RE: Re; How VSAT works ? [7:28156]

2001-12-04 Thread Randall Yoo

VSAT is an acronym for Very Small Aperture Terminal and is essentially an
earth station with (relatively) small antennas.  Some of the competing
architectures in the sat-com industry are SCPC/DAMA (Single Channel Per
Carrier/Demand Assigned Multiple Access), TDMA (Time Division Multiple
Access), etc.  These technologies are used for voice, data, TV broadcasting,
etc.  In United States, where the landlines for voice is well laid out,
VSATs & other sat-com architectures are used more for data transmission
(credit card verification at Gas Stations, verification at ATM machines,
etc).  In other parts of the world, they are quite often used for voice as
well (with addition of Echo Cancellers, etc).  CDMA, developed and licensed
by Qualcomm, is an acronym for Code Division Multiple Access and is used in
cellular phone network and I wasn't aware that they are used in satellite
communications.

Most sat-com earth stations are basically comprised of ODU (OutDoor Unit)
and IDU (InDoor Unit).  ODU are further comprised of antenna, LNB,
transceivers (if it's bi-directional), some sort of power amplifiers (SSPA,
HPA, TWTA, etc), etc (since systems like DirecTV and DirectPC are
receive-only (one-way), they only have antenna and LNB and do not include
transceiver nor power amplifier).  The frequency of the signals from and to
ODU are downconverted or upcoverted to and from IDU, which are comprised of
NMS, some sort of terminal devices, etc.  The application (PSTN & PBX for
voice, LAN/WAN for voice, etc), of course, is connected to the IDU.

As far as VSATs and DAMA solutions, I believe Hugh Network Systems
(http://www.hns.com) and Scientific-Atlanta (http://www.sciatl.com) dominate
the global market as turn-key equipment providers.

I have to ask, though, why are you "planning to implement/replace" leased
lines VSATs if you don't have a clue about VSATs?  In other words, do you
know if it's going to be a cost-effective replacement to your exsiting
leased lines?  I think you might be in India, and perhaps leased lines are
just way too expensive there.  If so, did you find out that VSAT is a less
expensive solution thru a local vendor or systems integrator?  If so, they
should be able to answer your questions for you.

You should also be able to find quite a bit of info by searching at
www.google.com.

HTH,


Randall


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 08:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re; How VSAT works ? [7:28156]


Hi guys,
I have cisco routers such as 3620 ,3640 with leased lines connectivity to
remote locations Now I am planning to implement/replace these lines to
VSATs, but I am not much familiar with the terms such as PAMA,DAMA,CDMA ,
Also how the operation of VSAT takes place ?Can anybody clear my doubts ,
Also is there any URL which will give details on these terms?
Thanks in advance .




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28164&t=28156
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Can Pix support Email spamming [7:28163]

2001-12-04 Thread fahim

Hi group,
I have a exchange server residing on the inside interface, How can i protect
spamming on pix. Does pix protect email spamming, I know that there is a
command in Cisco IOS firewall feature set its
ip audit smtp spam.. but to what extent it protects. any inputs, I have
searched cisco.com, there is no page giving me the answer.
thanks
fahim
ccna, ccda, css1




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28163&t=28163
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Loss of productivity [7:28162]

2001-12-04 Thread Kevin Welch

As part of my quest to stifle productivity, I thought I would share a
little game that has been going around the net.  Forgive me if this has
already been posted:
http://www.input-entertainment.de/laser/laser.html
 
-- Kevin Welch




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28162&t=28162
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Re; How VSAT works ? [7:28156]

2001-12-04 Thread Kevin Welch

www.vsat.net is a starting point. Or
http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci214155,00.
html

Im sure more would turn up in google.

-- Kevin Welch


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re; How VSAT works ? [7:28156]

Hi guys,
I have cisco routers such as 3620 ,3640 with leased lines connectivity
to
remote locations Now I am planning to implement/replace these lines to
VSATs, but I am not much familiar with the terms such as PAMA,DAMA,CDMA
,
Also how the operation of VSAT takes place ?Can anybody clear my doubts
,
Also is there any URL which will give details on these terms?
Thanks in advance .




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28161&t=28156
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cisco Dial-up and NT RAS [7:28079]

2001-12-04 Thread NetEng

Why pay for software, when cisco will provide it free. If you would have
read my post thoroughly, you would have seen that I do not have AD.

""Jagan Krishnaraj""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> For dial-out from any of the workstation (windows 95&98 and NT)
> using modem in Cisco Ras you can get software from tacticalsoftware.com
>
> For dial-in use Radius server and IAS service in Windows 2000 Server.
>
> This radius server in Windows 2000 uses native user domain login database.
>
> regards
> jagan
> CCNP, MCSE+I, CLP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28160&t=28079
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Tom Lisa

Chuck,

I have no doubt you will succeed on your next attempt.  I would venture a
guess that if
they hadn't switched to a one-day lab, you would have passed this time.

Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco Regional Networking Academy



Chuck Larrieu wrote:

> I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my
> excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required
> detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case.
>
> For those ninnies who complain that the one day lab devalues the process,
> all I can say is WRONG!
> The lab I saw was far more difficult than I remember from my previous
> attempt, and my previous attempt was NOT easy. In my first attempt, I did
> not see anything I couldn't do. This time, although FAR better prepared, I
> saw LOTS of things I couldn't do. IMHO, the one day format, with the
> elimination of the monkey tasks, allows Cisco to demand a lot more. The 26
> points previously allocated to terminal server setup, cabling, and
> troubleshooting all go someplace. WOW! The places they went! Previous
topics
> that were glossed over appeared in depth. Cisco continues to up the ante,
> and not always in ways one might expect. Some things I wouldn't have
> expected were there in spades. Probably THE major factor continues to be
> reachability. If you don't understand the implications of the given network
> topology, and given interactions, you will be screwed.
>
> The topology presented was interesting. Amazing what one can do on a six
> router / two switch pod to wreak havoc and let you know what an idiot you
> are. Devious doesn't begin to describe it. Bootcamp and IPExpert - it ain't
> the number of routers, boys!
>
> The e-mail feedback is amusing, but not particularly informative. I failed
> with a score greater than 20, meaning I can go back in 30 days for more
> humiliation, if I so desire. the breakdown percentages ( not scores ) would
> be of more interest if I were sitting with the proctor discussing the whys
> and the expectations. Otherwise it does me no god at all. for example, I
> solved a particular problem doing something a particular way. It worked
just
> fine in terms of the results. Yet on that section I scored very poorly.
What
> were they looking for?
>
> Fat fingers are still the major enemy for me, at least. It's no fun fat
> fingering on a Cat 5K. Not by any means. It also helps to be certain layer
> two stuff is done correctly.
>
> Well, debriefing will be fun. I have the topology duplicated in my home
lab,
> and I will "enjoy" analyzing the problems I saw in the real lab. No you
> can't telnet in to look. DON'T ASK!
>
> In terms of seating, it appears to me that there are now more racks in the
> lab, in San Jose, anyway. Half the seats are taken by those testing. The
> other half seem to be those used the previous day. the proctors crank
> through the idle racks, grading the previous day's results.
>
> One last thing. I know what CCO says, and I know what IOS I saw on my rack.
> Rats. The advertised IOS would have gone a long way towards eliminating a
> particular problem I had. Not complaining, because any CCIE should have
been
> able to solve the particular puzzle no matter what the IOS involved. Just
> observing that some things are still in the process of change.
>
> The proctors are still the good folks I remember from last time. Too bad we
> are not given the opportunity for more interaction afterwards. I would
> really have enjoyed discussing my results.
>
> Whelp, another time.
>
> Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28159&t=28142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Command Lookup Tool [7:28135]

2001-12-04 Thread Tom Lisa

Thanks John, I'll pass it along to my students.

Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco Regional Networking Academy


John Neiberger wrote:

> I thought I'd pass this along for those of you who haven't seen it yet.
> I just ran across it and I think I'll be using it often.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/support/Cmdlookup/ios-search.html
>
> Regards,
> John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28158&t=28135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Content Switches [7:28157]

2001-12-04 Thread CCB

I have a quick question about the Cisco 11000 series of content switches,
does anyone know if the content switch is supposed to be able to trunk a
link between the 11000 and a switch (5500,6500).  The reason why I am asking
is I have been working with a 11000 trying to setup a trunk link to provide
our current VLAN's in the VTP domain to the content switch and I am unable
to get the switch (Cat6509) to recognize the trunk link, when I do a "show
trunk detail" on the switch it shows the port as trunking, but it does not
recognize the trunk link.  Both the Content Switch and the Cat6509 are set
to use 802.1Q as the trunking type.  I may be mislead but from everything I
have tried I have come to the conclusion that the interface can only be
trunked between two content switches and not a content switch to a L2/L3
switch.  Any information would be helpful.

Chris




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28157&t=28157
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re; How VSAT works ? [7:28156]

2001-12-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi guys,
I have cisco routers such as 3620 ,3640 with leased lines connectivity to
remote locations Now I am planning to implement/replace these lines to
VSATs, but I am not much familiar with the terms such as PAMA,DAMA,CDMA ,
Also how the operation of VSAT takes place ?Can anybody clear my doubts ,
Also is there any URL which will give details on these terms?
Thanks in advance .




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28156&t=28156
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Telephone lines [7:28151]

2001-12-04 Thread Kevin Welch

A standard telephone line uses 1 pair (2 conductors) for analog phone
services.

-- Kevin Welch

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
John Tafasi
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Telephone lines [7:28151]

Hi group,

Can some one tell me how many twisted pair there are in a regular
telephone
line.


Thanks

John Tafasi




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28155&t=28151
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Donny Mateo

Hi Chuck,

sorry to hear that you didn't pass, but I do get the funny feeling that the 
next try is going bring good news to this list.. ;)
Anyway, just wanted to say, your commment really makes the test sounds 
difficult if not impossible .

Keep it on, and you'll be there in no time..;)

Regards
Donny

>From: "Chuck Larrieu" 
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:34:44 -0500
>
>I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my
>excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required
>detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case.
>
>For those ninnies who complain that the one day lab devalues the process,
>all I can say is WRONG!
>The lab I saw was far more difficult than I remember from my previous
>attempt, and my previous attempt was NOT easy. In my first attempt, I did
>not see anything I couldn't do. This time, although FAR better prepared, I
>saw LOTS of things I couldn't do. IMHO, the one day format, with the
>elimination of the monkey tasks, allows Cisco to demand a lot more. The 26
>points previously allocated to terminal server setup, cabling, and
>troubleshooting all go someplace. WOW! The places they went! Previous 
>topics
>that were glossed over appeared in depth. Cisco continues to up the ante,
>and not always in ways one might expect. Some things I wouldn't have
>expected were there in spades. Probably THE major factor continues to be
>reachability. If you don't understand the implications of the given network
>topology, and given interactions, you will be screwed.
>
>The topology presented was interesting. Amazing what one can do on a six
>router / two switch pod to wreak havoc and let you know what an idiot you
>are. Devious doesn't begin to describe it. Bootcamp and IPExpert - it ain't
>the number of routers, boys!
>
>The e-mail feedback is amusing, but not particularly informative. I failed
>with a score greater than 20, meaning I can go back in 30 days for more
>humiliation, if I so desire. the breakdown percentages ( not scores ) would
>be of more interest if I were sitting with the proctor discussing the whys
>and the expectations. Otherwise it does me no god at all. for example, I
>solved a particular problem doing something a particular way. It worked 
>just
>fine in terms of the results. Yet on that section I scored very poorly. 
>What
>were they looking for?
>
>Fat fingers are still the major enemy for me, at least. It's no fun fat
>fingering on a Cat 5K. Not by any means. It also helps to be certain layer
>two stuff is done correctly.
>
>Well, debriefing will be fun. I have the topology duplicated in my home 
>lab,
>and I will "enjoy" analyzing the problems I saw in the real lab. No you
>can't telnet in to look. DON'T ASK!
>
>In terms of seating, it appears to me that there are now more racks in the
>lab, in San Jose, anyway. Half the seats are taken by those testing. The
>other half seem to be those used the previous day. the proctors crank
>through the idle racks, grading the previous day's results.
>
>One last thing. I know what CCO says, and I know what IOS I saw on my rack.
>Rats. The advertised IOS would have gone a long way towards eliminating a
>particular problem I had. Not complaining, because any CCIE should have 
>been
>able to solve the particular puzzle no matter what the IOS involved. Just
>observing that some things are still in the process of change.
>
>The proctors are still the good folks I remember from last time. Too bad we
>are not given the opportunity for more interaction afterwards. I would
>really have enjoyed discussing my results.
>
>Whelp, another time.
>
>Chuck
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28154&t=28142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]

2001-12-04 Thread Donny Mateo

well you don't always have to put frame-relay map or interface dlci command 
to configure frame-relay.
The most basic one could just be
int serial0
ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y
encap frame-relay
exit
The router will do the mapping of dlci to ip address by using inverse-arp 
dynamically.

and as far as I know the router will maintain some sort of cache for this 
mapping
you can check it out by using the command sh frame map.




