RE: CCIE Power Sessions [7:47966]
> > Does anyone have a copy of the slides used at the 2002 CCIE > > power sessions at Networkers? If so, is there a link to it? > > If not, can I get a copy? > > In case you missed it in the other thread: > > http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos.html > Although I posted this, the way to the POWER SESSIONS is: http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw02/presos/pws/docs/ The CCIE power session is PS-570, but it appears to be corrupt, where the others are fine. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47982&t=47966 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: CCIE Lab Intelligence [7:47973]
Let's see - I said I was reading the config guide on CCO I provided the link.. maybe that's where I got the idea. I have also been told off line by a couple of different people now that BGP is expected to be released later this year. Got a question for you - are you sure that after you enter the command you don't get an error saying "unknown protocol" Chuck ""Kris Keen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What makes you think it doesnt do BGP? I have one right next to me.. Sure > has hell does bgp > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(8)EA1c, RELEASE > SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Fri 15-Feb-02 10:50 by antonino > Image text-base: 0x3000, data-base: 0x006675E0 > > ROM: Bootstrap program is C3550 boot loader > > WS-C3550-12T_A uptime is 1 week, 2 hours, 24 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is > "flash:/c3550-i5q3l2-mz.121-8.EA1c/c3550-i5q3l2-mz.121-8.E > 1c.bin" > > cisco WS-C3550-12T (PowerPC) processor (revision G0) with 65526K/8192K bytes > of > memory. > > > WS-C3550-12T_A#conf t > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > WS-C3550-12T_A(config)#router bgp ? > Autonomous system number > > WS-C3550-12T_A(config)#router bgp > > > Looks BGPish to me :) > I'm trying to get one for my Lab at home.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47983&t=47973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to form Etherchannel between Cisco and Summit 48 ? [7:47984]
Hi all I am trying to configure fastetherchannel using Cisco 2924 MXL switch and Extreme Networks Summit 48 Switch . I configured fastethernet 0/1 through 0/4 using commands port group 1 switchport mode trunk Also on Summit 48 switch I am using Enable enable sharing grouping command. Where port no defines master port i.e 1 in my case , portlist defines the no of ports taking part into etherchannel process 2-4 in this case. The momoment I confure the last port with cisco 2924 switch wih above mentioned commands it ( Cisco switch) switch goes to hang mode . The only way to come out of it's mode is I have to reset cisco switch. Can somebody help me out in doing so. Or is there anything missing in the configuration? Pls help me out. Thnaks in advance. Regards Parag Want to sell your car? advertise on Yahoo Autos Classifieds. It's Free!! visit http://in.autos.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47984&t=47984 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question - Cisco beta exams results on VUE? [7:47985]
Hi All! I've got a question concerning Cisco CCNP beta-exams. I was passing 4 betas at VUE testing center at Feb, 18 (Rouring, Switching, Troubleshooting and Remote access). At present, there are results only of two of them at the VUE site (and at CISCO accordingly). And status of other two is still TAKEN. If anybody of your encountered such a problem? Thanks in advance, Eduard. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47985&t=47985 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Neighbor distribute-list command w/ Extended ACL [7:47272]
These examples are the same except for the prefix length of the permit statement: access-list 100 permit ip 192.108.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 0.0.0.0 access-list 100 deny ip 192.108.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 101 permit ip 131.108.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 access-list 101 deny ip 131.108.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 in each, only a single route (/16 in 1st eg and /24 in 2nd eg) is being permitted and all other VLSM subnets under the /16 are being denied. Since the wildcard mask bits in the second octets are set to 1, any subnet/mask combo under the /16 will match and be denied. I don't have any sort of training experience so perhaps someone can break it down better??? Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunt Lee Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Neighbor distribute-list command w/ Extended ACL [7:47272] Hello Charles, Sorry to do this to you, but I still have one more e.g. that I'm not too sure (I found this on CCO) :( access-list 101 permit ip 131.108.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 In this line, I understand that since the wildcard mask for both network & mask are 0.0.0.0, it means that it will permit only 131.108.0.0 /24 access-list 101 deny ip 131.108.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 And in this line which is what I'm confused abt, I thought that on network, it will deny 131.108.0.1 to 131.108.255.254, while the prefix being deny is between /16 - /32. However, Cisco CCO said it will permit route 131.108.0/24 (which I understand), ... but deny 131.108/16 and all other subents of 131.108.0.0 Thanks for your help again. Best Regards, Hunt Lee ""Charles D Hammonds"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hunt- > > > access-list 100 deny ip 192.108.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 > > Remember that the wildcard mask is used to define which bits of the network > and mask fields to ignore. These bits are set to '1'. So, in this example, > the last 2 octets in both the src(network) and dest(mask) fields are ignored > as all the bits in these octets are set to 1. Only the first 2 octets are > compared so that any subnet/mask combo beneath the /16 will be denied. > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > Charles > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Hunt Lee > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Neighbor distribute-list command w/ Extended ACL [7:47272] > > > Hi Charles, > > Thanks so much for your explanation. I understand your first eg., but I'm > still confused how you get to the answer to the 2nd e.g., can you please > elaborate a bit more on the steps for the 2nd e.g.?? > > Thanks for your help again. > > Best Regards, > Hunt Lee > > > ""Charles D Hammonds"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The statement > > > > access-list 100 permit ip 192.108.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 0.0.0.0 > > > > could also be re-written as: > > > > access-list 100 permit ip host 192.108.0.0 host 255.255.0.0 > > > > which means that only the aggregate /16 will be accepted. > > > > The second statement: > > > > access-list 100 deny ip 192.108.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 > > > > denies the VLSM networks under the /16. > > > > > > Charles > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Dain Deutschman > > Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:05 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Neighbor distribute-list command w/ Extended ACL [7:47272] > > > > > > It's kind of wierd. The source portion of the access list defines the > > network whose updates are permited/denied...no suprise...the wierd part is > > that the destination portion specifies the subnet mask of that network. > So, > > in your example; > > > > access-list 100 permit ip 192.108.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 0.0.0.0 > > ( 192.108.0.0 [wildcard] 0.0.0.0 [subnet mask] 255.255.0.0 [wildcard] > > 0.0.0.0) > > ( 192.108.0.0/16 will be advertised ) > > > > Maybe someone else can jump in...because the wildcard is 0.0.0.0 does it > > mean that any other VLSM networks under the 192.108.0.0/16 supernet would > > also be advertised? > > > > access-list 100 deny ip 192.108.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 > > ( 192.108.0.0 [wildcard] 0.0.255.255 [ subnet mask ] 255.255.0.0 > [wildcard ] > > 0.0.255.255) > > (192.108.0.0/16 would be denied...the last two octets are ignored ) > > > > I'm new to all this and learning it myself...so please...someone correct > me > > if I am wrong or add to my comments. Thanks. Dain. > > ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Can anyone please explain this to me?? I have read some examples > regarding > > > neighbor x.x.x.x distribute-list in | out using extended Access-List > > > from CCO, Internet Routing Arch
Re: Took the MPLS exam and flunked [7:47830]
Hello, I have gone through the content of that book,It looks almost similar,They have added a new section on troubleshooting. Kind Regards /Thangavel 186K Reading,Brkshire Direct No -0118 9064259 Mobile No -07796292416 Post code: RG16LH www.186k.co.uk -- The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall ." -- Nelson Mandela "Tom Scott" cc: Sent by: Fax to: nobody@groupstSubject: Re: Took the MPLS exam and flunked [7:47830] udy.com 02/07/2002 15:02 Please respond to "Tom Scott" Mike Bernico wrote: > To prepare I used "MPLS and VPN architectures" by Ivan Pepelnjak and also > "Advanced MPLS Design and Implementation" by Vivek Alwayn. The second book > was much more pertinent to the test and I believe is being revised for test, > but check ciscopress.com for that. There's a new edition of the Pepelnjak book advertised on the ciscopress.com website: "MPLS and VPN Architectures, CCIP Edition". How does it differ from the original? I hope I won't have to buy the CCIP Edition, but if it's a significant boost in preparing for the MPLS exam, I'll do it. -- TT ** This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies taken. 186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England & Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street London SW1Y 4UR ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47988&t=47830 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice-IP [7:47990]
Team, I want to simulate an small voice-ip network on my lab. I have 2 2600 router that I will used for this task. My question is what are the components that I will need in order for me to accomplished my goal. What do I need? 2 routers 2 VIC-2FXS (TWO-PORT FXS VOICE/FAX INTERFACE CARD) - Interface that connects directly to a standard telephone, fax machine. (foreign exchange station) 2 Telephones IOS PLUS FEATURE Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47990&t=47990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 6500/IPX Issue!! HELP!! [7:47951]
Seems as if all the bases have been covered. Is there any difference between the cards on 6509A and 6509B? Does the 6509 support the "set port host" macro? I believe that it sets spanning tree portfast enabled, trunking to off and PAgP to off. According to Cisco LAN Switching page 314 "..when you enable PAgP (Port Aggregation Protocol) on a link where Spanning Tree is active, Spanning Tree takes about 18 more seconds to converge" I believe that is also true if spanning tree is set to portfast. I'd suggest comparing the configs of the two switches line by line. How is your VTP domain configured? > -Original Message- > From: Michael L. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 5:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Strange 6500/IPX Issue!! HELP!! [7:47951] > > > Wes, > > Thanks for your reply. As you can imagine I've been through > the ringer so > far with this one =) > > We checked all of the trunks for native VLAN, speed, duplex, > etc... All > checks out. This is also supported by the fact that IP works > fine (all IP > routing for VLAN1 is handled by the RSM in the 5513, which > means anything > plugged into 6509A or 6509B that leaves the IP subnet must > travel those > trunk links to hit the RSM and get routed. > > One interesting note: In an attempt to find out anything > new, I took a Dell > desktop with integrated NIC, etc (my test machines and the > machines having > the problem so far have been IBM 300PL with integrated NIC), > and when the > Dell is connected to 6509B (the one with the "problem") it > boots and gets > the Novell login, which automatically points to the hardware > or the image on > that IBM. However, that same IBM, when connected to 6509A > works fine, which > kinda discounts that theory. > > I'm going crazy here!! > > Another interesting thing to note: If I connect the PC (the > IBM) to a 2900, > then connect the 2900 to 6509B, the client still doesn't > receive the Novell > login. However, if I connect the PC to a hub and connect the > hub to 6509B > then the PC boots and gets the Novell login everytime. > > I gotta be missing something.. I watched the 'sho mac int fas' > closely and upon booting the IBM's MAC address isn't seen by > the switch for > 12-15 seconds after you see "Starting Windows 95". The MAC > address on the > Dell becomes visible within about 3 seconds after "Starting > Windows 95". > However I'm sure part of that can be attributed to the fact > the IBM is a > 200MHz -vs- 900MHz on the Dell (and the Dell I'm sure has newer faster > drives, etc) > > But everytime I start to form a theory about something to do > with the PC, my > co-worker goes "Yeah, but it works on the other 6509" and > everytime I > form a theory that it could be something wrong with 6509B he > goes, "Yeah, > but the Dell works on it".. I can't win!!! > > Thanks again to all who have replied... > > Mike W. > > "Wes " wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Michael, > > > > Shot in the dark - I've seen very strange issues like > this with trunk > > mismatches. You've probably got a trunk between the two > switches. Make > > sure your native VLANs match, make sure that every VLAN > permitted on the > > trunk is permitted on both sides. On a similar vein, all > trunk ports > should > > have similar characteristics (I go with 100, full, > desirable trunking, > > desirable channeling; regardless, just make sure it's the > same both sides) > > > > Also, if you've got links bundled, try bringing down one > of the links > for > > a bit, then try the other(s). Switches load balance via > MACs, if you've > got > > a uni-directional link or something, packets from the same > machine will > > usually transit the same wire every time - physical > port/cable problems > > might appear to be associated with only certain machines > because of this. > > > > Best guess for now. Good luck! > > --Wes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47989&t=47951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
