone;315886 Wrote: 
 Just to chime in with my two cents, I think it is a compromise. Not in
 the sense that I don't think lossless is lossless, but in the sense
 that it is not open source. I don't trust Apple and there are more
 layers involved in all process from ripping to playback.
 

I totally agree with your statement, however, you not trusting and
criticizing apple when your moniker is their logo and your name is
iphone... it just doesnt fit...


-- 
GuyDebord

Verity Audio Tamino X2 wired with v/d Hul Inspiration, REL Strata5.
AMPS: Pathos Classic One MKIII's in mono config. ANALOGUE: Clearaudio
Ambient CMB, Satisfy Carbon  Lyra Helikon SL, ASR Basis Exclusive
phono preamp, link: AcousticZen Silver Reference2 XLR’s. DIGITAL:
SlimDevices Transporter, link: WireWorld SilverEclipse 5.2.  POWER:
Isotek MiniSub GII, Isotek Elite cables (MiniSub, Rel), Siltech SPX30
MKII (ASR), v/d Hul Mainstream (Pathos)  v/d Hul Mainserver
(Transporter).

GuyDebord's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14587
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-29 Thread iPhone

GuyDebord;315909 Wrote: 
 I totally agree with your statement, however, you not trusting and
 criticizing apple when your moniker is their logo and your name is
 iphone... it just doesnt fit...

Well doesn't that depend? I only use an iPhone because it is the
closest thing to caring a laptop without carrying one. I believe it is
still the only cellular phone that can display full real webpages (not
the mobile ones). I know its the only phone I can use with my broker
website/software. And that is the ONLY reason I have it (and it doesn't
hurt that I am a retired ATT/Cingular employee with a large discount on
service plans/equipment).

As for Avatar, I wanted to use the FLAC logo but a guy that is on the
Forum often was already using it and the Apple kind of goes with the
user name that I picked out of the air because I had just received my
iPhone. It was more a choice of convience then conviction! And isn't
the shading wrong/backwards on the Avatar?

And I know that you have been around the Forum long enough to have read
my rambling on about how I hate how iTunes, QuickTime, and any other
Apple product or software tries to take over everything like it knows
better then the user. What I am saying is that this is not a waffle or
flip-flop, this has been my stand from the start and my user name and
Avatar are just an abstract dig at Apple. I have only bought one song
from the iTunes store because I had to buy the song first so that I
could make it my Ringtone even though I already owned the CD and had
the song ripped (another reason to dislike iTunes and Apple). Somebody
should write a program that will take any ripped song and make it an
iPhone Ringtone and sell it for $15. And lastly, one has to at least
give Apple and Jobs there just dues for not folding under the pressure
of MicroSoft (can't stand MS either but again have to use them
sometimes). My favorites have always been the underdog like Amiga, BE,
and using Red Hat.

And isn't funny that so many free or open source items do so well?

Back on topic now..


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
'Last.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/mephone)
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono Blocks,
Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference
Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1  


Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Bedroom: SB3, NAD C370, Thiel 2.3
Home Office: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, VSM-1 Sigs
Mobile: SB3, Audioengine A5

iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-29 Thread jgs

After going through a similar mental exercise I ended up keeping my
library in AIFF.  The down side of Apple Lossless is that you can't
fast forward/rewind it, nor can you with any of the other transcoded
formats.  AIFF on the other hand is supported natively, so you can
FFWD/REW (at least as well as FFWD/REW works at all on a Squeezebox,
which in my experience is only so-so).

I'd be happy if either Apple decided to support FLAC, or someone fixed
Slimserver to allows FFWD/REW on transcoded formats (which would appear
to be as simple as transcoding to a temp file instead of a pipe, but
maybe there's some reason not to do that which isn't obvious to me). 
Until then, well, disk is cheap.


-- 
jgs

jgs's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7538
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-29 Thread vincentyan

How do you fast forward/rewind AIFF files in the Squeezebox 3?

Isn't it very easy to convert Apple Lossless to AIFF, WAVE, or FLAC
when you need?


