flatbed scanner free
Hi, Future Tech Marketing, the leaders in direct marketing, has just three days left in our new client promotion. Call us at 877-798-9331 x 601 to qualify for your complementary flatbed scanner. Best Regards, Steve FTS Marketing -- To be removed from our database, please reply to this email with the subject "REMOVE". _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isdn configuration
Hi folks, I've been gone for a while (focusing on network security), but I'm back! I saw a few old friend's names on the list but also missed a few. Anyway, here's a problem I'm working on. Perhaps you'll find it interesting, too. Hardware Configuration: Central office running 10.0/8 network. New Cisco 802 (1 etherent, one bri). Two remote locations, each with an ISDN adapter card in the PC. Central office and remote locations have Centrex-like service, so only 4 digits need to be dialed. No per minute costs on ISDN for "inside" calls. This setup is to replace 33K modems (I tried 56K, but connection speed was usually around 28K). One B-channel will be fine for these users. Each ISDN installation was tested by calling out to an ISP and establishing connectivity (Thus, spids OK, switch-type OK, lines working, etc). Design, Make the ISDN cloud its own network, 10.0.76.0 /24 BRI interface on the router is .1, at the remote locations it is .4 and .7 Each remote station has its own ethernet adapter, with a separate IP network. Static routes in the 802 cover traffic to the remote sites' networks. Here's the pertinent part of the config. interface Dialer1 ip address 10.0.76.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast no ip proxy-arp encapsulation ppp no ip split-horizon dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 200 dialer map ip 10.0.76.4 5004 dialer map ip 10.0.76.7 5007 dialer hold-queue 10 no cdp enable ! ip http server ip classless ip route 10.0.67.0 255.255.255.252 10.0.76.7 ip route 10.1.45.0 255.255.255.252 10.0.76.4 ! _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: emty flash on 2500
You have to break into the router as it boots (e.g., Ctl-Break from Hyperterminal) and then go from the ">" prompt. 2500 series routers run IOS from flash. You cannot copy to flash without terminating the IOS, but since it is empty you're running the Rom version and it doesn't know how to terminate, and around we go. >From the ">" prompt type ?. You'll see a list of a few commands. There is a mini setup script. Set an ip adress and no shut the port, then TFTP into flash. Steve "Circusnuts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 068401c07b68$2ff6e9e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:068401c07b68$2ff6e9e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Have you changed the FLASH or boot ROM's lately. This smells of a bad > upgrade :-) > > Phil > > - Original Message - > From: "ElephantChild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 7:51 PM > Subject: Re: emty flash on 2500 > > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have trouble of copying an IOS image onto the flash memory on my > > > Cisco 2500 router from a TFTP server, it keeps telling me 'Device in > > > READ-ONLY state'. I have tried to set the config-register to 0x2101 > > > but it still saying the same thing. Can someone advise me on this > > > please? > > > > > > System flash directory: > > > No files in System flash > > > [0 bytes used, 8388608 available, 8388608 total] > > > 8192K bytes of System flash (Device not programmable) > > > > > > Router#copy tftp flash > > > ERR: Device in READ-ONLY state > > > > Some models have a jumper that prevents you from writing to flash EPROM, > > even when not running IOS from flash. See your router's hardware manual. > > > > -- > > "Airplane travel is nature's way of making you look like your passport > > photo." --- Al Gore > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passive-interface in OSPF
Throw a sniffer in the middle and see if it reports anything. (I think not.) Steve Jaeheon Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > in p.463 of Building Scalable Cisco Networks > --- > During testing with debug commands, it was found that OSPF does send > Hello and DBD packets on passive interfaces, but does not send LSUs. > EIGRP does not send anything on passive interfaces. > - > > I tested it by myself, Yes, it is true when you believe what the > debugger says, "debug ip packet" reports it's sending hellos on a > passive interface, But on the other end, the same "debug ip packet" > says no hellos from the passive interface are received. > > So what's going on here? I still firmly believe no hellos are sent on > a passive interface. Then is it a BUG in IOS? > > Thanks in advance. > > Jaeheon > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Snort versus Cisco IDS [7:62939]
hi, it`s even worse than you thought... the unix director no longer exsists ... the policy manager has now gone,and is now included as part of the new ciscoworks VPN/Secuirty 2.1 SUITE of software...and you can`t get it seperatly.. . the ids hook into OV simple report`s messages/error`s to the alarm server from there you can do what you would do with ordinary events (sms/email) the blade`s themselfs are REALLY good ,because they sit on the backplane of your core and see EVERYTHING ... they drop less packets than other hardware probes (from MY experience ) and have no Boundaries.(ie broadcast domain )...again this is all from my experience the software... hmmm... the onboard (as it is just a solaris box) is quite good and the event browser is OK... the way we have done it is to put a total of 2 cards into both our core`s and have them report to CW2k LMS ..for some sys messages OV 6.2 for alert`s IEV for alert`s .. our server team uses ISS Realsecure and we might forgo the IEV and pump alarm`s to that as it has a better alarm/report browser tool .. regards steve - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:06 AM Subject: Snort versus Cisco IDS [7:62939] > Someone told me in an authoritative voice today that Cisco doesn't recommend > their IDS. They recommend Snort. Is this really true? Isn't Cisco's IDS a > big part of SAFE? > > Of course, the person who said this doesn't understand that Cisco is a huge, > chaotic organism, and that saying Cisco does something based on what one > person does, doesn't make sense. > > But I'm just curious, what do you all recommend for intrusion detection? How > do Snort and Cisco IDS compare? I guess Cisco's solution is a bit more > complicated, requiring appliances or IDS cards in a switch and a console: > > Cisco Secure IDS Director-HP OpenView Network Node Manager "plug-in" that > runs on UNIX (Solaris and HP-UX) > > Cisco Secure Policy Manager (v2.2+)-Windows NT-based package > > Thanks. > > Priscilla Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63038&t=62939 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Who likes BGP? [7:64123]
what i find really funny is that BGP has been open to attack for some time,BUT the hacker`s themselfs won`t attack BGP ,because that would be attacking themselfes,because there way out (via the internet) is our way out ...and there would be no point in that.. yes i agree that BGP needs securing but DNS or IP are far more urgent ,as an attack on either one wouldn`t stop the attacker form carrying out the attack regards steve - Original Message - From: "The Long and Winding Road" To: Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 3:15 AM Subject: Re: Who likes BGP? [7:64123] > ""Edwin R. Gonzalez"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I came across this article about BGP earlier today, > > check it out; > > > > http://news.com.com/2100-1009-990608.html > > > > > yada yada yada :-> > > the big point seems to be the misconfigured router incident, and it is > highly unlikely that any system or protocol could have prevented that from > happening. afterall, that router was trusted by it's neighbors, as it should > have been. > > against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. > > ( OK, I agree in concept. but the article fails to make it's case by citing > idiocy as a driving factor ) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64243&t=64123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Networking problem [7:64012]
Do use half duplex also what are you doing when its slow specifically? is the server slow accessing computers on the network and taking files or is it slow accessing the internet? ""Orlando, Jr. Palomar"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Adeboye Onifade wrote: > > Server. > > The > > server is a Pentium 3, 128MB changed to 256, it's also on full > > duplex on the switch/ hubs etc could anyone advise on how > > to make the server more efficient! > > You can't configure full-duplex when connecting to a hub. Probably explains > the problems you're having. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64295&t=64012 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MRTG [7:64133]
I donno mrtg.org mr obvious ""milind tare"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > hi buddy, > > > Need information about the MRTG. can anyone tell me > from which site i can download, and wht is the > hardware requirment and any technical documentation > URL. > > Thanks & Regards, > milind > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64297&t=64133 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - for those looking for cheap lab routers [7:64312]
i got a 3920 for 120 usd. i know its cheap..yes it works steve ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > token ring stuff is going for very reasonable prices over on that auction > site we all know and love. might be a good way to add serial ports / > complexity to an existing rack. or start building a CCNA / CCNP study rack > > just a thought Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64312&t=64312 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Traffic Monitoring [7:64351]
HMMM, there are lots of answer`s to this question... 1. built into all 3600 and above ios 12.0 and above is something called cisco netflow . This will basically do a "sh ip accounting" (v1) and export this data " at random intervals" to a collector... This software can then be analysed and reports come of this... to do this you can 1 buy the cisco netflow collector ,which is a unix app ,and point your routers to it.. this simply collects data to be analysed by anither app 2.get a free version (i did 3.6) of cisco netflow analyser.to make reports which to be honest is abit pants... 3. get a third party app like either HP Inetnert performance monitor or concord traffic accountant .. 2. RMON Probes what you could do is buy a phsical probe and tap it inbetween your csu/dsu and router.. and again you need some sort of analysing software e.g Netscout RTM 1.4 (as part of ciscoworks LMS2.1) and a netscout probe (8241 fast ethernet) 3 Get MRTG it does all you ask for (and so iam told ) it include`s netflow monitoring.runs on linux and is well supported HTH steve - Original Message - From: "Brad Dodds" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:09 PM Subject: Re: Traffic Monitoring [7:64351] > Net Flow > > Can you recommend software to determine which hosts at the branch office > > generate all this traffic and what kind of traffic (ie. protocol) it is? > > I am more comfortable with unix tools, and I am the central office. The > > branch offices only have windows machines. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64590&t=64351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6509 cam entries [7:65758]
guys i have the following entry in my cam table that i cannot remove here is the config VLAN Dest MAC/Route Des [CoS] Destination Ports or VCs / [Protocol Type] - -- - --- 17 00-02-a5-e8-97-35 X 9/40 here i smy Show Ver WS-C6509 Software, Version NmpSW: 5.3(2)CSX Copyright (c) 1995-1999 by Cisco Systems NMP S/W compiled on Oct 11 1999, 17:45:02 System Bootstrap Version: 5.2(1) and here is my config set port security 9/1-32,9/34-48 disable BUT, it does not matter what i do ...i can`t get rid of this entry ...i have tried ,, clear cam ,clear cam all ,clear arp all ,clear cam static (mac Add) (vlan)... it just wont go ...any idea`s ...i can`t reboot it`s part of a server farm (UNLESS i really have to )...as i have about 300 server`s on this and it`s redundent switch many thanks steve Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65758&t=65758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 6509 cam entries [7:65758]
yes and i still get these static arp entries any other idea`s - Original Message - From: "David Vital" To: Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 9:00 PM Subject: RE: 6509 cam entries [7:65758] > Did you do a clear counters? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=65921&t=65758 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Self-Employment [7:62394]
I agree. I may not be the most technical person but i am good at selling so i have no problems getting gigs to go to. what i find is not all tech guys are good at sales and thats a shame. If you wanted to really be great you need to do sales. Telemarketing is where you learn the tricks of the trade. -- Regards, Steve K ""nrf"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > From what I've seen, you can still get very high rates. > > The problem is that in order to get those kind of rates, you either have to > be very well connected, have a big name (far beyond what a CCIE could ever > give you - for example, Dr. Vint Cerf could easily command a princely rate, > but of course he "only" invented TCP/IP), or be an excellent salesman, or > usually all of the above. Furthermore, it is extremely dangerous to assume > that you will be getting that high rate consistently for 40 hours a week, 50 > weeks a year. The Usually the majority of your time will be spent scoping > out clients, marketing yourself, and doing paperwork - things for which you > are making no money. > > Also from what I've seen, for true success as a self-employed person, what > is much more important than your technical skills is your business savvy. I > know a bunch of technically brilliant people who could never run their own > gig, and by the same token, I know guys who, quite frankly, suck > technically, but have the slick salesmanship to be very successful at > running their own business. You might ask how such people can actually get > jobs done if they aren't technically sharp, and the answer is simple - they > hire others to do it for them. To digress slightly,this is why at > practically every tech company I know, the top salesmen always make > substantially more than the top engineers - often by a factor of 3 to 5 > times. > > > ""supernet"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Not sure about Chicago area, but in my area, rate is generally above > > $150/hr. And guess what, I'm in Silicon Valley. > > > > To configure a router or switch is simple. Worst case, pick up the phone > > and call TAC will solve most configuration problems. Customers are > > looking for someone that can run the show. CCIE is not enough, you also > > need to know how to do project management and very importantly, how to > > BS. > > > > This is based on several interviews I had during the past couple of > > weeks. > > > > Yoshi > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Mike Schlenger > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: CCIE Self-Employment [7:62394] > > > > Really? WHERE DO I SIGN?? :) > > > > Mike > > Chicagoland CCIE #7079 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Sam Munzani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 4:12 PM > > To: steve r; Jay Greenberg; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: CCIE Self-Employment > > > > > > Rate depends on who is paying and how much do they have? :-) > > > > In chicago area $125/Hr is considered normal with 1 way travel time. If > > you > > got a fortune 500 client, you can easily bump it up to $175/Hr. and they > > will not argue about it. > > > > Sam > > > > > > > CCIE self employed, > > > well if you find another CCIE to partner with you can get silver > > partner > > > status, (and some other requirements too) > > > > > > If you are in the biz you should know...pix...vpn and some other stuff > > the > > > hourly work is great but it depends on the clients locations...and the > > > billing rate.. > > > Good luck in this market it may be better then being out of work like > > my > > > friend is (and he is a CCIE too) > > > Bill at what you can get $100 to $200 an hour or more > > > or less if its cash.. > > > > > > Stephen > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Jay Greenberg" > > > To: ; > > > Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:14 PM > > > Subject: CCIE Self-Employment > > > > > > > > > > Any CCIEs on the list in business for themselves? What's the money > > > > like, what sort of companies do you work for? Do you do short-term > > or > > > > long term contracts? Hourly work? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jason Greenberg, CCIE #11021 > > > > > > > > . > > > . > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66029&t=62394 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netflow, IP Accounting and RMON [7:62489]
