Re: Re: [Elecraft] K2 - getting ready to build

2008-01-18 Thread David Woolley

Don Wilhelm wrote:
that you should be aware of.  The Rework Eliminators would have you 
change the value of C71 and set the K2 menu D19 parameter to ON.  That 
precludes you from finally setting the VCO voltages (voltages at R30) 


I actually deleted these steps when I built with the eliminators.  The 
capacitor should be reasonably accessible later.


I think there is also an issue that the temperature compensation is 
optimised for not having this particular change made.


--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Wait list

2008-01-18 Thread George Marr
When I moved from NYC to Auckland New Zealand in ' 76 I learned that things do 
not go to plan 
in ZL I quickly learned that nothing was the same as in the big apple. Then I 
saw it almost in neon lights,
a ZL expression: She'l be right mate at this point I calmed down and realized 
that 3000 mile from where this thing is being built it really does not matter. 
In fact do not get fussed, there is nothing that you can do about it.

Being an east coast cynic, their cash flow might need help, so if they want to 
bill me for the full amount now this is fine.
anything to help. 

George Marr
ZL1TUJ
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 Test from Bavaria

2008-01-18 Thread dj7mgq

Hi Gang,

at http://www.bavarian-contest-club.de/projects/K3.pdf you can find  
Version 1.0 of our K3 test. Currently only in German, but I am working  
on a translation.


We plan on extending the report after the next important contests and  
further measurements. Also I will be adding a few comments about  
building the kit etc.


vy 73 de toby

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
I may just have come across this, at one point I couldn't get 160m - I power
cycled and all was ok.

John, if someone does get MBS ('Missing Bands Syndrome'), does a power cycle
fix it?

On 18/1/08 02:49, John   [K7SVV] [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 Ed,
 I just went through this last week.  It is a known problem and is on
 Wayne's things-to-do list.  What ever you do, don't press the SPLT button to
 go into split  mode when you have the condition you described because if you
 do, you will screw up the band sequence when you step through the bands.  At
 one point I had 3 80m bands and no 60m and 40m when I cycled through the
 bands.  Until Wayne gets it fixed, be careful to not have different bands in
 VFO A and B.

- Original Message -
From: Ed K1EP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:16 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

I noticed this behavior this evening and I was wondering if anyone else
could duplicate it.

 I have VFO A on 6M USB and VFO B on 10M USB.   When I turn the VFO B knob,
 the VFO frequency changes, but the mode changes to LSB.  If I turn VFO A
 now, the VFO A frequency changes and the mode goes back to USB.  If I do a
 band down, I don't get 10M on VFO A, instead I still see 6M, plus get a
 PLL error message flash by.

 Does anyone else see this?
-- 
The universe is like a safe to which there is a combination. But the
combination is locked up in the safe.
-Peter De Vries, editor, novelist (1910-1993)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] List of tips

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Yes, or rather Wayne is maintaining a operating Tip page on Ecraft site and
zerobeat has LOTS of info, including error message tips and FAQ etc at
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page


On 18/1/08 07:22, David Cutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 I hope someone is making a list of tips like this, they will be invaluable
 for us all.
 
 David
 G3UNA
 
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior
 
 
  What ever you do, don't press the SPLT button to go into split  mode when
 you have the condition you described because if you do, you will screw up
 the band sequence when you step through the bands.  At one point I had 3
 80m bands and no 60m and 40m when I cycled through the bands.  Until Wayne
 gets it fixed, be careful to not have different bands in VFO A and B.
 
 John[K7SVV]
-- 
Trust in Allah, but tie your camel. -Arabic saying



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Data Mode

2008-01-18 Thread G4ILO


Greg - AB7R wrote:
 
 Not yet, but having Line in automatically selected when in Data mode is on
 the list.
 
This only applies to DATA A and AFSK A though. In PSK D, the transmitter
ignores the audio input altogether. Some people may think this is stating
the obvious, but when you are switched to PSK D to see how well the DSP
decoder works compared to the PC soundcard decoder, and then decide to reply
to someone, it isn't!

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: 222
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Data-Mode-tp14946557p14948060.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] List of tips

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
I'll ask for a 'DontDoThis' page on the wiki and start if with that
If anyone has and good (bad?) don't do this's, let me have them please.


On 18/1/08 10:36, David Cutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 Both good sources, but a list of  don't do this...  as advised by John
 [K7SVV] might save a lot of headaches.  It would be an impossible task to
 make such a list from scratch, but if operators find things out the hard
 way, it might also lead to software changes.
 
 David
 G3UNA
 
 - Original Message -
 From: David Ferrington, M0XDF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: David Cutter [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Crafters
 elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:04 AM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] List of tips
 
 
 Yes, or rather Wayne is maintaining a operating Tip page on Ecraft site
 and
 zerobeat has LOTS of info, including error message tips and FAQ etc at
 http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
 
 
 On 18/1/08 07:22, David Cutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
 
 I hope someone is making a list of tips like this, they will be
 invaluable
 for us all.
 
 David
 G3UNA
 
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior
 
 
  What ever you do, don't press the SPLT button to go into split  mode
 when
 you have the condition you described because if you do, you will screw
 up
 the band sequence when you step through the bands.  At one point I had 3
 80m bands and no 60m and 40m when I cycled through the bands.  Until
 Wayne
 gets it fixed, be careful to not have different bands in VFO A and B.
 
 John[K7SVV]
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

-- 
The bamboo that bends is stronger than the oak that resists. -Japanese
proverb


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] List of tips

2008-01-18 Thread David Cutter
Both good sources, but a list of  don't do this...  as advised by John 
[K7SVV] might save a lot of headaches.  It would be an impossible task to 
make such a list from scratch, but if operators find things out the hard 
way, it might also lead to software changes.


David
G3UNA

- Original Message - 
From: David Ferrington, M0XDF [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Cutter [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Crafters 
elecraft@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] List of tips


Yes, or rather Wayne is maintaining a operating Tip page on Ecraft site 
and

zerobeat has LOTS of info, including error message tips and FAQ etc at
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page


On 18/1/08 07:22, David Cutter [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

I hope someone is making a list of tips like this, they will be 
invaluable

for us all.

David
G3UNA

Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior


 What ever you do, don't press the SPLT button to go into split  mode 
when
you have the condition you described because if you do, you will screw 
up

the band sequence when you step through the bands.  At one point I had 3
80m bands and no 60m and 40m when I cycled through the bands.  Until 
Wayne

gets it fixed, be careful to not have different bands in VFO A and B.

John[K7SVV] 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AGC strange behavior

2008-01-18 Thread dj7mgq

Hallo Klaus,

just saw, that when you switch off AGC, the S-meter and receiver   
Gain will stay at the level where it was at the moment when you   
switch off agc - for example noise at S4,  switch off AGC  - S-meter  
 will still show S4 and gain is also reduced, switching off antenna   
before AGC off and antenna on again will show S0 and full receiver   
gain...


This sounds like something for a CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED],  
which, afaik, is where Elecraft would like to receive bug reports.


Thanks for heads up,

vy 73 de toby

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AGC strange behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Koppendorfer Klaus
just saw, that when you switch off AGC, the S-meter and receiver Gain will stay 
at the level where it was at the moment when you switch off agc - for example 
noise at S4,  switch off AGC  - S-meter will still show S4 and gain is also 
reduced, switching off antenna before AGC off and antenna on again will show S0 
and full receiver gain...

using latest firmware

73
OE6KYG
KX1 244
K2 1331
K3 115


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] RE: Elecraft Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31 - Translation K3 Subreceiver update

2008-01-18 Thread JONES, George
It is an interesting  amusing comment upon practically any company -  other 
than Elecraft !

I was thinking as I read Wayne's message - this has got to be unique - a 
world-class
designer taking time out to share his issues  problems in such an informative 
 open way.

I am saving pennies (Sterling) to order a K3 in due course via the 
(voluntary)50% deposit route  - most of my salary finances Gordon Brown's 
existence. Meantime, I enjoy  learn from, the list generally

73

George G4TPV


This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information.   If you have received this e-mail and/or attachment in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any  attachment 
from your system.  If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, 
distribute, disclose or use the contents of the e-mail or any attachment.  
All e-mail sent to or from this address may be accessed by someone other than 
the recipient for system management and security reasons or for other lawful 
purposes. 
Airbus UK Limited is registered in England and Wales under company number 
3468788.  The company's registered office is at New Filton House,  Filton, 
Bristol, BS99 7AR.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
How did you set that up, I have found I can't get VFOA to go out of 10M band
when VFO B is set on 10M.
And when I enter freq for VFO A directly, say 51.0, VFO B changes to that
too.


On 18/1/08 00:16, Ed K1EP [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 I have VFO A on 6M USB and VFO B on 10M USB.   When I turn the VFO B
 knob, the VFO frequency changes, but the mode changes to LSB.  If I
 turn VFO A now, the VFO A frequency changes and the mode goes back to
 USB.  If I do a band down, I don't get 10M on VFO A, instead I still
 see 6M, plus get a PLL error message flash by.

-- 
Power is no substitute for Skill.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Ed K1EP

At 1/18/2008 03:57 AM, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:

I may just have come across this, at one point I couldn't get 160m - I power
cycled and all was ok.

John, if someone does get MBS ('Missing Bands Syndrome'), does a power cycle
fix it?


I have come across that several times.  You can spin the dial quite a 
bit (not recommended) or just manually enter a frequency in the band 
that is missing.  I use the band up or down button to get to the band 
that is missing and just enter a frequency manually through the front 
panel buttons.




On 18/1/08 02:49, John   [K7SVV] [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 Ed,
 I just went through this last week.  It is a known 
problem and is on
 Wayne's things-to-do list.  What ever you do, don't press the 
SPLT button to
 go into split  mode when you have the condition you described 
because if you
 do, you will screw up the band sequence when you step through the 
bands.  At

 one point I had 3 80m bands and no 60m and 40m when I cycled through the
 bands.  Until Wayne gets it fixed, be careful to not have 
different bands in

 VFO A and B.

- Original Message -
From: Ed K1EP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:16 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

I noticed this behavior this evening and I was wondering if anyone else
could duplicate it.

 I have VFO A on 6M USB and VFO B on 10M USB.   When I turn the VFO B knob,
 the VFO frequency changes, but the mode changes to LSB.  If I turn VFO A
 now, the VFO A frequency changes and the mode goes back to USB.  If I do a
 band down, I don't get 10M on VFO A, instead I still see 6M, plus get a
 PLL error message flash by.

