RE: VoIP [7:18426]

2001-09-04 Thread Peter Slow

depends on whos doing it.
I can do that in like, a day or two. for most that could be a week long
project.
i speak from experience.
-Peter

-Original Message-
From: Julius Bingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VoIP [7:18426]


Does anyone know around how many hours it takes to tie
in Voice over IP (VoIP) on a 2600 series router over
Frame Relay?  Less than 50 users and 10 simultaneous
lines connecting with a PBX?  I bidded this out and
received one bid and do not want to pay for excess
hours.  I appreciate your constructive responses and
knowledge.

Julius

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18456t=18426
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: H323/VoIP info [7:18451]

2001-09-04 Thread Peter Slow

-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow 
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:46 PM
To: 'Patrick Donlon'
Subject: RE: H323/VoIP info [7:18451]


but what about the RTP streams? the pix has always been able to do h323
filtering / fixup protocol for the h323 stuff. i've never gotten voip to
work thru a PIX with out leaving an enormous hole for a static NAT
translation or for UDP port mapping w/tcp 17191720
-Peter

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Donlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: H323/VoIP info [7:18451]


For those of you with an interest in VoIP and H323, the PIX 525 with version
5.3(2) does work with static NAT (and no NAT).

cheers Pat




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18458t=18451
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: How to upgrade ios on 2502 [7:18449]

2001-09-04 Thread Peter Slow

load (tiny/featureless) ios via tftp, so u can erase flash, or, set the
thing on fire.


-Original Message-
From: ietobe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to upgrade ios on 2502 [7:18449]


Hi,
does anybody know how to upgrade ios version on 2502, as you know I do
not have a token ring card on my pc or any other rouer. The router does not
provide copy xmodem: flash: command and does not have xmodem command under
rom ios. How do I upgrade ios software from console port?

TKS

ietobe
CCNP CCDP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18459t=18449
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Real Lab [7:18114]

2001-08-31 Thread Peter Slow

If you guys need lab time, I have a lab available for your use.
The equipment is the following:
1 7204VXR
1 3660
1 3640
1 2511
1 2501
1 2513
1 2504
2 4700
1 cat5000/supIII/NFFC
1 as5200 w/ modems
1 as5300 w/ modems
1 cat3512
all of those routers that are modular are pretty much PACKED.
i will try and put together any hardware configs you request, but some of
them i might not be able to do.
there are end stations running various OSes, MAUs, hubs, and assorted other
things available for use with the lab.

the price of 50 dollars an hour might change for you depeneding on how much
time you want it for.
contact me via email if interested

-Peter Slow



-Original Message-
From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: $10 Vitual CCIE/CCNP LAB NOW AVAILABLE [7:17490]


They also say that they have CCIE's on staff to deploy for all your
networking needs. If CCIE's were behind those Labs they should be ashamed of
themselves. Why don't John Doe send us their names and IE numbers and Chuck
and I could check them out on our favorite tool, the CCIE verification tool
on CCO.
Little advice to the dude that wants to sell rack time, focus on CCNA's
first, you do have equipment to satisfy their needs but you don't even come
close to NP or IE level with what you are showing. Don't say I didn't try to
help.


- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu 
To: 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:29 PM
Subject: RE: $10 Vitual CCIE/CCNP LAB NOW AVAILABLE [7:17490]


 I was a bit more interested in fritz on training, rather than hans on,
 but...

 with regards to Lab 1, you may want to add some commentary regarding the
 issue around the links between R2-R4 and R3-R4. it is an important issue,
 and the earlier one learns it, the better.

 with regards to Lab 2, I believe you meant to say issue a shut command,
 rather than a no shut

 a good hard working pre-CCNA level should be able to do the RIP lab in an
 hour, with plenty of time for troubleshooting.

 the IGRP lab appears to be a BCRAN level lab, and maybe 90 minutes or so.

 hiding behind the John Doe moniker leaves me wondering. got a real name
and
 real e-mail?

 Chuck

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:13 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: $10 Vitual CCIE/CCNP LAB NOW AVAILABLE [7:17490]


 www.it3networksonline.com is an up an coming web site that hosts virtual
 labs to help individuals gain hans on training for CCIE/CCNP/CCNA status.

 We also provide free over the phone support to help you get started and to
 answer network related questions at 917-880-6532.

 The first lab will be FREE!

 Please visit www.it3networksonline.com.

 Thank you.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18114t=18114
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: hi [7:16967]

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Slow

troll 

1. v.,n. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on
Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post
itself. Derives from the phrase trolling for newbies which in turn comes
from mainstream trolling, a style of fishing in which one trails bait
through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a
post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even
more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy
and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for
the joke, you get to be in on it. See also YHBT. 2. n. An individual who
chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or
personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other
purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are
recognizable by the fact that they have no real interest in learning about
the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly
creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics,
and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in,
Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll. Compare kook. 3. n. [Berkeley] Computer
lab monitor. A popular campus job for CS students. Duties include helping
newbies and ensuring that lab policies are followed. Probably so-called
because it involves lurking in dark cavelike corners. 

Some people claim that the troll (sense 1) is properly a narrower category
than flame bait, that a troll is categorized by containing some assertion
that is wrong but not overtly controversial. See also Troll-O-Meter. 

The use of `troll' in either sense is a live metaphor that readily produces
elaborations and combining forms. For example, one not infrequently sees the
warning Do not feed the troll as part of a followup to troll postings. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hi [7:16967]


Hi,
I would appreciate if you will send me the details for the CCIE 
written.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16973t=16967
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NAT using a single interface [7:16902]

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Slow

yeah, but you need to use sub interfaces. yah cant do it with a single
interface regardless of wether it will work theoretically, because IOS needs
the ip nat inside/outside commands, and wont let you put them on and
interface at the same time
Unfortunately, this means that you need a switch, because cisco wont allow
you to config inet addresses on a subif if you have no encap spec'd.
Personally i think it'd be cake to get nat up and running on the same
interface if they diddnt require you to config an encap.

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NAT using a single interface [7:16902]


well I am not sure to what application this would be usefull for, but if IOS
supported this funtionallity, you would have to create sub interfaces with
different ip addresses on different networks.  then set your inside
interface to one sub and the outside interface to the other sub just as you
would on a normal router.

But I have to ask...  If you have 2 subnets on the same network, in theory
you would have a lot of machines on each of those subnets trying to talk to
one another.  Is this correct?  Why not just use that ethernet port as a one
armed router?  (I would then assume that you are migrating your network from
one subnet to another) so this would not be a permanent intallation. (as
this is very unefficient)

If this is not the case, please explain your situation... I'm interested in
the need for this scenario.

-Patrick

 Leigh Anne Chisholm  08/22/01 06:27PM 
I've searched the Groupstudy archives...  there's been much speculation as
to whether or not this can be done.  Has anyone managed to get NAT using a
single Ethernet interface to work?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16981t=16902
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Relpys to a request [7:16980]

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Slow

no it doesnt.

In fact under general circumstances those source macs are the MAC of the
router that was the last hop onto the lan.

Although i would love to, at the moment i dont have time to explain where
arp is used and how it works =)

Now, im guessing this 6509 has an MSFC (or MSFC2) am i correct?
If so it might be a bit easier to do what you want, cause ou are looking at
IP addresses, in general, and i'm just making sure before going ahead and
giving guideance that you have that stuff =)

Don't take this post personally.

-humboldt

-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Relpys to a request [7:16980]


When an icmp echo is sent, or when a telnet connection is intiated, does the
destination PC gleen the source mac address from the echo packet/  telnet
initiation packet, or is an ARP request issued to derive the source mac?  I
am trying to find out if setting up a static arp entry on a switch would
prevent someone from spoofing an allowed IP address in an ip permit list on
a 6509.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16987t=16980
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Slow

Was james bond a CCIE?


-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]


I actually heard that the Rifle Part was not in Swahili, but
Aborigineseven though I have been studying the binary Swahili
methodologies in relationship to Bengal Tigers, I feel the Aborigines format
will be much more challenging.

-Original Message-
From:   Shaw, Winston Mr 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab!
[7:16960]

You guys sure have a good sense of humour. Anyway,the 2 day
lab exam I took
recently was much more difficult than this new upcoming 1
day exam. 

Day 1 of old exam

1. Do this and do that. You are not allowed to use this and
that.
2.Configure this and configure that. You are not allowed to
use this or
that.

Day 2 of old exam

1. Do more of this and more of that. You are not allowed to
do this or that.
2. Troubleshoot this and troubleshoot that. You are not
allowed to use this
or that.

The instuctor was very helpful. 
Candidate-(5 mins before end of day 1) What is this and
that ??
Proctor-- I am not allowed to tell you that.

I am only joking folks, good luck to all of you who are
making the trek.

Winston.


-Original Message-
From: Mark  Monica Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]


Well, most of those are pretty self-explanatory, except # 9,
which is a 
trick question. I know I shouldn't be giving answers, but,
what the 'ell: 
Do NOT attempt to assemble the rifle using the Swahili
manual (section c, 
paragraph 4 of the manual requires 2 hours of prayer, which
will put you 
over your time limit). Instead, take the barrel of the rifle
and club your 
fellow labtakers over the head with it. Drag them to the
door so the Bengal 
tiger will find them first. Continue with question 10 (which
requires VoIP 
configuration).

Mark

-Original Message-
From:   Dennis H [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]

I just got a copy of the new one day lab from someone who
shall remain
nameless. As you can see the troubleshooting has been
removed as we all
know. However an extra credit task has been added!



CCIE 1 Day Lab Exam - Morning

1. Describe the history of the papacy from its origin to the
present day,
concentrating especially, but not exclusively, on its
social, political,
economic, religious, and philosophical  impact on Europe,
Asia, America, 
and
Africa. Be brief, concise, and specific.

2. You have been provided with a razor blade, a piece of
gauze, and a 
bottle
of Jack Daniels. Remove your appendix. Do not suture until
your work has
been inspected. You have 10 minutes.

3. 2500 riot-crazed aborigines are storming the room. Calm
them. You may 
use
any ancient language except Latin or Greek.

4. Create life. Estimate the differences in subsequent human
culture if 
this
form of life had developed 500 million years earlier, with
special 
attention
to its probable effect on the English Parliamentary System.
Prove your
thesis.

5. Write a piano concerto. Orchestrate and perform it with
flute and drum.
You will find a piano under your chair.

6. Based on your knowledge of their works, evaluate the
emotional 
stability,
degree of adjustment, and repressed frustrations of each of
the following:

a. Alexander of Aphrodisias

b. Ramses II

c. Gregory of Nicea

d. Iammurati

Support your evaluation with quotations from each man's
work, making
appropriate references. It is not necessary to 

RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]

2001-08-23 Thread Peter Slow

Very insightful. I had never thought about it like that.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:11 PM
To: Peter Slow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]


obviously not. Bond had a license to kill, and used all routes to do so.
CCIE's are only licensed to practice, and try to discover the appropriate
routes to do so.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Peter Slow
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]


Was james bond a CCIE?


-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]


I actually heard that the Rifle Part was not in Swahili, but
Aborigineseven though I have been studying the binary Swahili
methodologies in relationship to Bengal Tigers, I feel the Aborigines format
will be much more challenging.

-Original Message-
From:   Shaw, Winston Mr 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab!
[7:16960]

You guys sure have a good sense of humour. Anyway,the 2 day
lab exam I took
recently was much more difficult than this new upcoming 1
day exam.

Day 1 of old exam

1. Do this and do that. You are not allowed to use this and
that.
2.Configure this and configure that. You are not allowed to
use this or
that.

Day 2 of old exam

1. Do more of this and more of that. You are not allowed to
do this or that.
2. Troubleshoot this and troubleshoot that. You are not
allowed to use this
or that.

The instuctor was very helpful.
Candidate-(5 mins before end of day 1) What is this and
that ??
Proctor-- I am not allowed to tell you that.

I am only joking folks, good luck to all of you who are
making the trek.

Winston.


-Original Message-
From: Mark  Monica Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]


Well, most of those are pretty self-explanatory, except # 9,
which is a
trick question. I know I shouldn't be giving answers, but,
what the 'ell:
Do NOT attempt to assemble the rifle using the Swahili
manual (section c,
paragraph 4 of the manual requires 2 hours of prayer, which
will put you
over your time limit). Instead, take the barrel of the rifle
and club your
fellow labtakers over the head with it. Drag them to the
door so the Bengal
tiger will find them first. Continue with question 10 (which
requires VoIP
configuration).

Mark

-Original Message-
From:   Dennis H [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Here is the new CCIE 1 day lab! [7:16960]

I just got a copy of the new one day lab from someone who
shall remain
nameless. As you can see the troubleshooting has been
removed as we all
know. However an extra credit task has been added!



CCIE 1 Day Lab Exam - Morning

1. Describe the history of the papacy from its origin to the
present day,
concentrating especially, but not exclusively, on its
social, political,
economic, religious, and philosophical  impact on Europe,
Asia, America,
and
Africa. Be brief, concise, and specific.

2. You have been provided with a razor blade, a piece of
gauze, and a
bottle
of Jack Daniels. Remove your appendix. Do not suture until
your work has
been inspected. You have 10 minutes.

3. 2500 riot-crazed aborigines are storming the room. Calm
them. You may
use
any ancient language except Latin or Greek.

4. Create life. Estimate the differences in subsequent human
culture if
this
form of life had developed 500 million years earlier, with
special
attention
to its probable effect on the English Parliamentary System.
Prove your
thesis

RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

you're wrong.
the /28 will be chosen.
-humboldt

-Original Message-
From: Ednilson Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


In this case, if you want to communicate with the host 10.1.1.1, for
instance, the route chosen will be the static...

Regards,

Ednilson Rosa

- Original Message -
From: Wright, Jeremy 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


So for example, if you have the following   10.1.1.0/28   OSPF
   10.1.0.0/24   EIGRP
   10.1.1.0/26   Static
Which route will be chosen?  Thanks for the help.

-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

In a nut shell yes and no.  i.e.

Admin distance is the winner by means that the lower the
admin distance the better, so a route learned from EIGRP will get into the
routing table despite having a longer match route which was learned from say
OSPF.  BUT if you have two routes learned from the same admin distance then
the longest
match ALWAYS wins.

Basically once the route is in the routing table then the
longest match is the outmost winner.

-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 August 2001 14:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


Does the longest match rule always override administrative
distance??
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16818t=16797
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

oops. diddn't click reply all...

