RE: OWA

[Tim Evans]

We have gone thru a similar decision making process here. Currently, I have 
disabled access to all attachments in OWA. There is a setting in IE under 
advance options "Do not save encrypted pages to disk" that leave nothing in the 
local temporary files cache (assuming you are using SSL to access OWA). 
Unfortunately, it is not enabled by default. I'd like to find a way to enable 
it the login form, but making that change  is beyond my abilities.

...Tim

From: Fogarty, Richard R CTR USA USASOC [mailto:rick.foga...@us.army.mil]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA

We're currently running a hefty E2k3 environment.

Currently, our customers only have access to their e-mail (when outside our 
infrastructure) by using the existing terminal server - which can only be 
accessed through the VPN.  I'm proposing (through an impact assessment) that we 
view the possibilities of providing access without using the following methods.

I've come up with two possibilities:

1.)OWA

2.)RPC over HTTP

For quite some time, OWA has not been authorized.  It appears that there are 
some valid points - and some control issues that have taken it off the table.  
Since our customers have the ability to work with some sensitive documents, OWA 
has always been discounted due to the possibility of a customer opening up a 
sensitive document on a public computer.  I'm not aware of any way to delete 
all of the cache after the docs have been downloaded on said public computer.  
In fact, it doesn't even have to be public, it could be the customers home 
computer as well.  In either case, there are valid concerns.

Apparently, our infrastructure guys (for some reason) believe pulling OWA into 
the mix would create a huge task to redesign our infrastructure.  So, to 
accommodate them, I recommended using RPC over HTTP when using the VPN.  This 
way, anyone that has a travel approved laptop, still has the ability to pull 
down their mail - to their system, and not be bothered with the TS.  So, 
essentially, connect to the VPN - get your mail, disconnect - work, reconnect 
and send all your mail.  A bit of a pain, but a compromise nonetheless.

While attempting the Impact Assessment, it was brought up that many other 
"similar" units that have similar customers provide OWA as a service.  During 
the review processes of this IA, my boss asked, ok, if OWA isn't recommended 
here due to security concerns - how can XXX unit get by with it?

I can't speak about the other security personnel, but I do have some concerns 
about the "left over" garbage once a user is done on a computer.  Is OWA still 
considered a security risk?  How do others ensure documents read on a public 
computer are not left over for others to view?

Comments?

Thanks
Rick






~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Filtering Spam

[Tim Evans]

+1

Assp is great, even if the main developer is a bit of an ass.


...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:23 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Filtering Spam
> 
> There's lots of good options, you could install Perl on the exchange
> server
> and proxy smtp with assp, or setup a Linux based MTA and install assp on
> it
> or something like postfix/sqlgrey/spamassassin/clamav/amavisd-new that
> of
> which there are lots of how to's.
> 
> By far the easiest is assp and it does work well.
> 
> jlc
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Hood [mailto:dsmh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Filtering Spam
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I'm looking for a good open-source/free product that we can use in
> conjuction with our exchange server to filter out spam. We did have
> mailwasher but due to the opensource version being crap and the
> enterprise version costing as much as putting an entire detriot high
> school through college, I'm looking for another free/open-source spam
> product that actually works.
> 
> Ideas?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Filtering Spam

[Tim Evans]

Anything that has lots of configurable options is going to take time to learn 
how to use, free or not.


���Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:09 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Filtering Spam
> 
> All this assumes of course that your time is free.
> 
> -
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: Joseph L. Casale 
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
> Sent: Tue Mar 10 21:22:51 2009
> Subject: RE: Filtering Spam
> 
> There's lots of good options, you could install Perl on the exchange
> server
> and proxy smtp with assp, or setup a Linux based MTA and install assp on
> it
> or something like postfix/sqlgrey/spamassassin/clamav/amavisd-new that
> of
> which there are lots of how to's.
> 
> By far the easiest is assp and it does work well.
> 
> jlc
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Hood [mailto:dsmh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Filtering Spam
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I'm looking for a good open-source/free product that we can use in
> conjuction with our exchange server to filter out spam. We did have
> mailwasher but due to the opensource version being crap and the
> enterprise version costing as much as putting an entire detriot high
> school through college, I'm looking for another free/open-source spam
> product that actually works.
> 
> Ideas?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> 
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Filtering Spam

[Tim Evans]

And assp will run on Windows too. :-)

> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:31 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Filtering Spam
> 
> Untangle is a Linux box .
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Hood [mailto:dsmh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:58 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Filtering Spam
> 
> Whoa seems like Ive got quite a few replies. I think I'll look into
> Untangled and Ninja, as they seem to be the general vibe of everyone.
> If either of those don't wont, im going to have to bite the bullet and
> put a linux box in and set up mail scanner and such. I may be the
> linux activist at the office here, but the extra work is just a pain
> in the ass.
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Hood [mailto:dsmh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:12 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Filtering Spam
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I'm looking for a good open-source/free product that we can use in
> conjuction with our exchange server to filter out spam. We did have
> mailwasher but due to the opensource version being crap and the
> enterprise version costing as much as putting an entire detriot high
> school through college, I'm looking for another free/open-source spam
> product that actually works.
> 
> Ideas?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OOF for Outlook Anywhere user

[Tim Evans]

We just ran across that here (outlook 2007 SP2/Exchange 2007 SP1) too, and that 
is what I told the user to do.

Is setting OOF not supported with Outlook Anywhere or do I have something 
misconfigured?


...Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 1:46 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OOF for Outlook Anywhere user
> 
> use OWA for setting OOF.
> 
> 
> From: Steve Hart [sh...@wrightbg.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:24 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: OOF for Outlook Anywhere user
> 
> I have a single user that uses Outlook remotely using Outlook Anywhere.
> Everything seems to be OK, except for Out of Office. When he attempts to
> use it, he gets a message saying that the server is unavailable. We're
> on Exchange07 SP1. I'm not sure which version of Office he has.
> 
> Ideas?
> 
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: CompuServe is gone...

[Tim Evans]

The is the one I think of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson_(writer)
(aka the Beerhunter)
Unfortunately, he's dead too


...Tim

From: Randal, Phil [mailto:pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CompuServe is gone...

Whenever I hear the name "Michael Jackson" I think of this guy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_Structured_Programming

Cheers,

Phil
--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T. Services 
Division
Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT
Tel: 01432 260160
email: pran...@herefordshire.gov.uk

Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of the 
individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council.

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the addressee. This communication may contain material protected by law 
from being passed on. If you are not the intended recipient and have received 
this e-mail in error, you are advised that any use, dissemination, forwarding, 
printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received 
this e-mail in error please contact the sender immediately and destroy all 
copies of it.



From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 08 July 2009 14:17
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: CompuServe is gone...
I am sick of hearing about Michael Jackson, to the extent that I had to have a 
quick rant on my blog about it. My wife is a big fan and her "he can do no 
wrong" approach is starting to boil my bag

http://raythestray.blogspot.com/2009/07/brief-note-about-michael-bloody-jackson.html

Sorry for the OT!
2009/7/8 Sherry Abercrombie mailto:saber...@gmail.com>>
Odd that a lot of newsworthy things haven't gotten the same press coverage in 
the last two weeks as Michael Jackson's death has.or is it.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Maglinger, Paul 
mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com>> wrote:
Odd that it didn't get the same press coverage as Michael Jackson's funeral...


From: Michael Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:28 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: CompuServe is gone...

Its still alive as my brother uses it all the time. I guess it's now just a 
single server in a corner of an AOL data center.



Mike

From: Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: 08 July 2009 13:00
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: CompuServe is gone...



http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/07/compuserve_shut_down_by_aol/



Alas, poor Yorick, I knew him well... (sic)



I suspect more than a few of us "old-timers" got our start on CompuServe or The 
Well...



Regards,



Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael

Monitoring Exchange w/OpsMgr now available http://snurl.com/45ppf


--
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke



--
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the 
machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly 
to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question."

http://raythestray.blogspot.com

RE: Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

FYI, if you migrate to the new cert, it won't be much different that using a 
self signed cert for the WM5 & 6 devices. If the root cert isn't installed in 
the firmware, you'll need to reinstall it after every time you wipe the device.

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:55 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> 
> So, after enjoying my weekend, I came into work this morning and
> contacted Verisign support. Apparently, Microsoft has confirmed that
> they forgot to include a Trusted Root cert with their Windows Mobile 5
> and Windows Mobile 6 OSes.  Due to this, Verisign is giving me a free
> upgrade to their SSL Pro cert, which still uses the old root cert.  They
> also sent me the missing root cert, so over the next 12 months, I can
> install this root cert to all my WM devices.
> 
> Oh Yay!
> 
> Joe Heaton
> Employment Training Panel
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:10 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> 
> See if you can download a root cert from verisign and reapply it.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> Sent: 24 July 2009 15:59
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> 
> I looked at the root certs on the phone, and there are some that have
> expired, but none that expired yesterday, which is when Activesync
> stopped working.
> 
> **
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the system manager.
> 
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> 
> www.clearswift.com
> **
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

RE: Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

The upgraded cert shouldn't be a problem if the root cert is already on the 
device. It sounded like you were going to install the missing root cert on all 
your devices. I was just pointing out that I didn't see much of a reason to 
install the missing root cert on those devices because you'll have to reinstall 
it every time you wipe a device.

I can see now that what I typed didn't say that, so I'll just chalk it up to a 
Monday morning and crawl back in my hole.


...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:36 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> 
> Well, Verisign is saying that the upgraded cert uses the same root cert
> as the cert we just renewed, so it should work with no issues.  But I'll
> let you guys know if that's not the case. :)
> 
> Joe Heaton
> Employment Training Panel
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:15 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> 
> FYI, if you migrate to the new cert, it won't be much different that
> using a self signed cert for the WM5 & 6 devices. If the root cert isn't
> installed in the firmware, you'll need to reinstall it after every time
> you wipe the device.
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:55 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> >
> > So, after enjoying my weekend, I came into work this morning and
> > contacted Verisign support. Apparently, Microsoft has confirmed that
> > they forgot to include a Trusted Root cert with their Windows Mobile 5
> > and Windows Mobile 6 OSes.  Due to this, Verisign is giving me a free
> > upgrade to their SSL Pro cert, which still uses the old root cert.
> They
> > also sent me the missing root cert, so over the next 12 months, I can
> > install this root cert to all my WM devices.
> >
> > Oh Yay!
> >
> > Joe Heaton
> > Employment Training Panel
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:10 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> >
> > See if you can download a root cert from verisign and reapply it.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> > Sent: 24 July 2009 15:59
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> >
> > I looked at the root certs on the phone, and there are some that have
> > expired, but none that expired yesterday, which is when Activesync
> > stopped working.
> >
> > **
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> > the system manager.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> >
> > www.clearswift.com
> > **
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

RE: Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

Until recently, we used an internally generated cert for all of our devices 
WM5/6 devices. Part of the deployment process was to install the certs on the 
device, and it had to be repeated every time the device was deployed. When we 
first started using these (back when Exchange 2003 SP2 first came out with WM5 
devices) many devices were locked down so much that there wasn't a way to even 
install our own certs. I've never found a way to install them so that they will 
survive a device wipe.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] 
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 9:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Activesync issue

Ahh, I got ya.  So the cert won't stay on the mobile device after a
wipe?  That's interesting.  The whole reason I was looking at doing
that, was for next year when we renew.  There's no reason to pay the
$995 for an Exchange cert, so we would be downgrading back to the
standard cert, and would need that root cert on the devices...

Joe Heaton
Employment Training Panel


-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Activesync issue

The upgraded cert shouldn't be a problem if the root cert is already on
the device. It sounded like you were going to install the missing root
cert on all your devices. I was just pointing out that I didn't see much
of a reason to install the missing root cert on those devices because
you'll have to reinstall it every time you wipe a device.

I can see now that what I typed didn't say that, so I'll just chalk it
up to a Monday morning and crawl back in my hole.


...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:36 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> 
> Well, Verisign is saying that the upgraded cert uses the same root
cert
> as the cert we just renewed, so it should work with no issues.  But
I'll
> let you guys know if that's not the case. :)
> 
> Joe Heaton
> Employment Training Panel
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 8:15 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> 
> FYI, if you migrate to the new cert, it won't be much different that
> using a self signed cert for the WM5 & 6 devices. If the root cert
isn't
> installed in the firmware, you'll need to reinstall it after every
time
> you wipe the device.
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:55 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> >
> > So, after enjoying my weekend, I came into work this morning and
> > contacted Verisign support. Apparently, Microsoft has confirmed that
> > they forgot to include a Trusted Root cert with their Windows Mobile
5
> > and Windows Mobile 6 OSes.  Due to this, Verisign is giving me a
free
> > upgrade to their SSL Pro cert, which still uses the old root cert.
> They
> > also sent me the missing root cert, so over the next 12 months, I
can
> > install this root cert to all my WM devices.
> >
> > Oh Yay!
> >
> > Joe Heaton
> > Employment Training Panel
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk]
> > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 8:10 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> >
> > See if you can download a root cert from verisign and reapply it.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov]
> > Sent: 24 July 2009 15:59
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Activesync issue
> >
> > I looked at the root certs on the phone, and there are some that
have
> > expired, but none that expired yesterday, which is when Activesync
> > stopped working.
> >
> >
**
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify
> > the system manager.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
by
> > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> >
> > www.clearswift.com
> >
**
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 

RE: Exchange 2007 and How to simlify Resource bookings..