 Does anyone else see this?
--
The universe is like a safe to which there is a combination. But the
combination is locked up in the safe.
-Peter De Vries, editor, novelist (1910-1993)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] List of tips

2008-01-18 Thread G4ILO


David Cutter wrote:
 
 I hope someone is making a list of tips like this, they will be invaluable 
 for us all.
 
Preferably in a form that can be printed out and stuck on the wall. I've
already hit several issues that were known faults. Trouble is, I'm getting
to the stage where I can't remember something I was told five minutes ago,
never mind what I may have read a week or more back. :(

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: 222
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Strange-VFO-Behavior-tp14940134p14948048.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] List of tips

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Hows this?
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/DontDoThis

On 18/1/08 09:56, G4ILO [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
 David Cutter wrote:
 
 I hope someone is making a list of tips like this, they will be invaluable
 for us all.
 
 Preferably in a form that can be printed out and stuck on the wall. I've
 already hit several issues that were known faults. Trouble is, I'm getting
 to the stage where I can't remember something I was told five minutes ago,
 never mind what I may have read a week or more back. :(

-- 
If you have the same ideas as everybody else but have them one week earlier
than everyone else then you will be hailed as a visionary. But if you have
them five years earlier you will be named a lunatic. -Barry Jones,
politician, author (1932- )


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Test from Bavaria

2008-01-18 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
Interesting work Toby. I would be interested to know how the K3's receiver 
behaves in terms of overall 3rd Order dynamic range (or Input IP3 and Noise 
Figure plus composite LO phase noise) while the test tones are moved in 
steps up the higher skirt regions and into the passband of a 8.215 MHz IF 
filter's response, hopefully without activating the 'Hardware AGC'. I 
appreciate that not all filters are born equal and that signal generators 
produce phase noise. Will you be including such tests sometime in the 
future?


73,
Geoff
GM4ESD


Toby  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hi Gang,

at http://www.bavarian-contest-club.de/projects/K3.pdf you can find 
Version 1.0 of our K3 test. Currently only in German, but I am working  on 
a translation.


We plan on extending the report after the next important contests and 
further measurements. Also I will be adding a few comments about  building 
the kit etc.


vy 73 de toby


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AGC strange behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Ken K3IU

Same behavior here with #202 and latest firmware.
73,
Ken K3IU

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hallo Klaus,

just saw, that when you switch off AGC, the S-meter and receiver  
Gain will stay at the level where it was at the moment when you  
switch off agc - for example noise at S4,  switch off AGC  - S-meter 
 will still show S4 and gain is also reduced, switching off antenna  
before AGC off and antenna on again will show S0 and full receiver  
gain...


This sounds like something for a CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
which, afaik, is where Elecraft would like to receive bug reports.


Thanks for heads up,

vy 73 de toby

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft  
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Test from Bavaria

2008-01-18 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy

Toby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I don't know yet. We have a whole list things which would be  interesting 
to measure, but won't have to test everything. One item on  our list is: 
What is the close in degradation with one of the wider  filters, e.g. the 
6kHz filter.


Also I would like to point out that while I provided the K3, Matthias   
Ben have done most of the testing and writing up of the results.


-

Many thanks, and thanks to Matthias and Ben as well. I look forward to 
seeing your results and hearing your K3 on 40m.


73,
Geoff
GM4ESD 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Test from Bavaria

2008-01-18 Thread dj7mgq

Hallo Geoff,


born equal and that signal generators produce phase noise. Will you be
including such tests sometime in the future?


I don't know yet. We have a whole list things which would be  
interesting to measure, but won't have to test everything. One item on  
our list is: What is the close in degradation with one of the wider  
filters, e.g. the 6kHz filter.


Also I would like to point out that while I provided the K3, Matthias  
 Ben have done most of the testing and writing up of the results.


vy 73 de toby

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] List of tips

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Since I've started it, I'll undertake to identify old entries that are no
longer valid as soon as I'm made aware of that.


On 18/1/08 13:47, Don Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 As long as that list is purged when every firmware upgrade comes out, I
 would agree.  Usually such lists are never updated and it becomes a
 'worry list' left there to confuse new owners long after the problem has
 been fixed.
 
 73,
 Don W3FPR
 
 David Cutter wrote:
 Both good sources, but a list of  don't do this...  as advised by
 John [K7SVV] might save a lot of headaches.  It would be an impossible
 task to make such a list from scratch, but if operators find things
 out the hard way, it might also lead to software changes.
 
 David
 G3UNA
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

-- 
Cats know exactly how we feel.  They don't give a damnŠ
but they know.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update

2008-01-18 Thread Steve Sacco
Hi John -

Actually (and this may be a shock to The Believers) you might be surprised to 
know that there seems to be a rather LARGE group of people who agree with me, 
not only for the TRANSLATION e-mail, but also the OPEN LETTER e-mail which 
I sent last month.  They say so, enthusiastically, in private correspondence.  
No joke.

You see, John, when all's said and done, all we have is our reputation.

There are those who stand and deliver on promises, those who don't.

Those who's word cannot be trusted must be held accountable.  This HAS to be 
the case, because, at a high level, what else holds a civilization together?

Anyway, enjoy S/N 157!

73,

Steve NN4X
EL98jh







Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:32:18 -0500
From: John Gaynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update
(KRX3 option)
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=US-ASCII

I doubt you'll get any chuckles from the majority of list readers.  Probably
just the opposite.  I do not believe that Wayne's emails need any
translation.

John K8WDN
K3 #157

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Elecraft Digest, Vol 45, Issue 31 - Translation K3 Subreceiver update

2008-01-18 Thread DaleJ

I too think it was a very nice gesture to explain and be so honest about the
delay.  VERY unique now days when many others only seek to cover their
behinds instead.  Refreshing indeed.

Thanks Gary for the update and to the whole Elecraft team.

Dale, K9VUJ



JONES, George wrote:
 
 It is an interesting  amusing comment upon practically any company - 
 other than Elecraft !
 
 I was thinking as I read Wayne's message - this has got to be unique - a
 world-class
 designer taking time out to share his issues  problems in such an
 informative  open way.
 
 I am saving pennies (Sterling) to order a K3 in due course via the
 (voluntary)50% deposit route  - most of my salary finances Gordon Brown's
 existence. Meantime, I enjoy  learn from, the list generally
 
 73
 
 George G4TPV
 
 
 This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and/or privileged
 information.   If you have received this e-mail and/or attachment in
 error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the e-mail and any 
 attachment from your system.  If you are not the intended recipient you
 must not copy, distribute, disclose or use the contents of the e-mail or
 any attachment.  
 All e-mail sent to or from this address may be accessed by someone other
 than the recipient for system management and security reasons or for other
 lawful purposes. 
 Airbus UK Limited is registered in England and Wales under company number
 3468788.  The company's registered office is at New Filton House,  Filton,
 Bristol, BS99 7AR.
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Elecraft-Digest%2C-Vol-45%2C-Issue-31---Translation-K3-Subreceiver-update-tp14951226p14951482.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 #234 assembled and had its first QSO

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Yes, I just leave AFX on all the time - in fact, I guess that's one function
that could be put int the MAIN menu and the button freed up for something
else.


On 18/1/08 15:13, Bob Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 when I hit the AFX button just to see what that
 meant...WOW, truly awesome.

-- 
Power is no substitute for Skill.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 #234 assembled and had its first QSO

2008-01-18 Thread Joe-aa4nn

aaah yes, AFX, Audio Factitious Extraordinaire
de Joe, aa4nn
---
Yes, I just leave AFX on all the time - in fact, I guess that's one 
function
that could be put int the MAIN menu and the button freed up for something 
else.



when I hit the AFX button just to see what that
meant...WOW, truly awesome.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update (KRX3 option)

2008-01-18 Thread rkayakr

Dave

  I agree that the delay in deliver is disappointing. I have a second
receiver on order too.
  I also am disappointed by the lack of maturity of the firmware.

   HOWEVER - I have a K3 (#70) and it is a joy to use. What it does, it does
VERY well and I still believe that the remaining features will be
implemented and operating annoyances fixed.

WRT to eham reviews of the OMNI VII
  I'm sure the OMNI VII is a fine piece of gear. The K3, OMNI VII and Flex
5000 are all interesting, innovative products with many 5 star ratings. You
might visit the Ten-Tec OMNI VII Yahoo group. I believe that you may see
similar concerns about that product. I wouldn't be surprised to hear the
Flex has it's own issues.

 I've been involved with programming and new RF product development for 35
years. The only rule that consistently applies is Hofstadter's Law:
 It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account
Hofstadter's Law


 Bob
   KD8CGH
 KX1, K2, K3, ... ?

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/TRANSLATION%3A-K3-Subreceiver-Status-Update-%28KRX3-option%29-tp14946083p14949794.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AGC strange behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Gil Cross

   The folks at Elecraft are aware of this behavior.
   73  Gil  K8EAG


- Original Message - 
From: Ken K3IU [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Elecraft@mailman.qth.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 AGC strange behavior



Same behavior here with #202 and latest firmware.
73,
Ken K3IU

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hallo Klaus,

just saw, that when you switch off AGC, the S-meter and receiver  
Gain will stay at the level where it was at the moment when you  
switch off agc - for example noise at S4,  switch off AGC  - S-meter 
 will still show S4 and gain is also reduced, switching off antenna  
before AGC off and antenna on again will show S0 and full receiver  
gain...


This sounds like something for a CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
which, afaik, is where Elecraft would like to receive bug reports.


Thanks for heads up,

vy 73 de toby

___

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 I/O Caution

2008-01-18 Thread Bob Patten
I've been having intermittent computer problems with the K3 connected 
ever since installing the K3 on the operating desk.  The ultimate 
disaster occurred during the RTTY Roundup when the computer shut itself 
off and lost my log with approximately 1100 QSO's.  After making various 
attempts to block RF from entering the computer, I ran across what 
appears to be the solution.


The DB9M connector on my serial cable used for K3 I/O had the standard 
threaded studs installed.  These had to be removed to allow fitting to 
the K3 I/O port with its own threaded studs.  With the studs removed, 
the connectors mated, but nothing but friction to hold them together.  I 
wondered if perhaps the shells were making intermittent contact.  I next 
drilled through the connector body where the studs were removed and 
inserted a spare pair of thumb screws that were left over from a DB9F 
connector.  With these screwed into the K3's threaded studs to secure 
the connectors, I've not had any further RF problems with the computer.