-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:43 AM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; Peter Slow
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


when we speak about a network, we speak about a pair, a net id and a netmask
if we learn a route to a NETWORK, from eigrp, ospf, and from a static, we
will ONLY see the static in the routing table.

when we learn of a more specific network  (not necesarily that falls under
that network, (again, a pair, a net id and a netmask) it has a longer mask,
and although there is alread an entry that matches the network it is
specifying, it is inserted into the table. lets say we only have one of
these more specific routes, it doesnt matter where it's learned from. it
pops up in the routing table. its NOT the same network.
then, it matches all addresses matching it's network, even though they fall
under the other route with the lower admin distance, because it's LONGER.

ip route any.one.who.dis agr.ees.255.0 null 0

-humboldt

-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:20 AM
To: 'Peter Slow'
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


I may be wrong on this but this is what I am guessing: It will choose the
route with the lowest AD and put it into the routing table...if we have 2
routes to a network in the routing table, then the longest match applies.
Please let me know what you all think. Thanks again.

-Original Message-
From:   Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

you're wrong.
the /28 will be chosen.
-humboldt

-Original Message-
From: Ednilson Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


In this case, if you want to communicate with the host
10.1.1.1, for
instance, the route chosen will be the static...

Regards,

Ednilson Rosa

- Original Message -
From: Wright, Jeremy 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


So for example, if you have the following   10.1.1.0/28
OSPF
   10.1.0.0/24   EIGRP
   10.1.1.0/26   Static
Which route will be chosen?  Thanks for the help.

-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]

In a nut shell yes and no.  i.e.

Admin distance is the winner by means that the lower the
admin distance the better, so a route learned from EIGRP
will get into the
routing table despite having a longer match route which was
learned from say
OSPF.  BUT if you have two routes learned from the same
admin distance then
the longest
match ALWAYS wins.

Basically once the route is in the routing table then the
longest match is the outmost winner.

-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 August 2001 14:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]


Does the longest match rule always override administrative
distance??
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16824t=16797
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Command to route directly to host [7:16820]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

you meant  a router INTERFACE.
a port is a tcp or udp port.


-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Toco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Command to route directly to host [7:16820]


Hi, I need your help !!!

I need to set a router to route all the incoming in a determined serial to a
specific host and not to a router port, this host is a proxy and all the
packets should go there.
Maybe there is a simple command but I really dont know.
Can you guys helpme ?
Thanks a lot.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16827t=16820
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Am i using LDP or TDP right now? [7:16832]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

I DONT get this... the commands say LDP but the output says TDP
so anyone know which this version is using? I'm looking on CCO now and have
yet to find a decisive answer...

c3660#sh version 
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software 
IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3660-JS-M), Version 12.2(2)T,  RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/ibld/view.pl?i=support
Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Sat 02-Jun-01 17:02 by ccai
Image text-base: 0x600089C0, data-base: 0x616A

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(6r)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
ROM: 3600 Software (C3660-JS-M), Version 12.2(2)T,  RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

c3660 uptime is 5 weeks, 1 day, 15 hours, 47 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is flash:c3660-js-mz.122-2.T.bin

cisco 3660 (R527x) processor (revision C0) with 189440K/7168K bytes of
memory.
Processor board ID JAB0443C10M
R527x CPU at 225Mhz, Implementation 40, Rev 10.0, 2048KB L2 Cache
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
SuperLAT software (copyright 1990 by Meridian Technology Corp).
TN3270 Emulation software.


3660 Chassis type: ENTERPRISE
2 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
4 Serial network interface(s)
2 Voice FXO interface(s)
2 Voice FXS interface(s)
DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.
125K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
32768K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

Configuration register is 0x101 (will be 0x2102 at next reload)

c3660#show mpls ldp neighbor 
Peer TDP Ident: 10.72.0.6:0; Local TDP Ident 10.0.36.60:0
TCP connection: 10.72.0.6.15826 - 10.0.36.60.711
State: Oper; PIEs sent/rcvd: 34/35; Downstream
Up time: 00:27:34
TDP discovery sources:
  Tunnel0, Src IP addr: 172.0.0.1
Addresses bound to peer TDP Ident:
  64.61.26.16164.61.24.10210.72.0.6   172.0.0.1   
  172.0.0.5   
c3660#




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16832t=16832
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

It rally depends on your version of ifconfig/what kernel your using/what
adapter you have.
Tell us those things and we'll try and help.

otherwise read RTFM
(granted the man page doesnt have the promisc flag, the option for you is
promisc.)

-humboldt

bash-2.03$ man ifconfig

IFCONFIG(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual
IFCONFIG(8)

NAME
 ifconfig - configure network interface parameters

SYNOPSIS
 ifconfig interface address_family [address [dest_address]] [parameters]
 ifconfig -a [-d] [-u] [address_family]
 ifconfig -l [-d] [-u] [address_family]

DESCRIPTION
 Ifconfig is used to assign an address to a network interface and/or
con-
 figure network interface parameters.  Ifconfig must be used at boot
time
 to define the network address of each interface present on a machine;
it
 may also be used at a later time to redefine an interface's address or
 other operating parameters.

 The following options are available:

 address
 For the DARPA-Internet family, the address is either a host
name
 present in the host name data base, hosts(5),  or a DARPA
Inter-
 net address expressed in the Internet standard ``dot
notation''.

 address_family
 Specify the address family which affects interpretation of the
 remaining parameters.  Since an interface can receive transmis-
 sions in differing protocols with different naming schemes,
spec-
 ifying the address family is recommended.  The address or
proto-
 col families currently supported are ``inet'', ``atalk'', and
 ``ipx''.

 dest_address
 Specify the address of the correspondent on the other end of a
 point to point link.

 interface
 This parameter is a string of the form ``name unit'', for exam-
 ple, ``en0''.

 The following parameters may be set with ifconfig:

 alias   Establish an additional network address for this interface.
This
 is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one
wishes
 to accept packets addressed to the old interface.

 arp Enable the use of the Address Resolution Protocol in mapping
be-
 tween network level addresses and link level addresses
(default).
 This is currently implemented for mapping between DARPA
Internet
 addresses and 10Mb/s Ethernet addresses.

 -arpDisable the use of the Address Resolution Protocol.

 broadcast
 (Inet only) Specify the address to use to represent broadcasts
to
 the network.  The default broadcast address is the address with
a
 host part of all 1's.

 debug   Enable driver dependent debugging code; usually, this turns on
 extra console error logging.

 -debug  Disable driver dependent debugging code.

 delete  Remove the network address specified.  This would be used if
you
 incorrectly specified an alias, or it was no longer needed.  If
 you have incorrectly set an NS address having the side effect
of
 specifying the host portion, removing all NS addresses will
allow
 you to respecify the host portion.

 downMark an interface ``down''.  When an interface is marked
 ``down'', the system will not attempt to transmit messages
 through that interface.  If possible, the interface will be
reset
 to disable reception as well.  This action does not
automatically
 disable routes using the interface.

 media type
 If the driver supports the media selection system, set the
media
 type of the interface to type. Some interfaces support the
mutu-
 ally exclusive use of one of several different physical media
 connectors.  For example, a 10Mb/s Ethernet interface might
sup-
 port the use of either AUI or twisted pair connectors.  Setting
 the media type to ``10base5/AUI'' would change the currently
ac-
 tive connector to the AUI port.  Setting it to ``10baseT/UTP''
 would activate twisted pair.  Refer to the interfaces' driver
 specific documentation or man page for a complete list of the
 available types.

 mediaopt opts
 If the driver supports the media selection system, set the
speci-
 fied media options on the interface.  Opts is a comma delimited
 list of options to apply to the interface.  Refer to the inter-
 faces' driver specific man page for a complete list of
available
 options.

 -mediaopt opts
 If the driver supports the media selection system, disable the
 specified media options on the interface.

 metric n
 Set the routing metric of the interface to n, default 0.  The
 routing metric 

RE: DHCP problems on bridged WAN over Frame Relay [7:16834]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

btw, i think you should remove any configuratio you have on the routers
pertaining to DHCP.
you dont need them. we are BRIDGED =)
helper addresses and the like are for routed stuff, we dont want that here.
have you tried this config without any dhcp stuff on the routers?

...this is what i would recomend.

-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DHCP problems on bridged WAN over Frame Relay [7:16834]


I cannot find help for this in my CIT book nor at Cisco's website, so I
would kindly ask for your assistance here.

I have three routers and two computers.

  WinNT---RouterB---RouterA---RouterC---Win98

RouterA is setup to act as a Frame Relay Switch.

RouterB and RouterC are each connected to RouterA.

The PVC between RouterB and RouterC is working great, and they are setup as
a bridged WAN, so the LAN that RouterB is connected to is also the LAN that
Router C is serving.

I have on the LAN (10.0.0.0/8) connected to RouterB an NT 4.0 Server
(10.1.1.1) with DHCP running on it. I can ping this server from RouterB and
RouterC.

I have on RouterB and RouterC typed in the following

ip dhcp server 10.1.1.1
ip dhcp relay information option

On RouterC's LAN (10.0.0.0/8) I have connected a Windows 98 workstation and
specified it to get it's IP information from a DHCP server - however, it
cannot find any.

What am I missing here?

Thanks in advance,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.RouterChief.com
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16840t=16834
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs [7:16841]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

I know you meant ethernet trunking. of course you did, you couldnt have
forgotten ATM and FDDI. Or token ring for that matter.
And you meant fastethernet interface, diddnt you?
-humboldt


-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs
[7:16826]


Trunking must use a Fast Ethernet or Gigabit Ethernet port, however you can
use simple access links (non-trunking connections) to a single 10 Mbps
Ethernet port on a router.  The number of VLANs the router can route is
dependent upon the number of interfaces the router has.  Each VLAN requires
its own dedicated 10 Mbps Ethernet port.


  -- Leigh Anne

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Tony Medeiros
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs
[7:16786]


As far as I know,  trunking MUST be on at least a fast ethernet interface.
Another way out is put an NM-1E ethernet module on your 2610 and put each
interface in a different vlan.   Or buy a 2620.

I hate to say this, but,   this has been gone over AT LENGTH  over the last
few months.

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.
Tony

- Original Message -
From: Hamid
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:28 AM
Subject: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs [7:16781]


 Hi group,

 I was wondering if it is A MUST for the external routers's interface to be
a
 100Mb interface, is it possible to do the InterVlan routing on an ethernet
 port (10Mb) on a 2600 router?

 I tried to setup a simple scenario with my 2600 router in my home lab,
 setting the port connected to the 2600 router to TRUNK mode with isl
 encapsulation , and allowing all vlans. But when I tried to confgure the
 router's sub-interfaces I the following errors:

 Router3(config)#int ethernet 0/0.2
 Router3(config-subif)#ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.0

 Configuring IP routing on a LAN subinterface is only allowed if that
 subinterface is already configured as part of an IEEE 802.10, IEEE 802.1Q,
 or ISL vLAN.

 The other problem was that inthe SUBIF configuration mode I didn't have
the
 ENCAPSULATION command available.

 Bellow is the output of the show version command:
 Router3#sh ver
 Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
 IOS (tm) C2600 Software (C2600-IO3-M), Version 12.2(3), RELEASE SOFTWARE
 (fc1)
 Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
 Compiled Wed 18-Jul-01 17:11 by pwade
 Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x809C818C

 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.3(2)XA4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

 Router3 uptime is 6 hours, 3 minutes
 System returned to ROM by reload
 System image file is flash:c2600-io3-mz.122-3.bin

 cisco 2610 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x203) with 28672K/4096K bytes of
 memory.
 Processor board ID JAD04390FCB (93659888)
 M860 processor: part number 0, mask 49
 Bridging software.
 X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
 1 Ethernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
 2 Serial(sync/async) network interface(s)
 32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
 8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

 Configuration register is 0x2102


 Any idea what the problem is?

 Thanx in advance

 Hamid




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16841t=16841
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface.
a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count.
i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like.

Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it
wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak correctly!

c3660#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
c3660(config)#port fastethernet 0/0
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

c3660(config)#interface fastethernet 0/0
c3660(config-if)#^Z
c3660#SEE!?
% Unrecognized command
c3660#SEE!
-humboldt




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16843t=16843
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

Yipes! Yer right! I meant UDP!

No offense taken, and in my opinion nothing said on this news grop should be
taken personally unless explicity stated that doing so should be done.
(huh?)

-humboldt

-Original Message-
From: Marshal Schoener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


Uh, I think you meant UDP ports!!!
If you are going to get on peoples cases for being wrong, at least try and
be correct ;)
No offense of course :)



-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface.
a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count.
i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like.

Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it
wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak correctly!

c3660#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
c3660(config)#port fastethernet 0/0
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

c3660(config)#interface fastethernet 0/0
c3660(config-if)#^Z
c3660#SEE!?
% Unrecognized command
c3660#SEE!
-humboldt




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16859t=16843
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

if you guys would just stop using hubs and
non-unicast mac-addresses, we'd all be fine =)



-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]


The issue isn't someone coming in the promiscuous interface. The issue is a 
hacker compromising the machine by getting in another interface and 
discovering that there is sniffer software on the machine. You have made 
the hacker's job really easy.

Of course, a good hacker would be able to install sniffer software on a 
compromised machine anyway.

Priscilla


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]


If it is truely in promiscuos mode, there should not be any problem.  You
can test this by pinging the ip address. (It should not respond)

alot of drivers do not allow for full promiscuity however.  Remember it's
not the app that talks to the nic, it's the driver.  Some companies do
offer
promiscuous drivers however if yours does not.  NAI also has their own
drivers built for specific nics.  (of course you ahve to use they're
product
to take advantage) These drivers are advanced prmiscuous drivers that allow
you to see runts and the like across the wire.

But if you are willing to take a server down by putting it's nic in
promiscuous mode, why not just unbind IP from that interface?

-Patrick

  Subba Rao  08/21/01 05:39PM 
Hi,

We have 2 sniffer systems on NT and on Unix. The sniffer puts the ethernet
interfaces
on both the systems in promiscuous mode. Currently we are not worried about
any local
users on the system. Are there any threats from remote users on the
promiscuous interface,
on either system? When I say remote users, I am talking about John Doe on
our network who
has no business with either of these system. John Doe could be on Internet
as well but has
no user accounts on these systems. Would he get any vulnerable information
from the sniffer
interfaces on either system?

Thank you in advance for any info.
--

Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.home.net/subba9/

GPG public key ID CCB7344E
Key fingerprint = A8DD 4CBA 1E9B D962 A55B  2B55 BAFE 92C5 CCB7 344E


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16863t=16734
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

YES! Yes they do! So does juniper in all of their manuals. and in their
configs as well.
they are wrong also!

We must keep these evil minions at bay. All! Join me!




-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


Does the IEEE get it wrong? Check IEEE 802.1D, the bridging standard. It 
uses ports for the physical interfaces on a bridge (switch).

Priscilla

At 01:08 PM 8/22/01, Peter Slow wrote:
an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface.
a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count.
i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like.

Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it
wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak correctly!

c3660#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
c3660(config)#port fastethernet 0/0
 ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

c3660(config)#interface fastethernet 0/0
c3660(config-if)#^Z
c3660#SEE!?
% Unrecognized command
c3660#SEE!
-humboldt


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16869t=16843
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

yeah, but i grew up getting slapped around everytime i referred to it as a
port.
i have interface embedded in my language =)

we can stop this thread though, i suppose, instead of starting a holy war =)

-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Peter Slow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


Interface:  the place at which independent and often unrelated systems meet
and act on or communicate with each other

Port: a hardware interface by which a computer communicates with another
device or system

So who really decided which was more correct--interface or port?  Who set
that standard?

When you talk about BRI on a router, is it a Basic Rate Interface
Interface or is it a Basic Rate Interface Port that you connect to?

Food for thought.

1.  Gigabit Ethernet Port Adapter (PA-GE) (7100 and 7200VXR only)
The single port Gigabit Ethernet Port Adapter (PA-GE) provides a Gigabit
Ethernet connection for the Cisco 7200 series router. 


2.

Verify the IP Address of the Router Ethernet Port
To verify the IP address, enter the show interface e0 command on the command
line. For example:

Routershow interface e0
Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is down
  Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 0003.6bdc.0435 (bia
0003.6bdc.0435)
  Internet address is 10.10.10.1/24


3.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/1000.pdf


Don't we have other things more important in our lives than correcting each
other's English based on our limited version of what we perceive is correct?
And if you must finish this argument, I would ask that you provide the
source of the original definition that interface has been defined to be
the only correct term to refer to a hardware-based network connection point?
Who has actually defined that interface is the only correct term?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Peter Slow
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


YES! Yes they do! So does juniper in all of their manuals. and in their
configs as well.
they are wrong also!

We must keep these evil minions at bay. All! Join me!




-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


Does the IEEE get it wrong? Check IEEE 802.1D, the bridging standard. It
uses ports for the physical interfaces on a bridge (switch).

Priscilla

At 01:08 PM 8/22/01, Peter Slow wrote:
an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface.
a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count.
i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like.

Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it
wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak correctly!

c3660#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
c3660(config)#port fastethernet 0/0
 ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

c3660(config)#interface fastethernet 0/0
c3660(config-if)#^Z
c3660#SEE!?
% Unrecognized command
c3660#SEE!
-humboldt


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16876t=16843
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]

2001-08-22 Thread Peter Slow

I am not without grammatical error.
never said i was.
BUT, If i say interface 3, you know im taking about an interface. if i say
port 3, you have no idea what layer im at, do you?

-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Peter Slow; Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


You should get slapped around for not capitalizing the first letter of a
sentence or the word I, and for not using punctuation properly.

Let he who is without grammatical error cast the first misplaced modifier.

-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:27 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


yeah, but i grew up getting slapped around everytime i referred to it as a
port.
i have interface embedded in my language =)

we can stop this thread though, i suppose, instead of starting a holy war =)

-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:03 PM
To: Peter Slow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


Interface:  the place at which independent and often unrelated systems meet
and act on or communicate with each other

Port: a hardware interface by which a computer communicates with another
device or system

So who really decided which was more correct--interface or port?  Who set
that standard?

When you talk about BRI on a router, is it a Basic Rate Interface
Interface or is it a Basic Rate Interface Port that you connect to?

Food for thought.

1.  Gigabit Ethernet Port Adapter (PA-GE) (7100 and 7200VXR only)
The single port Gigabit Ethernet Port Adapter (PA-GE) provides a Gigabit
Ethernet connection for the Cisco 7200 series router. 


2.

Verify the IP Address of the Router Ethernet Port
To verify the IP address, enter the show interface e0 command on the command
line. For example:

Routershow interface e0
Ethernet0 is up, line protocol is down
  Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 0003.6bdc.0435 (bia
0003.6bdc.0435)
  Internet address is 10.10.10.1/24


3.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/1000.pdf


Don't we have other things more important in our lives than correcting each
other's English based on our limited version of what we perceive is correct?
And if you must finish this argument, I would ask that you provide the
source of the original definition that interface has been defined to be
the only correct term to refer to a hardware-based network connection point?
Who has actually defined that interface is the only correct term?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Peter Slow
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


YES! Yes they do! So does juniper in all of their manuals. and in their
configs as well.
they are wrong also!

We must keep these evil minions at bay. All! Join me!




-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: THEY ARE NOT PORTS THEY ARE INTERFACES! [7:16843]


Does the IEEE get it wrong? Check IEEE 802.1D, the bridging standard. It
uses ports for the physical interfaces on a bridge (switch).

Priscilla

At 01:08 PM 8/22/01, Peter Slow wrote:
an INTERFACE a thing, such as an ethernet or loopback interface.
a port is a logical device, and NO a loopback does not count.
i meant like tcp ports, usp ports, and the like.

Stop being d0rks and copying everyone else who does it
wrong, and dont be afraid to tell people to speak correctly!

c3660#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
c3660(config)#port fastethernet 0/0
 ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

c3660(config)#interface fastethernet 0/0
c3660(config-if)#^Z
c3660#SEE!?
% Unrecognized command
c3660#SEE!
-humboldt


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16879t=16843
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Ethernet interface as DHCP client? [7:16724]

2001-08-21 Thread Peter Slow

Who posted it!?


-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Ethernet interface as DHCP client? [7:16724]


Found my answer.  One lonely little reference in a ton of hits in the
Groupstudy archives that I've been combing through...

ip address dhcp.  Introduced in IOS 12.1(2)T.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Leigh Anne Chisholm
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet interface as DHCP client? [7:16724]


I'm playing around with this and I've been concentrating my focus on EasyIP.
It would appear that only dialer interfaces are able to obtain an address
via DHCP.  I want my Ethernet interface to get an IP address dynamically.
Has anyone done this?  Can anyone give me some guidance if it is possible.
IS it possible?


  -- Leigh Anne




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16730t=16724
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Ethernet interface as DHCP client? [7:16724]

2001-08-21 Thread Peter Slow

yuppers.
HEY MY EMAIL WORKS!
...but anyway, as of IOS  12.1.2(T)
the command ip address dhcp is functional.
..it works, too.
put a T-train image later than 12.1.2 on yer router, and you'll be all set.
I am not sure if you need ip plus for this. i dont think so, but it's
posssible.


-Original Message-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet interface as DHCP client? [7:16724]


I'm playing around with this and I've been concentrating my focus on EasyIP.
It would appear that only dialer interfaces are able to obtain an address
via DHCP.  I want my Ethernet interface to get an IP address dynamically.
Has anyone done this?  Can anyone give me some guidance if it is possible.
IS it possible?


  -- Leigh Anne




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16729t=16724
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: HELP!! The Cisco Code Windows XP [7:16604]

2001-08-21 Thread Peter Slow

the buisness guys only know about layers 8, 9 and 10...
-humboldt



-Original Message-
From: Tom Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP!! The Cisco Code  Windows XP [7:16604]


Priscilla,

I find that whiskey flavored lattes are best for Mondays  really stressful
situations.

Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco Regional Networking Academy



Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:

 I wish that Networking 101 was required in schools. Then even the
 Management by Business Week types would know about the 7 layers and that
 the operating system, which generally deals with local file management and
 I/O, should not matter when considering traffic going through routers and
 switches.

 In actuality, there may be issues because the TCP/IP stack and other
 protocols are part of the operating system and they could be buggy, but if
 they are standard and not buggy, then there shouldn't be an issue.

 I don't mean to flame the person that asked. It can't hurt to do some
 research, and there was that one bug with 802.1x security and Catalyst
5000
 switches connecting PCs running Windows XP, but that kind of thing
 shouldn't happen. On the other hand, both Cisco and Microsoft like to take
 simple concepts (like bridging, etc.) and make them so complicated that
 bugs are bound to happen.

 We run an ISP among other things. I wish that our users would take the
 basic networking class also. This morning someone called and said she had
 an error message about running out of server space. So I talked to her
 about not keeping mail on the server. She said, you mean I can't keep
 messages in my In Box? Sigh. Networking 101 would have a short section on
 client/server architecture too.

 Sorry for the babbling. Haven't had my latte yet.

 Priscilla

 At 12:05 AM 8/21/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
 I'm sure you've had your fair share of smart remarks by now. So I won't
add
 my own. I will remark that in fairness to your boss, there is probably
 something he has heard or read which caused him to look for reassurance.
 
 for example, is there a concern with VPN compatibility of operation using
 Win XP VPN client software? is there a security concern based upon
published
 writings about the XP TCP stack?
 
 if the question is will Cisco routers pass traffic generated by XP
 machines? the answer is sure. why not after all, there is nothing in
an
 IP or a TCP header that indicates the type of host OS that originates the
 packet. as long as the traffic is contained in valid packets, the router
 will pass process them. knowing that, may I recommend you sit down with
the
 boss and ask what his concerns are. what has he read? what has he heard?
why
 would he think there is reason to be concerned? hell, he could be a
victim
 of MBBW ( Management By Business Week - where the president of the
company
 saw something in Business Week Magazine over the weekend and on Monday
 morning told your boss to investigate and come back with report. ;-
 
 ( and yes, I know some bosses are she )
 
 Chuck
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Ray Smith
 Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:38 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: HELP!! The Cisco Code  Windows XP [7:16604]
 
 
 Guys,
 
 After my boss delegated me to research all I can about what is need to
 upgrade if necessary our Cisco routers and switches to work with
Windows-XP,
 I was only able to assert from information on the web that there is a bug
in
 the switch software that is incompatible with XP.
 
 Does anyone here know of any valuable information that can help me with
 compiling an educated assessment of this research?  Is anyone out there
 knowledgeable of this issue either from personal experience or from
 literature?  I would really appreciate some feedback.
 
 The only problems that I have actually heard of thus far is that which
 occurred during the beta test that brought down one of Xerox's network.
I
 understand that there is a patch that is available as a fix, in addition
to
 the option of upgrading the Switch code.  My question is: -
 
 a). Does the incompatibility only exist with the Switch software or with
the
 router IOS as
   well?
 
 b). Is the patch the best way of dealing with the problem?
 
 I appreciate any help that I can get.  Thanks
 
 
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16736t=16604
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Interface Resets HELP [7:16052]

2001-08-14 Thread peter slow

your malloc errs may be from enormous logs you are creating, im not sure.
good possibility, tho.

turn on some debugs and post those.
what concerns me is that your protocol isnt just going down, the interface
is really resetting.

turn on debugs like
deb int serial
debug serial int
debug serial m32_dma 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 1:01 PM
Subject: Interface Resets HELP [7:16052]


 This problem has been driving me nuts and I do not know what to do.  We
have
 a
 point to point t1 that keeps having excessive interface resets.  We are
under
 the impression that the 2611 is the one with the problem, (outputs of sho
int
 commands are listed below).   (Also below is an output of the sho log):
 We have replaced every piece of hardware on both sides, and even had the
t1
 rerouted and still continue to get these interface resets.  Now in the log
we
 are starting to see memory allocation errors.
 Does anyone have any idea???

 Aug 14 09:53:53.307 EDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
 Serial0/0, changed state to up
 Aug 14 09:54:07.799 EDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0/0, changed
state
 to
 down
 Aug 14 09:54:08.801 EDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
 Serial0/0, changed state to down
 Aug 14 09:54:37.809 EDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0/0, changed
state
 to
 up
 Aug 14 09:54:38.818 EDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
 Serial0/0, changed state to up
 Aug 14 09:56:35.872 EDT: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1
disconnected
 from 1x 3640, call lasted 233 seconds
 Aug 14 09:56:36.132 EDT: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state
to
 down
 Aug 14 09:56:37.134 EDT: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface
 BRI0/0:1, changed state to down
 Aug 14 10:39:43.097 EDT: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18292
bytes
 failed from 0x802204E0, pool Processor, alignment 0
 -Process= Virtual Exec, ipl= 0, pid= 71
 -Traceback= 8021E5E0 802200D8 802204E4 8021BD80 8021C428 801D1E10 801D035C
 8021509C 801D4524 8021999C 801D07E8 801B7AF8 801B7E6C 801DA9EC 801D1C68
 801DD41C
 Aug 14 10:43:19.920 EDT: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18292
bytes
 failed from 0x802204E0, pool Processor, alignment 0
 -Process= Virtual Exec, ipl= 0, pid= 71
 -Traceback= 8021E5E0 802200D8 802204E4 8021BD80 8021C428 801D1E10 801D035C
 8021509C 801D4524 8021999C 801D07E8 801B7AF8 801B7E6C 801DA9EC 801D1C68
 801DD41C
 Aug 14 10:45:03.511 EDT: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18292
bytes
 failed from 0x802204E0, pool Processor, alignment 0
 -Process= Virtual Exec, ipl= 0, pid= 71
 -Traceback= 8021E5E0 802200D8 802204E4 8021BD80 8021C428 801D1E10 801D035C
 8021509C 801D4524 8021999C 801D07E8 801B7AF8 801B7E6C 801DA9EC 801D1C68
 801DD41C



 3640#sho int s2/0
 Serial2/0 is up, line protocol is up
   Hardware is M4T
   Description: T-1
   Internet address is 147.133.149.184/30
   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 1/255
   Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec)
   Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
   Last clearing of show interface counters 18:24:14
   Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 413
   Queueing strategy: weighted fair
   Output queue: 0/1000/413 (size/max total/drops)
  Conversations  0/158/64 (active/max active/threshold)
  Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
   5 minute input rate 13000 bits/sec, 16 packets/sec
   5 minute output rate 11000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec
  2204737 packets input, 282243640 bytes, 0 no buffer
  Received 7743 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
  0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
  2245867 packets output, 1219761148 bytes, 0 underruns
  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 10 interface resets
  0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
  10 carrier transitions DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=up

 3640#exit



 2611#sho int s0/0
 Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up
   Hardware is PowerQUICC Serial
   Internet address is 147.133.149.183/30
   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
  reliablility 255/255, txload 2/255, rxload 2/255
   Encapsulation HDLC, loopback not set, keepalive set (10 sec)
   Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
   Last clearing of show interface counters 18:25:26
   Input queue: 0/75/0 (size/max/drops); Total output drops: 0
   Queueing strategy: weighted fair
   Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
  Conversations  0/37/256 (active/max active/max total)
  Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
   5 minute input rate 14000 bits/sec, 7 packets/sec
   5 minute output rate 13000 bits/sec, 14 packets/sec
  2247769 packets input, 1220933961 bytes, 0 no buffer
  Received 7827 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
  18 input errors, 0 CRC, 17 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 1 abort
  2206638 packets output, 

RE: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

Guys, 261x series routers do NOT have fast ethernet, NOR will they accept
ANY network module w/ a FE interface.
neither will 262x routers, whic have 1 or two FE interfaces built in.
the same goes for 265x. one or two built in, but it it not possible to add
more.


i am assuming from your description that there is another router in your
network on that switch.

if this is a true L3 switch, than your 2610 is NOT capable of being an MLS
RP and there must be another one on the network somewhere.

your routers eth. interface will plug into a single VLAN, with an IP route
either static or dynamic to those other VLANs via a next hop, the MLS RP on
your layer three switch.

this is quite fundamental. is there an entry for the network you are trying
to reach in your routing table.

