Re: Which mailman server is correct?

2008-05-31 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Bill,

Sunday, June 1, 2008, 2:29:57 PM, you wrote:

 I seem to be getting two reminders for this mailing list each month.

snipped

 Does any one know which is the correct one?


I received duplicates as well - looks like something got fouled up
when the list moved servers.  I think that all the information now
resides on the kore.geschkult server but no doubt one of the
moderators will be along soon with an authorative answer.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.99.29 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 4.0.24.0 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: .EML associations don't remain sticky

2007-09-01 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Jurgen,

Saturday, September 1, 2007, 3:41:09 PM, you wrote:

 Hello lonewolf,

 Thursday, August 30, 2007, 5:33:26 AM, you wrote:


 Bob,

 On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, at 08:56:02 [GMT +1000] (08:56:02 30/08/2007
 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:

 If you happen to have MS Outlook installed you may find that you will
 have ongoing problems. Despite continually associating eml files with
 The Bat! Outlook continually grabs it back and there doesn't seem to
 be any way to stop it. Its like Microsoft can't accept that anyone
 would actually really want to use another e-mail program  

 Thanks, the problem has come back - not Outlook but Outofluck Express
 seems to keep grabbing it.

 In the Control Panel is 'Internet Options'. That has the tab
 'Programs'. Go there and look what's set as email program. I bet it's Outbook 
 Perplex.


In my case it was Microsoft Office Outlook (not Express) but
unfortunately changing it via Control Panel doesn't fix things. Next
time Outlook is launched it re-instates itself as the default program
:-( . There doesn't seem to be anywhere in Outlook's Preferences to
disable this behaviour, at least that I can find.  Manually setting
file associations in My Computer/Tools/Folder Options/FileTypes (WinXP
Home) also doesn't stick.  Since I really need to use the Calendar
function in Outlook it looks like I'm stuck with resetting the Bat! as
my default on a regular basis.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.99.24 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: .EML associations don't remain sticky

2007-08-29 Thread Bob Morris
G'day lonewolf,

Wednesday, August 29, 2007, 9:32:55 PM, you wrote:

 Bill,

 On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, at 09:38:27 [GMT -0700] (02:38:27 29/08/2007
 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:

 Well, first look at what it is associated with before The Bat! opens.

 In the Windows Explorer menu: Tools | Folder Options choose the File
 Types tab then scroll down to see what is associated with the .EML
 extension.

 That seemed to fix it - Thanks!


If you happen to have MS Outlook installed you may find that you will
have ongoing problems. Despite continually associating eml files with
The Bat! Outlook continually grabs it back and there doesn't seem to
be any way to stop it. Its like Microsoft can't accept that anyone
would actually really want to use another e-mail program ;-)

I just keep clicking to associate The Bat! every second or third
start.  Very frustrating.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: folders disappeared

2007-08-01 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Peter,

Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 2:38:14 AM, you wrote:

 Hi Brenda,

snipped

  You might try their forum - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum - I
 read recently that it is well visited, and I think/hope the
 developers read it too.

After having a quick look at the forums I would hesitate to send
anyone there looking for help.  The big news in the Company News Forum
is that The Bat! v.3.80 has apparently been released :-) .   No word
on anything later.

There doesn't seem to be anyone providing consistent assistance other
than Roelof Otten to recent threads and many queries posted don't seem
to be getting any replies (although the counter shows lots of people
looking at the threads). There doesn't seem to be any input from any
Ritlabs developers or staff (at least in any of the threads that I
checked out).  There is the occasional useful reply in the forums from
other users but generally far less than we get on TBUDL

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2





Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Flagged messages not shown?

2007-06-24 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Susanne,

Monday, June 25, 2007, 11:10:45 AM, you wrote:

 Hi,

 when I click the Flagged tab under the message
 list, TB shows no messages even though there are a
 number of parked messages in the folder.

 Am I misunderstanding the meaning of flags?
 Is a parked message not actually a flagged
 message?


I think you will find that you have the option of either flagging a
message (using the little orange flag symbol) or parking it using the
P symbol.  They aren't the same thing.  It is possible to use either
or both on the same message depending on what you want to do with it.
For instance I flag messages that I need to reply to and these then
appear in a virtual folder that I have set up.  I park messages that
contain important information (like software registration codes) so
that I don't accidentally delete them.  Hope this helps.  Probably
someone else may come along with a more technical explanation of the
differences between the two.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.99.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.99 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: MyRealBox IMAP Configuration?

2007-04-12 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Greg,

Friday, April 13, 2007, 9:37:26 AM, you wrote:

snipped

 Unfortunately TB is NOT able to log into the account.  I use it
 sparingly, but would like to continue to use. I've deleted TB MRB
 account and created from scratch.  It  worked for a while, then same
 old problem.  It looks like TB and MRB have problems.

 If you use TB with MRB and IMAP and it is working what are your
 settings?

 TIA!


I'm now experiencing the same problems - can't connect from The Bat!
although it previously worked fine.  I can still access my accounts
through the web access. Have tried resetting up the accounts using
various combinations of settings from their examples which
unfortunately assume that you are using one of a narrow range of
e-mail clients, not including the Bat!  I'd like to check the finer
details of port numbers and authentication settings but they don't
mention these.  If anyone currently has MRB working with the Bat! can
you please share your settings.  Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: MyRealBox IMAP Configuration?

2007-03-25 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Thomas,

Monday, March 26, 2007, 11:18:25 AM, you wrote:


 Wow, they should have sent an email to everybody! Thanks for
 mentioning it.


If I had known that you wanted one I would have let you have one of
mine :-) - I was receiving at least one a day for about a week on each
of my MRB accounts.  Copy follows:

 Subscriber Action Required to Transfer Accounts

 Dear MyRealBox User:

 Novell has transferred the MyRealBox.com service and public e-mail
 server to our partner, Messaging Architects. MyRealBox demonstrates
 the high performance and scalability of the NetMail engine, for
 which Messaging Architects is also assuming development and support.
 Messaging Architects plans to keep the MyRealBox public e-mail
 server live, with the added benefit of its powerful anti-virus,
 anti-spam and anti-adware capabilities and increased storage
 capacity. New account registration information will be available
 soon. Based on our privacy agreement with you, however, Novell
 cannot transfer your account information to Messaging Architects
 without your consent. To request that your account be transferred to
 Messaging Architects, please visit http://www.myrealbox.com.
 MyRealBox users will have until March 25, 2007 to opt in to the
 account transfer. After this date, all remaining accounts will be
 permanently removed, and mailbox contents will be deleted. If you
 intend to keep your MyRealBox account active and want to avoid
 disruptions in service, visit the web site and request that your
 account be transferred today. Regards,

 Novell, Inc.


-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Problem Getting File Associations to Stick

2007-03-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I recently installed Outlook 2003 (for the Calendar and Contacts - NOT
the e-mail) to permit synchronisation of my appointments and contacts
with my new Palm 750. Now The Bat! is no longer able to retain its
file associations for Mailto: and .VCF.  I have to reset it every
time I start The Bat! and even frequently if I want to utilise a
mailto link during a browsing session.  I know that Outlook is the
culprit constantly stealing the file associations but does anyone have
any idea how to stop it happening.  I'm sure there must be other Bat!
users that also have Outlook installed on their computers :-) .

I tried installing The Bat! as the MAPI handler, not sure whether that
fixed the problem or not as it broke Microsoft ActiveSync. The error
message was: WCESMgr.exe - Ordinal Not Found.  The ordinal 23 could
not be located in the dynamic link library MAPI32.dll. Removing the
MAPI32 file created by The Bat! and restoring the old version fixed
that problem but leaves me with the original problem.

Any suggestions would be gratefully received.

-- 
Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 22 March 2007
Using The Bat! PRO v3.98.1 on
Windows XP  5.1 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem Getting File Associations to Stick

2007-03-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Feli,

Thursday, March 22, 2007, 8:52:02 PM, you wrote:


 What is the default email program defined in Internet Explorer?
 If it's TB you could try to change to Outlook, boot and then again set
 TB as default.


I think that you may have fixed my problem.  Internet Explorer (which
I rarely use) had Outlook set as the default e-mail program and
contact list, even though I had the file associations set in Windows
as belonging to The Bat!  After resetting Internet Explorer to agree
with the settings at My Computer/Tools/Folder Options/File Options my
desired setting now appear to be sticking.  I will keep fingers
crossed - Mr Microsoft doesn't seem to want to let go of any rights
without a big fight :-) .

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem Getting File Associations to Stick

2007-03-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Julian,

Friday, March 23, 2007, 1:22:38 AM, you wrote:

 I use Outlook in the same way that you do. You will find that
 Outlook resets itself to be the default email programme on a regular
 basis - many Office updates via Microsoft Update reset the default
 email client, including updates of the Outlook Junk Mail list. There
 are instructions on stopping this happening at the following
 location http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=933450 but Brian
 Livingstone (http://windowssecrets.com/) suggests that it is easier
 to reset it manually.