www.google.ca -- Regards, Steve ""Ivan Yip"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dear All, > > Can anyone share some useful links for me to explain the above items? > I am quite confused about them. > > Thanks in advance. > > rgds, > Ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66030&t=62489 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Router-to-external MODEM connection [7:66585]
this can be done look for cisco doc to connect external modem to aux port -- Regards, Steve ""Diego Martmnez Boqui"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello Group. > > Is it possible to connect an external modem to a Cisco 1600 series > router? > > And if it is, then how is it done? > > Can I connect using the serial interface? > > Any link with step by step instructions? > > Thank you all! > -- > __ > Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com > http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66590&t=66585 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco ExecNet [7:55344]
John Chambers sure looks good. He must work out. ;-) hahaha i wish he would read this :) hed be like oh my i must send her some routers lol Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55417&t=55344 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Has Anyone used Global Knowledge? [7:57297]
hi, I have recently done a CWFUN course ... this was at global knowledge in the UK the instructor was very experienced and the facilities were good loads of kit ...loads of software ... and on this occasion i was the ONLY student...i would recommend them to anyone cheers Steve - Original Message - From: "David Vital" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: Has Anyone used Global Knowledge? [7:57297] > Wondering if anyone here has experience with Global Knowledge and the > classes they offer. > > Thanks, > > David Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57301&t=57297 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: remote access advice [7:57288]
hi, i used the boson and the exam cram to study for the test last year and passed no problem .. i think as you have already studied the subject you will be fine with JUST the boson test`s cheers steve - Original Message - From: "Robert Kimble" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:40 PM Subject: remote access advice [7:57288] > Hello everyone, > > It's been a while since I've posted anything here. > > I'm on the last chapter of Cisco's remote access exam cert guide. I was > planning on using Boson and Exam cram but was wondering if anyone had other > recomendations... > > So far I've read nothing but bad reviews of the Exam cram remote access book. > > Thanks in advance for the input! > > -Bobby Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57300&t=57288 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Very poor performance on Cat 6000 gigabit? [7:57695]
hi, as far as i was aware you CAN`T team to different speed network cards we use the intel/Compaq/HP (the same cards/drivers) and i have not been able to get the teaming to work with 100/1000 . if you put 2 1g`s togther ...no problem2 100`s ...again no problem but different speed`s NOPE.. HTH steve - Original Message - From: "Elijah Savage III" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:31 PM Subject: RE: Very poor performance on Cat 6000 gigabit? [7:57695] > If you get this to work keep me/us informed as I am sure you will. > Because I could never get this to work, I actually had to buy another > 1gig nic and still the drivers did not work correctly actually eneded up > just using fast etherchannel which is working great. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 6:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Very poor performance on Cat 6000 gigabit? [7:57695] > > > Here's something annoying that I came across yesterday... any clues as > to what's going wrong would be very much appreciated. > > Scenario: > > HP NetServers with built-in 100M NICs, based on an Intel chipset. > > With the HP drivers, the performance is fine - as you'd expect from a > 100M connection. With Intel drivers, nothing changes. Still fine. > > Add a 1G NIC, again HP badged but with an Intel chipset (Intel > Pro/1000TX), and bind them together into a fault-tolerant set using the > Intel drivers that were priovided by HP (they don't provide HP badged > drivers for this card, though they are happy to sell it with an HP > sticker on it for twice the cost of the "Intel" card). My intention of > course is that the 1G adapter is the primary (and set so in the "teamed > adapter" settings) and the 100M would only be used as a fallback if the > 1G fails. > > That's where things go wrong. > > With both cards connected to the same switch (long-term intention of > course is that the 100M card will connect to a standby switch) it > insists on using the 100M card, even when the 1G is set as the > "preferred primary" and the 100M is the "preferred secondary". Both > cards definitely work... if I unplug the connection to the 100M, the 1G > takes over. With only the 100M connected, it works. > > Now, here's the very odd bit. You'd expect better performance from the > 1G card. But no. Testing with file copies to or from another server that > has been working fine with a 1G card for a year or so (attached via > fiber to a GBIC on the supervisor card on the switch), I get several > times times better performance with the 100M NIC than I do with the 1G > (both UTP). > > I've tried different cables. All are BICC GigaPlus. The 100M connection > goes through a patch panel, but I've run a 20M flylead direct from the > server to the switch for the 1G connection. > > The switch is a Cisco Catalyst 6000 with the 100M connections going to > 48-port 100M cards, and the 1G connections going to a 16-port 1G card. > Software, firmware, etc versions pasted below. > > Seeing much worse performance from Gigabit adapters compared to 100M is > something of a disappointment, to say the least. > > Any ideas? > > The hardware and versions: > > WS-C6006 Software, Version NmpSW: 7.2(2) > Copyright (c) 1995-2002 by Cisco Systems > NMP S/W compiled on Jun 3 2002, 18:30:10 > > System Bootstrap Version: 5.3(1) > System Web Interface Version: Engine Version: 5.3.4 ADP Device: Cat6000 > ADP Ver0 > > Hardware Version: 1.0 Model: WS-C6006 Serial #: XXX > > PS1 Module: WS-CAC-1300WSerial #: XXX > PS2 Module: WS-CAC-1300WSerial #: XXX > > Mod Port Model Serial #Versions > --- --- --- > -- > 1 2WS-X6K-SUP1A-2GEXXX Hw : 3.1 > Fw : 5.3(1) > Fw1: 5.1(1)CSX > Sw : 7.2(2) > Sw1: 7.2(2) > WS-F6K-PFC XXX Hw : 1.0 > 3 8WS-X6408-GBIC XXX Hw : 2.1 > Fw : 4.2(0.24)VAI78 > Sw : 7.2(2) > 4 48 WS-X6248-RJ-45 XXX Hw : 1.1 > Fw : 4.2(0.24)VAI78 > Sw : 7.2(2) > 5 48 WS-X6248-RJ-45 XXX Hw : 1.4 > Fw : 5.4(2) > Sw : 7.2(2) &
Re: LMS v2.1 [7:57845]
hi, not really... LMS was never designed to do this .. I too have never been able to get the polled info back quick enough for my liking I spoke to an instructor who said that it will only update after 5 minutes and that it is not as responsive as he would have liked what you could do is download "SNMPc" ...it is a small but useful "HP Openview Netowrk Node manger" type programwhic will give you instant updates.or you could try solarwinds "network performance monitor" ...which is the same sort of thing... both are quite cheep to buy and should suit a small upto 100 device network ... HTH steve - Original Message - From: "richard beddow" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:16 PM Subject: LMS v2.1 [7:57845] > I am currently configuring an LMS to manage a small number of 2950 and 3550 > switches. All appears ok except for one issue. When i pull a cable and > bring a port down the GUI takes up to 5 minutes to update. Traps are sent > and the polling period is down to 30 secs but the topology diagram still > does not update immediately. Is there any way to have instant notification > of this (or any other) event? > > Thanks in advance, > > Filo. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57850&t=57845 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Souce Quench to a device from an MSFC [7:57870]
hi, some real stupid question... what is the default gateway for all the device`s... the source-quench should only come from the device that is bieng pinged...(ie the server itself ),these errors would not show up on the switch as the packets are getting through ok and it is the server that is not aaccepting them (source-quench=go away i am to busy) BUT if you are not getting the message from the switch and unix server and these are using a different VLan as default gateway (as i susupect you server and WKs is ) then the problem could be an overworked vlan int... check the amount of packets per sec of each int .any that are between 4-10,000 packets are bieng bashed majorly ... HTH steve - Original Message - From: "Hale Nick" To: Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:20 AM Subject: Souce Quench to a device from an MSFC [7:57870] > Cat 6509 (SW 5.5(16)) with MSFC (Version 12.1(1)E). > The MSFC has over 15 vlans. > The vlan in question has over 60 active devices. > There is one device that when pinged (datagram size does not change the > result) it produces a source quench. > All other devices on the vlan respond to pings ok. > From the command prompt on my desktop the result is the same. > From a unix server the ping results are normal. > From the switch the ping results are normal. > Specifications of the server are unknown. > The port that the device connects to is set to 100/full and has no errors. > The MSFC and switch resources are fine > The vlan interface does not have any errors. > The switch and router module are both heavily used and it appears this issue > is only happening to the one device. > > > Can anyone tell me why this is happening? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57878&t=57870 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Enterprise technologies [7:58493]
hi, just to add, We are an enterprise and we will be rolling out an MPLS solution very soon... it`s a MP-BGP VPN solution which a lot of provider`s in the UK are starting to push cheers steve - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:21 AM Subject: Re: Enterprise technologies [7:58493] > Thanks so much dre! > > Regarding GARP, someone said I had to cover it, but didn't explain why or > even what it is. It seems to mean more than one thing: > > Generic Attribute Registration Protocol > and > Group Address Resolution Protocol > > I'm assuming they meant the second one and that the second GARP is somewhat > of a replacement for IGMP snooping and CGMP? But I'm still trying to figure > it out. > > Your comments are very helpful. > > Priscilla > > dre wrote: > > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote > > > I may be starting a new project doing some writing about > > > technologies used in enterprise networks. (read not service > > > provider) > > > > > > Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this? > > > > I've never seen IS-IS in Enterprise networks, only ISP > > backbones and CODCN's (Central Office Data > > Communications Networks) that implement OSI stacks on > > network elements. The primary reason I've heard (I'm an > > IS-IS fan working in the Enterprise), that also happens to > > be a sort of compelling argument - is that OSPF and > > EIGRP work better through firewalls. I believe that IS-IS > > is significantly less complex than OSPF or EIGRP, and > > therefore, easier to train/learn, implement, manage, etc. > > > > > How about MPLS? I should discuss it briefly, but aren't > > > the main users of MPLS ISPs, not enterprise networks? > > > > I've only seen MPLS in ISP networks, but could be used > > in Enterprise, especially simple VRF concepts (from > > MPLS VPN's). I could see many reasons that Enterprises > > could use even static route VRF's for various useful purposes > > on occasion, but even that is a rarity. Of course, I'm also of > > the opinion that MPLS doesn't really belong in SP networks > > either - so YMMV. MPLS-TE is still being argued among > > the SP network guru's. MPLS FRR (Fast Re-Route) is an > > important network protection and resliency technology and > > should be researched, tested, and implemented when the > > need arises for it (including for Enterprises). > > > > > Anyone using GARP? That's on my list to research too. > > > > GARP, as in Multicast? Many Enterprises are using > > Multicast, but their use can vary depending on the > > company (could be for reliable multicast like TIBCO, or > > could be for live broadcasting sending/receiving, or > > research, or many other technical/business reasons). > > Understanding the basics is good, but it's hard to cover > > all the advanced topics in IP Multicast because it's such > > a point application as it is already. > > > > > Alas, I have a lot to learn. Thank-you VERY much > > > for answering these quick questions. > > > > You will probably want to look at this from a specific industry > > perspective, i.e.: > > > > High-Tech Manufacturing / Hardware/Software Engineering > > Pharmaceuticals > > Automotive, Consumer Goods > > Government / Political / Federal vs. State/County/City > > Defense / Military / Aerospace > > Education > > Banking / Securities / Financials / Real-Estate > > Insurance Companies > > Entertainment > > Retail > > Health Care > > Hospitality / Transportation > > Energy > > > > Certain companies have totally different needs > > technology-wise... > > in particular, some business build networks without latency in > > mind > > because they are a state-wide organization, or even a city-wide > > organization. Some companies have networks that span the globe, > > and some have the same type of need in a mission-critical way. > > There are many technologies that apply to certain companies and > > not others. > > > > For any large Enterprise that relies on IT to be > > mission-critical, > > figure that the cost of IT downtime is significant (Meta Group > > 2001 report shows $1.5M per hour of downtime). IT relies on > > the Internet for growth and technology. Data centers, > > especially > > Internet data centers are the key point to any IT > >
Re: Cisco 2000 Problems [7:59338]
yes .. you need the version 2 IDU ,this will update the RME/CW2000 server part so they can see these switches , this is the link ... also whcih version are you running of CM .. hint goto server configurations about the server applications and versions here`s the link.there is no wrap http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/cw2000-campus HTH steve - Original Message - From: "Han Chuan Alex Ang" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 2:42 AM Subject: Cisco 2000 Problems [7:59338] > I have some problems with the Cisco 2000, > > here is the scenario, I have add in all the necessary Cisco device and > checked their attributes to be correct > > however , when I try a topology services in Campus Manager , I am only able > to see the cisco 6006 and cisco 3548 switches , not a single 3524 and 3512 > switches that are supposed to be detected , any patches need to done ? and > how do I go about doing it . thank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59464&t=59338 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Vs. BS or MS dergree [7:59481]