>From: "MADMAN" 
>Reply-To: "MADMAN" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]
>Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:31:30 -0500
>
>not sure what an ip address has to do with LMI nor inverse arp as a
>map or interface dlci x will work just fine too.  Thew bottom line is up
>and up on a frame circuit does not mean active PVC.
>
>   Dave
>
>
>
>Donald wrote:
> >
> > Yeah if you inverse arp and you change the ip address on one end, the
> > circuit will stay up, lmi will function, but you will not transfer data.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "MADMAN"
> > To: "Donald"
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]
> >
> > >
> > >   Yup, up and up, you got LMI between you and the switch not an active
> > > PVC.
> > >
> > >   Dave
> > >
> > > Donald wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not necessarily you can have a frame connection in an up/up state 
>and
> > not
> > > > transfer data can't you.
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Gregg Malcolm"
> > > > To:
> > > > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 12:01 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW 
>[7:27930]
> > > >
> > > > > Anil,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sorry, my explaination wasn't very good.  The answer can't be 
>B
> > since
> > > > > you have no information saying data is being sent and received.  
>The
> > > > answer
> > > > > A does fit since a frame relay connection is active if int status 
>is
> > > > UP/UP.
> > > > >
> > > > > As far as the 2nd part, AFAIK not every encap uses keepalives.  
>Frame
> > > > Relay
> > > > > is somewhat special in that an UP/UP status really means that data
> > COULD
> > > > be
> > > > > xfer'ed.  The case of the broken remote CSU/DSU does not fit this
> > > > scenarios
> > > > > since keepalives would not be received.  The question seems geared
> > toward
> > > > > trying to trick the engineer into thinking that data is being 
>xfered
> > vs.
> > > > > could be.  Many encap use keepalives.  A few are F/R, ATM, PPP and
> > HDLC
> > > > (PPP
> > > > > uses an echo).  Not sure if all do (probably not).  Hope that 
>helps.
> > > --
> > > David Madland
> > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > CCIE# 2016
> > > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 612-664-3367
> > >
> > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
>
>--
>David Madland
>Sr. Network Engineer
>CCIE# 2016
>Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>612-664-3367
>
>"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28153&t=27930
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



AS2511 Configuration [7:28152]

2001-12-04 Thread Nahshon Makajil

Im planning to use the AS2500 to connect to most of my servers.
You guys have any configuration example that i can use.
Im planning to connect the servers directly to async ports of my as2511.By
the way all of my servers are on sun.





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28152&t=28152
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Telephone lines [7:28151]

2001-12-04 Thread John Tafasi

Hi group,

Can some one tell me how many twisted pair there are in a regular telephone
line.


Thanks

John Tafasi




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28151&t=28151
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Gregg Malcolm

Chuck,

Thanks for the great feedback.  Sounds like a killer.  I'm taking the lab in
a couple of months (failed my 1st attempt) and it was very helpful to hear
your take.  My question for you is, how much were you able to eat at lunch? 
Tests scores are directly proportional to the amount of food you consume at
lunch.  Correct this and you will pass next time.

Regards,  Gregg


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28150&t=28142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco and other network related links [7:28146]

2001-12-04 Thread Mike Sweeney

Cisco custom document generator- requires CCO login
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/DocGen.pl

Configure a Mac as a TFTP server
http://www.cabletron.com/support/techtips/tk0018-9.html

Dynamic DNS services. Very useful for those who get their network connection
via a cable company with a DHCP addressing.
http://www.tzo.com/MainPageServices/index.html

North American Network Operators Group. talks focus on large-scale backbone
operations, ISP coordination, or technologies that are already deployed or
soon to be deployed in core Internet backbones and exchange points. Popular
topics include traffic engineering, applications of new protocols, routing
policy specification, queue management and congestion, routing scalability,
caching, and inter-provider security, to name a few.
http://www.nanog.org/

One of the BEST comix for geeks!!!
http://www.userfriendly.org/static/

MikeS
www.packetattack.com


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28149&t=28146
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ghosting and Multi cast on switches [7:28120]

2001-12-04 Thread Jeff D

Yes. Using Cat 6500's and 4006's. Let me know what your problem is and I'll
see if I can help.

Jeff

""chris""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am having poor performance on the Cisco 3500 using Semantic ghost and
its
> multicasting.
>
> Has anyone had this problem?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28148&t=28120
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Ole Drews Jensen

Chuck,

I'm sorry to hear you didn't make it - you have been (and still are) on the
top list of members replying with good, informative and professional answers
to many questions including mine. You have also made some good points in
several discussions.

I am sure that you will smack a very good score on your next try at the lab.

Also, thanks for the feedback - it's nice (and scary) to hear about what
goes on on the inside.

Good luck next time, you'll make it.

Ole


 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.RouterChief.com

 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job




-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 7:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]


I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my
excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required
detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case.

For those ninnies who complain that the one day lab devalues the process,
all I can say is WRONG!
The lab I saw was far more difficult than I remember from my previous
attempt, and my previous attempt was NOT easy. In my first attempt, I did
not see anything I couldn't do. This time, although FAR better prepared, I
saw LOTS of things I couldn't do. IMHO, the one day format, with the
elimination of the monkey tasks, allows Cisco to demand a lot more. The 26
points previously allocated to terminal server setup, cabling, and
troubleshooting all go someplace. WOW! The places they went! Previous topics
that were glossed over appeared in depth. Cisco continues to up the ante,
and not always in ways one might expect. Some things I wouldn't have
expected were there in spades. Probably THE major factor continues to be
reachability. If you don't understand the implications of the given network
topology, and given interactions, you will be screwed.

The topology presented was interesting. Amazing what one can do on a six
router / two switch pod to wreak havoc and let you know what an idiot you
are. Devious doesn't begin to describe it. Bootcamp and IPExpert - it ain't
the number of routers, boys!

The e-mail feedback is amusing, but not particularly informative. I failed
with a score greater than 20, meaning I can go back in 30 days for more
humiliation, if I so desire. the breakdown percentages ( not scores ) would
be of more interest if I were sitting with the proctor discussing the whys
and the expectations. Otherwise it does me no god at all. for example, I
solved a particular problem doing something a particular way. It worked just
fine in terms of the results. Yet on that section I scored very poorly. What
were they looking for?

Fat fingers are still the major enemy for me, at least. It's no fun fat
fingering on a Cat 5K. Not by any means. It also helps to be certain layer
two stuff is done correctly.

Well, debriefing will be fun. I have the topology duplicated in my home lab,
and I will "enjoy" analyzing the problems I saw in the real lab. No you
can't telnet in to look. DON'T ASK!

In terms of seating, it appears to me that there are now more racks in the
lab, in San Jose, anyway. Half the seats are taken by those testing. The
other half seem to be those used the previous day. the proctors crank
through the idle racks, grading the previous day's results.

One last thing. I know what CCO says, and I know what IOS I saw on my rack.
Rats. The advertised IOS would have gone a long way towards eliminating a
particular problem I had. Not complaining, because any CCIE should have been
able to solve the particular puzzle no matter what the IOS involved. Just
observing that some things are still in the process of change.

The proctors are still the good folks I remember from last time. Too bad we
are not given the opportunity for more interaction afterwards. I would
really have enjoyed discussing my results.

Whelp, another time.

Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28147&t=28142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco and other network related links [7:28146]

2001-12-04 Thread Kevin Welch

I have a nice collection of CCO and miscellany network links I thought I
would share with the group and see if anyone has any others they might
like to share.  I tried to avoid some of the more specific links dealing
with OSPF, DLSW, SRB, etc.  I look forward to see your handy links.
 
-- Kevin
 
Tools
AirSnort -- AirSnort is a wireless LAN (WLAN) tool which recovers
encryption keys. AirSnort operates by passively monitoring
transmissions, computing the encryption key when enough packets have
been gathered.
http://airsnort.sourceforge.net/
 
Arin Whois -- The ARIN Whois database can be used to look up owners of
IP address ranges and AS information.  
http://www.arin.net/whois/
 
Expect - Expect is a tool that can be used to automate interactive
sessions.  
http://expect.nist.gov/
 
Mail Relay Testing - This site can be used to test a mail server against
various open relay tests.  
http://www.abuse.net/relay.html
 
Traceroute.org - Traceroute.org maintains a list of looking glasses,
public traceroute CGI's, and route-servers.  
http://www.traceroute.org/
 
Jeff Olenchek's VMPS Page - A neat little VMPS project I stumbled
across.  
http://www.uwm.edu/People/jeff/vmps/
 
 
Informational
 
Sockets.com Services - This site contains a list of assigned and well
known TCP/UDP Port numbers.  
http://www.sockets.com/services.htm
 
EtherType Field Public Assignments -- If you ever do protocol decodes
you may find this handy. A list of assigned EtherTypes
http://yocum.org/faqs/ethertypes.html
 
RFC.dk - RFC.dk is a very easy to remember site for finding Internet
RFC's, it also has these documents in HTML format for easy
viewing/printing.  
http://www.rfc.dk  
 
NSA Cisco Router Security Recommendations - This is a set of security
guidelines straight from the NSA for Cisco routers.  This is a very good
read for anyone interested in network security.  
http://nsa2.www.conxion.com/cisco/download.htm
 
Undocumented Cisco Commands - This site contains undocumented commands
in various in Cisco products.  It also has links to other sites that
maintain such database.  ** I take no responsibility for damage done **.

http://www.elemental.net/~lf/undoc/
 
CCO Links -- Some of these may require a CCO Login
 
IOS Feature Navigator - This handy dandy tool allows you to easily track
down what features are supported by an IOS rev and will recommend an IOS
rev based on your feature requirements.  
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/FeatureNav/FN.pl
 
Cisco Technologies Page - This is one of my all time favorite CCO links,
browse sample configurations and design guides by technology.  Very
complete and no engineer is complete without it.
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/index.pl?i=Technologies
 
Cisco Password Recovery - This page contains links to password recover
instructions for every model device you could ever need.  
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/474/
 
Cisco DocGen - DocGen is a java applet that allows you to generate
custom documentation, based on a number of criteria.  Its great for
building study guides.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/DocGen.pl
 
IOS Command Lookup Tool - This site allows you to look up information on
IOS commands very quickly and efficiently and is very handy if you need
syntax or usage information about a command.
http://www.cisco.com/support/Cmdlookup/ios-search.html
 
HW/SW Compatibility Matrix - Need to know what IOS revision supports
your new fancy module?  Well look no further this is indispensable and
should be consulted before the upgrade of any modular Cisco device.
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/Support/HWSWmatrix/hwswmatrix.cgi
 
Improving Security on Cisco Routers - This is router security according
to Cisco and is another very handy guide to understanding network and
router security.  
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/21.html
 
PSIRT Advisories - Keep up on the latest security advisories from
Cisco's Product Security Incident Response Team.  
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/advisory.html
 
Understanding and Troubleshooting Router Crashes - This is a very
informational document for anyone who runs has problems with router
crashes, it gives you an idea what to expect from TAC, how to help you
isolate the problem, etc.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/122/crashes_router_troubleshooting.shtm
l
 
Cisco Connection Documentation - The all knowing OZ, the great, the
powerful, documentation CD.  Available to you online.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/home/home.htm
 
Pix Documentation - Your one stop shop for Pix documentation.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pix_command_ref.shtml
 
Cisco Access Dial Configuration Cookbook - If you have any RAS questions
or just want a little more background in Access Dial Technologies, then
look no further.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28146&t=28146
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 

RE: NM-16A [7:28057]

2001-12-04 Thread Jagan Krishnaraj

no need 

regards
jagan


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28145&t=28057
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco Dial-up and NT RAS [7:28079]

2001-12-04 Thread Jagan Krishnaraj

For dial-out from any of the workstation (windows 95&98 and NT)
using modem in Cisco Ras you can get software from tacticalsoftware.com

For dial-in use Radius server and IAS service in Windows 2000 Server.