Well, I'm going to speculate for this company. Now why do they want to stay with Cisco? Mostly support I would imagine. If you have a completely Cisco shop, you are sometimes Willing to put up with extra cost/less functionality to stay one vendor. Then your employees only have 1 product to learn to configure. We don't know the skill/staffing level of this place, but I imagine that is the main driving point with staying Cisco If I was doing it, I would look at an OC circuit. When your talking about that many T's, the cost would have to be less and think of the reliability factor. I mean your still talking a bunch of DS-3's for 188T's ( 7 if my math is correct ). A single OC-12 would handle this pretty easily with plenty of room to spare... Just my $.02 though... Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] My question is - why does it have to be Cisco? If you want edge density, Cisco doesn't have the best solution. Try a Juniper/Unisphere ERX1440. Oh whoops - I forgot, I'm not allowed to mention the evil 'J' on this NG ""Chuck"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ""Chuck"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines? why in the world > > would they not use channelized DS3 at the center? hell of a LOT > > cheaper Your telco account manager bying a new boat this > > summer? > > > > > > density will be a problem. 7206's with the PA-MC-8T1 cards - that > > will > give > > you 64xT1 per box. you do the math. > > CL: because obviously I can't :-> make that 48 T1's per box I would > suggest a 7509 or so, but then you run into issues with too much on > one box > and all the additinal overhead cost to provision those suckers. > > > > > HTH > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""Vajira Wijesinghe"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Hi Group, > > > > > > I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations > > > to be done on the central site. > > > Network is hub and spoke fashion. > > > Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, > > > for this purpose. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > - (on postoffice) > > > > > > The information contained in this email is confidential and is > > > meant to > be > > > read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit > > > http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire > > > confidentiality clause. > > > > > > - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47994&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Question Mark Being a Charachter [7:47995]
Hey Group , I know that you can put the questions mark as a charachter like in a password or a hostname with out it bring up help. I know its some kind of key sequence before you put it in but i forgot which one. Can anyone tell me what it is or how to accomplish this ?? Thanks, Robert Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47995&t=47995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893]
Let me start with what is documented and then ask if anyone is doing it differently. First off the 7010 is a five slot chassis. It originally shipped with a route processor (RP), and a switch processor (SP). Later versions had a silicon switch processor (SSP). The 7000 is from the same family as the 7010. It has seven slots. Again it used the RP and SP/SSP pair. As previously posted, the IOS updates for the RP ended at 11.2. When Cisco introduced the 7500 series it created an upgrade for the existing 7000/7010 boxes. That was the RSP7000 / RSP7000CI set of cards. Note that the routing function and the switching function moved to one card. See: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7000/routeswi/25617r sp.htm Some are available. Often the RSP7000CI board, which contains all of the environmental monitoring functions is missing. I doubt that is an issue for lab use. The RSP7000 runs current IOS. The 7500 series replaced the 7010 with the 7505. The 7000 became the 7507. IIRC The 7505 shipped with an RSP1 card, the 7507 had an RSP2. Patrick's post sent me to CCO. The 7505 does support the RSP1, RSP2, RSP4, and RSP8. See the following: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7505/rte_swit/index. htm The 7000s had the CX buss, the 7500s the CY buss. Interface cards designed for the CX buss will work in the 7500s (with some exceptions. Usually resolved with a later version of the card.) I have not looked at the connectors on the rear of an RSP7000 vs an RSP2 or RSP4. My guess is that they are different because of the different busses. Anyone know? Anyone use an RSP2 in a 7000? If so, my prayers are answered. If not, anyone have a RSP7000 set at a reasonable price? > -Original Message- > From: Patrick Bass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893] > > > I've got RSP7000/7500 version 12.1.15 ent/fw/ids/56 version, > 16f/64r, the > filename is rsp-jo3sv56i-mz.121-15.bin... you need a cco > account to get it, > and i suppose a cco account with the right privs. In any event, I'm > guessing it will work on a 7010. i'm using a 7005 with an rsp2... > > > ""Kazan, Naim"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > This is off the topic but can you help me with what version > of IOS is > > support by the 7010 router. I was told before end of sale > of 7010 router, > > the highest ios version was 11.0. Is that correct or can I > DL 12.0 version > > to 7010 router. The router is for home lab use only. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47996&t=47893 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web one way, vpn the other [7:47997]
We have a t3 and a t1 coming into our hq. Is there a way to have internet browsing traffic leave on the t1 and have the 700 sales people using our vpn to come in the t3. I can get everything coming in on the t3. And I think I could get the traffic to leave on the t1, but I am pretty sure it is going to come back on the t3. I have never used route maps over 99, and maybe it would be to intense to use an extended acl to look at port 80 going out... you can see how I digree. I have looked all over cco and I can't seem to find anything... although I love this doc: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/14.html#A14.0 Very good explanation of some bgp stuff. Anybody done this before?? We have a /23 and we are using Broadwing for the t3 and AT&T for the t1. I thought about using different address spaces for the browsers and the vpn users... Thanks, ipguru Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47997&t=47997 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
OK...I've GOT to hear the story behind this. Why on earth would someone implement 188 T1 connections instead of multiple DS3 / HSSI ports, a couple OC3s or one OC12? At 02:44 PM 7/2/2002 +, you wrote: >Hi Group, > >I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations >to be done on the central site. >Network is hub and spoke fashion. >Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for >this purpose. > >Thanks. >- (on postoffice) > >The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be >read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit >http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire >confidentiality clause. > >- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48001&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Teltone demonstrator settings [7:48000]
Hello group, I have a teltone demonstrator in my homelab now and I am wondering how to setup following parameters: Caller identification Terminal Display Text EKTS Call Appearances Key Hold Additional Call Offering I feel like there are too many variables: it is kind of a matrix, with 3 configurations methods: dial string, dialer map, and dialer profiles on one side of the matrix and 1 spid, 2 spids no spids caller id, no caller id, ekts, no ekts etc on the other side. And we get different behaviors for each cell in the matrix: how many B channels come up, and if they are bidirectional or unidirectional. Also, could someeone point to a good resource about isdn, which explains about spids and tei etc... and the how these numbers are assigned... Thanks, Peter I. Racz Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48000&t=48000 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C2948 with ME interface [7:47998]
Hi Guru, I have this C2948 with ME (management interface) configure as say 154.1.1.1 and SC0 configure as 10.1.1.1 (private address).. My HPOV was able to poll this switch via the ME interface (154.1.1.1). But when the traps come from this switch, the trap source address was the SC0 address. How do I make it such that the trap source address is the ME interface. I know that IOS router have this statement "snmp-server trap-source Loopback0"...Is there such similiar command in set base switch? Thanx.. Regards, Choy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47998&t=47998 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 6500/IPX Issue!! HELP!! [7:47951]
At 06:20 PM 7/2/02, Michael Williams wrote: >The two PCs I'm experienting with are using hard-coded IPs, however the >results are the same with a DHCP machine. Portfast is indeed enabled (A >while ago, I learned the hard way about spanning-tree and DHCP/Novell). > >Well, and I find myself trying to get more into the Novell process to >understand where the breakdown could be happening. I know when the PC >boots, it does a GNS and I also know routers will keep a GNS table Routers keep a Service Advertising Protocol (SAP) table. Does the 5513 show the servers in its SAP table? What does show ipx servers display? (That's how you look at the SAP table.) >and can >respond to the GNS requests, but in this case the PCs are in the same VLAN >with the Novell servers. The Cisco TAC Engr said that if there are Type 4 >servers in the subnet (or on that ethernet segment) that the router won't >respond to the GNS requests. > >I connected a sniffer and when the PC boots you see 4 GNS requests go out >and never a single response. Can you put a Sniffer on the other side of the 5513 where the servers reside? Or is there some sort of troubleshooting that you can do on the server to determine if the GNS really made it to the server? It sure seems like the router is neither responding NOR forwarding the GNS to the servers! Does the router know about the servers? (What does show ipx servers display?) > Strange since it's in the same VLAN with 30+ >Novell servers!! Like I said tho, the strangest part is that if I connect >the PC to VLAN1 on 6509A (which would have to be L2 switched over 6509B >which would then L2 switch over to the 5513 where the Novell servers are >physically connected) it works like it should. Who responds? The router or one of the servers? Are you absolutely sure that the PC on 6509B is connected to a port in VLAN1? Can you move it to a different port? It seems like it's on a messed up port. But then again, you said the Dell works on that same port. >I've dug around on Novell's website, and found a document saying that not >only Spanning Tree, but also Trunk negotiation (which is 'auto' by default) >and PAgP (which is only active if you have the link set as a member of an >etherchannel, so it doesn't apply here) can all interfere with Novell's >login process. Yes, definitely turn all this off on the port that connects the PC. They make the port take a long time to start forwarding. I can see why this is driving you nuts! I think we can help more if you tell us more about the results of show commands on the 5513 and its IPX config. Good luck. Please keep us posted. Thanks. Priscilla >Again, thanks for your comments, and keep 'em coming... > >Mike W. Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48002&t=47951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What a mess...... [7:48005]
Team, Last month I bought for my lab a 5500 switch for my lab and now Cisco changed the requirement for a 3550.. My question is what will be an equivalent to the 3550, will I be use any 29XX, I don't want to spent more money, Does it make any sense to keep the 5500 No money on my packet and many things to do and to buy. J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48005&t=48005 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BGP community Q [7:48007]
Group, I have a community related question and the scenario is as follows.What am i doing wrong ? Scenario is: (AS100) r11-r8-r10(AS 200) iBGPeBGP There are some Networks (196.196.10.0/175.10.10.0 etc)coming via R10 to R8.I want to add a community string of 100:88 to all routes containing AS 200 and send it to R11 from R8.But somehow its not adding it rather adding 100:900 when i see it on R11. Whats wrong with my logic ? Here are my configs and show commands. R8#sr Building configuration... Current configuration: hostname r8 ! router bgp 100 bgp router-id 8.1.1.1 network 8.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 11.1.1.1 remote-as 100 neighbor 11.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 11.1.1.1 next-hop-self neighbor 11.1.1.1 send-community neighbor 11.1.1.1 route-map address out neighbor 180.10.10.1 remote-as 200 neighbor 180.10.10.1 ebgp-multihop 255 neighbor 180.10.10.1 update-source Loopback0 ! ip bgp-community new-format ip as-path access-list 11 permit _200_ ip as-path access-list 11 deny .* ! route-map address permit 10 match as-path 11 set community 100:88 ! route-map address permit 20 set community 100:900 -- r8#sh ip bgp regexp _200_ BGP table version is 12, local router ID is 8.1.1.1 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *> 10.1.1.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i *>175.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.10 200 300 i *> 180.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 0 200 i *> 190.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 400 i*> 192.168.1.0 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i *> 196.196.1.0 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i --- R11#b 196.196.1.0 BGP routing table entry for 196.196.1.0/24, version 40 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: 1.1.1.2 200 300 8.1.1.1 (metric 129) from 8.1.1.1 (8.1.1.1) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Community:100:900 R11#b 175.10.10.0 BGP routing table entry for 175.10.10.0/24, version 38 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Advertised to non peer-group peers: 1.1.1.2 200 300 8.1.1.1 (metric 129) from 8.1.1.1 (8.1.1.1) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Community: 100:900 --- Failed to troubleshoot it.Anyone with ideas. = Thanks in advance for ur time and replies. Annu. __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48007&t=48007 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice-IP [7:48008]
Team, I want to simulate an small voice-ip network on my lab. I have 2 2600 router that I will used for this task. My question is what are the components that I will need in order for me to accomplished my goal. What do I need? 2 routers 2 VIC-2FXS (TWO-PORT FXS VOICE/FAX INTERFACE CARD) - Interface that connects directly to a standard telephone, fax machine. (foreign exchange station) 2 Telephones IOS PLUS FEATURE Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48008&t=48008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009]