-- 
vincentyan

vincentyan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17868
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-28 Thread alexdemaet

Mark Lanctot;195637 Wrote: 
 You can't have one without the other.  A Squeezebox depends on
 SlimServer or SqueezeNetwork.
 
 This answers most of your other questions.  If you want to play local
 files you always need SlimServer.  SqueezeNetwork will let you play
 Internet content - the only local content it will play is from
 MP3tunes, and that part is still in beta.

Too bad that mp3tunes doesn't support lossless tracks!


-- 
alexdemaet

alexdemaet's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18158
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-28 Thread muski

Just going through the same exercise myself.  I have about 100GB of FLAC
files ripped with EAC.  I have also created a 192kbps AAC version of the
same library for my iPhone and to carry on my Macbook -- this is about
30GB.

I am looking at a new portable headphone rig (iPod with the iQube
headphone amp), which will be worthy of lossless files, so now I am in
the process of transcoding all the FLACs to Apple Lossless.  It is
possible to use Foobar and iTunesEncode to do this in a fairly
automated way (even picks up album art), but it takes DAYS of
processing time (approx 15 to 20 mins per transcoded CD on a 2.0Ghz
MacBook Pro running XP under Parallels).

It annoys me, but until Apple supports FLAC on both the Mac and iPod
I'll keep all three versions (heh, something to fill my 1TB Time
Capsule!).

muski


-- 
muski

Transporter-Bryston BP25DA-Bryston 4B SST-Wilson Watt Puppy 7
Transporter-Headroom Max Balanced Headphone Amp-Balanced AKG701s 
HD650s

muski's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3670
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2008-06-28 Thread esbrewer

I debated going with flac as well, and tried EAC, foobar, etc - but
ultimately decided to use iTunes and ALAC to simplify the workflow in
adding music to my system.  I just have more time to simply listen to
music and think about things other than how many programs I need to use
(and preferences I need to configure) to manage my files.

I wish Apple would offer FLAC as an option, but until they do the
simplicity of iTunes and ALAC is fine with me.


-- 
esbrewer

esbrewer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12409
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-17 Thread mgh

Sorry, 

Noob here.  I do not have a squeezebox yet, but planning/preparing for
one.  I will not have the slimserver, just the wireless sqeezbox.

I have been experimenting with sbpoweramp to convert CDs to FLAC.  The
program so far has been a PITA.  When it works it works fine, but only
works part time.

Am I to understand that to use Apple lossless I need the slimserver? 
Can I use apple lossless with only having the sqeezebox?

Frankly, I do not yet know how to rip to apple lossless as I do not see
the option in itunes, but it won't matter if I need slimserver.

Anyone with patience want to point me to some links on what folks are
using for formats and ripping programs?

Thanks for the help.  I am excited to figure this out so I can move on
to the purchase of a slimbox.


-- 
mgh

mgh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10308
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-17 Thread Mark Lanctot

mgh;195633 Wrote: 
 I will not have the slimserver, just the wireless sqeezbox.

You can't have one without the other.  A Squeezebox depends on
SlimServer or SqueezeNetwork.

This answers most of your other questions.  If you want to play local
files you always need SlimServer.  SqueezeNetwork will let you play
Internet content - the only local content it will play is from
MP3tunes, and that part is still in beta.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-07 Thread Shuggie

For information, the file conversion settings in Slimserver were set to
ALAC-WAV.  Not FLAC. I mentioned MP3 only because someone on this forum
once said that I should check that down-converting to MP3 was not taking
place.  So, I compared ALAC with WAV, and preferred plain WAV by rather
more than a country mile.  

What my personal experience tells me is that it's all very well
claiming bit-perfect decoding of lossless files, but in truth something
musical gets lost in the process, when compared with an uncompressed
format that the SB can just get on with.  I should stress that this is
my personal experience - I know what my ears tell me, and I'm happy
with the message.


