[jira] [Resolved] (CONNECTORS-399) Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Karl Wright resolved CONNECTORS-399. Resolution: Fixed r1240387 Japanese site page does not have 0.4 release information Key: CONNECTORS-399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-399 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Improvement Components: Documentation Affects Versions: ManifoldCF 0.5 Reporter: Hitoshi Ozawa Assignee: Karl Wright Priority: Trivial Labels: I18N Fix For: ManifoldCF 0.5 Attachments: CONNECTORS-399.patch Japanese site needs to be updated to contain release 0.4 information. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2
Three days, three +1's. Vote passes! Now all we need is for our mentors to vote in general@i.a.o. Karl On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: +1 - Checked md5 and sha1 sums for all packages - Downladed apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating-src.tar.gz on OSX and built it - Generated docs and javadocs and verified the content - Ran ant test - Ran the Jetty example application and tried the web crawler and posted to Solr 3.1 - Installed the war files on Resin/Linux and started a huge crawl and posted to Solr This looks very good. Erlend On 01.01.12 22.35, Karl Wright wrote: This release candidate has another fix for the Alfresco connector for a problem which prevented it from loading binary data into the search index. Please vote +1 to release RC2. You can find the artifact in the usual place, http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating. Thanks, Karl -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2
+1 for me. Piergiorgio 2012/1/1 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: This release candidate has another fix for the Alfresco connector for a problem which prevented it from loading binary data into the search index. Please vote +1 to release RC2. You can find the artifact in the usual place, http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating. Thanks, Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
Do I understand it correctly that the connector as it stands in the release-0.4 branch does not actually index the binary content at all? If so I think that is serious enough to spin an RC2 for. The problem with adding a new feature at the same time is that there's a risk it will introduce yet another bug. If the feature is really straightforward and low-risk maybe we can do it, but if it is more complicated I think we'd want to check in only the fix into the release branch, and open a specific ticket for it too. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: Ok, we could add the support for the binary in the next release or we could add this last commit in this release. This because I committed the fix and the new improvement (Multi-Tenancy) in the same commit... DOH! So we have these two options: 1. Notify that the Alfresco connector in this release supports only metadata and add some documentation sections about this in the website. 2. Merge my last commit in the 04-incubating to add the support of binary ingestion for the Alfresco connector. Piergiorgio 2011/12/31 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: This looks unrelated to the 0.4-incubating release, which does not have the alfresco multi-tenancy support at all in it. Can you clarify whether you think this is critical for the 0.4-incubating release? That is what the vote thread is for. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I solved the critical issue in the main trunk (r1226128). Hope this helps. Cheers and Happy New Year! Piergiorgio 2011/12/30 Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org: Hi guys, I found a critical bug about the Alfresco Connector, the binary is not correctly managed [1]. I solved the issue, but I have to solve all the conflicts related to the latest changes. I hope to release soon this patch. Cheers, Piergiorgio [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-349 2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
Nevermind about the ticket - I see that CONNECTORS-349 exists already. Can you come up with a patch against the release-0.4-incubating-branch that includes only the fix for ticket CONNECTORS-349? Karl On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Do I understand it correctly that the connector as it stands in the release-0.4 branch does not actually index the binary content at all? If so I think that is serious enough to spin an RC2 for. The problem with adding a new feature at the same time is that there's a risk it will introduce yet another bug. If the feature is really straightforward and low-risk maybe we can do it, but if it is more complicated I think we'd want to check in only the fix into the release branch, and open a specific ticket for it too. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: Ok, we could add the support for the binary in the next release or we could add this last commit in this release. This because I committed the fix and the new improvement (Multi-Tenancy) in the same commit... DOH! So we have these two options: 1. Notify that the Alfresco connector in this release supports only metadata and add some documentation sections about this in the website. 2. Merge my last commit in the 04-incubating to add the support of binary ingestion for the Alfresco connector. Piergiorgio 2011/12/31 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: This looks unrelated to the 0.4-incubating release, which does not have the alfresco multi-tenancy support at all in it. Can you clarify whether you think this is critical for the 0.4-incubating release? That is what the vote thread is for. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I solved the critical issue in the main trunk (r1226128). Hope this helps. Cheers and Happy New Year! Piergiorgio 2011/12/30 Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org: Hi guys, I found a critical bug about the Alfresco Connector, the binary is not correctly managed [1]. I solved the issue, but I have to solve all the conflicts related to the latest changes. I hope to release soon this patch. Cheers, Piergiorgio [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-349 2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
Ok, I'll commit the fix for the specific branch soon. Piergiorgio 2012/1/1 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: Nevermind about the ticket - I see that CONNECTORS-349 exists already. Can you come up with a patch against the release-0.4-incubating-branch that includes only the fix for ticket CONNECTORS-349? Karl On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Do I understand it correctly that the connector as it stands in the release-0.4 branch does not actually index the binary content at all? If so I think that is serious enough to spin an RC2 for. The problem with adding a new feature at the same time is that there's a risk it will introduce yet another bug. If the feature is really straightforward and low-risk maybe we can do it, but if it is more complicated I think we'd want to check in only the fix into the release branch, and open a specific ticket for it too. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: Ok, we could add the support for the binary in the next release or we could add this last commit in this release. This because I committed the fix and the new improvement (Multi-Tenancy) in the same commit... DOH! So we have these two options: 1. Notify that the Alfresco connector in this release supports only metadata and add some documentation sections about this in the website. 2. Merge my last commit in the 04-incubating to add the support of binary ingestion for the Alfresco connector. Piergiorgio 2011/12/31 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: This looks unrelated to the 0.4-incubating release, which does not have the alfresco multi-tenancy support at all in it. Can you clarify whether you think this is critical for the 0.4-incubating release? That is what the vote thread is for. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I solved the critical issue in the main trunk (r1226128). Hope this helps. Cheers and Happy New Year! Piergiorgio 2011/12/30 Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org: Hi guys, I found a critical bug about the Alfresco Connector, the binary is not correctly managed [1]. I solved the issue, but I have to solve all the conflicts related to the latest changes. I hope to release soon this patch. Cheers, Piergiorgio [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-349 2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2
This release candidate has another fix for the Alfresco connector for a problem which prevented it from loading binary data into the search index. Please vote +1 to release RC2. You can find the artifact in the usual place, http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating. Thanks, Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC2
I've run all the tests, looks good. +1 for me. Karl On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: This release candidate has another fix for the Alfresco connector for a problem which prevented it from loading binary data into the search index. Please vote +1 to release RC2. You can find the artifact in the usual place, http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating. Thanks, Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
I solved the critical issue in the main trunk (r1226128). Hope this helps. Cheers and Happy New Year! Piergiorgio 2011/12/30 Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org: Hi guys, I found a critical bug about the Alfresco Connector, the binary is not correctly managed [1]. I solved the issue, but I have to solve all the conflicts related to the latest changes. I hope to release soon this patch. Cheers, Piergiorgio [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-349 2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
This looks unrelated to the 0.4-incubating release, which does not have the alfresco multi-tenancy support at all in it. Can you clarify whether you think this is critical for the 0.4-incubating release? That is what the vote thread is for. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I solved the critical issue in the main trunk (r1226128). Hope this helps. Cheers and Happy New Year! Piergiorgio 2011/12/30 Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org: Hi guys, I found a critical bug about the Alfresco Connector, the binary is not correctly managed [1]. I solved the issue, but I have to solve all the conflicts related to the latest changes. I hope to release soon this patch. Cheers, Piergiorgio [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-349 2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
Ok, we could add the support for the binary in the next release or we could add this last commit in this release. This because I committed the fix and the new improvement (Multi-Tenancy) in the same commit... DOH! So we have these two options: 1. Notify that the Alfresco connector in this release supports only metadata and add some documentation sections about this in the website. 2. Merge my last commit in the 04-incubating to add the support of binary ingestion for the Alfresco connector. Piergiorgio 2011/12/31 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: This looks unrelated to the 0.4-incubating release, which does not have the alfresco multi-tenancy support at all in it. Can you clarify whether you think this is critical for the 0.4-incubating release? That is what the vote thread is for. Karl On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: I solved the critical issue in the main trunk (r1226128). Hope this helps. Cheers and Happy New Year! Piergiorgio 2011/12/30 Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org: Hi guys, I found a critical bug about the Alfresco Connector, the binary is not correctly managed [1]. I solved the issue, but I have to solve all the conflicts related to the latest changes. I hope to release soon this patch. Cheers, Piergiorgio [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-349 2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
Hi guys, I found a critical bug about the Alfresco Connector, the binary is not correctly managed [1]. I solved the issue, but I have to solve all the conflicts related to the latest changes. I hope to release soon this patch. Cheers, Piergiorgio [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-349 2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating, RC1
I've uploaded the RC1 apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. The fixes over RC0 are all UI related; you can see what they are in the CHANGES.txt file. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
2011/12/29 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com:
I found a potential blocker for 0.4-incubator, CONNECTORS-342. I
think it is severe enough to require respin of the candidate. The bad
HTML causes the Save button to vanish and makes the File Connector
only barely usable.
I've also found UI problems with the CMIS and Alfresco connectors; the
way hiddens are managed is incorrect so that you can get ${xxx} values
stuffed in the fields on the initial post/repost. In addition they
both suffer from lack of proper escaping of values in the UI. The
OpenSearchServer connector also suffers from the latter. These bugs
are pretty severe in my opinion and I've captured them in
CONNECTORS-343.
I've checked in a fix to the branch for CONNECTORS-342. The fix for
CONNECTORS-343 is a bit more extensive but is certainly doable within
the 0.4-incubating release. Piergiorgio, do you agree that we should
try to fix this for this release?
I agree that we have to fix these issues as soon as possible.
I have to reproduce the issue on the CMIS and Alfresco connector, I
hope to work on this this afternoon.
Piergiorgio
Karl
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
As long as your changes are committed to trunk, I can push them to the
site immediately. They just won't be in the documentation that ships
with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, is all.
So it sounds like we have a vote to release, as soon as we wait the
full 72 hours. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
piergior...@apache.org wrote:
2011/12/20 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com:
Piergiorgio wants to include a section in the how to build and
deploy documentation for the Alfresco connector. To me this is not
really an important enough change to spin another RC, but since we're
still waiting for Tommaso to review our releases there may be time to
do it.
But, right now, I vote +1 for RC0. We'll see if Piergiorgio withdraws his
vote.
It's not a problem for me to release this RC0, but I would like to
update at least the website documentation about how to build the
Alfresco Connector. I hope this night to work on this new section and
then we can push an update of the website.
Piergiorgio
Karl
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. I understand.
+1 for me.
Shinichiro Abe
On 2011/12/19, at 16:25, Karl Wright wrote:
The hsqldb configuration used by multiprocess-example is an external
hsqldb database. It does not require the
org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath property. If you want to try
out the multiprocess example, take the following steps:
(1) In one shell prompt, start the database: start-database.bat/.sh
(2) In another shell prompt, initialize the database:
initialize.bat/.sh
(3) When that is done, start the agents proces: start-agents.bat/.sh
Thanks,
Karl
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I checked 0.4 by running ant test, okay but one problem.
In multiprocess-example, at default properties.xml, HSQLDB database
requires
'org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath' property, containing a
relative path:
property name=org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath value=./
Now exception is thrown, so we need to add this property.
Should I send a patch? Next?
Regards,
Shinichiro Abe
On 2011/12/18, at 2:27, Karl Wright wrote:
I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which
you
can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree
this should be released please vote +1.
[Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of
the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change
those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please
note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per
Jukka's suggestion.]
I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing,
though, and passes all tests.
Thanks!
Karl
--
Piergiorgio Lucidi
http://www.open4dev.com
--
Piergiorgio Lucidi
http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
I found a potential blocker for 0.4-incubator, CONNECTORS-342. I
think it is severe enough to require respin of the candidate. The bad
HTML causes the Save button to vanish and makes the File Connector
only barely usable.
I've also found UI problems with the CMIS and Alfresco connectors; the
way hiddens are managed is incorrect so that you can get ${xxx} values
stuffed in the fields on the initial post/repost. In addition they
both suffer from lack of proper escaping of values in the UI. The
OpenSearchServer connector also suffers from the latter. These bugs
are pretty severe in my opinion and I've captured them in
CONNECTORS-343.
I've checked in a fix to the branch for CONNECTORS-342. The fix for
CONNECTORS-343 is a bit more extensive but is certainly doable within
the 0.4-incubating release. Piergiorgio, do you agree that we should
try to fix this for this release?
Karl
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
As long as your changes are committed to trunk, I can push them to the
site immediately. They just won't be in the documentation that ships
with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, is all.
So it sounds like we have a vote to release, as soon as we wait the
full 72 hours. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
piergior...@apache.org wrote:
2011/12/20 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com:
Piergiorgio wants to include a section in the how to build and
deploy documentation for the Alfresco connector. To me this is not
really an important enough change to spin another RC, but since we're
still waiting for Tommaso to review our releases there may be time to
do it.
But, right now, I vote +1 for RC0. We'll see if Piergiorgio withdraws his
vote.
It's not a problem for me to release this RC0, but I would like to
update at least the website documentation about how to build the
Alfresco Connector. I hope this night to work on this new section and
then we can push an update of the website.
Piergiorgio
Karl
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. I understand.
+1 for me.
Shinichiro Abe
On 2011/12/19, at 16:25, Karl Wright wrote:
The hsqldb configuration used by multiprocess-example is an external
hsqldb database. It does not require the
org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath property. If you want to try
out the multiprocess example, take the following steps:
(1) In one shell prompt, start the database: start-database.bat/.sh
(2) In another shell prompt, initialize the database: initialize.bat/.sh
(3) When that is done, start the agents proces: start-agents.bat/.sh
Thanks,
Karl
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shinichiro Abe
shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I checked 0.4 by running ant test, okay but one problem.
In multiprocess-example, at default properties.xml, HSQLDB database
requires
'org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath' property, containing a
relative path:
property name=org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath value=./
Now exception is thrown, so we need to add this property.
Should I send a patch? Next?
Regards,
Shinichiro Abe
On 2011/12/18, at 2:27, Karl Wright wrote:
I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which
you
can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree
this should be released please vote +1.
[Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of
the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change
those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please
note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per
Jukka's suggestion.]
I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing,
though, and passes all tests.
Thanks!
Karl
--
Piergiorgio Lucidi
http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
Thank you. I understand. +1 for me. Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/19, at 16:25, Karl Wright wrote: The hsqldb configuration used by multiprocess-example is an external hsqldb database. It does not require the org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath property. If you want to try out the multiprocess example, take the following steps: (1) In one shell prompt, start the database: start-database.bat/.sh (2) In another shell prompt, initialize the database: initialize.bat/.sh (3) When that is done, start the agents proces: start-agents.bat/.sh Thanks, Karl On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I checked 0.4 by running ant test, okay but one problem. In multiprocess-example, at default properties.xml, HSQLDB database requires 'org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath' property, containing a relative path: property name=org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath value=./ Now exception is thrown, so we need to add this property. Should I send a patch? Next? Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/18, at 2:27, Karl Wright wrote: I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, though, and passes all tests. Thanks! Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
Piergiorgio wants to include a section in the how to build and deploy documentation for the Alfresco connector. To me this is not really an important enough change to spin another RC, but since we're still waiting for Tommaso to review our releases there may be time to do it. But, right now, I vote +1 for RC0. We'll see if Piergiorgio withdraws his vote. Karl On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you. I understand. +1 for me. Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/19, at 16:25, Karl Wright wrote: The hsqldb configuration used by multiprocess-example is an external hsqldb database. It does not require the org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath property. If you want to try out the multiprocess example, take the following steps: (1) In one shell prompt, start the database: start-database.bat/.sh (2) In another shell prompt, initialize the database: initialize.bat/.sh (3) When that is done, start the agents proces: start-agents.bat/.sh Thanks, Karl On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I checked 0.4 by running ant test, okay but one problem. In multiprocess-example, at default properties.xml, HSQLDB database requires 'org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath' property, containing a relative path: property name=org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath value=./ Now exception is thrown, so we need to add this property. Should I send a patch? Next? Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/18, at 2:27, Karl Wright wrote: I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, though, and passes all tests. Thanks! Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
Ok, these are all the steps that I have done: - downloaded all the artifacts - verified all the signatures (md5, sha1, gpg) - verified the binary package structure - verified the example application - verified the source code package But I don't see the Alfresco Connector included in the default package. How we can say to users that exists the Alfresco Connector and how users could add the support for this latest connector? I think that we should add a documentation section dedicated to this. +1 for me, but I suggest to add an how-to section in the documentation in the website about how to add the Alfresco Connector before the final official release. Cheers, Piergiorgio 2011/12/17 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, though, and passes all tests. Thanks! Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