Hi all ... Quick easy question to you all ... can and how do you specify what DNS server to use on a router ??? Regards Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48009&t=48009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What a mess...... [7:48010]
Team, Last month I bought for my lab a 5500 switch for my lab and now Cisco changed the requirement for a 3550.. My question is what will be an equivalent to the 3550, will I be use any 29XX, I don't want to spent more money, Does it make any sense to keep the 5500 No money on my packet and many things to do and to buy. J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48010&t=48010 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009]
ip name-server x.x.x.x > Hi all ... > > Quick easy question to you all ... can and how do you specify what DNS > server to use on a router ??? > > Regards > > Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48012&t=48009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
netopia to cisco vpn [7:48011]
Hi- Does anyone know is it is possible to configure a router to router vpn tunnel between a netopia and cisco router? Thanks in advice Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48011&t=48011 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice-IP [7:48008]
At what point would you need Call Manager or the like? Would you need Call Manager even for two phones to place their calls? Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48013&t=48008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 6500/IPX Issue!! HELP!! [7:47951]
Priscilla, Thanks for your input. When I do a 'show ipx servers' it indeed shows the gamut of 1500+ IPX entries (which is normal). As far as putting a sniffer on the "other side" of the 5513 where the servers reside, that was also a request by the TAC engr, but unfortunately, the 5513 *is* the other side and most of the servers connect into VLAN1 on that switch. And, again unfortunately, we have a small number of servers that hang off of the other 6509, so even if I sniff all of VLAN1 IPX traffic on the 5513, there's a chance that the server that responds is hanging off of VLAN1 on 6509A and my capture wouldn't see the response anyway (which could be misleading to say the least). As far as a possible bad port, we've tried many ports on every linecard and get the same results (and even took some of those linecards and put them in 6509A and everything works fine, so we're moving away from the possibility the linecard is the problem). I did some more experimentation this morning. I took a 2950 switch, configured Fas0/1 for the PC, configured Fas0/48 and uplinked that port (using a x-over of course =) into a port on 6509B (the one that shows the problem). I connected the PC to the 2950, booted, no Novell. I then disconnected the uplink (Fas0/48) then threw a GBIC into the 2950 and the 6509B (since 6509A works and connects to 6509B via a GBIC, I wanted to see if using a GBIC into the 6509B from the 2950 would make a difference over standard FastEthernet). So I connected the fiber from the 2950 GBIC to the 6509 GBIC, rebooted the PC. nada. still nothing. I yanked that very same GBIC from 6509B and plugged into 6509A, rebooted the PC, and BAM! Novell! The ONLY way I can get this PC to boot to Novell while connected to 6509B is to connect to a hub, then connect the hub to a port on 6509B. WTF?!?!? And yes, the Dell works everytime whether plugged directly into a FastE port on 6509B, 6509A, a hub or switch connected to either 6509A/B. So again, it seems everything points to the IBM but IT WORKS ON 6509A!! I'm going to try to get some driver updates or something for the NIC on the IBM just to see if that fixes it, but these IBM PCs are like P200 or P2-233/266s, and running Win95 I seriously doubt there's been a driver update for these integrated NICs for years. Thanks again for all inputs! Keep it coming! I figure at this point, I've gotten myself and one co-worker, a TAC engr, many very capable people (from groupstudy) and at least 4-5 CCIEs thinking about this problem, and we STILL can't find a solution. The workaround for now is just simply not to connect any Novell related PCs/servers into that 6509 while we migrate to a Win2K platform and are all IP at that point. Geez Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48015&t=47951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009]
Doh Cheers Tim ... The underlying problem that I have is that within my LAN at work .. I can ping externally using DNS and IP fine .. However, If I try to traceroute it does not work !!! All I get is the timeout asterisks but I can successfully traceroute from workstations, servers and even Novell boxes Do anyone have any ideas ??? Regards .. Paul .. - Original Message - From: "Bob Timmons" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > ip name-server x.x.x.x > > > Hi all ... > > > > Quick easy question to you all ... can and how do you specify what DNS > > server to use on a router ??? > > > > Regards > > > > Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48017&t=48009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Automatic Backup Question [7:47652]
Perl script that would do that is simplest/cheapest solution. Sasa CCIE No. 8635 "Lupi, Guy" wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone knows of a device that can do this. I have a > situation where I need to provide automatic failover in the event that > connectivity to the Internet is lost from an Ethernet port. The Ethernet > port will not go down, it will be up, just IP connectivity will be lost. > For various reasons I cannot run a routing protocol over the Ethernet port > at all. Does anyone know if there is a unit that can ping a configurable IP > address and dial an ISDN line in the event that the ping times out a certain > number of times? It must have 2 routed Ethernet ports, one to connect to > the provider and one to connect to the users LAN, and an ISDN BRI U > interface. I appreciate any suggestions. > > Guy H. Lupi > CCIE No. 9275 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48022&t=47652 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: The Question Mark Being a Charachter [7:47995]
ctrl v then type ? C7500MIX(config)#pass cisco?ddd Dave Robert Raver wrote: > > Hey Group , > I know that you can put the questions mark as a charachter like in a > password or a hostname with out it bring up help. I know its some kind of > key sequence before you put it in but i forgot which one. Can anyone tell > me what it is or how to accomplish this ?? > > Thanks, > Robert -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48018&t=47995 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
Tis why I suggested a channelized or muxed solution. All those loop charges every month, no friggin thanx. Bri - Original Message - From: "Chuck" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:00 AM Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] > must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines? why in the world > would they not use channelized DS3 at the center? hell of a LOT > cheaper Your telco account manager bying a new boat this summer? > > > density will be a problem. 7206's with the PA-MC-8T1 cards - that will give > you 64xT1 per box. you do the math. > > HTH > > Chuck > > > > > > > > ""Vajira Wijesinghe"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Group, > > > > I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations > > to be done on the central site. > > Network is hub and spoke fashion. > > Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for > > this purpose. > > > > Thanks. > > - (on postoffice) > > > > The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be > > read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit > > http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire > > confidentiality clause. > > > > - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48020&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Next Wash. DC Meeting [7:48014]
Hello, There will be no official July meeting (router roast) but there will be one August 10th, Noon to 4 pm, at my house located at 1607 Thomas Road, Fort Washington, MD 20744. Will remind everyone closer to the event but please mark it on your calendars! There will be a talk this Saturday afternoon on Network Security Certifications. I'll be speaking about industry certifications for individuals such as the CISSP, Checkpoint and various Cisco certs. Kristin Sostrom will talk about certifying network systems as secure for government agencies such as the Pentagon. She is an expert in the policies, guidelines, and regulations that go into a security certification for your network. Interesting stuff. This will be held at CastleCon 15, a convention being held at the Sheraton, Reston in Reston, VA. (which also includes Science Fiction, Medieval Dancing, and everything inbetween). Con membership is $30. For more info on CastleCon visit www.fantek.org. Anyway, sorry about July and hope to see you all in August! If I have a new job by then we'll grill up some steaks! Yours Truly - Bruce Evry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48014&t=48014 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009]
IP Domain-Lookup IP Name-Server 192.168.97.1 IP Domain-Name Domain.com -Original Message- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] Hi all ... Quick easy question to you all ... can and how do you specify what DNS server to use on a router ??? Regards Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48023&t=48009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice-IP [7:48008]
NO, that's IP Telephony, VoIP and dial peers can be done with just routers. ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At what point would you need Call Manager or the like? Would you need Call > Manager even for two phones to place their calls? > > Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48024&t=48008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What a mess...... [7:48005]
The lab is using the L3 capabilities of the 3550, which saved the $$ from having to buy 6500's according to the lab proctors. Not only that, there will be 2 3550's in the lab pod, so you need to know trunking, etc. now. ""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The 5500 and 3550 run differant OS so learning set based CLI may not > do much good if it is no longer in the lab. > > The 2900 is the same as the 3550 if your not running EMI software on > the 3550. I don't know if the lab is using the 3550 for layer 3. > > Dave > > Juan Blanco wrote: > > > > Team, > > Last month I bought for my lab a 5500 switch for my lab and now Cisco > > changed the requirement for a 3550.. > > My question is what will be an equivalent to the 3550, will I be use any > > 29XX, I don't want to spent more money, Does it make any sense to keep the > > 5500 > > > > No money on my packet and many things to do and to buy. > > > > J > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48025&t=48005 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some good news and some bad news... [7:48026]
Ok I got some good new and some bad news. The good news is yesterday I manually updated the CCIELab archives search engine. It took all day and consumed a lot of memory and processing power on GroupStudy. You can now search the archives up through June 2002. I plan to update the search engine once a month until we develop a new system (probably swish-e). I also changed the maximum search hits from 200 to 50 and set the default from 50 to 10. If the server finds more then your maximum, it offers suggestions. I will work on the Cisco List once the server "calms down" :-). Now the bad news. In the process of consuming outrageous amounts of memory and processor speed, it hosed sendmail. Because most SMTP servers will hold messages for a few days (the default is 5 days) we should receive all messages in the next few hours. Take care, Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48026&t=48026 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009]
I'm assuming that your trace problem is from your router. Standard trace would be: router#trace aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd Just in case it's choking on your external ip address -- Try an extended trace: router#trace Protocol [ip]: Target IP address: aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd Source address: xxx.yyy.zzz.111 (one of your internal interfaces) Numeric display [n]: Timeout in seconds [3]: Probe count [3]: Minimum Time to Live [1]: Maximum Time to Live [30]: Port Number [33434]: Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd > -Original Message- > From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > Doh Cheers Tim ... > > The underlying problem that I have is that within my LAN > at work .. I > can ping externally using DNS and IP fine .. However, If I > try to traceroute it does not work !!! All I get is the > timeout asterisks but I can successfully traceroute from > workstations, > servers and even Novell boxes > > Do anyone have any ideas ??? > > Regards .. > > Paul .. > - Original Message - > From: "Bob Timmons" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:22 PM > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > ip name-server x.x.x.x > > > > > Hi all ... > > > > > > Quick easy question to you all ... can and how do you > specify what > DNS > > > server to use on a router ??? > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48027&t=48009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice-IP [7:48008]
Juan I think you will also need 2 NM-1V or NM-2V to give you voice slots that you can plug the VICs into. Regards Peter Walker --On Wednesday, July 03, 2002 3:12 PM + Juan Blanco wrote: > Team, > I want to simulate an small voice-ip network on my lab. I have 2 2600 > router that I will used for this task. My question is what are the > components that I will need in order for me to accomplished my goal. > > What do I need? > > 2 routers > > 2 VIC-2FXS (TWO-PORT FXS VOICE/FAX INTERFACE CARD) - Interface that > connects directly to a standard telephone, fax machine. (foreign exchange > station) > > 2 Telephones > > IOS PLUS FEATURE > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks, > > J > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48028&t=48008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cable Modem DHCP problem [7:47175]
