Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Lloyd


On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:


I wholly and completely disagree.


Interesting. It seems to me that we are saying the same thing.

1. S Meter standardization is a failed effort.  S meters are  
marketing numbers.  dBuV or dBmW is the measure to use.  If you  
are filing interference reports with the FCC and cannot figure out  
how to convert your signal strength readings to dB relative units,  
you need to make better measurements.


Precisely.

2. If Elecraft chooses to allow end-users to calibrate and set  
their S Meter readings to have a known intercept (50uV at S9) and  
slope (4dB, 6dB, 3dB), so much the better, as it helps number one.


That Elecraft allows it to be set to a standard and that it will be  
consistent from day-to-day and band-to-band is fantastic. It means it  
CAN be used for measurement. The only question is what the  
calibration will be. Since we have been taught that one S-unit  
represents a 6dB change, new kit should adhere to that. When I sit  
down at your radio and see a 1 S-unit change, I should be able to  
know what that means without having to ask you, Hey Leigh, what are  
your S-meter calibration coefficients? I don't have to do that with  
a wattmeter or a voltmeter, do I?


3. And, although I would not hold MSFT responsible for pushing  
forward UI design, I certainly don't think they offer the best  
options in terms of user configurability!


I think Microsoft has their head up their ... uh ... well, they are  
pretty clueless when it comes to coming up with a good UI. Their  
options su... are supremely suboptimal.


So, seems you are agreeing with me and I with you.

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Toby Deinhardt

Hallo,

Wayne wrote:
I'd agree with you if there were a single world-wide standard for S-9, 
and no need to compensate for slight differences in receive gain from 


There is a standard in Region 1, but, to be honest, a standard which up 
to now has almost totally been ignored by the industry. This has been 
bemoaned in almost all serious rig tests I can remember here in Germany. 
When a rig has a s-meter which comes close to the Region 1 standard, it 
is often considered by the authors to be a real plus point for the rig.


Wayne wrote:
This is also more flexible. As I mentioned earlier, I set my S-meters up 
for 4 dB per S-unit. Here's why: I like a greater degree of sensitivity 


Sorry but I do not agree.

A signal strength meter, which is what an s-meter should be, should not 
be affected by changes in amplification after entering the rig, i.e. the 
reading should not be affected by a built-in preamplifier.


Wayne wrote:
If hams wanted to be precise in assessing signal levels, we'd report 
them in dBm and do a lot of averaging. But for most operators this is a 
hobby, not a job  :)


I would prefer an s-meter which showed dBm or dBu and was fairly 
accurate. For many, if not most amateurs, +/- 1.5dB would, I think, be 
more than good enough. Professional style measurements are not really 
what you would want to do with an amateur communications receiver, but 
nonetheless the numbers from one rig to the next still ought to be 
comparable.


BTW: To quote the head honcho of our local club: We do professional 
amateur radio... ;-)


Leigh wrote:
 numbers.  dBuV or dBmW is the measure to use.  If you are filing
 interference reports with the FCC and cannot figure out how to convert

In some parts of the world and for some budgets I agree, in other cases, 
all you might have is a s-meter. Then it would be more than just nice to 
know that the numbers mean actually something, and that you can then say 
+/- 3dB the following level in dBm can be seen at the antenna jack. Easy 
math if the s-meter sticks to a standard.


Granted with the K3, you can go into menus, and set it up the way you 
need it. However, this does lead to feel good metering, i.e. useless for 
the other station, who does not know how you've set your rig up.



vy 73 de toby

PS: RST should be more than just Raten, Schätzen, Täuschen
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Sherwood Engineering and DSP

2007-06-07 Thread wayne burdick

Brian Lloyd wrote:


The thing is, what he is talking about would be very easy to fix


It's a no-brainer (emulating state-of-the-art hardware AGC), and was 
part of the spec in our case.



I just have a hard time believing that any competent engineer would 
fail to understand this.


Competent engineers may understand something, yet still ignore it. 
Unless they work here  :)


Wayne
N6KR


---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] [K1-2277] Voltage Check P1 pin 16 voltage is Supply - 0.24V not Supply - 0.3V

2007-06-07 Thread Toby Deinhardt

Hi Rich,

 I'm off by 0.06 V

Many DMMs show you a digit or more than they can actually measure.

0.06V is 0.45% of 13.2V so I really wouldn't worry about it. The K1 is 
not a RS ESU EMI test receiver... hi hi


vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Knives - now Conkers [OT]

2007-06-07 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
At the risk of starting another off-topic thread. Some schools in the UK
have now banned conkers because of the 'risk' of injury!
Can you believe this! We now have some people saying kids take risks they
can't handle when they are older (and hurt or kill themselves), because not
taking little risks when young means they can't access the risk properly. I
agree with this.
A list of some things schools are banning because they are dangerous:
Conkers, Ice Slides (in playground) in winter, Snowball fights, climbing
frames, climbing trees..

On 6/6/07 23:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
 When I went to school in England, in the early 1950's, students each had to
 bring a penknife, to sharpen pencils. (It also helped us make conkers.)
-- 
Ideas are like rabbits. You get a couple and learn how to handle them, and
pretty soon you have a dozen.
--John Steinbeck, novelist, Nobel laureate (1902-1968)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Elecraft Digest, Vol 38, Issue 11

2007-06-07 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
How could you do that to a good old friend ?
I'm a mac user!

On 7/6/07 09:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
 http://content.techrepublic.com.com/2346-10878_11-5597.html?tag=nl.e099.dl0606
 07

-- 
Many ideas grow better when transplanted into another mind than in the one
where
they sprang up. -Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., US Supreme Court Justice
(1841-1935)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Battery size

2007-06-07 Thread Steve Bunting

Dear All,

My K2 is not to hand at the moment and I am looking to order an internal 
battery on line. Can someone email me off list with the dimensions of 
the battery, please? I am trying to source one in Europe to reduce the 
shipping cost and I can't find the size info on the elecraft website.


Many thanks
Steve
M0BPQ
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] 80m CW last night...

2007-06-07 Thread Marc G0AZS

Dear all

Forgive the bandwidth but I just had to share this.

I have been trying to improve my CW over the last few weeks by getting
myself onto 80m of an evening and having one or two rag chewing type QSO's.

Well last might I was tuning around when I heard a station calling so I
replied. It was Bill G4WJM  also in the UK. We started chatting and at one
point he said he was using 5W and  I told him that I was using my IC 706
with 10W. However I then said that I really would like to build an Elecraft
rig... possibly a K2.

He then came straight back and said I was listening to a K2, he had just
finished building it and this was his first QSO!

I don't know who was more chuffed, him or me. It really did sound great.

Anyway I'm more motivated than ever to get one.

73 Marc G0AZS
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: Elecraft Digest, Vol 38, Issue 11

2007-06-07 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:


How could you do that to a good old friend ?
I'm a mac user!


I apologizeit was not meant to offend Mac users...but it struck me that
we need to look at secondary uses of our favored technology.

I felt that an IMAC case would have been a better choice, since that product 
line comes closer to our discussion of color options for the K3.


The advantage to the different colors might be that in contests we could have
more meaningful exchangescall, rig, color

de k3hrn K3 tangerine

Sooner or later a cult-like rating systemsome wise person will enter on a 
Wiki(where anyone can change the information, and thus all of it is suspect) 
that Elecraft only produced 10 puce K3s .. and the race will be on to discover 
the 10 puce units.


Wayne and Eric will have to ammend the FaQ to indicate that the amplifier module 
from a puce K3 can in fact be used in the avacado k3.


I also envision many serious tests to determine if the puce to puce 
communications are more effective than plum to orange communications.
If differences are discovered, a whole new look at point scoring in contests may 
evolve.


Of course there might be conflictsis your WAC for Worked All Countries, of 
Worked All Colors ?


It's also possible that a cottage industry of custom color modifications will 
surface.  At some point, you will be able to submit a hair sample from your 
poodle and your K3 will be returned to you with not only an exact color match, 
but also, for an additional fee, a texturizing, that would allow the 
memorializition of FiFi in the K3.


Now, I need to rework the Elecraft Owners Online Database to allow for the color 
option, and I suppose a way to note if it was a factory color or after-market.


Perhaps the database can be used years from now when a k3 is offered for sale, 
and it demands a high price because it is one of the very rare Pesto Green K3s.
Before purchasing, the potential buyer could lookup the unit by serial number to 
discover where or not the Pesto Green was manufactured by the Aptos crew.


Me? I want the K3naked optionI think it would be very relaxing to watch all 
the electrons running around inside the case.



http://content.techrepublic.com.com/2346-10878_11-5597.html?tag=nl.e099.dl0606
07


Thom,k3hrn,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Sherwood Engineering and DSP

2007-06-07 Thread Bill Tippett

http://www.sherweng.com/documents/Dayton2007w.pdf

SM2EKM:
Lets hope Elecraft got it right!

For the record I've used an Orion
for ~4 years and probably made at least
20k QSOs in contests and on the low bands.
I also have some local electric fence noise
as well as lots of thunderstorm QRN on 160.
I've never heard transients similar to his
recording *unless* my AGC was set to an
abnormally slow setting.  If I ever heard
anything like that, the first thing I would
have checked would have been AGC Decay rate,
and also made sure Hang was set to zero.

I'm not sure about the other rigs Rob
tested but I don't believe this was a real
problem in Orion.  I personally think you
would have to totally screw up the default
Med or Fast AGC settings to hear anything
similar to his recording using an Orion.

I think Ten-Tec got it right also
but am happy to hear Elecraft is aware of
the issue.

73,  Bill W4ZV

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Battery size

2007-06-07 Thread Steve Bunting
Wow, Super fast response from G4MDP. Thanks for the info. I have now 
placed my order. Hope to see some of you on the air from the Glastonbury 
music festival - I wonder if I will be the only ham operating from the 
site? 150,000 people will be there!


73
Steve

Steve Bunting wrote:

Dear All,

My K2 is not to hand at the moment and I am looking to order an internal 
battery on line. Can someone email me off list with the dimensions of 
the battery, please? I am trying to source one in Europe to reduce the 
shipping cost and I can't find the size info on the elecraft website.


Many thanks
Steve
M0BPQ


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: Battery size

2007-06-07 Thread Marc G0AZS

You're taking a K2 to Glastonbury? Wow...

I hope it's not muddy. Any special event call?

73 Marc G0AZS


On 07/06/07, Steve Bunting  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Wow, Super fast response from G4MDP. Thanks for the info. I have now
 placed my order. Hope to see some of you on the air from the Glastonbury
 music festival - I wonder if I will be the only ham operating from the
  site? 150,000 people will be there!

 73
 Steve

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: Elecraft Digest, Vol 38, Issue 11

2007-06-07 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
No offence taken - I thought it was quite funny too :-)

On 7/6/07 11:29, Thom LaCosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:
 
 How could you do that to a good old friend ?
 I'm a mac user!
 
 I apologizeit was not meant to offend Mac users...but it struck me that
 we need to look at secondary uses of our favored technology.

-- 
Don't say you don't have enough time. You have exactly the same number of
hours per day that were given to Helen Keller, Pasteur, Michaelangelo,
Mother Teresa, Leonardo da Vinci, Thomas Jefferson, and Albert Einstein.
-H. Jackson Brown, Jr., writer


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: Elecraft Digest, Vol 38, Issue 11

2007-06-07 Thread N2EY
In a message dated 6/7/07 7:26:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Don't say you don't have enough time. You have exactly the same number of
 hours per day that were given to Helen Keller, Pasteur, Michaelangelo,
 Mother Teresa, Leonardo da Vinci, Thomas Jefferson, and Albert Einstein.
 -H. Jackson Brown, Jr., writer
 
 

What operating systems did *they* use?

73 de Jim, N2EY


**
 See what's free at 
http://www.aol.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread Dick Hanson
Really glad to see this discussed here. Sherwood is usually pretty close to
the mark on his tests etc, so very happy the E Team on top of and out front
on this very impt issue.
Best, 
Dick, K5AND

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread Siu Johnny

Hi Dick,

I own IC7800, IC781 and K2.  I also bought Sherwood cool fan kit for my 
Ic781.  Having said that, I do not entirely agree to Sherwood report nor 
having the same observation about AGC or pinfalls of modern DSP rigs


It is my opinion and may only be applicable to my QTH and operation 
condition.


73

Johnny Siu VR2XMC


From: Dick Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft  elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 06:34:42 -0500

Really glad to see this discussed here. Sherwood is usually pretty close to
the mark on his tests etc, so very happy the E Team on top of and out front
on this very impt issue.
Best,
Dick, K5AND

_
MSN 人氣搜尋,有齊城中熱門話題 http://www.msn.com.hk/hothits/default.asp 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Bill W5WVO

You guys are awesome!  :D

Bill / /W5WVO


wayne burdick wrote:

On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Bill W5WVO wrote:


Hi Wayne,

In addition to the slope of the function (dB per S-unit), is the
scale set point user-configurable? Or is this hard-coded such that
S9=50 uV? 


User settable.

Wayne


---

http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread Brett gazdzinski
 I only had an icom 756 pro and the R4C, TS440, IC735, plus
other really old boatanchor receivers, and while I 
never paid real close attention to the old ones on CW,
I know the 756 pro was nasty sounding compared
to the K2 on CW.

I suspect if my homebrew receivers were set up for
CW, they would be better sounding then the K2, but
have other serious limitations.

Generally speaking, I find all the new stuff sounds
quite nasty in many respects, even under good band
conditions they are noisy and distorted.
All those high gain chips, mixing, processing, low fi
audio stages... 1.5 watts out at 10% distortion???


I also know many people think a really poor sounding 
radio sounds great to them, there are very low expectations
from some operators I guess.

Even the AM community has a good share of people with low
expectations, despite the mode having a fidelity bias.


Brett
N2DTS


 
 Hi Dick,
 
 I own IC7800, IC781 and K2.  I also bought Sherwood cool fan 
 kit for my 
 Ic781.  Having said that, I do not entirely agree to Sherwood 
 report nor 
 having the same observation about AGC or pinfalls of modern DSP rigs
 
 It is my opinion and may only be applicable to my QTH and operation 
 condition.
 
 73
 
 Johnny Siu VR2XMC
 
 
 From: Dick Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Elecraft  elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc
 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 06:34:42 -0500
 
 Really glad to see this discussed here. Sherwood is usually 
 pretty close to
 the mark on his tests etc, so very happy the E Team on top of 
 and out front
 on this very impt issue.
 Best,
 Dick, K5AND
 
 _
 MSN 人氣搜尋,有齊城中熱門話題 http://www.msn.com.hk/hothits/default.asp 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread Darwin, Keith
I think you've hit the nail on the head, Brett.  There is a vast
difference in the sound of different receivers.  I've listened
critically to several:

IC-735
TT Omni V (0.9 mods, mint)
TT Corsair II
TT Omni C
TT Century 21
TT Century 22
TS-830s (mint condx)
TS-930s
Drake R-4A (had some issues)
Drake 2B (in VG condition)


Many (most) of them actually sounded rather nasty.  The 2B was very
sweet sounding but had issues with the overly aggressive AGC.  830s was
pretty good as was the R-4A.  The worst of the bunch (Omni V, 930s, 735)
just sound bad.  Harsh, loud, distorted, spikey - many words describe it
but the bottom line is they make me want to QRT before the QSO has
ended.  And those are all well respected rigs.  I can't imagine how bad
a run-of-the-mill rig must sound.

The K1 and K2 are notable exceptions.  These rigs sound pretty good
(esp. K1).  Smooth, easy on the ears.

I can't for the life of me understand how so many people are so happy
with these rigs, but they are.  Actually, I guess I used to love them
too but then I actually took the time to listen.

That was probably a mistake on my part since the only rig I'll own now
is a K1, K2 or (someday) K3.

- Keith -

-Original Message-
From: Brett gazdzinski

I also know many people think a really poor sounding radio sounds great
to them, there are very low expectations from some operators I guess.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Toby Deinhardt

You guys are awesome!  :D


In addition to the slope of the function (dB per S-unit), is the
scale set point user-configurable? Or is this hard-coded such that
S9=50 uV? 


User settable.


I'm not sure I really like this at all. S-meters are meaningless if they 
do not adhere to some kind of norm.


The IARU Region I published a norm many years ago and, imho, it is a 
blemish on the face of the face of amateur community that this has not 
been implemented on a wide scale basis.


It is beyond me how regulators can take interference reports based on 
s-meter values seriously. The s-meter is for many amateurs around the 
world, the only way they have of selectively measuring low level 
signals. One can not expect an affordable s-meter to be accurate to a 
tenth of a dB but plus/minus one or two dBs ought to be possible.


vy 73 de toby

PS: The IARU Region I recommendation:
Page 156 in http://www.iaru-r1.org/VHF_Handbook_V5_11.pdf
Page 142 in http://www.iaru-r1.org/HFM%20Handbook%20V6.pdf
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread ab7r
The good new Toby is that for folks who are strictly concerned about a norm 
is that you 
can calibrate it to whatever norm you wish.  I think that's the whole point 
here.  Not 
everyone is so concerned about an exact norm nor does everyone use their 
S-meter when giving 
a signal reportI sure don'tto me it's how I hear the signal on the 
radio.  If I need 
to make a comparison between two or more signals then I might use the S-meter.

So don't fret...and adjust away to suit your needs.

73
Greg
AB7R


On Thu Jun  7  9:24 , Toby Deinhardt  sent:

 You guys are awesome!  :D
 
 In addition to the slope of the function (dB per S-unit), is the
 scale set point user-configurable? Or is this hard-coded such that
 S9=50 uV? 

 User settable.

I'm not sure I really like this at all. S-meters are meaningless if they 
do not adhere to some kind of norm.

The IARU Region I published a norm many years ago and, imho, it is a 
blemish on the face of the face of amateur community that this has not 
been implemented on a wide scale basis.

It is beyond me how regulators can take interference reports based on 
s-meter values seriously. The s-meter is for many amateurs around the 
world, the only way they have of selectively measuring low level 
signals. One can not expect an affordable s-meter to be accurate to a 
tenth of a dB but plus/minus one or two dBs ought to be possible.

vy 73 de toby

PS: The IARU Region I recommendation:
Page 156 in http://www.iaru-r1.org/VHF_Handbook_V5_11.pdf
Page 142 in http://www.iaru-r1.org/HFM%20Handbook%20V6.pdf
-- 
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? (
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread Siu Johnny

Hello,

Well, i f we are talking about sweet audio, then I agree that my IC781 and 
ICR9000L sound much nicer and sweeter than my DSP rigs.  DSP rigs do have 
noticable artifacts.  

Oh, I must mention that most of comemts made before or in this email are 
with reference to SSB mode.


My K2 is now without KDSP2 though I once installed it.

73

Johnny Siu VR2XMC

From: Darwin, Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 06:24:01 -0700

I think you've hit the nail on the head, Brett.  There is a vast
difference in the sound of different receivers.  I've listened
critically to several:

IC-735
TT Omni V (0.9 mods, mint)
TT Corsair II
TT Omni C
TT Century 21
TT Century 22
TS-830s (mint condx)
TS-930s
Drake R-4A (had some issues)
Drake 2B (in VG condition)


Many (most) of them actually sounded rather nasty.  The 2B was very
sweet sounding but had issues with the overly aggressive AGC.  830s was
pretty good as was the R-4A.  The worst of the bunch (Omni V, 930s, 735)
just sound bad.  Harsh, loud, distorted, spikey - many words describe it
but the bottom line is they make me want to QRT before the QSO has
ended.  And those are all well respected rigs.  I can't imagine how bad
a run-of-the-mill rig must sound.

The K1 and K2 are notable exceptions.  These rigs sound pretty good
(esp. K1).  Smooth, easy on the ears.

I can't for the life of me understand how so many people are so happy
with these rigs, but they are.  Actually, I guess I used to love them
too but then I actually took the time to listen.

That was probably a mistake on my part since the only rig I'll own now
is a K1, K2 or (someday) K3.

- Keith -

-Original Message-
From: Brett gazdzinski

I also know many people think a really poor sounding radio sounds great
to them, there are very low expectations from some operators I guess.

_
MSN Tool Bar 幫你刪除惱人的廣告 ! http://toolbar.msn.com.hk 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread d.cutter
I found the FT1000MP to have a softer, more pleasant sound and easier to do 
long operating times compared to the 756 which was unpleasant after just a few 
minutes, even tho it seemed to perform better.

David G3UNA
 
 From: Brett gazdzinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2007/06/07 Thu PM 01:54:43 BST
 To: 'Elecraft' elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc
 
  I only had an icom 756 pro and the R4C, TS440, IC735, plus
 other really old boatanchor receivers, and while I 
 never paid real close attention to the old ones on CW,
 I know the 756 pro was nasty sounding compared
 to the K2 on CW.
 
 I suspect if my homebrew receivers were set up for
 CW, they would be better sounding then the K2, but
 have other serious limitations.
 
 Generally speaking, I find all the new stuff sounds
 quite nasty in many respects, even under good band
 conditions they are noisy and distorted.
 All those high gain chips, mixing, processing, low fi
 audio stages... 1.5 watts out at 10% distortion???
 
 
 I also know many people think a really poor sounding 
 radio sounds great to them, there are very low expectations
 from some operators I guess.
 
 Even the AM community has a good share of people with low
 expectations, despite the mode having a fidelity bias.
 
 
 Brett
 N2DTS
 
 
  
  Hi Dick,
  
  I own IC7800, IC781 and K2.  I also bought Sherwood cool fan 
  kit for my 
  Ic781.  Having said that, I do not entirely agree to Sherwood 
  report nor 
  having the same observation about AGC or pinfalls of modern DSP rigs
  
  It is my opinion and may only be applicable to my QTH and operation 
  condition.
  
  73
  
  Johnny Siu VR2XMC
  
  
  From: Dick Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Elecraft  elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  Subject: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc
  Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 06:34:42 -0500
  
  Really glad to see this discussed here. Sherwood is usually 
  pretty close to
  the mark on his tests etc, so very happy the E Team on top of 
  and out front
  on this very impt issue.
  Best,
  Dick, K5AND
  
  _
  MSN ? http://www.msn.com.hk/hothits/default.asp 
  
  ___
  Elecraft mailing list
  Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
  You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
  Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
   http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
  
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
  Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
  
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 

-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread Marteinn Sverrisson
Hi

If K2 sounds better than most modern rigs, then listen to the 
soundfiles on

http://www.qslnet.de/member/df7tv/nc2030pn.html

and compare the sounds of NC2030 and K2,  in my opinion the NC2030 is
far superior sounding under these conditions, 
compared to K2, judging from these recordings.

73, Matti
-- 
   Marteinn SverrissonTF3MA
  Langitangi 2Internet: tf3ma [at] raunvis [dot] hi [dot] is
270 Mosfellsbær   http://www.raunvis.hi.is/~tf3ma
   Iceland
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] QSK with K-3 and Linear Amp

2007-06-07 Thread jrhallas
It looks like the key out and key jacks on the back of the K3 could support a 
Ten-Tec type QSK keying loop (key amp, then key radio). Does anyone know if 
that's the case?

Thanks and 73, Joel
Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] FAQ updated

2007-06-07 Thread ab7r
Sorry all...this was an error on my part.  The carrier offset item WILL be in 
the 
initial release.  I'll correct the FAQ this evening.

73
Greg
AB7R




On Thu Jun  7 11:18 , Bill Tippett  sent:



AB7R:
 FYIA few new items were added to the K3 FAQ last night.

 Will the K3 have a menu setting for carrier offset or something equivalent?

 Shifting the IF in relation to the crystal filter during TX mode in 
order to optimize the
operator's voice will be in a ***future firmware release, but not for 
the initial shipment.***

 Hmmm...I'll bet that means the firmware is now frozen
for the ~20 units being shipped to beta testers.  Hope this means
July still looks good for first production units!  Back to work guys.

 73,  Bill  W4ZV

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: QSK with K-3 and Linear Amp

2007-06-07 Thread wayne burdick

Hi Joel,

We have enough flexibility to handle just about any amp keying 
requirement. Small matter of programming (translation: it may or may 
not be in the first release, but if there's a need for it, chances are 
it'll be in a subsequent release).


73,
Wayne
N6KR

On Jun 7, 2007, at 8:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It looks like the key out and key jacks on the back of the K3 could 
support a Ten-Tec type QSK keying loop (key amp, then key radio). Does 
anyone know if that's the case?


Thanks and 73, Joel
Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com




---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Sherwood report and K3 agc

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Lloyd
I do a fair bit of digital recording. Ticks and pops are usually a  
sign that the DSP engine is not processing samples fast enough,  
usually because of latency in the operating system. I would expect  
this to be a less-likely problem with dedicated DSP where the  
designer knows ahead of time how he/she wants to spend the CPU cycles  
to ensure that the CPU is never saturated. I do not for a moment  
believe that this is a problem inherent in the use of DSP in the IF/ 
demod stages.


73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Lloyd

On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:24 AM, Toby Deinhardt wrote:

It is beyond me how regulators can take interference reports based  
on s-meter values seriously. The s-meter is for many amateurs  
around the world, the only way they have of selectively measuring  
low level signals. One can not expect an affordable s-meter to be  
accurate to a tenth of a dB but plus/minus one or two dBs ought to  
be possible.


I agree 100%.

I like the idea that by referencing a fixed standard, i.e. S9 = 50uV  
into 50ohms, and then with a fixed slope after that, i.e. 6dB/S-unit,  
I can get an actual calculation of path loss by knowing the rest of  
the kit, e.g. line loss, antenna gain, transmit power, etc. That is  
really useful! Randomly changing S-meter behavior because it looks  
good or sounds good seems pretty darned counter-productive to me.


As a minimum, if someone makes a 10dB change in their signal, I  
should see a 10dB change on my meter. I just roll my eyes when  
someone kicks on their amplifier and I see a 3 S-unit change. Oh please!


