Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Jan 17, 2012 6:11 AM, "Mick" wrote: > > On Monday 16 Jan 2012 01:35:04 Pandu Poluan wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2012 12:58 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote > > > > > > > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can > > > > figure that one out in seconds... > > > > > > A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular port, > > > > > > as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy instance > > > could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with special > > > iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. > > > > And don't forget to put the false sshd through a tc rule that chokes the > > return traffic to 1 cps B-) > > > > Of course, being the "real sysadmin" a.k.a lazy slob that I am, that's way > > too much work for not enough bastardly pleasure... I can't gleefully see > > the face of people trapped in the tc hell :-P > > > Can you set up tc by port? I thought it is only applicable to an interface. > I need to brush up on this one day. Actually, yes, by using u32 match. But I prefer to just MARK the packet in iptables and match against that. Rgds,
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Monday 16 Jan 2012 01:35:04 Pandu Poluan wrote: > On Jan 16, 2012 12:58 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote > > > > > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can > > > figure that one out in seconds... > > > > A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular port, > > > > as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy instance > > could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with special > > iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. > > And don't forget to put the false sshd through a tc rule that chokes the > return traffic to 1 cps B-) > > Of course, being the "real sysadmin" a.k.a lazy slob that I am, that's way > too much work for not enough bastardly pleasure... I can't gleefully see > the face of people trapped in the tc hell :-P Can you set up tc by port? I thought it is only applicable to an interface. I need to brush up on this one day. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 08:23:33AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote > That depends on who are authorized to access the boxen via SSH. In my case, > only the IT Division is authorized to access them via SSH, so the "real > sysadmin" in me (g) decides it is much easier to shift the port rather than > implementing esoteric hardening stuffs ;-) > > Plus, I get the benefit of ridiculing any IT guy/gal who managed to get > him-/herself locked out (thanks to the auto-blacklist) B-) The opposite of auto-blacklisting is port-knocking. Think of it as auto-unblacklisting, where the world is blacklisted by default. See... http://www.hostsvault.com/blog/howto-protect-services-like-ssh-against-brute-force-using-only-iptables-port-knocking/ The idea is that your external service is blocked to everybody by default. When an external IP address "knocks" in sequence on the right 3 ports (specified in iptables), it is then allowed a few seconds to establish a connection (ssh/ftp/whatever). -- Walter Dnes
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Jan 16, 2012 12:58 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote > > > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can > > figure that one out in seconds... > > A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular port, > as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy instance > could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with special > iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. > And don't forget to put the false sshd through a tc rule that chokes the return traffic to 1 cps B-) Of course, being the "real sysadmin" a.k.a lazy slob that I am, that's way too much work for not enough bastardly pleasure... I can't gleefully see the face of people trapped in the tc hell :-P Rgds,
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Jan 16, 2012 3:56 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:54:51 -0500 > "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote > > > > > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can > > > figure that one out in seconds... > > > > A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular > > port, as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy > > instance could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with > > special iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. > > > > Actually a real sysadmin[1] would run ssh standardly plus OSSEC with > active rules and dynamically block our Chinese friends > > [1] "real sysadmin" being defined as the quintessentially lazy dude who > is really not into causing himself pain or doing anything that would > increase support tickets in his inbox > That depends on who are authorized to access the boxen via SSH. In my case, only the IT Division is authorized to access them via SSH, so the "real sysadmin" in me (g) decides it is much easier to shift the port rather than implementing esoteric hardening stuffs ;-) Plus, I get the benefit of ridiculing any IT guy/gal who managed to get him-/herself locked out (thanks to the auto-blacklist) B-) Rgds,
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:54:51 -0500 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote > > > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can > > figure that one out in seconds... > > A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular > port, as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy > instance could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with > special iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. > Actually a real sysadmin[1] would run ssh standardly plus OSSEC with active rules and dynamically block our Chinese friends [1] "real sysadmin" being defined as the quintessentially lazy dude who is really not into causing himself pain or doing anything that would increase support tickets in his inbox -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-15 12:54 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can figure that one out in seconds... A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular port, as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy instance could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with special iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. Interesting, thanks for the idea... :)
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30:03AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can > figure that one out in seconds... A real BOFH would set up a dummy instance of sshd on the regular port, as well as a real sshd instance on another port. The dummy instance could be set up to always fail the login attempt, and with special iptable rules to not clutter up your logfile. -- Walter Dnes
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Sunday 15 Jan 2012 14:19:07 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2012-01-15 3:50 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > Well, I *always* change my sshd ports, not for added security, but > > because I'm tired of seeing failed login attempts from China. The daily > > log became *much* shorter after I moved the port somewhere else. > > That is the *only* legitimate reason (I can think of) to change the > port... but it always irks me when someone thinks they are truly gaining > any extra *security* through doing so... They are ... not at all in terms of complexity (the difficulty of cracking the ssh password remains exactly the same), but yes in terms of probability (fewer attempts to crack the password). Of course, using public keys instead of passwords improves difficulty by orders of magnitude, but for the sake of reducing bandwidth alone, I think that changing the sshd port makes sense. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-15 3:50 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: Well, I *always* change my sshd ports, not for added security, but because I'm tired of seeing failed login attempts from China. The daily log became *much* shorter after I moved the port somewhere else. That is the *only* legitimate reason (I can think of) to change the port... but it always irks me when someone thinks they are truly gaining any extra *security* through doing so...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Jan 12, 2012 8:07 PM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote: > , >8 snip > > Changing the ssh port (and even crypto keys on DVDs) is just a > brain-dead approach, we agree on that. We rightfully rip a new one to > people advocating doing this. > Well, I *always* change my sshd ports, not for added security, but because I'm tired of seeing failed login attempts from China. The daily log became *much* shorter after I moved the port somewhere else. Plus, thanks to the wonders of iptables and ipset, anyone attempting to connect to port 22 will now gets blocked completely. Rgds,
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Thursday 12 Jan 2012 14:06:26 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:58:02 -0500 > > Tanstaafl wrote: > > But I still disagree. Would you also classify 'changing the locks on > > your house' as security through obscurity? Because changing the > > character set in PWM is just like changing the lock on a door... Changing locks (with the same number and quality of locks) is as good as not changing locks at all - unless some burglar happens to be half way through unpicking the current door lock mechanism. Changing locks with a higher quality lock (i.e. one with more levers in it) is like increasing the number of characters in your password. If the new levers are from a different 'character set' (different design class/pattern of lock levers) then it would be more difficult for the burglar to guess what these levers might look like (sort of adding more entropy - the levers would appear to be more random) and he'll have to try all combinations of levers. The addition of levers (or locks of the same design) is called protection through redundancy. If one falls in the hands of a skilled cracker the second should present the *same* level of protection. So we are essentially increasing the time it will take to crack the locks and thankfully the burglar's time is a limited resource. If on the other hand we add an entirely different *means* of protection - e.g. a guard dog, then we are increasing the level of protection not through redundancy, but through diversity. This means that systemic weaknesses of door lock lever design can be compensated for in our door protection system. Systemic weaknesses are important because they can be guessed (like which side of the qwerty keyboard the uber-geek typed his password) and so give the burglar a smaller set of solutions to try. There's no point in a burglar trying to guess how many or what type of levers a guard dog has. Indeed, his skills and resources at picking locks is now irrelevant - he's got to be a skilled dog whisperer too! We could think of the change of the port of sshd like adding redundancy protection, but we don't really. In reality we are adding (a very low degree of) diversity. This is because we're hiding the door of our hypothetical house. However, in doing so we're giving away the wrong signal to a non- opportunistic burglar. Since every other house door in the street is not hidden we are subliminally telling the burglars: "Hey! We have something worth hiding in this house." Then they'll set off picking the locks of our door, instead of the doors down the road. From a probability perspective though we are better off changing the sshd port, because all the opportunistic (botnet) burglars who just check port 22 will miss our door and never bother us. A strong security system will have both redundancy and diversity in its design. As an example an IPSec VPN set up which uses both SSL Certificates and XAuth with a long and random passphrase does just that. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:41:28AM -0500, Mike Edenfield wrote: > Actually, it's just the words "purple RAIN" with e/a/I replaced with 3/4/1; > I chose l33t-sp33k since I figured it was so over-used for password > generation that everyone would recognize it immediately :) But yes, I think > Randall's point is much the same as yours: once the cracker tools "figure > out" this pattern of character replacements it becomes significantly less > secure. I'm just curious if there are any real metrics as to "how much less > secure" that is... I'm mixing both -- having long phrases (like whole, but normal, sentences), or randomly joined words, and those words are in turn leetified. Exampple: r3dc7053tch41r (red, closet and chair combined in such a fashion). -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. Düsseldorf is only half as big as the graveyard of New York, but twice as dead. pgp4qgoXr279K.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
> From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 7:31 PM
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:09:40 -0500
> "Mike Edenfield" wrote:
>
> > > I agree. Longer pass{words,phrases} only increases the difficulty of
> > > the problem, but not significantly so.
> >
> > After I read the aforementioned xkcd comic, my main question was how
> > he defined the various bits of entropy for each "thing" done to a
> > password. That seemed to be a crucial determining factor in why the
> > "common words" password appeared so much harder than the "goofy
> > gibberish" one. Some seemed more obvious to me than others.
> >
> > I'm also curious, using the latest modern password-cracking
> > techniques, if his assessment really is accurate. As in, which of the
> > following two passwords would take longer to crack:
> >
> > #purpl3.R$!n#
> >
> > dovesymbolcarprince
> I noticed something about your first sample password, and it reveals a
lot, I
> hinted at it in my reply to Dale. Look at the pattern one must type to
enter
> that password (assuming a qwerty keyboard):
>
> A symbol, a partial word, then 7 nonsense symbols. The pattern of those
> symbols is highly significant - composed entirely of keystrokes in the
upper
> left area and lower right area of the keyboard with a few Shifts thrown in
for
> good measure. Almost as if you dropped both hands on the keyboard and
> wiggled your fingers without moving the entire hand much.
Actually, it's just the words "purple RAIN" with e/a/I replaced with 3/4/1;
I chose l33t-sp33k since I figured it was so over-used for password
generation that everyone would recognize it immediately :) But yes, I think
Randall's point is much the same as yours: once the cracker tools "figure
out" this pattern of character replacements it becomes significantly less
secure. I'm just curious if there are any real metrics as to "how much less
secure" that is...
(Clearly my pop culture reference was too obscure, or you'd also have picked
up on the connection between the four random words. :) )
--K
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:58:02 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > > So it's just a description, not an insult. Don't read it as such > > Oh, I didn't, I did catch the 'but I still like it', sorry if my > reply made it sound like I was insulted ;) > > But I still disagree. Would you also classify 'changing the locks on > your house' as security through obscurity? Because changing the > character set in PWM is just like changing the lock on a door... I don't see it that way. But it all comes down to semantics really and it's quite a pointless debate as we DO agree that it's overall a good thing. And that's what's really important here. The words we classify it with as not anywhere near as important. -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-12 8:03 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:30:03 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: On 2012-01-11 5:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: yes, I know it's really just security by obscurity in disguise but I still like it. Actually, I disagree vehemently that it is 'security through obscurity'... I'd disagree with your disagreement. There's two usages of the phrase, the first is very disparaging and the second is simply descriptive. I'm using the second meaning. Changing the ssh port (and even crypto keys on DVDs) is just a brain-dead approach, we agree on that. We rightfully rip a new one to people advocating doing this. Changing the character set; well that's quite clever actually. You have a decent security strength underneath it and add an extra layer to increase the entropy even more (sort of like salting a hash). If an attacker figures out you're doing it, it won't be hard to undo it, then only to be faced with a *much* harder problem. So it's just a description, not an insult. Don't read it as such Oh, I didn't, I did catch the 'but I still like it', sorry if my reply made it sound like I was insulted ;) But I still disagree. Would you also classify 'changing the locks on your house' as security through obscurity? Because changing the character set in PWM is just like changing the lock on a door...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:30:03 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2012-01-11 5:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> 2. Change the character set used (I always do this) > > I like this one:-) > > > > yes, I know it's really just security by obscurity in disguise but I > > still like it. > > Actually, I disagree vehemently that it is 'security through > obscurity'... I'd disagree with your disagreement. There's two usages of the phrase, the first is very disparaging and the second is simply descriptive. I'm using the second meaning. Changing the ssh port (and even crypto keys on DVDs) is just a brain-dead approach, we agree on that. We rightfully rip a new one to people advocating doing this. Changing the character set; well that's quite clever actually. You have a decent security strength underneath it and add an extra layer to increase the entropy even more (sort of like salting a hash). If an attacker figures out you're doing it, it won't be hard to undo it, then only to be faced with a *much* harder problem. So it's just a description, not an insult. Don't read it as such > > It would be next to impossible to 'guess' what changes to any given > character set any one person randomly chose to make (ie, adding one > additional '!' character in the middle of the character set in > between 'r' and 's') totally changes the resulting passwords that use > that character set. > > This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can > figure that one out in seconds... > > The fact is, there is *no* 'perfect' security measure, but > Passwordmaker is as close to one that I have found for managing > password (both online, and not)... > -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-12 6:39 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: That, again, is why I like pwm... I only have to remember my 3 or 4 Master Passwords (and which category an account is in, but I have a system and that is not a problem). Oh... I have about 100 accounts in my passwordmaker settings... so I would have to remember 100+ passwords (+ = the ones I use the 'Default' settings with, which may be 10 or 15)...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 7:31 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: Personally, I advocate using smart password generators like apg. The password truly is a random distribution of junk, but one that can be pronounced (a key factor in remembering it). But that is the whole point... once you get beyond 3, 4 or 10+ passwords, 'remembering' them is the problem. That, again, is why I like pwm... I only have to remember my 3 or 4 Master Passwords (and which category an account is in, but I have a system and that is not a problem). The passwords it generates *are* as close to random as you can get, while still capable of being 'generated' each time by PWM... Even if I were to lose my settings file (which is kept on a Truecrypt container) which contains all of the accounts and settings, I could recreate the changes/modifications I have made to it... it would take a little while, but I could do it... I've been using it for many years, and it has never failed me...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 6:48 PM, Dale wrote: That's why I like Lastpass. It fills them in for me so that I can have a really nice strong password but I don't have to type it in each time. Like I said, I like Lastpass too, but I simply do not like *storing* the passwords somewhere, encrypted or no...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 5:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: 2. Change the character set used (I always do this) I like this one:-) yes, I know it's really just security by obscurity in disguise but I still like it. Actually, I disagree vehemently that it is 'security through obscurity'... It would be next to impossible to 'guess' what changes to any given character set any one person randomly chose to make (ie, adding one additional '!' character in the middle of the character set in between 'r' and 's') totally changes the resulting passwords that use that character set. This is nothing like changing the port for SSH - a port scanner can figure that one out in seconds... The fact is, there is *no* 'perfect' security measure, but Passwordmaker is as close to one that I have found for managing password (both online, and not)...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:09:40 -0500
"Mike Edenfield" wrote:
> > I agree. Longer pass{words,phrases} only increases the difficulty
> > of the problem, but not significantly so.
>
> After I read the aforementioned xkcd comic, my main question was how
> he defined the various bits of entropy for each "thing" done to a
> password. That seemed to be a crucial determining factor in why the
> "common words" password appeared so much harder than the "goofy
> gibberish" one. Some seemed more obvious to me than others.
>
> I'm also curious, using the latest modern password-cracking
> techniques, if his assessment really is accurate. As in, which of the
> following two passwords would take longer to crack:
>
> #purpl3.R$!n#
>
> dovesymbolcarprince
Interesting questions. Randall doesn't provide answers so though. I
suppose he knows his audience and assumes we'll understand the gist of
what he's getting at and not demand full proof from him - it's his
comic, not his PhD thesis :-)
I noticed something about your first sample password, and it reveals a
lot, I hinted at it in my reply to Dale. Look at the pattern one must
type to enter that password (assuming a qwerty keyboard):
A symbol, a partial word, then 7 nonsense symbols. The pattern of those
symbols is highly significant - composed entirely of keystrokes in the
upper left area and lower right area of the keyboard with a few Shifts
thrown in for good measure. Almost as if you dropped both hands on the
keyboard and wiggled your fingers without moving the entire hand much.
How much entropy? A truck load less than you think!
And how often do you think people will do that (or something similar)
when creating passwords? How easy will it be for a dev with a clue to
write cracker software that takes such biases
into account?
The second example looks better - four words that have no obvious
connection with each other and will not usually be found together.
Hence not much in the way of predictable pattern that I can see.
Personally, I advocate using smart password generators like apg. The
password truly is a random distribution of junk, but one that can be
pronounced (a key factor in remembering it). It's not too hard to
expand that to also use whole words, then you'd get a passphrase
without your own inherent bias in it. Just be careful that you don't
end up with a password containing the *developer's* own inherent
bias :-)
--
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:48:50 -0600 Dale wrote: > On a security related question. Why does so many people have their > facebook accounts and other similar sites hacked? Do hackers just > guess their passwords or do they break into the websites? I have > facebook, myspace, google+ and a couple others and have had them for > years. I have never had mine hacked into, at least not yet. I'm > just curious. Is it a windoze thing? lol Nothing like that. Most people think they are very clever about passwords but they are actually rather dumb about it. Easiest way to break into many people's FaceBook page is to scrape their FaceBook page and throw a lexical analyser at it (that being the same class of software that search engines use - it looks for patterns in text. The software does not have the human bias we all have, so it can find relations that our minds are wired to ignore). The more public the person's FaceBook page is and the more activity it has on it, the greater the odds that they will leak enough information about themselves so that software can make a reasonable prediction about what sort of passwords they use. When you approach this problem with an understanding of human psychology you almost always find that the range of possible passwords for people is far far smaller than we think. I'll even tell you who are the WORST offenders: Geeks. Geeks are their own worst enemies, and their accounts are very valuable targets to crackers. Geeks are a niche class of humans and are prone to think the same way (not all the time of course, they just share much more in common with each other than the big group called humanity). Too many geeks think they are being cute with their clever password schemes. Here's a common one: something from Lord of The Rings translated to l337-speak . And the geek who does it is blind to the fact that he's doing it - simple observer bias about self. That's not true for all geeks of course - some really do have well-nigh uncrackable passwords. But I find that when a geek is a victim of his own bias and does something dumbish, it's usually a spectacular level of dumbishness. -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:08:04 -0500
Michael Mol wrote:
I'm seriously unconvinced that concatenating words significantly
increases the difficulty of the problem. Just as a mentalist will
presume you're thinking about '7', your average demographic would
probably draw from a small pool of source words, even latching on to
catchphrases and other memes. You're likely to see
"steamingmonkeypile", "nyanyanyan", "dontsaycandleja-" and
"hasturhasturhast-" used more than once, for example. I'd give a
better list of likely results, but I don't want to run too far afoul
of good taste in public posting. :)
I agree. Longer pass{words,phrases} only increases the difficulty of
the problem, but not significantly so.
I use those online password strength testers. I don't use the exact
characters tho. I replace a character with a similar one. I may
replace the letter A with the letter Z. I leave cases the same tho
since they make a difference. I at least try to get them to 100% and
for sites like my bank, I add a few more weird characters for good measure.
The password I use for my banks has both upper and lower case, a few
numbers and some of the thingys above the numbers on the top row. You
know, !@#$%^&*(). Mine is reasonably long but it is not based on
anything related to me. It's just sort of a random thing that I can
remember pretty well but HATE to type in. That's why I like Lastpass.
It fills them in for me so that I can have a really nice strong password
but I don't have to type it in each time.
On a security related question. Why does so many people have their
facebook accounts and other similar sites hacked? Do hackers just guess
their passwords or do they break into the websites? I have facebook,
myspace, google+ and a couple others and have had them for years. I
have never had mine hacked into, at least not yet. I'm just curious.
Is it a windoze thing? lol
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how
you interpreted my words!
Miss the compile output? Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12.01.2012 00:09, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com] Sent:
> Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:48 PM
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:08:04 -0500 Michael Mol
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seriously unconvinced that concatenating words
>>> significantly increases the difficulty of the problem. Just as
>>> a mentalist will presume you're thinking about '7', your
>>> average demographic would probably draw from a small pool of
>>> source words, even latching on to catchphrases and other memes.
>>> You're likely to see "steamingmonkeypile", "nyanyanyan",
>>> "dontsaycandleja-" and "hasturhasturhast-" used more than once,
>>> for example. I'd give a better list of likely results, but I
>>> don't want to run too far afoul of good taste in public
>>> posting. :)
>>
>> I agree. Longer pass{words,phrases} only increases the difficulty
>> of the problem, but not significantly so.
>
> After I read the aforementioned xkcd comic, my main question was
> how he defined the various bits of entropy for each "thing" done to
> a password. That seemed to be a crucial determining factor in why
> the "common words" password appeared so much harder than the "goofy
> gibberish" one. Some seemed more obvious to me than others.
>
> I'm also curious, using the latest modern password-cracking
> techniques, if his assessment really is accurate. As in, which of
> the following two passwords would take longer to crack:
>
> #purpl3.R$!n#
>
> dovesymbolcarprince
>
> --K
>
>
Since both passwords are of nearly same length, the argument from the
comic is not fulfilled: if you would use
armageddonholycowencryptionworkshop you would have a relatively easy
to remember, long password.
Password length is far more important than using special characters... [1]
[1]
http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/password-size-does-matter-531
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPDh7sAAoJEJwwOFaNFkYcV8MIAK9VekY88JElF9n9dEOSFOq1
g/RajBSrAaVbR/WV84DQ8xGGOLSIFMUFRWXTRcVEufCw0fXu6OBvKIsXhgZbWK1v
DEYsQInIk73YGIeyCImd95nXZbswD7cbpGA7g9h/0u2d8+tbvqSIP/fNAKAUU0Yi
uj3YiBz3ZXF+PZhvN5H0ZbKo1h7FOspzrd8UeSAzCBYJJeFEnpihWsfDiYdMYZrz
AnAN6tk/llWfYsJkVaVpsjwHjzsDCCgUhmqL30kV2l24ngg5WeEXDcuuEoFdQGIK
eV6CP6NSxSIPfQ4qEi2FTKzPLhHR6YhT/EVfYwis/OyYMSXatW+s7oNaqdjGAbg=
=aKCH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
RE: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
From: Alan McKinnon [mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:48 PM
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:08:04 -0500
> Michael Mol wrote:
>
> > I'm seriously unconvinced that concatenating words significantly
> > increases the difficulty of the problem. Just as a mentalist will
> > presume you're thinking about '7', your average demographic would
> > probably draw from a small pool of source words, even latching on to
> > catchphrases and other memes. You're likely to see
> > "steamingmonkeypile", "nyanyanyan", "dontsaycandleja-" and
> > "hasturhasturhast-" used more than once, for example. I'd give a
> > better list of likely results, but I don't want to run too far afoul
> > of good taste in public posting. :)
>
> I agree. Longer pass{words,phrases} only increases the difficulty of the
> problem, but not significantly so.
After I read the aforementioned xkcd comic, my main question was how he
defined the various bits of entropy for each "thing" done to a password.
That seemed to be a crucial determining factor in why the "common words"
password appeared so much harder than the "goofy gibberish" one. Some seemed
more obvious to me than others.
I'm also curious, using the latest modern password-cracking techniques, if
his assessment really is accurate. As in, which of the following two
passwords would take longer to crack:
#purpl3.R$!n#
dovesymbolcarprince
--K
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:05:28 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2012-01-11 4:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > The site doesn't say much. It has one page, no internal links > > (quite a few external ones) and a single link to an image. > > Weird... the wiki tree is gone... there are a *ton* of pages there, > I'll have to poke the maintainers... maybe they were updating > mediawiki and broke something... > > > But still, one can infer some of the methods of operation. There's a > > master password and a few bits of easily guessable[1] entropy in the > > additional data the user can configure. > > > > It has one weakness that reduces it back to the same password being > > re-used. And that is that there is a single master password. > > Like I said, you can use more than one. The trick is remembering > which one you used with which accounts. I use different Master > Passwords for different Account Groups. > > > An attacker would simply need to acquire that using various > > nefarious means (shoulder surfing, social engineering, hosepipe > > decryption) and suddenly you are wide open[2]. > > That is true for *any* password scheme... but there are simple ways > to mitigate the risks... > > 1. Use multiple Master Passwords... > 2. Change the character set used (I always do this) I like this one :-) yes, I know it's really just security by obscurity in disguise but I still like it. It's like anti-spam measures - effective at first till the spammers catch on then you go find another method. But in the interim you did have something workableto use > 3. Add additional character modifications to each password (figure out > one way that you can easily remember and do it the same for each > password) > 4. > > > I don't see that it increases cryptographic security by very much > > (it does by a little) > > Actually, it does, and once the site is back up I'll post here and > you can go read all about it... > -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:08:04 -0500
Michael Mol wrote:
> I'm seriously unconvinced that concatenating words significantly
> increases the difficulty of the problem. Just as a mentalist will
> presume you're thinking about '7', your average demographic would
> probably draw from a small pool of source words, even latching on to
> catchphrases and other memes. You're likely to see
> "steamingmonkeypile", "nyanyanyan", "dontsaycandleja-" and
> "hasturhasturhast-" used more than once, for example. I'd give a
> better list of likely results, but I don't want to run too far afoul
> of good taste in public posting. :)
I agree. Longer pass{words,phrases} only increases the difficulty of
the problem, but not significantly so.
--
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 5:05 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: Actually, it does, and once the site is back up I'll post here and you can go read all about it... Even weirder... The menu tree is actually still there, but it is displayed way down the page, so something definitely is broken. I've already emailed the maintainer... But, you can peruse the site from the menu tree, you'll just have to scroll way down to get to it... www.passwordmaker.org
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:07:41 -0500 > Tanstaafl wrote: > >> On 2012-01-11 3:56 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500 >>> Tanstaafl wrote: http://passwordmaker.org/ >>> >>> I haven't read the site yet, but just on the basis of your >>> description, all I'm seeing is a teeny-weeny amount of entropy >>> leading to passwords that are very easy for computers to compute. >>> >>> The algorithm is probably known and there can't be that many unique >>> attributes to a URL, leading to a very small pool of random data. >>> >>> In fact, I see this as a distinct possibility: >>> http://xkcd.com/936/ >>> >>> Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. >> >> You are wrong, but you'll need to read the site to learn why... > > The site doesn't say much. It has one page, no internal links (quite a > few external ones) and a single link to an image. > > But still, one can infer some of the methods of operation. There's a > master password and a few bits of easily guessable[1] entropy in the > additional data the user can configure. > > It has one weakness that reduces it back to the same password being > re-used. And that is that there is a single master password. An > attacker would simply need to acquire that using various nefarious > means (shoulder surfing, social engineering, hosepipe decryption) and > suddenly you are wide open[2]. I would expect it to use a strong forward-only hash. I can't do that in my head, but that's what I'd expect this software to do. A MITM between the computer and the remote host should only result in a single password lost. > > I don't see that it increases cryptographic security by very much (it > does by a little) but it will increase real-life effective security by > a lot. It removes most of the threat from shoulder-surfing and > StickyNoteSyndrome (much like ssh agents do too). In a corporate > environment[3], that is the major threat we face, the onbe that keeps > me awake at night, the one ignored by all security auditors and the one > understood by a mere three people in the company... :-( I was convinced you completely missed the point, but I think you found it here. > > [1] Easily guessable by a computer > [2] I have my paranoia hat on currently > [3] for example, mine > I'm seriously unconvinced that concatenating words significantly increases the difficulty of the problem. Just as a mentalist will presume you're thinking about '7', your average demographic would probably draw from a small pool of source words, even latching on to catchphrases and other memes. You're likely to see "steamingmonkeypile", "nyanyanyan", "dontsaycandleja-" and "hasturhasturhast-" used more than once, for example. I'd give a better list of likely results, but I don't want to run too far afoul of good taste in public posting. :)
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 4:51 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: The site doesn't say much. It has one page, no internal links (quite a few external ones) and a single link to an image. Weird... the wiki tree is gone... there are a *ton* of pages there, I'll have to poke the maintainers... maybe they were updating mediawiki and broke something... But still, one can infer some of the methods of operation. There's a master password and a few bits of easily guessable[1] entropy in the additional data the user can configure. It has one weakness that reduces it back to the same password being re-used. And that is that there is a single master password. Like I said, you can use more than one. The trick is remembering which one you used with which accounts. I use different Master Passwords for different Account Groups. An attacker would simply need to acquire that using various nefarious means (shoulder surfing, social engineering, hosepipe decryption) and suddenly you are wide open[2]. That is true for *any* password scheme... but there are simple ways to mitigate the risks... 1. Use multiple Master Passwords... 2. Change the character set used (I always do this) 3. Add additional character modifications to each password (figure out one way that you can easily remember and do it the same for each password) 4. I don't see that it increases cryptographic security by very much (it does by a little) Actually, it does, and once the site is back up I'll post here and you can go read all about it...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
I tell you the right way todo it. Make it easy as possible, not so difficult like the others in the thread! Download system rescuecd (which is a nice gentoo system with lots of beautiful tools running out of the box): http://www.sysresccd.org/Download download, burn and boot from the cd. This is a gentoo live cd, with maintenance tools! After you started from the cd, create a directotry, let us say: /mnt/gentooX and mount your partition inside, where the entire tree lives in it. if /dev/sda5 or whatever has the entire tree: mount /dev/sda5 /mnt/gentooX optionally mount the other partitions from your harddisk, if "opt" is in your harddisk an own partition, otherwise look in your harddisk, in this case: /mnt/gentooX/etc/fstab which shows you the partition table! chroot the new environment: mount -t proc none /mnt/gentoo/proc if you need networking, otherwise leave this step away. cp -L /etc/resolv.conf /mnt/gentoo/etc/resolv.conf chroot /mnt/gentoo /bin/bash env-update source /etc/profile after you did this, your are on your harddisks environment as root, and you easily can issue this command: passwd root Tamer Am 10.01.2012 19:46, schrieb Tanstaafl: > Ok, I did something really dumb... > > I changed the root passwd for a system I manage last week, but neglected > to write it down, and now what I *thought* I had changed it to isn't > working... I know, I know, really *really* dumb, but that's where I am... > > I know I can boot into Single User mode, remount the root partition > read/write, and edit /etc/shadow (removing the encrypted passwd), then > rest it using passwd, but... > > Some of the accounts in /etc/shadow have a '*' where the encrypted > passwd would be, and some have a '!'... (ie, one is sshd:!:... and > another is halt:*:...) > > Does it matter what I change it to? Should I use a *, !, or nothing at > all (so that there is *nothing* between the two :: that would normally > contain the encrypted passwd)? > > Thanks... >
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:07:41 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2012-01-11 3:56 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500 > > Tanstaafl wrote: > >> http://passwordmaker.org/ > >> > > > > I haven't read the site yet, but just on the basis of your > > description, all I'm seeing is a teeny-weeny amount of entropy > > leading to passwords that are very easy for computers to compute. > > > > The algorithm is probably known and there can't be that many unique > > attributes to a URL, leading to a very small pool of random data. > > > > In fact, I see this as a distinct possibility: > > http://xkcd.com/936/ > > > > Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. > > You are wrong, but you'll need to read the site to learn why... The site doesn't say much. It has one page, no internal links (quite a few external ones) and a single link to an image. But still, one can infer some of the methods of operation. There's a master password and a few bits of easily guessable[1] entropy in the additional data the user can configure. It has one weakness that reduces it back to the same password being re-used. And that is that there is a single master password. An attacker would simply need to acquire that using various nefarious means (shoulder surfing, social engineering, hosepipe decryption) and suddenly you are wide open[2]. I don't see that it increases cryptographic security by very much (it does by a little) but it will increase real-life effective security by a lot. It removes most of the threat from shoulder-surfing and StickyNoteSyndrome (much like ssh agents do too). In a corporate environment[3], that is the major threat we face, the onbe that keeps me awake at night, the one ignored by all security auditors and the one understood by a mere three people in the company... :-( [1] Easily guessable by a computer [2] I have my paranoia hat on currently [3] for example, mine -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 3:56 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: http://passwordmaker.org/ I haven't read the site yet, but just on the basis of your description, all I'm seeing is a teeny-weeny amount of entropy leading to passwords that are very easy for computers to compute. The algorithm is probably known and there can't be that many unique attributes to a URL, leading to a very small pool of random data. In fact, I see this as a distinct possibility: http://xkcd.com/936/ Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. You are wrong, but you'll need to read the site to learn why...
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2012-01-11 9:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:26:07 -0500 > > Tanstaafl wrote: > >> I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I > >> can have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, > >> it auto fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login > >> page), but doesn't store any password anywhere... > > > Of course it stores the password somewhere. How else could it log > > you in next time? It isn't magic, it retrieves the password from > > somewhere. > > Nope, it generates it on the fly every time. It uses the current URL > (or if you create a custom account for that URL, whatever you tell it > to use), the username (if supplied), and a few other URL unique > attributes to compute it, and if you create a custom account, it > offers many other options... > > I highly recommend it... it does have a small learning curve, but the > website will teach you most of what you need to know (I even authored > a lot of the wiki)... > > http://passwordmaker.org/ > I haven't read the site yet, but just on the basis of your description, all I'm seeing is a teeny-weeny amount of entropy leading to passwords that are very easy for computers to compute. The algorithm is probably known and there can't be that many unique attributes to a URL, leading to a very small pool of random data. In fact, I see this as a distinct possibility: http://xkcd.com/936/ Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Tanstaafl wrote: On 2012-01-11 1:47 PM, Dale wrote: Tanstaafl wrote: On 2012-01-11 11:51 AM, Dale wrote: I use Lastpass for my stuff. It is encypted locally but available anywhere. It works pretty well. Heard good things about it, but I prefer something that doesn't store the passwords anywhere, ever... I have to many places to remember all the passwords tho. Having just one or two password isn't a good idea either. That is precisely *why* I love passwordmaker... each and every site has a unique 15 or 20 character strong password that I don't *have* to remember, all I have to remember is my Master Password for that category of account... Well, Lastpass does the same thing. I do make up my own tho. I at least have a chance at guessing it. ;-) If they won't let me have a good password, I won't be doing anything online. I'll just pick up the phone and call them to check on balances and such until they fix it. My bank does allow customers to disable online access. Which won't help if/when they get hacked. If you don't care enough to change banks, they'll probably never change their policy. If they lose enough accounts because of it, someone is gonna take notice, and some moron admin will get canned for being so stupid. If I call the bank and tell them to disable online access, even I can't access my account online. If a hacker can hack in and get my info, then that has nothing to do with passwords. The hacker has gained access to the server as a whole at that point. The biggest thing I don't like, my bank runs windoze. A really old version at that. I hope they update that thing. o_O Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Tanstaafl writes: > On 2012-01-11 11:51 AM, Dale wrote: >> These things sure beat trying to remember a really strong password. My >> bank and credit card passwords are off the chart. > > Yeah, but what about those moron banks that only allow you to use > lowercase letters - and only a max of 6 - for the password? I'm not sure > if it as big a problem as it was, but I have changed banks over things > like that, and told them why in the process. My banking PIN also has only six characters, but I don't worry too much about this. An attacker only has a few tries before online access is being disabled. And even if he would succeed, all he gains is to see my account balance and my past transactions. In order to actually do something, he would also need the correct TAN. In the past I had a list of those, but nowadays this is no longer possible, instead I get the TAN via SMS when I make a transaction. Wonko
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 1:47 PM, Dale wrote: Tanstaafl wrote: On 2012-01-11 11:51 AM, Dale wrote: I use Lastpass for my stuff. It is encypted locally but available anywhere. It works pretty well. Heard good things about it, but I prefer something that doesn't store the passwords anywhere, ever... I have to many places to remember all the passwords tho. Having just one or two password isn't a good idea either. That is precisely *why* I love passwordmaker... each and every site has a unique 15 or 20 character strong password that I don't *have* to remember, all I have to remember is my Master Password for that category of account... If they won't let me have a good password, I won't be doing anything online. I'll just pick up the phone and call them to check on balances and such until they fix it. My bank does allow customers to disable online access. Which won't help if/when they get hacked. If you don't care enough to change banks, they'll probably never change their policy. If they lose enough accounts because of it, someone is gonna take notice, and some moron admin will get canned for being so stupid.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Tanstaafl wrote: On 2012-01-11 11:51 AM, Dale wrote: I use Lastpass for my stuff. It is encypted locally but available anywhere. It works pretty well. Heard good things about it, but I prefer something that doesn't store the passwords anywhere, ever... I have to many places to remember all the passwords tho. Having just one or two password isn't a good idea either. These things sure beat trying to remember a really strong password. My bank and credit card passwords are off the chart. Yeah, but what about those moron banks that only allow you to use lowercase letters - and only a max of 6 - for the password? I'm not sure if it as big a problem as it was, but I have changed banks over things like that, and told them why in the process. I agree with that. My bank made some changes that I didn't agree with too. I sent them information about how their process was tested by MIT and some University in California and it failed the test badly. I then figured out a way to work around that and still have my really good password. If they won't let me have a good password, I won't be doing anything online. I'll just pick up the phone and call them to check on balances and such until they fix it. My bank does allow customers to disable online access. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2012-01-11 11:36 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> Most of my passwords are some hash[1] of a common passcode[2] and some >> site-specific or service-specific mnemonic. I imagine this would work >> similarly, using the absolute URL in place of a mnemonic. >> >> The downside would be if the server changed its URL rewriting scheme. >> - From their perspective, they didn't break anything as long as things >> 301 redirect to where they should. But it does break things that make >> assumptions about absolute URLs. (I've seen that break StumbleUpon >> thump-up counts, for example.) > > This is not a problem with Passwordmaker as long as you use a custom > account, because all you hev to do if the URL changes is add/edit the > URL pattern (used to detect the account/page). The 'text' used for > *calculating* the password wouldn't change then. > >> [1] The hash algorithm is something I can easily do in my head, not >> some massive, crypto-secure, heavily-mathematical thing. > > I do something similar with Passwordmaker... I have a specific way I > 'modify' the password (add a few specific characters at certain places > in the password) before logging in, but I only do this with critical > sites/passwords. > >> [2] I change the passcode I use for new passwords every several >> months, but I can usually guess which one I used for any given site >> within three tries. It works out, and is a nice in-head way to have a >> different password for every site. > > I almost never change my passwords, unless there is a good reason to. > With a strong password, it simply isn't necessary. But if you need to, > it is dead easy in Passwordmaker - just add a '1' to the modifier field > for that account, then start incrementing it whenever you change it. Pretty sure I understand the thing. The biggest driver for me to change my passcode are leaks...whether it's something like Sony's Play Station Network leak, or whether I typed something into the wrong terminal, or whether something stole focus at the wrong moment. Critical sites get their password changed first, on the off chance someone knows enough about me to guess my username, mnemonic and hash. Less critical sites follow. Actually happened Sunday morning. Typed a password into the wrong window, and now I've got a new passcode.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 11:51 AM, Dale wrote: I use Lastpass for my stuff. It is encypted locally but available anywhere. It works pretty well. Heard good things about it, but I prefer something that doesn't store the passwords anywhere, ever... These things sure beat trying to remember a really strong password. My bank and credit card passwords are off the chart. Yeah, but what about those moron banks that only allow you to use lowercase letters - and only a max of 6 - for the password? I'm not sure if it as big a problem as it was, but I have changed banks over things like that, and told them why in the process.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 11:36 AM, Michael Mol wrote: Most of my passwords are some hash[1] of a common passcode[2] and some site-specific or service-specific mnemonic. I imagine this would work similarly, using the absolute URL in place of a mnemonic. The downside would be if the server changed its URL rewriting scheme. - From their perspective, they didn't break anything as long as things 301 redirect to where they should. But it does break things that make assumptions about absolute URLs. (I've seen that break StumbleUpon thump-up counts, for example.) This is not a problem with Passwordmaker as long as you use a custom account, because all you hev to do if the URL changes is add/edit the URL pattern (used to detect the account/page). The 'text' used for *calculating* the password wouldn't change then. [1] The hash algorithm is something I can easily do in my head, not some massive, crypto-secure, heavily-mathematical thing. I do something similar with Passwordmaker... I have a specific way I 'modify' the password (add a few specific characters at certain places in the password) before logging in, but I only do this with critical sites/passwords. [2] I change the passcode I use for new passwords every several months, but I can usually guess which one I used for any given site within three tries. It works out, and is a nice in-head way to have a different password for every site. I almost never change my passwords, unless there is a good reason to. With a strong password, it simply isn't necessary. But if you need to, it is dead easy in Passwordmaker - just add a '1' to the modifier field for that account, then start incrementing it whenever you change it.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Tanstaafl wrote: On 2012-01-11 11:27 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but doesn't store any password anywhere... Of course it stores the password somewhere. How else could it log you in next time? It isn't magic, it retrieves the password from somewhere. Nope, it generates it on the fly every time. It uses the current URL (or if you create a custom account for that URL, whatever you tell it to use), the username (if supplied), and a few other URL unique attributes to compute it, So it stores the data and method needed to recreate the password, same thing. Or does it not store the username, in which case you have to use the same username everywhere? It would be easier for you to understand how it works if you would simply go read about it. The one piece that is not stored anywhere (but inside your head) is the Master Password. You can also use more than one Master Password, which I do (three to be exact, one for critical stuff (server root passwords, online banking, etc), one for less critical stuff, and one for incidental stuff... Like I said, there is a small learning curve involved with using it, but once you figure it out, you'll wonder how you ever got along without it. I use Lastpass for my stuff. It is encypted locally but available anywhere. It works pretty well. These things sure beat trying to remember a really strong password. My bank and credit card passwords are off the chart. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:35:57 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: > > So it stores the data and method needed to recreate the password, same > > thing. Or does it not store the username, in which case you have to > > use the same username everywhere? > > It would be easier for you to understand how it works if you would > simply go read about it. > > The one piece that is not stored anywhere (but inside your head) is the > Master Password. Ah, you didn't mention that part. Now it makes some sense. -- Neil Bothwick If at first you don't succeed you'll get lots of advice. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: > I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but doesn't store any password anywhere... >> >>> Of course it stores the password somewhere. How else could it >>> log you in next time? It isn't magic, it retrieves the >>> password from somewhere. >> >> Nope, it generates it on the fly every time. It uses the current >> URL (or if you create a custom account for that URL, whatever >> you tell it to use), the username (if supplied), and a few other >> URL unique attributes to compute it, > > So it stores the data and method needed to recreate the password, > same thing. Or does it not store the username, in which case you > have to use the same username everywhere? Most of my passwords are some hash[1] of a common passcode[2] and some site-specific or service-specific mnemonic. I imagine this would work similarly, using the absolute URL in place of a mnemonic. The downside would be if the server changed its URL rewriting scheme. - From their perspective, they didn't break anything as long as things 301 redirect to where they should. But it does break things that make assumptions about absolute URLs. (I've seen that break StumbleUpon thump-up counts, for example.) [1] The hash algorithm is something I can easily do in my head, not some massive, crypto-secure, heavily-mathematical thing. [2] I change the passcode I use for new passwords every several months, but I can usually guess which one I used for any given site within three tries. It works out, and is a nice in-head way to have a different password for every site. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPDbqfAAoJEC/SB0LItoL+OdQIALK/0qjkmQrfBENrj5WrEs0h 6oDe599TNya4XCTdOJbBmNAZ2JxCbXq+O1zunqSzHXHLE38n3vTHHPUHQNa/2I1k NQBLATfobr4edWqvdKO4LjhQLkKq7sL8I/rEA6ol2M019/WviIDNKmyJfPM3LfpK m3XZ3ATHDX5yC52cydYKXk1UbMQb6YZqPMzhmkpn4Vm7SL/Sj7RNdkQ+XAbLCyRo BWL4/oy3IZFuMd5r7x3ktKoQtzW85rUIpZrR8ZmoAFI+lXv+7JhuUwayM3kZga0O WeBLkv+efU0GP2s66ePPtjMeN7Z9AFpOG7OKO6VXwwjb1bPLkLUdALjyawzi2NE= =n6Cc -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 11:27 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but doesn't store any password anywhere... Of course it stores the password somewhere. How else could it log you in next time? It isn't magic, it retrieves the password from somewhere. Nope, it generates it on the fly every time. It uses the current URL (or if you create a custom account for that URL, whatever you tell it to use), the username (if supplied), and a few other URL unique attributes to compute it, So it stores the data and method needed to recreate the password, same thing. Or does it not store the username, in which case you have to use the same username everywhere? It would be easier for you to understand how it works if you would simply go read about it. The one piece that is not stored anywhere (but inside your head) is the Master Password. You can also use more than one Master Password, which I do (three to be exact, one for critical stuff (server root passwords, online banking, etc), one for less critical stuff, and one for incidental stuff... Like I said, there is a small learning curve involved with using it, but once you figure it out, you'll wonder how you ever got along without it.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:04:01 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can > >> have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto > >> fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but > >> doesn't store any password anywhere... > > > Of course it stores the password somewhere. How else could it log you > > in next time? It isn't magic, it retrieves the password from > > somewhere. > > Nope, it generates it on the fly every time. It uses the current URL > (or if you create a custom account for that URL, whatever you tell it > to use), the username (if supplied), and a few other URL unique > attributes to compute it, So it stores the data and method needed to recreate the password, same thing. Or does it not store the username, in which case you have to use the same username everywhere? -- Neil Bothwick If Satan ever loses his hair, there'll be hell toupee. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 9:16 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:26:07 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but doesn't store any password anywhere... Of course it stores the password somewhere. How else could it log you in next time? It isn't magic, it retrieves the password from somewhere. Nope, it generates it on the fly every time. It uses the current URL (or if you create a custom account for that URL, whatever you tell it to use), the username (if supplied), and a few other URL unique attributes to compute it, and if you create a custom account, it offers many other options... I highly recommend it... it does have a small learning curve, but the website will teach you most of what you need to know (I even authored a lot of the wiki)... http://passwordmaker.org/
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:26:07 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2012-01-10 2:12 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen > wrote: > > The simpelest solution should be to copy the password-hash of a user > > whose password is know to you. > > Afterwards you can log in an change the password again. > > Thanks, I like that better and it worked like a charm, this way the > root account is never unprotected (even for a minute)... although > remote root login is disabled anyway... > > > And for the future:http://xkcd.com/936/ ;) > > I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can > have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto > fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but > doesn't store any password anywhere... Of course it stores the password somewhere. How else could it log you in next time? It isn't magic, it retrieves the password from somewhere. > > http://passwordmaker.org/ > -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-11 7:35 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: While booting, pass init=/bin/bash in the kernel command line I did... otherwise, it still requires you to know the password... ;)
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Jan 11, 2012 5:57 PM, "Tanstaafl" wrote: > > On 2012-01-10 2:12 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: >> >> The simpelest solution should be to copy the password-hash of a user >> whose password is know to you. >> Afterwards you can log in an change the password again. > > > Thanks, I like that better and it worked like a charm, this way the root account is never unprotected (even for a minute)... although remote root login is disabled anyway... > >> And for the future:http://xkcd.com/936/ ;) > > > I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but doesn't store any password anywhere... > > http://passwordmaker.org/ > While booting, pass init=/bin/bash in the kernel command line
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On 2012-01-10 2:12 PM, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: The simpelest solution should be to copy the password-hash of a user whose password is know to you. Afterwards you can log in an change the password again. Thanks, I like that better and it worked like a charm, this way the root account is never unprotected (even for a minute)... although remote root login is disabled anyway... And for the future:http://xkcd.com/936/ ;) I couldn't live without Passwordmaker (Firefox Addon), with it, I can have as strong and random passwords as I want on every site, it auto fills the username/password for me (if it is a web login page), but doesn't store any password anywhere... http://passwordmaker.org/
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
Perfect answer Alan, many thanks... On 2012-01-10 3:38 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:46:59 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: Ok, I did something really dumb... I changed the root passwd for a system I manage last week, but neglected to write it down, and now what I *thought* I had changed it to isn't working... I know, I know, really *really* dumb, but that's where I am... I know I can boot into Single User mode, remount the root partition read/write, and edit /etc/shadow (removing the encrypted passwd), then rest it using passwd, but... Some of the accounts in /etc/shadow have a '*' where the encrypted passwd would be, and some have a '!'... (ie, one is sshd:!:... and another is halt:*:...) Does it matter what I change it to? Should I use a *, !, or nothing at all (so that there is *nothing* between the two :: that would normally contain the encrypted passwd)? The password field in shadow contains one of three types of values: - a valid hash - nothing (meaning the account has no password at all) - an invalid hash (meaning the account cannot be logged into as no password will ever hash to that value) The third type has some standard values set by convention over the years to indicate why the password is not valid. Because they are just loose conventions there's not much consistency by usually is goes like this: * means the account is definitely a system account, should never have a valid shell and no-one must ever log into that account. Accounts like bin are like this, and Gentoo gives these /bin/false as a shell ! means it is a valid account that probably should not have a login shell but might run with a proper environment. The man account is like this and Gentoo usually gives these nologin as a shell. So what's the difference? Not much really, it's all a fine case of semantics and to you they ought to be treated the same. I might even have the explanation the wrong way round or be completely wrong, that's how poorly documented this all is :-) To reset root's password, set the field to blank (nothing between the ::)
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:12:53PM +0100, Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote: > On 10.01.2012 19:46, Tanstaafl wrote: > > Ok, I did something really dumb... > > > > I changed the root passwd for a system I manage last week, but > > neglected to write it down, and now what I *thought* I had changed > > it to isn't working... I know, I know, really *really* dumb, but > > that's where I am... > > > > I know I can boot into Single User mode, remount the root > > partition read/write, and edit /etc/shadow (removing the encrypted > > passwd), then rest it using passwd, but... > > > > Some of the accounts in /etc/shadow have a '*' where the encrypted > > passwd would be, and some have a '!'... (ie, one is sshd:!:... and > > another is halt:*:...) > > > > Does it matter what I change it to? Should I use a *, !, or nothing > > at all (so that there is *nothing* between the two :: that would > > normally contain the encrypted passwd)? > > > > Thanks... > > > > The simpelest solution should be to copy the password-hash of a user > whose password is know to you. > Afterwards you can log in an change the password again. And for the > future: http://xkcd.com/936/ ;) Or boot from a Live CD, chroot and set the password from there.
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:46:59 -0500 Tanstaafl wrote: > Ok, I did something really dumb... > > I changed the root passwd for a system I manage last week, but > neglected to write it down, and now what I *thought* I had changed it > to isn't working... I know, I know, really *really* dumb, but that's > where I am... > > I know I can boot into Single User mode, remount the root partition > read/write, and edit /etc/shadow (removing the encrypted passwd), > then rest it using passwd, but... > > Some of the accounts in /etc/shadow have a '*' where the encrypted > passwd would be, and some have a '!'... (ie, one is sshd:!:... and > another is halt:*:...) > > Does it matter what I change it to? Should I use a *, !, or nothing > at all (so that there is *nothing* between the two :: that would > normally contain the encrypted passwd)? The password field in shadow contains one of three types of values: - a valid hash - nothing (meaning the account has no password at all) - an invalid hash (meaning the account cannot be logged into as no password will ever hash to that value) The third type has some standard values set by convention over the years to indicate why the password is not valid. Because they are just loose conventions there's not much consistency by usually is goes like this: * means the account is definitely a system account, should never have a valid shell and no-one must ever log into that account. Accounts like bin are like this, and Gentoo gives these /bin/false as a shell ! means it is a valid account that probably should not have a login shell but might run with a proper environment. The man account is like this and Gentoo usually gives these nologin as a shell. So what's the difference? Not much really, it's all a fine case of semantics and to you they ought to be treated the same. I might even have the explanation the wrong way round or be completely wrong, that's how poorly documented this all is :-) To reset root's password, set the field to blank (nothing between the ::) -- Alan McKinnnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Resetting the root passwd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10.01.2012 19:46, Tanstaafl wrote: > Ok, I did something really dumb... > > I changed the root passwd for a system I manage last week, but > neglected to write it down, and now what I *thought* I had changed > it to isn't working... I know, I know, really *really* dumb, but > that's where I am... > > I know I can boot into Single User mode, remount the root > partition read/write, and edit /etc/shadow (removing the encrypted > passwd), then rest it using passwd, but... > > Some of the accounts in /etc/shadow have a '*' where the encrypted > passwd would be, and some have a '!'... (ie, one is sshd:!:... and > another is halt:*:...) > > Does it matter what I change it to? Should I use a *, !, or nothing > at all (so that there is *nothing* between the two :: that would > normally contain the encrypted passwd)? > > Thanks... > The simpelest solution should be to copy the password-hash of a user whose password is know to you. Afterwards you can log in an change the password again. And for the future: http://xkcd.com/936/ ;) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPDI20AAoJEJwwOFaNFkYceuMH/0DJgaQ+6HH0zUkKl8y5wTW6 Kn2grThJwhrbAhzpQxRV2UOvwnVIc93LIfZXdtqISzyhYCtUo1BaYMCVNIn6Rcmj wbgk1sI3ql49SvH+Tfai/DyW0WzHbFmSsYu36xzGl02xZpuUeKSpk/cTmINz1wq4 HUA/Ej9x0jEAcNNby5t5neiTt4B3ILaFyAMQbVKVIyZy/8beoR/Rn+7bET0DoFJU QneX+fa98IYjLUFlAjENQnyNly/koEt/+RIrffbBAPUOYc3wcX+e/q9vIVrKad3H Ah+BpQOwAkceog33Y2HqNrKMMOfp3R2Nm1GgbqQpFe7N2A329OqLBPfMPs8Ejts= =EHqa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