I have roadrunner cable modem service and a 2514 as my internet connection. When I need to get another IP address I simply shut the interface down, wait a few seconds and do the no shut. To verify that you have a new IP address do the "show dhcp server" command, it show your IP address, the IP address of the DHCP server and the lease time. - Original Message - From: "Phil Lorenz" To: Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 7:56 PM Subject: RE: Cable Modem DHCP problem [7:47175] > When dealing with this type of circuit, think of your cable modem as the > UNI interface. > > The router can/will negotiate DHCP signals dynamically (i.e. Lease, > Renewal, Rebind), but this is in terms of a host. > > The information your 2514 is seeing, is the same info the cable modem > would provide your directly connected Microsoft PC. This is what the > DHCP command is allowing you to accomplish here, to gather predetermined > DHCP information from the cable modem and not full negotiations with the > DHCP server. > > In short- reboot the cable modem, then the router... and don't be > surprised if your regain the same IP address, even though you're granted > a brand new lease. > > All the best !!! > Phil > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > McHugh Randy > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cable Modem DHCP problem [7:47175] > > Does anyone know how to release a DHCP lease on a 2514 eth interface? I > would like to release the lease recieved from the cable modem (comcast) > . I > have tried powercycling the modem, router, reload, shuting the interface > ect > and nothing works. I get the same lease all the time and cant get out to > the > internet. > thanks > Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48029&t=47175 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 6500/IPX Issue!! HELP!! [7:47951]
Mike Just a thought, but have you tried setting a gns-response-delay on your router. From what I remember reading in my support exam study (I have NO ipx experience), this can be used to "compensate for the slow CPU or network adapter card of the client, which would otherwise miss a quicker response". It just seems from your other emails that this may match your symptoms and perhaps the difference between connecting to switch a vs switch b is just a tiny bit of latency that is enough to allow the old machines / cards to get the response. Like I said, I have no IPX experience and this is just a shot in the dark based on something I remember reading. Regards Peter Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48030&t=47951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CA , FQDN [7:48032]
If an entity does not have a registered domain name and has no desire to get one, how would one configure a router's FQDN for CA support assuming using in-house CA server. Can I do this :- hostname whatever_host_name ip domain-name whatever_domain_name.foo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48032&t=48032 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
>Hi Group, > >I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations >to be done on the central site. >Network is hub and spoke fashion. >Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for >this purpose. I'm really puzzled what problem they are trying to solve. Certainly, the carrier providing the local loop has these DS1's multiplexed onto faster internal faciliies (e.g., 28 per DS-3, 84 or so on an OC-3, 168 or so on an OC-12). I've had a situation where I had numbers approaching these, and indeed a fair number were not conventional data but POTS, videoconferencing, bulk crypto, etc. The answer was to put a fully redundant Stratacom switch in front of the routers, PBX, etc., and have (in my case) two redundant OC-3's coming into the switch. Since there are now CBR cards for some routers, the switch might no longer be necessary. The question still comes up is whether the 188 DS-1s truly need separate interfaces at the hub, and why. This sort of port density is going to eat you alive if it's a real requirement. If I had to do it, though, I'd certainly try for a hierarchy of routers -- 7500's or better taking high speed trunks, and connecting via Fast Ethernet to 3600's or such with lots of T1 interfaces. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48033&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written [7:47835]
Congratulation Man , let me know when you are planning to give the practical exam. -Original Message- From: Reza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written [7:47835] Hi Group, I passed the CCIE written last week. I like to thank every body in this group for your input. This is a great group. I have to say that Boson #3 by Dennis is excellent. Thanks Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47993&t=47835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Written [7:47835]
Congratulations to you keep it up khalid -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lopez, Robert Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 7:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Written [7:47835] . I passed the written yesterday. What a great exam...the NLI book and Boson #3 along with CCO were excellent prep materials. The journey has really just begun. A thank you to all who contribute to and keep this list moving along. Have a great day!! Robert -Original Message- From: Reza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Written [7:47835] Hi Group, I passed the CCIE written last week. I like to thank every body in this group for your input. This is a great group. I have to say that Boson #3 by Dennis is excellent. Thanks Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48003&t=47835 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Preparation workbook [7:47776]
Silju, I have all of them, and I preferred them in the following order: 1. CCBootcamp Still some typos, but a great way to work with many different setups and configs. 2. Hello Computers I only worked with lab 9, but it was a really good lab. 3. Boson I liked the two lab scenarios better than the workbook, but the workbook was still useful. 4. Solution Labs You didn't list this option, but I found it to be a good way to walk you through the code. 5. CCIE Practical Studies (Karl Solie)- Volume 1 I would have liked this book better if it had fewer typos. Great concept, weak execution. 6. IP Expert This book may be good for you, but I just didn't like the approach. I also found too many errors for my comfort. Treece -Original Message- From: Silju Pillai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Lab Preparation workbook [7:47776] HI, Which lab workbook (R&S) is the best to prepare for the lab... 1. IP Expert 2. CCBootcamp 3. Hello Computers 4. Boson 5. CCIE Practical Studies (Karl Solie)- Volume 1. regards, Silju Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48004&t=47776 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed with room to spare - CSVPN [7:47986]
All in all it was not a bad test. Some of the wording seemed a bit strange and did not seem to fit the answers so I used the "gut instinct, cover the eyes, click method" to answer those. ;) The course I took really helped, it gave a good solid presentation of what to expect. Thanks Paul (instructor) for answering all my questions. Sorry I have never seen a Boson test/study guide to compare it with. CCO has the information that is needed to pass but you would have to really sit with the outline to pick and choose from the information online. I can see that over the years this will probably develop into one of those tests you dread to take. Kim Graham Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47986&t=47986 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Intelligence [7:47973]
Chuck, You're missing something, though...there's going to be TWO of the 3550 EMI's per RACK That's right, not one, BUT TWO! Finally, a REAL Routing and SWITCHING test! Hurray! :) (I bet the sales of 3550 switches were low so they wanted to boost them some how...) One of the previous Cisco proctors who recently was promoted to another higher position within Cisco's CCIE organization and who is now responsible for the CCIE R&S and CCIE Security exams will be answering questions on one of our forums in the near future. You will be able to email her directly, and she will respond publicly (assuming the question is appropriate). thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net ""Chuck"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've started reading the documentation for the Cat 3550 EMI L3 switch that > will be making its appearance in the CCIE lab in October, and will become > THE L2 device in November. > > It does NOT route BGP, according to the docs. Good to know. Does do CEF. > Does do a s**t load of QoS. > > In fact, from the look of the documentation, some folks may just want to > move their labs up a bit. Bet it's going to get REAL hard, REAL fast, with > this new box in place. :-0 > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1219ea1/3550scg/sw > iprout.htm > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47975&t=47973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Lab Intelligence [7:47973]
Chuck, You're missing something, though...there's going to be TWO of the 3550 EMI's per RACK That's right, not one, BUT TWO! Finally, a REAL Routing and SWITCHING test! Hurray! :) (I bet the sales of 3550 switches were low so they wanted to boost them some how...) One of the previous Cisco proctors who recently was promoted to another higher position within Cisco's CCIE organization and who is now responsible for the CCIE R&S and CCIE Security exams will be answering questions on one of our forums in the near future. You will be able to email her directly, and she will respond publicly (assuming the question is appropriate). thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cisco home labs: www.optsys.net ""Chuck"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've started reading the documentation for the Cat 3550 EMI L3 switch that > will be making its appearance in the CCIE lab in October, and will become > THE L2 device in November. > > It does NOT route BGP, according to the docs. Good to know. Does do CEF. > Does do a s**t load of QoS. > > In fact, from the look of the documentation, some folks may just want to > move their labs up a bit. Bet it's going to get REAL hard, REAL fast, with > this new box in place. :-0 > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1219ea1/3550scg/sw > iprout.htm > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48031&t=47973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035]
Well, I just passed support and completed CCNP in one not-so-swift move. Without breaking the NDA I will say many of the questions were VERY nondescript as to what they were asking for. I really believe I passed because I got some lucky guesses on some of the questions. I read MANY of the questions repeatedly without ever finding out what they meant. Dan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48035&t=48035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Swap Request... [7:48036]
Can anybody swap a lab date for late August (this year) in either SJ or RTP with me for November 20th in SJ? Please let me know. Thanks! Eddie [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Notebook.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48036&t=48036 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009]
If the issue is true for all routers and switches then extended trace isn't the solution. I believe that Microsoft implements tracert differently from the standard which Cisco uses. Next guess is that you have a firewall that is blocking the traffic. Here's some snips from old GroupStudy posts: "Unix and Cisco send UDP packets, but Microsoft actually sends 3 ICMP echo requests. Using traceroute on different platforms may yield different results. Especially when you have firewall rulesets involved." "Here's a description of how it works in Unix. Traceroute sends out a UDP packet addressed to the target machine, port 33434, with a "TTL" field set to 1. The first hop accepts the packet, decrements the "TTL" field (as required by the IP spec), and sees that the resulting TTL is 0. It then sends an ICMP Time Exceeded message to the original host. This is repeated twice, and the host records the elapsed time between sending the packet and receiving the "Time Exceeded" packet. It reports this for each of the three packets. Then, the host increments the port number (33434 + 1 = 33435) and the TTL field (1 + 1 = 2), and sends another packet to the same target machine. This time, the packet will get to the second hop before the TTL field becomes a 0. So now the second hop will send ICMP Time Exceeded messages to the host. This is repeated over and over until an ICMP Port Unreachable message is received. This is how the host knows it's reached the destination. This is also why it uses UDP port 33434 and up, because it's pretty safe to assume that no service will be running on any of those ports." > -Original Message- > From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 2:00 PM > To: Daniel Cotts > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > Cheers Daniel ... > > I was using 'traceroute aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' > > Does traceroute perform differently to trace > > I am experiencing this problem from all routers and switches > !!! but all > workstations and servers perform a tracert without any problems !!! > > I will try the extended trace tomorrow in work ... > > Thanks again ... > > Paul ... > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Cotts" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 6:11 PM > Subject: RE: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > I'm assuming that your trace problem is from your router. > > Standard trace would be: > > router#trace aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd > > > > Just in case it's choking on your external ip address -- > > Try an extended trace: > > > > router#trace > > Protocol [ip]: > > Target IP address: aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd > > Source address: xxx.yyy.zzz.111 (one of your internal interfaces) > > Numeric display [n]: > > Timeout in seconds [3]: > > Probe count [3]: > > Minimum Time to Live [1]: > > Maximum Time to Live [30]: > > Port Number [33434]: > > Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > Tracing the route to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:46 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > > > > > > Doh Cheers Tim ... > > > > > > The underlying problem that I have is that within my LAN > > > at work .. I > > > can ping externally using DNS and IP fine .. However, If I > > > try to traceroute it does not work !!! All I get is the > > > timeout asterisks but I can successfully traceroute from > > > workstations, > > > servers and even Novell boxes > > > > > > Do anyone have any ideas ??? > > > > > > Regards .. > > > > > > Paul .. > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Bob Timmons" > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:22 PM > > > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > > > > > > > ip name-server x.x.x.x > > > > > > > > > Hi all ... > > > > > > > > > > Quick easy question to you all ... can and how do you > > > specify what > > > DNS > > > > > server to use on a router ??? > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > > Paul ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48037&t=48009 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035]
