Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-12 Thread Sam
We'll pay for the research, you just pay for the raw material.

On Feb 12, 2008 11:10 AM, Vivec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You mean the drug patents that US firms own that they use to set a
 high price of drugs?

 Or are you referring to the lawsuits and great hullabaloo when other
 countries try to produce
 and distribute the same drugs for far less?

  If other countries paid their share we wouldn't have to subsidies the
  world with our drugs and we'd all pay a fair price.



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254024
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-12 Thread Vivec
You mean the drug patents that US firms own that they use to set a
high price of drugs?

Or are you referring to the lawsuits and great hullabaloo when other
countries try to produce
and distribute the same drugs for far less?

 If other countries paid their share we wouldn't have to subsidies the
 world with our drugs and we'd all pay a fair price.

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254017
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-12 Thread Loathe
No he means the costs associated with research, the approval process and 
setting up initial manufacturing.

Vivec wrote:
 You mean the drug patents that US firms own that they use to set a
 high price of drugs?
 
 Or are you referring to the lawsuits and great hullabaloo when other
 countries try to produce
 and distribute the same drugs for far less?
 
 If other countries paid their share we wouldn't have to subsidies the
 world with our drugs and we'd all pay a fair price.
 
 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254025
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-12 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
 Not when we're talking about medical insurance.

This was in reference to the most common reason for bankruptcy. The 
*underlying* cause for over half of them is now medical costs...irrespective of 
whether the person is insured or not. The job loss is just secondary to that. 
That to me means we have a serious problem in this country! People should not 
be at risk of losing everything just because they get sick or injured. 


 How do you feel about mandating that small businesses provide
 insurance or pay it in taxes? Then there's mandatory child coverage,
 nice to have but if people are struggling now where's the money going
 to come from? 

I am only in favor of mandating insurance if a low-cost buy-in plan for 
everyone is in place. Right now, the insurance costs are rising considerably 
faster than the cost of living, it simply can't continue. 


 I have a friend whose family plan went up because he didn't visit the
 doctor enough.

That's a new one...I think insurance just comes up with any reason at all to 
raise your rates. 


 If other countries paid their share we wouldn't have to subsidies the
 world with our drugs and we'd all pay a fair price.

Regardless, it's something that should be addressed as well. 

 
 It only makes sense that if you take
 all the people that aren't in groups, group them together, you have
 the largest group with the biggest influence. Why doesn't that 
happen?

It's something we need a law to allow. 



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254008
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-12 Thread Loathe
Boils down to this, insurance is provided on the basis of risk by a 
private company.

Taxes, fire and police are all related to government services and are 
provided for all regardless of risk, or you couldn't live in da ghetto

Mary Jo Sminkey wrote:
 You just proved it was job loss.
 
 There's a big difference between job loss due to medical reasons and 
 eventually ending in bankruptcy...and just losing a job. 
 
 Are you saying you want your medical insurance to also pay your 
 person
 bills while you're sick?
 
 Of course not...the point is that most people simply cannot afford to get 
 sick and handle *those* costs on top of personal bills. 
 
 
 I'm talking about insurance risk. If they know your meds are
 guaranteed to be $300 a month plus and mine are zero I should pay
 less. 
 
 Why? Should you pay less in taxes for your fire or police service if you 
 haven't been robbed or had a fire versus someone that has? Again, there seems 
 to be some blame being put on people here for medical problems, and the vast 
 majority of people have no such control that you seem to be implying. 
 
 
 Not at all, just like people that often crash their car can have
 insurance but they have to pay more. 
 
 Again, there is a lot more control over how often you crash your car versus 
 what kind of medical assistance you might need. 
 
 
 My dad gave up his construction business to become a janitor so he'd
 get a pension and medical insurance. We have choices.
 
 Sorry, but it's not so easy for many people. Insurance costs even for the 
 insured continue to rise, having a job is no guarantee of financial safety 
 (again, refer to that article link I posted). I remember when I could get a 
 job and have good coverage at no cost (being single). Those types of jobs are 
 few and far between these days. 
 
 
 If you can't afford it look for other alternatives like working for a
 larger company that can provide insurance or join a group somehow.
 
 Luckily I can afford it for now, but this sentiment is exactly why small 
 businesses are having such a hard time these days (among other reasons) and 
 very few people able to be self-employed and truly be safe from bankruptcy. 
 You can be denied individual insurance for pretty much anything and if you do 
 get it, the cost is quite substantial. But the biggest problem is that it's 
 such a huge risk. I really do worry about what is going to happen if anything 
 really serious happens. It could wipe out my life savings, if not worse. It's 
 the main reason I do still do a lot of preventative, diagnostic stuff every 
 year or two, since my reflux does put me at high risk of some types of 
 cancer. 
 
 
 There are ways to get coverage but you just want someone else to help
 you pay. That's what groups are for not the government.
 
 Wrong, it has nothing to do with making someone else pay. If I felt confident 
 that what I paid now would protect me in the case of serious illness, I'd be 
 satisfied. It's a lot, but it's still not such a huge part of my income that 
 I couldn't deal with it. The problem is the cost goes up every year, and in 
 the case of something serious happening, the coverage quite simply is not 
 sufficient. 
 
 
 We're talking about two people making the same wage and one needs $300 a
 month worth of meds and the other needs nothing. You want my bill to
 be higher so yours is lower.
 
 Again, you're not getting the picture here. The costs of meds is a totally 
 different issue, it ticks me off that I have to pay so much when people in 
 other countries get the same meds for a reasonable price, not that I think 
 someone else needs to pay for them. But it also frustrates me that people on 
 company plans get decent prescription plans, the same should be available to 
 everyone. Why should company plans have decent prescription plans and 
 individuals not be allowed the same benefit? The same way that I should be 
 able to deduct fully my health insurance premiums before tax the way that 
 corporations can (it gets included when you calculate self-employed tax.) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253978
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-11 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
It's much cheaper to produce paper from hemp, and hemp is renewable on a
yearly basis, instead of tens to hundreds of years. If we could produce hemp
based paper on a large scale it would put a MAJOR dent in the logging
industry.

Certainly the hemp enthusiasts will tell you that (in regards to it being 
cheap)... but it's not really true. Just look at the other countries that do 
allow hemp production...it's used widely for textiles, rope, etc. but fairly 
limited use for paper production. Here's a good paper on the subject, and why 
this is so:

http://mojo.calyx.net/~olsen/HEMP/IHA/iha01105.html

Certainly a switch is still important for environmental reasons, but it's not a 
matter of just allowing hemp to be produced, it will take a lot more than just 
that. 


Hemp and marijuana are related plants (so are hops) but their not the same
plant as many think.

True, but one of the arguments against hemp is that they look the same, so you 
would have to have inspections to make sure of which is being grown. 



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253921
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-11 Thread Sam
On Feb 11, 2008 11:32 AM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The number one cause of bankruptcy is losing your job.

 Really? Show me something to prove that. Here's a study published a few years 
 ago showing that half of all bankruptcies were from medical causesthe 
 illness often *causing* job loss and then loss of coverage, so it wasn't the 
 primary factor.

 http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w5.63/DC1

You just proved it was job loss.
Are you saying you want your medical insurance to also pay your person
bills while you're sick?

  I'm not sure why you want me to pay for your meds. You pay $400 a
  month and your meds cost $300 that leaves $1200 a year for all other
  medical costs.

 Huh?? I don't follow this at all. Where did you get this $400 a month from? 
 Is that for insurance? Deductible? Co-Pay? My costs are way higher than 
 $400/month, this just doesn't make any sense. And $1200 regardless is 
 virtually nothing when it comes to medical care. One even minor injury can 
 eat that up in no time. So not sure what your point here is. Maybe this will 
 shed better light on the kinds of costs and how out of reach they are getting 
 for most people/businesses/etc.:

 http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml

I'm talking about insurance risk. If they know your meds are
guaranteed to be $300 a month plus and mine are zero I should pay
less. But I don't mind paying an extra hundred or two so your payments
are lower. Just don't ask me to pay all your costs.

 What, because I have medical problems? Yeah, exactly. That's why I can't get 
 decent coverage, and what I can get costs ridiculously high amounts, has high 
 deductibles and co-pays, etc. In many states I would not be able to be 
 insured at all. Are you saying that anyone with medical problems doesn't 
 deserve to have insurance?

Not at all, just like people that often crash their car can have
insurance but they have to pay more. If we work at the same company
we'd pay the same. If we both get insurance on our own we pay by the
risk. Same goes with life insurance. Bush's plan would make it easier
for us to join a group and distribute the fees evenly.

 Gee, how lucky for you. I unfortunately inherited this problem from my dad, 
 have already been through one surgery for it, do all the things I'm supposed 
 to do (lost weight, don't eat the wrong foods, etc.) but it's simply not 
 going to go away.

My dad gave up his construction business to become a janitor so he'd
get a pension and medical insurance. We have choices.

  I don't mind subsidizing the poor with my insurance payments but not
  the people that don't need it.