 Julian


Thanks Julian

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Hyperlinks not working

2007-03-15 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Ron,

Friday, March 16, 2007, 6:30:59 AM, you wrote:

 I found this workaround on the FF Forums and it has worked for me
 (so far) although I had to do it manually to get it to work.
 http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2764507#2764507

Thanks, Ron I will give it a try.  At least it is nice to know that it
is definitely a Firefox problem and nor something that The Bat! has
caused.


-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Hyperlinks not working

2007-03-14 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Ron,

Thursday, March 15, 2007, 6:48:51 AM, you wrote:


 Unfortunately, this (switching default) didn't work for me. Oh well, I
 guess I'll have to live with it until they get a fix.


Unfortunately it has also stopped again for me.  After initially
working it is back to receiving the message that system can not find
the file specified but Firefox then opens and opens the link as
requested.  It is an annoying bug.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Hyperlinks not working

2007-03-09 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Alexander,

Saturday, March 10, 2007, 7:53:13 AM, you wrote:


 That problem occured here too after I installed the autoupdate to
 Firefox 2.0.0.2 - it seems to me that is it a Firefox problem.

 I switched the default browser to IE and then back again to FF, and the
 problem disappeared.


Thanks Alexader - you just fixed a problem that has been bugging me
recently too.  In my case I got a message that the page referenced by
the hyperlink couldn't be found (but it still opened in Firefox
anyway). Switching the default browser to IE and then back to Firefox
fixed it.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.98.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Spam mail

2006-11-27 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Peter,

Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 11:00:58 AM, you wrote:

 lately I get a lot of spam with the subject line: name wrote:

 As I hear lots of people are getting the same. I use Bayes Filter
 Plugin, for spam filter, it doesn't filter them out.

snipped


I can't help you with a filter but K9 (http://keir.net/k9.html) is
catching them all with no problems plus those stock tips that just
include an image and a sea of irrelevant drivel. I tried AntiSpam
Sniper for a while after someone mentioned it here but abandoned it
after a couple of months after finding it less effective than K9.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: No Help

2006-11-23 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Thomas,

Friday, November 24, 2006, 11:44:34 AM, you wrote:

 Hello TBUDL,

 Main Menu / Help / Help Topics does nothing.

 F1 causes an error message:

  Missing context help topic 14028

 [OK]

 Can anybody confirm, or is it local to my machine?


Both work fine for me - opens up Welcome to The Bat! - the Natural
E-Mail System or whatever the last accessed help topic was.  Looks
like something has got corrupted in your system somehow.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB Updater

2006-09-10 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Ben,

Sunday, September 10, 2006, 5:47:33 PM, you wrote:

 Howdy Flying Rodent fans,

   I  was using the TB updater. I waited for my Bat to tell me it could
   update  to  the  latest version. I clicked on download. Firefox went
   off  merrily  to  download.  TB updater window came up with an error
   saying  that  it couldn't find the msi file, mostly I expect because
   it had not downloaded yet.

   Don't think that is supposed to happen.


I can't confirm this.  Just tried it (I'm using it manually) - The
Bat! popped up the box with details of the update, I okayed it and
then Firefox opened as expected.  My download manager then took over
the download of thebat_pro_ 3-85-03.msi which is currently proceeding
as expected.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.85.01 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: User Dictionary/Correction Dictionary Language

2006-02-23 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Mark,

Thursday, February 23, 2006, 7:00:44 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,

 Thursday, February 23, 2006, 2:47:28 AM, you wrote:

BM I just upgraded to version 3.71.03 (thanks to Mary Bull for noting its
BM release - no thanks to RitLabs who rarely seem to bother to advise
BM about upgraded versions despite being on their mailing list).

 3.71.03 is not a release. As you will understand there are far less release
 versions than Betas or even Release Candidates. If you want to be notified
 about new Betas, you should join TBETA.


RitLabs sure seem to think that it is a release - at least according
to their web page:

http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/news_detail.php?ID=1324

 RITLabs releases The Bat! v3.71
 02/18/2006 
 
 In the pursuit of a perfect piece of software we bring you yet
 another version of The Bat!. The list of bug-fixes is long, but pay
 attention to the new features we added too.

In view of the release date some 5 days ago and most of the regulars
here apparently not knowing that it existed sort of confirms my
thoughts about RITLABs failure to advise users of the update.

I have however discovered the solution to my original query.  After
resurrecting an prior version of The Bat! (on my old computer) and
looking at the settings there I find that if I open my UserDic.TLX and
change the LID (first line of file) from 24941 to 25202 it then
correctly shows the language as British English rather than US English
- in line with the language that I have set under Spell Checker
language. I can't remember who originally provided this fix but he/she
certainly has my thanks as it was driving me crazy seeing my User
dictionary described as US English when it most certainly wasn't. ;-)

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.71.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


User Dictionary/Correction Dictionary Language

2006-02-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I just upgraded to version 3.71.03 (thanks to Mary Bull for noting its
release - no thanks to RitLabs who rarely seem to bother to advise
about upgraded versions despite being on their mailing list).

I notice that my User and Correction dictionaries have reverted to
showing as American English despite me selecting British English
as my language selection.  I seem to remember that there was a trick
to fix this, I think that a language code number had to be changed (I
think it was the LID number in first line in the actual dictionary
files?). Can anyone help out with what the fix is as I forgot to save
it in my useful tips folder :-( ?.

-- 
Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 23 February 2006
Using The Bat! PRO v3.71.03 on
Windows XP  5.1 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Displaying HTML

2006-02-14 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Dwight,

Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 7:32:41 AM, you wrote:

 On Tuesday, February 14, 2006, 1:16:36 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:

 I'm using Foxit Reader for PDF.

 Link? I didn't find anything like this at foxIT.com



http://www.foxitsoftware.com/

I thoroughly recommend this as well.  Small, quick loading and so far
it has correctly displayed every PDF file I've used.  Works nicely
with Mozilla Firefox too.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: eml attachment when forwarding mail from The Bat!

2006-01-29 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Marck,

Sunday, January 29, 2006, 7:09:39 PM, you wrote:

snipped


 This is a MIME forward aka Alternative forwarding. In this mode, TB
 deliberately attaches a complete copy of the original email. This is
 also the way AOL users forward messages. TB's difference is that it
 attaches the copied email to a normal forward of the message. This is
 less explainable. I can understand an overview of the text in the
 covering message for the forward, but a complete content copy plus
 images plus attachments? Very odd.

 Of course, if you're not using MIME forwarding yourself, then you got
 the original message *from* an AOL user and merely formatted what
 you'd received. ;-)


Thanks Marck, I've passed your reply on to my Brother-in-law.  It had
me stumped so your explanation was much appreciated.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: eml attachment when forwarding mail from The Bat!

2006-01-29 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Marck,

Sunday, January 29, 2006, 7:09:39 PM, you wrote in response to my
question:

BM Anyone got any idea why The Bat! is sending the extra eml file, and
BM what it is intended to accomplish other than to boost the size of the
BM message?  I promised my B-I-L that I would ask the question for him.

 Because you told it to!

snipped

I got an indignant (tongue-in-cheek) response from my brother-in-law
when I sent him a copy of your reply.

*No I didn't!*

As a test he had set up a new account on The Bat!  and it defaulted to
the setting forward messages as attachments (MIME standard) with no
user intervention.  He then did a clean install on another computer -
set up a new account and once again it defaulted to that setting.  (In
both cases the accounts were IMAP.)

He obviously has too much time on his hands being able to do all this
experimenting ;-) .

On looking at my own installation I find that all six POP accounts
have the setting unticked, while my one IMAP account has it ticked. It
would appear that The Bat! applies different settings depending on
whether the account is POP or IMAP.

Not a problem as we now know why it was forwarding the eml attachment
and how to prevent it (if desired), but thought I would pass this on
to add to the store of knowledge



-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


eml attachment when forwarding mail from The Bat!

2006-01-28 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

My brother-in-law (who likes to play around with different e-mail
programs) has just sent me the following observation about the way in
which The Bat! forwards messages.


 I just noticed something odd about the way the The Bat forwarded that
 email re Husbands of the Year. (I copied to myself at FastMail..which,
 ebing IMAP...meant I could view the forwarded email in various
 mailers).
 
 Anyway, the original email was ~ 140 k.
 
 When forwarded to you - using default settings in The Bat - it doubled
 in size.  That's because there was an *.eml part (~ 140 kb), plus html
 plus jpegs. ie The Bat was doubling up in effect.
 
 I guess ThunderBird (which currently is not on my computer) displayed
 this in a certain way.  Opera did too:
 it displayed the email properly, then also displayed the three pics
 below (as did Outlook Express).
 
 I just did the forwarding bit from Outlook Express and from Opera.
 Both forwarded the message as a 140 kb email, with html and 3 x jpeg
 parts...and no *.eml attachment.  ie they didn't double up like The
 Bat.
 
 Maybe The Bat has a very good reason for doing this: eg you have the
 option of saving the *.eml attachment??  I don't know.
 