So this gets back to a discussion of user interface. Microsoft has  
convinced us that being able to change things is somehow useful and  
desirable when, in fact, all it really does is cause confusion and  
support problems. Almost nothing is more frustrating than finding  
that the person you are trying to help has customized their system  
beyond recognition and nothing you tell them is really going to help  
them get it to work.


Sorry Wayne, but being able to change the S-meter slope and intercept  
strikes me as being a bad option. To me that is like changing the  
calibration of a voltmeter or wattmeter because you like the needle  
pointer to move differently.


73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread wayne burdick

Brian Lloyd wrote:

being able to change the S-meter slope and intercept strikes me as 
being a bad option. To me that is like changing the calibration of a 
voltmeter or wattmeter because you like the needle pointer to move 
differently.


I'd agree with you if there were a single world-wide standard for S-9, 
and no need to compensate for slight differences in receive gain from 
one unit to the next. But reality is that S-meters usually require both 
scale and offset calibration.


This is also more flexible. As I mentioned earlier, I set my S-meters 
up for 4 dB per S-unit. Here's why: I like a greater degree of 
sensitivity in the S-meter so I can see the effects of things like 
preamp on/off, filter changes, notch, NR, etc. It also makes band-pass 
filters easier to tweak when there isn't a scope or AF voltmeter handy, 
and you can more readily see the effect of an improved antenna during 
A/B testing.


If hams wanted to be precise in assessing signal levels, we'd report 
them in dBm and do a lot of averaging. But for most operators this is a 
hobby, not a job  :)


73,
Wayne
N6KR

---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.

I wholly and completely disagree.
1. S Meter standardization is a failed effort.  S meters are marketing 
numbers.  dBuV or dBmW is the measure to use.  If you are filing 
interference reports with the FCC and cannot figure out how to convert 
your signal strength readings to dB relative units, you need to make 
better measurements.
2. If Elecraft chooses to allow end-users to calibrate and set their S 
Meter readings to have a known intercept (50uV at S9) and slope (4dB, 
6dB, 3dB), so much the better, as it helps number one.
3. And, although I would not hold MSFT responsible for pushing forward 
UI design, I certainly don't think they offer the best options in terms 
of user configurability!


Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 9:36 am, Brian Lloyd wrote:

On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:24 AM, Toby Deinhardt wrote:

It is beyond me how regulators can take interference reports based  on 
s-meter values seriously. The s-meter is for many amateurs  around the 
world, the only way they have of selectively measuring  low level 
signals. One can not expect an affordable s-meter to be  accurate to a 
tenth of a dB but plus/minus one or two dBs ought to  be possible.


I agree 100%.

I like the idea that by referencing a fixed standard, i.e. S9 = 50uV  
into 50ohms, and then with a fixed slope after that, i.e. 6dB/S-unit,  
I can get an actual calculation of path loss by knowing the rest of  
the kit, e.g. line loss, antenna gain, transmit power, etc. That is  
really useful! Randomly changing S-meter behavior because it looks  
good or sounds good seems pretty darned counter-productive to me.


As a minimum, if someone makes a 10dB change in their signal, I  should 
see a 10dB change on my meter. I just roll my eyes when  someone kicks 
on their amplifier and I see a 3 S-unit change. Oh please!


So this gets back to a discussion of user interface. Microsoft has  
convinced us that being able to change things is somehow useful and  
desirable when, in fact, all it really does is cause confusion and  
support problems. Almost nothing is more frustrating than finding  that 
the person you are trying to help has customized their system  beyond 
recognition and nothing you tell them is really going to help  them get 
it to work.


Sorry Wayne, but being able to change the S-meter slope and intercept  
strikes me as being a bad option. To me that is like changing the  
calibration of a voltmeter or wattmeter because you like the needle  
pointer to move differently.


73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp: 
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Lloyd


On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:50 AM, wayne burdick wrote:


Brian Lloyd wrote:

being able to change the S-meter slope and intercept strikes  
me as being a bad option. To me that is like changing the  
calibration of a voltmeter or wattmeter because you like the  
needle pointer to move differently.


I'd agree with you if there were a single world-wide standard for  
S-9, and no need to compensate for slight differences in receive  
gain from one unit to the next. But reality is that S-meters  
usually require both scale and offset calibration.


Yes, they do. But they can be calibrated to a standard regardless of  
the gain of the radio.


This is also more flexible. As I mentioned earlier, I set my S- 
meters up for 4 dB per S-unit. Here's why: I like a greater degree  
of sensitivity in the S-meter so I can see the effects of things  
like preamp on/off, filter changes, notch, NR, etc. It also makes  
band-pass filters easier to tweak when there isn't a scope or AF  
voltmeter handy, and you can more readily see the effect of an  
improved antenna during A/B testing.


What you are doing is changing the calibration instead of changing  
the *resolution*. What you really want to do is to be able to resolve  
smaller changes easily. So blow up the scale. Add calibration points  
for half S-units. That would give you 3dB points on the meter. That  
is even better than your 4dB resolution!


If hams wanted to be precise in assessing signal levels, we'd  
report them in dBm and do a lot of averaging.


I agree. I would prefer to have a meter calibrated in dBm but we have  
used S-units for so long that it is part of the fabric. Heck, we  
still use the English Standard system of measurements in the US. I  
have to switch back and forth between metric and ES all the time. And  
sometimes it is convenient to measure resistance in ohms or  
conductance in mohs even though we know they are really the same thing.



But for most operators this is a hobby, not a job  :)


It is a technical hobby. We measure voltage, resistance, current, and  
power to very accurate levels. Why should we therefore say that  
accurately measuring receive signal level is unimportant? You  
yourself say that you use the S-meter to:


...see the effects of things like preamp on/off, filter changes,  
notch, NR, etc. It also makes band-pass filters easier to tweak when  
there isn't a scope or AF voltmeter handy, and you can more readily  
see the effect of an improved antenna during A/B testing.


Clearly you are using it as an instrument of measurement. Why not  
have it conform to a standard so that the readings are useful rather  
than just randomly relative?


I think this gets back to my comment about resolution. If you are  
using a quantized bar-graph display it is easier to change the  
calibration than to change the resolution. OTOH, three digits would  
be nice or even an analog meter. (I actually still prefer analog  
meters for a lot of things, especially doing calibrations involving  
tweaking things.)


Never mind.

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Lloyd


On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Darwin, Keith wrote:

I disagree with this.  If S-meter cal was indeed a standard, that's  
one

thing but the reality of S-meters is that they are all over the map.

If I calibrate my rig and know how many dB per s-unit than I'm far  
ahead

of my peers who only *think* they know.  If I have 4 dB per unit I
expect to see a 2.5 unit jump when the other guy kicks on the linear.


I find it interesting that people say they disagree with me and then  
go on to agree with me.


The points I am making are:

1. Most radios have S-meters that don't tell you anything useful  
other than, the signal is bigger or smaller. Why bother with the  
meter if your ear can do just as well and probably more accurately?


2. Just because everyone else has crap for a meter doesn't mean you  
should too.


3. Having a meter that accurately tells you the received signal  
strength, one that can be accurately turned into relative dB changes  
or, better still, changes relative to 0dBm, is a very good thing.


4. Being able to sit down at a random radio, look at its meter, and  
know what it is telling you without having to get a lesson from its  
owner would be really nice.


The only question is what the calibration should be. If the FCC  
didn't put it on the test and if there weren't a european standard, I  
would say hey, knock yourself out; do what makes you happy so long  
as it is consistent.


But we do actually have a standard and we do (finally) have a radio  
that can perform accurate measurement to that standard. Why throw  
that away?


Sorry, I have carried on too long about this. When I get my K3 I can  
set its meter to give me real measurements in S-units. If you use my  
radio you will know that what you had to learn for your FCC exam is  
actually reflected in the behavior of the meter in my radio.


Oh, and I want a meter with resolution that corresponds to the  
accuracy of the measurement. ;-)


Uh, and can I have it for $59 too? :-)

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread wayne burdick
I think this gets back to my comment about resolution. If you are 
using a quantized bar-graph display it is easier to change the 
calibration than to change the resolution. OTOH, three digits would be 
nice or even an analog meter. (I actually still prefer analog meters 
for a lot of things, especially doing calibrations involving tweaking 
things.)


I just added a task to my future-K3-firmware list: allow the VFO B 
display to optionally show signal level in dBm. Three digits. Just for 
you, Brian   :)


73,
Wayne
N6KR


---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] S meters and audio quality

2007-06-07 Thread DOUGLAS ZWIEBEL

Here is (was) my take on S meters:
http://www.ac6rm.net/mailarchive/html/elecraft-list/2007-05/msg01072.html

Next.  I think that an adjustable sensitivity for the S meter (how
many db/S) is great for my purposes.  Frankly, I don't care if the guy
I'm working is S1 or 20 over, just so long as I can hear him.