 What the? Are you saying I don't need medical treatment? Or that if I can't 
 afford the more expensive treatment that would help me, then that's just too 
 bad? Come tell me that again, when you get cancer in 10 years or so, can't 
 keep your job, lose your insurance, can't afford the cost of treatment, etc. 
 Then maybe you will feel differently about the situation. This is one of the 
 problems with getting any support for changing the current system...people 
 that have never been through any kind of illness have no idea how at risk 
 they really are, and just stick their head in the sand and say, I shouldn't 
 have to pay for all the others that have problems. Well guess what, that's 
 what being part of a society is all about. Helping those that are less 
 fortunate that you...and that doesn't just mean those that are poor...it 
 means any of those that are suffering for whatever reason.

Thanks for those sweet wishes :)
I'm saying if you're self employed and making money you have to pay
insurance based on your risk factor.
If you can't afford it look for other alternatives like working for a
larger company that can provide insurance or join a group somehow.
There are ways to get coverage but you just want someone else to help
you pay. That's what groups are for not the government.

We're not talking about the less fortunate, they get aid. We're
talking about two people making the same wage and one needs $300 a
month worth of meds and the other needs nothing. You want my bill to
be higher so yours is lower.

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253936
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-11 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
 The number one cause of bankruptcy is losing your job.

Really? Show me something to prove that. Here's a study published a few years 
ago showing that half of all bankruptcies were from medical causesthe 
illness often *causing* job loss and then loss of coverage, so it wasn't the 
primary factor. 

http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w5.63/DC1


 My dad drinks a glass of water with baking soda since I can remembe
 even though his insurance covers the expensive drugs.

Well good for him, even with insurance, that's a cost savings for him. I 
generally avoid taking drugs when I can as well (I take enough vitamins and 
pills everyday as it is.) 
 

 I'm not sure why you want me to pay for your meds. You pay $400 a
 month and your meds cost $300 that leaves $1200 a year for all other
 medical costs. 

Huh?? I don't follow this at all. Where did you get this $400 a month from? Is 
that for insurance? Deductible? Co-Pay? My costs are way higher than 
$400/month, this just doesn't make any sense. And $1200 regardless is virtually 
nothing when it comes to medical care. One even minor injury can eat that up in 
no time. So not sure what your point here is. Maybe this will shed better light 
on the kinds of costs and how out of reach they are getting for most 
people/businesses/etc.:

http://www.nchc.org/facts/cost.shtml


Sounds like an insurance risk. 

What, because I have medical problems? Yeah, exactly. That's why I can't get 
decent coverage, and what I can get costs ridiculously high amounts, has high 
deductibles and co-pays, etc. In many states I would not be able to be insured 
at all. Are you saying that anyone with medical problems doesn't deserve to 
have insurance? 


 I was never admitted to
 a hospital and never prescribed anything other than antibiotics.

Gee, how lucky for you. I unfortunately inherited this problem from my dad, 
have already been through one surgery for it, do all the things I'm supposed to 
do (lost weight, don't eat the wrong foods, etc.) but it's simply not going to 
go away. 


 I don't mind subsidizing the poor with my insurance payments but not
 the people that don't need it.

What the? Are you saying I don't need medical treatment? Or that if I can't 
afford the more expensive treatment that would help me, then that's just too 
bad? Come tell me that again, when you get cancer in 10 years or so, can't keep 
your job, lose your insurance, can't afford the cost of treatment, etc. Then 
maybe you will feel differently about the situation. This is one of the 
problems with getting any support for changing the current system...people that 
have never been through any kind of illness have no idea how at risk they 
really are, and just stick their head in the sand and say, I shouldn't have to 
pay for all the others that have problems. Well guess what, that's what being 
part of a society is all about. Helping those that are less fortunate that 
you...and that doesn't just mean those that are poor...it means any of those 
that are suffering for whatever reason. 



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253914
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-11 Thread Billy Cox
The first step in changing a taboo is to change the terminology. Have you
ever noticed that pro-choice people hardly ever use the word 'abortion' in
public discourse?  Have you noticed that pro-life people never use the term
'fetus'? Do you think that is a coincidence?

If those in favor of legalizing marijuana aren't smart enough to think of a
more benign term for the object of their affection, then nothing will
change. 



-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:26 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary


and those of us that think it's gay that pot is taboo but booze and 
smokes are fine?

Billy Cox wrote:
 Those in favor of legalizing marijuana for medical use would be smart 
 to stop using the street name for the drug. Language is very powerful 
 in shaping opinions.
 
 
 




~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253865
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-11 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
 You just proved it was job loss.

There's a big difference between job loss due to medical reasons and eventually 
ending in bankruptcy...and just losing a job. 

 Are you saying you want your medical insurance to also pay your 
 person
 bills while you're sick?

Of course not...the point is that most people simply cannot afford to get sick 
and handle *those* costs on top of personal bills. 


 I'm talking about insurance risk. If they know your meds are
 guaranteed to be $300 a month plus and mine are zero I should pay
 less. 

Why? Should you pay less in taxes for your fire or police service if you 
haven't been robbed or had a fire versus someone that has? Again, there seems 
to be some blame being put on people here for medical problems, and the vast 
majority of people have no such control that you seem to be implying. 


 Not at all, just like people that often crash their car can have
 insurance but they have to pay more. 

Again, there is a lot more control over how often you crash your car versus 
what kind of medical assistance you might need. 


 My dad gave up his construction business to become a janitor so he'd
 get a pension and medical insurance. We have choices.

Sorry, but it's not so easy for many people. Insurance costs even for the 
insured continue to rise, having a job is no guarantee of financial safety 
(again, refer to that article link I posted). I remember when I could get a job 
and have good coverage at no cost (being single). Those types of jobs are few 
and far between these days. 


 If you can't afford it look for other alternatives like working for a
 larger company that can provide insurance or join a group somehow.

Luckily I can afford it for now, but this sentiment is exactly why small 
businesses are having such a hard time these days (among other reasons) and 
very few people able to be self-employed and truly be safe from bankruptcy. You 
can be denied individual insurance for pretty much anything and if you do get 
it, the cost is quite substantial. But the biggest problem is that it's such a 
huge risk. I really do worry about what is going to happen if anything really 
serious happens. It could wipe out my life savings, if not worse. It's the main 
reason I do still do a lot of preventative, diagnostic stuff every year or two, 
since my reflux does put me at high risk of some types of cancer. 


 There are ways to get coverage but you just want someone else to help
 you pay. That's what groups are for not the government.

Wrong, it has nothing to do with making someone else pay. If I felt confident 
that what I paid now would protect me in the case of serious illness, I'd be 
satisfied. It's a lot, but it's still not such a huge part of my income that I 
couldn't deal with it. The problem is the cost goes up every year, and in the 
case of something serious happening, the coverage quite simply is not 
sufficient. 


 
 We're talking about two people making the same wage and one needs $300 a
 month worth of meds and the other needs nothing. You want my bill to
 be higher so yours is lower.

Again, you're not getting the picture here. The costs of meds is a totally 
different issue, it ticks me off that I have to pay so much when people in 
other countries get the same meds for a reasonable price, not that I think 
someone else needs to pay for them. But it also frustrates me that people on 
company plans get decent prescription plans, the same should be available to 
everyone. Why should company plans have decent prescription plans and 
individuals not be allowed the same benefit? The same way that I should be able 
to deduct fully my health insurance premiums before tax the way that 
corporations can (it gets included when you calculate self-employed tax.) 






~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253945
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-11 Thread Sam
On Feb 11, 2008 7:43 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 There's a big difference between job loss due to medical reasons and 
 eventually ending in bankruptcy...and just losing a job.

Not when we're talking about medical insurance.

 Of course not...the point is that most people simply cannot afford to get 
 sick and handle *those* costs on top of personal bills.

Agreed, but what does it have to do with health care?

 Why? Should you pay less in taxes for your fire or police service if you 
 haven't been robbed or had a fire versus someone that has? Again, there seems 
 to be some blame being put on people here for medical problems, and the vast 
 majority of people have no such control that you seem to be implying.

We probably pay the same tax for county hospitals but it might depend
on the cost of the house. As for Insurance YES, If you're house gets
burgled or burned all the time you need to make some changes for an
insurance company to take you on and I don't blame them.

 Sorry, but it's not so easy for many people. Insurance costs even for the 
 insured continue to rise, having a job is no guarantee of financial safety 
 (again, refer to that article link I posted). I remember when I could get a 
 job and have good coverage at no cost (being single). Those types of jobs are 
 few and far between these days.

My point was my dad gave up $40k a year self employment job for $23k
because he was getting old and wanted security. Ironically he broke
his hip because someone waxed the wrong floor and now can't work. I
was trying to say if payments are overwhelming we can make tradeoffs.

 Luckily I can afford it for now, but this sentiment is exactly why small 
 businesses are having such a hard time these days (among other reasons) and 
 very few people able to be self-employed and truly be safe from bankruptcy. 
 You can be denied individual insurance for pretty much anything and if you do 
 get it, the cost is quite substantial. But the biggest problem is that it's 
 such a huge risk. I really do worry about what is going to happen if anything 
 really serious happens. It could wipe out my life savings, if not worse. It's 
 the main reason I do still do a lot of preventative, diagnostic stuff every 
 year or two, since my reflux does put me at high risk of some types of cancer.


How do you feel about mandating that small businesses provide
insurance or pay it in taxes? Then there's mandatory child coverage,
nice to have but if people are struggling now where's the money going
to come from? All of us have to pay one way or another. So the
struggle is medical bills or taxes either way we have to pay.


 Wrong, it has nothing to do with making someone else pay. If I felt confident 
 that what I paid now would protect me in the case of serious illness, I'd be 
 satisfied. It's a lot, but it's still not such a huge part of my income that 
 I couldn't deal with it. The problem is the cost goes up every year, and in 
 the case of something serious happening, the coverage quite simply is not 
 sufficient.


My insurance is $600 a month with $1000 deductible per person (that's
3k) a year. It's mainly for catastrophes but they do cover a lot of
preventive checkups so it's good.

I have a friend whose family plan went up because he didn't visit the
doctor enough.

 Again, you're not getting the picture here. The costs of meds is a totally 
 different issue, it ticks me off that I have to pay so much when people in 
 other countries get the same meds for a reasonable price, not that I think 
 someone else needs to pay for them. But it also frustrates me that people on 
 company plans get decent prescription plans, the same should be available to 
 everyone. Why should company plans have decent prescription plans and 
 individuals not be allowed the same benefit? The same way that I should be 
 able to deduct fully my health insurance premiums before tax the way that 
 corporations can (it gets included when you calculate self-employed tax.)


If other countries paid their share we wouldn't have to subsidies the
world with our drugs and we'd all pay a fair price.

I read years ago contractors were forming an insurance group so they
could have the same advantages. It only makes sense that if you take
all the people that aren't in groups, group them together, you have
the largest group with the biggest influence. Why doesn't that happen?

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253948
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-10 Thread Sam
I was still new to insurance during Hillcare and assumed it was her
threat of socializing the industry that made the HMO's band together
and so powerful. Trying to apply a quick fix to head of her plan. I
could be wrong of course.

Now the complaint from doctors is they can't treat somethings and
can't prescribe some meds, and the insurance complaint is fraud. I
think both sides are correct.

I don't know how to fix it but I'd guess scaring them into grabbing
more power or socializing themselves is not the answer. I like Bush's
and Gruss's plan that let's people shop there own insurance.


On Feb 9, 2008 11:04 AM, Robert Munn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It's shameless what goes on in the health care industry. I agree, eventually
 the system is going to collapse if it isn't completely overhauled, but what
 is a better alternative? My father-in-law is a retired surgeon who works
 part-time as a consultant to the insurance industry. His job is to review
 physician submitted treatments and look for fraud and abuse. It's
 unbelievable what some doctors try to get away with.

 I don't have a problem with anyone making a profit, even a big profit, but
 fraud is unacceptable.

 On Feb 8, 2008 2:03 AM, Maureen wrote:


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253857
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-09 Thread Sam
The number one cause of bankruptcy is losing your job.

My dad drinks a glass of water with baking soda since I can remembe
even though his insurance covers the expensive drugs.

I'm not sure why you want me to pay for your meds. You pay $400 a
month and your meds cost $300 that leaves $1200 a year for all other
medical costs. Sounds like an insurance risk. I was never admitted to
a hospital and never prescribed anything other than antibiotics.
I don't mind subsidizing the poor with my insurance payments but not
the people that don't need it.

On Feb 8, 2008 4:24 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That's even worse than I could ever fathom, and inexcusable.
 And precisely why someone needs to step in and do something...

 It's amazing how bad it has gotten so quickly. Health problems are now the 
 number one cause of bankruptcy...and that's among people that *have* health 
 insurance. Costs for the self-insured are rising so fast that more and more 
 can't afford if (if they are even able to get coverage) and if you get sick 
 at all you can expect your premium to shoot up the following year (mine went 
 up by about $400 this year due to one trip to the emergency room last 
 year...my only medical expense last year other than one or two normal 
 wellness visits.) You hear more and more stories of people denied coverage 
 for important tests or treatments, and people that can't afford the medicine 
 due to the overwhelming cost of prescription drugs. I personally suffer with 
 reflux and should be on one of the newer drugs but the cost is about 
 $100/month for me, so make due with Prilosec even though it's no longer 
 effective for me. Likewise my eye doctor would like me to try Restasis for 
 dry eye...that one was $200 for a month supply! I'll make due with eye drops, 
 thank you. These aren't the kinds of sacrifices well-employed, middle-class 
 people should have to make, but we do. The American Dream is rapidly moving 
 out of reach for all but a very few.


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253826
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-09 Thread Sam
Why should we pay for your cat scratch fever?

On Feb 8, 2008 10:06 PM, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'd like to mention that I spent a week in the hospital, after
 surgery, because a cat scratched me. It happened to have some sort of
 bizarre flesh-eating bacteria on its claw. The bill for that, had I
 not had coverage, could have been in the $15,000 range and that does
 not include tthe surgery and the CAT scan they did because they
 thought I might be getting a blood clot. There's a random five-figure
 medical bill for you


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253827
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-09 Thread Robert Munn
It's shameless what goes on in the health care industry. I agree, eventually
the system is going to collapse if it isn't completely overhauled, but what
is a better alternative? My father-in-law is a retired surgeon who works
part-time as a consultant to the insurance industry. His job is to review
physician submitted treatments and look for fraud and abuse. It's
unbelievable what some doctors try to get away with.

I don't have a problem with anyone making a profit, even a big profit, but
fraud is unacceptable.

On Feb 8, 2008 2:03 AM, Maureen wrote:

 Here are the major problems with any health care plan.

 1. The outrageous profiteering of the insurance industry.
 2. The outrageous profiteering of the health care industry
 3.  The lobbying of congress by said industries to make sure their
 profit machine does not go away.
 4.  The level of fraud infesting both  industries when dealing with
 the consumer and with government programs.
 5. Any proposed program would create a bureaucracy that would cost
 more than the health care costs



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253833
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-09 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
That is what Maureen is saying as well. I had heard at one point they had
engineered some marijuana that retained many of the medicinal qualities of
the plant, without the THC high.

Hhm, hadn't heard that...certainly industrialized hemp has very low THC, so it 
is possible to remove it. But THC is the component with the best anti-emetic 
effects, so not sure removing it is going to be useful in terms of medical use. 
In fact, there is a drug that is basically synthetic THC on the market for that 
use, but oral is not considered the best method of delivery for THC, and it's 
not as effective in general as other drugs, or smoked THC. Of course, smoking 
has its whole set of issues as well, not the least being difficulty in 
delivering a consistent dose (as well as being able to do a good, solid 
double-blind study...it's usually pretty obvious to a patient if they are 
smoking real marijuana versus just a placebo.) 


I had read several doctor's reports where they suggested that other
medicines were preferred to marijuana in just about every instance. They
seemed to suggest patients who said otherwise were at least partly
interested in the other affects of marijuana.

I'm sure there are doctors that say that, but it doesn't mean that they are in 
the majority. You can get find a doctor *somewhere* to testify to just about 
any position on such a polarizing issue. I'd agree that it probably should be a 
last resort, and certainly a good deal of patients probably are just looking to 
abuse it... but it definitely is effective for many patients, and surveys of 
doctors like oncologists show that at least a reasonably high percentage (50%+) 
would like to have the option to prescribe it (and many even suggest it knowing 
it is illegal). Keep in mind as well that while new drugs are always coming on 
the market and they may indeed be more effective...such new drugs are often 
very expensive when compared with the relatively low cost of marijuana. 





~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253835
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-09 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
As a side note, saw this on Digg about a week ago.  It's more fascinating 
than anything I imagined on my own.

Oh, I've heard all kinds of crazy (and not so crazy) theories on why marijuana 
become illegal. Not the least of which was the goal of getting rid of the whole 
the hemp industry (by competing industries). It's definitely a very complex 
issue with an interesting history. And now, there are just as many companies 
fighting against legalizing it...certainly the paper industry has no interest 
in seeing legalizes industrial hemp. And the drug companies certainly will do 
whatever they can to prevent medical marijuana. Why would people buy all their 
expensive drugs, if there is a cheap and easily home-grown plant they can use 
instead. 



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253836
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-09 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
From what I understand, it's main uses are as a: 

Appetite stimulant for those with AIDS and other disorders that kill
appetite

Anti nausea for chemo patients

Anti seizure medication

Hemp has a thousand uses in textiles and paper.


Yup, those are the main ones, although there are others as well. Hemp oil as 
well has tons of uses and can be used for many products such as body care items 
like shampoo and lotion, paint, lubricants, source of omega-36 fatty acids, 
even for use in plastics. But yes, its use for textiles and paper is an 
important one, and it's surprising how many people don't know even know about 
it. But wood pulp production is now so cheap, and getting more environmentally 
friendly, it would be tough for hemp to replace it, although certainly that 
would be a good goal, in order to at least slow down deforestation. 



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253837
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-09 Thread Scott Stewart
The logging industry is a major reason for the association between marijuana
and hemp, and the major reason that hemp has not taken off as a large scale
crop.

It's much cheaper to produce paper from hemp, and hemp is renewable on a
yearly basis, instead of tens to hundreds of years. If we could produce hemp
based paper on a large scale it would put a MAJOR dent in the logging
industry.

Hemp and marijuana are related plants (so are hops) but their not the same
plant as many think.