This radius server in Windows 2000 uses native user domain login database.

regards
jagan 
CCNP, MCSE+I, CLP





Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28144&t=28079
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Paul Lalonde

Chuck,

You didn't fail, buddy, you simply got one BIG step closer to achieving it.

It's all about learning, right?  I totally admire your approach, and I
applaud your determination.

The next one's got your name on it... count on it!

Paul


""Chuck Larrieu""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my
> excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required
> detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case.
>
> For those ninnies who complain that the one day lab devalues the process,
> all I can say is WRONG!
> The lab I saw was far more difficult than I remember from my previous
> attempt, and my previous attempt was NOT easy. In my first attempt, I did
> not see anything I couldn't do. This time, although FAR better prepared, I
> saw LOTS of things I couldn't do. IMHO, the one day format, with the
> elimination of the monkey tasks, allows Cisco to demand a lot more. The 26
> points previously allocated to terminal server setup, cabling, and
> troubleshooting all go someplace. WOW! The places they went! Previous
topics
> that were glossed over appeared in depth. Cisco continues to up the ante,
> and not always in ways one might expect. Some things I wouldn't have
> expected were there in spades. Probably THE major factor continues to be
> reachability. If you don't understand the implications of the given
network
> topology, and given interactions, you will be screwed.
>
> The topology presented was interesting. Amazing what one can do on a six
> router / two switch pod to wreak havoc and let you know what an idiot you
> are. Devious doesn't begin to describe it. Bootcamp and IPExpert - it
ain't
> the number of routers, boys!
>
> The e-mail feedback is amusing, but not particularly informative. I failed
> with a score greater than 20, meaning I can go back in 30 days for more
> humiliation, if I so desire. the breakdown percentages ( not scores )
would
> be of more interest if I were sitting with the proctor discussing the whys
> and the expectations. Otherwise it does me no god at all. for example, I
> solved a particular problem doing something a particular way. It worked
just
> fine in terms of the results. Yet on that section I scored very poorly.
What
> were they looking for?
>
> Fat fingers are still the major enemy for me, at least. It's no fun fat
> fingering on a Cat 5K. Not by any means. It also helps to be certain layer
> two stuff is done correctly.
>
> Well, debriefing will be fun. I have the topology duplicated in my home
lab,
> and I will "enjoy" analyzing the problems I saw in the real lab. No you
> can't telnet in to look. DON'T ASK!
>
> In terms of seating, it appears to me that there are now more racks in the
> lab, in San Jose, anyway. Half the seats are taken by those testing. The
> other half seem to be those used the previous day. the proctors crank
> through the idle racks, grading the previous day's results.
>
> One last thing. I know what CCO says, and I know what IOS I saw on my
rack.
> Rats. The advertised IOS would have gone a long way towards eliminating a
> particular problem I had. Not complaining, because any CCIE should have
been
> able to solve the particular puzzle no matter what the IOS involved. Just
> observing that some things are still in the process of change.
>
> The proctors are still the good folks I remember from last time. Too bad
we
> are not given the opportunity for more interaction afterwards. I would
> really have enjoyed discussing my results.
>
> Whelp, another time.
>
> Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28143&t=28142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Lab Attempt #2 - no go :-< [7:28142]

2001-12-04 Thread Chuck Larrieu

I wish I could say it took so long to get my results back because my
excruciatingly sophisticated solutions to the problems presented required
detailed and intimate analysis. Alas, that was not the case.

For those ninnies who complain that the one day lab devalues the process,
all I can say is WRONG!
The lab I saw was far more difficult than I remember from my previous
attempt, and my previous attempt was NOT easy. In my first attempt, I did
not see anything I couldn't do. This time, although FAR better prepared, I
saw LOTS of things I couldn't do. IMHO, the one day format, with the
elimination of the monkey tasks, allows Cisco to demand a lot more. The 26
points previously allocated to terminal server setup, cabling, and
troubleshooting all go someplace. WOW! The places they went! Previous topics
that were glossed over appeared in depth. Cisco continues to up the ante,
and not always in ways one might expect. Some things I wouldn't have
expected were there in spades. Probably THE major factor continues to be
reachability. If you don't understand the implications of the given network
topology, and given interactions, you will be screwed.

The topology presented was interesting. Amazing what one can do on a six
router / two switch pod to wreak havoc and let you know what an idiot you
are. Devious doesn't begin to describe it. Bootcamp and IPExpert - it ain't
the number of routers, boys!

The e-mail feedback is amusing, but not particularly informative. I failed
with a score greater than 20, meaning I can go back in 30 days for more
humiliation, if I so desire. the breakdown percentages ( not scores ) would
be of more interest if I were sitting with the proctor discussing the whys
and the expectations. Otherwise it does me no god at all. for example, I
solved a particular problem doing something a particular way. It worked just
fine in terms of the results. Yet on that section I scored very poorly. What
were they looking for?

Fat fingers are still the major enemy for me, at least. It's no fun fat
fingering on a Cat 5K. Not by any means. It also helps to be certain layer
two stuff is done correctly.

Well, debriefing will be fun. I have the topology duplicated in my home lab,
and I will "enjoy" analyzing the problems I saw in the real lab. No you
can't telnet in to look. DON'T ASK!

In terms of seating, it appears to me that there are now more racks in the
lab, in San Jose, anyway. Half the seats are taken by those testing. The
other half seem to be those used the previous day. the proctors crank
through the idle racks, grading the previous day's results.

One last thing. I know what CCO says, and I know what IOS I saw on my rack.
Rats. The advertised IOS would have gone a long way towards eliminating a
particular problem I had. Not complaining, because any CCIE should have been
able to solve the particular puzzle no matter what the IOS involved. Just
observing that some things are still in the process of change.

The proctors are still the good folks I remember from last time. Too bad we
are not given the opportunity for more interaction afterwards. I would
really have enjoyed discussing my results.

Whelp, another time.

Chuck




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28142&t=28142
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below m [7:28115]

2001-12-04 Thread John Neiberger

Do you mean, if you use the backup interface command will the interface
be spoofing?  If that's what you mean, the answer is no.  Here is what
it will look like:

Async4 is standby mode, line protocol is down 

John

>>> "Donald"  12/4/01 3:17:20 PM >>>
If you use a interface as a backup doesn't it spoof.



- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Dozier" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means?
[7:28101]


> Think of the definition of "spoof" - deception, lying, hoaxing,
etc...etc...
>
> Now to quote from the CiscoPress CIT book, pgs 495-496.
>
> What spooofing does is "lie" to Layer 3 DDR so that a routing entry
> will be maintained in the router. Having this routing entry enables
> DDR to wake and trigger a call to the ISDN network when user traffic
> requires the connection.
>
> Notes of interest:
>
> "Line protocol is up (spoofing)" is D channel information that the
> interface alleges to be up.
>
> Spoofing "does not" necessarily mean the the D channel is up. In
fact,
> there may be no line on the interface.
>
> end quote:
>
> HTH
>
> Stefan
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
> Bob Perez
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means?
[7:28092]
>
>
> PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
> BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
>   Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
>   Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28131&t=28115
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Confirm your subscription [7:28112]

2001-12-04 Thread Hire, Ejay

If anyone confirms this subscription, I will forcefully remove your
link-clicking fingers.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Confirm your subscription [7:28112]


~~~
Mailing List Subscription Confirmation
*** Confirmation required ***
~~~

You recently decided to join a mailing list.

This list has a double optin feature so you must goto the URL listed below
to finish joining this list. This is a safeguard for you.

PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION:
http://pub26.bravenet.com/elist/add.php?usernum=2223729417&id=4507306

This email is being sent to you because of a request to join a mailing list.
If this message was sent in error, please disregard it and no further email
will be sent to you on this subject.


---
Bravenet.com ~ free webtools for webmasters ~ http://www.bravenet.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28132&t=28112
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors [7:28137]

2001-12-04 Thread Jason

Yes, in a larger environment, you can use confederation and then use RR
within the confederation.

""Howard C. Berkowitz""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >It's my understanding that route reflectors are used in small
> >networks,confederations are used in larger networks.
>
> If anything, at least in the ISP context, it's probably more the
> other way around. Remember also that you can build hierarchies of
> route reflector clusters.
>
> ISPs, as opposed to enterprises, tend not to have a lot of internal
> policies about what can go where.  They also make increasing use of
> MPLS in their cores coordinated with BGP at the edge.
>
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Bob Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:32 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: OT: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors
> >
> >
> >Folks,
> >
> >Anyone have any real-world pro's/con's for BGP confeds versus
> >RouteReflectors. It seems that routereflectors are easier to configure,
> >but I was not sure of the actual technical reasons to have 2
> >technologies that seem to address the same problem.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Bob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28141&t=28137
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below m [7:28115]

2001-12-04 Thread Stefan Dozier

Actually a backup interface will go into "standby mode"!

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/britobribackup.html

Stefan


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Donald
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below m [7:28115]


If you use a interface as a backup doesn't it spoof.



- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Dozier"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28101]


> Think of the definition of "spoof" - deception, lying, hoaxing,
etc...etc...
>
> Now to quote from the CiscoPress CIT book, pgs 495-496.
>
> What spooofing does is "lie" to Layer 3 DDR so that a routing entry
> will be maintained in the router. Having this routing entry enables
> DDR to wake and trigger a call to the ISDN network when user traffic
> requires the connection.
>
> Notes of interest:
>
> "Line protocol is up (spoofing)" is D channel information that the
> interface alleges to be up.
>
> Spoofing "does not" necessarily mean the the D channel is up. In fact,
> there may be no line on the interface.
>
> end quote:
>
> HTH
>
> Stefan
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bob Perez
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28092]
>
>
> PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
> BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
>   Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
>   Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28140&t=28115
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors [7:28139]

2001-12-04 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>It's my understanding that route reflectors are used in small
>networks,confederations are used in larger networks.

If anything, at least in the ISP context, it's probably more the 
other way around. Remember also that you can build hierarchies of 
route reflector clusters.

ISPs, as opposed to enterprises, tend not to have a lot of internal 
policies about what can go where.  They also make increasing use of 
MPLS in their cores coordinated with BGP at the edge.

>
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:32 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: OT: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors
>
>
>Folks,
>
>Anyone have any real-world pro's/con's for BGP confeds versus
>RouteReflectors. It seems that routereflectors are easier to configure,
>but I was not sure of the actual technical reasons to have 2
>technologies that seem to address the same problem.
>
>Thanks,
>Bob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28139&t=28139
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MTU size increase`s bandwidth ???? [7:27673]

2001-12-04 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

Thanks for getting back to us. This is an interesting quandary. I think it 
must have something to do with SAR. When you had the MTU set to 4470, the 
interface chopped up 4470 worth of bytes (from different packets), and 
whipped out the cells as fast as possible, causing you to burst beyond your 
allotted 10 Mbps. (I say "from different packets" because the protocols you 
mention don't normally send packets larger than 1500 bytes.)

When you have the MTU set to 1500, the interface chops up those bytes, 
sends them out, grabs some more bytes, chops those up and sends them out, 
etc. This takes more time causing you not to burst.

Do you get charged extra for going over 10 Mbps? Also, does SMDS have 
something like Frame Relay where traffic in the burst range can get dropped 
more readily in the provider's network? (meaning it's a bit risky to burst)

If you don't get charged extra and the risk of dropped cells isn't an 
issue, then maybe you don't want to change it. The second scenario (with 
the 1500-byte MTU) is less efficient and leaves bytes hanging around in 
queues longer than the first scenario.