I would like to see the mcf-alfresco-connector.jar released in the connector-lib folder of the official release binary package in this way users could only add all the Alfresco dependencies provided by Alfresco SDK and configure the connector in the XML file. Piergiorgio 2011/12/18 Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org: Ok, these are all the steps that I have done: - downloaded all the artifacts - verified all the signatures (md5, sha1, gpg) - verified the binary package structure - verified the example application - verified the source code package But I don't see the Alfresco Connector included in the default package. How we can say to users that exists the Alfresco Connector and how users could add the support for this latest connector? I think that we should add a documentation section dedicated to this. +1 for me, but I suggest to add an how-to section in the documentation in the website about how to add the Alfresco Connector before the final official release. Cheers, Piergiorgio 2011/12/17 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, though, and passes all tests. Thanks! Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
The hsqldb configuration used by multiprocess-example is an external hsqldb database. It does not require the org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath property. If you want to try out the multiprocess example, take the following steps: (1) In one shell prompt, start the database: start-database.bat/.sh (2) In another shell prompt, initialize the database: initialize.bat/.sh (3) When that is done, start the agents proces: start-agents.bat/.sh Thanks, Karl On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I checked 0.4 by running ant test, okay but one problem. In multiprocess-example, at default properties.xml, HSQLDB database requires 'org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath' property, containing a relative path: property name=org.apache.manifoldcf.hsqldbdatabasepath value=./ Now exception is thrown, so we need to add this property. Should I send a patch? Next? Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/18, at 2:27, Karl Wright wrote: I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, though, and passes all tests. Thanks! Karl
[VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating
I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] Thanks! Karl
[WITHDRAW][VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating
I'm going to back this out and try again; the HSQLDB tests are now failing on the release branch, despite succeeding last night in trunk. Sorry about that - and stay tuned. Karl On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] Thanks! Karl
[VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of the three plugin packages upon which it depends. If we need to change those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one. Also please note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per Jukka's suggestion.] I apologize again for the earlier hiccup. This one is the real thing, though, and passes all tests. Thanks! Karl
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
Hi Jukka, * The release signing guide [1] recommends to have also SHA1 checksums for the release. We'll try to incorporate this in the future. * The approach to do an svn checkout as a part of the build is a bit troublesome. The build will fail as soon as Lucene rearranges their svn tree. I agree, but it seems the least bad of our choices. Since we are building a Lucene/Solr module, our alternatives are: (a) Include the entire Lucene/Solr tree in our package; (b) Check out a copy of lucene/solr and put our stuff in and build it; (c) Download a release source version of Lucene/Solr, unpack it, and then do the same as (b). (a) results in a massive package for little gain. (b) is the approach I finally took. And I didn't do (c) because for Lucene/Solr 4.x there is no package to download yet. * Would it make sense to contribute this code directly to Solr instead of having it in ManifoldCF? Especially since the code has no direct ManifoldCF dependencies. Tried to do this for more than a year. I had 6 committers willing and happy to commit, but then another committer vetoed it just before that happened. I can name names if you like, but the reason was apparently that they want Lucene and Solr to become much more minimal than it is now. Since the politics and stars were not in alignment, I decided we'd have to make the best of it somehow. Karl On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, +1 from me too (binding also for the upcoming IPMC vote) I checked the apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin-0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz package with SHA1 checksum 14adbae8c05dc589a707208a172901cddd5c19d5. Some comments, none blocking: * The release signing guide [1] recommends to have also SHA1 checksums for the release. * The approach to do an svn checkout as a part of the build is a bit troublesome. The build will fail as soon as Lucene rearranges their svn tree. * Would it make sense to contribute this code directly to Solr instead of having it in ManifoldCF? Especially since the code has no direct ManifoldCF dependencies. [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating
Hi, +1 from me too (binding also for the upcoming IPMC vote) I checked the apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin-0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz package with SHA1 checksum 4400b19cf0940bae30778e9fdcb992122ecbc142. Without Windows or SharePoint readily at hand I couldn't build the package, just statically review it. One comment (not blocking) that applies also to the other components is that since these components (AFAIUI) don't contain or use any crypto code, we should remove the Cryptographic Software Notice entries from the README files. Those notices should only be included in components referenced in http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/. BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
+1 Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/09, at 19:09, Karl Wright wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
Is it correct version of jar file? 3.5 is correct, isn't it ? apache-solr-mcf-3.6-SNAPSHOT.jar Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/09, at 19:09, Karl Wright wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
It's released based on the code in the current 3.x-dev branch. They are about to release 3.6, and it is built within Solr/Lucene as a module, so that is the number it gets. Karl On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Is it correct version of jar file? 3.5 is correct, isn't it ? apache-solr-mcf-3.6-SNAPSHOT.jar Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/09, at 19:09, Karl Wright wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl
Created the release branch for the 0.4-incubating release
I just created branches/release-0.4-incubating-branch. We still need to address outstanding issues having to do with the ManifoldCF external plugin packages, but there do not seem to be any other outstanding 0.4 issues remaining. So it should be OK to go ahead and start updating version numbers etc. on trunk. I believe the next version should be 0.5? Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating
+1 2011/12/9 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
+1 2011/12/13 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com: +1 from me, too. Karl On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/09, at 19:09, Karl Wright wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
Three +1's. Vote passes. Karl On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergior...@apache.org wrote: +1 2011/12/13 Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com: Thank you. I see, then +1 Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/13, at 19:19, Karl Wright wrote: It's released based on the code in the current 3.x-dev branch. They are about to release 3.6, and it is built within Solr/Lucene as a module, so that is the number it gets. Karl On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:55 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Is it correct version of jar file? 3.5 is correct, isn't it ? apache-solr-mcf-3.6-SNAPSHOT.jar Shinichiro Abe On 2011/12/09, at 19:09, Karl Wright wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://www.open4dev.com
[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl
[VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-4.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin 0.1-incubating
On the advice of the mentors, I've spun an RC1 which includes a binary package. If you have already looked at RC0, please look again before voting. Karl On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-sharepoint-3.0-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin 0.1-incubating
On the advice of the mentors, I've spun an RC1 which includes a binary package. If you have already looked at RC0, please look again before voting. Karl On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I've uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-solr-3.x-plugin-0.1-incubating package which you can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright. If you agree this should be released please vote +1. Karl
ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
Hi all, I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in? Thanks! Karl
Re: ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
I am taking a look at the stuff regarding licenses and the like for the Alfresco connector (help from Jukka would be appreciated here) which I'd like to see included in the next release. Tommaso 2011/12/6 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Hi all, I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in? Thanks! Karl
Re: ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
I did add mention of all the jars added by the Alfresco connector to the LICENSE.txt file, and in one case to the NOTICE.txt file as well. Karl On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: I am taking a look at the stuff regarding licenses and the like for the Alfresco connector (help from Jukka would be appreciated here) which I'd like to see included in the next release. Tommaso 2011/12/6 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Hi all, I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in? Thanks! Karl
Re: ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating release
Uh oh, the alfresco test blows up. Created ticket CONNECTORS-308 to cover it. Karl On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Erlend wants to postpone his remaining ticket, so I did that, and now there are none left... I think running some tests on trunk is a good idea. Then if Tommaso is happy with my license file checks, I'm happy to spin an RC0. Karl On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I think we're just about done with ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating. There's one ticket outstanding that belongs to Erlend, but I'm happy to postpone it if he is not yet ready to work on it. Once that's decided, is there any reason we should not go ahead and spin a release candidate? Does anyone want to volunteer to run some of the load tests to be sure nothing unexpected has crept in? Thanks! Karl
Re: 1.0 release, and graduation