Howard, just my 2 pence you know ... funny you should say about BGP ... I was just thinking that the other day... but I personally don`t agree with the new protocol theory... I personally don't claim to be able to do thisI can barely plug in a switch but as far as I am aware the ISP BGP world is an all seeing all knowing world were all OX amount of routes are seen by everyone ..and I believe this is where the problem lies. When designing a routing protocol ,there is a basic problem that all designer`s face is links go up/down ...route`s appear and disappear... the more routes you have the more the protocol has to do ...regardless of how you get around this fact with fancy techniques ,there will still be a scalability problem based around a connectivity problem ,the more routes the more unstable the less your inclined to scale the protocol`s I think can probably made more efficient ,but it does not address the real problem , that is the amount of routes that a being added daily make`s any computational algorithm`s task very difficult . the only way in my humble opinion to make this more stable/scaleable is to back to the OSPF DESIGN NOT PROTOCOL... Regionalise ...create Super AS for various regions i.e US UK JP AUS...and then Tag all routes coming out .. OK (in an ideal world) this IS NOT the only way of doing thingslink 1 of 8000 goes down ...your advertising all 8000 out of one supernet ... But atleast in this case only your "Super ASBR`s" if you like would only need to communicate with eachother ... perhaps this is what already happen`s but i see that a fundamental shift in the way we network is required and not necessarily a change in protocol many thanks (I`ll keep my head down now ...i think...i`m only trying to help !!!) Steve Original Message - From: "The Long and Winding Road" To: Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 7:05 AM Subject: Re: CCIE Vs. BS or MS dergree [7:59481] > ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 6:37 PM + 12/18/02, Mic shoeps wrote: > > >Hello > > > > > >I've been arguing with a collegue of mine which one would be tougher to > > >achieve. I told him that it would be much more harder to have a computer > > >science or a networking degree (you have to take the GRE and complete 2 > or 3 > > >years of school works) than a CCIE, but my collegue think other wise. He > > >literally believes that having a CCIE is equivalent of having a Ph.d in > > >Networking. I'd like to hear your thought. > > > > Well, let's look at some especially important PhD dissertations: > > > >Radia Perlman: > > http://www.lcs.mit.edu/publications/pubs/pdf/MIT-LCS-TR-429.pdf > >Steve Deering: > > http://www.tux.org/pub/net/ftp.ee.lbl.gov/sigcomm/sigcomm.ps > >Vern Paxson: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/paxson97measurements.html > > > > The content of many protocol RFCs is at a level that might be > > associated with PhD level research, although some of the most > > productive people with both operational and theoretical knowledge are > > college dropouts. Look through the list of RFCs and see how many > > that someone with a CCIE, and no theoretical* training could write. > > > > For example, we have fairly strong data that the path vector approach > > of BGP will not continue to scale as the Internet becomes more highly > > interconnected and there is more churn/flap. It's not directly a > > problem of the number of routes, but their interaction. A reasonable > > dissertation would propose the theory of a protocol to replace BGP, > > with some experimental backup. > > > > > time for the old paradigm shift, eh, Howard? > > BTW - do you know why it only took God 6 days to create the universe? ;-> > > > > > > -- > > *By theoretical, I don't mean as is often used on the list: "how the > > protocol works and what are its messages." I mean WHY the protocol > > is designed the way it is, what alternatives were rejected, the > > problems it solves, etc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59525&t=59481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exterior Routing Scalability (was: CCIE Vs. BS or MS [7:59532]
hello, indeed a large problem the need for a hierarchical routing protocol ,that is effectively flat... i think that is impossible for the internet to ever really converge ...if it did it would indicate a lack of growth or movement which would not be good for my job prospects ! i think that the industry needs more focus in this , i believe that for all intense and purposes`s the ip address is dead having a ip address limit`s your flexibility ,and any future expansion is dictated by it ..we need to find a way of doing something like this ( i DREAD writing this) fixed domain name i,e www.steve.com Multiprocessing routers and ... a Dynamic address of some format (a la` DHCP).eek dhcp .i dread it ... but in order for us to achieve what the customer`s are driving for ,it`s probably the only real way to give people the flexibilty the need and want i think it may be time for the industry to start driving the customer and not the other way around...dynamic addressing can be done ,but do we WANT to do it ...i`m not sure that it wouldn't`t cause more problems than it solve`s but also i think that we are approaching a time when we will HAVE no choice but to address this ...or face an internet meltdown ... at this point i back away ...stating that my intellect and knowledge of the problem is not as rounded as it needs to be to deal with this .. but ,as usual ,your answer was appreciated,and i will get on the mailing list ...(just to read) many thanks Steve - Original Message - From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" To: Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:13 PM Subject: Exterior Routing Scalability (was: CCIE Vs. BS or MS dergree [7:59529] > At 2:39 PM +0000 12/19/02, steve wrote: > >Howard, > > > >just my 2 pence > > > >you know ... > > > >funny you should say about BGP ... I was just thinking that the other day... > > > >but I personally don`t agree with the new protocol theory... > >I personally don't claim to be able to do thisI can barely plug in a > >switch but > >as far as I am aware the ISP BGP world is an all seeing all knowing > >world were all OX amount of routes are seen by everyone ..and I believe this > >is where the problem lies. > > There's a subtle difference, and also some history here. The absolute > number of routes isn't the problem. We can build perfectly good > memory structures and search algorithms to find 10 million routes. > The problem is the rate of change of the routes, constantly being > added and withdrawn, which has a couple of significant effects. > > First, it's a processor load on individual routers. That can be > dealt with, I think -- in fact, multiprocessing in the routing > control plane is one of my research interests. > > The big problem comes with global instability. The Internet never > really converges as a whole, and the protocol designers in the IRTF > and IETF have pretty much agreed to that. > > > > > >When designing a routing protocol ,there is a basic problem that all > >designer`s face is links go up/down ...route`s appear and disappear... > >the more routes you have the more the protocol has to do ...regardless of > >how you get around this fact with fancy techniques ,there will still be a > >scalability problem based around a connectivity problem ,the more routes the > >more unstable the less your inclined to scale > >the protocol`s I think can probably made more efficient ,but it does not > >address the real problem , > >that is the amount of routes that a being added daily make`s any > >computational algorithm`s task very difficult . > > > >the only way in my humble opinion to make this more stable/scaleable is to > >back to the OSPF DESIGN NOT PROTOCOL... > > > >Regionalise ...create Super AS for various regions i.e US UK JP > >AUS...and then Tag all routes coming out .. > > That, indeed, is the fundamental assumption of CIDR and BGP-4. > Unfortunately, we are having great market and perceptual problems in > changing. > > You see, CIDR/BGP-4 assumed that significant aggregation in a > hierarchy was possible and desirable. The Internet, in broad terms, > would be a pyramid, although there would be multiple major carriers > at the peak of the pyramid. EGP assumed only one core. > > Various people, especially Geoff Huston, have demonstrated that the > Internet topology is "flattening" away from the pyramid. The IETF > PTOMAINE Working Group web page, under www.ietf.org, is a good source > here. The growth in AS is not particularly in carriers, but in > multihoming users. The users want protocol-independent address space > so they aren'
Re: Possible CDP bug? Check it out! [7:59929]
hey.. AT Last i think i can try and properly help someone yippe.. on your switches type this message no cdp advertise V2 i have had this all over my network ..and you are correct it is a bug in CDP .. according to cisco ,this isn`t a fix just a work around H(and i mean HOPE)TH steve skinner (CCxx MCxx HPxx SCxx CSxx.you know i wish i had some proper certs and not just the xx ones) - Original Message - From: "The Long and Winding Road" To: Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 9:06 AM Subject: Possible CDP bug? Check it out! [7:59929] > I've run into this situation while doing some practicing with the 3550s and > some routers > > 2611--3550---35503640 > > all ethernet ports are set at full duplex 10 megabit speed. > > the 2611 and the 3640 are connected via a vlan tunnel. > > everything is working fine, until I turn on l2protocol-tunnel cdp on both > switches, at which point I get the following error: > > 3640 > FrameSwitch# > 1w0d: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Ethernet0/1 (not > hal > f duplex), with Router_14_2611 Ethernet0/1 (half duplex). > > 2611 > 1w0d: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Ethernet0/1 (not > ful > l duplex), with FrameSwitch Ethernet0/1 (full duplex). > > as near as I can tell, there are no errors on any of the interfaces. no > collisions, etc. not that I'm sending a lot of traffic during these studies, > but extended pings don't come up with anything either. > > relevant configurations for all interfaces. as you can see, everything > agrees all along the line. everyone is set for speed 10 and duplex full. if > I turn off l2protocol-tuinnel cdp on the interfaces, the error messages > disappear. I suspect a bug in CDP, but I'm wondering if I have missed > anything. > > 2611 > --- > interface Ethernet0/1 > no ip address > full-duplex > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.1 > encapsulation dot1Q 121 > ip address 122.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.2 > encapsulation dot1Q 122 > ip address 122.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.3 > encapsulation dot1Q 123 > ip address 122.1.3.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.4 > encapsulation dot1Q 124 > ip address 122.1.4.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > > Switch_24#sri f0/1 > Building configuration... > > Current configuration : 200 bytes > ! > interface FastEthernet0/1 > switchport access vlan 100 > switchport mode dot1q-tunnel > no ip address > duplex full > speed 10 > l2protocol-tunnel cdp > no cdp enable > spanning-tree bpdufilter enable > end > > interface FastEthernet0/26 > switchport access vlan 100 > switchport mode dot1q-tunnel > no ip address > duplex full > speed 10 > l2protocol-tunnel cdp > no cdp enable > spanning-tree bpdufilter enable > end > > 3640 > --- > interface Ethernet0/1 > no ip address > no ip redirects > full-duplex > priority-group 1 > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.1 > encapsulation dot1Q 121 > ip address 122.1.1.2 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.2 > encapsulation dot1Q 122 > ip address 122.1.2.2 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.3 > encapsulation dot1Q 123 > ip address 122.1.3.2 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Ethernet0/1.4 > encapsulation dot1Q 124 > ip address 122.1.4.2 255.255.255.0 > ! > > Chuck > -- > TANSTAAFL > "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60212&t=59929 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SNMP Filter [7:60100]
also one thing to point out is that even with a config of the like that has been correcetly recommended you still have problems with wasted bandwidth and CPU resource because someone is trying to send the request`s to you in the first place ... and also if you have any syslog logging setup they will be reported in thatas well ALSO someone could be trying to Hack you (snmp isnt that secure )...as has happened to me ANYWAY here is a pretty locked down snmp config form one of my 7500`s logging source-interface Loopback0 logging 10.*.*.* logging 164.*.*.* logging 10.*.*.* access-list 1 permit 10.*.*.* access-list 1 permit 164.*.*.* snmp-server community "snmp read-only community" RO 1 snmp-server community "snmp read-write community" RW 1 snmp-server trap-source Loopback0 snmp-server location London Bridge snmp-server host 10.*.*.*"snmp read-only community" snmp-server host 164.*.*.* "snmp read-only community" HTH steve - Original Message - From: "Frank" To: Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:57 PM Subject: Re: SNMP Filter [7:60100] > Hi, > > you can create an "snmp view" and secure this with an access-list. This way > you can deny any snmp requests to your box and allow your own ranges. > > Another way ( the hard way ;-) is to configure the snmp responses to come > from the loopback address and then start filtering outbound traffic from > that address on port 161. This is what you mean I think but I would advise > you to use the first example. > > cheers > > Frank > > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 13:52:53 GMT, Michael wrote: > >Dear All > > > >I have a few C7507 sereis routers with a lot of > >fram-relay and ll customers. How can I filter SNMP > >requests on the C7507 comming from the FR/LL > >customers? I get a lot of SNMP Authentication Failed > >on the router LOG. What I was wondering is wether SNMP > >uses a specific IP address from the router in order to > >answer to SNMP requests or whether all IP addresses on > >the router answer to SNMP request. I dont want to > >filter SNMP bettween customer sides therefore i can > >not use Access-lists on all router interfaces in order > >to deny SNMP. But in case SNMP n the router uses a > >specific IP to answer to request then it is possible > >to use access list and deny SNMP requests to the > >specific IP. > > > >Any help will be appreciated > > > >__ > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > >http://mailplus.yahoo.com > -- > Frank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60216&t=60100 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]
hi, this is a java "FEATURE" ,...we run it on a sun E250 dual proc 1gb mem and it goes very well.. once you have accepted the first security "token" and select "grant always" the problem will go away ,,, it is authenticating "of sorts" your PC .hell ...actually it is just registering it for future updates.. also you must remember on a pc that has never connected to CW2K the server download`s and install the java 1.3_01 client ,which can take some time..3-7 mins with install but again this only happen`s once... when you register your Pc buy saying "GRANT ALWAYS" some java CAR files are installed onto your machine which simply register you everytime you logonalso the web server itself, keeps some cookie info about which machine`s have tried to log on unsuccessfully.. it`s ok and part of the process ... just say YES I have used Cw2k for some time and have got USED TOO it`s little forboyles HTH Steve - Original Message - From: "Frank Jimenez" To: Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 10:38 PM Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > Is it from just one particular workstation or any workstation? IE and > Netscape both? > > I've had intermittent problems accessing CW2K servers from my laptop - > usually because I've done something funky with my Java settings or > installed one to many new widgets. I've had to reinstall IE/Netscape > before I could get it to work right. > > Wouldn't hurt to make sure that the server is patched to current revs as > well. > > Frank Jimenez, CCIE #738 > Systems Engineer > Cisco Systems, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Arnold, Jamie > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 6:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > > What about *very* slow access to CiscoWorks? We're running it from a > new Dell 2550, 2 processors, 1gb or ram and the box does nothing but run > CW. Accessing it from a workstation takes literally minutes to load the > initial page and then another 3-4 minutes to load the device manager. > Is this common? > > Thanks > > > "Imagination is more important than knowledge" > > Albert Einstein > > > -Original Message- > From: Amr Essam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > > Piyush > > Check the permissions for the user you logged on with to the ciscoworks > And check the java settings in the web browser too I have passed with > this kind of problem but it was solved by this way as it's mainly > related with the browser > > Amr > >-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Mr piyush shah > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > Hi all > I have windows2000 suite of NMS.I have installed CD1 > with version 4 .Now that I can acess the same locally > ,while When I am trying to acess ciscoview through web > using port 1741 on other pC,I am getting the error > Please grant the permission to acess Ciscoview.I > wonder whether where should I grant the > permisiion.Request all to help me. > Piyush > > > > Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. >visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60455&t=60285 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: set cam permanent HELP! [7:60448]
hey miss P
if you do a show trunk it should show you it`s native vlan that is the
one you are after ...