However, when I am doing things that require a RELATIVE scale (testing
antennas, aligning things, etc), all I care about is is condition 2
better or worse than condition 1?

One of the YUCK things about a bar graph S meter is that you can't see
tiny increments (at least I can't).  If I can twiddle the db/S unit,
then I suspect that I'll be able to observe TINY changes, more like
what I might be able to see on an analog meter (mechanical).

So I think this sounds GREAT to me.  Hope it goes does down to 1db per
S unit!  I do have an 82db step attenuator, so I'm all set.

Audio:  I think a classic case is the TR7.  For the time, a great
front end right out of the box.  But OMG, what an aweful audio
amp!!  It was wonderful to hear tiny signals when surrounded by
other BIG signals (especially at M/M...we had 10 TR7's), but wow, did
one get a headache from all that GARBAGE audio (I can't even call it
bad quality because it still has the word quality).

How many big dollars when into good design (for the time) only to send
it out through a 99 cent AF amp.  UGH...

Hope things are in order with the K3

de Doug KR2Q
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Toby Deinhardt
I just added a task to my future-K3-firmware list: allow the VFO B 
display to optionally show signal level in dBm. Three digits. Just for 
you, Brian   :)


One can not help but love these guys.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: Battery size

2007-06-07 Thread barry
Also looking for a K2 battery in the Uk, could you please pass on any
info received?

tia Barry. G0MPA

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] KX1 LED display

2007-06-07 Thread VE3GAM Al McRorie
My display is almost impossible to see outdoors.  Can I do anything to make the 
digits more visible outdoors during the day?


al ve3gam




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Mike
 -- Original message --
From: Toby Deinhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  User settable.
 
 I'm not sure I really like this at all. S-meters are meaningless if they 
 do not adhere to some kind of norm.

I tend to agree.  If someone doesn't want to use or place any importance on a 
particular S-meter reading that's fine - I tend to be that way as well.  But 
the fact that it's a meter suggests - as does its intended purpose - that it 
represents some type of standard of measurement.  Therefore IMO it's worth 
having your meter adhere to that, whether or not you choose to pay any 
attention to it.  Why call it a cup if in fact it's a tablespoon?

On this reflector, I'm surprised no one has mentioned the XG1 and XG2 kits that 
can be used to easily calibrate an S-meter *to* a known standard.  I used the 
XG2 first to become acquainted with Elecraft kit building (now I can't get 
enough!), and then to check the meter on my FT-857D (which needs a slight 
adjustment as it's reading a tad high at 50uV).

--
73,
Mike, KC0KBC
Yaesu FT-857D, FT-8800R, VX-7RB
Elecraft KX1 #1819 (in work), XG2
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Don Rasmussen
Wayne,

Could you also add a 3 digit display for BARS, as in
how many bars am I hitting you with?.

--
 
Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)
Sender:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

I think this gets back to my comment about resolution.
If you are using a quantized bar-graph display it is
easier to change the calibration than to change the
resolution. OTOH, three digits would be nice or even
an analog meter. (I actually still prefer analog
meters for a lot of things, especially doing
calibrations involving tweaking things.) 

I just added a task to my future-K3-firmware list:
allow the VFO B display to optionally show signal
level in dBm. Three digits. Just for you, Brian :)


73,
Wayne
N6KR
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Toby Deinhardt

Hi Mike,


On this reflector, I'm surprised no one has mentioned the XG1 and XG2 kits that 
can be used to easily calibrate an S-meter *to* a known standard.  I used the 
XG2 first to become acquainted with Elecraft kit building (now I can't get 
enough!), and then to check the meter on my FT-857D (which needs a slight 
adjustment as it's reading a tad high at 50uV).


Many rigs use the AGC voltage for the s-meter, which means often, 
especially below S9, the curve is anything but 6dB per S-meter-unit. So 
even if your rig does S9 correctly, the chances are that S5 will be

wildly wrong.

But you are right, better a correct indication of S9 than nothing. And 
the XG1 is a nice tool for this, especially if you can verify the signal 
level which it is producing.


vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: Tardy Dayton Comments

2007-06-07 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
At least half a dozen people took careful note of your call when viewing the
enclosures at SeaPac too. Primary interest was in the WM1 installed in one. 

Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wayne burdick
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:30 PM
To: Dave Van Wallaghen
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Re: Tardy Dayton Comments


Hi Dave,

Your attractive enclosures got a lot of attention, too!

Thanks for your help at Dayton--

Wayne


On Jun 6, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Dave Van Wallaghen wrote:

 My apologies for being so tardy with my comments, but I went on
 vacation
 after Dayton (without email access) and then it took a week for me to 
 get
 everything back to normal around here when I got home ;-)

 ---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Bill W5WVO

Mike wrote:


I tend to agree.  If someone doesn't want to use or place any
importance on a particular S-meter reading that's fine - I tend to be
that way as well.  But the fact that it's a meter suggests - as
does its intended purpose - that it represents some type of standard
of measurement.  Therefore IMO it's worth having your meter adhere to
that, whether or not you choose to pay any attention to it.  Why call
it a cup if in fact it's a tablespoon?


The S-meter has always been conceived to represent signal strength in terms of 
dB relative to a fixed intercept (nominally, in many quarters, 50 uV = S9). 
When you are measuring dB, you are measuring a ratio of two voltages, not an 
absolute quantity of voltage (though that can of course be derived from 
calibration data). Changing the slope and intercept of the S-meter is no 
different than changing the scaling factors on an old analog VTVM. The face 
might look different after you do it, the needle might react differently, but 
it still reads the same quantities if you know the calibration of the thing. 
From that perspective, it doesn't really matter HOW the S-meter is calibrated, 

as long as it IS calibrated.

Given the almost complete absence of any kind of accepted standard, I think 
Wayne made exactly the right call in making the S-meter user-programmable. We 
now have the opportunity, given this new feature, to experiment and see what 
really works best, and make a LOGICAL case for establishing that as a 
standard.


Bill / W5WVO 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Edward Dickinson III
...seems the on-air rag-chew talk these days is more and more about fine
settings and precision...comments to others that they, 'are 27 Hz off
frequency' and the like.  That was a non-issue before a couple more decimal
places were added to the right and scopes were built in.  

Will we now be faced with windy discussions when giving a station a signal
report about, 'how my s-meter is calibrated?'

Amateur radio is a technical hobby.  Yet some would like to talk about
things other than issues that are way to the right of the decimal point. 

With no attempt towards a standard, the s-meter report one receives degrades
further in relevance.  If one sets their own radio's s-meter in a way that
suits them for use as an instrument for other than signal reports, is it
appropriate to use that to report signal strength to the rest of the ham
community?

Specialization is fine...to a point.  At some point it becomes it becomes an
exclusive nitch.  Are we hearing more and more QSOs where if a person can't
talk about a particular brand/model of radio or feature of function of a
radio, they won't be included in the QSO?  Some can find nothing to QSO
about other than radio and precision.  Never mind accuracy and as another
said, 'consistency.'  Overall, 'fraternity' (for lack of a better term)
breaks down and insider cliques grow.

How many  enthusiasts does it take to dance in a chorus line to the
right of a decimal point?  (Fill in the blank with any particular specialty
you care to.)

Okay...resume target practice.


Regards,
Dick - KA5KKT/4

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread peter gerba
Kn6bi Signal Report Rules:
Ya don't need no stinking S meter..

If the station is copy-able, with ease; He's S9

If he's copy-able with some trouble; He's S5

If he's not very copy-able and DX and you need a card; He's S9

If he's not very copy-able and doesn't qualify for the above; He's S3

If he's loud and has a good fist; He's 20/S9

Same as above with a bad fist; He's S9

If you know he's got a stack of mono-banders and is running 10KW and you
like the guy or need a card.. He's 20/S9

If you know he's got a stack of mono-banders and is running 10KW and you DON
'T like the guy or DON'T need a card.. He's S9  (Tell him he used to have a
great sig on 20.. did he make antenna changes? He needs a K3, his finals
must be flat, call Eimac, what-ever..)


pete kn6bi


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:31 AM
To: [Elecraft] Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)



On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Darwin, Keith wrote:

 I disagree with this.  If S-meter cal was indeed a standard, that's
 one
 thing but the reality of S-meters is that they are all over the map.

 If I calibrate my rig and know how many dB per s-unit than I'm far
 ahead
 of my peers who only *think* they know.  If I have 4 dB per unit I
 expect to see a 2.5 unit jump when the other guy kicks on the linear.

I find it interesting that people say they disagree with me and then
go on to agree with me.