Hello Karl 2011/9/21 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Hi Tommaso, Thanks for your feedback! Are you in a position to update the status page? I don't think I can. I should be able to do it, will try and see if I can get that updated finally :) If you disagree please point me in the right direction.. As far as the technical aspects: (1) If MySQL support is something important then I will triage the appropriate ticket accordingly. I'm curious where this requirement comes from, though. this requirement just comes from my little experience; since I started mentoring here I tried to see if/where ManifoldCF would fit a particular business case (dealing almost always with managing communication between some source and Solr) and quite always I got asked if it could be used with MySQL instead of PostgreSQL. Personally I always prefer the latter for it's just faster (at least where I've seen meaningful comparisons) but often MySQL gets chosen as a DBMS maybe just for the reason that it's more popular. So this comes from some people asking me about the possibility of using ManifoldCF with MySQL instead of PostgreSQL. However this is not a 'blocker', just I think that it should give much architecture flexibility (and, thus, adoption) to the project. (2) I'm not sure it is reasonable to go with one build system over another. Lucene/Solr has been having this battle for years. I thought we might just learn from that experience and try to be more flexible. There are excellent technical reasons to have each - for instance, building Debian packages works much better with Ant, and Eclipse works much better with Maven. I don't like wars as well about which one *is* better, maybe it's just a matter of use case and personal preferences. However I like what you say about trying to be more flexible so I am +1 to your position. I have some experience with Maven so let me know if you need my help in tweaking that part of the build. (3) I would love to have the UI look cooler. Stylistic work on the UI is definitely not the right job for me though. Now, Piergiorgio mentioned going to a spring-based UI but I'm not sure that will fix anything stylistically, and it might well require redefinition of the connector interfaces, which would be a bad thing at this point, so I don't see much benefit to this architectural change proposal. Is this what you were thinking of, or were you more thinking of look and feel? My concern at the moment with this point is more related to the look and feel than on the appropriate (MVC) framework since I am not sure I'd want to inject another framework (I think lf can be better than the current one just using servlets and some JS). However if changing the framework would fasten the process of enhancing the UI style I'm ok for that too, on the contrary if that would affect connector interfaces it maybe a huge work to do right now. I'd love to hear other opinions on this and other topics as I'm sure MySQL and UI aren't the only open points the community would like to get sorted. Have a nice day you all. Cheers, Tommaso Karl On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Karl, all 2011/9/19 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Folks, I'd like to begin discussion about the next release, currently labeled 0.4, and also our potential for graduation from the incubator. What I'd like is a sense of: (a) what we are still missing as far as incubator graduation is concerned, at the moment I think we're in the right direction towards the graduation (see the clutch report [1] which however doesn't count the new committers/mentors as our page on Incubator website has to be updated). and (b) what a 1.0 release might look like to everyone my point here relates also to the graduation: I think we're building a nice community and the ManifoldCF code is being bettered every day but it seems to me there are some (few) parts which need some refactoring as they can't work as they are now (i.e.: support to MySQL DBs), also in my opinion we should choose one of Maven or Ant and drop the other building system as I fear this could confuse new users/devs. A minor thing in my opinion is that a restyle of the UI would make ManifoldCF some more nice to use, however this can be pretty personal and less important than functional requirements. Please try to be as concrete as possible. My own personal goal is to see this happen by the end of the year, more or less +1 To that end I've already begun triaging JIRA tickets for the 0.4 release that I think would be appropriate for a 1.0 release. It's entirely possible that some things that people feel strongly about may not be doable in that time frame, but so be it. This may also be true of our status as a project. What do others think? All the best. Tommaso [1] : http
Re: 1.0 release, and graduation
Hello On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: (2) I'm not sure it is reasonable to go with one build system over another. Lucene/Solr has been having this battle for years. I thought we might just learn from that experience and try to be more flexible. There are excellent technical reasons to have each - for instance, building Debian packages works much better with Ant, and Eclipse works much better with Maven. I don't like wars as well about which one *is* better, maybe it's just a matter of use case and personal preferences. However I like what you say about trying to be more flexible so I am +1 to your position. I have some experience with Maven so let me know if you need my help in tweaking that part of the build. I also have some experience with Maven, and I'm interested in MCF's development, so I can try to fix some problems. The first thing, that should be achieved - building with Maven out of box, without manual work (or at least with minimum of it). -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott
Re: 1.0 release, and graduation
Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: (a) what we are still missing as far as incubator graduation is concerned There's still quite a bit to be done for community diversity. The drive to get new committers in is definitely a step in the right direction, but we'll need to follow up on that to make keep at least some of the new people as active members of the community. This is an area where mentors should be able to help (I'll try to increase my involvement here). To put things in perspective, since the beginning of this year Karl has made over 96% of all ManifoldCF commits. This makes the bus factor [1] of the project pretty high, and suggests that a more diverse development community is needed. The solution is not to have Karl commit less, but to get other people to more actively join the fun. The situation here is roughly similar to what we experienced during the incubation of Apache Tika. In the last year before graduation (2008) I was responsible for about 87% of all commits, which raised similar concerns about diversity [2]. The solution then was to graduate into a Lucene subproject instead of a full TLP, so that the larger project could still provide oversight and continuity in case things went wrong. Since then Lucene has shed out most subprojects to avoid being too large to manage, and by the time Tika in 2010 became a TLP by itself my share of all commits had shrunk to a still high but much more reasonable 62%. Today I'm still the most active committer, but my share of all the activity is down to 44%. I'd like to see ManifoldCF follow a similar trajectory. Graduating into a Lucene subproject is probably out of the question given the structural changes in Lucene, so for now my recommendation would be to remain in the Incubator until the community balance gets better. Some of the key things I did in Tika to help reduce my central role there were to lower the barriers of entry by working on things like the Getting Started page [3] and adding tools like the runnable tika-app jar and the simple GUI interface that make it trivially easy for someone to get started using Tika. The Build and Deploy guide in ManifoldCF [4] and the start.jar mechanism are good steps in this direction, but I think we could streamline quite a few of those steps. As Tommaso and others already mentioned, things like a simpler build process and a nicer UI can be quite useful. These are things that don't usually mean much to people already familiar to the system, but for potential new users and contributors with a short attention span they matter a lot. Thus I think these are areas that we should try to focus on in near future. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor [2] http://markmail.org/message/bvqs2zv762fmlyv5 [3] http://tika.apache.org/0.9/gettingstarted.html [4] http://incubator.apache.org/connectors/how-to-build-and-deploy.html BR, Jukka Zitting
Re: 1.0 release, and graduation
Hello We can put following script (in attachment) to simplify setup of missing maven dependencies that are fetched using 'ant download-dependencies' command. After using this script I was able to build everything using maven. One more comment is on tests - maybe it's better to put long-running tests, like filesystem tests, etc. into integration-test build stage (https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html)? Maven Failsafe plugin (https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin/usage.html) provides useful functionality to implement this. I think, that this could make developer's life easier On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Alex Ott alex...@gmail.com wrote: Hello On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: (2) I'm not sure it is reasonable to go with one build system over another. Lucene/Solr has been having this battle for years. I thought we might just learn from that experience and try to be more flexible. There are excellent technical reasons to have each - for instance, building Debian packages works much better with Ant, and Eclipse works much better with Maven. I don't like wars as well about which one *is* better, maybe it's just a matter of use case and personal preferences. However I like what you say about trying to be more flexible so I am +1 to your position. I have some experience with Maven so let me know if you need my help in tweaking that part of the build. I also have some experience with Maven, and I'm interested in MCF's development, so I can try to fix some problems. The first thing, that should be achieved - building with Maven out of box, without manual work (or at least with minimum of it). -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.net/ Tiwtter: alexott_en (English), alexott (Russian) Skype: alex.ott mvn-bootstrap.sh Description: Bourne shell script
Re: 1.0 release, and graduation
Hello Karl, all 2011/9/19 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Folks, I'd like to begin discussion about the next release, currently labeled 0.4, and also our potential for graduation from the incubator. What I'd like is a sense of: (a) what we are still missing as far as incubator graduation is concerned, at the moment I think we're in the right direction towards the graduation (see the clutch report [1] which however doesn't count the new committers/mentors as our page on Incubator website has to be updated). and (b) what a 1.0 release might look like to everyone my point here relates also to the graduation: I think we're building a nice community and the ManifoldCF code is being bettered every day but it seems to me there are some (few) parts which need some refactoring as they can't work as they are now (i.e.: support to MySQL DBs), also in my opinion we should choose one of Maven or Ant and drop the other building system as I fear this could confuse new users/devs. A minor thing in my opinion is that a restyle of the UI would make ManifoldCF some more nice to use, however this can be pretty personal and less important than functional requirements. Please try to be as concrete as possible. My own personal goal is to see this happen by the end of the year, more or less +1 To that end I've already begun triaging JIRA tickets for the 0.4 release that I think would be appropriate for a 1.0 release. It's entirely possible that some things that people feel strongly about may not be doable in that time frame, but so be it. This may also be true of our status as a project. What do others think? All the best. Tommaso [1] : http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html [2] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/manifoldcf.html Thanks, Karl