"from CCO"
The following example shows how to add a unicast entry to the table for
module 2, port 9, and how to add a permanent multicast entry to the table
for module 1, port 1, and module 2, ports 1, 3, and 8 through 12:
Console> (enable) set cam static 00-00-0c-a0-03-fa 2/9
Static unicast entry added to CAM table.
Console> (enable) set cam permanent 01-40-0b-a0-03-fa 1/1,2/1,2/3,2/8-12
Permanent multicast entry added to CAM table.
Console> (enable)
i got the above from
http://cco-rtp-1.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps679
/products_command_reference_chapter09186a008007f2dc.html#13648
watch the wrap
from memory if you specify the native vlan and ONE port in the trunk that
SHOULD include all ports of the trunk with the set cam commandI just
can`t be 100 %
HTIOSH (hope this is of Some help)
Steve
--- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:37 PM
Subject: set cam permanent HELP! [7:60448]
> Hello folks,
>
> Somehow I got into a "back-to-back" conversation with one of our
colleagues
> and nobody else has been responding. :-{} So I decided to repost with the
> remaining questions. It's a production bank network, so he is hoping to
get
> some answers before trying anything.
>
> Two 6xxx switches are connected back-to-back across a trunk link with 2
sets
> of ports channeled together to form the trunk.
>
> To solve a problem, he needs to make a permanent CAM entry on one of the
> switches that associates a MAC address with the trunk.
>
> Since it's a channel, we're not sure which mod/ports to use as parameters
to
> the "set cam perm" command. Supervisor port 1/1, 1/2 or both?
>
> When you do a "set cam perm" on a trunk, documentation says you have to
> include a VLAN number. The trunk is part of the management VLAN. Is that
the
> VLAN it wants? Or does it want the VLAN that the destination is on?
> (Hopefully that VLAN is already associated with the trunk.)
>
> For more background, see the dicussion on Cat 6xxx and firewalls in a
> cluster, but I think our best hope at this point is to get answers to
these
> specific questions.
>
> THANKS
>
> Priscilla
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60457&t=60448
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Possible CDP bug? Check it out! [7:59929]
hi chuck,, yeah, it is abit funny ,one thing also i noticed , that sometime i had to do a "clear CDP table" before this properly kicked in all my 3548`s were ok ,but some of the older 2926MXL`s need that... but i agree with you about the bug.number 1XX in an ever increasing list of bugs Cheers steve ... - Original Message - From: "The Long and Winding Road" To: Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 9:13 PM Subject: Re: Possible CDP bug? Check it out! [7:59929] > ""steve"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > hey.. > > > > > > AT Last i think i can try and properly help someone yippe.. > > > > on your switches type this message > > > > no cdp advertise V2 > > > > i have had this all over my network ..and you are correct it is a bug in > CDP > > > yep - changing to ver 1 eliminates the problem. interesting. > > the other part of this is the duplex issue on the 2611. CDP ver 2 claims > the port is half duplex. the router and the switch claim it is full duplex. > I know that originally the 2610/11 were 10 meg half, and that IOS > 12.something allowed one to bring this up to full. I suspect there is still > an IOS bug someplace that is involved. I do not recall this issue when I was > writing my VPN tunnel lab for Cert Zone. At the time I was using my > employer's engineering lab, and IIRC the routers in question were 2621 - > different hardware beast. > > live and learn. > > > > > .. > > > > according to cisco ,this isn`t a fix just a work around > > > > H(and i mean HOPE)TH > > > > steve skinner > > (CCxx MCxx HPxx SCxx CSxx.you know i wish i had some proper certs and > > not just the xx ones) > > - Original Message - > > From: "The Long and Winding Road" > > To: > > Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 9:06 AM > > Subject: Possible CDP bug? Check it out! [7:59929] > > > > > > > I've run into this situation while doing some practicing with the 3550s > > and > > > some routers > > > > > > 2611--3550---35503640 > > > > > > all ethernet ports are set at full duplex 10 megabit speed. > > > > > > the 2611 and the 3640 are connected via a vlan tunnel. > > > > > > everything is working fine, until I turn on l2protocol-tunnel cdp on > both > > > switches, at which point I get the following error: > > > > > > 3640 > > > FrameSwitch# > > > 1w0d: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Ethernet0/1 > > (not > > > hal > > > f duplex), with Router_14_2611 Ethernet0/1 (half duplex). > > > > > > 2611 > > > 1w0d: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Ethernet0/1 > > (not > > > ful > > > l duplex), with FrameSwitch Ethernet0/1 (full duplex). > > > > > > as near as I can tell, there are no errors on any of the interfaces. no > > > collisions, etc. not that I'm sending a lot of traffic during these > > studies, > > > but extended pings don't come up with anything either. > > > > > > relevant configurations for all interfaces. as you can see, everything > > > agrees all along the line. everyone is set for speed 10 and duplex full. > > if > > > I turn off l2protocol-tuinnel cdp on the interfaces, the error messages > > > disappear. I suspect a bug in CDP, but I'm wondering if I have missed > > > anything. > > > > > > 2611 > > > --- > > > interface Ethernet0/1 > > > no ip address > > > full-duplex > > > ! > > > interface Ethernet0/1.1 > > > encapsulation dot1Q 121 > > > ip address 122.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > > ! > > > interface Ethernet0/1.2 > > > encapsulation dot1Q 122 > > > ip address 122.1.2.1 255.255.255.0 > > > ! > > > interface Ethernet0/1.3 > > > encapsulation dot1Q 123 > > > ip address 122.1.3.1 255.255.255.0 > > > ! > > > interface Ethernet0/1.4 > > > encapsulation dot1Q 124 > > > ip address 122.1.4.1 255.255.255.0 > > > ! > > > > > > Switch_24#sri f0/1 > > > Building configuration... > > > > > > Current configuration : 200 bytes > > > ! > > > interface FastEthernet0/1 > > > switchport access vlan 100 > > > switchport mode dot1q-tunnel > > > no ip address > > > duplex full > >
Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]
hi, that`s a real shame as it`s a great product...(2.1 once you have got all the bugs out) my sun machine has a 100 meg connection to a 5509 but it is in another building...which is connected to us over a 100meg fibre link (this link also carries normal "user"data) i am running solaris 2.6 32bit version on a dual proc(300mhz) system with 1gig of mem and a 36 gig hdd, but to be honest all the people i have spoken to recommend running it on atleast a dual proc system . it shouldn`t be that slow .what are you running it on steve - Original Message - From: "Arnold, Jamie" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:11 PM Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > I'm sorry to say, but even after accessing it 10 times from any machine it > is just as slow as the first time. > > -----Original Message- > From: steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > > hi, > > this is a java "FEATURE" ,...we run it on a sun E250 dual proc 1gb mem and > it goes very well.. > > once you have accepted the first security "token" and select "grant always" > the problem will go away ,,, > > it is authenticating "of sorts" your PC .hell ...actually it is just > registering it for future updates.. > > also you must remember on a pc that has never connected to CW2K the server > download`s and install the java 1.3_01 client ,which can take some time..3-7 > mins with install > > but again this only happen`s once... > when you register your Pc buy saying "GRANT ALWAYS" some java CAR files are > installed onto your machine which simply register you everytime you > logonalso the web server itself, keeps some cookie info about which > machine`s have tried to log on unsuccessfully.. > > it`s ok and part of the process ... just say YES > > I have used Cw2k for some time and have got USED TOO it`s little forboyles > > HTH > > Steve > > - Original Message - > From: "Frank Jimenez" > To: > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 10:38 PM > Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > > > Is it from just one particular workstation or any workstation? IE and > > Netscape both? > > > > I've had intermittent problems accessing CW2K servers from my laptop - > > usually because I've done something funky with my Java settings or > > installed one to many new widgets. I've had to reinstall IE/Netscape > > before I could get it to work right. > > > > Wouldn't hurt to make sure that the server is patched to current revs > > as well. > > > > Frank Jimenez, CCIE #738 > > Systems Engineer > > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > > Of Arnold, Jamie > > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 6:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > > > > > What about *very* slow access to CiscoWorks? We're running it from a > > new Dell 2550, 2 processors, 1gb or ram and the box does nothing but > > run CW. Accessing it from a workstation takes literally minutes to > > load the initial page and then another 3-4 minutes to load the device > > manager. Is this common? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > "Imagination is more important than knowledge" > > > > Albert Einstein > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Amr Essam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > > > > > Piyush > > > > Check the permissions for the user you logged on with to the > > ciscoworks And check the java settings in the web browser too I have > > passed with this kind of problem but it was solved by this way as it's > > mainly related with the browser > > > > Amr > > > >-Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > > Of Mr piyush shah > > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:14 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > > > > Hi all > > I have windows2000 suite of NMS.I have installed CD1 > > with version 4 .Now that I can acess the same locally > > ,while When I am trying
Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285]
sorry we got a bit of topic... all the access permissions are setup in ... Server configuration , setup ,secuiry,modify/Delete Users but even with the VERY basic permissions of helpdesk you should still be able to ruin ciscoview... i believe there is a permissions issue on the disk you have installed ciscoworks answer make sure your file permission`s is read/write for both group and world on the /opt/CSCOpx directory (also check permissions on Win2k) also make sure (unix) that the owner of the direcotry is csuser/causers again i don`t know which OS tyour onbut there are no default user permissions on the web server(unix).. HTH steve - Original Message - From: "Mr piyush shah" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:12 AM Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 [7:60285] > Frank > In fact I tried to install it on 3-4 machines ,but I > kept on getting the same message.As told previously it > works perfectly ok on the machine on which CIscoworks > is loaded and I get the graphical presentation of the > networking device . Pls help me. > Regards > > Piyush > > > > --- Frank Jimenez wrote: > Is it > from just one particular workstation or any > > workstation? IE and > > Netscape both? > > > > I've had intermittent problems accessing CW2K > > servers from my laptop - > > usually because I've done something funky with my > > Java settings or > > installed one to many new widgets. I've had to > > reinstall IE/Netscape > > before I could get it to work right. > > > > Wouldn't hurt to make sure that the server is > > patched to current revs as > > well. > > > > Frank Jimenez, CCIE #738 > > Systems Engineer > > Cisco Systems, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Arnold, Jamie > > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 6:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 > > [7:60285] > > > > > > What about *very* slow access to CiscoWorks? We're > > running it from a > > new Dell 2550, 2 processors, 1gb or ram and the box > > does nothing but run > > CW. Accessing it from a workstation takes literally > > minutes to load the > > initial page and then another 3-4 minutes to load > > the device manager. > > Is this common? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > "Imagination is more important than knowledge" > > > > Albert Einstein > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Amr Essam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 > > [7:60285] > > > > > > Piyush > > > > Check the permissions for the user you logged on > > with to the ciscoworks > > And check the java settings in the web browser too I > > have passed with > > this kind of problem but it was solved by this way > > as it's mainly > > related with the browser > > > > Amr > > > >-Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > > Mr piyush shah > > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 11:14 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: problems while acessing Ciscoworks 2000 > > [7:60285] > > > > Hi all > > I have windows2000 suite of NMS.I have installed CD1 > > with version 4 .Now that I can acess the same > > locally > > ,while When I am trying to acess ciscoview through > > web > > using port 1741 on other pC,I am getting the error > > Please grant the permission to acess Ciscoview.I > > wonder whether where should I grant the > > permisiion.Request all to help me. > > Piyush > > > > > > > > > Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the > > new, Yahoo! TV. > >visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. >visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60801&t=60285 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IDS [7:60769]
hi, it really depends on how you want to implemnet it ... the cisco stuff comes as a physicall probe device...i.e either a PCI card and stand-alone probe or a 6500 card... wear-as realsecure can come as a agent/software app that you can put on server`s ... the plus and minus point Cisco REAL + Easyier to config from box Req`s more devices out of box (agent/collector/reporter/manager..these can all be on goes into 6509 seperate boxes) user int good can run as Unix/linux/w2k agent or probe or standalone probe lots of support - not easy to develop and expand reqs somone with Dbase knoweledge database req`s work after multiple probes agents can crash on NT HTH steve - Original Message - From: "Dennis Ko" To: Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 11:54 PM Subject: IDS [7:60769] > If you have a choice of choosing ISS Real Secure IDS or Cisco IDS, which > one would you pick? > > Please let me know your idea. > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60810&t=60769 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6509-6513 power-supplies [7:62020]
Guys, can you please help we have this setup at the moment and we wish to upgrade to 6513..(these are server farm switches and we need more ports basically ).. what i want to know is if i use the PSU from the 6509`s (see below) will they work ok in the current config ..i.e redundent mode on the 6513 ,which will be fully loaded (with 11 48 port cards + 2 sup`s).. any help ?? Cheers guv steve 6509_3> sh sys PS1-Status PS2-Status Fan-Status Temp-Alarm Sys-Status Uptime d,h:m:s Logout -- -- -- -- -- -- - ok ok ok offok 131,15:36:18 20 min PS1-Type PS2-Type Modem Baud Traffic Peak Peak-Time --- - --- - WS-CAC-1300W WS-CAC-1300W disable 9600 1% 8% Mon Jan 27 2003, 23:16:45 PS1 Capacity: 27.46 Amps PS2 Capacity: 27.46 Amps PS Configuration : PS1 and PS2 in Redundant Configuration. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62020&t=62020 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco courseware [7:52805]
ebay -- Regards, ""Davis, Scott [ISE/RAC]"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know if there is a way to purchase Cisco courseware (like the > DQoS courseware) outside of taking the course? > > TIA > Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53063&t=52805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE written "revised" [7:53972]
dude, This is cisco we are talking about. This is not some 24.95 t shirt. tell her that and if she dosnt get it send her over here and i will gear her up with a 7507 and a 5505 haha Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55069&t=53972 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3com to Cisco Interoperability [7:71490]
IS it on auto detect speed / duplex? try manual. -- Regards, Steve Kalcevich ""Ron"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I am working in a shop where we are migrating from 3Com to Cisco switches > and routers. I am having difficulty connecting Cisco and 3Com switches at a > Gig. I am not sure what to look into when connecting these two links > together. Sometimes I get a link light and no communications and sometimes > I get nothing. Are there any encapsulation issues, timing issues that > anyone can lead me in the right direction on? I need to get these to work > together during the migration. We are not doing any vlan trunking or > anything fancy between the two, just switching. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71495&t=71490 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AOL Port Sniffing....
