[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

yes, uwe, as i mentioned, if your 3rd-party css does not use unique
id's or classes, then 'important' in the 3rd-party css could affect
your main site-rendering.

but in most cases, 3rd-party candy DOES use unique classes or id's, in
which case there's no problem.


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

if your 3rd-party css does not use unique id's or classes, then you
could create your own (which will enable you to use !important):

1. locate the html for the candy, in your site's html pages.

2. surround it with a div with an id that does not appear anyplace in
the rest of your site:
div id=candy.../div

3. open each of the candy's css files, and precede every element with
#candy:
#candy ul li { width: 100% !important; }

DONE!

If the candy appears throughout the site, then you can use a class-
name instead of an id name.


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

if your 3rd-party css does not use unique id's or classes, then you
could create your own (which will enable you to use !important):

1. locate the html for the candy, in your site's html pages.

2. surround it with a div with an id that does not appear anyplace in
the rest of your site:
div id=candy.../div

3. open each of the candy's css files, and precede every element with
that same id:
#candy ul li { width: 100% !important; }

DONE!

If the candy appears more than once on your site, then do the same
thing with a class-name instead of an id name, and use .candy instead
of #candy in the css files.


[jQuery] Use a function on code loaded with AJAX

2009-01-17 Thread paddelboot

Hi,

I am trying to use a click.function on a piece of code that has been
loaded with AJAX. I can't imagine how to do this at the moment.

Any tipps?


Thanks,

Michael



[jQuery] Re: Use a function on code loaded with AJAX

2009-01-17 Thread Giovanni Battista Lenoci


paddelboot ha scritto:

Hi,

I am trying to use a click.function on a piece of code that has been
loaded with AJAX. I can't imagine how to do this at the moment.

Any tipps?


Thanks,

Michae


You can achieve this in 3 ways.

1. With jquery 1.3 :

$(document).ready(function() {
 $(p).live(click, function(){
alert('this is a paragraph')
 });
});

In this way every p that exist in DOM (even if added after the document 
has loaded), has a click function binded to itself.


2. If you have jquery  1.3 you can do the same thing using the 
livequery plugin, after including it you can call


$(document).ready(function() {
 $(p).livequery(click, function(){
alert('this is a paragraph')
 });
});

3. If you don't want to use this way you have to bind the function to 
the element in the onsuccess function:


$.ajax({
  type: POST,
  url: some.php,
  data: name=Johnlocation=Boston,
  success: function(msg){
 $(p).click(function() {
   alert('this is a paragraph')
 });
  }
});

Now you have only to choose the method and change the p selector with 
your own selector.


Bye

--
gianiaz.net - web solutions
via angelo custode, 10 - 23100 sondrio (so) - italy
+39 347 7196482 



[jQuery] abort an animation?

2009-01-17 Thread Stephan Veigl

How can I abort an animation?

I have a slow fadeOut() on an element. Under some conditions I would
like to stop the fadeout and show the element without any
transparency. How can I do this?

Stephan


[jQuery] Re: Use a function on code loaded with AJAX

2009-01-17 Thread paddelboot

Thanks for the answer, I found the FAQ's meanwhile

On 17 Jan., 11:12, Giovanni Battista Lenoci gian...@gmail.com wrote:
 paddelboot ha scritto:

  Hi,

  I am trying to use a click.function on a piece of code that has been
  loaded with AJAX. I can't imagine how to do this at the moment.

  Any tipps?

  Thanks,

  Michae

 You can achieve this in 3 ways.

 1. With jquery 1.3 :

 $(document).ready(function() {
   $(p).live(click, function(){
  alert('this is a paragraph')
   });

 });

 In this way every p that exist in DOM (even if added after the document
 has loaded), has a click function binded to itself.

 2. If you have jquery  1.3 you can do the same thing using the
 livequery plugin, after including it you can call

 $(document).ready(function() {
   $(p).livequery(click, function(){
  alert('this is a paragraph')
   });

 });

 3. If you don't want to use this way you have to bind the function to
 the element in the onsuccess function:

 $.ajax({
type: POST,
url: some.php,
data: name=Johnlocation=Boston,
success: function(msg){
   $(p).click(function() {
 alert('this is a paragraph')
   });
}
  });

 Now you have only to choose the method and change the p selector with
 your own selector.

 Bye

 --
 gianiaz.net - web solutions
 via angelo custode, 10 - 23100 sondrio (so) - italy
 +39 347 7196482


[jQuery] [jquery]Need help in Simple Jquery Function I develop for tabs

2009-01-17 Thread Yuvraj Mathur

Hi,
I am stuck up with this function to make simple Tabs. It works absolutely fine 
only with the first two tabs. Can someone please observe the code and reply the 
problem.

Below d stands for the header(div) in which the links are, e for the 
targeted content(div), and f for the sequence number.

script
function TabTasTic(d,e,f){
$('#'+ d +' a').css({background: '#ff'});
$('#'+ e +' div').hide();
$('#'+ e +' div').eq(f).show();
$('#'+ d +' a').eq(f).css({background: '#00'});
}
/script
div class=header id=header
a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','0');Tab1/a
a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','1');Tab2/a
a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','2');Tab3/a
a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','3');Tab2/a
/div
div class=content id=content
divT1/div
divT2/div
divT3/div
divT4/div
/div



[jQuery] Re: abort an animation?

2009-01-17 Thread Jesse Skinner
You can call .stop() to stop an animation, and .css('opacity', 1) to remove
transparency.
Cheers,

Jesse Skinner
www.thefutureoftheweb.com

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Stephan Veigl stephan.ve...@gmail.comwrote:


 How can I abort an animation?

 I have a slow fadeOut() on an element. Under some conditions I would
 like to stop the fadeout and show the element without any
 transparency. How can I do this?

 Stephan



[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread Klaus Hartl

One thing to keep in mind: If two declarations use !important! the
conflict is solved by specificity again, e.g. as if there were no !
important:

div id=foo class=bar

#foo {
width: 200px !important; /* higher specificity */
}
.bar {
width: 300px !important;
}

Applied width will be 200px.


--Klaus


On 17 Jan., 06:31, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
 trying to integrate a 3rd party css candy into your site may result in
 conflicts between the candy's css and your site's css, resulting in a
 rendering mess. stuff that works beautifully by itself blows up when
 you put it into your website. this trick may not find you a new
 girlfriend, or butter your bread on both sides, !BUT¡  it may
 instantly eliminate your css conflicts. it instantly eliminated ALL of
 the rendering conflicts i was having with superfish (and other css
 menus), when trying to integrate them into my site.

 SOLUTION:
 open all your css files, and globally replace: ; with  !important;

 THAT'S IT!

 (don't forget the space before !important;)

 for example, this:

 top: -999em;

 will become:

 top: -999em !important;

 HOW IT WORKS:
 the !important property forces that style to override all other css,
 whether style-sheets, inline-css, header-styles, and whether above or
 below in the css hierarchy.

 badabing!

 http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/plugins/superfish/http://inyourear.org


[jQuery] Re: abort an animation?

2009-01-17 Thread Stephan Veigl

thanks



2009/1/17 Jesse Skinner je...@thefutureoftheweb.com:
 You can call .stop() to stop an animation, and .css('opacity', 1) to remove
 transparency.
 Cheers,
 Jesse Skinner
 www.thefutureoftheweb.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Stephan Veigl stephan.ve...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 How can I abort an animation?

 I have a slow fadeOut() on an element. Under some conditions I would
 like to stop the fadeout and show the element without any
 transparency. How can I do this?

 Stephan




[jQuery] Re: Can I override ui.draggable?

2009-01-17 Thread Jesse Skinner
You can attach data to each draggable HTML element (eg. a big div or table)
using the .data() jQuery function. Then when an element is dropped, you can
use .data() again to retrieve the object attached to it and use that data
for processing/saving/etc.
I hope that helps. Cheers,

Jesse Skinner
www.thefutureoftheweb.com

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:13 PM, alphadog alphad...@gmail.com wrote:


 So, if I understand correctly, when I create a droppable, and it gets
 triggered by a draggable, the drop callback gets access to the
 draggable via ui.draggable.

 ui.draggable seem to wrap up the child tags of whatever tag got
 labeled as a draggable. This works well if you are dragging one tag,
 not so well if you want to drag complex data represented by a big div
 or table.

 Is there a way to somehow override ui.draggable? Ideally, I'd like the
 drop to see a JSON object instead of a messy pile of HTML.



[jQuery] Re: Plugin problem with mouseover/mouseout and setTimout

2009-01-17 Thread Stephan Veigl

Check out this code, I'm using it to show a popup (#add_popup) and
fade out if the mousepointer is out for more than 1 second.

At the moment it's just a QuickDitry hack. Just to give you a clue.

$(div).dblclick(function(ev){
timer = $(#add_popup).data(popup-timer);
if (timer) {
clearTimeout(timer);
$(#add_popup)
.stop()
.css('opacity', 1)
.data(popup-timer,0);
}
$(#add_popup)
.show()
.css({'top': ev.pageY-40, 'left': ev.pageX-10})
.data(popup-timer, 0)
.bind(mouseleave, function(ev){
var timer = $(this).data(popup-timer);
if (timer)
clearTimeout(timer);
timer = setTimeout( function(){
$(#add_popup).fadeOut(slow);
}, 1000);
$(this).data(popup-timer, timer);
})
.bind(mouseenter, function(ev){
var timer = $(this).data(popup-timer);
if (timer)
clearTimeout(timer);
$(this)
.stop()
.css('opacity', 1)
.data(popup-timer, 0);
});
});


[jQuery] Re: Problems with the New API Browser - Bug in AIR APP

2009-01-17 Thread Giovanni Battista Lenoci


@rem I've tried contacting you on twitter, but I'm new to it, and don't 
know If you received my message.


I've installed the AIR api browser, and I love it, but when I open it 
the dimensions of the windows are greater than my desktop resolution 
(1280x800 on windows xp).


Here you can see a screenshot, hope you can fix it.

http://lab.gianiaz.com/apibrowser.jpg

(I can use it doing a dx click on the button on the taskbar and click on 
maximixe).


Thank you.


--
gianiaz.net - web solutions
via angelo custode, 10 - 23100 sondrio (so) - italy
+39 347 7196482 



[jQuery] Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread David .Wu

My process is
1. load images from other php file
2. put the response thing into a div
3. check all image sizes
4. resize image if the size over the restriction

the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
resize process work.

html code
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
titledemo/title
style
!--
div#slide
{
width:100px;
height:50px;
overflow:hidden;
}
div#slide ul
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px;
list-style:none;
}
div#slide li
{
float:left;
}
--
/style
script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
/head

body
div id=slide/div
script language=javascript
!--
$(document).ready(function()
{
$.ajax(
{
url:'ajax.php',
type:'get',
cache:false,
success:function(data)
{
/*
data will response html
ul
liimg src=1.jpg/li
liimg src=2.jpg/li
liimg src=3.jpg/li
/ul
*/
$('div#slide').html(data);
},
complete:function()
{
$h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
/* resize the image */
$('div#slide img').each(function()
{
if($(this).height()  $h) 
$(this).height($h);
});
}
});
});
//--
/script
/body
/html


[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
of that particular image on its load.


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

 My process is
 1. load images from other php file
 2. put the response thing into a div
 3. check all image sizes
 4. resize image if the size over the restriction

 the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
 resize process work.

 html code
 !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
 www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
 html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
 head
 meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
 titledemo/title
 style
 !--
div#slide
{
width:100px;
height:50px;
overflow:hidden;
}
div#slide ul
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px;
list-style:none;
}
div#slide li
{
float:left;
}
 --
 /style
 script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
 /head

 body
 div id=slide/div
 script language=javascript
 !--
$(document).ready(function()
{
$.ajax(
{
url:'ajax.php',
type:'get',
cache:false,
success:function(data)
{
/*
data will response html
ul
liimg src=1.jpg/li
liimg src=2.jpg/li
liimg src=3.jpg/li
/ul
*/
$('div#slide').html(data);
},
complete:function()
{
$h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
/* resize the image */
$('div#slide img').each(function()
{
if($(this).height()  $h) 
 $(this).height($h);
});
}
});
});
 //--
 /script
 /body
 /html


[jQuery] jQuery 1.3 selector :first; :first-child

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

Hi all,
I have trouble in jQuery 1.3 with :first; :first-child selector.
Always it selects all a. In version 1.2.6 it worked by suspense.
What is new or wrong?? Thx for help.

$(function(){
$('#menu li a:first-child').remove();
});


[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 live() vs listen/intercept plugins

2009-01-17 Thread Ariel Flesler

live is very similar to Intercept. It bubbles up using closest().
Listen is faster and specially more scalable, but supports a small
subset of selectors. It can also bubble up if you specify so.

--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com

On Jan 16, 5:58 pm, rolfsf rol...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm trying to understand where the new live() fits in to the world of
 event delegation, and plugins like listen and intercept

 What are the arguments for one approach over the other?

 thanks!


[jQuery] Re: .live help needed

2009-01-17 Thread Ariel Flesler

The idea is that you don't need to call live every time, it works
persistently.
Just call it at start and it should keep on working.

--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com

On Jan 16, 6:57 pm, seasoup seas...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm playing around with the new .live functionality.  it seems very
 cool.

 I have a page that gets refreshed with ajax with a .live getting set
 for a list of links every time, so I need to call .die but .dies
 doesn't seem to be working...

     $('a[name=prioritya]').die('click', currFxn);
     $('a[name=prioritya]').live('click', currFxn);

 I don't think it matters what currFxn does, but it is a defined
 function.  Any idea why .die isn't working?

 Secondly, if I call $('a[name=prioritya]').die('click'); does that
 remove all live 'click' events from the page, or just those registered
 to a[name=prioritya]?

 Thanks,
 Josh Powell


[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 selector :first; :first-child

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Just checked. Works just fine.

Maybe something wrong in your html? Could you paste it here?


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 Hi all,
 I have trouble in jQuery 1.3 with :first; :first-child selector.
 Always it selects all a. In version 1.2.6 it worked by suspense.
 What is new or wrong?? Thx for help.

 $(function(){
$('#menu li a:first-child').remove();
 });



[jQuery] Re: [jquery]Need help in Simple Jquery Function I develop for tabs

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

I have just created html with your content and js. It works just fine.
ALL tabs work fine...


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Yuvraj Mathur sa...@spicyspy.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I am stuck up with this function to make simple Tabs. It works absolutely 
 fine only with the first two tabs. Can someone please observe the code and 
 reply the problem.

 Below d stands for the header(div) in which the links are, e for the 
 targeted content(div), and f for the sequence number.

 script
 function TabTasTic(d,e,f){
 $('#'+ d +' a').css({background: '#ff'});
 $('#'+ e +' div').hide();
 $('#'+ e +' div').eq(f).show();
 $('#'+ d +' a').eq(f).css({background: '#00'});
 }
 /script
 div class=header id=header
 a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','0');Tab1/a
 a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','1');Tab2/a
 a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','2');Tab3/a
 a href=javascript:TabTasTic('header','content','3');Tab2/a
 /div
 div class=content id=content
 divT1/div
 divT2/div
 divT3/div
 divT4/div
 /div




[jQuery] Re: Hide content until loaded

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

// fired right away
$('tn-hide').css('display', 'none').addClass('tn-loading');

$(document).ready(function() {
   // fired on DOM ready
});


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Christine Masters
cmast...@townnews.com wrote:

 Hi everyone!

 I'm a jQuery newbie, so I apologize if this is an easy question!

 I'm building a template for newspaper sites, and by nature of having many
 ads and modules and so forth, the content loads before the jQuery that
 styles it, leading to a flash of unstyled content.

 So, on several of my modules that use a lot of jQuery, I'd like to hide them
 until they are loaded.

 Right now, I'm trying to do this:

 $('tn-hide').css('display', 'none').addClass('tn-loading');

 $(document).ready(function() {
$('tn-hide').css('display', 'block').removeClass('tn-loading);
 });

 I'd like to be able to simply apply the 'tn-hide' class to any module I'd
 like to hide until loaded on the page.

 It is my (limited) understanding that the first line will go into effect
 when the DOM is ready and the second when the document is ready.

 Anyway, right now it isn't working. I'd appreciate it if you could give me
 any insight on this or let me know if I'm heading in the right direction.

 If it helps, here is my page: http://blueprints.townnews-cms.com/

 
 Christine Masters, Product Manager, TownNews.com
 cmast...@townnews.com | 1-800-293-9576 x1022
 Twitter: c_masters
 






[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 - am I missing something or is this a bug?

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

I have just spent about 5 minutes trying to select elements without
. and also tried to select classes with different capitalization.

None could be selected... Works just fine, as it should be!!! I am
getting my jquery from:
http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3/jquery.min.js


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:25 AM, B J Pohl bjp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Upgraded to 1.3 on my site today and found that previously working
 code is broken.  The issue is that I was using a selector of $
 ('.aComment') to get, not surprisingly, elements with a class of
 'aComment' .  This worked great with 1.2.6.  However, with some
 tinkering, I have found that I can user $('acomment') to select these
 nodes with 1.3 .

 Question is, is the expected behavior or a bug?  I'm pretty new to a
 lot of this stuff so I acknowledge my ignorance in advance.  However,
 I thought it a weird change in behavior.

 Can someone give me some feedback?  If this is a bug, I'll do my best
 to submit it (and maybe even try a fix).  If it isn't, can someone
 explain to me why the different behavior between 1.2.6 and 1.3?

 Thanks!

 B.J.



[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 selector :first; :first-child

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

code:

div id=menuContent
ul id=menu
lia href=index.phpHome/a/li
lia href=rules.phpRules/a/li
lia href=#Pilots/a/li
lia href=#Briefing/a/li
lia href=#IGC/a/li
lia href=#Results/a/li
lia href=#Forum/a/li
/ul
/div


On Jan 17, 2:40 pm, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just checked. Works just fine.

 Maybe something wrong in your html? Could you paste it here?

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  Hi all,
  I have trouble in jQuery 1.3 with :first; :first-child selector.
  Always it selects all a. In version 1.2.6 it worked by suspense.
  What is new or wrong?? Thx for help.

  $(function(){
         $('#menu li a:first-child').remove();
  });


[jQuery] JSONP

2009-01-17 Thread Lay András

Hello!

I'd like to use $.getJSON with JSONP support, but i used
http://example.com/xxx/yyy URL sheme instead of
http://example.com/index.php?a=xxxb=yyy. I read in documentation, in
the 'myurl?callback=?' syntax the ? replaces to the callback name. I
tried this: http://example.com/xxx/yyy/? but don't works.

I tracking the connection with FireFox's LiveHttpHeaders plugin, and I
see jquery don't replaces ? to callback name, only send the
http://example.com/xxx/yyy/? url without any change.

How can I use JSONP support with this type of URL-s?


[jQuery] Superfish - left module size

2009-01-17 Thread thalueng

I try to apply superfish to a template based on aha_editionblack
(google for the link). when publishing superfish-vertical to the left
module, the module borders are drawn incorrectly, as if the superfish
menu would not contain any items. i went through all css and php
files, but cannot find what is different when applying the main
module. The rest of the menu and the drop downs display correctly,
after i have removed the overflow:hidden from the left module. any
ideas?


[jQuery] [jQuery V1.3] will lead behavior for IE to lose efficacy

2009-01-17 Thread ChenKaie

Dear all,

I use some behavior hack, like the famous Whatever:hover (http://
www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html), when I upgrade jQuery to v1.3,
it cause this hack to lose efficacy, but works well under jquery v1.2.

any body? meet the same problem with me?



[jQuery] Re: Hide content until loaded

2009-01-17 Thread MorningZ

Why not do it with CSS?  where css class tn-loading has display:
none declared

div class=tn-hide tn-loading
Content you are hiding until document ready
/div

then

$(document).ready(function() {
//Do some stuff here

//Done doing stuff, show the content
$('tn-hide').removeClass('tn-loading);
});


On Jan 16, 11:53 pm, Christine Masters cmast...@townnews.com
wrote:
 Hi everyone!

 I'm a jQuery newbie, so I apologize if this is an easy question!

 I'm building a template for newspaper sites, and by nature of having many
 ads and modules and so forth, the content loads before the jQuery that
 styles it, leading to a flash of unstyled content.

 So, on several of my modules that use a lot of jQuery, I'd like to hide them
 until they are loaded.

 Right now, I'm trying to do this:

 $('tn-hide').css('display', 'none').addClass('tn-loading');

 $(document).ready(function() {
     $('tn-hide').css('display', 'block').removeClass('tn-loading);

 });  

 I'd like to be able to simply apply the 'tn-hide' class to any module I'd
 like to hide until loaded on the page.

 It is my (limited) understanding that the first line will go into effect
 when the DOM is ready and the second when the document is ready.

 Anyway, right now it isn't working. I'd appreciate it if you could give me
 any insight on this or let me know if I'm heading in the right direction.

 If it helps, here is my page:http://blueprints.townnews-cms.com/

 
 Christine Masters, Product Manager, TownNews.com
 cmast...@townnews.com | 1-800-293-9576 x1022
 Twitter: c_masters
 


[jQuery] Re: Hide content until loaded

2009-01-17 Thread Saif ullah
*http://tinyurl.com/8rwmkr*

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:13 PM, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote:


 Why not do it with CSS?  where css class tn-loading has display:
 none declared

 div class=tn-hide tn-loading
Content you are hiding until document ready
 /div

 then

 $(document).ready(function() {
//Do some stuff here

//Done doing stuff, show the content
$('tn-hide').removeClass('tn-loading);
 });


 On Jan 16, 11:53 pm, Christine Masters cmast...@townnews.com
 wrote:
  Hi everyone!
 
  I'm a jQuery newbie, so I apologize if this is an easy question!
 
  I'm building a template for newspaper sites, and by nature of having many
  ads and modules and so forth, the content loads before the jQuery that
  styles it, leading to a flash of unstyled content.
 
  So, on several of my modules that use a lot of jQuery, I'd like to hide
 them
  until they are loaded.
 
  Right now, I'm trying to do this:
 
  $('tn-hide').css('display', 'none').addClass('tn-loading');
 
  $(document).ready(function() {
  $('tn-hide').css('display', 'block').removeClass('tn-loading);
 
  });
 
  I'd like to be able to simply apply the 'tn-hide' class to any module I'd
  like to hide until loaded on the page.
 
  It is my (limited) understanding that the first line will go into effect
  when the DOM is ready and the second when the document is ready.
 
  Anyway, right now it isn't working. I'd appreciate it if you could give
 me
  any insight on this or let me know if I'm heading in the right direction.
 
  If it helps, here is my page:http://blueprints.townnews-cms.com/
 
 
 
  Christine Masters, Product Manager, TownNews.com
  cmast...@townnews.com | 1-800-293-9576 x1022
  Twitter: c_masters
 
 


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts. which could be an issue,
if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css.

fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so that's probably
not going to be an issue.

if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important, then
you might be able to override it with some javascript or
runtimeStyle.

but, if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF,
then, unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended to be
resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to all elements
within the candy will have no effect on the intended behavior of the
candy.


[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread David .Wu

please tell me more tips, I don't really understand what to do.

On 1月17日, 下午9時21分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
 returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
 completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

 Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
 of that particular image on its load.

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

  My process is
  1. load images from other php file
  2. put the response thing into a div
  3. check all image sizes
  4. resize image if the size over the restriction

  the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
  resize process work.

  html code
  !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
 www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
  html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
  head
  meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
  titledemo/title
  style
  !--
 div#slide
 {
 width:100px;
 height:50px;
 overflow:hidden;
 }
 div#slide ul
 {
 margin:0px;
 padding:0px;
 list-style:none;
 }
 div#slide li
 {
 float:left;
 }
  --
  /style
  script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
  /head

  body
  div id=slide/div
  script language=javascript
  !--
 $(document).ready(function()
 {
 $.ajax(
 {
 url:'ajax.php',
 type:'get',
 cache:false,
 success:function(data)
 {
 /*
 data will response html
 ul
 liimg src=1.jpg/li
 liimg src=2.jpg/li
 liimg src=3.jpg/li
 /ul
 */
 $('div#slide').html(data);
 },
 complete:function()
 {
 $h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
 /* resize the image */
 $('div#slide img').each(function()
 {
 if($(this).height()  $h) 
  $(this).height($h);
 });
 }
 });
 });
  //--
  /script
  /body
  /html


[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 - am I missing something or is this a bug?

2009-01-17 Thread B J Pohl

Thanks for looking into this!  First off, I have complicated my
question by not being careful with my reporting:  The selector that
*did* work in fact used a '.' (I missed it above... i.e. $('acomment')
should be $('.acomment'))  Sorry about that.

Further experimenting shows that this behavior is browser specific.  I
see the described behavior in Chrome, but not in IE7.  (In fact, I've
had to revert to 1.2.6 because the behavior is inconsistent between
browsers).  I believe it is related to a bug that has been reported
concerning capitals  in class names with  Safari(i.e. WebKit):

http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3840

Anyway, thanks for the feedback!

On Jan 17, 8:02 am, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have just spent about 5 minutes trying to select elements without
 . and also tried to select classes with different capitalization.

 None could be selected... Works just fine, as it should be!!! I am
 getting my jquery 
 from:http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3/jquery.min.js

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:25 AM, B J Pohl bjp...@gmail.com wrote:



  Upgraded to 1.3 on my site today and found that previously working
  code is broken.  The issue is that I was using a selector of $
  ('.aComment') to get, not surprisingly, elements with a class of
  'aComment' .  This worked great with 1.2.6.  However, with some
  tinkering, I have found that I can user $('acomment') to select these
  nodes with 1.3 .

  Question is, is the expected behavior or a bug?  I'm pretty new to a
  lot of this stuff so I acknowledge my ignorance in advance.  However,
  I thought it a weird change in behavior.

  Can someone give me some feedback?  If this is a bug, I'll do my best
  to submit it (and maybe even try a fix).  If it isn't, can someone
  explain to me why the different behavior between 1.2.6 and 1.3?

  Thanks!

  B.J.


[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread David .Wu

aha, I understand, it's work, thanks :)

$img1.load(function()
{
$(this).each(function()
{
if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
});
});


On 1月17日, 下午9時21分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
 returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
 completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

 Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
 of that particular image on its load.

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

  My process is
  1. load images from other php file
  2. put the response thing into a div
  3. check all image sizes
  4. resize image if the size over the restriction

  the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
  resize process work.

  html code
  !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
 www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
  html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
  head
  meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
  titledemo/title
  style
  !--
 div#slide
 {
 width:100px;
 height:50px;
 overflow:hidden;
 }
 div#slide ul
 {
 margin:0px;
 padding:0px;
 list-style:none;
 }
 div#slide li
 {
 float:left;
 }
  --
  /style
  script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
  /head

  body
  div id=slide/div
  script language=javascript
  !--
 $(document).ready(function()
 {
 $.ajax(
 {
 url:'ajax.php',
 type:'get',
 cache:false,
 success:function(data)
 {
 /*
 data will response html
 ul
 liimg src=1.jpg/li
 liimg src=2.jpg/li
 liimg src=3.jpg/li
 /ul
 */
 $('div#slide').html(data);
 },
 complete:function()
 {
 $h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
 /* resize the image */
 $('div#slide img').each(function()
 {
 if($(this).height()  $h) 
  $(this).height($h);
 });
 }
 });
 });
  //--
  /script
  /body
  /html


[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 - am I missing something or is this a bug?

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Wow, thanks for the link and clearing out. That's something new I
learned today :)

Thanks again.


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:34 PM, B J Pohl bjp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks for looking into this!  First off, I have complicated my
 question by not being careful with my reporting:  The selector that
 *did* work in fact used a '.' (I missed it above... i.e. $('acomment')
 should be $('.acomment'))  Sorry about that.

 Further experimenting shows that this behavior is browser specific.  I
 see the described behavior in Chrome, but not in IE7.  (In fact, I've
 had to revert to 1.2.6 because the behavior is inconsistent between
 browsers).  I believe it is related to a bug that has been reported
 concerning capitals  in class names with  Safari(i.e. WebKit):

 http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3840

 Anyway, thanks for the feedback!

 On Jan 17, 8:02 am, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have just spent about 5 minutes trying to select elements without
 . and also tried to select classes with different capitalization.

 None could be selected... Works just fine, as it should be!!! I am
 getting my jquery 
 from:http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3/jquery.min.js

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:25 AM, B J Pohl bjp...@gmail.com wrote:



  Upgraded to 1.3 on my site today and found that previously working
  code is broken.  The issue is that I was using a selector of $
  ('.aComment') to get, not surprisingly, elements with a class of
  'aComment' .  This worked great with 1.2.6.  However, with some
  tinkering, I have found that I can user $('acomment') to select these
  nodes with 1.3 .

  Question is, is the expected behavior or a bug?  I'm pretty new to a
  lot of this stuff so I acknowledge my ignorance in advance.  However,
  I thought it a weird change in behavior.

  Can someone give me some feedback?  If this is a bug, I'll do my best
  to submit it (and maybe even try a fix).  If it isn't, can someone
  explain to me why the different behavior between 1.2.6 and 1.3?

  Thanks!

  B.J.


[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread David .Wu

I got one more question, actually I need to clone the result of $td1
into another $td2, how to do it after the load function finish.

$img1.load(function()
{
$(this).each(function()
{
if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
});
});

$tbl1.clone().prependTo($td2);



On 1月18日, 上午12時43分, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:
 aha, I understand, it's work, thanks :)

 $img1.load(function()
 {
 $(this).each(function()
 {
 if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
 });

 });

 On 1月17日, 下午9時21分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

  If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
  returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
  completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

  Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
  of that particular image on its load.

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

   My process is
   1. load images from other php file
   2. put the response thing into a div
   3. check all image sizes
   4. resize image if the size over the restriction

   the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
   resize process work.

   html code
   !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
  www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
   html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
   head
   meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
   titledemo/title
   style
   !--
  div#slide
  {
  width:100px;
  height:50px;
  overflow:hidden;
  }
  div#slide ul
  {
  margin:0px;
  padding:0px;
  list-style:none;
  }
  div#slide li
  {
  float:left;
  }
   --
   /style
   script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
   /head

   body
   div id=slide/div
   script language=javascript
   !--
  $(document).ready(function()
  {
  $.ajax(
  {
  url:'ajax.php',
  type:'get',
  cache:false,
  success:function(data)
  {
  /*
  data will response html
  ul
  liimg src=1.jpg/li
  liimg src=2.jpg/li
  liimg src=3.jpg/li
  /ul
  */
  $('div#slide').html(data);
  },
  complete:function()
  {
  $h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
  /* resize the image */
  $('div#slide img').each(function()
  {
  if($(this).height()  $h) 
   $(this).height($h);
  });
  }
  });
  });
   //--
   /script
   /body
   /html


[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread David .Wu

I got one more question, actually I need to clone the result of $td1
into another $td2, how to do it after the load function finish.

$img1.load(function()
{
$(this).each(function()
{
if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
});
});

$tbl1.clone().prependTo($td2);



On 1月18日, 上午12時43分, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:
 aha, I understand, it's work, thanks :)

 $img1.load(function()
 {
 $(this).each(function()
 {
 if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
 });

 });

 On 1月17日, 下午9時21分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

  If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
  returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
  completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

  Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
  of that particular image on its load.

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

   My process is
   1. load images from other php file
   2. put the response thing into a div
   3. check all image sizes
   4. resize image if the size over the restriction

   the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
   resize process work.

   html code
   !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
  www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
   html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
   head
   meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
   titledemo/title
   style
   !--
  div#slide
  {
  width:100px;
  height:50px;
  overflow:hidden;
  }
  div#slide ul
  {
  margin:0px;
  padding:0px;
  list-style:none;
  }
  div#slide li
  {
  float:left;
  }
   --
   /style
   script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
   /head

   body
   div id=slide/div
   script language=javascript
   !--
  $(document).ready(function()
  {
  $.ajax(
  {
  url:'ajax.php',
  type:'get',
  cache:false,
  success:function(data)
  {
  /*
  data will response html
  ul
  liimg src=1.jpg/li
  liimg src=2.jpg/li
  liimg src=3.jpg/li
  /ul
  */
  $('div#slide').html(data);
  },
  complete:function()
  {
  $h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
  /* resize the image */
  $('div#slide img').each(function()
  {
  if($(this).height()  $h) 
   $(this).height($h);
  });
  }
  });
  });
   //--
   /script
   /body
   /html


[jQuery] Re: Hide content until loaded

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Saif, do you have a point or is this spam?

MorningZ, I am sure you did not have time to go into much details just
like me with my first post :)

Christine, MorningZ suggested (IMO) the best way to do it. Just keep
in mind those users that do not have js enabled. Add some id or class
to your body tag USING JAVASCRIPT. For example a js id and in your
CSS add rules that make your blocks display none.

#js .tn-hide{
 display:none;
}

This will make sure those users with js disabled will ALSO see your
hidden blocks.

PS. It's surprising how many company system administrators disable js
in browser for security sake.


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Saif ullah saifullahha...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://tinyurl.com/8rwmkr

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:13 PM, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why not do it with CSS?  where css class tn-loading has display:
 none declared

 div class=tn-hide tn-loading
Content you are hiding until document ready
 /div

 then

 $(document).ready(function() {
//Do some stuff here

//Done doing stuff, show the content
$('tn-hide').removeClass('tn-loading);
 });


 On Jan 16, 11:53 pm, Christine Masters cmast...@townnews.com
 wrote:
  Hi everyone!
 
  I'm a jQuery newbie, so I apologize if this is an easy question!
 
  I'm building a template for newspaper sites, and by nature of having
  many
  ads and modules and so forth, the content loads before the jQuery that
  styles it, leading to a flash of unstyled content.
 
  So, on several of my modules that use a lot of jQuery, I'd like to hide
  them
  until they are loaded.
 
  Right now, I'm trying to do this:
 
  $('tn-hide').css('display', 'none').addClass('tn-loading');
 
  $(document).ready(function() {
  $('tn-hide').css('display', 'block').removeClass('tn-loading);
 
  });
 
  I'd like to be able to simply apply the 'tn-hide' class to any module
  I'd
  like to hide until loaded on the page.
 
  It is my (limited) understanding that the first line will go into effect
  when the DOM is ready and the second when the document is ready.
 
  Anyway, right now it isn't working. I'd appreciate it if you could give
  me
  any insight on this or let me know if I'm heading in the right
  direction.
 
  If it helps, here is my page:http://blueprints.townnews-cms.com/
 
 
  
  Christine Masters, Product Manager, TownNews.com
  cmast...@townnews.com | 1-800-293-9576 x1022
  Twitter: c_masters
 
  



[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Didn't get exactly what you meant, but if you want to do something
when loading has finished then put it into the load() function.

.load(function(){
// your code
});


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:53 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

 I got one more question, actually I need to clone the result of $td1
 into another $td2, how to do it after the load function finish.

$img1.load(function()
{
$(this).each(function()
{
if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
});
});

$tbl1.clone().prependTo($td2);



 On 1月18日, 上午12時43分, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:
 aha, I understand, it's work, thanks :)

 $img1.load(function()
 {
 $(this).each(function()
 {
 if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
 });

 });

 On 1月17日, 下午9時21分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

  If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
  returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
  completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

  Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
  of that particular image on its load.

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

   My process is
   1. load images from other php file
   2. put the response thing into a div
   3. check all image sizes
   4. resize image if the size over the restriction

   the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
   resize process work.

   html code
   !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
  www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
   html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
   head
   meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
   titledemo/title
   style
   !--
  div#slide
  {
  width:100px;
  height:50px;
  overflow:hidden;
  }
  div#slide ul
  {
  margin:0px;
  padding:0px;
  list-style:none;
  }
  div#slide li
  {
  float:left;
  }
   --
   /style
   script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
   /head

   body
   div id=slide/div
   script language=javascript
   !--
  $(document).ready(function()
  {
  $.ajax(
  {
  url:'ajax.php',
  type:'get',
  cache:false,
  success:function(data)
  {
  /*
  data will response html
  ul
  liimg src=1.jpg/li
  liimg src=2.jpg/li
  liimg src=3.jpg/li
  /ul
  */
  $('div#slide').html(data);
  },
  complete:function()
  {
  $h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
  /* resize the image */
  $('div#slide img').each(function()
  {
  if($(this).height()  $h) 
   $(this).height($h);
  });
  }
  });
  });
   //--
   /script
   /body
   /html


[jQuery] Re: abort an animation?

2009-01-17 Thread pinky reddy

On 1/17/09, pinky reddy pinky...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 1/17/09, Stephan Veigl stephan.ve...@gmail.com wrote:

 thanks



 2009/1/17 Jesse Skinner je...@thefutureoftheweb.com:
 You can call .stop() to stop an animation, and .css('opacity', 1) to
 remove
 transparency.
 Cheers,
 Jesse Skinner
 www.thefutureoftheweb.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Stephan Veigl
 stephan.ve...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 How can I abort an animation?

 I have a slow fadeOut() on an element. Under some conditions I would
 like to stop the fadeout and show the element without any
 transparency. How can I do this?

 Stephan






[jQuery] disable column from sorting in tablesorter

2009-01-17 Thread Rick Pasotto

I have a table in which the first column is the row number (always from
1 at the top to 100 at the bottom) so no matter how the other columns
are sorted that first column should be the 'rank' for that particular
sort.

Is it possible to do this with tablesorter? Could I change the values in
the first column after tablesorter did it's work?

I see how to disable sorting on the first column but that is not what I
want.

Could someone suggest another way to achieve what I want?

-- 
Everything that you can imagine is real. -- Pablo Picasso
Rick Pasottor...@niof.nethttp://www.niof.net


[jQuery] Re: abort an animation?

2009-01-17 Thread pinky reddy

On 1/17/09, Stephan Veigl stephan.ve...@gmail.com wrote:

 thanks



 2009/1/17 Jesse Skinner je...@thefutureoftheweb.com:
 You can call .stop() to stop an animation, and .css('opacity', 1) to
 remove
 transparency.
 Cheers,
 Jesse Skinner
 www.thefutureoftheweb.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Stephan Veigl stephan.ve...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 How can I abort an animation?

 I have a slow fadeOut() on an element. Under some conditions I would
 like to stop the fadeout and show the element without any
 transparency. How can I do this?

 Stephan





[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread David .Wu

I mean, I want to clone the image to another place with the image
resize finished, for example
I load three images by ajax

1.jpg height 200px
2.jpg height 350px
3.jpg height 400px

and my restriction is 180, therefore, images will resize to my rule
successfully, and I want to clone it in another table at the same
page, so I use jQuery clone function, the first three images resize
successful but the clone one become the origin size, I guess it clone
the image before it's resized, so how do I do the clone function after
the resize function truly be executed.

On 1月18日, 上午1時07分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Didn't get exactly what you meant, but if you want to do something
 when loading has finished then put it into the load() function.

 .load(function(){
 // your code

 });

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:53 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

  I got one more question, actually I need to clone the result of $td1
  into another $td2, how to do it after the load function finish.

 $img1.load(function()
 {
 $(this).each(function()
 {
 if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
 });
 });

 $tbl1.clone().prependTo($td2);

  On 1月18日, 上午12時43分, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:
  aha, I understand, it's work, thanks :)

  $img1.load(function()
  {
  $(this).each(function()
  {
  if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
  });

  });

  On 1月17日, 下午9時21分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

   If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
   returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
   completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

   Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
   of that particular image on its load.

   
   Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

   On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

My process is
1. load images from other php file
2. put the response thing into a div
3. check all image sizes
4. resize image if the size over the restriction

the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
resize process work.

html code
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN http://
   www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
titledemo/title
style
!--
   div#slide
   {
   width:100px;
   height:50px;
   overflow:hidden;
   }
   div#slide ul
   {
   margin:0px;
   padding:0px;
   list-style:none;
   }
   div#slide li
   {
   float:left;
   }
--
/style
script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
/head

body
div id=slide/div
script language=javascript
!--
   $(document).ready(function()
   {
   $.ajax(
   {
   url:'ajax.php',
   type:'get',
   cache:false,
   success:function(data)
   {
   /*
   data will response html
   ul
   liimg 
src=1.jpg/li
   liimg 
src=2.jpg/li
   liimg 
src=3.jpg/li
   /ul
   */
   $('div#slide').html(data);
   },
   complete:function()
   {
   $h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
   /* resize the image */
   $('div#slide img').each(function()
   {
   if($(this).height()  $h) 
$(this).height($h);
   });
   }
   });
   });
//--
/script
/body
/html


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread pinky reddy

On 1/17/09, Klaus Hartl klaus.ha...@googlemail.com wrote:

 One thing to keep in mind: If two declarations use !important! the
 conflict is solved by specificity again, e.g. as if there were no !
 important:

 div id=foo class=bar

 #foo {
 width: 200px !important; /* higher specificity */
 }
 .bar {
 width: 300px !important;
 }

 Applied width will be 200px.


 --Klaus


 On 17 Jan., 06:31, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
 trying to integrate a 3rd party css candy into your site may result in
 conflicts between the candy's css and your site's css, resulting in a
 rendering mess. stuff that works beautifully by itself blows up when
 you put it into your website. this trick may not find you a new
 girlfriend, or butter your bread on both sides, !BUT¡  it may
 instantly eliminate your css conflicts. it instantly eliminated ALL of
 the rendering conflicts i was having with superfish (and other css
 menus), when trying to integrate them into my site.

 SOLUTION:
 open all your css files, and globally replace: ; with  !important;

 THAT'S IT!

 (don't forget the space before !important;)

 for example, this:

 top: -999em;

 will become:

 top: -999em !important;

 HOW IT WORKS:
 the !important property forces that style to override all other css,
 whether style-sheets, inline-css, header-styles, and whether above or
 below in the css hierarchy.

 badabing!

 http://users.tpg.com.au/j_birch/plugins/superfish/http://inyourear.org


[jQuery] Re: disable column from sorting in tablesorter

2009-01-17 Thread MorningZ

So to clarify, you always want that column to be sequentially 1 to n
where n is the number of rows?

and if so, and the sort is descending, would it be n to 1 ?



On Jan 17, 12:10 pm, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote:
 I have a table in which the first column is the row number (always from
 1 at the top to 100 at the bottom) so no matter how the other columns
 are sorted that first column should be the 'rank' for that particular
 sort.

 Is it possible to do this with tablesorter? Could I change the values in
 the first column after tablesorter did it's work?

 I see how to disable sorting on the first column but that is not what I
 want.

 Could someone suggest another way to achieve what I want?

 --
 Everything that you can imagine is real. -- Pablo Picasso
     Rick Pasotto    r...@niof.net    http://www.niof.net


[jQuery] Re: JSONP

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

I am not 100% sure, but I remember reading somewhere that jQuery looks
for =? to replace the ? part of the pattern.

Try querying

http://example.com/xxx/yyy/=?

OR in case this won't work try this:

http://example.com/xxx/yyy/?tmp=dummycallback=?

Then on your server side get the value of callback and wrap your json with it.

I hope it will work out. Please let me know how you did solve the problem...

Thanks.


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Lay András lays...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello!

 I'd like to use $.getJSON with JSONP support, but i used
 http://example.com/xxx/yyy URL sheme instead of
 http://example.com/index.php?a=xxxb=yyy. I read in documentation, in
 the 'myurl?callback=?' syntax the ? replaces to the callback name. I
 tried this: http://example.com/xxx/yyy/? but don't works.

 I tracking the connection with FireFox's LiveHttpHeaders plugin, and I
 see jquery don't replaces ? to callback name, only send the
 http://example.com/xxx/yyy/? url without any change.

 How can I use JSONP support with this type of URL-s?



[jQuery] Re: disable column from sorting in tablesorter

2009-01-17 Thread Rick Pasotto

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:02:01AM -0800, MorningZ wrote:
 
 So to clarify, you always want that column to be sequentially 1 to n
 where n is the number of rows?

Yes.

 and if so, and the sort is descending, would it be n to 1 ?

No. the first row should always rank #1. The user can reverse the sort
order if he wants to. The user wants to know the rank of some row near
the middle of the table without having to manually count the rows.

 On Jan 17, 12:10 pm, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote:
  I have a table in which the first column is the row number (always from
  1 at the top to 100 at the bottom) so no matter how the other columns
  are sorted that first column should be the 'rank' for that particular
  sort.
 
  Is it possible to do this with tablesorter? Could I change the values in
  the first column after tablesorter did it's work?
 
  I see how to disable sorting on the first column but that is not what I
  want.
 
  Could someone suggest another way to achieve what I want?
 
  --
  Everything that you can imagine is real. -- Pablo Picasso
      Rick Pasotto    r...@niof.net    http://www.niof.net

-- 
Our doctrine is based on private property. Communism is based on
systematic plunder, since it consists in handing over to one man,
without compensation, the labor of another. If it distributed to
each one according to his labor, it would, in fact, recognize
private property and would no longer be communism.
-- Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)
Rick Pasottor...@niof.nethttp://www.niof.net


[jQuery] How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with selecting
a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should look
like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link, so
Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery 1.2.6
doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')

Thx for help in advance.


div id=container
ul id=menu
lia href=#Home/a/li
lia href=#Rules/a/li
lia href=#Pilots/a/li
lia href=#Briefing/a/li
lia href=#IGC/a/li
lia href=#Results/a/li
lia href=#Forum/a/li
/ul
/div


[jQuery] Re: Images resize problem with Aajx

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

$img1.load(function()
{
$(this).each(function()
{
if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);


if(check if it the item you want to clone){
  $tbl1.clone().prependTo($td2);
}


});

});


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

 I mean, I want to clone the image to another place with the image
 resize finished, for example
 I load three images by ajax

 1.jpg height 200px
 2.jpg height 350px
 3.jpg height 400px

 and my restriction is 180, therefore, images will resize to my rule
 successfully, and I want to clone it in another table at the same
 page, so I use jQuery clone function, the first three images resize
 successful but the clone one become the origin size, I guess it clone
 the image before it's resized, so how do I do the clone function after
 the resize function truly be executed.

 On 1月18日, 上午1時07分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Didn't get exactly what you meant, but if you want to do something
 when loading has finished then put it into the load() function.

 .load(function(){
 // your code

 });

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:53 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

  I got one more question, actually I need to clone the result of $td1
  into another $td2, how to do it after the load function finish.

 $img1.load(function()
 {
 $(this).each(function()
 {
 if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
 });
 });

 $tbl1.clone().prependTo($td2);

  On 1月18日, 上午12時43分, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:
  aha, I understand, it's work, thanks :)

  $img1.load(function()
  {
  $(this).each(function()
  {
  if($(this).height()  $h) $(this).height($h);
  });

  });

  On 1月17日, 下午9時21分, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

   If the image is not loaded by the time you call .height() function it
   returns 0. Since your code is run right after the ajax request is
   completed browser has no idea what is the size of that images.

   Tip: You could bind a .load() event to your images and change the size
   of that particular image on its load.

   
   Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

   On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:34 PM, David .Wu chan1...@gmail.com wrote:

My process is
1. load images from other php file
2. put the response thing into a div
3. check all image sizes
4. resize image if the size over the restriction

the problem is sometimes images resize failed, how to make sure the
resize process work.

html code
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN 
http://
   www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=utf-8 /
titledemo/title
style
!--
   div#slide
   {
   width:100px;
   height:50px;
   overflow:hidden;
   }
   div#slide ul
   {
   margin:0px;
   padding:0px;
   list-style:none;
   }
   div#slide li
   {
   float:left;
   }
--
/style
script type=text/javascript src=js/jquery-1.2.6.js/script
/head

body
div id=slide/div
script language=javascript
!--
   $(document).ready(function()
   {
   $.ajax(
   {
   url:'ajax.php',
   type:'get',
   cache:false,
   success:function(data)
   {
   /*
   data will response html
   ul
   liimg 
src=1.jpg/li
   liimg 
src=2.jpg/li
   liimg 
src=3.jpg/li
   /ul
   */
   $('div#slide').html(data);
   },
   complete:function()
   {
   $h = 40; /* images hight restriction */
   /* resize the image */
   $('div#slide img').each(function()
   {
   if($(this).height()  $h) 
$(this).height($h);
   });
   }

[jQuery] Submitting a form with .submit() problems

2009-01-17 Thread g...@getsharepoint.com

Hi,

I have a form that looks like this:

tabletr
form action=http://jquery.com; method=post id=myForm
td
input value=submit type=submit onclick=conversion(1000, this);
return false; /
/td
/form
/tr
/table

The onclick call for the button accesses code which does some special
processing and then is supposed to submit the form. The form
submission looks like this:

jQuery(this.clickedObject).parent('form').slice(0).submit();

Problem is this won't work. I'm assuming it's because of malformed
xhtml (the form tag inside the tr) however the html itself can not be
changed but my JavaScript can.

Unfortunately I can not use the form's id to submit the form as there
are two malformed xhtml forms that run on the same code. Is there
another way to get to the form tag by traversing elements in reverse
order?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Removing li solves the problem:

$('#menu a:first');


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with selecting
 a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should look
 like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link, so
 Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery 1.2.6
 doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')

 Thx for help in advance.


 div id=container
ul id=menu
lia href=#Home/a/li
lia href=#Rules/a/li
lia href=#Pilots/a/li
lia href=#Briefing/a/li
lia href=#IGC/a/li
lia href=#Results/a/li
lia href=#Forum/a/li
/ul
 /div



[jQuery] Re: JSONP

2009-01-17 Thread Lay András

Hello!

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:04 PM, jQuery Lover
ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am not 100% sure, but I remember reading somewhere that jQuery looks
 for =? to replace the ? part of the pattern.

 Try querying

 http://example.com/xxx/yyy/=?

Yes, this works! But need some trick, because jquery replaces to:

http://example.com/xxx/yyy/=jsonp1232216220188?_=1232216222402

But this is not big problem, because in server side php with a simple
regexp ( /=(.*?)\?/ ) i grab the callback name.

 OR in case this won't work try this:

 http://example.com/xxx/yyy/?tmp=dummycallback=?

I don't try this because the first working, and this look like more difficult.

Thank you for your idea!

Lay

ps.: I mean, it's better to change the documentation from ...replaces
the ? with the correct method name... to replaces the =? with the
'='+correct method name.


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

I tested it, but it remove all a, so sry, it doesnt work :-(

On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Removing li solves the problem:

 $('#menu a:first');

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with selecting
  a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should look
  like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link, so
  Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery 1.2.6
  doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')

  Thx for help in advance.

  div id=container
         ul id=menu
                 lia href=#Home/a/li
                 lia href=#Rules/a/li
                 lia href=#Pilots/a/li
                 lia href=#Briefing/a/li
                 lia href=#IGC/a/li
                 lia href=#Results/a/li
                 lia href=#Forum/a/li
         /ul
  /div- Skrýt citovaný text -

 - Zobrazit citovaný text -


[jQuery] Re: disable column from sorting in tablesorter

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

You can write a javascript function that will add a row count column
and after every table sort action will fire to clean the content of
the column and repopulate it with numbers from 1 to 100. You can use
tablesort's events:

$(table).bind(sortEnd,function() {
  // write your code here
});


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote:

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:02:01AM -0800, MorningZ wrote:

 So to clarify, you always want that column to be sequentially 1 to n
 where n is the number of rows?

 Yes.

 and if so, and the sort is descending, would it be n to 1 ?

 No. the first row should always rank #1. The user can reverse the sort
 order if he wants to. The user wants to know the rank of some row near
 the middle of the table without having to manually count the rows.

 On Jan 17, 12:10 pm, Rick Pasotto r...@niof.net wrote:
  I have a table in which the first column is the row number (always from
  1 at the top to 100 at the bottom) so no matter how the other columns
  are sorted that first column should be the 'rank' for that particular
  sort.
 
  Is it possible to do this with tablesorter? Could I change the values in
  the first column after tablesorter did it's work?
 
  I see how to disable sorting on the first column but that is not what I
  want.
 
  Could someone suggest another way to achieve what I want?
 
  --
  Everything that you can imagine is real. -- Pablo Picasso
  Rick Pasottor...@niof.nethttp://www.niof.net

 --
 Our doctrine is based on private property. Communism is based on
 systematic plunder, since it consists in handing over to one man,
 without compensation, the labor of another. If it distributed to
 each one according to his labor, it would, in fact, recognize
 private property and would no longer be communism.
-- Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)
Rick Pasottor...@niof.nethttp://www.niof.net



[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

of i add .remove() of course

On 17 Led, 19:32, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 I tested it, but it remove all a, so sry, it doesnt work :-(

 On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:



  Removing li solves the problem:

  $('#menu a:first');

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

   Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with selecting
   a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should look
   like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link, so
   Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery 1.2.6
   doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')

   Thx for help in advance.

   div id=container
          ul id=menu
                  lia href=#Home/a/li
                  lia href=#Rules/a/li
                  lia href=#Pilots/a/li
                  lia href=#Briefing/a/li
                  lia href=#IGC/a/li
                  lia href=#Results/a/li
                  lia href=#Forum/a/li
          /ul
   /div- Skrýt citovaný text -

  - Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -

 - Zobrazit citovaný text -


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
and it is working!!!

I have just triple checked...

$('#menu a:first').remove();

removes the first anchor in the list.


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 of i add .remove() of course

 On 17 Led, 19:32, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 I tested it, but it remove all a, so sry, it doesnt work :-(

 On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:



  Removing li solves the problem:

  $('#menu a:first');

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

   Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with selecting
   a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should look
   like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link, so
   Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery 1.2.6
   doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')

   Thx for help in advance.

   div id=container
  ul id=menu
  lia href=#Home/a/li
  lia href=#Rules/a/li
  lia href=#Pilots/a/li
  lia href=#Briefing/a/li
  lia href=#IGC/a/li
  lia href=#Results/a/li
  lia href=#Forum/a/li
  /ul
   /div- Skrýt citovaný text -

  - Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -

 - Zobrazit citovaný text -


[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 selector :first; :first-child

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/1c6403c5f628d45a


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 code:

div id=menuContent
ul id=menu
lia href=index.phpHome/a/li
lia href=rules.phpRules/a/li
lia href=#Pilots/a/li
lia href=#Briefing/a/li
lia href=#IGC/a/li
lia href=#Results/a/li
lia href=#Forum/a/li
/ul
/div


 On Jan 17, 2:40 pm, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just checked. Works just fine.

 Maybe something wrong in your html? Could you paste it here?

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  Hi all,
  I have trouble in jQuery 1.3 with :first; :first-child selector.
  Always it selects all a. In version 1.2.6 it worked by suspense.
  What is new or wrong?? Thx for help.

  $(function(){
 $('#menu li a:first-child').remove();
  });


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.

if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, that could create a conflict in your candy, which
would resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
display wrong! (even though you used !important).

fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
unlikely to arise.

if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important, then
you might be able to override it with some javascript and
getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only option)

w3.org states:
getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
over author style sheets. An !important declaration still takes
precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
sheets all may contain !important declarations. User !important
rules take precedence over both override and author !important
rules, and override !important rules take precedence over author !
important rules.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS-DocumentCSS

in other words, an override style marked !important is the CSS of
highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.

if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
behavior of the candy.



[jQuery] Re: Table sorter and pager problem

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

You must be loading your page 2 with an ajax call!

Add your empty text replacer to the ajax call callback.

PS. I haven't checked but I think you can rewrite your jquery code for
better performance like this:

$(.tablesorter).each(function() {
$('tbody tr td', this).each(function() {
$(this).css(width,80px);
if($(this).html()==)
{
$(this).html('NA')
}
}).eq(7).click(function(){
document.location.href =  $(this).html();
});
});


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:33 AM, varun khatri.vk1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi
 I am using these plugins. But my problem is firefox related.
 while sorting I can see small images in header of table in IE(images
 on which we click and do sort ascending and descending ) but when I
 open same page in firefox it does not show images  Any idea ?


 Also, there are some fields in the table where nothing is written so I
 am using Jquery to put NA where nothing is written. But it only does
 this on 1st page where I am showing only 10 rows Now suppose
 through my pager I change the option to 20 rows ... It shows NA in 1st
 10 rows but after that it doesnot show NA , It shows only empty
 field   I think when you use this :

 $(.tablesorter).each(function() {
  $(this).find(tbody).each(function() {


 $(this).find(tr).each(function() {

 $(this).find(td).each(function() {
  $(this).css(width,80px);
 if($(this).html()==)
 {
 $(this).html('NA')
 }

 });
  $(this).find(td).eq(7).click(function(){
  document.location.href =  $(this).html();

 });
 });
 });
 });


 It should put NA in the entire table ...Not just in 1st 10 rows which
 are shown default on page.
 Any ideas , any hints will help me!!


 Thanks
 Varun


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page 
http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html

On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
 and it is working!!!

 I have just triple checked...

 $('#menu a:first').remove();

 removes the first anchor in the list.

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howt.o.blogspot.com
.


 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  of i add .remove() of course

  On 17 Led, 19:32, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
  I tested it, but it remove all a, so sry, it doesnt work :-(

  On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

   Removing li solves the problem:

   $('#menu a:first');

   
   Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

   On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with selecting
a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should look
like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link, so
Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery 1.2.6
doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')

Thx for help in advance.

div id=container
       ul id=menu
               lia href=#Home/a/li
               lia href=#Rules/a/li
               lia href=#Pilots/a/li
               lia href=#Briefing/a/li
               lia href=#IGC/a/li
               lia href=#Results/a/li
               lia href=#Forum/a/li
       /ul
/div- Skrýt citovaný text -

   - Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -

  - Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -

 - Zobrazit citovaný text -


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.

if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, that could create a conflict in your candy, which
would resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
display wrong! (even though you used !important).

fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
unlikely to arise.

if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important, then
you might be able to override it with some javascript and
getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only option)

w3.org states:
getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
over author style sheets. An !important declaration still takes
precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
sheets all may contain !important declarations. User !important
rules take precedence over both override and author !important
rules, and override !important rules take precedence over author !
important rules. 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS...

in other words, an override style marked !important is the CSS of
highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.

if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
behavior of the candy—other than the joyful benefit of insulating your
candy from the site’s css!


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Nic Luciano
The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately under
a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
which will return the first matched element on the document only.

Cheers-
Nic
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:


 IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page
 http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html

 On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
  What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
  and it is working!!!
 
  I have just triple checked...
 
  $('#menu a:first').remove();
 
  removes the first anchor in the list.
 
  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howt.o.blogspot.com
 .
 
 
  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 
   of i add .remove() of course
 
   On 17 Led, 19:32, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
   I tested it, but it remove all a, so sry, it doesnt work :-(
 
   On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
Removing li solves the problem:
 
$('#menu a:first');
 

Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
 
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 
 Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with
 selecting
 a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should look
 like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link, so
 Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery 1.2.6
 doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')
 
 Thx for help in advance.
 
 div id=container
ul id=menu
lia href=#Home/a/li
lia href=#Rules/a/li
lia href=#Pilots/a/li
lia href=#Briefing/a/li
lia href=#IGC/a/li
lia href=#Results/a/li
lia href=#Forum/a/li
/ul
 /div- Skrýt citovaný text -
 
- Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -
 
   - Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -
 
  - Zobrazit citovaný text -


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Nic Luciano
Simple correction, I meant the first child of it's parent*. Just in case it
wasn't clear.

Cheers-
Nic
http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Nic Luciano nic.luci...@gmail.com wrote:

 The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
 you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
 parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately under
 a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
 which will return the first matched element on the document only.

 Cheers-
 Nic
 http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano


 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:


 IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page
 http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html

 On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
  What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
  and it is working!!!
 
  I have just triple checked...
 
  $('#menu a:first').remove();
 
  removes the first anchor in the list.
 
  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howt.o.blogspot.com
 .
 
 
  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 
   of i add .remove() of course
 
   On 17 Led, 19:32, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
   I tested it, but it remove all a, so sry, it doesnt work :-(
 
   On 17 Led, 19:21, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 
Removing li solves the problem:
 
$('#menu a:first');
 

Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com
 
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 
 Hi all, I am playing with jQuery 1.3 and I have provlem with
 selecting
 a first link in code below. Can you help me how how it should
 look
 like jQuery code and also for case, if Home will not be a link,
 so
 Rules will be a first link. My traditional way from jQuery
 1.2.6
 doesnt work now. ('#menu li a:first')
 
 Thx for help in advance.
 
 div id=container
ul id=menu
lia href=#Home/a/li
lia href=#Rules/a/li
lia href=#Pilots/a/li
lia href=#Briefing/a/li
lia href=#IGC/a/li
lia href=#Results/a/li
lia href=#Forum/a/li
/ul
 /div- Skrýt citovaný text -
 
- Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -
 
   - Zobrazit citovaný text -- Skrýt citovaný text -
 
  - Zobrazit citovaný text -





[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.

if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, that would create a conflict in your candy, which
MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
display wrong!

fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
unlikely to arise—and even then, there’s a 50% chance the candy css
will win!

if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important which
overpowers the candy css, then you might be able to override it with
some javascript and getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only
option)

w3.org states:
getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
over author style sheets. An !important declaration still takes
precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
sheets all may contain !important declarations. User !important
rules take precedence over both override and author !important
rules, and override !important rules take precedence over author !
important rules.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS...

in other words, an override style marked !important is the CSS of
highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.

if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
behavior of the candy—other than the joyful benefit of insulating your
candy from the site’s css!



[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Exactly, just like I wrote!!!

 $('#menu a:first').remove();


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nic Luciano nic.luci...@gmail.com wrote:
 The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
 you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
 parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately under
 a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
 which will return the first matched element on the document only.

 Cheers-
 Nic
 http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page
 http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html

 On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
  What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
  and it is working!!!
 
  I have just triple checked...
 
  $('#menu a:first').remove();
 
  removes the first anchor in the list.
 
  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howt.o.blogspot.com
 .
 


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

OFFTOP:

Johny, just let it go already... :)))


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:07 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:

 right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.

 if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
 with your candy css, that would create a conflict in your candy, which
 MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
 display wrong!

 fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
 unlikely to arise—and even then, there's a 50% chance the candy css
 will win!

 if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important which
 overpowers the candy css, then you might be able to override it with
 some javascript and getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only
 option)

 w3.org states:
 getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
 author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
 without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
 the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
 comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
 called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
 over author style sheets. An !important declaration still takes
 precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
 sheets all may contain !important declarations. User !important
 rules take precedence over both override and author !important
 rules, and override !important rules take precedence over author !
 important rules.
 http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS...

 in other words, an override style marked !important is the CSS of
 highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.

 if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
 unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
 designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
 ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
 behavior of the candy—other than the joyful benefit of insulating your
 candy from the site's css!




[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.

if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
with your candy css, it MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css--
causing your candy to display wrong!

fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
unlikely to arise—and even then, there’s a 50% chance the candy css
will win!

if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important, then
you might be able to override it with some javascript and
getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only option)

w3.org states:
getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
over author style sheets. An !important declaration still takes
precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
sheets all may contain !important declarations. User !important
rules take precedence over both override and author !important
rules, and override !important rules take precedence over author !
important rules.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS-DocumentCSS

in other words, an override style marked !important is the CSS of
highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.

if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
behavior of the candy—other than the joyful benefit of insulating your
candy from the site’s css!



[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

jquery Lover, let go of what? this technique? this thread? or my
repeatedly removing and reposting the same post, because you get an
email alert every time?


On Jan 17, 11:10 am, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 OFFTOP:

 Johny, just let it go already... :)))

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:07 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:

  right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.

  if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
  with your candy css, that would create a conflict in your candy, which
  MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
  display wrong!

  fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
  unlikely to arise—and even then, there's a 50% chance the candy css
  will win!

  if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important which
  overpowers the candy css, then you might be able to override it with
  some javascript and getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only
  option)

  w3.org states:
  getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
  author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
  without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
  the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
  comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
  called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
  over author style sheets. An !important declaration still takes
  precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
  sheets all may contain !important declarations. User !important
  rules take precedence over both override and author !important
  rules, and override !important rules take precedence over author !
  important rules.
 http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS...

  in other words, an override style marked !important is the CSS of
  highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.

  if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
  unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
  designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
  ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
  behavior of the candy—other than the joyful benefit of insulating your
  candy from the site's css!


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

hmm, it seems as my stupidity :-) so there is no need use element li
in this case. Originally I had code $('#menu li a:first'), but it
works only under 1.2.6, not under 1.3 Am I correct?

On 17 Led, 20:09, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Exactly, just like I wrote!!!

  $('#menu a:first').remove();

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nic Luciano nic.luci...@gmail.com wrote:
  The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
  you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
  parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately under
  a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
  which will return the first matched element on the document only.

  Cheers-
  Nic
 http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page
 http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html

  On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
   What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
   and it is working!!!

   I have just triple checked...

   $('#menu a:first').remove();

   removes the first anchor in the list.

   
   Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howt.o.blogspot.com
  .


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

 repeatedly reposting the same comment

And the idea is clear already. Use !important, but use it with
care...  Simple and clear...


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:16 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:

 jquery Lover, let go of what? this technique? this thread? or my
 repeatedly removing and reposting the same post, because you get an
 email alert every time?


 On Jan 17, 11:10 am, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 OFFTOP:

 Johny, just let it go already... :)))

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:07 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:

  right, Klaus, specificity resolves conflicts.

  if your main site css uses !important on any element which conflicts
  with your candy css, that would create a conflict in your candy, which
  MIGHT resolve in favor of the site's css-- causing your candy to
  display wrong!

  fortunately, !important seems to be used rarely, so such a conflict is
  unlikely to arise—and even then, there's a 50% chance the candy css
  will win!

  if, by rare chance, your site's css has a conflicting !important which
  overpowers the candy css, then you might be able to override it with
  some javascript and getOverrideStyle. (or, runtimeStyle is an IE-only
  option)

  w3.org states:
  getOverrideStyle method provides a mechanism through which a DOM
  author could effect immediate change to the style of an element
  without modifying the explicitly linked style sheets of a document or
  the inline style of elements in the style sheets. This style sheet
  comes after the author style sheet in the cascade algorithm and is
  called override style sheet. The override style sheet takes precedence
  over author style sheets. An !important declaration still takes
  precedence over a normal declaration. Override, author, and user style
  sheets all may contain !important declarations. User !important
  rules take precedence over both override and author !important
  rules, and override !important rules take precedence over author !
  important rules.
 http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Style-20001113/css.html#CSS...

  in other words, an override style marked !important is the CSS of
  highest-precedence, in the CSS-hierarchy.

  if your candy's css has conflicting declarations WITHIN ITSELF, then,
  unless it's a bug in the candy, it's a conflict intended, by the candy
  designer, to be resolved by specificity-- and applying !important to
  ALL elements within the candy will have no effect on the intended
  behavior of the candy—other than the joyful benefit of insulating your
  candy from the site's css!


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Interesting but it [ $('#menu li a:first') ] does not work in 1.3 !!!


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 hmm, it seems as my stupidity :-) so there is no need use element li
 in this case. Originally I had code $('#menu li a:first'), but it
 works only under 1.2.6, not under 1.3 Am I correct?

 On 17 Led, 20:09, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Exactly, just like I wrote!!!

  $('#menu a:first').remove();

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nic Luciano nic.luci...@gmail.com wrote:
  The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. What
  you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
  parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately under
  a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
  which will return the first matched element on the document only.

  Cheers-
  Nic
 http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page
 http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html

  On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
   What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
   and it is working!!!

   I have just triple checked...

   $('#menu a:first').remove();

   removes the first anchor in the list.

   
   Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howt.o.blogspot.com
  .


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
scripts. I thought that #menu li a is regular CSS selector...or
not??

On 17 Led, 20:23, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Interesting but it [ $('#menu li a:first') ] does not work in 1.3 !!!

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  hmm, it seems as my stupidity :-) so there is no need use element li
  in this case. Originally I had code $('#menu li a:first'), but it
  works only under 1.2.6, not under 1.3 Am I correct?

  On 17 Led, 20:09, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
  Exactly, just like I wrote!!!

   $('#menu a:first').remove();

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Nic Luciano nic.luci...@gmail.com 
  wrote:
   The reason it's not working is you're using the first-child selector. 
   What
   you're doing by using that is selecting every anchor that is the first
   parent of it's child (which is all of them since they lie immediately 
   under
   a list item). The selector you want to be using is just first (a:first),
   which will return the first matched element on the document only.

   Cheers-
   Nic
  http://www.twitter.com/nicluciano

   On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

   IE7, FF3, GoogleChrome..ok, check this page
  http://83.240.47.84/skyrace2/del.html

   On 17 Led, 19:41, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
What browser are you using? I am using firefox 3.0.5 and jquery 1.3
and it is working!!!

I have just triple checked...

$('#menu a:first').remove();

removes the first anchor in the list.


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howt.o.blogspot.com
   .


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

It is...


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
 scripts. I thought that #menu li a is regular CSS selector...or
 not??



[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

so why it doesnt work?? is it jQuery bug?

On 17 Led, 20:30, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 It is...

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
  scripts. I thought that #menu li a is regular CSS selector...or
  not??


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Submitted a ticket: http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3903

Let's see what happens :)


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 so why it doesnt work?? is it jQuery bug?

 On 17 Led, 20:30, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 It is...

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
  scripts. I thought that #menu li a is regular CSS selector...or
  not??


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why

jQuery Lover, i'm a programmer. i'm a perfectionist when it comes to
wording. Unfortunately, google groups does not provide a draft
feature, OR preview feature, OR edit-after-posting feature, which i
find galling and irritating. i'll try to get my wording right before
posting.

secondly, the idea is not clear-- this is a conversation between
several people, and we are extending the discussion with new ideas and
new observations with each post. for example, my last post, if you
actually read and understood, introduced the idea of resolving a
conflict... i'm  not going to repeat myself. no one here has been
repeating themselves.

are you just telling us all to shut up? that's totally out of line.
this is a discussion thread.

how about if your remove your unproductive, off-topic, discussion-
blocking flames, and i'll remove this post, and we can both prevent
this thread from turning into an infantile flame war.

and next time you have an off-topic comment to make, i suggest you
click reply to author instead of reply


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

ok, thx for your help guys, because it made me crazy for a while and
thx for your bug report jQuery Lover. I am new pretty new and jQuery I
am using 2-3 weeks and it is great TOOL!!!

On 17 Led, 20:33, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Submitted a ticket:http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3903

 Let's see what happens :)

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

  so why it doesnt work?? is it jQuery bug?

  On 17 Led, 20:30, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
  It is...

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

   yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
   scripts. I thought that #menu li a is regular CSS selector...or
   not??


[jQuery] Re: Submitting a form with .submit() problems

2009-01-17 Thread Alex Kachayev

If I undestood the task right, you can create code in such way.

You form will be like this:

tabletr
form action=http://jquery.com; method=post id=myForm
td
input value=submit type=submit onclick=conversion(1000, this);
 /
/td
/form
/tr
/table

Convertion(1000, this) will return:

true, if it`s neccesary to submit form.
false, in other case.

For this question: 'Is there  another way to get to the form tag by
traversing elements in reverse order? '.. But parents('form')
returns reverse order...


[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

You made a good point, I should have replied to you personally!

PS. Please don't take it personal. That was (kinda) a joke. I guess we
are in a better mood here and all of my friends that I MADE TO look
through the the thread said 'Good one' :
PSS. Nothing personal Johny... just a sunny day and a freaking good
mood (she is not pregnant) :)


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:34 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
 how about if your remove your unproductive, off-topic, discussion-
 blocking flames, and i'll remove this post, and we can both prevent
 this thread from turning into an infantile flame war.

 and next time you have an off-topic comment to make, i suggest you
 click reply to author instead of reply


[jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.3 Released

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

That tests must be in average. I made some test on .class selectors
and it showed 25x faster.

Here is the test and it's results:
http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com/2009/01/jquery-126-and-jquery-13-class-selector.html



On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:03 PM, ryan.joyce...@googlemail.com
ryan.joyce...@googlemail.com wrote:

 nice one, a 30% speed increase on selectors is impressive.



[jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!

2009-01-17 Thread johny why
so let's both remove our off-topic threads, ok?  and no hard feelings, and glad 
she's not preggo
  - Original Message - 
  From: jQuery Lover 
  To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 11:45 AM
  Subject: [jQuery] Re: Solution To Many Of Your CSS Nightmares!



  You made a good point, I should have replied to you personally!

  PS. Please don't take it personal. That was (kinda) a joke. I guess we
  are in a better mood here and all of my friends that I MADE TO look
  through the the thread said 'Good one' :
  PSS. Nothing personal Johny... just a sunny day and a freaking good
  mood (she is not pregnant) :)

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



  On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:34 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
   how about if your remove your unproductive, off-topic, discussion-
   blocking flames, and i'll remove this post, and we can both prevent
   this thread from turning into an infantile flame war.
  
   and next time you have an off-topic comment to make, i suggest you
   click reply to author instead of reply

  


[jQuery] Re: Display Loading Image While Ajax Content Loads

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Yeap, you can bind all images with .gallery class a .load() event like this:

$('img.gallery').load(function(){
  $(this.).removeClass('loading').show();
});


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:20 PM, jinscoe jackins...@gmail.com wrote:

 Whoops! I'm so used to getting email notifications for discussions...I
 just figured no one had replied! So sorry for not coming back.

 Thank you both for your replies. I was wondering if that might be the
 case JQuery Lover.

 Would there be a way to generalize the .load for only images with a
 certain class? I tried working with the .load before and was
 unsuccessful, perhaps you might be able to give me a few pointers. For
 example if I give an image a class of gallery as well as loader I
 can set the background image for the loader class to a load icon.
 And .load would fire when any image with the class of gallery loads
 (right?).

 I guess I could give gallery' display:none by default? and then when
 it loads I can remove that css and also remove the class loader.

 I'm pretty new to all this, so I'm probably way off in my logic! Any
 more help would be appreciatednow to try and find the setting
 where I get email notifications on reply!

 Thanks so much again, and sorry it took me so long to reply!


[jQuery] Re: Submitting a form with .submit() problems

2009-01-17 Thread g...@getsharepoint.com

Actually in this case parents('form') of the clicked object does not
include the form tag itself and I believe it's due to the poor html
structure. I just tested this out.

On Jan 17, 2:15 pm, Alex Kachayev kacha...@gmail.com wrote:
 If I undestood the task right, you can create code in such way.

 You form will be like this:

 tabletr
 form action=http://jquery.com; method=post id=myForm
 td
 input value=submit type=submit onclick=conversion(1000, this);
  /
 /td
 /form
 /tr
 /table

 Convertion(1000, this) will return:

 true, if it`s neccesary to submit form.
 false, in other case.

 For this question: 'Is there  another way to get to the form tag by
 traversing elements in reverse order? '.. But parents('form')
 returns reverse order...


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Pedram

hi Guys , I know what should you do ,
$('#menu li:first a').remove()
this is the code you need , jquery has no problem when you use this
code $('#menu li a:first').remove(); the selector checks each li and
removes the a so all of the links will be removed so in your case
your code should look like this $('#menu li:first a').remove();  the
selector selects the first li and removes the a
that set,
I am just following john Resig in twitter it seems he is going to
release jquery 1.3.1 maybe he found some little bugs .

On Jan 17, 2:37 pm, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 ok, thx for your help guys, because it made me crazy for a while and
 thx for your bug report jQuery Lover. I am new pretty new and jQuery I
 am using 2-3 weeks and it is great TOOL!!!

 On 17 Led, 20:33, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

  Submitted a ticket:http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3903

  Let's see what happens :)

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

   so why it doesnt work?? is it jQuery bug?

   On 17 Led, 20:30, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
   It is...

   
   Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

   On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
scripts. I thought that #menu li a is regular CSS selector...or
not??


[jQuery] Re: will lead behavior for IE to lose efficacy

2009-01-17 Thread Pedram

Don't worry 1.3.1 is going to be released soon

On Jan 17, 12:38 am, ChenKaie chenk...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear all,

 I use some behavior hack, like the famous Whatever:hover 
 (http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html), when I upgrade jQuery to v1.3,
 it cause this hack to lose efficacy, but works well under jquery v1.2.

 any body? meet the same problem with me?


[jQuery] Re: load script regarding to value of textfield

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Use jquery's get() method. More about it here:
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax/jQuery.get


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:40 PM, dirk w dirkwendl...@googlemail.com wrote:

 ides anyone?

 On 12 Jan., 17:43, dirk w dirkwendl...@googlemail.com wrote:
 thanks a lot for your help!
 is it possible to additionally explain me how i can execute this link
 through the ajax functions? that would be great!

 thanks in advance

 On 12 Jan., 15:53, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

  Try this:

  $('#searchButton').click(function(){
var url = 'script type=text/javascript
  src=http://gdata.youtube.com/feeds/api/videos?q='+
  $('#searchText').val() +
  'alt=json-in-scriptcallback=showMyVideosmax-results=7format=5/script';

// ajax functions to call $.ajax, $.load, $.get, $.post

  });

  -
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:49 PM, dirk w dirkwendl...@googlemail.com 
  wrote:

   hello community,
   i have some kind of a beginner question and i really would appreciate
   if you could help me with that.

   when someone types a value into the textfield and clicks on search
   or enter than the javascript line should be called regarding to the
   entered value. this should happen without reloading the complete page.

   # FORM
  form id=searchForm action=
  input type=text name=searchText id=searchText
   value= size=30 maxlength=30/
  input type=button name=searchButton id=searchButton
   class=button buttonText value=Search /
  /form

   # Script to call
   script type=text/javascript src=http://gdata.youtube.com/feeds/api/
   videos?q=' + searchTerm + 'alt=json-in-
   scriptcallback=showMyVideosmax-results=7format=5/script

   see the SearchTerm in the js line, it should be replaced with the
   value of the textfield.

   thank you very much in advance!
   dirk


[jQuery] Re: More efficient way to find Parent element

2009-01-17 Thread Ricardo Tomasi

$(this).parents('table:first')

or in jQuery 1.3:

$(this).closest('table');

- ricardo

On Jan 16, 5:13 pm, Coryt cory.c.tay...@gmail.com wrote:
 after learning the difference between parents and parent, I am having
 to resort to using parent(), but it's not very clean.

 Consider the following table, which is embedded in a page, which may
 have additional tables (for this reason I cannot use parents(table)
 because it returns multiple tables):

 table class=gridview id=A cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
    tbody
     tr class='gvheader'
         th width=20pxnbsp;/th
         th width=150pxHost/th
         th width=100pxDirects To/th
         th width=40pxTTL/th
     /tr
     tr class=dgalt id=trEmptyA runat=server visible=false
         td colspan=5You currently do not have any Records./td
     /tr
     tr class=gvfooter
         td colspan=4 class=newRecordAdd New Record/td
     /tr
    /tbody
 /table

 and now my jquery:
 Notice the multiple .parent().parent().parent()
 and $currentTable.children().children().size();

 $(function() {
             $(.newRecord).click(function() {
                 var $currentTable = $(this).parent().parent().parent
 ();

                 var tableType = $currentTable.attr(id);
                 var numRows = $currentTable.children().children().size
 ();
                 var $templateRow = $(#EditRowTemplate).clone().attr
 (id, new+tableType+Record_+numRows);

                 if (tableType=='MX'){
                     $(td:nth-child(5), $templateRow).show();
                 } else {
                     $(td:nth-child(5), $templateRow).hide();
                 }

                 $templateRow.insertAfter($(tr:last,
 $currentTable).prev());
             });
          });

 Is there a way to use parents, while only selecting the immediate
 parent table? and similarily with children, is there a better way to
 do this?

 I cannot always assume this is the first table, there may be 3,4,5 etc
 tables side-by-side.

 Thanks


[jQuery] Re: How to grab the filename (src attribute) of an image?

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Well, it depends where you need it...


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:19 PM, webmas...@terradon.nl
webmas...@terradon.nl wrote:

 Where and how do i implement var fileName = $(this).attr('src');



[jQuery] Re: question about changes to :not() in 1.3

2009-01-17 Thread Ricardo Tomasi

Shouldn't it simply be

$(':not(div):has(div)') ?

Note that it gives you all the chain of parents to the element which
contains a DIV.

On Jan 16, 6:26 pm, jdwbell jdwb...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thank you very much for your reply.  I am finding that with the
 example listed below these two work as expected (that is they are
 returning non divs and all divs which do not contain other divs):

 $('*').not('div:has(div)')
 $('*').not($('div:has(div)'))

 but these three:

 $(':not(div:has(div))')
 $('*:not(div:has(div))'
 $('*').filter(':not(div:has(div))')

 are excluding ALL divs as all other elements which contain divs

 Hopefully that explanation makes because I'm kind of confusing
 myself!  I've tried this on IE 6 and Chrome with the same results.

 Thanks!

 html
   head
     style
       div, fieldset, p {
         border: ridge 1px silver;
         padding: 20px;
         margin: 20px;
       }
       .wrappedElement {
         border: ridge 2px #FF;
       }
      /style
      script type=text/javascript
         src=../../scripts/jquery-1.3.js/script
      script
        $(function(){
          $(':not(div:has(div))').addClass('wrappedElement');
          //$('*:not(div:has(div))').addClass('wrappedElement');
          //$('*').filter(':not(div:has(div))').addClass('wrappedElement');
          //$('*').not('div:has(div)').addClass('wrappedElement');
          //$('*').not($('div:has(div)')).addClass('wrappedElement');
        })
      /script
   /head
   body
     div
       div
         div
           pparagraph surrounded by three divs/p
         /div
       /div
      /div
      fieldset
        div
          div surrounded by fieldset
        /div
      /fieldset
    /body
 /html

 On Jan 16, 1:50 pm, John Resig jere...@gmail.com wrote:

  $(':not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
  $('*:not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
  $('*').filter(':not(div:has(div))') is equivalent to
  $('*').not('div:has(div)')

  Hope that helps to answer your question :)

  --John

  On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:24 AM, jdwbell jdwb...@gmail.com wrote:

   Here I am trying to get every element which is not a div that contains
   another div.

   Is $(':not(div:has(div))') supposed to now be equivalent to $('*').not
   ($('div:has(div)')) or am I misunderstanding what the change was (I'm
   just getting started with jQuery)?

   Thanks!


[jQuery] Re: Jquery Calling Servlet

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

You can change your form method attribute to post and you would not
have the too long url problem.

form method='post' ...


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:52 AM, RUQUIA TABASSUM
ruquiatabas...@gmail.com wrote:
 ... i need to use AJAX because  the servlet called is appended with input
 parameters that contains 1 to 5 charectars and when i directly call
 the servlet  instead of making ajax call the url is not completely formed
 and the servlet is not invoked.
  ...


[jQuery] How to get sum of children element's width

2009-01-17 Thread David .Wu

This is the way I got the size now, is there any function can do the
same thing?

Html code
div
img src=..
img src=..
img src=..
/div

script
$(function()
{
$sum = 0;
$('div img').each(function()
{
$sum += $(this).width();
});
console.log($sum);
});
/script


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

Well, you are right, thx for explanation. Now it is clear!!

On 17 Led, 21:04, Pedram pedram...@gmail.com wrote:
 hi Guys , I know what should you do ,
 $('#menu li:first a').remove()
 this is the code you need , jquery has no problem when you use this
 code $('#menu li a:first').remove(); the selector checks each li and
 removes the a so all of the links will be removed so in your case
 your code should look like this $('#menu li:first a').remove();  the
 selector selects the first li and removes the a
 that set,
 I am just following john Resig in twitter it seems he is going to
 release jquery 1.3.1 maybe he found some little bugs .

 On Jan 17, 2:37 pm, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:



  ok, thx for your help guys, because it made me crazy for a while and
  thx for your bug report jQuery Lover. I am new pretty new and jQuery I
  am using 2-3 weeks and it is great TOOL!!!

  On 17 Led, 20:33, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

   Submitted a ticket:http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3903

   Let's see what happens :)

   
   Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

   On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

so why it doesnt work?? is it jQuery bug?

On 17 Led, 20:30, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
It is...


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 yes, that is what I said..not working, so I have to replace any
 scripts. I thought that #menu li a is regular CSS selector...or
 not??- Skrýt citovaný text -

 - Zobrazit citovaný text -


[jQuery] Re: Hide content until loaded

2009-01-17 Thread Pedram

I suggest you to use the toggleClass and your code should look like
this

$('#tn-loading').toggleClass('hide');
$(document).ready(function() {
  $('#tn-loading').toggleClass('hide');
});

.hide{ dispaly:none;}

so let me explain it this way , we first apply the .hide to the tn-
loading, and when the page is loaded we toggle it so the display will
be block.
try to use efficient you don't have to have multiple classes


On Jan 17, 9:01 am, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Saif, do you have a point or is this spam?

 MorningZ, I am sure you did not have time to go into much details just
 like me with my first post :)

 Christine, MorningZ suggested (IMO) the best way to do it. Just keep
 in mind those users that do not have js enabled. Add some id or class
 to your body tag USING JAVASCRIPT. For example a js id and in your
 CSS add rules that make your blocks display none.

 #js .tn-hide{
  display:none;

 }

 This will make sure those users with js disabled will ALSO see your
 hidden blocks.

 PS. It's surprising how many company system administrators disable js
 in browser for security sake.

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Saif ullah saifullahha...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://tinyurl.com/8rwmkr

  On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:13 PM, MorningZ morni...@gmail.com wrote:

  Why not do it with CSS?  where css class tn-loading has display:
  none declared

  div class=tn-hide tn-loading
     Content you are hiding until document ready
  /div

  then

  $(document).ready(function() {
     //Do some stuff here

     //Done doing stuff, show the content
     $('tn-hide').removeClass('tn-loading);
  });

  On Jan 16, 11:53 pm, Christine Masters cmast...@townnews.com
  wrote:
   Hi everyone!

   I'm a jQuery newbie, so I apologize if this is an easy question!

   I'm building a template for newspaper sites, and by nature of having
   many
   ads and modules and so forth, the content loads before the jQuery that
   styles it, leading to a flash of unstyled content.

   So, on several of my modules that use a lot of jQuery, I'd like to hide
   them
   until they are loaded.

   Right now, I'm trying to do this:

   $('tn-hide').css('display', 'none').addClass('tn-loading');

   $(document).ready(function() {
       $('tn-hide').css('display', 'block').removeClass('tn-loading);

   });

   I'd like to be able to simply apply the 'tn-hide' class to any module
   I'd
   like to hide until loaded on the page.

   It is my (limited) understanding that the first line will go into effect
   when the DOM is ready and the second when the document is ready.

   Anyway, right now it isn't working. I'd appreciate it if you could give
   me
   any insight on this or let me know if I'm heading in the right
   direction.

   If it helps, here is my page:http://blueprints.townnews-cms.com/

   ---
-
   Christine Masters, Product Manager, TownNews.com
   cmast...@townnews.com | 1-800-293-9576 x1022
   Twitter: c_masters

   ---
-


[jQuery] Re: Thickbox and Yahoo Stores

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

Try this two options:

$('a').unbind('click'); // not sure if it works or not

OR

$('a').click(function(){
window.location=$(this).attr('href');
return false;
});

and put this code after all other javascript codes!


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:59 PM, MikeFCraft mikewfcr...@gmail.com wrote:

 it won't be very useful but here's a snippet with the site itself
 removed:

 a class=thickbox href=http://site.example.com/Scripts/theFile.htm?
 modal=falseamp;height=500amp;width=720Click Here To Open Thickbox/
 a

 when you click that link you get the thickbox loading animation and
 the rest of the page is greyed out. the animation never goes away.
 Your browser really requests a 1x1 tracking pixel from a yahoo URL
 like http://a.analytics.yahoo.com/p.pl?a=asdfasdfasdfasdf

 Maybe there's a way to use jquery to reset the href value of the link
 to the original location, rather than what yahoo appends. Or maybe
 yahoo is appending some sort of onclick behavior that can be reset



 On Jan 10, 2:08 am, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:
 Do you have a link or could you copypaste html code snippet of your
 image with the links...

 jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

 On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:16 AM, MikeFCraft mikewfcr...@gmail.com wrote:

  I'm helping someone set up thickbox to work on their yahoo store. It
  seems like Yahoo has a built-in click tracking system that is messing
  up the thickbox though.

  For example clicking on a thickbox link that points to theFile.htm
  first makes a request to yahoo for something like:

 http://a.analytics.yahoo.com/p.pl?a=...

  with a ton of analytical data appended to the URL. It returns a
  tracking gif, and the real content of theFile.htm never loads. (you
  just stare at thickbox's loadingAnimation.gif forever)

  Has anyone ever seen this before and come up with a workaround?


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread jQuery Lover

No he is not!

Suppose you have this scenario:

div id=container
   ul id=menu
   liHome/li
   lia href=#Rules/a/li
   lia href=#Pilots/a/li
   lia href=#Briefing/a/li
   lia href=#IGC/a/li
   lia href=#Results/a/li
   lia href=#Forum/a/li
   /ul
/div

$('#menu li:first a').remove() - will do nothing here, since first li
has no anchor in it !


Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

 Well, you are right, thx for explanation. Now it is clear!!

 On 17 Led, 21:04, Pedram pedram...@gmail.com wrote:
 hi Guys , I know what should you do ,
 $('#menu li:first a').remove()
 this is the code you need , jquery has no problem when you use this
 code $('#menu li a:first').remove(); the selector checks each li and
 removes the a so all of the links will be removed so in your case
 your code should look like this $('#menu li:first a').remove();  the
 selector selects the first li and removes the a
 that set,
 I am just following john Resig in twitter it seems he is going to
 release jquery 1.3.1 maybe he found some little bugs.


[jQuery] Re: Jquery Calling Servlet

2009-01-17 Thread Mike Alsup

  ... i need to use AJAX because  the servlet called is appended with input
  parameters that contains 1 to 5 charectars and when i directly call
  the servlet  instead of making ajax call the url is not completely formed
  and the servlet is not invoked.

 You can change your form method attribute to post and you would not
 have the too long url problem.

 form method='post' ...

jQuery Lover is correct, you must use a POST request. GET requests are
limited to 1KB.  But don't use ajax.  POST a form like this:

form method=POST target=_blank
   // form contents here
/form

You can build the form dynamically and submit it via script.

Mike


[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Nic Luciano
That's true, but that's exactly how it's supposed to function.

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:


 No he is not!

 Suppose you have this scenario:

 div id=container
   ul id=menu
liHome/li
lia href=#Rules/a/li
   lia href=#Pilots/a/li
   lia href=#Briefing/a/li
   lia href=#IGC/a/li
   lia href=#Results/a/li
   lia href=#Forum/a/li
   /ul
 /div

 $('#menu li:first a').remove() - will do nothing here, since first li
 has no anchor in it !

 
 Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com



 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:
 
  Well, you are right, thx for explanation. Now it is clear!!
 
  On 17 Led, 21:04, Pedram pedram...@gmail.com wrote:
  hi Guys , I know what should you do ,
  $('#menu li:first a').remove()
  this is the code you need , jquery has no problem when you use this
  code $('#menu li a:first').remove(); the selector checks each li and
  removes the a so all of the links will be removed so in your case
  your code should look like this $('#menu li:first a').remove();  the
  selector selects the first li and removes the a
  that set,
  I am just following john Resig in twitter it seems he is going to
  release jquery 1.3.1 maybe he found some little bugs.



[jQuery] [ resolution browser? ]

2009-01-17 Thread Lord Gustavo Miguel Angel
Hi,

How i can to know resolution of browser?

Thank´s


[jQuery] Re: Submitting a form with .submit() problems

2009-01-17 Thread Mike Alsup

 Actually in this case parents('form') of the clicked object does not
 include the form tag itself and I believe it's due to the poor html
 structure. I just tested this out.

It's tough to script on back markup.  Different browsers will do
different things in an attempt to figure out what you really meant.
You can always get to the parent form of an input by accessing the
input's 'form' property.

var form = inputDomElement.form;



[jQuery] Re: How select first link??

2009-01-17 Thread Charlie22

jQuery has true. How can I select first link? this is original
question. And why doesnt work this code $('#menu li a:first')?

On 17 Led, 21:39, Nic Luciano nic.luci...@gmail.com wrote:
 That's true, but that's exactly how it's supposed to function.



 On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 3:35 PM, jQuery Lover ilovejqu...@gmail.com wrote:

  No he is not!

  Suppose you have this scenario:

  div id=container
        ul id=menu
                 liHome/li
                 lia href=#Rules/a/li
                lia href=#Pilots/a/li
                lia href=#Briefing/a/li
                lia href=#IGC/a/li
                lia href=#Results/a/li
                lia href=#Forum/a/li
        /ul
  /div

  $('#menu li:first a').remove() - will do nothing here, since first li
  has no anchor in it !

  
  Read jQuery HowTo Resource  -  http://jquery-howto.blogspot.com

  On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Charlie22 ch...@post.cz wrote:

   Well, you are right, thx for explanation. Now it is clear!!

   On 17 Led, 21:04, Pedram pedram...@gmail.com wrote:
   hi Guys , I know what should you do ,
   $('#menu li:first a').remove()
   this is the code you need , jquery has no problem when you use this
   code $('#menu li a:first').remove(); the selector checks each li and
   removes the a so all of the links will be removed so in your case
   your code should look like this $('#menu li:first a').remove();  the
   selector selects the first li and removes the a
   that set,
   I am just following john Resig in twitter it seems he is going to
   release jquery 1.3.1 maybe he found some little bugs.- Skrýt citovaný 
   text -

 - Zobrazit citovaný text -


[jQuery] premature ready?

2009-01-17 Thread JLundell

Well, maybe

In my first use of jQuery, I attached a visibility toggle function,
via document ready, to a button (button by id, toggling by class), and
got very erratic results. Typically, the toggle didn't work on first
load of the document, but tended to work if the document was reloaded
from cache.

* All my CSS is embedded in head

* All my JS is at the end of head

* I'm loading 1.3 from Google Code

* For any given page load, it either works all the time or fails all
the time

* I've got both Google ads and analytics in the doc

* Same symptoms on Mac Safari 3 and Mac FF3

I gather from the list archives that ready has been something of a
problem child.

My workaround is to use onclick instead of dynamic attachment, but I'd
like to use jQuery more in the future, and it'd be nice to know what's
going on. The onclick version is here: 
http://lobitos.net/wx?loc=half+moon+bay+cafmt=wide
(the 'raw' button is the one in question).


  1   2   >