Please Help with VLSM [7:9024]
Hi group, Please just throw more light of this. If I have a block of ip address, can I use different subnets for different purposes like this: If my block is 216.73.203.0 1. 216.73.203.0/26 4 Networks, 64 Hosts each 2. 216.73.203.0/27 -- 8 Networks, 32 Hosts each 3. 216.73.203.0/28 -- 16 Networks, 16 Hosts each 4. 216.73.203.0/29 -- 32 Networks, 8 Hosts each 5. 216.73.203.0/30 -- 64 Networks, 4 Hosts each. My desire is to use the item 5 for all my WAN links since it only have 2 valid hosts per network and the rest for other purposes. But my problem is if I have use two same IP-addresses but from different networks (eg one from item 3 and the other from item 4 above) assigned to two different hosts on both ends of a routable network, wouldn't the system response with a conflict/duplication of IP-addresses or give some other kind of error? Eg If, I have this scenerio: Host A = 216.73.203.21 255.255.255.248 (ie a host on network 216.73.203.16/29) Host B = 216.73.203.21 255.255.255.252 (ie another host on network 216.73.203.20/30) Questions: Since both hosts are on both sides of a routable network: 1. Wouldn't there be an IP-address conflict? 2. Wouldn't it be a duplication of IP-address? 3. If I ping 216.72.207.21, which of the two host will reply? OR 4. Is it that I can only variably subnet a block of IP-addresses once, say /29 and use only hosts from that subnet and cannot do another subnetting on that same block when the need arises? These are my questions. How I wish someone can clear this, for it will help myself and many other people in the group. Rgards. Oletu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9024t=9024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTP configuration [7:9025]
I want to config a network that consist about 17 routers. But i dont have a atomic clock Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9025t=9025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cisco 3660 [7:9026]
hi, i have a cisco 3660 router which have problem that it is rebooting again agian but saying that failing all rommon startup test. how can i breack that router . thanx kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9026t=9026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco [7:9027]
compared with 350-001,easier or much the same? Thanks, frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9027t=9027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NTP configuration [7:9025]
Do you have any higher-end routers with the calendar function? (show calendar). This function will keep the clock/date set on reloads. Set this router up as ntp server. If you don't have a router with calendar feature then you can do ntp server on one and point all others to it. When the server reloads you'll need to set clock/date manually again. This won't be as accurate as a real atomic clock but... I guess the real question is, how important is time to you? --- Cjack wrote: I want to config a network that consist about 17 routers. But i dont have a atomic clock __ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9028t=9025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pdl error [7:9029]
hi I have 3660 router which is reboting again by givin error of pdal file errors Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9029t=9029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NTP configuration [7:9025]
Hie There are # of public NTP servers . You can get pointers from here http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.htm bosire Cjack wrote: I want to config a network that consist about 17 routers. But i dont have a atomic clock -- ___ +$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$;'+$;%+$ richard bosire ccn[ap], ccd[ap], ccs[ae] UUnet Africa http://www.uunet.co.ke Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9030t=9025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARP [7:9031]
What configuration is to be done if the router (2600) ARP request is unable to determine the mac-address of the DHCP servers, whose IP address are already present as IP helper-address? On the show ARP command the hardware address states in-complete. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9031t=9031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ARP [7:9031]
Have you tried pinging one of the IP helper addresses? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9032t=9031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pdl error [7:9029]
Can you send us the logs pls? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9034t=9029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please Help with VLSM [7:9024]
I believe you can do that, if you enable subnet zero, and there won't be any address conflict because the subnet masks are different. But, you will not get the number of subnets and hosts that you have specified. This is because each time you subnet, you use up one address from the block you are subnetting from - hierachical thing. I would personally reserve bits from the assigned prefix block, and use those reserved addresses for further subnetting. That way you will not get into the pitfall where a network address is also a host address. CM -Original Message- From: Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19/06/01 07:52 Subject: Please Help with VLSM [7:9024] Hi group, Please just throw more light of this. If I have a block of ip address, can I use different subnets for different purposes like this: If my block is 216.73.203.0 1. 216.73.203.0/26 4 Networks, 64 Hosts each 2. 216.73.203.0/27 -- 8 Networks, 32 Hosts each 3. 216.73.203.0/28 -- 16 Networks, 16 Hosts each 4. 216.73.203.0/29 -- 32 Networks, 8 Hosts each 5. 216.73.203.0/30 -- 64 Networks, 4 Hosts each. My desire is to use the item 5 for all my WAN links since it only have 2 valid hosts per network and the rest for other purposes. But my problem is if I have use two same IP-addresses but from different networks (eg one from item 3 and the other from item 4 above) assigned to two different hosts on both ends of a routable network, wouldn't the system response with a conflict/duplication of IP-addresses or give some other kind of error? Eg If, I have this scenerio: Host A = 216.73.203.21 255.255.255.248 (ie a host on network 216.73.203.16/29) Host B = 216.73.203.21 255.255.255.252 (ie another host on network 216.73.203.20/30) Questions: Since both hosts are on both sides of a routable network: 1. Wouldn't there be an IP-address conflict? 2. Wouldn't it be a duplication of IP-address? 3. If I ping 216.72.207.21, which of the two host will reply? OR 4. Is it that I can only variably subnet a block of IP-addresses once, say /29 and use only hosts from that subnet and cannot do another subnetting on that same block when the need arises? These are my questions. How I wish someone can clear this, for it will help myself and many other people in the group. Rgards. Oletu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9033t=9024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please Help with VLSM [7:9024]
1. The command is ip subnet-zero. It is a global config command, and can be enabled on any router. This is generally not advised, due to inherent confusion between subnet and network addresses. 2. Starting with the block 216.73.203.0/24, reserve 2 bits from the host portion, this will give you 2 new subnets (ignoring the all zeroes, and all ones) - 216.73.203.64/26, and 216.73.203.128/26. Repeat the same process, again using 2 bits from the host portion (you can use 1 bit if you like). The block, 216.73.203.64/26 will yield the subnets - 216.73.203.80/28 and 216.73.203.96/28. The other block, 216.73.203.128/26 will yield the subnets - 216.73.203.144/28 and 216.73.203.160/28. Repeat the same process to get /30 subnets. Please note that you can use any number of bits, and you can also use the first and last subnets of all subsequent blocks. Do not use the first subnet (all zeroes) of the main block (216.73.203.0), for the issue already pointed out. Hope this helps. CM -Original Message- From: Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. To: Charles Manafa Sent: 19/06/01 09:31 Subject: Re: Please Help with VLSM [7:9024] Thanks a lot Charles, I did understand your point, however two key questions are really begging for your answer: 1. How and where do I enable network zero (is it on the Core Routers, Distribution Routers or the Access layer Router)? 2. How do I carry out the further sudnetting from a reserved bit as you explained in the second paragraph of your email? Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Charles Manafa To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:06 AM Subject: RE: Please Help with VLSM [7:9024] I believe you can do that, if you enable subnet zero, and there won't be any address conflict because the subnet masks are different. But, you will not get the number of subnets and hosts that you have specified. This is because each time you subnet, you use up one address from the block you are subnetting from - hierachical thing. I would personally reserve bits from the assigned prefix block, and use those reserved addresses for further subnetting. That way you will not get into the pitfall where a network address is also a host address. CM -Original Message- From: Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19/06/01 07:52 Subject: Please Help with VLSM [7:9024] Hi group, Please just throw more light of this. If I have a block of ip address, can I use different subnets for different purposes like this: If my block is 216.73.203.0 1. 216.73.203.0/26 4 Networks, 64 Hosts each 2. 216.73.203.0/27 -- 8 Networks, 32 Hosts each 3. 216.73.203.0/28 -- 16 Networks, 16 Hosts each 4. 216.73.203.0/29 -- 32 Networks, 8 Hosts each 5. 216.73.203.0/30 -- 64 Networks, 4 Hosts each. My desire is to use the item 5 for all my WAN links since it only have 2 valid hosts per network and the rest for other purposes. But my problem is if I have use two same IP-addresses but from different networks (eg one from item 3 and the other from item 4 above) assigned to two different hosts on both ends of a routable network, wouldn't the system response with a conflict/duplication of IP-addresses or give some other kind of error? Eg If, I have this scenerio: Host A = 216.73.203.21 255.255.255.248 (ie a host on network 216.73.203.16/29) Host B = 216.73.203.21 255.255.255.252 (ie another host on network 216.73.203.20/30) Questions: Since both hosts are on both sides of a routable network: 1. Wouldn't there be an IP-address conflict? 2. Wouldn't it be a duplication of IP-address? 3. If I ping 216.72.207.21, which of the two host will reply? OR 4. Is it that I can only variably subnet a block of IP-addresses once, say /29 and use only hosts from that subnet and cannot do another subnetting on that same block when the need arises? These are my questions. How I wish someone can clear this, for it will help myself and many other people in the group. Rgards. Oletu _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9035t=9024 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NTP configuration [7:9025]
Richard Bosire wrote: Hie There are # of public NTP servers . You can get pointers from here http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/servers.htm bosire Cjack wrote: I want to config a network that consist about 17 routers. But i dont have a atomic clock Take your best router, like a 7500 with a real calendar, and synchronize it to several external stratum 1 servers and perhaps a coupld of sttratum 2 servers as a backup. This will usually work, but often results in a great deal of variance (NTP calls it dispersion) over time due to variancein propagation delay. If you want to border on being rude, synchronize two of them to external sources. But at best you will get stratum 2. Then have everything internal synchronize to your source(s). They will be very accurte stratum 3 servers (variance from your reference clock will be minimal). It isn't polite etiquette to sync too many routers to external sources, so get yourself one, or at most two, good internal references. We use a 7505, which has an internal calendar, and the 'ntp update-calendar' keeps the date correct as well (some routers have no clue, that's why they default to reporting time as elapsed time since it last booted). I've not tried to setup broadcast servers or peers, but just settle for setting 'ntp server aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' pointing to my really sunchronized router, or maybe add 'ntp server eee.fff.ggg.hhh' to point to the secondary. No playing with broadcasts, peers, and the like. Works quire well, and we are within few milliseconds of real time, which is close enough for me. Jeff Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9036t=9025 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CSS 11000 question (Urgent) [7:8990]
I don't think the CSS is geared to perform data replication. I believe this is the responsibility of the web farm. In my former company, one of the developers wrote a real-time agent that performs this sort of replication, between servers in the web farm. CM -Original Message- From: John Neiberger To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18/06/01 21:39 Subject: Re: CSS 11000 question (Urgent) [7:8990] I know that these boxes can do dynamic replication of web content but you're wanting to do dynamic, instantaneous replication of per-session user data. Of the top of my head I can't think of a way to do that. Perhaps there is a way but I'm just not sure if the CSS switches have that capability. Bradley Wong 6/18/01 1:57:33 PM I have a CSS 11000 serving 4 webserver. The users are retrieving and updating the data from a sql database thru the webservers. If a webserver is crashed while the user has a session connecting to the database, CSS will switch it to the next available web server. I wonder whether or not it is possible to cache the information to another web server without having the user to re-enter the information again. Thanks. Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9037t=8990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ARP [7:9031]
Yes I can ping all the IP HELPER ADDRESSES Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9038t=9031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cisco 3660 [7:9026]
I had a similar problem, and tac concluded that it was a bad motherboard. After it got replaced, the router has been running great. -Original Message- From: cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco 3660 [7:9026] hi, i have a cisco 3660 router which have problem that it is rebooting again agian but saying that failing all rommon startup test. how can i breack that router . thanx kaushalender Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9039t=9026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Bootstrap chips [7:8934]
You can order the chips from Cisco for free on most of the routers. You just pay the shipping if you don't have a service contract. Omer Ehsan Dar wrote: Hi all, could anybody point out the source of cisco boot strap chips? Can we use third party chips or do they have to be cisco approved. Thanks in advance. Omer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9040t=8934 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco [7:9041]
I thought it was similar. frank wrote: compared with 350-001,easier or much the same? Thanks, frank -- Jason Douglas Lucent World Wide Services Pager 888-451-0755 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9041t=9041 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strage DDR problem [7:9043]
Hi all, I am getting a strange problem with DDR connection from a 801 to 803. Both routers are running IOS Ver. 12.1. If 801 orginates the call 803 answers the call and the call gets disconnected in less than aminute and in the meantime I cannot ping from 801 to 803 or the otherway. If 803 orginates the 801 answers without any problem and I can ping from 801 to 803 with 100% success. But when I ping from 803 to 801 the max success rate I get is 60% and normal is 40%. (I tried pinging the remote BRI interface, Ethernet Interface and PC in Remote network all with same result). I want to configure these routers to do tranperant bridging and tried bridging configuration also. With bridging config, If I keep the priority of 803 low, 801 learns 803 as root bridge and learns the MAC address of PC's on the network connected to Ethernet port of 803 but 803 doesn't learn any address for 801 network. Also if I reduce the priority of 801, 803 doesn't learns that and both routers claim to be root bridges. Also there is no data traffic between them. I can't figure out the reson for this if anybody have any idea I will be glad to hear it. Regards, Manoj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9043t=9043 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing Exams without a lab!! Read this its a thought [7:9042]
Is this a verboten subject? Just wanted to add my two cents sure, lab tests at the ccna level would make it harder, and maybe Cisco could do something with a simulator to avoid the logistic problems but hey, guys, they could go a long way to solving the problem without changing any of their software if the questions were at a more appropriate level ... it would be very easy to write multiple choice questions that require a greater depth of understanding than what was on the real test, which I found rather disappointing. JC wrote: I apologize did not mean to revive the dead, I just hate that they don't do anything about it. -- Jason Douglas Lucent World Wide Services Pager 888-451-0755 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9042t=9042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ARP [7:9031]
If you have 12.0T software, or 12.1 then you should either upgrade the 12.1 to 12.1t or downgrade you 12.0t to 12.0.5t. I remember some nasty issues with helper addressing and these software versions. Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9044t=9031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
Hi. I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But we have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like source destination Protocol Info 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Response 0.0008c7280106 0.NBIPXFind name our domain name 0.0008c7280106 0.BROWSER Host Announcement workstation name workstation, server, print queue server, NT workstation, NT server, Potential browser. In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer server? Why printer got something to do with IPX . How to get rid of this? Please advice Thanks -Original Message- From: jason douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco [7: 9041] I thought it was similar. frank wrote: compared with 350-001,easier or much the same? Thanks, frank -- Jason Douglas Lucent World Wide Services Pager 888-451-0755 == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9045t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2600 memory-size question [7:4622]
Pretend you are doing a password recovery, but add memory-size iomem 50 instead... Press break during the Boot sequence. Change the configuration register to 0x2142. Boot. Enable. config term. memory-size iomem 50. ctrl-z. copy start runn. config term. config-register 0x2102. ctrl-z. reload. -Ejay -Original Message- From: rancid moth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2600 memory-size question [1:4622] hello, while playing around with a new 2600 router, i took out the memory-size iomem 50 entry just to see what would happen (curious...ok it was probably a stupid thing to do, but hell im learning) now the thing is constantly forcing reboots when ever we try and bring it backup there must be a way to get around this so i can get back in, and fix things up...any ideas? cheers moth _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9050t=4622 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
Have any of your servers/clients/machines in the network got IPX or any IPX clients installed or services for IPX. Karl - Original Message - From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:12 PM Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] Hi. I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But we have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like source destination Protocol Info 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Response 0.0008c7280106 0.NBIPXFind name our domain name 0.0008c7280106 0.BROWSER Host Announcement workstation name workstation, server, print queue server, NT workstation, NT server, Potential browser. In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer server? Why printer got something to do with IPX . How to get rid of this? Please advice Thanks -Original Message- From: jason douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco [7: 9041] I thought it was similar. frank wrote: compared with 350-001,easier or much the same? Thanks, frank -- Jason Douglas Lucent World Wide Services Pager 888-451-0755 == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9051t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T in IOS software [7:9053]
Just curious. But what does the 'T' stand for in IOS releases? c2600-i-mz.121-4.bin c2600-i-mz.121-4.T1 Thanks, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9053t=9053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCRAN and BOSON [7:9052]
Hello all, Just checking if any one have used BOSON for BCRAN test , I am thinking of getting test 2 and wondering if it good enough comparing to the others. Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9052t=9052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reverse Telnet [7:9054]
I asked a question here before which related to My IOS not supporting certain features. I mentioned that I could not update the IOS because The router is in a remote office with no competant staff capable of carring out such a task. ( even though this is very straight forward. ) Some one on the study group stated that the IOS upgrade could be done using reverse telnet, I have tried to figure this out for myself and couldn't find enough information Im just confused about the hole thing. Is this Possible. Im using a C1720 on a Serial 512k Leased Line and remote router is C1603 ISDN dialup connection to the Net Can anyone shed any ligth on this theory? . Thanks Damien ** The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. www.Orbiscom.com ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9054t=9054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019]
Type Show log and see if you see your output there. If not, then try logging monitor debug Good Luck, Let me know if it works, Ejay -Original Message- From: cisco guru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019] Hi all, I am trying to see the debug output on my routers via telnet sessions but am not having any luck. I first got the debug ip packet command to work but then it stopped working. No other debug commands will work. Eg. debug ip igrp trans I have the service timestamps commands issued along with the term mon command on the router running the telnet session. The ios ver. on this particular router is 11.0 (10c). Does the ios ver. make a difference or does something in particular have to be done on both routers? Please advise. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9055t=9019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash For 2503 router [7:9023]
Search the web for a utility called MZmaker. It will compress the IOS image and the router will automagically decompress it at runtime. -ej -Original Message- From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash For 2503 router [7:9023] Hi All, SOme one else come across the problem of getting a 5MB IOS, on to a 4.4MB 2503 cisco pro flash ? I am in need of an IOS upgrade and I am short by about .5 MB of flash. This is a stand alon router in a small office so getting the flash from TFTP server is out of the question. Any one got any idea's , tricks, something I ahve not thought of ??? Thanks all. John in a very cold place of Sydney Australia (its freezing here) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9057t=9023 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
They can also communicate by IPX. The IPX addresses you are seeing are IPX Broadcasts. You using HP printers? do the printers have LCD or Other Management. IPX can be diabled. Damien -Original Message- From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] Hi. I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But we have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like source destination Protocol Info 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Response 0.0008c7280106 0.NBIPXFind name our domain name 0.0008c7280106 0.BROWSER Host Announcement workstation name workstation, server, print queue server, NT workstation, NT server, Potential browser. In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer server? Why printer got something to do with IPX . How to get rid of this? Please advice Thanks -Original Message- From: jason douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco [7: 9041] I thought it was similar. frank wrote: compared with 350-001,easier or much the same? Thanks, frank -- Jason Douglas Lucent World Wide Services Pager 888-451-0755 == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == ** The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. www.Orbiscom.com ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9056t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network Tools [7:8541]
Another one would be Compuwares ecoscope. It is similar to a sniffer but only captures header information and will allow to to see where all the load is coming from on your network. $$ -Original Message- From: Jim Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Tools [7:8541] And Netforensics (Realtime, Global, Syslog Manipulation and presentation and event notification) www.netforensics.com -Original Message- From: Stephen Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Tools [7:8541] Okey Dokey hardware get a laptop...running Win2000 (that way you can change ip address(non-dhcp) on the Fly software www.solarwinds.net ( solarwinds pro) managment+troubleshooting $500 www.nai.com (snifferpro or netXray) troubleshooting $500-10,000 www.concord.com (Nethealth) reporting+Stats $20-100,00 www.hp.com (Hpopenview) reporting+managment+troublshooting $ www.cisco.com (ciscoworks2000) Reporting (Resource manager essentials)+ Troubleshooting (Vlan,ATM,WAN manager) managemnt (CSWI,etc,etc) $30,000 as you can see it depends on your budget . i use hpopenview all day as it flags up devices/office/ospf area`s going down ..and can do some real-time int stats(nice graph).also logging of error`s ...Node down,SNMP mis-match,etc,etc,etc also concord nethealth...good for telling me what has happened...can tell say ,,,cpu utilization on a router for the last 12/24H..t up to weeks...gives graph... if you can`t stretch to that use solarwinds( some good tools for small networks) and netXray (packet analyser)we have 1,000s of devises over 100`s of sites so use enterprise tools HTH steve From: Jim Yam Reply-To: Jim Yam To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Tools [7:8541] Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:43:59 -0400 Can anybody recommend some good hardware and software tools for networking and troubleshooting. Please do let me know estimate cost if possible. Thanks in advance. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. [demime removed a uuencoded section named winmail.dat which was 79 lines] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9058t=8541 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T in IOS software [7:9053]
Maybe this will help. You will need a CCO login. http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/620/4.html#version -Original Message- From: STRAND Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: T in IOS software [7:9053] Just curious. But what does the 'T' stand for in IOS releases? c2600-i-mz.121-4.bin c2600-i-mz.121-4.T1 Thanks, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9059t=9053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T in IOS software [7:9053]
Should explain it for you. You may need CCO access to view this page. The T refers to consolidated Technology. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9061t=9053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T in IOS software [7:9053]
the T in the IOS version denotes the train. a train is kinda like a version of the OS that contains certain modifications to the already present feature sets. For instance, the XI train in version 12.1 has s00per d00per special modifications for VoIP. The T train is used to introduce new features and things. you'll see things that are not ready / tested enough to be put into the Main line in the T train. I however, have not had too many bad ex[eriences resulting from T train usage, but then again, even the most stable things have bugs. Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th. Street New York, New York 10001 Cell: +1(516) 782.1535 Desk: +1(646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: STRAND Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: T in IOS software [7:9053] Just curious. But what does the 'T' stand for in IOS releases? c2600-i-mz.121-4.bin c2600-i-mz.121-4.T1 Thanks, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9060t=9053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
If you have printers connected to your network by HP Jetdirect boxes or similar print servers they might be part of the problem. I often find jetdirect print servers with all their protocols enabled Dave H -Original Message- From: Sim, CT (Chee Tong) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045] Hi. I use the fluke meter and ethereal software to check the health of our network and I found there are a lot of IPX traffic in our network. But we have no Novell server here and where is the IPX traffic coming from? In the ethereal output I saw a lot of statement like source destination Protocol Info 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP Nearest Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Query 0.0008c7280106 0.IPX SAP General Response 0.0008c7280106 0.NBIPXFind name our domain name 0.0008c7280106 0.BROWSER Host Announcement workstation name workstation, server, print queue server, NT workstation, NT server, Potential browser. In fluke meter, I saw these IPX are mostly by printer and printer server? Why printer got something to do with IPX . How to get rid of this? Please advice Thanks -Original Message- From: jason douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson cisco [7: 9041] I thought it was similar. frank wrote: compared with 350-001,easier or much the same? Thanks, frank -- Jason Douglas Lucent World Wide Services Pager 888-451-0755 == De informatie opgenomen in dit bericht kan vertrouwelijk zijn en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onterecht ontvangt wordt u verzocht de inhoud niet te gebruiken en de afzender direct te informeren door het bericht te retourneren. == The information contained in this message may be confidential and is intended to be exclusively for the addressee. Should you receive this message unintentionally, please do not use the contents herein and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. == Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9062t=9045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping r1.ccie.com now working!! [7:9022]
Heya, cisco GURU, Do you know how DNS works? if domain-name lookup is off, it wont try and concatenate your hostame with a domain. ( i think) that is part of the LOOKUP process. which you have tunred off. things like this tend to be done away with in newer versions of IOS. -Original Message- From: cisco guru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ping r1.ccie.com now working!! [7:9022] Hi all, I have a bunch of routers configured with a static hosts file with the ip host, no ip domain-look and ip domain-name ccie.com commands configured. When I ping r1 or ping R1 it works. But when I ping r1.ccie.com or R1.ccie.com I get an error msg.Unrecognized host or address or protocol not running. I have versions 11.1(7) and 11.2(7) running. Does the ios ver. make a diff. or is it something wrong configured on the routers? Please advise. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9064t=9022 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Olicom OC-3612 [7:9065]
Anybody know if this is a stand-alone token-ring hub or requires an additional connection out the back ? I bought it thinking it is a dumb hub and when connected my interfaces comes up however I can't ping between them - almost as if the connections are not sharing the backplane..aaargh ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9065t=9065 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lane and FDDI? What to belive? [7:9063]
Does Lane have support for FDDI? I am reading Richard A. Deal's book Cisco LAN switch configuration page 475. It says FDDI is not supported under LANE? Then I go to Lammle CCIE book page 736 and it says LANE also provides translation between multiple media environments, allowing data sharing. Token Ring or FDDI networks can share data with Ethernet networks as if they were part of the same network. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9063t=9063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reverse Telnet [7:9054]
Reverse telnet? how about ]#telnet router blah enable blah #copy tftp: flash: -Original Message- From: Damien Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reverse Telnet [7:9054] I asked a question here before which related to My IOS not supporting certain features. I mentioned that I could not update the IOS because The router is in a remote office with no competant staff capable of carring out such a task. ( even though this is very straight forward. ) Some one on the study group stated that the IOS upgrade could be done using reverse telnet, I have tried to figure this out for myself and couldn't find enough information Im just confused about the hole thing. Is this Possible. Im using a C1720 on a Serial 512k Leased Line and remote router is C1603 ISDN dialup connection to the Net Can anyone shed any ligth on this theory? . Thanks Damien ** The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. www.Orbiscom.com ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9066t=9054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LEC, LES, LECS and BUS. [7:9067]
I am very confused! Can someone give me a solid definition of LEC, LES, LECS and BUS. I have been reading several books and each book has some different definition of each of these componets. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9067t=9067 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing Exams without a lab!! Read this its a thought [7:9068]
Hi this is something i just don`t understand..i have worked with cisco for 2 years + and have recently passed my NP...what i dont understand is how people can claim to pass 4 exam`s in 2 weeks .. i have to work for a living and i just don`t have the time to study 10 hours a day So OK i passed all 4 NP first time in 3mths.the CCDA took 2 attempts the CCNA V1/V2 was also a first time pass. the CCIE written tokk also 2 attempts but i still don`t see how it can be done..in such a small time frame i now several CCIE`s who are very active in the industry who i have instructed about different technologys...so it not as if i a suffering from lack of expsosure WHAT IS YOUR SECRET?? please pass it on :-) steve From: JC Reply-To: JC To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passing Exams without a lab!! Read this its a thought [7:9006] Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:28:09 -0400 Hello, I just couldn't resist stating this on the groupstudy, please respond with your feelings on this matter. I started studying for my CCNA back in October of last year. I was lazy so I took my time and passed the test in December of last year. I got lazy for a while and then I began studying for my CCNP in April. at the end of May I took my certification tests, my goal was to take: 1) CCNP Foundation Exam 2.0 2) CCNP CIT 2.0 Exam 3) CCDA Exam 4) CCDP Exam Within a two week time frame I passed all of these exams. What is my point, I'm dissapointed that I was able to pass all of these exams in two weeks. The state of certification today stinks in my opinion. They offer you multiple choice exams, why? So many people are getting certified in this and certified in that, that after awhile our certs will be of no value. The only reason the CCIE is the almighty is because you have to take a lab to pass it. Why don't they require everyone to take a lab test for all levels of tests. It does not have to be a full blown equipment lab but why can't the tests be virtual in nature. Setup a virtual lab test sorta like the Sybex CCNA simulator setup, and make people enter some crucial commands by memory or fill in the blank. Specify the connector that should be attached to this interface, configure the CSU, etc... etc... See, the problem is, I've studied for multiple choice tests all of my life, In college you took the same multiple choice tests, however every once in a while you had to be creative and pass an essay exam which truly tested your ability to know the process and know the facts. I realize it is easier to write a multiple choice exam and make money, but from our perspective it cheats us. The problem is that I studied my ass off to pass the tests, but a lot of the information you study for a multiple choice test leaves your head instantaneously. If all Certification tests reguardless of level included a lab portion it would test our ability to be creative with a design on a design exam, or test our troubleshooting knowledge on a troubleshooting exam, not merely remember a fact. I owe a lot to certifications because they have helped my career along, but in the same vein I still can't survive without my degree. The credibility of exams these days is diminishing along with the economy. As long as it is a dog eat- dog world as we have always known it to be, we are all in trouble. The only people that stand to make money off of us by writing multiple choice exams are the vendors of the equipment and those who train us. W are getting ripped off here guys and there will never be an end to the price increases on exams and labs if we don't work to improve the quality of the exams that are given. If everyone can pass these exams without ever touching any equipment then these certifications mean nothing. My heart tells me that the CCIE is the most coveted by all because it challenges your true ability to function in a real world scenario, and not everyone has it because their is a lab portion which truly tests our skills not just our memorization ability. Have you ever worked with the guy who knows everything, yet you study for all those certifications and you still feel completely inferior around him. Sure your title says CC this and MC that, but while your studying, the know it all veteran with no certifications is basically running the business by keeping the network running, keeping management happy, keeping customers happy, and most of all contributing to the profitability of the company. This is not meant to be a cut on any of us networkers, and I'm not saying I'm any different then the rest. However, my goal on certifications has changed dramatically. If there is not a lab component I'm not interested. We have to fight for the value of our studies, if not then we will all be searching for a new line of work. Thanks, JC _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
RE: BCRAN and BOSON [7:9052]
Test 2 is good! Good luck, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.OleDrews.com/ccnp ~~~ -Original Message- From: netlinesys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCRAN and BOSON [7:9052] Hello all, Just checking if any one have used BOSON for BCRAN test , I am thinking of getting test 2 and wondering if it good enough comparing to the others. Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9069t=9052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sipervisor Engine [7:8973]
hi, that is an extremly OPEN question. in short it is a card that looks after a mullti-bladed switch i.e 4006/5509/6509... it`s a managment card that comes in various flavours. steve From: ASM Reply-To: ASM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Sipervisor Engine [7:8973] Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:21:31 -0400 can any one eloborate the functionality of Supervisor Engine!!?? ASM _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9070t=8973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lane and FDDI? What to belive? [7:9063]
lane runs OVER atm. it connects LANs. i beleive you would need to do translational bridging to use fddi. i've never tried, but now im kinda interested...im reading the same book ..its good @!#$, isnt it!? Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist Network Engineer Planetary Networks 535 West 34th. Street New York, New York 10001 Cell: +1(516) 782.1535 Desk: +1(646) 792.2395 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lane and FDDI? What to belive? [7:9063] Does Lane have support for FDDI? I am reading Richard A. Deal's book Cisco LAN switch configuration page 475. It says FDDI is not supported under LANE? Then I go to Lammle CCIE book page 736 and it says LANE also provides translation between multiple media environments, allowing data sharing. Token Ring or FDDI networks can share data with Ethernet networks as if they were part of the same network. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9071t=9063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ARP [7:9031]
I have upgraded to 12.0 (7)XK1 from 12.0 (7)R, it is the same problem. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9072t=9031 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: T in IOS software [7:9053]
TERROR or TREPIDATION STRAND Scott cc: Sent by: Subject: T in IOS software [7:9053] nobody@groupst udy.com 19/06/2001 14:35 Please respond to STRAND Scott Just curious. But what does the 'T' stand for in IOS releases? c2600-i-mz.121-4.bin c2600-i-mz.121-4.T1 Thanks, Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9077t=9053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing Exams without a lab!! Read this its a thought [7:9078]
Remember that you are taking an exam sponsored by a vendor for the sole purpose of selling more of the vendors equipment. If the exams were too hard few people would pass and therefore when the buying decisions are made cisco would come up less often. If the exams were too easy cisco would lose credibility by certifying that people unskilled in their products were actually skilled professionals. In other words not a single certification exam is about anything other than a marketing tool. Ben, CCNP --- JC wrote: Hello, I just couldn't resist stating this on the groupstudy, please respond with your feelings on this matter. I started studying for my CCNA back in October of last year. I was lazy so I took my time and passed the test in December of last year. I got lazy for a while and then I began studying for my CCNP in April. at the end of May I took my certification tests, my goal was to take: 1) CCNP Foundation Exam 2.0 2) CCNP CIT 2.0 Exam 3) CCDA Exam 4) CCDP Exam Within a two week time frame I passed all of these exams. What is my point, I'm dissapointed that I was able to pass all of these exams in two weeks. The state of certification today stinks in my opinion. They offer you multiple choice exams, why? So many people are getting certified in this and certified in that, that after awhile our certs will be of no value. The only reason the CCIE is the almighty is because you have to take a lab to pass it. Why don't they require everyone to take a lab test for all levels of tests. It does not have to be a full blown equipment lab but why can't the tests be virtual in nature. Setup a virtual lab test sorta like the Sybex CCNA simulator setup, and make people enter some crucial commands by memory or fill in the blank. Specify the connector that should be attached to this interface, configure the CSU, etc... etc... See, the problem is, I've studied for multiple choice tests all of my life, In college you took the same multiple choice tests, however every once in a while you had to be creative and pass an essay exam which truly tested your ability to know the process and know the facts. I realize it is easier to write a multiple choice exam and make money, but from our perspective it cheats us. The problem is that I studied my ass off to pass the tests, but a lot of the information you study for a multiple choice test leaves your head instantaneously. If all Certification tests reguardless of level included a lab portion it would test our ability to be creative with a design on a design exam, or test our troubleshooting knowledge on a troubleshooting exam, not merely remember a fact. I owe a lot to certifications because they have helped my career along, but in the same vein I still can't survive without my degree. The credibility of exams these days is diminishing along with the economy. As long as it is a dog eat- dog world as we have always known it to be, we are all in trouble. The only people that stand to make money off of us by writing multiple choice exams are the vendors of the equipment and those who train us. W are getting ripped off here guys and there will never be an end to the price increases on exams and labs if we don't work to improve the quality of the exams that are given. If everyone can pass these exams without ever touching any equipment then these certifications mean nothing. My heart tells me that the CCIE is the most coveted by all because it challenges your true ability to function in a real world scenario, and not everyone has it because their is a lab portion which truly tests our skills not just our memorization ability. Have you ever worked with the guy who knows everything, yet you study for all those certifications and you still feel completely inferior around him. Sure your title says CC this and MC that, but while your studying, the know it all veteran with no certifications is basically running the business by keeping the network running, keeping management happy, keeping customers happy, and most of all contributing to the profitability of the company. This is not meant to be a cut on any of us networkers, and I'm not saying I'm any different then the rest. However, my goal on certifications has changed dramatically. If there is not a lab component I'm not interested. We have to fight for the value of our studies, if not then we will all be searching for a new line of work. Thanks, JC [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9078t=9078 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
Lab for sale [7:9079]
The below lab is being offered for $5500. I am not parting it out. It is a very nice and complete lab, and the price I believe is very fair. All equipment is *very* clean.. Cisco 2502 8MB Flash/8MB DRAM Cisco 2502 8MB Flash/8MB DRAM Cisco 2503 8MB Flash/8MB DRAM Cisco 2503 8MB Flash/8MB DRAM Cisco 2520 8MB Flash/8MB DRAM Cisco Catalyst 3016B 16 port ethernet switch Merge 2000AF ISDN Simulator/Analyzer 2 Startek 8-port token ring MAU's (RJ45) 5 DB60 DB60 Back-to-Back serial cables 2 AUI Tranceivers (needed for 2501 and 2503) 2 Token Ring filters (DB9-RJ45) 5 Cat5 Patch Cables All necessary power cables IOS 12.x on all routers The Merge2000AF, for those of you who do not know, is like the Rolls Royce of ISDN Simulators. Total Windows GUI Control (or dumb terminal), ISDN B/D Channel Packet Sniffing, Takes S/T or U interfaces directly...it retails for around $4500+ You have everything above to immediatly get working, no hunting down of cables or adapters needed. Feel free to get in touch with me if you have any questions. --- Brian Feeny e:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CCNP+Voice/ATM/Security p:318.222.2638x109 CCDPf:318.221.6612 Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9079t=9079 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: LEC, LES, LECS and BUS. [7:9067]
Read IOS Switching Services ISBN# 1578700531 The last half of the book covers this. Additionally, the book covers the different types of switching.. Cut-Through, fragment-free, store-and-forward, Process-switching, Distributed switching, Fast switching... You can pick the book up used for 19.99 used, and it's worth it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LEC, LES, LECS and BUS. [7:9067] I am very confused! Can someone give me a solid definition of LEC, LES, LECS and BUS. I have been reading several books and each book has some different definition of each of these componets. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9080t=9067 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
site-to-site VPN connection [7:9081]
Hey all, has anyone configured a site to site VPN configuration via two routers before? Is it the same basic configuration as a site-to-site VPN via two PIX's? Thank you! -G _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9081t=9081 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Tunnel Interface and DDR [7:8982]
We're looking at it from the view that it's only IP traffic that's interesting as well, John. The IPX traffic should already be encapsulated by then for use in the tunnel. As soon as our lab is not being used we'll check it out. Thanks for your help. Jim -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP John Neiberger wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I've never configured this but I thought I'd take a stab at it anyway. My thinking is this: since IPX is not being routed directly across the ISDN link, then there is no need to place IPX traffic in the dialer list. You don't want IPX traffic to trigger the dialer, you want IP-tunneled IPX traffic to trigger it. So, configure the dialer list so that the IP tunnel itself is interesting and then utilize floating static routes or dialer watch to bring up the backup line. If the main line goes down, the router will still want to tunnel that traffic but it then knows it has to bring up the backup link to reach the opposite end of the tunnel. Regards, John James Haynes 6/18/01 1:09:47 PM I'm working on a situation where two routers are to be connected by a frame-relay connection. An ISDN dial-backup will be available. A tunnel interface has been created to bring IPX across the IP Backbone. My question involves the dialer-list on the BRI interface. When I'm defining interesting traffic for the list is the IPX traffic to be considered as interesting, or does the check for interesting traffic occur only after the IPX traffic has been encapsulated for use in the tunnel and thus, it is only IP traffic that should be examined? If the IPX traffic is to be looked at to define interesting traffic can more than one dialer-group be applied to the BRI interface in the same way that an interface can have more than one access-list as long as it's one per protocol, per direction? This way interesting IP or IPX traffic would bring up the backup ISDN line. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9082t=8982 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco VPN 3000 and ACS TACACS+ [7:9083]
Have anyone successfully configured the Cisco VPN 3030 concentrator to work with Cisco ACS TACACS+ for Administration anthentication? Kim. __ Do You Yahoo!? Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more. http://buzz.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9083t=9083 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: site-to-site VPN connection [7:9081]
Prety much. Try http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking: IPSecs=Implementation_and_Configuration#Samples_%26_Tips Steve -Original Message- From: John Gotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: site-to-site VPN connection [7:9081] Hey all, has anyone configured a site to site VPN configuration via two routers before? Is it the same basic configuration as a site-to-site VPN via two PIX's? Thank you! -G _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9085t=9081 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019]
Hi, the problem could be that only process-switched packets get 'seen' by the debug process. issue 'no ip route-cache' at the interface config. please report if this solved the problem ... Greetings Reinhold On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, cisco guru wrote: Hi all, I am trying to see the debug output on my routers via telnet sessions but am not having any luck. I first got the debug ip packet command to work but then it stopped working. No other debug commands will work. Eg. debug ip igrp trans I have the service timestamps commands issued along with the term mon command on the router running the telnet session. The ios ver. on this particular router is 11.0 (10c). Does the ios ver. make a difference or does something in particular have to be done on both routers? Please advise. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9087t=9019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Encrypting the vtp domain passwd during show config on a [7:9086]
Is there anyway to encrypt the vtp domain password on a cat 2948g when using the show config command? I use the command service password-encryption on my 2900xl's, but can't seem to find a comparable set command on the 2948g. Any suggestions?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9086t=9086 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: T in IOS software [7:9053]
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9088t=9053 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: what about ccie-pre-qualification test in boson ci [7:9027]
Hey, I'm studying for the CCIE written now after getting my NP and DP. I'm reading the All-In-One CCIE study guide by Roosevelt Giles (around 900 pages) then I'm going to take Boson tests and every sample test I can find for a couple of days before taking the exam. Any other suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9089t=9027 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reverse Telnet [7:9054]
i think you mean hooking up an external modem to the either console or aux port. you would get into the router over hyperterminal, and then just xmodem the software into the router. Don't listen to geniuses like this Peter Slow guy. Have him try upgrading the software over the wan link. Dragi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9090t=9054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Written [7:9091]
Hello. I'm getting ready for my CCIE written examination on the 26th of June. I've recently gotten my NP and DP, and I'm studying for the CCIE written by reading the entire book of All-In-One CCIE Study guide by Roosevelt Giles. After I read the book, I'm going to take Boson tests and any other test or questions I can to prepare. Any other suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9091t=9091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Lab Construction [7:9092]
Hello. I've recently come into four Cisco 2621's and four Cisco 2924 switches. I need to configure this equipment into a lab to study for my CCIE lab exam. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9092t=9092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
strange problem in voice [7:9093]
Hi, i configured voice on two routers, on one router i hav a phone set attached with Fxs and on the other router Pbx is connected with fxo. I can recieve and make calls from both ends, but i m having this problem that the phone keeps on ringing even when i onhook the phone. Regards, Dar Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9093t=9093 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aironet 350 bridge questions [7:9094]
All, I have a few questions regarding the Aironet 350 workgroup bridges and I haven't yet found the answers on CCO. I'm connecting building to building via Aironet. 1. Is the 350 series good for this? From what I can, find the 350 series appears to be superior to the 340 series. However, I'm being told by a design guy that the 350 bridges won't connect building to building. His opinion doesn't appear to be accurate. Furthermore, the 350 series workgroup bridges are $499 vs $1,499 for the 340 workgroup bridge. Is this because of limited ability or aggressive pricing by Cisco? 2. The 350 workgroup bridge documentation at http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/350wgbr.htm shows the workgroup bridge being connected to the network via an access point. Is this the proper configuration for building to building? I've seen 340 series workgroup bridge kits that are designed to connect buildings via bridge to bridge (not using an access point). 3. Can the 350 workgroup bridge be powered from a regular power adapter as well as from the ethernet cable? Thank you very much for your help! Michael Ashton Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9094t=9094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written [7:9091]
The Token Ring white paper from CCPrep.com would be a good addition to your studies. Be aware of time management. Time flies when you're having fun. Frank Ken Browne wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hello. I'm getting ready for my CCIE written examination on the 26th of June. I've recently gotten my NP and DP, and I'm studying for the CCIE written by reading the entire book of All-In-One CCIE Study guide by Roosevelt Giles. After I read the book, I'm going to take Boson tests and any other test or questions I can to prepare. Any other suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9095t=9091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written [7:9091]
Do you see much appletalk or NetBios content on the CCIE written? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9096t=9091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Connecting Two 3548XL's with GigaEthernet [7:9098]
I recently accquired two 3548XL's I want to connect both via giga ethernet. The problem I'm facing is that the link light will go up on one, but not on the other. I had the TX/RX ports reversed ie RX going to the TX on the other switch and vice versa. I configured both 0/1 modules with no negoiation auto, and duplex full. When I bring an interface up say on 3548XL-A and 3548XL-B, the A comes up, the B comes up but goes down right away. The link light stays up on the 3548XLA. When I switch the cables around (multi mode fiber) the opposite happens. IE. B interace comes up, and A goes down. I can't provide configs right now, but I will in a few hours (I'm not at home right now). I've tried different fiber cables and no go. I know for a fact they work. If anyone who has this type of config or knows how I should tackle it could drop me a line, I would appreciate it. -- Sanity is calming, but madness is far more interesting. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9098t=9098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping r1.ccie.com now working!! [7:9022]
actually, the way it works is: 1. Lookup local hosts (that is, host that are defined in the ip host commands 2. Lookup with domain server (that is, if you have ip name-server defined) If you have no ip domain-lookup 3. Appending the ip domain-name only resolves if you have a host defined with the full domain name. (I had to relook this up myself... here's the link:) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_c /1cprt2/1cipadr.htm#xtocid2651713 If you want to ping r1.ccie.com, then make this entry in your config: ip host r1.ccie.com 10.1.1.1 (or whatever the ip address might be). Then, you should be able to ping either r1 or r1.ccie.com -e- - Original Message - From: Peter Slow To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 7:11 AM Subject: RE: ping r1.ccie.com now working!! [7:9022] Heya, cisco GURU, Do you know how DNS works? if domain-name lookup is off, it wont try and concatenate your hostame with a domain. ( i think) that is part of the LOOKUP process. which you have tunred off. things like this tend to be done away with in newer versions of IOS. -Original Message- From: cisco guru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ping r1.ccie.com now working!! [7:9022] Hi all, I have a bunch of routers configured with a static hosts file with the ip host, no ip domain-look and ip domain-name ccie.com commands configured. When I ping r1 or ping R1 it works. But when I ping r1.ccie.com or R1.ccie.com I get an error msg.Unrecognized host or address or protocol not running. I have versions 11.1(7) and 11.2(7) running. Does the ios ver. make a diff. or is it something wrong configured on the routers? Please advise. Thank you. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9099t=9022 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Written [7:9091]
I think you will be fine. The CCIE written does cover a great deal of material. But nothing you have not had yet throughout your studies. I would definitely hit anything with security related issues. When I took mine I did not find it at all difficult however I do believe that the questions can be very misleading at times. Read everything carefully and dont be afraid to put as an answer none of the above. I passed mine on the first try and had gone through the CCNA, NP, DP track. Good luck. Raul - Original Message - From: Ken Browne To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:09 PM Subject: CCIE Written [7:9091] Hello. I'm getting ready for my CCIE written examination on the 26th of June. I've recently gotten my NP and DP, and I'm studying for the CCIE written by reading the entire book of All-In-One CCIE Study guide by Roosevelt Giles. After I read the book, I'm going to take Boson tests and any other test or questions I can to prepare. Any other suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9101t=9091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Aironet 350 bridge questions [7:9094]
The 350 are superior to the 340 in the area of power transmitted, but you have to be aware that Cisco WORKGROUP bridges are jsut for small workgroups. I believe that they only allow 3-4 machines to use the bridge. That is the reason for the lower ($500) price versus the full 350 bridge at $1400. If it has WBR in the part number , then it is limited to 3-4 machine. Joel Lurker wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... All, I have a few questions regarding the Aironet 350 workgroup bridges and I haven't yet found the answers on CCO. I'm connecting building to building via Aironet. 1. Is the 350 series good for this? From what I can, find the 350 series appears to be superior to the 340 series. However, I'm being told by a design guy that the 350 bridges won't connect building to building. His opinion doesn't appear to be accurate. Furthermore, the 350 series workgroup bridges are $499 vs $1,499 for the 340 workgroup bridge. Is this because of limited ability or aggressive pricing by Cisco? 2. The 350 workgroup bridge documentation at http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/350wgbr.htm shows the workgroup bridge being connected to the network via an access point. Is this the proper configuration for building to building? I've seen 340 series workgroup bridge kits that are designed to connect buildings via bridge to bridge (not using an access point). 3. Can the 350 workgroup bridge be powered from a regular power adapter as well as from the ethernet cable? Thank you very much for your help! Michael Ashton Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9102t=9094 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed BCMSN ! [7:9103]
I passed today. Thanks to all for your help. Special thanks to Ole Drews Jensen for his Cat 5000 simulator. Overall the test was fair and the wording of the questions was good. My method of preparing : BCMSN Cisco Press plus Exam Certification for 640-504 Cisco Press, CIM switching , SwitchSim and for review Boson tests. One down three to go George Yiannibas MCSE CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9103t=9103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passing Exams without a lab!! Read this its a [7:9078]
I passed the CCNA exam yesterday with a score of 903 on my first try! Eight months ago I had 0 networking knowledge. This post really took the wind out of the sails of my celebration! There are some points I want to make, both positive and negative: 1. I do not believe I could have passed without lab time, both in the two semesters of Networking Academy and the Sybex virtual lab. 2. As someone making a mid-life career change, certification was important to me for two reasons, clasees were the only way for me get my feet wet in the IT arena (while I was a full-time retailer) and it was the only way for me to achieve credibility with technical people after a career owning retail stores. 3. I have always suspected that passing a multiple choice test is vastly different from work in a wiring closet. My next step is work, further certifications will wait. 4. I personally know two uncertified networkers making in excess of $100K. They do it with know-how and a willingness to go literally to the ends of the Earth. I know 3 with CCNA certifications that work in school districts at relatively low pay. 5. Certification is a test of knowledge which, even in IT, is not the same as skill. Related to point 3, above, I want to eventually design networks full-time. Does anyone have an opinion as to weather network administration or network installation is the better choice for a first job? Or is another path quicker to my goal? Cliff Collard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9104t=9078 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Connecting Two 3548XL's with GigaEthernet [7:9098]
This might not help at all, but here it is anyway. I have the same setup, except that I am using GigaStack modules and a GigaStack cable. This is working without any problems. I am not an expert in fiber cables, but I would suggest that you check that GigaBit interfaces and make sure they're not disabled, they are using the same encapsulation, and they are set for auto in duplex and speed. Hth, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.OleDrews.com/CCNP ~~~ -Original Message- From: Marco P Rodrigues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Connecting Two 3548XL's with GigaEthernet [7:9098] I recently accquired two 3548XL's I want to connect both via giga ethernet. The problem I'm facing is that the link light will go up on one, but not on the other. I had the TX/RX ports reversed ie RX going to the TX on the other switch and vice versa. I configured both 0/1 modules with no negoiation auto, and duplex full. When I bring an interface up say on 3548XL-A and 3548XL-B, the A comes up, the B comes up but goes down right away. The link light stays up on the 3548XLA. When I switch the cables around (multi mode fiber) the opposite happens. IE. B interace comes up, and A goes down. I can't provide configs right now, but I will in a few hours (I'm not at home right now). I've tried different fiber cables and no go. I know for a fact they work. If anyone who has this type of config or knows how I should tackle it could drop me a line, I would appreciate it. -- Sanity is calming, but madness is far more interesting. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9106t=9098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019]
I have yet to experience any debug whose output i cant see on my telnet. are u sure you are using 'term mon' after turning on debug ? Allen May wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I seem to recall ( experienced) a situation where certain debugs do not work via telnet are only visible on the console or by dumping to a syslog viewing there. - Original Message - From: Reinhold Fischer To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:48 AM Subject: Re: Debug not working via telnet [7:9019] Hi, the problem could be that only process-switched packets get 'seen' by the debug process. issue 'no ip route-cache' at the interface config. please report if this solved the problem ... Greetings Reinhold On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, cisco guru wrote: Hi all, I am trying to see the debug output on my routers via telnet sessions but am not having any luck. I first got the debug ip packet command to work but then it stopped working. No other debug commands will work. Eg. debug ip igrp trans I have the service timestamps commands issued along with the term mon command on the router running the telnet session. The ios ver. on this particular router is 11.0 (10c). Does the ios ver. make a difference or does something in particular have to be done on both routers? Please advise. Thank you. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9107t=9019 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Construction [7:9092]
Let me know what you find out. I have only one switch but 2 2621's, a 2610, a 2524, and a 1601. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9108t=9092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Found a Great Site [7:9111]
Sure, we'll let you know as soon as you let us know which site your talking about. Brandon Carroll wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Let me know what you think Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9113t=9111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messed up the Flash [7:9114]
Hi, I upgraded my flash to a IOS not compatible for a 3620 router. now i am getting wrong software for this hardware. I can't seem to get the router to go to the mini-OS. It keeps booting from the flash and then gives the above mesage. How do i erase this image. or is there any other solution. Any leads !!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9114t=9114 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Found a Great Site [7:9111]
sorry, ascolta.com/ping Brandon Carroll wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Let me know what you think Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9116t=9111 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cool site for fun learning [7:9115]
they give away free classes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9115t=9115 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCRAN and BOSON [7:9052]
Ditto Mike W. Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Test 2 is good! Good luck, Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.OleDrews.com/ccnp ~~~ -Original Message- From: netlinesys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BCRAN and BOSON [7:9052] Hello all, Just checking if any one have used BOSON for BCRAN test , I am thinking of getting test 2 and wondering if it good enough comparing to the others. Thanks in advance Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9117t=9052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errata page for Satterlee Hutnik 007212766X [7:9120]
There's nothing here at the moment, but I've written to McGraw-Hill and asked them where to submit errata, or possibly contact the authors. http://www.osborne.com/certification_career/007212766X/007212766X.shtml BJ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9120t=9120 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: e-mail encryption [7:9109]
PGP from Network Associates will do the trick. However, we are using it now and quite frankly, I wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy! The most complex, troublesome and administrative disaster this software has proven to be!!! But, if you're looking for e-mail encryption, certificate servers, etc...And your company has about $12,000 and 4 weeks to spare, then PGP by NA will serve you well. -C -Original Message- From: anthony moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: e-mail encryption [7:9109] Does anyone use any type of e-mail encryption for their entire company. I have been asked to implement some type of program whereby all the e-mail the is sent out is encrypted. Is this possible? I know that you can encrypt between users that have one anothers' public keys but can you encrypt anything that you send to those that don't even use encryption? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9124t=9109 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What can you get for a buck . . . . [7:9126]
What can you get for a buck these days? More than a phone call: Cisco 2505 router w/16MB DRAM and 8MB flash Also has XB2 BootROM chipset installed. Will include additionally: 1 - BootROM chipset (11.0(10c)) 3 - 4MB flash SIMMs Ebay item #1248236248 ALL for $1.00 while it lasts! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9126t=9126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange Encryption Problem/Mystery/Bug???? [7:9131]
Hi all, Thought I'd ask if anyone has experienced similar to a problem I've had recently. It's going to TAC now and I've got a workaround, but I'd be interested if anyone could suggest the reason or confirm a bug which I have been unable to locate. These routers had been running for nearly a year with no problems. All of a sudden they started giving problems and I have been unable to track down what external network changes may have triggered it. There were no config changes to the two routers (We run Resource Manager Essentials which monitors router config changes) Set-up was two 3660's running 12.1.1T, DES encryption over serial 2Mb link. The links were set up with encryption peers as the serial IP addresses and encryption access lists set up symmetrically without using any any on the serial interfaces. After reload routers come up fine and encryption runs O.K. After a varying length of time (around 5-10 minutes), the CPU utilisation builds up gradually until it sits at around 98%. This utilisation was almost totally due to encryption process. After swapping out the router and upgrading IOS, the problem still existed. I have got around the problem by using IP Unnumbered Loopback0 on Serial links. CPU utilisation now hovers around 2%. Anybody seen similar, or suggest what could make the CPU utilisation snowball like this? Thanks, Gareth Hinton Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9131t=9131 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsuscribe/remove [7:9132]
please remove me from this list ASAP. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9132t=9132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Construction [7:9092]
Ken, Congratulations on the equipment. Those are some great pieces. I suggest setting up the 2621's with Enterprise w/FS Plus IPSec. Check memory requirements before loading and compare with your memory/flash installed. With it you can experiment with CBAC, which provides a firewall similar to the PIX. I recommend getting (2) other routers if possible. The 4000's are good buy now with 4 serial port module installed (to use as a frame switch), and a termserver. A 2509/2511 is recommended, but a 508/516 will work as second choice. Just start checking out labs at www.fatkid.com or in the All-in-One CCIE LAB book and you will setup your lab many ways doing the labs. Good luck Tim - Original Message - From: Ken Browne To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:10 AM Subject: CCIE Lab Construction [7:9092] Hello. I've recently come into four Cisco 2621's and four Cisco 2924 switches. I need to configure this equipment into a lab to study for my CCIE lab exam. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9133t=9092 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Messed up the Flash [7:9114]
kevi andrews wrote: I can't seem to get the router to go to the mini-OS. It keeps booting from the flash and then gives the above mesage. If flash is totally hosed you will have to replace it with flash with a good image (i.e., a different pcmcia card) or boot from rom . so please tell the group more about your unsuccessful efforts to boot. By mini-IS do you mean booting from ROM (a bootloader image)? Also, have you read http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis3600/3600ig/3600rom.htm#xtocid14910 and http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis3600/3600ig/3600virt.htm and, for general background http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/fun_c/fcprt2/fcmemory.htm ? -- Jason Douglas Lucent World Wide Services Pager 888-451-0755 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9141t=9114 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange Encryption Problem/Mystery/Bug???? [7:9131]
1. Have you checked the health of the serial interfaces? (line hits, CRC errors, dropped packets, etc) 2. Did the traffic over the line increase dramatically? 3. Although it sounds like these are production routers, have you looked at a short-timed trace of 'debug crypto ipsec' and/or 'debug ip isakmp'? Do your 'show crypto' stats show anything revealing? -e- - Original Message - From: Gareth Hinton To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 6:29 PM Subject: Strange Encryption Problem/Mystery/Bug [7:9131] Hi all, Thought I'd ask if anyone has experienced similar to a problem I've had recently. It's going to TAC now and I've got a workaround, but I'd be interested if anyone could suggest the reason or confirm a bug which I have been unable to locate. These routers had been running for nearly a year with no problems. All of a sudden they started giving problems and I have been unable to track down what external network changes may have triggered it. There were no config changes to the two routers (We run Resource Manager Essentials which monitors router config changes) Set-up was two 3660's running 12.1.1T, DES encryption over serial 2Mb link. The links were set up with encryption peers as the serial IP addresses and encryption access lists set up symmetrically without using any any on the serial interfaces. After reload routers come up fine and encryption runs O.K. After a varying length of time (around 5-10 minutes), the CPU utilisation builds up gradually until it sits at around 98%. This utilisation was almost totally due to encryption process. After swapping out the router and upgrading IOS, the problem still existed. I have got around the problem by using IP Unnumbered Loopback0 on Serial links. CPU utilisation now hovers around 2%. Anybody seen similar, or suggest what could make the CPU utilisation snowball like this? Thanks, Gareth Hinton Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9145t=9131 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: new RFC Resource [7:8951]
This site has it's good and bad points. Searching by word or phrase can indeed help locate things more easily, but it can work against you. For example, I did a search on ARP and got 60 hits. Not one of which had the RFC title. The index page gives RFC numbers, but again no titles. So for the fun stuff - the joke RFC's, one might benefit from this site. For real research I still prefer the ietf site. Where RFC titles are returned when one searches. Guess I'm just a stick in the mud. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ciscodog Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:new RFC Resource [7:8951] Hey folks Just thought I'd pass along this new RFC resource website - its an official RFC Org. mirror - easy to search by word/topic. www.rfcdoctor.com PS - type in coffee or monkey and catch up on the latest new technology breakthroughs and a few laughs! -Ciscodog CCNP/DP and IE2B! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9146t=8951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