Congrats Dan. :) I too found the CIT a bit difficult and I was doing nothing but support at the time of writting the exam (nocling, backbone support). Thus, logically, it should have been a bit easier for myself. Now you can have a break and think about the next step. :) Kim > > From: "Dan Penn" > Date: 2002/07/03 Wed PM 03:01:56 EDT > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035] > > Well, I just passed support and completed CCNP in one not-so-swift move. > Without breaking the NDA I will say many of the questions were VERY > nondescript as to what they were asking for. I really believe I passed > because I got some lucky guesses on some of the questions. I read MANY > of the questions repeatedly without ever finding out what they meant. > > Dan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48038&t=48035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
I couldn't imagine someone purchasing that many seperate lines from a carrier. If you have 188 T-1s coming into the customer premise I believe the piece of equipment you are looking for is called a multiplexer. If you are saying they need @ 300M bandwidth I would have to say your best bet would be to purchase 2 OC-3 circuits. In that case I reccomend the GSR12000 series routers. (We just built out a superhub of a huge VPN using 2 of those things to terminate the OCs and those things are working like a champ. We are planning to upgrade to OC-12 in the near future so using anything else was kindof out of the picture for us except for a Juniper and who wants one of those things in their data center -just kidding) If the 12000 is way too pricey, and you would never need to go to that large of a circuit a 7500 should serve your purpose by using ATM OC-3 cards on the front and FastEs on the back. Heck why don't you just go down to your local MicroCenter and pick up one of those 12008s with a couple of GigE cards in it, and call up one of our sales people and say you want GigE IDE to your site. We are very soon planning to offer Ethernet to the CPE. Cool idea I think. >>>Brian Why can't we just go back to being UUNET? >From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" >Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] >Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:52:57 GMT > > >Hi Group, > > > >I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations > >to be done on the central site. > >Network is hub and spoke fashion. > >Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for > >this purpose. > > >I'm really puzzled what problem they are trying to solve. Certainly, >the carrier providing the local loop has these DS1's multiplexed onto >faster internal faciliies (e.g., 28 per DS-3, 84 or so on an OC-3, >168 or so on an OC-12). > >I've had a situation where I had numbers approaching these, and >indeed a fair number were not conventional data but POTS, >videoconferencing, bulk crypto, etc. The answer was to put a fully >redundant Stratacom switch in front of the routers, PBX, etc., and >have (in my case) two redundant OC-3's coming into the switch. > >Since there are now CBR cards for some routers, the switch might no >longer be necessary. The question still comes up is whether the 188 >DS-1s truly need separate interfaces at the hub, and why. > >This sort of port density is going to eat you alive if it's a real >requirement. If I had to do it, though, I'd certainly try for a >hierarchy of routers -- 7500's or better taking high speed trunks, >and connecting via Fast Ethernet to 3600's or such with lots of T1 >interfaces. _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48039&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice-IP [7:48008]
Steven A. Ridder wrote: > > NO, that's IP Telephony, VoIP and dial peers can be done with > just routers. Yeah you're right. I had a brainfart when I was writing that post =) Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48040&t=48008 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1601 flash [7:48041]
Looking for info on using standard flash memory in 1600 1700 series routers. Will this work How to prepare the memory for ios etc Thanks TH Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48041&t=48041 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042]
Over the next few months I am going to take steps towards completing my CCDP. It looks to be the best way to gain some design background/information that can help me on a future qwest, CCIE. It should also help me with my present position. Questions or thoughts that come to mind are reference materials. Currently I have Sybex's, CCDP (2000 publication date) which I really have not browsed through, and Top Down Design. So far I have read the Testing and parts of the Documention chapters of Top Down Design. It is a nice book and will be a great resource. Thanks Priscilla for taking the time to write it. Should I venture out and get the CID Cisco Press book or will I be fine with those 2 resources, plus practical experience and CCO? Anyone's thoughts on it are appreciated. Kim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48042&t=48042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035]
I didn't like the CIT questions too much either Dan, but congratulations on your achievement. Have a great 4th., Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~ Need a Job? http://www.OleDrews.com/job ~ -Original Message- From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035] Well, I just passed support and completed CCNP in one not-so-swift move. Without breaking the NDA I will say many of the questions were VERY nondescript as to what they were asking for. I really believe I passed because I got some lucky guesses on some of the questions. I read MANY of the questions repeatedly without ever finding out what they meant. Dan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48043&t=48035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IETF encapsulation [7:48044]
Hi. Mmm... Reading in Wendel Odoms 640-607 studying book here it says: "For example, if one router is not a Cisco router and does not support Cisco encapsulation, IETF encapsulation is required". But, what im wondering is: Isnt IETF the default encapsulation method for Frame Relay on Cisco routers? Then, as im sure it is. Why would IETF be used if it wasn't a cisco router? Would someone like to explain it to me briefly? Its probably me just messing things up :) Best, Morgan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48044&t=48044 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
Has your customer heard of channelized DS-3? At 02:44 PM 7/2/2002 +, you wrote: >Hi Group, > >I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations >to be done on the central site. >Network is hub and spoke fashion. >Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for >this purpose. > >Thanks. >- (on postoffice) > >The information contained in this email is confidential and is meant to be >read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit >http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire >confidentiality clause. > >- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47992&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:47999]
Can anyone explain how to get cisco routers running OSPF to load balance traffic on 3 or more T1s? As I understand it, OSPF load-balancing handles 4-6 simultanious connections. Yet I hear rumors that getting any more than 2 requires some creativity. Can anyone elaborate? = James D Montigny, MCSE, MCP+I, CCNA Network Engineer (913)205-6486 __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47999&t=47999 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:48045]
by default OSPF will load balance across equal cost paths. (unless you are trying to run it on a Lucent VPN router, in that case it will probobaly catch on fire and burn the building down) >>>Brian >From: "James Montigny" >Reply-To: "James Montigny" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: 3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:47999] >Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:27:42 GMT > >Can anyone explain how to get cisco routers running >OSPF to load balance traffic on 3 or more T1s? > >As I understand it, OSPF load-balancing handles 4-6 >simultanious connections. Yet I hear rumors that >getting any more than 2 requires some creativity. >Can anyone elaborate? > > > >= >James D Montigny, MCSE, MCP+I, CCNA > Network Engineer > (913)205-6486 > >__ >Do You Yahoo!? >Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free >http://sbc.yahoo.com _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48045&t=48045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042]
I don't know about CCDP, but for CCNP Sybex is terrible! I am in the same position as you are right now. My plan to prepare is Cisco Press CID exam certification guide and Top Down Network Design. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kim Graham Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042] Over the next few months I am going to take steps towards completing my CCDP. It looks to be the best way to gain some design background/information that can help me on a future qwest, CCIE. It should also help me with my present position. Questions or thoughts that come to mind are reference materials. Currently I have Sybex's, CCDP (2000 publication date) which I really have not browsed through, and Top Down Design. So far I have read the Testing and parts of the Documention chapters of Top Down Design. It is a nice book and will be a great resource. Thanks Priscilla for taking the time to write it. Should I venture out and get the CID Cisco Press book or will I be fine with those 2 resources, plus practical experience and CCO? Anyone's thoughts on it are appreciated. Kim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48046&t=48042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IETF encapsulation [7:48044]
Cisco is the default. ""Morgan Hansen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi. > > Mmm... Reading in Wendel Odoms 640-607 studying book here it says: > > "For example, if one router is not a Cisco router and does not support > Cisco encapsulation, IETF encapsulation is required". > > But, what im wondering is: > > Isnt IETF the default encapsulation method for Frame Relay on Cisco > routers? Then, as im sure it is. Why would IETF be used if it wasn't a > cisco router? > > Would someone like to explain it to me briefly? Its probably me just > messing things up :) > > Best, > Morgan > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48047&t=48044 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035]
Yea, I didn't like this test, because I had big problems with Cisco wording on this. Like using the wrong names for things, and using combination of words that are not the correct description of things. Not using the official names of troubleshooting technologies. The CIT book terms they use, and the terms on the test are not even the same. I am playing with words to protect myself from violating the NDA. That's just it, it's a catch-22, we cant say what is wrong with the test exactly, so Cisco cant fix it. Happy 4th, Be Safe Brian MCSE,CCNP -Original Message- From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035] Well, I just passed support and completed CCNP in one not-so-swift move. Without breaking the NDA I will say many of the questions were VERY nondescript as to what they were asking for. I really believe I passed because I got some lucky guesses on some of the questions. I read MANY of the questions repeatedly without ever finding out what they meant. Dan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48048&t=48035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IETF encapsulation [7:48044]
are you crazy? Like Cisco is going to select IETF over Cisco encapsulation as the default riiiggt. 2 types of Frame-Relay encapsulations on a Cisco router Cisco and IETF. Cisco is proprietary. Use IETF encapsulation if connecting to anything not Cisco. >>>Brian >From: "Morgan Hansen" >Reply-To: "Morgan Hansen" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: IETF encapsulation [7:48044] >Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 21:03:51 GMT > >Hi. > >Mmm... Reading in Wendel Odoms 640-607 studying book here it says: > >"For example, if one router is not a Cisco router and does not support >Cisco encapsulation, IETF encapsulation is required". > >But, what im wondering is: > >Isnt IETF the default encapsulation method for Frame Relay on Cisco >routers? Then, as im sure it is. Why would IETF be used if it wasn't a >cisco router? > >Would someone like to explain it to me briefly? Its probably me just >messing things up :) > >Best, >Morgan >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48049&t=48044 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lab swap--REVISED [7:48050]
Sorry for the confusion, everyone. I NEED a lab date in late August (on or around the 30th) to swap with my date on November 20 in SJ. YOUR date may be at either the RTP or SJ location. Please let me know! Thanks, Eddie [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Notebook.jpg] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48050&t=48050 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Voice-IP [7:47990]
You also need a Network Module into which you will install the FXS VICs. NM-1V or NM-2V. The former will meet your need. > -Original Message- > From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Voice-IP [7:47990] > > > Team, > I want to simulate an small voice-ip network on my lab. > I have 2 2600 > router that I will used for this task. My question is what are the > components that I will need in order for me to accomplished my goal. > > What do I need? > > 2 routers > > 2 VIC-2FXS (TWO-PORT FXS VOICE/FAX INTERFACE CARD) - > Interface that connects > directly to a standard telephone, fax machine. (foreign > exchange station) > > 2 Telephones > > IOS PLUS FEATURE > > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Thanks, > > J Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48051&t=47990 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
I would advise your client to have the telco mux the T1s into Channelized DS3s. If for some reason that isn't possible do it yourself with a cisco ONS 15454 or the new 15600. Once you have Channelized ds3s your in better shape. You may be able to get away with a 7500 series full of CT3 cards, but more than likely you'll want to get a ESR 10,000 due to router packet pet second performance issues. Those can do 6 CT3s per slot, so around 1000 t1s on the box and work quite well I think. --- Mike Bernico [EMAIL PROTECTED] Illinois Century Network http://www.illinois.net (217) 557-6555 > -Original Message- > From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 12:00 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944] > > > must be nice to have so much money. these all data lines? why > in the world > would they not use channelized DS3 at the center? hell of a LOT > cheaper Your telco account manager bying a new boat > this summer? > > > density will be a problem. 7206's with the PA-MC-8T1 cards - > that will give > you 64xT1 per box. you do the math. > > HTH > > Chuck > > > > > > > > ""Vajira Wijesinghe"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi Group, > > > > I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) > terminations > > to be done on the central site. > > Network is hub and spoke fashion. > > Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central > site, for > > this purpose. > > > > Thanks. > > - (on postoffice) > > > > The information contained in this email is confidential and > is meant to be > > read only by the person to whom it is addressed.Please visit > > http://www.millenniumit.com/legal/email.htm to read the entire > > confidentiality clause. > > > > - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47991&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT: CCIE Lab Intelligence [7:47973]
Chuck is correct... My 3550 came back with "Unknown routing protocol" only after I entered "router bgp 100". If you leave off the AS number you get "incomplete command". Switch(config)#router ? bgp Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) egp Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) eigrp Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) igrp Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) isis ISO IS-IS iso-igrp IGRP for OSI networks mobileMobile routes odr On Demand stub Routes ospf Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) rip Routing Information Protocol (RIP) staticStatic routes Ryan -Original Message- From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 6:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: CCIE Lab Intelligence [7:47973] Let's see - I said I was reading the config guide on CCO I provided the link.. maybe that's where I got the idea. I have also been told off line by a couple of different people now that BGP is expected to be released later this year. Got a question for you - are you sure that after you enter the command you don't get an error saying "unknown protocol" Chuck ""Kris Keen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What makes you think it doesnt do BGP? I have one right next to me.. Sure > has hell does bgp > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(8)EA1c, RELEASE > SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Fri 15-Feb-02 10:50 by antonino > Image text-base: 0x3000, data-base: 0x006675E0 > > ROM: Bootstrap program is C3550 boot loader > > WS-C3550-12T_A uptime is 1 week, 2 hours, 24 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is > "flash:/c3550-i5q3l2-mz.121-8.EA1c/c3550-i5q3l2-mz.121-8.E > 1c.bin" > > cisco WS-C3550-12T (PowerPC) processor (revision G0) with 65526K/8192K bytes > of > memory. > > > WS-C3550-12T_A#conf t > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > WS-C3550-12T_A(config)#router bgp ? > Autonomous system number > > WS-C3550-12T_A(config)#router bgp > > > Looks BGPish to me :) > I'm trying to get one for my Lab at home.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48019&t=47973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FORGET WHAT I SAID ABOUT IETF encap, IM ASHAMED :( [7:48052]
Sorry folks. Looks like ive got a lot to learn. (Learning every day) And for those of you going. "Argh!" Bear with me ok, ill get there ;) Morgan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48052&t=48052 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009]
Wow ... spot on ... I also found out that the traceroute also fails from Unix boxes too !!! sounds like your theory is spot on We have 3 exit points .. 2 Pix Firewalls and a Novell BorderManager ... Tomorrow I will explicitly allow all traffic in and out from a Unix box and a Router through a Pix to test your theory !!! but it sounds good to me ... I know that ICMP is allowed ... and from what I can remember I think UDP may be getting filtered Nice one Daniel Regards Paul ... - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cotts" To: "'Paul'" ; Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:42 PM Subject: RE: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > If the issue is true for all routers and switches then extended trace isn't > the solution. I believe that Microsoft implements tracert differently from > the standard which Cisco uses. Next guess is that you have a firewall that > is blocking the traffic. Here's some snips from old GroupStudy posts: > > "Unix and Cisco send UDP packets, but > Microsoft actually sends 3 ICMP echo requests. Using traceroute on > different platforms may yield different results. Especially when you have > firewall rulesets involved." > > "Here's a description of how it works in Unix. > > Traceroute sends out a UDP packet addressed to the target machine, port > 33434, with a "TTL" field set to 1. The first hop accepts the packet, > decrements the "TTL" field (as required by the IP spec), and sees that > the resulting TTL is 0. It then sends an ICMP Time Exceeded message to > the original host. > > This is repeated twice, and the host records the elapsed time between > sending the packet and receiving the "Time Exceeded" packet. It reports > this for each of the three packets. > > Then, the host increments the port number (33434 + 1 = 33435) and the > TTL field (1 + 1 = 2), and sends another packet to the same target > machine. This time, the packet will get to the second hop before the > TTL field becomes a 0. So now the second hop will send ICMP Time > Exceeded messages to the host. > > This is repeated over and over until an ICMP Port Unreachable message is > received. This is how the host knows it's reached the destination. > This is also why it uses UDP port 33434 and up, because it's pretty safe > to assume that no service will be running on any of those ports." > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 2:00 PM > > To: Daniel Cotts > > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > > > Cheers Daniel ... > > > > I was using 'traceroute aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' > > > > Does traceroute perform differently to trace > > > > I am experiencing this problem from all routers and switches > > !!! but all > > workstations and servers perform a tracert without any problems !!! > > > > I will try the extended trace tomorrow in work ... > > > > Thanks again ... > > > > Paul ... > > - Original Message - > > From: "Daniel Cotts" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 6:11 PM > > Subject: RE: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > > > > I'm assuming that your trace problem is from your router. > > > Standard trace would be: > > > router#trace aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd > > > > > > Just in case it's choking on your external ip address -- > > > Try an extended trace: > > > > > > router#trace > > > Protocol [ip]: > > > Target IP address: aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd > > > Source address: xxx.yyy.zzz.111 (one of your internal interfaces) > > > Numeric display [n]: > > > Timeout in seconds [3]: > > > Probe count [3]: > > > Minimum Time to Live [1]: > > > Maximum Time to Live [30]: > > > Port Number [33434]: > > > Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: > > > Type escape sequence to abort. > > > Tracing the route to aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:46 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > > > > > > > > > Doh Cheers Tim ... > > > > > > > > The underlying problem that I have is that within my LAN > > > > at work .. I > > > > can ping externally using DNS and IP fine .. However, If I > > > > try to traceroute it does not work !!! All I get is the > > > > timeout asterisks but I can successfully traceroute from > > > > workstations, > > > > servers and even Novell boxes > > > > > > > > Do anyone have any ideas ??? > > > > > > > > Regards .. > > > > > > > > Paul .. > > > > - Original Message - > > > > From: "Bob Timmons" > > > > To: > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:22 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Specify DNS on a Router ... [7:48009] > > > > > > > > > > > > > ip name-server x.x.x.x > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Quick easy question to you all ... can and how do you > > > > specify what > > > > DNS > > > > > > server to use on a router ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > Re
Re: OT: CCIE Lab Intelligence [7:47973]
How much are you willing to pay for one? I'm trying to get rid of some 3550-24 EMI's from my lab. I only have two, but I'd be willing to sell them for less than $2400.00. Make me an offer... -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Kris Keen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > What makes you think it doesnt do BGP? I have one right next to me.. Sure > has hell does bgp > > > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) C3550 Software (C3550-I5Q3L2-M), Version 12.1(8)EA1c, RELEASE > SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Fri 15-Feb-02 10:50 by antonino > Image text-base: 0x3000, data-base: 0x006675E0 > > ROM: Bootstrap program is C3550 boot loader > > WS-C3550-12T_A uptime is 1 week, 2 hours, 24 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is > "flash:/c3550-i5q3l2-mz.121-8.EA1c/c3550-i5q3l2-mz.121-8.E > 1c.bin" > > cisco WS-C3550-12T (PowerPC) processor (revision G0) with 65526K/8192K bytes > of > memory. > > > WS-C3550-12T_A#conf t > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. > WS-C3550-12T_A(config)#router bgp ? > Autonomous system number > > WS-C3550-12T_A(config)#router bgp > > > Looks BGPish to me :) > I'm trying to get one for my Lab at home.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48056&t=47973 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:48054]
James, I would have to say that depends. I don't know what you have in mind, so if you could provide more information as to what you're trying to accomplish. I'm sure any number of folks on the list would willing offer a solution to your problem. HTH Nigel - Original Message - From: "James Montigny" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:27 AM Subject: 3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:47999] > Can anyone explain how to get cisco routers running > OSPF to load balance traffic on 3 or more T1s? > > As I understand it, OSPF load-balancing handles 4-6 > simultanious connections. Yet I hear rumors that > getting any more than 2 requires some creativity. > Can anyone elaborate? > > > > = > James D Montigny, MCSE, MCP+I, CCNA > Network Engineer > (913)205-6486 > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48054&t=48054 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP community Q [7:48007]
Annu, I'll provide a hint !Look at your "as-path" ACL.. the answer lies therein..:-> Nigel - Original Message - From: "Annu Roopa" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:56 AM Subject: BGP community Q [7:48007] > Group, > > I have a community related question and the scenario > is as follows.What am i doing wrong ? Scenario is: > > > (AS100) > r11-r8-r10(AS 200) > iBGPeBGP > > There are some Networks (196.196.10.0/175.10.10.0 > etc)coming via R10 to R8.I want to add a community > string of 100:88 to all routes containing AS 200 and > send it to R11 from R8.But somehow its not adding it > rather adding 100:900 when i see it on R11. Whats > wrong with my logic ? > > Here are my configs and show commands. > > R8#sr > Building configuration... > Current configuration: > hostname r8 > ! > router bgp 100 > bgp router-id 8.1.1.1 > network 8.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 > neighbor 11.1.1.1 remote-as 100 > neighbor 11.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 > neighbor 11.1.1.1 next-hop-self > neighbor 11.1.1.1 send-community > neighbor 11.1.1.1 route-map address out > neighbor 180.10.10.1 remote-as 200 > neighbor 180.10.10.1 ebgp-multihop 255 > neighbor 180.10.10.1 update-source Loopback0 > ! > ip bgp-community new-format > ip as-path access-list 11 permit _200_ > ip as-path access-list 11 deny .* > ! > route-map address permit 10 > match as-path 11 > set community 100:88 > ! > route-map address permit 20 > set community 100:900 > > -- > r8#sh ip bgp regexp _200_ > BGP table version is 12, local router ID is 8.1.1.1 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * > valid, > best, i - internal > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > >Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf > Weight Path > *> 10.1.1.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i > *>175.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.10 200 300 i > *> 180.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 0 200 i > *> 190.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 400 > i*> 192.168.1.0 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i > *> 196.196.1.0 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i > --- > R11#b 196.196.1.0 > BGP routing table entry for 196.196.1.0/24, version 40 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table > Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Advertised to non peer-group peers: > 1.1.1.2 > 200 300 > 8.1.1.1 (metric 129) from 8.1.1.1 (8.1.1.1) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > Community:100:900 > > R11#b 175.10.10.0 > BGP routing table entry for 175.10.10.0/24, version 38 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table > Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Advertised to non peer-group peers: > 1.1.1.2 > 200 300 > 8.1.1.1 (metric 129) from 8.1.1.1 (8.1.1.1) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > Community: 100:900 > --- > > Failed to troubleshoot it.Anyone with ideas. > > > > > > = > Thanks in advance for ur time and replies. > Annu. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48055&t=48007 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035]
Dan, Congrats! I am starting to read the support books and plan to take it in Aug sometime. Thanks for the warning about the test, anything else you could provide offline without break of NDA is appreciated. :-} Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48057&t=48035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042]
Howdy Kim :-) I run a useful website that has some great (free) material for all the Certs. Email me offline and I'll send you the URL (I don't want Paul to get mad at me for spamming the list with advertisements). Clayton Dukes CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: "Kim Graham" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 4:39 PM Subject: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042] > Over the next few months I am going to take steps towards completing my > CCDP. It looks to be the best way to gain some design > background/information that can help me on a future qwest, CCIE. It should > also help me with my present position. > > Questions or thoughts that come to mind are reference materials. Currently > I have Sybex's, CCDP (2000 publication date) which I really have not browsed > through, and Top Down Design. So far I have read the Testing and parts of > the Documention chapters of Top Down Design. It is a nice book and will be > a great resource. Thanks Priscilla for taking the time to write it. > > Should I venture out and get the CID Cisco Press book or will I be fine with > those 2 resources, plus practical experience and CCO? > > Anyone's thoughts on it are appreciated. > > Kim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48058&t=48042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple Individual T1 termination --urgent [7:47944]
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 02:44:43PM +, Vajira Wijesinghe wrote: Hi Group, I have a client who needs 188 T1 (all 1.544Mb serial lines) terminations to be done on the central site. Network is hub and spoke fashion. Pls advise the suitable Cisco router/routers on the central site, for this purpose. We use Cisco GSR's with 6xCT3 (blizzard) cards with great success. Have the telco mux all those DS1 into Channelized T3s for you. That'll be a lot cheaper than muxing them yourself at the core site. --phil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48059&t=47944 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042]
Thanks Dan for the heads up on the Sybex material. I will not waist my time on it then. Kim > > From: "Dan Penn" > Date: 2002/07/03 Wed PM 05:31:30 EDT > To: "'Kim Graham'" , > > Subject: RE: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042] > > I don't know about CCDP, but for CCNP Sybex is terrible! I am in the > same position as you are right now. My plan to prepare is Cisco Press > CID exam certification guide and Top Down Network Design. > > Dan > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Kim Graham > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 2:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Starting to prepare for CCDP [7:48042] > > Over the next few months I am going to take steps towards completing my > CCDP. It looks to be the best way to gain some design > background/information that can help me on a future qwest, CCIE. It > should > also help me with my present position. > > Questions or thoughts that come to mind are reference materials. > Currently > I have Sybex's, CCDP (2000 publication date) which I really have not > browsed > through, and Top Down Design. So far I have read the Testing and parts > of > the Documention chapters of Top Down Design. It is a nice book and will > be > a great resource. Thanks Priscilla for taking the time to write it. > > Should I venture out and get the CID Cisco Press book or will I be fine > with > those 2 resources, plus practical experience and CCO? > > Anyone's thoughts on it are appreciated. > > Kim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48060&t=48042 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IETF encapsulation [7:48044]
You know you are probobaly right. Maybe RIP only enters the best route into the routing table? I'm not entirely sure. I know OSPF will enter all routes into the routing table regardless, and I know BGP will only enter the best route into the routing table. Might want to check on Cisco's website? I don't have my lab setup with duplicate routes using RIP, IGRP or EIGRP so I'm not entirely sure. You know maybe if we sent these out to the entire group someone on there could help clear this up for us? Gotta get outta here and start my holiday. Happy Independance Day everyone! God Bless America! >>>Brian >From: "Morgan Hansen" >To: "'Brian Lodwick'" >Subject: RE: IETF encapsulation [7:48044] >Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 01:39:51 +0200 > >Hmm... Well? I belive you, no question there! Id trust you with my life >the way I see it now, but... > >K, heres all of my notes, and one of the four lines below should tell me >which one who is not going to be entred into the receiving router... > > >Router_B#show ip route >Codes: C-connected,s-static,I-IGRP,R-RIP,M-Mobile,B-BGP,D- EIGRP,EIGRP >external,O-OSPF,IA-OSPFinter area,EI-OSPF external type 1,E2-OSPF >external type 2, E-EGP,i-IS-IS,L1-IS-IS level- 1,L2-IS-IS >level-2,*-candidate default,U-per-user static route >Gateway of last resort is not set R 192.168.8.0/24 [120/1] via >192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 >C 192.168.9.0/24 is directly connected, Serial 1 >R 192.168.10.0/24 [120/7] via 192.168.9.1, 00:00:02, Serial1 >R 192.168.11.0/24 [120/7] via 192.168.9.1, 00:00:03, Serial1 >C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 >C 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0 >R 192.168.3.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 >R 192.168.4.0/24 [120/15] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 >R 192.168.5.0/24 [120/15] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 >R 192.168.6.0/24 [120/15] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 >R 192.168.7.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 > >And looking at these lines, given the following 4 lines below - >One of these lines will be the one NOT being entred into the receiving >router. As you know, I started out thinking it was the [120/5] one, but >now im thinking more [120/1] >The only thing I know for certain is that by looking at these lines from >the show ip route command, I should be able to determine which of these >4 lines (below) not being entred into the receiving router. What do you >make of all this? >I must be missing something? > >Should it be this one? > >R 192.168.3.0/24 [120/1] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 > >Or; > >R 192.168.11.0/24 [120/7] via 192.168.9.1, 00:00:03, Serial1 > >Or; > >C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > >Or maybe; > >R 192.168.5.0/24 [120/15] via 192.168.2.2, 00:00:10, Serial0 > >I don't know? And if it's the [120/1] one, then why? Wow, I find this >really hard to see. > >Morgan >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >-Original Message- >From: Brian Lodwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 4. juli 2002 01:19 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: IETF encapsulation [7:48044] > >Well, the router should receive all of the routes and add them all to >the >routing table. Of these routes it selects the best path(s), and when it >receives a packet destined for that destination it routes it via the >best >path(s). > >For example take a look at this routing table and see the routes to the >150.10.20.0 network. > >r5#ip >Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP >D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area >N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 >E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP >i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS >inter >area >* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR >P - periodic downloaded static route > >Gateway of last resort is not set > > 55.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets >C 55.55.55.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0 >O E2 200.200.100.0/24 [110/20] via 150.10.50.2, 00:00:13, Serial0 >O E2 200.100.100.0/24 [110/20] via 150.10.60.6, 00:00:13, Serial1.1 >B198.5.51.0/24 [200/0] via 150.10.60.6, 02:08:21 >O E2 10.0.0.0/8 [110/20] via 150.10.60.6, 00:00:13, Serial1.1 >C200.150.150.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1 >B198.5.53.0/24 [200/0] via 150.10.60.6, 02:08:21 >B198.6.53.0/24 [200/0] via 150.10.50.2, 02:22:29 >B198.5.52.0/24 [200/0] via 150.10.60.6, 02:08:22 >B198.5.54.0/24 [200/0] via 150.10.60.6, 02:08:22 > 150.10.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 17 subnets, 5 masks >O E2150.10.30.0/29 [110/20] via 150.10.10.3, 00:00:14, Serial1.2 >O 150.10.20.0/25 [110/74] via 150.10.10.1, 00:00:15, Serial1.2 >O IA150.10.20.0/24 [110/74] via 150.10.10.3, 00:00:15, Serial1.2 >O 150.10.10.0/24 is a summary, 02:08:28, Null0 >C 150.10.10.0/28 is directly connected, Serial1.2 >I 150.10.4.0/24 [100/8976] via 150.10.40.4, 0
Re: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893]
I just checked I'm using an RSP2 in a 7005. Does that help? ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Let me start with what is documented and then ask if anyone is doing it > differently. > First off the 7010 is a five slot chassis. It originally shipped with a > route processor (RP), and a switch processor (SP). Later versions had a > silicon switch processor (SSP). > The 7000 is from the same family as the 7010. It has seven slots. Again it > used the RP and SP/SSP pair. > As previously posted, the IOS updates for the RP ended at 11.2. > When Cisco introduced the 7500 series it created an upgrade for the existing > 7000/7010 boxes. That was the RSP7000 / RSP7000CI set of cards. Note that > the routing function and the switching function moved to one card. See: > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7000/routeswi/25617r > sp.htm > Some are available. Often the RSP7000CI board, which contains all of the > environmental monitoring functions is missing. I doubt that is an issue for > lab use. > The RSP7000 runs current IOS. > > The 7500 series replaced the 7010 with the 7505. The 7000 became the 7507. > IIRC The 7505 shipped with an RSP1 card, the 7507 had an RSP2. > Patrick's post sent me to CCO. The 7505 does support the RSP1, RSP2, RSP4, > and RSP8. See the following: > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7505/rte_swit/index. > htm > > The 7000s had the CX buss, the 7500s the CY buss. Interface cards designed > for the CX buss will work in the 7500s (with some exceptions. Usually > resolved with a later version of the card.) > > I have not looked at the connectors on the rear of an RSP7000 vs an RSP2 or > RSP4. My guess is that they are different because of the different busses. > Anyone know? Anyone use an RSP2 in a 7000? If so, my prayers are answered. > If not, anyone have a RSP7000 set at a reasonable price? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Patrick Bass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:43 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cisco 7010 router help [7:47893] > > > > > > I've got RSP7000/7500 version 12.1.15 ent/fw/ids/56 version, > > 16f/64r, the > > filename is rsp-jo3sv56i-mz.121-15.bin... you need a cco > > account to get it, > > and i suppose a cco account with the right privs. In any event, I'm > > guessing it will work on a 7010. i'm using a 7005 with an rsp2... > > > > > > ""Kazan, Naim"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > This is off the topic but can you help me with what version > > of IOS is > > > support by the 7010 router. I was told before end of sale > > of 7010 router, > > > the highest ios version was 11.0. Is that correct or can I > > DL 12.0 version > > > to 7010 router. The router is for home lab use only. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48062&t=47893 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846]
I'll be there. Taking the CCIE PS on Monday. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Benjamin Kessler Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT - Networkers, Orlando [7:47846] Anyone from the list going? Is there going to be a GroupStudy gathering? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48063&t=47846 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please stop sending me dumps [7:48064]
I would like everyone who is trying to send me so called dumps on this studygroup to stop doing so right now! I thank you for your kind thoughts, but id rather make the exam on my own thank you so much. I don't need them so buzz off! Morgan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48064&t=48064 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange 6500/IPX Issue!! HELP!! [7:47951]
6509 A | | | | 6509B - > 5513 NOVELL SERVERS So anything connected to 5513 can see the Novell Servers? So anything connected to 6509B can see Novell Servers? Can anything see the Novell Servers from the 6509A? Where does the VLAN's come into this? You say the 5513 has an RSM? I persume your novell servers are all in different vlans?? Does your 6509A have full IPX Route/Sap Tables? Does your 6509B have full IPX Route/Sap Tables? Can you confirm IPX Routes are present on ALL switches? And therefore, SAPs? Cheers We use Novell 5 at work, along with 6509's in your same setup but your 5513 is our 3548, and we use Routing also but its done on the MSFC in the 6509 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48065&t=47951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for a CCIE Security study partners for Bellingham MA [7:48066]
I am looking for a CCIE Security study partners / group for Bellingham MA area. I completed my CSS1 in February 2002 and will be taking my written on September 1, 2002. I have set up a complete lab with all the routers, PIX, and study guides. I am currently living in Bellingham, MA area and can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] PG Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48066&t=48066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:48067]
I have load balanced over three parallel E1s. No creativity required (which is fortunate, because I wasn't offering any). JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 04/07/2002 01:31 pm - "Nigel Taylor" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/07/2002 08:07 am Please respond to "Nigel Taylor" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: 3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:48054] Is this part of a business decision process?: James, I would have to say that depends. I don't know what you have in mind, so if you could provide more information as to what you're trying to accomplish. I'm sure any number of folks on the list would willing offer a solution to your problem. HTH Nigel - Original Message - From: "James Montigny" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:27 AM Subject: 3 T1s - 2 cisco routers - OSPF - configuration problems [7:47999] > Can anyone explain how to get cisco routers running > OSPF to load balance traffic on 3 or more T1s? > > As I understand it, OSPF load-balancing handles 4-6 > simultanious connections. Yet I hear rumors that > getting any more than 2 requires some creativity. > Can anyone elaborate? > > > > = > James D Montigny, MCSE, MCP+I, CCNA > Network Engineer > (913)205-6486 > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > http://sbc.yahoo.com Important: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any review, re-transmission, disclosure, use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited by several Commonwealth Acts of Parliament. If you have received this communication in error please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48067&t=48067 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question - Cisco beta exams results on VUE? [7:47985]