Re: 1.0 release, and graduation
Hi Tommaso, Thanks for your feedback! Are you in a position to update the status page? I don't think I can. If you disagree please point me in the right direction.. As far as the technical aspects: (1) If MySQL support is something important then I will triage the appropriate ticket accordingly. I'm curious where this requirement comes from, though. (2) I'm not sure it is reasonable to go with one build system over another. Lucene/Solr has been having this battle for years. I thought we might just learn from that experience and try to be more flexible. There are excellent technical reasons to have each - for instance, building Debian packages works much better with Ant, and Eclipse works much better with Maven. (3) I would love to have the UI look cooler. Stylistic work on the UI is definitely not the right job for me though. Now, Piergiorgio mentioned going to a spring-based UI but I'm not sure that will fix anything stylistically, and it might well require redefinition of the connector interfaces, which would be a bad thing at this point, so I don't see much benefit to this architectural change proposal. Is this what you were thinking of, or were you more thinking of look and feel? Karl On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Karl, all 2011/9/19 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Folks, I'd like to begin discussion about the next release, currently labeled 0.4, and also our potential for graduation from the incubator. What I'd like is a sense of: (a) what we are still missing as far as incubator graduation is concerned, at the moment I think we're in the right direction towards the graduation (see the clutch report [1] which however doesn't count the new committers/mentors as our page on Incubator website has to be updated). and (b) what a 1.0 release might look like to everyone my point here relates also to the graduation: I think we're building a nice community and the ManifoldCF code is being bettered every day but it seems to me there are some (few) parts which need some refactoring as they can't work as they are now (i.e.: support to MySQL DBs), also in my opinion we should choose one of Maven or Ant and drop the other building system as I fear this could confuse new users/devs. A minor thing in my opinion is that a restyle of the UI would make ManifoldCF some more nice to use, however this can be pretty personal and less important than functional requirements. Please try to be as concrete as possible. My own personal goal is to see this happen by the end of the year, more or less +1 To that end I've already begun triaging JIRA tickets for the 0.4 release that I think would be appropriate for a 1.0 release. It's entirely possible that some things that people feel strongly about may not be doable in that time frame, but so be it. This may also be true of our status as a project. What do others think? All the best. Tommaso [1] : http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html [2] : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/manifoldcf.html Thanks, Karl
1.0 release, and graduation
Folks, I'd like to begin discussion about the next release, currently labeled 0.4, and also our potential for graduation from the incubator. What I'd like is a sense of: (a) what we are still missing as far as incubator graduation is concerned, and (b) what a 1.0 release might look like to everyone Please try to be as concrete as possible. My own personal goal is to see this happen by the end of the year, more or less. To that end I've already begun triaging JIRA tickets for the 0.4 release that I think would be appropriate for a 1.0 release. It's entirely possible that some things that people feel strongly about may not be doable in that time frame, but so be it. This may also be true of our status as a project. Thanks, Karl
[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating, RC1
Three +1's. 72 hours. Vote passes! Karl On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: +1 The JCIFS Connector and ant test work fine! Shinichiro Abe On 2011/09/13, at 10:05, Karl Wright wrote: Thanks! We need one more binding +1. Shinichiro? Simon? Erlend? Tommaso? Karl On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergiorgioluc...@gmail.com wrote: +1 The CMIS Connector works fine! Piergiorgio 2011/9/9 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright, and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. +1 to release this RC. -1 to not release it. After a successful release vote, please be aware that I will need to present the release candidate to the incubator for their vote as well, before the release is actually made. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating, RC1
+1 The JCIFS Connector and ant test work fine! Shinichiro Abe On 2011/09/13, at 10:05, Karl Wright wrote: Thanks! We need one more binding +1. Shinichiro? Simon? Erlend? Tommaso? Karl On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Piergiorgio Lucidi piergiorgioluc...@gmail.com wrote: +1 The CMIS Connector works fine! Piergiorgio 2011/9/9 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright, and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. +1 to release this RC. -1 to not release it. After a successful release vote, please be aware that I will need to present the release candidate to the incubator for their vote as well, before the release is actually made. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating, RC1
Hi Emmanuel, Until you are a ManifoldCF committer your vote will not be binding. But we'd still very much like to hear your assessment of the release, especially any problems you find. So, thank you very much for having a look at the artifact! Karl On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Emmanuel Keller ekel...@open-search-server.com wrote: +1 I don't know if I am allowed to vote… But I agree ! Emmanuel Keller On 9 sept. 2011, at 19:41, Karl Wright wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright, and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. +1 to release this RC. -1 to not release it. After a successful release vote, please be aware that I will need to present the release candidate to the incubator for their vote as well, before the release is actually made. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating, RC1
+1 I don't know if I am allowed to vote… But I agree ! Emmanuel Keller On 9 sept. 2011, at 19:41, Karl Wright wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright, and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. +1 to release this RC. -1 to not release it. After a successful release vote, please be aware that I will need to present the release candidate to the incubator for their vote as well, before the release is actually made. Karl
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating, RC1
You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright, and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. +1 to release this RC. -1 to not release it. After a successful release vote, please be aware that I will need to present the release candidate to the incubator for their vote as well, before the release is actually made. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating, RC1
+1 from me. Karl On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: You can download the release candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright, and there is also a tag in svn under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags. +1 to release this RC. -1 to not release it. After a successful release vote, please be aware that I will need to present the release candidate to the incubator for their vote as well, before the release is actually made. Karl
Re: Maven release conventions?
Nope, using the maven-release-plugin [1] would be enough as it takes care of checking/changing versions both in the dependencies (if there is any -SNAPSHOT dependency) and in the modules' versions. A very quickly look at the process goes like running mvn release:prepare which signs artifact, creating a svn tag with the release version and preparing the poms for the next development version, then if the RC is ok run mvn release:perform otherwise if there is any problem run mvn release:rollback to bring back the trunk to the -SNAPSHOT version. One more nice thing would be to add the apache-pom as parent pom of our manifoldcf-parent: parent groupIdorg.apache/groupId artifactIdapache/artifactId version9/version relativePath / /parent this will allow using the -Papache-release option (enabling the apache-release profile) to create reports and sign artifacts. Hope this helps. Tommaso 2011/9/8 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Hi folks, I'm handling the 0.3-incubating release of MCF, and I'm trying to figure out what the version tags in the maven pom files should say. They currently say 0.3-SNAPSHOT. Should I edit them in the release branch to be just 0.3? Karl
Re: Maven release conventions?
Thanks for the answers. This would all be fine if maven were the primary build mechanism for ManifoldCF, but it is not at this time, for many reasons. From your description the pom's should remain -SNAPSHOT in the release if this is the case, no? Also, is there any way to have it not change anything other than the pom's themselves? I don't want maven to create svn tags etc. Karl On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: Nope, using the maven-release-plugin [1] would be enough as it takes care of checking/changing versions both in the dependencies (if there is any -SNAPSHOT dependency) and in the modules' versions. A very quickly look at the process goes like running mvn release:prepare which signs artifact, creating a svn tag with the release version and preparing the poms for the next development version, then if the RC is ok run mvn release:perform otherwise if there is any problem run mvn release:rollback to bring back the trunk to the -SNAPSHOT version. One more nice thing would be to add the apache-pom as parent pom of our manifoldcf-parent: parent groupIdorg.apache/groupId artifactIdapache/artifactId version9/version relativePath / /parent this will allow using the -Papache-release option (enabling the apache-release profile) to create reports and sign artifacts. Hope this helps. Tommaso 2011/9/8 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Hi folks, I'm handling the 0.3-incubating release of MCF, and I'm trying to figure out what the version tags in the maven pom files should say. They currently say 0.3-SNAPSHOT. Should I edit them in the release branch to be just 0.3? Karl
Maven release conventions?
Hi folks, I'm handling the 0.3-incubating release of MCF, and I'm trying to figure out what the version tags in the maven pom files should say. They currently say 0.3-SNAPSHOT. Should I edit them in the release branch to be just 0.3? Karl
Re: Next ManifoldCF release
If you are not planning to be ready by Sept 1 or so, would you just prefer to wait for the next release? I am sure we will have one in another 3-6 months after 0.3-incubating. We might even be ready to graduate from the incubator by that point, and call that release 1.0. Karl On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for Next ManifoldCF release. will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? I will. This is modifications. The design is that it replaces httpposter to solrindexer(EmbeddedSolrServer) in solr connector. It will provide a switch on solr connection. httppost or createindexdata. And it will put solr conf and solr data on MCF side. The purpose of this is that it prevents configuration files from being changed while posting. And it can keep the consistency between conf and data. Though I want to write as soon as possible, I just have started to write. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/08/18, at 0:14, Karl Wright wrote: I think that should be OK, as long as the connector is really solid and doesn't need a lot of follow-up work. Will it be structured as a whole new connector, or will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? Karl On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: I think Abe-san would like to push Embedded version of solr output connecter that he is trying to write now. The patch should be public in a week or so. koji -- Check out Query Log Visualizer http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/08/17 19:08), Karl Wright wrote: I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl
Re: Next ManifoldCF release
Yes, I will. I 'll provide my patch for the next 0.4. In my opinion, we should release 0.3 earlier. For, there are not only new features but also bug fixes since 0.2. I would like to write my code by Sept 1, but maybe it will take time until being committed formally.If I complete the patch quickly, I'll let you know. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe by Sept 1 On 2011/08/22, at 19:01, Karl Wright wrote: If you are not planning to be ready by Sept 1 or so, would you just prefer to wait for the next release? I am sure we will have one in another 3-6 months after 0.3-incubating. We might even be ready to graduate from the incubator by that point, and call that release 1.0. Karl On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for Next ManifoldCF release. will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? I will. This is modifications. The design is that it replaces httpposter to solrindexer(EmbeddedSolrServer) in solr connector. It will provide a switch on solr connection. httppost or createindexdata. And it will put solr conf and solr data on MCF side. The purpose of this is that it prevents configuration files from being changed while posting. And it can keep the consistency between conf and data. Though I want to write as soon as possible, I just have started to write. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/08/18, at 0:14, Karl Wright wrote: I think that should be OK, as long as the connector is really solid and doesn't need a lot of follow-up work. Will it be structured as a whole new connector, or will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? Karl On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: I think Abe-san would like to push Embedded version of solr output connecter that he is trying to write now. The patch should be public in a week or so. koji -- Check out Query Log Visualizer http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/08/17 19:08), Karl Wright wrote: I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl
Re: Next ManifoldCF release
+1 I think that there are new features, many bugfixes and the next week I hope to provide the documentation for the CMIS Connector. I'm on holidays and I will return fully operative the next week. 2011/8/17 Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl -- Piergiorgio Lucidi http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
Re: Next ManifoldCF release
I suggest that it might be a good idea for you to create a JIRA ticket to describe your work, and create a branch based on the JIRA ticket to work in. That way all of us can provide feedback about the changes you are making, and it will make your development smoother. For example, if the JIRA ticket you create is CONNECTORS-247, then the branch would be created by: svn -m Create branch for CONNECTORS-247 copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/branches/CONNECTORS-247 When you are done it should be straightforward to merge your changes into trunk. What do you think? Karl On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, I will. I 'll provide my patch for the next 0.4. In my opinion, we should release 0.3 earlier. For, there are not only new features but also bug fixes since 0.2. I would like to write my code by Sept 1, but maybe it will take time until being committed formally.If I complete the patch quickly, I'll let you know. Thank you, Shinichiro Abe by Sept 1 On 2011/08/22, at 19:01, Karl Wright wrote: If you are not planning to be ready by Sept 1 or so, would you just prefer to wait for the next release? I am sure we will have one in another 3-6 months after 0.3-incubating. We might even be ready to graduate from the incubator by that point, and call that release 1.0. Karl On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Shinichiro Abe shinichiro.ab...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for Next ManifoldCF release. will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? I will. This is modifications. The design is that it replaces httpposter to solrindexer(EmbeddedSolrServer) in solr connector. It will provide a switch on solr connection. httppost or createindexdata. And it will put solr conf and solr data on MCF side. The purpose of this is that it prevents configuration files from being changed while posting. And it can keep the consistency between conf and data. Though I want to write as soon as possible, I just have started to write. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/08/18, at 0:14, Karl Wright wrote: I think that should be OK, as long as the connector is really solid and doesn't need a lot of follow-up work. Will it be structured as a whole new connector, or will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? Karl On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: I think Abe-san would like to push Embedded version of solr output connecter that he is trying to write now. The patch should be public in a week or so. koji -- Check out Query Log Visualizer http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/08/17 19:08), Karl Wright wrote: I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl
Re: Next ManifoldCF release
+1 for Next ManifoldCF release. will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? I will. This is modifications. The design is that it replaces httpposter to solrindexer(EmbeddedSolrServer) in solr connector. It will provide a switch on solr connection. httppost or createindexdata. And it will put solr conf and solr data on MCF side. The purpose of this is that it prevents configuration files from being changed while posting. And it can keep the consistency between conf and data. Though I want to write as soon as possible, I just have started to write. Regards, Shinichiro Abe On 2011/08/18, at 0:14, Karl Wright wrote: I think that should be OK, as long as the connector is really solid and doesn't need a lot of follow-up work. Will it be structured as a whole new connector, or will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? Karl On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: I think Abe-san would like to push Embedded version of solr output connecter that he is trying to write now. The patch should be public in a week or so. koji -- Check out Query Log Visualizer http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/08/17 19:08), Karl Wright wrote: I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl
Next ManifoldCF release
I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl
Re: Next ManifoldCF release
I've been trying to keep the book up-to-date, so there are only minor deviations at this point between 0.3-incubating and the book. As far as a tutorial showing off what is new, I'll think about how that might be done. But since we've got probably a month for the RC to sit in the incubator for assessment, we may not have time to do much here, unless you are offering to contribute your services. Karl On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote: +1 There's been a lot of great progress. Question: What is the status of the book relative to what release was used as the basis for the book? If there have been any core features used or referenced in the book that changed, then some sort of wiki addendum would be appropriate, but I don't think I am aware of any. Mostly we're talking new features and bug fixes. It might be nice to have a mini-tutorial for new features, new connectors, etc. CHANGES.txt is good, but encourage people to contribute examples and screen shots or mini-tutorials. In other words, show off what's new. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Karl Wright Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:08 AM To: connectors-dev Subject: Next ManifoldCF release I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl
Re: Next ManifoldCF release
I think that should be OK, as long as the connector is really solid and doesn't need a lot of follow-up work. Will it be structured as a whole new connector, or will he instead be making modifications to the existing Solr connector? Karl On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: I think Abe-san would like to push Embedded version of solr output connecter that he is trying to write now. The patch should be public in a week or so. koji -- Check out Query Log Visualizer http://www.rondhuit-demo.com/loganalyzer/loganalyzer.html http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/08/17 19:08), Karl Wright wrote: I'd like to propose working towards the next ManifoldCF official release, 0.3-incubating, somewhere around September 15. This release would include major new features, such as the CMIS connector, the client scripting language, and (hopefully) the OpenSearchServer connector (if it is ready by then). This is in addition to the dozens or hundreds of other fixes and changes already committed to trunk. Please let me know your thoughts. Karl
[ANN] Release crawler-commons 0.1
[Apologies for cross-posting] The initial release of crawler-commons is available from : http://code.google.com/p/crawler-commons/downloads/list The purpose of this project is to develop a set of reusable Java components that implement functionality common to any web crawler. These components would benefit from collaboration among various existing web crawler projects, and reduce duplication of effort. The current version contains resources for : - parsing robots.txt - parsing sitemaps - URL analyzer which returns Top Level Domains - a simple HttpFetcher This release is available on Sonatype's OSS Nexus repository [ https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/releases/com/google/code/crawler-commons/] and should be available on Maven Central soon. Please send your questions, comments or suggestions to http://groups.google.com/group/crawler-commons Best regards, Julien -- Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ http://www.digitalpebble.com
[RESULT][VOTE] Adopt Java 1.5 as the minimum Java release for ManifoldCF
Although it hasn't been the quite required 3 days, this vote isn't binding anyway, so I'm going to declare it closed and commit the code. Karl On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Please have a look at CONNECTORS-203 and vote +1 if you think it's time to move beyond Java 1.4 at the source level, to Java 1.5. I did some work on this over the weekend and managed to convince myself that a migration to a newer Java version will have no obvious ill effects. But I'd like your thoughts. Especially interesting will be whether or not we try to maintain backwards compatibility in the connector interfaces: IConnector, IRepositoryConnector, IAuthorityConnector, and IOutputConnector. I have some ideas how I could bring these into the modern world in a relatively painless manner, should the community require it. But I'd like to hear your views as to whether we *should* work towards that end, or be willing to disrupt our early adopters in this process. Karl
[VOTE] Adopt Java 1.5 as the minimum Java release for ManifoldCF
Please have a look at CONNECTORS-203 and vote +1 if you think it's time to move beyond Java 1.4 at the source level, to Java 1.5. I did some work on this over the weekend and managed to convince myself that a migration to a newer Java version will have no obvious ill effects. But I'd like your thoughts. Especially interesting will be whether or not we try to maintain backwards compatibility in the connector interfaces: IConnector, IRepositoryConnector, IAuthorityConnector, and IOutputConnector. I have some ideas how I could bring these into the modern world in a relatively painless manner, should the community require it. But I'd like to hear your views as to whether we *should* work towards that end, or be willing to disrupt our early adopters in this process. Karl
[jira] [Created] (CONNECTORS-199) Modify site release page to include new release
Modify site release page to include new release --- Key: CONNECTORS-199 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-199 Project: ManifoldCF Issue Type: Task Components: Documentation Affects Versions: ManifoldCF next Reporter: Karl Wright The site release page needs to be modified, so that the site points to the new release (0.2-incubating). Also, the PostgreSQL caveat only applies to the 0.1-incubating release, and will not to the 0.2-incubating release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: Book release
Before we even consider a 0.3 release, though, we need to shepherd the 0.2 release through the incubator. The vote has been open on the general@incubator.a.o list for some 10 days now, with one +1 vote. We need two more. The incubator folks say they are looking for our mentors to vote on the incubator list. So please consider doing so! Thanks, Karl On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I have no problem with a ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating release, and I agree that technically a book release has nothing to do with a software release. But community building is a critical part of making a project successful, so it's clearly more linked that one would idealistically expect. ;-) Karl On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: While I understand the dilemma you are in for the book very much, the two are independent events (such is the life of an author). My personal feeling is MCF is not a 1.0 release yet and that we should just continue on w/ the next release being 0.3. Moreover, a 1.0 release typically means, in my opinion, some important things for a project: 1. maturity in the development community, 2. That we are committing to those APIs for the 1.x line and will make backward compatible changes. Are we ready to do that? My instinct also says a 1.0 release is something that should be done by a graduated project and not an incubating one b/c it's generally a policy that incubating projects don't do much PR, etc. and a 1.0 release should be a big deal. (I'm not sure what the ASF policy is on that stuff) -Grant On May 2, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Karl Wright wrote: Once the 0.2-incubating release goes out the door, I'd like to propose that the next release be considered a ManifoldCF in Action book release. Basically this will mean that we need a release that is consistent with the examples and explanations in the book, before the book actually is done. 0.2-incubating does not work for this purpose because half-a-dozen issues pertaining to the book were detected and corrected since that release was frozen. There are still some open issues that should be addressed before the book release too is frozen. I'd like people's thoughts on (a) the wisdom of this strategy, and (b) what release number we should use for it. My personal feeling is that it would be great if it was a 1.0-incubating release, but I'm comfortable with anything really. Karl
Re: Book release
I have no problem with a ManifoldCF 0.3-incubating release, and I agree that technically a book release has nothing to do with a software release. But community building is a critical part of making a project successful, so it's clearly more linked that one would idealistically expect. ;-) Karl On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: While I understand the dilemma you are in for the book very much, the two are independent events (such is the life of an author). My personal feeling is MCF is not a 1.0 release yet and that we should just continue on w/ the next release being 0.3. Moreover, a 1.0 release typically means, in my opinion, some important things for a project: 1. maturity in the development community, 2. That we are committing to those APIs for the 1.x line and will make backward compatible changes. Are we ready to do that? My instinct also says a 1.0 release is something that should be done by a graduated project and not an incubating one b/c it's generally a policy that incubating projects don't do much PR, etc. and a 1.0 release should be a big deal. (I'm not sure what the ASF policy is on that stuff) -Grant On May 2, 2011, at 8:59 AM, Karl Wright wrote: Once the 0.2-incubating release goes out the door, I'd like to propose that the next release be considered a ManifoldCF in Action book release. Basically this will mean that we need a release that is consistent with the examples and explanations in the book, before the book actually is done. 0.2-incubating does not work for this purpose because half-a-dozen issues pertaining to the book were detected and corrected since that release was frozen. There are still some open issues that should be addressed before the book release too is frozen. I'd like people's thoughts on (a) the wisdom of this strategy, and (b) what release number we should use for it. My personal feeling is that it would be great if it was a 1.0-incubating release, but I'm comfortable with anything really. Karl
Book release
Once the 0.2-incubating release goes out the door, I'd like to propose that the next release be considered a ManifoldCF in Action book release. Basically this will mean that we need a release that is consistent with the examples and explanations in the book, before the book actually is done. 0.2-incubating does not work for this purpose because half-a-dozen issues pertaining to the book were detected and corrected since that release was frozen. There are still some open issues that should be addressed before the book release too is frozen. I'd like people's thoughts on (a) the wisdom of this strategy, and (b) what release number we should use for it. My personal feeling is that it would be great if it was a 1.0-incubating release, but I'm comfortable with anything really. Karl
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2
I count 4 +1's, no -1's. Vote passes! I'll request a vote in the incubator next. Karl On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: +1 On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Karl Wright wrote: The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2. Please vote! Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2
Looks like we've got the votes this time! But the vote must remain open though for 72 hours, and I'll be out of town until Sunday. I'll plan on hopefully submitting to gene...@incubator.apache.org then. Thanks! Karl On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/04/27 7:12), Karl Wright wrote: The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2. Please vote! Karl +1. ant test, read CHANGES.txt, check md5, etc. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2
+1 On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Karl Wright wrote: The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2. Please vote! Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2
+1 from me as well. 1. Verified the CHANGES.txt 2. Tested the binary release (tar.gz) on OS X: - md5sums - ant test - Did a web crawl and indexed Solr 3.1 using the example (Jetty + Derby) - Deployed on Resin 4.0.15, crawled the web, indexed Solr 3.1 and used an external PostgreSQL server (new future in this release) - Verified that an html page with meta robots noindex was not indexed by Solr (new future in this release) 3. Tested the source release (zip) on OS X: - md5sums - ant test - ant build - Did a web crawl and indexed Solr 3.1 using the example (Jetty + Derby) On 27.04.11 00.12, Karl Wright wrote: The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2. Please vote! Karl -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2
+1 from me. I verified that the line ending characters for all scripts were correct. I did notice, however, that the .bat scripts do not have CRLF as their eol-style attribute in svn; this is harmless in result but probably should be corrected at some point. Karl On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2. Please vote! Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating, RC1
-1. The executecommand.sh script cannot be run since CRLF line endings have been added (should be LF). I have created a ticket about this problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-188 Erlend On 01.04.11 12.24, Karl Wright wrote: RC1 is now available on http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Please check it out and vote! Karl On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com wrote: Vote failed; a new release candidate with a fix is being respun. This will be RC1. Karl -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating, RC1
Vote fails; I'll need to create a new release candidate and upload it. Karl On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Erlend Garåsen e.f.gara...@usit.uio.no wrote: -1. The executecommand.sh script cannot be run since CRLF line endings have been added (should be LF). I have created a ticket about this problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-188 Erlend On 01.04.11 12.24, Karl Wright wrote: RC1 is now available on http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Please check it out and vote! Karl On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com wrote: Vote failed; a new release candidate with a fix is being respun. This will be RC1. Karl -- Erlend Garåsen Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo P.O. Box 1086 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway Ph: (+47) 22840193, Fax: (+47) 22852970, Mobile: (+47) 91380968, VIP: 31050
[VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2
The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2. Please vote! Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating, RC1
Still looking for one additional vote... Karl On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: We only need one more vote! If you are a committer and have any time, please check it out. It still has to run the gauntlet of the incubator even if it passes here... Karl On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: +1 also. I ran ant test-pg (yes, the new PostgreSQL test target), ant test, and looked at the javadocs and site docs. Karl On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/04/01 19:24), Karl Wright wrote: RC1 is now available on http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Please check it out and vote! Karl +1. I checked all .md5/.asc files, did ant test, ant javadoc and read CHANGES.txt, etc. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating, RC1
+1 also. I ran ant test-pg (yes, the new PostgreSQL test target), ant test, and looked at the javadocs and site docs. Karl On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/04/01 19:24), Karl Wright wrote: RC1 is now available on http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Please check it out and vote! Karl +1. I checked all .md5/.asc files, did ant test, ant javadoc and read CHANGES.txt, etc. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
[RESULT][VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating
Vote failed; a new release candidate with a fix is being respun. This will be RC1. Karl On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Looking at it in depth, it's likely that it's a Derby bug. I've filed ticket DERBY-5169 accordingly, and marked CONNECTORS-172 as a blocker for 0.2-incubating. Karl On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, this does sound like CONNECTORS-172. It's intermittent; if you run the tests again it will likely pass. The problem appeared with either the new Derby or the new Jetty. Jetty changed its shutdown so that I can no longer guarantee that it shuts down before the rest of the process shuts down - it could be related to that. The Derby changes involve having more queries (so that they use indexes rather than scans), so it is possible that something is taking a bit longer than before and causing an occasional timeout. I've not seen any evidence that the problem is other than test related, though. But I think it's worth trying to understand the issue more completely before deciding whether to respin or accept the RC as it stands. Karl On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/03/21 9:32), Karl Wright wrote: The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC0. You can download the candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Hi Karl, I downloaded apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz and did ant test, but I got Database exception: Exception doing query: No current connection. exception during the test. I'm not sure it is same as CONNECTORS-172. Are you digging in the issue and planning to respin the RC? Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
[VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating, RC1
RC1 is now available on http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Please check it out and vote! Karl On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Vote failed; a new release candidate with a fix is being respun. This will be RC1. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating, RC1
(11/04/01 19:24), Karl Wright wrote: RC1 is now available on http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Please check it out and vote! Karl +1. I checked all .md5/.asc files, did ant test, ant javadoc and read CHANGES.txt, etc. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating
(11/03/21 9:32), Karl Wright wrote: The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC0. You can download the candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Hi Karl, I downloaded apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz and did ant test, but I got Database exception: Exception doing query: No current connection. exception during the test. I'm not sure it is same as CONNECTORS-172. Are you digging in the issue and planning to respin the RC? Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating
Yes, this does sound like CONNECTORS-172. It's intermittent; if you run the tests again it will likely pass. The problem appeared with either the new Derby or the new Jetty. Jetty changed its shutdown so that I can no longer guarantee that it shuts down before the rest of the process shuts down - it could be related to that. The Derby changes involve having more queries (so that they use indexes rather than scans), so it is possible that something is taking a bit longer than before and causing an occasional timeout. I've not seen any evidence that the problem is other than test related, though. But I think it's worth trying to understand the issue more completely before deciding whether to respin or accept the RC as it stands. Karl On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/03/21 9:32), Karl Wright wrote: The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC0. You can download the candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Hi Karl, I downloaded apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz and did ant test, but I got Database exception: Exception doing query: No current connection. exception during the test. I'm not sure it is same as CONNECTORS-172. Are you digging in the issue and planning to respin the RC? Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF-0.2-incubating
Looking at it in depth, it's likely that it's a Derby bug. I've filed ticket DERBY-5169 accordingly, and marked CONNECTORS-172 as a blocker for 0.2-incubating. Karl On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, this does sound like CONNECTORS-172. It's intermittent; if you run the tests again it will likely pass. The problem appeared with either the new Derby or the new Jetty. Jetty changed its shutdown so that I can no longer guarantee that it shuts down before the rest of the process shuts down - it could be related to that. The Derby changes involve having more queries (so that they use indexes rather than scans), so it is possible that something is taking a bit longer than before and causing an occasional timeout. I've not seen any evidence that the problem is other than test related, though. But I think it's worth trying to understand the issue more completely before deciding whether to respin or accept the RC as it stands. Karl On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/03/21 9:32), Karl Wright wrote: The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC0. You can download the candidate from http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating. Hi Karl, I downloaded apache-manifoldcf-0.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz and did ant test, but I got Database exception: Exception doing query: No current connection. exception during the test. I'm not sure it is same as CONNECTORS-172. Are you digging in the issue and planning to respin the RC? Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: Next release?