[Tim Evans]

+1
We just completed a migration like this from public folders to resources and 
the staff really likes it.

...Tim

From: Dave Hardyman [mailto:dhardy...@swtc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 5:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and How to simlify Resource bookings..

You add the rooms in the scheduling assistant (click on Add Rooms and then 
select the rooms from the list) to see their schedules and then uncheck all the 
rooms that don't work leaving your desired meeting room and meeting attendees.  
It's very quick and easy.

Our staff usually want to hold their meeting in a specific building so they 
only view the schedules for the conference rooms located in that building.  But 
they can view the schedules for all conference rooms if needed.

Dave

From: Fergal O'Connell [mailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and How to simlify Resource bookings..

But do you have to add all the resources to the meeting first and then delete 
the resources you no longer need or am I missing something...

From: Dave Hardyman [mailto:dhardy...@swtc.edu]
Sent: 01 September 2009 13:25
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and How to simlify Resource bookings..

Use the scheduling assistant.  You can view the schedules for all meeting 
invitees and any or all of the resource rooms at once.

Dave

From: Fergal O'Connell [mailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 and How to simlify Resource bookings..

Hi Folks,

We are running Exchange 2007 Sp1 - with Outlook 2007 clients.

Currently we have approx 20 meeting rooms and we use Public Folders as the 
meeting room -
I am now looking to migrate all these to resource rooms.
When a user books a meeting in public folders - they navigate to public 
folders\meeting rooms and all the meeting rooms are listed - they select a room 
and can then view the monthly schedule.

Is there a way to simplify this process once I migrate to Resource Rooms?

It would appear that one of the only ways is to select the room - check the 
availability and then select another one etc.

Fergal








The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else

is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance

on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended

addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.





The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else

is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance

on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended

addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.

RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

[Tim Evans]

I use ASSP here and love it. Very effective!

...Tim

From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 8:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

Anyone out there used ASSP for Anti-spams? I've been giving a budget of 
"Exchange should do this natively" and the request "Exchange is not doing a 
good enough job at killing the right spam"
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/assp/index.php?title=Exchange_2007

Any other options for what I need?

From: Brad DeHart [mailto:br...@khs-net.com]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 8:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

+6 for IronPort.  They will let you try it for free for 30 days, too, so you 
can see if it's a fit for you.

From: Kumar, Guhan [mailto:guhan.ku...@liberty-bank.com]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 7:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

+5 for Ironport.  Great product.  Mostly set it and forget it...


From: Tim Vandael [mailto:tim.vand...@khlim.be]
Sent: September 18, 2009 03:12 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

+4 if you can effort a ironport. Go for it!
The reason for us to buy a PineApp instead of a Ironport was the price.
Ironport is better but much more expensive.
Although we are quite satisfied with our Pineapp.

Greetz

Tim

Van: Fergal O'Connell [mailto:foconn...@curamsoftware.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 18 september 2009 9:07
Aan: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Onderwerp: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

+3
Installed Iron Port a few years and have not touched it since.

From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: 17 September 2009 23:03
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Ironport or Proofpoint?

I work for an Ironport reseller and we perform tons of these installations.  We 
do not have one unsatisfied customer with this appliance.  It is by far the 
Mercedes of SPAM/AV/SMTP Gateways.

+2

From: Leedy, Andy [mailto:ale...@butlerahs.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Ironport or Proofpoint?

Any insights or preferences if you had to choose between Ironport or Proofpoint?

They both look like good products, but the salesmen always say their product is 
superior. I wonder which one does better job at filtering and which provides 
the best support.

When it comes down to it, I'm looking for ease of manageability and 
effectiveness of filtering.

Any thoughts or insights are appreciated (even a simple +1 vote for either one 
would be helpful).

Thanks,
Andy


**

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this message is intended 
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, 
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, 
please contact the sender and destroy all copies of this document. Thank you.

Butler Animal Health Supply

**







The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.

It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else

is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,

copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance

on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended

addressee please contact the sender and dispose of this e-mail. Thank you.


**
Deze email werd gescand op virussen en andere mogelijk schadelijke code.
Meer info : KHLim - dienst ICT
tel : (011230)894
**


Mail send by Exchange 2007 SP1

Mail send by Exchange 2007 SP1

**

Unless you have received this email through the Liberty Bank secure email 
system, before you respond, please consider that any unencrypted e-mail that is 
sent to us is not secure.  If you send regular e-mail to Liberty Bank, please 
do not include any private or confidential information such as social security 
numbers, unlisted telephone numbers, bank account numbers, personal income 
information, user names, passwords, etc.  If you need to provide us with such 
information, please telephone us at (888)570-0773 during business hours or 
write to us at 315 Main St. Middletown, CT 06457.



The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you 
are not the intended recipi

RE: OT - Multiple ISA

[Tim Evans]

You can do that - just make sure that the default gateway on the mail server 
points to ISA2. If the mail server needs to talk to other local subnets, you'll 
need to manually add the routing to them, but it should work just fine.

My only question is why you can't use the 1st ISA Server for this. It  should 
be able to publish a mail server and handle browsing without any problem.


...Tim

From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 4:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT - Multiple ISA

Hi,
ISA 2006 Standard edition

I have a 3-leg ISA configured (ISA1 - 192.168.0.1)
I need to install another ISA 2-leg configuration (ISA2 - 192.168.0.2).

My internal network is 192.168.0.0/24
My DMZ is 192.168.200.0/28

DMZ contains Edge and Web server.
Internal mail server is 192.168.0.10

I want all the user traffic such as Web browsing and user access from Internal 
n/w to go through ISA 1 and mail server be published on ISA2.
Can I have more than 1 ISA in a network?  Is it supported to have more than 1 
ISA in a network?
I tried googling and couldn't find anything concrete.
Appreciate any assistance.
Regards
Liby


Disclaimer
[The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are 
confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein 
is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any 
errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.]

RE: OT - Multiple ISA

[Tim Evans]

Yes, that was my original assumption - that the users, mail server and inside 
interfaces if the ISA servers would all be on the same subnet. What I was 
referring to in what you highlighted below is if you have multiple subnets 
behind the 1st ISA server and the mail server needs to communicate all the 
local subnets, you'll have to manually add routes to the mail server for the 
other local subnets.

From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 10:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT - Multiple ISA

Tim,
Sorry I forgot to mention that both the ISA servers will be in a single subnet 
referring to the highlight.  Is it possible to have 2 ISA servers in a single 
subnet?
Regards
Liby

From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 6:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OT - Multiple ISA

You can do that - just make sure that the default gateway on the mail server 
points to ISA2. If the mail server needs to talk to other local subnets, you'll 
need to manually add the routing to them, but it should work just fine.

My only question is why you can't use the 1st ISA Server for this. It  should 
be able to publish a mail server and handle browsing without any problem.


...Tim

From: Liby Philip Mathew [mailto:lmat...@path-solutions.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 4:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT - Multiple ISA

Hi,
ISA 2006 Standard edition

I have a 3-leg ISA configured (ISA1 - 192.168.0.1)
I need to install another ISA 2-leg configuration (ISA2 - 192.168.0.2).

My internal network is 192.168.0.0/24
My DMZ is 192.168.200.0/28

DMZ contains Edge and Web server.
Internal mail server is 192.168.0.10

I want all the user traffic such as Web browsing and user access from Internal 
n/w to go through ISA 1 and mail server be published on ISA2.
Can I have more than 1 ISA in a network?  Is it supported to have more than 1 
ISA in a network?
I tried googling and couldn't find anything concrete.
Appreciate any assistance.
Regards
Liby


Disclaimer
[The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files are 
confidential information and intended solely for the use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. This transmission may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
immediately and delete all copies. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein 
is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Path Solutions accepts no responsibility for any 
errors, omissions, computer viruses and other defects.]

RE: Restore a Public Folder

[Tim Evans]

If you didn't have deleted item retention set on your public folders,
you're probably looking at a restoration for your most recent backup.
Just for grins, you could  check out 
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924044 and see if it helps

 

 

...Tim

 

From: ExchList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 7:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Restore a Public Folder

 

NO! L

 

But I do now...

 

Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP

Network Blade Inc.

49 Marcy Street

Somerset, NJ 08873

732-213-0600

www.networkblade.com  

 

Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for
your company

 



 

From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Posted At: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 10:14 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Restore a Public Folder
Subject: Re: Restore a Public Folder

 

Hold on, do you have public folders deleted item retention set?

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:09 AM, ExchList <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

Something I've NEVER done before! PLEASE HELP ME L

 

Exchange 2003 (patched) Windows 2003 R2 (patched).

 

My top client just deleted their most important public folder - I wanted
to ask for some advice for our group as to what the best process is to
accomplish this.

 

Joseph Danielsen, CSBS, MCSA-2003, MCSA-2000 (Messaging), MCP

Network Blade Inc.

49 Marcy Street

Somerset, NJ 08873

732-213-0600

www.networkblade.com  

 

Ask me why a Microsoft Certified Small Business Specialist is best for
your company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~<><><>

OAB Problems

[Tim Evans]

We're in an Exchange 2003 SP2 environment. Shortly after upgrading to
Outlook 2007, some users started reporting synchronization errors
downloading the OAB. Following the instructions in KB 867506, I created
a new OAB with a different name. That didn't solve the problem. In fact,
no one can download the OAB now and everyone running in cached mode is
working with an old copy of the GAL. After a week, I created a new OAB
called "Default Offline Address Book" (the same name as it was
originally) but still now joy.

 

Manual attempts to download the OAB get an error: "Task 'Microsoft
Exchange' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The operation failed. An object
cannot be found." or just  "An error occurred while opening the
Microsoft Exchange offline address book files. See your administrator."

 

Any ideas how to fix my OAB?

Thanks

 

...Tim

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OAB Problems

[Tim Evans]

Thanks. Turns out that there was no OAB associated with any of the
stores. I guess in my deleting and recreating them the didn't get
reassociated properly.

 

 

...Tim

 

From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 2:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OAB Problems

 

Sorry M, still under the influence of knock out juice from the dentist
for cracking 2 teeth.  Been a very painful 3 days of dental work.

 

 

Webster

 

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:59 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OAB Problems

 

He means "rebuild" and "rebuilt".

 

J

 

"regen" 

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

MCITP:EM/MCSE/Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 4:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OAB Problems

 

Turn up logging to Maximum and the logs will show you the
users/contacts/etc it is having issues with.  Clean those issues up and
regen the OAB.  You will then be fine.  Just had this issue and the
customer had 112 contacts with no X.400 addresses.  Once that was
resolved the OAB regened just fine and OL users could manually download
it.

 

 

Webster

 

From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: OAB Problems

 

We're in an Exchange 2003 SP2 environment. Shortly after upgrading to
Outlook 2007, some users started reporting synchronization errors
downloading the OAB. Following the instructions in KB 867506, I created
a new OAB with a different name. That didn't solve the problem. In fact,
no one can download the OAB now and everyone running in cached mode is
working with an old copy of the GAL. After a week, I created a new OAB
called "Default Offline Address Book" (the same name as it was
originally) but still now joy.

 

Manual attempts to download the OAB get an error: "Task 'Microsoft
Exchange' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The operation failed. An object
cannot be found." or just  "An error occurred while opening the
Microsoft Exchange offline address book files. See your administrator."

 

Any ideas how to fix my OAB?

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OAB Problems

[Tim Evans]

No, I didn't. I didn't even think of using that to troubleshoot.

 

 

...Tim

 

From: Webster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OAB Problems

 

Did you happen to run the ExBPA during this?  Was wondering if it would
have found that issue?

 

 

Webster

 

From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject: RE: OAB Problems

 

Thanks. Turns out that there was no OAB associated with any of the
stores. I guess in my deleting and recreating them the didn't get
reassociated properly.

 

 

...Tim

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OAB Errors

[Tim Evans]

I just had this problem. Do you have an OAB assigned to each of your stores?


...Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:27 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: OAB Errors
> 
> Exchange 2003 SP2, Outlook 2007 in cached mode
> 
> Clients receive the following when sync'ing or downloaded the OAB:
> Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The
> operation failed. An object cannot be found.'
> 
> The OAB replication appears to be correct, the server event log
> indicates the OAB is regenerating properly.
> 
> I've found a ton of stuff Googling but nothing simple that seems to
> apply.
> 
> Suggestions?
> 
> 
> 
> Roger Wright
> Network Administrator
> Evatone, Inc.
> 727.572.7076  x388
> _
> 
> "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree,
> is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals.
> We cause accidents." - Nathaniel Borenstein
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OAB Errors

[Tim Evans]

That would do it. There needs to be one assigned for each one. I believe you 
can get by with just specifying it on one (i.e. it would eliminate the error) 
but it would make your OAB incomplete. 


...Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:56 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> Checking the properties on each one, no, there's no OAB assigned.
> 
> 
> Roger Wright
> Network Administrator
> Evatone, Inc.
> 727.572.7076  x388
> _
> 
> Even a hawk is an eagle among crows.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:45 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> Ahh... I'll check.
> 
> 
> Roger Wright
> Network Administrator
> Evatone, Inc.
> 727.572.7076  x388
> _
> 
> We don't know who discovered water, but we're certain it wasn't a fish.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:35 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> I just had this problem. Do you have an OAB assigned to each of your
> stores?
> 
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:27 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: OAB Errors
> >
> > Exchange 2003 SP2, Outlook 2007 in cached mode
> >
> > Clients receive the following when sync'ing or downloaded the OAB:
> > Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The
> > operation failed. An object cannot be found.'
> >
> > The OAB replication appears to be correct, the server event log
> > indicates the OAB is regenerating properly.
> >
> > I've found a ton of stuff Googling but nothing simple that seems to
> > apply.
> >
> > Suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
> > Roger Wright
> > Network Administrator
> > Evatone, Inc.
> > 727.572.7076  x388
> > _
> >
> > "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts
> > agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer
> professionals.
> > We cause accidents." - Nathaniel Borenstein
> >
> > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OAB Errors

[Tim Evans]

I don't know how big your organization is, but assuming it isn't too big, you 
should be able to try fairly soon if you've forced a rebuild. Ours happened 
right away (200 users, 4 exchange servers). MBS has a blog entry (or it was 
discussed here recently, I forget) that describes how long it takes if you want 
to wait and let outlook by itself. In that case it could be as long as 48 hours 
worst case.


...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> I've assigned the OAB to each store, and rebuilt the OAB.  How long
> should I have to wait before testing the download?
> 
> 
> Roger Wright
> Network Administrator
> Evatone, Inc.
> 727.572.7076  x388
> _
> 
> Everything changes but change itself.   --John F. Kennedy
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:05 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> Thanks... I'll give it a try.
> 
> 
> Roger Wright
> Network Administrator
> Evatone, Inc.
> 727.572.7076  x388
> _
> 
> I used to be a tap dancer until I fell in the  sink.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:02 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> That would do it. There needs to be one assigned for each one. I
> believe you can get by with just specifying it on one (i.e. it would
> eliminate the error) but it would make your OAB incomplete.
> 
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:56 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> >
> > Checking the properties on each one, no, there's no OAB assigned.
> >
> >
> > Roger Wright
> > Network Administrator
> > Evatone, Inc.
> > 727.572.7076  x388
> > _
> >
> > Even a hawk is an eagle among crows.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:45 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> >
> > Ahh... I'll check.
> >
> >
> > Roger Wright
> > Network Administrator
> > Evatone, Inc.
> > 727.572.7076  x388
> > _
> >
> > We don't know who discovered water, but we're certain it wasn't a
> fish.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:35 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> >
> > I just had this problem. Do you have an OAB assigned to each of your
> > stores?
> >
> >
> > ...Tim
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:27 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: OAB Errors
> > >
> > > Exchange 2003 SP2, Outlook 2007 in cached mode
> > >
> > > Clients receive the following when sync'ing or downloaded the OAB:
> > > Task 'Microsoft Exchange Server' reported error (0x8004010F) : 'The
> > > operation failed. An object cannot be found.'
> > >
> > > The OAB replication appears to be correct, the server event log
> > > indicates the OAB is regenerating properly.
> > >
> > > I've found a ton of stuff Googling but nothing simple that seems to
> > > apply.
> > >
> > > Suggestions?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Roger Wright
> > > Network Administrator
> > > Evatone, Inc.
> > > 727.572.7076  x388
> > > _
> > >
> > > "The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts
> > > agree, is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer
> > professionals.
> > > We cause accidents." - Nathaniel Borenstein
> > >
> > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> >
> > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> >
> > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> >
> > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: OAB Errors

[Tim Evans]

Well, then I'll back out and let one of the more capable hands here take over. 
I'm out of my league now.


...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:04 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> The OAB generated in just a couple minutes.  Still can't download it
> though...  :(
> 
> 
> Roger Wright
> Network Administrator
> Evatone, Inc.
> 727.572.7076  x388
> _
> 
> I vow to consider your idea fairly, before I reject it.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:42 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> 
> I don't know how big your organization is, but assuming it isn't too
> big, you should be able to try fairly soon if you've forced a rebuild.
> Ours happened right away (200 users, 4 exchange servers). MBS has a
> blog entry (or it was discussed here recently, I forget) that describes
> how long it takes if you want to wait and let outlook by itself. In
> that case it could be as long as 48 hours worst case.
> 
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:18 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> >
> > I've assigned the OAB to each store, and rebuilt the OAB.  How long
> > should I have to wait before testing the download?
> >
> >
> > Roger Wright
> > Network Administrator
> > Evatone, Inc.
> > 727.572.7076  x388
> > _
> >
> > Everything changes but change itself.   --John F. Kennedy
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:05 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> >
> > Thanks... I'll give it a try.
> >
> >
> > Roger Wright
> > Network Administrator
> > Evatone, Inc.
> > 727.572.7076  x388
> > _
> >
> > I used to be a tap dancer until I fell in the  sink.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:02 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> >
> > That would do it. There needs to be one assigned for each one. I
> > believe you can get by with just specifying it on one (i.e. it would
> > eliminate the error) but it would make your OAB incomplete.
> >
> >
> > ...Tim
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:56 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> > >
> > > Checking the properties on each one, no, there's no OAB assigned.
> > >
> > >
> > > Roger Wright
> > > Network Administrator
> > > Evatone, Inc.
> > > 727.572.7076  x388
> > > _
> > >
> > > Even a hawk is an eagle among crows.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:45 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> > >
> > > Ahh... I'll check.
> > >
> > >
> > > Roger Wright
> > > Network Administrator
> > > Evatone, Inc.
> > > 727.572.7076  x388
> > > _
> > >
> > > We don't know who discovered water, but we're certain it wasn't a
> > fish.
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:35 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: OAB Errors
> > >
> > > I just had this problem. Do you have an OAB assigned to each of
> your
> > > stores?
> > >
> > >
> > > ...Tim
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Roger Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:27 PM
> > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > > Subject: OAB Errors
> > > >
> > > > Exchange 2003 SP2, Outlook 2007 in cached mode
> > > >
> > > > Clients receive the following when sync'ing or downloaded the
> OAB:
> > > > Task 'Micr

RE: barracuda block?

[Tim Evans]

We got on their list earlier in the year. It took about a month before
we got off for good. It was intermittent over that month. Barracuda is
one of the most annoy things I've run across. Between their arbitrary
blacklist and their backscatter

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: barracuda block?

 

So, with our little malicious brownie sending out naughty emails that
placed us on several RBLs about a month ago, well we are cleared.
However, barracudacentral has our ip blocked and I've sent out several
requests to be removed. Has anyone have their ip blocked by them and how
long did it take to be removed?

 

 

TIA

 

Thomas Gonzalez

Technology Manager

Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas

210.349.2404 phone
210.403.1586 DID

210.349.2666 fax

www.girlscouts-swtx.org

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas cannot accept responsibility for
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: barracuda block?

[Tim Evans]

If only it were that simple. Clicking on that link and actually getting
off the list are two different things. 

 

From: Davies,Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:47 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: barracuda block?

 

I have had to get various companies removed, from my experience it takes
a few hours

 

There is a link on barracuda central website to request removal, you
will need to enter your IP address first.

 

Cheers

 

Matt

 

From: Theochares, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: 10 July 2008 22:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: barracuda block?

 

Happend to us. They refused to speak to me until one of our customers
complained so I found a customer willing to complain and they removed
us. 

 



From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 5:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: barracuda block?

We got on their list earlier in the year. It took about a month before
we got off for good. It was intermittent over that month. Barracuda is
one of the most annoy things I've run across. Between their arbitrary
blacklist and their backscatter

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: barracuda block?

 

So, with our little malicious brownie sending out naughty emails that
placed us on several RBLs about a month ago, well we are cleared.
However, barracudacentral has our ip blocked and I've sent out several
requests to be removed. Has anyone have their ip blocked by them and how
long did it take to be removed?

 

 

TIA

 

Thomas Gonzalez

Technology Manager

Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas

210.349.2404 phone
210.403.1586 DID

210.349.2666 fax

www.girlscouts-swtx.org

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or
opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not
represent those of the Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although
precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this
email, Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas cannot accept responsibility for
any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged.  
It is for the exclusive use of the addressee only.  If you are not the
addressee, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is
strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
erase all 
copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Thank You.

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

Exchange 2003 server removal

[Tim Evans]

I have been working upgrading exchange 2003 to 2007 for the last few weeks now. 
My domain is at has 2003 forest & domain functional level and there are 4  
exchange BE 2003 servers and a 2003 FE server.  I've got the new exchange 2007 
mailbox, HT and CAS role servers installed and working now, all mail is flowing 
thru the 2007 HT server, mailboxes migrated & public folders replicated to the 
2007 server and removed replicas from the 2003. I'm now ready to start removing 
some of the 2003 servers. When I go into add/remove programs on one of the 
servers, and get to the point where I'm setting the "remove" action I get:
Setup encountered an error while checking prerequisites for the component 
"Microsoft Exchange": 0XC))70005 (5): Access is denied.

This happens no matter what account I use, including the admin account I use 
for day to day Exchange management or even the enterprise admin account. It 
happens on the FE server and on the BE that is ready for removal. These lines 
are at the end of the exchange setup log:

 [11:47:03]  ScPRQ_ServerIsNotHomeServerForAnyUsers 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\excommon\prereq.cxx:3230)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CCompServer::ScCheckEVSPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\components\server\compserver.cxx:1358)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CCompServer::ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\components\server\compserver.cxx:955)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CComExchSetupComponent::ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\bo\comboifaces.cxx:1598)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CComExchSetupComponent::ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\bo\comboifaces.cxx:1598)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03] === IGNORING PREVIOUS ERRORS === HrSetProblemOnInstallAction, while 
calling ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\bo\comboifaces.cxx:1399)
   The operation has completed successfully.
[11:47:03] Setup encountered an error while checking prerequisites for the 
component "Microsoft Exchange":
0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.

Any ideas on how I can get these old servers removed? I'm not concerned about 
the servers themselves - they are all scheduled to be retired or rebuilt. My 
main concern is getting the old servers out of AD. Would I be OK if I just 
followed the AD removal parts of KB833396 and ignored the rest?


...Tim


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2003 server removal

[Tim Evans]

Wow, I really don't know what I'm looking for here. I see this on the 
organization container:
Ace[1]
Ace Type:  0x6 - ACCESS_DENIED_OBJECT_ACE_TYPE
Ace Size:  56 bytes
Ace Flags: 0x2
CONTAINER_INHERIT_ACE
Object Ace Mask:  0x0100
ACTRL_DS_CONTROL_ACCESS
Object Ace Flags: 0x1
ACE_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT
Object Ace Type:  Send As - 
ab721a54-1e2f-11d0-9819-00aa0040529b
Object Ace Sid:   DOMAIN\Enterprise Admins 
S-1-5-21-1085081214-922432649-72545543-519

I assume this means that enterprise admins are denied Send As rights at the org 
level? What would I be looking for and, more importantly, once I find it, where 
would I go to change it?

...Tim

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 server removal

Using ldp I would look at the ACL on the organization container, from the top 
all the way down to the server that is failing.

I wouldn't recommend manual removal.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
Link with me at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/theessentialexchange

From: Tim Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2003 server removal

I have been working upgrading exchange 2003 to 2007 for the last few weeks now. 
My domain is at has 2003 forest & domain functional level and there are 4  
exchange BE 2003 servers and a 2003 FE server.  I've got the new exchange 2007 
mailbox, HT and CAS role servers installed and working now, all mail is flowing 
thru the 2007 HT server, mailboxes migrated & public folders replicated to the 
2007 server and removed replicas from the 2003. I'm now ready to start removing 
some of the 2003 servers. When I go into add/remove programs on one of the 
servers, and get to the point where I'm setting the "remove" action I get:
Setup encountered an error while checking prerequisites for the component 
"Microsoft Exchange": 0XC))70005 (5): Access is denied.

This happens no matter what account I use, including the admin account I use 
for day to day Exchange management or even the enterprise admin account. It 
happens on the FE server and on the BE that is ready for removal. These lines 
are at the end of the exchange setup log:

 [11:47:03]  ScPRQ_ServerIsNotHomeServerForAnyUsers 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\excommon\prereq.cxx:3230)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CCompServer::ScCheckEVSPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\components\server\compserver.cxx:1358)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CCompServer::ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\exsetdata\components\server\compserver.cxx:955)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CComExchSetupComponent::ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\bo\comboifaces.cxx:1598)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03]  CComExchSetupComponent::ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\bo\comboifaces.cxx:1598)
   Error code 0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.
[11:47:03] === IGNORING PREVIOUS ERRORS === HrSetProblemOnInstallAction, while 
calling ScCheckPrerequisites 
(f:\titanium\admin\src\udog\bo\comboifaces.cxx:1399)
   The operation has completed successfully.
[11:47:03] Setup encountered an error while checking prerequisites for the 
component "Microsoft Exchange":
0XC0070005 (5): Access is denied.

Any ideas on how I can get these old servers removed? I'm not concerned about 
the servers themselves - they are all scheduled to be retired or rebuilt. My 
main concern is getting the old servers out of AD. Would I be OK if I just 
followed the AD removal parts of KB833396 and ignored the rest?


...Tim








~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Parse Exchange log files

[Tim Evans]

I'd be willing to bet that Log Parser could probably do what you want.