FYI.. AIM runs on other ports as well. I've also had it working on port 21 & 25. Whatever the AIM server allows as open connections. -- | __O_/ | |___, _|CCIE | \_|CCNP Never stop climbing! --> | ./ |CCNA - Stephen E. Hildenbrand ""Johnson, Richard (NY Int)"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Is it possible to put a snifter on to the port that AIM uses, ( I > believe it is 4192), and capture all the text that is coming into my > network? > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AOL Port Sniffing....
FYI.. AIM runs on other ports as well. I've also had it working on port 21 & 25. Whatever the AIM server allows as open connections. -- | __O_/ | |___, _|CCIE | \_|CCNP Never stop climbing! --> | ./ |CCNA - Stephen E. Hildenbrand ""Johnson, Richard (NY Int)"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > Is it possible to put a snifter on to the port that AIM uses, ( I > believe it is 4192), and capture all the text that is coming into my > network? > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radiator
Chan, You can get it from this site, but it is not free: http://www.open.com.au/radiator/ It is a very good Radius product and easy to modify/customize. Steve Cable & Wireless Optus ""Chiao Liang"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 952ng2$dou$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:952ng2$dou$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All > > Does anyone know about a radius server known as Radiator? I heard that it's > free and can downloaded from web site, > anyone know where can i get it from? it's is free?? > > Than in advance > Chan > CCDA CCNA > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QOS for Citrix
G'day All, Currently got a problem with a WAN I support where they are getting time-outs with their Citrix Clients. Citrix Clients are connected via frame-relay edge routers 1700's to an ATM core router 7200VXR NPE-200 with ATM DS3 routing traffic between all sites. Can anybody suggest any QOS solutions to prioritize the Citrix traffic. So far I have reserched the following: Citrix Ports 1494/tcp ica 1494/udp ica (not sure which of these needs more priority) bandwidth ~ 20k per user (although I have heard that it can be a lot higher than this) average packet size 300 bytes delay sensitive I am looking at Priority queueing, but a little concerned about the warnings that it may starve other traffic if the Citrix queue is constantly full. If anyone has any suggestions, or played with this before it would much appreciated. Many Thanks Steve _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CISCO Web Site
Got in fine -Original Message- From: Tariq Bin Azad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 10:35 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: CISCO Web Site Hi. Can anybody try to access cisco web site ?? I tihnk that their site is down. Tazad _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PA-T3 and PA-A3-T3
Hey Gang sorry for the OT post but I have 2 PA-A3-T3 ATM cards and a regular PA-T3 card for 7200 series routers I need to sale off. I need a PA-MC-T3 card if someone wants to do some swapping. Sorry for the post, Steve Smith MCSE, CCNA Data Networks Technical Manager Freeliant.com 901-309-3919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Swap Date - 3/13 at RTP
I am looking to swap my date on March 13th and 14th for a date in late = April or early May. The lab is scheduled for the RTP location. Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Lab Tax Write Off
Are router's/switche's/isdn simulator's purchased for the home lab tax deductible. Also, are the ciscopress textbook's tax deductible expense. Is anyone else claiming these on the Federal Taxes? TIA _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE:
Sathesh, On the FRS 2.0 exam I took there were either 3 or 4 questions that were directly about the Cisco 700 series. steve Original Message Follows From: "martijn michiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "martijn michiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:10:49 - Sathesh, in my bcran book there is a full chapter of 700. Check C's website though. martijn -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 14 februari 2001 22:35 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: guyz: any comprehensive resource fo BCRAN ? any idea if there are questions on cisco 700 ? thanks,, - Get free personalized email at http://email.lycos.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this is test Just don't open it.
this is test _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boot Problems on a 7200
Is the following statement in your config? boot system flash slot0:c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S.bin .I have seen that problem when the statement is not in there. regards, Steve -Original Message- From: Roger Sohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 2:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boot Problems on a 7200 I've tried searching massively through CCO and can't seem to find the solution to this problem. I have a Cisco 7206VXR and everytime I try to boot it up, everything is dandy...but it always comes to the prompt of "Router(boot)". This is the output when I run a "show version". It says that the system is returned to ROM by reload. Is this tied in with the problem? I currently have it set to boot off the flash disk with the image of c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S. Am I missing something? -Roger --- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-BOOT-M), Version 12.0(10)S, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEA SE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2000 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Fri 24-Mar-00 15:54 by htseng Image text-base: 0x60008900, data-base: 0x60684000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(19990210:195103) [12.0XE 105], DEVELOPMENT S OFTWARE California uptime is 4 minutes System returned to ROM by reload System image file is "disk0:c7200-boot-mz.120-10.S" cisco 7206VXR (NPE300) processor with 57344K/40960K bytes of memory. R7000 CPU at 262Mhz, Implementation 39, Rev 2.1, 256KB L2, 2048KB L3 Cache 6 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.0 Last reset from power-on Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 3 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 8 Serial network interface(s) Router(boot)# _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Network Design
I have both logins and only the reseller login will work. Kevin is correct. Steve -Original Message- From: Kevin Wigle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 1:42 PM To: Mark Rose; Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail) Subject: Re: Cisco Network Design Perhaps you need a CCO login associated to a Reseller/Partner, not a client CCO login. I can get to the site and what I read on CCO is that the software/tool is part of a course. When you take the course - you get the tool. The course is $435. * * * * * * * Training In order to insure partner success and to maximize the benefit from Cisco Network Designer, the software package has been bundled with training, which is being offered through Global Knowledge for $435.00 per person. * * * * * * * * Then they want $995 a year for maintenance (per user) and I think the Auto-Discover module is an additional $1995. Anyway, don't think it can be downloaded from CCO. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Mark Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: RE: Cisco Network Design > I have a CCO login, but cannot get to this tool. It keeps on asking for a > logon. Any ideas? > > TIA > Mark > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > McCallum, Robert > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 8:03 AM > To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail) > Subject: Cisco Network Design > > > Does anyone out there use the Cisco Network Designer tool? If so what are > your views on it. > > Here is the link to view the actual tool. > > http://www.cisco.com/partner/cnd/inside.html > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DS3 -- no channelized
Good Afternoon Group, I was wondering if someone could give me a hand. I am trying to a configure T3 controller on a 7507 using the no channelized command. The router will not accept it. I am running IOS 12.0(5)T1. I want to open the pipe to full bandwidth without configuring the T1 interfaces. Any help/links you have to offer I would appreciate. Thanks. Steve D. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
computer networking degree
Hi group, Can you please tell me good universities from where one can obtain degree at the undergraduate and graduate level in computer networking (specifically). Thanks Steve __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to update pix520 IOS
This may help. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/upgrade.shtml Steve -Original Message- From: wangjun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 8:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how to update pix520 IOS=20 Hi,all: I can't update PIX520 IOS 4.3(2) to 4.4(5) from floppy ,someone can help me?=20 when I update PIX IOS frome Floppy ,then monitor display following information : Finesse Bios V3.3=20 Booting Floppy =20 ...Execing flop =20 =D6=C2 =C0=F1=A3=A1 wangjun [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the answers regarding computer networking degree
I would like to thank all who responded to my question. __ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: WAN Interface Carrd
Try www.networkhardware.com regards, Steve -Original Message- From: Ray Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 10:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WAN Interface Carrd Guys, I am trying to find somewhere other than E-Bay that has a used=20 Five-in-One Synchronous Serial WAN Module(DB-60) interface for sale. I am not good at this e-bay bidding stuff and think that one has to go in too many circles and red tape to actually purchase something there.If you guys have any ideas, please let me know ASAP, I would really apprecite it Thanks=20 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CiscoWorks Hardware Need to Operate Efficiently
I use a DL360 dual PIII with 1Gig Ram and 2x18.1 scsi hd and a gig card. Runs great. -Original Message- From: Rossetti, Stan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:29 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: CiscoWorks Hardware Need to Operate Efficiently Anybody have any recommendation for the hardware for a CiscoWork2000 server (NT). I am currently using a 500MHz processor, 512MB memory and 12 GB skuzzy drive, but it still takes 5 minutes for the initial load. The NT statistics show the memory is flat lined at 100% and processor utilization is about 60%. I have over 2GB of swap space setup. The PC I am currently using was originally a workstation. =20 Thanks Stan Rossetti NASA - PriSMS Advanced Technology Group Voice: (256) 544-5031 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Beeper: 544-1183 pin 0112 CCDA, CCNA, CCSE _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX problem
I e-mailed Sam, and the group I thought, but this seems to be solved by the alias command. Our users can reach things in the DMZ by it's registered ip from inside the network. If I have a web site in a dmz and I want to go to it and its IP addr is 66.22.33.44 and that is the way DNS sees it, then I can use the alias command and my users can then go to www.xyz.com. They can also connect to whatever port deemed by the external address. Maybe I am reading the post wrong so please correct me if I am. Example: alias (inside) 208.x.y.z 192.168.a.b 255.255.255.255 as long as I have a static to match this work great. The static has to apply to the DMZ or inside pc/server IP. regards, Steve -Original Message- From: Vijay Ramcharan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:37 PM To: 'Sam'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX problem Sam, Cisco documentation suggests that there is no workaround for this. I've had the same problem. From what I read on CCO, for a machine with a static global IP address mapped to a LAN address, LAN users use the local IP while outside users use the global IP. If someone has a config where they can use the Global address inside the LAN, I'd like to see how it was done. Vijay Ramcharan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sam Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX problem Hello Group, I am having trouble figuring out a small issue with a PIX firewall. It is running ver 4.4(5). After entering the approriate static and conduit (WWW) commands, I tried accessing the host from our internal network using the external address and I was not able to. I then tested from a machine that is outside our firewall and was able to access the host without any problem. Is their a command that I am missing in order to let users on our internal network access hosts using the external IP addresses? Thanks in advance, Sam _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Something to think about
So is any other certification or college degree. Neither one is worth their salt until you have the experience to work beside it. On a English professors door at Rhodes College was a big chart that broke down statistics. It showed that the average person with a college degree makes $5 dollars more a year, globally, than a person without a college degree. The difference? College teaches you to think. So go the multitudes of certs out there. They are not there to say you are an expert who can solve the worlds problems, they are merely there to show you have put forth the effort to have a base understanding of how something works...much the same as a bachelors degree. By the way I am proud to be a CCNAand then some. respectfully, Steve -Original Message- From: The.Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Something to think about After all, the CCNA is really just an admission ticket to play in the big leagues. It doesn't prove that you can play or hit the ball over the fence. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: flatbed scanner free
Come on Roger, everyone knows that all MGX switches have to boot with the flatbed IOS, it has something to do with layer 2.546. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: flatbed scanner free And this has what to do with Cisco routers / internetworking, Steve? -Original Message- From: steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 08:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: flatbed scanner free Hi, Future Tech Marketing, the leaders in direct marketing, has just three days=20 left in our new client promotion. Call us at 877-798-9331 x 601 to qualify=20 for your complementary flatbed scanner.=20 Best Regards, Steve FTS Marketing -- To be removed from our database, please reply=20 to this email with the subject "REMOVE". _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: flatbed scanner free