I am wondering how you know you passed all 4 if only have results to 2 of them? ""Eduard Moisak"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All! > > I've got a question concerning Cisco CCNP beta-exams. > I was passing 4 betas at VUE testing center at Feb, 18 (Rouring, Switching, > Troubleshooting and Remote access). At present, there are results only of > two of them at the VUE site (and at CISCO accordingly). And status of other > two is still TAKEN. If anybody of your encountered such a problem? > > Thanks in advance, > Eduard. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48068&t=47985 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - Cisco vis a vis World Com [7:47505]
UUNet is a Cisco shop for sure (Canada and US). And don't confuse WCOM's data networking division with UUNet (WCOM's subsidiary in Internetworking). Those students might be talking about the data networking sidetrue or false, I don't know. -B :) --- Chuck wrote: > Not too long ago, John Chambers was quoted in one of > the networking > magazines talking about erosion of margins, and > partners who sold very > cheaply. The talk on the street was that it was no > secret he was talking > about WorldCom, who have been notorious for their > pricing of Cisco products > as an inducement to use worldCom data circuits. > > I believe what used to be UUNet is a major user of > Cisco equipment. that's > one reason I asked about UUNet's viability. WCOM is > going to end up selling > assets, and it seems to me that the ISP is about the > best asset they have. > The network / fiber assets only contribute to the > current fiber glut, so > become less of a source of hope for revenue from > sales. > > As far as what's in the carrier networks themselves, > maybe this is less > important to Cisco, as no carriers use their stuff > anyway? ;-> > > BTW Juniper stock is not looking real good right now > at all. Nor Ciena. > > > ""John Kaberna"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Talking with a couple of my students (employees at > Cisco) WCOM is mostly a > > Nortel shop. They said that ATT and Sprint are > Cisco Powered Networks so > > they are the big providers that Cisco is > interested in. This is not > > official or anything from Cisco it's just what > these guys are telling me. > > > > > > ""Chuck"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > So far today I have seen no word from Cisco on > its exposure to World > Com. > > > > > > the other so called players in the networking > industry - Redback, > Nortel, > > > and Lucent, have all said they have very little > on the line with > WorldCom. > > > Of course, these are companies with one foot in > the grave already. > > > > > > WorldCom is one of Cisco's MAJOR customers. > Cisco stock is back close > to > > > it's low of the last year. Maybe Cisco believes > nothing needs be said? > > Maybe > > > Cisco figures they can still sell their stuff > through other channels? > > > > > > As an employee of another of Cisco's major > customers, maybe this bodes > > well > > > for me? with WorldCom out of the way, and no > longer selling at cost to > > steal > > > my customers, maybe my own business will pick > up? > > > > > > Sheesh, this is scary. > > > > > > Anybody out there know how what used to be UUNet > is doing? Viable? Any > > > repercussions through the ISP world? [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48070&t=47505 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP community Q [7:48069]
Annu, you are using _200_ to match a route coming directly from 200. i see AS200 is adjacent. try ^200.* see bgp example at the end of the link: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/ftersv_c/ftsappx/tcfaapre.htm let us know if this helps? On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Annu Roopa wrote: > Group, > > I have a community related question and the scenario > is as follows.What am i doing wrong ? Scenario is: > > > (AS100) > r11-r8-r10(AS 200) > iBGPeBGP > > There are some Networks (196.196.10.0/175.10.10.0 > etc)coming via R10 to R8.I want to add a community > string of 100:88 to all routes containing AS 200 and > send it to R11 from R8.But somehow its not adding it > rather adding 100:900 when i see it on R11. Whats > wrong with my logic ? > > Here are my configs and show commands. > > R8#sr > Building configuration... > Current configuration: > hostname r8 > ! > router bgp 100 > bgp router-id 8.1.1.1 > network 8.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 > neighbor 11.1.1.1 remote-as 100 > neighbor 11.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0 > neighbor 11.1.1.1 next-hop-self > neighbor 11.1.1.1 send-community > neighbor 11.1.1.1 route-map address out > neighbor 180.10.10.1 remote-as 200 > neighbor 180.10.10.1 ebgp-multihop 255 > neighbor 180.10.10.1 update-source Loopback0 > ! > ip bgp-community new-format > ip as-path access-list 11 permit _200_ > ip as-path access-list 11 deny .* > ! > route-map address permit 10 > match as-path 11 > set community 100:88 > ! > route-map address permit 20 > set community 100:900 > > -- > r8#sh ip bgp regexp _200_ > BGP table version is 12, local router ID is 8.1.1.1 > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * > valid, > best, i - internal > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete > >Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf > Weight Path > *> 10.1.1.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i > *>175.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.10 200 300 i > *> 180.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 0 200 i > *> 190.10.10.0/24 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 400 > i*> 192.168.1.0 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i > *> 196.196.1.0 180.10.10.1 0 200 300 i > --- > R11#b 196.196.1.0 > BGP routing table entry for 196.196.1.0/24, version 40 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table > Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Advertised to non peer-group peers: > 1.1.1.2 > 200 300 > 8.1.1.1 (metric 129) from 8.1.1.1 (8.1.1.1) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > Community:100:900 > > R11#b 175.10.10.0 > BGP routing table entry for 175.10.10.0/24, version 38 > Paths: (1 available, best #1, table > Default-IP-Routing-Table) > Advertised to non peer-group peers: > 1.1.1.2 > 200 300 > 8.1.1.1 (metric 129) from 8.1.1.1 (8.1.1.1) > Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal, best > Community: 100:900 > --- > > Failed to troubleshoot it.Anyone with ideas. > > > > > > = > Thanks in advance for ur time and replies. > Annu. > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > http://sbc.yahoo.com > _ > Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html > Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48069&t=48069 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to upgrade IOS on GSR12016 [7:48071]
'cause 12016 can't configure ppp multilink on 2-port STM-1-OC-3 Channelized E1-T1 Line Card on line(other end is 7206,any change to ppp multilink need 12016 to reboot in order to take config take place),Cisco suggest to upgrade IOS of 12016. any one did it?Please give me suggestion?Thank you.or give some URL. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48071&t=48071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIP V1&V2 [7:48072]
Hi, there. In case a RIP v1 speaking router (Send v1 and Receive v1 & v2)receives RIP v2 updates, how does it process those unused fields within v1, say subnet mask. According to Jeff Volume I, it would ignore them but my RIP v1 router does show up the network address as well as subnet mask, please advise. Best Regards. Leo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48072&t=48072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unity port question [7:48073]
I downloaded unity server from Cisco. I don't have a key so I installed as demo. When tried to integrate with call manager, I created 10 ports on call manager and TSP. But when I checked "unity status monitoring", it said I used 2 ports and had 8 available. How do I activate those 8 ports? Thanks. Yoshi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48073&t=48073 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FORGET WHAT I SAID ABOUT IETF encap, IM ASHAMED :( [7:48074]
Most of us on this list started off knowing little or nothing. Hang in there, pal. After a while it really does start to make sense. Nothing wrong with asking questions. It's only wrong if you never learn anything as a result. Chuck ""Morgan Hansen"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Sorry folks. Looks like ive got a lot to learn. (Learning every day) > > And for those of you going. "Argh!" Bear with me ok, ill get there ;) > > Morgan > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48074&t=48074 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RIP V1&V2 [7:48072]
without having had the chance to verify this for myself, I can offer that someone who occasionally lurks on this list once told me about a good RIP lab he designed, in which this issue is covered. His purpose in designing this particular lab was to demonstrate exactly what you are reporting, and to show how you can get screwed as a result. I've been meaning to look at this for some time now. Don't know if I'll have a chance in the near future, but if I do, I will certainly report the result. Chuck ""Leo Song"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, there. > > In case a RIP v1 speaking router (Send v1 and Receive v1 & v2)receives > RIP v2 updates, how does it process those unused fields within v1, say > subnet mask. According to Jeff Volume I, it would ignore them but my RIP > v1 router does show up the network address as well as subnet mask, > please advise. > > Best Regards. > Leo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48075&t=48072 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Router as a terminal server [7:48077]
Hello all I am trying to configure a Cisco 2511 router as a terminal server in order to connect to vi the tty ports to the console ports of my core routers. I followed all the steps that are described on Cisco WEb side but whenever i do reverse telnet, I get the message connection refused by remote host. Any suggestion or a sample working config will be appreciated __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48077&t=48077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035]
Congratulations Dan I felt the same very similar about the CIT ... But then I thought maybe I just didn't pay attention in the first place :) A question I'd like to throw out if you don't mind entertaining me is this :)How many of you's on this list has achieved CCNP/IP/DP or CCIE written in the last four months and how long did it take you to achieve the complete cert or the written. It took me about three months to get this. Of course I was sitting around for the last year doing nothing at all. I had all these books on the shelf including a lot of CCIE level books and I was intimidated by them. Didn't have the courage to open one. Now I feel I can conquer the world ... When it comes to study / learning / playing with the stuff Manish CCNP (for three weeks!) ;) -Original Message- From: Dan Penn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 July 2002 21:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035] Well, I just passed support and completed CCNP in one not-so-swift move. Without breaking the NDA I will say many of the questions were VERY nondescript as to what they were asking for. I really believe I passed because I got some lucky guesses on some of the questions. I read MANY of the questions repeatedly without ever finding out what they meant. Dan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48078&t=48035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Dan Penn Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Kim Graham RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Ole Drews Jensen RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Brian Zeitz RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], John McCartney RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Juli Hato <-- Chronological --> <-- Thread --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Reply via email to Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Dan Penn Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Kim Graham RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Ole Drews Jensen RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Brian Zeitz RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], John McCartney RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Juli Hato Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Tom Scott <-- Chronological --> <-- Thread --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Reply via email to Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Kim Graham RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Ole Drews Jensen RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Brian Zeitz RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], John McCartney RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Juli Hato Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Tom Scott <-- Chronological --> <-- Thread --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Reply via email to RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Ole Drews Jensen RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Brian Zeitz RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], John McCartney RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Juli Hato Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Tom Scott <-- Chronological --> <-- Thread --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Reply via email to RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Brian Zeitz RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], John McCartney RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Juli Hato Re: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Tom Scott <-- Chronological --> <-- Thread --> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"> Reply via email to RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], John McCartney RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: RE: Just passed support, and completed CCNP [7:48035], Juli Hato Re: Ju