The points I am making are:

1. Most radios have S-meters that don't tell you anything useful
other than, the signal is bigger or smaller. Why bother with the
meter if your ear can do just as well and probably more accurately?

2. Just because everyone else has crap for a meter doesn't mean you
should too.

3. Having a meter that accurately tells you the received signal
strength, one that can be accurately turned into relative dB changes
or, better still, changes relative to 0dBm, is a very good thing.

4. Being able to sit down at a random radio, look at its meter, and
know what it is telling you without having to get a lesson from its
owner would be really nice.

The only question is what the calibration should be. If the FCC
didn't put it on the test and if there weren't a european standard, I
would say hey, knock yourself out; do what makes you happy so long
as it is consistent.

But we do actually have a standard and we do (finally) have a radio
that can perform accurate measurement to that standard. Why throw
that away?

Sorry, I have carried on too long about this. When I get my K3 I can
set its meter to give me real measurements in S-units. If you use my
radio you will know that what you had to learn for your FCC exam is
actually reflected in the behavior of the meter in my radio.

Oh, and I want a meter with resolution that corresponds to the
accuracy of the measurement. ;-)

Uh, and can I have it for $59 too? :-)

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Toby Deinhardt

Hallo Bill,

user-programmable. We now have the opportunity, given this new feature, 
to experiment and see what really works best, and make a LOGICAL case 
for establishing that as a standard.


6dB makes a lot of sense to me: 1 S-unit = 6db = factor 2 in voltage.

This is the Region 1 recommendation:
--
IARU Region 1 Technical Recommendation R.1

BRIGHTON 1981, TORREMOLINOS 1990

STANDARDISATION OF S-METER READINGS

1. One S-unit corresponds to a signal level difference of 6 dB,

2. On the bands below 30 MHz a meter deviation of S-9 corresponds to an 
available power of -73 dBm from a  continuous wave signal generator 
connected to the receiver input terminals,


3. On the bands above 30 MHz this available power shall be -93 dBm,

4. The metering system shall be based on quasi-peak detection with an 
attack time of 10 msec ∀ 2 msec and a decay time constant of at least 
500 msec.

--

But *MUCH, MUCH* better is Wayne's plan to display dBm.

I do wonder what timing Wayne will use.

vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Very good. 

I'm sure that, in order to facilitate better understanding, all contesters
are careful to give accurate S-meter reports in every exchange too.;-)

Honest signal reports have been an issue since I opened my first copy of
How to Become a Radio Amateur. Personally, I think the commercial
operators got it right by adopting the QSA reporting system:

QSA 1 = scarcely perceptible
QSA 2 = weak
QSA 3 = fairly good
QSA 4 = good
QSA 5 = very good

Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-

Kn6bi Signal Report Rules:
Ya don't need no stinking S meter..

If the station is copy-able, with ease; He's S9

If he's copy-able with some trouble; He's S5

If he's not very copy-able and DX and you need a card; He's S9

If he's not very copy-able and doesn't qualify for the above; He's S3

If he's loud and has a good fist; He's 20/S9

Same as above with a bad fist; He's S9

If you know he's got a stack of mono-banders and is running 10KW and you
like the guy or need a card.. He's 20/S9

If you know he's got a stack of mono-banders and is running 10KW and you DON
'T like the guy or DON'T need a card.. He's S9  (Tell him he used to have a
great sig on 20.. did he make antenna changes? He needs a K3, his finals
must be flat, call Eimac, what-ever..)


pete kn6bi

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Lloyd

On Jun 7, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Toby Deinhardt wrote:

4. The metering system shall be based on quasi-peak detection with  
an attack time of 10 msec ∀ 2 msec and a decay time constant of at  
least 500 msec.


Hmm, peak rather than RMS voltage? If you are averaging then it needs  
to be something like RMS so that noise energy is properly accounted  
for. Peak works for an SSB signal but not so good for general  
measurement. I guess we need to ask Wayne for a peak/RMS switch.



--

But *MUCH, MUCH* better is Wayne's plan to display dBm.


Yes.



I do wonder what timing Wayne will use.


And don't forget attack/decay time for the peak-reading meter and  
integration time for the RMS meter function. :-)


Oh dear, this could get SO out-of-hand. Sorry.

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Toby Deinhardt

I do wonder what timing Wayne will use.


And don't forget attack/decay time for the peak-reading meter and 
integration time for the RMS meter function. :-)


You could of course read a stream of values into a computer via the 
RS-232 port and then do all kinds of stuff with da data.


((( Oh dear, I mentioned something new )))



Oh dear, this could get SO out-of-hand. Sorry.


Yep. We should stop while we are ahead... hi hi

Let's declare an eot before Eric has to.

vy 73 de toby
--
DD5FZ, 4N6FZ (ex dj7mgq, dg5mgq, dd5fz)
K2 #885, K2/100 #3248
K3/100 #??? ( #200)
DOK C12, BCC, DL-QRP-AG
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Edward Dickinson III wrote:



Will we now be faced with windy discussions when giving a station a signal
report about, 'how my s-meter is calibrated?'


Well, the true tinkerer in quest of gnats eye calibration would simply 
calibrate his/her S meter with an accurate external signal generator.


Then, instead of telling someone they are S7, the person could actually give 
them a DB report.  Sounds silly?  I remember so much spectrum and time be wasted 
on 75 meters with folks arguing about S meter readings.


Of course we could simply query a station who gives us an S7, and ask how their 
S Meter is calibrated.


This is all too technical for me...I'm still trying to determine how many angels
can dance upon a K3 power connector.

Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer
k3hrn

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:



Honest signal reports have been an issue since I opened my first copy of
How to Become a Radio Amateur. Personally, I think the commercial
operators got it right by adopting the QSA reporting system:


But the commercial operators had a primary concern of communicating information, 
rather than being technical wizards.


Sigh, I know I'm out of step...I'd rather learn about the person on the other 
end of QSO instead of how many dbs I am presenting to the internal measuring 
point of his/her receiver.


Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer
k3hrn

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Kevin Rock
   When someone wants to tell me of their rig, their fancy antenna, and the Oh 
wow linear amp I tell them that's fine and dandy and proceed to ask them about 
their weather :)  I heard an IK op running stations the other evening on 20 
meters.  His message mentioned name, QTH, RST, and weather report.  What he 
wanted in return was the weather report from each op he worked.  It stymied 
some of them who were big into the 599 thing but they finally figured out he 
really did wish to know something other than the standard QSO material.  I'd 
rather know the weather than the details of someone's rig too.  If I can hear 
them I assume their antenna is still up and their rig is not yet smoking!  I 
thought the idea of communication was to create a dialog between two people.  I 
don't really care if you're running 50 Terawatts or 100 milliwatts; I want to 
hear about you, your family, your cat (or pheasant), and, yes, your weather :)
   73,
  Kevin.  KD5ONS

-Original Message-
From: Thom LaCosta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jun 7, 2007 1:18 PM
To: Ron D'Eau Claire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[Elecraft] Reflector' elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:


 Honest signal reports have been an issue since I opened my first copy of
 How to Become a Radio Amateur. Personally, I think the commercial
 operators got it right by adopting the QSA reporting system:

But the commercial operators had a primary concern of communicating 
information, 
rather than being technical wizards.

Sigh, I know I'm out of step...I'd rather learn about the person on the other 
end of QSO instead of how many dbs I am presenting to the internal measuring 
point of his/her receiver.

Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer
k3hrn

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX1 LED display

2007-06-07 Thread Don Wilhelm

Al,

Not a lot you can do other than to devise some sort of shade to keep the 
direct sunlight off the LED.  If it is not a frequent requirement, 
shading it with your palm long enough to see the frequency may be enough.


Of course working in the shade is always more comfortable - at least at 
my latitude.


73,
Don W3FPR

VE3GAM Al McRorie wrote:
My display is almost impossible to see outdoors.  Can I do anything to make the 
digits more visible outdoors during the day?



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 Facilitating Thermistor Calibration

2007-06-07 Thread David Woolley
I'm getting close to the point at which I populate the thermistor board 
and I came across an article saying that the quarter watt resistor was 
deliberately not an eighth watt in order to make it easier to change it 
to calibrate the board.  Has anyone devised good ways of making it easy 
to adjust, e.g. by using a variable, or using a header, so the through 
hole joints don't have to be remade? Is there enough clearance to do 
something like this.


(As an aside, it would have been nice to have done the correction in 
firmware, so that you linearise the calibration curve, but I guess that 
would have needed another microcontroller hanging off the AuxBus.)


--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Julian G4ILO

I'm amazed by this thread. Most S meters are pretty much AGC
voltmeters. They register practically nothing until the signal is more
or less readability 9 and then whizz up to S9 or so after which they
may approximate to the +10, +20db calibration. Whatever the K3 has
will be streets ahead of any other radio, allowing the user to set it
up to suit their own personal foibles / preferences.

But who cares about S meters? I run QRP. Nearly every report I get is
599. Most of the people I work are not running QRP so I'm not about to
offend them by giving a lower report than I got. Besides, while he's
sending his first over I'm entering his details into the log and never
even think to look at the meter before it's my turn to reply.
--
Julian, G4ILO
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: ???
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: KX1 LED display

2007-06-07 Thread wayne burdick

Al,

Make sure you have the LED brightness set to maximum (6).

Also note that the KX1 can be operated entirely without the display. It 
has a full CW audio interface, with programmable code speed. All 
controls and menu entries can be used in this fashion.


See the CFB menu entry in the manual.

73
Wayne
N6K



VE3GAM Al McRorie wrote:
My display is almost impossible to see outdoors.  Can I do anything 
to make the digits more visible outdoors during the day?

___


---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote:


But who cares about S meters? I run QRP.


Well, with a fully adjustable S-Meter...you could simply ask the other station 
what S-Meter report he would like.


Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread w6jd
QSM?

de W6JD

-- Original message -- 
From: Thom LaCosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote: 
 
  But who cares about S meters? I run QRP. 
 
 Well, with a fully adjustable S-Meter...you could simply ask the other 
 station 
 what S-Meter report he would like. 
 
 Thom,EIEIO 
 Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer 
 
 www.baltimorehon.com/ Home of the Baltimore Lexicon 
 www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month 
 ___ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] RST or S - meter readings?

2007-06-07 Thread Kevin Rock
Do people really use a meter to give signal reports to people?  I thought RST 
was to be honest reportage.
   Kevin.  KD5ONS



-Original Message-
From: Thom LaCosta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jun 7, 2007 2:39 PM
To: Julian G4ILO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote:

 But who cares about S meters? I run QRP.

Well, with a fully adjustable S-Meter...you could simply ask the other station 
what S-Meter report he would like.

Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread Lee Buller


I sometimes wonder why we have S-Meters.  They've never been a scientific 
instrument to determine signal strengthat least not the ones I've seen.  I 
think that S-Meters are a marketing toojust try to sell a radio without 
one.  Hard to do.

However S-Meters are calibratedI like to compare signals on the bands...so 
when I have a QSO...I can tell the person he is so and so loud in comparison to 
other signals on the band.  S-Meters (to me) are relative to the band 
conditions.

Lee - K0WA





In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply.  If you don't 
have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it.  If you can't find 
any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.  Is 
Common Sense divine?
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RST or S - meter readings?

2007-06-07 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Kevin Rock wrote:


Do people really use a meter to give signal reports to people?  I thought RST 
was to be honest reportage.


Well, all we need do is observe signal reports in contests and the quaint notion 
of RST being an honest report is nullified.


I rememeber years ago, at least a 1000, being on 75 meters AM and giving folks S 
meter reportsuntil some real ole timer(he had to look like the folks in the 
Jeeves cartoons in QST asked us where we were measuring the S units...and how.


It suddendly dawned on me that:
A. I didn't know
B. I had no interest in learning how it was done

But, I guess if the meter is there...you are tempted to use it.  Now folks with 
insensitive meters had scotch s-meters...but we can't say that now, since it 
ain't PC.


I'd really like to have a magic-eye tube instead of an S-meter...they are so 
interesting...and for output power a neon bulb at least 6 inches longthey 
are really interesting as you adjust your antenna and the SWR changes.


Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer
k3hrn

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: K3: S-meter calibration (redux)

2007-06-07 Thread K4tmc

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RST or S - meter readings?

2007-06-07 Thread Fred Jensen

Kevin Rock wrote:

Do people really use a meter to give signal reports to people?  I thought RST 
was to be honest reportage.
   Kevin.  KD5ONS



It's context dependent, Kevin.  If it's a DXpedition or a contest, 
everyone is 5NN.  If it's a QRP contest or QSO, everyone is 56N.  If you 
get a report from me, be aware ... I made it up.  Best way to tell your 
real report at my QTH is to watch and see if I answer your questions.


Can't tell you the last time I heard a CW signal that wasn't xxN 
although chirp is a bit more common.  The whole system is an 
anachronism, but old habits die hard.  We call it CW and mean 
communications using the International Morse Code when CW means 
continuous waves.


But then, Sam Morse didn't exactly invent the code which carries his 
name either.


73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 2007 CQP Oct 6-7
- www.cqp.org
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Just what isn't user definable?

2007-06-07 Thread K8TB

I just added a task to my future-K3-firmware list: allow the VFO B
display to optionally show signal level in dBm. Three digits. Just for 
you, Brian   :)

73, Wayne N6KR

In addition to the slope of the function (dB per S-unit), is the
scale set point user-configurable? Or is this hard-coded such that
S9=50 uV?

User settable. ...Wayne


OK, I overheard this at Dayton. As with everything on the K3, all 
things are definable.


   Is it true that one can change the size of the cabinet, in both 
English and Metric?


  Tom K8TB K3 Sn xxx



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Just what isn't user definable?

2007-06-07 Thread Thom LaCosta

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, K8TB wrote:

  Is it true that one can change the size of the cabinet, in both English 
and Metric?


That option is a subset of the color change settings.

Be aware that the K3 senses the technical prowess of the user, so some menu 
options may be hidden from Appliance Operators like myself.


Thankfully Elecraft did not take the suggestion of either an interactive user 
skill qualifier or license class detector.



Thom,EIEIO
Email, Internet, Electronic Information Officer
k3hrn

www.baltimorehon.com/Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
www.tlchost.net/hosting/ Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Life and Elecraft

2007-06-07 Thread Kevin Rock
I find it makes my life simpler if I think of Elecraft as the Chocolate Factory 
and Wayne as Willie Wonka :)

(Stuck at work, deep in a recalcitrant ISR, hoping to map a timing issue.)

Kevin.  KD5ONS

P.S. Not the movie, the book!
   KJR

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RST or S - meter readings?

2007-06-07 Thread Mike Morrow
 We call it CW and mean communications using the International
 Morse Code when CW means continuous waves.

Communications using Morse code by keyed continuous waves in contrast to 
communications using Morse code by keyed damped waves, which was the type of 
signal emitted by those old spark and arc transmitters of yesteryear, until 
alternators and vacuum tube oscillators were available to emit continuous waves 
during key-down.  CW vs. DW!

I wish that there were allowances for damped wave transmissions by amateurs 
somewhere above 1500 meters for one night each year.  Dust off that crystal set.

73,
Mike / KK5F
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Signal Stength Monitoring (WAS: K3: S-meter calibration (redux))

2007-06-07 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
From time to time a buddy will enlist my help in doing some signal strength
monitoring. That can be a useful exercise when working with stable signals
to compare various antennas at least over the path between that station and
mine. 

When I do that I turn off the S-meter because I turn the AGC off. I put a
step attenuator in the antenna line and select some nominal amount of
attenuation - say -20 dB. Then I connect my DMM or a 'scope to read the AC
voltage at the speaker jack and note the audio his signal produces. That can
be a tone transmitted by him SSB or, best, the beat not produced from his CW
carrier. 

He makes a change and I adjust the step attenuator to regain the *same*
voltage at the audio output. The attenuator shows me the dB change directly.


I've considered building an appropriate audio voltmeter into a homebrew
receiver but the need doesn't come up often enough to justify it. I have
built step attenuators into my receivers at the antenna jack that I use for
a RF gain control. I've often used 6 dB, since that is about the smallest
definite change in gain one notices in normal operation with typical QSB,
etc. A rotary switch attenuator is handy for that; just turn the knob. I
used two separate -40 dB attenuators cascaded with it, each with a simple
toggle switch, for a total of about 116 dB attenuator. Of course, it's
necessary to pay attention to isolating the inputs from the outputs for the
attenuation to be accurate, especially on the higher frequencies. With a
rotary switch, that starts to get difficult above 40 dB, so I limit the
range to that value and add to well-isolated single stage -40 dB attenuators
in series with it. 

That attenuator at the antenna input become the main receiver gain control.
Like days of old, the audio gain is adjusted to the level just below that at
which the internal noise is audible, then the RF Gain - the attenuator -
controls the loudness of signals heard. 

That makes for a lazy operator. If I notice that I have to switch in, say,
another 6 dB of attenuation as the other station's signal builds up during a
QSO, I can observe UR SIG UP AN S UNIT HR OM... during the next xmission. 

I suppose I could calibrate the attenuator in S-Units. That's definitely
not a new idea. A popular regenerative receiver from the 1930's featured
direct signal strength readout. They calibrated the volume control! As the
control was turned, the pointer passed 9 down near minimum gain and worked
through 8, 7, 6...to 1 at maximum gain. One tuned in a signal, set the
gain for comfortable listening, and then read the S report directly from
the pointer on the gain control knob!

Ron AC7AC 




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] WA3WSJ's Blue Moon Hike Saturday.

2007-06-07 Thread Edward R. Breneiser
Hello all,

Since I had to cut short my earlier Blue Moon QRP Hike, I'll give it a
go again this Saturday. I plan to hike into the pond area off Rt. 183
again and play QRP.

WA3WSJ's Blue Moon QRP Hike
Date:June 9, 2007
Time:1600utc to 1900utc
Place:   Appalachian Trail,  PA 
Bands:   7.030, 10.106, 14.060mhz

Special QSL Card for celebrating the Blue Moon in May of 2007 - it's
COOL!
I'll be using my Elecraft pimped-out KX1!

To view the Blue Moon QSL Card, click on the link below.
http://www.wa3wsj.com/WA3WSJ-hiking.html


72,
Ed,WA3WSJ


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Signal report

2007-06-07 Thread Scott McDowell
I have always given signal reports according to how well I could hear the 
sending station.

I never pay any attention to the S-meter. Is that incorrect?
If I have to turn down the volume for a station, I will give him a 9, and if 
I can barley hear him
above the noise, he will probably get a 3. And the rest will be somewhere in 
between.

73
Scott N5SM

_
Don’t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft 
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 circuit breaker

2007-06-07 Thread Scott McDowell
Is there any way to test the circuit breaker in a K2 without running the 
risk of damaging the rig?


I have had the circuit breaker in my Icom PS-30 switching power supply trip 
a couple of times
lately because of high swr on the antenna I was trying to use. The power 
supply always beats
the K2 circuit breaker in opening. Seems to me this should be the other way 
around?

73
Scott N5SM

_
Picture this – share your photos and you could win big!  
http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHMloc=us


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 circuit breaker

2007-06-07 Thread Don Wilhelm

Scott,

That sounds like you have a K2/100 there (using a 30 amp? power supply).
There is no circuit breaker in the KPA100, but if you are using the 
supplied power cord, the manual instructs you to add a 20 amp fuse in 
the power supply lead.


The base K2 does have a resettable fuse that acts rather quickly.

For my own preference, I would rather rely on the internal power supply 
circuit breaker (or foldback current limiting or crowbar circuit) than a 
fuse in the transceiver itself - the breaker in the power supply 
protects against faults in both the transceiver and the power cable.


If you are seeing erratic HI SWR on your antenna, consider that the 
KPA100 could be oscillating (especially if it happens on 40 meters) - if 
that is suspected, I recommend that you add the KPA100UPKT.  If your 
KPA100 kit was shipped after last December, it already has the upgrade, 
but if it is earlier, it is wise to add it.


73,
Don W3FPR

Scott McDowell wrote:
Is there any way to test the circuit breaker in a K2 without running the 
risk of damaging the rig?


I have had the circuit breaker in my Icom PS-30 switching power supply 
trip a couple of times
lately because of high swr on the antenna I was trying to use. The power 
supply always beats
the K2 circuit breaker in opening. Seems to me this should be the other 
way around?

73
Scott N5SM

_
Picture this – share your photos and you could win big!  
http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHMloc=us


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Hakko 936

2007-06-07 Thread Tony Morgan

The famous Hakko 936 ESD at a good price.
http://www.hmcelectronics.com/cgi-bin/scripts/query.cgi?query=936esd

Tony W7GO
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RST or S - meter readings?

2007-06-07 Thread Ian Stirling
On Thursday 07 June 2007 17:44:31 Kevin Rock wrote:

 Do people really use a meter to give signal reports to people?

  I don't and never have done in my 28 years as a Radio Amateur.
My K2's bar meter is switched off.

Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962
--

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] ESD bags

2007-06-07 Thread Nancy and Bob Widmaier
It seems that the K2 circuit boards should be stored in ESD bags while being 
assembled.  

I am concerned that family members might inadvertently touch the boards being 
built.

Is this correct?

Do most kit builders do this or is there a different solution?

Where can I get or buy large ESD bags in small quantities at a reasonable price?

Thanks,

Bob

K3JOP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] ESD bags

2007-06-07 Thread Brian Lloyd

On Jun 7, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Nancy and Bob Widmaier wrote:

Where can I get or buy large ESD bags in small quantities at a  
reasonable price?


Just wrap them in aluminum foil if you are concerned.

73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] ESD bags

2007-06-07 Thread AJSOENKE
Foils OK if you don't snag a bit on a sharp pin  and short something later. 
Also don't use foil if there are any batteries  involved. You can kill a 
computer motherboard if you  wrap it in foil with  the battery installed.  
Check  
http://www.esdbagsonline.com/General_purpose_esd_bags_.php  
for $11 you can buy 100 - 8x10s
 
Al WA6VNN



** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] ESD bags

2007-06-07 Thread michael taylor

On 6/7/07, Nancy and Bob Widmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Do most kit builders do this or is there a different solution?


I protect my work bench with a large mess, which seems to discourage
people wandering into my workshop.



Where can I get or buy large ESD bags in small quantities at a reasonable price?


Most of mine are from various electronic bits I've ordered.

One other source is local computer stores that actually build
computers themselves, the motherboards and cards (video, source,
network, etc.) come in a large anti-static bag, that are mostly waste
for them. I have a number of bags from motherboards and cards I've
bought or inherited over the years.

Here's one surplus source, but I see that they only are selling them in 100s.
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/products.asp?dept=1287

I think all the online / catalog places like Newark, Mouser, Digi-Key,
Jameco stock them as well, not so sure the prices are reasonable.
Jameco's price doesn't look too bad.
http://www.jameco.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?langId=-1storeId=10001catalogId=10001productId=78650

-Michael, VE3TIX
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RST or S - meter readings?

2007-06-07 Thread Bob Nielsen


On Jun 7, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Kevin Rock wrote:

Do people really use a meter to give signal reports to people?  I  
thought RST was to be honest reportage.


Only when the meter needle is stuck on 9.  :^)

Maybe we should use meters calibrated for power density or field  
strength, taking into account antenna gain and feedline loss.  That  
would be honest and consistent.


73, Bob N7XY

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Elecraft's HexKey

2007-06-07 Thread Ken Kopp

This occurred to me immediately of course, but the Bencher folks
couldn't assure me that the bare steel base would be suitable for
chrome plating.  They said the reason they don't offer a chrome
version is the reject rate for chromed hex bases.  I don't know if 
this is due to the finish of the steel that appeared in the chrome

finish or not.

I didn't ask the obvious ... how is the Hex Key base different
from the (chrome) bases of their famous square-based paddles?
Perhaps a different supplier and/or material.  Brass?

Along the same line ... if someone has a Hex Key, please look
closely at he top surface of the large square post and see if you
can see file-like marks in the metal that appear in/through the 
chrome ... especially at each corner.  Mine has these, but they 
are fine enough that they most likely wouldn't show if the post 
was painted like the base.


Still, it -IS- a fine paddle and a joy to use.

73! Ken Kopp - K0PP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message - 
From: Brian Lloyd 
To: Elecraft Reflector 
Sent: Thursday, 07 June, 2007 03:02

Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft's HexKey


On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Ken Kopp wrote:

I'm a long-time CW op (54 years) and agree it's about the best I've  
ever used, too.  Attaching a house logo and adding a S/N is another  
example of Elecraft's marketing savvy.  Mine's  S/N 290, FWIW.  (:-))
No, there's no way to buy a chrome version, from either Elecraft or  
Bencher, even at a premium price.


So, take it apart, strip the base, and take it to your local chrome- 
plating shop. Then you can attach S/N 0001 to it. :-)


73 de Brian, WB6RQN
Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft's HexKey

2007-06-07 Thread Augie Hansen

Ken Kopp wrote:

...
Along the same line ... if someone has a Hex Key, please look
closely at he top surface of the large square post and see if you
can see file-like marks in the metal that appear in/through the chrome 
... especially at each corner.  Mine has these, but they are fine 
enough that they most likely wouldn't show if the post was painted 
like the base.


Hi Ken,

I have an original Bencher Hex Key, bought before Elecraft started 
selling their re-branded version. There are no visible tool marks on the 
chromed main post or any of the other chrome plated parts.


It really is a fine paddle -- my personal favorite.

73,
Gus Hansen
KB0YH

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 circuit breaker

2007-06-07 Thread David Cutter
Normal fuses are rated such that when 2.1 times their nominal current rating 
is passed they will break within 30s.  So, a normal 20A fuse will not break 
until it is passing 40A and even then it will take a long time to go, 
enough to fry the rig.  The fuse is there to protect the cable when a gross 
overload occurs, eg a dead short across the power cable entry; perhaps when 
you drop a spanner in the works  : o (


David
G3UNA 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com