-- 
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
 
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Mary Jo Sminkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 5:08 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

From what I understand, it's main uses are as a: 

Appetite stimulant for those with AIDS and other disorders that kill
appetite

Anti nausea for chemo patients

Anti seizure medication

Hemp has a thousand uses in textiles and paper.


Yup, those are the main ones, although there are others as well. Hemp oil as
well has tons of uses and can be used for many products such as body care
items like shampoo and lotion, paint, lubricants, source of omega-36 fatty
acids, even for use in plastics. But yes, its use for textiles and paper is
an important one, and it's surprising how many people don't know even know
about it. But wood pulp production is now so cheap, and getting more
environmentally friendly, it would be tough for hemp to replace it, although
certainly that would be a good goal, in order to at least slow down
deforestation. 





~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253839
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Maureen
That's because you don't need it.  And as for the comment that the
medicinal effects can be replicated or surpassed, that's pure BS.

Without going into too much personal detail, I will say that over the
last year of fighting stomach cancer, and having the docs try
everything to relieve the nausea and pain to no avail,  I am very glad
I live in California.

On Feb 7, 2008 10:06 AM, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What's the impetus for medical marijuana? Very few doctors prescribe it,
 because it's medicinal affects are easily replicated and surpassed with
 other drugs that don't have any of the negative side affects.

 I have a soft spot for the wacky too, but medicinal marijuana just doesn't
 make any sense to me.

 On Feb 7, 2008 11:58 AM, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  barack is at least on the fence for med marijuana and states rights.
 
  thats a plus.
 
  states rights!
 
  tw

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253760
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Maureen
Here are the major problems with any health care plan.

1. The outrageous profiteering of the insurance industry.
2. The outrageous profiteering of the health care industry
3.  The lobbying of congress by said industries to make sure their
profit machine does not go away.
4.  The level of fraud infesting both  industries when dealing with
the consumer and with government programs.
5. Any proposed program would create a bureaucracy that would cost
more than the health care costs

Until you fix those, any universal health care program will fail.  In
fact, if those problems aren't addressed soon, the existing health
care system is going to collapse under its own weight.

I've spent most of my 30 plus year career writing software and doing
management consulting in the insurance and health care industries.
Both of them are rotten to the core.  Throwing more money at the
problem is never going to fix it.  It will just fatten the sharks.



On Feb 7, 2008 10:18 AM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Just curious, 2 questions:

 How should health care be handled in your view?
 Do you currently have health benefits where you work? Or does your wife?


 On 2/7/08, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  Since Shawna did a good job of simplifying where Obama and Hillary differ
  on
  the (awful) idea of universal health care, let me just say that I hate
  Hillary's plan even more than Obama's.
 


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253744
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Sam
That's not what he's proposing is it?

Employer Contribution:
Employers that do not offer or make a meaningful contribution to the
cost of quality health coverage for their employees will be required
to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the costs of the national
plan. Small employers that meet certain revenue thresholds will be
exempt.

I'm getting from this that the government is adding business payroll
tax unless you're business is operating at the poverty level.

Isn't this the same as HC's mandatory insurance plan?


On Feb 8, 2008 9:10 AM, Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wouldn't this be a place where a state-subsidy plan to help small businesses
 afford an insurance plan be effective?

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253774
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Scott Stewart
 As for affording it, I'm talking about many jobs going away because
business have to provide insurance and smaller shops will have to cut
someplace. When I was young and healthy I preferred having a job and a
choice rather then no job no choice.

Wouldn't this be a place where a state-subsidy plan to help small businesses
afford an insurance plan be effective?

-- 
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
 
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)

-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 11:55 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

Yes a gamble but the odds were in my favor. Except for all my near
death experiences skiing, rock climbing and surfing. I always assumed
it was all or nothing, dead or still walking.

As for affording it, I'm talking about many jobs going away because
business have to provide insurance and smaller shops will have to cut
someplace. When I was young and healthy I preferred having a job and a
choice rather then no job no choice.


On Feb 7, 2008 6:47 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And I know quite a few people under the age of 35 who had serious
injuries,
 illnesses, surgeries etc. Age has nothing to do with the need for
insurance
 in this day and age. Gone are the days that a doctor or a hospital will
take
 a hen or a basket of eggs in exchange for services.

 So the statement: People don't need or want it, is simply a risk taker
 gambling.

 I gamble every single day myself. But if I could afford it, I'd pay it in
a
 heartbeat. Soon, soon. Business is getting better :)





~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253773
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Scott Stewart
I dunno, It just seemed like a reasonable solution.

I'd like to see a state level pool to help businesses afford to provide
health insurance.

-- 
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
 
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)

-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 12:21 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

That's not what he's proposing is it?

Employer Contribution:
Employers that do not offer or make a meaningful contribution to the
cost of quality health coverage for their employees will be required
to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the costs of the national
plan. Small employers that meet certain revenue thresholds will be
exempt.

I'm getting from this that the government is adding business payroll
tax unless you're business is operating at the poverty level.

Isn't this the same as HC's mandatory insurance plan?


On Feb 8, 2008 9:10 AM, Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wouldn't this be a place where a state-subsidy plan to help small
businesses
 afford an insurance plan be effective?



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253777
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Sam
Yes a gamble but the odds were in my favor. Except for all my near
death experiences skiing, rock climbing and surfing. I always assumed
it was all or nothing, dead or still walking.

As for affording it, I'm talking about many jobs going away because
business have to provide insurance and smaller shops will have to cut
someplace. When I was young and healthy I preferred having a job and a
choice rather then no job no choice.


On Feb 7, 2008 6:47 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And I know quite a few people under the age of 35 who had serious injuries,
 illnesses, surgeries etc. Age has nothing to do with the need for insurance
 in this day and age. Gone are the days that a doctor or a hospital will take
 a hen or a basket of eggs in exchange for services.

 So the statement: People don't need or want it, is simply a risk taker
 gambling.

 I gamble every single day myself. But if I could afford it, I'd pay it in a
 heartbeat. Soon, soon. Business is getting better :)



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253769
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Sam
That's different and could be good.
I guess I could read his document but I was hoping someone else would,
like maybe a die hard supporter :)

I still prefer Bush's plan but would like to know more about the Hilbama plans.


On Feb 8, 2008 9:25 AM, Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I dunno, It just seemed like a reasonable solution.

 I'd like to see a state level pool to help businesses afford to provide
 health insurance.


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253779
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread G Money
Really?

I had never heard a (credible) personal testimonial that marijuana was the
BEST solution for any particular ailment.

On Feb 8, 2008 3:54 AM, Maureen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 That's because you don't need it.  And as for the comment that the
 medicinal effects can be replicated or surpassed, that's pure BS.

 Without going into too much personal detail, I will say that over the
 last year of fighting stomach cancer, and having the docs try
 everything to relieve the nausea and pain to no avail,  I am very glad
 I live in California.

 On Feb 7, 2008 10:06 AM, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What's the impetus for medical marijuana? Very few doctors prescribe it,
  because it's medicinal affects are easily replicated and surpassed with
  other drugs that don't have any of the negative side affects.
 
  I have a soft spot for the wacky too, but medicinal marijuana just
 doesn't
  make any sense to me.
 
  On Feb 7, 2008 11:58 AM, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   barack is at least on the fence for med marijuana and states rights.
  
   thats a plus.
  
   states rights!
  
   tw

 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253767
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
What's the impetus for medical marijuana? Very few doctors prescribe it,
because it's medicinal affects are easily replicated and surpassed with
other drugs that don't have any of the negative side affects.

Hhm, not so sure about that...it's one of the most effective anti-emetics and 
thus very useful in pain treatment of people particularly with end-stage 
disease. I have chronic pain issues, and I can tell you it's a frustrating 
situation when you have a choice between suffering with the pain or taking pain 
meds that you know will make you sick to your stomach or have severe cramps, 
etc. I've never tried marijuana (nor would I be likely to) but I do understand 
people wanting the option to use it when nothing else works. They just need to 
regulate the use of it better...which frankly goes for all narcotics...way too 
easy to abuse any of them, get scripts from multiple doctors, etc. 

Another somewhat related issue is industrial hemp...a crop that could do a 
great deal to help farmers and our struggling economy. We're the only 
industrial nation that does not produce hemp, and it's time for that to be 
corrected. 



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253787
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Todd
As a side note, saw this on Digg about a week ago.  It's more fascinating 
than anything I imagined on my own.

http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2003/12/22/whyIsMarijuanaIllegal.html

- Original Message - 
From: G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary


 On Feb 8, 2008 2:23 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hhm, not so sure about that...it's one of the most effective anti-emetics
 and thus very useful in pain treatment of people particularly with 
 end-stage
 disease. I have chronic pain issues, and I can tell you it's a 
 frustrating
 situation when you have a choice between suffering with the pain or 
 taking
 pain meds that you know will make you sick to your stomach or have severe
 cramps, etc. I've never tried marijuana (nor would I be likely to) but I 
 do
 understand people wanting the option to use it when nothing else works. 
 They
 just need to regulate the use of it better...which frankly goes for all
 narcotics...way too easy to abuse any of them, get scripts from multiple
 doctors, etc.