 This is not meant to be a criticism of The Bat: just an observation.
 
 Steve
 

In The Bat! I can see the message normally, plus am able to open the
eml file which repeats the message complete with pictures.

In Mozilla Thunderbird I can open the message normally (although the
formatting is a bit scatty with pictures appended rather than being
in-line) and also see the pictures and the eml file as attachments.

If I try to open the eml file with Thunderbird the text content
(formatted in HTML) appears but all the pictures are just blank boxes
with red crosses just like when a remotely stored image is included in
a message. There appears to be picture attachments included but these
can neither be opened, viewed or saved.

I also tried PocoMail which could open the message normally as well as
being able to open the eml attachment (same as The Bat!).

I know that Outlook Express can view the eml file okay (I tested by
drag and drop), but I have no intention of setting it up to retrieve
mail from the server to see if it can read the original message
format.

Anyone got any idea why The Bat! is sending the extra eml file, and
what it is intended to accomplish other than to boost the size of the
message?  I promised my B-I-L that I would ask the question for him.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Sunday, 29 January 2006
Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.

2006-01-20 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Roelof,

Friday, January 20, 2006, 6:57:33 PM, you wrote:

 Hallo Bob,


 Close TB and delete the account.m_r and account.m_d files matching
 with the problem account. When you're using OTFE the extensions are
 .emr and .emd
 I'm not sure whether this solves the problem so I'd appreciate some
 feedback, but unless you keep mail on the server (and you deleted
 everything) you don't really need them. 


Thanks MAU, Roelof and Maurice for your suggestions.  I gave up in
frustration last night (prior to your replies), shut the computer down
and went to bed. This morning on re-booting The Bat! successfully
downloaded all the messages (including the one with the very large
attachment) that both my ISP web-mail interface and PocoMail had
reported as already having been deleted from my account.  I have no
idea how or what happened, but it is now resolved.  I have politely
suggested to my friend that I would prefer not to receive his large
mass mailings in future.

Sorry Roelof that I can't be the guinea-pig to test the effects of
deleting the account.m-r and account.m-d files :-) .
-- 
Bob Mo®®is
Saturday, 21 January 2006
Using The Bat! PRO v3.65.03 on
Windows XP  5.1 Service Pack 2




Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Dual address books

2006-01-19 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Jack,

Friday, January 20, 2006, 1:20:39 PM, you wrote:

snipped

 I see where my wording on this question may have caused you to
 misunderstand. If we assume there are no parked messages but only
 saved, ready-to-send messages, and I choose GET NEW MAIL FOR ALL I
 would expect TB to do only a receive, not a send/receive which is what
 it does. I would expect a send/receive only if I had chosen SEND +
 CHECK FOR ALL.

Have you checked Account Properties - Transport to see if the box
marked Combined Delivery (Send + Receive) is ticked.  If the box is
ticked The Bat! will do both actions together whenever you ask it to
Send OR Check for new mail.

-- 
Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 20 January 2006
Using The Bat! PRO v3.65.03 on
Windows XP  5.1 Service Pack 2




Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


The Bat! keeps trying to dowload deleted messages.

2006-01-19 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

A friend sent me a message with a _very_ large attachment (several
MB) which was taking forever to download. (I'm on dial-up.)  I aborted
the procedure and directly accessed my ISP mailbox via web-mail and
deleted the offending message along with everything else in my in-box.
Now whenever I attempt to check for new mail on that account The Bat!
reports that it is downloading the messages that I have already
deleted and just sits there at 0% received for however long I remain
connected. As a check I have accessed the offending account both via
web-mail and by PocoMail, both of which report that there is no mail
currently in the account.

I figure that there must be some sort of cache that The Bat! is
referring to and that it thinks that there is still mail to retrieve.
I have closed The Bat! down (several times) and also rebooted the
computer a couple of times as well with no change.  Any ideas on how I
can clear whatever is that is locking things up?

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 20 January 2006
Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.65.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Smileys

2005-12-23 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Mary,

Saturday, December 24, 2005, 1:42:31 AM, you wrote:

 Hello Stuart!

 On Friday, December 23, 2005, 8:57 AM, you wrote:



 Very sorry to hear of omission of Smileys settings instructions in the
 new Help File.

 Perhaps that can be remedied next year.


It is already included in the new help file - under the heading
Roguemoticons and PCWSmileys.  I found it by doing a search for
emoticons.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service 
Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem with v.3.64.01 crashing

2005-12-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Curtis,

Thursday, December 22, 2005, 9:13:43 PM, you wrote:

 On 21/12/2005 at 8:30:33 PM [GMT -0500], Bob Morris wrote:

 I have just installed the latest Christmas Edition.  The updated help
 file is a big improvement.  Unfortunately however whenever I try to
 access my IMAP account at Fastmail The Bat! appears to complete all
 the downloading and then crashes with an Access violation error.

 Using a FastMail account here and don't experience any access
 violations. :/


Thanks for the input Curtis.

I have determined exactly where the error occurs and can reproduce it
on demand. Under Account Properties - Mail Management - IMAP Fine
Tune: if Automatically Disconnect after synchronisation is checked
then The Bat! crashes every time.  (As I am on dial-up I don't want
Fastmail to be continually connected so I need it to disconnect after
checking my mail.)

I have discovered a work-round that solves the problem for me: Mail
Management - When inactive, disconnect after 5 Seconds has almost
exactly the same effect as automatically disconnect but without the
crash :GRIN:

I wonder if anyone else would be good enough to try setting their IMAP
to disconnect after synchronisation to determine if it is a
reproducible bug, or just an isolated strangeness on my machine.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service 
Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem with v.3.64.01 crashing

2005-12-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Curtis,

Thursday, December 22, 2005, 9:13:43 PM, you wrote:


 Using a FastMail account here and don't experience any access
 violations. :/


I wish I was so lucky.  Everything runs okay until the command
TImapDisconnectRequest is processed.  It crashes The Bat! every
time. It worked fine on the previous version and I haven't changed any
settings.  If I get the chance tomorrow I may try setting up a new
IMAP account to see if the same thing occurs.  Meanwhile I have to use
PocoMail to access FastMail, and IMAP definitely isn't it's strong
point either :GRIN: .

If no one has any other suggestions it looks like I may need to
uninstall and revert to v.3.62.14

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service 
Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem with v.3.64.01 crashing

2005-12-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day steverio,

Friday, December 23, 2005, 11:14:05 AM, you wrote:



 Not a problem here and I'm on fastmail too! 


Thanks Steverio (and Curtis) for taking the time to experiment for me.
I appreciate it.  Looks like I have one of those mysterious
unexplained bugs that is unique to my computer.  At least I have
discovered how to work around it.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service 
Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Problem with v.3.64.01 crashing

2005-12-21 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I have just installed the latest Christmas Edition.  The updated help
file is a big improvement.  Unfortunately however whenever I try to
access my IMAP account at Fastmail The Bat! appears to complete all
the downloading and then crashes with an Access violation error.

The last time it was Access violation at address A10C74C0. Read of
address A10C74C0.  The problem occurs every time I try to access
Fastmail but I'm not sure whether the error has an identical address
each time.  (I was too surprised the first couple of times to note
down the details.) Access to POP accounts seems to be okay at this
stage.

Any one else seeing this?  Any suggestions appreciated.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 22 December 2005
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600  Service 
Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem with v.3.64.01 crashing

2005-12-21 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Bob,

Thursday, December 22, 2005, 11:30:33 AM, you wrote:

 G'day TBUDL Members,



 The last time it was Access violation at address A10C74C0. Read of
 address A10C74C0.  The problem occurs every time I try to access
 Fastmail but I'm not sure whether the error has an identical address
 each time.  (I was too surprised the first couple of times to note
 down the details.) Access to POP accounts seems to be okay at this
 stage.




I just made several more attempts to access Fastmail.  The access
violation error has a different address on each occasion.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.64.01 Christmas Edition on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service 
Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.14 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: K9

2005-11-06 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Jack,

Sunday, November 6, 2005, 5:49:37 AM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,

 Saturday, November 5, 2005, 12:22:30 AM, you wrote:


 Well, I set K9's limit to 10,000KB (which should be 10megs) and ticked
 the box. I then sent myself the same 6meg message I've been playing
 with from my wife's side of the computer using TB. It took almost 10
 minutes to send but it went. I then fetched it using Outlook Express
 (sorry) because I've been using that program to test all this and it's
 configured to leave messages on the server. Outlook express (which is
 not using K9 or any other spam filter) was able to fetch it with no
 trouble.

Jack I think you are missing the point here.  The aim here is to
_STOP_ K9 checking very large messages as the foul-up apparently
occurs when K9 is trying to scan a very large message and the download
process times out before the message is fully downloaded.  What you
need to do is to set a limit large enough so that all your normal
sized mail (including Spam) is checked, but very large messages, like
the one you are having problems with) go straight through without
checking.  My K9 checks everything up to 200 KB but allows larger
messages through without checking.  So far I haven't had any Spam over
the 200 KB limit and the few very large messages that I get are
received without problems.