Yes I believe that is RFC 168FL8TB3D.=20 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:50 AM To: Steve Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: flatbed scanner free Touche' Mr Smith.You got an RFC # for that? Thx Roger -Original Message- From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 08:42 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: flatbed scanner free Come on Roger, everyone knows that all MGX switches have to boot with the flatbed IOS, it has something to do with layer 2.546. -Original Message-=20 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:21 AM=20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 Subject: RE: flatbed scanner free=20 And this has what to do with Cisco routers / internetworking, Steve?=20 -Original Message-=20 From: steve [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 08:09=20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 Subject: flatbed scanner free=20 Hi,=20 Future Tech Marketing, the leaders in direct marketing, has just three days=20 left in our new client promotion. Call us at 877-798-9331 x 601 to qualify=20 for your complementary flatbed scanner.=20 Best Regards,=20 Steve=20 FTS Marketing=20 --=20 To be removed from our database, please reply=20 to this email with the subject "REMOVE".=20 _=20 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:=20 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html> =20 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _=20 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html> =20 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attn: All Herb, Smart Basics, Health Zone, Vitamin Discount & Health Shop Customers
Hey! Health food for routers!! -Original Message- From: Vitacost-Newsletter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Attn: All Herb, Smart Basics, Health Zone, Vitamin Discount & Health Shop Customers Customer In The Know Newsletter March 21, 2001=3D20 "A weekly newsletter from the medical doctors of vitacost.com, brings yo=3D u the latest research, news and product reviews to help you increase you=3D r knowledge and improve your health"=3D20 Welcome , We at vitacost.com would like to extend a welcome to customers and visit=3D ors of Allherb.com. We at vitacost have long ago realized that PRICE MAT=3D TERS. We have seen many companies on the internet come and go and yet vi=3D tacost has grown stronger in the 6 years that we have been in business. =3D Sales have grown by over 1,000% in the last 5 years and we turned profit=3D able earlier this year. So what is our secret? Answer: offer the best pr=3D ices and the best service. A few days ago (3/11/01), we selected a few of the better selling produc=3D ts and did a price comparison with some of our more popular competitors.=3D Here are the blatant results: Size Retail http://pull.xmr3.com/p/216427-7626/5053660/http-www.vitac=3D ost.com.html VitaminShoppe.com Drugstore.com=3D20 =20 http://pull.xmr3.com/p/216427-7626/5053691/http-www.vitacost.com-produc=3D= ts-brandsaz-atkins.html 15 $40.35 $24.20 (40% savings) $30.26 $27.99=3D20 =20 http://pull.xmr3.com/p/216427-7626/5053691/http-www.vitacost.com-produc=3D= ts-brandsaz-atkins.html 16oz $23.99 $14.40 (40% savings) $18.00 $23.99=3D =3D20 =20 http://pull.xmr3.com/p/216427-7626/5053719/http-www.vitacost.com-Store-=3D= Products-ProductDescription.cfm-SKUNumber=3D3D047469006778.html 90 $20.0=3D 0 $12.00 (40% savings) $16.00 $14.79=3D20 =20 http://pull.xmr3.com/p/216427-7626/5053717/http-www.vitacost.com-Store-=3D= Products-ProductDescription.cfm-SKUNumber=3D3D033674630006.html 90 $14.9=3D 9 $7.50 (50% savings) $11.24 *=3D20 =20 http://pull.xmr3.com/p/216427-7626/5053715/http-www.vitacost.com-Store-=3D= Products-ProductDescription.cfm-SKUNumber=3D3D027434001632.html 60 $71.9=3D 5 $35.98 (50% savings) $50.36 $44.31=3D20 *Not available on site=3D20 We sell practically every brand at listed wholesale (typically 40 to 50 =3D % off retail). There are no gimmicks. Some of the other sites may offer =3D 30, 40 or even 50% off on a limited time basis or may limit the minimum =3D or maximum amount of product that you can buy. There may be clubs that y=3D ou have to join with membership fees. We have none of that at vitacost. =3D Our prices do not vary from day to day. We offer only top quality, best =3D selling brands at wholesale - everyday. We are able to do this by workin=3D g with small margins but with large volumes. But it doesn't end with just the best prices on the Internet. We also pr=3D ovide the best service. Unlike many of our competitors we have our own w=3D arehouse and customer service center and do not have to rely on an outsi=3D de third party fulfillment center. If the product is in stock (and it us=3D ually is), we will typically ship your order within 24 hours. Even if it=3D needs to be backordered, the product is usually shipped within a few da=3D ys. We have one standard shipping charge of $4.95 no matter how large yo=3D ur order. And, of course, if you are not satisfied with your purchase fo=3D r any reason, you may return it to us within 30 days, for a full refund,=3D no questions asked. If all this wasn't enough, we also offer some value added benefits that =3D can only be found on http://pull.xmr3.com/p/216427-7626/5053660/http-ww=3D w.vitacost.com.html . We send out products for independent laboratory a=3D nalysis and report the results on the website, telling you which of the =3D products passed and failed. If a particular product does not meet our ri=3D gorous standards, we will remove it from our virtual shelf. We make a pl=3D edge to sell only safe and effective products. We will not sell ma huang=3D /ephredra type products (which many of our competitors sell) because we =3D feel they are potentially life threatening. Our science section was deve=3D loped and written by board certified physicians and our http://pull.xmr=3D 3.com/p/216427-7626/5053663/http-www.vitacost.com-community-index.html =3D is unique on the Internet. In addition, we provide you with a weekly ne=3D wsletter containing commentary, breaking health news, information on new=3D products along with timely material and reports from our science sectio=3D n. By just spending a few minutes once a week to read the newsletter, in=3D no time you will become very knowledgeable about nutrition. Finally, vitacost.com is the only website that offers http://pull.xmr3.=3D com/p/216427-7626/5053695/http-www.vitacost.com-products-brandsaz-nsi.ht =3D ml products. These products are formulated by physicians and are consi=3D dered cut
RE: Question regarding DLCI's...
If they are doing global addressing then YES! -Original Message- From: John Gotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question regarding DLCI's... Hi all...quick question; We have 4 offices, NY, Chicago, Stamford and San=20 Francisco, we just got our T1 turned on and will have a point to point=20 Frame-Relay connection between all of us in a Hub & Spoke topology with=20 Stamford being the Hub. The question I have is, our Frame-relay provider gaves us the following DLCI's; NY-104, CH-101, SF-103 and=20 Stamford-100...When your configuring each locations' router, am I correct in=20 assuming all the remote routers will have DLCI 100 pointing them to Stamford=20 and Stamford would have 4 entries each with the remotes' respective DLCI's?=20 Does this make sense? Thanks a bunch! JG _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: differance between two PIXs
Licensing. Un restricted cost more because the licenses are unrestricted. regards. -Original Message- From: fmxiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 6:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: differance between two PIXs what is the difference between the PIX 515R Bundle (Chassis, restricted SW, 2 FE ports) and the PIX 515UR Bundle (Chassis, unrestricted SW, 2 FE ports)??? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvoice 640-647
Can someone advise me about which books and course material are best for Cvoice exam 640-647. I do not intend to attend the course and rather want to study on my own. Thanks. Steve _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvoice 640-647
Can someone advise me about which books and course material are best for Cvoice exam 640-647. I do not intend to attend the course and rather want to study on my own. Thanks. Steve __ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cvoice 640-647
Can someone advise me about which books and course material are best for Cvoice exam 640-647. I do not intend to attend the course and rather want to study on my own. Thanks. Steve __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Napster block
Me too. I used outbound on my PIX by IP addr. -Original Message- From: Eddie Parra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 10:52 AM To: Patrick Bass; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Napster block How did you do that? Napster isn't port based... Napster can use ANY TCP port? You can set the Napster client to port 80 (HTTP) and it works fine. -Eddie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Bass Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Napster block Which firewall are you using? I've blocked my users from napster using the PIX outbound command. ""Dave Malik"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone know what TCP or UDP ports need to be blocked on a firewall to prevent users on a network from accessing Napster?? > > Any comments would be appreciated. > > Regards, > Dave > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: Frame Relay vs. ADSL
We do both. The only problem with ADSL is the distance limit. It is still a little flakey and even carriers will tell you not to bank your business on it. Its dependability has improved greatly in a year but still lacks a little. All in all it seems to work fairly well for our remote clients and myself at home. regards, Steve -Original Message- From: Rick Stanger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 7:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Off Topic: Frame Relay vs. ADSL Has anyone else evaluated the possibility of switching from Frame Relay = to a ADSL line? I have a remote site with approx. 50 users (only 25 max = at one time using the Internet) and I am considering switching from a = 56k Frame-Relay circuit to a Tier II 768k download speed ADSL line. = Users with the 56k Frame have been complaining about poor download = speeds and was wondering what the thoughts are on moving to ADSL? I = would be increasing the speed and saving money as well. The only = negative I have heard is time waiting to get ADSL repaired should it = fail. I need to decide quickly so any input is appreciated. Rick Stanger MCSE, CCNA _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Last Nights DC Cisco Meeting
I was there at the meeting last night. The information at that meeting was meant for training providers to watch out for what is posted. I believe the fact that the knowledge about who was being sued by Cisco was to remain confidential. Cisco is basically saying that you can publish information as to the CCNA, CCDA, CCNP, and CCDP but as for CCIE, you better stay away. Cisco will use every legal means possible to keep the CCIE the black belt of networking. Also, they mentioned Howard Berkowitz website "knowledgenet.com" but he didn't do all 168 violations. They are going after all the CCIE authors on the site. Howard is charging money for getting the information so he is first on Cisco's list. Steve Jacks, CCNA, CCDP Bankok Instruction Center A Certified Cisco Training Partner --- Thailand's BEST Free Email at Bangkok.com - http://mail.bangkok.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access Lists
I have the Sybex book by Todd Lammle and in it he says: Place the IP standard access lists as close to the destination as possible. Place the IP extended access lists as close to the source as possible. But on the CD that has a practice exam on it, he has it the other way around. Could someone tell me which is right. Thanks, Steve __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: Last Nights DC Cisco Meeting
Actually the website was never mentioned at the meeting. I asked around and was told it was Knowledgenet.com however I now know it is CertificationZone.com. -Chuck --- Thailand's BEST Free Email at Bangkok.com - http://mail.bangkok.com _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT-procedures
Hey all sorry for the OT post but you all are the professionals. I have been asked to start drafting a Data Center procedures manual. I can not find anything anywhere that will give me a hint or template as to how it should look. I am at a loss how to start this thing. Could anyone provide insight or links to examples of how one should look? Thanks in advance, Steve _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Free DES key for PIX
The only way I know is to do what I did. E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], explain what you want and they will reply in about 30 minutes. -Original Message- From: Nabil Fares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Free DES key for PIX Greetings all, Can you guys point me to the page where I can get the free DES key from Cisco for the PIX. Thanks, Nabil _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
good salary in london
Hello friends, Can I request UK professionals to tell me how much money is enough to live in London? I am not asking for luxury life. Just enough to live with a family + house on rent. Will appreciate responses. Steve. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Voice Over IP
12.0.7T at least, 12.1.2T even better. Steve "Amit Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi everybody, > > I need assistance on the VoIP problem I am facing : > > We are planning to have a VoIP setup on the already > existing data link between our local and remote > office. > Both sites have Cisco 3640 routers configured for it. > > The router on the local site has IOS 11.3(9)T and the > remote router has 12.0(5)T1 on it. > > Is it necessary for the routers at both ends be > running a similar version of IOS for the Voice calls > to be successful. What kind of upgrade is required? > > Secondly the loopback test (hairpinning) was > successful for the local site but a similar test at > the remote site was unsuccessful. > Could that be due to any signalling problems ? > > Thanks & Regards > > Amit > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco's TFTP Program
I run W2K professional "workstation" and use it very frequently. I have not had one problem with it yet. regards, Steve -Original Message- From: suaveguru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 8:22 PM To: Jennifer Mellone; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco's TFTP Program hi, from what I know cisco TFTP program does not run well on NT workstation OS but works ok on NT Server regards, suaveguru --- Jennifer Mellone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Gang, > > Is it me, or has anyone else had this problem using > the Cisco TFTP > program--- > > I TFTPed software from my laptop to a switch just > fine today. > > But then I tried to TFTP IOS code from my laptop to > a router today. I got > an error message (from the TFTP program itself), and > the program immediately > closed down. I even rebooted the laptop and this > did not help. > > - Jennifer Mellone > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online! http://photos.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radius support in cisco routers
Nezar, We needed to go to IP/Plus on a 1600 to get Radius support. This required more flash than the 4mb we originally purchased. Steve ""Nezar Ahmed"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 01f101c0788d$fa57bdf0$09e37ad4@nezar">news:01f101c0788d$fa57bdf0$09e37ad4@nezar... > hello everyone, > As far as I can see there is no Radius support in cisco's 16xx and = > 26xx series. Is it a software version limitation ? For example do newer = > releases support radius ? Or is it a hardware limitation ? If this was = > the case which series supports radius ? > Thanks for your help. > Nezar > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix Firewall License R or UR ?
Your base mem config for the 520R should be 32 MB. The 520U will be 64. Or do sh ver. -Original Message- From: A.C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix Firewall License R or UR ? Hi, Does anyone know a command on Pix Firewall 520 that shows what kind of license it has (R -UR license)? Thank you _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VTP Protocal Cisco 5000 and 3com Superstack II 1100
I was looking into this Cisco/non-Cisco switch issue just recently and was told that the 802.1q standard stipulates only 1 x STP, and yet with Cisco's 802.1q implementation you can have per vlan STP (not quite matching the 802.1q standard). Perhaps someone in the group can clear this issue up for us. Steve "Piatnitchi Cristian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Rico > > Take care ! I had many problems with set up a STP, trunking and > 802.1q between Cisco 5000 and Bay Networks. > I gave up because finally I used just 1 link between these devices. > I was surprised to see that FastEtherChannel on Cisco means trunking on > Bays'. > This is what somebody from CISCO staff suggested to me. > > -Original Message- > From: Washington Rico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VTP Protocal Cisco 5000 and 3com Superstack II 1100 > > > Dear all, > > I wonder if anyone knows if it is possible to trunk a 3com Superstack II > 1100 with a Cisco 5000 serious switch. 3com switch is the client and > recieving vlan info from Cisco5000? If it is possible which Trunking > Protocal should be used? > > I appreciate the help... > > Rico > > > _ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bandwidth constraints for VoIP
IOS 12.1.2T has generally been the recommended one, but I believe 12.1.5T is now out. Steve "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I think the best IOS version to use for VoIP came up in an earlier thread, > so you might want to search the archives or perhaps people can remind us. > Cisco made quite a few updates and bug fixes in the QoS for voice about a > year ago, but I can't recall the IOS version number. Help anyone? > > Priscilla > > > At 09:12 AM 1/10/01, Ishtiaque Mahbub wrote: > >All, > > > >Thank you so much for contributing. (Oh my God, Priscilla has given an > >answer to my question!! this must be my big lucky day!! have taken a print > >out of the reply and kept it in my personal file, i will show it to my > >grand child someday!!) > > > >One last question though, and that is, if IOS 12.x is good enough to > >implement VoIP, or do I need to ask for additional features? Pardon for > >not adding the question in the first place (I am bit sluggish, as you may > >have noticed, in my thinking process!) > > > > > >Regards > > > >Ishtiaque > > > >>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: "Ishtiaque Mahbub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: Bandwidth constraints for VoIP > >>Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 15:45:59 -0800 > >> > >>Each CODEC has different capabilities for compressing voice, so you'll have > >>to know which CODEC you want to use first. > >> > >>The compressed voice is then put into an IP frame, so you will need to take > >>into account the bandwidth used by headers of the following sizes: > >> > >>20-byte IP header > >>8-byte UDP header > >>12-byte Real-Time Protocol (RTP) header > >> > >>On point-to-point links those headers can be compressed down to just a few > >>bytes. Even the IP header can be compressed if it's a point to point link > >>and IP addressing isn't needed for forwarding to the next hop. > >> > >>If you use Voice-Activity Detection (which uses no bandwidth during > >>silence) you can further reduce bandwidth requirements. > >> > >>Finally, you need to take into account the data-link header, PPP, Frame > >>Relay, whatever. > >> > >>According to a chart that I picked up at Networkers a couple years ago, > >>here are a few examples: > >> > >>G.729 CODEC on PPP without compressed IP/UDP/RTP and without VAD uses > >>26.4Kbps. > >> > >>G.729 CODEC on PPP with compressed IP/UDP/RTP and without VAD uses 11.2 Kbps. > >> > >>G.729 CODEC on PPP with compressed IP/UDP/RTP and with VAD uses 5.6 Kbps. > >> > >>G.729 CODEC on Frame Relay without compressed IP/UDP/RTP and without VAD > >>uses 25.6Kbps. > >> > >>G.729 CODEC on Frame Relay with compressed IP/UDP/RTP and without VAD uses > >>10.4Kbps. > >> > >>G.729 CODEC on Frame Relay with compressed IP/UDP/RTP and with VAD uses > >>5.2Kbps. > >> > >>I would copy and paste the whole chart but I only have hard copy. You > >>should be able to find such a chart somewhere though. > >> > >>Priscilla > >> > >> > >>At 11:47 AM 1/9/01, Ishtiaque Mahbub wrote: > >>>Hello Group! > >>> > >>>A very happy new year to you all! > >>> > >>>I was wondering if any one could advise what is the minimum Bandwidth > >>>required for Voice Over IP installation on Cisco Routers (Router Series will > >>>be 2600). > >>> > >>>Is 64kbps is too steep for 4 simultaneous voice operations? > >>> > >>>Suggestion, advices welcome. > >>> > >>>Regards > >>> > >>>Ishtiaque > >>> > >>>_ > >>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > >>> > >>>_ > >>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > >>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Priscilla Oppenheimer > >>http://www.priscilla.com > > > >_ > >Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Register IP Address on your Private network
We had a MASSIVE dispute within our company about this. We bought another company and they uses registered IPs on everything down to the workstation. They claimed NAT caused problems with most programs and it was just easier to use registered IPs. We had a meeting with 3 different CCIE's that worked for Cisco and 2 security consulting firms and decided, although it would be nice to use registered IPs, it was more efficient and secure to use private IPs. We then tested the "apps that won't work with NAT" and found 99 percent of them worked fine if the server and firewalls where configed correctly. Don't get me wrong, NAT can and does have some minor downfalls but overall, in my opinion, it's does its job. regards, Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 7:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Using Register IP Address on your Private network I have a question here? Why would anyone use register addresses on their private network, while you can use UN-register addresses like 10.X.X.X ? Do you really need to burn register addresses on a private network? I would like to hear anyone opinion on this subject Brian _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information on Canadian Telecommunication
Hello friends, I need to buy have some information on Canadian Telecommunication standards like Telcos, leaselines, different options available for all provinces. Can someone advise me web sites or books for this purpose? Thanks in advance. Steve _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information on Canadian Telecommunication
Hello friends, I need to buy have some information on Canadian Telecommunication standards like Telcos, leaselines, different options available for all provinces. Can someone advise me web sites or books for this purpose? Thanks in advance. Steve _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CiscoWorks2000
Rik, CiscoWorks 2000 is slow. We used CiscoWorks RWAN on a Compaq DL380 (733Mhz processor, RAID5, 768 MB RAM) for a client. We did NOT use MS SQL, just used the Microsoft jet database for indexing. (1) Heed the software versions in the documentation. (2) Configure an administration console on a workstation (it's in the docs). This will significantly offload some processing to the client -- client-server model, eh? (3) I'd recommend 1 Gig of RAM. (4) Maybe use SQL vs. jet database for indexing. (5) Download the patches and updates from CCO. You did sell them Smartnet, right? (6) Use RME. Regards, Steve _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CEF or round robin
OK gang I need to opinions. We set up 2 point-to-point Ts to a client running CEF. Everything seemed to work fine, speed was good, packets per T was about equal. Then we had a switch go bad. We replaced it but still had a sluggish network. Some of our techs came in from another office and together we found the problem. While looking around they saw CEF per-packet was set on the 2 Ts. They informed our CEO that was really wrong and should not be ran that way. They said "round robin is the only real way to utilize 2 Ts". I say # *! Any opinions? Thanks in advance, Steve _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CEF or round robin
Changed back to CEF and it is balanced on packets sent and received withing 20 or so. Seem good to me. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 5:31 PM To: Steve Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CEF or round robin So what was the problem you found that was effecting traffic negatively? CEF does not necessarily "load share" equally across two paths. It can be set up to do "per source/destination" or "per packet" Per source/destination has the usual problems - all traffic can end up going across one link. Per packet will indeed share traffic more or less equally across two links. My reading indicates that CEF per packet is actually the way to go if one wants to balance traffic equally across two paths. ( Cisco press book Network Design and Case Studies ) ( BTW anyone else think this book is not all that good? ) HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:CEF or round robin OK gang I need to opinions. We set up 2 point-to-point Ts to a client running CEF. Everything seemed to work fine, speed was good, packets per T was about equal. Then we had a switch go bad. We replaced it but still had a sluggish network. Some of our techs came in from another office and together we found the problem. While looking around they saw CEF per-packet was set on the 2 Ts. They informed our CEO that was really wrong and should not be ran that way. They said "round robin is the only real way to utilize 2 Ts". I say # *! Any opinions? Thanks in advance, Steve _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3 down, 1 to go...(passed BCRAN)
In my case.. 1 down, 3 to go.. Congrats Mark.. I just finally got myself back on the study train myself, and took the BCMSN Switching test today. I've been out of the study game, and out of GroupStudy for about a year now (Sorry guys & gals!!!) ;-) Well.. I finally found the motivation again, and passing todays test helped! I also found myself not studying as dilligently as I could have. In the end, I made it thru on 2 things. Personal experience and 2 days of cramming with the Cisco Press BCMSN Exam Certification Guide. I broke down & bought it as a last minute desparation move, as the Cisco Press BCMSN "course book" was putting me to sleep every day by chapter 2.. (Theory is soo boring!!). With only 2 days with the cert guide, I crammed the sample test & read the chapter Q&A quizzes over & over.. and on the topics I didn't fully understand, I read over as much of the chapter as I could to fill in the mental blanks. I do think I got a bit lucky, as there were a few area's I still feel weak in, but either got no questions on those area's, or barely 1 or 2. So, the concensus is that BCRAN is the easiest? Interesting. I thought todays test was easier than I expected, but still enough to cause a bead or 2 of sweat.. Personally, I know I'm horrible at things like Async configs.. but ISDN I find rather easy. If anyone is still around from the last time I haunted the list (Chuck.. Tony.. Ozzie.. Paul.. anyone... Buehler.. Buehler.. ) they'll probably remember why.. but that was in another life ;-) Interesting that everyone thinks CIT is the worst. Personally, I'm setting aside 3 weeks hard study time for BSCN Routing as the hardest. I'm on a tight personal goal schedule. 1 test every 2 weeks, but again, 3 for BSCN. So, tomorrow I schedule the CIT and hit the books. I suspect I have an advantage, in that most of my experience is raw troubleshooting. It's also mostly in routing, over switching, but the BSCN goes into a depth I haven't learned from experience yet. So, I'm planning heavy studies for that one. CIT I'm more secure about. Hopefully, it's not overconfidence.. If all goes well.. we (my test partner) should see CCNP accomplished by mid-March. As she likes to say "Failure is not an option" ;-) Then again.. one does not always need immediate gratification to achieve success. But.. drive on we must! Steve-H@ .. oh wait.. nevermind. Now it's just: -- - Stephen E. Hildenbrand, CCNP2Be <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey Group, >Just wanted to share my victory today over the BCRAN. Went in very > unprepared (first time going in feeling unsure) but still passed. I barely > studied for this one and my score reflected upon that but I still knew my > stuff and passed. I have to agree with the masses when I say that this test > was very, very easy. I wouldn't even say that this was a 10th as hard as the > switching or routing 2.0's. Well, I got one more to go (dreaded CIT) and then > I can change my signature (it's about time) from CCNA, CCDA...to CCNP, CCDA. > God I can't wait. =o) > > On a side note: The only thing I used to prepare for this test was Lammle's > Remote Access. I personally feel this book was great. I barely studied and > got a 762. If I had put more time into it I'm sure his book could have scored > me in the 900s. I recommend it to anybody pursuing the BCRAN. Thanks all and > now it's time to start studying for the CIT (Feb. 13...think I may change > that 13 though, just not a good number)... > > Mark Z. CCNA, CCDA, 3/4-NP (1 to go) > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3 down, 1 to go...(passed BCRAN)
LoL.. Dan.. your memory is amazing! I'll have to dig up a new one. Maybe create something more appropriate to the times. I'll work on it ;-) -Steve- ..We now return you to your regularly scheduled GroupStudy.. "Daniel Cotts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA10E9E@EXCHANGE1">news:303479FA060CD211B893F805A88AA10E9E@EXCHANGE1... > Welcome back. Do you still use your ASCII art signature? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT (sort of) TAC Horror Stories
"dre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 94lis6$icg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:94lis6$icg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've personally never experienced any problems with the TAC. > It is often that I get a front line person that has no idea > what I'm talking about, and sometimes they try to help anyways, Andre.. The 'front line' person you get is the CRC agent (Customer Response Center). They are not engineers/technicians. However, they are encouraged, and trained, to field as much of the problem as is possible for them. Their efforts off-load a great deal of the calls that otherwise would be going to the TAC engineers. Leaving TAC free (or reasonably so) to put more effort into handling their already heavy technical related call volume. Another benefit, is that it gives the CRC agent, some experience into the technical side of the Cisco world, and some of them progress to move to TAC.. and begin their own learning & certification track. It's a win for TAC in their assists, a win for the CRC in their growth, and since Cisco support is considered hands-down the best.. it's a win for Cisco as a whole. > Bob Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just curious about other peoples experiences with TAC on products "gone bad"... Bob.. I can definitely relate to the story.. but do keep in mind, that TAC was 100% on the ball in taking care of the problem. Unfortunately, this sounds like a shipping related problem. I'd also suspect some mishandling at the fulfilment docks. I can further tell you, that issues like that are followed up on internally. The worst case I dealt with.. was a call I fielded to a customer who said his product (don't recall what it was) looked like it had been beaten up & thrown around. Of course, I felt he was exaggerating, and figured the unit was a refurbed product with some cosmetic damage. Well.. he was quite descriptive of the damage.. which totally shocked me to think a Cisco product arived in the condition he stated. I asked him to send me a picture of the box & the shipping it came in. I have no idea who was smoking what that day in shipping, but the product was in a shoddy cardboard carton, and the casing truly was crushed in on one side and gouged severly on 2 others. Needless to say, it was an overside wrecked paperweight. He was of course sent a new replacement immediately. Unfortunately, I never did find out what happened to create this problem in the 1st place. And I definitely tried ;-) -- -- | __O_/ | |___, _ |CCIE | \ _ |CCNP Never stop climbing! --> | ./ |CCNA - Stephen E. Hildenbrand -- "dre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 94lis6$icg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:94lis6$icg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Bob Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just curious about other peoples experiences with TAC on products "gone > > bad"... > > > 1) Get call while almost in bed at 9:30 PM > > 2) 3548XL GigE interface goes down... > > The problem here was that you are using 3548XL switches... > if you were using a modular chassis with redundant > everything (i.e. 6500 w/ dual PSs, SUPs, et al), you > probably wouldn't be worried about your 3548XL. Not > to mention that the MTBF numbers on the XL series > suck in comparison to the 6000/6500. > > > I was lucky as the first unit worked (though it's fan did not) and did not > > over heat (mainly due to it's location)... Had there been cooling problems I > > would have yanked a fan off one of the other units (though as the part was > > not a "service item" TAC did not support such creativeness).. > > Just curious as to what anyone elses TAC horror stories have been like? > > I've personally never experienced any problems with the TAC. > It is often that I get a front line person that has no idea > what I'm talking about, and sometimes they try to help anyways, > but after I explain to them that I would like it escalated, > they do it. Good team of people, IMHO. Best tech-support ever. > > It sounds like your problems were not even TAC related, more > like shipping and receiving problems (UPS, anyone?). So be > more careful when trying to pin the blame on a tech-support > department, especially the Cisco Technical Assistence Center. > They were doing their jobs just fine. > > -dre > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unspecified Card
I know the WIC-2T is but have not seen a 4T that will work in that router. 4T is usually 3600 and up. Regards, Steve -Original Message- From: alex campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 6:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Unspecified Card Cheers William I have a feeling that the card isnt even compatible with the router ! more square peg..round hole shenanigans...:(( alex >From: "Plantier, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: alex campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: Unspecified Card >Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 07:24:35 -0400 > >Maybe the IOS you have doesnt support the card. Check the documentation on >the card. > > > -Original Message- > > From: alex campbell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2000 6:54 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:Unspecified Card > > > > Hello all, > > > > I have a cisco 2620 router...running IOS 12.0, I have also just got a 4T > > serial card, > > every time I power up the router...I get the message 'Unspecified Card >in > > Port 1'. > > I have tried differend versions of IOS 12 all to no avail. I get the >Green > > > > EN light on the card to illuminate once the router powers up, but then >it > > turns itself off again. > > > > Any help much appreciated > > Alex > > > > > > > > >_ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at > > http://profiles.msn.com. > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recommedations for CCNP
I am a recent CCNP and am currently looking around for area to further my experience. My current work environment is a basic Lan and I would really like to apply my knowledge in a more complex environment. What would be a good area to start, ISP Telcom facility, Startup or **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Route-Map
Hi, Could someone explain what the right hand bit of the extended Access-list does below. This is taken from a router running an in-bound route map for BGP. This is used to reject routes. Steve route-map peer-in deny 10 match ip address 100 route-map peer-in permit 20 set local-preference 100 set community 1234:80 1234:3000 access-list 100 permit ip 192.41.177.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 198.32.130.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip any 255.255.255.128 0.0.0.127 access-list 100 permit ip host 0.0.0.0 any access-list 100 permit ip 127.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 255.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 255.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 access-list 100 permit ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 255.240.0.0 0.15.255.255 access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 100 permit ip 192.0.2.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 128.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 100 permit ip 191.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 100 permit ip 192.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 223.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 198.32.136.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 149.20.0.0 0.0.255.255 255.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 access-list 100 permit ip 198.32.128.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 192.157.69.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 access-list 100 permit ip 224.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 224.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 access-list 100 deny ip any any **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dial-in user assigned duplicate IP addresses
Good morning gang, I am currently using a 3640 to allow remote users to dial-in to our LAN. They are receiving their IP address information from a DHCP server, as opposed to an IP pool on the router. This appears to work fine for about a week at a time, then users start to receive duplicate addresses. The 3640 is running 12.1(3a). The Mica modems' portware is version 2.5.1. Has anyone out there seen this type of behavior before? Can anyone point me in the direction of a resolution? Any help/comments would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Steve Donohue
RE: ISDN problem
run the show stack command and paste the results into the stack decoder. http://www.cisco.com/stack/stackdecoder.shtml Looks to me like a process issued a non maskable interrupt while a non re-entrant code segment was executing (kinda like getting caught having sex by your mom hehe). Course that don't explain why. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Bond Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 12:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ISDN problem Hello, I'm having problem on a 3640, the router kept giving following error message: 01:33:14: %LINK-2-INTVULN: In critical region with interrupt level=0, intfc=Serial1/0:22 -Process= "ISDN", ipl= 0, pid= 48 -Traceback= 60235CDC 600D260C 600D6388 600CDBC8 60097898 600947DC 6008E778 60064 458 6006443C What does it mean? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ ___ To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: unsubscribe ccielab _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Circuit Test's help
What kind of line? http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1915.htm http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/tr1918.htm -Original Message-From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 2:14 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Circuit Test's help Team, Does any one knows any guide or document which will explain the set of commands that can be use in a router in order to troubleshoot a circuit or to test it. Thanks,
Re: FOUNDATION EXAM
Elijah, I took the FRS 2.0 Exam a week ago. It is a difficult test and will cover all of the area quite well. Since the recent change in the exam with the newest version 2.0 here are some pointers that I learned in the exam. 1. The exam is 155 questions and you have about 125 minutes to take it. That means that either you know the answer to the question or you do not, they do not give you any time to sit and ponder over the questions. As in all Cisco exams now, you cannot skip questions and return to them later, so I would say if you do not know the answer take your best guess and move on (or you will wind up either not finishing the exam or be on the last section with about 10 minutes left). 2. The exam is in 3 distinctive parts, Routing, Switching and Remote Access. Each section will appear in that order numbered 1-52 or so. When that section is done you will see the question numbers start over. 3. Remember with the FRS 2.0 you must obtain a passing score on each section, Routing, Switching and Remote Access to pass the exam, if you fail 1 section you fail the entire exam. 4. All of the questions are pulled directly from the individual test, however I believe that anyone can pass this exam with enough preparation. It is a great deal of material to cover at one time and requires a in depth knowledge of all 3 areas. Good luck Steve MCSE, MSS, CCNP Original Message Follows From: "Elijah Landreth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Elijah Landreth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FOUNDATION EXAM Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 03:32:27 GMT Hello all, I have studied extensively for routing and switching, I am just starting on remote access, and I haven't taken any of the exams. I was thinking of taking the foundation just to get it over with, can anyone shed light on this test? Have you taken it, is it tough, what did they hit you on, ect Thanks in advance, Me _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ATM Network
Title: RE: ATM Network I am using an 8 port with 12.0.7. regards, Steve -Original Message- From: Jacques Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ATM Network Can ATM Network module with Inverse Multiplexing over ATM , P/N: NM-4E1-IMA be installed on Cisco 7204VXR ??? If yes, what IOS version should be used ?? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not receiving ICMP messages
Good Afternoon All, I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we are having trouble sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. With this encryption employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. When we attempt to send traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we are finding that it does not work. My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being sent are setting the DF bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that if the router is unable to send the packet, it would drop it and return an ICMP message back to the source telling it to decrease the packet size and try it again. I am not seeing any of these messages. We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that connect to my LAN. I believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although I am not sure of the actual version. Does anyone have any ideas why this might be happening? I am trying to resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the routers. I have been informed by the controlling body that there are no access lists prohibiting ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no firewall rules in place that would be dropping the ICMP messages. Any and all explanations of possible causes/resolutions would be appreciated. Steve D.
Not receiving ICMP messages
Good Afternoon All, I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we are having trouble sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. With this encryption employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. When we attempt to send traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we are finding that it does not work. My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being sent are setting the DF bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that if the router is unable to send the packet, it would drop it and return an ICMP message back to the source telling it to decrease the packet size and try it again. I am not seeing any of these messages. We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that connect to my LAN. I believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although I am not sure of the actual version. Does anyone have any ideas why this might be happening? I am trying to resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the routers. I have been informed by the controlling body that there are no access lists prohibiting ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no firewall rules in place that would be dropping the ICMP messages. Any and all explanations of possible causes/resolutions would be appreciated. Steve D.
Not receiving ICMP messages
Good Afternoon All, I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we are having trouble sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. With this encryption employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. When we attempt to send traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we are finding that it does not work. My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being sent are setting the DF bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that if the router is unable to send the packet, it would drop it and return an ICMP message back to the source telling it to decrease the packet size and try it again. I am not seeing any of these messages. We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that connect to my LAN. I believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although I am not sure of the actual version. Does anyone have any ideas why this might be happening? I am trying to resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the routers. I have been informed by the controlling body that there are no access lists prohibiting ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no firewall rules in place that would be dropping the ICMP messages. Any and all explanations of possible causes/resolutions would be appreciated. Steve D.
RE: Not receiving ICMP messages
Thanks for your replies. A traceroute will traverse the entire path. As for the MTU of 1476, I believe it is because of the overhead added by the encryption. Attempts have been made to increase the MTU size on the link, but to this point they have been unsuccessful. When an ftp is attempted from a UNIX box, which is trying to send with an MTU of 1500, the process fails. When that same file is ftp-d from a Win95 machine ( which uses a smaller MTU ) it works fine. This is why I am pointing to the MTU issue, and lack of ICMP messages, as possible problems. Steve D. -Original Message- From: Gareth Hinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 5:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Not receiving ICMP messages Hi Steve, Is the MTU size of 1476 a limitation of the encryption, or merely because of the overheads added by the encryption knocking it down from 1500. Is it a possibility to increase the MTU size on the link? Gaz "Phil Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Steve, > Without CLI access your going to struggle. > Q : How far does the traceroute get, from the send > node ? > > try rfc 792 ICMP > http://www.landfield.com/rfcs/rfc792.html > > >> SNIP from RFC 792 > > If a host reassembling a fragmented datagram > cannot complete the > reassembly due to missing fragments within its > time limit it > discards the datagram, and it may send a time > exceeded message. > > If fragment zero is not available then no time > exceeded need be > sent at all. > > Good luck, > > Phil. > > > > --- "Donohue, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good Afternoon All, > > > > I am currently trying to resolve an issue where we > > are having trouble > > sending data across a tunnel running GRE encryption. > > With this encryption > > employed the MTU size allowed is decreased to 1476. > > When we attempt to send > > traffic (email, ftp, etc...) through the tunnel, we > > are finding that it does > > not work. > > > > My sniffer trace is showing that the frames being > > sent are setting the DF > > bit, which I would expect. I would then expect that > > if the router is unable > > to send the packet, it would drop it and return an > > ICMP message back to the > > source telling it to decrease the packet size and > > try it again. I am not > > seeing any of these messages. > > > > We are running HSRP on the ethernet interfaces that > > connect to my LAN. I > > believe we are running a 12.0 IOS release, although > > I am not sure of the > > actual version. > > > > Does anyone have any ideas why this might be > > happening? I am trying to > > resolve this issue while having no CLI access to the > > routers. I have been > > informed by the controlling body that there are no > > access lists prohibiting > > ICMP messages from being sent, and there are no > > firewall rules in place that > > would be dropping the ICMP messages. > > > > Any and all explanations of possible > > causes/resolutions would be > > appreciated. > > > > Steve D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk > or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