-- 
Shuggie

Shuggie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8568
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-06 Thread Shuggie

I'm sure all the above is theoretically correct, but I found that
reproduction of Apple Lossless files through the SB3 was noticeably
poorer than WAV or AIFF, even after checking that Slimserver was not
transcoding ALAC to MP3 etc.  So, I can understand that ALAC is not a
compromise per se, but that's not quite how it works out with
Slimserver and the SB3.  As disk space is not a problem for me, I am
content to use uncompressed storage in iTunes, which I find the easiest
way to organise my music.  I can't be bothered with FLAC, when Apple
have made iTunes so pleasant to use.


-- 
Shuggie

Shuggie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8568
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-06 Thread opaqueice

Shuggie;192970 Wrote: 
 I'm sure all the above is theoretically correct, but I found that
 reproduction of Apple Lossless files through the SB3 was noticeably
 poorer than WAV or AIFF, even after checking that Slimserver was not
 transcoding ALAC to MP3 etc.  So, I can understand that ALAC is not a
 compromise per se, but that's not quite how it works out with
 Slimserver and the SB3.  As disk space is not a problem for me, I am
 content to use uncompressed storage in iTunes, which I find the easiest
 way to organise my music.  I can't be bothered with FLAC, when Apple
 have made iTunes so pleasant to use.

That's an extraordinary claim - my understanding is that SS converts
apple lossless files into WAV *at the server side* before streaming it
to the SB3, and therefore the packets the SB3 receives, and the
processing it has to perform, are *identical* whether your music is
stored as apples lossless or as WAV/AIFF.

Have you done a blind test to verify that the effect is real?


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-06 Thread CardinalFang

opaqueice;192974 Wrote: 
 That's an extraordinary claim - my understanding is that SS converts
 apple lossless files into WAV *at the server side* before streaming it
 to the SB3, and therefore the packets the SB3 receives, and the
 processing it has to perform, are *identical* whether your music is
 stored as apples lossless or as WAV/AIFF.

Isn't it the case that SS uses Quicktime to decode the Apple Lossless
format? Are their any circumstances under which that process could
result in less than perfect WAV or AIFF files? 

I find that some of my Apple Lossless files which play perfectly
through iTunes exhibit clipping or clicking sounds when played back
through my SB2 - it's one of the reasons I've been thinking about a
radical change. When I play the same files back through my laptop into
the same DAC using the laptop SPDIF connector, the artifacts are gone.
So it's as though something in the SS transcoding is messing up gain
levels.


-- 
CardinalFang

CardinalFang's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=962
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-06 Thread PhilNYC

opaqueice;192974 Wrote: 
 That's an extraordinary claim - my understanding is that SS converts
 apple lossless files into WAV *at the server side* before streaming it
 to the SB3, and therefore the packets the SB3 receives, and the
 processing it has to perform, are *identical* whether your music is
 stored as apples lossless or as WAV/AIFF.


It depends on how you have the File Types set up in Slimserver.  You
can have it convert Apple Lossless files to either FLAC, MP3, or WAV,
and I believe the default converts it to FLAC.

I do perceive a slight but noticeable improvement in sound quality when
using ALAC-to-WAV over ALAC-to-FLAC


-- 
PhilNYC

Sonic Spirits Inc.
http://www.sonicspirits.com

PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-06 Thread opaqueice

PhilNYC;192999 Wrote: 
 It depends on how you have the File Types set up in Slimserver.  You can
 have it convert Apple Lossless files to either FLAC, MP3, or WAV, and I
 believe the default converts it to FLAC.
 
 I do perceive a slight but noticeable improvement in sound quality when
 using ALAC-to-WAV over ALAC-to-FLAC

OK, I'm skeptical, but it's more plausible since at least the packets
sent to the SB are different.  

The issue here was different - it was whether you hear a difference
between ALAC-WAV and WAV-WAV, or between ALAC-FLAC and WAV-FLAC.

CardinalFang, of course it's possible there's a bug in ALAC decoding,
but it would be pretty strange for it to result in a subtle degradation
of sound quality (as opposed perhaps to a click like what you heard). 
Anyway this can be easily checked - just play an ALAC file and record
the S/PDIF stream from the SB digital out, then compare that to the
original.