 I then switched back to TB and tried to fetch it. Nothing came in and
 my connection timed out. More than willing to give TB another chance,
 I told TB to try fetching again. This time it did fetch the whole
 message including the large attachments. I hate intermittent problems.

I am pretty sure that the problem is actually K9 and not The Bat!  I
certainly wouldn't dump K9 because of it though - the correct use of
the exclude setting works fine.  I am currently running at 99.82%
accuracy, no messages falsely tagged as Spam, and the rare Spam that
slips through is usually written in such a way as to look non-spammy.
Tell K9 once that it got it wrong and it is very rare for it to repeat
the mistake.


-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.62.09 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: K9

2005-11-04 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Jack,

Friday, November 4, 2005, 9:41:29 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,

 Thursday, November 3, 2005, 11:31:51 PM, you wrote:

BM G'day Jack,

BM Friday, November 4, 2005, 1:42:39 PM, you wrote:

BM snipped

 I looked all over K9 but could not find any setting which restricted
 receipt of large emails. Did I miss something or have any others of
 you had similar problems?


BM Under the configuration tab there is a box Don't filter messages
BM larger than.  Mine is ticked and with 200 KB set as the amount.  I
BM have had no problem receiving large messages with this setting.
 snipped

 Upon receipt of your message I looked at the 'Don't filter messages
 larger than' box and it's not checked, so there should be no size
 restriction. I too am using v1.28.


Yes that is definitely the problem - well I'm almost sure :-) . Check
the box and insert a limit over which K9 isn't to check messages and
you hopefully won't see it fouling up on the large messages any more.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.62.09 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: K9

2005-11-04 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Bob,

Saturday, November 5, 2005, 4:22:30 PM, you wrote:

Quoting a whole lot of untrimmed message.

 Yes that is definitely the problem - well I'm almost sure :-) . Check
 the box and insert a limit over which K9 isn't to check messages and
 you hopefully won't see it fouling up on the large messages any more.


Apologies moderators - I dashed off the above reply and forgot to
trim.  Please don't hit me with a trout. :-)

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.62.09 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: K9

2005-11-03 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Jack,

Friday, November 4, 2005, 1:42:39 PM, you wrote:

snipped

 I looked all over K9 but could not find any setting which restricted
 receipt of large emails. Did I miss something or have any others of
 you had similar problems?


Under the configuration tab there is a box Don't filter messages
larger than.  Mine is ticked and with 200 KB set as the amount.  I
have had no problem receiving large messages with this setting.  I
think that early versions of K9 sometimes had a problem with timing
out when receiving very large messages and this setting was introduced
to overcome the difficulty.  It does of course mean that it a spammer
sends you a message larger than the limit you set - K9 won't intercept
it. I'm using the latest released version 1.28.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.62.09 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.62.09 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Inactive

2005-09-27 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Richard,

Wednesday, September 28, 2005, 11:24:09 AM, you wrote:


 I have not received a single post for four days now - has the list
 gone inactive temporarily or am I having problems?


I was wondering the same thing myself.  Just updated my firewall and
thought that I might have mucked up some setting.  Looks like everyone
is just resting at present :-) .

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.60.07 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Continuing Lock-Ups in BAT 3.5.30 on XP

2005-07-11 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Chris,

Monday, July 11, 2005, 4:05:10 AM, you wrote:

 Do you have lots of filters or complicated filters?


No complicated filters, just one for Spam filtering (on a header field
added by K9) and one to steer my TBUDL mail into a separate folder.
These are both working fine with no lock-ups when triggered.  I have
tried disabling just in case but that didn't make any difference.
Thanks for the suggestion though.

By the way - the repair/re-install of The Bat! didn't make any
difference.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Continuing Lock-Ups in BAT 3.5.30 on XP

2005-07-11 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Alexander,

Sunday, July 10, 2005, 10:31:02 PM, you wrote:

 Did you disable your Antivirus entirely? If you haven't tried that
 yet, that would be my next step.

I'm a little reluctant to totally disable the AV as I have received
several viruses (my first ever) in mail during the past few days.  All
have been the same nasty, identified as - HTML-Phishbank.UN   I
suppose though that if I have to try this then at least using The Bat!
keeps me much safer than Outlook Express.


 Did you maybe just exclude TB's mail directory from the AV's on-access
 scanning? If so, maybe it helps to disable TB's temporary directory from
 the scanner, too. TB downloads all mail to a temporary directory and then
 imports it into its own messagebase. The path to exclude is in your user
 profile, the folder Local Settings\Temp.

Thank you - I didn't know about this particular temporary directory
(one more difference from my old 98SE) but did find that it was choked
with a couple of hundred TMP files, so I have cleared that out as well
- I seem to remember reading here some time back that an over
abundance of these files could cause The Bat! to have problems.  I'll
try excluding this directory and the Bat! mail directories from AV
scanning as the next step in searching for a solution. If that doesn't
work I'll try totally disabling the AV for a bit.

Thanks for your help.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Monday, 11 July 2005
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Continuing Lock-Ups in BAT 3.5.30 on XP

2005-07-10 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I wrote a while back about continual lock-ups that I was experiencing
with The Bat! on my new computer.  The thread got hijacked :-) on to
other lock-up problems apparently unrelated to my problem so I have
just been playing around trying to see if I could track any obvious
causes down.


After disabling my AV E-mail checking (EZ-Antivirus) the
situation now seems better but I am still getting regular lock-ups
when viewing downloaded mail in the Browse Ticker Messages screen. I
generally get to view one message and then it locks up.  The Browse
window is totally unresponsive. I can close the Browse window from the
Task Bar (right clicking and choosing Close), and can then re-open
the Browse Ticker messages window by re-clicking on the Mail Ticker,
only to have it lock up again generally after only one message.


Closing and then re-opening The Bat! restores everything to normal
operations and I can read all my mail until next time I download.  The
cycle generally (but not always) starts over again.


As a test I have tried marking previously read messages unread so
that the Mail Ticker appears, then the Browse Ticker messages works
fine with no lock-ups. It somehow appears to be related to when new
messages arrive in my mail box but I can't spot what is triggering the
freezes. I generally try to resist browsing until all messages have
been received and all connections to the server has been broken, but I
have experimented with browsing while messages are still being
downloaded and it seems to make no difference.  Usually it freezes but
not always.

I have just done a repair re-install to see if that helps, if anyone
can think of anything else to try I'd appreciate your suggestions.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Sunday, 10 July 2005
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Sorting of Address Oicker

2005-07-10 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I have my Address Book sorted by last name but notice that if I use
the Address Picker in the edit window when composing a new message
that all names are sorted by first name with (apparently) no way to
re-sort in the same way as my address book.

It is possible to use the quick search function to locate an address
but I find it frustrating that the Address Book preference doesn't
just carry over to the Address Picker as well.

Anyone else bugged by this, or discovered any way to fix it?

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Sunday, 10 July 2005
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Sorting of Address Picker

2005-07-10 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Bob,

Sunday, July 10, 2005, 9:22:20 PM, you wrote:

Of course that should be Address PICKER - not what I wrote.



-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Bat v3.5.30 locking up on Windows XP

2005-07-02 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I just upgraded to a new computer with XP Home after hanging onto my
old WIN 98SE as long as I could.  I also upgraded to The Bat! v3.5.30
when transferring my programs across to the new computer.

The only thing that is driving me mad is that The Bat! now
periodically freezes either in the view folder screen when reading
messages or in the main screen. Other programs can be accessed alright
but The Bat! just sits there not responding to anything. I have tried
leaving it sit up to about half an hour, thinking that maybe there was
some background task going on but it stays locked up. The only way out
is to CTRL-ALT-DEL and to then close it using Windows Task Manager.
This seems to happen about once or twice a day - I can't pick any
pattern with other programs interacting with it.

Any suggestions or work arounds appreciated


--
Bob Mo®®is Saturday, 2 July 2005
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on
Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bat v3.5.30 locking up on Windows XP

2005-07-02 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Alexander,

Saturday, July 2, 2005, 5:41:49 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob Morris,

 02-Jul-2005 09:26, you wrote:

 The only thing that is driving me mad is that The Bat! now periodically
 freezes either in the view folder screen when reading messages or in
 the main screen. Other programs can be accessed alright but The Bat! just
 sits there not responding to anything.

 The only idea I have right now - are you using a virus scanner that maybe
 locks TB out from reading its own messagebases?

The rotten thing locked up on me again when I tried to read your
reply.

Your suggestion could be the answer. I use EZ AntiVirus and had the
e-mail scanning option disabled on my old computer but hadn't thought
to do this on the new setup. I have now disabled it and will give it a
try to see if this helps. Thanks for the suggestion.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Bat v3.5.30 locking up on Windows XP

2005-07-02 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Bob,

Saturday, July 2, 2005, 6:01:21 PM, you wrote:


 Your suggestion could be the answer. I use EZ AntiVirus and had the
 e-mail scanning option disabled on my old computer but hadn't thought
 to do this on the new setup. I have now disabled it and will give it a
 try to see if this helps. Thanks for the suggestion.