--
73, Bob Patten, N4BPPlantation, FL

E-Mail :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]Website: http://www.qsl.net/n4bp
SOC #1  ARS #799QRP ARCI #3412   FISTS #7871
FP #1491SMIRK #6625
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update (KRX3 option)

2008-01-18 Thread Bill W4ZV


Barry N1EU wrote:
 
 Dave, I also find the K3 subrx delay a real bummer that may impact my
 purchase timing.
 
 But as far as your proposition that The Ten Tec Omni VII . . . may be a
 worthy and fully developed competitor, are you REALLY buying that?  I
 guess worthiness (not to mention fully developed) totally depends on the
 context of comparison and how quickly you're apt to butt up against the
 radio's limitations.  In tough band condx, I don't think it would be much
 of a comparison.
 

In addition to performance (e.g. 10-15 dB IMDDR3), there's a difference in
cost.  I would configure the K3 as a competitor to Omni VII as follows:

Omni VII (no ATU) - $2650
600 Hz CW filter-  99
Total $2749

K3/100 (no ATU)   -  $1989 (assembled)
KXV3 (for RX ANT) -   79
500 Hz CW filter-   79
Total  $2147 (assembled...less $240 if kitted)

The Omni VII has no Sub-RX and never will.  The K3 will eventually have one
with roughly equivalent performance as its Main.  Is the O7's scope worth
another $600 (assembled K3) or $840 (kitted K3)?  Not in my opinion, but
10-15 dB IMD difference would be worth it to me even if the prices were
reversed!

73,  Bill  W4ZV


-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/TRANSLATION%3A-K3-Subreceiver-Status-Update-%28KRX3-option%29-tp14946083p14949373.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update (KRX3 option)

2008-01-18 Thread G4ILO


Barry N1EU wrote:
 
 Dave, I also find the K3 subrx delay a real bummer that may impact my
 purchase timing.
 
 But as far as your proposition that The Ten Tec Omni VII . . . may be a
 worthy and fully developed competitor, are you REALLY buying that?  I
 guess worthiness (not to mention fully developed) totally depends on the
 context of comparison and how quickly you're apt to butt up against the
 radio's limitations.  In tough band condx, I don't think it would be much
 of a comparison.
 
The K3 also has a 5.0 review rating at eHam. What does that prove?

Like you, I am disappointed at the amount of promised features still to be
delivered. It takes the shine out of owning a new K3 just a bit. If I was
going to write a review at eHam, I'd give it only a 4 just because of that.

But do I regret buying it? No. And when those features eventually come, I'll
still be ahead of all those who held off buying until they were ready.

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: 222
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/TRANSLATION%3A-K3-Subreceiver-Status-Update-%28KRX3-option%29-tp14946083p14949372.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Ed K1EP

At 1/18/2008 06:07 AM, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:

How did you set that up, I have found I can't get VFOA to go out of 10M band
when VFO B is set on 10M.
And when I enter freq for VFO A directly, say 51.0, VFO B changes to that
too.


Good question!  On 6M, I had set up the M1-M4 quick memories for 
50.125, 50.110, etc.  For some reason, when I used them yesterday, 
VFO B ended up on 10M.



On 18/1/08 00:16, Ed K1EP [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 I have VFO A on 6M USB and VFO B on 10M USB.   When I turn the VFO B
 knob, the VFO frequency changes, but the mode changes to LSB.  If I
 turn VFO A now, the VFO A frequency changes and the mode goes back to
 USB.  If I do a band down, I don't get 10M on VFO A, instead I still
 see 6M, plus get a PLL error message flash by.

--
Power is no substitute for Skill.


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 + KAT100 + Cushcradt R8 Vertical

2008-01-18 Thread David Yarnes
If the R8 has been discontinued, then that is a recent action.  The last 
time I checked various dealer websites, the R8 was still for sale. 
Cushcraft had them on display last year at Dayton.  I wonder if you aren't 
confusing it with the R7, which has been discontinued for several years--at 
least 7 years or more.


Dave W7AQK

- Original Message - 
From: Doug Person [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Phil Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Elecraft Discussion List 
elecraft@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 + KAT100 + Cushcradt R8 Vertical



Phil,

The R8 has been discontinued for some time so I assume you have a line on 
a used one. There has been some issues with getting parts for the older 
Cushcraft verticals.  I've had most of the so-called no-radial verticals 
and the Cushcraft is more or less the middle of the pack. I found the GAP 
Titan to be superior.  Not too great on 80 but decent performance on the 
other bands.  My current choice of these types is the Hy-Gain AV-640 and 
AV-620.  The AV-620 is available from RL Electronics for $269 - which is, 
in my book, a bargain ( I have no association with them - just passing on 
my observation).  The AV-620 covers 20 through 6 meters and is very well 
built.  You can download the manual from Hy-Gain to get a good sense of 
the antenna.


73, Doug -- K0DXV



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update (KRX3 option)

2008-01-18 Thread Barry N1EU

Dave, I also find the K3 subrx delay a real bummer that may impact my
purchase timing.

But as far as your proposition that The Ten Tec Omni VII . . . may be a
worthy and fully developed competitor, are you REALLY buying that?  I guess
worthiness (not to mention fully developed) totally depends on the context
of comparison and how quickly you're apt to butt up against the radio's
limitations.  In tough band condx, I don't think it would be much of a
comparison.

73,
Barry N1EU



David and Dianne on Comcast wrote:
 
 Hi Everyone,
 
 The delay of the second receiver option is to me both highly regrettable 
 and somewhat deceptive. 
 
 I, for one, based my purchase decision greatly on this option being 
 ready for prime time which is obviously was not and apparently will not 
 be any time soon.  Production delays are forgivable and understandable 
 but discovering that this option which is touted as a big-time feature 
 but is really no where near ready is confidence deflating.
 
 I have been personally patient waiting for my K3 (as are many others) 
 and occasionally publicly supportive on this list of the delays that 
 Elecraft has been experiencing. Now we discover that a MAJOR K3 feature 
 is no where near production ready, if even designed at this time. Come 
 on
 
 As for me, I'm reassessing my purchase decision  and may wait until the 
 K3 project has matured.
 
 I have bought lots of transceivers over the years and this was to be the 
 first I ever considered buying in its first year. I now wondering if I 
 should still make that exception.
 
 The Ten Tec Omni VII has a 5.0 Review rating out of 25 reviews on Eham 
 and may be a worthy and fully developed competitor.
 
 Very disappointed in all of this.
 
 Elecraft does a lot of great things but this one was really lame.
 
 Flame away. I could care less.
 
 My $.02
 
 73 de N1LQ-Dave
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/TRANSLATION%3A-K3-Subreceiver-Status-Update-%28KRX3-option%29-tp14946083p14949164.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Thanks, I've noted that on the page at
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/DontDoThis

(that page is going to move on Sunday, sorry, but I will link to new page).


On 18/1/08 17:28, John   [K7SVV] [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

 I suppose I should have mentioned that if you do get yourself into this
 situation with the band sequence being screwed up, the change to the band
 sequence is permanent until you manually correct it.  In other words it
 won't go away by itself.  To get the bands back into the correct sequence
 you will have to step to the band that is incorrect and then, using FREQ
 ENT, enter a frequency that is in the correct band and then press AB to set
 VFO B to the same frequency.  (e.g. If the slot in the sequence that
 normally has 40m actually has an incorrect 80m frequency, then step to that
 band entry,  press FREQ ENT, using the keypad enter a 40m frequency, press
 the AFX/ENTER button, and the press AB.  Your band sequence should now be
 correct).  No big deal repairing the damage.

-- 
No sensible decision can be made any longer without taking into account not
only the world as it is, but the world as it will be.
-Isaac Asimov, scientist and writer (1920-1992)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RE: Translation - 2nd RX

2008-01-18 Thread Stewart Baker
And while were are at it, how about the KDVR3 (Digital Voice
Recorder Option). This also seems to have slipped into the DELAYED
category. For me, in addition to the 2nd receiver this modules
availability was a decision maker. Total lack of transparency

Stewart G3RXQ
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:33:05 -0800 (PST), Dave Agsten wrote:
 Dave, N1LQ wrote : The delay of the second receiver
 option is to me both highly
 regrettable
 and somewhat deceptive.

 I, for one, based my purchase decision greatly on this
 option being
 ready for prime time which is obviously was not and
 apparently will not

 be any time soon.  Production delays are forgivable
 and understandable
 but discovering that this option which is touted as a
 big-time feature
 but is really no where near ready is confidence
 deflating.

 I have been personally patient waiting for my K3 (as
 are many others)
 and occasionally publicly supportive on this list of
 the delays that
 Elecraft has been experiencing. Now we discover that a
 MAJOR K3 feature

 is no where near production ready, if even designed at
 this time. Come
 on 

 I have to agree with Dave here. It's the same
 situation here. The delays are understandable. Even a
 SHORT, further delay with the KRX3, was accepable. Now
 it's listed merely as DELAYED. What does that really
 mean? If I recall correctly, the KRX3 2nd receiver
 option has been on the Elecraft info/order sheet, with
 no mention of being available in the future, at any
 time since its annoucement. All of the info sheets I
 have from Dayton show the KRX3 as being like any other
 option...such as filters. This option was certainly a
 deciding factor in ordering a K3. It wasn't until
 quite a few orders were taken that it was suddenly
 listed with a later shipping date that continues, even
 now, to slip. ( A big slip apparently, since now there
 isn't even a projected date ) I was never informed
 when placing my order on May 25th that the KRX3 would
 not be available with the rest of my order. Was anyone
 else who ordered before the KRX3 delay was posted
 notified that the it would not be immediately
 available? My 50% deposit was calculated with the KRX3
 option included. It would be nice to know exactly
 what's going on here. If it is, as Wayne said, that
 they are redesigning for a valid reason, then there is
 no way the KRX3 should have been listed as an
 available option from Day 1.

 I was thinking about having my deposit applied to a K2
 and waiting until who knows when for the 2nd
 production run to be shipped. Now, with the KRX3 news,
 I'm not sure what direction to go. It has made me
 decide to scrap the K2 idea. Perhaps an Orion II or an
 Omni VII for now and continue to wait and see on the
 K3. I could probably have either Ten-Tec within a week
 or so. Then, when the K3 comes along, I can do my own
 side-by-side.

 And, in reading a few of the latest list postings,
 there appears to be some issues with using the K3
 being used in a certain manner before the KRX3 is
 available. ie. VFO A/B things. To me, having one band
 on VFO A and another on VFO B is perfectly normal and
 should not be an issue.

 It does seem that the K3 was actually announced and
 released a bit before it was ready for Prime Time.
 That was probably driven by the Visalia and Dayton
 dates which, obviously, would not be slipped.

 73,
 Dave N8AG


 

 
 Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
 http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Don Nesbitt
BTW:  this whole scenario is VERY EASY to fall into if you start tuning
around the Shortwave Bands and accidently bump VFO B and/or start cycling
through the bands.  The quickest cure I have found was to remember (ha!)
to return VFO A to the Ham Band frequency from which I started BEFORE I move
VFO B.  73 es hv fun -- Don N4HH  K3# 83

SNIP  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John [K7SVV]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

SNIP  At 
one point I had 3 80m bands and no 60m and 40m when I cycled through the 
bands.  Until Wayne gets it fixed, be careful to not have different bands in

VFO A and B.
SNIP


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 2nd RX Specification

2008-01-18 Thread wayne burdick

Phil wrote:


This is the latest news release about the sub receiver:-

/When we release a product, it has to meet a number of criteria. Raw
performance by traditional measures is just one of these. Fortunately
the subreceiver has met our expectations in this regard, with dynamic
range *virtually identical* to that of the main./


Hi Phil,

The main and subreceivers use identical circuitry, including bandpass 
and crystal filtering, synthesizer, and DSP. They *are* identical.


The only reason I used the word virtual when describing the 
performance is that the sub and main are both subject to +/- 1 to 2 dB 
of variation, as would be any two K3s. This is the limit of the state 
of the art in manufacturing and alignment.


Suppose you test your subreceiver and find that its IMDDR3 at 5 kHz is 
107 dB, while your main receiver is only 105 dB (or vice-versa). Are 
these identical? No, they're virtually identical. But in statistics 
class we referred to this as a ceiling effect. Both measurements are 
off the charts at the high end of what's possible in a production 
radio.


I'm glad to see that we're being held to a high standard of semantics, 
as well as performance  :)


73,
Wayne
N6KR

---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread G4ILO



wb8yqj wrote:
 
 Here's the new page - please feel free to add anything
 you know about. With the number of K3 users increasing
 greatly every day, the firmware can be expected to
 experience a variety of keystrokes and scenarios that
 the smaller beta group had not encountered. The E-guys
 make these issues a priority, The wiki can help
 provide a current moment view of any of these issues.
 
 http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/Firmware_problems_known_to_Elecraft%2C_on_the_list_to_be_fixed.
 
 
Whilst this is a worthy endeavor and I don't wish to knock it, I think the
problem is most people who visit this page won't have the faintest idea how
to contribute.

What is really needed is something like the bug tracking thing on
SourceForge, where people can log in and see a form where they can post
their bug report or suggestion for the wishlist, and the developers can then
add their comments on it and note when it has been implemented (or junked.)

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: 222
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-Strange-VFO-Behavior-tp14960479p14961338.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 Interfacing with old amplifiers

2008-01-18 Thread Lyle Johnson

My question is:  Has this feature been implemented yet,


No, it is on the The List.

73,

Lyle KK7P

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Fwd: [qrp-l.org] HELP Missing 13 year old

2008-01-18 Thread Bert Craig

Chris,

I too am a LEO and will disseminate this among my fellow officers. Thanks 
for sharing and stay safe. Take care es...


Vy 73 de Bert
WA2SI


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:08 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] Fwd: [qrp-l.org] HELP Missing 13 year old


I rarely forward emails, especially to a reflector, but since I am a Police 
Officer, I felt compelled to make an exception. Please help Perry find his 
neice. Thanks 73/72


Chris Blaase NV9Z
KX1 #1455
Hagerstown IN



-Original Message-
From: Perry WA8THK FP 582 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Qrp-l org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 4:44 pm
Subject: [qrp-l.org] HELP Missing 13 year old



Here is a TV station link

http://www.wnem.com/news/15063671/detail.html


My Neice 's Daughter is Missing please keep an Eye
open for Them ..

Perry wa8thk

810 635 7815



Perry Baker
FP 582
Qrp-l org 108



_
___
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. 
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping


___
http://mail.qrp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l_qrp-l.org



More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update

2008-01-18 Thread Stephen W. Kercel

Fellow Elecrafters:

I have no doubt as to the integrity, honesty or technical excellence 
of Elecraft, and am delighted with the K2 that I have been using for 
the past two years.


As I posted on this list about 6 months ago, my impression of the 
release of the K3 is that it is a lot like release of the whatever is 
the latest version of Windows. At the time, someone responded to me 
that thank God, Elecraft is not Microsoft. That much is true. 
Microsoft always makes its major releases several years before they 
are actually ready (and does not appear even to be embarrassed about 
it). Elecraft has dropped the ball only this once.


Nevertheless, they have indeed dropped the ball on the K3. I stand by 
my initial expectation that although I would like to have a K3, I see 
no point in ordering one until at least two years after the initial 
release date. The seemingly endless delay in delivering on orders 
prepaid 7 months ago, the indefinite unavailability of the 
sub-receiver (a prime motivation in my choice to upgrade from the K2 
when the time finally does come), and the rapid ongoing evolution of 
the firmware all indicate to me that the K3 was nowhere close to 
being ready when Elecraft started taking orders last spring.


I remain a loyal customer of Elecraft, but I do hope that they will 
take a lesson from this debacle.


Steve Kercel
AA4AK


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 I/O Caution

2008-01-18 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Did you install that DB9 Gil? I ask because a common mistake when assembling
the connector is to put the shoulders of the jack screws in the wrong place
inside the housing. I became aware of it when some builders had that problem
assembling the connectors supplied with their transverter kits no mating
properly and making intermittent contact. 

Probably the best way to describe it is to refer you to Figure 10 on page 10
in the XV Owner's manual available here:

http://www.elecraft.com/manual/XV%20Transverter%20Owner's%20Manual-D.pdf

If the jack screws are positioned too far forward (toward the contacts) they
will bottom out before the connectors are fully mated.

Ron AC7AC



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Cross
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Bob Patten; Elecraft Reflector; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 I/O Caution


This missive caused me to look at my installation also. I found that

the situation was not good. The contacts in the db9m connector made very 
minimal contact. In fact the retaining screws would not draw the connectors 
together fully and if the connectors were forced together as far as they 
would go ,you could then pull on the connector attached to the cable and the

result was you were able to pull the connectors apart by .03 or more but 
still evidently making contact but in my mind not a good situation at 
allAlso the cable connector could be wiggled somewhat.
I have made a couple of wire washers from #18 wire and placed them 
between the shoulder of the retaining screws and the connector housing, also

I removed the lock washers from under the jack screw nuts. This gave me 
another.07 of engagement when the screws were tightened to hold the 
connectors together and there is no longer any wiggle of the cable 
connector. Works for me until something better comes along.

Gil  K8EAG   K3 99


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Fwd: [qrp-l.org] HELP Missing 13 year old

2008-01-18 Thread nv9z
I rarely forward emails, especially to a reflector, but since I am a 
Police Officer, I felt compelled to make an exception. Please help 
Perry find his neice. Thanks 73/72


Chris Blaase NV9Z
KX1 #1455
Hagerstown IN



-Original Message-
From: Perry WA8THK FP 582 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Qrp-l org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 4:44 pm
Subject: [qrp-l.org] HELP Missing 13 year old



Here is a TV station link

http://www.wnem.com/news/15063671/detail.html


My Neice 's Daughter is Missing please keep an Eye
open for Them ..

Perry wa8thk

810 635 7815



Perry Baker
FP 582
Qrp-l org 108


  
_

___
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping


___
http://mail.qrp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l_qrp-l.org



More new features than ever.  Check out the new AOL Mail ! - 
http://webmail.aol.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 Interfacing with old amplifiers

2008-01-18 Thread George
Perhaps my following question has been answered in esoteric terms too hard for 
my simple brain to fathom.  

Q  Under Interfacing, in the K3 FAQs, the next to last question reads Does 
the K3 have a variable delay (0-50 ms) to control older amp TX relays ?  
The answer was Yes --, but not in the initial shipment.  

My question is:  Has this feature been implemented yet, and if not, 
approximately when will it be done?  This is a very desirable feature to me, as 
my 
amp relays are old and slow  (like me!)

This is the third time I've asked this question, with no response the first two 
times.  Anyone know the answer?  I would really appreciate knowing.

Tnx and 73
George, N4YM

Mucho mojo K2 # 4758
2nd wave K3
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AGC question

2008-01-18 Thread Toby Deinhardt

 Didn't I read somewhere that in the architecture of the K3, the AGC
 only operates when necessary to prevent the DSP from being overloaded?

This refers to the hardware AGC.

In the case of the strange AGC behavior, I would think the the digital 
AGC is meant, which is only math in the DSP code.


vy 73 de toby
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AGC question

2008-01-18 Thread G4ILO


John   [K7SVV] wrote:
 
 While checking the problem that someone reported a little while ago with
 the 
 S meter being stuck when the AGC is turned off, I noticed that  I don't
 hear 
 any difference in the received signal when I turn AGC off and on.  I have 
 tried it with an S5 CW signal, an S9 SSB signal, and 40 over 9 signal on
 the 
 AM broadcast band.  I would expect each of these signals to much louder
 when 
 the AGC is switched off but I hear no change at all.  Strange, it is like 
 the AGC is not being turned off.  How about the rest of you fellows, what
 do 
 you hear?
 
Didn't I read somewhere that in the architecture of the K3, the AGC only
operates when necessary to prevent the DSP from being overloaded? So perhaps
you are just not listening to strong enough signals for it to have an
effect.

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: 222
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-AGC-question-tp14959697p14961432.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] L34 on K2 tuning question?

2008-01-18 Thread bill KE5KWE



Eddy Avila wrote:
 Changes while tuning L34 on my K2 are very subtle.
 Just barely hear L34 peak with the slug near the top
 of the canis this normal?
 
 I'm just trying to determine if the receiver on my K2
 is working as it should.

I went through the same thing just today.  We also used a spectogram but
after failing to hear an apreciable change we followed the next suggestion,
alligning the 40-meter band pass filter.  Once this was aligned we were able
to tune L-34 by ear. It did indeed occur near the top of the can, as stated
in the text.

Once done everything tested ok!

Bill- KE5KWE
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/L34-on-K2-tuning-question--tp14863908p14965855.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: RE: [Elecraft] Translation - 2nd RX

2008-01-18 Thread G4ILO


Dave Larson-2 wrote:
 
 I am sure it was a very hard and disappointing decision to have to return
 to 
 the drawing board. Elecraft did the right thing in my opinion and when it
 is 
 all over, their fine reputation that they have had in the past will be 
 maintained.
 
Whilst I tend to agree with you, it's easier for some who already have well
equipped shacks to live with that decision than others. I still feel sorry
for the guy a few months ago who sold his only radio so as to put down a
deposit on a K3, never realizing how long he would have to wait. Vendors do
have a responsibility to make accurate advertising and at the time I placed
my deposit I never realized how much of the K3 was just an idea rather than
an actual working prototype. Since I now have my albeit incomplete K3 it's
hard to still feel annoyed about it, but I'm going to remember this episode
when the K4 is announced in another 8 years time and I may well decide to
wait that one out as a result.

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: 222
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-Translation---2nd-RX-tp14958272p14961328.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 The Silence.

2008-01-18 Thread Don Rasmussen
Correction: As many may have noticed, The silence from
Elecraft has been deafening **since** Wayne's recent
post detailing the snip


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 2nd RX Specification

2008-01-18 Thread Toby Deinhardt
So have Elecraft now down graded the sub receiver ? Virtually identical 
and identical are two different specifications.


Yep. The second RX might even be better than the primary RX... ;-)

Seriously, identical in this case was always a relative term. You can 
not seriously expect to receivers to have absolutely identical specs. 
Parts have tolerances, and these alone will always mean there is some 
variation from unit to unit, from board to board. I do not see this as 
downgrading the specs.


Apart from this, it has always been obvious that, because parts of the 
second RX are not used for TX (e.g. roofing filters), the receivers 
could not have absolutely identical circuits.



The website still says:

 In a first for the industry, the K3’s identical main
 receiver and subreceiver ...


My read is: Elecraft has not downgraded the specs and are doing their 
best to insure that both receivers will run at full specs when both are 
in the same box.



vy 73 de toby
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update

2008-01-18 Thread John Klewer

AMEN!



Tom AK2B wrote:


Hi Steve,

The Believers sounds more like a 60's rock group than a description of
Elecraft customers. From my perspective, working for a small business, you
become well acquainted with your customers over a period of time. A lot of
these customers come back because they trust you based upon their past
experiences. So, you are absolutely correct when you say that a company's
word and reputation are paramount. I've been dealing with Elecraft since
2004. In that time I've had numerous occasions where I had to contact the
company for a variety of reasons. In no case were my e-mails or phone calls
ignored or sidetracked to a foreign country. Every experience I've had with
Elecraft whether through their products or customer support has been
positive. (I wish I could say that about more than a handful of the
companies I do business with.)

The simple truth is, any company can hit a bump in the road and will. At
that point, they have to rely on their word and past reputation. Based upon
Elecraft's track record, I don't feel the least worried. When I read posts
like yours, I just assume you haven't any prior experience with the company
in which to base your comments. It is very easy to look with a jaundiced eye
towards a lot of disreputable businesses these days and then lump them all
together. In the long run, though, it is not fair to those that who have
done nothing to warrant it. 


I don't see Elecraft as a religion to which your Believers tag implies.
They are a COMPANY of people of which I have had the pleasure of doing
business with. I like what they sell and I like the way the treat me. It’s
that simple.

The K3 is as a major undertaking by a couple of wide eyed hams in Aptos who
think they can build the world’s best amateur transceiver. I think they have
done it – even though there remain a few bumps. I think they also feel a
strong sense of responsibility in making sure that you not only get what
they have advertised but that it also works as advertised.  


Frankly, I see it all as rather exciting that the K3 is still undergoing so
many changes right before my eyes and that it only takes a few mouse clicks
to implement them. But, make no mistake, the K3 as it sits is a remarkable
product - maybe not finished - but, none-the-less, remarkable. The fact that
the K3 will be getting even better with time leaves me feeling that my money
was not only well spent – but is also producing dividends. 


Come to think of it, maybe I am a Believer.

Tom, AK2B


Steve Sacco NN4X wrote:
 


Actually (and this may be a shock to The Believers) you might be
surprised to know that there seems to be a rather LARGE group of people
who agree with me, not only for the TRANSLATION e-mail, but also the
OPEN LETTER e-mail which I sent last month.  They say so,
enthusiastically, in private correspondence.  No joke.

You see, John, when all's said and done, all we have is our reputation.

There are those who stand and deliver on promises, those who don't.

Those who's word cannot be trusted must be held accountable.  This HAS to
be the case, because, at a high level, what else holds a civilization
together?

Anyway, enjoy S/N 157!

73,

Steve NN4X
EL98jh

   



 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] 2nd Rx and DVR3

2008-01-18 Thread paul.bradbeer2
I suppose like many I have felt aggrieved at delays etc in the past but have 
not added to the noise.  However, the 2nd Rx and DVR3 issue though has prompted 
me to post.

The nub of the matter isn't that Elecraft are so much better than YaeKenCom etc 
about 'admitting' their delays etc, the problem for me is that Options such as 
the 2nd Rx and DVR were toted as main features of the K3 (and thus, things that 
influenced my purchasing decision), not things that my be developed later.  The 
fact that 8 months after I placed my order with deposit (2nd batch I thought... 
but I'm getting so confused now) there is no sign of a KDVR3 or KRX3 is shoddy 
at best, and bordering on deceptive.

I'm a big Elecraft fan/supporter, and have been for years, but the fact that my 
ordered K3 keeps slipping away, that my 50% deposit (now) counts for nought (at 
the time the website lead me to believe it moved me up the chain..), and that 
key Options are still a long way from Production standard, just leaves me 
feeling bruised. I'm not at all reassured by the 'Shipping Updates' because 
unless one has an insight as to how many orders there were for 8/9/10 May 07 
etc, it is completely meaningless for people with later orders. 

Sorry, I've kept my gob shut for a long time now, but this is not a good way to 
treat loyal customers.  Flame away, I know this is heresy

Paul M0CVX

-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Data Mode

2008-01-18 Thread Greg - AB7R
Correct...it is for the audio data modes.  Please keep in mind that PSK-D is 
not 
yet functional, so you will still need to use an external software application 
and 
Data-A mode.

-
73,
Greg - AB7R
Whidbey Island WA
NA-065
K3#0009

On Fri Jan 18  2:13 , G4ILO  sent:



Greg - AB7R wrote:
 
 Not yet, but having Line in automatically selected when in Data mode is on
 the list.
 
This only applies to DATA A and AFSK A though. In PSK D, the transmitter
ignores the audio input altogether. Some people may think this is stating
the obvious, but when you are switched to PSK D to see how well the DSP
decoder works compared to the PC soundcard decoder, and then decide to reply
to someone, it isn't!

-
Julian, G4ILO K2 s/n: 392  K3 s/n: 222
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Data-Mode-
tp14946557p14948060.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 #234 assembled and had its first QSO

2008-01-18 Thread Bob Evans
I got the K3/100 together in about 9 hours after it arrived at noon
yesterday.  I guess the options added more time than I thought it would, but
everything went perfectly.  Even if this rig never got powered up, it is
truly a work of art.  
 
When I powered it up, everything tested out perfectly.  It took me a couple
of reads through the manual to figure out how to activate the KPA3, but that
came up perfectly after I chose the correct menu setting.  I love the sound
of the side tone and the variable pass band is fantastic even with 1.0 kHz
being my narrowest filter until the backordered 500 Hz arrives.  The most
startling thing though was when I hit the AFX button just to see what that
meant...WOW, truly awesome.  I was in the middle of my first QSO (40M CW)
and the guy was very weak, but after I narrowed the bandwidth and hit the
AFX button, he jumped out of the noise.  What a pleasure.  This rig may make
a rag chewer out of a contester.  (Naw, probably not  ;-)  )
 
I have only scratched 1% of what this rig will do so far, but it will be a
pleasure to read the manual with an actual K3 in front of me as I learn this
radio.  I tried reading the manual before the rig arrived and it just didn't
sink in very well, but now I can put the word, feel, look and sound
together. 
 
Thanks Elecraft!!!
Bob K5WA
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Polar Bear QRP Event

2008-01-18 Thread Chuck Gehring
The Polar Bear Moonlight Madness Event will be taking place tomorrow 19 
January, 2008.  QRP operating frequencies 20, 30, 40 and 80 meters between 
1700-2300 UTC.  Our fingers may be a little cold so “BEAR” with us if our 
replies are a little slow.

Several Polar Bear QRP Operators will be taking to the field under the frosty 
full moon to capture a few QSO’s.  

We polar bears just love operating in the great outdoors. All PBMMEs are held 
close to full moons during the months of October, November, December, January, 
February and March. That's right - when it's cold!   

As a small incentive for folks to make QSO’s with the Polar Bears, A limited 
edition Polar Bear Backpacking Alcohol Stove, wind screen and fuel bottle will 
be given away to the operator who makes the most QSO’s with the Polar Bears.  A 
look at the stove and a list of a few of the operators is on the web page.  

http://www.polarbearqrp.org/PBMME01-08.html

To apply for the prize you must send in a copy of your log. (NOTE: Logs should 
reflect: Time of QSO in UTC, Freq, and Polar Bear Number)  Send a copy of your 
log via email in ASCII format to K2CG (at sign) arrl.net   All logs must be 
received by 25 January 2008.

This is not meant to be a contest so please avoid the hit and run QSO’s.  If 
you tag us on 30 meters then the hope is that you will chat for a little before 
moving on.

Polar Bears should be identifying themselves by calling “CQ CQ PBMM DE...”

Thanks and 72 K2CG
Chuck G. Polar Bear #16

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Elecraft Cover

2008-01-18 Thread richardkronick

Got a couple of Kopp covers, one for my K3 and the other for
one of my K2s. They arrived quickly. They were professionally
done. They are a great addition to the ham shack.