I'm goign to take a wild guess here and assume that there is not yet.

tell us what kind of L3 switch you are using i need to know what equipment
you have, exactly, in this case, in order to help you.

i do not think that this is a default route probllem at all.

he is not supposed to be trunking to the switch, he should in this case have
a next hop on the VLAN that is connected to other VLANS, if this is a L3
switching scenario.

I also think that what he thinks is a layer 3 switch is not capable of
acting as one, or is not configured correctly.

Kiran, tell us what equipment you have, and what network connections you
have.

-Peter

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem with Fastethernet 2610 router [7:13497]


sounds like you have missed a default route on the 2610.

The 2610 will not be able to see any other vlans unless the vlan it is
plugged into has an ip address assigned to it acting as a gateway.  Then
you need to set that ip address as the 2610's default gateway.  (or at least
specify a specific route to the other vlans)

If this is a router conencted to the internet, you would defiantely want to
keep the default gw out it's serial interface.

-Patrick


 Kiran Kumar M  07/24/01 10:27AM 
Hai,

I am facing a strange problem. I am using a cisco 2610 router in my
network. In that I am having one fastethernet, and 2 WIC2T . When I am
connecting to the L3 switch, it is able to ping to that particular VLAN,
and unable to ping to other VLANS or outside of that VLAN. If I use
another router with ethernet card (becuase I am not having another
ethernet card in first router), with the same setup it is able to
communicate with the outside world. So I concluded that it is not the
problem with L3 switch. I tried to find it on cisco site, but unable to
locate the solution.

Thanks in advance,
Kiran




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13515t=13497
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: RSM Problems [7:13022]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

still need help?

-Original Message-
From: Richard Tufaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RSM Problems [7:13022]


Hey im having a problem with my RSM here are the messages anyone got a clue?


Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
CR-RSM#
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978


CR-RSM#show logging
Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 overruns)
Console logging: level debugging, 424 messages logged
Monitor logging: level debugging, 16 messages logged
Logging to: vty2(4)
Buffer logging: level informational, 424 messages logged
Trap logging: level informational, 1018 message lines logged
Logging to 10.1.1.71, 914 message lines logged
  
Log Buffer (4096 bytes):
 6021098C 60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, ipl= 6, pid= 64
-Traceback= 602152DC 602165D0 601E71F8 602213B0 601E7824 601F4E64 6021098C
60210978
27w4d: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 18184 bytes failed from
0x601E71F0, pool Processor, alignment 0
-Process= Per-minute Jobs, 

RE: vpn speed [7:13499]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

correct me if im wrong, but encryption and compression are COMPLETELY
different, and in most cases, encryption results in LARGER payloads.

/me hangs his head in dissapointment

-Peter


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: vpn speed [7:13499]


I'm not exactly sure where the 128k came into play but you are right
about end point to endpoint. If either of the ends tops out at 64k, then the
throughput will only be 64k.  Regardless of compression/and or vpn
acceleration.

-Patrick

 Allen May  07/24/01 11:02AM 
I could be off here...but I believe the accelerator card only helps the cpu
intense part of encrypting/decrypting traffic.  You would still be limited
to internet speed which involves amount of traffic between endpoints, etc.
Maximum would be 128K unless you have alot of traffic going through that can
be compressed.  In that case that traffic can go faster than 128K but most
files that can be compressed on the fly with noticable difference are
uncompressed files such as .bmp, .txt, comma delimited files, etc.

Allen

- Original Message -
From: Farhan Ahmed 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: vpn speed [7:13499]


 lets say we have 2 cisco 1720 with vpn accelerator card and both have a
64k
 connection to internet
  what would be the speed of the tunnel




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13526t=13499
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

OH MY GOD.
im still hanging my head from the last email i replied to, and this email
makes me wanna go into the corner and cry.

(had to ask again)  I have a PA-T3 about 25 feet away from OC3 

yeah. lets see how well those singlemode SC connectors fit into your coax
receptacles.

(Ameritech).
The Cisco documentation is very unclear on whether I can you a non-Cisco
cable for this.  The Cisco cable is only 10 feet long, so I can't get it

this is because they dont make them.

from the demarc into the server room.  DS3 documenation says that I can go
upto 400 feet or so, but it all depends on the CSU/DSU.  So my question is

PA-T3 doesnt need a CSU/DSU.
HSSI adaptors need CSU/DSUs.

whether or not I can have a coax cable made up (50 feet), and if I did that,
what kind of problems might I run into.

Uhh. Please tell me that the OC3 thing was a typo.  Not that i'll beleive
you, but i might not be ashamed to post in the future.

think about it.

can i plug a t1 into a phone jack? can i plug a ds3 into a t1? can i plug an
oc3 into a ds3?

-Peter

 Thanks in advance,
 
 paul timmerman

PS. I REALLY hope that was a typo.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13527t=13512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

I'd like to find out what the chipset on the two routers is.

to the best of my knowledge, the 1751 is a 1750 chassis.

can anyone get a show interfaces fas0 on each router?


-Original Message-
From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]


no. the 1750's do not support isl.

The new 1751's do not support isl either, but they do support dot1q.




Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice
Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld

704-943-3615 - Phone
704-943-3660 - Fax
877-6-iReady - Helpdesk



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VLAN on 1750 router [7:12024]


Can any one tell me if we can run the command encapsulation ISL on
ethernet port of 1750 router .

-Mamoor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13534t=12024
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

type-o type-o type-o type-o
pleeease.
say type-o
and i dont mean blood type.
=P
-Pietro

-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DS3 (PA-T3) ? - Please Help [7:13512]


OH MY GOD.
im still hanging my head from the last email i replied to, and this email
makes me wanna go into the corner and cry.

(had to ask again)  I have a PA-T3 about 25 feet away from OC3 

yeah. lets see how well those singlemode SC connectors fit into your coax
receptacles.

(Ameritech).
The Cisco documentation is very unclear on whether I can you a non-Cisco
cable for this.  The Cisco cable is only 10 feet long, so I can't get it

this is because they dont make them.

from the demarc into the server room.  DS3 documenation says that I can go
upto 400 feet or so, but it all depends on the CSU/DSU.  So my question is

PA-T3 doesnt need a CSU/DSU.
HSSI adaptors need CSU/DSUs.

whether or not I can have a coax cable made up (50 feet), and if I did that,
what kind of problems might I run into.

Uhh. Please tell me that the OC3 thing was a typo.  Not that i'll beleive
you, but i might not be ashamed to post in the future.

think about it.

can i plug a t1 into a phone jack? can i plug a ds3 into a t1? can i plug an
oc3 into a ds3?

-Peter

 Thanks in advance,
 
 paul timmerman

PS. I REALLY hope that was a typo.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13533t=13512
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]

2001-07-24 Thread Peter Slow

what?
huh?
say this again?



-Original Message-
From: Rajeev Karamchand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Blocking the unsed IP [7:13514]


All

Is there a way to block all unused external IP 




=
Rajeev Karamchand
MCSE,MCSE+I,MCDBA,CCNA

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13535t=13514
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805]

2001-07-18 Thread Peter Slow

is that one of those protocols that upper managment uses for making
networking decisions?
-Peter

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805]


I want to deploy DSPF here at work.
- Original Message -
From: Tony Medeiros 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805]


 I want to be a developer for DSPF

 What is that?

 Dumbest Shortest Path First ?



  My name is Johnna Smith and I work for a placement firm in Dallas,
  Texas. I am in desperate need of a CCIE that DEVELOPS routing
  protocols. I need them to have BGP, DSPF, IS-IS, and MPLS. The must
  be a software engineer and they must be degreed.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12882t=12805
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Leaky Switches [7:12714]

2001-07-17 Thread Peter Slow

this is not a feature.
this is a bug, a quite common one that i've noticed.
of course, cisco is just going to tell you that thier layer two switches are
sooo smart that they are actually doing ,ayer three switching, but check
your source and destination MAC addresses =)

That was supposed to be funny but it wasnt. be quiet.

John Neiberger  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I'm running a demo of some LAN analysis software from my PC which is
 connected to a non-SPAN port.  So, I should only see unicast traffic
 to/from my workstation, broadcasts, and multicasts, right?  right!

 However, from time to time I see unicast packets that are neither
 destined for or originated from my machine.  In one particular case I'm
 seeing SNMP traffic from our NMS to the switch I'm connected to.
 There's not a lot of this occurring, but since it shouldn't happen ever
 I'm worried that I might have a defective switch or at least a feature
 in the switch software.

 Have any of you seen this behavior before?

 Thanks,
 John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12734t=12714
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Leaky Switches [7:12714]

2001-07-17 Thread Peter Slow

this is not a feature.
this is a bug, a quite common one that i've noticed.
of course, cisco is just going to tell you that thier layer two switches are
sooo smart that they are actually doing ,ayer three switching, but check
your source and destination MAC addresses =)

That was supposed to be funny but it wasnt. be quiet.

John Neiberger  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I'm running a demo of some LAN analysis software from my PC which is
 connected to a non-SPAN port.  So, I should only see unicast traffic
 to/from my workstation, broadcasts, and multicasts, right?  right!

 However, from time to time I see unicast packets that are neither
 destined for or originated from my machine.  In one particular case I'm
 seeing SNMP traffic from our NMS to the switch I'm connected to.
 There's not a lot of this occurring, but since it shouldn't happen ever
 I'm worried that I might have a defective switch or at least a feature
 in the switch software.

 Have any of you seen this behavior before?

 Thanks,
 John




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12735t=12714
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Resume ... [7:12495]

2001-07-16 Thread Peter Slow

It seemed pretty short. I guess you dont have a lot of experience.
/me ducks

-Original Message-
From: Ho, John (JOHO) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Resume ... [7:12495]


Hello,
   Attached is a copy of my resume.
   Thank you for your consideration.


   John Ho


 

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a
name of JH_RES.doc]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12527t=12495
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 3660 router-----Finished [7:12135]

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Slow

Uhh, they do!
c3660-telcoent-mz.121-5.T9.bin

-Original Message-
From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 3660 router-Finished [7:12135]


Telco requirements are quite strict
There are Bellcore standards that are used at all central offices.
It has nothing to do with the goverment but will Bell ensurring that any
third party equipment will:
1) Fit in telco racks
2) No physically interfer with other equipment in telco racks
3) Not add to the fire load
4) Not cause any undue electrical problems (NEBS grounding, etc)

It's all really for infrastructure protection
Too bad they didn't have a Telco version of the IOS.

Bob

-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 3660 router-Finished [7:12135]


This brings up a point:  why is there a telco version in the first
place?  What are these telco requirements and why are they there?  I've
been hearing little snippets about this but I don't know the details. 
From what I've read so far, it sounds like some government agency had
too much time on its hands and felt like being even more intrusive than
usual.  

Who cares if there is a plastic cover or not?  Who cares if the rack is
19 or 24 wide?  Who cares if the equipment is more than 12 deep?  

Someone please explain this to me, and please tell me there are good
reasons for these requirements.  Otherwise, it will just annoy me and
ruin my day.  ;-)  Besides, I have a feeling I'll be running into
situations where equipment that I provision has to meet these
requirements so I might as well know what they are, right?

Thanks,
John (who is just starting his 2nd cup of coffee...be gentle.)

 Mears, Rob  7/12/01 8:55:12 AM 
Greeting to all,

This problem proved to be a real bitch, and I thank you for all the
advice. 

Here is the fix, and I am almost ashamed to say, but I want to pass
this on
so none of you all fall into the same trap as I did.

As I said, in one post before, I kept getting the same error messages
even
after TAC sent me new memory and a new router. The 3rd TAC engineer was
the
charm, because he asked me if this was a TELCO version of the 3660.
That was
a real good question cuss I had no idea, as I have never worked on
one.
Well, that was the problem, it takes a TELCO FEATURE SET IOS. One
telltail
clue is that their is not a plastic front on the Telco version.
I saw this right off the bat, but thought Cisco had just redesigned it.
 Man
what a day. The other way to see if the router is an Enterprise version
or
Telco is to run the SN numbers. I can think off all the times i do
this
before I install an IOS. Maybe i should.

Good news is I got it fixed and got a new Router out of the deal
(thanks you
TAC). And as TAC goes, they have pulled my Butt out of the sling more
then
once, so I have nothing but good to say for them. Yes I have gotten
some
DORKS before, but I have the option to tell them to get lost and give
me a
new Engineer. We pay a lot for this service.

Hope this has been as educational for you all as it has been for me.

Look below at link for the difference in the two.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/3600/prodlit/36kmp_ds.htm 


-Original Message-
From: Charlie Hartwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Mears, Rob
Subject: Re: 3660 router [7:11917]


Hi Rob,
 I didn't want to send this out to the whole group but I sympathise
with your problem - I used to work on TAC and I see this sort of
thing happening more and more. Unfortunately TAC have a new policy of
employing people without much real technical experience (even
pre-CCNA level people) and they put them on the bread and butter
TAC teams to break them in. It will be one of those teams dealing
with your problem - probably euro-config. I know a lot of those
guys and, although they all work hard, they don't have the experience
to deal with a case that gets over complicated.

 If you have had an RMA already and you are still no nearer to
solving the problem then the next step is to have the case escalated.
I expect this case has been going on for a few days already and has
probably passed the P3 SLA so the TAC can escalate to a more
technical team to get you a speedy fix.

 I hope this helps and I would appreciate it if you kept this under
your hat.

Regards

Charlie


 --- Mears, Rob  wrote:  Any one ever had
a problem loading IOS on a 3660 right out of the
 box? I
 have one with 64meg flash and 256 ram and the damn thing will not
 come out
 of RMMON. I have set the confreg to boot correctly still RMMON. I
 have
 flashed it with two different IOS (12112.2), swapped out Flash,
 MEM, even
 sent the chassis back to Cisco and the new one had the same
 problem. TAC has
 no clue, they have been sending me part and giving me to different
 Engineer
 with no luck.
 
 What gives?
 