Replying to myself now :-)

No that didn't work - it locked up again after sending the message and
the e-mail virus scanning is definitely disabled now.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Outpost Pro Firewall 2.7 - Fixes for The Bat!

2005-06-04 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

There is an updated version of Outpost Pro Firewall (v.2.7) which has
some specific fixes for issues with The Bat!  I haven't personally had
any hassles with these but it may be of interest to other Outpost/Bat!
users.

Following is a list of issues mentioned:

Issue with opening of renamed attachments in The Bat!

Windows Server 2003 SP1 issue showing up in inability to receive mail
using  The Bat!

http://www.agnitum.com/products/outpost/history.html

Download from http://www.agnitum.com/download/outpostpro.html

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Saturday, 4 June 2005
Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: file extension on attached files in received mail

2005-05-26 Thread Bob Morris
G'day achdut,

Thursday, May 26, 2005, 12:55:09 PM, you wrote:

 When I receive an e-mail with an attached document, I am unable to
 directly open the document with a double click because the file name
 for the document has a .aq exentension that is added to the file
 name.  This extension is added automatically to all received mail.



Are you by any chance using Outpost Firewall.  My Outpost Pro addsaq
(for attachment quarantine) to any e-mail attachments received which
match its preset list of file types. You can easily change the
nominated account types that are quarantined if this is what is
causing your problem, or totally disable e-mail checking (probably not
a good idea).

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 26 May 2005
Using The Bat! v3.5 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


The Bat! 3.01 Automatically Registered itself?

2004-10-15 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I finally took the plunge and downloaded version 3.0.1.33 the other
day and paid my registration via CIFNET.  My registration e-mail
arrived this morning and I viewed in from the Ticker.  Immediately
after I got a pop-up window thanking me for registering The Bat! On
checking I see that my name and serial number now appear under Help -
About and I no longer get the reminder message about registering when
I start The Bat! all with no action by me other than reading the
e-mail.

I am a little concerned that merely viewing a text e-mail can trigger
the registration process without any intervention by me.  One of the
things that I loved about The Bat! was that unlike some other e-mail
clients scripts or other processes could not be run automatically just
by viewing a message.  Has this now changed?  Has The Bat! lost its
main security advantage and will other malicious scripts also now run
merely by opening an e-mail? If I was to forward this message to
someone else with an unregistered copy of The Bat! would it also
automatically register their copy in my name? (I'm not planning on
doing so - just curious about the implications of allowing a text
e-mail to trigger something like this.)

I notice that the registration e-mail also instructs that the message
should be printed (obviously sensible) _AND_ backed up to a floppy
disk or writeable CD in case I need to reinstall The Bat! Does this
mean that the registration details will no longer be able to be
entered manually as in the past?  If this is the case will a copy of
the message in TXT format be sufficient, or does it need to be saved
in some more exotic format to preserve the hidden trigger to
activate the program?  Presumably since the original message was text,
a TXT copy should be sufficient?

On checking further I find that the latest Help File actually does
mention the automatic registration procedure (I got so used to the
Help file being several version out of date that I hadn't looked
there).  It also does mention manually entering the details by a cut
and paste if the message was received in another E-mail client, so I
guess that answers that part of my question.

I'm surprised that no one else has commented about this.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Saturday, 16 October 2004
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem setting the Bat! to default mailto: client in Mozilla

2004-09-16 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Leif,

Thursday, September 16, 2004, 2:14:31 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,

[snipped]

 What happens when you use IE?

 I tried IE this morning and it works perfectly (as far as accessing
 the site - that is :-) ).  Looks like it is something in my set-up
 for Mozilla but I just can't see which particular setting is doing
 it.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 17 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem setting the Bat! to default mailto: client in Mozilla

2004-09-15 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Stuart,

Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 10:58:38 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,
 Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 11:33:29 PM, you wrote:

 [snipped]

 Has someone passed this info on to the new Wiki?

I'm sorry but I won't volunteer to do this - I am still having major
problems accessing the Wiki site, but if anyone else wants to submit
it please feel free to do so.

Maybe there is another magic trick to solve my access problems
:GRIN: , Leif couldn't reproduce what is happening to me.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 16 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TBUDP Wiki site part deux...

2004-09-14 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Bob,

Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:42:24 AM, you wrote:

 G'day Bob,

 Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:17:35 AM, you wrote:

 G'day Leif,

 Monday, September 13, 2004, 3:00:36 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,

 [snipped]

 Which URL are you using?

 It should be http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp

 [snipped

 Well I retried accessing http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp this
 morning.  It doesn't reject my username or password this time - just
 takes me to a blank page:
 http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-login.php where it just sits
 with nothing showing or happening.  Nothing I do will get me past this
 blank page and into the site.

  Replying to myself.  I eventually found that I was actually signed in
  even though the site was just showing a blank page.  Flipping back
  and forward between pages somehow I stumbled in.  Each time I try to
  access the page I still get the blank page after signing in, but
  eventually I seem to be able to access things.  I can't figure out
  what is going on.



Replying to myself yet again (this is very boring :GRIN: ).  I have
found that the only way that I can access the site (other than the
initial page) is to sign on - get sent to the blank page, then go to
another site (something like Google).  I then enter:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-index.php in my browser. This
takes me back to the site, which then recognises me as signed in and
permits me access. I'm using Mozilla 1.7.2 if this is of any
relevance.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Tuesday, 14 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Problem setting the Bat! to default mailto: client in Mozilla

2004-09-14 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I recently installed Mozilla Mail (1.7.2) - previously just used the
Mozilla Browser as a stand alone item. Now whenever I click on a
mailto: link in the browser Mozilla Mail opens instead of The Bat!  I
have made sure the Mozilla Mail is NOT the default mail application in
it's settings and have checked The Bat!
Options/Preferences/Applications settings to ensure that it is set as
the default mail client and that all the specific file types are
associated with The Bat!.  I have also reset The Bat! as the Simple
MAPI Request handler but Mozilla still calls Mozilla Mail instead of
The Bat!.  I even tried setting Outlook Express as the default, and
then resetting to The Bat! but still no change.

I have a vague recollection that someone here shared a manual edit to
Mozilla prefs.js file (I think) to force it to call The Bat! but I
can't locate it in my saved useful information folder. Can anyone
help? Any other solutions or suggestions also gratefully received.

On an aside I quite like Mozilla Mail as a backup client (I hated the
stand-alone Thunderbird variety) but it is certainly not as powerful
or useable (for me) as The Bat!.  I really miss the Connection Centre
- if you blink you miss any problems with the collecting mail, and
their implementation of a mail ticker - just a brief display of how
many messages have been received - is so basic as to be a joke. I
haven't tried its IMAP capabilities yet.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Tuesday, 14 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem setting the Bat! to default mailto: client in Mozilla

2004-09-14 Thread Bob Morris
G'day John,

Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 7:23:49 PM, you wrote:


 Hi Bob,
 On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, at 18:24:05 [GMT+1000] (which was 18:24:05 Australian
 Eastern Time) you wrote:



[snipped]

  You have to un-install Mozilla.

 Re-install the browser only.

 Sorry, otherwise Mozilla Mail will take over.


See my reply to Louis-Dominique - by using the preference setting he
outlined (in Mozilla About:Config edits prefs.js in your profile) it
is possible to keep Mozilla Mail while using The Bat! as the default
mailto: client.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Wednesday, 15 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem setting the Bat! to default mailto: client in Mozilla

2004-09-14 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Louis-Dominique,

Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 12:45:38 AM, you wrote:

 Bonjour Bob,
 Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:24:05 AM, tu écrivais:

[snipped]

 I use this in user.js for Netscape 7 may be it could work in
 mozilla:

 user_pref(network.protocol-handler.external.mailto, true);


Thank you.  This worked fine and I now have The Bat! back as my
default e-mail client without needing to uninstall Mozilla Mail.

For anyone who needs to do it in Mozilla just type about:config in a
browser window.  This opens the utility that edits prefs.js in your
user profile. Scroll down the preference names until you come to the
network.protocol-handler section, right click and select New then
Boolean, and insert network.protocol-handler.external.mailto and
true in the appropriate boxes and you are done.  I then closed and
reopened Mozilla to check that it was saved. As long as The Bat! is
set as your default e-mail client it should now pop-up whenever you
click on a mailto: link on a web page.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Wednesday, 15 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TBUDP Wiki site part deux...

2004-09-13 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Leif,

Monday, September 13, 2004, 3:00:36 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,

 Sunday, September 12, 2004, 5:49:43 PM, you wrote:
B I tried registering after reading this message. Received my welcome
B e-mail okay but any attempt to use the sign on link provided gives
B me the message PHP has encountered a Stack overflow, so it would
B appear that you still have problems.

 Which URL are you using?

 It should be http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp

I used:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbwiki/tiki-login_validate.php?user=
(additional information relating to my initial sign-in edited out) as
advised in my welcome e-mail. This is the address that gave me the
stack overflow error. The funny thing is the next time I went directly
to http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp it immediately recognised me and
permitted me to enter without signing in.  However once I signed out
it would not permit me to re-sign in - rejecting my user id and/or
password as invalid.

I then signed up again - using identical username and password and
received another welcome e-mail with the confirmation address as:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-login_validate.php?user=
(additional information edited out) and this address accepted me okay.

I will retry accessing the site before sending this but it looks like
there was just a hiccup in the registration process and that hopefully
everything is now working okay.  Thanks for your help.

Well I retried accessing http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp this
morning.  It doesn't reject my username or password this time - just
takes me to a blank page:
http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-login.php where it just sits
with nothing showing or happening.  Nothing I do will get me past this
blank page and into the site.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Tuesday, 14 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TBUDP Wiki site part deux...

2004-09-13 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Bob,

Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 10:17:35 AM, you wrote:

 G'day Leif,

 Monday, September 13, 2004, 3:00:36 PM, you wrote:

 Hello Bob,

[snipped]

 Which URL are you using?

 It should be http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp

[snipped

 Well I retried accessing http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp this
 morning.  It doesn't reject my username or password this time - just
 takes me to a blank page:
 http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/tbudp/tiki-login.php where it just sits
 with nothing showing or happening.  Nothing I do will get me past this
 blank page and into the site.

 Replying to myself.  I eventually found that I was actually signed in
 even though the site was just showing a blank page.  Flipping back
 and forward between pages somehow I stumbled in.  Each time I try to
 access the page I still get the blank page after signing in, but
 eventually I seem to be able to access things.  I can't figure out
 what is going on.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Tuesday, 14 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TBUDP Wiki site part deux...

2004-09-12 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Leif,

Monday, September 13, 2004, 12:50:03 AM, you wrote:

 Hello All,

[snipped]


  At any rate, I rebuilt the site (got up at 3am this morning) at a
  slightly different URL. We had no data loss other than I could not
  import the user table over as something in it was causing the
  problem.

  Apologies, but you'll have to register again.


[snipped]



I tried registering after reading this message.  Received my welcome
e-mail okay but any attempt to use the sign on link provided gives me
the message PHP has encountered a Stack overflow, so it would appear
that you still have problems.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Monday, 13 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Is the The BAT! 3.0 released?

2004-08-31 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

Is there a new version 3.0 released?  RitLabs site has it featured on
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/ but any attempt to access
what's new details, or other information about it just leads to a page
in Cyrillic characters.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Wednesday, 1 September 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: TB and XP new SP2...

2004-08-25 Thread Bob Morris
G'day WilWilWil,

Thursday, August 26, 2004, 8:05:00 AM, you wrote:

[snipped]

 Is this SP2 really necessary for people who don't use use microsoft Outlook and
 Internet Explorer with all his holes of security ? Because this upgrade seems to
 be very heavy !


I don't use XP but if you want to avoid a very large download you can
order the update on CD for free from Microsoft at this address:
 http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/downloads/updates/sp2/cdorder/en_us/default.mspx

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 26 August 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Missing icons in address book

2004-07-23 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Zonnet,

Friday, July 23, 2004, 8:17:03 PM, you wrote:


 ON Friday, July 23, 2004, 9:21:27 AM, you wrote:
DR I just checked it out myself. Im getting the same thing. Im using the
DR original bat grahics. Havent download any glyphs yet so thats not the
DR problem. Looks like ritlabs forgot something I would say.

 Thanks Darrin. I am glad it is not me seeing things :crazy:



Yes I can confirm that one too.  It is a lovely neat blank space
though isn't it? :grin:

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 23 July 2004
Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Virtual Folders - Strange Messages from 1899

2004-04-28 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I have a virtual folder set up to keep track of messages that I flag
in any of my accounts.

I have noticed that sometimes when I open the virtual folder that I
have a large number of blank messages shown as both flagged and
parked.  All show their received and creation date as 30 DEC 1899 and
size as -1.  From, To and Subject are all blank and it is impossible
to open or view them.  Clicking on the messages just opens the account
inbox but there are no related messages there.

It is possible to unflag or unpark the messages and to toggle them
between Read and Unread status.  I haven't tried deleting in case they
are somehow linked to legitimate messages (or perhaps that my long
dead great grandfather is now trying to e-mail me GRIN). Normally I
have had to close the Bat! and reopen it to get rid of them but I have
just discovered that if I select the Virtual Folder properties and
toggle the use filter box on or off it will also clear them.

Has anyone else seen this? Is it a bug or just an undocumented feature
for some unknown purpose?

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 29 April 2004
Using The Bat! v2.10.01 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: V.2.10.00 and V2.10.01

2004-04-21 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Marek,


Wednesday, April 21, 2004, 5:54:21 PM, you wrote:

[snipped]

 yes, help file was missing in 2.10.00.


As I had loaded 2.10.00 over my previous version (2.04.07) there was
still a help file present so the explanation wasn't readily apparent.
Looking at the file date I can now see that it is an old Help File.
I will now install the update to 2.10.01 to get access to the latest
Help File.

Thank you very much for the clarification.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
The Bat! v2.10 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


V.2.10.00 and V2.10.01

2004-04-20 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

Can anyone advise what differences there are between the two versions.
2.10.00 is 3186KB (previously available) while 2.10.01 is 3838KB (now
available) but there is no mention on the RITLABs site (that I can
find) to explain the difference.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Wednesday, 21 April 2004
Using The Bat! v2.10 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: What does Canvas does not allow mean?

2004-04-01 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Dirigo,


Thursday, April 1, 2004, 3:52:39 AM, you wrote:


 Occassionally when I open an HTML formatted email, I will get a pop-up
 message that reads Canvas does not allow (nothing else) with an OK
 button.

[snipped]

From my experience and previous threads about this problem over the
past year or two this is a Windows 98 problem rather than problem with
The Bat!.

This problem occurs from time to time on Windows 98 when it runs low
on resources.  You can try closing down some programs to free up
resources, but generally the only solution is to re-boot.  You can
probably recreate the problem if you have MS Word or some similar
resource hungry program on your computer. Just open and close it four
or five times (you don't need to actually use it each time) and all
sorts of strange things will start to happen when you try to access
programs - the inability to redraw a screen being one of the most
immediately obvious. Each time a program opens it reserves part of
Windows resources for its use but some poorly written ones don't fully
release the resources when closed.

I think the first time the error message appears it actually says
Canvas does not allow redraw, but generally there are multiple error
messages popping up quicker than you can click OK and subsequent
ones do indeed just say Canvas does not allow as you noted.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  B



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: 2.01.3 bug?

2004-03-01 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Scott,


Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 3:10:17 PM, you wrote:

 When I am checking email or scrolling thru received emails, I occasionally see
 a window flicker or see the title bar of TheBat! flicker.  I am not able to see
 what that window is that is flickering.  Anyone else experience this?


Do you by any chance have the BayesIt plug-in installed.  You can
check under Options-Preferences-Plug-In if you are not sure.  The
behaviour described exactly matches what I saw with BayesIt.

I have since uninstalled the plug-in as I am using K9 which is working
fine for me.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Canvas does not allow

2004-02-19 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Wayne,


Friday, February 20, 2004, 2:20:24 PM, you wrote:

 Thursday, February 19, 2004 at 8:16 PM (Pacific Time)

 Hello Bat Users,

 Every once in a while I will get a joke from a friend and a box will
 pop up saying Canvas does not allow and I have to ctrl-alt-del to
 shut TheBat down. When restarting, all is fine and I delete the
 message that made this happen. Has anyone seen this message before and
 know what causes it?


This is a problem with Windows 98 running out of resources.  The only
solution is to reboot as it is a system problem and not a Bat!
problem.  Usually when it does it to me I don't just get one pop-up -
I get dozens that keep appearing quicker than I can close them down.
CTRL-ALT-DEL is usually the only way out.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error: Canvas does not allow drawing

2003-11-13 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Simon,


Thursday, November 13, 2003, 7:12:54 PM, you wrote:


 As Ellen said in MID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] it *seems*
 to  be  a  resources  problem,  and  related  to  TB!  on  W98  setups
 especially.

 When I first got The Bat! quite some time back I ran ran it on a W98SE
 machine  for a while and occasionally encountered the same errors (and
 other  W98  users  reported  the same problems via this list I seem to
 recall). One of the things I did was to kill and not reload background
 processes that weren't necessary, and the other was to reboot a couple
 of times a day.


Thanks Simon and Jane Ellen.  I've had no more problems since.  I had
been running a couple of extra programs in the background that I don't
normally use and as I was showing plenty of free memory didn't even
think about the old resource limitation bug in WIN98.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 14 November 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Error: Canvas does not allow drawing

2003-11-12 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

Several times today my Bat! has crashed with multiple pop-up warning
boxes saying Canvas does not allow drawing or Canvas does not
allow.  This has happened when I have tried to move a message, and
also when opening an existing message to reread it.