...Tim

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 6:07 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Parse Exchange log files

I need to parse the log files and present a decent looking report of anyone 
logging into a mailbox who is not the owner.  Specifically one username.  Is 
their any free software out there that will do this.  I can get the eventID's 
and then export it, manipulate into excel and spend awhile doing that, but this 
is something they want to start doing as part of an ongoing monthly checklist.  
Apparently several people are convinced that this one guy is looking in their 
mailboxes.  We don't manage this particular server directly and have been asked 
to get this info.  I have confirmed that the server is logging the information 
so it's just a matter of formatting and reporting it.

Any free or REALLY cheap software that can do this.  Exchange 2003 Sp2.

Thx

Greg




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.

[Tim Evans]

I've just run across this here too. All clients are Outlook 2007, Exchange 2007 
SP1. I wasn't pay real close attention before it happened here, but we've also 
tried OWA without any solution. In our case, I don't know if the OOF was set 
when the mailbox was migrated, but this is showing up a month after the 
migration.

We've also tried running Outlook with /CLEANRULES, which didn't fix it either.


...Tim

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.

last resort...disable-mailbox and connect-mailbox?  Other concern would be if 
this is a BES user...there was a bug prior to 4.1.4 SP5 or 6 if I recall 
correctly with OOF.

-alex
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Troy Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 use owa or make sure you are using a Outlook 2007 client.



-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:53 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: User can't disable OOF after mailbox migration.

What about via OWA or WM6 ?

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Campbell, Rob
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a user who's mailbox was migrated from 2k3 to 2k7 while his Out of
> Office was set, and now he can't turn it off.
>
>
>
> Anyone seen this before?
>
> **
> Note:
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
> and
> protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the
> intended
> recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message
> to
> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
> **
>
>



--
ME2

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~




~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Resume Posting

[Tim Evans]

And sometimes, it even snows too!

1/2" of snow on the ground and I've got 4 people snowed in :-(


...Tim

From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Resume Posting

Shshshshshshshshsh... No, really, it does rain here. All the time. We have 
slits in our rain coats and moss on our backs.  =)
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Phillips
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:35 PM
Subject: RE: Resume Posting

I spent about 2.5 years traveling North America  40+ weeks/year as a consultant 
and I've seen a number of places (including Virginia) where it seemed to rain 
much more than in Seattle. Maybe it's due to the fact that most of the rain in 
Seattle is just drizzle a lot of the time.

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980
You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting

Been here for 30-someithng years, and it's nice to never have to shovel snow 
just to get out of your house, no tornado's or hurricanes or 110+ heat or 
sub-zero temps. Sure, it rains a bit, but it never destroys my house :). Funny 
thing about the Pacific Northwest is we can get 250 days with measureable rain, 
but also 150 days with sunshine. For those struggling with the math it means 
that yes, we have 35 days where it might rain for an hour then the sun comes 
out the same day.

Not that this place is all roses either, but


From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting

LOL - I spent seven years in Virginia before moving back to Seattle in 2007.  
It's not that bad.

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980
You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting

See - if you had a remote-worker or a sub-contract deal, I might be interested. 
But move to the "great Northwest"??? 

Regards,

Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP
My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael
I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php

From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting

I think I initially found you on this list and then Twitter sealed the deal. :)

On that subject, we've got a large number of Exchange admin openings ranging 
from entry level to senior. All located in Seattle, WA. Ping me off-list for 
more info.

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980
You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.

From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting

You hired me via Twitter..

From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting

I've actually hired more than a few people that submitted their resume through 
Craigslist. We've got one up there right now actually and I'm getting ready to 
go through a couple dozen resumes.

Thanks,

Jeremy Phillips
Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980
You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.

From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Resume Posting

Are you guys being serious with the craigslist, myspace comments? Erik, we are 
in South Texas.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Erik Goldoff 
mailto:egold...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yep, like Bob Free reminds me even today, I *was*  'Ham Boy' left 
there in July 2006, and left them in VERY good hands ... Didn't want to job hop 
from employer to employer so I've been doing independent consulting to stay 
afloat, but the economy is definitely hurting the small business arena, I've 
lost several clients to acquisitions, and several have either severely cut 
back, or closed altogether ...

Erik Goldoff

IT  Consultant

Systems, Networks, & Security



From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 5:41 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Resume Posting
What happened with Honey Baked Ham man? You were one of the folks on this list 
who worked there right?
- Original Message 

RE: Resume Posting

[Tim Evans]

Nobody around here knows how to drive in the snow, but then they don't know how 
to drive in the rain either


...Tim

From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Resume Posting

Must be nice! I live in Anchorage, AK and I remember several times we received 
30+ inches over night and I still had to be at work the next morning.

- Sean
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:

And sometimes, it even snows too!



1/2" of snow on the ground and I've got 4 people snowed in :-(





...Tim



From: Matt Moore 
[mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com<mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:49 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Resume Posting



Shshshshshshshshsh... No, really, it does rain here. All the time. We have 
slits in our rain coats and moss on our backs.  =)

- Original Message -

From: Jeremy Phillips<mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com>

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues<mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>

Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 12:35 PM

Subject: RE: Resume Posting



I spent about 2.5 years traveling North America  40+ weeks/year as a consultant 
and I've seen a number of places (including Virginia) where it seemed to rain 
much more than in Seattle. Maybe it's due to the fact that most of the rain in 
Seattle is just drizzle a lot of the time.



Thanks,



Jeremy Phillips

Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980

You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.



From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org<mailto:david@nwea.org>]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting



Been here for 30-someithng years, and it's nice to never have to shovel snow 
just to get out of your house, no tornado's or hurricanes or 110+ heat or 
sub-zero temps. Sure, it rains a bit, but it never destroys my house :). Funny 
thing about the Pacific Northwest is we can get 250 days with measureable rain, 
but also 150 days with sunshine. For those struggling with the math it means 
that yes, we have 35 days where it might rain for an hour then the sun comes 
out the same day.



Not that this place is all roses either, but





From: Jeremy Phillips 
[mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com<mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting



LOL - I spent seven years in Virginia before moving back to Seattle in 2007.  
It's not that bad.



Thanks,



Jeremy Phillips

Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980

You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.



From: Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com<mailto:mich...@theessentialexchange.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting



See - if you had a remote-worker or a sub-contract deal, I might be interested. 
But move to the "great Northwest"??? 



Regards,



Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP

My blog: 
http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael<http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael>

I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php



From: Jeremy Phillips 
[mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com<mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 2:01 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting



I think I initially found you on this list and then Twitter sealed the deal. :)



On that subject, we've got a large number of Exchange admin openings ranging 
from entry level to senior. All located in Seattle, WA. Ping me off-list for 
more info.



Thanks,



Jeremy Phillips

Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980

You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.



From: KevinM [mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org<mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 9:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting



You hired me via Twitter..



From: Jeremy Phillips 
[mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com<mailto:jeremy.phill...@azaleos.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Resume Posting



I've actually hired more than a few people that submitted their resume through 
Craigslist. We've got one up there right now actually and I'm getting ready to 
go through a couple dozen resumes.



Thanks,



Jeremy Phillips

Operations Manager | Azaleos Corporation | T: 206.926.1945 | M: 540.322.7980

You rely on Exchange. We keep it running.



From: mqcarp [mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com<mailto:mqcarpen...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, December 16,

Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

OK, I'm probably missing something simple, but I'd appreciate it if someone 
could point me in the right direction. I'm in the middle of a migration from 
Ex03 to Ex07. I've got 3 sites. The first site has been migrated and everything 
is working properly. I just installed the new  Ex07 server in a different site, 
and migrated the mailboxes over to it. Mail flow properly in and out of the new 
server, but activesync, & owa don't work. The new server is a combination 
MBX/CAS/HT server. The users I'm troubleshooting were all set up and working 
fine before the migration. I've replaced the self signed cert with one from our 
ca and did a get-ActiveSyncVirutalDirectory on the working CAS server with the 
one that doesn't work and confirmed that the settings are all the same.

I'm finding lots of info on how to set up AS, but nothing on how to make it 
work in another site.

Thanks


...Tim


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

Thanks, Troy
Yes, I can log into OWA internally by going to the server. Externally, when I 
log in I get a page that says "Use the following link to open this mailbox with 
optimal performance:" and gives me the URL I used to log in, along with a 
button to add to favorites, but no mailbox. If it makes any difference, all the 
sites are published thru ISA 2006.


...Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:02 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> Hi Tim,
> 
> Can you access the new OWA web page from internal or external sources at
> all? It shouldn't require any special setup to be on a new site, though
> I have heard of Autodiscover issues on MB/CAS/HT combo boxes, is your
> first server running this same combo?
> 
> If you can't see the site internally, is this an authentication issue?
> Are you using basic auth over SSL?
> 
> -troy
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:42 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> OK, I'm probably missing something simple, but I'd appreciate it if
> someone could point me in the right direction. I'm in the middle of a
> migration from Ex03 to Ex07. I've got 3 sites. The first site has been
> migrated and everything is working properly. I just installed the new
> Ex07 server in a different site, and migrated the mailboxes over to it.
> Mail flow properly in and out of the new server, but activesync, & owa
> don't work. The new server is a combination MBX/CAS/HT server. The users
> I'm troubleshooting were all set up and working fine before the
> migration. I've replaced the self signed cert with one from our ca and
> did a get-ActiveSyncVirutalDirectory on the working CAS server with the
> one that doesn't work and confirmed that the settings are all the same.
> 
> 
> 
> I'm finding lots of info on how to set up AS, but nothing on how to make
> it work in another site.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

> And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first OWA 
> site you built?

This is correct

> It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the site

It does that even when I'm logged on as my test user with a mailbox in the new 
site

> How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
I have a DNS entry for Autodiscover.sparling.com that points to the original 
CAS server

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:52 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> OWA site you built?
> 
> It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the site
> your mailbox is in, I.E. if your personal mailbox is in site1 it will
> route you to OWA in site1.  Can you try this with a mailbox that is
> housed in site2 and see if the new OWA  site works with that account?
> 
> How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> 
> -troy
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:16 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> Thanks, Troy
> Yes, I can log into OWA internally by going to the server. Externally,
> when I log in I get a page that says "Use the following link to open
> this mailbox with optimal performance:" and gives me the URL I used to
> log in, along with a button to add to favorites, but no mailbox. If it
> makes any difference, all the sites are published thru ISA 2006.
> 
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:02 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > Can you access the new OWA web page from internal or external sources
> at
> > all? It shouldn't require any special setup to be on a new site,
> though
> > I have heard of Autodiscover issues on MB/CAS/HT combo boxes, is your
> > first server running this same combo?
> >
> > If you can't see the site internally, is this an authentication issue?
> > Are you using basic auth over SSL?
> >
> > -troy
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:42 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > OK, I'm probably missing something simple, but I'd appreciate it if
> > someone could point me in the right direction. I'm in the middle of a
> > migration from Ex03 to Ex07. I've got 3 sites. The first site has been
> > migrated and everything is working properly. I just installed the new
> > Ex07 server in a different site, and migrated the mailboxes over to
> it.
> > Mail flow properly in and out of the new server, but activesync, & owa
> > don't work. The new server is a combination MBX/CAS/HT server. The
> users
> > I'm troubleshooting were all set up and working fine before the
> > migration. I've replaced the self signed cert with one from our ca and
> > did a get-ActiveSyncVirutalDirectory on the working CAS server with
> the
> > one that doesn't work and confirmed that the settings are all the
> same.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm finding lots of info on how to set up AS, but nothing on how to
> make
> > it work in another site.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ...Tim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~
> 
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja~

RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

Yes, it has the correct ExternalURL entered on this server.

I'm on the phone with PSS now :-) I don't think there is such a thing as a 
"quick call" to PSS :-(

I'll let you know what they find

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:24 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> Tim,
> 
> Double check and make sure that your new server has an external site url
> assigned for OWA.  For some reason your Exchange box in the new site
> isn't correctly determining AD site structure. Without having more
> information about your environment it's hard to know why.  You sound
> like you are 90% there, perhaps its worth a quick support call to MSFT
> to track down the misfire.
> 
> -troy
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 1:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> OWA site you built?
> 
> This is correct
> 
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the
> site
> 
> It does that even when I'm logged on as my test user with a mailbox in
> the new site
> 
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> I have a DNS entry for Autodiscover.sparling.com that points to the
> original CAS server
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:52 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> > OWA site you built?
> >
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the site
> > your mailbox is in, I.E. if your personal mailbox is in site1 it will
> > route you to OWA in site1.  Can you try this with a mailbox that is
> > housed in site2 and see if the new OWA  site works with that account?
> >
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> >
> > -troy
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:16 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > Thanks, Troy
> > Yes, I can log into OWA internally by going to the server. Externally,
> > when I log in I get a page that says "Use the following link to open
> > this mailbox with optimal performance:" and gives me the URL I used to
> > log in, along with a button to add to favorites, but no mailbox. If it
> > makes any difference, all the sites are published thru ISA 2006.
> >
> >
> > ...Tim
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:02 AM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> > >
> > > Hi Tim,
> > >
> > > Can you access the new OWA web page from internal or external
> sources
> > at
> > > all? It shouldn't require any special setup to be on a new site,
> > though
> > > I have heard of Autodiscover issues on MB/CAS/HT combo boxes, is
> your
> > > first server running this same combo?
> > >
> > > If you can't see the site internally, is this an authentication
> issue?
> > > Are you using basic auth over SSL?
> > >
> > > -troy
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:42 AM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> > >
> > > OK, I'm probably missing something simple, but I'd appreciate it if
> > > someone could point me in the right direction. I'm in the middle of
> a
> > > migration from Ex03 to Ex07. I've got 3 sites. The first site has
> been
> > > migrated and everything is working properly. I just installed the
> new
> > > Ex07 server in a different site, and migrated the mailboxes over to
> > it.
> > > Mail flow properly in and out of the new server, but activesync, &
> owa
> > > don't work. The new server is a combination MBX/CAS/HT server. The
> > u

RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

Well, that was an educational 2 hours.

It turns out that when you have one CAS server proxying to another, the  
downstream server should *not* have an external URL entered. The other change 
we made was to  disable forms auth and enable windows auth on the downstream 
server. Once we did that, OWA and activesync just worked

...Tim

-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

Yes, it has the correct ExternalURL entered on this server.

I'm on the phone with PSS now :-) I don't think there is such a thing as a 
"quick call" to PSS :-(

I'll let you know what they find

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:24 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> Tim,
> 
> Double check and make sure that your new server has an external site url
> assigned for OWA.  For some reason your Exchange box in the new site
> isn't correctly determining AD site structure. Without having more
> information about your environment it's hard to know why.  You sound
> like you are 90% there, perhaps its worth a quick support call to MSFT
> to track down the misfire.
> 
> -troy
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 1:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> 
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> OWA site you built?
> 
> This is correct
> 
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the
> site
> 
> It does that even when I'm logged on as my test user with a mailbox in
> the new site
> 
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> I have a DNS entry for Autodiscover.sparling.com that points to the
> original CAS server
> 
> ...Tim
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:52 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> > OWA site you built?
> >
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the site
> > your mailbox is in, I.E. if your personal mailbox is in site1 it will
> > route you to OWA in site1.  Can you try this with a mailbox that is
> > housed in site2 and see if the new OWA  site works with that account?
> >
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> >
> > -troy
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:16 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > Thanks, Troy
> > Yes, I can log into OWA internally by going to the server. Externally,
> > when I log in I get a page that says "Use the following link to open
> > this mailbox with optimal performance:" and gives me the URL I used to
> > log in, along with a button to add to favorites, but no mailbox. If it
> > makes any difference, all the sites are published thru ISA 2006.
> >
> >
> > ...Tim
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Troy Meyer [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:02 AM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> > >
> > > Hi Tim,
> > >
> > > Can you access the new OWA web page from internal or external
> sources
> > at
> > > all? It shouldn't require any special setup to be on a new site,
> > though
> > > I have heard of Autodiscover issues on MB/CAS/HT combo boxes, is
> your
> > > first server running this same combo?
> > >
> > > If you can't see the site internally, is this an authentication
> issue?
> > > Are you using basic auth over SSL?
> > >
> > > -troy
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:42 AM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> > >
> > > OK, I'm probably missing something simple, but I'd appreciate it if
> > > someone could point me in the

RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

Where were you yesterday when I needed this? My googling skills weren't quite 
up to it. Part of the problem was that I didn't think to put in proxy. That 
likely would have brought it right up


From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:43 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

Figures since that's exactly how it works...;-)  If you set an externalURL 
Exchange thinks you are telling it that the server is externally available and 
will try and hand out/redirect the user to that URL instead of proxying.  
Here's a great article about how it all works.  I had to read it a couple of 
times when we were going through this...

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/10/12/447266.aspx

-alex
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:
Well, that was an educational 2 hours.

It turns out that when you have one CAS server proxying to another, the  
downstream server should *not* have an external URL entered. The other change 
we made was to  disable forms auth and enable windows auth on the downstream 
server. Once we did that, OWA and activesync just worked

...Tim

-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com<mailto:tev...@sparling.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

Yes, it has the correct ExternalURL entered on this server.

I'm on the phone with PSS now :-) I don't think there is such a thing as a 
"quick call" to PSS :-(

I'll let you know what they find

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer 
> [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com<mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com>]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:24 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
>
> Tim,
>
> Double check and make sure that your new server has an external site url
> assigned for OWA.  For some reason your Exchange box in the new site
> isn't correctly determining AD site structure. Without having more
> information about your environment it's hard to know why.  You sound
> like you are 90% there, perhaps its worth a quick support call to MSFT
> to track down the misfire.
>
> -troy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com<mailto:tev...@sparling.com>]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 1:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
>
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> OWA site you built?
>
> This is correct
>
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the
> site
>
> It does that even when I'm logged on as my test user with a mailbox in
> the new site
>
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> I have a DNS entry for 
> Autodiscover.sparling.com<http://Autodiscover.sparling.com> that points to the
> original CAS server
>
> ...Tim
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Troy Meyer 
> > [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com<mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:52 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> > OWA site you built?
> >
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the site
> > your mailbox is in, I.E. if your personal mailbox is in site1 it will
> > route you to OWA in site1.  Can you try this with a mailbox that is
> > housed in site2 and see if the new OWA  site works with that account?
> >
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> >
> > -troy
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com<mailto:tev...@sparling.com>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:16 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > Thanks, Troy
> > Yes, I can log into OWA internally by going to the server. Externally,
> > when I log in I get a page that says "Use the following link to open
> > this mailbox with optimal performance:" and gives me the URL I used to
> > log in, along with a button to add to favorites, but no mailbox. If it
> > makes any difference, all the sites are published thru ISA 2006.
> >
> >
> > ...Tim
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Troy Meyer 
> > > [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com<mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com>]
> &

RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

[Tim Evans]

NP, the blog post you referenced was informative too.

From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 4:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

lol...yeah...one of those posts where half way down I thought to myself, "I ran 
into this problem...and it was..." then I get to the part where you fixed 
it...sigh.  Sorry...
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:

Where were you yesterday when I needed this? My googling skills weren't quite 
up to it. Part of the problem was that I didn't think to put in proxy. That 
likely would have brought it right up





From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com<mailto:afontana...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 2:43 PM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue



Figures since that's exactly how it works...;-)  If you set an externalURL 
Exchange thinks you are telling it that the server is externally available and 
will try and hand out/redirect the user to that URL instead of proxying.  
Here's a great article about how it all works.  I had to read it a couple of 
times when we were going through this...

http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2007/10/12/447266.aspx

-alex

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:

Well, that was an educational 2 hours.

It turns out that when you have one CAS server proxying to another, the  
downstream server should *not* have an external URL entered. The other change 
we made was to  disable forms auth and enable windows auth on the downstream 
server. Once we did that, OWA and activesync just worked

...Tim

-Original Message-
From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com<mailto:tev...@sparling.com>]

Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue

Yes, it has the correct ExternalURL entered on this server.

I'm on the phone with PSS now :-) I don't think there is such a thing as a 
"quick call" to PSS :-(

I'll let you know what they find

...Tim


> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Meyer 
> [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com<mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com>]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:24 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
>
> Tim,
>
> Double check and make sure that your new server has an external site url
> assigned for OWA.  For some reason your Exchange box in the new site
> isn't correctly determining AD site structure. Without having more
> information about your environment it's hard to know why.  You sound
> like you are 90% there, perhaps its worth a quick support call to MSFT
> to track down the misfire.
>
> -troy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com<mailto:tev...@sparling.com>]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 1:18 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
>
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> OWA site you built?
>
> This is correct
>
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the
> site
>
> It does that even when I'm logged on as my test user with a mailbox in
> the new site
>
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> I have a DNS entry for 
> Autodiscover.sparling.com<http://Autodiscover.sparling.com> that points to the
> original CAS server
>
> ...Tim
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Troy Meyer 
> > [mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com<mailto:troy.me...@monacocoach.com>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:52 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > And the link that it gives you for optimal performance is to the first
> > OWA site you built?
> >
> > It sounds like its trying to route your OWA request based on the site
> > your mailbox is in, I.E. if your personal mailbox is in site1 it will
> > route you to OWA in site1.  Can you try this with a mailbox that is
> > housed in site2 and see if the new OWA  site works with that account?
> >
> > How have you setup autodiscover in your environment?
> >
> > -troy
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com<mailto:tev...@sparling.com>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:16 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 Activesync issue
> >
> > Thanks, Troy
> > Yes, I can log into OWA internally by going to the server. Externally,
>

Exchange 2007 recipient update service

[Tim Evans]

I'm preparing to apply SP2 to my Exchange organization. When I updated the 
schema, I got the message "Cannot find the Recipient Update Service responsible 
for domain DC=mydomain,DC=com'. New and existing users may not be properly 
Exchange-enabled." during the organization prerequisite checks. I thought they 
didn't have the RUS any more in Exchange 2007. Any idea what gives here? Do I 
have a problem?

...Tim

RE: Exchange 2007 recipient update service

[Tim Evans]

I still have the last 2003 Server that I haven't uninstalled yet. It's been 
decommissioned and the only thing we are using it for is a SMTP relay for our 
scanners. I don't see a RUS listed in our AD, so that would make sense.

Thanks.


...Tim

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@owa.smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 recipient update service

there is no more RUS in Exchange 2007. this seems to imply that your last 2000 
or 2003 server was not removed properly.

do you have a recipient update service in your active directory?

____
From: Tim Evans [tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 1:49 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2007 recipient update service
I'm preparing to apply SP2 to my Exchange organization. When I updated the 
schema, I got the message "Cannot find the Recipient Update Service responsible 
for domain DC=mydomain,DC=com'. New and existing users may not be properly 
Exchange-enabled." during the organization prerequisite checks. I thought they 
didn't have the RUS any more in Exchange 2007. Any idea what gives here? Do I 
have a problem?

...Tim

RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

[Tim Evans]

This: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=4475
implies that it is not supported. We have one user here with an Eris that we 
haven't been able to get to work with our Exchange 2007 system. It receives but 
does not send. There is an add on called Touchdown http://www.nitrodesk.com 
that is supposed to work pretty well,  but I understand that it isn't 
integrated with any of the phone functions. (sep contacts, etc)

...Tim

From: Phil Guevara [mailto:pguev...@mhccov.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Motorola Droid - Exchange

Anyone know what requirements on exchange and the firewall are needed to get 
droid to work with exchange?

Best Regards,
Phil

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Motorola Droid - Exchange


Did you disassociate the first Exchange server? You can only have one Exchange 
server comnected at a time. But I only have the HTC Eris with the 1.7 Android 
OS.
On Jan 12, 2010 7:21 PM, "Phil Guevara" 
mailto:pguev...@mhccov.org>> wrote:
Anyone have a Motorola droid hooked up to exchange??

I can't get the damn thing to work. I tried it for another exchange server and 
it worked but when I try it on ours it doesn't. Does anyone know if it requires 
port 443 to work? Is there any resources online that show what requirements are 
needed on the firewall and on exchange.
Best Regards,
Phil



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com










__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


http://www.eset.com


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

[Tim Evans]

Does it enforce any of the policies (pin required, min length, etc)?

...Tim

From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

Oh, and this assumes that you did the Droid Firmware 2.0.1 upgrade that came 
out in Dec for the Android OS (fixes a ton of bugs including some Exchange 
ones).


From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

Works ok here, and the setup is the same as any active-sync device. I only say 
it works ok, as the Droid sometimes loses all its mail settings and I have to 
type them back in which is a pain.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa995962(EXCHG.80).aspx



From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

This: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=4475
implies that it is not supported. We have one user here with an Eris that we 
haven't been able to get to work with our Exchange 2007 system. It receives but 
does not send. There is an add on called Touchdown http://www.nitrodesk.com 
that is supposed to work pretty well,  but I understand that it isn't 
integrated with any of the phone functions. (sep contacts, etc)

...Tim

From: Phil Guevara [mailto:pguev...@mhccov.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Motorola Droid - Exchange

Anyone know what requirements on exchange and the firewall are needed to get 
droid to work with exchange?

Best Regards,
Phil

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Motorola Droid - Exchange


Did you disassociate the first Exchange server? You can only have one Exchange 
server comnected at a time. But I only have the HTC Eris with the 1.7 Android 
OS.
On Jan 12, 2010 7:21 PM, "Phil Guevara" 
mailto:pguev...@mhccov.org>> wrote:
Anyone have a Motorola droid hooked up to exchange??

I can't get the damn thing to work. I tried it for another exchange server and 
it worked but when I try it on ours it doesn't. Does anyone know if it requires 
port 443 to work? Is there any resources online that show what requirements are 
needed on the firewall and on exchange.
Best Regards,
Phil



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com










__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


http://www.eset.com


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

[Tim Evans]

I see the problem. The Eris has v1.5 firmware, and it says there are no updates.

From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

Oh, and this assumes that you did the Droid Firmware 2.0.1 upgrade that came 
out in Dec for the Android OS (fixes a ton of bugs including some Exchange 
ones).


From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

Works ok here, and the setup is the same as any active-sync device. I only say 
it works ok, as the Droid sometimes loses all its mail settings and I have to 
type them back in which is a pain.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa995962(EXCHG.80).aspx



From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 6:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Motorola Droid - Exchange

This: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=4475
implies that it is not supported. We have one user here with an Eris that we 
haven't been able to get to work with our Exchange 2007 system. It receives but 
does not send. There is an add on called Touchdown http://www.nitrodesk.com 
that is supposed to work pretty well,  but I understand that it isn't 
integrated with any of the phone functions. (sep contacts, etc)

...Tim

From: Phil Guevara [mailto:pguev...@mhccov.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:42 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: FW: Motorola Droid - Exchange

Anyone know what requirements on exchange and the firewall are needed to get 
droid to work with exchange?

Best Regards,
Phil

From: Daniel Rodriguez [mailto:drod...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Motorola Droid - Exchange


Did you disassociate the first Exchange server? You can only have one Exchange 
server comnected at a time. But I only have the HTC Eris with the 1.7 Android 
OS.
On Jan 12, 2010 7:21 PM, "Phil Guevara" 
mailto:pguev...@mhccov.org>> wrote:
Anyone have a Motorola droid hooked up to exchange??

I can't get the damn thing to work. I tried it for another exchange server and 
it worked but when I try it on ours it doesn't. Does anyone know if it requires 
port 443 to work? Is there any resources online that show what requirements are 
needed on the firewall and on exchange.
Best Regards,
Phil



__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com










__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __


The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


http://www.eset.com


__ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4765 (20100112) __

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

RE: Mobile Device Policy

[Tim Evans]

copy sent off line

...Tim

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mobile Device Policy

Anyone have any examples of their corporate policy regarding the use of 
personal mobile devices and what will happen to it when they leave the company.

We've had a plethora of personal mobile devices connecting to Exchange, mostly 
iPhones, and most are owned by the individual, only a few are company devices.  
I tried to not allow it, but management overruled me.  My concern is when a 
person is terminated by either voluntary, or otherwise, means, I want to wipe 
the device.  I know that I need a policy in place stating that to cover the 
legalities of taking such action.   So if anyone has such a policy written, and 
would be willing to share the verbiage it would be appreciated.

Thanks,

--
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke
Sent from Keller, TX, United States

RE: Mobile Device Policy

[Tim Evans]

yeah, too much me too! :-)

Here are the T&C everyone here agrees to when they receive reimbursement for 
their personal device:

By accepting reimbursement for a personal mobile communications device or 
monthly cellular service from Sparling, Inc., I hereby assert and agree to the 
following: I acknowledge that the phone will be used or has been used for 
business purposes; I accept that by connecting to Sparling's e-mail or data 
servers, data synchronized with those servers may be remotely deleted from the 
mobile device at any time and without warning; I agree to accept, install or 
deploy any file downloads and/or settings changes classified as "mandatory" by 
Sparling IT; I agree to keep my phone secure at all times and (in the case of 
smart phones) use a strong password or strong (minimum 4 digit) PIN to access 
the device's data or features; I further agree to notify Sparling IT as soon as 
is practical in the case of a device's loss or theft or, alternatively, agree 
to disable my device remotely via the Outlook Web Application.

It doesn't specifically address termination, but I don't think it would be hard 
to modify it. Our policy is that certain staff are required to have cell 
phones/smart phones for their work and the company reimburses them for it.

Hope this helps

...Tim

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy

Tim, you probably should have just posted on the list.  It would've been less 
email!  :)

-Paul

By the way, excellent point about numbers.  We hadn't considered that.

From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy

Tim,

Me as well, please.

Thanks!

Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com<mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com>

From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy

Ditto

Sean Rector, MCSE

From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:pa...@mmcwm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy

I would appreciate a copy also, please.


From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy

Can you send a copy my way as well, please?

-Paul

From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:36 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy

copy sent off line

...Tim

From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Mobile Device Policy

Anyone have any examples of their corporate policy regarding the use of 
personal mobile devices and what will happen to it when they leave the company.

We've had a plethora of personal mobile devices connecting to Exchange, mostly 
iPhones, and most are owned by the individual, only a few are company devices.  
I tried to not allow it, but management overruled me.  My concern is when a 
person is terminated by either voluntary, or otherwise, means, I want to wipe 
the device.  I know that I need a policy in place stating that to cover the 
legalities of taking such action.   So if anyone has such a policy written, and 
would be willing to share the verbiage it would be appreciated.

Thanks,

--
Sherry Abercrombie

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
Arthur C. Clarke
Sent from Keller, TX, United States
Information Technology Manager
Virginia Opera Association

E-Mail: sean.rec...@vaopera.org<mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org>
Phone:(757) 213-4548 (direct line)
{+}

Virginia Opera's 35th Anniversary Season<http://www.vaopera.org>  The One You 
Love

Celebrate with a 2009-2010 subscription:
La Bohème<http://www.vaopera.org/html/currentoperas/opera1.cfm>   |   The 
Daughter of the Regiment<http://www.vaopera.org/html/currentoperas/opera2.cfm>  
 |   Don Giovanni<http://www.vaopera.org/html/currentoperas/opera3.cfm>   |   
Porgy and BessSM<http://www.vaopera.org/html/currentoperas/opera4.cfm>

Visit us online at www.VaOpera.org<http://www.vaopera.org/> or call 
1-866-OPERA-VA

The vision of Virginia Opera is to enrich lives through the powerful 
integration of music, voice and human drama.



This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). Unless otherwise specified, persons unnamed as 
recipients may not read, distribute

RE: Mobile Device Policy

[Tim Evans]

You wouldn't make a good lawyer, too simple

...Tim


-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mobile Device Policy

"It's company data. If you leave the company for any reason, we'll
wipe the device you're using and turn off its access. If you lose
personal data as a result, tough noogies. If you lose it, we'll wipe
it and turn off its access, and if you lose personal data, tough
noogies. If we think you're using it in a manner that puts company
data at risk, we'll wipe it and turn off its access, and if you lose
personal data, tough noogies."

There, that covers it.

Kurt

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:55, Tim Evans  wrote:
> yeah, too much me too! :-)
>
>
>
> Here are the T&C everyone here agrees to when they receive reimbursement for
> their personal device:
>
>
>
> By accepting reimbursement for a personal mobile communications device or
> monthly cellular service from Sparling, Inc., I hereby assert and agree to
> the following: I acknowledge that the phone will be used or has been used
> for business purposes; I accept that by connecting to Sparling's e-mail or
> data servers, data synchronized with those servers may be remotely deleted
> from the mobile device at any time and without warning; I agree to accept,
> install or deploy any file downloads and/or settings changes classified as
> "mandatory" by Sparling IT; I agree to keep my phone secure at all times and
> (in the case of smart phones) use a strong password or strong (minimum 4
> digit) PIN to access the device's data or features; I further agree to
> notify Sparling IT as soon as is practical in the case of a device's loss or
> theft or, alternatively, agree to disable my device remotely via the Outlook
> Web Application.
>
>
>
> It doesn't specifically address termination, but I don't think it would be
> hard to modify it. Our policy is that certain staff are required to have
> cell phones/smart phones for their work and the company reimburses them for
> it.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps
>
>
>
> ...Tim
>
>
>
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:42 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy
>
>
>
> Tim, you probably should have just posted on the list.  It would’ve been
> less email!  J
>
>
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
> By the way, excellent point about numbers.  We hadn’t considered that.
>
>
>
> From: Don Guyer [mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:38 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy
>
>
>
> Tim,
>
>
>
> Me as well, please.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Don Guyer
>
> Systems Engineer - Information Services
>
> Prudential, Fox & Roach/Trident Group
>
> 431 W. Lancaster Avenue
>
> Devon, PA 19333
>
> Direct: (610) 993-3299
>
> Fax: (610) 650-5306
>
> don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
>
>
>
> From: Sean Rector [mailto:sean.rec...@vaopera.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:26 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy
>
>
>
> Ditto
>
>
>
> Sean Rector, MCSE
>
>
>
> From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:pa...@mmcwm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:28 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy
>
>
>
> I would appreciate a copy also, please.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 5:46 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy
>
>
>
> Can you send a copy my way as well, please?
>
>
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
> From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 4:36 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Mobile Device Policy
>
>
>
> copy sent off line
>
>
>
> ...Tim
>
>
>
> From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 1:30 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Mobile Device Policy
>
>
>
> Anyone have any examples of their corporate policy regarding the use of
> personal mobile devices and what will happen to it when they leave the
> company.
>
> We've had a plethora of personal mobile devices connecting to Exchange,
> mostly iPhones, and most are owned by the individual, only a few are company
> devices.  I tried to not allow it, but management overruled me.  My concern
> is when a person is

RE: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

[Tim Evans]

So, do you any links to specifics on security problems on the iPhone?

...Tim

From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

'zactly - [ picturing a guy with an iPhone in one hand and a BlackBerry in the 
other - looks at the iPhone, says this is a toy - looks at the BlackBerry says 
this is a tool ] - we don't want toys in the toolbox ;).


From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

I've started researching allowing iphones for my network. Currently we're a 
blackberry shop.
Based on my current research, iPhone security is a complete, 110%, joke. 
Encryption, password, etc are apparently easily bypassed. It seems that for 
places like our military, congress, etc, they only allow blackberrys and 
iphones running 'good' software.




On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Don Andrews 
mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com>> wrote:
We ran an extended test of Good several years ago with "good" results - 
eventually it was decided to limit company smart phones to Blackberry - partly 
due to the cost of additional server required to gain intranet access with Good 
- subsequently a policy was implemented that NO personally owned communications 
devices would be allowed to connect in any way.


From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

Do any of you use a 3rd party solution to manage smart phones connecting to 
your exchange 2003 server (other than Blackberry Enterprise server)?  If so, 
can you comment on your success with it and what pricing was like?


Thanks!

Bill Lambert
Windows System Administrator
Concuity
A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc.
Phone  847-941-9206
Fax  847-465-9147
[cid:image001.gif@01CAB08A.4A512DD0]


NASDAQ: TTPA
The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, 
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive 
information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received 
this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, 
or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all 
copies of this message.  Thank you.


<>

RE: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

[Tim Evans]

wow, it does look like there are some issues there

Thanks

...Tim

From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 12:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

I might post up my research when I'm done. I've found tons of issues.
Things from as simple as rebooting your iphone when it goes into roaming and 
the password is bypassed(I think is now fixed) to apple re-breaking issues 
during updates, to mis-reporting devices are encrypted when they're not, to 
this latest issue which is not fixed which apparently allows someone with 
physical access to your encrypted iphone to get all of your data. Not way this 
would fly in a real business.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peQrovkTcac





On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:
So, do you any links to specifics on security problems on the iPhone?

...Tim

From: Don Andrews 
[mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com<mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com>]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:02 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

'zactly - [ picturing a guy with an iPhone in one hand and a BlackBerry in the 
other - looks at the iPhone, says this is a toy - looks at the BlackBerry says 
this is a tool ] - we don't want toys in the toolbox ;).


From: Jon D [mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com<mailto:rekcahp...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 10:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

I've started researching allowing iphones for my network. Currently we're a 
blackberry shop.
Based on my current research, iPhone security is a complete, 110%, joke. 
Encryption, password, etc are apparently easily bypassed. It seems that for 
places like our military, congress, etc, they only allow blackberrys and 
iphones running 'good' software.




On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Don Andrews 
mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com>> wrote:
We ran an extended test of Good several years ago with "good" results - 
eventually it was decided to limit company smart phones to Blackberry - partly 
due to the cost of additional server required to gain intranet access with Good 
- subsequently a policy was implemented that NO personally owned communications 
devices would be allowed to connect in any way.


From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com<mailto:blamb...@concuity.com>]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 7:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Subject: Mobile Smart Phones/Exchange 2003

Do any of you use a 3rd party solution to manage smart phones connecting to 
your exchange 2003 server (other than Blackberry Enterprise server)?  If so, 
can you comment on your success with it and what pricing was like?


Thanks!

Bill Lambert
Windows System Administrator
Concuity
A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc.
Phone  847-941-9206
Fax  847-465-9147
[cid:image001.gif@01CAB096.1A5C73D0]


NASDAQ: TTPA
The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, 
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive 
information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received 
this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, 
or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all 
copies of this message.  Thank you.



<>

RE: Basic help

[Tim Evans]

or bipeka?

...Tim

From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 6:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Basic help

No, today it's Topeka!

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 7:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Basic help

Biggle...
That's awesome!
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
I'm sorry I don't have time to give you a complete answer this morning, but 
this is called "backscatter". Biggle on "exchange 2003 backscatter" and you 
should find loads of help.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Bill Lambert [mailto:blamb...@concuity.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 8:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Basic help

Hello all

I'm getting several messages per day that are  hanging in the outbound queues.  
They all appear to be spam and have these characteristics:
In ESM/ Message Properties the Sender is 
postmas...@concuity.com.  The Subject for all 
of them is Delivery Status Notification (Failure).  The Recipients are to 
various spam addresses.  The 'Additional Queue Information' is 'The remote 
server did not respond to a connection attempt.'

I'm wondering how these are being generated and if there is a way to stop them.

The environment is Exchange 2003 Enterprise fully patched.  Outlook 2003 and 
2007 clients.

Any help/advice/links/tips would be greatly appreciated!

Bill Lambert
Windows System Administrator
Concuity
Phone  847-941-9206
Fax  847-465-9147
[cid:image001.png@01CAD168.7011F730]


The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached files, 
is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) 
named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive 
information for the recipient) you are hereby notified that you have received 
this communication in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, 
or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all 
copies of this message.  Thank you.


<>

RE: 2010 Outlook Bug

[Tim Evans]

And I've had just the opposite problem - Outlook collapsing groups when I don't 
want them collapsed.  My Office 2010 install is only a few days old now, so I 
don't know if this is still a problem or not.

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2010 Outlook Bug

Well, here are some screenshots... should be self-explanatory for now.

Bug:
http://i.imgur.com/Nm3aL.png


New Annoyance:
http://i.imgur.com/0cPyG.png

Both are somewhat related, as I sort by categories in Outlook.

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2010 Outlook Bug

Or at least a bug that I wish they would have fixed in 2003 and 2007...
And another issue that frustrates me.
I just installed 2010 and I can't believe they still haven't fixed it.  Going 
from 2003 to 2010, I expected more.

Are there any popular Outlook Discussion Groups that have any visibility to MS 
Employees?

Thanks,

Sam

RE: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

[Tim Evans]

and if you want to use DAGs, you'll need to install it on enterprise version.

...Tim

From: Peter Johnson [mailto:peter.john...@peterstow.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 3:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

Also Enterprise addresses more RAM than the standard version. However since STd 
X64 addresses 32GB of RAM I doubht this is actually an issue anymore :) Since 
32GB should be more than sufficient for most organisations,

Regards
[cid:image001.jpg@01CAEA8B.DB283700]

Peter Johnson
I.T Architect
United Kingdom: +44 1285 658542
South Africa: +27 11 252 1100
Swaziland: +268 442 7000
Fax:+27 11 974 7130
Mobile: +2783 306 0019
peter.john...@peterstow.com


This email message (including attachments) contains information which may be 
confidential and/or legally privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, 
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information 
contained in the message or from any attachments that were sent with this 
email, and If you have received this email message in error, please advise the 
sender by email, and delete the message. Unauthorised disclosure and/or use of 
information contained in this email may result in civil and criminal liability. 
Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of 
Peterstow Aquapower is proprietary to the company.

Caution should be observed in placing any reliance upon any information 
contained in this e-mail, which is not intended to be a representation or 
inducement to make any decision in relation to Peterstow Aquapower. Any 
decision taken based on the information provided in this e-mail, should only be 
made after consultation with appropriate legal, regulatory, tax, technical, 
business, investment, financial, and accounting advisors. Neither the sender of 
the e-mail, nor Peterstow Aquapower shall be liable to any party for any 
direct, indirect or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss 
of profit, interruption of business or loss of information, data or software or 
otherwise.

The e-mail address of the sender may not be used, copied, sold, disclosed or 
incorporated into any database or mailing list for spamming and/or other 
marketing purposes without the prior consent of Peterstow Aquapower.
No warranties are created or implied that an employee of Peterstow Aquapower 
and/or a contractor of Peterstow Aquapower is authorized to create and send 
this e-mail.
 [cid:image002.jpg@01CAEA8B.DB283700]
From: Evan Brastow [mailto:ebras...@automatedemblem.com]
Sent: 22 April 2010 22:04
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 on Win Server 2008

Hi guys,

Quick question. Is there a benefit to running Exchange 2010 Enterprise on 
Windows 2008 Server Enterprise instead of Windows Server 2008 Standard?

Thanks,

Evan
<><>

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Tim Evans]

You need to export it from your current server first, with the private key. It 
will give you a PFX file you can import into the new server. Whenever I get a 
new cert, I export like this and keep a copy for backup.

...Tim

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

RE: Digital Cert Request response

[Tim Evans]

oops, never mind. I thought you were trying to move it from another server. I'd 
still make a backup once you get it installed.

...Tim

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:03 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Digital Cert Request response

I created the request (still have a copy of the .req file there) on the machine 
I'm trying to import onto.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:
You need to export it from your current server first, with the private key. It 
will give you a PFX file you can import into the new server. Whenever I get a 
new cert, I export like this and keep a copy for backup.

...Tim

From: Russ Patterson [mailto:rus...@gmail.com<mailto:rus...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:50 AM

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Digital Cert Request response

Hello all -

We just got a SAN DigCert request back, and I'm trying to import it into our 
2010 CAS server. Problem is - there's no "Complete Pending Request" wizard on 
the Server Configuration / Exchange certificates tab Actions Pane.

Anybody have any suggestions about how to import this .CRT file? Do I just use 
Import-ExchangeCertificate? I'm not real positive I understand the -FileData 
part of that cmdlets syntax. Do I need to use the Certificate mmc first?

Sorry about my lack of DigCert knowledge. Any suggestions gratefully accepted.

Russ

RE: Several NDR's

[Tim Evans]

google "joe job"

...Tim


-Original Message-
From: Brent Zalewski [mailto:bzalew...@comcast.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 1:26 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Several NDR's

We have a user that has been receiving hundreds of the following NDR's.  The 
date sent on the message show yesterday which was a holiday.  The user did not 
loogn to her OWA or was not on her computer email at all yesterday.  Any ideas 
would be appreciated.  Check machine for virus, spyware, etc.  Nothing found as 
of yet.  There was nothing in the Sent Items for any of these messages.
I noticed that the to in the first part of the message with a banet.net domain 
and the to in the diagnostic area is winn...@camelot.co.uk.

Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: Our Exchange Server

xx...@banet.net
vms169129pub.verizon.net #550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: xx...@banet.net ##

Original message headers:

Received: from Our Exchange Server ([::1]) by Our Exchange Server
 ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 31 May 2010 09:35:00 -0500
From: User email with the issue
To: "winn...@camelot.co.uk" 
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 09:35:00 -0500
Subject: =?windows-1256?Q?Sponsored_by_Camelot_Groups=FE?=
Thread-Topic: =?windows-1256?Q?Sponsored_by_Camelot_Groups=FE?=
Thread-Index: AQHLAM5yfeXkCvk01kyPotV89Cun4Q==
Message-ID: <75d9a2b054a32b4cbfb345d89fc273d61004f1d...@isdexch1.sangcty.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_75D9A2B054A32B4CBFB345D89FC273D61004F1D0FDISDEXCH1SangC_"
MIME-Version: 1.0

2003-2007 migration with a twist

[Tim Evans]

We have an all Exchange 2007SP2 environment. We are acquiring a company with an 
Exchange 2003 (unknown SP) environment. My plan is to create user accounts in 
our domain for all the users and use exmerge/powershell to move their mailboxes 
into our domain. My problem is that they have a bunch of public folders with 
data that we need to bring over. So far, I've found that exmerge won't work on 
public folders. It looks like the inter-org replication tool may do what I need.

Does anyone have any comments/suggestions on the best way to handle this? Is 
there anything else I need to think about to migrate this properly? Will their 
free/busy info propagate in our organization when I import their calendar data?

Thanks for any ideas.

...Tim

RE: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

[Tim Evans]

Hmm, that's too bad. I'm in the same boat here. Our move day is scheduled for 
next weekend and I only found out about this Friday. It sounds like I'll have a 
good job for an intern for a while.

Thanks for the info.

...Tim

From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:58 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

Went through this at my former employer, only we were going from our Ex 2007 
environment to their Ex 2003.
We did a pretty thorough evaluation of the Quest tools - they are VERY nice and 
don't seem to miss anything.  Not cheap, but money was not the primary concern 
in this case.

Our problem was time-to-implementation.  When a vacant suit says "do it now" 
because he/she can't see another vacant suit's calendar - you don't get a lot 
of time to work with scheduling professional services from Quest.  Our sales 
rep told me that they will not sell the product without Prof Services, and they 
needed 2-3 weeks to get someone on site, so

We went with Plan B which is not as elegant and involves the users more 
heavily, but still works.  In the end, it probably took the same amount of 
time, but a whole lot more work to do it the way we did, but we had to give the 
empty suits some warm fuzzy feelings that we were getting on it "right away".

  Good times...good times.

Jim

Jim Holmgren
Manager of Server Engineering
XLHealth Corporation
The Warehouse at Camden Yards
351 West Camden Street, Suite 100
Baltimore, MD 21201
410.625.2200 (main)
443.524.8573 (direct)
443-506.2400 (cell)
www.xlhealth.com



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:37 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

Well, if you want it to be "perfect", you should look at the quest tool.

If you just are concerned about the data, use Outlook 2007+ and export the PFs 
to a PST on the "far side" and import them on the "near side".

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: 2003-2007 migration with a twist

We have an all Exchange 2007SP2 environment. We are acquiring a company with an 
Exchange 2003 (unknown SP) environment. My plan is to create user accounts in 
our domain for all the users and use exmerge/powershell to move their mailboxes 
into our domain. My problem is that they have a bunch of public folders with 
data that we need to bring over. So far, I've found that exmerge won't work on 
public folders. It looks like the inter-org replication tool may do what I need.

Does anyone have any comments/suggestions on the best way to handle this? Is 
there anything else I need to think about to migrate this properly? Will their 
free/busy info propagate in our organization when I import their calendar data?

Thanks for any ideas.

...Tim


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email, including attachments, is for the sole use 
of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or protected 
health information. Under the Federal Law (HIPAA), the intended recipient is 
obligated to keep this information secure and confidential. Any disclosure to 
third parties without authorization from the member of as permitted by law is 
prohibited and punishable under Federal Law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message.

NOTA DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este mensaje incluyendo cualquier anejo es para uso 
exclusivo del (los) destinatario (s) y puede incluir informaci?n confidencial 
y/o informaci?n de salud protegida. La Ley Federal (HIPAA) establece que el 
destinatario est? obligado a mantener la informaci?n confidencial y sequra. 
HIPAA proh?be y castiga cualquier divulgaci?n a terceras personas sin 
autorizaci?n del afiliado o permitido por ley. Si usted no es el destinatario, 
redirija esta mensaje al remitente, y destruye cualquier copia existente del 
mensaje original.

Powershell: Clear multivalued property

[Tim Evans]

How do you clear a multi-valued property in Powershell? I've got a bunch of 
mailboxes that have a setting in the RejectMessagesFromDLMembers property. I'd 
like to clear that value. I'm finding lots of examples on how to set them, but 
nothing on how to clear it. Exchange 2007, SP2

Thanks,

...Tim

RE: Powershell: Clear multivalued property

[Tim Evans]

That did it, thanks!

...Tim

From: Eric Woodford [mailto:ericwoodf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:00 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Powershell: Clear multivalued property

hmmm, have you tried setting it to Null?

set-mailbox  -id user -rejectmessagesfromdlmembers $null


On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:
How do you clear a multi-valued property in Powershell? I've got a bunch of 
mailboxes that have a setting in the RejectMessagesFromDLMembers property. I'd 
like to clear that value. I'm finding lots of examples on how to set them, but 
nothing on how to clear it. Exchange 2007, SP2

Thanks,

...Tim

RE: Blacklisted on new IP?

[Tim Evans]

You can find out everything you ever wanted to know about SPF records at 
http://www.openspf.org/

...Tim

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 1:55 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted on new IP?

You set them up with whoever is hosting your DNS.

Nothing bad about setting them up.

Here is a wizard:

http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/safety/content/technologies/senderid/wizard/

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 4:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted on new IP?

I'm finding on forums that some people were able to resolve this by setting up 
an SPF record.  I don't know anything about them.

Is there anything bad about setting them up? Do I set them up with Time Warner?



Steve Hart
Network Administrator
503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax

From: Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 1:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted on new IP?

"Bigfish" is FOPE; i.e., Forefront Online Protection for Exchange (or something 
like that).

It's very much a black box. TTBOMK, you have done everything you can do.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Steve Hart [mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted on new IP?

Yeah, we've shown up clean on every online source I can find, but we're still 
getting the bounced mail from bigfish.

Naturally, our largest two customers use them.

Do we know anything about how "Blocklist 2" works? Is it reported spam? DNS? 
Some other criteria?

Steve



Steve Hart
Network Administrator
503.491.4343 -Direct | 503.492.8160 - Fax

From: Michael B. Smith 
[mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 1:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Blacklisted on new IP?

It all looks OK to me.

http://www.mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3a66.194.64.143

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
Consultant and Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com

From: Steve Hart 
[mailto:sh...@wrightbg.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 3:56 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Blacklisted on new IP?

We just changed from XO to TW and we got new IPs in the deal.  This morning I'm 
am getting bounced emails like this:




Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:

Gini Adams
Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange 
will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following 
diagnostic text to your system administrator.

The following organization rejected your message: CH1EHSMHS016.bigfish.com.


Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007


Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: CORP-EXCHANGE.wrightbg.com

gini.ad...@harlandclarke.com
CH1EHSMHS016.bigfish.com #550 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host 
[66.194.64.143] blocked using Blocklist 2, mail from IP banned; To request 
removal from this list please forward this message to 
del...@messaging.microsoft.com. ##


I've requested to be delisted. Is there anything else I should be looking into?

Steve



---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_

RE: eDiscovery tools for Exchange .pst files

[Tim Evans]

We are currently working with Ontrack PowerControls for Exchange. I wish it had 
better search functions (support for regular expressions would be great, I 
would even settle for decent and/or operators), but it does basic text searches 
pretty well. I doubt that the average user would want or need these advanced 
search functions. Their support is pretty decent for non technical people too. 
I haven't tried opening files from a read only location - you'd have to check 
with them. They have pretty good presales support. 
http://www.krollontrack.com/software/powercontrols/

...Tim


-Original Message-
From: Rupprecht, James R [mailto:jimruppre...@ku.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:19 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: eDiscovery tools for Exchange .pst files

Looking for recommendations on tools to search .pst files. Here is what I 
want...

1. Can access/search .pst files (including any message attachments) located on 
a read-only network share.
2. Is simple enough be be understood by people who are good lawyers but average 
users.
3. Allows export of results to a new (local) .pst file or individual messages.
4. Has 'decent' support by the vendor that said lawyers can call when they have 
questions or need help.

Anyone use anything that they really love or really hate?

Thanks in advance.

Jim Rupprecht
University of Kansas


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: lync 2013 client to 2010 server

[Tim Evans]

Same here. I just installed it and it connected without problem. The client is 
running on Windows 8 if that makes any difference.

...Tim

From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:53 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: lync 2013 client to 2010 server

I've had the Lync 2013 preview client installed on my laptop for months now, 
which connects to Lync Server 2010.

Is there an error that appears when trying to connect?  Does anything show up 
in the Lync logging (if enabled)?

Regards,

Cameron

___
Cameron Cooper | IT Manager | Aurico
Direct: 847.890.4021 | Cell: 224.688.2854 | Fax: 847.255.1896
ccoo...@aurico.com | 
www.aurico.com

From: Rick Berry 
[mailto:rbe...@elevativenetworks.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 7:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OT: lync 2013 client to 2010 server

The compatibility charts say that Lync 2013 client works to Lync 2010 server if 
the server has the latest Cumulative ... but I can't get it to work?

I suspect (but don't really know) that it's something to do with Client version 
stuff (OC older than or same as/etc) ...

Anyone have a hint?  Not important, lync2010 runs fine, but would like to see 
how Lync 2013 works on our existing 2010 infrastructure.  I just finally got 
around to installing 8 & office 2013, besides an outlook autodiscover annoyance 
Lync is the only thing I can't get to fly ...

-Rick

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message is intended only for the person or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential material. Any 
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, downloading, copying or distribution is 
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
reply email and permanently delete all copies of the original message. If you 
are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through 
this medium, please advise the sender immediately.

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: ios6.1 woes

[Tim Evans]

This blog  has links to several blogs that may help: 
http://blog.jasonsherry.net/2013/02/10/ios-6-1-causing-very-high-log-generation-on-exchange/
 I haven't had the need to try it myself (yet).


...Tim

From: Peter Sam [mailto:srir...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: ios6.1 woes

Hmm sort of..

This will delete the full ActiveSync functionality.  I was looking to see if we 
can just disable the "Calendar" portion only..

So, users will still be able to get email on their iphones but they wont be 
able to accept any new invites (the ones that cause the rapid log growth).

From: 
rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net
To: 
exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Subject: RE: ios6.1 woes
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:46:55 +
Any help?

http://thoughtsofanidlemind.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/ios6-activesync/

From: Peter Sam [mailto:srir...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 3:40 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: ios6.1 woes

Please refer

http://9to5mac.com/2013/02/08/aol-disables-meeting-management-via-iphones-due-to-apple-ios-6-1-bug/


Does anyone know how AOL does this?  Can it be done in Exchange 2007? Exchange 
2010? (temporarily disable the ability to accept or manage calendar meetings 
using mobile devices to..)

--snip..

AOL's corporate Enterprise Messaging Operations team has been monitoring a 
rapidly increasing and unusually large volume of traffic across our enterprise 
mail environment originating from iOS devices running the new iOS 6.1 update. 
We have researched this problem and appears to be connected to a recently 
identified issue that seems to cause these iOS devices to continuously loop 
while synchronizing a recurring calendar meeting invitation. Similar problems 
have been reported by a number of sources to several media outlets across the 
Web in the past few days. While our team continues to work productively and 
rapidly with Apple and Microsoft to resolve the issue, it has been necessary to 
temporarily disable the ability to accept or manage calendar meetings using 
mobile devices to ensure that we maintain the integrity of our corporate 
enterprise messaging platform. Since this change is limited to managing 
calendar invitations, by disabling them temporarily we allow our employees to 
continue to experience the excellent productivity these devices bring to our 
enterprise until this issue is resolved.

Thanks
Peter


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

[Tim Evans]

If you change any of the original names on the cert, they will revoke the 
original one before they reissue it. That may be an issue if you can't replace 
the original cert quickly. You can add names to it without revoking the 
original, but you have to pay the difference.

...Tim

From: Tobie Fysh [mailto:tobie.f...@freebridge.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

If you get a digicert one then you can amend the names on the certificate as 
many times as you like during the lifetime of the cert.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 21 February 2013 14:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

Of course. You just need to ensure you include all the required namespaces.

-Original Message-
From: Connolly, Peter [mailto:pjc...@buffalo.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

All,

We are preparing to deploy Exchange 2010 and will coexist with Exchange 2007. 
Is it possible to generate the CSR for the certificate from an Exchange 2007 
server? Our 2007 SAN cert expires before we will install 2010 and this would 
prevent having to get another certificate. Also I would like to have the cert 
available before the 2010 CAS install process. I know I need to add the legacy 
namespace for 2007 CAS. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Peter

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

This message has been scanned by MimeCast on behalf of Freebridge Community 
Housing and found to be free of viruses and not SPAM. If you have any concerns 
about the message contents please contact the ICT ServiceDesk.

[Freebridge Community Housing Logo]


[twitter.com/Freebridge]


[Freebridge on 
Facebook]



This e-mail (including any attachments), is confidential and intended only for 
the use of the addressee(s). It may contain information covered by legal, 
professional or other privilege. If you are not an addressee, please inform the 
sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Do not copy, use or disclose this 
e-mail.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free. The sender 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard copy version.

Freebridge Community Housing Ltd is a Charitable Industrial and Provident 
Society - Reg No IP29744R Registered with the Registered with the Homes & 
Communities Agency - No L4463. VAT Registration Number 860762121

Freebridge Community Housing, Juniper House, Austin Street, Kings Lynn, Norfolk 
PE30 1DZ


This email message has been scanned for viruses by Mimecast.
Mimecast delivers a complete managed email solution from a single web based 
platform.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist<><><>

RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

[Tim Evans]

Leaving the old names in place won't hurt anything. If you can't have the 
revoked cert in production, I'd either just get a new cert or add the new names 
to the old cert, depending on how much time it has left on it.

...Tim

From: Connolly, Peter [mailto:pjc...@buffalo.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

Thanks Tim - this may be an issue for us.  Our original cert contains invalid 
FQDN's, and they will no longer be issued after November 1st, 2015 (according 
to http://www.networking4all.com/en/ssl+certificates/faq/change+san+issue/).

I was not sure how this would affect us so I was going to remove those entries 
(Comodo SAN cert).  Should I just leave the old names in place?  There is a bit 
of turnaround time and we can't afford a revoked cert in production.

Peter

From: Tim Evans [mailto:tev...@sparling.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

If you change any of the original names on the cert, they will revoke the 
original one before they reissue it. That may be an issue if you can't replace 
the original cert quickly. You can add names to it without revoking the 
original, but you have to pay the difference.

...Tim

From: Tobie Fysh [mailto:tobie.f...@freebridge.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 7:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

If you get a digicert one then you can amend the names on the certificate as 
many times as you like during the lifetime of the cert.

From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: 21 February 2013 14:26
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

Of course. You just need to ensure you include all the required namespaces.

-Original Message-
From: Connolly, Peter [mailto:pjc...@buffalo.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2010 generate CSR

All,

We are preparing to deploy Exchange 2010 and will coexist with Exchange 2007. 
Is it possible to generate the CSR for the certificate from an Exchange 2007 
server? Our 2007 SAN cert expires before we will install 2010 and this would 
prevent having to get another certificate. Also I would like to have the cert 
available before the 2010 CAS install process. I know I need to add the legacy 
namespace for 2007 CAS. Thanks in advance for any advice.

Peter

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

This message has been scanned by MimeCast on behalf of Freebridge Community 
Housing and found to be free of viruses and not SPAM. If you have any concerns 
about the message contents please contact the ICT ServiceDesk.

[Freebridge Community Housing Logo]<http://www.freebridge.org.uk>


[twitter.com/Freebridge]<http://twitter.com/Freebridge>


[Freebridge on 
Facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Kings-Lynn-United-Kingdom/Freebridge-Community-Housing/192690183387?v=box_3>



This e-mail (including any attachments), is confidential and intended only for 
the use of the addressee(s). It may contain information covered by legal, 
professional or other privilege. If you are not an addressee, please inform the 
sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Do not copy, use or disclose this 
e-mail.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free. The sender 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this 
message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is 
required please request a hard copy version.

Freebridge Community Housing Ltd is a Charitable Industrial and Provident 
Society - Reg No IP29744R Registered with the Registered with the Homes & 
Communities Agency - No L4463. VAT Registration Number 860762121

Freebridge Community Housing, Juniper House, Austin Street, Kings Lynn, Norfolk 
PE30 1DZ


This email message has been scanned for viruses by Mimecast.
Mimecast delivers a complete managed email solution from a single web based 
platform.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe excha

RE: what spam or edge server are you using?

[Tim Evans]

I use assp. It's a very powerful, but complex, open source program available at 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp.

...Tim

From: Jimmy Tran [mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what spam or edge server are you using?

Any recommendations for ones that are free if not near free?  I'd like to have 
something hosted on my servers for long term testing purposes?

From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 5:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: what spam or edge server are you using?

I've managed a couple of Barracuda 800s as second tier AV/SPAM gateways. 
Primary protection is provided by Postini (soon to be Google Apps). They're 
really easy to configure and manage, clustering is a breeze, and for the most 
part they just work. There's only been a couple of occassions in the last few 
years where I've lost access to the interface requiring a power cycle of the 
appliance. It hasn't been enough of an issue for me to contact support yet. I 
don't remember the exact cost but I'm pretty sure they were middle of the road.

- Sean
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jimmy Tran 
mailto:ji...@jt-solution.com>> wrote:
I'm looking for some opionoins on what to use as a spam/edge server for 
Exchange 2010.  What do you all recommend or use?  Budget is a concern since 
that has not been decided on yet.

Thanks,

Jimmy


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: what spam or edge server are you using?

[Tim Evans]

Yes, Micheal had a falling out with one of the developers and left the project. 
It is worse off for it now, too. Fortunately, another developer has come on 
board and has been making a lot more improvements, plus he is easier to get 
along with too. I don't mind that the project is in Perl because I don't have 
to deal with the code. It's a pretty solid piece of work if you stick with the 
stable version.

...Tim

From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what spam or edge server are you using?

No kidding, I use it at a few places as well. One of the guys on this list 
actually used
to be a contributor at one point. Nice piece of ware, only shame is that its 
Perl.

If I never have to work with Perl again, its to soon:)

jlc
____
From: Tim Evans
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 7:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: what spam or edge server are you using?
I use assp. It's a very powerful, but complex, open source program available at 
http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp.

...Tim

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Anybody out there seeing any effects of the DDOS attack on Spamhaus?

[Tim Evans]

Supposed to be the "worst cyberattack ever"
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/03/27/spam-blocking-group-spamhaus-reports-being-hit-by-massive-cyberattack-many/


...Tim

From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anybody out there seeing any effects of the DDOS attack on Spamhaus?

Some sites are kind of slow here.  I hear it's a lot worse in the UK.

**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: Anybody out there seeing any effects of the DDOS attack on Spamhaus?

[Tim Evans]

Here is another article with a bit more technical details: 
http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/03/spamhaus-ddos-grows-to-internet-threatening-size/

Yes, the DNS reflector attack is interesting, as is CloudFlare's anycast 
defense against it. I haven't seen any difference in my connections out of 
Seattle. Apparently, it has been going on for over a week now.

...Tim

From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:09 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Anybody out there seeing any effects of the DDOS attack on 
Spamhaus?

I'm based in the UK and my internet speed is no worse than normal. That DNS 
reflector attack is quite neat though, I have to admit.


On 27 March 2013 21:54, Tim Evans 
mailto:tev...@sparling.com>> wrote:
Supposed to be the "worst cyberattack ever"
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/03/27/spam-blocking-group-spamhaus-reports-being-hit-by-massive-cyberattack-many/


...Tim

From: Campbell, Rob 
[mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net<mailto:rob_campb...@centraltechnology.net>]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anybody out there seeing any effects of the DDOS attack on Spamhaus?

Some sites are kind of slow here.  I hear it's a lot worse in the UK.

**
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist



--
James Rankin
Technical Consultant (ACA, CCA, MCTS)
http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: DAG monitoring

[Tim Evans]

I monitor for MSExchangeRepl Events 2153 & 4982

...Tim

From: phil levine [mailto:plevin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAG monitoring

Is there anything out there that will alert me to when a database in a DAG 
fails to another server? Can I monitor anything in the logs for this?

Thanks

Phil


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

RE: DAG monitoring

[Tim Evans]

That would probably require SCOM or a script like Peter suggested. I just set 
up event log tasks on those event ID's and have it notify me. I then check the 
server to see what happened.

…Tim

From: phil levine [mailto:plevin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 7:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: DAG monitoring

Thanks.

But is there anything or any way to specifically monitor each database in the 
DAG for when they move to a different node in the DAG? We have this happen more 
often than I'd care to admit and doesn't cause any outage but it does happen 
and I'd like to know when. We don't have SCCM in place nor will it be for a few 
more moths and I'd like something in the interim.

________
From: Tim Evans mailto:tev...@sparling.com>>
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
mailto:exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:00 AM
Subject: RE: DAG monitoring

I monitor for MSExchangeRepl Events 2153 & 4982

…Tim

From: phil levine [mailto:plevin...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: DAG monitoring

Is there anything out there that will alert me to when a database in a DAG 
fails to another server? Can I monitor anything in the logs for this?

Thanks

Phil

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com<mailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com>
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist