Re: [Discuss] Refactoring KahaDBStore class
Hi Jamie, That's interesting. What's the rationale behind the refactoring ? New features or perf improvements ? Regards JB On 25/11/2018 20:16, Jamie G. wrote: > Hi All, > > I've taken some time to prototype a refactored KahaDBStore class: > https://github.com/jgoodyear/activemq/tree/KahaDBRefactor > > As KahaDBStore exists in Master, it contains 7 internal classes, over > some 1677 lines of code. > > In my refactor branch I've separated out those classes into their own > files, and applied some gentle clean code practices to help make these > files easier to read and maintain. > > I'd like to gather feed back from the community; I've taken care to > change functionality as little as possible - the aim here is to reduce > complexity and improve maintainability. If the community feels this is > a worth while goal than I'll open a card on Jira & prepare a PR. > > Notes: > ActiveMQ KahaDB Store and ActiveMQ-Unit-Tests suites remain passing > after refactor. > > Cheers, > Jamie > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th
Repositories have been moved by INFRA. I'm now updating the scm location where I can. Regards JB On 10/01/2019 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > Following this, the migration of all of our repositories started. > > I will keep you posted soon. > > Regards > JB > > On 07/01/2019 20:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as mentioned in the other thread, and in order to give visibility to >> everyone, I would like to do the move to gitbox on January, 9th. >> >> Nothing change: I already the migration on several other projects >> without problem. >> >> Just after the migration, I will update scm section in the pom and >> update Jenkins. >> >> From a committer perspective, the only thing to change is to update git >> remote to gitbox. >> >> So, without objection, I will do the move on January, 9th (or if you >> think we can do it before, please let me know as I'm ready). >> >> Thanks, >> Regards >> JB >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th
Hi, Following this, the migration of all of our repositories started. I will keep you posted soon. Regards JB On 07/01/2019 20:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > as mentioned in the other thread, and in order to give visibility to > everyone, I would like to do the move to gitbox on January, 9th. > > Nothing change: I already the migration on several other projects > without problem. > > Just after the migration, I will update scm section in the pom and > update Jenkins. > > From a committer perspective, the only thing to change is to update git > remote to gitbox. > > So, without objection, I will do the move on January, 9th (or if you > think we can do it before, please let me know as I'm ready). > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to gitbox.apache.org
Hi, I'm ready to do the move. No objection ? Regards JB On 07/01/2019 17:30, Justin Bertram wrote: > Where are we on this? Has anything actually happened yet? > > > Justin > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 9:22 AM Robbie Gemmell > wrote: > >> For what its worth, I've now been through migration of the various >> Qpid repositories to the Gitbox service, it was very straightforward. >> >> I proposed we migrate shortly after replying below, raised the JIRA >> request yesterday afternoon, Infra did the migrations during the night >> (for me at least), and I then updated the various metadata and links >> in the repos and the website content/build bits today. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 15:31, Robbie Gemmell >> wrote: >>> >>> I agree a formal vote isnt needed but a documented consensus on the >>> mailing list is required in order to be included in the initial >>> voluntary moves, which seems to be what Jean-Baptiste is proposing, so >>> it does at minimum need this discussion and probably a direct lazy >>> consensus statement on the matter. >>> >>> I'd echo your comment about being fine with it any time so long as >>> noone is planning an imminent release. >>> >>> Robbie >>> >>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 17:14, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> You don’t need a vote… It’s going to happen one way or another by Feb >> 7. >>>> >>>> The only issue is weather to be pro-active and do it now or wait a >> little bit. If we have releases imminent, I’d say wait till after the >> release. Otherwise, I’m OK at any time. >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> Our repositories are currently located on git-wip-us.apache.org. >>>>> >>>>> This service will be decommissioned in the coming month. >>>>> >>>>> I'm proposing to move our repositories to gitbox.apache.org. >>>>> >>>>> I'm volunteer to start a vote, and if OK, I will deal with the infra. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Kulp >>>> dk...@apache.org <mailto:dk...@apache.org> - http://dankulp.com/blog < >> http://dankulp.com/blog> >>>> Talend Community Coder - http://talend.com <http://coders.talend.com/> >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th
Hi, as mentioned in the other thread, and in order to give visibility to everyone, I would like to do the move to gitbox on January, 9th. Nothing change: I already the migration on several other projects without problem. Just after the migration, I will update scm section in the pom and update Jenkins. >From a committer perspective, the only thing to change is to update git remote to gitbox. So, without objection, I will do the move on January, 9th (or if you think we can do it before, please let me know as I'm ready). Thanks, Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th
Hi Clebert, no, the current PRs are still valid and we will be able to merge it without problem. Regards JB On 07/01/2019 21:09, Clebert Suconic wrote: > I forgot to ask this on the other thread. Will that affect any of the > pending Pull Requests on the various projects? > > This shouldn't affect your date. I just want to understand if we need > to do anything about them. > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:54 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> as mentioned in the other thread, and in order to give visibility to >> everyone, I would like to do the move to gitbox on January, 9th. >> >> Nothing change: I already the migration on several other projects >> without problem. >> >> Just after the migration, I will update scm section in the pom and >> update Jenkins. >> >> From a committer perspective, the only thing to change is to update git >> remote to gitbox. >> >> So, without objection, I will do the move on January, 9th (or if you >> think we can do it before, please let me know as I'm ready). >> >> Thanks, >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to gitbox on January, 9th
Hi Clebert, We have to create a Jira for INFRA to fix. I will do that. Regards JB On 11/01/2019 18:06, Clebert Suconic wrote: > The comitts now are coming to the dev list instead of the commit list. > > > Anyone know how to fix it ? > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 8:32 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Repositories have been moved by INFRA. >> >> I'm now updating the scm location where I can. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 10/01/2019 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Following this, the migration of all of our repositories started. >>> >>> I will keep you posted soon. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 07/01/2019 20:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as mentioned in the other thread, and in order to give visibility to >>>> everyone, I would like to do the move to gitbox on January, 9th. >>>> >>>> Nothing change: I already the migration on several other projects >>>> without problem. >>>> >>>> Just after the migration, I will update scm section in the pom and >>>> update Jenkins. >>>> >>>> From a committer perspective, the only thing to change is to update git >>>> remote to gitbox. >>>> >>>> So, without objection, I will do the move on January, 9th (or if you >>>> think we can do it before, please let me know as I'm ready). >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Website updated!
That's great !! Thanks a this great update. I'm not sure I agree with all contents and naming, but maybe we can propose some PR or discuss about some working here. Regards JB On 05/04/2019 01:18, Justin Bertram wrote: > I talked with Apache Infra today and got them to move on the ticket I > opened a few days ago [1]. As of today the new ActiveMQ website is now > live! > > The instructions on how to update the site are available here [2]. > > I've also added a few mod_rewrite rules for compatibility with the > components from the old site [3]. > > This update has been a long time coming, and I extend my thanks to > everybody who contributed. Well done! > > > Justin > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18151 > [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/ > [3] https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/blob/master/src/.htaccess > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Website Update
+1 Regards JB On 27/03/2019 21:07, Justin Bertram wrote: > As most of you probably know there's been work underway to update the > ActiveMQ website for the better part of a year. That work has reached a > point where it makes sense to vote on whether or not it should replace the > existing website. The new website is available at: > > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/ > > All existing links for *ActiveMQ 5.x* content should continue to work as-is. > > The source files for the new site are hosted here: > > https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/ > > This repo includes instructions on how to modify, test, & update the site. > > > [ ] +1 approve the promotion of the new website to be the official ActiveMQ > website > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here's my +1 > > > Justin > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [Discuss] automated github messages on a separate list
Hi Clebert, I agree, I think it would be more "readable" to have gitbox mail on com...@activemq.apache.org mailing list for instance. Regards JB On 15/02/2019 00:36, Clebert Suconic wrote: > I work on this dev list on my daily basis. We had some members here > suggesting doing this in the past and we decided to let just people to > filter out stuff with filters. Etc. > > But this doesn’t make easy to recruit new open source devs. > > I just heard from a guy who only subscribed users list because there is too > much traffic. > > Github is easy enough to follow. So I propose we move GitHub comments to a > separate list. > > > We could leave this list for more generic and important discussions. Such > as the web site. Architectural decisions. Releases. And eventually even > codes but without the clutter of github. > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release ActiveMQ-CPP v3.9.5
+1 Checked the signature and legal. Regards JB On 28/01/2019 17:35, Timothy Bish wrote: > New vote open for ActiveMQ-CPP v3.9.5 > > This is a new patch release of the ActiveMQ-CPP client with an > additional configuration option to allow for timing out connect attempts > when the remote fails to respond. There is also a fix for a potential > memory leak during SSL handshake processing. > > The source bundles for this release can be found here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-cpp/3.9.5/ > > The Wiki page for the release is here: > http://activemq.apache.org/cms/activemq-cpp-395-release.html > > The list of issues fixed in this release is available here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311207=12339670 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311207=12335498> > > > Please cast your votes: > > [ ] +1 Release the source as Apache ActiveMQ-CPP 3.9.5 > [ ] -1 (provide specific comments) > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[DISCUSSION] ActiveMQ 5.x roadmap, codename ActiveMQ Missus
Hi all, I would like to discuss with you about the ActiveMQ 5.x roadmap. Even if Artemis is there, the stack is different and we still have lot of users on ActiveMQ, and, as a ActiveMQ 5.x fan and contributor, I think it's worth to give a new "dimension" to ActiveMQ 5.x. As all Apache projects, ActiveMQ 5.x roadmap and use is driven by the community, so I would like to propose and share some ideas with the ActiveMQ community. I already imagine a new codename for ActiveMQ 5.x roadmap: ActiveMQ Missus. Basically, I would like to propose a roadmap around three major points: 1. Modularity Today, ActiveMQ 5.x is a monolythic broker, even if most of the parts are already well isolated (persistent stores, transport connectors, etc). It makes sense to have some more "modular" and micro-services oriented, why not leveraging Apache Karaf with services. 2. Configuration backends We currently use Spring beans XML as main configuration backend (or blueprint in Karaf). I think it makes sense to update and split the configuration backend with something more "pluggable", and be able to expose new configuration format like yml. 3. Protocol/API update I would like to add support of JMS 2.0 in ActiveMQ 5.x and check/update the other protocols/APIs. 4. Cloud friendly I already sent some ideas weeks ago about "cloud friendly features" in ActiveMQ 5.x. Basically, I would like to propose: - a replicated/distributed persistent store to be able to have several brokers running with a distributed store. I'm testing an update to KahaDB using Bookkeeper. - provide new discovery agents with support of Kubernetes, Hazelcast, ... I would love to hear the community about this ! ;) I'm planning to start a complete document to provide more details and "milestone". Thoughts ? Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation
Thanks Christopher, I will ping you if needed ! Regards JB On 18/06/2019 18:48, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Thanks Jean-Baptiste. If you need some help (or have issues) with the > 5.15.10 release let me know as I have done the last several as you probably > know. > > Also having JDK 11/12 support will be great and we can finally release > 5.16.0 > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 4:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> By the way, once 5.15.10 will be released (hopefully beginning of next >> week), I will focus on 5.16.0, especially with JDK 11/12 full support. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10. >>> >>> I've started the preparation aka: >>> 1. reviewing PRs >>> 2. reviewing Jira >>> 3. preparing some improvements/fixes on local branches >>> >>> I made good progress, and I'm working on some OSGi/Karaf improvements. >>> >>> Unfortunately, it took more time than I expected. >>> >>> So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation >>> but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). >>> >>> If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, >>> please ping me directly. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation
By the way, once 5.15.10 will be released (hopefully beginning of next week), I will focus on 5.16.0, especially with JDK 11/12 full support. Regards JB On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10. > > I've started the preparation aka: > 1. reviewing PRs > 2. reviewing Jira > 3. preparing some improvements/fixes on local branches > > I made good progress, and I'm working on some OSGi/Karaf improvements. > > Unfortunately, it took more time than I expected. > > So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation > but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). > > If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, > please ping me directly. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation
Hi guys, some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10. I've started the preparation aka: 1. reviewing PRs 2. reviewing Jira 3. preparing some improvements/fixes on local branches I made good progress, and I'm working on some OSGi/Karaf improvements. Unfortunately, it took more time than I expected. So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, please ping me directly. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release
Hi team, I started to review some PRs and I'm also working on some improvements/fixes PR (for OSGi, but also preparing better cloud support features). I would like to submit to vote ActiveMQ 5.15.10 over the week end or beginning of next week. No objection ? Thanks, Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release
Hi Christopher, Agree for the Jira, my bad, I'm creating the Jira today for the tracking. For 5.16.x, it sounds like a plan. I will release 5.15.10 and then, I will move forward on 5.16.0 preparation with JDK 11 support (build and runtime). Thanks ! Regards JB On 14/05/2019 16:17, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Yes they were minor but we currently use Jira for the release notes so it's > good to have visibility to users know what changed. > > Master is already on 5.16.0-SNAPSHOT. It's fine to do a 5.15.10 my point > is just that it's pretty clear we need to get 5.16.0 out the door if we are > already hitting 10 point releases for 5.15 so I would like to get that JDK > 11 support figured out. If there's issues with building with JDK 11 then > we could always wait for build compatibility for the next release but at > least make sure it's runtime compatible with JDK 11. > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The PRs without Jira were minor, but I will create the corresponding >> Jira anyway, at least for the tracking. >> >> For the release, I propose the following: >> >> 1. Release 5.15.10 with the merge >> 2. Once 5.15.10 is released, I will create 5.16.x branch focus on JDK 11 >> support. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 14/05/2019 12:45, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>> Also, one more thing, you merged a bunch of PRs today but none of them >> have >>> Jiras. We need to have Jiras for all of those so that we can track the >>> commits in the release notes. >>> >>> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:34 AM Christopher Shannon < >>> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Ooops, I read the proposal as 5.15.0 not 5.15.10 :) >>>> >>>> So I think my opinion probably stands either way. We could do a 5.15.10 >>>> but we really need to get 5.16.0 out the door and stop doing patch >> releases >>>> on 5.15.x. The only thing holding back 5.16.0 is the JDK 11 support but >>>> there's some nice improvements to 5.16.0 that I would like to see >> released >>>> (such as some KahaDB improvements) >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:32 AM Christopher Shannon < >>>> christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I assume you mean 5.16.0 >>>>> >>>>> I've probably mentioned this a few times in various posts and chat but >> my >>>>> opinion is we need to support JDK 11 so I consider this issue a blocker >>>>> until resolved. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7087 >>>>> >>>>> 5.16.0 should still be compatible to run on JDK 8 or JDK 11 but (since >>>>> JDK 11 is the new LTS build) we should be able to run a build and pass >> all >>>>> tests using both 8 and 11 as well. I have done work here to get it to >>>>> build with JDK 11 but all of the OSGi tests and stuff are broken and >> I'm >>>>> not sure how to fix it as I haven't worked very much with OSGi. >>>>> >>>>> Here is the commit I started work on 6 months ago: >>>>> >> https://github.com/cshannon/activemq/commit/68c91621a0568a0d47e66a800833e1770c27b7d8 >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:53 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi team, >>>>>> >>>>>> I started to review some PRs and I'm also working on some >>>>>> improvements/fixes PR (for OSGi, but also preparing better cloud >> support >>>>>> features). >>>>>> >>>>>> I would like to submit to vote ActiveMQ 5.15.10 over the week end or >>>>>> beginning of next week. >>>>>> >>>>>> No objection ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: dist area clean up needed for old releases
I will thanks. Le 23 mai 2019 à 19:05, à 19:05, Robbie Gemmell a écrit: >I have now updated the links on the 5.14.5 release page to point to >the archive. Can a PMC member clean it from the dist area please? > >That could be accomplished by running e.g: >svn rm -m "clean out old release from mirrors" >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.14.5/ > > >Similarly, I think the apollo subdir of the dist area could be >removed. There are no releases in it anymore, it holds only a KEYS >file which isnt mirrored, isnt linked to from the site anymore, is >archived alongside the releases, and has contents duplicated in the >main KEYS file already. > >That could be accomplished by running e.g: >svn rm -m "remove apollo release subdir" >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/activemq-apollo/ > >Thanks, >Robbie > >On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 16:09, Robbie Gemmell >wrote: >> >> Thanks for cleaning up the Apollo and Artemis bits Clebert (Artemis >> 2.7.0 can now go too, and 2.8.0 once 2.8.1 is on the site and >> announced). >> >> For ActiveMQ 5.14.5, I wouldnt consider it an active branch given its >> age, the non trivial number of 5.15.x releases done since then >without >> any new 5.14.x, and multiple security fixes in 5.15.x that were not >> backported. Noone has replied to suggest otherwise, so unless someone >> does I will proceed to update the 5.14.5 release page on the website >> tomorrow to point to the archive area, then ask again that a PMC >> member clears it from the dist area. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 20:27, Clebert Suconic > wrote: >> > >> > I have cross referenced with the other post about docs... I thought >I >> > was answering that post. >> > >> > However, since I accidentally promised it :) I am doing the cleanup >> > >> > Artemis: >> > Deleting 1.5.6 >> > Deleting 2.6.1 >> > Deleting 2.6.2 >> > Deleting 2.6.3 >> > Deleting 2.6.4 >> > (2.7.0 will go after I send the announcement.. working on it.. I >had a >> > few issues on updating the website) >> > >> > >> > Apollo: >> > Removed >> > >> > NMS: >> > Is it ok to remove 1.5.0? (I'm not sure if these two are active >branches) >> > >> > >> > for ActiveMQ: >> > >> > should I remove 5.14.5? I'm not sure if 5.14 is an active branch or >not. >> > >> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 1:55 PM Robbie Gemmell > wrote: >> > > >> > > Great, thanks Clebert. >> > > >> > > Robbie >> > > >> > > On Fri, 10 May 2019 at 01:10, Clebert Suconic > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Ok. Thanks a lot to contribute to the discussion. That’s >sensible. >> > > > >> > > > I will remove some older versions. >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:43 AM Robbie Gemmell > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I noticed there are various older releases in the dist area >being >> > > > > mirrored that either definitely or probably should not be any >longer. >> > > > > Could PMC members clean them up as appropriate please? >> > > > > >> > > > > Apollo 1.7.1 is still being mirrored, it seems like it should >not be >> > > > > since its deprecated and isnt listed on the new site at all >that I >> > > > > see. >> > > > > >> > > > > For Artemis, 1.5.6, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.3, and 2.6.4 are still >being >> > > > > mirrored and shouldn't be, they aren't mentioned on the main >download >> > > > > page for Artemis (2.7.0 is, presumably to become 2.8.0 later >today), >> > > > > and the past releases page links to the archive as would be >expected >> > > > > and not the mirrors. (2.7.0 should also be removed from >mirroring >> > > > > later after the download pages are updated for 2.8.0, which >is now >> > > > > mostly mirrored.) >> > > > > >> > > > > For the 5.x releases, 5.14.5 is still being mirrored but >perhaps >> > > > > should not be. The main download page for 5.x only mentions >the latest >> > > > > 5.15.9 release. The release page for 5.14.5 does still link >to the >> > > > > mirrors but you have to drill down to find that page, its >over 2 years >> > > > > old now and there doesn't seem to be intent to do further >5.14.x, so >> > > > > its perhaps time to stop mirroring this release? >> > > > > >> > > > > Robbie >> > > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Clebert Suconic >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Clebert Suconic
Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release
Hi, The PRs without Jira were minor, but I will create the corresponding Jira anyway, at least for the tracking. For the release, I propose the following: 1. Release 5.15.10 with the merge 2. Once 5.15.10 is released, I will create 5.16.x branch focus on JDK 11 support. Thoughts ? Regards JB On 14/05/2019 12:45, Christopher Shannon wrote: Also, one more thing, you merged a bunch of PRs today but none of them have Jiras. We need to have Jiras for all of those so that we can track the commits in the release notes. On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:34 AM Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: Ooops, I read the proposal as 5.15.0 not 5.15.10 :) So I think my opinion probably stands either way. We could do a 5.15.10 but we really need to get 5.16.0 out the door and stop doing patch releases on 5.15.x. The only thing holding back 5.16.0 is the JDK 11 support but there's some nice improvements to 5.16.0 that I would like to see released (such as some KahaDB improvements) On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 6:32 AM Christopher Shannon < christopher.l.shan...@gmail.com> wrote: I assume you mean 5.16.0 I've probably mentioned this a few times in various posts and chat but my opinion is we need to support JDK 11 so I consider this issue a blocker until resolved. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7087 5.16.0 should still be compatible to run on JDK 8 or JDK 11 but (since JDK 11 is the new LTS build) we should be able to run a build and pass all tests using both 8 and 11 as well. I have done work here to get it to build with JDK 11 but all of the OSGi tests and stuff are broken and I'm not sure how to fix it as I haven't worked very much with OSGi. Here is the commit I started work on 6 months ago: https://github.com/cshannon/activemq/commit/68c91621a0568a0d47e66a800833e1770c27b7d8 On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:53 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi team, I started to review some PRs and I'm also working on some improvements/fixes PR (for OSGi, but also preparing better cloud support features). I would like to submit to vote ActiveMQ 5.15.10 over the week end or beginning of next week. No objection ? Thanks, Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Board Report Time
Fair enough.
Anyway, I'm moving forward on 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation
reviewing/fixing/merging.
About the "roadmap", I will start a formal vote.
Regards
JB
On 09/07/2019 12:08, Christopher Shannon wrote:
> There was almost no discussion on the proposals for 5.x. Almost no one
> responded and there was no consensus so definitely a -1 from me to include
> anything about JMS 2.0, cloud features or any other features like that for
> 5.x on the board report until it is discussed and the community has a
> consensus.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:34 AM wrote:
>
>> There was feedback i gave some on that thread.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Get Outlook for Android
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:43 AM +0100, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <
>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> It's just worth to mention, there's no feedback for now.
>>
>> Anyway, as a community effort, I don't see any blocker. About the
>> releases, it's straight forward as it's maintenance and improvements on
>> existing branches.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 9 juil. 2019 à 02:44, à 02:44, Clebert Suconic a écrit:
>>> I don’t think the community reached a consensus in order to include on
>>> the
>>> report.
>>>
>>> If you want to mention it on the report mention the discussion didn’t
>>> reach
>>> a consensus yet.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to contribute with the two e-mails sent about ActiveMQ:
>>>>
>>>> - 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation
>>>> - Roadmap proposal (JMS 2.0, JDK 11 support, ...)
>>>> - Cloud friendly features
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately I don't have the permission to edit the wiki page.
>>>>
>>>> Can you grant permission to my user ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 08/07/2019 17:40, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>>>>> This is a reminder that your contributions to the Board report are
>>>> urgently
>>>>> needed this week!
>>>>>
>>>>> The report is due in two days and currently there have been zero
>>>>> contributions. Please take a few minutes to report on project
>>> activity
>>>>> here:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 7:39 AM Bruce Snyder
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's time once again to create a report for the ASF Board for July
>>> 2019.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your contribution only takes five minutes, so please report
>>> project
>>>>>> activity for any of the ActiveMQ projects on the wiki page below:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This report is due to by July 10, 2019.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> perl -e 'print
>>>>>>
>>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E);'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>>>>>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/
>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Clebert Suconic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Board Report Time
It's just worth to mention, there's no feedback for now.
Anyway, as a community effort, I don't see any blocker. About the releases,
it's straight forward as it's maintenance and improvements on existing branches.
Regards
JB
Le 9 juil. 2019 à 02:44, à 02:44, Clebert Suconic a
écrit:
>I don’t think the community reached a consensus in order to include on
>the
>report.
>
>If you want to mention it on the report mention the discussion didn’t
>reach
>a consensus yet.
>
>On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> I would like to contribute with the two e-mails sent about ActiveMQ:
>>
>> - 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation
>> - Roadmap proposal (JMS 2.0, JDK 11 support, ...)
>> - Cloud friendly features
>>
>> Unfortunately I don't have the permission to edit the wiki page.
>>
>> Can you grant permission to my user ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 08/07/2019 17:40, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>> > This is a reminder that your contributions to the Board report are
>> urgently
>> > needed this week!