As the boxes are popping up faster than I can click on the OK the
only way out has been to CTRL-ALT-DEL.  I have tried running the
folder maintenance function and it reports no errors (or indeed any
action required). Closing and re-opening The Bat! initially solved the
problem but it then happened again.

I have closed Windows down and rebooted and so far there have been no
more problems.  Any suggestions as to what might be causing the
problem, and how to fix it, would be appreciated.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 13 November 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error When using Scheduler (Version 2.01)

2003-10-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Pat

Wednesday, October 22, 2003, 2:47:09 AM, you wrote:

 Bob,

 On Saturday, October 18, 2003, 11:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

B Pat, I also noticed that your signature doesn't seem to be
B stripping on reply, you might be missing the space after the --  ,
B unless this is another Version 2 bug.

 Thanks for the heads-up-- don't know what happened. Hopefully it's
 working now... ?


It's working fine now.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Wednesday, 22 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Error While Reading Message Base (v2.01.3)

2003-10-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

Whenever I try to read my TBUDL messages today I am receiving the
following error:

An error occurred while reading the message base C:\PROGRAM FILES\THE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do you want to repair this
message base now?  YES/NO

I select YES the repair function runs but when I try to access the
messages afterwards I receive exactly the same message again, and
still can't access the mail.

I have tried using the repair function in Folder/Maintenance but
although this runs and apparently fixes the problem it in fact doesn't
work either.

The Report in the Folder Maintenance Centre reads:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Messages recovered 909, damaged parts
(part.bin) saved:0  Processing finished.  1 folders processed.

Help!  What do I try next to get out of this endless loop?



-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 23 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error While Reading Message Base (v2.01.3)

2003-10-22 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Marck,


Thursday, October 23, 2003, 11:21:15 AM, you wrote:

 Hi Bob,

 @23-Oct-2003, 09:32 +1000 (00:32 UK time) Bob Morris said to TBUDL:

 Help!  What do I try next to get out of this endless loop?

 1) Exit TB. Run up Windows Explorer. Navigate to your TB MAIL
folder, which will be somewhere like:
 C:\ Program Files\TheBat!\MAIL\Inbox

 2) If you have messages in the inbox you want to save, just delete
 the messages.tbi file, reload TB and see if anything has
 improved.

snipped

Thank you very much Marck.  Deleting the messages.tbi file worked fine
and everything is accessible once again.

 I strongly recommend to *everyone* here not to use an account inbox
 as a mail store - get those messages into other folders now. Instate
 a filter set to keep the inbox empty.

snipped

Can you also clarify your advice regarding not storing mail in the
Inbox?  My batgroup account is set up only for messages from the group
- no other mail goes to it at all.

I retain messages for a maximum of 31 (I used to have it set on just a
couple of days but this mucked up threading and there was a suggestion
to the Group to retain messages for at least a month as most threads
will complete/die in that period.)  I have my Folder options set to
remove old messages and compress folder on exit (so it happens at
least once a day as I am on dial-up and the computer is shut down
every night).

Any messages of special interest are copied to a separate Useful BAT
Info folder which is compressed on each exit but not purged of old
messages unless I do it manually.

If I move the received mail into another folder as it is received and
read won't this:

(a) cause the Bat! to have problems with threading once again as newly
received mail is in the Inbox and previous mail in the thread is
stored elsewhere, and

(b) the new folder will be subject to exactly the same pressures with
exactly the same amount of mail passing through and stored in it -
i.e. from Inbox - hold 31 days - Delete old mail and compress on each
exit?

For all of my other accounts I move completed messages (i.e. read and
replied to) into a common Stored Mail Folder (I have 4 different ones
to cover different subjects).  These folders are also compressed on
each exit and I cull them manually from time to time to remove items
no longer wanted.  I generally only ever have e-mails awaiting reply
(perhaps 1 or 2) and newly received (unread) mail in my inbox.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Thursday, 23 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error When using Scheduler (Version 2.01)

2003-10-20 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Terry,


Friday, October 17, 2003, 8:15:55 PM, you wrote:


 Sorry that I have nothing helpful, but I can confirm the problem.


I just downloaded the latest 2.01.3 Bat! version and it seems like
this problem is fixed.  I can get into the Scheduler either directly
or via SmartBat without all those horrible error messages.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
The Bat! v2.01.3 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01.3 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Error When using Scheduler (Version 2.01)

2003-10-18 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Pat,


Saturday, October 18, 2003, 5:25:53 AM, you wrote:

SNIPPED

 I was just about to report the same error message. Very annoying. Does
 your scheduler work ok otherwise?


I haven't tried to do too much with it yet other than trying a few test alarms.  The 
first didn't give any audible warning although a message box popped up - I think that 
I probably mucked something up dodging all those silly error messages GRIN.  My 
subsequent tries got both a popup reminder and an audible alarm.  I have noticed 
though that when you click on the Notification Settings/ Use as default that it 
won't stick.  I have to reset the default everytime I set up a new alarm.

I'd appreciate some advise from one of our more knowledgeable members here - is there 
any way to easily check whether this bug - (The Failed to set calendar selected range 
error message appearing on every use of the Scheduler and on each change of tab)  has 
already been reported and if it hasn't how do I go about it.

Pat, I also noticed that your signature doesn't seem to be stripping on reply, you 
might be missing the space after the --  , unless this is another Version 2 bug.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Saturday, 18 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Version 2.01 - Problems Using HTML Editor

2003-10-18 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Allie,


Saturday, October 18, 2003, 9:46:18 AM, you wrote:


 Ok. I can't so we're likely doing things differently or use different
 settings.

 Currently, I'm using MicroEd as my default editor. I tend to just open a
 new message, fill in the To: and Subject: headers, tab into the message
 body field and then switch editors to HTML only. I type a few words and
 then put in the Outbox or save as draft. Both work.

snipped 

 I'm using the Rich Text Viewer as my default viewer. I'm also using no
 plug-ins (plug-ins seem to interfere in unexpected ways at times so I
 thought I'd mention that).

snipped

I'm also using the Rich Text Viewer and no plug-ins, so that rules out that 
explanation for me at least.

I tried altering my default editor to MicroEd and then changing the settings for 
individual messages with Options/Message Format as you said you did and everything 
then went beautifully exactly as it should with the message correctly formatted 
without multiple draft files moving to the Outbox when I hit the Put letter in 
Outbox button.  I tried a few variations of coloured text, varying text size and with 
and without inline pictures.  Every combination worked fine.

I then changed to the Plain Text (Windows) Editor as my default and once again 
everything went again fine this time.  The same with setting up both the HTML Editor 
options as default.

Whatever the problem was, it has obviously been corrected (for now at least) by 
swapping the default editor and using  the message format option.  Subsequent changes 
of default editor haven't resulted in it reappearing.

This could be one of those really annoying problems to track down if it only happens 
intermittently and not to all users.  I will keep my fingers crossed that it will keep 
working for me, just in case I ever really do want to send HTML mail. 

Allie, thank you very much for taking so much time to try to emulate the problem.  
Rich Gregory - thank you for confirming that you have the same problem - at least I 
know I haven't gone completely senile and wasn't just imagining it.


-- 
 Bob Mois
Saturday, 18 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 




Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Version 2.01 - Problems Using HTML Editor

2003-10-17 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Allie,


Friday, October 17, 2003, 11:08:01 AM, you wrote:

snipped confirmation that  Spell Checking problem is a known issue

BM Then when I hit the Put letter in Outbox button nothing happened.
BM The same with the Send the letter button - nothing. Manually
BM switching to the Outbox showed my message was there but with the
BM draft hourglass symbol displayed. The only way I can convince the
BM message to send is to manually click on the Hourglass symbol in the
BM outbox to delete the draft status and then send manually. Is this
BM the expected behaviour?

AM Yes. Drafts cannot be sent unless their draft status is removed.


Perhaps I didn't explain too well here.  There is no way that I can send a message 
from the HTML Editor, either to my Outbox for later despatch or as a request for 
immediate despatch, unlike the other two editors which allow me to use either of the 
icons at the top left of my tool bar.  The selection of Message -  Send Now or 
Queue in Outbox also doesn't work for me with the HTML Editor.  I didn't really want 
to send a draft - it was only by changing to the outbox and manually removing the 
draft status that I could get the message sent.  The other editors automatically 
remove the draft status as soon as you hit the Send command from within the Editor. 

snipped other comments re Quick Templates not working with HTML Editor

I guess that it is pretty clear that The Bat! isn't really ready for use as a HTML 
client, and personally I have no problem with that.  If I had purchased it wanting to 
use HTML then I would be pretty cheesed off though.

Thanks very much for your quick reply.
-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 17 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Language Spell Checking Options in v2.01

2003-10-17 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I recently installed v2.01 over the top of my old 1.62r (as outlined on the RIT Labs 
site) and find that although I still have the options of both American English and 
British English above the line under Spell Checker - Language, and still have 
British English checked as my option; when I select Spell Checker / Dictionaries, it 
shows the language as American English for both UserDic.TLX and Correct.TLX with no 
other alternatives available.

Under the line which I understand to mean that there is no dictionary available, I 
have American English (CSAPI),  Australian English (my system Language default) and 
British English listed a second time.  I tried re-running The Bat International Pack 
executable file, even though I have never had to do this on previous 1.6 upgrades but 
I still am unable to access anything other than American English.  

Any suggestions on where I am going wrong, or what other settings I might need to 
change?  I think I've looked in all the obvious places but I must be overlooking 
something.

Sorry for bugging the list with all these questions but the Help file for v2 is no 
more complete or helpful than the old version.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 17 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Version 2.01 - Problems Using HTML Editor

2003-10-16 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I have recently updated to Version 2.01 (and registered it) and am currently exploring 
the various options - probably a life long program I expect GRIN as I never found 
them all in my previous versions.

I don't normally use HTML for e-mail but decided to experiment with the HTML/Text 
option to see how it worked.  Actually composing a message worked fine, I could insert 
all the pretty fonts, change background colour, insert pictures in line and so on.

Then I attempted to run my spell check - it doesn't appear to work at all with the 
HTML Editor although both options - Check entire text and Check before send/queue 
works fine in both the Plain Text (Windows) and Plain Text (MicroEd) editors.  Is this 
a known issue, or am I doing something wrong?

I then noticed that every auto-save of my message (set at the 40 second default) was 
creating a new HTML attachment to my message, plus saving an additional copy of each 
graphic file so that I ended up with multiple HTML files each progressively a little 
larger as my message progressed.  Then when I hit the Put letter in Outbox button 
nothing happened.  The same with the Send the letter button - nothing.  Manually 
switching to the Outbox showed my message was there but with the draft hourglass 
symbol displayed.  The only way I can convince the message to send is to manually 
click on the Hourglass symbol in the outbox to delete the draft status and then send 
manually.  Is this the expected behaviour?  I think that I read in earlier messages to 
the group that The Bat's HTML implementation in v2.0 was a bit buggy, but as I was not 
planning an immediate move to v2.0 in view of all the other teething problems I didn't 
take any notice.

I have confirmed that the recipient received the final version plus 5 different draft 
versions of my message -only the final was initially visible in Outlook Express v6, 
but the others show up when viewing the message source, 6 copies of one graphic 
(inserted at the start of the message) and 4 copies of the graphic inserted at the end 
- all copies of the graphics appeared both inline plus queued at the end of the 
message as well.

The HTML Editor would also not allow me to insert my Quick Template signature, carried 
over from my old 1.62r version, but it works fine with the other two editors.

Forgive me if I am running over old ground - all the current messages headed as 
relating to Version 2.01 seem to only relate to enquiries about using PGP signatures.

Any advise and/or guidance would be appreciated.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 17 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 
Composed Using the Plain Text (Windows) Editor



Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Error When using Scheduler (Version 2.01)

2003-10-16 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

Whenever I select the scheduler either with ALT F11 or Tools - Scheduler I get a 
popup warning box The Bat! - Failed to set calendar selected range.  After I click 
on OK the scheduler starts, but the first time I click on each tab in it I receive 
the same error message.  It then seems to run okay until next time I open the 
Scheduler, when it all happens again.

I get the same error if I try to access the Scheduler via SmartBat.

I can't find any reference to the error message, or how to set the calendar range in 
the help file.  Any helpful suggestions would be appreciated.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 17 October 2003
Using The Bat! v2.01 on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.01 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Problem with TB and SpamPal

2003-10-05 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Prezes,


Sunday, October 5, 2003, 1:28:11 AM, Prezes wrote:

 Hello TBUDL list,

   I have 54 mail accounts. Recently I have installed SpamPal (then
 K9). And I have a problem: in 43/54 accounts there is Cannot

SNIPPED

   But in K9 there is no option to listening in more than 1 port. So,
   could you tell me how can I use K9 with automatically checking all
   accounts in the same time (54 accounts). Error is the same as in
   SpamPal before changing ports...  

SNIPPED SIGNATURE


A good place to get information about using K9 is the newsgroups at
GRC.COM, specifically the GRC.SPAM group as Robin Keir the developer
hangs out there regularly, plus lots of people who use SpamPal.  I
have K9 running with 9 addresses with no problems but don't use
SpamPal.  I'm sure that you will find someone at GRC.SPAM who will be
willing to assist.



-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Sunday, 5 October 2003
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.00.6 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: More SmartBat/Scheduler monkeybusiness

2003-09-17 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Urban,


Wednesday, September 17, 2003, 8:49:03 AM, you wrote:

U Tuesday, September 16, 2003, myob wrote:

 SmartBat. [A word not in the dictionary, I see.]

U Wow, I just discovered...
U Neither is the word synchronise (in the Tools menu)
U The word synchronize, however, seems to be correct.


I guess that depends on whether you use an English dictionary as
used in most of the English speaking world, or an American one.
SmartBat is of course a trade name so unlikely to appear in either
version.

-- 
Regards,
 Bob
The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: test - pls ignore

2003-09-05 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Keith,


Friday, September 5, 2003, 7:46:58 PM, Marck Pearlstone wrote:

MDP Hi Keith,

snipped

KR Sorry, I have received only 2 messages from the list yesterday,
KR and none today. I hope this has nothing to do with V2!

MDP It doesn't, but it may have something to do with myrealbox delays or
MDP even bouncing at the myrealbox end.


Keith,

As Marck points out, myrealbox.com is having major problems at
present. I haven't been able to reliably get mail in or out for
several days now, a little was getting in but most of the messages
from this list were being bounced without me being aware of it.  Like
you I thought that maybe volume was down as a result of everyone
playing with v2.  I can't even log on to the web interface at
myrealbox now.  I have had to set up an alternative account to receive
my daily fix of Batnews.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Friday, 5 September 2003
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 2.00 | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Setting up a Kill Filter

2003-06-15 Thread Bob Morris
G'day Allie,


Saturday, June 14, 2003, 10:07:43 PM, you wrote some very useful
advice.  Bill and Joel also provided some valuable guidance which I
also appreciated.  Thanks guys.

Unfortunately I found that the kill filter failed to work in the real
world (as opposed to testing on old messages already downloaded)
because I was basing it on the person I wanted to block being listed
in the Sender string.  It appears that all TBUDL list mail comes
with the Sender being [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than
from the individual member so of course the filter doesn't work.

Using the alternative locations of Subject/Text/Kludges/or Anywhere
had the undesired effect of filtering out any message which mentions
the target person's name in any context which wasn't my desire.  It
looks like it isn't as simple or easy as I thought to set up a simple
kill filter, but at least I had fun trying.  The immediate need for
the filter has now passed, but if you have any alternative suggestions
I would love to hear them.

I really do love using The Bat! as there is a never ending range of
extra functions to explore and experiment with, and frequently I find
that I can set up something to meet my exact needs (unlike that MS
stuff which always assumed that I wanted to do it their way GRIN).

Thanks again for your assistance,


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Sunday, 15 June 2003
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re[2]: Setting up a Kill Filter

2003-06-15 Thread Bob Morris
G'day neurowerx,


Sunday, June 15, 2003, 6:01:23 PM, you wrote:


nwd You should check the kludges for FROM: offender then, shouldn't you?



Thanks - that solved the problem.  I knew there had to be a way but I
was too dense to see it.

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Sunday, 15 June 2003
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Setting up a Kill Filter

2003-06-14 Thread Bob Morris
G'day TBUDL Members,

I am using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 98 4.10 Build   A

I am used to reading my news group messages in a dedicated newsreader
(Forte Agent) which gives me the ability to quickly and easily kill
filter any objectionable poster by clicking a button and then
specifying how long and from which groups I want to filter them, plus
whether to simply mark as read or to delete the offending messages.

TBUDL is my first experience of an e-mail based group and of course I
read it through The Bat!  Until now I have not felt any need to apply
a kill filter, but after the recent spate of aggressive posts from one
poster I want to exclude him from the material I read. I have set up a
filter as follows:

RULE

Name:  (Offender's Name) Kill Filter

Source folder: Inbox

Move messages to folder: TBUDL

Filtering strings: (Offender's Name)  Location: Sender  Presence: Yes

Rule is Active

ACTIONS

Mark the message as read

OPTIONS

Continue processing with other filters

Regular expressions


This filter appears to work fine, but is there any neater and more
flexible way to set up a kill filter without setting up a separate
individual filter for each offender?  Based on my experience of the
group over the past nine months it wouldn't appear likely that I would
want to use it frequently (if at all) but I am curious about the best
way to do it (just in case the current attack of bad manners/trolling
escalates.


-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Saturday, 14 June 2003
















  

-- 
 Bob Mo®®is
Saturday, 14 June 2003



Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html