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-06 Thread PhilNYC

opaqueice;193002 Wrote: 
 
 The issue here was different - it was whether you hear a difference
 between ALAC-WAV and WAV-WAV, or between ALAC-FLAC and WAV-FLAC.
 

The comment being discussed was an assertion that but I found that
reproduction of Apple Lossless files through the SB3 was noticeably
poorer than WAV or AIFF, even after checking that Slimserver was not
transcoding ALAC to MP3 etc.

So the question I had was which File Type was being used when making
this comment...ALAC-FLAC or ALAC-WAV?  He just said that he wasn't
using ALAC-MP3, but didn't specify whether he was using FLAC or WAV. 
If he was using ALAC-FLAC (the default setting), then the comment I
posted was appropriate, because he was then comparing ALAC-FLAC to
WAV-WAV (instead of ALAC-WAV to WAV-WAV)...

:-)-:-D


-- 
PhilNYC

Sonic Spirits Inc.
http://www.sonicspirits.com

PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-06 Thread opaqueice

PhilNYC;193011 Wrote: 
 
 So the question I had was which File Type was being used when making
 this comment...ALAC-FLAC or ALAC-WAV?  He just said that he wasn't
 using ALAC-MP3, but didn't specify whether he was using FLAC or WAV. 
 If he was using ALAC-FLAC (the default setting), then the comment I
 posted was appropriate, because he was then comparing ALAC-FLAC to
 WAV-WAV (instead of ALAC-WAV to WAV-WAV)...
 

Isn't part of the default setting WAV-FLAC?

Anyway, it's pointless to speculate - maybe he will chime in.


-- 
opaqueice

opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-05 Thread gusi

I don't think itunes supports flac though. You may be better of with
apple lossless. Note that you can't tag wav.


-- 
gusi

gusi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3801
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-05 Thread creativepart

Apple Lossless (ALAC) is a good compromise to save disk space and to
allow full tagging and artwork. iTunes can work with Wav files and
covert your files to ALAC. The process is completely reversible (at
least that's what I've been told, I haven't tried it). And you can set
your Slimserver to decode ALAC on the fly to either FLAC or WAV for
broadcasting to the network. I've tried both and see (hear) no
difference. My network is strong and tests out over 5 mbs between the
computer and my SB3 via the Slimserver throughput test. So, I went with
ALAC to WAV conversion in Slimserver.


-- 
creativepart

-
Great Guitar Websites:
www.telecaster.com | www.strat-talk.com | www.gibson-talk.com

creativepart's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10822
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-05 Thread Eric Seaberg

I've got over 12000 songs in my library so far, and 75% of them are
Apple Lossless. I've seriously considered FLAC encoding because of
Slim's 'native' playback of that format, but just haven't found any
software that tags and maintains my library as well as iTunes does. 
Playback is NOT a problem, even transcoding to LAME.

There is talk that Leopard, the next Apple OS, may add FLAC
capabilities to QuickTime.


-- 
Eric Seaberg

Eric Seaberg - San Diego
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Eric Seaberg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7896
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-02 Thread Heuer

Why are you keeping your files as WAV - would FLAC not be a better
medium in terms of disk space?

Any lossless format is just that - lossless - so you will not
compromise quality. You will eat up bandwidth on your network as you
will have to stream the ALAC files as WAV's - SB3 does not have ALAC
native.


-- 
Heuer

Heuer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2543
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Apple Lossless a compromise?

2007-04-02 Thread jeffmeh

No, as you will have to setup the SlimServer to transcode the ALAC files
on the fly.  If you transcode to WAV, the SB will be receiving data
packets identical to your original WAV files.  If you transcode to
FLAC, you will save some bandwidth, but since you are already streaming
WAV there is probably no need.  Obviously, if you transcode to MP3, you
will be using lossy compression, so the audio properties will be
affected.


-- 
jeffmeh

jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34122

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles