Problem viewing attachment in OWA
Hello, In one customer, the emails received from one of their customers, with attachments, show the little attachment clip when viewing the messages in OWA, but don´t show the attachment itself. This happens when their customers send the email/attachment through their system ( which I suppose to be some SAP software, by the looks of the mail headers, below ) . If the person creates the pdf invoice, and them email it normally, the attachment appears just fine when viewing email in OWA. Now, if one downloads this message in Outlook express, the attachment can be accessed. If this person them forwards the message back to the account in the server, and look at it through OWA, the attachment can be accessed normally. And then the headers format seems more normal, that is, the Content-Type, Content-Transfer, etc, they look like this ( took from other message with attachments): Is there a way to make exchange understand their wrong-formatted message, so that the attachment can be accessed normally? Or, if there is no other way, to script something that when some message comes from that specific person, it is auto-forwarded to the same intended recipient if that will fix its headers ? I tried to include the mail headers, but the Lyris manager think it is an attachment and block the message. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Adding Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007 Forest
Hi all, Is it possible to add in an Exchange 2003 server to a Forest which has a running Exchange 2007 server? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Have you tried this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124076(EXCHG.80).aspx
This is clean-mailbox, and it's to get rid of mailboxes that don't get
marked properly in system manager.
-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Since they are still in the system I believe there is a way you can
get the guid of the bad mailbox and get rid of it with a powershell
command but of course I haven't figured out how to do that.
I already tried what you suggest and it is suprising that it didn't
work. Generally when you 'disable' a mailbox it goes into the
disconnected area and I use the PS command I pasted before to get rid of
it. Its unexpected that it not show up in the disconnected area.
If anyone knows how to do what I think works above I would love to know
the commands, I will keep looking in the meantime.
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
So you didn't disconnect. You just disabled. I must have missed that
little tidbit (you know, the important part).
If you have a little time and a cooperative customer, disconnect her
current mailbox, re-enable the old one, delete it, then reconnect the
current. It shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. You could also get
creative about the mail that might get bounced in those five minutes, by
forwarding it to another account then deleting the forwarding. It
depends on how important it is that mail always be deliverable, if 5 -
10 minutes really matter that much (or time it so you do it at night).
I don't know how else you can get rid of a disabled mailbox since I
don't think disabled mailboxes will ever purge. Hopefully someone else
has an ingenious plan. I'd just do it the hard way.
Michelle
-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected
mailboxes list, which is the original issue. :)
Thanks
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Can you connect it to another user object and then delete? You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.
Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute Pennsylvania State
University
-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.
Thanks
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Hi-
This should be a quickie
I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between disable
and remove for mailboxes. Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
created a new one. Now presumably the old one would go to the
disconnected mailboxes list and I would delete it for good with this
powershell command
Get-MailboxStatistics
http://www.exchangeninjas.com/Get-mailboxstatistics -database
server\db | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
$_.mailboxguid}
However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere. When I run the powershell
command...
Get-MailboxStatistics | sort-object TotalItemSize | format-table
DisplayName,
@{expression={$_.TotalItemSize.Value.ToMB()};label=TotalItemSize(MB)}
To see a list of all of our mailboxes with the sizes in MB sorted
smallest to biggest I can still see the old one at the bottom of the
list (because its huge) and the new one which I am currently filling
with all of his good data closer to the top. So its in the system
somewhere but not in the disconnected list.
How do I smoke the thing?
Many thanks!
Feel free to copy my PS commands if you don't currently have them in
your handy commands list J
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
Department of Physics and
RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Thanks to Alex and Michelle for the answer! Once I ran Clean-MailboxDatabase
-Identity server\db they showed up in disconnected as expected.
There are so many cmdlets that its hard to know them all! I remember there was
a function similar to this in exchange 2003 where you would right click a
mailbox database and click cleanup or something similar. Figured there had to
be something like that.
Thanks so much.
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Have you tried this:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124076(EXCHG.80).aspx
This is clean-mailbox, and it's to get rid of mailboxes that don't get
marked properly in system manager.
-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 3:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Since they are still in the system I believe there is a way you can
get the guid of the bad mailbox and get rid of it with a powershell
command but of course I haven't figured out how to do that.
I already tried what you suggest and it is suprising that it didn't
work. Generally when you 'disable' a mailbox it goes into the
disconnected area and I use the PS command I pasted before to get rid of
it. Its unexpected that it not show up in the disconnected area.
If anyone knows how to do what I think works above I would love to know
the commands, I will keep looking in the meantime.
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:45 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
So you didn't disconnect. You just disabled. I must have missed that
little tidbit (you know, the important part).
If you have a little time and a cooperative customer, disconnect her
current mailbox, re-enable the old one, delete it, then reconnect the
current. It shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. You could also get
creative about the mail that might get bounced in those five minutes, by
forwarding it to another account then deleting the forwarding. It
depends on how important it is that mail always be deliverable, if 5 -
10 minutes really matter that much (or time it so you do it at night).
I don't know how else you can get rid of a disabled mailbox since I
don't think disabled mailboxes will ever purge. Hopefully someone else
has an ingenious plan. I'd just do it the hard way.
Michelle
-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
I can not reconnect it because it is not listed in the disconnected
mailboxes list, which is the original issue. :)
Thanks
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
-Original Message-
From: Michelle Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Can you connect it to another user object and then delete? You
obviously can't reconnect it to the orignal user.
Michelle Weaver
System Administrator - Materials Research Institute Pennsylvania State
University
-Original Message-
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Sorry, if it wasn't clear this is exchange 2007.
Thanks
Ehren J. Benson, MCSE
Windows Systems Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
517-884-5469
From: Ehren Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:04 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Removing mailboxes (for good dang it!)
Hi-
This should be a quickie
I learned a while back (the hard way) the difference between disable
and remove for mailboxes. Luckily (or not) it was on my own mailbox.
Anyway...there is a user on our systems whose data got completely
convoluted by their own doingsso I DISABLED their mailbox and
created a new one. Now presumably the old one would go to the
disconnected mailboxes list and I would delete it for good with this
powershell command
Get-MailboxStatistics
http://www.exchangeninjas.com/Get-mailboxstatistics -database
server\db | where {$_.disconnectdate -ne $null} | foreach
{Remove-mailbox -database $_.database -storemailboxidentity
$_.mailboxguid}
However for some reason it does not go to the disconnected mailbox
list, but I still want to delete it because I don't want this 3.3GB
mailbox floating around in limbo somewhere. When I run the powershell
RE: Adding Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007 Forest
If you install Exchange 2007 into a forest that did not have Exchange 2000 / 2003 then no. Chuck Robinson, MCSE: Messaging, VCP Senior Practice Consultant EMC Global Services, Microsoft Practice tel 732-321-3644 xt.45, mobile 973-865-0394, fax 732-321-6855 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.emc.com/mspracticehttp://www.emc.com/ From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Adding Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007 Forest Hi all, Is it possible to add in an Exchange 2003 server to a Forest which has a running Exchange 2007 server? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Adding Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007 Forest
If there was previously Exchange 2000 or 2003 in the environment, then yes. If it was a Greenfield Exchange 2007 installation, then no. Regards, Michael B. Smith MCSE/Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Adding Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2007 Forest Hi all, Is it possible to add in an Exchange 2003 server to a Forest which has a running Exchange 2007 server? Thanks Rob ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Shared calendars in OWA
How is it in OWA for exchange 2007 that one would view someone else's shared calendar? Both in the instances of viewing their 'main' calendar and also in the case where say someone creates a calendar called employee leaves under their main calendar and just shares that one out, how would you view that? I knew how it worked a bit in ex2007 OWA but it doesn't seem to be the same in 2007. I also notice in Outlook 2007 when I view a calendar that is shared it looks like I see all of their individual calendars combined on one which makes me think you couldn't just view the 'employee leaves' calendar shared by Joe Blow. Thanks Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Folders in English
Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
ex2k3 for dummies
I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Group Mailboxes
We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Problem viewing attachment in OWA
I don't know if this will be your issue or not, but... Depending on the version of SAP, we found that some things just did not come out well being transmitted out by SMTP; that was why there was an SAP-Exchange connector. The connector was written by SAP and had versions for Exchange 5.5 and 2000 only. Newer versions of SAP haven't had the issue and the SMTP connector works OK for all data types we've tried. -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problem viewing attachment in OWA Hello, In one customer, the emails received from one of their customers, with attachments, show the little attachment clip when viewing the messages in OWA, but don´t show the attachment itself. This happens when their customers send the email/attachment through their system ( which I suppose to be some SAP software, by the looks of the mail headers, below ) . If the person creates the pdf invoice, and them email it normally, the attachment appears just fine when viewing email in OWA. Now, if one downloads this message in Outlook express, the attachment can be accessed. If this person them forwards the message back to the account in the server, and look at it through OWA, the attachment can be accessed normally. And then the headers format seems more normal, that is, the Content-Type, Content-Transfer, etc, they look like this ( took from other message with attachments): Is there a way to make exchange understand their wrong-formatted message, so that the attachment can be accessed normally? Or, if there is no other way, to script something that when some message comes from that specific person, it is auto-forwarded to the same intended recipient if that will fix its headers ? I tried to include the mail headers, but the Lyris manager think it is an attachment and block the message. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Google Message Filtering/Security
I've been using postini for a couple of years now (before google bought them). Been pretty happy with the service so far. From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security I'd be very leary about anything Google is selling. They are data miners at the core. nuf said? - Original Message - From: Roger Wright mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:29 AM Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low... http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: Folders in English
Not 100% sure I follow that, but you probably want the /resetfoldernames switch for outlook. From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Folders in English Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: ex2k3 for dummies
Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
R: Folders in English
Very strange because Windows is Italian. I'll give a look to resetfolders Thanks GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì 11 giugno 2008 15.51 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Folders in English If I remember correctly the folders are set to the language of the client when the mailbox is first opened ever. Meaning if you have Windows setup in Italian, and you connect to a mailbox using Outlook, the default folder names will be in Italian. If you then subsequently connect to the mailbox using an English client, they'll still be in Italian. You can use outlook /resetfolders to reset this though .. then the language of your next connection will set the folders language. From : http://www.howto-outlook.com/howto/commandlineswitches.htm /resetfoldernames Resets default folder names (such as Inbox or Sent Items) to default names in the current Office user interface language.For example, if you first connect to your mailbox Outlook using a Russian user interface, the Russian default folder names cannot be renamed. To change the default folder names to another language such as Japanese or English, you can use this switch to reset the default folder names after changing the user interface language or installing a different language version of Outlook. Hope that helps, Thanks Rob - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:43:48 PM Subject: Folders in English Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Folders in English
If I remember correctly the folders are set to the language of the client when the mailbox is first opened ever. Meaning if you have Windows setup in Italian, and you connect to a mailbox using Outlook, the default folder names will be in Italian. If you then subsequently connect to the mailbox using an English client, they'll still be in Italian. You can use outlook /resetfolders to reset this though .. then the language of your next connection will set the folders language. From : http://www.howto-outlook.com/howto/commandlineswitches.htm /resetfoldernames Resets default folder names (such as Inbox or Sent Items) to default names in the current Office user interface language.For example, if you first connect to your mailbox Outlook using a Russian user interface, the Russian default folder names cannot be renamed. To change the default folder names to another language such as Japanese or English, you can use this switch to reset the default folder names after changing the user interface language or installing a different language version of Outlook. Hope that helps, Thanks Rob - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:43:48 PM Subject: Folders in English Folders in English Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Public folder error
You do not have perm to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator I've mail enabled a public folder on E2K3...the user cannot send as (when replying to requests) the public folder address. She has delegate permissions, send as, etc...she as author rights to the public folder. I've googled all day trying to find the answer. Any ideas? Thanks Steve ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Public folder error
I would look to see if you have Explicitly denied her the CREATE either by group membership or something similar. Then I would make sure that she really has SEND AS permissions by checking on the properties, permissions tab, Directory rights (using ESM). The other place to check is on the properties of the PF, Administration tab. Make sure that the This folder is available to: is set to All users with access permission and not Owners only. Sometimes you just need to wait for replication. Nikki From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public folder error You do not have perm to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator I've mail enabled a public folder on E2K3...the user cannot send as (when replying to requests) the public folder address. She has delegate permissions, send as, etc...she as author rights to the public folder. I've googled all day trying to find the answer. Any ideas? Thanks Steve ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: ex2k3 for dummies
Each server has it's own SMTP connector. Part of the idea is redundancy, if City A is under a hurricane, B keeps on ticking. MyCompany.com DNS points to A, MyCompany.net DNS points to B On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:56 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Public folder error
Thanks Nikki I'll take a look. I always thought she could send as from this PF, but only lost the ability over the last week or so. She thought it was after I uninstalled plaxo from her PC, but I told her she was smoking something. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Nikki Peterson - OETX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would look to see if you have Explicitly denied her the CREATE either by group membership or something similar. Then I would make sure that she really has SEND AS permissions by checking on the properties, permissions tab, Directory rights (using ESM). The other place to check is on the properties of the PF, Administration tab. Make sure that the This folder is available to: is set to All users with access permission and not Owners only. Sometimes you just need to wait for replication. Nikki *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:02 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Public folder error You do not have perm to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator I've mail enabled a public folder on E2K3...the user cannot send as (when replying to requests) the public folder address. She has delegate permissions, send as, etc...she as author rights to the public folder. I've googled all day trying to find the answer. Any ideas? Thanks Steve ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: R: Folders in English
is it at all possible that someone, or something (service account of some sort) logged in to the mailbox BEFORE the ordinary Outlook user? - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:57:24 PM Subject: R: Folders in English Folders in English Very strange because Windows is Italian. I'll give a look to resetfolders Thanks GuidoElia HELPPC Da: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì 11 giugno 2008 15.51 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Folders in English If I remember correctly the folders are set to the language of the client when the mailbox is first opened ever. Meaning if you have Windows setup in Italian, and you connect to a mailbox using Outlook, the default folder names will be in Italian. If you then subsequently connect to the mailbox using an English client, they'll still be in Italian. You can use outlook /resetfolders to reset this though .. then the language of your next connection will set the folders language. From : http://www.howto-outlook.com/howto/commandlineswitches.htm /resetfoldernames Resets default folder names (such as Inbox or Sent Items) to default names in the current Office user interface language.For example, if you first connect to your mailbox Outlook using a Russian user interface, the Russian default folder names cannot be renamed. To change the default folder names to another language such as Japanese or English, you can use this switch to reset the default folder names after changing the user interface language or installing a different language version of Outlook. Hope that helps, Thanks Rob - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:43:48 PM Subject: Folders in English Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: ex2k3 for dummies
Have a look at the link I included.. the 4.4.7 is coming from the receiving server at the destination domain, because it's having problems looking up the MX record.. (I think). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Each server has it's own SMTP connector. Part of the idea is redundancy, if City A is under a hurricane, B keeps on ticking. MyCompany.com DNS points to A, MyCompany.net DNS points to B On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:56 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Public folder error
Looks like all permissions are set properly in both places. She hasn't been added/edited/deleted from any groups. I've tried creating a different public folder and mail enabling it and adding myself as a send as delegate, same error... The only change I've made lately is adding a BES server in the last few weeks. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Nikki Peterson - OETX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would look to see if you have Explicitly denied her the CREATE either by group membership or something similar. Then I would make sure that she really has SEND AS permissions by checking on the properties, permissions tab, Directory rights (using ESM). The other place to check is on the properties of the PF, Administration tab. Make sure that the This folder is available to: is set to All users with access permission and not Owners only. Sometimes you just need to wait for replication. Nikki *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:02 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Public folder error You do not have perm to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator I've mail enabled a public folder on E2K3...the user cannot send as (when replying to requests) the public folder address. She has delegate permissions, send as, etc...she as author rights to the public folder. I've googled all day trying to find the answer. Any ideas? Thanks Steve ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Google Message Filtering/Security
Not that I think Trend is that great, but we have been using Postini's Message Security option since before Google bought them and I am completely unimpressed. I'm looking at Ironport... What I don't like: No message tracking Pain in the arse to manage A fair amount of SPAM still finds its way through the net NDR's are about useless to troubleshoot what rules were tripped when external emails get bounced Google owns the service On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Theochares, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then the cost of Trend. Tough decision. -- *From:* Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Google Message Filtering/Security Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low... http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 [image: ET E-mail Signature Logo] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image002.jpg
RE: Google Message Filtering/Security
I'd like to know what system Gmail is using to filter their spam. I have yet to find a false positive and rarely have a junk message hit my Inbox (actually had 1 today, but this was the first in weeks). Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security Not that I think Trend is that great, but we have been using Postini's Message Security option since before Google bought them and I am completely unimpressed. I'm looking at Ironport... What I don't like: No message tracking Pain in the arse to manage A fair amount of SPAM still finds its way through the net NDR's are about useless to troubleshoot what rules were tripped when external emails get bounced Google owns the service On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Theochares, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then the cost of Trend. Tough decision. From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low... http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
R: Folders in English
I will try it but the strange thing that some folders are correct (i.e junk mail is correctly translated into Italian as Posta indesiderata but calendar and inbox are still in English) GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: Bingham, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì 11 giugno 2008 15.53 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: Folders in English Not 100% sure I follow that, but you probably want the /resetfoldernames switch for outlook. _ From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Folders in English Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC _ This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. _ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
R: R: Folders in English
Mailboxes were created by the Corporate, but with local Outlook I was the only one that prepared clients and I saw the procedure of OL opening for the first time. Regional settings are correct , but folders are partially in English. As I said from OWA is everything OK GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì 11 giugno 2008 16.39 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: R: Folders in English is it at all possible that someone, or something (service account of some sort) logged in to the mailbox BEFORE the ordinary Outlook user? - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:57:24 PM Subject: R: Folders in English Very strange because Windows is Italian. I'll give a look to resetfolders Thanks GuidoElia HELPPC _ Da: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì 11 giugno 2008 15.51 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Folders in English If I remember correctly the folders are set to the language of the client when the mailbox is first opened ever. Meaning if you have Windows setup in Italian, and you connect to a mailbox using Outlook, the default folder names will be in Italian. If you then subsequently connect to the mailbox using an English client, they'll still be in Italian. You can use outlook /resetfolders to reset this though .. then the language of your next connection will set the folders language. From : http://www.howto-outlook.com/howto/commandlineswitches.htm /resetfoldernames Resets default folder names (such as Inbox or Sent Items) to default names in the current Office user interface language.For example, if you first connect to your mailbox Outlook using a Russian user interface, the Russian default folder names cannot be renamed. To change the default folder names to another language such as Japanese or English, you can use this switch to reset the default folder names after changing the user interface language or installing a different language version of Outlook. Hope that helps, Thanks Rob - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:43:48 PM Subject: Folders in English Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Google Message Filtering/Security
They dont eat thier own dog food? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know what system Gmail is using to filter their spam. I have yet to find a false positive and rarely have a junk message hit my Inbox (actually had 1 today, but this was the first in weeks). Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security Not that I think Trend is that great, but we have been using Postini's Message Security option since before Google bought them and I am completely unimpressed. I'm looking at Ironport... What I don't like: No message tracking Pain in the arse to manage A fair amount of SPAM still finds its way through the net NDR's are about useless to troubleshoot what rules were tripped when external emails get bounced Google owns the service On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Theochares, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then the cost of Trend. Tough decision. From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low... http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Shared calendars in OWA
In OWA 2007, when you're logged as your primary account, near the top right hand side of the window there is the addres list box, and Options, and then the name of the logged in user, and finally log-off. The username has a drop down arrow on it. Click on that, and you can Open someone else's mailbox. If you have only access to the calendar type of thing, then you can build a URL like this : https://cas/owa/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/?cmd=contentsf=calendar Where johnny is the mailbox name of the shared calendar. Not particularly intuitive, but that seems to be the way that it has to be for this to work. Thanks Rob - Original Message From: Ehren Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:35:21 PM Subject: Shared calendars in OWA How is it in OWA for exchange 2007 that one would view someone else’s shared calendar? Both in the instances of viewing their ‘main’ calendar and also in the case where say someone creates a calendar called “employee leaves” under their main calendar and just shares that one out, how would you view that? I knew how it worked a bit in ex2007 OWA but it doesn’t seem to be the same in 2007. I also notice in Outlook 2007 when I view a calendar that is shared it looks like I see all of their individual calendars combined on one which makes me think you couldn’t just view the ‘employee leaves’ calendar shared by Joe Blow. Thanks Ehren J. Benson, MCSE Windows Systems Administrator Department of Physics and Astronomy Michigan State University 1209 A Biomed Phys Sci [EMAIL PROTECTED] 517-884-5469 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Google Message Filtering/Security
I don't know... but of all the web-based mail systems, Gmail seems to have the most accurate spam filters. Maybe they're using Ninja - it functioned nearly as well for me. Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security They dont eat thier own dog food? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know what system Gmail is using to filter their spam. I have yet to find a false positive and rarely have a junk message hit my Inbox (actually had 1 today, but this was the first in weeks). Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security Not that I think Trend is that great, but we have been using Postini's Message Security option since before Google bought them and I am completely unimpressed. I'm looking at Ironport... What I don't like: No message tracking Pain in the arse to manage A fair amount of SPAM still finds its way through the net NDR's are about useless to troubleshoot what rules were tripped when external emails get bounced Google owns the service On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Theochares, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then the cost of Trend. Tough decision. From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low... http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: R: Folders in English
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Localization_Outlook_Folders.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/188856 Haven't tried what they say, but it looks like maybe a meeting request or other received e-mail from another language before the client logged on could have done it. -Bonnie From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:57 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: R: R: Folders in English Mailboxes were created by the Corporate, but with local Outlook I was the only one that prepared clients and I saw the procedure of OL opening for the first time. Regional settings are correct , but folders are partially in English. As I said from OWA is everything OK GuidoElia HELPPC Da: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì 11 giugno 2008 16.39 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: R: Folders in English is it at all possible that someone, or something (service account of some sort) logged in to the mailbox BEFORE the ordinary Outlook user? - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:57:24 PM Subject: R: Folders in English Very strange because Windows is Italian. I'll give a look to resetfolders Thanks GuidoElia HELPPC Da: ROBERT WILCOX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: mercoledì 11 giugno 2008 15.51 A: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Oggetto: Re: Folders in English If I remember correctly the folders are set to the language of the client when the mailbox is first opened ever. Meaning if you have Windows setup in Italian, and you connect to a mailbox using Outlook, the default folder names will be in Italian. If you then subsequently connect to the mailbox using an English client, they'll still be in Italian. You can use outlook /resetfolders to reset this though .. then the language of your next connection will set the folders language. From : http://www.howto-outlook.com/howto/commandlineswitches.htm /resetfoldernames Resets default folder names (such as Inbox or Sent Items) to default names in the current Office user interface language.For example, if you first connect to your mailbox Outlook using a Russian user interface, the Russian default folder names cannot be renamed. To change the default folder names to another language such as Japanese or English, you can use this switch to reset the default folder names after changing the user interface language or installing a different language version of Outlook. Hope that helps, Thanks Rob - Original Message From: HELP_PC [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:43:48 PM Subject: Folders in English Connecting with OK3 to a corporate WAN Exchange 2k3 server I get all the folders in English ,but OL is Italian version and when I was connected to interna Exchange (that was italian version) I had all folders in Italian. From OWA folders are in Italian Is ther is a way to get the folders in local language ? TIA GuidoElia HELPPC ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: email archiving
In the SEA world, what does Direct Archiving a user refer to? Is it simply just user mailbox management, stubbing, reduction, etc? From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I am running Direct Archive with over 150 with no issues on the Exchange side. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving We have customers that are using direct archiving for a little more than 100 mailboxes without problems, but since the bottleneck is the Exchange Server, we do not suggest direct archiving for more than 50 mailboxes. Instead we prefer setting up jobs that run every couple of hours, which has the same effect. Or use journaling, which the product supports. HTH, Alex From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Alex what is the cutoff for a small shop? 250, 500 mailboxes? From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA. There are also environmental considerations to consider, Direct Archving works well in smaller shops but for larger operations, we recommend Journaling instead for overhead reasons. Alex Alex Eckelberry CEO Sunbelt Software 33 N. Garden Avenue, Suite 1200 Clearwater, FL 33755 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 727.562.0101 x220 f: 727-562-3402 w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/ b: www.sunbeltblog.com http://www.sunbeltblog.com/ From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving SEA doesn't use Journaling. Direct Archiving eliminates need for Journaling SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Bob are you running it with journaling turned off? From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I am using SEA and am very happy with it. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email retention. Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on. From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: email archiving I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat. We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. I don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn Journaling on on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive. Can someone give me an in-a-nutshell explanation of how this works? Is this the best solution for our money? Any alternatives? We are a non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant. We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003. Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub). Thanks, Paul Everett IS Dept. Lee Mental Health Center 239-791-1551 Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to learn more. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the
Re: Google Message Filtering/Security
Privacy concerns asside, Gmail's filter is definately one of the best I have seen/used. Sure there are next to no controls, but I dont find that I need them. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know... but of all the web-based mail systems, Gmail seems to have the most accurate spam filters. Maybe they're using Ninja - it functioned nearly as well for me. Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security They dont eat thier own dog food? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know what system Gmail is using to filter their spam. I have yet to find a false positive and rarely have a junk message hit my Inbox (actually had 1 today, but this was the first in weeks). Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security Not that I think Trend is that great, but we have been using Postini's Message Security option since before Google bought them and I am completely unimpressed. I'm looking at Ironport... What I don't like: No message tracking Pain in the arse to manage A fair amount of SPAM still finds its way through the net NDR's are about useless to troubleshoot what rules were tripped when external emails get bounced Google owns the service On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Theochares, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then the cost of Trend. Tough decision. From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low... http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ -- ME2 ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: email archiving