0.2 makes sense. I think we need to figure out how to attract more contribution. It may have been a mistake to have separate user and dev lists at this point in the game. We need users to also be contributors. -Grant On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote: A lot of fairly critical fixes and changes have already taken place since ManifoldCF 0.1 went out. When do you think we should try to release ManifoldCF 0.2? Or, do you think a 0.1.1 release would be the right approach? Karl -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Next release?
I've been pulling users in to extract contributions from them as best I can. This has generally been effective; success rate is about 3 out of 4. But it's a pull process, from people who don't usually contribute to open source. Karl On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: 0.2 makes sense. I think we need to figure out how to attract more contribution. It may have been a mistake to have separate user and dev lists at this point in the game. We need users to also be contributors. -Grant On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote: A lot of fairly critical fixes and changes have already taken place since ManifoldCF 0.1 went out. When do you think we should try to release ManifoldCF 0.2? Or, do you think a 0.1.1 release would be the right approach? Karl -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
Next release?
A lot of fairly critical fixes and changes have already taken place since ManifoldCF 0.1 went out. When do you think we should try to release ManifoldCF 0.2? Or, do you think a 0.1.1 release would be the right approach? Karl
[ANNOUNCE] Release of ManifoldCF 0.1-incubating
ManifoldCF 0.1-incubating has been released. In a short while the mirrors should all have the release available for download. The site has also been updated, and that will be replicating within 24 hours also. After this time tomorrow, please visit the download page (http://incubator.apache.org/connectors/download.html) for important caveats regarding the release. Thanks, Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC8
(11/01/17 17:04), Karl Wright wrote: C'mon, guys - we just need two more binding PMC votes... Karl On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com wrote: RC8 is ready. This fixes the problems found in CONNECTORS-149. Find it at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating The svn tag URL is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.1-incubating-RC8 Please evaluate the candidate, and if you find it OK then vote. I've completed my review of the deletion/expiration code, and although there are a couple of other tickets from that review, they do not (in my opinion) warrant holding the release. +1 from me. Karl Hi Karl, +1. ran test, javadoc, rat-sources, etc on my Mac and looked at *.txt. Looks fine. Sorry for the late vote. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC8
Thanks! It looks like RC8 passes. Karl On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/01/17 17:04), Karl Wright wrote: C'mon, guys - we just need two more binding PMC votes... Karl On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com wrote: RC8 is ready. This fixes the problems found in CONNECTORS-149. Find it at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating The svn tag URL is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.1-incubating-RC8 Please evaluate the candidate, and if you find it OK then vote. I've completed my review of the deletion/expiration code, and although there are a couple of other tickets from that review, they do not (in my opinion) warrant holding the release. +1 from me. Karl Hi Karl, +1. ran test, javadoc, rat-sources, etc on my Mac and looked at *.txt. Looks fine. Sorry for the late vote. Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC8
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Koji Sekiguchi k...@r.email.ne.jp wrote: (11/01/17 17:04), Karl Wright wrote: C'mon, guys - we just need two more binding PMC votes... Karl On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Karl Wrightdaddy...@gmail.com wrote: RC8 is ready. This fixes the problems found in CONNECTORS-149. Find it at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating The svn tag URL is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.1-incubating-RC8 Please evaluate the candidate, and if you find it OK then vote. I've completed my review of the deletion/expiration code, and although there are a couple of other tickets from that review, they do not (in my opinion) warrant holding the release. +1 from me. Karl Hi Karl, +1. ran test, javadoc, rat-sources, etc on my Mac and looked at *.txt. Looks fine. Sorry for the late vote. here is the 3rd binding vote +1 that release looks good to me. simon Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC8
+1. Checked sigs, ran the tests, looked at CHANGES, etc. On Jan 17, 2011, at 3:04 AM, Karl Wright wrote: C'mon, guys - we just need two more binding PMC votes... Karl On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: RC8 is ready. This fixes the problems found in CONNECTORS-149. Find it at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating The svn tag URL is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.1-incubating-RC8 Please evaluate the candidate, and if you find it OK then vote. I've completed my review of the deletion/expiration code, and although there are a couple of other tickets from that review, they do not (in my opinion) warrant holding the release. +1 from me. Karl -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com/ Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC8
C'mon, guys - we just need two more binding PMC votes... Karl On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: RC8 is ready. This fixes the problems found in CONNECTORS-149. Find it at: http://people.apache.org/~kwright/apache-manifoldcf-0.1-incubating The svn tag URL is http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.1-incubating-RC8 Please evaluate the candidate, and if you find it OK then vote. I've completed my review of the deletion/expiration code, and although there are a couple of other tickets from that review, they do not (in my opinion) warrant holding the release. +1 from me. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC7
I found another severe problem with the deletion logic, and thus I've escalated CONNECTORS-149 to blocker status. This will mean that we need an RC8. Voting on RC7 is therefore ended. Karl On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote: +1 (but non-committer) -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Karl Wright Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:40 AM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC7 +1 for me. Karl On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Vote for/against RC7 on this thread, please. Karl
[VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC8
I've made more required changes and uploaded an RC7. So the RC6 vote is cancelled, and the RC7 vote begins. Thanks, Karl On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I just discovered a fairly significant problem that's been there all along, but may well need to be solved before first release. The main reason I'd like to solve it is because I discovered it while working on the book, and I'd like the book to make sense in this area. It's unfortunately a fairly major problem, although I'm about 60% done with a fix for it after working most of the afternoon. See CONNECTORS-146. Any strong opinions please let me know. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC8
Sorry, typo'd the subject line. This thread is dead; I'll start a new one. Karl On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I've made more required changes and uploaded an RC7. So the RC6 vote is cancelled, and the RC7 vote begins. Thanks, Karl On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: I just discovered a fairly significant problem that's been there all along, but may well need to be solved before first release. The main reason I'd like to solve it is because I discovered it while working on the book, and I'd like the book to make sense in this area. It's unfortunately a fairly major problem, although I'm about 60% done with a fix for it after working most of the afternoon. See CONNECTORS-146. Any strong opinions please let me know. Karl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC7
+1 (but non-committer) -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Karl Wright Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:40 AM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1 Incubating, RC7 +1 for me. Karl On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: Vote for/against RC7 on this thread, please. Karl