 That is what Maureen is saying as well. I had heard at one point they had
 engineered some marijuana that retained many of the medicinal qualities of
 the plant, without the THC high.

 I had read several doctor's reports where they suggested that other
 medicines were preferred to marijuana in just about every instance. They
 seemed to suggest patients who said otherwise were at least partly
 interested in the other affects of marijuana.

 I guess I'm up in the air after listening to you and Maureen... 


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253791
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Rastafari
it helps with RLS, i can say that for shizzle.

tw

On Feb 8, 2008 3:43 PM, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2008 2:23 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hhm, not so sure about that...it's one of the most effective anti-emetics
  and thus very useful in pain treatment of people particularly with end-stage
  disease. I have chronic pain issues, and I can tell you it's a frustrating
  situation when you have a choice between suffering with the pain or taking
  pain meds that you know will make you sick to your stomach or have severe
  cramps, etc. I've never tried marijuana (nor would I be likely to) but I do
  understand people wanting the option to use it when nothing else works. They
  just need to regulate the use of it better...which frankly goes for all
  narcotics...way too easy to abuse any of them, get scripts from multiple
  doctors, etc.


 That is what Maureen is saying as well. I had heard at one point they had
 engineered some marijuana that retained many of the medicinal qualities of
 the plant, without the THC high.

 I had read several doctor's reports where they suggested that other
 medicines were preferred to marijuana in just about every instance. They
 seemed to suggest patients who said otherwise were at least partly
 interested in the other affects of marijuana.

 I guess I'm up in the air after listening to you and Maureen...

 --
 It was dark all around
 There was frost on the ground
 When the Tigers broke free


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253790
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread G Money
On Feb 8, 2008 2:23 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hhm, not so sure about that...it's one of the most effective anti-emetics
 and thus very useful in pain treatment of people particularly with end-stage
 disease. I have chronic pain issues, and I can tell you it's a frustrating
 situation when you have a choice between suffering with the pain or taking
 pain meds that you know will make you sick to your stomach or have severe
 cramps, etc. I've never tried marijuana (nor would I be likely to) but I do
 understand people wanting the option to use it when nothing else works. They
 just need to regulate the use of it better...which frankly goes for all
 narcotics...way too easy to abuse any of them, get scripts from multiple
 doctors, etc.


That is what Maureen is saying as well. I had heard at one point they had
engineered some marijuana that retained many of the medicinal qualities of
the plant, without the THC high.

I had read several doctor's reports where they suggested that other
medicines were preferred to marijuana in just about every instance. They
seemed to suggest patients who said otherwise were at least partly
interested in the other affects of marijuana.

I guess I'm up in the air after listening to you and Maureen...

-- 
It was dark all around
There was frost on the ground
When the Tigers broke free


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253789
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Tony
this is 100% absurd.
i hope that we could have used hemp
all along for fuel, etc, and the idiots who
run our government find out that their
moronic asses COULDA used it all along
etc etc etc, i will laugh, for sure.

tw

On Feb 8, 2008 3:23 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Another somewhat related issue is industrial hemp...a crop that could do a 
 great deal to help farmers and our struggling economy. We're the only 
 industrial nation that does not produce hemp, and it's time for  that to be 
 corrected.

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253788
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread G Money
There is a first time for everything.and this is the first time i'm in
100% agreement with Maureen.

Exactly right on all counts.

On Feb 8, 2008 4:03 AM, Maureen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Here are the major problems with any health care plan.

 1. The outrageous profiteering of the insurance industry.
 2. The outrageous profiteering of the health care industry
 3.  The lobbying of congress by said industries to make sure their
 profit machine does not go away.
 4.  The level of fraud infesting both  industries when dealing with
 the consumer and with government programs.
 5. Any proposed program would create a bureaucracy that would cost
 more than the health care costs

 Until you fix those, any universal health care program will fail.  In
 fact, if those problems aren't addressed soon, the existing health
 care system is going to collapse under its own weight.

 I've spent most of my 30 plus year career writing software and doing
 management consulting in the insurance and health care industries.
 Both of them are rotten to the core.  Throwing more money at the
 problem is never going to fix it.  It will just fatten the sharks.



 On Feb 7, 2008 10:18 AM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Just curious, 2 questions:
 
  How should health care be handled in your view?
  Do you currently have health benefits where you work? Or does your wife?
 
 
  On 2/7/08, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
   Since Shawna did a good job of simplifying where Obama and Hillary
 differ
   on
   the (awful) idea of universal health care, let me just say that I hate
   Hillary's plan even more than Obama's.
  
 
 
 

 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253757
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Scott Stewart
From what I understand, it's main uses are as a: 

Appetite stimulant for those with AIDS and other disorders that kill
appetite

Anti nausea for chemo patients

Anti seizure medication

Hemp has a thousand uses in textiles and paper.



-- 
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
 
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)

-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:14 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

My mom admits to wishing she'd scored some when she was in chemo.  None 
of the available anti-nausea drugs helped, but marijuana is supposed to 
be amazing for that.  For the record:  Mom barely drinks (half a glass 
of wine, 3 nights a week when she's on a tear), rarely uses anything but 
her anti-cancer drugs, tylenol, and zinc for colds, and doesn't smoke.

--Doom

G Money wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2008 2:23 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hhm, not so sure about that...it's one of the most effective anti-emetics
 and thus very useful in pain treatment of people particularly with
end-stage
 disease. I have chronic pain issues, and I can tell you it's a
frustrating
 situation when you have a choice between suffering with the pain or
taking
 pain meds that you know will make you sick to your stomach or have severe
 cramps, etc. I've never tried marijuana (nor would I be likely to) but I
do
 understand people wanting the option to use it when nothing else works.
They
 just need to regulate the use of it better...which frankly goes for all
 narcotics...way too easy to abuse any of them, get scripts from multiple
 doctors, etc.
 
 
 That is what Maureen is saying as well. I had heard at one point they had
 engineered some marijuana that retained many of the medicinal qualities of
 the plant, without the THC high.
 
 I had read several doctor's reports where they suggested that other
 medicines were preferred to marijuana in just about every instance. They
 seemed to suggest patients who said otherwise were at least partly
 interested in the other affects of marijuana.
 
 I guess I'm up in the air after listening to you and Maureen...
 




~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253793
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Ben Doom
My mom admits to wishing she'd scored some when she was in chemo.  None 
of the available anti-nausea drugs helped, but marijuana is supposed to 
be amazing for that.  For the record:  Mom barely drinks (half a glass 
of wine, 3 nights a week when she's on a tear), rarely uses anything but 
her anti-cancer drugs, tylenol, and zinc for colds, and doesn't smoke.

--Doom

G Money wrote:
 On Feb 8, 2008 2:23 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hhm, not so sure about that...it's one of the most effective anti-emetics
 and thus very useful in pain treatment of people particularly with end-stage
 disease. I have chronic pain issues, and I can tell you it's a frustrating
 situation when you have a choice between suffering with the pain or taking
 pain meds that you know will make you sick to your stomach or have severe
 cramps, etc. I've never tried marijuana (nor would I be likely to) but I do
 understand people wanting the option to use it when nothing else works. They
 just need to regulate the use of it better...which frankly goes for all
 narcotics...way too easy to abuse any of them, get scripts from multiple
 doctors, etc.
 
 
 That is what Maureen is saying as well. I had heard at one point they had
 engineered some marijuana that retained many of the medicinal qualities of
 the plant, without the THC high.
 
 I had read several doctor's reports where they suggested that other
 medicines were preferred to marijuana in just about every instance. They
 seemed to suggest patients who said otherwise were at least partly
 interested in the other affects of marijuana.
 
 I guess I'm up in the air after listening to you and Maureen...
 


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253792
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Billy Cox
Those in favor of legalizing marijuana for medical use would be smart to
stop using the street name for the drug. Language is very powerful in
shaping opinions. 



-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:55 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary


That's because you don't need it.  And as for the comment that the medicinal
effects can be replicated or surpassed, that's pure BS.

Without going into too much personal detail, I will say that over the last
year of fighting stomach cancer, and having the docs try everything to
relieve the nausea and pain to no avail,  I am very glad I live in
California.

On Feb 7, 2008 10:06 AM, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What's the impetus for medical marijuana? Very few doctors prescribe 
 it, because it's medicinal affects are easily replicated and surpassed 
 with other drugs that don't have any of the negative side affects.

 I have a soft spot for the wacky too, but medicinal marijuana just 
 doesn't make any sense to me.

 On Feb 7, 2008 11:58 AM, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  barack is at least on the fence for med marijuana and states rights.
 
  thats a plus.
 
  states rights!
 
  tw



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253762
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
That's even worse than I could ever fathom, and inexcusable.
And precisely why someone needs to step in and do something...

It's amazing how bad it has gotten so quickly. Health problems are now the 
number one cause of bankruptcy...and that's among people that *have* health 
insurance. Costs for the self-insured are rising so fast that more and more 
can't afford if (if they are even able to get coverage) and if you get sick at 
all you can expect your premium to shoot up the following year (mine went up by 
about $400 this year due to one trip to the emergency room last year...my only 
medical expense last year other than one or two normal wellness visits.) You 
hear more and more stories of people denied coverage for important tests or 
treatments, and people that can't afford the medicine due to the overwhelming 
cost of prescription drugs. I personally suffer with reflux and should be on 
one of the newer drugs but the cost is about $100/month for me, so make due 
with Prilosec even though it's no longer effective for me. Likewise my eye 
doctor would like me to try Restasis for dry eye...that one was $200 for a 
month supply! I'll make due with eye drops, thank you. These aren't the kinds 
of sacrifices well-employed, middle-class people should have to make, but we 
do. The American Dream is rapidly moving out of reach for all but a very few. 



