RE: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: I wasn't entirely sure whether or not to shit myself. Skidmark! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote: On 2010-02-07 16:59, mike wilson wrote: I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. I had a Delta pilot do that years ago, leaving Ft. Lauderdale. The air was thin because it was high summer, and the plane was loaded to the gills. We didn't move after we got to 3rd in line. The pilot counted down as the other planes left. Then told us we were next. About fifteen seconds later he comes on the intercom to say Y! Ha! and slammed the throttles to (through?) the firewall. We made the 180* turn from the taxiway to the runway at what felt like 40 knots, and we still needed every flappin' inch of runway available. It was the most fun I've ever had on a takeoff. :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) There's nothing quite like taking off from a 3000 foot strip on a hot mid-afternoon in high summer at 6000 feet ASL in an aircraft significantly larger than the one you crashed in on takeoff from the same small strip 3 hours before due to running out of runway. Luckily for me, the small aircraft was a Piper Apache (chronically underpowered) and the large a DHC-5 Buffalo (which has extreme STOL performance) -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On 1/31/2010 9:58 PM, P N Stenquist wrote: @Boris Liberman BH has a small warehouse under our Manhattan store and our main warehouse is in Brooklyn. We're working on a program to distinguish store stock from Brooklyn warehouse stock for our web site. Any store customer who wants to buy an item that's only in stock in the Brooklyn warehouse should be offered free shipping to any address in the lower-48 states. Paul, please pass Henry (if this is at all possible) that... 1. I was offered this shipping option but since I was coming for less than one full day from Israel, it wasn't possible. 2. I don't have any negative words to say about BH as all my dealings with them were completely flawless on their side... 3. I appreciate the attention and time spent by Henry so as to keep their hand on the pulse of the customer base. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
I'll pass it along Boris. Best, Paul On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: On 1/31/2010 9:58 PM, P N Stenquist wrote: @Boris Liberman BH has a small warehouse under our Manhattan store and our main warehouse is in Brooklyn. We're working on a program to distinguish store stock from Brooklyn warehouse stock for our web site. Any store customer who wants to buy an item that's only in stock in the Brooklyn warehouse should be offered free shipping to any address in the lower-48 states. Paul, please pass Henry (if this is at all possible) that... 1. I was offered this shipping option but since I was coming for less than one full day from Israel, it wasn't possible. 2. I don't have any negative words to say about BH as all my dealings with them were completely flawless on their side... 3. I appreciate the attention and time spent by Henry so as to keep their hand on the pulse of the customer base. Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Thomas Cakalic wrote: OK... make it 4 meters. Most meters aren't very big. Let's make it metres. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Thomas Cakalic caka...@gmail.com wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Yes, an evocative image!... if I may continue... Inside the shop, hard at work is a tall, distinguished, balding gentleman who wears a perpetual smile with a grey mustachio above it. He is known simply as WR by his friends and foes alike. Foes, perish the thought! That is, as the French Canadiens who come from all over to visit would grin and say, impossible' . He works hard at keeping the shop stocked with every kind and brand of photography gear imaginable. The shop is a virtual treasure chest, a cornucopia of all good things photographic, and WR is a true and cherished friend to all. As we enter the shop, walking through the lattice-windowed door, a bell tinkles. WR is on a stepladder installing a 10 meter high flourescent sign in the eastern window, with large red letters running vertically, which reads PENTAX. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote: Bob Sullivan wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Brilliant, Bob, brilliant -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Stan Halpin wrote: I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
mike wilson wrote: Stan Halpin wrote: I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. Don't know how I stumbled onto this a few weeks ago, but I did: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:59:36PM +, mike wilson wrote: Stan Halpin wrote: I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. I've had that on a commercial US flight. We'd missed our regular takeoff slot, but the pilot was told he could use the second (normally landing) runway if he was quick - there was just enough time before an incoming flight was due. He did all the pre-flight checks on the taxiway, then lit it up, zipped out onto the runway, and off we went. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 05:12:08PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote: mike wilson wrote: Stan Halpin wrote: I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. Don't know how I stumbled onto this a few weeks ago, but I did: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE That's Hong Kong for you. Just enough runway to operate a Jumbo, and mountains that prevent a traditional straight-on approach. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
I was told a long time ago by a pilot that this manuever was'forbidden' by FAA rules. Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: John Francis jo...@panix.com Subject: Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I) On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 09:59:36PM +, mike wilson wrote: Stan Halpin wrote: I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. I've had that on a commercial US flight. We'd missed our regular takeoff slot, but the pilot was told he could use the second (normally landing) runway if he was quick - there was just enough time before an incoming flight was due. He did all the pre-flight checks on the taxiway, then lit it up, zipped out onto the runway, and off we went. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. Don't know how I stumbled onto this a few weeks ago, but I did: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE When I was a kid and we used to fly in and out of Gibraltar, Britain and Spain were still arguing about who owned the rock. Franco had closed the border and wouldn't allow British planes over Spanish airspace, so flights had to make a similar peculiar manoeuvre to land and take off in a way that avoided breaching their air space. It was a similar runway too, sticking out into the sea. Not jumbos though. On one flight we hit an air pocket during the strange turn and dropped quite a long way before the pilot figured out what to do. That was pretty scary and we had to be diverted to Tangiers for the night. You haven't lived until you've seen an aircraft full of people vomiting in unison. Flying out of Gatwick this afternoon we waited a long time on the taxi-way for another flight to come in and land before ours turned onto the main runway. I was watching it coming in and it appeared to be aiming straight for us - I wasn't entirely sure whether or not to shit myself. In the end I didn't, which is a good job really because the incoming plane missed us by probably as much as 100 ft. It literally rocked the plane I was in as it came over. Bob -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On 2010-02-07 16:59, mike wilson wrote: I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. I had a Delta pilot do that years ago, leaving Ft. Lauderdale. The air was thin because it was high summer, and the plane was loaded to the gills. We didn't move after we got to 3rd in line. The pilot counted down as the other planes left. Then told us we were next. About fifteen seconds later he comes on the intercom to say Y! Ha! and slammed the throttles to (through?) the firewall. We made the 180* turn from the taxiway to the runway at what felt like 40 knots, and we still needed every flappin' inch of runway available. It was the most fun I've ever had on a takeoff. :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Feb 7, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: On 2010-02-07 16:59, mike wilson wrote: I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. I had a Delta pilot do that years ago, leaving Ft. Lauderdale. The air was thin because it was high summer, and the plane was loaded to the gills. We didn't move after we got to 3rd in line. The pilot counted down as the other planes left. Then told us we were next. About fifteen seconds later he comes on the intercom to say Y! Ha! and slammed the throttles to (through?) the firewall. We made the 180* turn from the taxiway to the runway at what felt like 40 knots, and we still needed every flappin' inch of runway available. It was the most fun I've ever had on a takeoff. :-) The closest I've come to that was doing a donut in a pulse jet powered go-kart. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
That _was_ Hong Kong - the new airport at Chek Lap Kok has a very modern runway and terminal system: now the approach is almost boringly normal. The most fun I had in a commercial flight was a four-seater domestic flight in Australia, where the destination was beneath 100% cloud. The pilot flew forty minutes on dead-reckoning at 9800 feet, then, knowing the only mount in the region was 1800 feet one mile from the destination runway, dropped down to 2500 and cruised around looking for a break in the cloud. After ten minutes circling, he found one and we went down it like in an elevator! Popped out under the cloud two miles from the runway and only a few degrees off the glide path... John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Francis Sent: Monday, 8 February 2010 8:29 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I) Don't know how I stumbled onto this a few weeks ago, but I did: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtnL4KYVtDE That's Hong Kong for you. Just enough runway to operate a Jumbo, and mountains that prevent a traditional straight-on approach. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
This Russian pilot must have wished he had a taxiway entrance at the runway's end for a little extra takeoff run: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZGXwbPfwQs He backtracked all the way down the runway, and still almost ran out of tarmac. regards, Anthony Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight (Anon) On 8 February 2010 08:59, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote: Stan Halpin wrote: I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
'Tis amazing to me how airports attract videographers. On an earlier excursion into YouTube I saw a number of shots of planes landing on the (constrained) runway in Sint Maarteen. [A Dutch/French island in the Caribbean.] Fortunately this was after I had flown in and out of that airport. There is a 30-40 foot stretch of sandy beach just beyond the fence that is just beyond the end of the runway, so it is quite easy to stand directly beneath the very final approach. Many decades ago, as a teen I lived in La Paz Bolivia. The airport was above the city, on the edge of the Altiplano. It was not paved. It was not level. It was at 13,000+ altitude. Fortunately the wind was seldom a factor as the preferred takeoff was to start at the higher end of the runway, accelerate downhill. (Incoming flights landed uphill.) My sense is that if you couldn't get airborne by the end of the runway, you'd drop off the edge of the plateau and have a chance of gaining sufficient airspeed to be able to recover as you dove. I don't think that ever actually happened. All three Bolivian airforce planes used that airport, and during one of the revolutions I watched them from our porch, taking off, strafing a part of the city, then returning to the airport. Ah, those were the days. stan On Feb 7, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Anthony Farr wrote: This Russian pilot must have wished he had a taxiway entrance at the runway's end for a little extra takeoff run: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZGXwbPfwQs He backtracked all the way down the runway, and still almost ran out of tarmac. regards, Anthony Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight (Anon) On 8 February 2010 08:59, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote: Stan Halpin wrote: I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. I've had a pilot (Aeroflot) start his takeoff accelleration during the turn onto the runway. Until you've felt the tyres of an airliner scrubbing sideways, you haven't lived. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Not enough wood in Saskatchewan t build 2 story shops. Other than that, good job.:-) Dave On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote: Bob Sullivan wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Brilliant, Bob, brilliant -- der...@iinet.net.au http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:40:38 -0500 David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote: Not enough wood in Saskatchewan t build 2 story shops. Other than that, good job.:-) Regina used to be called Pile o' Bones. used those for the shop. Up north in Saskatoon we had to fight off the beavers. -- Love is that condition in which the happiness of another person is essential to your own... Jealousy is a disease, love is a healthy condition.- Robert Heinlein -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
- Original Message - From: Tom C Subject: Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I) Example - what if I bring my camera to the local camera store in Regina, SK. I tell them I can't get the histogram to display properly and the camera picks it own focus point. The tall bald man with the mustache behind the counter brings out the manual and shows it to me saying See it's your fault, you sniveling low-life excuse for a tapeworm. Next time read the manual and go crawl back up in the butthole you came from if you can find it. You'd actually be called a f#cking little wanker for that. We are a little more direct with our language on the praries.. Actually, one of the things that keeps counter sales people busy is showing customers how to use their cameras. For some reason, no one has ever really read their owners manuals. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
2010/2/6 Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info: [eloquence snipped] Air travel may be frustrating, but the airlines still have a lot of good service-oriented people working for them who try and make the experience as painless as possible. That's just _so_ true. Most of my travels are to and fro London Heathrow, where the ground crew has, occasionally, received a lot of pepper. In my experience, however, they are really just trying their best to keep the flow of passengers run through with as little turbulence as possible. I'll never forget the great and professional service I received when going home on the 21. July 2005, 12 hours after the terror attack on the London Tube. Those guy and gals there are really trying to make the best of a sometimes awful job. Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
2010/2/6 John Francis jo...@panix.com: I must admit I've stretched the rules myself - my Pelican 1510 case qualifies as a carry-on on most airlines, and I regularly flew with that and my computer bag. While technically within the rules, it does push them to the extremes. But I'm not really prepared to hand either pieces of equipment over to baggage handlers if I can avoid it. Sometimes it's unavoidable - the 250-600 has to go in the hold - but generally the one bag + one item such as a computer or camera is enough. hehe. You wouldn't believe the hand luggage I got away with to Argentina and back... It fit the volume restrictions, with a squeeze. This is what it contained: 1 K-7 1 K-7 w/grip DA 14mm, DA 21, FA 77, DA* 300, FA* 600, DA* 60-250, DA* 16-50, 14 laptop, 3 additional portable harddrives Sony eBook reader Chargers, cables mouse. A gore-tex jacket. I was damn lucky noone wanted to know the weight of the thing... Jostein -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On 2/6/2010 6:54 AM, William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Tom C Subject: Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I) Example - what if I bring my camera to the local camera store in Regina, SK. I tell them I can't get the histogram to display properly and the camera picks it own focus point. The tall bald man with the mustache behind the counter brings out the manual and shows it to me saying See it's your fault, you sniveling low-life excuse for a tapeworm. Next time read the manual and go crawl back up in the butthole you came from if you can find it. You'd actually be called a f#cking little wanker for that. We are a little more direct with our language on the praries.. Actually, one of the things that keeps counter sales people busy is showing customers how to use their cameras. For some reason, no one has ever really read their owners manuals. If POWs were requred to read most owners manuals it would be be against the Geneva Convention, and those aren't even the ones translated into English from the Japanese by Chinese who' s only western language is German. William Robb -- {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier New;}} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the interface subtly weird.\par } -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 4:54 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: Example - what if I bring my camera to the local camera store in Regina, SK. I tell them I can't get the histogram to display properly and the camera picks it own focus point. The tall bald man with the mustache behind the counter brings out the manual and shows it to me saying See it's your fault, you sniveling low-life excuse for a tapeworm. Next time read the manual and go crawl back up in the butthole you came from if you can find it. You'd actually be called a f#cking little wanker for that. We are a little more direct with our language on the praries.. Thank you. Kind sir. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
A point that Tom also conveniently ignores, when assigning blame, is that THE AIRLINE has to sell a product people will buy. As the great American public has consistently demonstrated, they will buy the product at the cheapest price point, no matter what other drawbacks there are. That means that THE AIRLINE will do everything it can to keep the base price down, even if this means add-on fees for checked baggage. That same spirit of cheapness is why people will try and bring on too many (or too large) carry-on items - they aren't prepared to pay an extra $10 for comfort, and so they make everybody else suffer. But I would certainly hate to be the agent that had to tell the worst abusers that they couldn't take *that* on board. I have to disagree with that analysis, in part. Of course people want things at the cheapest price point, but they also realize that prices do go up. What people don't want to do is pay an EXTRA fee for something that for the last 60 years appeared to be FREE. The smart thing for the airlines to have done is to increase ticket prices by $10/$20 for every single passenger, a hidden luggage fee. Prices go up from time-to-time anyway. Everyone would be paying for checked luggage, whether they checked it or not, and most people would not even notice unless it pushed the price upward of an even $100 or $200. On higher priced tickets it would go virtually unnoticed. The airlines would have come out ahead, they would not have to handle the additional burden of an additional transaction, credit card processing, software changes, every single thing with regard to luggage would have stayed the same. Many people would still check their luggage, and overhead bins would be less crowded. Tom -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: [SPAM] Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Feb 6, 2010, at 3:54 AM, William Robb wrote: You'd actually be called a f#cking little wanker for that. The planned parenthood poster child. We are a little more direct with our language on the praries.. Actually, one of the things that keeps counter sales people busy is showing customers how to use their cameras. For some reason, no one has ever really read their owners manuals. I don't know about other brands of cameras, but the Pentax owners manuals are absolute shite. I've read mine, multiple times, and the only documentation I've found less useful is that from Apple. The manuals seem to be aimed at second graders that barely know which end of a camera to look through, and barely cover when the features might be useful, without saying a word about what they actually do. They might be OK for someone that doesn't know their aperture from a hole in the ground who is happy dropping a kilobuck on a large, heavy point and shoot, but woe betides the person who is actually trying to learn to use a camera from the user manual. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: [SPAM] Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Mark! Lary Colen wrote: They might be OK for someone that doesn't know their aperture from a hole in the ground... I have to say in a childish way, this is doubly funny. Tom On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: On Feb 6, 2010, at 3:54 AM, William Robb wrote: You'd actually be called a f#cking little wanker for that. The planned parenthood poster child. We are a little more direct with our language on the praries.. Actually, one of the things that keeps counter sales people busy is showing customers how to use their cameras. For some reason, no one has ever really read their owners manuals. I don't know about other brands of cameras, but the Pentax owners manuals are absolute shite. I've read mine, multiple times, and the only documentation I've found less useful is that from Apple. The manuals seem to be aimed at second graders that barely know which end of a camera to look through, and barely cover when the features might be useful, without saying a word about what they actually do. They might be OK for someone that doesn't know their aperture from a hole in the ground who is happy dropping a kilobuck on a large, heavy point and shoot, but woe betides the person who is actually trying to learn to use a camera from the user manual. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:03:49PM -0700, Tom C wrote: I have to disagree with that analysis, in part. Of course people want things at the cheapest price point, but they also realize that prices do go up. What people don't want to do is pay an EXTRA fee for something that for the last 60 years appeared to be FREE. The smart thing for the airlines to have done is to increase ticket prices by $10/$20 for every single passenger, a hidden luggage fee. Prices go up from time-to-time anyway. Unfortunately that aproach doesn't work of routes with more than one choice of airline. Easy consumer access to sites such as Travelocity or Expedia lets potential customers see the price for each carrier. As soon as one airline finds a way to lower the base price for a route by any means (usually by dropping some basic amenity), the other airlines all seem to respond with lower prices in a very short time - something they would not need to do if customers were prepared to pay extra for the amenity in question. But the single biggest factor that seems to determine how well an airline does in selling seats is the price it charges for each seat - price trumps everything else. This all gets complicated by the variable pricing strategy used to sell airline tickets - the airline's goal is to fill all the seats at the highest price for each seat, so the price will go up as the plane gets fuller, and down if there are too many empty seats left. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
I've long thought that if airlines simply sold seats based upon what it REALLY cost them to fly, instead of giving $100 flights cross-country and charging somestimes an additional $300/$400 to fly the last 150 mile leg of a trip, they'd be better off. On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:51 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:03:49PM -0700, Tom C wrote: I have to disagree with that analysis, in part. Of course people want things at the cheapest price point, but they also realize that prices do go up. What people don't want to do is pay an EXTRA fee for something that for the last 60 years appeared to be FREE. The smart thing for the airlines to have done is to increase ticket prices by $10/$20 for every single passenger, a hidden luggage fee. Prices go up from time-to-time anyway. Unfortunately that aproach doesn't work of routes with more than one choice of airline. Easy consumer access to sites such as Travelocity or Expedia lets potential customers see the price for each carrier. As soon as one airline finds a way to lower the base price for a route by any means (usually by dropping some basic amenity), the other airlines all seem to respond with lower prices in a very short time - something they would not need to do if customers were prepared to pay extra for the amenity in question. But the single biggest factor that seems to determine how well an airline does in selling seats is the price it charges for each seat - price trumps everything else. This all gets complicated by the variable pricing strategy used to sell airline tickets - the airline's goal is to fill all the seats at the highest price for each seat, so the price will go up as the plane gets fuller, and down if there are too many empty seats left. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:59:43PM -0700, Tom C wrote: I've long thought that if airlines simply sold seats based upon what it REALLY cost them to fly, instead of giving $100 flights cross-country and charging somestimes an additional $300/$400 to fly the last 150 mile leg of a trip, they'd be better off. Actually, to a large extent, they are. That $300/$400 is close to the true cost of providing service to the feeder airport - often on a regional jet or some other configuration with few high-priced (business/first-class) seats. All the overhead has to be covered by a small number of daily flights. The $100 cross-country seat is an attempt to fill excess capacity on a route which already has far more daily customers paying the regular price (not to mention the airline target demographic - the business and first class customers), flying between airports which amortise the overhead over a larger route network. The regular price for that seat could well be $400, but it's cheaper to sell 10% of the seats at $100 than it is to fly with empty seats. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
After ploughing through this thread I'm drawn to one recurring reference, which is to unprofitable customers. Forgive me for asking, but doesn't the store and not the customer decide what deals will be offered for sale? In that context, then it's the store's responsibility/fault if they offer a deal that doesn't turn a profit. Also in that context, it's totally out of line for the store to turn around and blame the customer for those losses, the deals didn't have to be offered in the first place. Now, we all know about loss leaders, don't we? The store offers a doorbuster price usually at a loss, but hopes to turn it into a profit by upsizing the customer before they reach the checkout. Then, is a customer who hops from one store to another and buys only the loss leader but never the upsize a bad customer? No answer is needed for two reasons. One is that the store offered the deal, it's as simple as that. The second is that there's no workable way to filter out or discriminate against a customer because of how many items you ~think~ they'll put in their cart. If the business model for loss-leaders isn't working for a store, then they need to remedy it, not demonize customers who accept the offers. In essence - an unprofitable transaction is the result of the business practice that led up to it, not the customer who entered into it. Finally, a question for Henry Posner. If you could replay this event that has caused so much grief, would you once again stand by your legal/moral position for the sake of $250, or would you let it slide, let the customer have the benefit-of-the-doubt (even though you believe he is wrong), and circumvent the ill-will and misunderstanding that it has spawned? What does advertising cost these days, anyway? More than $250? (Rhetorical questions). regards, Anthony Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight (Anon) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On Feb 5, 2010, at 4:30 AM, Anthony Farr wrote: After ploughing through this thread I'm drawn to one recurring reference, which is to unprofitable customers. Forgive me for asking, but doesn't the store and not the customer decide what deals will be offered for sale? In that context, then it's the store's responsibility/fault if they offer a deal that doesn't turn a profit. Also in that context, it's totally out of line for the store to turn around and blame the customer for those losses, the deals didn't have to be offered in the first place. Now, we all know about loss leaders, don't we? The store offers a doorbuster price usually at a loss, but hopes to turn it into a profit by upsizing the customer before they reach the checkout. Then, is a customer who hops from one store to another and buys only the loss leader but never the upsize a bad customer? No answer is needed for two reasons. One is that the store offered the deal, it's as simple as that. The second is that there's no workable way to filter out or discriminate against a customer because of how many items you ~think~ they'll put in their cart. If the business model for loss-leaders isn't working for a store, then they need to remedy it, not demonize customers who accept the offers. In essence - an unprofitable transaction is the result of the business practice that led up to it, not the customer who entered into it. Finally, a question for Henry Posner. If you could replay this event that has caused so much grief, would you once again stand by your legal/moral position for the sake of $250, or would you let it slide, let the customer have the benefit-of-the-doubt (even though you believe he is wrong), and circumvent the ill-will and misunderstanding that it has spawned? I'm not Henry and certainly can't speak for BH. But after many years of dealing with them, I would guess the answer would be a firm no. They'll stick by their decision. And that's what I like about them. They have specific policies that are set forth in writing, and you can depend on them following them. I've never known them to deviate from the course that they've set. Most often, that works to the consumer's advantage. I also doubt that this event has caused so much grief in the overall scheme of things. Hand wringing and name calling here? Sure, but that's meaningless. Perhaps another tempestuous discussion or two on photo lists? Certainly not a big deal given the scope of BH's business. I think we should feel honored that Henry felt we deserved a reply. I'm only sorry that he was not treated with the respect to which any human being is entitled. Paul What does advertising cost these days, anyway? More than $250? (Rhetorical questions). regards, Anthony Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight (Anon) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On 2010-02-05 4:30, Anthony Farr wrote: After ploughing through this thread I'm drawn to one recurring reference, which is to unprofitable customers. Forgive me for asking, but doesn't the store and not the customer decide what deals will be offered for sale? First, you're right. Second, I'm not coming at it from the retail side, where my only experience is working in high school as a stock boy for a pharmacy. I'm coming at it from the environment of companies, especially start ups, producing computer hardware systems, software systems, and services. I've seen way too many cases of closing a big contract just to get the cash flow. Then the costs of supporting that customer or contract go far out of balance with the income, or even cash flow, resulting from the sale. This happens for a variety of reasons. Sometimes, though, it's due to an unreasonable customer. Some customers in that environment end up being so expensive to keep that you could never get them to agree to a contract that would allow the deal to be profitable for the seller. However, you're right that the burden is on the seller. -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: paul stenquist Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I I'm not Henry and certainly can't speak for BH. But after many years of dealing with them, I would guess the answer would be a firm no. They'll stick by their decision. And that's what I like about them. They have specific policies that are set forth in writing, and you can depend on them following them. I've never known them to deviate from the course that they've set. Most often, that works to the consumer's advantage. Except when they decide that they don't like the price they offered and cancel the sale after they have accepted payment for it. I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. For myself, wouldn't tolerate it from a retail store, and I wouldn't tolerate it from an online store as well. I haven't been a big BH customer, I've probably only spent perhaps 20K with them over the years, but after this, I'm done with them as a customer. They crossed the line from being trustworthy to being untrustworthy in my mind. Now I suppose because I took up the cause in my usual fun loving manner, Henry will breath a sigh of relief because I am an outspoken person and therefore potentially one of the problem customers he doesn't want, but I suspect I am not in the bottom 10% of dollars spent with them and I have never given them grief, other than what I feel is the well deserved grief I gave Henry for coming here and defending the indefensible. And for all of you who have sent me public and private emails chastising me for sewering this thread, please be assured that unless I am specifically invited to post to it again, I am most likely done with it. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
William Robb wrote: I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. Bill, you're equating a physical store with a virtual store. There seems to be a tacit assumption that online stores can or should work just like physical stores. This is, in and of itself, untrue. They don't. They can't. They shouldn't. Here's how a mis-priced item is handled in a physical store: You sell the product to the customer for the price marked and eat the loss. That's the right thing to do and it's also the law in many places (it was in New York State when I lived there). Then you go back onto the sales floor and correct the price. This isn't viable in an online store because in the time it takes to ring up the sale and walk back to the sales area of the physical store the customer in the virtual store has announced his bargain through Twitter, Facebook, Woot, etc. and the mis-priced product has been ordered by 100 other people. Or 200. Or 800. BH's servers can probably handle several hundred orders a *minute*. Consider an expensive item that's not underpriced by a mere 50% but with a mis-placed decimal point (it's been known to happen) that effectively underprices it by 90%... and is ordered by 1000 or so people before the mistake is discovered. Consider a web site that's been hacked and products re-priced: If the law treated any of these like a physical store, they'd be obliged to sell everything at the marked price until they noticed and fixed each erroneous price (good luck proving it was hackers who did it - or, if you're an aggrieved customer, proving that hackers *didn't* do it when the seller claims that was the case). Mark Cassino's web page was hacked not long ago - they were trying to upload trojans to site visitors but they could just as easily have re-priced everything he sells. Are there any online retailers who *do* guarantee that they'll sell for the price that's advertised in their online store even if it's an error? Find one. I haven't been able to. Look at the places that offer to match competitors' prices (buy.com, for example): They specifically state that they'll only match *correct* prices - they know *none* of their competitors will actually sell at an erroneous price, and they know pricing errors are a realistic possibility so they want to be protected, too. The marking of a price on an item on the shelf of a physical store carries with it a kind of contractual obligation between the store and the customer. The advertised price in a virtual store, on the other hand, is treated as informational like the price in a printed advertisement; subject to change or retraction in the case of errors. Many practices that work in the physical world don't scale to the speed, volume and security threats of the online environment. As far as I can tell there are *no* online retailers who promise to sell for the price advertised on the web site even if it's wrong. This is one of the policies that simply isn't workable in the virtual world. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Well I can state that I will not be purchasing from BH again where I otherwise would have. I have nothing personal against Henry. I don't know him. I agree totally with Stan and Anthony who have reiterated a point I made earlier and then expounded with logical reasoning. In short, this was an issue of choosing profit (or loss of profit) over the customer and their satisfaction. BH would not have suffered huge losses causing irrepairable harm and I believe the Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake is being grossly misapplied and misused, if that's the rationale behind not honoring the contract. In fact I think they would have come out ahead in the long run by eating the cost of the goods, the desired profit margin and the shipping, in effect purchasing customer goodwill, loyalty, and perception. Or if they simply viewed that bargain sale as a loss leader instead of a loss. If BH can't see the logic in this reasoning, or if they set forth a policy and blindly stick to it on every occasion, then they are a stupid and foolish corporate entity, and are likely losing current and future business that far offsets any short term savings on a transactional basis. Even as a single independent IT Consultant I sometimes give away hours of service here and there. Maybe I had trouble figuring something out or possibly I had to ramp up learning a new tool and the job took me longer than I anticipated. Because I realize that in the business world perception is at least 50% of reality, I eat those hours, that profit, in order to ensure my client has a positive view of me and my services. What I lose amounts to a lot more than $250, but what I gain exceeds even that. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:06 AM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: On Feb 5, 2010, at 4:30 AM, Anthony Farr wrote: After ploughing through this thread I'm drawn to one recurring reference, which is to unprofitable customers. Forgive me for asking, but doesn't the store and not the customer decide what deals will be offered for sale? In that context, then it's the store's responsibility/fault if they offer a deal that doesn't turn a profit. Also in that context, it's totally out of line for the store to turn around and blame the customer for those losses, the deals didn't have to be offered in the first place. Now, we all know about loss leaders, don't we? The store offers a doorbuster price usually at a loss, but hopes to turn it into a profit by upsizing the customer before they reach the checkout. Then, is a customer who hops from one store to another and buys only the loss leader but never the upsize a bad customer? No answer is needed for two reasons. One is that the store offered the deal, it's as simple as that. The second is that there's no workable way to filter out or discriminate against a customer because of how many items you ~think~ they'll put in their cart. If the business model for loss-leaders isn't working for a store, then they need to remedy it, not demonize customers who accept the offers. In essence - an unprofitable transaction is the result of the business practice that led up to it, not the customer who entered into it. Finally, a question for Henry Posner. If you could replay this event that has caused so much grief, would you once again stand by your legal/moral position for the sake of $250, or would you let it slide, let the customer have the benefit-of-the-doubt (even though you believe he is wrong), and circumvent the ill-will and misunderstanding that it has spawned? I'm not Henry and certainly can't speak for BH. But after many years of dealing with them, I would guess the answer would be a firm no. They'll stick by their decision. And that's what I like about them. They have specific policies that are set forth in writing, and you can depend on them following them. I've never known them to deviate from the course that they've set. Most often, that works to the consumer's advantage. I also doubt that this event has caused so much grief in the overall scheme of things. Hand wringing and name calling here? Sure, but that's meaningless. Perhaps another tempestuous discussion or two on photo lists? Certainly not a big deal given the scope of BH's business. I think we should feel honored that Henry felt we deserved a reply. I'm only sorry that he was not treated with the respect to which any human being is entitled. Paul What does advertising cost these days, anyway? More than $250? (Rhetorical questions). regards, Anthony Of what use is lens and light to those who lack in mind and sight (Anon) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Please post Bill, please. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:45 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: paul stenquist Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I I'm not Henry and certainly can't speak for BH. But after many years of dealing with them, I would guess the answer would be a firm no. They'll stick by their decision. And that's what I like about them. They have specific policies that are set forth in writing, and you can depend on them following them. I've never known them to deviate from the course that they've set. Most often, that works to the consumer's advantage. Except when they decide that they don't like the price they offered and cancel the sale after they have accepted payment for it. I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. For myself, wouldn't tolerate it from a retail store, and I wouldn't tolerate it from an online store as well. I haven't been a big BH customer, I've probably only spent perhaps 20K with them over the years, but after this, I'm done with them as a customer. They crossed the line from being trustworthy to being untrustworthy in my mind. Now I suppose because I took up the cause in my usual fun loving manner, Henry will breath a sigh of relief because I am an outspoken person and therefore potentially one of the problem customers he doesn't want, but I suspect I am not in the bottom 10% of dollars spent with them and I have never given them grief, other than what I feel is the well deserved grief I gave Henry for coming here and defending the indefensible. And for all of you who have sent me public and private emails chastising me for sewering this thread, please be assured that unless I am specifically invited to post to it again, I am most likely done with it. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Ugh! :-) I agree that the retailer should not suffer *huge* losses because an item was mismarked, especially in the electronic online ordering scenario where word gets around and they are flooded with orders. On the other hand, being aware of this possibility, any large online retailer who does not have software in place to monitor transactions and send out an alert when there's a spike in orders of any given item in a given time period, and automatically suspend sales of that item is foolish. Same goes for selling items at or below cost unless they are specifically flagged to allow it. On an individual transaction basis, Bill's mis-priced milk scenario stands and the online store has exactly the same responsibilities to the customer as a brick and mortar store. The money is the same, why is everything else not the same? Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: William Robb wrote: I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. Bill, you're equating a physical store with a virtual store. There seems to be a tacit assumption that online stores can or should work just like physical stores. This is, in and of itself, untrue. They don't. They can't. They shouldn't. Here's how a mis-priced item is handled in a physical store: You sell the product to the customer for the price marked and eat the loss. That's the right thing to do and it's also the law in many places (it was in New York State when I lived there). Then you go back onto the sales floor and correct the price. This isn't viable in an online store because in the time it takes to ring up the sale and walk back to the sales area of the physical store the customer in the virtual store has announced his bargain through Twitter, Facebook, Woot, etc. and the mis-priced product has been ordered by 100 other people. Or 200. Or 800. BH's servers can probably handle several hundred orders a *minute*. Consider an expensive item that's not underpriced by a mere 50% but with a mis-placed decimal point (it's been known to happen) that effectively underprices it by 90%... and is ordered by 1000 or so people before the mistake is discovered. Consider a web site that's been hacked and products re-priced: If the law treated any of these like a physical store, they'd be obliged to sell everything at the marked price until they noticed and fixed each erroneous price (good luck proving it was hackers who did it - or, if you're an aggrieved customer, proving that hackers *didn't* do it when the seller claims that was the case). Mark Cassino's web page was hacked not long ago - they were trying to upload trojans to site visitors but they could just as easily have re-priced everything he sells. Are there any online retailers who *do* guarantee that they'll sell for the price that's advertised in their online store even if it's an error? Find one. I haven't been able to. Look at the places that offer to match competitors' prices (buy.com, for example): They specifically state that they'll only match *correct* prices - they know *none* of their competitors will actually sell at an erroneous price, and they know pricing errors are a realistic possibility so they want to be protected, too. The marking of a price on an item on the shelf of a physical store carries with it a kind of contractual obligation between the store and the customer. The advertised price in a virtual store, on the other hand, is treated as informational like the price in a printed advertisement; subject to change or retraction in the case of errors. Many practices that work in the physical world don't scale to the speed, volume and security threats of the online environment. As far as I can tell there are *no* online retailers who promise to sell for the price advertised on the web site even if it's wrong. This is one of the policies that simply isn't workable in the virtual world. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
I can guarantee you Bill, that between either one of us alone, and certainly combined, BH has already lost far more profit than they would have by simply honoring the contract on that one transaction. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:45 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: paul stenquist Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I I'm not Henry and certainly can't speak for BH. But after many years of dealing with them, I would guess the answer would be a firm no. They'll stick by their decision. And that's what I like about them. They have specific policies that are set forth in writing, and you can depend on them following them. I've never known them to deviate from the course that they've set. Most often, that works to the consumer's advantage. Except when they decide that they don't like the price they offered and cancel the sale after they have accepted payment for it. I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. For myself, wouldn't tolerate it from a retail store, and I wouldn't tolerate it from an online store as well. I haven't been a big BH customer, I've probably only spent perhaps 20K with them over the years, but after this, I'm done with them as a customer. They crossed the line from being trustworthy to being untrustworthy in my mind. Now I suppose because I took up the cause in my usual fun loving manner, Henry will breath a sigh of relief because I am an outspoken person and therefore potentially one of the problem customers he doesn't want, but I suspect I am not in the bottom 10% of dollars spent with them and I have never given them grief, other than what I feel is the well deserved grief I gave Henry for coming here and defending the indefensible. And for all of you who have sent me public and private emails chastising me for sewering this thread, please be assured that unless I am specifically invited to post to it again, I am most likely done with it. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Anthony Farr farranth...@gmail.com wrote: Also in that context, it's totally out of line for the store to turn around and blame the customer for those losses, the deals didn't have to be offered in the first place. Then, is a customer who hops from one store to another and buys only the loss leader but never the upsize a bad customer? snip If the business model for loss-leaders isn't working for a store, then they need to remedy it, not demonize customers who accept the offers. In essence - an unprofitable transaction is the result of the business practice that led up to it, not the customer who entered into it. Anthony, Your post reminds me of something I've experienced in airports recently. Yesterday evening, I walked past a gate that was getting ready to board (this was Delta Airlines but I've heard this from United as well)... 'We have a very full flight today and would like to make an ontime departure. It's important that travelers board the plane, stow their luggage and belongings, and be seated. We ask that you stow your larger items like roller bags in the overhead bins, leaving the space at your feet for smaller items. If you bring an item on board that is too big to fit in an overhead bin, this will cause additional congestion in the aisle and the bag will need to be carried to the front of the plane and then stowed with the rest of the cargo. The number one reason for late departures is because travelers delay departure by not handling their carryon items properly.' WHAT??? The CUSTOMER is responsible for late departures? Who decided to change their policy and charge an exhorbitant fee to check luggage, so that now 70% of the passengers bring the larger carrier on bags into the passenger compartment? THE AIRLINE. It's they that have caused the congestion and lack of space in the overhead bins, the confusion while travelers wander back and forth searching for a place to put their bag, blocking the aisle no where near their assigned seat, and consequent late departures. THOSE NAUGHTY PESKY CUSTOMERS! So I check my bag and then put my laptop in the overhead bin, so I have room at my feet. What do you think happens? The flight attendant, frantically searches for space in the overheads, sees my laptop, asks whose it is, and then asks me if I would mind stowing it under the seat in front of me. To that I say 'No, I've already checked my large bag underneath (often having to pay to do so). I shouldn't have to pay to check my bag and then ALSO give up the space around my feet. You want me, the person that has paid to check their luggage, now sacrifice my comfort for the sake of customers who chose not to pay. It's the airlines policy of charging for checked luggage that is the problem and that's why there's not enough space'. Anyway when I walked by the gate and heard that announcement, I stopped and told three guys waiting to board that Did you hear that? It's all your fault they're going to be late. They laughed. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Tom C wrote: Ugh! :-) I agree that the retailer should not suffer *huge* losses because an item was mismarked, especially in the electronic online ordering scenario where word gets around and they are flooded with orders. On the other hand, being aware of this possibility, any large online retailer who does not have software in place to monitor transactions and send out an alert when there's a spike in orders of any given item in a given time period, and automatically suspend sales of that item is foolish. Good idea, but I'm not aware of any software that does so. And, by definition, it could only react *after* a spike existed. It would be tricky to implement, too, because most of the time a spike in sales is something you *want* to see. You'd need algorithms to differentiate between good sales spikes and bad ones. (And staff to deal with pissed off customers when the algorithm - eventually - made a mistake.) Same goes for selling items at or below cost unless they are specifically flagged to allow it. I'd guess that's exactly what happened in the case that started all this. The company running the web site has the *price* of the items for sale but it's unlikely that any large retailer would allow their *cost* information out of house. So the discrepancy won't be detected until the web host forwards the order information to the retailer. On an individual transaction basis, Bill's mis-priced milk scenario stands and the online store has exactly the same responsibilities to the customer as a brick and mortar store. The money is the same, why is everything else not the same? The cashier in Bill's mis-priced milk scenario can see if there are 1000 other customers in line with mis-priced milk. The online retailer can't (until it's too late). If the online store is required to sell just one mis-priced item because the loss isn't huge, what do they tell the second person in line? For that matter, how does the second person know they're not being lied to and they really *are* the first person in line? (I think that's what Cambridge Camera Exchange would do!) The answer to pretty much all of the above is that a lot of best practices for the real world simply don't scale to the virtual one. Comparison of one to the other is fundamentally flawed. I looked for online retailers who promised to honor the prices advertised on their site even in the event of a mistake. I couldn't find any. (They're probably out there if you look hard enough, but I'll bet they're small, newbie operations that haven't been bitten yet. Or sellers of v...@gra, pr0n, etc. who have no intention of honoring the promise.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: Mark Roberts Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Good idea, but I'm not aware of any software that does so. And, by definition, it could only react *after* a spike existed. It would be tricky to implement, too, because most of the time a spike in sales is something you *want* to see. You'd need algorithms to differentiate between good sales spikes and bad ones. (And staff to deal with pissed off customers when the algorithm - eventually - made a mistake.) What you'd need is an item tracker to find spikes and a person who's responsibility it is to track back to the website to see if the spike is caused by incorrect pricing. It would mean having someone with the ability to correct pricing errors manning a terminal 24/7, but considering that BH and it's ilk has done a very effective job of killing BM stores by not employing people, perhaps it would only be fair to ask them to hire a few people whose job is to keep them honest. At what point do these places have a right to practice breach of contract? Is it a 2 for 1 price mistake such as what this thread is about? What happens if it is a fifty dollar mistake on a five hundred dollar item? What happens when the price is believable but they decide that it is too low and so arbitraritly decide to raise it, cancelling good faith transactions at the same time? What happens when they arbitrarily cancel back orders because they decide that it is inconvenient to fullfill the order? What happens when a customer chooses BH for the low price, eschewing another retailer who is slightly higher, only to have BH dishonour the contract and then said customer finds that everone has raised their price and he is screwed because he tried to be a smart shopper when in reality if he had been smart, he would have bought from the somewhat higher priced seller whose pricing was correct at the time? All this makes me very glad that I live in an area that has an honest camera store so that I generally don't have to deal with mail order shysters. Tom, that was your invite, I'm done now. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
The thing is, it's not difficult to implement, it's just a matter if doing it. Will it cost money for the online retailer to do it? Yes. Would it potentially save them money if implemented? Likely yes. The online retailers are already reducing overheads and maximizing profits by 1) not usually have a physical location with a store front, 2) having essentially no sales staff, and 3) many times drop-shipping an item straight from a manufacturer to the customer's door, meaning that they didn't even have to maintain an inventory, and did not incur the item cost until it was purchased. Detecting sales spikes is simply a matter of setting threshholds, recording item and time of each sale, and then a batch process running that continually analyzes the data and flips a switch if a probable problem is detected. As you know the NYSE has software that operates on this principle, and guess what? AFAIK, up to the point it kicks in, the trades are valid and legal. I disagree with the notion that there is any inherent difference between putting a physical price tag on an item or display shelf, and entering that same information into a computer screen, except that the computer screen likely shows far more information (item cost, description, units of sale like single or pair) to the person, and should enable one to catch pricing issues more easily than when a low paid, unknowledgable clerk hangs a price tag. As far as where to cut it off in the case of volume sales, that's up to the vendor. One way to handle it, other than the monitoring software, is to have sales of certain items only be finalized after further review and approval, which could take no more than several minutes. It seems what you would do is put the majority of the responsiblity on the customer, and abrogate the responsibility of the retailer, which if done, will simply lead to sloppy(ier) business practices. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Tom C wrote: Ugh! :-) I agree that the retailer should not suffer *huge* losses because an item was mismarked, especially in the electronic online ordering scenario where word gets around and they are flooded with orders. On the other hand, being aware of this possibility, any large online retailer who does not have software in place to monitor transactions and send out an alert when there's a spike in orders of any given item in a given time period, and automatically suspend sales of that item is foolish. Good idea, but I'm not aware of any software that does so. And, by definition, it could only react *after* a spike existed. It would be tricky to implement, too, because most of the time a spike in sales is something you *want* to see. You'd need algorithms to differentiate between good sales spikes and bad ones. (And staff to deal with pissed off customers when the algorithm - eventually - made a mistake.) Same goes for selling items at or below cost unless they are specifically flagged to allow it. I'd guess that's exactly what happened in the case that started all this. The company running the web site has the *price* of the items for sale but it's unlikely that any large retailer would allow their *cost* information out of house. So the discrepancy won't be detected until the web host forwards the order information to the retailer. On an individual transaction basis, Bill's mis-priced milk scenario stands and the online store has exactly the same responsibilities to the customer as a brick and mortar store. The money is the same, why is everything else not the same? The cashier in Bill's mis-priced milk scenario can see if there are 1000 other customers in line with mis-priced milk. The online retailer can't (until it's too late). If the online store is required to sell just one mis-priced item because the loss isn't huge, what do they tell the second person in line? For that matter, how does the second person know they're not being lied to and they really *are* the first person in line? (I think that's what Cambridge Camera Exchange would do!) The answer to pretty much all of the above is that a lot of best practices for the real world simply don't scale to the virtual one. Comparison of one to the other is fundamentally flawed. I looked for online retailers who promised to honor the prices advertised on their site even in the event of a mistake. I couldn't find any. (They're probably out there if you look hard enough, but I'll bet they're small, newbie operations that haven't been bitten yet. Or sellers of v...@gra, pr0n, etc. who have no intention of honoring the promise.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Just tagging onto the thread here. Responding in general, not to Marks specifics. I've been following this for a couple of days and what surprises me is the attitude of aha, I caught you, the rules say you have to do this, so there! Because of long standing experience with BH I'm convinced this was a mistake. But it would not make any difference to me. If I was approached by any vendor that said, we made a mistake, here's how we would like to make up for it. You won't get as good a deal as you thought, but it will be the best we can do or we'll take the mdse back at our expense, refund your money and call it a day. I don't think I could say aha, the law says you have too lose money because there are other people in the past that have done this on purpose. I wouldn't feel right treating anyone that way. I would of course, take this into account in future transactions. Now, on the subject of bad customers. Yes, they do exist. Women, for example, that buy a dress, wear it to a function, and return the dress to the store. A friend's wife, who bought several place settings of fine silver for a party, used it, washed it, and returned it to the store. The handy homeowner who buys a tool, uses it for one job, then takes advantage of the store's no questions asked policy to return the tool. (Ask anyone who's worked in the Sears tool dept.) These people raise the cost of doing business which raises prices for all of us. You guy with the attitude of the store should eat the cost. You do understand that that raises the cost of doing business which only raises the price for everyone else, don't you? From the standpoint of learning about human nature, the most valuable jobs I ever had were the retail jobs I worked while going through school. Stepping down from my soapbox now, gs -- George Sinos www.georgesphotos.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
... also large companies have software that automatically orders and replenishes stock, think of the risk inherent in that. So certainly software of this nature exists. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Tom C wrote: Ugh! :-) I agree that the retailer should not suffer *huge* losses because an item was mismarked, especially in the electronic online ordering scenario where word gets around and they are flooded with orders. On the other hand, being aware of this possibility, any large online retailer who does not have software in place to monitor transactions and send out an alert when there's a spike in orders of any given item in a given time period, and automatically suspend sales of that item is foolish. Good idea, but I'm not aware of any software that does so. And, by definition, it could only react *after* a spike existed. It would be tricky to implement, too, because most of the time a spike in sales is something you *want* to see. You'd need algorithms to differentiate between good sales spikes and bad ones. (And staff to deal with pissed off customers when the algorithm - eventually - made a mistake.) Same goes for selling items at or below cost unless they are specifically flagged to allow it. I'd guess that's exactly what happened in the case that started all this. The company running the web site has the *price* of the items for sale but it's unlikely that any large retailer would allow their *cost* information out of house. So the discrepancy won't be detected until the web host forwards the order information to the retailer. On an individual transaction basis, Bill's mis-priced milk scenario stands and the online store has exactly the same responsibilities to the customer as a brick and mortar store. The money is the same, why is everything else not the same? The cashier in Bill's mis-priced milk scenario can see if there are 1000 other customers in line with mis-priced milk. The online retailer can't (until it's too late). If the online store is required to sell just one mis-priced item because the loss isn't huge, what do they tell the second person in line? For that matter, how does the second person know they're not being lied to and they really *are* the first person in line? (I think that's what Cambridge Camera Exchange would do!) The answer to pretty much all of the above is that a lot of best practices for the real world simply don't scale to the virtual one. Comparison of one to the other is fundamentally flawed. I looked for online retailers who promised to honor the prices advertised on their site even in the event of a mistake. I couldn't find any. (They're probably out there if you look hard enough, but I'll bet they're small, newbie operations that haven't been bitten yet. Or sellers of v...@gra, pr0n, etc. who have no intention of honoring the promise.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
You guy with the attitude of the store should eat the cost. You do understand that that raises the cost of doing business which only raises the price for everyone else, don't you? Does it? Only if the retailer makes it so. On the other hand, the increased sales because you have a happy customer and now enjoy the benefits of their repeat business can quickly surpass the temporal loss. Then that customer tells his friends, 'You know what happened?', and his friends think next time they want to make a purchase, 'Wow ABC company really treated my friend right. I think I'll check out their website first'. So many many businesses are shortsighted and only see the tangible, when it's often the intangible that is of higher value. Since I'm no longer purchasing from BH, and they will not have the benefit of my $ paying the gross margin, and consequently stock for which they've paid for sits longer in the warehouse, does that raise the price for everyone else? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Those were also my thoughts Bill. The person wouldn't have to find the spikes, simply review the ones reported. I can't say what the transaction volume/min on a given item is... but I can imagine were not talking about something like 50 Pentax K-7's or 10 Nikon D3x's sold per minute. The software could even track inventory data and regularly update a database containing sales volume per item in a time frame, last month, last week, yesterday, last hour, last minute. If at any point, a threshhold is crossed, the software would run the proverbial red flag up the flagpole, temporarily suspend sales of the item, and generate high priority e-mails, pages, or phone calls to the appropriate personnel to alert them. If not excessive, I think most businesses view pricing errors as a cost of doing business and to some degree it's already reflected in the selling price, just like shrinks, returns, damages, etc. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:19 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: What you'd need is an item tracker to find spikes and a person who's responsibility it is to track back to the website to see if the spike is caused by incorrect pricing. It would mean having someone with the ability to correct pricing errors manning a terminal 24/7, but considering that BH and it's ilk has done a very effective job of killing BM stores by not employing people, perhaps it would only be fair to ask them to hire a few people whose job is to keep them honest. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Not the selling price of THE item, but across the board in terms of overall markup. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Those were also my thoughts Bill. The person wouldn't have to find the spikes, simply review the ones reported. I can't say what the transaction volume/min on a given item is... but I can imagine were not talking about something like 50 Pentax K-7's or 10 Nikon D3x's sold per minute. The software could even track inventory data and regularly update a database containing sales volume per item in a time frame, last month, last week, yesterday, last hour, last minute. If at any point, a threshhold is crossed, the software would run the proverbial red flag up the flagpole, temporarily suspend sales of the item, and generate high priority e-mails, pages, or phone calls to the appropriate personnel to alert them. If not excessive, I think most businesses view pricing errors as a cost of doing business and to some degree it's already reflected in the selling price, just like shrinks, returns, damages, etc. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:19 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: What you'd need is an item tracker to find spikes and a person who's responsibility it is to track back to the website to see if the spike is caused by incorrect pricing. It would mean having someone with the ability to correct pricing errors manning a terminal 24/7, but considering that BH and it's ilk has done a very effective job of killing BM stores by not employing people, perhaps it would only be fair to ask them to hire a few people whose job is to keep them honest. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Thanks Mark for putting some sanity back into this thread. Bill wants to argue like this is some 2 dollar item picked off of the store shelf. I think the situation changes with the price of the item and in the virtual store. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: William Robb wrote: I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. Bill, you're equating a physical store with a virtual store. There seems to be a tacit assumption that online stores can or should work just like physical stores. This is, in and of itself, untrue. They don't. They can't. They shouldn't. Here's how a mis-priced item is handled in a physical store: You sell the product to the customer for the price marked and eat the loss. That's the right thing to do and it's also the law in many places (it was in New York State when I lived there). Then you go back onto the sales floor and correct the price. This isn't viable in an online store because in the time it takes to ring up the sale and walk back to the sales area of the physical store the customer in the virtual store has announced his bargain through Twitter, Facebook, Woot, etc. and the mis-priced product has been ordered by 100 other people. Or 200. Or 800. BH's servers can probably handle several hundred orders a *minute*. Consider an expensive item that's not underpriced by a mere 50% but with a mis-placed decimal point (it's been known to happen) that effectively underprices it by 90%... and is ordered by 1000 or so people before the mistake is discovered. Consider a web site that's been hacked and products re-priced: If the law treated any of these like a physical store, they'd be obliged to sell everything at the marked price until they noticed and fixed each erroneous price (good luck proving it was hackers who did it - or, if you're an aggrieved customer, proving that hackers *didn't* do it when the seller claims that was the case). Mark Cassino's web page was hacked not long ago - they were trying to upload trojans to site visitors but they could just as easily have re-priced everything he sells. Are there any online retailers who *do* guarantee that they'll sell for the price that's advertised in their online store even if it's an error? Find one. I haven't been able to. Look at the places that offer to match competitors' prices (buy.com, for example): They specifically state that they'll only match *correct* prices - they know *none* of their competitors will actually sell at an erroneous price, and they know pricing errors are a realistic possibility so they want to be protected, too. The marking of a price on an item on the shelf of a physical store carries with it a kind of contractual obligation between the store and the customer. The advertised price in a virtual store, on the other hand, is treated as informational like the price in a printed advertisement; subject to change or retraction in the case of errors. Many practices that work in the physical world don't scale to the speed, volume and security threats of the online environment. As far as I can tell there are *no* online retailers who promise to sell for the price advertised on the web site even if it's wrong. This is one of the policies that simply isn't workable in the virtual world. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: George Sinos Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I These people raise the cost of doing business which raises prices for all of us. You guy with the attitude of the store should eat the cost. You do understand that that raises the cost of doing business which only raises the price for everyone else, don't you? Dammit Geoge, I hate it when you make a liar out of me. For the past 9 months or so, I have been slinging lumber at my local Home Depot. Here are some actual returns I've dealt with: A cart load of 5/4x6/16' PT deck boards returned. The top layer was new wood, the bottom 40 boards had been pulled off a deck. I presume they replaced old wood with new and successfully returned the old product. Odd length boards such as 11 foot runs. We sell 8', 10' and 12' Soketimes you get to see where the customer calculated his cut and them marked it wrong. Boards with screws still embedded in them (I hit that with my radial arm saw when cutting it down to cull and I wouldn't be happy). Sheets of plywood that have been cut up and then returned because they did the cuts wrong. If you like, I can post a picture of a sheet of MDF that was broken by a vehicle driving over it. We gave them their money back for it, too. Broken sheets of drywall. A pail of drywall mud that had been opened and partially used. Two end plates from single device electrical boxes that the customer had bought, made a single two gang box with and then returned the unused end plates for a full refund. I bitched and moaned about this sort of thing at a Towne Hall metting once and was told that this sort of thing was a very small % of returns, and that the company's position was that it wasn't worth annoying customers over. We eat the loss, write off the product at full retail and I am sure that the Harvard guys figure out some way to turn it into a financial windfall. The point is, a good retailer takes the point of view that the customer, while not always right, at least deserves the benefit of the doubt, and should not be called out as a liar by the retailer. In the situation that led us to this thread, had BH been as good a retailer as Home Depot is, they would have taken the hit, and not had the bad PR that anyone doing a Google search is going to give them when people find this thread. BH has not only made it plain that they will not stand behind their pricing when they find it inconvenient, they have sicced one of their representatives onto this forum and he, in turn, has cast a few insults at forum members. It's one thing for Bill Robb to insult Henry Posner, Bill Robb is known for this sort of behaviour. It is something else entirely for BH Photo to insult Bill Robb, who has been a good customer of theirs. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
The principle is the same. We were not talking about massive high volume sales where the retailer loses his shirt. We're talking about one transaction of two items to one customer, and it was not a high priced item. I don't see that any sanity was injected into it. What's insane is for a retailer to alienate their customers when by a relatively small gesture, they could make them happy and most probably lock in their repeat business. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Mark for putting some sanity back into this thread. Bill wants to argue like this is some 2 dollar item picked off of the store shelf. I think the situation changes with the price of the item and in the virtual store. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: William Robb wrote: I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. Bill, you're equating a physical store with a virtual store. There seems to be a tacit assumption that online stores can or should work just like physical stores. This is, in and of itself, untrue. They don't. They can't. They shouldn't. Here's how a mis-priced item is handled in a physical store: You sell the product to the customer for the price marked and eat the loss. That's the right thing to do and it's also the law in many places (it was in New York State when I lived there). Then you go back onto the sales floor and correct the price. This isn't viable in an online store because in the time it takes to ring up the sale and walk back to the sales area of the physical store the customer in the virtual store has announced his bargain through Twitter, Facebook, Woot, etc. and the mis-priced product has been ordered by 100 other people. Or 200. Or 800. BH's servers can probably handle several hundred orders a *minute*. Consider an expensive item that's not underpriced by a mere 50% but with a mis-placed decimal point (it's been known to happen) that effectively underprices it by 90%... and is ordered by 1000 or so people before the mistake is discovered. Consider a web site that's been hacked and products re-priced: If the law treated any of these like a physical store, they'd be obliged to sell everything at the marked price until they noticed and fixed each erroneous price (good luck proving it was hackers who did it - or, if you're an aggrieved customer, proving that hackers *didn't* do it when the seller claims that was the case). Mark Cassino's web page was hacked not long ago - they were trying to upload trojans to site visitors but they could just as easily have re-priced everything he sells. Are there any online retailers who *do* guarantee that they'll sell for the price that's advertised in their online store even if it's an error? Find one. I haven't been able to. Look at the places that offer to match competitors' prices (buy.com, for example): They specifically state that they'll only match *correct* prices - they know *none* of their competitors will actually sell at an erroneous price, and they know pricing errors are a realistic possibility so they want to be protected, too. The marking of a price on an item on the shelf of a physical store carries with it a kind of contractual obligation between the store and the customer. The advertised price in a virtual store, on the other hand, is treated as informational like the price in a printed advertisement; subject to change or retraction in the case of errors. Many practices that work in the physical world don't scale to the speed, volume and security threats of the online environment. As far as I can tell there are *no* online retailers who promise to sell for the price advertised on the web site even if it's wrong. This is one of the policies that simply isn't workable in the virtual world. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Thanks Mark for putting some sanity back into this thread. Bill wants to argue like this is some 2 dollar item picked off of the store shelf. I think the situation changes with the price of the item and in the virtual store. The price is not germaine, the principal behind it is what is important. If I can't depend on an online retailer to honour the pricing on his web store shelves (and lets make no mistake, that is what the BH website is), then what incentive do I have to go there rather than to my BM store that may end up having a lower cost if BH decides they don't have to honour the pricing on their virtual shelves. I can go downtown and get an honest transaction, or I can go to BHPhotoVideo.com and run the risk of them being dishonest with me. Mark mentioned Cambridge Camera as an example of who not to shop with. Is BH really any different? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Bill, After your story, Lynn will have to sell her Home Depot stock... Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:57 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: George Sinos Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I These people raise the cost of doing business which raises prices for all of us. You guy with the attitude of the store should eat the cost. You do understand that that raises the cost of doing business which only raises the price for everyone else, don't you? Dammit Geoge, I hate it when you make a liar out of me. For the past 9 months or so, I have been slinging lumber at my local Home Depot. Here are some actual returns I've dealt with: A cart load of 5/4x6/16' PT deck boards returned. The top layer was new wood, the bottom 40 boards had been pulled off a deck. I presume they replaced old wood with new and successfully returned the old product. Odd length boards such as 11 foot runs. We sell 8', 10' and 12' Soketimes you get to see where the customer calculated his cut and them marked it wrong. Boards with screws still embedded in them (I hit that with my radial arm saw when cutting it down to cull and I wouldn't be happy). Sheets of plywood that have been cut up and then returned because they did the cuts wrong. If you like, I can post a picture of a sheet of MDF that was broken by a vehicle driving over it. We gave them their money back for it, too. Broken sheets of drywall. A pail of drywall mud that had been opened and partially used. Two end plates from single device electrical boxes that the customer had bought, made a single two gang box with and then returned the unused end plates for a full refund. I bitched and moaned about this sort of thing at a Towne Hall metting once and was told that this sort of thing was a very small % of returns, and that the company's position was that it wasn't worth annoying customers over. We eat the loss, write off the product at full retail and I am sure that the Harvard guys figure out some way to turn it into a financial windfall. The point is, a good retailer takes the point of view that the customer, while not always right, at least deserves the benefit of the doubt, and should not be called out as a liar by the retailer. In the situation that led us to this thread, had BH been as good a retailer as Home Depot is, they would have taken the hit, and not had the bad PR that anyone doing a Google search is going to give them when people find this thread. BH has not only made it plain that they will not stand behind their pricing when they find it inconvenient, they have sicced one of their representatives onto this forum and he, in turn, has cast a few insults at forum members. It's one thing for Bill Robb to insult Henry Posner, Bill Robb is known for this sort of behaviour. It is something else entirely for BH Photo to insult Bill Robb, who has been a good customer of theirs. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
It's one thing for Bill Robb to insult Henry Posner, Bill Robb is known for this sort of behaviour. It is something else entirely for BH Photo to insult Bill Robb, who has been a good customer of theirs. William Robb MARK! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Bob, I'm a virtual store and will gladly accept your virtual money, in any amount, denomination or currency. HAND IT OVER! :-) Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Mark for putting some sanity back into this thread. Bill wants to argue like this is some 2 dollar item picked off of the store shelf. I think the situation changes with the price of the item and in the virtual store. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: William Robb wrote: I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. Bill, you're equating a physical store with a virtual store. There seems to be a tacit assumption that online stores can or should work just like physical stores. This is, in and of itself, untrue. They don't. They can't. They shouldn't. Here's how a mis-priced item is handled in a physical store: You sell the product to the customer for the price marked and eat the loss. That's the right thing to do and it's also the law in many places (it was in New York State when I lived there). Then you go back onto the sales floor and correct the price. This isn't viable in an online store because in the time it takes to ring up the sale and walk back to the sales area of the physical store the customer in the virtual store has announced his bargain through Twitter, Facebook, Woot, etc. and the mis-priced product has been ordered by 100 other people. Or 200. Or 800. BH's servers can probably handle several hundred orders a *minute*. Consider an expensive item that's not underpriced by a mere 50% but with a mis-placed decimal point (it's been known to happen) that effectively underprices it by 90%... and is ordered by 1000 or so people before the mistake is discovered. Consider a web site that's been hacked and products re-priced: If the law treated any of these like a physical store, they'd be obliged to sell everything at the marked price until they noticed and fixed each erroneous price (good luck proving it was hackers who did it - or, if you're an aggrieved customer, proving that hackers *didn't* do it when the seller claims that was the case). Mark Cassino's web page was hacked not long ago - they were trying to upload trojans to site visitors but they could just as easily have re-priced everything he sells. Are there any online retailers who *do* guarantee that they'll sell for the price that's advertised in their online store even if it's an error? Find one. I haven't been able to. Look at the places that offer to match competitors' prices (buy.com, for example): They specifically state that they'll only match *correct* prices - they know *none* of their competitors will actually sell at an erroneous price, and they know pricing errors are a realistic possibility so they want to be protected, too. The marking of a price on an item on the shelf of a physical store carries with it a kind of contractual obligation between the store and the customer. The advertised price in a virtual store, on the other hand, is treated as informational like the price in a printed advertisement; subject to change or retraction in the case of errors. Many practices that work in the physical world don't scale to the speed, volume and security threats of the online environment. As far as I can tell there are *no* online retailers who promise to sell for the price advertised on the web site even if it's wrong. This is one of the policies that simply isn't workable in the virtual world. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
No - please don't. It should be obvious to all, by now, that you and Bill stand on one side of the issue, and a much larger number stand on the other side. Nobody is going to change anyones opinion, so this topic should be dropped - its just religion/politics now, not a sensible discourse. On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:11:08AM -0500, Tom C wrote: Please post Bill, please. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:45 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: paul stenquist Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I I'm not Henry and certainly can't speak for BH. But after many years of dealing with them, I would guess the answer would be a firm no. They'll stick by their decision. And that's what I like about them. They have specific policies that are set forth in writing, and you can depend on them following them. I've never known them to deviate from the course that they've set. Most often, that works to the consumer's advantage. Except when they decide that they don't like the price they offered and cancel the sale after they have accepted payment for it. I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. For myself, ?wouldn't tolerate it from a retail store, and I wouldn't tolerate it from an online store as well. I haven't been a big BH customer, I've probably only spent perhaps 20K with them over the years, but after this, I'm done with them as a customer. They crossed the line from being trustworthy to being untrustworthy in my mind. Now I suppose because I took up the cause in my usual fun loving manner, Henry will breath a sigh of relief because I am an outspoken person and therefore potentially one of the problem customers he doesn't want, but I suspect I am not in the bottom 10% of dollars spent with them and I have never given them grief, other than what I feel is the well deserved grief I gave Henry for coming here and defending the indefensible. And for all of you who have sent me public and private emails chastising me for sewering this thread, please be assured that unless I am specifically invited to post to it again, I am most likely done with it. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:23 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: On Feb 5, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Tom C wrote: It's one thing for Bill Robb to insult Henry Posner, Bill Robb is known for this sort of behaviour. It is something else entirely for BH Photo to insult Bill Robb, who has been a good customer of theirs. William Robb MARK! Mark knows better, believe me. Great now we don't have an unbiased collector of MARKS! This deserves a review panel. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On Feb 5, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Tom C wrote: It's one thing for Bill Robb to insult Henry Posner, Bill Robb is known for this sort of behaviour. It is something else entirely for BH Photo to insult Bill Robb, who has been a good customer of theirs. William Robb MARK! Mark knows better, believe me. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Tom C wrote: I can guarantee you Bill, that between either one of us alone, and certainly combined, BH has already lost far more profit than they would have by simply honoring the contract on that one transaction. Tom C. Oh, good. Sou you can retire to your corner with a smug feeling of having made those reprobates at BH pay for their misconduct. Now can the rest of us get on with our lives? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Hi Bill - I agree, as long as this remains a small percentage of customers, it can be handled. I was just trying to point out there there are problems on both sides of the cash register. As long as both parties treat each other with the benefit of the doubt, we're all better off for it. My daughter worked at the Home Depot for about a year and told me similar stories. I've worked at Camera and Stereo/Audio stores and could also tell tales that would make you cringe. I don't know how people can live with themselves when they do that kind of stuff. It's clearly dishonest. I'm lucky to have a great retail camera store, Rockbrook Camera, http://www.rockbrookcamera.com/ right here in town. This place is family owned, and in an era where camera stores are closing, they are growing. They recently expanded by opening another store. You can read about them here if your curious. http://www.photoreporter.com/article.asp?issueID=128num=15vol=17articleType=tsarticleID=3123 That being said, there are times when I need some oddball item faster than they can order it and I've usually turned to BH. I especially like the shipping discount offered to NAPP members. I feel like I've been treated fairly by both companies. Fair disclosure - For the most part I'm just a Rockbrook customer, but after doing business with them for decades, I teach a Saturday morning class for them about three times a year. George Sinos gsi...@gmail.com www.georgesphotos.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Bill, After your story, Lynn will have to sell her Home Depot stock... Consider, Home Depot is doing very well, Lowes OTOH.. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: John Francis Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I No - please don't. Mafud once said: Bill Robb will be the one to put the Muslim in his place. Now it's Henry's turn. HAR!! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Bill, Price is really important here. A one dollar error is fluff to be overlooked. A 10,000 dollar error is something nobody will overlook. You and Tom C. are welcome to continue the rant against BH. Your rant won't save the brick and mortar shops. That train has left the station. It's wonderful that you have a Pentax retaler in Regina. In the Chicago metro with 6-8 million people, we have one retailer left. Central Camera is the only place to go for a hands on look at Pentax. I can wish that this was different, but I know that I won't pay 10-20-30% extra to support a local shop. Whenever I was given the choice, I voted on price. And before you opine on all those wonderful services I lost, let me tell you this. The guys behind the counters didn't know squat about Pentax cameras and lenses. I get more good and useful feedback from this list about new products than I ever got from the bricks and mortar shops. There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:13 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Thanks Mark for putting some sanity back into this thread. Bill wants to argue like this is some 2 dollar item picked off of the store shelf. I think the situation changes with the price of the item and in the virtual store. The price is not germaine, the principal behind it is what is important. If I can't depend on an online retailer to honour the pricing on his web store shelves (and lets make no mistake, that is what the BH website is), then what incentive do I have to go there rather than to my BM store that may end up having a lower cost if BH decides they don't have to honour the pricing on their virtual shelves. I can go downtown and get an honest transaction, or I can go to BHPhotoVideo.com and run the risk of them being dishonest with me. Mark mentioned Cambridge Camera as an example of who not to shop with. Is BH really any different? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Sorry Tom, A guy with a virtual gun stole all my virtual money. ;-) Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Bob, I'm a virtual store and will gladly accept your virtual money, in any amount, denomination or currency. HAND IT OVER! :-) Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Mark for putting some sanity back into this thread. Bill wants to argue like this is some 2 dollar item picked off of the store shelf. I think the situation changes with the price of the item and in the virtual store. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: William Robb wrote: I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. Bill, you're equating a physical store with a virtual store. There seems to be a tacit assumption that online stores can or should work just like physical stores. This is, in and of itself, untrue. They don't. They can't. They shouldn't. Here's how a mis-priced item is handled in a physical store: You sell the product to the customer for the price marked and eat the loss. That's the right thing to do and it's also the law in many places (it was in New York State when I lived there). Then you go back onto the sales floor and correct the price. This isn't viable in an online store because in the time it takes to ring up the sale and walk back to the sales area of the physical store the customer in the virtual store has announced his bargain through Twitter, Facebook, Woot, etc. and the mis-priced product has been ordered by 100 other people. Or 200. Or 800. BH's servers can probably handle several hundred orders a *minute*. Consider an expensive item that's not underpriced by a mere 50% but with a mis-placed decimal point (it's been known to happen) that effectively underprices it by 90%... and is ordered by 1000 or so people before the mistake is discovered. Consider a web site that's been hacked and products re-priced: If the law treated any of these like a physical store, they'd be obliged to sell everything at the marked price until they noticed and fixed each erroneous price (good luck proving it was hackers who did it - or, if you're an aggrieved customer, proving that hackers *didn't* do it when the seller claims that was the case). Mark Cassino's web page was hacked not long ago - they were trying to upload trojans to site visitors but they could just as easily have re-priced everything he sells. Are there any online retailers who *do* guarantee that they'll sell for the price that's advertised in their online store even if it's an error? Find one. I haven't been able to. Look at the places that offer to match competitors' prices (buy.com, for example): They specifically state that they'll only match *correct* prices - they know *none* of their competitors will actually sell at an erroneous price, and they know pricing errors are a realistic possibility so they want to be protected, too. The marking of a price on an item on the shelf of a physical store carries with it a kind of contractual obligation between the store and the customer. The advertised price in a virtual store, on the other hand, is treated as informational like the price in a printed advertisement; subject to change or retraction in the case of errors. Many practices that work in the physical world don't scale to the speed, volume and security threats of the online environment. As far as I can tell there are *no* online retailers who promise to sell for the price advertised on the web site even if it's wrong. This is one of the policies that simply isn't workable in the virtual world. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Exactly! Except I still reserve the right express my views and the rest of the list can excercise their right to read it or not. There's a good 50% of the list I don't read based on topic alone. I think there's probably an equal number who see it the same way as Bill and I, and simply have not felt it necessary to join the discussion. All things considered though, as strongly as we feel about it, it's been relatively low key and even in the hiccups where things escalated, it's at least been entertaining. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Tom C wrote: I can guarantee you Bill, that between either one of us alone, and certainly combined, BH has already lost far more profit than they would have by simply honoring the contract on that one transaction. Tom C. Oh, good. Sou you can retire to your corner with a smug feeling of having made those reprobates at BH pay for their misconduct. Now can the rest of us get on with our lives? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
OH NO, Tom has evoked the 'silent majority'! Next thing I know, you'll be pelting us with tea bags. :-) Is that Ronald Regan I see over your shoulder? Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Exactly! Except I still reserve the right express my views and the rest of the list can excercise their right to read it or not. There's a good 50% of the list I don't read based on topic alone. I think there's probably an equal number who see it the same way as Bill and I, and simply have not felt it necessary to join the discussion. All things considered though, as strongly as we feel about it, it's been relatively low key and even in the hiccups where things escalated, it's at least been entertaining. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Tom C wrote: I can guarantee you Bill, that between either one of us alone, and certainly combined, BH has already lost far more profit than they would have by simply honoring the contract on that one transaction. Tom C. Oh, good. Sou you can retire to your corner with a smug feeling of having made those reprobates at BH pay for their misconduct. Now can the rest of us get on with our lives? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Bob Sullivan wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Brilliant, Bob, brilliant -- der...@iinet.net.au http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Tom here... speaking as Tom... The Tom, Tom t Tom Tom, TO. :-) Yes Bob, there's certainly a cutoff point where unreasonable expectations cannot be assuaged. I would not reasonably expect to purchase a $10,000 camera for $1000 if that was the nature of the pricing error, for example. We were discussing a far lesser amount, and it was combined with the fact that ithe tem had been SOLD, receipt of sale received. Let's turn the scenario around. If I were looking at an item on a website that had terms of 'No cancellations/refunds/returns', managed to click accidentally and put it in my shopping cart, and then completed the purchase (not unreasonable considering that some stores retain your filled shopping cart if you leave w/o purchasing), and then I attempted to cancel the transaction saying I had clicked in error, I would expect to get the heave-ho and be stuck with the item. How is that any different than a retailer making an error by clicking the keys, typing the word PAIR, and then having a transaction come through to completion? I would expect them to follow through with the sale, just as they would expect me to honor my agreement to purchase. Three years back I purchased a DVD Recorder/VCR combo from Circuit City. The website said it was the same price in store. I drove the 30 miles. The item had a price of $100.00 too high on the shelf tag. I got a salesager to help me. No, he didn't think I was right. I had him pull up the website. Sure enough, I was not mistaken. Guess what happened next? He wrote up a sales ticket, except instead of writing $280.00, he wrote $200.00. I thought I'd just wait and watch. He walked me up to pay and handed the sales ticket to the cashier telling her an override would be be needed. Yep it rang up at $380.00. Yep, then 2nd salesager manager comes over, looks at the transaction, and performs the override. Right there I got an item at pretty close to 50% off. Did I feel bad? I had a twinge, but with the recognition that it's likely another customer (or more) walked in and did not receive the promotional price, paying $100 too much. Had the price been correct on the shelf, and had their sales staff been properly trained (or folloed their training), the error in my favor would not have occurred at all. So it was really a matter of cause and effect I guess that might have been the straw that broke Circuit City's back. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Bill, Price is really important here. A one dollar error is fluff to be overlooked. A 10,000 dollar error is something nobody will overlook. You and Tom C. are welcome to continue the rant against BH. Your rant won't save the brick and mortar shops. That train has left the station. It's wonderful that you have a Pentax retaler in Regina. In the Chicago metro with 6-8 million people, we have one retailer left. Central Camera is the only place to go for a hands on look at Pentax. I can wish that this was different, but I know that I won't pay 10-20-30% extra to support a local shop. Whenever I was given the choice, I voted on price. And before you opine on all those wonderful services I lost, let me tell you this. The guys behind the counters didn't know squat about Pentax cameras and lenses. I get more good and useful feedback from this list about new products than I ever got from the bricks and mortar shops. There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:13 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Thanks Mark for putting some sanity back into this thread. Bill wants to argue like this is some 2 dollar item picked off of the store shelf. I think the situation changes with the price of the item and in the virtual store. The price is not germaine, the principal behind it is what is important. If I can't depend on an online retailer to honour the pricing on his web store shelves (and lets make no mistake, that is what the BH website is), then what incentive do I have to go there rather than to my BM store that may end up having a lower cost if BH decides they don't have to honour the pricing on their virtual shelves. I can go downtown and get an honest transaction, or I can go to BHPhotoVideo.com and run the risk of them being dishonest with me. Mark mentioned Cambridge Camera as an example of who not to shop with. Is BH really any different? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Well there's at least two others that spoke up, not counting the original poster, who also questioned the rightness of the policy. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: OH NO, Tom has evoked the 'silent majority'! Next thing I know, you'll be pelting us with tea bags. :-) Is that Ronald Regan I see over your shoulder? Regards, Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Exactly! Except I still reserve the right express my views and the rest of the list can excercise their right to read it or not. There's a good 50% of the list I don't read based on topic alone. I think there's probably an equal number who see it the same way as Bill and I, and simply have not felt it necessary to join the discussion. All things considered though, as strongly as we feel about it, it's been relatively low key and even in the hiccups where things escalated, it's at least been entertaining. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:28 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Tom C wrote: I can guarantee you Bill, that between either one of us alone, and certainly combined, BH has already lost far more profit than they would have by simply honoring the contract on that one transaction. Tom C. Oh, good. Sou you can retire to your corner with a smug feeling of having made those reprobates at BH pay for their misconduct. Now can the rest of us get on with our lives? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Yes, an evocative image!... if I may continue... Inside the shop, hard at work is a tall, distinguished, balding gentleman who wears a perpetual smile with a grey mustachio above it. He is known simply as WR by his friends and foes alike. Foes, perish the thought! That is, as the French Canadiens who come from all over to visit would grin and say, impossible' . He works hard at keeping the shop stocked with every kind and brand of photography gear imaginable. The shop is a virtual treasure chest, a cornucopia of all good things photographic, and WR is a true and cherished friend to all. As we enter the shop, walking through the lattice-windowed door, a bell tinkles. WR is on a stepladder installing a 10 meter high flourescent sign in the eastern window, with large red letters running vertically, which reads PENTAX. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote: Bob Sullivan wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Brilliant, Bob, brilliant -- der...@iinet.net.au http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
OK... make it 4 meters. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Thomas Cakalic caka...@gmail.com wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Yes, an evocative image!... if I may continue... Inside the shop, hard at work is a tall, distinguished, balding gentleman who wears a perpetual smile with a grey mustachio above it. He is known simply as WR by his friends and foes alike. Foes, perish the thought! That is, as the French Canadiens who come from all over to visit would grin and say, impossible' . He works hard at keeping the shop stocked with every kind and brand of photography gear imaginable. The shop is a virtual treasure chest, a cornucopia of all good things photographic, and WR is a true and cherished friend to all. As we enter the shop, walking through the lattice-windowed door, a bell tinkles. WR is on a stepladder installing a 10 meter high flourescent sign in the eastern window, with large red letters running vertically, which reads PENTAX. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote: Bob Sullivan wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Brilliant, Bob, brilliant -- der...@iinet.net.au http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
I'm gonna book my flight out there now... Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Thomas Cakalic caka...@gmail.com wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Yes, an evocative image!... if I may continue... Inside the shop, hard at work is a tall, distinguished, balding gentleman who wears a perpetual smile with a grey mustachio above it. He is known simply as WR by his friends and foes alike. Foes, perish the thought! That is, as the French Canadiens who come from all over to visit would grin and say, impossible' . He works hard at keeping the shop stocked with every kind and brand of photography gear imaginable. The shop is a virtual treasure chest, a cornucopia of all good things photographic, and WR is a true and cherished friend to all. As we enter the shop, walking through the lattice-windowed door, a bell tinkles. WR is on a stepladder installing a 10 meter high flourescent sign in the eastern window, with large red letters running vertically, which reads PENTAX. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote: Bob Sullivan wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Brilliant, Bob, brilliant -- der...@iinet.net.au http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Thomas Cakalic wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Yes, an evocative image!... if I may continue... Inside the shop, hard at work is a tall, distinguished, balding gentleman who wears a perpetual smile with a grey mustachio above it. He is known simply as WR by his friends and foes alike. Foes, perish the thought! That is, as the French Canadiens who come from all over to visit would grin and say, impossible' . He works hard at keeping the shop stocked with every kind and brand of photography gear imaginable. The shop is a virtual treasure chest, a cornucopia of all good things photographic, and WR is a true and cherished friend to all. As we enter the shop, walking through the lattice-windowed door, a bell tinkles. WR is on a stepladder installing a 10 meter high flourescent sign in the eastern window, with large red letters running vertically, which reads PENTAX. While the artic gale swirls outside, I browse through the slightly dusty shelves and glass cabinets. One handsome well-worn leather case catches my eye. Inside, a weighty talisman of a long-gone era was nestled. Many brave souls have held this instrument, austere in its design, well-worn in its black leather and titanium. A barely-hidden ring falls naturally into place under my left hand, an aperture control, we used to call it. I laugh at the imitations now. The mirror sticks, but at the last minute, gives way, revealing on the other side of the lens, WR, now unsmiling, brandishing a wee dram. How much?, I tentatively ask. -- der...@iinet.net.au http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Why didn't you tell me you'd been through town. I'd have treated you to a Papa Burger and Root Beer. About the only part you got wrong is that Don's is a 1 story building. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On 6 February 2010 06:35, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Why didn't you tell me you'd been through town. I'd have treated you to a Papa Burger and Root Beer. About the only part you got wrong is that Don's is a 1 story building. But man what a story it is... I have been avoiding this thread because I had no idea who Henry was and why I should give a f%k about a message from him. Seems I did the right thing because I've just wasted half an hour skim reading all the traffic. Jesus you people can talk some shit. I'm off to buy a new dive kit bag. (cheaply, from a BM store for those who care) DS -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Sometimes warm air and sunshine addles the mind... Bob S. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:41 PM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 February 2010 06:35, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Why didn't you tell me you'd been through town. I'd have treated you to a Papa Burger and Root Beer. About the only part you got wrong is that Don's is a 1 story building. But man what a story it is... I have been avoiding this thread because I had no idea who Henry was and why I should give a f%k about a message from him. Seems I did the right thing because I've just wasted half an hour skim reading all the traffic. Jesus you people can talk some shit. I'm off to buy a new dive kit bag. (cheaply, from a BM store for those who care) DS -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
- Original Message - From: Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:48 PM Subject: Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner,Part I) Thomas Cakalic wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, a windswept town on the frozen tundra of Canada, miles from the nearest neighbors. Rising from the plains of 1 story homes and shops is a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. In the early evening darkness I can almost see the faces of the customers, bundled against the cold, as they wind thru the streets toward the brightly lit shop. Yes, an evocative image!... if I may continue... Inside the shop, hard at work is a tall, distinguished, balding gentleman who wears a perpetual smile with a grey mustachio above it. He is known simply as WR by his friends and foes alike. Foes, perish the thought! That is, as the French Canadiens who come from all over to visit would grin and say, impossible' . He works hard at keeping the shop stocked with every kind and brand of photography gear imaginable. The shop is a virtual treasure chest, a cornucopia of all good things photographic, and WR is a true and cherished friend to all. As we enter the shop, walking through the lattice-windowed door, a bell tinkles. WR is on a stepladder installing a 10 meter high flourescent sign in the eastern window, with large red letters running vertically, which reads PENTAX. While the artic gale swirls outside, I browse through the slightly dusty shelves and glass cabinets. One handsome well-worn leather case catches my eye. Inside, a weighty talisman of a long-gone era was nestled. Many brave souls have held this instrument, austere in its design, well-worn in its black leather and titanium. A barely-hidden ring falls naturally into place under my left hand, an aperture control, we used to call it. I laugh at the imitations now. The mirror sticks, but at the last minute, gives way, revealing on the other side of the lens, WR, now unsmiling, brandishing a wee dram. How much?, I tentatively ask. hear play girlish giggle Fun, Derby! Cheers, Christine -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Tom C wrote: I've heard this .. 'The number one reason for late departures is because travelers delay departure by not handling their carryon items properly.' WHAT??? The CUSTOMER is responsible for late departures? Who decided to change their policy and charge an exhorbitant fee to check luggage, so that now 70% of the passengers bring the larger carrier on bags into the passenger compartment? THE AIRLINE. ... I travel frequently, my wife has been logging 1600+ miles per week for over two years now. We have friends who are (former) executives at airlines, friends who are current or former pilots for major airlines, friends who are gate agents. One thing I know from my personal experience and from talking with my friends is that there is no such thing as THE AIRLINE. For that matter, I can't think of any organization with more than one or two persons which is so monolithic that it could be described in such terms. The bean counters at Delta, United, etc. try to figure ways to avoid too great a financial loss. The PR folks establish schedules that seem to ignore the possibility of weather, inadequate staffing of FAA controllers or other disruption, in order to try and fill one more passenger onto the plane. The cabin crew are left with trying to pleasantly cope with a bunch of frustrated people who would rather save a few bucks than check their bags (and who apparently are clueless about size limitations). The flight crew is left with trying to get out and away as fast as possible so they don't get a black mark with a late arrival. The experienced traveler is left to recall when airline travel was better than riding the Greyhound bus, as he sits with his knees in his face, his obese seat mate's blubber spilling across the arm rest, just hoping they get it together soon and get underway so that the torture will soon be over. I did have a couple of pleasant airline experiences recently. In the first I flew into Flint MI, had had a very tight connection in Milwaukee. I made the flight, my luggage didn't. I am going to be in Midland [about 60 miles away] I told the person at the counter in Flint. Not a problem she said. We've delivered bags toTraverse City. [about 190 miles] And I had the luggage the next day. On my next flight in that direction I went through Detroit. Got to the counter for the connecting flight, found that there would be a 20-minute departure delay. Because it was the last flight of the day to Midland, they had people coming in on flights that had suffered weather delays, and they were waiting to try and give them a chance to make the connection. When we did leave, it reminded me of MASH episodes when Radar would yell Bug out! We pushed back from the gate, and then a minute or two later we were in the air. I am still not convinced that the pilot didn't take off from the taxiway to avoid wasting time by going all the way out to the runway. We arrived just about on the scheduled time. Air travel may be frustrating, but the airlines still have a lot of good service-oriented people working for them who try and make the experience as painless as possible. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Tom C wrote: I've heard this .. 'The number one reason for late departures is because travelers delay departure by not handling their carryon items properly.' WHAT??? The CUSTOMER is responsible for late departures? Who decided to change their policy and charge an exhorbitant fee to check luggage, so that now 70% of the passengers bring the larger carrier on bags into the passenger compartment? THE AIRLINE. ... I don't doubt anything you told me Stan. I just thought it very poor form to pass the blame off to the customer for late departures and to essentially tell them it's not our fault, it's yours. Even if that were true, it's in very poor form to treat a customer that way. Example - what if I bring my camera to the local camera store in Regina, SK. I tell them I can't get the histogram to display properly and the camera picks it own focus point. The tall bald man with the mustache behind the counter brings out the manual and shows it to me saying See it's your fault, you sniveling low-life excuse for a tapeworm. Next time read the manual and go crawl back up in the butthole you came from if you can find it. I wouldn't like that in the same way I don't like the gate agent trying to make me feel guilty for their crowded bins and late departure. :-) The experienced traveler is left to recall when airline travel was better than riding the Greyhound bus, as he sits with his knees in his face, his obese seat mate's blubber spilling across the arm rest, just hoping they get it together soon and get underway so that the torture will soon be over. Isn't that the truth! Point taken. I used the word airline euphmestically, probably because the gate agent is the face person for them at that point in time. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: J. Peterman, hire this man (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: There's an image forming in my mind of Regina, ... ... a 2 story retail beacon. It's the Regina Camera shop. Yes, an evocative image!... if I may continue... Inside the shop, hard at work is a tall, distinguished, balding gentleman ... As we enter the shop, walking through the lattice-windowed door, a bell tinkles. WR is on a stepladder installing a 10 meter high flourescent sign in the eastern window, with large red letters running vertically, which reads PENTAX. While the artic gale swirls outside, I browse through the slightly dusty shelves and glass cabinets. hear play girlish giggle Fun, Derby! Cheers, Christine Amazing. You have actually made me contemplate visiting Regina! I'm an Eastern Canadian, so that's not far short of miraculous. Moreover, I live in the South of China because I am utterly convinced that snow and cold are four-letter words. Perhaps Regina in summer? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: airlines (was Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I)
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 08:14:35PM -0600, Stan Halpin wrote: On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Tom C wrote: I've heard this .. 'The number one reason for late departures is because travelers delay departure by not handling their carryon items properly.' WHAT??? The CUSTOMER is responsible for late departures? Who decided to change their policy and charge an exhorbitant fee to check luggage, so that now 70% of the passengers bring the larger carrier on bags into the passenger compartment? THE AIRLINE. ... I travel frequently, my wife has been logging 1600+ miles per week for over two years now. We have friends who are (former) executives at airlines, friends who are current or former pilots for major airlines, friends who are gate agents. One thing I know from my personal experience and from talking with my friends is that there is no such thing as THE AIRLINE. For that matter, I can't think of any organization with more than one or two persons which is so monolithic that it could be described in such terms. The bean counters at Delta, United, etc. try to figure ways to avoid too great a financial loss. The PR folks establish schedules that seem to ignore the possibility of weather, inadequate staffing of FAA controllers or other disruption, in order to try and fill one more passenger onto the plane. The cabin crew are left with trying to pleasantly cope with a bunch of frustrated people who would rather save a few bucks than check their bags (and who apparently are clueless a bout size limitations). The flight crew is left with trying to get out and away as fast as possible so they don't get a black mark with a late arrival. The experienced traveler is left to recall when airline travel was better than riding the Greyhound bus, as he sits with his knees in his face, his obese seat mate's blubber spilling across the arm rest, just hoping they get it together soon and get underway so that the torture will soon be over. A point that Tom also conveniently ignores, when assigning blame, is that THE AIRLINE has to sell a product people will buy. As the great American public has consistently demonstrated, they will buy the product at the cheapest price point, no matter what other drawbacks there are. That means that THE AIRLINE will do everything it can to keep the base price down, even if this means add-on fees for checked baggage. That same spirit of cheapness is why people will try and bring on too many (or too large) carry-on items - they aren't prepared to pay an extra $10 for comfort, and so they make everybody else suffer. But I would certainly hate to be the agent that had to tell the worst abusers that they couldn't take *that* on board. I must admit I've stretched the rules myself - my Pelican 1510 case qualifies as a carry-on on most airlines, and I regularly flew with that and my computer bag. While technically within the rules, it does push them to the extremes. But I'm not really prepared to hand either pieces of equipment over to baggage handlers if I can avoid it. Sometimes it's unavoidable - the 250-600 has to go in the hold - but generally the one bag + one item such as a computer or camera is enough. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
I've said my peice on this matter, and I'd left the thread, but just because I'm silent doesn't mean I've changed my mind. While I think that Bill and Tom are beating a dead horse, it doesn't mean I don't agree with them. Unless BH had thousands of orders based on this mistake I think they would have been better off to honor the contract in hand rather than stand on their disclaimer, weather they believe it will stand up in court or not. On 2/5/2010 12:24 PM, John Francis wrote: No - please don't. It should be obvious to all, by now, that you and Bill stand on one side of the issue, and a much larger number stand on the other side. Nobody is going to change anyones opinion, so this topic should be dropped - its just religion/politics now, not a sensible discourse. On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:11:08AM -0500, Tom C wrote: Please post Bill, please. Tom C. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:45 AM, William Robbwar...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: paul stenquist Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I I'm not Henry and certainly can't speak for BH. But after many years of dealing with them, I would guess the answer would be a firm no. They'll stick by their decision. And that's what I like about them. They have specific policies that are set forth in writing, and you can depend on them following them. I've never known them to deviate from the course that they've set. Most often, that works to the consumer's advantage. Except when they decide that they don't like the price they offered and cancel the sale after they have accepted payment for it. I asked you once, I'll ask you again: If you walked into a store to buy a quart of milk and when you get to the counter you are told the price that is clearly marked on the bottle as pr quart is actually per pint, and therefore you will have to pay double, would you do so happily? If you'd care to, answer me this time. In essence, this is what BH has done, and it is what you, Mark, Godfrey and (most unfortunately) Henry is defending. For myself, ?wouldn't tolerate it from a retail store, and I wouldn't tolerate it from an online store as well. I haven't been a big BH customer, I've probably only spent perhaps 20K with them over the years, but after this, I'm done with them as a customer. They crossed the line from being trustworthy to being untrustworthy in my mind. Now I suppose because I took up the cause in my usual fun loving manner, Henry will breath a sigh of relief because I am an outspoken person and therefore potentially one of the problem customers he doesn't want, but I suspect I am not in the bottom 10% of dollars spent with them and I have never given them grief, other than what I feel is the well deserved grief I gave Henry for coming here and defending the indefensible. And for all of you who have sent me public and private emails chastising me for sewering this thread, please be assured that unless I am specifically invited to post to it again, I am most likely done with it. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier New;}} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the interface subtly weird.\par } -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
If Bill is coming out here, let me know when and I'll crash the party... Christian Tom C wrote: I went to this fantastic seafood place in Annapolis today (Yellow Fin). Nice and good ambience, but great menu, wine list and of course seafood (steaks as well). This is just a stupid off the wall, inebriated idea, but does Delta fly in to Regina? or somewhere near? Because shortly I could possibly trade in miles for a free flight and you could come spend a weekend in Maryland/DC. Just a thought... Your Tom. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:17 PM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Tom C Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I LOL. You guys should all know by now we're different. I'm an analytical IT geek, analyze things to death and blather on in my analysis. Bill speaks his mind and does so strongly because they took his chainsaws away. Paul's a grandfather and has new found joy in his life, liking almost every photograph exhibited. Mark's an intellectual and see's things from both sides, hoping he'll figure where to land. Fun, eh? :-) It's the Tourette's. You owe me a glass of Merlot and a keyboard. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: P. J. Alling Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I I could make a crack about the Harvard School of Business being nearly as destructive to good business as the Harvard School of Government has been to good governance, but I won't. I was thinking that quoting from the Harvard Business School as a means of defending one's shaky business practices might not be wise in light of the present economic climate and what brought us to it, and I was going to refrain, but then, what the Hell. We are being all touchy feely, and how often do I get to agree with Peter. I found that quote of Henry's to be right up there with the We'll just presume we have a can opener theory of economists stranded on a desert island. Hey Henry, do some math if you are able to. If you drop 10% of your customers every year, how many years does it take before you can't get new ones because you've dropped them all? William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Henry, do some math if you are able to. If you drop 10% of your customers every year, how many years does it take before you can't get new ones because you've dropped them all? William Robb How does a retailer drop a customer? Pointblank refuse their order? Do you come and take the goods back if they manage to sneak in under the radar? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: mike wilson Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Hey Henry, do some math if you are able to. If you drop 10% of your customers every year, how many years does it take before you can't get new ones because you've dropped them all? How does a retailer drop a customer? Pointblank refuse their order? Do you come and take the goods back if they manage to sneak in under the radar? I'll leave Henry to explain that as well. The entire concept comes across as drooling idiot stupid, but perhaps Henry could explain why it isn't. Unless Elvis has left the building, that is. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Sounds pretty much like being a teenager to me. And growing older ... since I refuse to actually grow UP. From: Tom C I didn't know about the law, but it seems that the essence of wisdom may be the realization that one is ignorant. In that case, I'm wiser than most. Tom C. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Doug Franklin jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote: On 2010-02-03 22:54, Tom C wrote: Photography sucks. The more experience you have, the worse you become. That's true of pretty much every skilled pursuit. ?There's even a law about it, the name of which I can't recall. ?Maybe Dunning-Kruger Effect. ?The net-net is that people who really know a subject are aware of just how little they know, while the ignorant think they know everything. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On Feb 4, 2010, at 9:26 AM, William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: mike wilson Subject: Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Hey Henry, do some math if you are able to. If you drop 10% of your customers every year, how many years does it take before you can't get new ones because you've dropped them all? How does a retailer drop a customer? Pointblank refuse their order? Do you come and take the goods back if they manage to sneak in under the radar? I'll leave Henry to explain that as well. The entire concept comes across as drooling idiot stupid, but perhaps Henry could explain why it isn't. Unless Elvis has left the building, that is. What Henry said was that it's probably a plus if you lose your bottom 10%. Overall, not every year. And he's probably correct. Paul William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
That's true of pretty much every skilled pursuit. There's even a law about it, the name of which I can't recall. Maybe Dunning-Kruger Effect. The net-net is that people who really know a subject are aware of just how little they know, while the ignorant think they know everything. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning-Kruger_effect -- - regards, Henry Posner Director of Corporate Communications BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
I was thinking that quoting from the Harvard Business School as a means of defending one's shaky business practices might not be wise in light of the present economic climate and what brought us to it, and I was going to refrain, but then, what the Hell. We are being all touchy feely, and how often do I get to agree with Peter. Fine. Let's say I didn't read it in the HBR. Let's say it was on the back of a Rice Chex box. The concept remains as provocative. Criticizing the source (HBR) and ignoring the concept is a typical Straw Man argument, I believe, and obscures the real issue which is -- are there customers too expensive or too troublesome for a company to keep and does a company benefit from purposely dropping unprofitable and difficult customers? -- - regards, Henry Posner Director of Corporate Communications BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Certainly that could be the case. I think the proposed 10% was extremely high. Someone suggested 1/10 of 1%. But how would that be accomplished with an online store? Flag their name, credit card, address, e-mail... Disable their online account? All of which can be gotten around? Do you maintain a 'DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH... LIST'? Is J.C. O'Conell's name on it. ;-) Tom C. On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Henry Posner hen...@bhphoto.com wrote: I was thinking that quoting from the Harvard Business School as a means of defending one's shaky business practices might not be wise in light of the present economic climate and what brought us to it, and I was going to refrain, but then, what the Hell. We are being all touchy feely, and how often do I get to agree with Peter. Fine. Let's say I didn't read it in the HBR. Let's say it was on the back of a Rice Chex box. The concept remains as provocative. Criticizing the source (HBR) and ignoring the concept is a typical Straw Man argument, I believe, and obscures the real issue which is -- are there customers too expensive or too troublesome for a company to keep and does a company benefit from purposely dropping unprofitable and difficult customers? -- - regards, Henry Posner Director of Corporate Communications BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
- Original Message - From: Henry Posner Subject: RE: Message from Henry Posner, Part I Fine. Let's say I didn't read it in the HBR. Let's say it was on the back of a Rice Chex box. The concept remains as provocative. Criticizing the source (HBR) and ignoring the concept is a typical Straw Man argument, I believe, and obscures the real issue which is -- are there customers too expensive or too troublesome for a company to keep and does a company benefit from purposely dropping unprofitable and difficult customers? I suspect a lot of your wisdom comes from the back of a Rice Chex box. However, in this case you have, apparently, decided to drop a customer for being too much trouble after lying to him about your pricing on your website. Deflecting the issue to try to justify your actions is certainly not morally superior to someone dismissing a concept because the source of that concept has proven itself to be wrong with regards to the concept. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
I am merely a researcher, the closest I have come to being in business is when I walk into one to buy something. With that footnote out of the way... I would agree with the premise that some customers are a pain in the neck and in many other mentionable and unmentionable parts of the anatomy. I would agree that a retail company might well be better off if they did not have those customers. Assuming, as you say, that they are both difficult and unprofitable. However, this does not mean that the company is better off getting rid of such customers. The problem is that you are treating the obnoxious rude unprofitable difficult customer as though he/she (most likely he) was an isolate. And as though the world had two static states: a) damn troublemaker customer still here; and b) whew! the idiot is gone! However, the world is a bit more dynamic than that, they probably won't go quietly, rather they will continue with renewed vigor to spew invectives about your service and products. So as you rid yourself of a problem, but lose many potential good customers in the process. And disillusion others of your current customers who had some mental model of you as a peer, as a company with a shared interest in good photography (or audio or whatever) products at a good price, as a company where you sympathize with the customer because you share their love of the passion (photography/easy listening/whatever) which leads them to indulge in with your products. Oops! Now it seems that you are after all a company out to make a profit at whatever moral costs. In short, the process of dropping the troublemakers may be more trouble than it is worth. One of the implicit assumptions of this discussion is the the only raison d' outre for a business is to make as large a profit as possible, no matter what. But since we accord corporations the rights of living breathing citizens (e.g., first amendment rights to buy and sell politicians), I would like to think that in return we might expect good citizenly behavior from corporations. In that idealistic world, I can see a bar or restaurant or audio/video/photo store deciding that difficult customers should be banned to save wear and tear on the nerves of the employees and of other customers. However, the wealthy, steady purchaser would be just as likely to be bounced for bad behavior, and the choice would not relate to the profitable/unprofitable issue at all. And by the way, when will you start stocking the Pentax 645-D and how will it be priced? [There! Back on topic!] stan On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Henry Posner wrote: ... the real issue ... is -- are there customers too expensive or too troublesome for a company to keep and does a company benefit from purposely dropping unprofitable and difficult customers? -- - regards, Henry Posner Director of Corporate Communications BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On 2010-02-04 23:43, Stan Halpin wrote: I would agree with the premise that some customers are a pain in the neck and in many other mentionable and unmentionable parts of the anatomy. I've long been of the opinion that a lot of businesses, especially startups and small businesses, never realize that some customers are just too expensive to keep. The business loses far more on the back end of the transactions than they ever make on the front end. That said, my experience has been that it's generally /far/ less then 10% of the customer base, and the ones that need to go are typically easily identifiable. However, small businesses and startups often feel that they can't afford to lose that cash flow, and sometimes they're right. -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
A cardinal rule in all businesses is that the customer comes first. Granted there could be an exceptional customer that deserves to get the boot or who makes unreasonable demands. In this case, resolving the problem to the customer's satisfaction, in the big scheme of things, was a rather small concession for BH to make considering the volume of business they do, the monetary amount, and the fact that the mistake was theirs. I read a very illuminating article in the Harvard Business Review a few years ago which made a strong case for companies dropping the least profitable 10% of their customer base annually and replacing it with a combination of new customers and increased business (or more profitable business) from existing customers. I don't recall every detail but the article defended the idea that unprofitable customers were a cancer on the business, draining resources and costing, not earning, money and as a side benefit, sending these troublesome, difficult, expensive customers to your competition put more burden on them, benefiting you again. I cannot say I necessarily agree with every detail of this argument, but it does have points worth considering. In the particular instance under discussion, various compromise offers were tendered. None were accepted. Lawyers I know say a compromise is when both parties are equally dissatisfied. This customer declined all compromise efforts. Those here arguing this so vehemently should consider there's more to the tale than they know. -- - regards, Henry Posner Director of Corporate Communications BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Henry, Then, respectfully, please inform us regarding the rest of the story and details we're unaware of. Then we'll also have complete information and can reach a fair conclusion, which you imply we have not. Tom C. In the particular instance under discussion, various compromise offers were tendered. None were accepted. Lawyers I know say a compromise is when both parties are equally dissatisfied. This customer declined all compromise efforts. Those here arguing this so vehemently should consider there's more to the tale than they know. -- - regards, Henry Posner Director of Corporate Communications BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio http://www.bhphotovideo.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
-Original Message- From: Tom C caka...@gmail.com Then, respectfully, please inform us regarding the rest of the story and details we're unaware of. Then we'll also have complete information and can reach a fair conclusion, which you imply we have not. Actually I was emailing replies all along. Unfortunately for me I'd registered here under hen...@bhphotovideo.com and learned only this morning that our back-end people had changed me to hen...@bhphoto.com so every message I'd sent here bounced. Since the topic has died down I don't think tossing gas on dieing embers is particularly fruitful. The product in question was not a Pentax product and the customer in question is, as far as I can tell, not a subscriber to this group. I am reluctant to go too far OT, but briefly we sell a particular speaker for 250.00 each. We inadvertently posted on our site the speaker was selling for 250.00/pair. The customer placed an order which was transmitted to the warehouse where they were unaware of the site error and shipped the customer a speaker. He contacted us and we offered a variety of reasonable compromises including the chance to buy the 2nd speaker for our cost with free shipping. Lawyers I know say a compromise is when both parties are equally dissatisfied. We were unable to reach a compromise with the customer. We regret the error and regret not being able to come to a compromise. Someone speculated about the original review disappearing from the site. The author of the review revised it. That sent it from active to pending status. Once the pending period expired the review returned to visibility. BH had nothing to do wit that. Regarding legalities, our site and our site's disclaimer and our response to this situation have all been vetted by our in-house lawyer. We are confident of the legality. I believe my first post, forwarded by another member of this group, referenced The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. It is germane. On a personal note, one person here posted the following at various times: Posner's whine ...Posner's just the waterboy for them...BH lied about their pricing...So, we now have BH Photo who come off looking like a bunch of lying scumbags...attack dog Posner... I'd like to think it's possible to engage in a reasonable dialogue here and disagree with one another without resorting to venal personal invective and insults. -- - regards, Henry Posner BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
On 3/2/10, Henry Posner, discombobulated, unleashed: I'd like to think it's possible to engage in a reasonable dialogue here and disagree with one another without resorting to venal personal invective and insults. Mark! (we have an annual quotes list published at Christmas or thereabouts and Mark Roberts collates them. I simply bring your sentence to his attention for inclusion. Actually that's a T-shirt as well I'd say...) Interesting input BTW. As a managing director, nice to see someone from a company standing up for what they believe in, instead of switching off at 5pm. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Thank you for the response Henry. I read/skimmed the The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. Here's my thoughts and I preface they are obviously simply my opinions: http://www.lctjournal.washington.edu/vol1/a002groebner.html 1. I couldn't find whether the The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake is simply that, or if it really has any basis in law. Since the article I read came from a law journal, I assume it must at least have been recognized in legal decisions that set precedents. 2. In either case it is very vague and fuzzy and open to much interpretation. 3. As you mentioned, it speaks of When online retailers make honest, good-faith pricing mistakes that result in huge losses to the benefit of opportunistic online shoppers, their mistake could be grounds for rescinding the unfavorable contract under the doctrine of unilateral mistake. 4. I question whether the amount of money involved in this transaction, represented a 'huge loss'. Since I don't have near the annual revenue of BH, and I wouldn't consider it a *huge* loss if I lost $250 personally, I would say it does not represent a huge loss for BH either. I admit I don't know where I'd draw the line, but I know it would not be at $250. Earlier in the document it cites losses in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and millions of dollars that have been incurred by online retailers, because of pricing mistakes in automated systems. I can certainly understand why a retailer would want to prevent those kinds of losses, and doing so is indeed fair to the retailer. 5. The offer to sell the 2nd speaker at cost with free shipping was a move in the right direction. Not knowing what that cost is, it's hard to judge how much of a concession it was. However, I can understand at least, the principle of compromising so that the buyer gets a lower price, and the retailer does not lose their entire item cost. 6. I still think it would have been better, and in the long term interests of both customer loyalty and BH's reputation, to simply honor the original contract as it stood. Thank you again. Tom C. Actually I was emailing replies all along. Unfortunately for me I'd registered here under hen...@bhphotovideo.com and learned only this morning that our back-end people had changed me to hen...@bhphoto.com so every message I'd sent here bounced. Since the topic has died down I don't think tossing gas on dieing embers is particularly fruitful. The product in question was not a Pentax product and the customer in question is, as far as I can tell, not a subscriber to this group. I am reluctant to go too far OT, but briefly we sell a particular speaker for 250.00 each. We inadvertently posted on our site the speaker was selling for 250.00/pair. The customer placed an order which was transmitted to the warehouse where they were unaware of the site error and shipped the customer a speaker. He contacted us and we offered a variety of reasonable compromises including the chance to buy the 2nd speaker for our cost with free shipping. Lawyers I know say a compromise is when both parties are equally dissatisfied. We were unable to reach a compromise with the customer. We regret the error and regret not being able to come to a compromise. Someone speculated about the original review disappearing from the site. The author of the review revised it. That sent it from active to pending status. Once the pending period expired the review returned to visibility. BH had nothing to do wit that. Regarding legalities, our site and our site's disclaimer and our response to this situation have all been vetted by our in-house lawyer. We are confident of the legality. I believe my first post, forwarded by another member of this group, referenced The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. It is germane. On a personal note, one person here posted the following at various times: Posner's whine ...Posner's just the waterboy for them...BH lied about their pricing...So, we now have BH Photo who come off looking like a bunch of lying scumbags...attack dog Posner... I'd like to think it's possible to engage in a reasonable dialogue here and disagree with one another without resorting to venal personal invective and insults. -- - regards, Henry Posner BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Tom, You're like an old dog with a bone. Leave it alone already! Let it die here. Regards, Bob S. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the response Henry. I read/skimmed the The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. Here's my thoughts and I preface they are obviously simply my opinions: http://www.lctjournal.washington.edu/vol1/a002groebner.html 1. I couldn't find whether the The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake is simply that, or if it really has any basis in law. Since the article I read came from a law journal, I assume it must at least have been recognized in legal decisions that set precedents. 2. In either case it is very vague and fuzzy and open to much interpretation. 3. As you mentioned, it speaks of When online retailers make honest, good-faith pricing mistakes that result in huge losses to the benefit of opportunistic online shoppers, their mistake could be grounds for rescinding the unfavorable contract under the doctrine of unilateral mistake. 4. I question whether the amount of money involved in this transaction, represented a 'huge loss'. Since I don't have near the annual revenue of BH, and I wouldn't consider it a *huge* loss if I lost $250 personally, I would say it does not represent a huge loss for BH either. I admit I don't know where I'd draw the line, but I know it would not be at $250. Earlier in the document it cites losses in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and millions of dollars that have been incurred by online retailers, because of pricing mistakes in automated systems. I can certainly understand why a retailer would want to prevent those kinds of losses, and doing so is indeed fair to the retailer. 5. The offer to sell the 2nd speaker at cost with free shipping was a move in the right direction. Not knowing what that cost is, it's hard to judge how much of a concession it was. However, I can understand at least, the principle of compromising so that the buyer gets a lower price, and the retailer does not lose their entire item cost. 6. I still think it would have been better, and in the long term interests of both customer loyalty and BH's reputation, to simply honor the original contract as it stood. Thank you again. Tom C. Actually I was emailing replies all along. Unfortunately for me I'd registered here under hen...@bhphotovideo.com and learned only this morning that our back-end people had changed me to hen...@bhphoto.com so every message I'd sent here bounced. Since the topic has died down I don't think tossing gas on dieing embers is particularly fruitful. The product in question was not a Pentax product and the customer in question is, as far as I can tell, not a subscriber to this group. I am reluctant to go too far OT, but briefly we sell a particular speaker for 250.00 each. We inadvertently posted on our site the speaker was selling for 250.00/pair. The customer placed an order which was transmitted to the warehouse where they were unaware of the site error and shipped the customer a speaker. He contacted us and we offered a variety of reasonable compromises including the chance to buy the 2nd speaker for our cost with free shipping. Lawyers I know say a compromise is when both parties are equally dissatisfied. We were unable to reach a compromise with the customer. We regret the error and regret not being able to come to a compromise. Someone speculated about the original review disappearing from the site. The author of the review revised it. That sent it from active to pending status. Once the pending period expired the review returned to visibility. BH had nothing to do wit that. Regarding legalities, our site and our site's disclaimer and our response to this situation have all been vetted by our in-house lawyer. We are confident of the legality. I believe my first post, forwarded by another member of this group, referenced The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. It is germane. On a personal note, one person here posted the following at various times: Posner's whine ...Posner's just the waterboy for them...BH lied about their pricing...So, we now have BH Photo who come off looking like a bunch of lying scumbags...attack dog Posner... I'd like to think it's possible to engage in a reasonable dialogue here and disagree with one another without resorting to venal personal invective and insults. -- - regards, Henry Posner BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Re: Message from Henry Posner, Part I
Bob, I asked Henry a question which he needn't have responded to, but he did so in a respectful manner. I simply responded back with my further thoughts, also in a respectful manner. His answer led to me having a better understanding of the issue, irregardless of whether I think the solution was best. Tom C. On 2/3/10, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Tom, You're like an old dog with a bone. Leave it alone already! Let it die here. Regards, Bob S. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for the response Henry. I read/skimmed the The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. Here's my thoughts and I preface they are obviously simply my opinions: http://www.lctjournal.washington.edu/vol1/a002groebner.html 1. I couldn't find whether the The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake is simply that, or if it really has any basis in law. Since the article I read came from a law journal, I assume it must at least have been recognized in legal decisions that set precedents. 2. In either case it is very vague and fuzzy and open to much interpretation. 3. As you mentioned, it speaks of When online retailers make honest, good-faith pricing mistakes that result in huge losses to the benefit of opportunistic online shoppers, their mistake could be grounds for rescinding the unfavorable contract under the doctrine of unilateral mistake. 4. I question whether the amount of money involved in this transaction, represented a 'huge loss'. Since I don't have near the annual revenue of BH, and I wouldn't consider it a *huge* loss if I lost $250 personally, I would say it does not represent a huge loss for BH either. I admit I don't know where I'd draw the line, but I know it would not be at $250. Earlier in the document it cites losses in the hundreds of thousands of dollars and millions of dollars that have been incurred by online retailers, because of pricing mistakes in automated systems. I can certainly understand why a retailer would want to prevent those kinds of losses, and doing so is indeed fair to the retailer. 5. The offer to sell the 2nd speaker at cost with free shipping was a move in the right direction. Not knowing what that cost is, it's hard to judge how much of a concession it was. However, I can understand at least, the principle of compromising so that the buyer gets a lower price, and the retailer does not lose their entire item cost. 6. I still think it would have been better, and in the long term interests of both customer loyalty and BH's reputation, to simply honor the original contract as it stood. Thank you again. Tom C. Actually I was emailing replies all along. Unfortunately for me I'd registered here under hen...@bhphotovideo.com and learned only this morning that our back-end people had changed me to hen...@bhphoto.com so every message I'd sent here bounced. Since the topic has died down I don't think tossing gas on dieing embers is particularly fruitful. The product in question was not a Pentax product and the customer in question is, as far as I can tell, not a subscriber to this group. I am reluctant to go too far OT, but briefly we sell a particular speaker for 250.00 each. We inadvertently posted on our site the speaker was selling for 250.00/pair. The customer placed an order which was transmitted to the warehouse where they were unaware of the site error and shipped the customer a speaker. He contacted us and we offered a variety of reasonable compromises including the chance to buy the 2nd speaker for our cost with free shipping. Lawyers I know say a compromise is when both parties are equally dissatisfied. We were unable to reach a compromise with the customer. We regret the error and regret not being able to come to a compromise. Someone speculated about the original review disappearing from the site. The author of the review revised it. That sent it from active to pending status. Once the pending period expired the review returned to visibility. BH had nothing to do wit that. Regarding legalities, our site and our site's disclaimer and our response to this situation have all been vetted by our in-house lawyer. We are confident of the legality. I believe my first post, forwarded by another member of this group, referenced The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. It is germane. On a personal note, one person here posted the following at various times: Posner's whine ...Posner's just the waterboy for them...BH lied about their pricing...So, we now have BH Photo who come off looking like a bunch of lying scumbags...attack dog Posner... I'd like to think it's possible to engage in a reasonable dialogue here and disagree with one another without resorting to venal personal invective and insults. -- - regards, Henry Posner BH Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net