Re: [RCSE] Finishing a glass wing??

2001-07-10 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

I've seen lots unfinished. Don't think it is a structural issue. I have
always sealed the raw edges on my wings mostly for protection from
moisture. Flying contests you may get caught in the rain. It would take
a little while for the water to get into the foam but I like the extra
protection from the elements.

Of course coating those raw edges will add some weight.

Later...

Lee Cox wrote:
 
 I would like to hear some of the pros and cons about
 whether or not the edges of the ailerons / flaps 
 back side of wing should be finished or left as open
 foam.
 It seems to me that if edges are sealed with
 (glass-epoxy or?? )it would structurally be a stronger
 wing and would help to stop any twist. I see a lot of
 wings unfinished.  HELP!!! LEE
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] A Case of reading and understanding.

2001-07-07 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

I, and I think Gordy, was referring to the 60's meaning and not the
plane. I have a Red Herring and really like it. Especially as a small
close in slope plane. It turns on a dime.

...

Dick Barker wrote:
 
 .
 As for 'Red Herrings' I've seen Gordy after a weekend of contesting. He
 looked pretty 'Red' to me and as far as the 'Herring' part, he didn't
 smell too good either.
 ..
 
 I think red Herring is (r) to tgworks.com and has nothing to do
 with the 1960s catch phrase.
 --
 Dick Barker
 Seattle, WA
 - Turning HLG Around -
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Mantis ballast question

2001-06-25 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

You should make up a few lighter ballast slug of the same weight. Say
two 3 oz slugs. When you want more you just add the two lighter ones
both front and back. That adds another 6 oz. If you have another set of
6 oz slugs for front and back that add another 6 oz. So you can add 6,
12, or 18 oz. Max you could add and still stay at the same CG would be
one 10 oz in the center and two 6 oz front and back. That's 22 oz. HOW
MUCH BALLAST DO YOU WANT TO ADD I don't know anybody flying a Mantis
that adds that much to get penetration. Don't think that much is needed.
But then that is here on the East Coast. Winds usually stay under 20 or
so. I think I heard Phil Barnes say he doesn't add more than about 12oz
in most condition.

Marta Zavala wrote:
 
 Have a Mantis ballast question.  It was super windy at the Spring
 Fling in Sacramento this weekend.  After about the second round
 yesterday I was doomed
 as it got so windy I could not make it out far enough to slope the
 tree line. I opted not to fly the second day due to lack of
 penetration. The way the Mantis ballast is set up, three holes, one
 10oz slug over cg, one 10oz slug
 in front of cg and one 6oz slug behind cg,  I dont see how one can use
 more than
 the one 10oz slug over the cg.  Adding the other slugs seems like it
 would take some major rebalancing before flying. Sure could have used
 more than the one 10oz slug yesterday, have any of you used the entire
 balance capability(roughly 24-26 oz??) and if so could you please tell
 me how it worked out- did you have to
 rebalance plane- seems to me you would have to add a bunch of weight
 in tail with fully ballasted plane.  Thanks, Walter
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #2756

2001-06-22 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Slegers originally sold the Prizm, then NSP took over after that. I have
a Spectrum I bought from Slegers many years ago. Had a midair that
trashed one wing and I replaced them with a set of Prizm wings. Flew
well and I still have it. Natural finished obeechi wings much harder to
see than the Victory carbon bottom finish ones I now fly.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 One of my old Northeast Sailplanes catalogs shows 3 Prisms, including a
 Prism Racer slope plane, and the 2V and 2T thermal planes.  It says it
 was originally designed by Ron Vann, and NSP bought the the rights to mfg it.
 
 At 02:14 AM 6/22/01 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Can someone please tell me about a Prism?  Who designed and mfg. the
 kit?
  Has it done well?
 
 TIA,
 
 Christopher, in Omaha
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
 and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Brett Jaffee: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Brett's Slope and Power Home Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~jaffee
 OnTheWay Quake 2 server utility:   http://www.planetquake.com/ontheway
 The Unoffical Extra 300 Home Page: http://members.nbci.com/bjaffee/extra300/
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] rule clarifications

2001-06-17 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

I think you are confusing two different incidents.

One was where the timer had to take over the flight. It was scored a
zero.

The other was where someone lost sight of the plane. I think they
finally did regain sight and continue to fly but a bit disconcerting to
hear the timer counting off the seconds.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Rick,
  Both your questions are answered in 10.2.2b,1. and 2., the contest a
 month
 ago, the guy was robbed if it was counted as a 0.  The time stops 10
 seconds
 after loss of sight.
  If the plane hit the upper small leaves and twigs of a tree, but
 continues
 to fly to the ground or landing circle, the time does not stop.  In
 the case
 of handing the tranny to the timer, time stops then, not 10 seconds
 later.
  I'll throw a little fodder in to this now.  Check rule 10.2.2.e,
 hugely
 violated by almost all of us.  Never even covered in the pilot's
 meeting
 either.  With a few exceptions I'm sure.
 
  Food for thought
  Thermals
  Jerry Miller, CD
  SOSS-Medford, OR
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] rule clarifications

2001-06-17 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Rick,
  Both your questions are answered in 10.2.2b,1. and 2.,
  The time stops 10
 seconds
 after loss of sight.

And then the ten seconds is deducted from the time shown on the watch.
So the time is adjusted to the time the plane was last seen.

  If the plane hit the upper small leaves and twigs of a tree, but
 continues
 to fly to the ground or landing circle, the time does not stop.
 
The AMA rule does state that the time stops if the plane comes into
contact with a ground based object, and specifically includes trees.

  In
 the case
 of handing the tranny to the timer, time stops then, not 10 seconds
 later.

The flight is scored a zero if tranny is handed over to anyone, at
anytime, during a flight.


  I'll throw a little fodder in to this now.  Check rule 10.2.2.e,
 hugely
 violated by almost all of us.  Never even covered in the pilot's
 meeting
 either.  With a few exceptions I'm sure.


The rule of 'no time to be given in the last 10 seconds by the official
timer' has been discussed here before and I'm not sure what the
concensus was.
 I do not like to hear the time in the last few seconds of the flight.
After lining up and starting the final leg I usually concentrate more on
trying to hit the tape than fine tuning to the second the touchdown.
Therefore I tell me timer to quit on the time after I get set up on
final.


 
  Food for thought
  Thermals
  Jerry Miller, CD
  SOSS-Medford, OR
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Mantis - Psy-Antis???

2001-05-26 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

I wouldn't refer to this as a Psy-Antis, as this is Terry's nicer
looking molded version of a Mantis fuse with a slip on nose cone.

 I think of these planes more as a Mantis 'ala Luckenbaugh'.

 I've seen a couple of guys flying these now, Terry's fuse design with
Mantis wings, at the last ESL contest. Terry's fuse design is very nice
compared to the bare bones carbon rod and small nose pod. It's got the
wing pylon molded right in too, rather than having to assemble the pylon
to the carbon rod. There are more of these to come I'm sure, as a number
of flyers have gotten Terry's fuse to use with their Mantis wings and
tails.

 



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What am I currently working on?  A Psy-Antis.  Its a set of Mantis
 wings and
 tail feathers with a Terry Luchanbach fuselage which is similar to the
 mantis
 pod and boom fuse but with a psycho ish nose and cone versus the blob.
  Why
 the scientist?
 Just in the mood to do some building :-)
 
 Gordy
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] thermaling hawks

2001-05-18 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

I do not believe that thermaling birds, including the Redtail Hawk has
a preference of direction to cicle in a thermal. One reason that I think
this is the fact that I have observed what is referred to as 'kettles',
large groups of 50 or more hawks in a thermal, usually during the fall
migration.
 If what you say was true, most if not all, these birds would be cicling
in the same direction. They do not. Many birds, in the same thermal,
will be circling in both directions.

 I do know an 'expert' birder named Scott Weidensal??(spelling) who has
written many books about hawks and migrating birds, and I will
definately try to run this past him.
 Also I will be making a greater effort in the future, when watching
vultures and hawks thermal, to pay very close attention to which
direction they are thermaling.



Daniel Boyer wrote:
 
 No, not all birds obey this rule of thumb all the time, but we are trying
 to look at the big picture, not exception... I am sure the Turkey Vultures
 have a reason for not always turning left...maybe because their wings allow
 them to do right turns in a left turning thermal, but most birds will turn
 counter-clockwise, in the Northern Hemisphere, with the thermal (a quote
 from a handout that was a page copied from a textbook, which was handed out
 during one of the lectures that I sat in on this past semester.)   I'm not
 saying I'm an expert (I'm a molecular biologist), just restating what I was
 told by people that I consider experts... (I do know that all the red tailed
 hawks I have watched, over the past year, always thermal turn to the
 left...JME)
 
 Daniel
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Rubber Duck Range and range check?

2001-04-23 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Gordy, Does it matter why Matt had the problem? He apparently had no
problem with the stock antenna at his field. When using another type
antenna he did have a problem. Weather it was a tuning problem or not
his particular setup did not do as well.

I used a Smiley Rubber Duck antenna with no problems on a Futaba 8UAF.
During some combat a plane hit me and my radio and broke off the adapter
so I went back to the stock antenna.

The problem I had with the Rubber Duck installed is there was no good
way to do a range check. If you removed the antenna at the BNC connector
you had almost no range at all. With the 8UAF there is just a short wire
that connects the plastic adapter to the regular antenna pickup inside
the Tx.

My question is this. Is there a way to do a range check with a Rubber
Duck antenna setup on the 8UAF or other radios? I liked using it. I had
no precieved range problem with the one I had installed on my Tx but I
couldn't ever do a range check! Maybe I'm missing something. Anybody
tell me how they accomplish a range check with a Rubber Duck antenna
setup??


Thanks

Ed Berris wrote:
 I just finished reading it and like Gordy, I am amazed at the way some
 of you have translated what was said.
  
  In a message dated 4/23/01 12:10:33 PM Canada Central
  Standard Time,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 First
  time out for TD, I found a corner of our field in Syossett,
  LI in which I
  lost control of my ship TWICE, and barely recovered to bring
  it on home.

 
   Okay Matt,
 
  Explain why you had the problem?
 
  Gordy
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Glider Terms

2001-04-19 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Robert Bingham wrote:
 What are your definitions
 for:
 thumbs 
 ...put your funny bone on high rates...

Thumbs- as in, use for glider guiding.

Something only to be used in conjunction with at least one, preferably
two other fingers, on the primary(aileron,elevator) stick
At your disgretion, may be used alone on the secondary
stick(flap,rudder)
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] positive postings please!

2001-04-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Paul, et al,

 I don't think that anyone posting to a list should post things not
intended for general comsumption. And eveyone, when posting, should
really try to keep it on a positive note.

Paul Klissner wrote:
 
 Rick Brown and Jill Wiest wrote:
 
  Oh, so sorry Paul. Didn't realize that with all the talk about freedom
  of speech that you were keeping your comments private.
 
 You know damned well if it was meant for RCSE it would
 not have been sent to you alone.   Oh well.  Its your credibility,
 not mine.  If you want to be the Linda Tripp of RCSE, be my guest.
 
 I'd rather be known as someone who complained a bit much,
 than as a hypocrit who could not be trusted.
 
 I won't stop you from forwarding this, or would it not serve
 your ulterior motives?  I mean why would  I intend this to be
 anymore private than the last?   Anyway, anyone who was paying
 any attention knows your true colors now anyway.
 
 I know people who complain, but are honest.  I may not like everything
 about their style, but underneath it all, I know they believe in what
 they are saying, and may even be conveying something of value.
 But more importantly, I can respect their character.
 
 With you, I can appreciatea few of your fine words.
 But beneath it all, I can see that you're a weasel,
 a liar and a traitor.Now if someone were to put values on
 all of these things, what I have done, and you, I'm afraid
 you'd go down in the losers hall of fame.
 
 Personally, I wouldn't forward this, but if you must
 I guess I can't stop you.
 
 -Paul
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] DLG learning curve

2001-04-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Don't know the plane. Couldn't recognize the pilot in a line up. And the
tale of the battery and the fuse is just that.

The point is that saying a plane broke in use is not good info. If you
find out that over time many of a particular design has had structural
failures that means something. An isolated event means nothing.

Many good planes are going to be broken by bad throwing technique in the
coming year. GOOD planes, BAD technique. That's all.

Maybe you should ask the 'father of DLG' how many planes he has broken
learning to throw discus style.

Later...

Robert J wrote:
 
 Okay I give? Who is the pilot?
 You say you were there, saw it happen, know that there
 may have been a 25+ lbs. battery thrown on the fuse,
 could have structural failure due to misplaced
 battery, you know all this but don’t know the name or
 if this is a commercially sold plane? Again it is
 becoming obvious that you are holding back
 information.
 
 --- Rick Brown and Jill Wiest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Robert J wrote:
   what you are saying it is pilot error?\
 
 
  Most broken airplanes are pilot error. I've seen
  many a good javelin
  launch plane break on launch. Design/structural
  problem? Most times it's
  throwing technique. Is it any differnent for DLG? I
  think any plane CAN
  be broken if you try hard enough.
 
   So? Is this a commercial dlg? You seem to be
  avoiding
   the question?
 
  Not sure if this plane had a name yet. You'd have to
  talk to the pilot
  for the plane name and also the history of this
  particular plane.
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] DLG learning curve

2001-04-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

B R wrote:
 
Hey buddy, welcome back to the list. Got the name of that mold maker?
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Good, Bad DGLs

2001-04-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

All,

 Since some interested parties out there don't like the answers I am
giving, can some with a good base of DLG experience chime in.

 I am not interested in DLG's at this time but I guess the question from
those who intend to purchase is...

 Are there any DLG designs to be avoided or that are know to be sub-par?
Any with know structural defects or problems?

Later...

Later
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] just another negative post

2001-04-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

B R wrote:
 
 Fuck the mold maker, how dose it feel to be out of the
 closet as a dumb fuck?
 
 --- Rick Brown and Jill Wiest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  B R wrote:
  
  Hey buddy, welcome back to the list. Got the name of
  that mold maker?
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane
  News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests
  to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[Fwd: Re: [RCSE] Good, Bad DGLs]

2001-04-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

This question was really for posting to the list since I am not the one
wanting answers and opinions to this question.

Anyone else caring to reply, please do so to the list.

I think Craig has a valid point.

Thanks





Rick,

It's really to early to tell. I've busted a 
couple recently but am throwing pretty hard and the designs are still being 
perfected. Unfortunately with stuff this new some customers are going to be part 
of the research team and may break the odd airplane before the gliders are 
optimised.

Craig.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Rick Brown and Jill 
  Wiest 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 9:01 
PM
  Subject: [RCSE] Good, Bad DGLs
  All,Since some interested parties out there don't 
  like the answers I amgiving, can some with a good base of DLG experience 
  chime in.I am not interested in DLG's at this time but I guess 
  the question fromthose who intend to purchase is...Are there 
  any DLG designs to be avoided or that are know to be sub-par?Any with know 
  structural defects or problems?Later...LaterRCSE-List 
  facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and 
  "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] all this chat about chargers???

2001-03-22 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

James V. Bacus wrote:
 
 A wall wart is like my 3rd or 4th line back up.  Had to go check on
 the UL thing, it appears my Japan Radio wall wart is not UL approved.
 8-) (There, Dr K didn't have to say it but I knew what he was saying
 anyway.)
 
 Jim

 Not sure what Japan brand you may have or how old it may be. Just had
to check my wall chargers, Futaba, all had UL stamp.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Mantis Thread

2001-03-01 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Quiet Man wrote:
 
 These are simply MY OPINIONS AND MY IMPRESSIONS.
 YOU should go do whatever the hell you want,
 unless of course you would like your name on a
 T-shirt someday.
 
 John Roe


AHHH. Show me a man with his name on his shirt,   and I'll show you a
man that can't remember his own name... Or, has a need for every one
else to know and remember it.

I think I've had just about enough of this 'Ugly' talk.

Just my opinion.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Mold maker

2001-02-28 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Stanley B. Koch wrote:
 
 What is this mold-maker's address? Thanks...STAN



Sorry Stan, and any other's that may be interested in this info. I am
not the one who knows who this 'mold maker' is that Brian is referring
to in his message below.

I have ask him for the info but he has not passed it along to me. He
did, in one of his most recent posts, offer to give out the guys e-mail
address to anyone on the list who wanted it. The mold maker is to be
from PA. I was interested for a friend and for the fact that I live in
PA also. Apparently the guy does very good work and at a resonable
price.

I requested of him to put it out there but haven't seen anything yet. I
am sending this message to him since I know he unsubscribed from the
list and would not have gotten your request for the info.

You out there Brian. Got that e-mail address.

Later Stan, Brian,

RB

 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rick Brown and Jill Wiest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:16 PM
 To: B R
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [RCSE] Mold maker
 
 You could post any info you have about a mold maker out there on the
 list as I'm sure there would be other's interested in finding a good
 source for molds.
 
 I'm sure other's would appreciate this info.
 
 Thanks,
 RB
 
 B R wrote:
 
  I had a guy build my mold and he also molded several
  fuses for me. I must say I am very happy with the
  price, I didn't have to deal with this or any of the
  molding problems you are having. I can give you his
  Email address if you or anyone on the list needs a
  mold made at a reasonable price. Can't say he has the
  time to do it since he dose a couple of molds that are
  the most popular h/l planes offered on the list today.
  You have to understand his molds are so good that a
  mold can produce a lot of money if you plan on using
  it for production. I had my mold made and fuse's
  laid-up and have the mold, I paid shipping for
  everything of course.
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe"
 and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
 "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Mold maker

2001-02-27 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

You could post any info you have about a mold maker out there on the
list as I'm sure there would be other's interested in finding a good
source for molds.

I'm sure other's would appreciate this info.

Thanks,
RB

B R wrote:
 
 I had a guy build my mold and he also molded several
 fuses for me. I must say I am very happy with the
 price, I didn't have to deal with this or any of the
 molding problems you are having. I can give you his
 Email address if you or anyone on the list needs a
 mold made at a reasonable price. Can't say he has the
 time to do it since he dose a couple of molds that are
 the most popular h/l planes offered on the list today.
 You have to understand his molds are so good that a
 mold can produce a lot of money if you plan on using
 it for production. I had my mold made and fuse's
 laid-up and have the mold, I paid shipping for
 everything of course.
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
 http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Orlando?? Gordy??

2001-02-22 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I just hope he(Gordy) brings his own planes, I don't want to hear him cry about not
 being familiar with the plane. Rich

Come on Rich. Let him cry. You know he cries s gd. NOBODY cries
as good as Gordy.

RB
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Servo damage?

2001-02-22 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

About a year ago I had a problem with some HS-205MG Hitec servos, or so
I thought!

On landing they would seem to find a new center. I would retrim and
center them and the next hard, flap dragging landing would have them out
of whack again. I though something was moving/slipping internally in the
servos.

The problem was actually my fault. I had replaced the stock servo horns
with Futaba brand horns, what I though was the same fit to the splines
on the output shaft of the Hitec servos. It was in fact just slightly
oversized. It held up fine to normal flight loads and seemed fine when
putting pressure on them by hand, but on hard landings where I didn't
get the flaps up quick enough it would jump a position and end up out of
center.

After finding the problem I replaced the horns with stock Hitec horns
and have had no problems since.

Check that the horns are not moving on the spline under extreme shock
loads like when dragging the flaps on landing.

RB



Tom Seitz wrote:
 
 After a fairly hard landing, I noticed that both of my flaps remained
 deflected several degrees when I returned them back to neutral.  I seems
 something internal to the servos has permanently moved the neutral
 location.  The servos seem to work fine, no slop or noise.  Should I
 just subtrim them and not worry, or has some damage been done?  The
 servos are Multiplex mcv2 digitals.
 
 Tom Seitz
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Excitement at aerotow event today

2001-02-18 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Someone once told me that it is not the span of a plane so much as the
viewable width dimension of the wing that makes it able to be seen
easily.

Like the way a plane can become near invisible to the eye as it flys
directly toward or away from you. Still the same span but very hard to
see.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 In a message dated 02/18/2001 7:34:40 PM Central Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Can anyone see a 5.33 meter plane at 3400 feet ?  Mike
 
 I seem to recall that human eyes can resolve one minute of arc, so the 17
 minutes of arc subtended by 5.33 meters at 3400 feet is well within that
 range. Theoretically, you could see a 1 foot disc at that distance, though
 I'd imagine atmospheric effects may diminish that (I'd probably have wished
 I'd reined in my HLG before it got that high :)
 
 Bill Wingstedt
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Patton P-51B flys

2001-01-21 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Thanks to those that posted info on the Patton Aircraft P51B a few weeks
ago.

I had completed it last evening and took it out in some decent
conditions today at Chickies Rock here in Central PA. Nice sunny day,
after a storm yesterday and evening that left behind about 5 to 6 inches
of snow. West wind about 15 - 20.

 The P-51B weighed in at 33 oz for a loading of 12oz/sq.ft.
 I used two HS-85MG servos side by side burried in the fuse using the
supplied torque rods instead of mounting them out in the wing panels.
Same weight as one std. servo. Used 3/16" thick balsa instead of the
coroplast for tails. I have to agree with Steve on the above two items,
gives a nice clean look rather than the rods hangin out in the open.
 One std. servo for the elevator and a Hitec 555 RX with a 4 cell 600AE
battery pack. Needed about 1 3/4oz lead in the nose to balance.
 Cut in a hatch for the Rx to be able to accesss it if I want to change
crystals or remove it without butchering the fuse.
 I set two tubes into the fuse to route the antenna. One down the length
of the fuse side and another back up the underside of the fuse to the
wing. This allowed the antenna to be fed back to the tail and back up
the underside and leave no exposed antenna hanging loose.

 Test flights were a bit less than anticipated. All in all, it flew
well, but the bigger P-51B didn't quite live up to my expectations for
speed. I have a Mini P51 by Patton and it flys very fast. Maybe it has
spoiled me.

Checked the wing to tail and it is very close to zero incidence, maybe
just a 1/2 degree positive. I have the CG just a little behind what is
called out on the plans. Using the throws recommended by Steve after
inquiring where to set them due to no info in the instruct. 3/4" up and
down on the ailerons and 1/2" up and down on elevator.

I expected more speed out of this plane considering the very thin
airfoil and the wing loading. Was I expecting too much?

 Anyone out there that is flying one of these planes care to comment
about it's performance? Any suggestions about wind conditions and
ballasting? How much weight for specified wind speed/lift conditions?
Any comments on control throws? CG?

Thanks for any info,
Later,
RB
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Gyro's for all

2001-01-20 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

If I understand gyros correctly I would like all the flyers to use them,
except me of course.

It should enable a TD plane to fly right through a thermal and due to
the gyro resisting change, give no indication of it at all.

Yes? No? Maybe?



J S. wrote:
 
 I am curious, do you mean in contests? This doesn't seem like it would be
 legal.
 Is there a rule about having a plane equipped with a gyro?
 To me it seems to take all the talent and challenge out of td flying.
 Any comments?
 
 From: B R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Poly angle...Gyro's
 Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 15:28:31 -0800 (PST)
 
 
 Interesting article about Gyro's. Dose anyone use
 Gyro's for there t/d planes? If so I would like to
 know everything about you success or failure.
 Dose it aid in landing, and coring thermals?
 
 
 
 
 --- Blaine  Deborah Beron-Rawdon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   In Soaring 2161, Dave Seay asked "Is there any
   science in determining the
   angle of the poly break and/or its location out from
   center?"
  
   Well, it may not be science, but there is some
   engineering involved!
  
   To summarize, the amount of dihedral (or polyhedral)
   that a rudder and
   elevator (no ailerons) sailplane has is a major
   factor in its roll
   responsiveness and maximum roll rate, and strongly
   influences spiral
   stability.  More dihedral increases roll
   responsiveness, roll rate and
   spiral stability.  Airplanes with more dihedral also
   require larger vertical
   stabilizers.
  
   The exact arrangement of the dihedral, whether it is
   two-panel dihedral or a
   six-panel polyhedral for instance, is less important
   than the effective
   amount of dihedral that the arrangement provides.
   The effective dihedral of
   any arrangement can be estimated and is commonly
   referred to as "equivalent
   dihedral angle" (EDA).  For what it is worth, I
   recommend at least 12
   degrees of EDA for most rudder and elevator
   sailplanes.
  
   The arrangement of the panels is a compromise
   between efficiency while
   thermalling, efficiency in a rolling maneuver, and
   stall characteristics
   while thermalling.  In short, arrangements that
   resemble a parabolic
   dihedral distribution provide a smooth and efficient
   lift distribution
   across the span while thermalling, and avoid large
   variations in lift
   coefficient across the span in a steady-state roll
   maneuver.  This is good.
   Arrangements that have at lot of dihedral
   concentrated in the outer panels
   will tend to tip stall prematurely while
   thermalling.
  
   Equivalent dihedral angle is explained at:
  
   http://www.rc-soar.com/tech/spiral_eda.htm
  
   Envision Design sells software called "Plane
   Geometry" that enables easy
   experimentation with dihedral arrangements.  Check
   out:
  
  
 http://members.home.net/evdesign/pages/plane_geometry.html
  
   That's all for now.
  
   Blaine Beron-Rawdon
   Envision Design
   San Pedro, California
   http://members.home.net/evdesign/
  
   RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane
   News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests
   to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
 http://auctions.yahoo.com/
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
 "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Servo reversing application?

2000-12-27 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

What was the application that required reversing the servo rotation?
does it have something to do with the mentioned 'Escape'. This is the 6
servo wing? 

Stephen Syrotiak wrote:
 
 For those who give a rohobo;
 
 To reverse a (Hitec) servo.  Follow directions from the hoss's mouth.
 (see below)
 
 Cost? I timed it.  3 minutes and 20 seconds.  Best part; all the smoke
 stayed inside and kept it working.
 
 Thanks to all list members who tried to help.
 
 Now if only that new Escape would get here...
 
 Regards,
 
 Steve
 
 Service wrote:
 
  Hello Stephen,
 
  Switch the two wires on the motor (orange and brown), and the two wires on
  the pot (red and green).  That's all it takes.
 
  Tony Ohm
  Service Dept. Mgr.
  Hitec Rcd Inc
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 Stephen Syrotiak
 Southern Connecticut
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Manti Home Page

2000-12-19 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Luke Waters was doing the webpage thru a free service, I think? Due to
some problem with the provider service he no longer has it up. Posted
somthing awhile ago and said he would be back in touch when he found a
new home for the webpage.

Bill  Rose Haymaker wrote:
 
 The bookmark for the Mantis home page that I have saved doesn't seem to work
 anymore, anyone knows what up?
 Is Phil still in business? Did he get a new web page?
 
 Thanks
 Bill
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] all a waste of time

2000-12-18 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

How about we all get together at a contest this summer and waste some
time then.

I'm all for wasting time, if that's what this is all about.

JIM AND CHERYL THOMPSON wrote:
 
 If landing is a waste time, launching is a waste of time  and everything
 in between is also a waste of time.
 
 Jim Thompson
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] HLG Launch

2000-12-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Dick Barker wrote:
 
 No! No! You got it all wrong. One day of f3b and six days of hlg is
 more like it. Would make people appreciate low stress hlg launches.
 --
 Dick Barker

Dick,

 Quit getting yourself all twisted up in knots over how people launch
thier HL gliders.

..
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Contests and LSF Levels (2nd try)

2000-12-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

This statement was made by Tom Broeski and it was made as a SARCASTIC
remark and he of course did not mean it. It was a remark made to try to
make his point about having more than two classes (sport and expert) in
the ESL contests. He is for more levels so he made the comment about
why  the need for 5 levels in LSF. Why don't we just have level V of
LSF? 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 At the beginning of this thread someone wrote:
 
  Why does the LSF not just have the level V.  It is such a waste to promote
  the sport at those lower levels.  I am sure there would still be several
  members and couple of level V's anyway.  Who needs the level ones, two's and
  threes.
 
 I'd like to address that.
 
 The early levels of the LSF program are pretty easy for an experienced pilot but 
they do require participation. This is a place where the experienced pilot can get 
together with less experienced flyers and together work on the lower levels.
 
 I was still pretty new to rc and soaring when I started LSF and the lower levels 
generated enthusiasm for the sport and helped me to become a better flyer. The most 
active period my club ever had was when a group of about ten of us were all working 
on LSF.
 
 After a few years I made Level IV and began working on Level V. The first entry on 
my Level V voucher was dated 1977, the last, 1997. During the next "few" years I 
worked on Level V tasks. I considered them all "doable" except the contest 
requirements.
 
 For twenty years I flew in as few as 10 and as many as 20 contests a year. In almost 
all of those contests I competed against 2 or 3 Level V's, and a bunch of people who 
could/should have been Level V's. I had nearly given up hope of ever making it. A 
little determination, slightly above average flying skills, help from other LSFers 
and some good luck got me that last win.
 
 I was a little luckier than some of my other friends who, because of their age and 
participation levels, probably will neven make Level V but they are proud of their 
Level IV's and the parts of V that they have done. Other friends are close and still 
trying--and might yet make it.
 
 None of these people would like to see the rules change.
 
 Huzzah to them!
 
 Mike Clancy
 LSF 926 Level V #92
 
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Wanted- Competition flyers

2000-12-10 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Dennis Phelan wrote:

 Dudes,
 Are there really only 50 competitive fliers in the ESL? Does the
 website only list the top 50 fliers, top 17 sportsmen and top 33
 experts?
 
 If there are, I[not being an ESL member] would ask why someone would
 need more classes?
 
 =
 Dennis Phelan


I think this is the point. There are about 45 to 50 core ESL flyers that
compete on a regular basis. There are others that compete, but are not
members of the ESL, and are not listed on the ESL site.

If you don't pay dues for the year then even if you compete in a ESL
contest you are not listed in the year end standings. You can still take
home a plaque at a contest, just not get in on the year end trophies.
Year end standings are made up of your six best scores for the year.
Scores are calculated as a percent of the winners score for that
contest.

There are not enough flyers to support many classes. In order to add
more classes you need to get more competitive flyers into the league.
There have been discussions on how to accomplish this.

 I know there are many sailplane flyers out there that enjoy flying but
don't compete. Many may not feel they are good enough or don't feel
confident enough to go out and compete. Some don't fly TD stuff. Some
just don't want to spend the time and money it takes to travel to
contests and compete.

Any good ideas from other clubs/leagues on how to attract more flyers
into competition? How do you get the guys out that love to fly but have
not been bitten by the 'competition bug'.

Later,
RB







 

 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
 http://shopping.yahoo.com/
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] servo calculator

2000-10-05 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Possibly the calculator is haveing a problem with the extreme
deflections of the flap function,(90 degrees). 

I also think that you are using some unresonable numbers as far as
speed. 75mph is not an unresonable number as far as speed of some
planes, but I know when I pull flaps on my TD ship I am not normally
going anywhere near 75mph. I do sometimes dive down from altitude but do
not come screaming in and drop the flaps at that speed.

If I have time and have planned things right I may pull on flaps first
and spiral down slowly. In this case the flaps come in with very little
speed and then pull out and off the flaps.

Also when making the landing approach it is not at the extreme speeds
you are referring to.

I am using Hitec HS-225MG servos, one on each flap and as you have said
they are up to the task for a 65 - 70 oz. Unlimited plane.

Try inputting some smaller value for speed and see where the torque
values come in about 45 oz.

RB

Bill Johns wrote:
 
 Greetings!
 
 One of the really neat things about the Multiplex web page is the
 calculator that will help predict the right sized calculator for an
 application.  check out:
 
 http://www.multiplexrc.com/calcservo.htm
 
   OK, given that it is an approximation at best, I still get some really
 strange numbers.  I'm probably using it wrong.
 
 Given your basic 125" sailplane.  weighs say 70 oz, flaps are 2x25 inches,
 they deflect 90 degrees, the wing has a 10" chord and the plane is moving
 at say 75 mph.  Yes, this is fast, but not unreasonable for a dive.  For me
 the servo calculator gives a required servo of 112 in oz.  This is a huge
 servo.   Most of us would find a Hitec 225 MG with 55 in oz adequate.
 
 On the other hand, given an aileron on the same plane, again say 2"x25"
 that moves only 30 degrees then the required servo must carry only 37 in oz
 and an HS 85 at 42 in oz.is more than adequate.
 
 Am I doing this right?  Whenever I try to come up with a value for flaps,
 it always seems about twice as high as folks use successfully.  What am I
 missing?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bill
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] servo calculator

2000-10-05 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Just did some quick calculations on the servo calc program and if you
drop the speed value down to 50 - 55 mph you will come in around the
55oz torque value of the HS-225's.

I still feel this is too high a speed to be pulling full flaps for
normal TD flying.

RB



Bill Johns wrote:
 
 Greetings!
 
 One of the really neat things about the Multiplex web page is the
 calculator that will help predict the right sized calculator for an
 application.  check out:
 
 http://www.multiplexrc.com/calcservo.htm
 
   OK, given that it is an approximation at best, I still get some really
 strange numbers.  I'm probably using it wrong.
 
 Given your basic 125" sailplane.  weighs say 70 oz, flaps are 2x25 inches,
 they deflect 90 degrees, the wing has a 10" chord and the plane is moving
 at say 75 mph.  Yes, this is fast, but not unreasonable for a dive.  For me
 the servo calculator gives a required servo of 112 in oz.  This is a huge
 servo.   Most of us would find a Hitec 225 MG with 55 in oz adequate.
 
 On the other hand, given an aileron on the same plane, again say 2"x25"
 that moves only 30 degrees then the required servo must carry only 37 in oz
 and an HS 85 at 42 in oz.is more than adequate.
 
 Am I doing this right?  Whenever I try to come up with a value for flaps,
 it always seems about twice as high as folks use successfully.  What am I
 missing?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Bill
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Fut 8U setup sheet?

2000-09-19 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Anybody having the regular manual has the various blank setup sheets in
the back of the book. I just made some copies of them if I wanted a
paper record of my model setups.

Problem is I tweak them from time to time and don't go back to the paper
copies and update. Was thinking of getting more memory modules and using
them to store backup data.

Jones, Philip wrote:
 
 Buy Don Edberg's book...he has sheets in there for recording set-ups.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 9:54 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [RCSE] Fut 8U setup sheet?
 
 Does anybody have a paper form for recording setups of a Futaba 8U?
 
 thanks - Rob Glover
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and
 "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Low-end computer radio

2000-09-19 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

High end computer radios MAY be more than the new guy needs but if you
buy 2 or more lower priced ones you'll have the same money into your
epuipment.

I went thru the multiple radios thing. Keeping them all charged and
maintained. Hauling many Tx's along to the field, ect. Finally got a
Futaba 8U a few years back(no I don't want to argue which radio is the
best) and now I fly all my planes on that one radio. Slope, HL and TD.
 
In my mind one radio is the way to go.

RB 

James V. Bacus wrote:
 
 At 08:02 PM 9/16/2000, regis white wrote:
 (My guess is
 that most members of this list have more than two radios.)  So that is why I
 would not encourage any one new to the hobby to go high end.  Regis
 
 Yep, I have more than two radios.  I started out with a Futaba 6xa, sold it
 in two weeks, I wanted more.  Then I bought a JR 783, I was flying mainly
 HLG and slope combat, but the SOAR guys were leading me astray with the big
 molded ships.  Still I wanted more for 6 servo models, so I kept the 783
 and bought a JR 8103.  I realized at that point I should have started with
 the 8103.  Now I have sold the 8103 because I need more channels, so I just
 bought a JR 10x.  The 10x would be too much for a beginner, but I could
 have started higher up the ladder rung's with the computer radios.
 
 Jim
 Downers Grove, IL
 Member of Chicago SOAR club
 ICQ 6997780R/C Soaring Page at http://www.mcs.net/~bacuslab/soaring.html
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] passaj

2000-09-12 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Thanks for the pronunciation. It'll put a whole new 'twist' on things
everytime someone posts about this plane.

Later

James V. Bacus wrote:
 
 At 08:05 PM 9/11/2000, Rick Brown and Jill Wiest wrote:
 Anybody on the list that can pronounce 'PASSAJ'
 
 Pass a J?
 
 Sorry, couldn't resist...  8-)
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Handlaunch Shoulder Syndrome

2000-09-12 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Don't think so. I threw a Red Herring for a while and it is just a whole
other set of muscles and strains from that action. Jut takes working up
to it. Working out with a HLG can be Heaven or Hell. The better you get
a working lift the less you'll hurt. When the air is flat put it down
and wait. You know when there is lift!!!

Dick Barker wrote:
 
 Tom,
 You can solve it with a simple one step solution. Get, or build, a modern
 discus launch hlg.
 --
 Dick Barker
 Seattle, WA
 - The Old Fart Glider Flyer -
 http://www.eskimo.com/~dickb/UpLink.html
 
 Tom Nagel grumbled:
 This Spring and summer I made a serious attempt to learn how to fly HLG.
 What I learned was all about shoulder strain.
 .
 I suspect that I am not alone in this problem, and I have been
 researching treatments.  So here is a three step program to cure Handlaunch
 Shoulder Syndrome that seems to be working for me.
 .
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Antenna/servo flutter

2000-07-30 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Is it possible that the reason the servos are no longer jittering is
due to the difference in the pattern of the signal being sent out of
these two different antenna types.
 I'm not the expert on this subject but the way it was explained to me
is that the regular collasping antenna generates a cone shaped pattern
while the rubber duck style antenna generates its strongest signal
directly in line with, generally out the end of the antenna.
 So, while holding the plane in hand at the winch or high start the cone
shaped signal would possibly affect the servos while the rubber duck
antenna would not.
 Not that this means one is generating a stronger or weaker signal
overall. The rubberduck antenna may be better for those of us that have
that habit of facing our planes while we fly. This gets the antenna
pointing mostly at the plane. The very spot that a regular antenna is
suppose to generate its weakeest signal. At the moment I use a regular
style antenna andhave experienced no problems with it.
 Anybody have any range problems with either style antenna?

Anybody that really knows about this stuff have an opinion I would like
to hear from you.

Thanks,
RB
 

Art Mcnamee wrote:
 
 Hi Bill,
  I assume the Power Duck is a short rubber ducky type of antenna.
 If so, the servo flutter is probably loss of signal strength and torroid beads would
 have stopped the fluttering without loss of signal strength.The signal strength 
won't cause much of a problem as the receivers we
 get today are pretty good but out on the fringe area
 the signal strength could make a difference. I no longer have a Spectrum Analyzer
 to measure the signal strength but I'll bet $10.00 to $1.00 there is a difference 
and the full size antenna is the winner.
 Thermals, Art
 
 Bill  Rose Haymaker wrote:
 
  I would like to thank those who suggested Smiley Antenna for replacing the
  original telescoping antenna with a R/C Power Duck. Got it yesterday, flew
  with it today, WHAT A DIFFERENCE. Not only was it a pleasure not having to
  worry about jamming the antenna tip, but it also cured my servo flutter at
  the high start.
 
  Thanks
  Bill
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Using a tow plane to launch sailplanes

2000-07-27 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

When towing a glider the pilot of the glider MUST NOT rise off the
ground too quickly. The glider must follow the tow planes flight path.
The limited towing I have seen was done at a brisk pace in some wind,
maybe why the steep climb, and mostly straight out. Rising very quickly.
I don't think this is the required flight path though. Just maybe the
safest way with the conditions that day.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 The other day a friend of mine asked me to tow up his sailplane with my IMAC
 plane and I agreed.  The results were interesting but not what we had
 intended.  Both planes survived in tact but the glider never got more than
 20 feet in the air before the two planes separated.  The IMAC plane hadn't
 left the runway yet.
 
 So the question I have for this list is how do people tow sailplanes up to
 altitude?  Does the tow plane accelerate fast or slowly, etc.  I'm looking
 for a prescribed procedure on how to safely do this.
 
 Thanks,
 John
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Flying in Colorado

2000-07-24 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Which of your sailplanes do you refer to as 'sweetheart'?

Richard Bothell wrote:
 
 My sweetheart and I will be traveling and camping in Colorado
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Help! I keep loosing my trainer chords!

2000-07-24 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

The English language is dying. It's being butchered to death.

robert k scott wrote:
 
 Does anyone know why many people are suddenly having a problem with
 homonyms?
 
 Does anyone have any ideas what's causing this?
 
 -robert
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Mine isn't better than Yours

2000-07-20 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

All,

 I have been following the posts about servos and Rx. I just had to
throw in my two cents.

 I have invested a good bit of money in radios, planes and servos over
the years. I don't fly the latest molded plane or have the most
expensive servos or even have the latest design Rx. I have a foam,
fiberglass and carbon fiber plane (getting to be in the minority - many
molded), a Futaba FM radio and Rx and some of those cheap Hitec servos.
I probably still have about $1000 just to get one plane in the air. This
gets a bit less expensive for multiple planes due to the same radio for
all the others.

 My point is I feel I have put enough money into the hobby to be
competitive. Over the weekend, flying an ESL contest in Lancaster PA, I
beat many good flyers with better equipment. I placed 8th in Expert
class(my first year in Expert - they kicked me out of Sportflyer class
last year)both Saturday and Sunday against good flyers, Gordy (he graced
us with his presence) being one of them with his molded plane and high
priced servos. I blew a 4th place finish on Saturday with a short flight
in the 8th and final round. 

 I think we all know it's how well you can fly what you have and not if
you have the latest most expensive 'stuff'. Having a molded plane and
the top of the line, most expensive equipment WOULD NOT have gotten me
in the top five on either day, only better flying. Mine isn't better
than yours, but one of these days I may just slip in there for a win

 Fly what you got and have fun doing it.

Later,
RB
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] 3 cell pack for HL

2000-07-04 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

All,

 Just put together a 3 cell 110mil pack for a HL.

 My question is what can I expect to see as a peak voltage reading on
this pack when fully charged. I put the first charge on the new pack and
have a reading of 4.25 volts right off the charge.

 Anybody using this size pack. Any info or advise along the lines of
charging and maintaining this style pack would be appreciated.

Thanks,
RB
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]