I hate making all these guesses, but my SMDS, AAL3, HSSI experience is 
pretty minimal. But the theory is sound! ;-)

Priscilla

At 09:08 AM 12/4/01, steve skinner wrote:
>Hello,
>
>
>sorry i`ve taken so long to reply
>
>the underlying technology is an SMDS network...we have bought a 10 meg pipe
>that has the capacity to Burst upto 25meg..(think Frame..same sort of
>thing)..
>
>so yes it is impossible to use 120% ...but i should have said 120% of what
>we are allowed ...sorry...my bad
>
>it`s SMDS which is just basically AAL3 over a HSSI int to the provider ATM
>backbone...so BT say`s
>
>about the SARing.we were thinking about that but
>
>we are only  using Ethernet apps...we have OSPF,Multicast SMDS,HTTP,Mail
>netbeui,ipx(tunneld)...that`s all ...
>non of this stuff should generate packets bigger than 1500...
>
>the only thing i have been able to come up with since then is
>
>it goes from
>HUBPTMultiP (10 sites) over HSSI multicast
>To Spoke PTP multicast...
>both of our ends are serail so prehaps it was losing something in the
>sar`ing at both ends...
>
>i am really stumped as to how changes to the MAX MTU size would do
>anything..i thought with this command all we were doing was allowing
>a MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION SIZEnot changing the interface so every unit is
>set to this size...that`s what foxes me..
>
>
>cheers anyway
>
>steve
> >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> >Reply-To: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: MTU size increase`s bandwidth  [7:27673]
> >Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:31:04 -0500
> >
> >Bandwidth is how much capacity a link has. It can't be increased without
> >asking for more bandwidth from a provider or moving to a different
> >technology. (Just a comment on the subject of your message.)
> >
> >The amount of bandwidth usable by applications could increase if you
> >reduced the overhead. Overhead includes packet headers, packet ACKs,
> >interframe gaps, etc. Increasing packet sizes can reduce the percentage of
> >bandwidth used by those overhead functions, thus leaving more for
> >application-layer data.
> >
> >You said that you are using 120% of bandwidth. That's not possible.
> >Remember bandwidth just means capacity. You can't use more than is there.
> >The offered load to the network could be more than the capacity. But the
> >network itself can't carry more than its capacity. I'm wondering what is
> >telling you that you are using 120%?
> >
> >Since you are paying for bandwidth, in one way or another, you want to use
> >as much as possible, while leaving head room for bursty traffic.
> >
> >Those were just terminology things.
> >
> >On to your question: I could see bandwidth usage going down when you
> >decrease the frame size. There's an interframe gap (silence) between every
> >frame. That may explain it.
> >
> >Also perhaps you are benefiting from more efficient segmentation and
> >reassembly. (I think you said you are using SMDS which is cell-based?)
> >Perhaps it works more efficiently if you give it smaller chunks to work
on.
> >
> >On the other hand, what are the applications? Most applications don't send
> >large frames, although they could be configured to do so. But a typical
> >TCP/IP application that grew up on Ethernet and Internet technologies
> >wouldn't send packets bigger than 1500 bytes. And packets can't grow in
> >size. I don't know of any technology that puts packets together just
> >because the interface MTU is larger than received packets. So I'm
wondering
> >what the 4470 MTU you mentioned was really doing (as are you! ;-)
> >
> >Need more caffeine ;-)
> >
> >Priscilla
> >
> >
> >
> >At 09:30 AM 11/29/01, steve skinner wrote:
> > >Chaps,
> > >
> > >
> > >i came across this recently and was wondering if anyone had seen this
> > >before..
> > >
> > >we currently have 2 10meg smds(multic

RE: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors [7:28137]

2001-12-04 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>It's my understanding that route reflectors are used in small
>networks,confederations are used in larger networks.

If anything, at least in the ISP context, it's probably more the 
other way around. Remember also that you can build hierarchies of 
route reflector clusters.

ISPs, as opposed to enterprises, tend not to have a lot of internal 
policies about what can go where.  They also make increasing use of 
MPLS in their cores coordinated with BGP at the edge.

>
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:32 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: OT: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors
>
>
>Folks,
>
>Anyone have any real-world pro's/con's for BGP confeds versus
>RouteReflectors. It seems that routereflectors are easier to configure,
>but I was not sure of the actual technical reasons to have 2
>technologies that seem to address the same problem.
>
>Thanks,
>Bob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28137&t=28137
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command Lookup Tool [7:28135]

2001-12-04 Thread juno vtv

Thanks John!

-junovtv


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28136&t=28135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Command Lookup Tool [7:28135]

2001-12-04 Thread John Neiberger

I thought I'd pass this along for those of you who haven't seen it yet. 
I just ran across it and I think I'll be using it often.

http://www.cisco.com/support/Cmdlookup/ios-search.html

Regards,
John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28135&t=28135
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: SNMP process [7:28134]

2001-12-04 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark

> on our core router, every once in a while we will drop some
> telnet connections. When this happens I look at "show proc
> cpu" and see that overall util is 89% in which 69% of that
> traffic is snmp. Obviously this is not good.

An obvious suggestion would be to stop asking the router so
many questions (via SNMP). If you're unsure who's generating
the SNMP traffic, set up an access-list to block it.

If you're looking for something else that that, please be more
specific.

-A
-- 
Heroes: Vint Cerf & Bob Kahn, Leonard Kleinrock, Robert Metcalfe
Links : http://www.hojmark.org/networking/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28134&t=28134
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Hi [7:28133]

2001-12-04 Thread Greason, Rebecca

How are you ?
When I saw this screen saver, I immediately thought about you
I am in a harry, I promise you will love it!

 
Your attachment "gone.scr" contained virus:
 "UNAUTHORIZED FILE".

It was quarantined and replaced with this text file.

ID:SVDC1ULL003::SYQ0cf830c9




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28133&t=28133
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cyclades Terminal Server [7:28126]

2001-12-04 Thread Gaz

You read my mind. I'm a convert. Formatting a partition as we speak.
Even bought a book - I'll probably even buy another one once I realise the
first one is too advanced :-)

The feeling that I've started too late and ignored it well enough up until
now kept me away from Linux/Unix, but finished my CCNP and need a change
rather than a rest.
This old dog needs a new trickhopefully it won't be to roll over and die
:-)


Gaz


""Patrick Ramsey""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> awesome!  Now go grab a copy of linux and install it!  : )
>
> >>> "Gaz"  12/04/01 05:17PM >>>
> Thank-you to those that pointed me in the direction of the Cyclades
Terminal
> Server.
> My problem at the time was dial up access to a site with 10 cisco devices
> which needed console access and I said I would let people know how it
went.
>
> Worried me a little when it arrived and configuration seemed to be CLI and
> worst of all for a Unix-fool like me, its Linux based.
> Nobody is worse with Linux than me.
>
> Luckily, after minimal configuration there is a Web based GUI which does a
> lot of tasks and the manual scraped the rest.
>
> Took me a full day to configure it for:
> modem access to it,
> dial in with SSH v2,
> authenticate with Radius,
> and connect through any one of the other 15 ports to the Cisco devices.
>
> Long time I know but 3000 pounds sterling cheaper than an equivalent Cisco
> set-up (Cisco don't cater for SSH very well)
>
> Thanks again
>
> Gaz




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28130&t=28126
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Hi [7:28129]

2001-12-04 Thread Greason, Rebecca

How are you ?
When I saw this screen saver, I immediately thought about you
I am in a harry, I promise you will love it!

 
Your attachment "gone.scr" contained virus:
 "UNAUTHORIZED FILE".

It was quarantined and replaced with this text file.

ID:SVDC1ULL003::SYQ0cf4b4a2




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28129&t=28129
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Cyclades Terminal Server [7:28126]

2001-12-04 Thread Patrick Ramsey

awesome!  Now go grab a copy of linux and install it!  : )

>>> "Gaz"  12/04/01 05:17PM >>>
Thank-you to those that pointed me in the direction of the Cyclades Terminal
Server.
My problem at the time was dial up access to a site with 10 cisco devices
which needed console access and I said I would let people know how it went.

Worried me a little when it arrived and configuration seemed to be CLI and
worst of all for a Unix-fool like me, its Linux based.
Nobody is worse with Linux than me.

Luckily, after minimal configuration there is a Web based GUI which does a
lot of tasks and the manual scraped the rest.

Took me a full day to configure it for:
modem access to it,
dial in with SSH v2,
authenticate with Radius,
and connect through any one of the other 15 ports to the Cisco devices.

Long time I know but 3000 pounds sterling cheaper than an equivalent Cisco
set-up (Cisco don't cater for SSH very well)

Thanks again

Gaz




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28128&t=28126
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread Kent Hundley

Actually that's not quite true.  While most, if not all, commercial FW's
support NAT, there are some notable FW software sets that are pretty
strictly proxy based.  The FW toolkit comes to mind for one. (FWTK) This is
the code that the Guantlet firewall is based on.  There are also FW's that
support NAT but also support true proxies such as Gauntlet and Raptor.  The
PIX can _only_ do NAT, it has no proxy functionality. (what they call a
cut-through proxy is a "proxy" only from an authentication perspective)

I think the point of the NAT comment though was that the PIX is very limited
in its routing ability and generally will only function for packets to come
in one interface and go out another, as opposed to other FW's which can
support more advanced IP forwarding. (such as one-armed routing/filtering)

Regards,
Kent

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Patrick Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX [7:28083]


Isn't that what all firewalls do?  Static translation from the outside to
the inside with various rules.  aside from protocol analysing, I would say
all firewalls are nat boxes.

-Patrick

>>> "Kevin Welch"  12/04/01 01:46PM >>>
That is very correct.  The pix is more a NAT box than anything (sorry if
this offends anyone).

-- Kevin Welch


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Michael J. Doherty
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX [7:28083]

The PIX has limited routing capabilities (in order to allow packets
through
the firewall).  It cannot route packets out the same interface that it
arrived on.  If it does not have a route to a host on another interface,
it
will drop the packet.  (my understanding, anyway, feel free to correct
an
inaccuracies).

Mike

- Original Message -
From: "BASSOLE Rock"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:03
Subject: PIX [7:28083]


> Hi group,
>
>
> I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).
>
> -Security level for the inside interface is 100.
> -Security level for the outside interface is 0.
>
> Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on
the
> outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside
interface)?
>
> Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside
interface?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rock BASSOLE
> Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28127&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below m [7:28115]

2001-12-04 Thread Donald

If you use a interface as a backup doesn't it spoof.



- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Dozier" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28101]


> Think of the definition of "spoof" - deception, lying, hoaxing,
etc...etc...
>
> Now to quote from the CiscoPress CIT book, pgs 495-496.
>
> What spooofing does is "lie" to Layer 3 DDR so that a routing entry
> will be maintained in the router. Having this routing entry enables
> DDR to wake and trigger a call to the ISDN network when user traffic
> requires the connection.
>
> Notes of interest:
>
> "Line protocol is up (spoofing)" is D channel information that the
> interface alleges to be up.
>
> Spoofing "does not" necessarily mean the the D channel is up. In fact,
> there may be no line on the interface.
>
> end quote:
>
> HTH
>
> Stefan
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Bob Perez
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28092]
>
>
> PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
> BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
>   Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
>   Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28115&t=28115
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cyclades Terminal Server [7:28126]

2001-12-04 Thread Gaz

Thank-you to those that pointed me in the direction of the Cyclades Terminal
Server.
My problem at the time was dial up access to a site with 10 cisco devices
which needed console access and I said I would let people know how it went.

Worried me a little when it arrived and configuration seemed to be CLI and
worst of all for a Unix-fool like me, its Linux based.
Nobody is worse with Linux than me.

Luckily, after minimal configuration there is a Web based GUI which does a
lot of tasks and the manual scraped the rest.

Took me a full day to configure it for:
modem access to it,
dial in with SSH v2,
authenticate with Radius,
and connect through any one of the other 15 ports to the Cisco devices.

Long time I know but 3000 pounds sterling cheaper than an equivalent Cisco
set-up (Cisco don't cater for SSH very well)

Thanks again

Gaz




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28126&t=28126
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



You have been removed from our mailing list [7:28125]

2001-12-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You have been removed from the mail list at
http://www.herbal-scentsations.com
Sorry to see you go. Come back and visit from time to time.

---




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28125&t=28125
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Welcome to Herbal Scentsation's Mailing List [7:28124]

2001-12-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You have successfully been added to the mailing list at:

http://www.herbal-scentsations.com

Thank you for joining our list.
If you did not want to join our list and did so by mistake click here and
unsubcribe http://www.herbal-scentsations.com/page570673.htm

---




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28124&t=28124
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: COLT [7:28119]

2001-12-04 Thread Chris & Cindy Watson

COLT is now offline - it has been replaced by elearning. You need a reseller
login to access it.