Refers to the use of an Event Store Sink to perform the archival, rather than a MAPI login or journaling mailbox. From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving In the SEA world, what does Direct Archiving a user refer to? Is it simply just user mailbox management, stubbing, reduction, etc? From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I am running Direct Archive with over 150 with no issues on the Exchange side. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving We have customers that are using direct archiving for a little more than 100 mailboxes without problems, but since the bottleneck is the Exchange Server, we do not suggest direct archiving for more than 50 mailboxes. Instead we prefer setting up jobs that run every couple of hours, which has the same effect. Or use journaling, which the product supports. HTH, Alex From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Alex what is the cutoff for a small shop? 250, 500 mailboxes? From: Alex Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Actually you can opt to use Journaling or not in SEA. There are also environmental considerations to consider, Direct Archving works well in smaller shops but for larger operations, we recommend Journaling instead for overhead reasons. Alex Alex Eckelberry CEO Sunbelt Software 33 N. Garden Avenue, Suite 1200 Clearwater, FL 33755 e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 727.562.0101 x220 f: 727-562-3402 w: www.sunbeltsoftware.com http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/ b: www.sunbeltblog.com http://www.sunbeltblog.com/ From: Tom Strader - NCBPAC Systems Administrator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving SEA doesn't use Journaling. Direct Archiving eliminates need for Journaling SEA provides a unique Direct Archiving feature that enables archiving of emails immediately after they are received. Direct Archiving is a significant breakthrough in efficient email archiving which eliminates the need for the Exchange Journal mailbox. Immediate archiving onto storage media improves the performance of the Exchange server, helps to ensure legal compliance, and diminishes the necessity to apply scheduler, threshold and quota archiving jobs. From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving Bob are you running it with journaling turned off? From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I am using SEA and am very happy with it. Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: email archiving I didn't think there were any specific regs concerning HIPAA and email retention. Anyone on the list using our hosts product? Sunbelt Archiver. They do mention that it doesn't require journaling turned on. From: Paul Everett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: email archiving I'm sure this topic has come up before so excuse me it this is old hat. We are looking at an email archive solution from an outside vendor. I don't know much about it except they put an appliance on our network and turn Journaling on on our Exchange server, and it's wildly expensive. Can someone give me an in-a-nutshell explanation of how this works? Is this the best solution for our money? Any alternatives? We are a non-profit behavioral health facility trying to stay HIPAA compliant. We have a 2003 Domain w/Exchange 2003. Approx 250 mailboxes and right now my total mail store is 30 gigs (priv and pub). Thanks, Paul Everett IS Dept. Lee Mental Health Center 239-791-1551 Lee Mental Health Center, Inc. providing services through Ruth Cooper Center for Behavioral Health Care and VISTA Behavioral Crisis Services. Visit our website at www.leementalhealth.org blocked::http://www.leementalhealth.org/ to learn more. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
Re: ex2k3 for dummies
I do halff-suspect it's a DNS issue (all one domain and all) but I'm not sure of how to go from here. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:40 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look at the link I included.. the 4.4.7 is coming from the receiving server at the destination domain, because it's having problems looking up the MX record.. (I think). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Each server has it's own SMTP connector. Part of the idea is redundancy, if City A is under a hurricane, B keeps on ticking. MyCompany.com DNS points to A, MyCompany.net DNS points to B On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:56 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Problem viewing attachment in OWA
Silvio are you using 2007? There are some advanced attachment settings for OWA that can effectively make some attachments un-openable based on the computer type chosen (public or private computer). In our org if you don't specify you are on a private computer, attachments will open but cant be downloaded, I believe the default is that on public computers attachments don't show at all. -troy -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problem viewing attachment in OWA Hello, In one customer, the emails received from one of their customers, with attachments, show the little attachment clip when viewing the messages in OWA, but don´t show the attachment itself. This happens when their customers send the email/attachment through their system ( which I suppose to be some SAP software, by the looks of the mail headers, below ) . If the person creates the pdf invoice, and them email it normally, the attachment appears just fine when viewing email in OWA. Now, if one downloads this message in Outlook express, the attachment can be accessed. If this person them forwards the message back to the account in the server, and look at it through OWA, the attachment can be accessed normally. And then the headers format seems more normal, that is, the Content-Type, Content-Transfer, etc, they look like this ( took from other message with attachments): Is there a way to make exchange understand their wrong-formatted message, so that the attachment can be accessed normally? Or, if there is no other way, to script something that when some message comes from that specific person, it is auto-forwarded to the same intended recipient if that will fix its headers ? I tried to include the mail headers, but the Lyris manager think it is an attachment and block the message. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Google Message Filtering/Security
I have heard people all impressed with Gmail's anti-spam efforts as well. It is mediocre in my experience. I mean, it works, it's good, but it is nothing special. The same false positives and junk mail making it to the inbox as other services for me. Always a few here and there. I have not used Postini. From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Google Message Filtering/Security I'd like to know what system Gmail is using to filter their spam. I have yet to find a false positive and rarely have a junk message hit my Inbox (actually had 1 today, but this was the first in weeks). Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security Not that I think Trend is that great, but we have been using Postini's Message Security option since before Google bought them and I am completely unimpressed. I'm looking at Ironport... What I don't like: No message tracking Pain in the arse to manage A fair amount of SPAM still finds its way through the net NDR's are about useless to troubleshoot what rules were tripped when external emails get bounced Google owns the service On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Theochares, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looking at it now. Using Trend and want to get away from supporting a box. Hesitant to move the MX. Users like what they have but backscatter is a problem and Google claims to have a better solution for less then the cost of Trend. Tough decision. _ From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 2:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Google Message Filtering/Security Anybody using Google's Postini filtering system ahead of your Exchange box? The pricing per mailbox seems radically low... http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 ET E-mail Signature Logo ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~image001.jpg
RE: Google Message Filtering/Security
This is Google. Do you think they are really using a third party application? -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Google Message Filtering/Security I don't know... but of all the web-based mail systems, Gmail seems to have the most accurate spam filters. Maybe they're using Ninja - it functioned nearly as well for me. Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security They dont eat thier own dog food? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know what system Gmail is using to filter their spam. I have yet to find a false positive and rarely have a junk message hit my Inbox (actually had 1 today, but this was the first in weeks). Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Blackberry Curve
I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Blackberry Curve
Yeah I think you've heard wrong, I've got stuff on my calendar on the 8300 on April 24th. Definitely over 30 days old... On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. *From:* David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? -- Sherry Abercrombie Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Arthur C. Clarke ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-'s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I'm using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it'll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
Got the new Sprint one here. Love it! First time BB user. Been a Treo loyalist for like 4 years... For me, never being a BB user, I find the OS a little tough to navigate through, and miss having some 'hard keys' (Email/Calendar/Lock Screen like the palm). I find myself clicking and clicking to make it to the right application I want to be in... But I am playing around with assigned shortcuts etc, it's getting better. I love the GPS, full sized headphone jack, size, feel, keyboard. Did I say I like the size yet? ;) From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
I know, I would have liked to wait for the Bold... but an opportunity came up for me to get the curve... so I jumped on it. I have a new baby at home and am excited about having the camera! Any big differences from the Curve to the Bold? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-'s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I'm using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it'll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
I believe it has convenience keys on it (like the 8830)? You can set the front or side button for your calendar... From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Got the new Sprint one here. Love it! First time BB user. Been a Treo loyalist for like 4 years... For me, never being a BB user, I find the OS a little tough to navigate through, and miss having some 'hard keys' (Email/Calendar/Lock Screen like the palm). I find myself clicking and clicking to make it to the right application I want to be in... But I am playing around with assigned shortcuts etc, it's getting better. I love the GPS, full sized headphone jack, size, feel, keyboard. Did I say I like the size yet? ;) From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
The biggest differences? 3G support, higher screen resolution, 1GB internal memory, OS 4.6 to name a few. It's a bit larger than the Curve's footprint. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I know, I would have liked to wait for the Bold... but an opportunity came up for me to get the curve... so I jumped on it. I have a new baby at home and am excited about having the camera! Any big differences from the Curve to the Bold? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-'s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I'm using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it'll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
Yes on the Convenience keys. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I believe it has convenience keys on it (like the 8830)? You can set the front or side button for your calendar... From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Got the new Sprint one here. Love it! First time BB user. Been a Treo loyalist for like 4 years... For me, never being a BB user, I find the OS a little tough to navigate through, and miss having some 'hard keys' (Email/Calendar/Lock Screen like the palm). I find myself clicking and clicking to make it to the right application I want to be in... But I am playing around with assigned shortcuts etc, it's getting better. I love the GPS, full sized headphone jack, size, feel, keyboard. Did I say I like the size yet? ;) From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
3G ... NICE! I think that will give you like 14MB downloads? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve The biggest differences? 3G support, higher screen resolution, 1GB internal memory, OS 4.6 to name a few. It's a bit larger than the Curve's footprint. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I know, I would have liked to wait for the Bold... but an opportunity came up for me to get the curve... so I jumped on it. I have a new baby at home and am excited about having the camera! Any big differences from the Curve to the Bold? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-'s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I'm using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it'll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Google Message Filtering/Security
We are subjected to Postini through corporate and since it's rollout, we've had nothing but trouble with NDRs and weird message limit things. I used US Internet's Securence product for 3 years, by far the cheapest solution, very few false positives and after it's learning curve of about a week we stopped spam down to about 3 to 4 messages a week from 3000 a day that got through to 150 users. In addition all email viruses stopped showing up period. I can't recommend them enough. Great customer service too. I was never on hold for more than few minutes, any time of day. That's my preference for spam and virus. M _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Google Message Filtering/Security
Just being a little facetious. Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Google Message Filtering/Security This is Google. Do you think they are really using a third party application? -Original Message- From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:05 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Google Message Filtering/Security I don't know... but of all the web-based mail systems, Gmail seems to have the most accurate spam filters. Maybe they're using Ninja - it functioned nearly as well for me. Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ -Original Message- From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security They dont eat thier own dog food? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Roger Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know what system Gmail is using to filter their spam. I have yet to find a false positive and rarely have a junk message hit my Inbox (actually had 1 today, but this was the first in weeks). Roger Wright Network Administrator 727.572.7076 x388 _ From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Google Message Filtering/Security com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
Yeah, I got one set to Email and one set to Key lock now... I miss having them right below the screen though. From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Yes on the Convenience keys. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I believe it has convenience keys on it (like the 8830)? You can set the front or side button for your calendar... From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:43 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Got the new Sprint one here. Love it! First time BB user. Been a Treo loyalist for like 4 years... For me, never being a BB user, I find the OS a little tough to navigate through, and miss having some 'hard keys' (Email/Calendar/Lock Screen like the palm). I find myself clicking and clicking to make it to the right application I want to be in... But I am playing around with assigned shortcuts etc, it's getting better. I love the GPS, full sized headphone jack, size, feel, keyboard. Did I say I like the size yet? ;) From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
Probably closer to 7.2Mb. Anything is better than the EDGE speeds 300kb that I'm subjected to currently. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve 3G ... NICE! I think that will give you like 14MB downloads? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve The biggest differences? 3G support, higher screen resolution, 1GB internal memory, OS 4.6 to name a few. It's a bit larger than the Curve's footprint. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I know, I would have liked to wait for the Bold... but an opportunity came up for me to get the curve... so I jumped on it. I have a new baby at home and am excited about having the camera! Any big differences from the Curve to the Bold? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-'s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I'm using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it'll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
I'm on Sprint - so I believe that is EVDO v1 Probably around 300k also From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Probably closer to 7.2Mb. Anything is better than the EDGE speeds 300kb that I'm subjected to currently. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve 3G ... NICE! I think that will give you like 14MB downloads? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve The biggest differences? 3G support, higher screen resolution, 1GB internal memory, OS 4.6 to name a few. It's a bit larger than the Curve's footprint. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I know, I would have liked to wait for the Bold... but an opportunity came up for me to get the curve... so I jumped on it. I have a new baby at home and am excited about having the camera! Any big differences from the Curve to the Bold? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-'s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I'm using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it'll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Group Mailboxes
How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. -- From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James **Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
OoO to the Internet...
All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
I believe that this is a transport rule they are talking about. If you are using Outlook rules, I believe that forwarding messages and sending to other users (other than sender) cant be done without Outlook open. -troy From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETXmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issuesmailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
Right click on the public folder Select Properties Select the ADMINISTRATION tab Click FOLDER ASSISTANT... ADD RULE... Then just Forward them to the group (in whatever format works best) Nikki From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Blackberry Curve
3G is kinda a blanket term... HSDPA is what the Bold will use, although capable of 14Mb/s, it's not anywhere around that yet. The new iPhone is HSDPA too, and people average around 700Kb/s. I do hear over and over again though, that ATT does have the fastest mobile data network. From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Probably closer to 7.2Mb. Anything is better than the EDGE speeds 300kb that I'm subjected to currently. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve 3G ... NICE! I think that will give you like 14MB downloads? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve The biggest differences? 3G support, higher screen resolution, 1GB internal memory, OS 4.6 to name a few. It's a bit larger than the Curve's footprint. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I know, I would have liked to wait for the Bold... but an opportunity came up for me to get the curve... so I jumped on it. I have a new baby at home and am excited about having the camera! Any big differences from the Curve to the Bold? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-'s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I'm using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it'll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It's the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set keep appointments for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OoO to the Internet...
I'm sure you have, but I the ESM have you checked -Global Settings- Interweb Message Formats-Right click, if default, default-properties-Advanced Tab. Make sure Allow OoO responses is checked. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OoO to the Internet... All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
It's not an ALERT (per sé) but it does let your folks know something came into the PF. Pretty easy to implement without a lot of hastle. Nikki From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Right click on the public folder Select Properties Select the ADMINISTRATION tab Click FOLDER ASSISTANT... ADD RULE... Then just Forward them to the group (in whatever format works best) Nikki From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Blackberry Curve
I just got my hands on a Bold at the ATT booth at TechEd, very nice display, just not avail till Aug or Sept. From: Sam Cayze To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wed Jun 11 13:45:02 2008 Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve 3G is kinda a blanket term... HSDPA is what the Bold will use, although capable of 14Mb/s, it's not anywhere around that yet. The new iPhone is HSDPA too, and people average around 700Kb/s. I do hear over and over again though, that ATT does have the fastest mobile data network. From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Probably closer to 7.2Mb. Anything is better than the EDGE speeds 300kb that I’m subjected to currently. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve 3G … NICE! I think that will give you like 14MB downloads? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:50 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve The biggest differences? 3G support, higher screen resolution, 1GB internal memory, OS 4.6 to name a few. It’s a bit larger than the Curve’s footprint. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I know, I would have liked to wait for the Bold… but an opportunity came up for me to get the curve… so I jumped on it. I have a new baby at home and am excited about having the camera! Any big differences from the Curve to the Bold? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve I have a 8100, 8300, and a 8820 on my desk. The Curve is by far my favorite. No +/-‘s really, they are the all the same internals, I just prefer the Curve form factor. Though, my 8100 is running OS 4.5, so I’m using it for most of my web browsing at the moment. ;) When the Bold/9000 hits next month, it’ll replace the Curve as my favorite. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve Great! Thank you for confirming this. Do you have a Curve? If so, how do you like it? Any +/-? From: Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Blackberry Curve You heard wrong. It’s the same as your current 8830. From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Blackberry Curve I am replacing my 8830 w/ a 8300 (Curve). Mainly for the smaller size, and the camera. Now I am being told that with the curve can only go back 30 days on your calendar? I know with my current 8830, I can set “keep appointments” for 15, 30, 60, 90, or forever. Is this not the same for the curve? ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: OoO to the Internet...
Nope. I had no idea that was there. I have checked that. Will I need to restart the SMTP connector? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure you have, but I the ESM have you checked -Global Settings- Interweb Message Formats-Right click, if default, default-properties-Advanced Tab. Make sure Allow OoO responses is checked. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OoO to the Internet... All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
Yes, but you're still forwarding (or copying) the message. You almost might as well have sent it to the distribution list to begin with. It would be nice if rules contained a way to send a notification. From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes It's not an ALERT (per sé) but it does let your folks know something came into the PF. Pretty easy to implement without a lot of hastle. Nikki From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Right click on the public folder Select Properties Select the ADMINISTRATION tab Click FOLDER ASSISTANT... ADD RULE... Then just Forward them to the group (in whatever format works best) Nikki From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: OoO to the Internet...
You do not need to restart the SMTP connector. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OoO to the Internet... Nope. I had no idea that was there. I have checked that. Will I need to restart the SMTP connector? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure you have, but I the ESM have you checked -Global Settings- Interweb Message Formats-Right click, if default, default-properties-Advanced Tab. Make sure Allow OoO responses is checked. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OoO to the Internet... All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: ex2k3 for dummies
Here is where it get's confusing. The following occurs from a command prompt on the City B Exch 2k3 server... TELNET mail.mycompany.com 220 cordoba.mycompany.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:05:49 -0600 helo 250 cordoba.mycompany.local Hello [12.23.178.130] mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK rcpt to:kavalec 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] data 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF the quick red fox . 250 2.6.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Queued mail for delivery And - of course - I get the email in City A The above works manually, so what - in City B's Ex2k3 server (on the above machine) - is causing the 4.4.7 ? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:20 AM, G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do halff-suspect it's a DNS issue (all one domain and all) but I'm not sure of how to go from here. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:40 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look at the link I included.. the 4.4.7 is coming from the receiving server at the destination domain, because it's having problems looking up the MX record.. (I think). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Each server has it's own SMTP connector. Part of the idea is redundancy, if City A is under a hurricane, B keeps on ticking. MyCompany.com DNS points to A, MyCompany.net DNS points to B On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:56 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? -- Gregory Waleed Kavalec - Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. Dwight D. Eisenhower ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: OoO to the Internet...
Cool. Testing now. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You do not need to restart the SMTP connector. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OoO to the Internet... Nope. I had no idea that was there. I have checked that. Will I need to restart the SMTP connector? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure you have, but I the ESM have you checked -Global Settings- Interweb Message Formats-Right click, if default, default-properties-Advanced Tab. Make sure Allow OoO responses is checked. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OoO to the Internet... All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
Yeah, but you are not having to mess with permissions and setup for mailbox for multiple folks using one mailbox. If you have one guy leave, and another take their place, just make them a member of the DL, then they just go to the PF and administer it, no special setup or training involved. Just much easier for all. Nikki From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Yes, but you're still forwarding (or copying) the message. You almost might as well have sent it to the distribution list to begin with. It would be nice if rules contained a way to send a notification. From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes It's not an ALERT (per sé) but it does let your folks know something came into the PF. Pretty easy to implement without a lot of hastle. Nikki From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Right click on the public folder Select Properties Select the ADMINISTRATION tab Click FOLDER ASSISTANT... ADD RULE... Then just Forward them to the group (in whatever format works best) Nikki From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
If it's important... buy it. http://www.artfulbits.com/Products/PublicFolderWatcher.aspx http://www.mapinotify.com/ Disclaimers: Haven't used, haven't bought. Easily found w/Google. May be possible to script a similar solution. Carl From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Yes, but you're still forwarding (or copying) the message. You almost might as well have sent it to the distribution list to begin with. It would be nice if rules contained a way to send a notification. _ From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Its not an ALERT (per sé) but it does let your folks know something came into the PF. Pretty easy to implement without a lot of hastle. Nikki From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Right click on the public folder Select Properties Select the ADMINISTRATION tab Click FOLDER ASSISTANT ADD RULE Then just Forward them to the group (in whatever format works best) Nikki From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Thats pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other Users Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group thats monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. _ From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: ex2k3 for dummies
Maybe it's me, but the entire setup seems a bit confusing. Are these servers part of the same Exchange org? Why are you using two different TLD's? .net and .com for redundancy opposed to using MX records and cost. Where are you getting the 4.4.7 when you send inbound from the internet? Or between servers? If between servers are you delivering the mail via the internet or the internal MPLS connection? From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Here is where it get's confusing. The following occurs from a command prompt on the City B Exch 2k3 server... TELNET mail.mycompany.com 220 cordoba.mycompany.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:05:49 -0600 helo 250 cordoba.mycompany.local Hello [12.23.178.130] mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK rcpt to:kavalec 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] data 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF the quick red fox . 250 2.6.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Queued mail for delivery And - of course - I get the email in City A The above works manually, so what - in City B's Ex2k3 server (on the above machine) - is causing the 4.4.7 ? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:20 AM, G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do halff-suspect it's a DNS issue (all one domain and all) but I'm not sure of how to go from here. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:40 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look at the link I included.. the 4.4.7 is coming from the receiving server at the destination domain, because it's having problems looking up the MX record.. (I think). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Each server has it's own SMTP connector. Part of the idea is redundancy, if City A is under a hurricane, B keeps on ticking. MyCompany.com DNS points to A, MyCompany.net DNS points to B On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:56 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? -- Gregory Waleed Kavalec - Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. Dwight D. Eisenhower ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Group Mailboxes
From the first link - Why do my company need it LOL! From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 1:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes If it's important... buy it. http://www.artfulbits.com/Products/PublicFolderWatcher.aspx http://www.mapinotify.com/ Disclaimers: Haven't used, haven't bought. Easily found w/Google. May be possible to script a similar solution. Carl From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Yes, but you're still forwarding (or copying) the message. You almost might as well have sent it to the distribution list to begin with. It would be nice if rules contained a way to send a notification. From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes It's not an ALERT (per sé) but it does let your folks know something came into the PF. Pretty easy to implement without a lot of hastle. Nikki From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Right click on the public folder Select Properties Select the ADMINISTRATION tab Click FOLDER ASSISTANT... ADD RULE... Then just Forward them to the group (in whatever format works best) Nikki From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: OoO to the Internet...
Well, I did anyway, 'cause it isn't working. Does this setting replicate to the other sites, and if so, how long does that take? Kurt On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You do not need to restart the SMTP connector. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OoO to the Internet... Nope. I had no idea that was there. I have checked that. Will I need to restart the SMTP connector? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure you have, but I the ESM have you checked -Global Settings- Interweb Message Formats-Right click, if default, default-properties-Advanced Tab. Make sure Allow OoO responses is checked. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OoO to the Internet... All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: ex2k3 for dummies
Two servers, same AD domain, different TLD's to the net. The 4.4.7 happens ONLY on messages going from server to server. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's me, but the entire setup seems a bit confusing. Are these servers part of the same Exchange org? Why are you using two different TLD's? .net and .com for redundancy opposed to using MX records and cost. Where are you getting the 4.4.7 when you send inbound from the internet? Or between servers? If between servers are you delivering the mail via the internet or the internal MPLS connection? *From:* G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:19 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: ex2k3 for dummies Here is where it get's confusing. The following occurs from a command prompt on the City B Exch 2k3 server... TELNET mail.mycompany.com 220 cordoba.mycompany.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:05:49 -0600 helo 250 cordoba.mycompany.local Hello [12.23.178.130] mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK rcpt to:kavalec 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] data 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF the quick red fox . 250 2.6.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Queued mail for delivery And - of course - I get the email in City A The above works manually, so what - in City B's Ex2k3 server (on the above machine) - is causing the 4.4.7 ? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:20 AM, G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do halff-suspect it's a DNS issue (all one domain and all) but I'm not sure of how to go from here. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:40 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look at the link I included.. the 4.4.7 is coming from the receiving server at the destination domain, because it's having problems looking up the MX record.. (I think). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Each server has it's own SMTP connector. Part of the idea is redundancy, if City A is under a hurricane, B keeps on ticking. MyCompany.com DNS points to A, MyCompany.net DNS points to B On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:56 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? -- Gregory Waleed Kavalec - Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. Dwight D. Eisenhower -- Gregory Waleed Kavalec - Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. Dwight D. Eisenhower ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Group Mailboxes
We have a large number of resource mailboxes. Each resource mailbox gets a security group with the same name and MCL_ tacked in front. The mcl_mailbox group gets the permissions needed on the mailbox. Each resource mailbox gets two owners in the notes section and once a year we contact the owners to validate the mailbox is still needed and they are the correct business contact to manage the resource. They also get a list of currently authorized members and can true it up. Individuals are never given rights to the mailbox directly, it's all through dedicated security groups. Steven Peck http://www.blkmtn.org On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Nikki Peterson - OETX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, but you are not having to mess with permissions and setup for mailbox for multiple folks using one mailbox. If you have one guy leave, and another take their place, just make them a member of the DL, then they just go to the PF and administer it, no special setup or training involved. Just much easier for all. Nikki From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Yes, but you're still forwarding (or copying) the message. You almost might as well have sent it to the distribution list to begin with. It would be nice if rules contained a way to send a notification. From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes It's not an ALERT (per sé) but it does let your folks know something came into the PF. Pretty easy to implement without a lot of hastle. Nikki From: Nikki Peterson - OETX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes Right click on the public folder Select Properties Select the ADMINISTRATION tab Click FOLDER ASSISTANT… ADD RULE… Then just Forward them to the group (in whatever format works best) Nikki From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Group Mailboxes How would I setup such a rule using Exchange 2003? I don't see the option to notify a group in the folder assistant. James - Original Message - From: Nikki Peterson - OETX To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:21 AM Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes I would use an email-enabled public folder with an administrative rule that alerts the group to incoming. Nikki From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Group Mailboxes That's pretty much the way we handle that kind of situation. You can either add the mailbox to their profile so it stays open all the time, or they can use Open Other User's Folder to do it on an ad-hoc basis. We have seen issues if you start getting too many people having the same mailbox open concurrently. Depending on circumstances, you can also set a server-side rule that will send a notification email to the group that's monitor that mailbox when new mail arrives. From: James Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Group Mailboxes We need to have an email address that patients can send an email to, that will be checked by certain staff on a rotating schedule. I was wondering what the best way to do this was. I was thinking about creating a user account with a mailbox and giving certain users permission to access it and have it opened with their Outlook all the time and they can monitor the mailbox when it their turn to do so. I would like to hear how some of you would do this. One things as well, I believe the staff are all members of the same AD security group, if that helps me in any way. James ** Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. ** ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja
RE: OoO to the Internet...
I just tested in my dev environment and simply flipping the setting works. This kb also mentions that no restart of any Exchange services are required. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/266166 However, it does mention bouncing Outlook, have you tried that? Are you trying for your AUS site or your US site? Try testing from a 2003 only site. Also, what does message tracking show you? -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OoO to the Internet... Well, I did anyway, 'cause it isn't working. Does this setting replicate to the other sites, and if so, how long does that take? Kurt On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You do not need to restart the SMTP connector. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OoO to the Internet... Nope. I had no idea that was there. I have checked that. Will I need to restart the SMTP connector? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure you have, but I the ESM have you checked -Global Settings- Interweb Message Formats-Right click, if default, default-properties-Advanced Tab. Make sure Allow OoO responses is checked. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OoO to the Internet... All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: ex2k3 for dummies
How are you routing between sites? Over the internet or over the MPLS? If over the MLPS, how is that configured? Anything filtering in between the servers? When you performed that telnet session, what IP were you connecting to? The internal or external IP? Did that test message you performed earlier end up in the mailbox? A 4.4.7 generally means there is a problem with the recipient's address. From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Two servers, same AD domain, different TLD's to the net. The 4.4.7 happens ONLY on messages going from server to server. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe it's me, but the entire setup seems a bit confusing. Are these servers part of the same Exchange org? Why are you using two different TLD's? .net and .com for redundancy opposed to using MX records and cost. Where are you getting the 4.4.7 when you send inbound from the internet? Or between servers? If between servers are you delivering the mail via the internet or the internal MPLS connection? From: G.Waleed Kavalec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Here is where it get's confusing. The following occurs from a command prompt on the City B Exch 2k3 server... TELNET mail.mycompany.com 220 cordoba.mycompany.local Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 6.0.3790.3959 ready at Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:05:49 -0600 helo 250 cordoba.mycompany.local Hello [12.23.178.130] mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 2.1.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK rcpt to:kavalec 250 2.1.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] data 354 Start mail input; end with CRLF.CRLF the quick red fox . 250 2.6.0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Queued mail for delivery And - of course - I get the email in City A The above works manually, so what - in City B's Ex2k3 server (on the above machine) - is causing the 4.4.7 ? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:20 AM, G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do halff-suspect it's a DNS issue (all one domain and all) but I'm not sure of how to go from here. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:40 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have a look at the link I included.. the 4.4.7 is coming from the receiving server at the destination domain, because it's having problems looking up the MX record.. (I think). Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 3:34:34 PM Subject: Re: ex2k3 for dummies Each server has it's own SMTP connector. Part of the idea is redundancy, if City A is under a hurricane, B keeps on ticking. MyCompany.com DNS points to A, MyCompany.net DNS points to B On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:56 AM, ROBERT WILCOX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have one SMTP connector setup, and it sits on the server in CityB? Does it have both servers listed as bridgeheads? Try having just CityB listed. This means that when ServerA sends a mail it will travel to ServerB, and ServerB will send it on. Info on 4.4.7 - http://www.123together.com/Support/error_447_non_delivery_message.htm Thanks Rob - Original Message From: G.Waleed Kavalec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 2:44:27 PM Subject: ex2k3 for dummies I have a Ex2k3 server in city A and city B, connected by MPLS (VPN). They see each other just fine, I can move mailboxes, etc. City B can send to the internet just fine, but an email to a City A mailbox gets a 4.4.7. Where do I start? -- Gregory Waleed Kavalec - Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. Dwight D. Eisenhower -- Gregory Waleed Kavalec - Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, represents, in the final analysis, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. Dwight D. Eisenhower ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: email archiving
Anyone use Mimosa Systems for archiving? We are looking at this product. It doesn;t use journaling rather log shipping similar to Exchange 2007. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Solved, I think... Re: OoO to the Internet...
I have a test account for each of the UK and AU servers, and used OWA to turn OoO off and on. I then tested internally, to make sure that an internal account sending them email generates an OoO. Testing from an external account yields bupkiss, but I figured that it required time for replication. I have tested just now - about after about three hours after making the change - and IT WORKS! Thanks for the tip, John. You've solved one of my nagging problems. Kurt On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just tested in my dev environment and simply flipping the setting works. This kb also mentions that no restart of any Exchange services are required. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/266166 However, it does mention bouncing Outlook, have you tried that? Are you trying for your AUS site or your US site? Try testing from a 2003 only site. Also, what does message tracking show you? -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:51 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OoO to the Internet... Well, I did anyway, 'cause it isn't working. Does this setting replicate to the other sites, and if so, how long does that take? Kurt On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You do not need to restart the SMTP connector. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 11:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OoO to the Internet... Nope. I had no idea that was there. I have checked that. Will I need to restart the SMTP connector? On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure you have, but I the ESM have you checked -Global Settings- Interweb Message Formats-Right click, if default, default-properties-Advanced Tab. Make sure Allow OoO responses is checked. -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OoO to the Internet... All, I've recently migrated our AU office from Ex5.5 to E2k3, though I haven't shut down the 5.5 server yet. There's been a longstanding problem with OoO replies not going to the Internet, and I was hoping that the move to the new server would resolve that. I've checked the SMTP connector on the 5.5 box many times to ensure that the 'Disable Out Of Office responses to the Internet' tick box is not checked. The 'Disable Automatic Replies to the Internet' tick box is checked, however. All SMTP mail from their site is routed through our site, and I'm now finding that no OoO replies are going from here, either, nor from our UK office. I did apply a regentry some time ago to our site's Exchange server that was supposed to suppress OoO to the Internet for DLs - http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=825370 - but that isn't supposed to have this kind of effect. I'm stumped on where to start troubleshooting this. Anyone have some thoughts on this? Kurt ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Public folder error
Is there any reason why i could send as a mail enabled public folder when I am not in cached mode? I created a new profile and tested this, and lo and behold, it went through. Changed back to the original profile and it errored out again. Not sure what causes this, but at least I know a solution On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like all permissions are set properly in both places. She hasn't been added/edited/deleted from any groups. I've tried creating a different public folder and mail enabling it and adding myself as a send as delegate, same error... The only change I've made lately is adding a BES server in the last few weeks. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Nikki Peterson - OETX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would look to see if you have Explicitly denied her the CREATE either by group membership or something similar. Then I would make sure that she really has SEND AS permissions by checking on the properties, permissions tab, Directory rights (using ESM). The other place to check is on the properties of the PF, Administration tab. Make sure that the This folder is available to: is set to All users with access permission and not Owners only. Sometimes you just need to wait for replication. Nikki *From:* Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:02 AM *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues *Subject:* Public folder error You do not have perm to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator I've mail enabled a public folder on E2K3...the user cannot send as (when replying to requests) the public folder address. She has delegate permissions, send as, etc...she as author rights to the public folder. I've googled all day trying to find the answer. Any ideas? Thanks Steve ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Exchange VPN DNS issue
I am sure I am missing something simple here, but I have looked at everything I can think of and have not found the solution. Here is the setup: At my house, I have commercial Internet service with static IPs. I have a Cisco 2811 with AIM VPN module, with a VPN to the Cisco Concentrator at my office. I have an AD setup with SBS2K3 on a separate domain. In order to be able to access my work network I have added a forwarder for that domain in my SBS DNS. Everything works great. Except for one thing: I cannot send email from my personal domain to my work domain. If I remove the forwarder, I can send email to that domain fine. I can telnet from my home to the work Exchange and drop an email that way. I can ping work Exchange machine. I have tried adding a host record on my SBS to send the email to the Internet rather than the VPN, but that does not seem to fix the issue. I tried to add a static record on the SBS DNS to the work Exchange. Did not help. The error is Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. #4.4.7 Do I need to setup another connector and point it to a relay within the work network? Any Ideas? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Problem viewing attachment in OWA
Hi, the line that makes me believe it to be a SAP problem is : X-Mailer: SAP Web Application Server 6.20 But we don´t have control over the SAP people. And as outlook express can see the attachment, they say it´s our problem. ( Even if is just their messages that doesn´t work ). Thanks for the input. - Original Message - From: Bingham, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:49 AM Subject: RE: Problem viewing attachment in OWA I don't know if this will be your issue or not, but... Depending on the version of SAP, we found that some things just did not come out well being transmitted out by SMTP; that was why there was an SAP-Exchange connector. The connector was written by SAP and had versions for Exchange 5.5 and 2000 only. Newer versions of SAP haven't had the issue and the SMTP connector works OK for all data types we've tried. -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problem viewing attachment in OWA Hello, In one customer, the emails received from one of their customers, with attachments, show the little attachment clip when viewing the messages in OWA, but don´t show the attachment itself. This happens when their customers send the email/attachment through their system ( which I suppose to be some SAP software, by the looks of the mail headers, below ) . If the person creates the pdf invoice, and them email it normally, the attachment appears just fine when viewing email in OWA. Now, if one downloads this message in Outlook express, the attachment can be accessed. If this person them forwards the message back to the account in the server, and look at it through OWA, the attachment can be accessed normally. And then the headers format seems more normal, that is, the Content-Type, Content-Transfer, etc, they look like this ( took from other message with attachments): Is there a way to make exchange understand their wrong-formatted message, so that the attachment can be accessed normally? Or, if there is no other way, to script something that when some message comes from that specific person, it is auto-forwarded to the same intended recipient if that will fix its headers ? I tried to include the mail headers, but the Lyris manager think it is an attachment and block the message. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you have received this message in error, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. Thank you. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
Re: Problem viewing attachment in OWA
Hi Troy, No, it is Exchange 2003. The problem isn´t with the attachments being opened or not. They are PDF files. In the affected messages, the little clip indicating an attachment appears, but there is no attachment to be seen in the message. If the message is sent through normal ways , the clip appears and the attachment name appears also in the outlook window. If someone downloads the messages using outlook express, the attachment appear. If they then forward it back to the exchange server, the attachment appears also. Looking at the message source code, I can see that before the forwarding, the MIME headers are different, without blank lines, and missing some normal fields. After the forwarding, they look normal to me, headers with content-type and etc in their right places. if nothing can be done, would it be possible to create a rule to auto-forward the message to the same user that received it? And how could this be made not to create a mail loop ? Thanks. Silvio. - Original Message - From: Troy Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:23 PM Subject: RE: Problem viewing attachment in OWA Silvio are you using 2007? There are some advanced attachment settings for OWA that can effectively make some attachments un-openable based on the computer type chosen (public or private computer). In our org if you don't specify you are on a private computer, attachments will open but cant be downloaded, I believe the default is that on public computers attachments don't show at all. -troy -Original Message- From: Silvio L. Nisgoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 3:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problem viewing attachment in OWA Hello, In one customer, the emails received from one of their customers, with attachments, show the little attachment clip when viewing the messages in OWA, but don´t show the attachment itself. This happens when their customers send the email/attachment through their system ( which I suppose to be some SAP software, by the looks of the mail headers, below ) . If the person creates the pdf invoice, and them email it normally, the attachment appears just fine when viewing email in OWA. Now, if one downloads this message in Outlook express, the attachment can be accessed. If this person them forwards the message back to the account in the server, and look at it through OWA, the attachment can be accessed normally. And then the headers format seems more normal, that is, the Content-Type, Content-Transfer, etc, they look like this ( took from other message with attachments): Is there a way to make exchange understand their wrong-formatted message, so that the attachment can be accessed normally? Or, if there is no other way, to script something that when some message comes from that specific person, it is auto-forwarded to the same intended recipient if that will fix its headers ? I tried to include the mail headers, but the Lyris manager think it is an attachment and block the message. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange VPN DNS issue
Is the Outlook profile you are using set for your work account as the main or only account? When I have used VPN access from home, I use that profile with no problem or interference from my SBS server, but, then, again, I am not using some fancy schmantzy Cisco VPN, but the plain ole MS VPN. I have now got my laptop only set up to use RPC, which, after some initial problems getting connected, and a rebuild of the laptop to remove a long lingering problem that affected exploerer.exe in certain situations, it works just fine. The laptop was the one on which I used the VPN on the most. I also pop mail down onto my main desktop, and I had to set Exchange to allow me to relay from here. The only pain in the butt is that anything I send through the work server, I need to choose the work account to send it with. I used to be able to just send replies without having to set the account, and never had to set anything when sending to another user on the work Exchange. If I do not set it, I get an NDR that the message is undeliverable. However, it is different than what you get, You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. If you are sending through your Exchange server, have you checked message tracking to see what may be happening? \\Steve// From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange VPN DNS issue I am sure I am missing something simple here, but I have looked at everything I can think of and have not found the solution. Here is the setup: At my house, I have commercial Internet service with static IPs. I have a Cisco 2811 with AIM VPN module, with a VPN to the Cisco Concentrator at my office. I have an AD setup with SBS2K3 on a separate domain. In order to be able to access my work network I have added a forwarder for that domain in my SBS DNS. Everything works great. Except for one thing: I cannot send email from my personal domain to my work domain. If I remove the forwarder, I can send email to that domain fine. I can telnet from my home to the work Exchange and drop an email that way. I can ping work Exchange machine. I have tried adding a host record on my SBS to send the email to the Internet rather than the VPN, but that does not seem to fix the issue. I tried to add a static record on the SBS DNS to the work Exchange. Did not help. The error is Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. #4.4.7 Do I need to setup another connector and point it to a relay within the work network? Any Ideas? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Exchange VPN DNS issue
I have no idea why this posted again. This was something I sent out last week. It is resolved. (I setup another DNS server) Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Steve Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 9:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange VPN DNS issue Is the Outlook profile you are using set for your work account as the main or only account? When I have used VPN access from home, I use that profile with no problem or interference from my SBS server, but, then, again, I am not using some fancy schmantzy Cisco VPN, but the plain ole MS VPN. I have now got my laptop only set up to use RPC, which, after some initial problems getting connected, and a rebuild of the laptop to remove a long lingering problem that affected exploerer.exe in certain situations, it works just fine. The laptop was the one on which I used the VPN on the most. I also pop mail down onto my main desktop, and I had to set Exchange to allow me to relay from here. The only pain in the butt is that anything I send through the work server, I need to choose the work account to send it with. I used to be able to just send replies without having to set the account, and never had to set anything when sending to another user on the work Exchange. If I do not set it, I get an NDR that the message is undeliverable. However, it is different than what you get, You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. If you are sending through your Exchange server, have you checked message tracking to see what may be happening? \\Steve// From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 10:11 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange VPN DNS issue I am sure I am missing something simple here, but I have looked at everything I can think of and have not found the solution. Here is the setup: At my house, I have commercial Internet service with static IPs. I have a Cisco 2811 with AIM VPN module, with a VPN to the Cisco Concentrator at my office. I have an AD setup with SBS2K3 on a separate domain. In order to be able to access my work network I have added a forwarder for that domain in my SBS DNS. Everything works great. Except for one thing: I cannot send email from my personal domain to my work domain. If I remove the forwarder, I can send email to that domain fine. I can telnet from my home to the work Exchange and drop an email that way. I can ping work Exchange machine. I have tried adding a host record on my SBS to send the email to the Internet rather than the VPN, but that does not seem to fix the issue. I tried to add a static record on the SBS DNS to the work Exchange. Did not help. The error is Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. #4.4.7 Do I need to setup another connector and point it to a relay within the work network? Any Ideas? Bob Fronk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
SBS/Exchange
Hi all, I have a user getting this, and I can't seem to track down what's going wrong. Logs show nothing, and message tracker simply shows there was a NDR generated. Any help would be appreciated. _ From: System Administrator Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 2:08 PM To: EMAILADDRESS mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Undeliverable: pls call me regarding the Space at Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:pls call me regarding the Space at Sent: 6/11/2008 2:08 PM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: EMAILADDRESS on 6/11/2008 2:08 PM You do not have permission to send to this recipient. For assistance, contact your system administrator. MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:/DC=local/DC=domainname:SBS Dave Disclaimer and confidentiality note: The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records can be corrected. Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies. Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or interference. ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
RE: Error when moving mailboxes (UNCLASSIFIED)
Yes, there are errors in the event log. Source MSEXCHANGEADMIN EVENT ID: 9170 and Event ID: 1008 Source: MSEXCHANGEADMIN John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems Forward Operating Base Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823 Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832 In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American... There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag.. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people. Teddy Roosevelt; 1907 -Original Message- From: Steve Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:02 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Error when moving mailboxes (UNCLASSIFIED) Any indication of the error in the Event Logs? \\Steve// From: Matteson, John H Jr USA Mr USA 25th SigBN (ITT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:53 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Error when moving mailboxes (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Good day to everyone: I am currently in the process of moving mailboxes from one MDB on an Exchange 2003 server to another in an attempt to recover about 50% whitespace. When running the EXCHANGE TASK of MOVE MAILBOX I will sometimes receive an error on a mailbox. The detailed report records an error of 0x80072020. I've Googled the error and it seems to be related to accessing Active Directory. Does anyone on the list have an idea of how to fix this? Thanks. John H. Matteson, Jr. Systems Administrator/ITT Systems Forward Operating Base Orgun-E Afghanistan DSN - 318 431 8001 VoSIP - (308) 431 - Iridium SatPhone - 717.633.3823 Roshain Mobile - 079 - 736 - 3832 In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American... There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag.. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people. Teddy Roosevelt; 1907 Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