73 Dick W4RAK  K3 serial #105


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 The Silence.

2008-01-18 Thread Don Rasmussen
As many may have noticed, The silence from Elecraft
has been deafening Wayne's recent post detailing the
delay with the K3 subreceiver. 

IMO (in my opinion) This could mean only one of two
things:

1. The company has begun a damage control policy,
allowing for a complete written Mea culpa or
possibly even a Mea maxima culpa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mea_culpa detailing the
unforseen events that have brought a dark cloud over
the heretofor sunny days of Elecraft. 

(or the other possibility)

2. They have continued working on my K3 transceiver,
which is due at my premises next week some time. 

I will not suggest my opinion in this matter on which
way they should go. ;-)

I feel certain that events related to the delivery of
the base K3 radio lessened the priority of all phases
of the subreceiver. Anyone that would challenge the
sincerity of the company over this single issue never
built one of their kits. Go back and read through the
K2 archives, things went pretty well the same way over
a number of years and all turned out well. 

_..._

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 2nd RX Specification

2008-01-18 Thread Phil G4UDU
I have been reading all of the news since making my decision to purchase 
a K3.


There have been several occasions I thought I should have made comment 
about the delivery schedule but have decided enough was already being said.


But after the last posting about the delays on the second receiver, I 
need to ask a question



Did you notice the following :-

This is the latest news release about the sub receiver:-

/When we release a product, it has to meet a number of criteria. Raw
performance by traditional measures is just one of these. Fortunately
the subreceiver has met our expectations in this regard, with dynamic
range *virtually identical* to that of the main./

And this is the product specification from the web site :-

In a first for the industry, the K3’s *identical main receiver and 
subreceiver* each feature a high-dynamic-range, down-conversion analog 
architecture.


So have Elecraft now down graded the sub receiver ? Virtually identical 
and identical are two different specifications.


I ordered (Dayton Hamvention ) a K3 to have two identical receivers - 
not to have a sub receiver that was  less than, but not equal to  the 
main receiver, if I wanted that I could have purchased one of the other 
twin receive transceivers and not waited for the K3


I do not think I am alone in thinking that anyone who has ordered the K3 
for DXpedition operating is going to want what was stated in the product 
specification, and I as someone who is keen to work the most difficult 
of DX certainly have been waiting for this feature to appear on a new 
compact transceiver. I thought I had ordered that feature - but now I am 
not so sure .


It is bad enough having to endure the constant changing delivery 
schedule - please don't tell me the specifications are going into 
decline in the same way


Leaving the news release until 15 days before the scheduled delivery 
date it totally unprofessional, the problems should have been noticed 
weeks/months ago and a statement issued at the time.



Phil G4UDU




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update

2008-01-18 Thread Tom AK2B

Hi Steve,

The Believers sounds more like a 60's rock group than a description of
Elecraft customers. From my perspective, working for a small business, you
become well acquainted with your customers over a period of time. A lot of
these customers come back because they trust you based upon their past
experiences. So, you are absolutely correct when you say that a company's
word and reputation are paramount. I've been dealing with Elecraft since
2004. In that time I've had numerous occasions where I had to contact the
company for a variety of reasons. In no case were my e-mails or phone calls
ignored or sidetracked to a foreign country. Every experience I've had with
Elecraft whether through their products or customer support has been
positive. (I wish I could say that about more than a handful of the
companies I do business with.)

The simple truth is, any company can hit a bump in the road and will. At
that point, they have to rely on their word and past reputation. Based upon
Elecraft's track record, I don't feel the least worried. When I read posts
like yours, I just assume you haven't any prior experience with the company
in which to base your comments. It is very easy to look with a jaundiced eye
towards a lot of disreputable businesses these days and then lump them all
together. In the long run, though, it is not fair to those that who have
done nothing to warrant it. 

I don't see Elecraft as a religion to which your Believers tag implies.
They are a COMPANY of people of which I have had the pleasure of doing
business with. I like what they sell and I like the way the treat me. It’s
that simple.

The K3 is as a major undertaking by a couple of wide eyed hams in Aptos who
think they can build the world’s best amateur transceiver. I think they have
done it – even though there remain a few bumps. I think they also feel a
strong sense of responsibility in making sure that you not only get what
they have advertised but that it also works as advertised.  

Frankly, I see it all as rather exciting that the K3 is still undergoing so
many changes right before my eyes and that it only takes a few mouse clicks
to implement them. But, make no mistake, the K3 as it sits is a remarkable
product - maybe not finished - but, none-the-less, remarkable. The fact that
the K3 will be getting even better with time leaves me feeling that my money
was not only well spent – but is also producing dividends. 

Come to think of it, maybe I am a Believer.

Tom, AK2B


Steve Sacco NN4X wrote:
 
 
 Actually (and this may be a shock to The Believers) you might be
 surprised to know that there seems to be a rather LARGE group of people
 who agree with me, not only for the TRANSLATION e-mail, but also the
 OPEN LETTER e-mail which I sent last month.  They say so,
 enthusiastically, in private correspondence.  No joke.
 
 You see, John, when all's said and done, all we have is our reputation.
 
 There are those who stand and deliver on promises, those who don't.
 
 Those who's word cannot be trusted must be held accountable.  This HAS to
 be the case, because, at a high level, what else holds a civilization
 together?
 
 Anyway, enjoy S/N 157!
 
 73,
 
 Steve NN4X
 EL98jh
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/RE%3A-TRANSLATION%3A-K3-Subreceiver-Status-Update-tp14953421p14957797.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Don Rasmussen
Here's the new page - please feel free to add anything
you know about. With the number of K3 users increasing
greatly every day, the firmware can be expected to
experience a variety of keystrokes and scenarios that
the smaller beta group had not encountered. The E-guys
make these issues a priority, The wiki can help
provide a current moment view of any of these issues.

http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/Firmware_problems_known_to_Elecraft%2C_on_the_list_to_be_fixed.


[Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior
David Ferrington, M0XDF M0XDF at Alphadene.co.uk 
Fri Jan 18 13:19:37 EST 2008 

Previous message: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior 
Next message: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior 

Thanks, I've noted that on the page at
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/DontDoThis

(that page is going to move on Sunday, sorry, but I
will link to new page).
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 I/O Caution

2008-01-18 Thread Matt Zilmer
This worked for me too.  An added tip is one I got from Wayne when
experiencing RF feedback on PSK31:  Seat the two KIO3 rear panel
connector boards (3.5mm fems, and also the RCA / 1/4 phono) so that
there is a slight amount of interference with the screw-on panel. This
allows the grounds for the jacks to make best contact with the 3.5mm
plugs.  It takes a little jiggling to get the fit to come out just
right, but you need the jack bodies (sleeve is ground) to jut out just
a little bit to get proper contact.

matt, W6NIA

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:11:12 -0500, you wrote:

I've been having intermittent computer problems with the K3 connected 
ever since installing the K3 on the operating desk.  The ultimate 
disaster occurred during the RTTY Roundup when the computer shut itself 
off and lost my log with approximately 1100 QSO's.  After making various 
attempts to block RF from entering the computer, I ran across what 
appears to be the solution.

The DB9M connector on my serial cable used for K3 I/O had the standard 
threaded studs installed.  These had to be removed to allow fitting to 
the K3 I/O port with its own threaded studs.  With the studs removed, 
the connectors mated, but nothing but friction to hold them together.  I 
wondered if perhaps the shells were making intermittent contact.  I next 
drilled through the connector body where the studs were removed and 
inserted a spare pair of thumb screws that were left over from a DB9F 
connector.  With these screwed into the K3's threaded studs to secure 
the connectors, I've not had any further RF problems with the computer.
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] List of tips

2008-01-18 Thread Don Wilhelm
As long as that list is purged when every firmware upgrade comes out, I 
would agree.  Usually such lists are never updated and it becomes a 
'worry list' left there to confuse new owners long after the problem has 
been fixed.


73,
Don W3FPR

David Cutter wrote:
Both good sources, but a list of  don't do this...  as advised by 
John [K7SVV] might save a lot of headaches.  It would be an impossible 
task to make such a list from scratch, but if operators find things 
out the hard way, it might also lead to software changes.


David
G3UNA


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3: AGC question

2008-01-18 Thread John [K7SVV]
While checking the problem that someone reported a little while ago with the 
S meter being stuck when the AGC is turned off, I noticed that  I don't hear 
any difference in the received signal when I turn AGC off and on.  I have 
tried it with an S5 CW signal, an S9 SSB signal, and 40 over 9 signal on the 
AM broadcast band.  I would expect each of these signals to much louder when 
the AGC is switched off but I hear no change at all.  Strange, it is like 
the AGC is not being turned off.  How about the rest of you fellows, what do 
you hear?


John[K7SVV] 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread Don Wilhelm
There is no need to step to the incorrect band (but you do have to know 
which band is incorrect).  A direct frequency entry for the band that is 
incorrect alone is sufficient (the K3 will switch to the band where the 
direct frequency entry is located).


BTW, the K2 suffers from the same situation - you can twist the VFO knob 
and tune WAY out of the proper band - the frequency display will follow 
even though the VFO has long ago stopped changing frequency because it 
topped out.


73,
Don W3FPR

David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:

Thanks, I've noted that on the page at
http://www.zerobeat.net/mediawiki/index.php/DontDoThis

(that page is going to move on Sunday, sorry, but I will link to new page).


On 18/1/08 17:28, John   [K7SVV] [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:

  

I suppose I should have mentioned that if you do get yourself into this
situation with the band sequence being screwed up, the change to the band
sequence is permanent until you manually correct it.  In other words it
won't go away by itself.  To get the bands back into the correct sequence
you will have to step to the band that is incorrect and then, using FREQ
ENT, enter a frequency that is in the correct band and then press AB to set
VFO B to the same frequency.  (e.g. If the slot in the sequence that
normally has 40m actually has an incorrect 80m frequency, then step to that
band entry,  press FREQ ENT, using the keypad enter a 40m frequency, press
the AFX/ENTER button, and the press AB.  Your band sequence should now be
correct).  No big deal repairing the damage.



  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RE: Translation - 2nd RX

2008-01-18 Thread Dave Larson
2 days ago I received the invoice for my K3.  Lisa, without my asking, 
applied my full payment for the 2nd rx to the K3.  I now have the 2nd rx on 
backorder with none of my money tied up in it.
I feel Elecraft handled this case properly.  I am as disappointed as anyone 
that the 2nd rx may be a long way off. Elecraft could have shipped a lower 
quality 2nd rx and everything would have been just fine until we started to 
use it and found that it was inferior to the main rx. Doing so would have 
damaged Elecraft's reputation long term.
I am sure it was a very hard and disappointing decision to have to return to 
the drawing board. Elecraft did the right thing in my opinion and when it is 
all over, their fine reputation that they have had in the past will be 
maintained.


Dave, K8AA

- Original Message - 
From: Dave Agsten [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 12:33 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] RE: Translation - 2nd RX



Dave, N1LQ wrote : The delay of the second receiver

option is to me both highly
regrettable
and somewhat deceptive.

I, for one, based my purchase decision greatly on this
option being
ready for prime time which is obviously was not and
apparently will not

be any time soon.  Production delays are forgivable
and understandable
but discovering that this option which is touted as a
big-time feature
but is really no where near ready is confidence
deflating.

I have been personally patient waiting for my K3 (as
are many others)
and occasionally publicly supportive on this list of
the delays that
Elecraft has been experiencing. Now we discover that a
MAJOR K3 feature

is no where near production ready, if even designed at
this time. Come
on 

I have to agree with Dave here. It's the same
situation here. The delays are understandable. Even a
SHORT, further delay with the KRX3, was accepable. Now
it's listed merely as DELAYED. What does that really
mean? If I recall correctly, the KRX3 2nd receiver
option has been on the Elecraft info/order sheet, with
no mention of being available in the future, at any
time since its annoucement. All of the info sheets I
have from Dayton show the KRX3 as being like any other
option...such as filters. This option was certainly a
deciding factor in ordering a K3. It wasn't until
quite a few orders were taken that it was suddenly
listed with a later shipping date that continues, even
now, to slip. ( A big slip apparently, since now there
isn't even a projected date ) I was never informed
when placing my order on May 25th that the KRX3 would
not be available with the rest of my order. Was anyone
else who ordered before the KRX3 delay was posted
notified that the it would not be immediately
available? My 50% deposit was calculated with the KRX3
option included. It would be nice to know exactly
what's going on here. If it is, as Wayne said, that
they are redesigning for a valid reason, then there is
no way the KRX3 should have been listed as an
available option from Day 1.

I was thinking about having my deposit applied to a K2
and waiting until who knows when for the 2nd
production run to be shipped. Now, with the KRX3 news,
I'm not sure what direction to go. It has made me
decide to scrap the K2 idea. Perhaps an Orion II or an
Omni VII for now and continue to wait and see on the
K3. I could probably have either Ten-Tec within a week
or so. Then, when the K3 comes along, I can do my own
side-by-side.

And, in reading a few of the latest list postings,
there appears to be some issues with using the K3
being used in a certain manner before the KRX3 is
available. ie. VFO A/B things. To me, having one band
on VFO A and another on VFO B is perfectly normal and
should not be an issue.

It does seem that the K3 was actually announced and
released a bit before it was ready for Prime Time.
That was probably driven by the Visalia and Dayton
dates which, obviously, would not be slipped.

73,
Dave N8AG




Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.6/1230 - Release Date: 1/17/2008 
4:59 PM




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior

2008-01-18 Thread John [K7SVV]
I suppose I should have mentioned that if you do get yourself into this 
situation with the band sequence being screwed up, the change to the band 
sequence is permanent until you manually correct it.  In other words it 
won't go away by itself.  To get the bands back into the correct sequence 
you will have to step to the band that is incorrect and then, using FREQ 
ENT, enter a frequency that is in the correct band and then press AB to set 
VFO B to the same frequency.  (e.g. If the slot in the sequence that 
normally has 40m actually has an incorrect 80m frequency, then step to that 
band entry,  press FREQ ENT, using the keypad enter a 40m frequency, press 
the AFX/ENTER button, and the press AB.  Your band sequence should now be 
correct).  No big deal repairing the damage.


John[K7SVV]

- Original Message - 
From: John [K7SVV] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior



Ed,
   I just went through this last week.  It is a known problem and is 
on Wayne's things-to-do list.  What ever you do, don't press the SPLT 
button to go into split  mode when you have the condition you described 
because if you do, you will screw up the band sequence when you step 
through the bands.  At one point I had 3 80m bands and no 60m and 40m when 
I cycled through the bands.  Until Wayne gets it fixed, be careful to not 
have different bands in VFO A and B.


John[K7SVV]

- Original Message - 
From: Ed K1EP [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 5:16 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Strange VFO Behavior


I noticed this behavior this evening and I was wondering if anyone else 
could duplicate it.


I have VFO A on 6M USB and VFO B on 10M USB.   When I turn the VFO B 
knob, the VFO frequency changes, but the mode changes to LSB.  If I turn 
VFO A now, the VFO A frequency changes and the mode goes back to USB.  If 
I do a band down, I don't get 10M on VFO A, instead I still see 6M, plus 
get a PLL error message flash by.


Does anyone else see this?


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 
269.19.6/1229 - Release Date: 1/17/2008 11:12 AM





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 
269.19.6/1229 - Release Date: 1/17/2008 11:12 AM





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] RE: Translation - 2nd RX

2008-01-18 Thread Dave Agsten
 Dave, N1LQ wrote : The delay of the second receiver
option is to me both highly
 regrettable 
and somewhat deceptive. 

I, for one, based my purchase decision greatly on this
option being 
ready for prime time which is obviously was not and
apparently will not
 
be any time soon.  Production delays are forgivable
and understandable 
but discovering that this option which is touted as a
big-time feature 
but is really no where near ready is confidence
deflating.

I have been personally patient waiting for my K3 (as
are many others) 
and occasionally publicly supportive on this list of
the delays that 
Elecraft has been experiencing. Now we discover that a
MAJOR K3 feature
 
is no where near production ready, if even designed at
this time. Come 
on 

I have to agree with Dave here. It's the same
situation here. The delays are understandable. Even a
SHORT, further delay with the KRX3, was accepable. Now
it's listed merely as DELAYED. What does that really
mean? If I recall correctly, the KRX3 2nd receiver
option has been on the Elecraft info/order sheet, with
no mention of being available in the future, at any
time since its annoucement. All of the info sheets I
have from Dayton show the KRX3 as being like any other
option...such as filters. This option was certainly a
deciding factor in ordering a K3. It wasn't until
quite a few orders were taken that it was suddenly
listed with a later shipping date that continues, even
now, to slip. ( A big slip apparently, since now there
isn't even a projected date ) I was never informed
when placing my order on May 25th that the KRX3 would
not be available with the rest of my order. Was anyone
else who ordered before the KRX3 delay was posted
notified that the it would not be immediately
available? My 50% deposit was calculated with the KRX3
option included. It would be nice to know exactly
what's going on here. If it is, as Wayne said, that
they are redesigning for a valid reason, then there is
no way the KRX3 should have been listed as an
available option from Day 1.

I was thinking about having my deposit applied to a K2
and waiting until who knows when for the 2nd
production run to be shipped. Now, with the KRX3 news,
I'm not sure what direction to go. It has made me
decide to scrap the K2 idea. Perhaps an Orion II or an
Omni VII for now and continue to wait and see on the
K3. I could probably have either Ten-Tec within a week
or so. Then, when the K3 comes along, I can do my own
side-by-side. 

And, in reading a few of the latest list postings,
there appears to be some issues with using the K3
being used in a certain manner before the KRX3 is
available. ie. VFO A/B things. To me, having one band
on VFO A and another on VFO B is perfectly normal and
should not be an issue.

It does seem that the K3 was actually announced and
released a bit before it was ready for Prime Time.
That was probably driven by the Visalia and Dayton
dates which, obviously, would not be slipped.

73,
Dave N8AG


  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update (KRX3 option)

2008-01-18 Thread Ian J Maude

Hi all,
I have tried to stay out of the noise on this but I felt I had to comment.
I know the delay in the 2nd Receiver is frustrating but I think the fact 
that one of the owners of the company will mail the list to say that 
they are reworking because they are not happy with the result is 
fantastic!  It would have been so easy to simply release it 'as is'.  
However, they have decided it is not up to the standard they were 
looking for.  I cannot think of another company so committed to 
quality.  I would much rather wait and get a great product.


On the subject of the Omni VII, in my opinion it is not an Omni at all, 
it is a Jupiter.  VHF first IF etc.  The Omni VII was a far better radio 
IMHO.  You may have different opinions of course :-)


I am sure if the gentleman who is thinking about cancelling his K3 order 
were to ask, there would be plenty of people looking for his place in 
the queue ;-)


73 Ian

--

Ian J Maude, G0VGS
SysOp GB7MBC DX Cluster
Member RSGB, GQRP
K2 #4044 |K3 #?

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update (KRX3

2008-01-18 Thread Robert Allbright

N1LQ-Dave wrote:
The Ten Tec Omni VII has a 5.0 Review rating out of 25 reviews on Eham
and may be a worthy and fully developed competitor.
--

Dave
I have an OMNI VII and am very pleased with it, I particularly like  
TenTec radios, I've got to really like the scope display,having had a  
PRO III and ORION II before.


However, I don't think you will be able to compare the OMNI VII to  
the K3. They are different radios.
The K3 looks in my opinion to be unbeatable and will become the Top  
radio in 2008. I'm looking forward to reading the ARRL and RSGB  
reviews eventually.

73 Rob G3RCE K2 #5219, Fists 12517
--- 
___

Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] RE: Translation - 2nd RX

2008-01-18 Thread starmike
These delays are dissapointing to me as well, but I would rather have it right, 
than to go out with issues.  I look at the Yaesu FT-2000 (and the 9000 for that 
fact) was released with a lot of issues which still have not been resolved.  I 
would have Elecraft resolve these things before releasing them, no matter how 
dissapointing it may seem

Mike, N4GW

-- Original message from Stewart Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
-- 


 And while were are at it, how about the KDVR3 (Digital Voice 
 Recorder Option). This also seems to have slipped into the DELAYED 
 category. For me, in addition to the 2nd receiver this modules 
 availability was a decision maker. Total lack of transparency 
 
 Stewart G3RXQ 
 On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:33:05 -0800 (PST), Dave Agsten wrote: 
  Dave, N1LQ wrote : The delay of the second receiver 
  option is to me both highly 
  regrettable 
  and somewhat deceptive. 
  
  I, for one, based my purchase decision greatly on this 
  option being 
  ready for prime time which is obviously was not and 
  apparently will not 
  
  be any time soon. Production delays are forgivable 
  and understandable 
  but discovering that this option which is touted as a 
  big-time feature 
  but is really no where near ready is confidence 
  deflating. 
  
  I have been personally patient waiting for my K3 (as 
  are many others) 
  and occasionally publicly supportive on this list of 
  the delays that 
  Elecraft has been experiencing. Now we discover that a 
  MAJOR K3 feature 
  
  is no where near production ready, if even designed at 
  this time. Come 
  on  
  
  I have to agree with Dave here. It's the same 
  situation here. The delays are understandable. Even a 
  SHORT, further delay with the KRX3, was accepable. Now 
  it's listed merely as DELAYED. What does that really 
  mean? If I recall correctly, the KRX3 2nd receiver 
  option has been on the Elecraft info/order sheet, with 
  no mention of being available in the future, at any 
  time since its annoucement. All of the info sheets I 
  have from Dayton show the KRX3 as being like any other 
  option...such as filters. This option was certainly a 
  deciding factor in ordering a K3. It wasn't until 
  quite a few orders were taken that it was suddenly 
  listed with a later shipping date that continues, even 
  now, to slip. ( A big slip apparently, since now there 
  isn't even a projected date ) I was never informed 
  when placing my order on May 25th that the KRX3 would 
  not be available with the rest of my order. Was anyone 
  else who ordered before the KRX3 delay was posted 
  notified that the it would not be immediately 
  available? My 50% deposit was calculated with the KRX3 
  option included. It would be nice to know exactly 
  what's going on here. If it is, as Wayne said, that 
  they are redesigning for a valid reason, then there is 
  no way the KRX3 should have been listed as an 
  available option from Day 1. 
  
  I was thinking about having my deposit applied to a K2 
  and waiting until who knows when for the 2nd 
  production run to be shipped. Now, with the KRX3 news, 
  I'm not sure what direction to go. It has made me 
  decide to scrap the K2 idea. Perhaps an Orion II or an 
  Omni VII for now and continue to wait and see on the 
  K3. I could probably have either Ten-Tec within a week 
  or so. Then, when the K3 comes along, I can do my own 
  side-by-side. 
  
  And, in reading a few of the latest list postings, 
  there appears to be some issues with using the K3 
  being used in a certain manner before the KRX3 is 
  available. ie. VFO A/B things. To me, having one band 
  on VFO A and another on VFO B is perfectly normal and 
  should not be an issue. 
  
  It does seem that the K3 was actually announced and 
  released a bit before it was ready for Prime Time. 
  That was probably driven by the Visalia and Dayton 
  dates which, obviously, would not be slipped. 
  
  73, 
  Dave N8AG 
  
  
   
  
   
  Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. 
  http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
  ___ 
  Elecraft mailing list 
  Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
  You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
  Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
  
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
  Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
 
 
 ___ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You 

Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update

2008-01-18 Thread Jim Brewster

Likewise.  Jim - KE0NE
- Original Message - 
From: John Klewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Tom AK2B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update



AMEN!



Tom AK2B wrote:


Hi Steve,

The Believers sounds more like a 60's rock group than a description of
Elecraft customers. From my perspective, working for a small business, you
become well acquainted with your customers over a period of time. A lot of
these customers come back because they trust you based upon their past
experiences. So, you are absolutely correct when you say that a company's
word and reputation are paramount. I've been dealing with Elecraft since
2004. In that time I've had numerous occasions where I had to contact the
company for a variety of reasons. In no case were my e-mails or phone 
calls
ignored or sidetracked to a foreign country. Every experience I've had 
with

Elecraft whether through their products or customer support has been
positive. (I wish I could say that about more than a handful of the
companies I do business with.)

The simple truth is, any company can hit a bump in the road and will. At
that point, they have to rely on their word and past reputation. Based 
upon

Elecraft's track record, I don't feel the least worried. When I read posts
like yours, I just assume you haven't any prior experience with the 
company
in which to base your comments. It is very easy to look with a jaundiced 
eye

towards a lot of disreputable businesses these days and then lump them all
together. In the long run, though, it is not fair to those that who have
done nothing to warrant it.
I don't see Elecraft as a religion to which your Believers tag implies.
They are a COMPANY of people of which I have had the pleasure of doing
business with. I like what they sell and I like the way the treat me. It’s
that simple.

The K3 is as a major undertaking by a couple of wide eyed hams in Aptos 
who
think they can build the world’s best amateur transceiver. I think they 
have

done it – even though there remain a few bumps. I think they also feel a
strong sense of responsibility in making sure that you not only get what
they have advertised but that it also works as advertised.
Frankly, I see it all as rather exciting that the K3 is still undergoing 
so
many changes right before my eyes and that it only takes a few mouse 
clicks

to implement them. But, make no mistake, the K3 as it sits is a remarkable
product - maybe not finished - but, none-the-less, remarkable. The fact 
that
the K3 will be getting even better with time leaves me feeling that my 
money

was not only well spent – but is also producing dividends.
Come to think of it, maybe I am a Believer.

Tom, AK2B


Steve Sacco NN4X wrote:


Actually (and this may be a shock to The Believers) you might be
surprised to know that there seems to be a rather LARGE group of people
who agree with me, not only for the TRANSLATION e-mail, but also the
OPEN LETTER e-mail which I sent last month.  They say so,
enthusiastically, in private correspondence.  No joke.

You see, John, when all's said and done, all we have is our reputation.

There are those who stand and deliver on promises, those who don't.

Those who's word cannot be trusted must be held accountable.  This HAS to
be the case, because, at a high level, what else holds a civilization
together?

Anyway, enjoy S/N 157!

73,

Steve NN4X
EL98jh






___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] TRANSLATION: K3 Subreceiver Status Update

2008-01-18 Thread Ken Kopp

Nicely said, Tom.

73! Ken Kopp - K0PP

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 I/O Caution

2008-01-18 Thread Gil Cross
   This missive caused me to look at my installation also. I found that 
the situation was not good. The contacts in the db9m connector made very 
minimal contact. In fact the retaining screws would not draw the connectors 
together fully and if the connectors were forced together as far as they 
would go ,you could then pull on the connector attached to the cable and the 
result was you were able to pull the connectors apart by .03 or more but 
still evidently making contact but in my mind not a good situation at 
allAlso the cable connector could be wiggled somewhat.
   I have made a couple of wire washers from #18 wire and placed them 
between the shoulder of the retaining screws and the connector housing, also 
I removed the lock washers from under the jack screw nuts. This gave me 
another.07 of engagement when the screws were tightened to hold the 
connectors together and there is no longer any wiggle of the cable 
connector. Works for me until something better comes along.


   Gil  K8EAG   K3 99


- Original Message - 
From: Bob Patten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:11 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 I/O Caution


I've been having intermittent computer problems with the K3 connected ever 
since installing the K3 on the operating desk.  The ultimate disaster 
occurred during the RTTY Roundup when the computer shut itself off and 
lost my log with approximately 1100 QSO's.  After making various attempts 
to block RF from entering the computer, I ran across what appears to be 
the solution.


The DB9M connector on my serial cable used for K3 I/O had the standard 
threaded studs installed.  These had to be removed to allow fitting to the 
K3 I/O port with its own threaded studs.  With the studs removed, the 
connectors mated, but nothing but friction to hold them together.  I 
wondered if perhaps the shells were making intermittent contact.  I next 
drilled through the connector body where the studs were removed and 
inserted a spare pair of thumb screws that were left over from a DB9F 
connector.  With these screwed into the K3's threaded studs to secure the 
connectors, I've not had any further RF problems with the computer.


--
73, Bob Patten, N4BPPlantation, FL

E-Mail :   [EMAIL PROTECTED]Website: http://www.qsl.net/n4bp
SOC #1  ARS #799QRP ARCI #3412   FISTS #7871
FP #1491SMIRK #6625
___ 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Notice of invoice

2008-01-18 Thread nand kishore
Rec'd invoice #47805 for K3/100 kit for order with
deposit dated 14May'07.
KRX3 on backorder.

  Nandu.
  VU2NKS
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-01-18 Thread Don Ehrlich
What am I doing wrong.  When I plug in my stereo earphones I expect to hear 
the special effects that others have been noting.  It sounds like plain old 
fashioned stereo to me .. no special effects.  This is while listening to CW 
or SSB.


I have speaker set to 1.  Speaker + Phones is OFF.  I have tried two 
different sets of stereo phones and tried all of the choices in the AFX menu 
(delay 1 to 5, and b in).


Maybe my head is just hard wired to ignore the effects.

Don K7FJ
K3 #195 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-01-18 Thread Ed Muns
 What am I doing wrong.  When I plug in my stereo earphones I 
 expect to hear the special effects that others have been 
 noting.  It sounds like plain old fashioned stereo to me .. 
 no special effects.  This is while listening to CW or SSB.
 
 I have speaker set to 1.  Speaker + Phones is OFF.  I have 
 tried two different sets of stereo phones and tried all of 
 the choices in the AFX menu (delay 1 to 5, and b in).

Set SPKR = 2.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-01-18 Thread Matt Zilmer
You might want to see if it makes any difference if you push the AFX
button (lower right of the keypad).  This toggles AFX on and off.

matt, W6NIA

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:38:02 -0800, you wrote:

 What am I doing wrong.  When I plug in my stereo earphones I 
 expect to hear the special effects that others have been 
 noting.  It sounds like plain old fashioned stereo to me .. 
 no special effects.  This is while listening to CW or SSB.
 
 I have speaker set to 1.  Speaker + Phones is OFF.  I have 
 tried two different sets of stereo phones and tried all of 
 the choices in the AFX menu (delay 1 to 5, and b in).

Set SPKR = 2.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Delayed Elecraft cover messages

2008-01-18 Thread Ken Kopp

My apology for the bandwidth, but ...

We've just discovered (tonight, Friday)  that there were 
52 (!) messages waiting on our ISP that were addressed to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .  Some were over a week old!


All have now been received and responded to. If you still 
haven't received a reply to an earlier inquiry please e-mail 
me.


73! Rose Kopp - N7HKW
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com