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253795
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Loathe
and those of us that think it's gay that pot is taboo but booze and 
smokes are fine?

Billy Cox wrote:
 Those in favor of legalizing marijuana for medical use would be smart to
 stop using the street name for the drug. Language is very powerful in
 shaping opinions. 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:55 AM
 To: CF-Community
 Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary
 
 
 That's because you don't need it.  And as for the comment that the medicinal
 effects can be replicated or surpassed, that's pure BS.
 
 Without going into too much personal detail, I will say that over the last
 year of fighting stomach cancer, and having the docs try everything to
 relieve the nausea and pain to no avail,  I am very glad I live in
 California.
 
 On Feb 7, 2008 10:06 AM, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What's the impetus for medical marijuana? Very few doctors prescribe 
 it, because it's medicinal affects are easily replicated and surpassed 
 with other drugs that don't have any of the negative side affects.

 I have a soft spot for the wacky too, but medicinal marijuana just 
 doesn't make any sense to me.

 On Feb 7, 2008 11:58 AM, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 barack is at least on the fence for med marijuana and states rights.

 thats a plus.

 states rights!

 tw
 
 
 
 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253807
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread morchella
did some one say gay  pot is fine?


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253808
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Loathe
no

morchella wrote:
 did some one say gay  pot is fine?
 
 
 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253809
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Dana
I'd like to mention that I spent a week in the hospital, after
surgery, because a cat scratched me. It happened to have some sort of
bizarre flesh-eating bacteria on its claw. The bill for that, had I
not had coverage, could have been in the $15,000 range and that does
not include tthe surgery and the CAT scan they did because they
thought I might be getting a blood clot. There's a random five-figure
medical bill for you

On Feb 7, 2008 7:47 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 And I know quite a few people under the age of 35 who had serious injuries,
 illnesses, surgeries etc. Age has nothing to do with the need for insurance
 in this day and age. Gone are the days that a doctor or a hospital will take
 a hen or a basket of eggs in exchange for services.

 So the statement: People don't need or want it, is simply a risk taker
 gambling.

 I gamble every single day myself. But if I could afford it, I'd pay it in a
 heartbeat. Soon, soon. Business is getting better :)


 On 2/7/08, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I never had insurance until I was 35.
  Same goes for many people I know.
  It would have sucked if I needed it but decided to take the risk.
 
 
  On Feb 7, 2008 3:15 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   So they are rich enough to pay for any medical expenses out of their own
   pocketes?
  
   Including cancer care or major illnesses or catastrophic events like
   accidentally cutting off an arm or breaking a major bone or two? I'm
  talking
   about care that runs in the thousands and thousands. Not an annual
  physical
   or an ocassional run to the doctor for the flu or a sore throat.
  
 
 

 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253810
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-08 Thread Dana
I take Nexium, yeah, it is about $180 for a month's supply, and that
is at WalMart. With coverage, I am still paying 30, which I cough up
because the consequences of not taking it scare me.

On Feb 8, 2008 5:24 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That's even worse than I could ever fathom, and inexcusable.
 And precisely why someone needs to step in and do something...

 It's amazing how bad it has gotten so quickly. Health problems are now the 
 number one cause of bankruptcy...and that's among people that *have* health 
 insurance. Costs for the self-insured are rising so fast that more and more 
 can't afford if (if they are even able to get coverage) and if you get sick 
 at all you can expect your premium to shoot up the following year (mine went 
 up by about $400 this year due to one trip to the emergency room last 
 year...my only medical expense last year other than one or two normal 
 wellness visits.) You hear more and more stories of people denied coverage 
 for important tests or treatments, and people that can't afford the medicine 
 due to the overwhelming cost of prescription drugs. I personally suffer with 
 reflux and should be on one of the newer drugs but the cost is about 
 $100/month for me, so make due with Prilosec even though it's no longer 
 effective for me. Likewise my eye doctor would like me to try Restasis for 
 dry eye...that one was $200 for a month supply! I'll make due with eye drops, 
 thank you. These aren't the kinds of sacrifices well-employed, middle-class 
 people should have to make, but we do. The American Dream is rapidly moving 
 out of reach for all but a very few.



 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253811
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread William Bowen
 I want to see things actually get done. Hillary has too much baggage with
 the GOP to be an effective president. It's unfortunate...

Exactly.

-- 
will

If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable.
- Carrie Fisher

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253674
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread morchella
see Obama is rather tall and skinny, he is also a male.
on the other hand Hillary is a little shorter and rounder, she also has dyed
hair..


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253688
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread G Money
Two other differences that stick out to me:

1) The war on terror and Iraq. Hillary seems more willing to be pro-active
and commit US military forces to the fight.

2) Charisma. Obama has a lot of it.Hillary does not have near the
charisma that her hubby has.

Since Shawna did a good job of simplifying where Obama and Hillary differ on
the (awful) idea of universal health care, let me just say that I hate
Hillary's plan even more than Obama's.

On Feb 7, 2008 11:25 AM, Shawna Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 You're pretty correct in the sense that they are similar on most things.

 The biggest difference for me (strictly speaking on issues) is each
 candidate's take on universal health care.

 Hillary wants mandated health care. You would be required to get health
 insurance, like you are required to get auto insurance, whether you need
 it,
 want it or can afford it.

 Obama will create a national health plan similar to the plan enjoyed by
 members of Congress, making insurance available to and affordable for
 everyone, but won't require people to get it (except he does want to
 require
 health coverage for children).

 Here's a good FAQ about Obama's plan:

 http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/Obama08_HealthcareFAQ.pdf


 -Original Message-
 From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:01 AM
 To: CF-Community
 Subject: Differences between Obama and Hillary

 Felt this warranted a different thread so those of you who know more than
 me
 can educate me.

 I was looking over the bullet point list of issues for Obama and Hillary.
 To
 me, both of them, are really alike on most issues. There's obviously a few
 small points here and there that they differ, like perhaps where money
 might
 come from to fund certain programs, like healthcare, but overall I find
 them
 pretty similar in thinking.

 Again, is this my naivete on not really understanding some of the
 political
 jargon or is this really the case?

 IMO, I would like Hillary to get the nod, but I'm just as ecstactic for
 Obama to get the nod. I just want a change in goverment and a change for
 this country. I would think an O/H or H/O ticket might be pretty
 interesting, because if it is public support that will get things done,
 how does it get any better than that?




 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253678
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread William Bowen
 Since Shawna did a good job of simplifying where Obama and Hillary differ on
 the (awful) idea of universal health care, let me just say that I hate
 Hillary's plan even more than Obama's.

Obama's at least isn't mandatory. And I like that. I don't think that
government should mandate health care, but it doesn't seem that the
Medical and insurance industries are interested in keeping healthcare
affordable..


-- 
will

If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable.
- Carrie Fisher

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253696
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Erika L. Walker
Just curious, 2 questions:

How should health care be handled in your view?
Do you currently have health benefits where you work? Or does your wife?


On 2/7/08, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Since Shawna did a good job of simplifying where Obama and Hillary differ
 on
 the (awful) idea of universal health care, let me just say that I hate
 Hillary's plan even more than Obama's.



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253689
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Jerry Johnson
I cannot quite articulate why Hillary Clinton bugs me so much, but she does.

So much so that the latest McCain news has me breathing easier.

Even if Hillary is selected by the Democrats, I have someone else I
can vote for.

I've never mentioned my voting intentions pre-election before, since
it may change right up to vote day, but here is where my thinking is
now.

An Obama-McCain matchup is still not 100% defined in my mind. Leaning
towards Obama, but still on the fence.

Clinton-McCain is a no brainer. McCain.

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253702
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Shawna Hampton
One more difference between the two candidates, as illustrated here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/7/101110/2068/766/451817

There's been a lot of excitement on DailyKos about the Obama movement,
coupled with some detractors out there saying Obama is all style and no
substance.  My response to that is to look at ethics reform, an issue no one
should scoff at as corruption was the #1 reason Congress changed hands in
2006.  It just so happens that Barack Obama played a big role in getting
ethics reform done.  Not only that, I would like to focus on some key votes
which show like night and day, the difference between Obama and Clinton.
Obama had to log some courageous votes that amounted to rebellion against
the Democratic leadership -- Reid and Durbin -- while Hillary Clinton chose
not to rock the boat.


-Original Message-
From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

 Since Shawna did a good job of simplifying where Obama and Hillary differ
on
 the (awful) idea of universal health care, let me just say that I hate
 Hillary's plan even more than Obama's.

Obama's at least isn't mandatory. And I like that. I don't think that
government should mandate health care, but it doesn't seem that the
Medical and insurance industries are interested in keeping healthcare
affordable..


-- 
will

If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable.
- Carrie Fisher



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253701
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread G Money
On Feb 7, 2008 12:18 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 How should health care be handled in your view?


I don't really know. That is such an enormous question. What I DO know is
that:

1) Health insurance is a scam
2) The government never makes things better
3) Competition is usually the best way to make things affordable

Universal health care encapsulates the first two, and eliminates the last
oneyikes.



 Do you currently have health benefits where you work? Or does your wife?


Yes. Every paycheck, a chunk of my money is paid out to health insurance.
That money goes into a big old pot of money that is salivated over by the
insurance companies and the health care providers.

They look at this big old pot of money, and decide how much of it they can
get, and how they are going to split it up. The medical provider then
charges 10X what he might otherwise charge, and the health insurance covers
about 60% of that. Then they send me the paper work. Here's the result:

1) Medical provider charged 10x what he would otherwise charged, and made 6x
what he would have otherwise made
2) Insurance company paid out the agreed upon amount to the doctor, which
ensured that they would clear a hefty profit (whatever margin they decided
they could gain from the big ole pot of money)
3) I am sent a bill with a RIDICULOUS price quoted by my doctor. Then I see
that my insurance company paid 60% of it...and that silly doctor accepted
it Wow!!! I can't believe I saved that much money!!! Hooray insurance!!!

Rich doctor, rich insurance company, oblivious customerbent over
backwards and butt rapedand none the wiser.

-- 
It was dark all around
There was frost on the ground
When the Tigers broke free


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253718
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Scott Stewart
I'm afraid that McCain will continue to abandon his centrist stance in order
to get the GOP nod.

-- 
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
 
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)

-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 2:17 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

I cannot quite articulate why Hillary Clinton bugs me so much, but she does.

So much so that the latest McCain news has me breathing easier.

Even if Hillary is selected by the Democrats, I have someone else I
can vote for.

I've never mentioned my voting intentions pre-election before, since
it may change right up to vote day, but here is where my thinking is
now.

An Obama-McCain matchup is still not 100% defined in my mind. Leaning
towards Obama, but still on the fence.

Clinton-McCain is a no brainer. McCain.



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253709
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Tony
barack is at least on the fence for med marijuana and states rights.

thats a plus.

states rights!

tw

On Feb 7, 2008 12:30 PM, Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 One difference is that Hillary is much more polarizing, she's been in the
 GOP's crosshairs since she became a senator. I fear that a Hillary
 presidency will unleash a lot of the same stonewalling and issue distraction
 that Bill's presidency did.

 I want to see things actually get done. Hillary has too much baggage with
 the GOP to be an effective president. It's unfortunate...

 --
 Scott Stewart
 ColdFusion Developer

 SSTWebworks
 4405 Oakshyre Way
 Raleigh, NC. 27616
 (919) 874-6229 (home)
 (703) 220-2835 (cell)
 -Original Message-
 From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:01 PM
 To: CF-Community
 Subject: Differences between Obama and Hillary

 Felt this warranted a different thread so those of you who know more than me
 can educate me.

 I was looking over the bullet point list of issues for Obama and Hillary. To
 me, both of them, are really alike on most issues. There's obviously a few
 small points here and there that they differ, like perhaps where money might
 come from to fund certain programs, like healthcare, but overall I find them
 pretty similar in thinking.

 Again, is this my naivete on not really understanding some of the political
 jargon or is this really the case?

 IMO, I would like Hillary to get the nod, but I'm just as ecstactic for
 Obama to get the nod. I just want a change in goverment and a change for
 this country. I would think an O/H or H/O ticket might be pretty
 interesting, because if it is public support that will get things done,
 how does it get any better than that?




 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253677
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Scott Stewart
One difference is that Hillary is much more polarizing, she's been in the
GOP's crosshairs since she became a senator. I fear that a Hillary
presidency will unleash a lot of the same stonewalling and issue distraction
that Bill's presidency did.

I want to see things actually get done. Hillary has too much baggage with
the GOP to be an effective president. It's unfortunate...

-- 
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
 
SSTWebworks
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC. 27616
(919) 874-6229 (home)
(703) 220-2835 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 12:01 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Differences between Obama and Hillary

Felt this warranted a different thread so those of you who know more than me
can educate me.

I was looking over the bullet point list of issues for Obama and Hillary. To
me, both of them, are really alike on most issues. There's obviously a few
small points here and there that they differ, like perhaps where money might
come from to fund certain programs, like healthcare, but overall I find them
pretty similar in thinking.

Again, is this my naivete on not really understanding some of the political
jargon or is this really the case?

IMO, I would like Hillary to get the nod, but I'm just as ecstactic for
Obama to get the nod. I just want a change in goverment and a change for
this country. I would think an O/H or H/O ticket might be pretty
interesting, because if it is public support that will get things done,
how does it get any better than that?




~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253663
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Shawna Hampton
You're pretty correct in the sense that they are similar on most things.

The biggest difference for me (strictly speaking on issues) is each
candidate's take on universal health care.

Hillary wants mandated health care. You would be required to get health
insurance, like you are required to get auto insurance, whether you need it,
want it or can afford it.

Obama will create a national health plan similar to the plan enjoyed by
members of Congress, making insurance available to and affordable for
everyone, but won't require people to get it (except he does want to require
health coverage for children). 

Here's a good FAQ about Obama's plan:

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/Obama08_HealthcareFAQ.pdf


-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:01 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Differences between Obama and Hillary

Felt this warranted a different thread so those of you who know more than me
can educate me.

I was looking over the bullet point list of issues for Obama and Hillary. To
me, both of them, are really alike on most issues. There's obviously a few
small points here and there that they differ, like perhaps where money might
come from to fund certain programs, like healthcare, but overall I find them
pretty similar in thinking.

Again, is this my naivete on not really understanding some of the political
jargon or is this really the case?

IMO, I would like Hillary to get the nod, but I'm just as ecstactic for
Obama to get the nod. I just want a change in goverment and a change for
this country. I would think an O/H or H/O ticket might be pretty
interesting, because if it is public support that will get things done,
how does it get any better than that?




~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253661
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Tony
one of them has to drop their ego and allow the other to be top
dog... and i dont think we will see that until the primaries shake themselves
out a bit more...

looks like maryland is going to be a nice little battleground state and
there have been whispers of an obama appearance 30 miles from me...
sunday afternoon... im going to go, but will leave if he aint comin'

tw

On Feb 7, 2008 12:00 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Felt this warranted a different thread so those of you who know more than me
 can educate me.

 I was looking over the bullet point list of issues for Obama and Hillary. To
 me, both of them, are really alike on most issues. There's obviously a few
 small points here and there that they differ, like perhaps where money might
 come from to fund certain programs, like healthcare, but overall I find them
 pretty similar in thinking.

 Again, is this my naivete on not really understanding some of the political
 jargon or is this really the case?

 IMO, I would like Hillary to get the nod, but I'm just as ecstactic for
 Obama to get the nod. I just want a change in goverment and a change for
 this country. I would think an O/H or H/O ticket might be pretty
 interesting, because if it is public support that will get things done,
 how does it get any better than that?


 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253656
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Erika L. Walker
Felt this warranted a different thread so those of you who know more than me
can educate me.

I was looking over the bullet point list of issues for Obama and Hillary. To
me, both of them, are really alike on most issues. There's obviously a few
small points here and there that they differ, like perhaps where money might
come from to fund certain programs, like healthcare, but overall I find them
pretty similar in thinking.

Again, is this my naivete on not really understanding some of the political
jargon or is this really the case?

IMO, I would like Hillary to get the nod, but I'm just as ecstactic for
Obama to get the nod. I just want a change in goverment and a change for
this country. I would think an O/H or H/O ticket might be pretty
interesting, because if it is public support that will get things done,
how does it get any better than that?


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253653
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread G Money
What's the impetus for medical marijuana? Very few doctors prescribe it,
because it's medicinal affects are easily replicated and surpassed with
other drugs that don't have any of the negative side affects.

I have a soft spot for the wacky too, but medicinal marijuana just doesn't
make any sense to me.

On Feb 7, 2008 11:58 AM, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 barack is at least on the fence for med marijuana and states rights.

 thats a plus.

 states rights!

 tw



-- 
It was dark all around
There was frost on the ground
When the Tigers broke free


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253680
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread morgan l
On Feb 7, 2008 2:43 PM, G Money  wrote:

 I don't really know. That is such an enormous question. What I DO know is
 that:

 1) Health insurance is a scam
 2) The government never makes things better
 3) Competition is usually the best way to make things affordable

 Universal health care encapsulates the first two, and eliminates the last
 oneyikes.


I'm no expert, certainly, but my layperson's perusal of Obama's plan hardly
meets with that definition of Universal health care. If I read it right,
his plan would actually increase competition by allowing everyone the choice
of their employer's coverage, or the equivalent of federal employee's
coverage. If your employer's offered coverage is too expensive for too
little coverage, and the fed plan is better, pick the fed plan. The idea is
to drive down those prices by increasing availability and options.

Will it work? I don't know. It sounds like a good start, at least. The tax
deduction and tax credit plans I've seen from other candidates don't exactly
sound better, except that they play on the claim to reduce taxes.


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253722
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Erika L. Walker
Agreed, doctor's, pharmaceutical companies and the government make
affordable healthcare almost a fairytale dream.
But: we all need healthcare. And the system, being what it is and has been
for too many years, isn't going to change in the immediate future. It is sad
that it seems like a total scam.

However, anger over the process doesn't make for a good discussion.

A scenario if I may.

I know for a fact that a colonoscopy, which everyone over the age of 50, and
probably some before that, typically costs between $5,000 and $8,000, more
if biopsy's and cycts need to be removed. I don't care if it's inflated or
not, that's what it typically costs. Your average, middle income 51
year-old-man, getting by, pay check to pay check, without health insurance
because either his job doesn't offer it, or he's self employed, or whatever
reason exists for him to NOT have health insurance, cannot afford a $5-8,000
scope to ensure he doesn't have cancer.

Said man celebrates his 56th birthday, same financial situation, same health
care scenario, suddenly gets ill. Ignores it for awhile until pain is so
severe he can no longer not go to the emergency room. Fast forward to a week
later, he's been diagnosed with colon cancer. Colon cancer his doc says,
that could of been stopped if he'd had it checked 5 years ago.

Like it or not, this happens EVERY DAY, EVERY WHERE, whether it's colon
cancer, liver cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer or any other cancer or
disease that caught early enough, could of either been prevented or at least
treated and put into remission, etc.

EVERY DAY, EVERY WHERE, there are people who simply cannot afford what you
get to take for granted and be angry over. They cannot afford to be able to
even get a cute little bill, distorted and inflated and disected by
insurance companies and doctors. There's people wishing they could be in
your shoes to get butt raped, because at least when they broke a bone,
instead of an emergency room visit and subsequent doctor's visit running in
the $1,000's, they could at least have a somewhat manageable copay, or
deductible, etc.

You're living in Utopia if you think that the insurance companies will lay
down that segment of the business, and say to all the docotrs, you're on
your own.   Get real.

I'm all for anyone's solution to this problem that will work, and by god, if
a president or congress needs to get involved in at least this, then I hope
they help, because i'm telling you now, the greed of pharmaceutical
companies and the greed of doctors and the greed of insurance companies will
NEVER EVER EVER abate enough for the private sector to come up with a
solution.

And yes, as someone who is self-employed and only BARELY getting by right
now, *I* cannot afford proper healthcare. I barely maintain my thyroid
treatment. I can't even go to a dentist. Even signing up for an Dental HMO,
at $25 a month (very affordable), I need over $3,000 worth of dental work
because a filling cracked between two teeth, and they want to pull both of
them out and give me a root canal and a then a crown.

Damn right this country needs to do SOMETHING to fix healthcare. I don't
know what either, I'm not smart enough to come up with a plan. That's why
I'm not running for president.


On 2/7/08, G Money [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Feb 7, 2008 12:18 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  How should health care be handled in your view?

 I don't really know. That is such an enormous question. What I DO know is
 that:

 1) Health insurance is a scam
 2) The government never makes things better
 3) Competition is usually the best way to make things affordable

 Universal health care encapsulates the first two, and eliminates the last
 oneyikes.


  Do you currently have health benefits where you work? Or does your wife?

 Rich doctor, rich insurance company, oblivious customerbent over
 backwards and butt rapedand none the wiser.


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253724
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Sam
What do you like about it.
I read mandatory care for children, policed by the schools.
Employer mandatory coverage.
Will a small company have to choose between three employees with
coverage or four without?
I'm not sure the president should make that decision. I know plenty of
people that don't need or want insurance.


On Feb 7, 2008 1:57 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I want to see things actually get done. Hillary has too much baggage with
 the GOP to be an effective president. It's unfortunate...

 Yup, that's exactly why many of us are supporting Obama instead. And I do 
 think that for those of us that desperately want and need some kind of 
 universal health care, his plan seems more reasonable and likely to make it 
 past Congress.

 --- Mary Jo


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253730
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Mary Jo Sminkey
I want to see things actually get done. Hillary has too much baggage with
the GOP to be an effective president. It's unfortunate...

Yup, that's exactly why many of us are supporting Obama instead. And I do think 
that for those of us that desperately want and need some kind of universal 
health care, his plan seems more reasonable and likely to make it past 
Congress. 

--- Mary Jo



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253729
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Erika L. Walker
That's even worse than I could ever fathom, and inexcusable.
And precisely why someone needs to step in and do something...

On 2/7/08, Shawna Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 And that's for EMPLOYEES of UHC.

 How f'ed up is THAT?




~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253728
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Erika L. Walker
So they are rich enough to pay for any medical expenses out of their own
pocketes?

Including cancer care or major illnesses or catastrophic events like
accidentally cutting off an arm or breaking a major bone or two? I'm talking
about care that runs in the thousands and thousands. Not an annual physical
or an ocassional run to the doctor for the flu or a sore throat.

..

On 2/7/08, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I know plenty of people that don't need or want insurance.



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253731
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


RE: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Shawna Hampton
And yes, as someone who is self-employed and only BARELY getting by right
now, *I* cannot afford proper healthcare. I barely maintain my thyroid
treatment. I can't even go to a dentist. Even signing up for an Dental HMO,
at $25 a month (very affordable), I need over $3,000 worth of dental work
because a filling cracked between two teeth, and they want to pull both of
them out and give me a root canal and a then a crown.

Damn right this country needs to do SOMETHING to fix healthcare. I don't
know what either, I'm not smart enough to come up with a plan. That's why
I'm not running for president.

Erika, I hear you loud and clear ... my husband WORKS for a division of
United HealthCare and because my prescriptions for my allergies and asthma
are so ridiculously expensive, we can either pay for those or pay for
preventive care (but not both), and god help us if we should have an
emergency room visit or need extensive care for some reason. Every year our
benefits have decreased and our deductibles/premiums have increased. He's
worked there 5 years and we pay about 40% more than we did when he started.

And that's for EMPLOYEES of UHC.

How f'ed up is THAT?



-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 3:12 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

Agreed, doctor's, pharmaceutical companies and the government make
affordable healthcare almost a fairytale dream.
But: we all need healthcare. And the system, being what it is and has been



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253726
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Sam
Hold on now...
The congress changed hands because of Republican corruption, so Obama
voted WITH the Republicans on the ethics bill.

So the only good thing you've listed so far is his supporting the GOP
while he's running on CHANGE.


On Feb 7, 2008 11:08 AM, Shawna Hampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 One more difference between the two candidates, as illustrated here:

 http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/7/101110/2068/766/451817

 There's been a lot of excitement on DailyKos about the Obama movement,
 coupled with some detractors out there saying Obama is all style and no
 substance.  My response to that is to look at ethics reform, an issue no one
 should scoff at as corruption was the #1 reason Congress changed hands in
 2006.  It just so happens that Barack Obama played a big role in getting
 ethics reform done.  Not only that, I would like to focus on some key votes
 which show like night and day, the difference between Obama and Clinton.
 Obama had to log some courageous votes that amounted to rebellion against
 the Democratic leadership -- Reid and Durbin -- while Hillary Clinton chose
 not to rock the boat.



~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253725
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Sam
I never had insurance until I was 35.
Same goes for many people I know.
It would have sucked if I needed it but decided to take the risk.


On Feb 7, 2008 3:15 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So they are rich enough to pay for any medical expenses out of their own
 pocketes?

 Including cancer care or major illnesses or catastrophic events like
 accidentally cutting off an arm or breaking a major bone or two? I'm talking
 about care that runs in the thousands and thousands. Not an annual physical
 or an ocassional run to the doctor for the flu or a sore throat.


~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253738
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Erika L. Walker
And I know quite a few people under the age of 35 who had serious injuries,
illnesses, surgeries etc. Age has nothing to do with the need for insurance
in this day and age. Gone are the days that a doctor or a hospital will take
a hen or a basket of eggs in exchange for services.

So the statement: People don't need or want it, is simply a risk taker
gambling.

I gamble every single day myself. But if I could afford it, I'd pay it in a
heartbeat. Soon, soon. Business is getting better :)


On 2/7/08, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I never had insurance until I was 35.
 Same goes for many people I know.
 It would have sucked if I needed it but decided to take the risk.


 On Feb 7, 2008 3:15 PM, Erika L. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  So they are rich enough to pay for any medical expenses out of their own
  pocketes?
 
  Including cancer care or major illnesses or catastrophic events like
  accidentally cutting off an arm or breaking a major bone or two? I'm
 talking
  about care that runs in the thousands and thousands. Not an annual
 physical
  or an ocassional run to the doctor for the flu or a sore throat.
 

 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253739
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5


Re: Differences between Obama and Hillary

2008-02-07 Thread Bruce Sorge
Same here. Since I took a job in the public sector, I cannot afford 
insurance. Fortunately I don't get sick and I have not had any serious 
injuries. Especially since I rock climb and I ride my quad pretty hard. 
Luckily the only accidents I had on the quad were at Glamis in the nice 
soft sand, otherwise I would be up shit creek. Hopefully my luck will 
hold out until I get back into the Army in a month or so where I get 
free medical and dental.

Bruce
 On 2/7/08, Sam wrote:
   
 I never had insurance until I was 35.
 Same goes for many people I know.
 It would have sucked if I needed it but decided to take the risk.
 

~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253741
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5