 Rob
[EMAIL 

RE: What is a WIC card? [7:9764]

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Slow

GYAHH.
NO
db-60 is NOT high speed serial.
everyone stop calling it that
there is no high speed serial wic.
high-speed serial == HSSI == NM-xH == (about 45 Mbits/s)
multi-function/regular serial == wic-xT, nm-xT  = 4 Mbits/s

and while we're on that, they arn't serial ports. they're seial interfaces
=P.

-Original Message-
From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is a WIC card? [7:9764]


Wan Interface Card  VWIC's are Voice Wan Interface Cards.  It's kinda hard
to go anymore in-depth than that.  This is what Cisco's named their
interface cards for the 1700/2600/3600 series routers.  A WIC-1T is a single
DB60 High Speed Serial, WIC-1 ADSL would be an Asymmetrical DSL interface
card  an NM-1E would be a single 10BaseT.

Phil

- Original Message -
From: RJ 
To: 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:28 AM
Subject: What is a WIC card? [7:9764]


 Hello,

 What exactly is a WIC card and how does it work?

 Thanks
 RJ




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12171t=9764
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: catalyst 5000 rebooted [7:12101]

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Slow

werd. (right on)
-humboldt

-Original Message-
From: GNOME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: catalyst 5000 rebooted [7:12101]


Hi

How about doing a show version  to see the reason of last reboot


Arun  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 hi
 we have catalyst 5000 in our organization and last week oneof our catalyst
 5000 rebooted bu its own ...can anyboby tell me what could be the
probabale
 cause or where one shoulb be looking for it ...
 how do i start looking for it .Please help
 this reboot has caused the services to be stopped for 15 minutes and it is
 really big issue for us why it happened ...i think i am totally stuck
 ..can anybody give a a start .


 Regards

 Arun Sharma




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12175t=12101
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Duplicate Ip addresses ! [7:12100]

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Slow

clear your arp table.
-humboldt

-Original Message-
From: shella kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 7:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Duplicate Ip addresses ! [7:12100]


mmmhh ! yes i shutdown the interface and then bring it up ... looks like

the software issue to me too  anyother way i can check on the cisco 
router if they still exists?

btw what is NOC ?

From: Chuck Larrieu 
To: shella kevin , 
Subject: RE: Duplicate Ip addresses ! [7:12100]
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 03:47:34 -0700

what are you - the night shift in the NOC?

when you say you decommissioned the interfaces, did you issue shutdown
commands? physically pull the wires so they aren't connected to anything?

in general, issuing a shutdown command on an interface prevents it from
telling the network about itself. I'm wondering if your monitoring software
has failed to flush the old interfaces, and is complaining when it sees the
new interfaces come on line when it already has those addresses in its
database.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
shella kevin
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 3:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Duplicate Ip addresses ! [7:12100]


I am monitoring cisco routes via netview. I decommissioned 2 interfaces on
the cisco router and put it on an other outer. Now I am getting alerts on
netview  Duplicate Ip addresses .. it's the same ip
addresses/FastEthernet interface which I decommissioned.

How can I address this problem ?
How to flush out this on a route ?

Cheers
Shella k

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12176t=12100
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: PIX/w/WIN2k VPN3000 client problem [7:12181]

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Slow

get a reboot approved.


-Original Message-
From: Ayers, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX/w/WIN2k VPN3000 client problem [7:12181]


I'm having a problem. I'm running a PIX520 (5.3) with multiple VPNGROUPs.  I
have a client installed on a WIN2k machine.  The machine was using a group
that didn't split tunnel.  I changed the group to a group that does, and now
I get a failed to negotiate error AFTER THE LOGON and the Your link is now
secure error.  I have cleared IPSEC SA and ISAKMP SA.  I even went as far
as deleting the MAPS.  The Client has been removed and re-installed.  I'm
thinking the problem is either something embedded somewhere in the WIN2k, or
an association to the peer IP in the PIX, but I have successfully changed
the group on other win 9x machines without a problem after the SA timed out,
and the Dynamic Maps cleared.  This is a production PIX, but do I get a
reboot approved to try to clear old info out of memory, or do I go after the
client and see if the problem lies there?

Any input appreciated.


Thank you,

Michael 

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto.  Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12190t=12181
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 3660 router [7:11917]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

open up hyperterm, connect to console, log the session, flick the power
switch, and let it drop into ROMMON.

then you need to post the text file IN LINE with your next email.
THEN we can help you.


-Original Message-
From: Mears, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3660 router [7:11917]


Any one ever had a problem loading IOS on a 3660 right out of the box? I
have one with 64meg flash and 256 ram and the damn thing will not come out
of RMMON. I have set the confreg to boot correctly still RMMON. I have
flashed it with two different IOS (12112.2), swapped out Flash, MEM, even
sent the chassis back to Cisco and the new one had the same problem. TAC has
no clue, they have been sending me part and giving me to different Engineer
with no luck.

What gives?

Rob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11925t=11917
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Insight [7:11803]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

you cant blame him. hes an mcse also!

/me DUCKS!



-Original Message-
From: Dennis H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Insight [7:11803]


You don't need to mention CCNA when you reference being CCNP it's
implied as you must pass CCNA to become CCNP.  If you reference them both it
appears like you're only focused on certs and probably lacking experience.



men u  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 CCNP,CCNA,MCSE Looking for work in Montgomery, Alabama over 6 yrs exp in
 field. Any help will be appreciated. Resume upon request.
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11927t=11803
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: line speed [7:11911]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

Uhhh, what?
wic-1t is sync serial.
you can clock it at up to four megs.
there are e1 dsu s that can clock up to 2 megs onto the v35 connection, and
then there are dsus that actually can map timeslotsfrom multiple e1/t1s onto
a single serial interface.

for instance, the kentrox opera.

of course, when you hook up the wic-1t to a dsu, it is dte, and therefore
you should not need to configure clocking on it.

all of your config is on the dsu

-Original Message-
From: Burnham, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 7:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: line speed [7:11911]


It seem my earleir question either confused everyone or basically didn't
interest anyone.
To put it in a nutshell.This is what I need to find out.

Cisco state that a Synchronous Serial interface, eg. a WIC-1T will run up to
2.048 mbps
HOW can you get this line speed to a Synch serial interface ?? eg. n x 64,
e1 etc 

I need to know ASAP


Chris Burnham,
Systems Engineer,
Delphis Consulting Plc.
Tel:   +(44) 020 7916 0200
Mob: +(44) 07799403576
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged.
Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they
must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If
you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may
not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from
your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure.  Delphis does
not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have
been sent.  Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the
author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11931t=11911
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

wait, 2502 has rj45 coneector, not db-9?

-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


I am using a CAT5 cable to connect my 2502 to my TR MAU without any
problems.

As for doing it without a MAU, I do not know the answer, but would be
interested in it if someone has a good tip.

Hth,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.OleDrews.com/CCNP
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


Hi,
Does anyone know what kind of cable do I need to use to connect my 2 2502 
routers to an Andrew mau that has RJ-45 ports? Is there a special pin-out 
for building TR cables or will a regular cat-5(straight-thru) cable work?
Also, if I do NOT want to use a MAU, is there a way to fake the TR int. in a

UP/UP state similiar to the # no keepalive command used for E0 interfaces?
Please advise.
Thank you.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11979t=11961
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

the pins that are used on the rj45 side are 3,4,5,6, on the db-9 
the pins that are used are the two outermost pins on each side, looking at
it horizontally.

look on the web for the pinouts, thats where i found them, though i dont
remember the site, then go to radio shack, buy a db-9 connector, and do it
yourself =)

it worked when i did it =P


-Peter
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


Hi,
Does anyone know what kind of cable do I need to use to connect my 2 2502 
routers to an Andrew mau that has RJ-45 ports? Is there a special pin-out 
for building TR cables or will a regular cat-5(straight-thru) cable work?
Also, if I do NOT want to use a MAU, is there a way to fake the TR int. in a

UP/UP state similiar to the # no keepalive command used for E0 interfaces?
Please advise.
Thank you.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11976t=11961
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

ive done this. you just need to know the pinouts and make the cable
properly.


-Original Message-
From: EA Louie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


Yes.  use a device known as a type 3 media filter - it's a DB-9 male
connector that converts to an RJ-45 (basically, an STP to UTP converter)  It
has electronic components in it, so don't try to use a standard DB-9 PC
Serial type connector.

You can't fake a Token Ring interface into an up/up state with no keepalive.
It needs to be physically inserted into a ring.

If you have 2 2502's, you'll need 2 media filters.  They're available in
many different places - I know Ortronics manufactures them, and they are
available on eBay (search in Computers:Networking using 'media filter')

-e-

- Original Message -
From: Cisco Nuts 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:25 AM
Subject: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


 Hi,
 Does anyone know what kind of cable do I need to use to connect my 2 2502
 routers to an Andrew mau that has RJ-45 ports? Is there a special pin-out
 for building TR cables or will a regular cat-5(straight-thru) cable work?
 Also, if I do NOT want to use a MAU, is there a way to fake the TR int. in
a
 UP/UP state similiar to the # no keepalive command used for E0 interfaces?
 Please advise.
 Thank you.
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11983t=11961
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

MAUs are passive, and dont provide anything except electrical resistance and
some relays.
it doesnt signal anything you cant replicate by shorting out contacts with a
paperclip!!
-Peter

-Original Message-
From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


To connect token ring device you have to use a mau.  It provides electrical
and signalling functions that cannot be replicated with a cable.

-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


I am using a CAT5 cable to connect my 2502 to my TR MAU without any
problems.

As for doing it without a MAU, I do not know the answer, but would be
interested in it if someone has a good tip.