>> >
>> > The report is due in two days and currently there have been zero
>> > contributions. Please take a few minutes to report on project
>activity
>> > here:
>> >
>>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511
>> >
>> > Thank you!
>> >
>> > Bruce
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 7:39 AM Bruce Snyder
>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> It's time once again to create a report for the ASF Board for July
>2019.
>> >>
>> >> Your contribution only takes five minutes, so please report
>project
>> >> activity for any of the ActiveMQ projects on the wiki page below:
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511
>> >>
>> >> This report is due to by July 10, 2019.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> perl -e 'print
>> >>
>unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E);'
>> >>
>> >> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> >> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>> >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>--
>Clebert Suconic
Re: Board Report Time
Hi Bruce,
I would like to contribute with the two e-mails sent about ActiveMQ:
- 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation
- Roadmap proposal (JMS 2.0, JDK 11 support, ...)
- Cloud friendly features
Unfortunately I don't have the permission to edit the wiki page.
Can you grant permission to my user ?
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 08/07/2019 17:40, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> This is a reminder that your contributions to the Board report are urgently
> needed this week!
>
> The report is due in two days and currently there have been zero
> contributions. Please take a few minutes to report on project activity
> here:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511
>
> Thank you!
>
> Bruce
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 7:39 AM Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
>> It's time once again to create a report for the ASF Board for July 2019.
>>
>> Your contribution only takes five minutes, so please report project
>> activity for any of the ActiveMQ projects on the wiki page below:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511
>>
>> This report is due to by July 10, 2019.
>>
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>> unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E>
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
>> Blog: http://bsnyder.org/ <http://bruceblog.org/>
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
>>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation
Hi, it seems the assembly issue was a temporary one related to the Camel website update (the xsd was not available during the new Camel website publication). I'm double checking and starting the release process if ok. Regards JB On 21/08/2019 08:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > By the way, the assembly issue is not related to Jetty upgrade, it also > happens on master. I'm fixing it now. > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > Regards > JB > > On 20/08/2019 11:59, Christopher Shannon wrote: >> Jean-Baptiste, >> >> Are you going to do the release soon? The 5.15.10 Jira list is getting >> really large so I think the work should be cut off and the release needs to >> go out at this point. Fixes can also go into 5.15.11 and again I'd like to >> see 5.16.0 get done sooner rather than later if we can get JDK 11 support >> working properly with everything. >> >> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> just a quick update about 5.15.10 preparation. >>> >>> Some more cherry-pick have been done and I have more in the TODO list. >>> >>> I plan to submit 5.15.10 to vote next week. >>> >>> I keep you posted. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10. >>>> >>>> I've started the preparation aka: >>>> 1. reviewing PRs >>>> 2. reviewing Jira >>>> 3. preparing some improvements/fixes on local branches >>>> >>>> I made good progress, and I'm working on some OSGi/Karaf improvements. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, it took more time than I expected. >>>> >>>> So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation >>>> but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). >>>> >>>> If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, >>>> please ping me directly. >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation
By the way, the assembly issue is not related to Jetty upgrade, it also happens on master. I'm fixing it now. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards JB On 20/08/2019 11:59, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Jean-Baptiste, > > Are you going to do the release soon? The 5.15.10 Jira list is getting > really large so I think the work should be cut off and the release needs to > go out at this point. Fixes can also go into 5.15.11 and again I'd like to > see 5.16.0 get done sooner rather than later if we can get JDK 11 support > working properly with everything. > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> just a quick update about 5.15.10 preparation. >> >> Some more cherry-pick have been done and I have more in the TODO list. >> >> I plan to submit 5.15.10 to vote next week. >> >> I keep you posted. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10. >>> >>> I've started the preparation aka: >>> 1. reviewing PRs >>> 2. reviewing Jira >>> 3. preparing some improvements/fixes on local branches >>> >>> I made good progress, and I'm working on some OSGi/Karaf improvements. >>> >>> Unfortunately, it took more time than I expected. >>> >>> So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation >>> but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). >>> >>> If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, >>> please ping me directly. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation
Hi, Just to let you know that I postponed scala 2.13.0 update to 5.16.0 as it has large impact. Jetty update is done, I just fixing the assembly (about the camel.xml example). I will cut the 5.15.10 today. Regards JB On 20/08/2019 11:59, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Jean-Baptiste, > > Are you going to do the release soon? The 5.15.10 Jira list is getting > really large so I think the work should be cut off and the release needs to > go out at this point. Fixes can also go into 5.15.11 and again I'd like to > see 5.16.0 get done sooner rather than later if we can get JDK 11 support > working properly with everything. > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> just a quick update about 5.15.10 preparation. >> >> Some more cherry-pick have been done and I have more in the TODO list. >> >> I plan to submit 5.15.10 to vote next week. >> >> I keep you posted. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10. >>> >>> I've started the preparation aka: >>> 1. reviewing PRs >>> 2. reviewing Jira >>> 3. preparing some improvements/fixes on local branches >>> >>> I made good progress, and I'm working on some OSGi/Karaf improvements. >>> >>> Unfortunately, it took more time than I expected. >>> >>> So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation >>> but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). >>> >>> If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, >>> please ping me directly. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #3)
Hi guys, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 The Maven staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1195 The dist staging repository is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ Git tag: activemq-5.15.10 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)
Hi guys, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 The Maven staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1193 The dist staging repository is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ Git tag: activemq-5.15.10 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release
Due to xsd update missing, I cancel this vote and I will submit a new one. Sorry about that. Regards JB Le 24 août 2019 09:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : Hi guys, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1192 Git tag: activemq-5.15.10 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com Due to xsd update missing, I cancel this vote and I will submit a new one. Sorry about that. Regards JB Le 24 août 2019 09:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 > > > The staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1192 > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.10 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release
Hi
My bad I will fix that. I thought we use a global schema version as I do
in Karaf (or camel).
I also saw that scm should be updated to gitbox.
I'm fixing both.
Regards
JB
Le 24 août 2019 15:09, Christopher Shannon
a écrit :
-1
It looks like step 1 of the release guide was not completed to add the
5.15.10 schema references in both the META-INF/spring.schemas
and activemq-osgi/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring.schemas files.
As I
posted earlier the guide is here:
https://activemq.apache.org/release-guide.html
This is important as seen in this Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6544
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 3:50 AM Francois Papon
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks JB!
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
>
> Le 24/08/2019 à 09:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
> >
> > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
> >
> > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> >
> >
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171
> >
> > The staging repository is:
> >
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1192
> >
> > Git tag:
> > activemq-5.15.10
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks !
> > Regards
> > JB
>
Hi
My bad I will fix that. I thought we use a global schema version as I do in
Karaf (or camel).
I also saw that scm should be updated to gitbox.
I'm fixing both.
Regards
JB
Le 24 août 2019 15:09, Christopher Shannon a
écrit :
>
> -1
>
> It looks like step 1 of the release guide was not completed to add the
> 5.15.10 schema references in both the META-INF/spring.schemas
> and activemq-osgi/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring.schemas files. As I
> posted earlier the guide is here:
> https://activemq.apache.org/release-guide.html
>
> This is important as seen in this Jira:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6544
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 3:50 AM Francois Papon
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks JB!
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > François
> > fpa...@apache.org
> >
> > Le 24/08/2019 à 09:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote.
> > >
> > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements.
> > >
> > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details:
> > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171
> >
> > >
> > > The staging repository is:
> > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1192
> > >
> > > Git tag:
> > > activemq-5.15.10
> > >
> > > Please vote to approve this release:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks !
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> >
[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)
Hi, due to http test error and missing jbonofre key in KEYS file, I cancel this release. I will cut a new one tonight. Regards JB On 25/08/2019 10:15, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1193 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.10 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #3)
Hi, due to identified AMQ-7292, I cancel this vote to fix it. Sorry about that. Regards JB On 26/08/2019 22:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1195 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.10 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Casting my own +1. Regards JB On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.10 > > NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, > especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi guys, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 The Maven staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 The dist staging repository is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ Git tag: activemq-5.15.10 NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)
Hi, Oh, thanks for pointing. It's weird as the PullRequest worked. Regards JB On 26/08/2019 16:04, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hey JB, > > The Jetty upgrade caused the HTTP tests to fail. I'm preparing a PR to fix > this: > > https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/ActiveMQ/job/ActiveMQ-Java8/1310/ > > Colm. > > On 2019/08/25 08:15:43, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >> >> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >> >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >> >> The Maven staging repository is: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1193 >> >> The dist staging repository is: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >> >> Git tag: >> activemq-5.15.10 >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)
Hi Chris, I tried to update the KEYS file on dist.apache.org, but it's weird, I don't have the permission: activemq-dist-release/KEYS' is forbidden by the server Can you please give the permission to me or add my key in KEYS file ? Thanks ! Regards JB On 26/08/2019 13:05, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Unfortunately I think I need to -1 again. I don't see your key in the KEYS > file which is important to verify signatures obviously. See > https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keys-policy > The file we maintain our keys is > https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/KEYS and also you need to > merge it as part of 5.15.x branch and tag as well. > > Furthermore, I couldn't find your PGP key here: > https://home.apache.org/keys/ > > Also, it looked like you force pushed the 5.15.x branch. In the future > don't force push, just revert the commits. > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 4:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >> >> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >> >> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >> >> The Maven staging repository is: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1193 >> >> The dist staging repository is: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >> >> Git tag: >> activemq-5.15.10 >> >> Please vote to approve this release: >> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release >> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #2)
Yeah, it's the correct one. Thanks ! Regards JB On 26/08/2019 16:25, Christopher Shannon wrote: > You might need to be PMC to do it so I will try. I found your key here so > I will grab it: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/karaf/KEYS > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> I tried to update the KEYS file on dist.apache.org, but it's weird, I >> don't have the permission: >> >> activemq-dist-release/KEYS' is forbidden by the server >> >> Can you please give the permission to me or add my key in KEYS file ? >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 26/08/2019 13:05, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>> Unfortunately I think I need to -1 again. I don't see your key in the >> KEYS >>> file which is important to verify signatures obviously. See >>> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#keys-policy >>> The file we maintain our keys is >>> https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/master/KEYS and also you need to >>> merge it as part of 5.15.x branch and tag as well. >>> >>> Furthermore, I couldn't find your PGP key here: >>> https://home.apache.org/keys/ >>> >>> Also, it looked like you force pushed the 5.15.x branch. In the future >>> don't force push, just revert the commits. >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 4:15 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >>>> >>>> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >>>> >>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>> >>>> >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >>>> >>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1193 >>>> >>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >>>> >>>> Git tag: >>>> activemq-5.15.10 >>>> >>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>> >>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi guys, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, Michael Pearce +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Jamie Goodyear I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, and publish schema. I will also update Jira and prepare PR to update the website (tomorrow). Then, I will send an announcement e-mail. Now, I'm resuming the work on 5.16.0 ! Thanks all for your vote. Regards JB On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.10 > > NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, > especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release
Hi guys, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 The staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1192 Git tag: activemq-5.15.10 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: ActiveMQ 5.15.10 not yet advertised on website
Hi, It's on the way, I'm preparing the website update. Chris helped me to finalize the release (publishing on dist.apache.org), so, now I'm moving forward on the website update and announcement e-mail. Sorry for the delay. Regards JB On 06/09/2019 04:43, W B D wrote: > I saw that the vote passed for the release of 5.15.10, and that the maven > repository and download folder are both in place, but the website still > indicates 5.15.9 as the current release. Did something go wrong with the > publishing process? > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi Chris, yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy). The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon. Sorry for the delay. Regards JB On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Jean-Baptiste, > > Are you still working on updating the website and sending a release email? > It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release is > finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. > > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> this vote passed with the following result: >> >> +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, >> Michael Pearce >> +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, >> Jamie Goodyear >> >> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, and >> publish schema. I will also update Jira and prepare PR to update the >> website (tomorrow). Then, I will send an announcement e-mail. >> >> Now, I'm resuming the work on 5.16.0 ! >> >> Thanks all for your vote. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >>> >>> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >>> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >>> >>> The Maven staging repository is: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 >>> >>> The dist staging repository is: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >>> >>> Git tag: >>> activemq-5.15.10 >>> >>> NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, >>> especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: ActiveMQ 5.15.10 not yet advertised on website
Hi Tim, it's in my bucket, but I'm late on this (due to ApacheCon). It will happen very soon. Sorry again for the delay. Regards JB On 12/09/2019 15:51, Timothy Bish wrote: > Is there some hurdle that is holding up the process? Seems like we should > have an announce thread by now and the site should be updated. > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It's on the way, I'm preparing the website update. Chris helped me to >> finalize the release (publishing on dist.apache.org), so, now I'm moving >> forward on the website update and announcement e-mail. >> >> Sorry for the delay. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 06/09/2019 04:43, W B D wrote: >>> I saw that the vote passed for the release of 5.15.10, and that the maven >>> repository and download folder are both in place, but the website still >>> indicates 5.15.9 as the current release. Did something go wrong with the >>> publishing process? >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi guys, just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume website update and announcement today and tomorrow. Regards JB On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Thanks for the update Chris. > +1 > > El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré () > escribió: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy). >> >> The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon. >> >> Sorry for the delay. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>> Jean-Baptiste, >>> >>> Are you still working on updating the website and sending a release >> email? >>> It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release is >>> finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>> >>>> +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, >>>> Michael Pearce >>>> +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, >>>> Jamie Goodyear >>>> >>>> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, and >>>> publish schema. I will also update Jira and prepare PR to update the >>>> website (tomorrow). Then, I will send an announcement e-mail. >>>> >>>> Now, I'm resuming the work on 5.16.0 ! >>>> >>>> Thanks all for your vote. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> >>>>> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >>>>> >>>>> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >>>>> >>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >>>>> >>>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>>> >>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 >>>>> >>>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >>>>> >>>>> Git tag: >>>>> activemq-5.15.10 >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, >>>>> especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. >>>>> >>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>> >>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks ! >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi, @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will send the announcement email when website is ok. Regards JB On 16/09/2019 15:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume > website update and announcement today and tomorrow. > > Regards > JB > > On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote: >> Thanks for the update Chris. >> +1 >> >> El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré () >> escribió: >> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy). >>> >>> The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon. >>> >>> Sorry for the delay. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>>> Jean-Baptiste, >>>> >>>> Are you still working on updating the website and sending a release >>> email? >>>> It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release is >>>> finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> >>>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, >>>>> Michael Pearce >>>>> +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, >>>>> Jamie Goodyear >>>>> >>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, and >>>>> publish schema. I will also update Jira and prepare PR to update the >>>>> website (tomorrow). Then, I will send an announcement e-mail. >>>>> >>>>> Now, I'm resuming the work on 5.16.0 ! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks all for your vote. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >>>>>> >>>>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 >>>>>> >>>>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Git tag: >>>>>> activemq-5.15.10 >>>>>> >>>>>> NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, >>>>>> especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi, website PR is ready: https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/12 I also pushed the schema (xsd and html with signatures) directly on website production svn. Regards JB On 19/09/2019 20:41, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Good point Robbie, any committer should be able to push since it's just > another git project. But either way I'm happy to review a PR. > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:40 AM Robbie Gemmell > wrote: > >> Possibly you just want someone on the PMC to look at the update before >> publishing, hence raising a PR...but just in case, note that unlike >> the release repo area you dont need a PMC member to push updates to >> the website. >> >> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 06:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the >>> website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will >>> send the announcement email when website is ok. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 16/09/2019 15:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume >>>> website update and announcement today and tomorrow. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote: >>>>> Thanks for the update Chris. >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré (< >> j...@nanthrax.net>) >>>>> escribió: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Chris, >>>>>> >>>>>> yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy). >>>>>> >>>>>> The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for the delay. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you still working on updating the website and sending a release >>>>>> email? >>>>>>> It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release >> is >>>>>>> finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, >>>>>>>> Michael Pearce >>>>>>>> +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste >> Onofré, >>>>>>>> Jamie Goodyear >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, >> and >>>>>>>> publish schema. I will also update Jira and prepare PR to update >> the >>>>>>>> website (tomorrow). Then, I will send an announcement e-mail. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, I'm resuming the work on 5.16.0 ! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks all for your vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Git tag: >>>>>>>>> activemq-5.15.10 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, >>>>>>>>> especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific >> comments) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi, as ASF member, I can even push directly on repo. However, I prefer to "four eyes" validation, and not acting as lonesome cowboy ;) That's why I asked at least Christopher to review (not necessary push/publish). It's not a question of karma but community respect. Regards JB On 19/09/2019 17:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Possibly you just want someone on the PMC to look at the update before > publishing, hence raising a PR...but just in case, note that unlike > the release repo area you dont need a PMC member to push updates to > the website. > > On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 06:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the >> website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will >> send the announcement email when website is ok. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 16/09/2019 15:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume >>> website update and announcement today and tomorrow. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote: >>>> Thanks for the update Chris. >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> () >>>> escribió: >>>> >>>>> Hi Chris, >>>>> >>>>> yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy). >>>>> >>>>> The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon. >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for the delay. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste, >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you still working on updating the website and sending a release >>>>> email? >>>>>> It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release is >>>>>> finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, >>>>>>> Michael Pearce >>>>>>> +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste Onofré, >>>>>>> Jamie Goodyear >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, and >>>>>>> publish schema. I will also update Jira and prepare PR to update the >>>>>>> website (tomorrow). Then, I will send an announcement e-mail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now, I'm resuming the work on 5.16.0 ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks all for your vote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28/08/2019 12:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release to your vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This release includes dependency updates, and improvements. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345171 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1196 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.10/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Git tag: >>>>>>>> activemq-5.15.10 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> NOTE: I'm preparing a release notes highlights for the website, >>>>>>>> especially to mention the updates related to CVE issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Hi Robbie, It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault, and it won't happen for next one for sure ;) Regards JB On 20/09/2019 11:09, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > As I said I wondered if that was the case, which is all good. I just > thought in case that wasnt the situation it would be helpful to ensure > you knew the website updates can be / normally are pushed directly, to > hopefully help avoid the release publishing process going past the 3 > week mark. > > Robbie > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> as ASF member, I can even push directly on repo. However, I prefer to >> "four eyes" validation, and not acting as lonesome cowboy ;) >> >> That's why I asked at least Christopher to review (not necessary >> push/publish). >> >> It's not a question of karma but community respect. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 19/09/2019 17:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>> Possibly you just want someone on the PMC to look at the update before >>> publishing, hence raising a PR...but just in case, note that unlike >>> the release repo area you dont need a PMC member to push updates to >>> the website. >>> >>> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 06:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the >>>> website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I will >>>> send the announcement email when website is ok. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 16/09/2019 15:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> >>>>> just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume >>>>> website update and announcement today and tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote: >>>>>> Thanks for the update Chris. >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> () >>>>>> escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Chris, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry for the delay. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you still working on updating the website and sending a release >>>>>>> email? >>>>>>>> It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a release is >>>>>>>> finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding): Christopher Shannon, Clebert Suconic, Timothy Bish, >>>>>>>>> Michael Pearce >>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding): Colm O'hEigeartaigh, Krzysztof, Jean-Baptiste >>>>>>>>> Onofré, >>>>>>>>> Jamie Goodyear >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and dist.apache.org, and >>>>>>>>> publish schema. I will also update Jira and prepare PR to update the >>>>>>>>> website (tomorrow). Then, I will send an announcement e-mail. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now, I'm resuming the work on 5.16.0 ! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks all for your vote. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>
Re: [HEADS UP] ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release preparation
Hi guys, just a quick update about 5.15.10 preparation. Some more cherry-pick have been done and I have more in the TODO list. I plan to submit 5.15.10 to vote next week. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 13/06/2019 14:53, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > some days ago, I proposed to move forward on ActiveMQ 5.15.10. > > I've started the preparation aka: > 1. reviewing PRs > 2. reviewing Jira > 3. preparing some improvements/fixes on local branches > > I made good progress, and I'm working on some OSGi/Karaf improvements. > > Unfortunately, it took more time than I expected. > > So, just to let you know that I'm focus on 5.15.10 release preparation > but I need some more days (probably about 5 more days). > > If you have some specific Jira or fixes you want to see in 5.15.10, > please ping me directly. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: ActiveMQ cve vulnerabilities seen in latest version
HI, I gonna take a look. If the CVE has been published, they should be fixed already. The point is more on which branch it has been fixed. So, let me do a pass as I'm preparing 5.15.10. Regards JB On 04/07/2019 06:01, venu madhav wrote: > Hi team, > > I am running a dummy project to scan the vulnerabilities using owasp > dependency-check. The project doesn't contain anything except for the > activemq jars added as dependencies in the pom.xml. Even when we use the > latest version of activemq-kahadb-store jar (5.15.9 version) we see some > vulnerabilities such as CVE-2018-11775 , CVE-2016-3088 which ideally > should be fixed in the latest release as per mentioned in the link: > https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/security > > Can you please check and tell if the issue is not fixed or NVD database > is still showing the vulnerability even if the issue is fixed. > > I have attached the pom.xml and the dependency check reports for your > reference. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version
Hi guys, I got a consensus as follow: - 5.15.x: JDK 8 max - 5.16.x: JDK 8 still compliant, support of JDK 9+ - 5.17.x: JDK 9+ min I've updated Jira accordingly. Thanks for your comments ! Regards JB On 31/10/2019 11:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > As I'm working on 5.16.0 release preparation, it's important to agree > about the minimum Java version for runtime of this version. > > The purpose is to fully support JDK 9+ (and so 11, 12, 13). > > I started some upgrade to fully support those Java versions (for > instance Derby 10.15.1.3 upgrade). > > We have two options here: > > - still support JDK8 and run with newer version (and then, we have to > keep JDK8 compliant dependencies, like Derby 10.14.2.0 for instance) > - define JDK9 as minimum version to run and then, we can upgrade the > dependencies. > > Thoughts ? > > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: i want to know the count of Message IDs.
Hi, You mean the messages count (pending messages) in a destination (queue or topic) ? You can browse a destination to get the count, or use JMX. Regards JB On 03/11/2019 12:24, deepakvdtls wrote: > Dears, > > I am using ActiveMQ and i want to know the count of Message IDs. > > On click of QueName, system displayed me lots of Message IDs. > > How can I get its count in .net? > > Thanks > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 31/10/2019 16:18, Michael Pearce wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now resolved. > > I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please > check it and vote accordingly. > > This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP client.. > > Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to > make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly, > creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget. > > The files can be grabbed > from:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/ > > The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP > > > Regards, > Michael > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version
Hi Tim, I agree, let me focus on 5.16.0 running with JDK 8, 9, 11, 12 ... It makes sense. I'm completing 5.15.11 now, and 5.16.0 will follow. Regards JB On 31/10/2019 16:53, Timothy Bish wrote: > On 10/31/19 6:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> As I'm working on 5.16.0 release preparation, it's important to agree >> about the minimum Java version for runtime of this version. >> >> The purpose is to fully support JDK 9+ (and so 11, 12, 13). >> >> I started some upgrade to fully support those Java versions (for >> instance Derby 10.15.1.3 upgrade). >> >> We have two options here: >> >> - still support JDK8 and run with newer version (and then, we have to >> keep JDK8 compliant dependencies, like Derby 10.14.2.0 for instance) >> - define JDK9 as minimum version to run and then, we can upgrade the >> dependencies. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB > > Given how long folks have been waiting on a 5.16.0 release I'd go with > option 2 and continue supporting JDK 8 so that a new release that can > run on newer JDKs is out but still maintains compatibility with the > existing supported platform. > > Once 5.16.0 is out then a move to JDK 11 in 5.17.0 if such a release was > ever to be done would be the next most sensible option as that moves to > supported JDK. > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Hi, I agree with Robbie. I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member). However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close the vote. Regards JB On 06/11/2019 18:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding > +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to > have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it > is the PMC that must agree to the release happening. > > I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm > not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC > obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos > votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd > expect its the former though. > > This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details > the 3 binding +1 votes requirement: > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes > > I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from > Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise), > which if cast would get the required 3. > > Robbie > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram wrote: >> >> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates >> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says: >> >> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more >> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed. >> Votes cast by PMC members are binding. >> >> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've >> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes >> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this >> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback. >> >> It also says: >> >> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all >> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet >> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all >> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their >> own platform. >> >> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted. >> >> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread. >> >> >> Justin >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval >> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM wrote: >> >>> Hi PMC >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Best >>> >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Get Outlook for Android >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +, "Krzysztof" >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box >>> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully). >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (Binding) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now >>>> resolved. >>>>> >>>>> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please >>>>> check it and vote accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP >>> client.. >>>>> >>>>> Also includes some modernisation of the project that was needed to >>>>> make the release, updating for latest visual studio, and lastly, >>>>> creating a nuget package, that once approved, we can publish to nuget. >>>>> >>>>> The files can be grabbed >>>>> from: >>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-nms-amqp/1.8.0-rc2/ >>>>> >>>>> The JIRAs assigned for this release can be found: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQNET-618?jql=project%20%3D%20AMQNET%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20AMQP >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Michael >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Clebert Suconic >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2
Sorry, I meant for Artemis Native vote, sorry for the cross meaning. Regards JB On 06/11/2019 18:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you > actually did cast the first vote in the thread. > > On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I agree with Robbie. >> >> I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would >> like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a >> vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member). >> >> However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close >> the vote. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 06/11/2019 18:13, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding >>> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to >>> have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it >>> is the PMC that must agree to the release happening. >>> >>> I'd agree the page you linked isnt really clear on that though. I'm >>> not sure if thats still meant to be implied since it speaks of the PMC >>> obeying the requirements, and then min 3 positive votes, plus whos >>> votes are binding..or whether there was an actual policy shift. I'd >>> expect its the former though. >>> >>> This page which I've typically seen referred to before, still details >>> the 3 binding +1 votes requirement: >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >>> >>> I see 2 PMC votes cast from Clebert+Martyn and another implied from >>> Michael (apologies anyone else is on the PMC and I didn't realise), >>> which if cast would get the required 3. >>> >>> Robbie >>> >>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 16:51, Justin Bertram wrote: >>>> >>>> My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates >>>> you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says: >>>> >>>> For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more >>>> positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed. >>>> Votes cast by PMC members are binding. >>>> >>>> So, you need 3 votes and more positive than negative votes (which you've >>>> received). It doesn't say you need 3 binding votes. It just says PMC votes >>>> are binding (which has other implications). Perhaps I'm interpreting this >>>> incorrectly. I'd welcome any feedback. >>>> >>>> It also says: >>>> >>>> Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download all >>>> signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that they meet >>>> all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, validate all >>>> cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the result on their >>>> own platform. >>>> >>>> I'm not set up here to test an NMS release which is why I haven't voted. >>>> >>>> Sorry if I'm derailing this [VOTE] thread. >>>> >>>> >>>> Justin >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 10:01 AM >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi PMC >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Get Outlook for Android >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +, "Krzysztof" >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box >>>>> and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully). >&g
Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml
Hi Clebert, The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build. It's what I'm doing for Karaf: https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags Regards JB On 02/12/2019 20:51, Clebert Suconic wrote: > The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache > Infra. their support is limited as in Apache the release is the > Source. > > I hope things have changed on apache regarding docker. In any case it > would really benefit to have a separate thread discussion showing the > progress on that front, as in if the infra team have improved their > support on docker or not. > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: >> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image >> for ActiveMQ >> - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) >> >> I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml
+1 for dedicated thread. I will start it. Thanks, Regards JB On 03/12/2019 14:30, Clebert Suconic wrote: > What Infra offered didn’t make it easy to make a service like project to be > officially built on docker. > I would appreciate a separate discussion if you find a way. > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:50 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Clebert, >> >> The purpose is more to populate docker hub within the build. >> >> It's what I'm doing for Karaf: >> >> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/karaf/tags >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 02/12/2019 20:51, Clebert Suconic wrote: >>> The "official" image is something you will have to work with Apache >>> Infra. their support is limited as in Apache the release is the >>> Source. >>> >>> I hope things have changed on apache regarding docker. In any case it >>> would really benefit to have a separate thread discussion showing the >>> progress on that front, as in if the infra team have improved their >>> support on docker or not. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:41 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: >>>> - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image >>>> for ActiveMQ >>>> - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) >>>> >>>> I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. >>>> >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Building Errors
min] > [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Generic JMS Pool ... SUCCESS [ 5.626 > s] > [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Pool ... FAILURE [ 1.457 > s] > [INFO] ActiveMQ :: RA ......... SKIPPED > [INFO] ActiveMQ :: Spring . SKIPPED > > Please help to resolve this build error. > > Thanks > Goutam Giri > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: activemq
Hi, You have one producer that you want to move from a broker to another ? It's possible in a network of brokers, using the rebalance client. Is it what you want ? Regards JB On 16/12/2019 14:51, uda4ia777 wrote: > I'm interested in transferring from one Producer to a broker on one port and > picking up (Consumer) from a broker on another can I implement it in > activemq in apache > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
I tried to build with Jekyll but it failed on my machine. I'm resuming my work on the PR. It should be OK to merge tonight or tomorrow. Regards JB On 16/12/2019 17:52, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > A PR for site updates > https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/22 was raised, but > some trivial fixups remain outstanding. > > Robbie > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 12:00, Christopher Shannon > wrote: >> >> JB, >> >> Are you still working on the website update and release email for the >> release? >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:46 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks a lot ! >>> >>> Much appreciated. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 25/11/2019 19:01, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>>> I promoted the artifacts: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.11/ >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon, Michael Andre Pearce >>>>> +1 (non binding): Jonathan Gallimore, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear, >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> >>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and update Jira. One PMC >>>>> will help me to push the artifacts on dist.apache.org release. >>>>> >>>>> I'm preparing a website PR to announce the release. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks all for your vote. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote >>> shortly, >>>>>> probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your >>>>> vote. >>>>>> This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. >>>>>> >>>>>> This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security >>>>>> fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 >>>>>> >>>>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>>>> >>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 >>>>>> >>>>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Git tag: >>>>>> activemq-5.15.11 >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>> >>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0
Hi, Just a quick update about these releases. I'm finalizing the latest updates to address CVE for 5.15.11, the release should be submitted to vote next week. About 5.16.0, I fixed the OSGi issue with JDK >= 11, I will create the PR during the week end. I plan to submit this release to vote next week as well. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 25/09/2019 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11. We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have those 9 issues addressed by middle of next week and I plan to submit 5.15.11 to vote in 2 or 3 weeks. In the mean time, I started the JMS 2.0 support in ActiveMQ 5.16.0-SNAPSHOT and JDK 11 full support. I'm reviewing the Jira for 5.16.0 and defining the priorities. My goal is to be able to submit 5.16.0 release around end of November. Regards JB
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release
Hi guys, Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote. This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 The Maven staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1200 The dist staging repository is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ Git tag: activemq-5.15.11 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release
Good point Chris ;) I will do the vote the week following Thanksgiving, it gives me time to polish and fix the latest issues ;) Regards JB On 20/11/2019 15:02, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Not to hijack the thread but I would strongly recommend not doing a 5.16.0 > vote next week as it is Thanksgiving week in the USA so a lot of people > (myself included) will be taking a lot of time off. > > I will vote on this after I take a look. > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 8:51 AM Francois Papon > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks JB! >> >> regards, >> >> François >> fpa...@apache.org >> >> Le 20/11/2019 à 06:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, >>> probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your >> vote. >>> >>> This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security >>> fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. >>> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 >>> >>> The Maven staging repository is: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1200 >>> >>> The dist staging repository is: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ >>> >>> Git tag: >>> activemq-5.15.11 >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
Hi guys, Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote. This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 The Maven staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 The dist staging repository is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ Git tag: activemq-5.15.11 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release
Hi Chris, I just fixed this issue on master and activemq-5.15.x branch. I didn't have the issue during the release build. Do you consider it's a release blocker ? If so, I can do a take 2 right now. Regards JB On 20/11/2019 16:43, Christopher Shannon wrote: > -1, When running the build from the tag I am getting the following error > (on JDK: openjdk version "1.8.0_232") > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process > (process-resource-bundles) on project activemq-osgi: Execution > process-resource-bundles of goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process failed.: > NullPointerException -> [Help 1] > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:55 AM jgenender wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release
Hi, due to build issue on activemq-osgi module, I cancel this vote to submit a new one (the issue is already fixed, weird I didn't have the issue on my machine during the vote build). Regards JB On 20/11/2019 06:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, > probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote. > > This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security > fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1200 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.11 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release
Fair enough, let me cancel the vote and cut a new one. Thanks, Regards JB On 20/11/2019 16:45, Christopher Shannon wrote: > I do consider it a blocker because I can't run the unit tests or build from > the tag so it needs to be fixed. > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 10:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Chris, >> >> I just fixed this issue on master and activemq-5.15.x branch. >> >> I didn't have the issue during the release build. >> >> Do you consider it's a release blocker ? If so, I can do a take 2 right >> now. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 20/11/2019 16:43, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>> -1, When running the build from the tag I am getting the following error >>> (on JDK: openjdk version "1.8.0_232") >>> >>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal >>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process >>> (process-resource-bundles) on project activemq-osgi: Execution >>> process-resource-bundles of goal >>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process >> failed.: >>> NullPointerException -> [Help 1] >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:55 AM jgenender wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from: >>>> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
Here's my +1 (non binding) Regards JB On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, > probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote. > This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. > > This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security > fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.11 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
Just a gently reminder: we would need an additional PMC (binding) vote to complete this vote. Thanks Regards JB On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, > probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote. > This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. > > This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security > fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.11 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
Hi all, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon, Michael Andre Pearce +1 (non binding): Jonathan Gallimore, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear, Jean-Baptiste Onofré I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and update Jira. One PMC will help me to push the artifacts on dist.apache.org release. I'm preparing a website PR to announce the release. Thanks all for your vote. Regards JB On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, > probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your vote. > This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. > > This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security > fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. > > Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 > > The Maven staging repository is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 > > The dist staging repository is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ > > Git tag: > activemq-5.15.11 > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
Yeah, just saw the vote. Thanks Michael. I'm closing the vote. @Chris, I will need you to promote the artifacts from dist.apache.org dev to release. Thanks again Regards JB On 25/11/2019 18:22, Christopher Shannon wrote: > Thanks Michael. > > JB, you should be good to close out the vote now as we have 3 binding +1s. > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:19 PM > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> Downloaded binariesChecked checksum and hashesBasic single node setup with >> some smoke test client. >> ThanksMike >> Get Outlook for Android >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:05 AM +, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" < >> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Here's my +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, >>> probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your >> vote. >>> This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. >>> >>> This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security >>> fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. >>> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 >>> >>> The Maven staging repository is: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 >>> >>> The dist staging repository is: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ >>> >>> Git tag: >>> activemq-5.15.11 >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
Thanks a lot ! Much appreciated. Regards JB On 25/11/2019 19:01, Christopher Shannon wrote: > I promoted the artifacts: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.11/ > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> this vote passed with the following result: >> >> +1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon, Michael Andre Pearce >> +1 (non binding): Jonathan Gallimore, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear, >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> >> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and update Jira. One PMC >> will help me to push the artifacts on dist.apache.org release. >> >> I'm preparing a website PR to announce the release. >> >> Thanks all for your vote. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote shortly, >>> probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your >> vote. >>> This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. >>> >>> This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security >>> fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. >>> >>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 >>> >>> The Maven staging repository is: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 >>> >>> The dist staging repository is: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ >>> >>> Git tag: >>> activemq-5.15.11 >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[PROPOSAL] ActiveMQ official Docker images and K8S yml
Hi guys, as part of the ActiveMQ 5.16.0 preparation, I works on: - Dockerfile/Docker image to provide an "official" Apache Docker image for ActiveMQ - Several k8s yml files (with different scenarios) I propose to integrate this in the ActiveMQ codebase. Thoughts ? Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version
Hi guys, As I'm working on 5.16.0 release preparation, it's important to agree about the minimum Java version for runtime of this version. The purpose is to fully support JDK 9+ (and so 11, 12, 13). I started some upgrade to fully support those Java versions (for instance Derby 10.15.1.3 upgrade). We have two options here: - still support JDK8 and run with newer version (and then, we have to keep JDK8 compliant dependencies, like Derby 10.14.2.0 for instance) - define JDK9 as minimum version to run and then, we can upgrade the dependencies. Thoughts ? Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [DISCUSS] ActiveMQ 5.16.0 minimum Java version
Hi Jon, I took Derby as example, it's more a general topic. It's also a question of timing, I can cut 5.16.0 as it's (with JDK 11 support but still JDK 8 support as well) and prepare 5.17.0 with JDK9 min. Regards JB On 31/10/2019 11:35, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > Personally, I'd prefer something that still ran on Java 8, but I'll > understand if I'm in the minority. > > What benefits do we get from upgrading Derby to 10.15.1.3 and therefore > requiring Java 9? > > Jon > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:26 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> As I'm working on 5.16.0 release preparation, it's important to agree >> about the minimum Java version for runtime of this version. >> >> The purpose is to fully support JDK 9+ (and so 11, 12, 13). >> >> I started some upgrade to fully support those Java versions (for >> instance Derby 10.15.1.3 upgrade). >> >> We have two options here: >> >> - still support JDK8 and run with newer version (and then, we have to >> keep JDK8 compliant dependencies, like Derby 10.14.2.0 for instance) >> - define JDK9 as minimum version to run and then, we can upgrade the >> dependencies. >> >> Thoughts ? >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 release (take #4)
Awesome, thanks, I'm preparing the announcement e-mail. Regards JB On 20/09/2019 15:57, Christopher Shannon wrote: > website has been updated > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:39 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Robbie, >> >> It makes sense. Regarding the release publish, it's all my fault, and it >> won't happen for next one for sure ;) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 20/09/2019 11:09, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>> As I said I wondered if that was the case, which is all good. I just >>> thought in case that wasnt the situation it would be helpful to ensure >>> you knew the website updates can be / normally are pushed directly, to >>> hopefully help avoid the release publishing process going past the 3 >>> week mark. >>> >>> Robbie >>> >>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as ASF member, I can even push directly on repo. However, I prefer to >>>> "four eyes" validation, and not acting as lonesome cowboy ;) >>>> >>>> That's why I asked at least Christopher to review (not necessary >>>> push/publish). >>>> >>>> It's not a question of karma but community respect. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 19/09/2019 17:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>>>> Possibly you just want someone on the PMC to look at the update before >>>>> publishing, hence raising a PR...but just in case, note that unlike >>>>> the release repo area you dont need a PMC member to push updates to >>>>> the website. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 06:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> @Chris, following the process, I would need help of a PMC to merge the >>>>>> website PR. Would you have time later today (PR is on the way) ? I >> will >>>>>> send the announcement email when website is ok. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On 16/09/2019 15:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> just to let you know that I'm now back from ApacheCon. I will resume >>>>>>> website update and announcement today and tomorrow. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/09/2019 17:02, Cesar Hernandez wrote: >>>>>>>> Thanks for the update Chris. >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré (< >> j...@nanthrax.net>) >>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Chris, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> yes, I'm doing it at same time as I'm at ApacheCon (so a bit busy). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The website update and announcement e-mail will happen very soon. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 12/09/2019 15:51, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are you still working on updating the website and sending a >> release >>>>>>>>> email? >>>>>>>>>> It's important to get that out as soon as possible after a >> release is >>>>>>>>>> finished and it's been almost 2 weeks. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >> j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1
[ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.10 released !
The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce the release of ActiveMQ 5.15.10. You can find more details on: https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-51510-release A big thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. We look forward to your feedback.
[HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0
Hi guys, I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11. We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have those 9 issues addressed by middle of next week and I plan to submit 5.15.11 to vote in 2 or 3 weeks. In the mean time, I started the JMS 2.0 support in ActiveMQ 5.16.0-SNAPSHOT and JDK 11 full support. I'm reviewing the Jira for 5.16.0 and defining the priorities. My goal is to be able to submit 5.16.0 release around end of November. Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0
Hi Jon, +1 to have AMQ-7149 on both 5.16.0 and 5.15.11. For the Jira, feel free to take a look and if it's assigned to me, please just ping me and I will give you an update. Thanks ! Regards JB On 25/09/2019 12:38, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for this update! Couple of questions: > > * Could this be included in 5.16: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7149 - it was pushed back from > 5.15 to avoid introducing a dependency change on the 5.15.x branch. > * Are there some JIRAs that people can dig in and work on? I potentially > have some cycles and would like to pick up some JIRAs to work on. > > Jon > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11. >> >> We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have those 9 issues >> addressed by middle of next week and I plan to submit 5.15.11 to vote in >> 2 or 3 weeks. >> >> In the mean time, I started the JMS 2.0 support in ActiveMQ >> 5.16.0-SNAPSHOT and JDK 11 full support. I'm reviewing the Jira for >> 5.16.0 and defining the priorities. >> My goal is to be able to submit 5.16.0 release around end of November. >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] Preparing ActiveMQ 5.15.11 and 5.16.0
Hi guys, Just an update about this. Regarding ActiveMQ 5.15.11, I moved forward during the week end. I plan to create the PR this week and hopeful submit the release to vote by the end of this week. Regarding ActiveMQ 5.16.0, I did good progress but still some work to do. Reasonably I plan to submit the release to vote by the end of this month or beginning of November. Stay tuned ! Regards JB On 25/09/2019 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi guys, > > I started the triage and fixes on ActiveMQ 5.15.11. > > We have 9 issues to address in 5.15.11. I hope to have those 9 issues > addressed by middle of next week and I plan to submit 5.15.11 to vote in > 2 or 3 weeks. > > In the mean time, I started the JMS 2.0 support in ActiveMQ > 5.16.0-SNAPSHOT and JDK 11 full support. I'm reviewing the Jira for > 5.16.0 and defining the priorities. > My goal is to be able to submit 5.16.0 release around end of November. > > Regards > JB > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0
Technically it's possible, but I would inform the users first. So, 5.17.x gives us time to do so. Regards JB On 29/01/2020 11:30, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi all, > > If LevelDB is deprecated for several major versions, I'm wondering if we > should just not remove it in 5.16.0 instead of waiting til 5.17.0? > > Colm. > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi Christopher, >> >> OK, so, I will move forward on 5.16.0 with JDK11 support at runtime. >> >> I will focus on JDK11 build + LevelDB cleanup + other >> cleanup/refactoring for 5.17.0. >> >> So, let me move forward on 5.16.0 as it's now ready ;) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 28/01/2020 20:22, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>> We definitely do not want to remove JDK 8 support for 5.16.0 so my vote >> is >>> for option 1. I think it's fine if we build with JDK 8 as long as it >>> supports JDK 8 - 11 at runtime. >>> >>> For 5.17.0 we can work on building with JDK 11. For one thing I think we >>> should just make it easier on ourselves and remove LevelDB entirely as it >>> has been deprecated now for several major versions and there isn't any >>> reason to keep it at around at this point. >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> I would like to move forward on ActiveMQ releases: >>>> >>>> - ActiveMQ 5.15.12 >>>> I'm preparing several dependency updates and important fixes on the >>>> activemq-5.15.x branch. It includes some security fixes, postgresql jdbc >>>> store performance improvements, ... >>>> I have some PRs under review and on the fly, so, I plan to submit >>>> 5.15.12 to vote next week. >>>> >>>> - ActiveMQ 5.16.0 >>>> I did a full pass (standalone and in Apache Karaf) with JDK 11. The >>>> broker works without problem, including on Karaf 4.2.8. >>>> However, it's not currently possible to fully build with JDK 11. I have >>>> a branch where I did the required changes (remove the use of tools.jar >>>> in openwire generator, add annotation and jaxb dependency in different >>>> modules, update scala for leveldb, ...). >>>> The question that I have is about what's the exact target for 5.16.0: >>>> 1. We still build ActiveMQ 5.16.x with JDK8, but it supports both JDK8 >>>> or JDK11 at runtime. >>>> 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only >>>> support JDK11 at runtime. >>>> Thoughts ? >>>> Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me >>>> know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime). >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0
Hi guys, I would like to move forward on ActiveMQ releases: - ActiveMQ 5.15.12 I'm preparing several dependency updates and important fixes on the activemq-5.15.x branch. It includes some security fixes, postgresql jdbc store performance improvements, ... I have some PRs under review and on the fly, so, I plan to submit 5.15.12 to vote next week. - ActiveMQ 5.16.0 I did a full pass (standalone and in Apache Karaf) with JDK 11. The broker works without problem, including on Karaf 4.2.8. However, it's not currently possible to fully build with JDK 11. I have a branch where I did the required changes (remove the use of tools.jar in openwire generator, add annotation and jaxb dependency in different modules, update scala for leveldb, ...). The question that I have is about what's the exact target for 5.16.0: 1. We still build ActiveMQ 5.16.x with JDK8, but it supports both JDK8 or JDK11 at runtime. 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only support JDK11 at runtime. Thoughts ? Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime). Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [HEADS UP] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.12 and ActiveMQ 5.16.0
Hi Christopher, OK, so, I will move forward on 5.16.0 with JDK11 support at runtime. I will focus on JDK11 build + LevelDB cleanup + other cleanup/refactoring for 5.17.0. So, let me move forward on 5.16.0 as it's now ready ;) Regards JB On 28/01/2020 20:22, Christopher Shannon wrote: > We definitely do not want to remove JDK 8 support for 5.16.0 so my vote is > for option 1. I think it's fine if we build with JDK 8 as long as it > supports JDK 8 - 11 at runtime. > > For 5.17.0 we can work on building with JDK 11. For one thing I think we > should just make it easier on ourselves and remove LevelDB entirely as it > has been deprecated now for several major versions and there isn't any > reason to keep it at around at this point. > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 7:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I would like to move forward on ActiveMQ releases: >> >> - ActiveMQ 5.15.12 >> I'm preparing several dependency updates and important fixes on the >> activemq-5.15.x branch. It includes some security fixes, postgresql jdbc >> store performance improvements, ... >> I have some PRs under review and on the fly, so, I plan to submit >> 5.15.12 to vote next week. >> >> - ActiveMQ 5.16.0 >> I did a full pass (standalone and in Apache Karaf) with JDK 11. The >> broker works without problem, including on Karaf 4.2.8. >> However, it's not currently possible to fully build with JDK 11. I have >> a branch where I did the required changes (remove the use of tools.jar >> in openwire generator, add annotation and jaxb dependency in different >> modules, update scala for leveldb, ...). >> The question that I have is about what's the exact target for 5.16.0: >> 1. We still build ActiveMQ 5.16.x with JDK8, but it supports both JDK8 >> or JDK11 at runtime. >> 2. I do the changes required to build with JDK11, and then we will only >> support JDK11 at runtime. >> Thoughts ? >> Anyway, I would like to submit 5.16.0 to vote asap, so please, let me >> know what you think about JDK support (build or/and runtime). >> >> Regards >> JB >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: supported windows for ActiveMq 5.9
Hi, It should work using JDK8. Regards JB On 21/01/2020 03:06, Roy Low Chee Mun wrote: > hi all > > > I am going to install ActiveMQ 5.9 in windows server 2012 however refer to > link below windows server 2012 is not in the list, so my question is simple, > can I install ActiveMQ 5.9 in Windows server 2012? > Refer: > https://activemq.apache.org/getting-started.html#InstallationProcedureforWindows > > > Windows: Windows XP SP2, Windows 2000, Windows Vista, Windows 7. > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Add to list: activemq-developers
Hi, Done, welcome aboard ! Regards JB On 21/01/2020 12:48, Piyush Chugh wrote: > Hi, > > I recently noticed some documentation issues with ActiveMQ website and then > got introduced to AMQ issue tracker; I would like to be added to > *activemq-developers > *group on JIRA to have a go at fixing some of the issues. > My registered email address - piyushchugh1...@gmail.com > > > Thanks & Regards, > Piyush Chugh > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Request to be added as contributor
Hi, It's done. Regards JB On 20/01/2020 14:16, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone with the relevant permissions please add me as a contributor to > AMQ JIRA, so that I can assign issues to myself? > > Thanks, > > Colm. > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: First board report of 2020
Hi Robbie, yeah, 5.16.0 is still my top priority and it's almost ready. JDK 9+ is OK (including on Karaf). JMS 2.0 is "optional" for 5.16.0 (but I think it's worth to try to have it). So, it's more an indication in terms of "best effort", not a strong commitment. In term of timeline, 5.16.0 could be submitted to vote end of next week. For the report, we should use the reporter.apache.org that create the report skeleton for us. Regards JB On 06/01/2020 11:53, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > You mentioned on the 5.15.11 vote thread that a 5.16.0 vote would > happen in late November, but it was suggested to skip that particular > week and so folks had returned from holidays around US Thanksgiving. > Its been a bit longer now, but is the intent still to release 5.16.0 > very soon? I ask as the text added in the report draft indicates > 5.16.0 will include JMS 2 support, but there doesnt seem to have been > work committed on that as yet. If thats the case it would seem > surprising to include in 5.16.0 at this point, several weeks after > indication it was primed for release, instead of say doing 5.16.0 and > only then adding potentially large changes afterwards towards a 5.17.0 > following the needed time to bake them. > > The mailing list stats should probably be removed from the report, and > just a summary line given. The board have in the past typically asked > for the stats not to be c from the reporter tool unless they show > important details. It seems like all they show is that it was a > holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the > prior one without thier effect. > > I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release date. > > Robbie > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 07:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Hi Bruce, >> >> Happy new year to you as well ! >> >> I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall activity). >> Please let me know if it's OK for you. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 06/01/2020 06:28, Bruce Snyder wrote: >>> Happy New Year everyone! >>> >>> Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions to the >>> latest report to the ASF board: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735 >>> >>> This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> jbono...@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release (take #2)
Hi Robbie, Due to the Jekyll issue, I forgot to send the announcement e-mail, sorry about that. And yeah, I already a series of cherry picks from master (coming 5.16.0) to 5.15.x branch (coming 5.15.12). I plan to have 5.15.12 to vote by the end of this month. Agree to "use" 5.15.12 for announcement. Regards JB On 06/01/2020 12:05, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > It seems like an announcement never happened. The draft board report > mentions 5.15.12, is that likely to be soon? If it is then its > probably not worth announcing 5.15.11 now given it has been 6 weeks > and folks might be better going to the followup instead. > > Robbie > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 15:05, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> >> Since its been over 3 weeks I have just updated the website now, >> cherry-picking the commit from your PR and adding another with changes >> for my PR feedback and also the generated site output. You can >> announce the release now. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 19:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>> I tried to build with Jekyll but it failed on my machine. >>> >>> I'm resuming my work on the PR. It should be OK to merge tonight or >>> tomorrow. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 16/12/2019 17:52, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>>> A PR for site updates >>>> https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/22 was raised, but >>>> some trivial fixups remain outstanding. >>>> >>>> Robbie >>>> >>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 12:00, Christopher Shannon >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> JB, >>>>> >>>>> Are you still working on the website update and release email for the >>>>> release? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 2:46 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks a lot ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Much appreciated. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25/11/2019 19:01, Christopher Shannon wrote: >>>>>>> I promoted the artifacts: >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/activemq/5.15.11/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:34 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this vote passed with the following result: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding): Dan Kulp, Christopher Shannon, Michael Andre Pearce >>>>>>>> +1 (non binding): Jonathan Gallimore, François Papon, Jamie Goodyear, >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm promoting the artifacts on Maven Central and update Jira. One PMC >>>>>>>> will help me to push the artifacts on dist.apache.org release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm preparing a website PR to announce the release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks all for your vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Waiting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (that will be submitted to vote >>>>>> shortly, >>>>>>>>> probably next week), I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.15.11 release to your >>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>> This is take #2 containing a fix on activemq-osgi build. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This release includes dependency updates (especially for CVE/Security >>>>>>>>> fixes), minor improvements, and fixes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12345958 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Maven staging repository is: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1201 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The dist staging repository is: >>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.15.11/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Git tag: >>>>>>>>> activemq-5.15.11 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: First board report of 2020
Hi, agree, but I started the work about JMS 2.0 first simple support (both broker and connection factory sides), and it seems to not be so large/impacting. That's why I proposed to support it if the effort is not so huge. Regards JB On 06/01/2020 12:30, Christopher Shannon wrote: > JMS 2.0 is definitely not going into 5.16.0 but maybe some future release > if someone wanted to do the work. However, I seriously doubt 5.x will > ever support it as it would be a lot of work to update the broker including > the datastores to support it and Artemis already has support. > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 5:53 AM Robbie Gemmell > wrote: > >> You mentioned on the 5.15.11 vote thread that a 5.16.0 vote would >> happen in late November, but it was suggested to skip that particular >> week and so folks had returned from holidays around US Thanksgiving. >> Its been a bit longer now, but is the intent still to release 5.16.0 >> very soon? I ask as the text added in the report draft indicates >> 5.16.0 will include JMS 2 support, but there doesnt seem to have been >> work committed on that as yet. If thats the case it would seem >> surprising to include in 5.16.0 at this point, several weeks after >> indication it was primed for release, instead of say doing 5.16.0 and >> only then adding potentially large changes afterwards towards a 5.17.0 >> following the needed time to bake them. >> >> The mailing list stats should probably be removed from the report, and >> just a summary line given. The board have in the past typically asked >> for the stats not to be c from the reporter tool unless they show >> important details. It seems like all they show is that it was a >> holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the >> prior one without thier effect. >> >> I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release date. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 07:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bruce, >>> >>> Happy new year to you as well ! >>> >>> I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall activity). >>> Please let me know if it's OK for you. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 06/01/2020 06:28, Bruce Snyder wrote: >>>> Happy New Year everyone! >>>> >>>> Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions to >> the >>>> latest report to the ASF board: >>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735 >>>> >>>> This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait. >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: First board report of 2020
Hi Bruce, Happy new year to you as well ! I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall activity). Please let me know if it's OK for you. Regards JB On 06/01/2020 06:28, Bruce Snyder wrote: > Happy New Year everyone! > > Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions to the > latest report to the ASF board: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735 > > This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait. > > Bruce > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: First board report of 2020
Yes, so JDK 9+ on 5.16.0 and JMS 2.0 after 5.16.0. Fair enough, I'm moving forward like this. Thanks for your feedback guys. Regards JB On 06/01/2020 13:36, Christopher Shannon wrote: > I agree with Robbie, it's a -1 from me to try and include JMS 2.0 at this > point in 5.16.0 as it's way too late to try and add such a big change. It > needs to be 5.17.0 or higher. > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 7:23 AM Robbie Gemmell > wrote: > >> Even if it were almost complete, which it doesnt sound like it is, >> such a significant change would still seem better positioned for a >> 5.17.0 at this point than dropped into an almost-ready 5.16.0 at the >> last moment. >> >> Either way I would suggest updating the draft report to be clearer as >> it doesnt currently read in line with the below, saying "5.16.0 will >> be an important milestone with full JDK 9+ support and JMS 2.0 support >> as well." >> >> The example skeleton on reporter.apache.org doesnt include the stats >> from what I recall as they often asked folks not to include them, so >> I'd drop those. I just give a summary line in reports. >> >> Robbie >> >> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 12:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>> Hi Robbie, >>> >>> yeah, 5.16.0 is still my top priority and it's almost ready. JDK 9+ is >>> OK (including on Karaf). JMS 2.0 is "optional" for 5.16.0 (but I think >>> it's worth to try to have it). So, it's more an indication in terms of >>> "best effort", not a strong commitment. >>> In term of timeline, 5.16.0 could be submitted to vote end of next week. >>> >>> For the report, we should use the reporter.apache.org that create the >>> report skeleton for us. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 06/01/2020 11:53, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >>>> You mentioned on the 5.15.11 vote thread that a 5.16.0 vote would >>>> happen in late November, but it was suggested to skip that particular >>>> week and so folks had returned from holidays around US Thanksgiving. >>>> Its been a bit longer now, but is the intent still to release 5.16.0 >>>> very soon? I ask as the text added in the report draft indicates >>>> 5.16.0 will include JMS 2 support, but there doesnt seem to have been >>>> work committed on that as yet. If thats the case it would seem >>>> surprising to include in 5.16.0 at this point, several weeks after >>>> indication it was primed for release, instead of say doing 5.16.0 and >>>> only then adding potentially large changes afterwards towards a 5.17.0 >>>> following the needed time to bake them. >>>> >>>> The mailing list stats should probably be removed from the report, and >>>> just a summary line given. The board have in the past typically asked >>>> for the stats not to be c from the reporter tool unless they show >>>> important details. It seems like all they show is that it was a >>>> holiday filled quarter and so some things were lower volume than the >>>> prior one without thier effect. >>>> >>>> I tweaked the 5.15.11 release info to use its actual Nov 25th release >> date. >>>> >>>> Robbie >>>> >>>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 07:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bruce, >>>>> >>>>> Happy new year to you as well ! >>>>> >>>>> I added some content about ActiveMQ (releases, stats, overall >> activity). >>>>> Please let me know if it's OK for you. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 06/01/2020 06:28, Bruce Snyder wrote: >>>>>> Happy New Year everyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> Please take a few minutes of your time to submit your contributions >> to the >>>>>> latest report to the ASF board: >>>>>> >>>>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=144509735 >>>>>> >>>>>> This report must be submitted by Jan 8, so please don't wait. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bruce >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> jbono...@apache.org >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release (take #2)
Hi everyone, Now that we fixed the ASF header issue, I'm submitting ActiveMQ 5.16.0 release to your vote (take #2). This release is an important milestone as the runtime supports JDK 11. The full build with JDK 11 is planned for 5.17.0. It also includes bunch of fixes, improvements and much more. For your information, once this vote will pass, I will create activemq-5.16.x branch and I will move master branch to version 5.17.0. Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12341032 The Maven staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1213/ The dist staging repository is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.16.0/ Git tag: activemq-5.16.0 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB
Re: [DISCUSS] JMS 2.0 support in 5.x going forward
Hi, Thanks Chris for bringing this up. First, a quick update about JMS 2.0: client API compatibility is almost done. I tested in Karaf, Camel and standalone Java and so far so good. My first intention when I proposed the JMS 2.0 support is first on client side, as least to allow client to use JMS 2.0 API. About the specific features from JMS 2.0, the first step I did is to return OperationNotSupportedException for now. So it's mostly Chris' point 1. In term of roadmap, I tried to follow recommendation and feedback from everyone. So roughly, that's my intention/understanding: - 5.16.0: JDK 11 support at runtime - 5.16.x: first JMS 2.0 client side support (before 5.17.0). - 5.17.0: JDK 11 support at both build and runtime and improved JMS 2.0 support (even if not complete on broker side ;)). I'm ready to move forward on (3), but I think it's worth to create PR and merge what I started already. Thoughts ? Regards JB On 25/06/2020 15:10, Christopher Shannon wrote: > There seems to be some confusion on what the plan is for JMS 2.0 support in > 5.x so I figured it was worth starting a discussion on it. > > First, targeting a complete implementation of "full" JMS 2.0 support for > 5.17.0 is not very realistic in my opinion. I think 5.17.0 needs to go out > faster than 5.16.0 did as for one thing it is starting to get annoying to > have to use JDK 8 to build it. If JMS 2.0 support is going to happen that's > probably going to take a few releases along the way with increasing > functionality for each one and there is still a discussion that needs to > happen on what will actually be done and the effort level. The main level > of effort is dealing with the new shared subscription semantics. > > For example, in order of increasing effort: > *1)* We could just add basic API compatibility with the JMS 2.0 jar but > don't really implement many features at all (maybe have unsupported > exceptions thrown if a new method is called) which i think was the goal of > 5.16.1. Note that this isn't really buying much as a user can simply use > the JMS 2.0 jar now with 5.x and just not call the new methods (which is > what I personally do) > *2)* We could have the Java client fake it by using Virtual topics to > create shared subscriptions. So if a user calls off to the shared sub api > call it would just subscribe to the matching queue it needed. The downside > to this is it's done all client side so would only work for the Java client > and not any other open wire clients and is pretty hacky. Seems better to > just have the user use virtual topics natively than this way. > *3)* Another approach could be to add full JMS 2.0 support to OpenWire and > upgrade the client/server to the new version but use Composite destinations > or Virtual topics on the server to provide the functionality. The idea > being when the server receives the new openwire commands to create a shared > subscription it fakes it by leveraging the composite destination or virtual > topic feature to mimic the behavior. The main functionality to add would be > client side, openwire itself and the management/tracking logic on the > server side to map shared subscriptions to composite destinations/virtual > topics. > *4)* We could add true native support for JMS 2.0 to the client (openwire) > and server (treat shared subs/durables as their own thing in the broker > logic and also in the different storage options) and this would take by far > the most effort to do correctly. > > In my opinion number 3 seems the most viable if JMS 2.0 support is really > desired as the level of effort wouldn't be as bad compared to trying to do > full native support as described by number 4. Simply leveraging composite > destinations behind the scenes seems like a decent solution on the server > side as we should be able to get the desired behavior and spec compliant. > > Alright, all of that being said, while it would be kind of nice to have JMS > 2.0 in 5.x to give people options, I still lean to the idea that it would > be a better use of time to just work on improving the migration and feature > parity of 5.x with Artemis instead of adding JMS 2.0 support as Artemis > already supports it. If migration is easier and if all the main 5.x > features people care about work in Artemis then people could just migrate > to Artemis. > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Non-canonical alignment for shared and replicated state terminology
Hi Matt, thanks for the proposal. Personally, I'm still skeptical about this kind of changes for "technical wording". If we really want to change, I think active/passive is the most accurate for kahadb/store HA, both runtime mode and status. Anyway, in ActiveMQ, we don't have concrete wording in the configuration (it's more in the code). So, +1 with the proposal, +0 for change (I see more drawback than benefit). Regards JB On 7/12/21 7:40 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: [Abstract] ActiveMQ 5 and Artemis are both re-working legacy terminology to better describe function and move away from problematic language for shared storage and replication terminology indicators. [Background] JIRA discussion: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7514 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7514> Mailing list: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Draft-proposal-for-terminology-change-td4758351.html <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Draft-proposal-for-terminology-change-td4758351.html> [Proposal] P-1. Broker layer will maintain a status— ‘active’ or ’standby’ based on signals from persistence layer P-2. Persistence layer will optionally provide a noun and verb based on the underlying technology's terminology. P-3. ActiveMQ project created persistence layers that support replication, the terminology should attempt to provide noun and verb terms to describe the mode and state. Mode: ‘primary’ and ‘replica’ Status: ‘active’ and ’standby' [Scope] S-1. Terminology alignment between ActiveMQ 5 and Artemis is only for shared storage, replicated storage, broker status, and future terms. [Benefits] B-1. Terms for Broker state will be aligned between ActiveMQ 5 and Artemis free of problematic language. B-2. Terms for replication will bubble up “as-is” based on the underlying persistence layer technology. B-3. If both ActiveMQ 5 and Artemis use the same replication tech, then terms will be aligned. B-4. If one provides a persistence layer adapter that the other does not there is no phantom noun or verb present on the other broker that has no direct technical meaning [Rationale] R-1. Attempting to create common terms may leave one broker with a phantom term that has no meaning R-2. Attempting to create common terms is problematic when two supported persistence adapter layer technology use different terms (leader / follower, vs primary / replica). R-3. Renaming terminology that is not problematic for the sake of alignment (ie. acceptor vs transportConnector) unfairly creates burden on the existing user base. Thank you, -Matt Pavlovich -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
[PROPOSAL] Remove nabble links from website
Hi guys, I created pull request https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/56 on website to remove the nabble link from the contact page. Since nabble downgraded their servers capacity, a bunch of forums linked to mailing list are not available anymore. It's the case for several Apache projects, including Apache ActiveMQ. Users should use mailing list and eventually slack (but remember, if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it never happens, so discussions on slack should moved to mailing list at some point). If there's no objection, I will merge PR #56. Thanks, Regards JB
Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove nabble links from website
Justin already merged the PR, so I guess we are good ;) Thanks ! Regards JB On 13/08/2021 16:48, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi guys, I created pull request https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/pull/56 on website to remove the nabble link from the contact page. Since nabble downgraded their servers capacity, a bunch of forums linked to mailing list are not available anymore. It's the case for several Apache projects, including Apache ActiveMQ. Users should use mailing list and eventually slack (but remember, if it doesn't happen on the mailing list, it never happens, so discussions on slack should moved to mailing list at some point). If there's no objection, I will merge PR #56. Thanks, Regards JB
Re: ActiveMQ Feathercast interview request
Hi Rich, It's pretty open on my side, just have to know at least 24 hours before. Regards JB On 27/08/2021 22:11, Rich Bowen wrote: I'm certainly not opposed to having more than one person on the interview, but it does make scheduling more challenging, because time zones are hard. How about this - I like to do interviews on Fridays, and I'm in Eastern US time, so if you can figure out who, and a time on Friday that's between 9am and 4pm next Friday (September 3), let me know, and we'll do it. Looking forward to it. For preparation purposes, here's my usual script: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FZzloEiCf2qxm9Q4Ipq6i-2mkykdKfvuNaqOpRf901w/edit# On 2021/08/27 18:51:32, Francesco Nigro wrote: Me too! Il ven 27 ago 2021, 20:19 Matt Pavlovich ha scritto: Hi Rich! Thanks for reaching out, I’d happy to participate. Been working with ActiveMQ since around 2005 and joined on as a committer team a few years later. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich On Aug 27, 2021, at 11:55 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: Hi, ActiveMQ, For those that don't know me, I'm Rich Bowen, the voice behind many of the Feathercast recordings. For those not familiar with Feathercast, it's a not-very-regular podcast/videocast about Apache topics. You can see some of my past episodes here - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU2OcwpQkYCzs8261KxC4BoB2ptHJyMQt - and, yes, I've been inactive for a year. I'm trying really hard to get through all of the Apache projects (yes, this is going to take years) and do a "What is it" kind of a podcast. (If you want to talk about something else, that's fair game too.) Is there someone from this project who would be available and willing to talk with me about Accumulo? The basic script is here - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FZzloEiCf2qxm9Q4Ipq6i-2mkykdKfvuNaqOpRf901w/edit# - but it's very flexible, and can be whatever you need it to be at this point in your project's life. I'll do a video interview on Google Meet. This should take anywhere from a few minutes to a half hour, depending on what you want to talk about. I'm looking for about 10-15 minutes of actual content after edits. The final cut gets posted on YouTube and on feathercast.org, and then probably makes appearances elsewhere, like Twitter and the Apache weekly newsletter. If you're interested, please discuss amongst yourselves who the right spokesperson (or more than one?) is, and let me know, at rbo...@apache.org, and we'll set up a time. I *try* to do interviews on Fridays, and then post them the following Tuesday, schedule permitting. Thanks! --Rich
[ANN] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 has been released!
Hi everyone, The ActiveMQ team is pleased to announce Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 feature. https://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5016003-release This release includes updates, improvements and important fixes, especially: - fix on potential connection deadlock - fix on broker plugin allowing java.util package for deserialization - fix on XStream marshaler allowing java.util package for deserialization - improvements on the Karaf features repository - improvements for the Camel 3.x support - bunch of dependency updates - and more (take a look on Release Notes for details) Enjoy ! Regards -- The ActiveMQ Team
Re: ActiveMQ Feathercast interview request
Thanks Rich ! And thanks for Justin, Clebert and Matt as well ;) Regards JB On 03/09/2021 17:42, Rich Bowen wrote: Thank you so much for everyone that participated in the call. I'll edit and run a draft by this list before publishing. --Rich On 2021/08/27 16:55:14, Rich Bowen wrote: Hi, ActiveMQ, For those that don't know me, I'm Rich Bowen, the voice behind many of the Feathercast recordings. For those not familiar with Feathercast, it's a not-very-regular podcast/videocast about Apache topics. You can see some of my past episodes here - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLU2OcwpQkYCzs8261KxC4BoB2ptHJyMQt - and, yes, I've been inactive for a year. I'm trying really hard to get through all of the Apache projects (yes, this is going to take years) and do a "What is it" kind of a podcast. (If you want to talk about something else, that's fair game too.) Is there someone from this project who would be available and willing to talk with me about Accumulo? The basic script is here - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FZzloEiCf2qxm9Q4Ipq6i-2mkykdKfvuNaqOpRf901w/edit# - but it's very flexible, and can be whatever you need it to be at this point in your project's life. I'll do a video interview on Google Meet. This should take anywhere from a few minutes to a half hour, depending on what you want to talk about. I'm looking for about 10-15 minutes of actual content after edits. The final cut gets posted on YouTube and on feathercast.org, and then probably makes appearances elsewhere, like Twitter and the Apache weekly newsletter. If you're interested, please discuss amongst yourselves who the right spokesperson (or more than one?) is, and let me know, at rbo...@apache.org, and we'll set up a time. I *try* to do interviews on Fridays, and then post them the following Tuesday, schedule permitting. Thanks! --Rich
[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 release
Hi everyone, due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-8352, I cancel this vote to prepare a fix. As reminder, this issue is related to this commit: commit dce83db7c2444e3e058a6561ea806fe1c3d171c9 Author: Matt Pavlovich Date: Fri Jun 4 09:30:31 2021 -0500[AMQ-8290] Cleanup assembly warnings and upgrade assembly plugin - Convert 'attached' to 'single' goal - Clean up leading "/" in descriptors (cherry picked from commit 5c9df5db0c4f4682ff489f437eea7ec7da98ba92) The commit upgrade to assembly plugin version and it breaks the assembly build on some environment due to long file path. I will fix by using posix instead of gnu. Sorry about that, I will submit a new vote soon. Regards JB On 06/08/2021 19:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache ActiveMQ 5.16.3 release to your vote. This release includes important fixes and updates on the 5.16.x series, especially: - include java.util package in the deserialization enforcement - logging improvements on STOMP transport - improvement on Karaf features to avoid cascading refresh - fix on couple of potential deadlocks - several dependencies updates Please take a look on the Release Notes for details: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210=12350105 Maven staging repository is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1232/ Dist staging repository is: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq/5.16.3/ Git tag: activemq-5.16.3 Please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks ! Regards JB
Re: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release
+1 (binding) Just a quick note: the vote section of the email mention 2.4.0, but we are actually voting on 2.18.0. Not a big deal ;) Thanks ! Regards JB On 09/08/2021 20:50, Clebert Suconic wrote: Just wanted to record my +1. and update the voting template from previous vote (sorry for the copy & paste error): [X] +1 approve this release [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 2:45 PM Clebert Suconic wrote: I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.18.0 release This is a substantial release involving good work from a lot of great people. Thank you and congratulations to all involved in achieving the current state on the codebase. The following features were added as part of this release: [ARTEMIS-2716] - Pluggable Quorum Vote [ARTEMIS-2919] - Support timestamping incoming messages [ARTEMIS-3106] - Support for SASL-SCRAM [ARTEMIS-3137] - Support XPath filters [ARTEMIS-3168] - JAAS login module to convert existing Principal to an Artemis UserPrincipal [ARTEMIS-3198] - Ability to increase concurrency on core bridges [ARTEMIS-3243] - Dual Mirror Support on AMQP Broker Connections [ARTEMIS-3280] - Netty pool metrics via Micrometer [ARTEMIS-3288] - Bulk user loading with basic security manager [ARTEMIS-3297] - Journal Retention [ARTEMIS-3365] - Broker Balancers [ARTEMIS-3402] - Split Brain detection should reject bad member updates The full JIRA release notes can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920=12349689 The git commit report is here: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.18.0 Source and binary distributions can be found here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.18.0 The Maven repository is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1236 In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo: https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html The source tag: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.18.0 I will update the website after the vote has passed. Please, send your vote: [ ] +1 approve the release as Apache Artemis 2.4.0 [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