""Brian Zeitz""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello!
>
> Does anyone have the link for Cisco Online Tests? I guess it's a secret
> link ;) A friend of mine said he found them helpful, but he doesn't
> remember the link :O Hope you are having a good day..
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Brian




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28123&t=28119
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Confirm your subscription [7:28121]

2001-12-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

~~~
Mailing List Subscription Confirmation
*** Confirmation required ***
~~~

You recently decided to join a mailing list.

This list has a double optin feature so you must goto the URL listed below
to finish joining this list. This is a safeguard for you.

PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION:
http://pub26.bravenet.com/elist/add.php?usernum=2223729417&id=4507306

This email is being sent to you because of a request to join a mailing list.
If this message was sent in error, please disregard it and no further email
will be sent to you on this subject.


---
Bravenet.com ~ free webtools for webmasters ~ http://www.bravenet.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28121&t=28121
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Confirm your subscription [7:28122]

2001-12-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

~~~
Mailing List Subscription Confirmation
*** Confirmation required ***
~~~

You recently decided to join a mailing list.

This list has a double optin feature so you must goto the URL listed below
to finish joining this list. This is a safeguard for you.

PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION:
http://pub26.bravenet.com/elist/add.php?usernum=2223729417&id=4507306

This email is being sent to you because of a request to join a mailing list.
If this message was sent in error, please disregard it and no further email
will be sent to you on this subject.


---
Bravenet.com ~ free webtools for webmasters ~ http://www.bravenet.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28122&t=28122
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Ghosting and Multi cast on switches [7:28120]

2001-12-04 Thread chris

I am having poor performance on the Cisco 3500 using Semantic ghost and its
multicasting.

Has anyone had this problem?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28120&t=28120
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



COLT [7:28119]

2001-12-04 Thread Brian Zeitz

Hello!

Does anyone have the link for Cisco Online Tests? I guess it's a secret
link ;) A friend of mine said he found them helpful, but he doesn't
remember the link :O Hope you are having a good day..

Thanks in advance,

Brian




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28119&t=28119
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Need Help [7:28118]

2001-12-04 Thread Kazan, Naim

I am interested in your opinion guys. I am interested in studying for my
Cisco certs. I have troytec and Boson tests. How would you rate the two
companies. 

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: Provost, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ameritrain for CCNP cert classes [7:28111]


Does anyone have experience with Ameritrain for CCNP certification classes?
They offer an 8 week course (12 hours a week) for the CCNP track (all 4
tests).  Hands on Cisco equipment and only 8 students max per class.  

I have heard their radio commercials, but don't know anyone who has used
them.

If anyone has any info, please let me know.

Thanks,
Rob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28118&t=28118
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Hi [7:28107]

2001-12-04 Thread netman

Ya some people just have to click on every attachment they get.
Unbelieveable. Hopefully they learn before they become a network admin.

Don
- Original Message -
From: "VoIP Guy" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: Hi [7:28107]


> Looks like Aderion got a virus or two :)
>
> ""Aderion Brewer""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > How are you ?
> > When I saw this screen saver, I immediately thought about you
> > I am in a harry, I promise you will love it!
> >
> > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
> which
> > had a name of gone.scr]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28117&t=28107
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Searched the archives but didn't find this scenario.. [7:28114]

2001-12-04 Thread Gibb, Jake

We have two remote offices that use Appletalk over a Frame-Relay line
currently. I will be installing Pt-2-Pt lines in each office giving them
each local ISP access to the Internet. I would like to use a Cisco PIX
in each office to establish an IPSEC tunnel between the two. The
clincher is how to get appletalk across that tunnel? Would tunneling
appletalk at a seperate router behind the pix and then shoving IP over
the IPSEC be the answer? So for each office I would need two routers and
one pix? Thoughts?

-Jake




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28114&t=28114
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Hi [7:28107]

2001-12-04 Thread Bill Carter

This is a new virus going around.  note the file gone.scr

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Aderion Brewer
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hi [7:28107]


How are you ?
When I saw this screen saver, I immediately thought about you
I am in a harry, I promise you will love it!

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which
had a name of gone.scr]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28113&t=28107
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT:Advise on Auction fraud [7:28004]

2001-12-04 Thread Jason

I would toss out names but I believe that the groupstudy server filter any
messages with the seller name... They still owe me more than US$1000 and has
refuse to answer my calls cliaming that I slander them and that their
lawyers will contact me. I'm still waiting and I'm still going to continue
to "slander" them until their pay me back the money. It has been a good 8
months since they agree to return the money. I don't expect to see it soon
and I'm still waiting for the lawyers call and in fact, left my contact
number , etc a couple of times in case they don't have it...

Feel free to email me offline and I'll be glad to provide the details. I'm
just sooo busy at the moment, else I'll "slander" them further on all the
related usenet groups. Maybe I'll get around to doing it this Christmas as a
present. Oh yeah, they do sell under a lot of different names in eBay. I
got about a dozen of emails cliaming similar type of fraud, complaints to
BBB doesn't do anything except a promise from BBB to file up the complaints
on them for record. In case anybody is wondering , it is GStore or
www.iq.com .


""Mike Sweeney""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Why not start posting names of sellers that are good to work with? I would
> imagine it would get away from the possible slander threats. I will toss
out
> three names that I deal with on a regular basis and have zero complaints.
> All have gone a bit beyond the normal in several cases.
>
> Quadrasource ( bigpeach) in Tustin CA.. they also do walk up sales..
Classic
> store front with stuff spilling out of the back ;)
>
> Comstar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I gave him a call to pay for a Cat5000 and
> mentioned it was for my lab. The pic showed empty slots.. no covers except
> for the filled slots. The cat showed up 2 days later with ALL covers in
> place. Nice guy :)
>
> Lassongdl I have bought three times from him and each has been trouble
free.
> And he is responsive to email even after the sale. I had a problem with a
> card that ended up being a dirty connector but he was willing right away
to
> help or replace the card if needed.
>
> Now- I have NO stake in any of these companies aside from the money I send
> them for more cisco parts :) I've just had very good luck with them on MY
> purchases.. no claims are made beyond that.
>
> MikeS




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28088&t=28004
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Confirm your subscription [7:28112]

2001-12-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

~~~
Mailing List Subscription Confirmation
*** Confirmation required ***
~~~

You recently decided to join a mailing list.

This list has a double optin feature so you must goto the URL listed below
to finish joining this list. This is a safeguard for you.

PLEASE VISIT THIS LINK TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION:
http://pub26.bravenet.com/elist/add.php?usernum=2223729417&id=4507306

This email is being sent to you because of a request to join a mailing list.
If this message was sent in error, please disregard it and no further email
will be sent to you on this subject.


---
Bravenet.com ~ free webtools for webmasters ~ http://www.bravenet.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28112&t=28112
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Ameritrain for CCNP cert classes [7:28111]

2001-12-04 Thread Provost, Robert

Does anyone have experience with Ameritrain for CCNP certification classes?
They offer an 8 week course (12 hours a week) for the CCNP track (all 4
tests).  Hands on Cisco equipment and only 8 students max per class.  

I have heard their radio commercials, but don't know anyone who has used
them.

If anyone has any info, please let me know.

Thanks,
Rob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28111&t=28111
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors [7:28110]

2001-12-04 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz

>Folks,
>
>Anyone have any real-world pro's/con's for BGP confeds versus
>RouteReflectors. It seems that routereflectors are easier to configure,
>but I was not sure of the actual technical reasons to have 2
>technologies that seem to address the same problem.
>
>Thanks,
>Bob

There are a lot of pros and cons, but both have their applications. 
Confederations give you more control, while route reflectors are 
simpler and probably have better performance.  I find that I tend to 
use confederations when I'm doing "backbones of backbones" for large 
enterprises and route reflectors more for ISPs.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28110&t=28110
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



OT: outlook bashing [7:28107]

2001-12-04 Thread Alex Lei

I wish it was easier to be security - conscious with Microsoft products..
but outlook is very difficult to secure. For a lot of users, it's tedious
for them to disable preview panel and automatic preview; increase attachment
security level and macros security level. These features should have never
been implemented, or at least shipped disabled. I have received a good dozen
infected emails this morning alone.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28109&t=28107
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Hi [7:28107]

2001-12-04 Thread VoIP Guy

Looks like Aderion got a virus or two :)

""Aderion Brewer""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> How are you ?
> When I saw this screen saver, I immediately thought about you
> I am in a harry, I promise you will love it!
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream
which
> had a name of gone.scr]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28108&t=28107
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Hi [7:28107]

2001-12-04 Thread Aderion Brewer

How are you ?
When I saw this screen saver, I immediately thought about you
I am in a harry, I promise you will love it!

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which
had a name of gone.scr]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28107&t=28107
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread Patrick Ramsey

Isn't that what all firewalls do?  Static translation from the outside to
the inside with various rules.  aside from protocol analysing, I would say
all firewalls are nat boxes.

-Patrick

>>> "Kevin Welch"  12/04/01 01:46PM >>>
That is very correct.  The pix is more a NAT box than anything (sorry if
this offends anyone).

-- Kevin Welch


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Michael J. Doherty
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: PIX [7:28083]

The PIX has limited routing capabilities (in order to allow packets
through
the firewall).  It cannot route packets out the same interface that it
arrived on.  If it does not have a route to a host on another interface,
it
will drop the packet.  (my understanding, anyway, feel free to correct
an
inaccuracies).

Mike

- Original Message -
From: "BASSOLE Rock" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:03
Subject: PIX [7:28083]


> Hi group,
>
>
> I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).
>
> -Security level for the inside interface is 100.
> -Security level for the outside interface is 0.
>
> Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on
the
> outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside
interface)?
>
> Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside
interface?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rock BASSOLE
> Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28106&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread Kevin Welch

That is very correct.  The pix is more a NAT box than anything (sorry if
this offends anyone).

-- Kevin Welch


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Michael J. Doherty
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX [7:28083]

The PIX has limited routing capabilities (in order to allow packets
through
the firewall).  It cannot route packets out the same interface that it
arrived on.  If it does not have a route to a host on another interface,
it
will drop the packet.  (my understanding, anyway, feel free to correct
an
inaccuracies).

Mike

- Original Message -
From: "BASSOLE Rock" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:03
Subject: PIX [7:28083]


> Hi group,
>
>
> I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).
>
> -Security level for the inside interface is 100.
> -Security level for the outside interface is 0.
>
> Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on
the
> outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside
interface)?
>
> Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside
interface?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rock BASSOLE
> Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28097&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FW: HP-Openview messages reveived [7:28073]

2001-12-04 Thread John Neiberger

Bill, 

The best source of OpenView information is the mailing list at
www.ovforum.org.  Sign up for a membership (now free) and you can
browse the archives of the list, as well.  If you need to support an
OpenView product then a subscription to that list is a must-have.  I'm
not personally aware of any good books on OpenView products yet.  I know
there are couple of them out there but I haven't heard any good
reviews.

HTH,
John

>>> "William Harrison"  12/4/01 12:26:29 PM >>>
John,

You seem to know a lot about Openview.  Is there a list for it?  Your
URL
for node manager is installed and working great!  Thanks.  Any good
books

Bill Harrison
CCIE written

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: Re: HP-Openview messages reveived [7:28073]


Was this post meant for the OV Forum list ?  ;-)

Yes, this is because you don't have the necessary MIBs loaded.  This
particular trap is sent when a telnet session to that device is either
started or ended.

HTH,
John

>>> "Patrick Ramsey"  12/4/01 9:07:22 AM
>>>
Ok Guys/Gals,

Received event .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.0.1 (enterprise:.1.3.6.4.1.9 generic:6
specific:1), no format in trapd.conf. 6 args: [1]
private.enterprises.cisco.2.9.3.1.1.226.1 (integer): 5 [2]
mgmt.mib-2.tcp.tcpConnTable.tcpConnEntry.tcpConnState.10.70.32.2.23.10.70.52
.171.1083
(integer): synReceived

etc, etc, etc... It goes on with stuff similar to this.

Is this because I do not have cisco's mibs on the openview box?  How
do
I
decipher this junk?

-Patrick


How do I know what this means?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28105&t=28073
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: VoIP MC-3810 [7:27874]

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Whittle

Hugo,

I am not sure of 12.2 T images.

Certainly in 12.1 and below voip support was a variant on the standard
feature sets. So 'is-mz' was IP plus, 'a2isv5-mz' was IP plus with VoATM
& VoIP support. This was also the case for main stream 12.2(3)
'mc3810-a2jk8sv5-mz_122-3.bin'

When you come to down load from cco it has the variants. Take a look at
the 12.1 to see what I mean then look at 12.2 and check the release
notes.

Peter

In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 writes
>Peter,
>
>Looking at the feature navigator, we can see that the image
>mc3810-is-mz.12.2-4.T1 supports VoIP.
>
>
>
>May be the "v5" variant is not needed.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Hugo
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Peter Whittle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: sabado, 1 de dezembro de 2001 07:45
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: VoIP MC-3810 [7:27874]
>
>
>Hugo,
>
>Your sh ver looks promising. The definitive way is to look at the
>BOTTOM
>and see if they are p.n.: 17-4840 rev 03 or later.
>
>I believe that they contain System Bootstrap Version 12.0(6r)T4.
>
>By the way the 12.0(6r)T4 is the WBOOT code that you need to support
>32
>Mb Flash.
>
>You will need atleast 16 Mb Flash if you want to run current
>enterprise
>feature set. If you can get by with ip plus then you can get by with
>your existing 8 Mb. Remember, if money is tight and you have upgraded
>the DRAM to 64 Mb you could always boot the IOS from a TFTP server
>instead of from flash, just watch out when you do a 'wr erase' to
>clear
>out the configs as it will no longer know its ip address and you will
>end up running the flash IOS. 
>
>
>Peter
>
>
>
>In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>>Peter,
>>
>>Thank you for replying. Great info that the IOS image should contain
>>"v5" feature set.  ;-))
>>
>>The box is an MC-3810 (not V or V3) with 32MB DRAM and 8MB flash with
>>mc3810-is-mz.120-5.XK image.
>>
>>ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(6r)T4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
>>ROM: MC3810 Software (MC3810-WBOOT-M), Version 12.0(6r)T4,  RELEASE
>>SOFTWARE (fc1)
>>
>>As fas I understood reading the notes at:
>>
>>this box will recognize a 64MB DRAM.
>>
>>Am I correct?
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Peter Whittle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2001 21:40
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: VoIP MC-3810 [7:27874]
>>
>>
>>The MC-3810 supports VoIP if you have a v5 variant of the IOS.
>>
>>eg enterprise + voatm + voip would be mc3810-a2jsv5_122-3.bin
>>
>>Of course you need a voice module, AVM (analogue), BVM (ISDN Bri),
>>DVM (ISDN Pri, CAS) and any load will do vofr. 
>>
>>
>>However, VoIP loads require 64 Mbytes DRAM.
>>
>>If you upgrade an old mc-3810 or mc-3810v you need recent BOOTROMs,
>>take
>>a look in the release notes for details. If your bootroms are not
>>recent
>>enough then a 64Mb SIMM will only show up as 16 Mb! The bootroms are
>a
>>free of charge item. You will have to pay postage and may need to
>>order
>>them via a partner if you don't have SMARTNET on the routers.
>>
>>Peter
>>
>>
>> In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> writes
>>>Just to confirm. Can a MC-3810 do VoIP or only VoFR?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>Hugo
>>>html
>>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>

-- 
Peter Whittle




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28103&t=27874
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: IS-IS BSCN [7:27955]

2001-12-04 Thread Peter Whittle

Steve,

When I last looked IS-IS was not specifically in the syllabus for BSCN.
However, it is in scope for the new BSCI which you can also offer
instead of the routing exam. It is actually the routing module for CCIP.

This suggests that even if it is not on the current syllabus it is
likely to come on in the future. In any case it is probably useful at
least to have had a look at it.

Peter

In article , Stephen Neville
 writes
>Hi group
>
>Iam currently studying for the BSCN, i am using the sybex study guide.  My
>question is i have gone through the book and cant see any sections on IS-IS,
>yet the books practice exams has questions reguarding IS-IS.  I have looked
>on the cisco web site but cant see anything about IS-IS being in the BSCN
>exam.
>
>Can any one clear this up is IS-IS a topic in the BSCN exam.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>- Steve
>html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-- 
Peter Whittle




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28104&t=27955
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Adtran Atlas 550... [7:28102]

2001-12-04 Thread Tony Russell

Would anyone be willing to walk me through a config of an Atlas 550.  I am
trying to take a PRI (in network slot 1) and split it up via a Quad PRI
module so that I can connect two poly com devices (1/2 PRI each).  Is this
possible.  Please e-mail me. I am willing to make a Long distance call if a
voice conversation is easier.

Tony Russell




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28102&t=28102
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28101]

2001-12-04 Thread Stefan Dozier

Think of the definition of "spoof" - deception, lying, hoaxing, etc...etc...

Now to quote from the CiscoPress CIT book, pgs 495-496.

What spooofing does is "lie" to Layer 3 DDR so that a routing entry
will be maintained in the router. Having this routing entry enables
DDR to wake and trigger a call to the ISDN network when user traffic
requires the connection.

Notes of interest:

"Line protocol is up (spoofing)" is D channel information that the
interface alleges to be up.

Spoofing "does not" necessarily mean the the D channel is up. In fact,
there may be no line on the interface.

end quote:

HTH

Stefan


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Bob Perez
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28092]


PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
  Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
  Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28101&t=28101
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: HP-Openview messages reveived [7:28073]

2001-12-04 Thread William Harrison

John,

You seem to know a lot about Openview.  Is there a list for it?  Your URL
for node manager is installed and working great!  Thanks.  Any good books

Bill Harrison
CCIE written

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HP-Openview messages reveived [7:28073]


Was this post meant for the OV Forum list ?  ;-)

Yes, this is because you don't have the necessary MIBs loaded.  This
particular trap is sent when a telnet session to that device is either
started or ended.

HTH,
John

>>> "Patrick Ramsey"  12/4/01 9:07:22 AM
>>>
Ok Guys/Gals,

Received event .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.0.1 (enterprise:.1.3.6.4.1.9 generic:6
specific:1), no format in trapd.conf. 6 args: [1]
private.enterprises.cisco.2.9.3.1.1.226.1 (integer): 5 [2]
mgmt.mib-2.tcp.tcpConnTable.tcpConnEntry.tcpConnState.10.70.32.2.23.10.70.52
.171.1083
(integer): synReceived

etc, etc, etc... It goes on with stuff similar to this.

Is this because I do not have cisco's mibs on the openview box?  How do
I
decipher this junk?

-Patrick


How do I know what this means?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28100&t=28073
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28099]

2001-12-04 Thread MADMAN

The bri0/0 is faking, (spoofing), that it is up but the actual
channels, bri0/0:1 and bri0/0:2 may well be down. Bri0/0 while spoofing
is actually in standby, ready to kick in once the configured event
triggers it's use.

  That's my take anyway...

  Dave  

Bob Perez wrote:
> 
> PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
> BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
>   Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
>   Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30
>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
>  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
>   Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set
>   Last input 00:00:02, output never, output hang never
>   Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1d00h
>   Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
>   Queueing strategy: weighted fair
>   Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
>  Conversations  0/1/16 (active/max active/max total)
>  Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
>   5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>  18810 packets input, 83842 bytes, 0 no buffer
>  Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>  0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
>  19653 packets output, 86964 bytes, 0 underruns
>  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
>  0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>  3 carrier transitions
> EPX-VER-DE-RTR#
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28099&t=28099
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Can someone tell me what the spoofing below means [7:28091]

2001-12-04 Thread George Murphy CCNP, CCDA

Hey Bob, see below of Cisco's explanation, but essentially you are 
having BRI0/0 "stay awake" to keep route tables active. Everything is 
good if this is what you are intending, as we do at my employer.

Routing
Once defined, interesting packets must be routed properly for a call to 
be initiated. The routing process depends on two things: routing table 
entries and an "up" interface over which to route packets.

Interfaces - up/up (spoofing)
In order for packets to be routed to and through an interface, that 
interface must be up/up as seen in a show interfaces output:


Montecito# show interfaces ethernet 0
Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is up
  Hardware is Lance, address is . . .
What happens to a dialer interface that is not connected? If protocol is 
not up and running on the interface, the implication is that the 
interface itself will not be up. Routes which rely on that interface 
will be flushed from the routing table, and traffic will not be routed 
to that interface. The result is that no calls would be initiated by the 
interface.

The solution to counter this possibility is to allow the state up/up 
(spoofing) for dialer interfaces. Any interface can be configured as a 
dialer interface. For example, a Serial or Async interface could be made 
into a dialer by adding the command dialer in-band or dialer dtr to the 
interface's configuration. These lines are unnecessary for interfaces 
that are by nature a dialer interface (BRIs and PRIs). The output for a 
show interface will look like this:


Montecito# show interfaces bri 0
BRI0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
  Hardware is BRI
  Internet address is . . .
In other words, the interface "pretends" to be up/up so that associated 
routes will remain in force and so that packets can be routed to the 
interface.

There are circumstances under which a dialer interface will not be up/up 
(spoofing). The show interface output may show the interface as being 
administratively down:


Montecito# show interfaces bri 0
BRI0 is administratively down, line protocol is down
  Hardware is BRI
  Internet address is . . .
Administratively down merely means that the interface has been 
configured with the command shutdown. This is the default state of any 
router interface when the router is booted for the very first time. To 
remedy this, use the interface configuration command no shutdown.



Bob Perez wrote:

>PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
>BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
>  Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
>  Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30
>  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
> reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
>  Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set
>  Last input 00:00:02, output never, output hang never
>  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1d00h
>  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
>  Queueing strategy: weighted fair
>  Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
> Conversations  0/1/16 (active/max active/max total)
> Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
>  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
> 18810 packets input, 83842 bytes, 0 no buffer
> Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
> 19653 packets output, 86964 bytes, 0 underruns
> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
> 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
> 3 carrier transitions
>EPX-VER-DE-RTR#




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28098&t=28091
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE IPExpert WorkBook [7:28096]

2001-12-04 Thread Kim Seng

Does anyone want to share with me the IPExpert
workbook in DC Metro area? I would like to buy but it
is too much for my budget right now.

Kim.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28096&t=28096
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread Bill Carter

Set the default gateway of the host to the router.  The router should handle
this function.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
BASSOLE Rock
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX [7:28083]


Hi group,


I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).

-Security level for the inside interface is 100.
-Security level for the outside interface is 0.

Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on the
outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside interface)?

Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside interface?

Regards,

Rock BASSOLE
Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28095&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: OT:Advise on Auction fraud [7:28004]

2001-12-04 Thread Michael J. Doherty

I agree with the response that Daniel Cotts sent, and wanted to add some
more to it.

Most auction sites provide an Escrow service, now, as a means of cutting
down on fraudulent actions.  You may want to consider using those services
if you purchase through an auction site again.

Mike

- Original Message -
From: 
To: 
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 14:24
Subject: OT:Advise on Auction fraud [7:28004]


> Sorry for off topic
> I recentley bcame the victim of the Auction fraud the guy took my $1000
for
> 2621 router and now not replying for my emails and also I came to know
that
> thi s guy is a fraud and  done similiar thing to at least 4 other people
,Now
> what are the options I have to get my money back from him
>
> Thanks for all your advise
> Kaamvi
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28093&t=28004
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Win2K Browsing Problem [7:28074]

2001-12-04 Thread Patrick Ramsey

man, I thought I was pretty off topic with my last post

without specific problems, one can only give generic advice.

Make sure the master browser on a subnet is a strong machine that is always
on. (force election to this machine) this will stop unneeded elections from
occuring.  (this would typically be a wins server with a push/pull relation
ship with it's counterpart on each other subnet)

-Patrick

>>> "maamun Murangwa"  12/04/01 11:10AM >>>
Hi all,
Can anyone give me some advise on how to solve a
network browsing problem on a win2k enviroment, how
can i improve it or what should i check for, on the
Win2k side?

MMK


Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. 
Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! 
The competition ends 16 th of December 2001.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28094&t=28074
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Can someone tell me what the spoofing below means [7:28091]

2001-12-04 Thread Bob Perez

PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
  Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
  Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set
  Last input 00:00:02, output never, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1d00h
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: weighted fair
  Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
 Conversations  0/1/16 (active/max active/max total)
 Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 18810 packets input, 83842 bytes, 0 no buffer
 Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
 19653 packets output, 86964 bytes, 0 underruns
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
 3 carrier transitions
EPX-VER-DE-RTR#




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28091&t=28091
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Can someone tell me what this spoofing below means? [7:28092]

2001-12-04 Thread Bob Perez

PX-VER-DE-RTR#sh int bri0/0
BRI0/0 is up, line protocol is up (spoofing)
  Hardware is PQUICC BRI with U interface
  Internet address is 128.121.22.145/30
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation PPP, loopback not set
  Last input 00:00:02, output never, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 1d00h
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: weighted fair
  Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
 Conversations  0/1/16 (active/max active/max total)
 Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 18810 packets input, 83842 bytes, 0 no buffer
 Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
 19653 packets output, 86964 bytes, 0 underruns
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
 3 carrier transitions
EPX-VER-DE-RTR#




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28092&t=28092
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread Allen May

Whatever the default gateway of the outside interface is would need the
route statement.

- Original Message -
From: BASSOLE Rock 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:03 AM
Subject: PIX [7:28083]


> Hi group,
>
>
> I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).
>
> -Security level for the inside interface is 100.
> -Security level for the outside interface is 0.
>
> Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on the
> outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside interface)?
>
> Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside interface?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rock BASSOLE
> Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28090&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread Brant Stevens

In my experience, it will drop the packet.  It is not a router.

BASSOLE Rock wrote:

>Hi group,
>
>
>I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).
>
>-Security level for the inside interface is 100.
>-Security level for the outside interface is 0.
>
>Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on the
>outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside interface)?
>
>Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside interface?
>
>Regards,
>
>Rock BASSOLE
>Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28089&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Deny trace route using ACL on Cisco router [7:28047]

2001-12-04 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

At 04:50 AM 12/4/01, Engelhard M. Labiro wrote:
>Ciscos ( & Unixes) use ICMP time-exceeded reply

All trace route implementations return ICMP time-exceeded. That's how it 
works. It's also not too relevant since it's probably the incoming packets 
he's more concerned about.

Cisco (and Unix) are different from Microsoft in that the incoming trace 
route packets from these operating systems are UDP packets to a port number 
in the 33,000 - 43,000 range. Windows sends pings.

Priscilla

>to the host that doing traceroute, so not return
>icmp time-exceeded or drop all the icmp packet
>would be better, eg:
>access-list 101 deny icmp any any and assign it
>to the interface to the Internet.
>
> > Can someone share with me the experience in
> > configuring ACL to deny trace route from the Internet
> > to the internal network.  I am wondering what ports to
> > deny as it keeps changing.


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28087&t=28047
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Deny trace route using ACL on Cisco router [7:28047]

2001-12-04 Thread Scott Nawalaniec

Hi Sgp,

access-list 100 deny icmp any any ttl-exceeded

Trace route uses TTL (Time To Live), so if you block TTL-exceeded, I think
this might stop the trace routes.

HTH,

Scott 

-Original Message-
From: Sgp YH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Deny trace route using ACL on Cisco router [7:28047]


Hi guys/gals
Can someone share with me the experience in
configuring ACL to deny trace route from the Internet
to the internal network.  I am wondering what ports to
deny as it keeps changing.

Cheers


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
http://shopping.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28086&t=28047
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread Michael J. Doherty

The PIX has limited routing capabilities (in order to allow packets through
the firewall).  It cannot route packets out the same interface that it
arrived on.  If it does not have a route to a host on another interface, it
will drop the packet.  (my understanding, anyway, feel free to correct an
inaccuracies).

Mike

- Original Message -
From: "BASSOLE Rock" 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:03
Subject: PIX [7:28083]


> Hi group,
>
>
> I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).
>
> -Security level for the inside interface is 100.
> -Security level for the outside interface is 0.
>
> Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on the
> outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside interface)?
>
> Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside interface?
>
> Regards,
>
> Rock BASSOLE
> Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28085&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



San Diego Cisco Users Group [7:28044]

2001-12-04 Thread EA Louie

This Wednesday, the SDCUG is meeting to discuss next year's planning
schedule.  It's a great place to meet other Cisco Users, and we'll be
planning some certification-type activities, too.

Please join us for December's CISCO Users Group meeting:
Where:
Network Insight
10171 Sorrento Valley Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Date and Time:
December 5, 2001 6:00 PM.
Topic:
Planning session for the New Year, bring your suggestions your input is very
important
Food will be supplied by CISCO, Ascolta, DoItSmater and Network Insight
Plus door prizes
Please RSVP by replying to this message with RSVP in the subject line.
I hope to see you all there!



_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28044&t=28044
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]

2001-12-04 Thread MADMAN

not sure what an ip address has to do with LMI nor inverse arp as a
map or interface dlci x will work just fine too.  Thew bottom line is up
and up on a frame circuit does not mean active PVC.

  Dave



Donald wrote:
> 
> Yeah if you inverse arp and you change the ip address on one end, the
> circuit will stay up, lmi will function, but you will not transfer data.
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: "MADMAN" 
> To: "Donald" 
> Cc: 
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]
> 
> >
> >   Yup, up and up, you got LMI between you and the switch not an active
> > PVC.
> >
> >   Dave
> >
> > Donald wrote:
> > >
> > > Not necessarily you can have a frame connection in an up/up state and
> not
> > > transfer data can't you.
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Gregg Malcolm"
> > > To:
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 12:01 PM
> > > Subject: RE: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]
> > >
> > > > Anil,
> > > >
> > > > I'm sorry, my explaination wasn't very good.  The answer can't be B
> since
> > > > you have no information saying data is being sent and received.  The
> > > answer
> > > > A does fit since a frame relay connection is active if int status is
> > > UP/UP.
> > > >
> > > > As far as the 2nd part, AFAIK not every encap uses keepalives.  Frame
> > > Relay
> > > > is somewhat special in that an UP/UP status really means that data
> COULD
> > > be
> > > > xfer'ed.  The case of the broken remote CSU/DSU does not fit this
> > > scenarios
> > > > since keepalives would not be received.  The question seems geared
> toward
> > > > trying to trick the engineer into thinking that data is being xfered
> vs.
> > > > could be.  Many encap use keepalives.  A few are F/R, ATM, PPP and
> HDLC
> > > (PPP
> > > > uses an echo).  Not sure if all do (probably not).  Hope that helps.
> > --
> > David Madland
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > CCIE# 2016
> > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 612-664-3367
> >
> > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"

-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28063&t=27930
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]

2001-12-04 Thread Donald

Yeah if you inverse arp and you change the ip address on one end, the
circuit will stay up, lmi will function, but you will not transfer data.


- Original Message -
From: "MADMAN" 
To: "Donald" 
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]


>
>   Yup, up and up, you got LMI between you and the switch not an active
> PVC.
>
>   Dave
>
> Donald wrote:
> >
> > Not necessarily you can have a frame connection in an up/up state and
not
> > transfer data can't you.
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Gregg Malcolm"
> > To:
> > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 12:01 PM
> > Subject: RE: Serial Line is up and line protocol is up ANSW [7:27930]
> >
> > > Anil,
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, my explaination wasn't very good.  The answer can't be B
since
> > > you have no information saying data is being sent and received.  The
> > answer
> > > A does fit since a frame relay connection is active if int status is
> > UP/UP.
> > >
> > > As far as the 2nd part, AFAIK not every encap uses keepalives.  Frame
> > Relay
> > > is somewhat special in that an UP/UP status really means that data
COULD
> > be
> > > xfer'ed.  The case of the broken remote CSU/DSU does not fit this
> > scenarios
> > > since keepalives would not be received.  The question seems geared
toward
> > > trying to trick the engineer into thinking that data is being xfered
vs.
> > > could be.  Many encap use keepalives.  A few are F/R, ATM, PPP and
HDLC
> > (PPP
> > > uses an echo).  Not sure if all do (probably not).  Hope that helps.
> --
> David Madland
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE# 2016
> Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 612-664-3367
>
> "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28061&t=27930
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



PIX [7:28083]

2001-12-04 Thread BASSOLE Rock

Hi group,


I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside).

-Security level for the inside interface is 100.
-Security level for the outside interface is 0.

Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on the
outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside interface)?

Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside interface?

Regards,

Rock BASSOLE
Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28083&t=28083
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Flash Trouble. [7:28069]

2001-12-04 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler

try using the commands

dir disk0:

and

format disk0:

you'll need to modify the boot string as well - for example:

boot system flash disk0:c7200-io3s-mz.121-5.T8.bin

use the "copy tftp disk0:" command to get files on the disk.

HTH,

Ben

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
NK Sat
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Flash Trouble. [7:28069]


Hi All,
I am having a 7204VXR with 40MG of Flash. The router boots fine when powered
Off/On. But i cannot say " show flash" I see the IOS on disk0:  I have
already tried a bunch of IOS. Formating the disk0: doesn;t help.

46976K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector size 512 bytes).
4096K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K).
Configuration register is 0x102

MISRAN01#sh flash
Open device slot0 failed (Device not ready)


MISRAN01#sh file systems
File Systems:

 Size(b) Free(b)  Type  Flags  Prefixes
4789043239772160 flash rw   disk0:
   -   - flash rw   disk1:
   -   -opaque rw   null:
   -   -opaque rw   system:
   -   -   network rw   tftp:
  129016  124129 nvram rw   nvram:
*  -   - flash rw   slot0: flash:
   -   - flash rw   slot1:
 3407872  379204 flash rw   bootflash:
   -   -opaque wo   lex:
   -   -   network rw   rcp:
   -   -   network rw   ftp:

MISRAN01#



Can anybody tell me how to make show flash work
1) Sh file system always says flash is with slot0:
2) I cannot make flash associate with disk0:


Please Help.

Thanks
Satish Kumar.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28082&t=28069
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Packet analyzer [7:27295]

2001-12-04 Thread Maurizio Moroni

Maybe someone already posted this, but did anyone of you ever try Ethereal ?
(http://www.ethereal.com)

" Ethereal is a free network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows.
It allows you to examine data from a live network
or from a capture file on disk. You can interactively browse the capture
data,
viewing summary and detail information for each packet.
Ethereal has several powerful features, including a rich display filter
language and the ability to view the
reconstructed stream of a TCP session. It supports a *huge* list of
protocols."

Regards,
  Maurizio


-Original Message-
From: jeff sicuranza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 November 2001 18:53
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Packet analyzer [7:27295]


Yes, the Agilent  Advisor is an awesome tool, I own two of them. You may not
necessarily need to schedule an outage on your serial link if your CSU/DSUs
have external non intrusive monitoring port capabilities. If they do then
all you need is a pair of bantam cables and plug one end of the pair  into
your T-1 module on the Advisor and plug the other ends into your CSU and
away you go…  You can not only sniff, but generate traffic for stimuli
testing and basically use your advisor as a T berd.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28081&t=27295
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: HP-Openview messages reveived [7:28073]

2001-12-04 Thread John Neiberger

Was this post meant for the OV Forum list ?  ;-)

Yes, this is because you don't have the necessary MIBs loaded.  This
particular trap is sent when a telnet session to that device is either
started or ended.

HTH,
John

>>> "Patrick Ramsey"  12/4/01 9:07:22 AM
>>>
Ok Guys/Gals,

Received event .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.0.1 (enterprise:.1.3.6.4.1.9 generic:6
specific:1), no format in trapd.conf. 6 args: [1]
private.enterprises.cisco.2.9.3.1.1.226.1 (integer): 5 [2]
mgmt.mib-2.tcp.tcpConnTable.tcpConnEntry.tcpConnState.10.70.32.2.23.10.70.52.171.1083
(integer): synReceived

etc, etc, etc... It goes on with stuff similar to this.

Is this because I do not have cisco's mibs on the openview box?  How do
I
decipher this junk?

-Patrick


How do I know what this means?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28080&t=28073
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco Dial-up and NT RAS [7:28079]

2001-12-04 Thread NetEng

I have a 2620 configred for dial-up. Is it possible to have the cisco box
act like a modem pool for NT RAS? I need NT to authenticate my users (I dont
have RADIUS/TACACs/AD) otherwise I have to create 125 username passwords on
the cisco router! I found some inf files on TAC, which gave me this idea.
Any suggest are greatly appreciated. Also I can not find the dial-out
utility software anywhere, anyone know where it is at?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28079&t=28079
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Flash Trouble. [7:28069]

2001-12-04 Thread MADMAN

You answer your own question, you have DISK!

C7507MIX#sh flash
Open device slot0 failed (Device not ready)
(Try device DISK: for ATA media.)
C7507MIX#sh disk0:
-#- --length-- -date/time-- path
1  9797024 Apr 21 1950 08:08:42 rsp-pv-mz-nov7.atm
2  9727156 May 10 1950 09:13:02 rsp-pv-mz.120-19.ST1.bin

22208512 bytes available (19529728 bytes used)

C7507MIX#

  Dave

NK Sat wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> I am having a 7204VXR with 40MG of Flash. The router boots fine when
powered
> Off/On. But i cannot say " show flash" I see the IOS on disk0:  I have
> already tried a bunch of IOS. Formating the disk0: doesn;t help.
> 
> 46976K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector size 512 bytes).
> 4096K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K).
> Configuration register is 0x102
> 
> MISRAN01#sh flash
> Open device slot0 failed (Device not ready)
> 
> MISRAN01#sh file systems
> File Systems:
> 
>  Size(b) Free(b)  Type  Flags  Prefixes
> 4789043239772160 flash rw   disk0:
>-   - flash rw   disk1:
>-   -opaque rw   null:
>-   -opaque rw   system:
>-   -   network rw   tftp:
>   129016  124129 nvram rw   nvram:
> *  -   - flash rw   slot0: flash:
>-   - flash rw   slot1:
>  3407872  379204 flash rw   bootflash:
>-   -opaque wo   lex:
>-   -   network rw   rcp:
>-   -   network rw   ftp:
> 
> MISRAN01#
> 
> Can anybody tell me how to make show flash work
> 1) Sh file system always says flash is with slot0:
> 2) I cannot make flash associate with disk0:
> 
> Please Help.
> 
> Thanks
> Satish Kumar.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28078&t=28069
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SNMP process [7:28068]

2001-12-04 Thread MADMAN

Had a problem recently similiar to what your seeing cept the router
CPU hit 99% when SNMP grabbed the routing table, all 105K routes!!  

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/477/SNMP/ipsnmphighcpu.html

Dave

"Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
> 
> on our core router, every once in a while we will drop some telnet
> connections. When this happens I look at "show proc cpu" and see that
> overall util is 89% in which 69% of that traffic is snmp. Obviously this is
> not good. The router is a 7507. Anyone have any suggestions on this?
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28077&t=28068
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: SNMP process [7:28068]

2001-12-04 Thread Martin Roy

Try putting an ACL on the inbound interface blocking SNMP requests and see
if that improves your situation.  If you can't block it, log it and try to
find the culprit.  You may also have a SNMP process stuck in CPU.  Plan to
reboot your router after hours if you can.

Martin Roy
Network Support Specialist 
Nuvo Network Management 
E-mail: 
 - Maximizing Network Availability



-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SNMP process [7:28068]


on our core router, every once in a while we will drop some telnet
connections. When this happens I look at "show proc cpu" and see that
overall util is 89% in which 69% of that traffic is snmp. Obviously this is
not good. The router is a 7507. Anyone have any suggestions on this?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28076&t=28068
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Win2K Browsing Problem [7:28074]

2001-12-04 Thread maamun Murangwa

Hi all,
Can anyone give me some advise on how to solve a
network browsing problem on a win2k enviroment, how
can i improve it or what should i check for, on the
Win2k side?

MMK


Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. 
Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! 
The competition ends 16 th of December 2001.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28074&t=28074
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Question about moving PVC's. [7:28062]

2001-12-04 Thread Rizzo, Damian

Sure does. Thank you all for your responses!



-Original Message-
From: R. Benjamin Kessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:01 AM
To: CiscoG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question about moving PVC's. [7:28062]

The ASCII Art didn't come through too well on my e-mail so let me see if I
have this straight...

NY is the hub, PVCs between DLCI's 300 and 301 (CH) and 300 and 302 (SF).

If you want to make CH the hub you'll need to add a PVC between 301 (CH) and
302 (SF); you can then remove the PVC between 300 and 302.  This will move
the hub from NY to CH.  You'll need to contact the provider to have them
build the new PVC (and possibly delete the one that isn't required any more
if you want to remove the one between NY and SF).

Does this answer your question?

Ben

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
CiscoG
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about moving PVC's. [7:28062]


Hey all. I have a question regarding Frame Relay PVC's. Let's use the below
as an example;


   NY (dlci 300)
 |
  /\
(dlci 301)CH   SF (dlci 302)

  In a Hub+Spoke topology, NY is the hub in this example. What I am unclear
of is: is it possible for myself to reconfigure the routers to make CH (dlci
301) the hub and the rest Spokes? Or do I have to call the Frame Relay
provider and have them move the circuits for me???

 Thanks in advance for your help!

-C



This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying, or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by replying to e-mail and
destroy message.  Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of MARAKON ASSOCIATES
shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the company.  When
addressed to MARAKON clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying, or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by replying to e-mail and
destroy message.  Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of MARAKON ASSOCIATES
shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the company.  When
addressed to MARAKON clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28075&t=28062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Question about moving PVC's. [7:28062]

2001-12-04 Thread John Neiberger

You must call your provider to repoint the SF-NY PVC to CH.  There's
nothing you can do from a configuration standpoint that will accomplish
this.

HTH,
John

>>> "CiscoG"  12/4/01 7:38:38 AM >>>
Hey all. I have a question regarding Frame Relay PVC's. Let's use the
below
as an example;
 
   
   NY (dlci 300)
 | 
  /\  
(dlci 301)CH   SF (dlci 302) 
 
  In a Hub+Spoke topology, NY is the hub in this example. What I am
unclear
of is: is it possible for myself to reconfigure the routers to make CH
(dlci
301) the hub and the rest Spokes? Or do I have to call the Frame Relay
provider and have them move the circuits for me???  
 
 Thanks in advance for your help!
 
-C
 
 
 
This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information
intended
only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying, or
disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by replying to e-mail
and
destroy message.  Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of MARAKON
ASSOCIATES
shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the company. 
When
addressed to MARAKON clients, any information contained in this e-mail
is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28072&t=28062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



HP-Openview messages reveived [7:28073]

2001-12-04 Thread Patrick Ramsey

Ok Guys/Gals,

Received event .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.0.1 (enterprise:.1.3.6.4.1.9 generic:6
specific:1), no format in trapd.conf. 6 args: [1]
private.enterprises.cisco.2.9.3.1.1.226.1 (integer): 5 [2]
mgmt.mib-2.tcp.tcpConnTable.tcpConnEntry.tcpConnState.10.70.32.2.23.10.70.52.171.1083 
(integer): synReceived

etc, etc, etc... It goes on with stuff similar to this.

Is this because I do not have cisco's mibs on the openview box?  How do I
decipher this junk?

-Patrick


How do I know what this means?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28073&t=28073
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT:Advise on Auction fraud [7:28004]

2001-12-04 Thread Mike Sweeney

Why not start posting names of sellers that are good to work with? I would
imagine it would get away from the possible slander threats. I will toss out
three names that I deal with on a regular basis and have zero complaints.
All have gone a bit beyond the normal in several cases.

Quadrasource ( bigpeach) in Tustin CA.. they also do walk up sales.. Classic
store front with stuff spilling out of the back ;)

Comstar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I gave him a call to pay for a Cat5000 and
mentioned it was for my lab. The pic showed empty slots.. no covers except
for the filled slots. The cat showed up 2 days later with ALL covers in
place. Nice guy :)

Lassongdl I have bought three times from him and each has been trouble free.
And he is responsive to email even after the sale. I had a problem with a
card that ended up being a dirty connector but he was willing right away to
help or replace the card if needed.

Now- I have NO stake in any of these companies aside from the money I send
them for more cisco parts :) I've just had very good luck with them on MY
purchases.. no claims are made beyond that.

MikeS



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28071&t=28004
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Flash Trouble. [7:28069]

2001-12-04 Thread NK Sat

Hi All,
I am having a 7204VXR with 40MG of Flash. The router boots fine when powered 
Off/On. But i cannot say " show flash" I see the IOS on disk0:  I have 
already tried a bunch of IOS. Formating the disk0: doesn;t help.

46976K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector size 512 bytes).
4096K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K).
Configuration register is 0x102

MISRAN01#sh flash
Open device slot0 failed (Device not ready)


MISRAN01#sh file systems
File Systems:

 Size(b) Free(b)  Type  Flags  Prefixes
4789043239772160 flash rw   disk0:
   -   - flash rw   disk1:
   -   -opaque rw   null:
   -   -opaque rw   system:
   -   -   network rw   tftp:
  129016  124129 nvram rw   nvram:
*  -   - flash rw   slot0: flash:
   -   - flash rw   slot1:
 3407872  379204 flash rw   bootflash:
   -   -opaque wo   lex:
   -   -   network rw   rcp:
   -   -   network rw   ftp:

MISRAN01#



Can anybody tell me how to make show flash work
1) Sh file system always says flash is with slot0:
2) I cannot make flash associate with disk0:


Please Help.

Thanks
Satish Kumar.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28069&t=28069
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Question about moving PVC's. [7:28062]

2001-12-04 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler

The ASCII Art didn't come through too well on my e-mail so let me see if I
have this straight...

NY is the hub, PVCs between DLCI's 300 and 301 (CH) and 300 and 302 (SF).

If you want to make CH the hub you'll need to add a PVC between 301 (CH) and
302 (SF); you can then remove the PVC between 300 and 302.  This will move
the hub from NY to CH.  You'll need to contact the provider to have them
build the new PVC (and possibly delete the one that isn't required any more
if you want to remove the one between NY and SF).

Does this answer your question?

Ben

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
CiscoG
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about moving PVC's. [7:28062]


Hey all. I have a question regarding Frame Relay PVC's. Let's use the below
as an example;


   NY (dlci 300)
 |
  /\
(dlci 301)CH   SF (dlci 302)

  In a Hub+Spoke topology, NY is the hub in this example. What I am unclear
of is: is it possible for myself to reconfigure the routers to make CH (dlci
301) the hub and the rest Spokes? Or do I have to call the Frame Relay
provider and have them move the circuits for me???

 Thanks in advance for your help!

-C



This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended
only for the person(s) named.  Any use, distribution, copying, or disclosure
by any other person is strictly prohibited.  If you received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender by replying to e-mail and
destroy message.  Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of MARAKON ASSOCIATES
shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the company.  When
addressed to MARAKON clients, any information contained in this e-mail is
subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28070&t=28062
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SNMP process [7:28068]

2001-12-04 Thread Wright, Jeremy

on our core router, every once in a while we will drop some telnet
connections. When this happens I look at "show proc cpu" and see that
overall util is 89% in which 69% of that traffic is snmp. Obviously this is
not good. The router is a 7507. Anyone have any suggestions on this?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28068&t=28068
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: secondary ip address on e0? [7:28012]

2001-12-04 Thread Cisco Man

You don't put an Ip address on the e0 interface just on e0.1 etc. This is
beacuse the main interface will overwrite the sub interface config.
Therefore the router is having problems. If you want to use secondary
addresses on the main interface then you can configure an Ip address on e0
and then you type in the next IP address you want that interface to have and
type eg 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0 secondary. This would give the one interface
2 addresses


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28067&t=28012
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: O/T Cisco article from SJ Mercury [7:28007]

2001-12-04 Thread Cisco Breaker

Very interesting. Thank you so much.

""Priscilla Oppenheimer""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is filler due to the GroupStudy bug that eliminates text with URLs at
> the beginning of messages. This is filler due to the GroupStudy bug that
> eliminates text with URLs at the beginning of messages.  This is filler
due
> to the GroupStudy bug that eliminates text with URLs at the beginning of
> messages.  This is filler due to the GroupStudy bug that eliminates text
> with URLs at the beginning of messages.
>
> FYI: Interesting article on the "true" history of Cisco, with more credit
> given to Stanford and less to Bosack and Lerner.
>
> http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/depth/cisco120201.htm
>
> 
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28066&t=28007
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   >