Hth,

Ole

~~~
 Ole Drews Jensen
 Systems Network Manager
 CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
 RWR Enterprises, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~ 
 http://www.OleDrews.com/CCNP
~~~
 NEED A JOB ???
 http://www.oledrews.com/job
~~~


-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cable connection from a 2502--- Andrew mau?? [7:11961]


Hi,
Does anyone know what kind of cable do I need to use to connect my 2 2502 
routers to an Andrew mau that has RJ-45 ports? Is there a special pin-out 
for building TR cables or will a regular cat-5(straight-thru) cable work?
Also, if I do NOT want to use a MAU, is there a way to fake the TR int. in a

UP/UP state similiar to the # no keepalive command used for E0 interfaces?
Please advise.
Thank you.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11984t=11961
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Hi Guys! [7:11974]

2001-07-11 Thread Peter Slow

2661

-Original Message-
From: Shahid Muhammad Shafi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 1:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hi Guys! [7:11974]


Hi Cisco Gurus

Do anyone know whats the RFC number or internet draft
for L2TP, i assume its a standard protocol and not
cisco proprietary.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11985t=11974
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: bridge and switch [7:11656]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

i dont mean to be a jerk, but surely if yo can write an email, you are
capable of reading books, rfcs, and so on.

As we say in most really dick-ish channels on EFNet, RTFM.
-Original Message-
From: parky chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bridge and switch [7:11656]


What is the different of the bridge and switch ?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11705t=11656
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Spanning tree cost for redundant connection. [7:11623]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

nope. not if hes connecting to his root bridge. all of the interfaces on the
root bridge will be in forwarding state, so he should see the blocked
interface on the 3548 switch.

something is wrong. 

just remember that you dont plug things in and ~*BLIP*~ things start
blocking.
convergence takes like 50 seconds on a network set up with defaults.

wait a few minutes bofore looking and see what you come up with.
\
-Peter Slow


-Original Message-
From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spanning tree cost for redundant connection. [7:11623]


Only one end of the link will show as blocking, the other will stay as
forwarding even though no traffic can pass over the link.
Check the other end to see if that is blocking.

Regards,

Gaz

Ryan Ngai Hon Kong  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 I have about 18 C3548 switches with UTP cross-over as a redundant link to
 the core C6009 switches (1 unit) and the production link of LX  SX GBIC.
 When the production link is in operation, all the GBIC ports is in
 forwarding
 state. However when I attach the redundant UTP cable at 1 C3548 to the
 another
 C3548 (cascade), I wonder why they are still in forwarding state. Here's a
 basic
 layout.

 C3548\  / C3548
   (utp) |  \ /   | (utp)
 C3548  C6009 - C3548
   (utp) |  /   \   | (utp)
 C3548/\ C3548

 How do I set the cascading port (as a redundant link) into blocking state?

 Regards,
 Ryan




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11707t=11623
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: TCP Ack [7:11703]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

i think this is because the window size is allowed to get much larger
befrore something gets dropped on a higer speed segment.

i think sending the window size is still used.

also dont forget that sometimes ICMP is used to control certain things.

of course you've read the rfcs, the authoritative source.
why are you asking questions here?
if you dont understand, it's time to scroll to the RFC credits, and email
the writer =)






-Original Message-
From: Brett Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TCP Ack [7:11703]


After reading a few RFCs(2001 is one of them)and Internetworking with TCP/IP
by Comer I am still having trouble figuring what causes the receiver to send
an ack.  From what I read in RFC 2001, the old versions of TCP/IP the sender
would send the window size then expect an ack, but now they use a congestion
window based on the segment size, but what would cause the receiver to send
an ack. Is it based on some setting inside the receiver, ie response time,
packet size...  I did a little test and I found that when the sender
receiver were on a high speed connection the receiver acked far less then
when they were on a slower connection.  The difference between the two was
substantial almost a 12 to 1 ratio.  In the first test the two devices were
on different segments connected through an IP switch, in the second test the
devices were on two different segments connected by a AIX server acting like
a router.  Thanks for the help.

Brett




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11710t=11703
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Voip troubleshooting [7:11429]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

it shows packets that were not received/sent (lost), then packets arriving
too early/then late, in that order.
this is part of what is used to calculate the ipcif.

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PS im a VoIP freak.
i can prolly help you more.
feel free to call me.

-Original Message-
From: Amit Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Voip troubleshooting [7:11429]


Hi Everyone, 

I used the following cmd to get the following output.
Can somebody elaborate on what the parameters
lost/delay shown below indicate.

show call history voice brief

57EB : 288131106hs.11447 +845 +4266 pid:22 Originate
+78877462513 
 dur 00:00:34 tx:592/11840 rx:749/14980 10  (normal
call clearing.) 
 IP 136.225.219.169:18240 rtt:636ms pl:13880/830ms
lost:23/30/40 delay:99/89/170 
ms g729r8 


Thanks  Regards

Amit


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11712t=11429
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: 2 questions [7:9732]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

what?
yes you can.
you've gotta be able to.
simulate an ISDN switch type that doesnt need spids.
this is like saying that i cant hook up two t1 interfaces back to back using
a crossover and PRI signalling.
PS i've never tried.
PSS I'm sure it can be done
PSSS I think.
-Peter Slow

-Original Message-
From: Kent Hundley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 2 questions [7:9732]


John,

#1: Unfortunately, there's no way to simulate an ISDN circuit with a
cross-over cable or with the router, you'll have to get an ISDN simulator.
You sometimes see these on Ebay, but they still usually go for $1,000 or
more.

#2: If your link is Frame-Relay, depending on the LMI type you might see the
CIR value if you do a 'sh frame pvc'.  This doesn't really tell you much
other than that your CIR is set correctly though.  If you want to do some
throughput testing from the router, you can use ttcp.  It's available on the
router IOS beginning in 11.2. (some of the newer versions may not have it)

Here's a useful link regarding ttcp and its use:

http://www.ccci.com/product/network_mon/tnm31/ttcp.htm

HTH,
Kent


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Brandis
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2 questions [7:9732]


Question 1:I recently acquired 2 routers. 1x 1603 bri  1 x 1720 2
bri 1 fast ether . As both are isdn cards for the WIC's, how can I
simulate an ISDN connection between
 between the 2 routers, without spending money on an
expensive ISDN simulator ???


Question 2: Is there any method of finding out if the service
provider we connect to does provide the 4MB link as they say they
doI know the obvious such as using a
an app such as Solar Winds, but can I do it via the
router ??


Thanks all for your help.

JOhn
Sydney Australia




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11721t=9732
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco 3640 VS 2600 Series [7:11715]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

nopers.
3620 - slow-assed proc. 64 megs ram, 2 netmods
3640 - faster   128 4 slots
3660-   fast as all hell, 256 max, 7 slots. (YES the ethernet
interface(s) are 0/0, and 0/1 netmod numbering starts at 1 and there are six
modular slots

261x - slow proc, 64 megs ram
262x - faster proc, 64 megs ram, fast ethernet on board
265x - faster than a 3640, 128 megs ram.

BEFORE BUYING A NETWORK MODULE FOR A 26xx seires router ASK SOMEONE WHO
KNOWS!
there are funky things here.
for example nm-1e2w wont work in a 2600 but nm-2w will. nm-4e will. nm-1e
will. you cant put in isdn bri and a vwic in the same chassis.
little things like that that can KILL you when you are onsite, and appear to
work till you get there.
be careful and ask someone.

-Peter Slow


-Original Message-
From: Sean Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco 3640 VS 2600 Series [7:11715]


The main differences between a 3640 and 2600s are follows (if I am wrong,
please correct me):

1)  3640 has faster processor than 2600,

2)  3640 has 2 NM slots compared to just 1 for 2600s (however, 2600 has
at least 1 built-in

  Ethernet port compared to none for 3640,

3)  3640 can handle up to 128 MB of RAM compared to 64MB for 2600s,

4)  With 3640, you can have extra PCMCIA Flash (in addition to internal
Flash).  This

  provides and extra redundancy in case the internal flash dies for
whatever reason (at

  extra cost ofcourse).  The 2600s does not have external PCMCIA
flash slot,

5)  3640 costs at least 3 times more than 2600s (I may be wrong here but
I know that the

  3640 is quite expensive) not counting the extra modules that you
will have to purchase,

My advice is that if you don't anticipate any growth in the future, then
the 2600 will meet and/ord exceed your need.  You should go with the 3640
only if you anticipate growth in the future.  Those extra NM slots can
come really handy. 

HTH

Sean

From: William Reply-To: William To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
Cisco 3640 VS 2600 Series [7:11715] Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:25:17
-0400  Hello,  When using a T1 links to a router and daily usage is
about 256Kand using 24 voice channels and with a local LAN. 
What is the key advantages of using 3640 but not using 2600 series? 
misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11737t=11715
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Cisco 3640 VS 2600 Series [7:11715]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

how many voice trunks do you have?

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco 3640 VS 2600 Series [7:11715]


Hello,

When using a T1 links to a router and daily usage is about 256Kand
using 24 voice channels and with a local LAN.

What is the key advantages of using 3640 but not using 2600 series?

Thank!




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11738t=11715
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Physicaliy disable Cisco 8M flash (Write Protect) [7:11642]

2001-07-10 Thread Peter Slow

ive seen this before.
in fact, i spent an hour or two fixing it.

same error.

same symtoms.

it was fixed by replacing the flash =(

you can get that error when your flash is screwy.

replace it, i would say that continuing to troubleshoot is a waste of your
time...


-Original Message-
From: anyong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Physicaliy disable Cisco 8M flash (Write Protect) [7:11642]


Hi Group,

My friend send me a weird 8M flash memory which is write protected.
I put show ver I can see it is read/write.
I put one original flash and one weird flash on 2503 and write a 10M IOS on
it, The first 8M can been downloaded from the tftp server but on to the
weird flash error occurred %Error: System flash write protected %Error:
System flash location 0x3000240  - wrote 0x48E7FFFC, read 0x

The router display there it has 16M flash read/write.
Does anyone know how to disable or enable the joint on the flash?
Thanks for any input.

anyong




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11739t=11642
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]

2001-07-09 Thread Peter Slow

quite simply, you need to upgrade the positronic quasitator on the
motherboard of your packet-dropping device. this will allow the electron
flows to migrate from the electro-channeling device over the flex-capacitor
to a lambda on the quanta-channeling circuit.

-Peter Slow

-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Failover distance between two PIXes [7:11468]


Without the serial cable, there is no way to keep the configs updated on
both machines.  The ethernet cables are actualy what control failover.

In theory, you could run ip to and from a termserver on either end and
connect to a local serial port from that term server to the pix.

IE. PIX1serial to TS1--ethernet-TS2---serial to pix2

Remember for failover to take place though you still have to have an
ethernet connection between the two, and for stateful failover it must be
full duplex.

-Patrick

 RB Jsn Eggert Gupmundsson  07/09/01 11:18AM 
Is there any way to create failover between PIXes over longer distance than
the max limit of the failover cable (modified RS-232). I am thinking of
connecting two houses. The distanse between them is around 2 kilometers.
There is an Gb Ethernet optical cable between them that I can use if the PIX
supports it. I have looked on the CCO but have not seen any article about
this.

Regards
Jon Eggert Gudmundsson
Network Administrator
Icelandic Banks Data Center




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11482t=11468
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: When booting up i get ATQOHO [7:11261]

2001-07-09 Thread Peter Slow

these look like modem control commands

-peter Slow

PS... /me ducks

-Original Message-
From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 5:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: When booting up i get ATQOHO [7:11261]


Joe- I'm not sure the history of this problem.  Is this a new device for you
???  Did it ever work ???  What you are seeing is a modem string.  My first
two home lab switches were a Firmware Version 1924  a Grand Junction/ Cisco
2800.  Both devices showed the exact output with a standard Cisco console
cable kit  required me to use a DB9 to DB9 (Female to Female) Null Modem
cable.

All the best !!!
Phil

- Original Message -
From: 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 3:49 PM
Subject: When booting up i get ATQOHO [7:11261]


 Hello,
 I want to thank all who responded to my problem of accessing through the
 console port. the problem was a background program that tied up the COM1
 port.
 Now when i access my 1924 switch , it responds with the letters ATQOHO
and
 ATQOZO and just sits there. I am wondering if the flash is corupted and
i
 need to reload the operating system or if i have a bigger problem. I have
 looked at the cisco site and nothing came up regaurding the problem.
 thank you for your time,
 Joe gearhart, CCNP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11485t=11261
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: When booting up i get ATQOHO [7:11261]

2001-07-09 Thread Peter Slow

oh.
maybe ill read more closely next time (duh)
oops. sorry for posting crap again =)

-Original Message-
From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 5:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: When booting up i get ATQOHO [7:11261]


Joe- I'm not sure the history of this problem.  Is this a new device for you
???  Did it ever work ???  What you are seeing is a modem string.  My first
two home lab switches were a Firmware Version 1924  a Grand Junction/ Cisco
2800.  Both devices showed the exact output with a standard Cisco console
cable kit  required me to use a DB9 to DB9 (Female to Female) Null Modem
cable.

All the best !!!
Phil

- Original Message -
From: 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 3:49 PM
Subject: When booting up i get ATQOHO [7:11261]


 Hello,
 I want to thank all who responded to my problem of accessing through the
 console port. the problem was a background program that tied up the COM1
 port.
 Now when i access my 1924 switch , it responds with the letters ATQOHO
and
 ATQOZO and just sits there. I am wondering if the flash is corupted and
i
 need to reload the operating system or if i have a bigger problem. I have
 looked at the cisco site and nothing came up regaurding the problem.
 thank you for your time,
 Joe gearhart, CCNP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11486t=11261
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: HSRP with RSM [7:11483]

2001-07-09 Thread Peter Slow

ok.
first, trunk the vlans between the two core/dist. switches. 
now.
trunk the vlans to the WS-X4232-L3 modules on the cats.
hsrp interface commands on the interfaces on the RSMs on each cat.
they should be communicating now over that uplink.
now, keep in mind that this is a layer-2 connection between two switches.
SPANNING TREE WILL BE RUNNING.
connect those two switches to a third.
ytou now have a triangle.
that third could have an uplink to each switch.
spanning tree will shut one of them down.
my recomendation would be, and this is weird, mind you, to keep all of those
links active (the uplinks).
this could be done by making the stupid little access switch the root...
if these are the only switches in this design, that's fine.
then your hsrp traffic must traverse those two links, instead of a directly
connected link, keep in mind that hsrp works off of a virtual MAC address,
think about these implications with regard to spanning tree and that access
switch.
you could also  make one of those 4000s the root and enable uplinkfast on
the access switch.
all of the things you do here have funny implications.
think about it, i could go on for days, but instead ill let you do that, and
ask the resulting questions here on groupstudy =)

-Peter Slow

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP with RSM [7:11483]


HSRP with RSMs in switches is part of the BCMSN course - so any material (
CiscoPress books, course books) that covers that course should give
comprehensive instructions.

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:35 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
 
 
 Yeah Jen is staying!!!
 
 Now could someone please give me some tips on how to take my two 4006
 with RSM and make them as close to redundant as possible. I 
 need to run
 HSRP on the RSM if possible.
 
 Thanks,
 Steve




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11510t=11483
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: source-route bridging help [7:11167]

2001-07-06 Thread Peter Slow

enabling spanning tree will reduce your explorer traffic and free up your
network.
-Peter slow

-Original Message-
From: Burnham, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: source-route bridging help [7:11167]


To all you Token Ring  SNA gurus out there. Do you have to enable spanning
tree on a token ring network, or will the RIF field guarantee loop avoidance
as a bridge will not forward the frame over the same ring twice.
If so when is spanning tree required on a token ring SNA or netbios
network

Chris Burnham,
Systems Engineer,
Delphis Consulting Plc.
Tel:   +(44) 020 7916 0200
Mob: +(44) 07799403576
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
addressee and are confidential. They may also be legally privileged.
Copyright in them is reserved by Delphis Consulting PLC [Delphis] and they
must not be disclosed to, or used by, anyone other than the addressee. If
you have received this e-mail and any accompanying files in error, you may
not copy, publish or use them in any way and you should delete them from
your system and notify us immediately.E-mails are not secure.  Delphis does
not accept responsibility for changes to e-mails that occur after they have
been sent.  Any opinions expressed in this e-mail may be personal to the
author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of Delphis.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=11178t=11167
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Syslog message [7:10656]

2001-07-02 Thread Peter Slow

dont reboot it...
examine it if you kill it without fixing it, it's GOING to happen again.
lets see a show tech from the router.


-Original Message-
From: John Kale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 12:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Syslog message [7:10656]


just received the following level 2 (critical) message on a syslog server:


Error Message

%SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of [dec] bytes failed from [hex], pool 
[chars], alignment [dec]


i'm going to do a reboot on the access server but how do i know if it is a 
hardware problem or a sotware problem? can somebody enlighten me please


regards,


John
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10658t=10656
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is EIGRP a DV or LS protocol [7:10657]

2001-07-02 Thread Peter Slow

neither.
the correct answer is either hybrid
or
enhanced distance vector protocol
The latter is a quote from EIGRP network design, cisco press

-Original Message-
From: CCIE TB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is EIGRP a DV or LS protocol [7:10657]


Hi Group members,

Is EIGRP a Distance Vector or a Link State protocol. I thought it is a Link 
State until I read Cisco BSCN book, which classify it as both. Is that 
possible.

Regards to all

Adiah
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=10662t=10657
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ATM Home Lab [7:9834]

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Slow

..i beleive the DSL wics also go into the 2600, those are atm interfaces
methinks.

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ATM Home Lab [7:9834]


If I have several Cisco 2600 routers, is it possible to create a home lab 
that runs ATM (for practicing) if I buy the ATM modules.  If yes, what 
modules should I buy.

Thanks.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9837t=9834
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ATM Home Lab [7:9834]

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Slow

the mods you want are nm-4t1-ima
configuring atm on a ds-3, on oc-3, and an ima t1-group are all the same,
minus configuring the linecoding and framing and whatnot.

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: SH Wesson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ATM Home Lab [7:9834]


If I have several Cisco 2600 routers, is it possible to create a home lab 
that runs ATM (for practicing) if I buy the ATM modules.  If yes, what 
modules should I buy.

Thanks.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9836t=9834
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Fast Switching on Cisco Routers [7:9753]

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Slow

it is...
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ednilson Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fast Switching on Cisco Routers [7:9753]


Hi Debbie and all!

Is one of theses switching methods the same as the Cisco Express
Forwarding (CEF)?? If not, what are the differences between them and, most
important, what do I loose on enabling it?

I tried the link you included in your message but I received a Document Not
Found :-(  Is the link correct?

http://www.cisco.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/design/topdown/td0512.htm

Regards!

ER
CCNA


- Original Message -
From: Debbie Westall 
To: 
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: Fast Switching on Cisco Routers [7:9753]


Mohamed,

My comments are included below.

Debbie

--- Mohamed El Komy  wrote:
 I'd like to know which is the default switching in
 Cisco Routers for TCP/IP
 traffic? Is it Process or Fast Switching?
 Also there're some questions I need an answer to:

 1- When issuning debug commands,do I need to turn
 off Fast Switching ?

I'm not really sure about this, I have never read
anything that said this.

 2- Which leads to more CPU and Memory utilization:
 Process or Fast Swithing?

Process switching is PER-PACKET load-balancing with NO
caching. It makes use of the routing table everytime.
It is the slowest of all the switching modes.

Fast Switching is PER-DESTINATION load-balancing, the
first packet hits the routing table, everyone after
that (to the same destination) is taken from the
cached entry.

 3- What's the differnece between
 Fast,Autonomous,Silicon and Optimum
 Switching?

Autonomous switching is available on 7000 series and
above. Uses the autonomous-switching cache that is
located on the interface processors. Provides faster
packet switching bu allowing the controller to switch
packets indenpendently, without having to interrupt
the system processor.

Silicon switching - this is similiar to autonomous
switching, thru the use of a silicon-switching cache
located on the Silicon Switch Processor.

Optimum Switching - is similiar to fast switching, but
is faster, due to enhanced caching algorithm and
optimized structure of the optimum-switching. ONly
available on routers equipped with a route/switch
processor (RSP).

All this info was taken from the following document:

http://www.cisco.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/design/topdown/td0512.htm


 I also need some technical papers about Distributed
 Switching using VIP
 cards on Cisco 7500 series and its Architecture.

 Thanks,
 komy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9783t=9753
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Layer 3 Module on 4006 [7:9229]

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Slow

Sure =)


!!!SWITCH CONFIG!!!
begin
!
# * NON-DEFAULT CONFIGURATION *
!
!
#time: Mon Jun 25 2001, 04:51:54
!
#version 5.5(4b)
!
!
#system web interface version(s)
set password z00t
set enablepass z00t
!
#system
set system name  z00t
set system location Equinix Datacenter
set system contact  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
#frame distribution method
set port channel all distribution mac both
!
#vtp
set vtp domain offyx
set vlan 1 name default type ethernet mtu 1500 said 11 state active
set vlan 2 name VLAN0002 type ethernet mtu 1500 said 12 state active
set vlan 3 name VLAN0003 type ethernet mtu 1500 said 13 state active
set vlan 4 name VLAN0004 type ethernet mtu 1500 said 14 state active
set vlan 5 name VLAN0005 type ethernet mtu 1500 said 15 state active
set vlan 6 name VLAN0006 type ethernet mtu 1500 said 16 state active
set vlan 7 name VLAN0007 type ethernet mtu 1500 said 17 state active
set vlan 8 name VLAN0008 type ethernet mtu 1500 said 18 state active
set vlan 1002 name fddi-default type fddi mtu 1500 said 101002 state active
set vlan 1004 name fddinet-default type fddinet mtu 1500 said 101004 state
active stp ieee
set vlan 1005 name trnet-default type trbrf mtu 1500 said 101005 state
active stp ibm
set vlan 1003 name token-ring-default type trcrf mtu 1500 said 101003 state
active mode srb aremaxho
p 7 stemaxhop 7 backupcrf off
!
#ip
set interface sc0 2 z00t/255.255.254.0 z00t

set interface sl0 down
set interface me1 10.6.0.14 255.255.255.0 10.6.0.255

set ip route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 z00t
!
#spantree
#vlan 1
set spantree fwddelay 201
#vlan 2
set spantree fwddelay 202
#vlan 3
set spantree fwddelay 203
#vlan 4
set spantree fwddelay 204
#vlan 5
set spantree fwddelay 205
#vlan 6
set spantree fwddelay 206
#vlan 7
set spantree fwddelay 207
!
#syslog
set logging level cops 2 default
!
#set boot command
set boot config-register 0x2
set boot system flash bootflash:cat4000.5-5-4b.bin
!
#qos
set qos enable
set qos defaultcos 5
!
#port channel
set port channel 2/1-2 1
!
#module 1 : 2-port 1000BaseX Supervisor
set port disable1/1-2

set switchacceleration enable 1
set udld enable 1/2
set udld disable 1/1
!
#module 2 : 34-port Router Switch Card
set vlan 22/3-4
set vlan 32/5,2/8-10
set vlan 42/6,2/11-12
set vlan 62/13-14,2/25,2/27,2/29,2/31,2/33
set vlan 72/15-24
set vlan 82/7,2/26,2/28,2/30,2/32,2/34
set port speed  2/3,2/6-12,2/14-24,2/26,2/28,2/30,2/32,2/34  100
set port duplex 2/3,2/6-7,2/9-12,2/14-24,2/26,2/28,2/30,2/32,2/34  full
clear trunk 2/1  8-1005
set trunk 2/1  on dot1q 1-7
clear trunk 2/2  8-1005
set trunk 2/2  on dot1q 1-7
set port channel 2/1-2 mode on
!
#module 3 empty
!
#module 4 empty
!
#module 5 empty
!
#module 6 empty
end

!!!ROUTER CONFIG!!!


Building configuration...

Current configuration:
!
version 12.0
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
!
hostname z00t
!
enable password 7 
!
username humboldt password 7 z00t
ip subnet-zero
ip domain-name z00t
ip name-server 10.6.0.10
!
!
!
interface Port-channel1
 no ip address
 no ip redirects
 no ip directed-broadcast
 hold-queue 300 in
!
interface Port-channel1.2
 encapsulation dot1Q 2
 ip address z00t 255.255.254.0
 no ip redirects
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
interface Port-channel1.3
 encapsulation dot1Q 3
 ip address 10.3.0.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip redirects
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Port-channel1.4
 encapsulation dot1Q 4
 ip address 10.4.0.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip redirects
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Port-channel1.5
 encapsulation dot1Q 5
 ip address 10.5.0.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip redirects
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
interface Port-channel1.6
 encapsulation dot1Q 6
 ip address 10.6.0.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip redirects
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface Port-channel1.7
 encapsulation dot1Q 7
 ip address 10.7.0.1 255.255.255.0
 no ip redirects
 no ip directed-broadcast
!
interface FastEthernet1
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet1
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet2
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 shutdown
!
interface GigabitEthernet3
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no negotiation auto
 channel-group 1
!
interface GigabitEthernet4
 no ip address
 no ip directed-broadcast
 no negotiation auto
 channel-group 1
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.3.0.2
ip route 10.5.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.4.0.2
!
arp 127.0.0.2 0004.2783.a900 ARPA
!
line con 0
 transport input none
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
!
end

z00t#

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: LaVillie Tate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Peter I. Slow
Subject: Re: Layer 3

RE: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake? [7:9789]

2001-06-25 Thread Peter Slow

My honest reccomendation would be to study for it like you were going to
take it again, and then not.

study till you know you would ace it.
(of course if you went and took it then, youd prolly only get a 90, but
thats okay.)
...and then don't take it 'cause it costs 300 to take, and you've already
passed it.

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake?
[7:9743]


you have 18 months now to take yer first whiff at it, is that not enuff
time??

Bri

- Original Message -
From: Nate Vanderschaaf 
To: 
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:48 PM
Subject: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake? [7:9733]


 Since I realized I would never feel ready for the CCIE, I figured the best
 way to prepare for the CCIE written was to take it once, try to get a feel
 for the subject material, topics and format, then go home, study anything
 that was a total surprise, and take it again.  ($300 for the test, instead
 of $3000 for a class).  Trouble is, I passed the test-- barely. I got a
70%,
 the absolute minimum passing score.

 I realize the lab is challenging, and since it's at least 6 months out for
 me (full schedule in NC and CA), I'm trying to figure out if there's a
good
 reason to retake the written.  I did notice that you need to submit your
 score when logging in to the Lab scheduling system.


 BTW, I thought the CCIE written was too easy and too difficult at the same
 time.  I really don't see the need to have memorized tons of TokenRing
 bridging techniques in today's Ethernet world, but concurrently, I would
 have liked to be more challenged with OSPF and BGP questions, things that
 are critical to today's Internet world.  I wonder how many people on this
 newsgroup realize that ARIN has allowed backbone carriers to only
advertise
 /20 bits to BGP peers and how this threatens the integrity of the 'net?
 (Also hats off to uu.net for continuing on with /24!  Damn you sprint!)


 Congratulations to anyone who has worked hard to learn internetworking.
 Certified or not.

 Nate Vanderschaaf




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9789t=9789
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: e-mail encryption [7:9109]

2001-06-20 Thread Peter Slow

You most certainly can encrypt and/or sign email with PGP.

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: cheekin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 6:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: e-mail encryption [7:9109]


You can't encrypt the e-mail.  You can sign the the e-mail though.  Check
out MailSecure at www.baltimore.com.  No I don't work or sell Baltimore's
product.  You may want to look into the key management issue before
implementing it.

cheekin

- Original Message -
From: anthony moore 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 05:31
Subject: e-mail encryption [7:9109]


 Does anyone use any type of e-mail encryption for their entire company.  I
 have been asked to implement some type of program whereby all the e-mail
the
 is sent out is encrypted.  Is this possible?  I know that you can encrypt
 between users that have one anothers' public keys but can you encrypt
 anything that you send to those that don't even use encryption?

 Thanks




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9197t=9109
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Layer 3 Module on 4006 [7:9229]

2001-06-20 Thread Peter Slow

What are you having trouble with, i know the stupid little ws-x4232-L3
module quite well
(I don't like it tho)

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: LaVillie Tate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Layer 3 Module on 4006 [7:9229]


Does anyone have any sample configurations I can look
at for the layer 3 module on a catalyst 4000.  I have
a 4006 and I'm having a little trouble configing the
layer 3 services.  I've already searched the cisco
site.  Any help would be gladly accepted.  

Thanks in advance 

LaVillie Tate

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9233t=9229
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: how to track down unused ports on a switch [7:9213]

2001-06-20 Thread Peter Slow

UH, ARE YOU JOKING!?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
...Brute force? 30 days? try not to be an unrealistic brainless peckerhead.
It's unbecoming of you. 
Try show port status
once during the day, once at lunch, once at 5 o clock.
OR.
pull out the cables with no blinky lights at the end during peak usage.
people who were out that day will eventually bitch and get their stuff fixed
in like ten seconds, and that's that.

or you could be really elite, and do it the proper way, like me =)

use SNMP it's the best for you here.
you dont need to script diddly.
exec this on a unix box.
snmptable   interfaces.ifTable
that is going to print out ALL of your interfaces. AND their opstatus. AND
the LAST TIME THEY CHANGED STATUS. And, that, my friend, is the end of your
problem =P

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-Original Message-
From: Luke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to track down unused ports on a switch [7:9213]


Brute force method:

logon switch
enable
clear counters
yes
day 30
show mac
look for any rcv and xmit that are all zero, unused port
remove patch cable from unused ports
clear counters and wait until day 30

Automated method:
snmp and script search

Hennen, David  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does anyone have or know of a tool that will track unused ports on a
switch
 over time.  My employer has a couple of thousand switch ports where I work
 and we have a pretty mobile work force, ie people switch cubes a lot it
 seems.

 Sometimes we don't find out about a move until after when someone calls to
 get two network connections in their new cube.  We typically accomodate
them
 by adding new patch cables but it's difficult to track down their old
 connections and pull them out, so we end up using a lot of patch cables.

 If there was a way to find out all the ports on a switch that haven't been
 active for the last month that would be helpful.  I thought about trying
to
 use snmp and write some type of list out to excel but this isn't my forte'
 and hopefully someone else has a better solution

 Thanks if you can help,
 Dave H




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9240t=9213
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



FW: how to track down unused ports on a switch [7:9213]

2001-06-20 Thread Peter Slow

UH, ARE YOU JOKING!?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
...Brute force? 30 days? try not to be an unrealistic brainless peckerhead.
It's unbecoming of you. 
Try show port status
once during the day, once at lunch, once at 5 o clock.
OR.
pull out the cables with no blinky lights at the end during peak usage.
people who were out that day will eventually bitch and get their stuff fixed
in like ten seconds, and that's that.

or you could be really elite, and do it the proper way, like me =)

use SNMP it's the best for you here.
you dont need to script diddly.
exec this on a unix box.
snmptable   interfaces.ifTable
that is going to print out ALL of your interfaces. AND their opstatus. AND
the LAST TIME THEY CHANGED STATUS. And, that, my friend, is the end of your
problem =P

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-Original Message-
From: Luke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to track down unused ports on a switch [7:9213]


Brute force method:

logon switch
enable
clear counters
yes
day 30
show mac
look for any rcv and xmit that are all zero, unused port
remove patch cable from unused ports
clear counters and wait until day 30

Automated method:
snmp and script search

Hennen, David  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does anyone have or know of a tool that will track unused ports on a
switch
 over time.  My employer has a couple of thousand switch ports where I work
 and we have a pretty mobile work force, ie people switch cubes a lot it
 seems.

 Sometimes we don't find out about a move until after when someone calls to
 get two network connections in their new cube.  We typically accomodate
them
 by adding new patch cables but it's difficult to track down their old
 connections and pull them out, so we end up using a lot of patch cables.

 If there was a way to find out all the ports on a switch that haven't been
 active for the last month that would be helpful.  I thought about trying
to
 use snmp and write some type of list out to excel but this isn't my forte'
 and hopefully someone else has a better solution

 Thanks if you can help,
 Dave H




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9241t=9213
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: how to track down unused ports on a switch [7:9213]

2001-06-20 Thread Peter Slow

I'd Like to appologize to Luke, and to the group for the arrogant, annoing
response i just sent...
Sorry luke, I should have said that, it was completely unnecessary and and
uncalled for, and sorry, group, that kind of crud should not be posted.

Sincerely, Peter


-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FW: how to track down unused ports on a switch [7:9213]


UH, ARE YOU JOKING!?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
...Brute force? 30 days? try not to be an unrealistic brainless peckerhead.
It's unbecoming of you. 
Try show port status
once during the day, once at lunch, once at 5 o clock.
OR.
pull out the cables with no blinky lights at the end during peak usage.
people who were out that day will eventually bitch and get their stuff fixed
in like ten seconds, and that's that.

or you could be really elite, and do it the proper way, like me =)

use SNMP it's the best for you here.
you dont need to script diddly.
exec this on a unix box.
snmptable   interfaces.ifTable
that is going to print out ALL of your interfaces. AND their opstatus. AND
the LAST TIME THEY CHANGED STATUS. And, that, my friend, is the end of your
problem =P

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-Original Message-
From: Luke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to track down unused ports on a switch [7:9213]


Brute force method:

logon switch
enable
clear counters
yes
day 30
show mac
look for any rcv and xmit that are all zero, unused port
remove patch cable from unused ports
clear counters and wait until day 30

Automated method:
snmp and script search

Hennen, David  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Does anyone have or know of a tool that will track unused ports on a
switch
 over time.  My employer has a couple of thousand switch ports where I work
 and we have a pretty mobile work force, ie people switch cubes a lot it
 seems.

 Sometimes we don't find out about a move until after when someone calls to
 get two network connections in their new cube.  We typically accomodate
them
 by adding new patch cables but it's difficult to track down their old
 connections and pull them out, so we end up using a lot of patch cables.

 If there was a way to find out all the ports on a switch that haven't been
 active for the last month that would be helpful.  I thought about trying
to
 use snmp and write some type of list out to excel but this isn't my forte'
 and hopefully someone else has a better solution

 Thanks if you can help,
 Dave H




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9249t=9213
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: T in IOS software [7:9053]

2001-06-19 Thread Peter Slow

the T in the IOS version denotes the train. a train is kinda like a
version of the OS that contains certain modifications to the already present
feature sets.
For instance, the XI train in version 12.1 has s00per d00per special
modifications for VoIP.

The T train is used to introduce new features and things. you'll see things
that are not ready / tested enough to be put into the Main line in the T
train. I however, have not had too many bad ex[eriences resulting from T
train usage, but then again, even the most stable things have bugs.

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: STRAND Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: T in IOS software [7:9053]


Just curious. But what does the 'T' stand for in IOS releases?

c2600-i-mz.121-4.bin
c2600-i-mz.121-4.T1

Thanks,
Scott




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9060t=9053
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: ping r1.ccie.com now working!! [7:9022]

2001-06-19 Thread Peter Slow

Heya, cisco GURU, 
Do you know how DNS works?
if domain-name lookup is off, it wont try and concatenate your hostame with
a domain. ( i think)
that is part of the LOOKUP process.
which you have tunred off.
things like this tend to be done away with in newer versions of IOS.


-Original Message-
From: cisco guru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ping r1.ccie.com now working!! [7:9022]


Hi all,
I have a bunch of routers configured with a static hosts file with the ip 
host, no ip domain-look and ip domain-name ccie.com commands configured. 
When I ping r1 or ping R1 it works. But when I ping r1.ccie.com or 
R1.ccie.com I get an error msg.Unrecognized host or address or protocol not

running.
I have versions 11.1(7) and 11.2(7) running. Does the ios ver. make a diff. 
or is it something wrong configured on the routers?
Please advise.
Thank you.

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9064t=9022
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Reverse Telnet [7:9054]

2001-06-19 Thread Peter Slow

Reverse telnet?
how about 
]#telnet router
blah
enable
blah
#copy tftp: flash:


-Original Message-
From: Damien Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reverse Telnet [7:9054]


I asked a question here before which related to My IOS not supporting
certain features.  I mentioned that I could not update the IOS because The
router is in a remote office with no competant staff capable of carring out
such a task. ( even though this is very straight forward. )

Some one on the study group stated that the IOS upgrade could be done using
reverse telnet,  I have tried to figure this out for myself and couldn't
find enough information
Im just confused about the hole thing.  Is this Possible.

Im using a C1720 on a Serial 512k Leased Line and remote router is C1603
ISDN dialup connection to the Net

Can anyone shed any ligth on this theory? .

Thanks  Damien


**
The information contained in this message is confidential and 
is intended for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received 
this message in error or there are any problems please notify 
the originator immediately.  The unauthorised use, disclosure, 
copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This
message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses.
Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or 
consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents 
of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being
passed on.


www.Orbiscom.com
**




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9066t=9054
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Lane and FDDI? What to belive? [7:9063]

2001-06-19 Thread Peter Slow

lane runs OVER atm. it connects LANs.
i beleive you would need to do translational bridging to use fddi. i've
never tried, but now im kinda interested...im reading the same book
..its good @!#$, isnt it!?

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Lane and FDDI? What to belive? [7:9063]


Does Lane have support for FDDI? I am reading Richard A. Deal's book Cisco
LAN switch configuration page 475. It says FDDI is not supported under
LANE?

Then I go to Lammle CCIE book page 736 and it says 
LANE also provides translation between multiple media environments,

allowing data sharing. Token Ring or FDDI networks can share data with

Ethernet networks as if they were part of the same network.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9071t=9063
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: voice ports (tcp/udp) for VoIP [7:8956]

2001-06-18 Thread Peter Slow

that was really vauge.
explain your setup and the protocols you are using...
make sure that tcp ports 1719  1720 are open...

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Federico Dmaz Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: voice ports (tcp/udp) for VoIP [7:8956]


Hi, somebody knows which are the port(tcp/udp) used for VoIP???
regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8972t=8956
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT Simple SNMP Trap Logging Application [7:8968]

2001-06-18 Thread Peter Slow

syslog? free? Linux?
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT Simple SNMP Trap Logging Application [7:8968]


I need something to log SNMP traps. Something as simple as a Syslog server.
Something hopefully free or cheap.
No bells or whistles needed.
Thanks,

Bob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8974t=8968
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OT Simple SNMP Trap Logging Application [7:8968]

2001-06-18 Thread Peter Slow

...but ci$cowork$ is only like 14 Gs

-Original Message-
From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Simple SNMP Trap Logging Application [7:8968]


Thanks Tim,

This is exactly what I was looking for. 

Lot's of people have been mentioning syslog servers but as far as I can tell
none of them log SNMP traps (which as far as I know use a different port
number). While Cisco routers can send out both syslog and SNMP traps I have
a need to monitor some equipment that only sends traps. 
It's for a small project so I can't really justify the $$ for a full blown
NMS system...

I also must apologize to the group for not specifing the OS needed (NT)

-Original Message-
From: Tim Lovelace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT Simple SNMP Trap Logging Application [7:8968]


Check http://www.bttsoftware.co.uk/ they have a small application called
SNMP Trap Watcher. I just ran across it earlier and havent used it so I have
no idea how good it is.. but hey.. its free!

Tim

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Bob Johnson
 Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:39 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: OT Simple SNMP Trap Logging Application [7:8968]


 I need something to log SNMP traps. Something as simple as a
 Syslog server.
 Something hopefully free or cheap.
 No bells or whistles needed.
 Thanks,

 Bob




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8992t=8968
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Satterlee Hutnik (was Re: CCIE lab prep. Is there a [7:8996]

2001-06-18 Thread Peter Slow

i havent seen this, and i dont know what you mea, but i can tell you that ip
classless is usually a default command if ip routing is on...
/me ducks
Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Bradley J. Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Satterlee  Hutnik (was Re: CCIE lab prep. Is there a [7:8991]


After going through the first lab (BGP), here are some of the errors I've
encountered:

p. 16 - chart shows three routers all connected to S0 interface of a
frame-relay switch.

p. 17 - chart lists Loopback 0 twice.  This could mean multinetting a
loopback (which I'm not even sure is possible), but I'm pretty sure they
mean lo0 and lo1.

Numerous discrepancies in the solution configs provided on the CD - it looks
like they were modified from a previous revision, but not proofread.

I've tried looking for an errata webpage, but have come up empty.  And can
anyone explain why they would use ip classless in all of their configs in
Chapter 2?

BJ



- Original Message -
From: Thomas Crowe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: CCIE lab prep. Is there a syllabus? [7:8385]


I have this book, and I confess that I have not totaly picked through it
yet.  What errors are you referring to?

__

Thomas Crowe
Technical Director
Research  Development
CTS - Atlanta
Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45
__

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 6:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE lab prep. Is there a syllabus? [7:8385]


This is a very good book for lab practise, however understand there are alot
of errors in the book.


 Check out:

 http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/007212766X/groupstudycom

 This book gives detailed CCIE practice labs and more importantly, also
 offers an analysis of the solution.  $47.99 from Amazon.com

 Take care,

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of Thomas Crowe.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8996t=8996
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Help with traceroute issue [7:9002]

2001-06-18 Thread Peter Slow

please, be stupid or paranoid, but not both.

bash-2.03$ nslookup epa.gov
Name:epa.gov
Address:  134.67.99.44

bash-2.03$ nslookup 134.67.139.1
Name:rtp-c5-fa1-1-2.nccr.epa.gov
Address:  134.67.139.1

bash-2.03$
bash-2.03$
bash-2.03$
bash-2.03$ nslookup kcr-c3-s00-00.nccr.epa.gov
Name:kcr-c3-s00-00.nccr.epa.gov
Address:  204.46.4.49

bash-2.03$ nslookup kcd-c1-e01-00.nccr.epa.gov
Name:kcd-c1-e01-00.nccr.epa.gov
Address:  204.47.23.1

bash-2.03$ nslookup den-c1-s03-00.nccr.epa.gov
Name:den-c1-s03-00.nccr.epa.gov
Address:  192.58.247.62

bash-2.03$ nslookup rtp-c2a-fddi.nccr.epa.gov
Name:rtp-c2a-fddi.nccr.epa.gov
Address:  134.67.190.9

bash-2.03$


Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Nabil Fares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help with traceroute issue [7:9002]


Greetings all,

I've this strange result from traceroute.  Listed below is the output from a
trace I did from my machine to a remote router, I get 3 responses from the
same host as seen below.  have you guys seen this before?

ThanksNabil


C:\tracert xxx.xxx.23.1

Tracing route to kcd-c1-e01-00[xxx.xxx.23.1]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1   10 ms10 ms   10 ms  rtp-c5-fa1-1-2 [xxx.67.139.1
  2   10 ms   10 ms   10 ms  rtp-c3-f02-00 [xxx.67.140.3]
  3   10 ms   10 ms   10 ms  rtp-c2a-fddi  [1xxx.67.190.9]
  4   331 ms   160 ms   160 ms  den-c1-s03-00 [xxx.58.247.62
  5   231 ms   370 ms   541 ms  kcr-c3-s00-00 [xxx.46.4.49]
  6   380 ms   261 ms   310 ms  kcd-c1-e01-00 [xxx.47.23.1]
  7   351 ms   400 ms   431 ms  kcd-c1-e01-00 [xxx.47.23.1]
  8   440 ms   531 ms   471 ms  kcd-c1-e01-00 [xxx.47.23.1]

Trace complete.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9004t=9002
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Wake on LAN [7:8755]

2001-06-15 Thread Peter Slow

i beleive it is one of those evil broadcast packets. you'd have to brigde
it, or write something to send out your own.
you might wanna look at the type feild if there is one in the packet, and
try and do some sort of policy routing thing to automatically trow it onto a
tunnel interface...and then do whatever
this brings me to another question.
if i make it so that a policy map matches a broadcast packet, and explicity
route that packet out of an interface using the policy routing thingy, can i
route a broadcast?
if so, i will pat myself on the back for finally coming up with a good
idea =P

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Wake on LAN [7:8755]


Well it seems that WOL is a widely used technology.  So there is got to be a
way how
pass those packets through the router.
Any ideas?

Patrick Ramsey wrote:

 It is indeed a packet.  And all of the utils I have seen to perform a WOL
to
 a device use MAC addresses, so routing would not be possible.   Now that I
 think about it, this would be the only way this would work unless you
could
 build a tcp/ip stack into the rom of a nic.  (otherwise the OS would
already
 have to be awake to make use of it's tcp/ip stack)

 -Patrick

  Priscilla Oppenheimer  06/15/01 03:48PM 
 Could you capture with a protocol analyzer the actual Wake on LAN packet?
 It's always been a mystery to me. But my guess is that it's not a routable
 packet.

 On the other hand, is it even a packet or it is just an electrical surge
or
 something?

 I suggest you find out more about what the Wake on LAN sender actually
 sends. Maybe somebody else knows. We did discuss it once before. Check the
 archives. We did not discusss it from the point of view of it crossing a
 router, though.

 Priscilla

 At 03:29 PM 6/15/01, khramov wrote:
 Is there a special config on a router for wake on lan to work?
 

 Priscilla Oppenheimer
 http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8787t=8755
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: channlized T1 into different VLAN config [7:8783]

2001-06-15 Thread Peter Slow

you need to route based on source, you NEED policy routing to do that.
you might look into ip unnumbered as well, as this would bind each serial
interface to the fe subinterface.
you could also bridge and make the box at the other end of the serial link
the default gw for the boxes on that vlan.

Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
Network Engineer
Planetary Networks
535 West 34th. Street
New York, New York
10001

Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Adam Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 2:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: channlized T1 into different VLAN config [7:8783]


Hi group,

I have a router set up with 3 channel groups on the
serial side, and 3 VLANs using 802.1q on the ethernet
side.  I want to use RIP2 for routing.

How would I setup routing so that the traffic always
follow the same path between the serial and ethernet
back and forth.

ie, s0.1 always goes to fa 0.1, s0.2 always to fa 0.2,
etc.



Thanks

Adam

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=8789t=8783
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ubr924

2000-11-06 Thread Peter Slow

Nah. screw the people at @home, and at cablevision.
if you look hard enough on CCO, youll find something.
for instance, i have a cable modem and had the same problem. but did you know that in
IOS release 12.1.2(T) and ONLYthat version, ther is an interface command
ip address dhcp
?

i had the same problem as you.
take a look with this ios tho
interface FastEthernet2/0
 ip address dhcp
 ip nat outside
 duplex auto
 speed auto



Rick Holden wrote:

 I have a cable router that I am trying to get working in my house, but with
 no success. The problem is the service provider is not giving me an IP
 address and the IOS doesn't let me assign one. I believe that the service
 provider wants to assign it based on the hostname, because that how my PC
 gets it. Is there a way to send the router's hostname in the DHCP request?
 Or does anyone know how I can get an IP address on the cable interface.
 Any help would appreciated? Thanks?

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DNS Problem

2000-11-06 Thread Peter Slow

first, dns is only udp.
dns will establish connections by connecting TO port 53, but will connect from a port
1023.
just allowing established connections will NOT work.
dns  server that your dns server queries will need to  open a connection TO your
nameserver.
you need to find a DNS server that everyone will use, and allow ALL ports 1023 on that
dns server to open udp connections to your nameserver.

if you want to learn from this, you need to go to the router with the problem, debug
security, and udp / tcp packets (as detailed as possible) and look at what is Being
denied and how you can fix it.







"Millner, Gary" wrote:

 I have a unique problem.  I'm trying to put our firewall up using the Cisco
 IOS access-list commands.  When I put it in place, with TCP and UDP ports 53
 open, DNS will not work.  We are using Windows 2000 Server as our DNS
 Server.  Is there a bug in Windows 2000?  Or does Windows 2000 use an
 additional port for DNS that I'm not aware of.

 Thanks.

 Gary Millner
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re: supernetting question

2000-10-26 Thread Peter Slow

no not really.
what you will want to do is configure null interfaces on those routers tho...( i think)
1010 -- 10
0001 -- 16
 -- 0
this is the third octet, and all the bits are the same up to 19.
so yes, your aggregation is correct. (i think)

 - Peter (i think, therefore i am not always sure...)



first , to be able to do supersubneting you need to have consecutive
network



"A.Strobel" wrote:
 
 What is the correct supernet for the followings:
 
 172.29.10.0   255.255.255.128
 172.29.16.64   255.255.255.192
 172.29.0.0 255.255.255.224
 
 is my calculation of  172.29.0.0/19 correct?
 
 Thanks,
 
 A. Strobel
 
 
 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
 
 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
=RICIB=
Yves Routhier
Connexim, Gestion de Reseaux
Telephone   : 514-828-6141
Ligne Support   : 888-828-6289   
Telecopieur : 514-636-7467   | ~  ~ | 
Courriel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  | O  O |
()()()==()()()=

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Are You soFunky.com? - get your http://www.sofunky.com email free!

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]