Re: KM Matrix metering gauge
Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit: K/M lens could use matrix metering, see: http://www.robertstech.com/matrix.htm http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/multizone.htm For thoses we want try, I have put a gauge on my web http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/Images/bricolage/gabarit-ki.zip I wrote an as detailed page that possible on this topic. But my English is too bad to write an English version of it (I translate my French with « Power-Translator ») If someone wants to make this translation, I will put it in line ? Michel
RE: XP question
You can partition an empty disk, up until the point that there is no 'unpartitioned' space on it anymore. Without an add on tool like partition magic, you cannot change the size of a partition once it has been set up. Your C drive was presumably formatted with a single partition fillinf the whole disk. DO NOT use the format option on the C drive, because the only way XP can format the disk as standard is to wipe it!! -Original Message- From: Butch Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2003 23:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: XP question Hi: Is it possible to partition the main HD in XP? I just installed an 80GB HD and was able to partition that no problem. Using the same techniques on the C (main) HD the format option is grayed out. I have a format option in My Computer but I'm leery of using it for fear of wiping out all of my programs. Any help appreciated TIA BUTCH Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself. Hermann Hess (Damien)
Pentax Optio S (4MP Si version?)
No idea as to the validity, but the following has been lifted from dpreview: I have heard a rumor that Pentax is coming out with a 4 megapixel camera called the Pentax Optio Si. I cannot comfirm this and was wondering if anyone else has heard about this. I was going to purchase the Optio S, but when someone told me that a 4 mp version øf the same camera, with all the same features was coming out. I thought I would wait and see. Anyone heard anything?
Re: Pentax Optio S (4MP Si version?)
No, but it sure makes me sit up and take notice... If that's active pixels, it's only 25% more than the S version. I wonder if you'd actually notice that 25%? An honest question, as I don't know. I do know, however, that with computer (CPU) speeds, in order to make a significant step-function change large enough for most operations to be noticeably faster, a mere 25% won't begin to do it, and sometimes it takes a doubling to be noticeable in everyday operations... So, if it turns out to be significantly more expensive than the S, with the pixel count of the CCD being the only difference, it would make me hesitate a bit... We'll just have to see! It's going to be nice to have a choiice, tho', isn't it! grin It's been a while. keith whaley Rob Brigham wrote: No idea as to the validity, but the following has been lifted from dpreview: I have heard a rumor that Pentax is coming out with a 4 megapixel camera called the Pentax Optio Si. I cannot comfirm this and was wondering if anyone else has heard about this. I was going to purchase the Optio S, but when someone told me that a 4 mp version øf the same camera, with all the same features was coming out. I thought I would wait and see. Anyone heard anything?
Re: Pentax Optio S (4MP Si version?)
Far more likely than a K DSLR and btw, no leak about that one so far. Obviously Pentax agenda and ours are completely disjunctive. :o( Servus, Alin Rob wrote: RB I have heard a rumor that Pentax is coming out with a 4 megapixel RB camera called the Pentax Optio Si. I cannot comfirm this and was RB wondering if anyone else has heard about this. I was going to purchase RB the Optio S, but when someone told me that a 4 mp version øf the same RB camera, with all the same features was coming out. I thought I would RB wait and see. Anyone heard anything?
Re: Pentax Optio S (4MP Si version?)
Hi Keith, on 07 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list: No, but it sure makes me sit up and take notice... If that's active pixels, it's only 25% more than the S version. I wonder if you'd actually notice that 25%? I would prefer the 3MP version. You don't see any difference between a 10x15cm print from a 2MP or 3MP digicam. You will see advantages of a 4MP camera only when you make prints of 20x30cm or bigger or if you want to make enlargements of picure parts. So 3MP are sufficient in most times. Further more there are some disadvantages of a 4MP digicam: - The CCD will be as small as that of the 3MP digicam. Because of this the density of pixels will be higher, causing more noise in the pictures. - 4MP take longer to be processed, i.e. the camera needs longer to store them on the memory card - We will have to see, if the new lens is sufficient for a 4MP CCD or if there will occur optical errors. Cheers, Heiko
Re: Pentax Optio S (4MP Si version?)
Alin wrote: Far more likely than a K DSLR and btw, no leak about that one so far. Obviously Pentax agenda and ours are completely disjunctive. :o( As far as I know the DSLR is a fact and far more certain than other Optio S versions. Anyway, as the Optio S is a runaway sucess before it even reaches the shops, version of it with different resolutions can be taken for granted. Pål
Photo Contest
I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al http://www.usefilm.com
Re: Black black paint
I've been thinking about chemistry. Long ago I developed, not from first principles, but from old formulae, a physical developer for Holograms. The idea was that if one developed the plate with a developer that could enhance the actual interference pattern on the plate by giving it a physical structure, it could be used as a master to make metal replicas for pressing white light Holograms. It worked and we were able to make very good impressions in various kinds of plastic from nickel replicas of the Holographic plates. This was a quite different process to that used now which utilises a photo resist. The developer, to start with, had a dozen components. Slowly, but surely, I reduced them and finally ended with two solutions with only four components - they were mixed 1:1 for use. By the way, the resolution obtained was 750- 850 lines per mm. I think the same will happen with this new black coating process. It will be further developed and simplified until it becomes a marketable product. Two solutions (perhaps) one to coat, the other to treat the surface. It will never be cheap. ___ Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:13 AM Subject: Re: Black black paint Thanks Robin Hood! So it appears to be a process that would be used for metal parts in optical gear, that could reflect light, but probably not edges of lens elements. BR Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've broken the law. But here it is.
Re: Overexposure of PZ1+
Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Roberts a écrit: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: . I believe the screw-mount adaptor insulates the contacts in the lens mount so the camera acts as if there's no lens attached. Apparently, those who use screw-mount lenses on AF cameras can insert a piece of aluminum foil to overcome this problem. I've had this same trouble with a couple of third-party MF lenses that have lens mounts with black anodized (non-conductive) finishes; no autofocus confirmation. Yes I have this problem with a black mount Cosina 2/50. I scraped the painting to permit the electric contact, so focus-aid works ! That's what I did with my Cosina 200/4.0 (which is a surprisingly good lens). -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
Re: Photo Contest
Al Shaikh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. Aw hell, none of us will enter because we know Mike Johnston will walk away with all the prizes... :-P -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
Are you using tap or bottle water.Any change in development times noticed as mentioned by others?? Dave(who now has all the chemicals and jugs)Brooks Begin Original Message From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:42:57 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post I only recntly discovered presoak, now for some reason my neg are cleaner. --- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - Subject: OT: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post Seeing as how I belong to both PDML and the HUG, I was wondering if anyone had comments on this. I personally try to pre-soak everything but apparently (at least from the HUG) it looks as though pre-soaking is not done by some.. and vehemently opposed by others. What does everyone else think? I've found that with presoaking, I get more even development, and no decrease in film speed, although as with any change in processing technique, testing needs to be done to get a new development time. William Robb __ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca End Original Message Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art stops and the wall begins--Frank Zappa http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
Re: Re: Photo Contest
I'll sacrifice myself and enter a few,just to make him work for itvbg Dave(2 flowers)Brooks Begin Original Message From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 07:41:02 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Photo Contest Al Shaikh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. Aw hell, none of us will enter because we know Mike Johnston will walk away with all the prizes... :-P -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com End Original Message Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art stops and the wall begins--Frank Zappa http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
OT: Digital vs film look
wondering: You can usually easily tell the difference between tv shows/movies shot on film and those shot direct on video, though I'm not certain I can articulate the difference. Does the same difference in look apply to still photography? Do you mean between photography and still video capture? Still video and digital imaging aren't the same things. --Mike
Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
I too recently started presoaking, but I really began to believe in it when I processed some APX 100 and after the presoak the water came out blue. I developed the negatives in D-76 and they were beautiful. Evan Brendan wrote: I only recntly discovered presoak, now for some reason my neg are cleaner.
Re: Photo Contest
Al Shaikh wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al http://www.usefilm.com I took a look - 5 images are required. 12 months. 5 calendars. So what you win is one different image on each of 5 calendars, not an image a page, it appears. And you have to join and a $25 donation is suggested to be a member. Not so appealing to me, at least. Just my 2 cents annsan
Re: Photo Contest
Ann... Just to be fair, one has to join PDML in order to participate in PUG, and those donations go to support the website and pay for the prizes. I don't think usefilm.com is making a killing on this. My guess is that the calendars are a lot like those sold by Photographer's Edge. t On 2/7/03 8:54 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Al Shaikh wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al http://www.usefilm.com I took a look - 5 images are required. 12 months. 5 calendars. So what you win is one different image on each of 5 calendars, not an image a page, it appears. And you have to join and a $25 donation is suggested to be a member. Not so appealing to me, at least. Just my 2 cents annsan
Re: Photo Contest
1) The contest is for 5 flower images, so you can show a little thought and put together a series of decent images. Any gimp can take one decent image by accident but putting together a mini portfolio is more of a challenge and perhaps will help show a bit of your visual style. 2) You can put whatever images you want to on your calendar if you win. The choice of images for your calendar is up to you and not related to the contest. You can and will be able to put an image per page on your calendar if you win. 3) Joining usefilm.com is free. 4) Participating in the contest is free. 5) The donations have nothing to do with this contest, they are for members who use and enjoy the site to help defray the costs of hosting a large site. They are completely VOLUNTARY. Hope that cleared everything up. al Ann Sanfedele wrote: Al Shaikh wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al http://www.usefilm.com I took a look - 5 images are required. 12 months. 5 calendars. So what you win is one different image on each of 5 calendars, not an image a page, it appears. And you have to join and a $25 donation is suggested to be a member. Not so appealing to me, at least. Just my 2 cents annsan
Re: Photo Contest
Hi tim, This is what the calendars look like if you are curious: http://digi-labs.net/ Basically we don't get a penny for putting up this contest, we give a little publicity to the vendor and they sponsor something nice for our members. That's the whole deal. al Timothy Sherburne wrote: Ann... Just to be fair, one has to join PDML in order to participate in PUG, and those donations go to support the website and pay for the prizes. I don't think usefilm.com is making a killing on this. My guess is that the calendars are a lot like those sold by Photographer's Edge. t On 2/7/03 8:54 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Al Shaikh wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al http://www.usefilm.com I took a look - 5 images are required. 12 months. 5 calendars. So what you win is one different image on each of 5 calendars, not an image a page, it appears. And you have to join and a $25 donation is suggested to be a member. Not so appealing to me, at least. Just my 2 cents annsan
Re: Re: FS: cameras and lenses - updated list
Hi Stan, Do you leave Pentax? Alek Uytkownik Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa: This is an update to my previous update. Status of my items for sale listed below. I haven\'t placed anything on eBay yet but some, as indicated, will go on eBay tonight (approx 2000 Central Strd Time, GMT-6). on 1/31/03 9:05 PM, Stan Halpin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am simplifying and consolidating. I haven\'t worked out minimum-price, etc. on all of the following This is an update of the previous, with pricing information and links to some pictures so you can see the items which are for sale. A couple of the previous listing have sold, have been paid for, and are in the mail to their new home. A couple from the list I have decided to keep for now. Additional have been added. All of these items are in very good condition; i.e., no scratches on the glass, no dents on the filter rings, etc. Older lenses may have more of the inevitable subtle signs of wear, but none of this equipment is abused. Except as noted below. Note that the file names on the site with the photos are case sensitive. Also note that I have mostly identified only one photo for each item. If there is an /SPIIb.jpg, you may safely assume an /SPIIa.jpg, and possibly an /SPIIc.jpg, /...d.jpg, etc. I am not consistent in my lettering or numbering convention from one lens or camera to another, but for a given item I am absolutely consistent in my lettering or numbering. Description PriceLinkNotes Spotmatic SPII $100 [If some here does not buy, I will keep for now.] http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/SPIIb.jpg includes 55/1.8 Super-Multi-Coated lens. SMC Takumar 1.8/55 $25 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/Tak55a.jpg This is a second Tak 55/1.8 Super-Takumar 1:4/200 $50 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/200mmC.jpg Super-Macro-Takumar 1:4 50mm SOLD Black ME$40 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/ME-1.jpg or .../ME-2.jpg The typical ding in the finder is more of a crunch on this camera, but it seems to work ok. Except maybe the hot shoe doesn\'t work . . . LX - 523$350 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/LXd.jpg CLA about 2 years ago. Older version of the camera, film speed to 3200 but the finder-release button does not trigger the meter. Typical inconsequential ding in the finder. No other known problems. Sold with A-50/2.0 body cap. Includes strap and lugs, grip style A available if you want for extra $, your choice of G-20 or E-20 or C-21. LX - 535 SOLD LX Finder attachment FC-1 $100 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/Finders1.jpg and http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/Finders2.jpg This is a great Sports Finder, helps the viewing if you wear eyeglasses, but is just too bulky for my taste. In the first photo the FC-1 is shown mounted on the FB-1 System base, in photo two it is shown to the side. (I\'ve decided to hold onto the FB-1 and the FD-2 eyepiece for now.) SMC-M 1:4 20mmSOLD SMC-A 1:2.8 35mm$110 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/A35a.jpg SMC-A Macro 1:2.8 50mm $150 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/A50macroC.jpg SMC-M 1:2.8-4.0 40-80mm zoom $75 WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/40-80c.jpg Nice older Macro zoom lens in very fine condition. Vivitar Series 1 70-210 mm 1:2.8-4.0 Macro zoom WILL go on eBay 2-07-03 http://home.earthlink.net/~smh645/VS1-a.jpg --r-e-k-l-a-m-a- Tanie bilety lotnicze! http://samoloty.onet.pl
Re: Photo Contest
I already have 2 calendars with my name on it, that and theres no way were going to win aginst that shoe box of slides. But it's a good spot to get critique. --- Timothy Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ann... Just to be fair, one has to join PDML in order to participate in PUG, and those donations go to support the website and pay for the prizes. I don't think usefilm.com is making a killing on this. My guess is that the calendars are a lot like those sold by Photographer's Edge. t On 2/7/03 8:54 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Al Shaikh wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al http://www.usefilm.com I took a look - 5 images are required. 12 months. 5 calendars. So what you win is one different image on each of 5 calendars, not an image a page, it appears. And you have to join and a $25 donation is suggested to be a member. Not so appealing to me, at least. Just my 2 cents annsan __ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Re: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
Thanks Mr. Robb.I just threw out a filter, Do'h.Back to the Britag Dave Begin Original Message From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:31:12 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post - Original Message - From: David Brooks Subject: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post Are you using tap or bottle water.Any change in development times noticed as mentioned by others?? Filtered tap water. I found my development times increased by a half minute. I presume this is because the developer has to replace the water in the emulsion, and it takes a bit of time to do that. William Robb End Original Message Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art stops and the wall begins--Frank Zappa http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
Re: Re: Photo Contest
I just saw your entry Brendan,I'm sending one tonight.I can only send one a day anyway.I have no jpg's in the office computer to sendg Dave Begin Original Message From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:22:11 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Photo Contest I already have 2 calendars with my name on it, that and theres no way were going to win aginst that shoe box of slides. But it's a good spot to get critique. --- Timothy Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ann... Just to be fair, one has to join PDML in order to participate in PUG, and those donations go to support the website and pay for the prizes. I don't think usefilm.com is making a killing on this. My guess is that the calendars are a lot like those sold by Photographer's Edge. t On 2/7/03 8:54 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: Al Shaikh wrote: I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images. Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal. Enjoy Good luck al http://www.usefilm.com I took a look - 5 images are required. 12 months. 5 calendars. So what you win is one different image on each of 5 calendars, not an image a page, it appears. And you have to join and a $25 donation is suggested to be a member. Not so appealing to me, at least. Just my 2 cents annsan __ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca End Original Message Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art stops and the wall begins--Frank Zappa http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
Re: Re: XP question
Well, not really that simple. When you re-partition the drive, you'll have to have enough space on your C:\ partition to hold the image that you made of it originally. Mainly because the registry is going to look for all of your programs in the same places they were before you repartitioned the drive. The only sure way is to back up all of your data and then partition and format the drive the way that you want it. Then, you re-install all of your software from the original disks into the partitions in which you want them. Last, you bring back your data into the appropriate program subdirectories, where the programs will expect to find it. There are other ways to do this, one of which uses the Norton's Ghost program. You install a new hard drive, of the size you desire. You partition and format the partitions the way that you want, making the first partition bootable. Then you use Norton Ghost to move the applications and their data files to the places where you want them on the other drive. Now you go into CMOS and make the new drive the primary drive and boot from it. You can now fdisk and format your original drive any way you want. You can even make an image of the new drive and clone it onto the old drive, if you wish. Then go back and reset the CMOS to boot from the old drive. After this is done, you have the perfect backup system. Just periodically image the old drive to the new one. If the old one fails, or is corrupted, you can reformat it and image the new drive back to it again. Or replace the old drive and put an image of the backup drive on it and keep right on keepin' on. It's a lot easier to do than it is to tell about it and new hard drives are really very cheap. If what you have on your computer is important to you, the machine should have two drives set up like this with a third drive sitting on a shelf just in case one of the two operating drives should fail. There are other ways to do all of this, this way minimizes risk and hair tearing. Len --- From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: XP question Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:15:01 +0200 Quite easy and you have several opportunities to decide whether what the program is about to do is actually what you want. Of course you should back up your files first; just in case the power fails in the middle of the operation. To do this there is another program, by the same people, called Drive Image. This will make an exact image of your drive that can be put back easily in case of trouble. Of course - if you just buy Drive Image and do a backup you can then use DOS's Fdisk to re-partition your drive. You can then format the new partitions, make the first active and put everything back from the image and save some money. You need to be sure that the new partition is big enough for the image. But when I did it I merely backed up some important files to CD and then re-partitioned the drive with PMagic. It went smoothly. ___ Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 - Original Message - From: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:57 PM Subject: Re: Re: XP question Don. I'm thinking of getting Partition Magic to slice up my 40 Gig HD(XP Home version)Is it relativley painfree to use:) Dave Begin Original Message From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:42:25 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: XP question I use XP Pro and used Partition Magic to change the partitions on C: Don ___ Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 - Original Message - From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:20 AM Subject: OT: XP question Hi: Is it possible to partition the main HD in XP? I just installed an 80GB HD and was able to partition that no problem. Using the same techniques on the C (main) HD the format option is grayed out. I have a format option in My Computer but I'm leery of using it for fear of wiping out all of my programs. Any help appreciated TIA BUTCH Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself. Hermann Hess (Damien) End Original Message Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art stops and the wall begins--Frank Zappa http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
SMC M 35/2.8-3.5?
A humble and old-fashioned lens question: What is your opinion about the SMC M 35/2.8-3.5 zoom. Could it be a convenient alternative to a normal prime lens? Together with an LX that is. Peter Smekal Uppsala, Sweden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FS Friday
Hi all. I have one S3 c/w the standard 55mm f 1.8 lens,Pentax cap,no case. I bought this from a list member in the fall of 2001 and did not run more than 10 rolls through it, but worked fine for me.I used it for IR work until my SP500 was back from the shop,then i went back to the SP 500. I';ll also include in the package the clip on Pentax meter,with working battery,and case.Readings were damn close to my other cameras and proofs looked fine(to me) Asking $60.00 US for both plus shipping.(Or make an offer if you think its too high) I dont have bid pay or pal bill or what ever that stuff is, so Postal or bank MO is fine,or personal cheque from North America pdmlers. Thanks Dave(still at 0 feedback)Brooks
RE: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
On a related note, when I moved to my current location, I noticed that I was getting water spots on my film when they dried. Basically the water here is very hard and leaves deposits on the film surface. Apparently it's very stubborn too, as 2 vigorous baths in distilled water doesn't totally remove the gunk either. Anyway, I was going through loads of filtered water, which is a PIA to lug home, so I tried to use water from a Brita. That water was *worse* than the tap water wrt gunk spots on the film. Now I use the filtered water and give a final wipe with a film chamois, which generlly does the trick. tv -Original Message- From: David Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post Thanks Mr. Robb.I just threw out a filter, Do'h.Back to the Britag Dave Begin Original Message From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:31:12 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post - Original Message - From: David Brooks Subject: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post Are you using tap or bottle water.Any change in development times noticed as mentioned by others?? Filtered tap water. I found my development times increased by a half minute. I presume this is because the developer has to replace the water in the emulsion, and it takes a bit of time to do that. William Robb End Original Message Pentax User Stouffville Ontario Canada Art needs to be in a frame.That way we know when the art stops and the wall begins--Frank Zappa http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
Re: SMC M 35/2.8-3.5?
A humble and old-fashioned lens question: What is your opinion about the SMC M 35/2.8-3.5 zoom. Could it be a convenient alternative to a normal prime lens? Together with an LX that is. I think you're missing some information, Peter. Is this a zoom that you're referring to, one that zooms beyond 35 to 35mm, that is? g Fred
Re: Overexposure of PZ1+
Alek, There must be some kind of a language barrier here. Read my post again, Mark's too. I did the same experiment. I used a K24/2.8 lens (wide angle lens) with the PZ-1 (Z-1 by you). I was 6 feet (2 meters) from a table lamp that I focused on. The lamp just filled the finder [ focus ] area. Using a wide angle lens, I was seeing a dark room with a bright lamp in the middle. Yes with the PZ-1, the little * goes ON in the LCD display. NO, this doesn't mean anything. The exposure doesn't change!!! The PZ-1 says you have spot metering but you don't! It is telling you lies!!! With the PZ-1p, you have spot metering. I put the K24/2.8 lens on the camera. I focused on the light... it just filled the [focus] in the viewfinder. When I pressed the spot button, the * went on in the viewfinder, and the exposure changed. This was for the PZ-1p only - Z-1p by you. I don't know how to make this explaination any clearer. Regards, Bob S. In a message dated 2/7/2003 10:27:58 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Bob, With PZ1 you have spot for sure with K and M lenses!!! Just click the buttom on the back of the camera - it was with . one and then turn the wheel ( I do not remember if it is AV or TV) in front of the camera, just near shutter buttom, remember to keep . buttom pushed! and turn it. On the display you will see in the frame * informing you that spot is set.just all. I own PZ1 and some K and M it WORKS. Reply to me if you manage to do it. Hope it helps. Cheers, Alek PS you wrote exposure did not change, sometimes you could set on the subjects where there is no difference in light, that is it. Good luck and be happy with spot with you K and M lenses:) [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał: My Z1 spot meters with all my pentax lenses, K,M,A,F,FA. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don\'t know. I\'ll go home and try it, but I remember trying to get my M\'s K\'s to spot meter and they didn\'t. They will say SPOT metering is ON in the viewfinder, but the exposure won\'t change. Just tried my PZ-1p with a K50/1.4 and both spot and center-weighted metering work - and the exposure definitely does change (I metered in a dark room with a small window in the center). -- Mark Roberts Mark, I did the same experiment this AM. The PZ-1p will spot meter with a K lens (tried the K24/2.8). The PZ-1 will not spot meter with a K lens. So I\'d revise what I said to this... PZ-1: NO Spot metering with K and M lenses, you need A,F,FA and NO matrix metering with K M, only Center Weighted. PZ-1p: Center Weighted OR Spot metering with K M lenses and NO matrix metering with K M, only Center Weighted. and Spot, Matrix, or Center Weighted with A, F FA lens. Thanks to you and Paal for pointing that feature out, I had missed it on the PZ-1p. Regards, Bob S.
OT Window coverings
Hi all. I'm ready to start bathroom developing and just wondering if this will work. There is one small window about 16 x 24 that needs to be covered. Just wondering if adhering a couple of pieces of black bristol board or similar material to the window,then add soem black plastic bags over top (and turning ther out side light off) would be ok.When the outside light is off at night its quite dark out there. I have a bit of space by the door but i can foam up that no problem. Any comments app. Dave
FS: Hot shoe adapter F
I have an extra one of these, in like new condition, with box, etc. It's $25 new at BH; how about $15 including U.S. shipping? Joe
SMC M 35-70/2.8-3.5?
Should have been 35-70, thanks, Fred! A humble and old-fashioned lens question: What is your opinion about the SMC M 35/2.8-3.5 zoom. Could it be a convenient alternative to a normal prime lens? Together with an LX that is. I think you're missing some information, Peter. Is this a zoom that you're referring to, one that zooms beyond 35 to 35mm, that is? g Fred Peter Smekal Uppsala, Sweden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT Window coverings
Your window covering should work, but the true test comes from installing the window cover, sealing the door, then standing in the darkened room with all lights off for five minutes. During this time, your eyes will have time to adjust to the darkness and you'll be able to see light leaks easily. Attack ones on the window with black masking tape or electricians tape. For my door, the foam approach didn't work well because the door in the frame a bit too tight for regular use (the darkroom is also a 1/2 bathroom). Instead, I installed a curtain rod over the door (on the inside of the darkroom) and my wife made a heavy black curtain (running from floor to ceiling) that I can cover the door with. This works perfectly for blocking those stray photons. t On 2/7/03 5:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. I'm ready to start bathroom developing and just wondering if this will work. There is one small window about 16 x 24 that needs to be covered. Just wondering if adhering a couple of pieces of black bristol board or similar material to the window,then add soem black plastic bags over top (and turning ther out side light off) would be ok.When the outside light is off at night its quite dark out there. I have a bit of space by the door but i can foam up that no problem. Any comments app. Dave
RE: OT Window coverings
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Hi all. I'm ready to start bathroom developing and just wondering if this will work. There is one small window about 16 x 24 that needs to be covered. Just wondering if adhering a couple of pieces of black bristol board or similar material to the window,then add soem black plastic bags over top (and turning ther out side light off) would be ok.When the outside light is off at night its quite dark out there. I have a bit of space by the door but i can foam up that no problem. Should be fine. I have one 4x8 foot window that is covered with 2 layers of black plastic and a lot of gaffers tape. It's sold by B+H as 8 mil black out cloth, but I would suppose any thick black plastic would *probably* work. I bought some similar material from Home Depot to cover the carpet and it looks identical. I can print during broad daylight w/ this setup. Whatever you end up doing, you'll need to do a test to make sure the space is light-tight before you start printing in earnest. You probably have some b+w printing books that explain how to do this - you want to use the same procedure you'd use to test safelights with a little modification. tv
RE: Hot shoe adapter F
I'll take it. -Original Message- From: Joe Wilensky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FS: Hot shoe adapter F I have an extra one of these, in like new condition, with box, etc. It's $25 new at BH; how about $15 including U.S. shipping? Joe
Exhibition preview tonight.
Hi all, Just want to say that there will be a sort of a kick-off or preview of my exhibition tonight in a couple of hours. I'm late and pretty exhausted, but I have managed to finish 12 of the planned 24 images that finally will make the exhibition. I'm going to put up these twelve at tonight's opening concert of the ten day jazz festival I've been working on. As for the pictures (20x30 cm), well I am rather impressed. They are good, a few of them very good. Will be interesting to see or hear what people will think of them. Got to take a shower and rush off to get them on the wall. Till later, Lasse
RE: Hot shoe adapter F
On a related note, I have an extra Hot Shoe Adapter Fg which can be had for $25. $36 new at B+H. -Original Message- From: Joe Wilensky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FS: Hot shoe adapter F I have an extra one of these, in like new condition, with box, etc. It's $25 new at BH; how about $15 including U.S. shipping? Joe
RE: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
Good to know Tom.The water up here in Dave and Brendan country is VERY hard.Fouled up a 40 gallon gas water heater in 14 months.Furnace humidifier last just one season. As i am probably only going to procces 2-3 rolls per month uuntil summer horse season,i was planning on using the bring home stuff to help eliminate as much gunk as possible. I have had to rewash a lot of negs i used in class(done in a lab) with photoflow,as they were just riddled with dust and spots. I dunk and swishbut still a few remain.Do you recomend a cleaning in photo flow AND a towel off,so to speak or just let drip dry.Its very frustrating to spend all that time with test strip etc then take the print out to look at and the first thing i see is dust .I'm reluctant to rewash a neg and chaimos it,unless the concenses is its safe. Dave Dave On a related note, when I moved to my current location, I noticed that I was getting water spots on my film when they dried. Basically the water here is very hard and leaves deposits on the film surface. Apparently it's very stubborn too, as 2 vigorous baths in distilled water doesn't totally remove the gunk either. Anyway, I was going through loads of filtered water, which is a PIA to lug home, so I tried to use water from a Brita. That water was *worse* than the tap water wrt gunk spots on the film. Now I use the filtered water and give a final wipe with a film chamois, which generlly does the trick. tv
Re: OT Window coverings
take 2 real think garbage bags and tape them to make 1 shet to cover the windown, put the board behind it. for the door I hung a black curtatin infront on the outside, works fine for me. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. I'm ready to start bathroom developing and just wondering if this will work. There is one small window about 16 x 24 that needs to be covered. Just wondering if adhering a couple of pieces of black bristol board or similar material to the window,then add soem black plastic bags over top (and turning ther out side light off) would be ok.When the outside light is off at night its quite dark out there. I have a bit of space by the door but i can foam up that no problem. Any comments app. Dave __ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
RE: OT Window coverings
I can print during broad daylight w/ this setup. Whatever you end up doing, you'll need to do a test to make sure the space is light-tight before you start printing in earnest. You probably have some b+w printing books that explain how to do this - you want to use the same procedure you'd use to test safelights with a little modification. tv Hi Tom. Yes my sister gave me several books this Chritmas and the subject is mentioned.Right now its just for blocking light long enough to load a 2 reel tank so i can proccess at home and not have to do so at class,as enlarger time is a premium. May not be getting to much better yet but gaining a lot of knowledge from the screwups:) Dave
Re: OT Window coverings
Dave, If you're just developing film and not printing, a changing bag works well. Load the tank in the changing bag, then everything can be done in daylight. Bill - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:35 AM Subject: OT Window coverings Hi all. I'm ready to start bathroom developing and just wondering if this will work. There is one small window about 16 x 24 that needs to be covered. Just wondering if adhering a couple of pieces of black bristol board or similar material to the window,then add soem black plastic bags over top (and turning ther out side light off) would be ok.When the outside light is off at night its quite dark out there. I have a bit of space by the door but i can foam up that no problem. Any comments app. Dave
Re: Re: Overexposure of PZ1+
So it is strange. I also did similar test with the lamp. But centerweighted meter is quite similar to spot if you fill the finder with light/lamp for instance and not only in this case. I shall check in manual. But if it does not work it could not be dispalyed if you are working in spot meter. SO I do not know what to say. So only pversion has spot with K and M lenses? Really strange Alek [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa: Alek, There must be some kind of a language barrier here. Read my post again, Mark\'s too. I did the same experiment. I used a K24/2.8 lens (wide angle lens) with the PZ-1 (Z-1 by you). I was 6 feet (2 meters) from a table lamp that I focused on. The lamp just filled the finder [ focus ] area. Using a wide angle lens, I was seeing a dark room with a bright lamp in the middle. Yes with the PZ-1, the little * goes ON in the LCD display. NO, this doesn\'t mean anything. The exposure doesn\'t change!!! The PZ-1 says you have spot metering but you don\'t! It is telling you lies!!! With the PZ-1p, you have spot metering. I put the K24/2.8 lens on the camera. I focused on the light... it just filled the [focus] in the viewfinder. When I pressed the spot button, the * went on in the viewfinder, and the exposure changed. This was for the PZ-1p only - Z-1p by you. I don\'t know how to make this explaination any clearer. Regards, Bob S. In a message dated 2/7/2003 10:27:58 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Bob, With PZ1 you have spot for sure with K and M lenses!!! Just click the buttom on the back of the camera - it was with . one and then turn the wheel ( I do not remember if it is AV or TV) in front of the camera, just near shutter buttom, remember to keep . buttom pushed! and turn it. On the display you will see in the frame * informing you that spot is set.just all. I own PZ1 and some K and M it WORKS. Reply to me if you manage to do it. Hope it helps. Cheers, Alek PS you wrote exposure did not change, sometimes you could set on the subjects where there is no difference in light, that is it. Good luck and be happy with spot with you K and M lenses:) [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa: My Z1 spot meters with all my pentax lenses, K,M,A,F,FA. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don\\\'t know. I\\\'ll go home and try it, but I remember trying to get my M\\\'s K\\\'s to spot meter and they didn\\\'t. They will say SPOT metering is ON in the viewfinder, but the exposure won\\\'t change. Just tried my PZ-1p with a K50/1.4 and both spot and center-weighted metering work - and the exposure definitely does change (I metered in a dark room with a small window in the center). -- Mark Roberts Mark, I did the same experiment this AM. The PZ-1p will spot meter with a K lens (tried the K24/2.8). The PZ-1 will not spot meter with a K lens. So I\\\'d revise what I said to this... PZ-1: NO Spot metering with K and M lenses, you need A,F,FA and NO matrix metering with K M, only Center Weighted. PZ-1p: Center Weighted OR Spot metering with K M lenses and NO matrix metering with K M, only Center Weighted. and Spot, Matrix, or Center Weighted with A, F FA lens. Thanks to you and Paal for pointing that feature out, I had missed it on the PZ-1p. Regards, Bob S. --r-e-k-l-a-m-a- Tanie bilety lotnicze! http://samoloty.onet.pl
RE: Exhibition preview tonight.
Good luck! -Original Message- From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exhibition preview tonight. Hi all, Just want to say that there will be a sort of a kick-off or preview of my exhibition tonight in a couple of hours. I'm late and pretty exhausted, but I have managed to finish 12 of the planned 24 images that finally will make the exhibition. I'm going to put up these twelve at tonight's opening concert of the ten day jazz festival I've been working on. As for the pictures (20x30 cm), well I am rather impressed. They are good, a few of them very good. Will be interesting to see or hear what people will think of them. Got to take a shower and rush off to get them on the wall. Till later, Lasse
RE: OT Window coverings
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT Window coverings Hi Tom. Yes my sister gave me several books this Chritmas and the subject is mentioned.Right now its just for blocking light long enough to load a 2 reel tank so i can proccess at home and not have to do so at class,as enlarger time is a premium. Oh. Why not use a changing bag? tv
RE: OT Window coverings
Never thought too.Thanks Tom and Bill. I'll check into it, and availability. Dave Oh. Why not use a changing bag? tv
Grandfather Mountain
Camper Bill Asked... Hey, Jerome, you coming to GFM this spring? Thanks for asking, I almost forgot about it. It seemed too early to discuss such things but (wow) I guess this year is progressing rather quickly... only about 3 months away, huh? To answer your question, yes, I plan to be there. I like the entrance fee of the Camera Clinic *much* better g but hey, what can you do? The trip up there last year was a good time (YES, even being *tricked* by Mark Roberts into climbing the North Carolina equivalent of Mount Everest) and so I definitely look forward to a repeat performance... This time I'll be ready! This is all assuming, of course, that Cesar is still willing to carry my tripod for me everywhere I go vbg. But seriously, I enjoyed meeting (dorn near!) all the PDMLers that showed up there last year at the Camera Clinic, and hope to see some new faces this year as well. Who else is planning to make it? http://www.grandfather.com/events/nphoto.htm - jerome
RE: Grandfather Mountain
-Original Message- From: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] But seriously, I enjoyed meeting (dorn near!) all the PDMLers that showed up there last year at the Camera Clinic, and hope to see some new faces this year as well. I'll be at the clinic. Who else is planning to make it? Can't make the NPW this year. Dang. tv
Re: Grandfather Mountain
Great! Looking forward to seeing you again. Drop Don a line at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let him know you're coming. He will probably waive the admission fee. I plan on bringing the Jobo Duolab so we can process E-6 while we're there. Bill - Original Message - From: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: Grandfather Mountain Camper Bill Asked... Hey, Jerome, you coming to GFM this spring? Thanks for asking, I almost forgot about it. It seemed too early to discuss such things but (wow) I guess this year is progressing rather quickly... only about 3 months away, huh? To answer your question, yes, I plan to be there. I like the entrance fee of the Camera Clinic *much* better g but hey, what can you do? The trip up there last year was a good time (YES, even being *tricked* by Mark Roberts into climbing the North Carolina equivalent of Mount Everest) and so I definitely look forward to a repeat performance... This time I'll be ready! This is all assuming, of course, that Cesar is still willing to carry my tripod for me everywhere I go vbg. But seriously, I enjoyed meeting (dorn near!) all the PDMLers that showed up there last year at the Camera Clinic, and hope to see some new faces this year as well. Who else is planning to make it? http://www.grandfather.com/events/nphoto.htm - jerome
Re: Grandfather Mountain
They can't hold it without me. Doug at least, that's what I tell myself At 03:22 PM 2/7/03, you wrote: Who else is planning to make it?
Re: Re: XP question
Len wrote: After this is done, you have the perfect backup system. Just periodically image the old drive to the new one. If the old one fails, or is corrupted, you can reformat it and image the new drive back to it again. Or replace the old drive and put an image of the backup drive on it and keep right on keepin' on. That's what I thought when I had this setup. The perfect backup system Until an unknown force (ottawa hydro) blew up most of the components on my PC including BOTH hard drives. Darned unlucky. I'd have put money on it that I wouldn't have two disks fail at the same time. --- Wendy Beard Mosaid Technologies Inc 11 Hines Rd, Kanata, Ontario K2K 2X1, Canada
Re: Grandfather Mountain
They can't hold it without me. Doug at least, that's what I tell myself HAR!!! [actually, Doug, I think you're right... but still... HAR!]
Re: Re: XP question
On 7 Feb 2003 at 17:30, Leonard Paris wrote: The only sure way is to back up all of your data and then partition and format the drive the way that you want it. Then, you re-install all of your software from the original disks into the partitions in which you want them. Last, you bring back your data into the appropriate program subdirectories, where the programs will expect to find it. Got to agree with Len on this one, a duplicate transfer is the only way that you can guarantee the preservation of your data. I have seen more drives/data trashed by Partition Magic over the years than I'd care to recall. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
Re: SMC M 35-70/2.8-3.5?
I think you're missing some information, Peter. Is this a zoom that you're referring to, one that zooms beyond 35 to 35mm, that is? g Should have been 35-70, thanks, Fred! g Hmmm... A 35-35mm zoom would definitely be a candidate for Limited status, wouldn't it? g Well, I can't help you much beyond that, though, Peter - the only Pentax 35-70's that I'm at all familiar with are the AF 35-70/2.8 and the A 35-70/4. Fred
Grandfather Mountain
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Who else is planning to make it? http://www.grandfather.com/events/nphoto.htm - jerome i am planning, but not definite yet. Herb
Re: XP question
Hi, That's what I thought when I had this setup. The perfect backup system Until an unknown force (ottawa hydro) blew up most of the components on my PC including BOTH hard drives. Darned unlucky. I'd have put money on it that I wouldn't have two disks fail at the same time. That's the way Sod's Law works! --- Bob
Re: Exhibition preview tonight.
Ditto! tom wrote: Good luck! -- The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
FS Friday: Me Too
WRT the bargain I got, it turns out the Super Program doesn't need a new mount. Those were just scratches in the pic. Picked up an AF200T for $20 today. Nice little outfit. But to the main point: ... tomorrow I'll fix the A135/2.8 it's for sale. (Not a focal length I use). Anyway, A135/2.8 K300/4 for sale. Make me reasonable offers/trade offers. I need to clear them out. Collin
Re: Grandfather Mountain
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: Who else is planning to make it? I will be there to monitor your behavior Doug. Ed Tyler 205-913-6786 www.carriagehousearts.com
Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
- Original Message - From: tom Subject: RE: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post How do you know that stuff isn't supposed to be present when developing? The blue dye that washes out is the anti halation layer, and perhaps some sensitizing dyes. Once the film is exposed, it has done it's job and can safely be rinsed away with a presoak. If you think about it, the stuff soaks out of the film into the solution, so it's not really present in the emulsion during development anyway. William Robb
Re: Exhibition preview tonight.
- Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:37 PM Subject: Re: Exhibition preview tonight. Ditto! tom wrote: Good luck! Thanks guys! (and to those who wrote me off-list) (What's the level after exhausted? Thats where I am right now, on some sort of an auto-pilot.) Yes, it turned out pretty well in the end, although there was another delay in getting the (un)foldable screens in place onto which I hanged the pictures. (One of them fell to the floor and broke at the corner of the frame, but glass reained intact.) I got a lot of nice comments on the photos. I was quite pleased. It's very nice to have people paying attention to your stuff and telling you about it face to face. Many people found very specific details that they liked, and picked out different favourites. Since I only got them ready and hurried down to the club/restaurant, they were kind of new to me too, in that size and framing. That was interesting. (Btw, earlier today I was intervied on the radio about the festival and was also asked bout my exhibition which gave me an opportunity to promote it.) I still got another twelve photos to pick out. I guess it will be by early next week. I'll keep you updated. Lasse
RE: Exhibition preview tonight.
-Original Message- From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I got a lot of nice comments on the photos. I was quite pleased. It's very nice to have people paying attention to your stuff and telling you about it face to face. Many people found very specific details that they liked, and picked out different favourites. Since I only got them ready and hurried down to the club/restaurant, they were kind of new to me too, in that size and framing. That was interesting. (Btw, earlier today I was intervied on the radio about the festival and was also asked bout my exhibition which gave me an opportunity to promote it.) SUPERSTAR! tv
Re: Exhibition preview tonight.
Lasse, It's very good news! I'm glad the pre-show went well. Is there a chance of seeing your pictures (preferably those that are going on display) on the web? Sorry, if you already posted the URL, but I'm unable to keep up with the list (aroung 800 unread messages in my inbox now). Regards and best of luck the exhibition proper, Lukasz === www.fotopolis.pl [EMAIL PROTECTED] === internetowy magazyn o fotografii - Original Message - From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 3:38 AM Subject: Re: Exhibition preview tonight. - Original Message - From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:37 PM Subject: Re: Exhibition preview tonight. Ditto! tom wrote: Good luck! Thanks guys! (and to those who wrote me off-list) (What's the level after exhausted? Thats where I am right now, on some sort of an auto-pilot.) Yes, it turned out pretty well in the end, although there was another delay in getting the (un)foldable screens in place onto which I hanged the pictures. (One of them fell to the floor and broke at the corner of the frame, but glass reained intact.) I got a lot of nice comments on the photos. I was quite pleased. It's very nice to have people paying attention to your stuff and telling you about it face to face. Many people found very specific details that they liked, and picked out different favourites. Since I only got them ready and hurried down to the club/restaurant, they were kind of new to me too, in that size and framing. That was interesting. (Btw, earlier today I was intervied on the radio about the festival and was also asked bout my exhibition which gave me an opportunity to promote it.) I still got another twelve photos to pick out. I guess it will be by early next week. I'll keep you updated. Lasse --r-e-k-l-a-m-a- Tanie bilety lotnicze! http://samoloty.onet.pl
